►
From YouTube: Bloomington Plan Commission, March 14, 2022
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
C
A
Petitions
continued
several
petitions
continued
till
april
and
then
we
have
some
an
item
on
the.
A
Consent
agenda
and
then
two
petitions
that
are
substantive
in
nature
and
then
a
bunch.
A
Of
amendments
to
the
udo,
so
this
will
be
a
good
flavor
of
meetings
here,
lots
of
different.
A
D
For
can
we
do
them
both
at
the
same
time
or
you
want
them
separately.
A
Separately,
I'm
separate
yeah
motion
for
approval
of
the
december
minutes.
Please.
A
Is
the
december
updated
minutes
that
were
sent
today?
It
was
just
a
one
date
update
that.
C
St
john,
yes,
I
guess
we
could
do
one
yeah
kenzie.
Yes,.
B
A
A
E
B
Rules
of
procedure,
that's
you
have
to
vote
on
the
resolution
itself.
Yes,
yeah,
yeah.
Okay,
all
right.
A
I
can
explain
it
and
then
eric
can
pop
on
if
I'm
leaving
anything
out
here.
It's
pretty
basic.
B
Construction
and
then
decided
not
to
build
it.
Zoning
commitments
that
we
record
through.
A
So
it
looks
like
we
have
a
motion
and
a
second
so
we're
ready
to
call
the
roll
on
this
one
or,
if.
A
G
B
We
are
proposing
to
update
the
fee
schedule.
Let
me
see
if
I
can
pull
this
up
just
a
second.
B
Looked
up
comparable
fee
schedules
for
both
college
towns
and
other.
B
Just
other
towns
in
indiana
to
try
to
see
kind
of
where
we
were
falling
when
we
thought
about.
B
Making
these
changes
so
we
are
proposing
a
number
of
changes,
some
to
kind
of
simplify.
B
And
then
hold
on,
I
can
share
that
just
a
second.
B
There
we
go.
Thank
you
so
plats
and
amendments
two
plaques
clarifying
what.
B
B
B
Proposing
to
keep
most
of
our
permit
fees
the
same
again,
they
probably
could
be
raised.
B
Like
sign
permits
and
temporary
use
permits,
those
are
usually
small,
small
businesses
or.
B
B
B
So
we
are
proposing
relatively
small
increases
in
most
areas.
B
B
Is
that
yes,
so
you
can
see
here
that
a
primary
plot
under
the
old
amount
was
300.
B
Together
was
also
300
and
then
just
the
double
lock
cost.
First
of
all,
we
don't
prefer
that.
B
They're
filed
together
anymore,
that
creates
a
lot
of
confusion,
and
actually,
I
think
here.
B
We
were
going
back
and
forth
about
how
much
to
fi
how
much
to
charge
for
the
secondary
plat.
So
if.
B
You
do
approve
this.
We
would
ask
that
that
fee
for
preliminary
and
final
be
800,
plus
100
per
lot.
B
D
Final
plan,
the
next
section
down
I
see
on
residential
edition
it
has
a
new
fee
in
red,
but.
D
B
B
B
Apologies
and
my
last
question
is
under
grading
closer
to
the
bottom.
It's
100
plus
125,
an
acre.
D
B
B
In
the
posted
administrative
manual
we'll
try
to
get
that
done
as
soon
as
possible,
so.
B
H
H
H
B
H
Okay,
okay,
great
and
then
the
other
thing
I
just
want
to
make
a
statement.
Is
I
just
caution
as.
H
We
raise
fees
because
many
times
and
not
that
I
don't
feel
it's
justified,
because
these
still
seem.
H
Very
affordable,
but
I
want
to
be
very
sensitive
to
it
because,
ultimately,
in
a
development
project,.
A
A
Affordable
housing
so,
but
given
the
time
between
the
last
fee
increase,
this
seems
perhaps.
