City of Bloomington, Indiana Plan Commission, 13 Jan 2020

Previous Meeting Next Meeting

⏯

youtube image

►

From YouTube: Bloomington Plan Commission, January 13, 2020

Description

meeting packet: https://bloomington.in.gov/onboard/meetingFiles/download?meetingFile_id=5320

A

I'd like to call to order this meeting of the city of bloomington planning.

A

Commission january 13 2020 we'll start by calling the roll you kate here.

B

Whistler here st. john coin and right, randolph excellent sounds like we have a.

A

Quorum so we will begin our agenda with minutes to be approved. We have one set.

A

Of minutes from the october 2019 meeting, we have any questions minutes all right.

A

All in favor of approving those minutes say aye.

A

Any opposed, nay, okay, so the minutes are approved. We will move on now to reports.

A

Resolutions and communications from staff other than we did need to point.

C

Out you do need to elect some new officers this evening. So, although that's.

C

Not on the agenda that does need to happen excellent, so this is the first.

A

Meeting of the year, and so we do need to elect new officers in particular, there.

A

Are there are five offices or appointments in that would need to fill.

A

President vice president plaque committee representative, bz a.

A

Representative and a hearing officer representatives so we'll we'll start.

A

With president, as president, all right, we have a nomination, any other nominations.

A

For president okay, we need a roll call on these, or is it boys, okay? Well, let's.

A

Start them with call roll on the appointment of brad whistler as.

A

President for 2020 coin.

D

They have to be unanimous, st. john, yes, whistler, abstain, sandburg, yes, jacques.

B

Wyler? Yes, kinzie; yes, kate, yes, burrell! Yes,.

A

All right so that passes we'll move on to vice president. Do we have a.

A

Nomination, for vice president julian kinsey is vice president all right. Any.

A

Other nominations for vice president all right, seeing none, let's call the.

A

Roll on pointing to gillian kinsey, as vice president, okay.

B

Yes, well, yes, jean cuyler, yes, sandburg! Yes,.

B

Whistler, yes, st. john, yes coin. Yes,.

A

All right, congratulations! You are oh! Thank you.

A

So, somewhere around here we have a little card that will you can put in.

A

Front of there that will let everyone know that you're now the vice president.

A

So next up is our plaque committee representative and I believe jillian.

A

You've been our flat committee representative in the previous year and you're willing to continue in that role. Okay, I am willing to continue to serve.

E

On the flat commission all right: well, second, let's start with a nomination. Yes,.

A

Nominate and jillian kinsey to the black commission, a second okay.

A

Any other nominees for plaque committee representative singh, none, let's call the.

A

Roll on jillian kinsey, as our plaque committee of representative, st. john yes,.

B

Coin? Yes, yes, sandburg! Yes, kenzie! Yes, okay! Yes, yes,.

C

Point a back them as well for blackness. So yes, so we need a an alternate.

A

Representative to the plaque committee, in the case that jillian's unable to.

A

Make it would we have any nominations for alternate.

E

Mendeley me: it's a fucker. Man meets right before this meeting yeah.

A

Not everybody at once. We only need one.

B

It's just an alternate, yes, just an alternate. Would you be willing flavia.

E

I'm willing it's the same day as this meeting yeah. Just you have an hour.

A

Before right, yep well I'll nominate commissioner burrell.

A

Then, to be our alternate for the plaque committee. Okay, thank you. Speak of the.

F

Second, I just I won't use it a conflict, I mean I'm staffed, but I attend those.

F

A

You attend those meetings already yeah, but I'm not a voting. I mean I just.

F

Attend them because I have staff, that's in there. I don't know. If that's a conflict, though I was just saying if nobody wanted to do so. It's certainly.

C

Possible for craig to be the alternate or the main I mean either. Those are.

F

Possible, okay, well, yeah, we're gonna, be there anyway. That sure makes it easy. I.

A

Think yeah cheekily well I'll, withdraw my nomination then so other. Do you still.

G

Want to stand with gillian being your main representative yeah that deals done.

H

Review the plan commission rules establishing the plac committee. I just.

