►
From YouTube: Bloomington Plan Commission, August 10, 2020
Description
meeting packet: https://bloomington.in.gov/onboard/meetingFiles/download?meetingFile_id=7429
A
B
Great
well,
let
me
call
to
order
this
meeting
of
the.
B
Before
we
get
to
that,
we'll
start
with
our
normal.
D
Here
and
then
st
john
is
absent
tonight,
thanks.
B
B
So
looks
like
we
do
have
a
quorum
so
we'll.
B
We'll
continue
with
minutes
to
be
approved.
We
have
the
minutes
from
july.
B
Favor
of
approving
those
minutes
say
aye.
B
Reports
or
communications
from
staff,
no,
we
don't
have
any
tonight
thanks
bro.
B
All
right,
thank
you,
tron
any
other
communications
from.
B
Commissioner
cockrum
has
a
quick
announcement:
yeah
hi
this.
H
To
have
to
produce
myself
from
this
meeting,
so
I
have
the
property
listed
and
I'm
currently
marketing
it
for
this
one.
So
I.
H
B
So
I'll
give
just
a
second
to
disappear.
All
right.
B
Excellent,
so
I
believe
eric
grulick
is
the
case.
J
All
right,
so
this
is
a
petition
for.
J
Tom
brennan,
via
the
mcdole
business
center
for.
J
Single-Family
lots
on
this
parcel
parcel
e
of
the.
J
That
area
for
the
habitat
petition
is
shown.
J
This
was
redeveloped
in
2012
for
a
community
center,
so
the
petitioner
as.
J
Arranged
so
that
the
loss
will
front
or
the.
J
East
lots
will
front
on
the
switch
yard
part
and
then
the
loss
that
are
on
the
interior
lots
15
through
23.
J
Underneath
that
multi-family
building,
so
that's
something
that's.
J
Problematic
for
the
fire
department,
so
there
will
need
to
be
a
few.
J
Hillside
drive
as
well
as
a
tree
plot,
and
that
would.
J
Also
to
the
switchyard
park
further
to
the
east,
so
that
would.
J
Extend
all
the
way
to
rogers
street
the
right
of
way
is
very
narrow,
along.
J
For
the
multi-family
buildings,
again
we
don't
have
any
specific
renderings.
J
For
those
two
buildings,
however,
they
have.
J
Is
the
two
five-story
multi-family
buildings
that
are
on
the
north
and.
J
Know
we've
certainly
spent
a
lot
of
money
redeveloping
the
switch
yard
park,
providing
that
as
a.
J
The
buildings
that
are
along
that
trail
have
a
cohesive
design,
so
we
would.
J
Like
to
see
some
renderings
specifically
of
how
these.
J
This
site
plan
is
the
density,
so
this
outlined
a
series
of.
J
Multi-Family
units
approximately
160
multi-family
units.
J
Of
that
plan
that
the
consultant
drew
up,
one
other
thing
that
I
certainly
want.
J
Kind
of
done
internally,
this
was
not
a
publicly
vetted.
J
Proposed
versus
you
know
what
might
be
a
better
more.
J
Is
proposing
to
utilize
the
r4
standards
for
the
single.
J
Only
a
43
percent
percentage
of
the
loss
that
are.
J
Reduction
from
that
minimum
112
spaces
would
be
required.
J
And
54
spaces
are
being
proposed
within
the
ground
floor
of
those
two.
J
Buildings,
so
those
are,
these
reductions
are
all
outlined
in.
J
Several
benefits
and
highlights
of
this
development.
B
All
right,
thank
you.
Eric
is
there
a
representative
of
the
petitioner
who.
D
There
are
a
few,
I
think
I
don't
know
who
wants
to
speak?
Can
you
can
you
guys.
B
Okay,
hi
doug,
yeah
I'll
I'll
start.
This.
K
Difficulties
but
he's
would
really
like
to
speak
to
this.
K
Pop
in
here
but
I'll
I'll
try
to
answer
a
few.
K
To
the
architecture
and
we've
taken
quite
a
bit
of
feedback,
and
this
is
why.
K
Project
because
we're
making
some
changes
based
on
some
feedback
that
we've
heard
one
of
the
things
I
will
address.
K
It's
a
warehouse,
it's
got.
Semi-Truck
traffic.
K
It's
not
a
very
pretty
building,
it
certainly
does
not.
K
And
we
had
met
with
the
city,
the
mayor's
office
and
planning.
K
And
you
know
we
were
really
told
back
then
that.