A
A
A
B
D
D
Attend
to
here
there
is
a
lot
going
on
yes,
so
we
do
want
to
remind
those
on
zoom
that
if
they.
B
B
We
do
have
some
member,
we
have
a
number
of
people
here
who
are
specifically
here.
B
As
petitioners
representatives,
but
I
do
think
we
have
some
members
of
the
public
as
well.
Okay.
A
A
A
B
B
Someone
is
here
if
that's
okay,
we've
got
the
robert
v
shaw
project
at
3500,
north
hackberry.
B
So
you
should
see
that
in
the
next
few
months
I
would
think
the
mgh
apartment
complex
at.
B
A
A
A
Then
we
can
move
this
to
approval.
If
there's
a
motion
for
a
can.
A
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Right-Of-Way,
so
all
74
feet
of
this
was
going
to
be
dedicated.
This
particular
section.
I
Strip
along
that
entire
430
feet
long,
a
section
of
road
that
would
widen
out
to
about
10
feet.
I
Out
at
the
road
that
would
contain
the
sign,
so
for
the
most
part,
this
would
be
a
three
foot
long.
I
Piece
of
property
that
would
extend
all
the
way
out
to
arlington
just
for
the
purpose
of
that.
I
Signage,
so
the
the
reason
for
these
amendments
is
so
that
the
signage
is
on
the
property.
I
I
I
I
I
I
Development
that
you
know
just
are
not
allowed
signage
outside
of
the
actual
land
that
they
own.
I
I
A
J
Good
good
evening,
my
name
is
austin
tracy,
I'm
a
development
manager.
I
work
with
jeff.
J
J
We've
added
a
little
bit
of
clarity
to
some
pud
language
for
the
retail
space
and
area
c.
J
J
J
J
J
Along
the
mains,
the
main
streets
yeah,
as
I
mentioned,
we
worked
with
staff,
and
this
was.
J
J
J
J
J
J
A
A
We'll
go
to
my
right
first
well,
thank
you
for
the
presentation
there.
So
just
by
quick
look
here.
F
On
this
is
extensive
40
acres,
so
I
I
guess
you're
asking
for
two
areas
to
put
a
sign
with.
F
F
F
J
J
Okay,
thank
you
other
questions
from
to
my
right.
I
guess
I'll
start
with
a
question
for
staff,
so
it.
K
K
I
Bit,
we
didn't
have
any
issues
with
with
those
modifications.
You
know
that
was
just
a
minor.
J
J
D
C
bohr's
question
about
the
the
change
in
use
that
eric
you
said
you
don't
have
any
issue
with.
D
We
supposed
to
vote
on
that
and
if
so,
maybe
some
clarifying
statement
as
to
what
that
is.
I
Yeah
absolutely
so
you
know,
their
request
is
to
basically.
I
I
I
D
J
B
B
A
I
I
Or
fire
department-
I
mean
this-
isn't
too
dissimilar
from
you
know
other
situations
where.
I
I
Directions
you
follow
to
to
get
to
a
development.
You
know
there
are
lots
of
developments
that.
I
You
know
not
too
dissimilar
from
other
situations.
You
know
everybody
obviously
is
going
to
know.
I
Guess
I
don't
know
how
else
to
really
kind
of
go
into
that?
You
know
yes
they're
accessed
from.
A
I
Within
the
improved
cross
sections
of
those
two
streets,
you
know
so
the
road
will
still
be
able.
I
Tree
plots
aren't
changing,
there's
just
yeah,
so
so
that
shouldn't
change
with
this
aspect.
A
I
Just
briefly
go
back
to
some
of
my
exhibits
here
to
help
answer
your
question
a
little
bit.
I
I
I
I
J
J
Written
into
the
pud
to
allow
that,
I
think
the
logistics
of
that
maybe
weren't
fully
thought
out.
B
B
B
Been
that
way
for
decades
because
of
the
proliferation
of
billboards,
that
just
is
what.