H

Want to make sure it's not gonna present an issue. Can you just chill able this for one minute I'll, come back sure I'll, tell you what why don't we will move on.

A

And we'll deal with the next one, while we get a confirmation from legal on that.

A

So, let's move on to appointment of our bza representative mr. birrell for the.

E

Bz, a second okay, any other nominations.

A

Seeing none, let's go ahead and call the roll on nominating mr. burrell as our.

A

Bza representative, yes, kenzi, yes, shawn boiler, yes coin! Yes, st.

B

John, yes, whistler, yes, sandburg! Yes! Now do we need.

A

An alternate for that one as well all right so do we have any nominations for.

A

Alternates dz, a representative third third thursday,.

I

Once it's once a month on thursday, third thursday, yes same as so, I can't have one.

J

Not every month.

I

Is there anyone not here on the bza as an alternate okay, all right yeah? We have.

A

We have one vacancy, but I think all of the all of our appointed seats are all.

A

Of our pointing commissioners are here tonight.

I

Seems like they're still there's a possibility down here I mean if we need.

A

To just put somebody in there, I you can put me as the alternate. I cannot promise.

A

That I'm going to be available for those meetings, but but I would I would do my.

A

Best so, commissioner whistler is the alternate for bca. Okay, it doesn't look.

A

Like we're, gonna have any competing nominations for this one. So let's call.

A

The roll on pointing myself as the alternate vza representative.

A

Okay? Yes! Well! Yes, kenzi! Yes, sandburg! Yes, yes, coin, saint john! Yes,.

A

Okay, now that one passes as well, let's come back to the question of whether or.

A

Not commissioner shank weiler is eligible to serve as our alternate to.

A

The flat committee, it's perfectly fine for mr. schock weiler, to serve as the.

H

Alternate on the plat committee, thank you for giving me a moment to check on that excellent. So, let's go ahead and call the roll on that one. I think we.

A

Already had the motion in a second on that, if I'm not mistaken so we'll just.

A

Put a bow on that coin. Say john! Yes, sandburg! Yes, yes, kenzie! Yes, okay! Yes,.

B

Burrell, yes, okay and finally, we need to appoint a hearing officer representative.

A

So the hearing officer is already: we already have an appointment from staff.

C

So the plane commission just has to reaffirm that appointment every year. So.

G

It's better our marker as the main hearing officer and then scott robinson.

G

Acts as the backup, so the plane commission just has to reaffirm those.

G

Appointments I affirm that appointment.

J

All right: well, we have motion a second. Let's call the roll.

E

I will and just to clarify word we're reaffirming both the appointment and the.

A

Alternate in this single vote here, excellent! Well, yes, saint john! Yes,.

B

Whistler, yes, jean cuyler, yes, sandburg, yes, kate, yes,.

B

Kenzie, yes, coin. Alright, I think we've done it. The maybe a lists, maybe even in.

I

An email of who does what? Because I know beth, said she's for the county and I'm.

I

On I'm, the plan commission to the urban enterprise association or perfect.

I

Enterprise zone association for that board and just to kind of have a yeah. We.

A

Do have there are a couple, other appointments, but bue a and then we also.

A

Appoint a non-voting member, I think, to the to the county planning commission.

A

There may be a couple others that we don't have on the list here tonight. If.

A

It's if it's all right with everyone else, I think we can just continue with.

A

The status quo until our next meeting until we can get a list of whatever.

A

Those other appointments that we have outstanding are yeah. We can certainly.

C

Put together a small list of how everybody gets here, yeah.

C

Great all right, okay, so I think we're done with our elections.

A

Thank you to the audience for bearing with us. While we do some housekeeping.

A

Here we're now, unless there are any other reports or communications from.

A

Commissioners, I think we are ready to move on to our petitions. We've got two.

A

Petitions tonight the first is 0 300 1 9, and this is.

A

Adoption of the draft unified development ordinance and then we have.

A

Of pud 3 6-1 9 trinity, toss development, 1550 north arlington park drive in 1723.

A

West arlington road, so we can start with the you do, and so we do not have a.

C

Formal presentation for the final version here of the you do, you know.

G

Staff is just presenting this to you, as it has come back from council with all.