K
K
K
The
development,
the
storage
express
building
that
is
a
different
parcel
and.
K
Will
stay
and
the
wall
will
be
covered
with
a
material
of
some
sort
and.
K
You
know
had
shown
the
the
kind
of
consultant
study
you
know.
K
K
To
three
story:
houses
again,
it
depends
on
because
they're.
K
Perhaps
some
town
homes
would
be
something
that
would
be
desirable
and.
K
A
smaller
footprint
you
know,
they're,
usually
21,
to
24
feet
wide.
K
To
meet
everything
that
the
newly
approved
udo
is
asking.
K
Again,
that
was
vetted
over
years
requests
of
us
for
a
pud
amendment.
K
So
again,
I
thank
you
for
your
time.
Hopefully,
tom
will
jump
in
here
and
add.
M
Technologies
anyway,
I.
M
I've
been
here
ever
since
the
days
of
breaking
away,
and
so
I've
seen
a
lot.
M
Of
changes
and
and
and
unfortunately
I've
been
a.
M
Part
of
it
I've
back
years
ago,
I
had
a
blue.
M
Jeans
store
on
kirkwood
avenue
and,
and
they
they
filmed
the
movie.
M
Right
in
front
of
my
shop-
and
they
came
in
and
asked
if
they
could
put
this
rail
track
along
the
sidewalk
and.
M
M
And
had
since,
since
then
gone
on
to.
M
The
first
pcb
scares
kind
of
arose
and-
and
we
did,
we
sold
a
lot
of
water.
M
But
aside
from
that,
I
I
moved
my
company
all
source
packaging.
M
Group
into
the
the
building
that
we're
talking.
M
I
came
in
as
a
tenant
and
shortly
after
I
got
in
there
blanks.
M
So
the
landlord
at
that
time
was
a
guy
named
rod,
mcdonald
and
his
company.
M
American
fasteners
from
out
on
liberty,
drive
and
so.
M
M
And
forth
and
lo
and
behold
we
came
to
an
accepted.
M
Price
and
and
I
started
paying
a
mortgage
on
a.
M
Number
of
years
until
we
ran
into
some
issues
with.
M
The
economy
back
around
2010,
2011
and
and
then
american
fasteners.
M
And
had
just
plain
warehouse
space
and.
M
And
but
anyway,
we
put
in
a
large
fulfillment
operation.
M
And
then
in
the
process,
so,
oh,
let's
see
sprout
box
came
in
there
as
a
tenant.
M
People
have
brought
in
there
and
home
health
care
and
there's
a.
M
Fellow
in
there
that
still
is
storing
spanish
wines
and
we've
had
solar.
M
Panel
people
in
there
that
take
a.
M
Pretty
fair
amount
of
area
cardinal
spirits
has
been
in
and
out
at
different.
M
Times
in
their
existence,
so.
M
You
know
just
a
real
variety
of
people
at
different
times.
M
M
Throwing
lacrosse
balls
around
and
stuff,
and
it's
funny
even
today,.
M
Stray
lacrosse
ball
bouncing
around
somewhere,
but.
M
Anyway,
but
and
currently
we
have
the
there's
a
temporary.
M
Shelter
in
there
now
taking
care
of
some
of
the.
M
Homeless,
people
that
you
know
would
potentially
be
at
risk.
M
With
the
rest
of
the
population,
and
so
we
have.
M
Now
so
it's
not
been
without
a
lot
of.
M
And
and
and
the
comings
and
goings,
and
sometimes
it
would
be
a
lot
of
income.
M
Always
kind
of
managed
to
make
things
work
one
way
or
another
over
time
it's
been,
it's
been
difficult.
M
With
seeing
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
the
the
syringes
and
and
there's
been.
M
Windows
that
have
been
had
rocks
thrown
through
them.
M
And
so
on
and
so
forth,
and
so
when
the
trail
came
in.
M
It
really,
it
was
really
looked
like
a
pretty
neat.
M
There
were
people
that
approached
me
about
hey.
What
are
you
gonna
do
with.
M
Your
building,
you
know
why
don't
we
get.
M
You
know
team
up
and
let's
develop
it
and
I'd
never
really
seen
myself
as
a.
M
Minutes
left,
okay,
all
righty
well,
anyway,
at
a.
M
M
That
wasn't
what
the
developers
wanted,
and
so
we
went
back
to
the
drawing.
M
City
with
the
administration,
planning
and
and
so
on,.
M
And
so
forth,
and
we
feel,
like
we've,
come
up
with
a.