B
This
is,
if
I
think,
if
these
roads
weren't
public,
maybe
there
would
be
you
know,
and
they.
B
B
Where
we're
kind
of
saying
that,
yes,
we
we
see
that
the
road
that
you're
connected
to
out.
B
Located-
and
that
is
the
rule
for
everyone,
so
that
is
kind
of
that's
our
main.
B
B
B
D
Item
number
three:
I
think
it
is
what
she
was
alluding
to
under
that
it
shall
not
result.
D
D
B
Normally
would
ask
now
for
a
development,
and
so
we
we
would
not
want
to
support
it
for.
B
That
reason
does
that
make
sense.
So
what
is
the
the
issue
with
the?
What
is
the
future
maintenance.
B
Right
so
that
are
held
by
public
so
once
they
become
public
roads
and
they're
built.
B
Primary
platt,
which
you
saw
they
do
have
road
names
already
tell
your
right,
is
one
of
them.
J
A
J
H
This
is
commissioner
cochran.
My
questions
were
answered
by
jackie.
G
I
I
So
one
of
them,
you
know
the
tele
ride
they
purchased.
That
lot
as
part
of
the
overall.
A
A
A
All
right,
so
we
can
entertain
a
motion
or,
if
there's
additional
comments
or
questions
on
this.
A
F
L
K
D
On
the
major
thoroughfares
and
it
it's
too
much
of
a
sort
of
a
break
in
the
rules
to.
A
Do
we
have
commissioners
online,
or
that
would
like
to
comment
yeah,
commissioner
cochran
here
I
I'm.
H
H
H
However,
and
if
you
guys,
I
think
the
turning
point
is
if
it
was
if
it
was
a
private
road.
H
Monument
sign
like
this,
I'm
afraid
planning
commission
would
be
inundated
with
requests.
H
Because
you
know,
signage
is
obviously
something
that
many
businesses
feel
that
will
make
or
break.
H
H
Go
with
staff
recommendation,
but
again
just
know
that
your
project
is
very
appreciative.
H
And
we
want
it
to
be
successful.
We
just
need
to
stay
within
the
system
that
we
have
thanks.
A
G
Road
that
needs
to
have
you
know
at
least
a
60
feet
wide
entrance
and
we're
already
doing
that
at.
G
50
feet,
which
is
already
an
exception
and
then,
if
you
add
a
10
foot
sign
or
a
10
foot,
10
foot.
G
Lot
in
there
because
it's
three
feet
beyond
the
50
feet,
so
you
have
seven
feet
and
seven.
G
G
To
be
able
to
see
the
road,
I
don't
know,
I
can't
answer
those
questions.
My
one
interesting
question.
G
I
have,
though,
and
I
don't
I
know
we're
past
question
times
is
if
this
was
approved
in
the.
G
I
That
for
you,
you
know
so
the
allowance
and
the
beauty
allowed
for
freestanding
signs
on
the.
I
Property
as
a
whole,
you
know
the
location
of
those
wasn't
deviated
with
their
district.
I
I
Think
that
they're
going
to
be
able
to
have
the
signage
out
on
those
major
thoroughfares.
So.
I
I
I
Roads
where,
where
they
would
most
desire
those,
but
that's
where
you
know
our
our
challenges
right.
I
I
I
I
M
A
A
A
B
Odd
remind
you
that
we
need
five
votes
for
any
recommendation,
so
five
people
to
agree.
B
To
be
able
to
pass
something
along
and
that
for
for
an
amendment
to
a
plan
unit
development.
A
A
H
I
will
make
a
motion
to
approve,
as
stated
second
excellent.
Okay,
we
have
a
motion.
B
B
B
To
help
facilitate
the
future
development
of
the
trades
district,
and
so
this
site
would
be.
B
B
So
again,
requesting
major
site
plan
review.
The
reason
that
you'll
see
it
tonight
is
because.