G

Of its amendments, so I think we're you know basically just kind of here to.

G

Answer any basic questions you might have scott. You want to tell us anything.

A

How much fun was it at council there's a lot of fun? My name is scott robinson.

K

Assistant director for planning and transportation before I do my staff.

K

Presentation, it's just a few remarks I want to make regarding commissioner st.

K

John's comment about board appointments on the city's website. There is a page.

K

Called on board that does list the members and who your, what hat you're.

K

Wearing so to speak, we try to keep it up to date, but that is a resource. I did.

K

Want to point that out and before you tonight to ask for your recommendation.

K

For approval of zeo 30 1 9, where ordinance 1924, if you recall, we were.

K

Before the planned commission earlier, this fall considering the amendment.

K

Draft of the unified development ordinance plant commission heard this.

K

Over a series of meetings adopted several amendments that was ford onto.

K

Common council, in which they considered those amendments and did additional.

K

Amendments to that council subsequently adopted it because of that, and because.

K

Of state code, it has to come back to you and you have three options before you.

K

Tonight, option number one is do nothing in from 45 days from the date that the.

K

Council submitted that report, the you do would be adopted that would bring us.

K

Some time in about early february, I believe option number 2 is the one. I'm.

K

Suggesting that you do would be to recommend or approve zeo 19 or 30 19.

K

That would bring this step of the process to a closure.

K

The third options, if you disapprove of the council's amen.

K

Then council didn't goes back to council and they have 45 days to either reaffirm.

K

Their original action, the ordinance, would stand if they do nothing than the.

K

Original proposal that planned commission brought before city council.

K

Would be adopted, so I think that's a very highly unlikely scenario in that.

K

Situation, that's why I'm recommending that planning commission approve this. I.

K

Will say that the council did submit a very detailed packet that was included.

K

That details all the amendments that they considered as well as which ones.

K

Were adopted and have approved as well as a summary from my recollection, what.

K

Came out of clan commission, probably the biggest change that happened between the.

K

Two was dealing with accessory dwelling units. What came out of planned.

K

Commission was still being considered as conditional what bedroom and they were.

K

Much smaller, what came out of common council is now they're considered by.

K

Wright with additional criteria so up to two bedrooms and some different square.

K

Footage requirements other than that council focused in on some other areas.

K

The plexes didn't really change, they are not permitted in the older areas, but.

K

They are allowed in the newer area, so I think other than the the kind of big.

K

Issues I'd be happy to try to recall what has changed, but again the council.

K

In the packet there's pretty detailed information, what's there moving forward.

K

After tonight, regardless of whatever your decision is the next step in the.

K

Process is we need to adopt the conversion map, and that is simply.

K

Adopting the new district name. So if you remember a lot of the district names.

K

Have changed to new district names, we're not changing the boundaries and at that.

K

Point in time, that's when the effective date would take place. So again we come.

K

Back to plan commission with a conversion map, depending on your.

K

Recommendation it would go to council depending on what happens at council.

K

That's a point in time that the you do it would become effective. We're.

K

Anticipating, sometime later the spring late april, early may, by the time we get.

K

To council, with that there may be a small batch of.

K

Text amendments: these are things that staff is going to go through right now,.

K

To kind of double check, as permits come in to make sure that we didn't forget to.

K

Cross a t or dot, and I somewhere and just some simple text amendments so.

K

There may be some of those that we would bring forward both to the plan.

K

Commission in common council there would not be any big policy changes that we.

K

Would do that and the last step in the process after.

K

That is, we would definitely envision looking at the zoning map to identify.

K

Areas that we'd want to rezone, if you recall there were several new zoning.

K

Districts, the student housing district, the r4 district or two that come to mind.

K

A lot of discussion about the bloomington hospital location as an.

K

Opportunity to look at that area to be rezone the cities in the process of.

K

Evaluating some rfps that were recently issued to help us plan master plan for.

K

That area, and hopefully the timing with that, will help us give an idea of how we.

K

Want to preemptively rezone that once the hospital leaves that site and.

K

There's some other areas around the community, the southwest and other areas.

K

We look at or anything that from the from that process that we would kick off.