M
Pretty
nice
compromise
here,
that
is
a
compromise
that.
M
Seniors
families,
professional
people-
we
want
this.
M
And
also
with
some
of
the
residents
that
live
adjacent
to
the
property
and.
M
Kind
of
a
special
opportunity,
for
you
know,
transitioning
this
property.
M
Into
something
that
the
city
can
be
proud
of,
and
and.
M
To
you
know
going
forward
to
take
advantage
of
this
transitional
part
of
this
project
and
and.
M
We're
open
for
discussions,
everybody
has
ideas
and,
and
our
design
team
has.
M
Spent
considerable
amount
of
time
and
going
through
various
things
and
and.
M
Had
I
been
a
little
less
enough
to
probably
go.
B
All
right,
thank
you
tom.
You
will
now
in.
F
The
study
that
have
been
done,
you
said
you
said
that
the
study.
J
To
the
city
for
us
to
use
to
meet
the
housing.
J
J
Yeah
yeah,
it's
just
hard
to
compare.
I
mean
we're
not.
D
On
its
face,
when
you
look
at
the
large
multi-family
buildings
here,.
D
Planned
as
opposed
to
the.
D
Would
be
something
denser
giving
more
people
an
opportunity
to
live
on
the.
F
F
Yeah
yeah,
which,
considering
that
we
only
have
one.
B
Okay,
any
other
questions
forum,
commissioners,
either
for
staff
or.
J
Pud,
so
the
planning
commission
has
three
options
they
can
deny
it.
J
They
can
approve
it
or
they
can
continue
it
to
the
second
hearing.
The
department's
recommendation
is
to
gather
input
from
the
community
from.
J
The
planning
commission
and
then
hear
this
again
at
a
second
hearing
with
any
possible
changes
that
might
come
about.
N
Is
just
what
is
the
status
of
the
other,
the
south
walnut.
N
That
yep,
so
we
you
know
so
we
we
had
a.
J
Discussion
with
a
prospective
developer
late
last
year,
who
was
looking
at.
J
Just
the
night
moves
portion
of
the
property
that
the
city
owns,
the
meineke
portion
of
that
property
was
not
in
play.
D
Was
picked
so
we
are
working,
the
city
is
working
with
a.
D
Developer
to
develop
just
that
portion
without
the
meineke,
as
eric
mentioned,
and
what
kind
of
very
beginning.
D
Because
it's
an
affordable
housing
project,
so
that's
why
they
did
it
that
way.
I
believe
there
weren't.
D
Renderings,
it
was
just
an
idea
of
of
of
how
they
would
operate.
D
And
plan
the
building,
so
we
we
actually
haven't
gotten
that
far
yet.
B
First
question
there:
so,
regardless
of
what
happens
tonight?
Well,
I
should
say
regardless
as
long
as
this
move.
J
E
District
ordinance
and
and
the
choice
of
r4-
and
I
wonder
eric
and.
J
Is
the
the
most
compact
and
urban
style
zoning
district
that.
J
We
have
in
the
new
udo,
so
this
has
the
smallest
lot
size.
J
District
as
just
the
base,
certainly
as
you.
J
Can
see
in
in
what's
brought
up
here
in
the
proposed.
J
Standards
even
further,
so
the
r4
was
you
know,
is
basically.
J
The
consultant
study
with
the
petitioner,
you
know
so
the.
J
The
petitioner
proposes
these
standards,
so
then
it
is
the
planning.
J
Commission's
job
to
say
yes,
we
approve
these
or
you
know
we.
J
Modify
those
so
we
shared
with
them.
The
consultant.
J
Study
and
how
that
looks,
the
different.
J
Design
that
is
being
proposed,
the
petitioner
has
chosen
to
come.
J
This
particular
portion
was
a
multi-family
design.
J
You
know
it
was
just
not
a.
It
was
a
multi-family
design,
as
opposed
to
a.
J
D
Would
we
we
would
have
to
look
and
see
which.
D
E
I
mean
it
is
tight,
there
is
no
denying
and
concerns
about
just
traffic.
J
Are
not
any
other
options,
there
was
a
portion,
and
I
don't
know
if
you
can.
J
See
my
my
cursor,
there
was
a
right
right-of-way
that.
J
Extended
through
the
site
and
stubbed
in,
however,.
J
North
of
this
redevelops
in
some
manner.
That's
this.
J
J
Possible
with
some
modifications
you
know
the
the
other
plan
for
the.
J
E
That
would
I
don't
know
if
there
were
other.