B
000
square
feet
so
here
is
the
overall
site
plan
of
the
site,
pretty
straightforward.
B
B
A
variance
will
be
required
from
the
board
of
zoning
appeals
for
those
who
don't
know.
B
Of
the
plan
commission,
who
are
on
the
board
of
zoning
appeals,
so
just
to
let
you
know.
B
So
here
is
the
site
kind
of
split
up
by
type
of
development,
so
the
building
in
blue.
B
B
B
They
will
be
doing
a
subdivision
and
we
have
time
limited
that
that
they
will
need
to.
B
Figure
out
exactly
how
big
they
want
the
slot
to
be
and
have
that
filed.
I
believe
within.
B
Here
is
the
first
floor
plan
the
it
is
going
to
be
a
largely
office.
It's
an
office
building.
B
B
B
B
Well,
this
building
does
not
have
parking
and
is
not
required
to
have
parking,
so
you
may
have.
B
Noticed
on
the
site
plan
that
there
is
no
parking
included,
which
is
allowed
for
vehicles.
B
For
cars,
but
we
will
have
bicycle
parking
on
site
and
landscaping.
Those
areas
that
are
open.
B
A
Do
we
have
someone
that
represents
the
property
here
too.
A
Someone
else
from
the
city
presenting
on
this,
I
think
miss
cooper
smith
is
going
to
speak.
Yes,.
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
Madison
street
the
main
entry
or
will
both
include
entryways
sure,
so
I
ashley
thornberry,
is
here.
B
B
Yes,
so
there
will
be
two
pedestrian
entrance
points.
The
main
one
will
be
off
of
madison.
O
Two
primary
entrances,
however,
with
that
stair
that
jackie
currently
has
highlighted.
A
It
will
not
yeah
okay,
okay,
interesting
and
then
other
question,
perhaps
for
the
the
I
I
guess.
A
You're,
the
petitioners
ashley
and
and
jane
that
the
idea
about
the
green
space
and
hardscape
do.
A
A
O
Our
project
team
recommends
lowering
the
southern
property
line
so
that
we
can
meet.
O
That
minimum
25
landscape
open
area,
we
have
done
preliminary
calculations
and
we
will
be
able.
A
A
I
guess
a
question
and
maybe
for
the
design
team,
but
just
the
the
structure
also
faces
an
alley.
K
O
Design
phase
we're
trying
to
size
those
appropriately,
it
has
been
brought
to
our.
O
Attention
that
the
schematic
plan
is
showing
them
beyond
the
right-of-way,
so
the
final.
H
Planning
staff,
but
can
just
out
of
curiosity-
and
I
might
have
missed
this
in
the
presentation.
N
But
we're
building
it,
for
you
know
potential
users
that
we
think
are
kind
of
next
in
line.
B
Have
two
members
of
the
news
on
zoom?
Yes,
okay,
all
right!
Okay,
all
right!
So
seeing
nothing!
No
one.
D
D
D
A
A
A
B
Ask
mike
correct
me
if
I
say
this
raw
incorrectly,
if
we
could
the
way
that
they're
structured.
B
I'd
prefer
if
we
could
do
z,
o
10
last,
but
you'll
have
to
amend
the
agenda
to
do
that.
A
C
G
You
see
here,
okay,
thank
you.
I
don't
know
if
I
ever
introduced
myself
to
being
the
night,
jackie.
B
Scalin
development
services
manager-
oh
sorry
about
that,
we
will
look
at
zo1122.
So
first
just.
B
As
an
update
or
clarification
for
everyone
joining
us,
the
planning
and
transportation.
B
Department,
through
this
memo
and
redline
with
tables,
is
proposing
to
amend
the
unified.
B
Development
ordinance:
this
is
a
process
we
should
be
doing
roughly
annually
and
the
last
studio.
B
Update
was
done
in
spring
of
last
year,
which
became
effective.