K

We would identify as places to rezone so with that I'd be happy to answer any.

K

Questions but again, tonight's mostly formality per state code, since a common.

K

Council did amend the original action that planned commission take. It took and.

K

So it's back to you for one last time for your consideration.

A

Thank you, scott. Are there any questions from commissioners about so what does.

E

This mean in terms of the formal use, then, of this, is that your expectation by.

E

April after the conversion maps or work, it will be adopted, but the current you.

K

Do is still effective, so this you do will not become effective until city.

K

Council takes action on the conversion manual at the point in time that they.

K

Adopt that that's the point in time, that would be the effective date in the.

K

Resolution in ordinance, 1920 for section 5, does identify that's the triggering.

K

Point of when, by reference, that's when the you do would become effective, so I'm.

K

Anticipating you know, depending on our notice requirements getting before you.

K

And then getting on councils schedule, I'm trying to get on to their schedule.

K

Before their june slash july recess, so I'm we're targeting that april may time.

K

Frame again, we don't anticipate anything contentious, so it should be fairly straightforward in that. Thank you any.

A

Other questions.

I

Does our approval, let you start working sooner than if we did nothing and you.

I

Have to wait till the 45 days is up yes, okay, thank you.

A

Any other questions.

A

All right, seeing none is there anyone from the public who would like to.

A

Comment on zio, 301, nine, if so, step up to the podium, looks like none all right so.

A

We are back to the commission for file comment or a motion. A motion to approve.

E

Zero: three zero one: nine for approval.

A

All right, any final discussion, final comments before we vote. I certainly.

J

Thank you for that motion and I would urge us all to support it. This has been.

J

A long time coming, it's been through a lot of rigorous vetting from the public.

J

And this body, as well as the city council and I am eager now to start.

J

Applying the new you do, I think it's been a rough lift for those of us on.

J

Planning commission over the past year or so being on the cusp of the old you.

J

Do and the new, so now we have a new you do in front of us, that'll be our guide.

J

And I'm very very eager to get moving on it and start looking at the conversion.

J

Maps. Thank you. Thank you.

A

Any other comments yeah, I just want to say thanks to to staff and to fellow.

A

Commissioners and to council and everybody who put a lot of hard work.

A

Into this and to scott assuming this passes, congratulations hope you can.

A

Breathe a little easier now and the rest of the staff as well yeah. So I think we.

A

Have a motion, a second we're ready to call the roll.

B

Bril? Yes, kate. Yes, sean boiler; yes, kenzi, yes, samberg! Yes,.

B

St. john, yes coin, yes, whistler! Yes, that zo 301 nine is.

A

Approved moving on the next and final petition tonight is pud three six one.

A

Nine crenna toss developments. This is a request for approval of preliminary plan.

A

Amendment and district ordinance and rezone business park, residential.

A

Single-Family and pud two pud we've got eric grillak to present the case. This is.

C

The second hearing for this petition- and, as you just mentioned, this is a request.

C

To approve a preliminary plan and district ordinance and to rezone a.

G

Portion of property from business park to a planned unit development: this is an.

G

Effort to redevelop an approximately 41 acre piece of property on the northwest.

G

Side of town just a real, quick overview of the site itself, it connects to.

G

Arlington road, through a lot that is along the east side of the property, it.

G

Connects to 17th street to the south through a public right-of-way as well as.

G

Through an access, easement, interstate 69 runs along the west side of the site.

G

This particular site has a mix of history on it, although no actual.

G

Development has occurred on the property. There were significant portions of the.

G

Property that were used or the the fill the topsoil on the site was used as fill.

G

For previous indot projects in the area, so roughly of 50 60 percent of the.

G

Property was heavily graded to accommodate that there are some creeks.

G

And wetlands that run through the property, although a lot of the property.

G

Was graded and disturbed with that previous work? There are some portions of.

G

It specifically along the north and northwest portions of the site that were.

G

Not disturbed and are therefore in excellent shape, so.

G

This petition is an effort to redevelop this property with a mix of uses. This.

G

Was heard last year and was denied by the planning commission in the council.

G

The petitioners made a lot of changes to that previous petition and they have.