B
I
believe
I
saw
tron
had
a
hand
raised
there.
Yes,
I
just.
G
Wanted
to
confirm,
because
I
just
heard
that.
J
that
20
may
have
been
a
typo.
I
apologize.
B
One
twice:
okay:
we
will
move
on
to
public
comment,
then
so.
B
If
you
are
here
to
give
public
comment
on.
B
This
petition,
you
need
to
indicate
that
by.
B
Yourself,
as
we've
we've
learned
already,
this.
B
Meeting
and
then
you'll
have
five
minutes
to.
B
Give
your
comment
on
this
petition
so
thanks
brad.
D
I
think
I
miss
piedmont.
Smith
is
ready
to
go.
F
Of
more
housing,
because
we
really
do
need
it
in
our
community
to
drive
down
the
price
of
housing.
F
Neighborhood,
I
would
find
a
development
with.
F
Maybe
three
stories
all
the
way
across.
F
One
or
two
story
buildings,
mostly
one
story
actually
on
on
that
part
of.
F
Madison
street,
so
I
I'm
in
favor
of
density,
but
this.
F
Is
not,
I
think
this
is
not
an
appropriate
way
to
do
it
here
so
close
to
single-family
homes.
F
I
don't
understand
why
driscoll
or
especially
wilson
street.
F
I
do
appreciate
the
lead
silver
plans
for
both
the
multi-family
and.
F
At
maybe
town
homes,
two
or
three
stories
in
this
area.
D
Greg,
I
think,
you're
ready
to
go
okay,
great
thanks.
P
Hi
I'm
greg
alexander.
I
just
want
to
draw
your
attention.
P
To
this
development
was
mentioned
earlier,
it's
about.
P
A
thousand
feet
north,
I
think,
of
what's
proposed,
the
new
houses
built.
P
Its
first
owner
and
then
it
had
second
owner,
so
we
got
two
two
price
points
in
2013:
it
sold
for
283,
000
and
then
in
2019
last
year,.
P
House,
I
mean
that's
incredible:
that's
that's
actually
affordable
housing
in
a
weird
sort
of
way,
because
the.
P
P
That
it
paid
back
their
interest
on
their
bank
loan
and
then
some.
P
I
mean
that's
incredible,
that's
that's
not.
P
Affordable,
that
is
a
disaster,
because
only
a
very
rich.
P
Up
front,
and
so
when
we
have
like
single.
P
P
Units
10
or
11
times,
density
increase
by.
P
P
P
Bridge
across
the
creek,
so
you
can
come
out.
I
guess
behind
night
moves
now.
P
P
Really
flipping
the
script
almost
everywhere
else
in
the
city.
F
Two-Story
condos
or
town
homes,
which.
F
Around
are
the
streets
going
to
be
completely
filled
with
cars.
I
I'm
all
for
bike
pad.
F
So
there's
another
thing
and
that
is
hillside
hillside.
F
These
houses
they're
protected
and
it
cannot
go
through
the
switch
yard.
C
Out
of
outdated
and
in
disrepair
so
quickly
and
I've
been.
C
D
Okay,
kevin
hi,
kevin
romanak.
I
also
live
along
the
warehouse
here.
Q
Q
With
the
traffic
issues
greg,
you
mentioned
the
the
car
stuff.
Q
Q
All
do
from
this
neighborhood,
I
I
agree
with
isabel
and.
Q
Elizabeth
about
the
two
to
three
story:
townhomes:
if,
if
they.
Q
Have
to
build
townhomes
in
this
area,
the
other,
the
four
and
five
story
I.
Q
Think
you
just
tower
over
us
and
and
with
those.
Q
Possibly
be
thinking
about
the
future,
where
storage
express
might
not
be
there.
Q
Anymore
and
the
connectivity
with
grimes
so.
Q
So
yeah
and
that's
all
I
have
thank
you.
D
Okay,
jack
all
right,
thank
you
for
the
record.
This
says
jan
beula,.
I
Baker,
but
it
is
me,
jack
speaking,
I
just
wanted
to
address
a.
I
We've
met
the
executive
committee
of
the
neighborhood.
I
Of
mcdonald
neighborhood
has
met
with
tom
brennan.
I
Private
thing
wants
to
put
up
five
apartment.
I
Is
a
couple
blocks
up
the
trail
and
right
next
to
hopscotch
coffee
bar
on.
I
Too
expensive
in
that
area,
and
nor
is
it
said
anything
about.
I
B
All
right!