Finally,
in
july
of
last
year,
the.
B
B
Working
quite
right-
or
even
you
know,
small
policy
things
that
we
think
need
to
be
brought.
B
B
So,
as
was
mentioned,
this
is
all
in
the
packet.
So
I
will
not,
you
know,
read
every
line
to
you,
but.
B
B
B
B
B
B
South
college,
so
they
have
different
zoning
districts,
so
this
scales
of
the
sizes
are
also.
B
Related
to
the
district,
so
reducing
that
square
footage,
for
example
in
the
mn
from
2500
to
2000.
B
That
you
can
have
larger
buildings.
So
if
you're
going
to
do
one
incentive.
B
Then
there's
a
one
tier,
a
slightly
larger
building.
If
you're
going
to
utilize.
B
Maximum
for
floor
plate
reduced
from
twenty
thousand
ten
thousand
square
feet
for
building.
B
However,
that
again
increased
if
you
are
going
to
do
either
or
both
of
the
incentives.
B
So
that's
the
kind
of
big
changes
for
chapter
three.
You
can
also
see
in
the
first
here
the.
B
First
change
buildings
with
more
than
20
dwelling
units
also
now
have
a
10
000
square
foot.
B
Multi-Family,
which
we
are
interested
in
and
provides,
you
know
a
much
needed
different.
B
Type
of
housing
here
in
the
community,
but
we'll
capture
some
of
our
larger
projects.
B
And
then
we
have
here
on
the
second
page,
the
architectural
requirements
for
garages.
B
B
Garages
that
aren't
wrapped
by
commercial
or
residential
so
trying
to
add
some
in
here.
B
B
A
I
Sure
yeah,
so
we
did,
we
had
a
few
requests
and
even
permits.
I
I
Situations
where
people
wanted
to
have
relatives
living
within
their
house
while
still
having.
I
A
I
guess
I
have
maybe
one
other
one
other
comment.
I
should
have
probably
started
with.
A
A
A
D
I
I
do
have
one
just
a
quick
question
in
just
trying
to
understand
all
of
it.
D
And
it
makes
sense
to
me,
I'm
just
curious
the
process,
given
that
we
just
looked
at
this.
It
feels.
D
D
Such
as
this,
the
ones
with
regard
to
basically,
if
you
do
either
sustainable
or.
D
Affordable
you
get
5000
reduced
down,
but
if
you
do
both,
then
you
get
the
10.
sure.
B
I
think
it's
been
work
working
with
the
code,
the
incentive,
the
incentives
as
they
are.
B
Now
you
know
they
were
new,
and
so
we
wanted
to
try
them
out
and
see
what
we
were
getting.
B
B
D
B
B
B
Incentives
are
being
used.
We
think
that
this
will
kind
of
get
us
more
towards
some.
D
F
In
terms
of
yeah,
a
ton
of
appreciation
just
being
newer
to
this,
but
all
the
work.
F
That
went
into
the
udo
period,
but
in
terms
of
like
quantifying
when
you're
saying
this
is.
B
B
B
That
we
thought
we
would
be
kind
of
promoting
with
the
incentives
and
so
that
that's
kind
of.
B
The
discussion
we
have
internally
as
something
comes
through
but
yeah
we
can
give
you
kind.
B
Of
a
synopsis
of
those
things
that
have
been
done
and
and
what
they've
used
yeah
just
in.
A
D
E
C
B
B
B
And
the
amendments
do
a
number
of
things.
The
first
one
you
can
see
here
is
an
amendment
to.
B
B
You've
seen
it
you've
seen
it
excuse
me,
that's
not
exactly
right.
Sorry,
it's
bounded.
B
B
Are
zoned
mm?
We
are
proposing
to
change
the
impervious
surface
coverage
to
85
percent.
B
B
Two
which
we'll
get
to
with
the
final
text
with
the
final
ordinance,
this
basically.