G

Even made some some changes since the last hearing in december, so real quick.

G

I'll just kind of go through the overall specifics of the project. As I mentioned.

G

Slightly over 40 acres and the petitioners are breaking up the site.

G

Into four different development areas area a along the north side of the.

G

Property will have 45 single family lots. These have been arranged in a.

G

Traditional grid-like layout with alley loaded garages along the back public.

G

Streets running along the front, the lots are approximately 40 feet by a hundred.

G

Feet wide and these would be developed with the r4 standards that are outlined.

G

In the new zoning code, these particularly offs would be dedicated to.

G

The city for their use to meeting the housing needs of our community, so one of.

G

The things that are outlined in the petitioners statement regarding these.

G

Lots is that these lots would be fully graded out the roads. Would ins would be.

G

Installed sidewalks street trees all utility infrastructure before they would.

G

Be handed over to the city, this would be done with phase one of the development.

G

And these would be given to the city for our use.

G

So, just to the south of that is an area, that's about seven acres in size that.

G

Would be used for townhomes these would be set up so that these could be.

G

Owner-Occupied they would have individual sewer connections. These would.

G

Be townhomes that could be plaited with the land underneath them to be sold.

G

There would be private drives running through that development, with parking.

G

Spaces this particular portion of the property has a creek as well as several.

G

Wetlands that run through there, the wetlands will be set aside in the.

G

Required preservation area there are two or three stream crossings that are being.

G

Conceptually shown now petitioners looking at possibly.

G

Eliminating one of those in the future, but they're showing three crossings now.

G

Those are allowed disturbances within the riparian buffer. So there's not an.

G

Issue with the stream crossing, but it's possible when this comes back for final.

G

Plan approval that there might be one less of those crossings to the west side.

G

Of the property, the area designated as area c would have a large five six story.

G

Apartment building this would be designed as student housing. This is.

G

Immediately alongside the I-69 corridor at the initial hearing in december, the.

G

Petitioners had shown a 25-foot buffer along the I-69 corridor. Adjacent to this.

G

Building and along the west of the the rest of the west side of this property.

G

The petitioners work to increase that to a 50-foot buffer for a majority of it.

G

There are still two portions where they did not accomplish that: 50-foot buffer.

G

And I'll kind of show that when I get to the area see site plans specifically.

G

Just to the south of that is an area that will be used for townhomes or I'm.

G

Sorry for paired patio homes, which could be duplexes or something similar to that.

G

These would all be served by on street parking spaces, as well as some private.

G

Spaces just to the east of that the site also has an electric easement that runs.

G

Down the center of it, that's about a hundred feet wide, so that kind of breaks.

G

Up the site in terms of developments, that's why you kind of see two different.

G

Portions of the site that are that are developed a little differently with the.

G

West side having some development and then a break in the center for this utility easement and then more development on the east side. Of that.

G

Utility easement, so in total there would be approximately 387 units, 825 bedrooms.

G

These would be broken down on a mix of different housing types, townhomes.

G

Multi-Family duplexes single family units- in addition, the bedroom counts.

G

Would be broken up pretty substantially within the development as well, so you.

G

Can see the numbers here they'd be approximately one hundred one hundred bedroom units, 326 two-bedroom units, two hundred and ten three-bedroom units.

G

And 184 bedroom units- these are just possible bedroom breakdowns. I want to.

G

Emphasize that each of these parcels would be approved with a specific set of.

G

Development standards so multifamily districts, single-family districts with a.

G

Density approved for that development. In addition, their petitioner statement.

G

Includes the dwelling unit equivalents that are in our current code, so as these.

G

Properties come forward when it comes forward for final plan approval. It's.

G

Possible that these this bedroom breakdown may change, but they will still.

G

Be held to the density standards that are outlined for each parcel. So, as I.

G

Mentioned there will be a mix of parking spaces on throughout the property. These.

G

Would be a mix of on-site parking spaces, as well as on street spaces, as well as.

G

The main apartment building will have a parking garage inside that for the use.

G

Of those residents so just factoring in the on-site spaces, not including the on.

G

Street it works out to about 0.4 for parking spaces per bedroom. When you.