Well,
if
there
is
no
more
public
comment,
we'll
come
back
to
the.
B
Commission,
for
any
final
questions.
B
I
see
commissioner
sandberg
thank
you.
I
have
been
listening
very.
R
Neighborhood
friendly
and
compatible
scale.
R
With
the
with
the
traffic
and
the
the
connectivity,
this
is
a
wonderful.
R
Consultant
study
that
just
does
not
square
with
it
being
the
proper
density,
proper
height.
E
Of
the
commenters
remarks,
but
I
wonder
if
we
can
raise.
E
Or
at
least
have
some
response
to
isabella
piedmont,
smith's
question
about.
E
These
roads
and
their
status,
I'm
presuming
that
this
is
the
one
that.
E
J
So
there
are
not
any
public
streets
that
stub
into
this
property.
B
The
right-of-way
that
was
once
there
is
there
now
something
built.
B
In
that
right
away,
so
I'm
I'm
not
sure
if
it
is
the
northern
connection
or.
J
The
southern
one
that
was
vacated
but.
J
N
Prospect,
that's
sticking
in
any
kind
of
reasonable
time
frame.
I
I
can't
even
begin
to
speak
to
that.
J
Storage
units-
you
know
nothing's
ever
permanent.
J
Certainly,
you
know
that
that
could
be
redeveloped
at
any
time.
E
A
concern
or
issue
in
this,
so
that
would
probably
be
a.
J
I
I
would
imagine
it's
possible
being
immediately
adjacent
to
the
switch
yard.
K
K
Okay,
I
can
answer
a
couple
of
these
things.
First,
off.
K
And
and
then
we
tom
approached
some
of
the
neighbors
there
and
there
I
think.
K
K
Streets
running
through
here
from
east
to
west,
but
it's
it's
just
not.
K
I
don't
think
that's
going
to
go
anywhere
anytime
soon.
I
mean
that's
just.
K
G
But
this
is
the
time
for
that
it.
It
sounds
like
there's
a.
G
My
observation
is:
there's
some
mixed
feelings.
G
And
of
this,
is
you
know,
we're
looking
at.
G
So
we're
looking
at
124
bedrooms
with
one
and
two
bed
unions.
That's.
G
Then
you
only
have
21
residential
lots.
There's
a
huge.
G
Our
packet,
that
the
comprehensive
plan
is
clear
that.
G
Select
few,
I
think
that's
exactly
what
we're
looking
at
here.
One
thing
I
would
like
before
we
just.
G
Townhouses
seem
like
a
great
idea,
maybe
turning
some
of
those
into
condos.
G
G
G
Now
being
constructed
and
used
well,
it's
already
mostly.
G
Constructed
so
I
wanted
to
state
that.
G
Would
be
great,
a
lot
of
those
roads
were
planted.
G
Alleyways
in
the
50s
and
a
lot
of
them
haven't
been
vacated.
G
Want
to
look
at
a
warehouse,
I'm
sure
some
people
do
and
some
people
don't
the
fact
that
the
study
didn't
have.
G
Public
comment:
I
really
think
the
whole
idea
of
what
the
public
wants
is
out
the
window.
So
I'm
happy
you
guys
did
it.
It
gives.
G
Direction,
but
still
I
I
don't
like.
B
I
see
commissioner
kinsey
if
we're
if
we
are
going
to
be
moving
into
final.
B
E
I
was
gonna,
make
a
comment
and
a
motion,
but
israel
go
ahead
with
your.
S
The
the
project
and
it
seemed
that
there.
S
Now,
with
this
meaning,
we
could
see
that
there
were
some.
K
I
think
could
be
january
and
we
had
the
kind
of
the
mix
we
had.
K
One
five-story
building
and
then
we
had
all
the
residential
lots.
K
With
anyone,
certainly
I'm
completely
for
it.
I.
K
K
Towards
you
know
some
parking
issues
I
mean.
K
But
certainly
having
a
zoom
meeting
or
some
way
to
get
neighborhood.
K
Interaction
is
you
know
something
that
we
would.
K
B
Thank
you,
okay,
any
other
questions.
If
not,
we
will.
B
And
yeah:
let's,
let's
go
on
with
our
final
comment,
then.
B
Now
on
the
density.
B
The
the
site
plan
between
now
and
the
next
meeting.
B
Yeah,
are
you
responding
to
the
the
previous
question
here?
Well,
there.
M
It
was
part
of
the
original
package
that
for
bank
approval,
that
was
back.