B
B
Some
references
for
parking
that
exist
in
other
districts,
I'm
sorry
in
other
chap
other
parts.
B
That,
again
is
in
line
to
reflect
the
plan
that
was
done.
The
master
plan
that
was
done
for.
B
Larger
impervious
surface
coverage,
a
number
of
small
corrections
are
shown
we're
adding.
B
Solar
energy
ready
requirements
clarifying
a
couple
of
things
where
we're
not
changing
the.
B
B
And
subdivisions
adding
or
cleaning
up
the
code
a
little
bit
by
deleting
redundancy.
B
That's
something
that
was
kind
of
missing
for
that
use
and
so
adding
in
similar
architectural.
B
B
To
work
with
her,
but
for
now
getting
an
updated
list
of
those
trees
that
that
we,
as
through.
B
Her
as
the
representative,
but
we
as
the
city,
would
like
to
see
more
or
less
of
allowed
across
town.
B
That
that's
allowed
because
it
is
not
currently
so
those
are,
I
would
say,
the
gist
of
the
changes.
B
That
we're
making
then
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
If
you
have
something
specific.
D
Actually,
I
think
I'm
abstaining
from
this,
mr
rooker
right,
because
it's
the.
D
The
one,
the
very
first
one
on
south
on
south
of
2nd
street
north.
E
B
D
Different
from
when
I
abstained
last
time
the
petition
came
before
or
does
it
feel
like
the.
E
The
particular
parcel
that
was
implicated
yeah
previously
again,
we
have
six
members
here.
D
A
A
Purpose
or
origin
of
that
new
development-
oh
geez,
I
think
eric
you
can
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong.
B
But
I
think
it's
in
the
I'm
not
going
to
say
the
right
thing,
the
sap,
the
what's
it
called.
B
Commissioner
seaboard,
that
economic
development-
it's
in
I'm
just
going
to
say
the
right
thing
so.
B
Is
staying
with
me
was
led
by
economic
and
sustainable
development.
I
believe
that
it.
B
Suggested
that
we
codify
solar,
ready
rules,
and
so
so
director
robinson.
I
Sustainable
action
plan
encouraged
the
solar
readiness,
so
that
was
something
that
we.
A
A
All
right,
so
we
have
five
positive
votes
and
then
a
an
abstention
so
that
one
still
is
approved.
B
Thank
you
so
for
these
three
chapters
we
have,
I
believe,
13
amendments
just
a
second.
B
Okay,
the
first,
which
is
an
important
one
when
we
rewrote
the
code
in
2019-2020,.
B
B
B
A
petition
representative:
we
are
now
requiring
that
and
trying
to
go
to
a
more
direct
line.
B
Administrative
manual
are
that
for
most
of
our
hearings,
including
plan
commission,
we.
B
B
Confusing
we
are
following
the
rules,
but
we
would
like
to
sync
those
rules
with
the
state
code.
B
That
we
know
what
is
appearing,
and
so
it
is
also
easier
for
the
public
to
kind
of
be.
B
We
did
probably
the
biggest
one
in
this
section
is
modifying
and
syncing
the
triggers.
B
For
both
minor
and
major
site
plans,
so
you
can
see
those
more
detailed
in
the
red
line.
B
But
basically
increasing
the
standards
slightly
for
the
bottom
threshold
of
a
minor
subdivision.
B
B
B
That
seemed
awfully
small
to
be
here,
based
on
what
we've
seen
in
the
past,
so
trying
to
kind
of.
B
B
B
Just
trying
to
update
portions
of
their
you
know
of
their
commercial
lots
really
gets
them
in.
B
Kind
of
a
a
process
that
maybe
is
in
place
for
larger
problems
for
larger
sites,
so
we.
B
B
Disturbance
outside
of
the
footprint
of
their
foundation,
so
so
changing
those
triggers.
B
And
then
just
a
couple
more
clarifications,
as
I
mentioned,
those
kind
of
snuck
into
these.
B
As
well
as
well
as
the
first
as
well
as
zo10,
and
allowing
minor
modifications
to
be
done,.
B
We
had
when
that
was
put
in,
and
it
always
seemed
the
intent
of
of
the
code
and
then
when
it
was.
B
Discussed
in
public
hearings
that
that
could
be
done
for
building
permits,
but
it
isn't
written.
B
In
that
way,
so
we
can't
we
realized
when
we
were
going
to
do
one
that
that's
not
what
it.
B
Done
at
a
staff
level
for
those
permits
as
well-
and
I
think
that's
all
I
can
answer
any
questions.
B
In
your
setbacks,
you
can
be
asked
to
remove
it
to
get
closer
to
compliance
if
you're
redeveloping.
B
Type
of
road
neighborhood
residential
that
front
setback
for
a
building
will.
B
B
Transportation
plan
specifically
calls
out
in
in
the
language
of
the
plan
that
those
should.
B
Another
you
become,
you
become
student
housing
because
you
are
doing
three
units
with
three
beds.
B
So
adding
a
bottom
threshold
there
changing
our
abandonment
timeline
from
six
months
to
12
months.
B
And
the
the
last
is
cleaning
up
some
of
our
language
and
our
change
of
use
definition.
A
B
To
go
to
the
meeting
are
like
professionally
drawn
plans
or
architectural
plans
so
that.
B
Professional
is
usually
already
engaged
and-
and
they
often
come
anyway,
so
we
haven't
had.
B
A
B
P
P
Director
of
housing
and
neighborhood
development,
I
just
want
to
say
that
I
appreciate
the
staff's.
P
P
K
C
C
B
This
is
technical
amendments
from
the
entirety
of
the
code.
There
are
22
amendments.
B
So
I
will
briefly
go
through
them.
They
range
from
you
can
see.
B
We
capture
the
the
proposed
change
that
was
done
in
the
chapter
four
ordinance
here
with.
B
As
a
cross-reference
in
table
2-11
that
that
we
spoke
about
earlier
for
the
areas
in
the
hospital.
B
Things
appear
more
than
once,
so
they
appear
in
the
tables
that
discuss.
B
Specific
zoning
district
is
discussed,
so
this
is
just
kind
of
joining
those
cross.
B
Park
syncing
with
a
plan
for
the
the
downtown
from
a
number
of
years
ago.
So
then
we
have.
B
A
couple
of
code
reference
fixes
clarifying
you've
already
seen
this
in
chapter
four,
but.
B
This,
this
ordinance
seeks
to
clarify
for
the
different
zoning
districts
related
to.
B
Maximum
building
floor
plate
that
it's
per
building
so
right
now
it
says
per
lot.
That's.
B
Per
building,
removing
some
old
terminology,
including
the
terminology
for
homeless
shelter,.
B
Updating
our
language
related
to
accessible
ramps
or
people
with
with
disabilities.
B
Terminology
and
then
again
syncing
some
more
code;
references
from
chapter
four.
B
And
making
sure
that
those
things
that
need
to
be
routed
through
engineering
are
being
routed
through
engineering
such
as.
B
Table
that
shows
who
can
review
what
petitions
so
making
making
sure
that
change
is
reflected.
B
D
D
A
A
One
I
I'll
just
say
I
really
appreciate
the
person-centered
language
too,
on.
A
To
update
that
language,
I
think,
is
not
only
timely
and
appropriate,
but
it's
really
sensitive.
A
A
A
To
make
sure
that
it's
spelled
correctly
yeah,
so
nice
nice
work
on
the
language,
though
I
really.
A
D
Did
you
want
to
share
what
that
would
be
well,
okay,
so
good
question
it
is
listed
in.
B
The
definition
for
another
definition,
so
it's
just
in
one
place
where
we're
removing
it.