F
I
have
a
comment.
I
I
really
appreciate
the
public.
F
Coming
and
giving
us
their
perspective.
F
We
look
at
the
road
access
how
the
how
people
are
gonna
get.
F
This
is
not
going
to
be
unaffordable.
I
think
we
need
to
look
one
thing
that
I.
F
Make
it
into
either
town
houses
or
two-story
buildings.
F
So
I
I
think
the
direction
for
the
initial
com
initial
conversation
as.
F
F
L
I
want
to
say
I
actually.
I
do
think
this
is
a
good
place
for.
L
Closer
to
the
neighborhood,
you
know
a
lot
of
this
has
been
said
already
and
I.
L
Don't
want
to
repeat
it
too
much,
but
you
know
having
multi-family.
L
And
I
think
I
think
that's
really
what
we
should
we
should
be
aiming
for.
I.
L
Don't
think
we
need
more
single
family
directly
adjacent
to
a
park
like
that.
L
B
Thank
you
any
other
final
comments.
I
see
commissioner
kinsey
and
then
I.
E
As
I,
I
am,
an
urban.
E
What
this,
what
comes
of
this
space?
So
I
think
this
is
an.
E
Do
a
really
thoughtful
rendering
and
decision
making.
E
Wants
to
use
it
to
either
say
I
told
you
so
or
to.
E
Know
that
it
exists,
I
I
won't
be
any
more
persuaded
by
it.
E
Important
that
we
know
it
exists,
and
I
think
there
might
be
ideas
in.
E
What
what
neil
copper
was
just
saying
in
terms
of.
E
Know
exactly
what
the
status
of
that
is,
it
sounded
like
eric
was
pretty
sure.
E
E
The
bicycle
pad
potential
of
this,
so
I
think
I'm
hoping
for
some.
E
Input-
and
I
hope
there's
more
of
that
as
we
progress
through
this
next.
N
N
Concerned
about
the
ingress
and
egress
constraints
that.
N
Have
already
been
mentioned,
I
appreciate
all
the
thoughtful
comments
from
the
public,
but
also
the
all
the
work
that's
gone
into
this
by.
N
The
developer,
I
do
think
density
is
important.
This.
N
A
you
know,
in
that
sense,
it
is
a
tremendous
community
resource.
N
And
also
to
provide,
I
think
it's
not
just.
N
The
benefit
and
the
improvement
in
their
lives
of
having
access
to
that.
N
So,
like
commissioner
kinsey
and
others
I'd
like
to
see
some
kind
of
in-between
approach,
that
would
be.
N
Ingress
egress
constraint,
so
so,
thanks
to
everyone
I
know
this
is.
B
Well,
there's
no
other
commissioners
would
like
to
come.
B
And
I'll
say
my
my
two
cents.
I
think
that
this.
B
Just
thank
the
petitioner.
I
can
see
how
easy
it
would
be.
B
For
your
head
to
be
spinning,
trying
to.
B
Develop
this
the
spot
with
all
the
changes
going
on
and.
B
Seemingly
constant
changes
in
opinions
on
what
should
be
here.
B
Order
to
to
land
somewhere
in
the
middle.
B
Important
everywhere
and
and
that
will
have
a.
B
And
I
understand
the
the
the
the
consultant's
desire
to
put.
B
Density
here
when,
given
the
inputs
that
that
consultant
had
to.
B
Work
with,
but
I
think
if
you
look
at
the.
B
Rendering
you
can
see,
I
think,
right
away.
B
Lots
of
issues
with
this
you
know
access
certainly
will
give
people
access.
B
To
the
people
who
live
in
those
units,
but
if
if
if
the
construction
there.
B
Is
so
dense,
you
actually
cut
off
access.
B
The
current
design
of
that
street
sort
of
dead,
ending
into.
B
Be
any
way
to
continue
that
so
so
I
think
about
making
turning
those.
B
Those
two
apartment
buildings
into
four.
I
think
what
that
does
is
you
know
it.
B
Helps
with
the
the
the
traffic
issues,
but
it
also.
B
Creates
some
additional
sight
lines
where,
where
this
thing
doesn't
feel.
B
From
the
park
now,
of
course,
I
know
that
there's.
B
The
middle
you
can
create
a
nicer
transition.
B
Parking
and
and
there
being
less
parking.
B
Here,
this
absolutely
is
gonna
put.
B
Additional
cars
on
the
streets
in
the
neighborhood
behind.
B
Parked
on
them
and
and
that's
I
think,
that's
okay,.