G

Factor in those 125 on street spaces, the number of parking spaces goes up a.

G

Little bit more to 0.56 spaces per bedroom. So, as we mentioned with the.

G

Previous presentation in december, the petitioners have worked out an agreement.

G

With bloomington transit for shuttle service, so if you know, if there are.

G

Concerns about the lack of parking on the site that will be supplemented by.

G

The bloomington transit shuttle service, so real quick, I'll, just kind of go.

G

Through each area just to go through that a little bit more in-depth site.

G

Plan area a these: are the single family lots, so you can see the more clear site.

G

Plan for this, as I mentioned garages along the back public streets along the.

G

Front since the previous petition, they have included or added an additional.

G

50-Foot buffer along the east side of these lots that extends down to the.

G

Townhomes as well so they're, preserving the existing vegetation.

G

Although these slots are immediately adjacent to other single family lots, you.

G

Know, there's not really a conflict of land-uses here this.

G

Preserve the existing vegetation and give a buffer for for these units from.

G

The adjacent residences to the east of that, as I mentioned just the south of.

G

This so this would be the townhomes. This is about a seven acre piece of property.

G

Once again, that preservation area extends south of this. The areas in black.

G

Here that are shaded black are wetlands that are being set aside within the.

G

Conservancy area the hatched area represents the creeks that run through.

G

Here and the associated riparian buffers with those, so those would be preserved.

G

As I mentioned, there were some stream crossings for the drives. The pitcher has.

G

Mentioned that there might be a possibility to eliminate one of those so.

G

We'll look at that a little bit more in depth when that comes forward with the.

G

The final plan approval, so the townhomes are conceptually shown as three-story.

G

Buildings, so they have submitted one rendering, as well as they did revise.

G

Their petitioner statement to specifically list.

G

What building finishing materials would be used, cement, chessboard, siding and.

G

Fiber cement board was a primary material. However, we did call out to.

G

Expand that list a little bit to allow for brick limestone other masonry.

G

Products, although that's not conceptually shown right now, we want to.

G

Be able to allow those should that element be be included later, moving to.

G

The west area see this would be the large multifamily building that would be.

G

Mostly student oriented housing, so that would have an individual garage within.

G

The building it will, I believe, 80 or so parking spaces for the use of those.

G

Tenants there's a basketball court showing along the west side of the.

G

Property, so this site plan kind of shows the preservation area that they have.

G

Illustrated so, as I mentioned, there would be a 50-foot buffer. However, there.

G

Are two portions that do not meet that 50-foot buffer? That would be the north.

G

West side of the building, where it encroaches the corner of the building.

G

Encroaches into that area and then an area of the basketball court, one of the.

G

Concerns that was heard at the previous meeting was how this build.

G

Would look from I-69, so the petitioners have submitted a rendering showing how.

G

The building would look and what you would see and/or not see. So you know in.

G

The packet and on the screen is that rendering from I-69, so with this, you.

G

Know this this particular rendering basically shows the site, as it sits.

G

Right now, you know with the landscaping that would be required when this comes.

G

Forward a lot of the building that you see now, you know especially has that.

G

Landscaping matures would be even more hidden than what you see now so just.

G

Kind of keep that in mind that this is only looking at existing vegetation and.

G

Not certainly taking into account anything that's planted in the future, so.

G

Area d- and this is kind of on the southwest side of the site- approximately.

G

11 acres inside 11 acres in size, this would be developed with duplexes or.

G

Attached, single-family residences, there are public streets that run through this.

G

Area as well with on street parking spaces, all of the public streets would.

G

Have sidewalk and tree plants along both sides? The petitioner is also shown a.

G

10-Foot wide multi-use path that goes through the site as well. This connects.

G

Down to 17th street and would connect out to arlington road as well, so that.

G

Provides for multi-use connections as well as vehicular connections as well.

G

Sidewalk systems would run throughout the property as well to help tie.

G

Everything together so environmental preservation. You know I mentioned that.

G

The site was was heavily graded with previous work, but the majority of the.

G

High quality vegetation was along the north and northwest side of the property.

G

That is area that is all being set aside in a conservation easement. So it's over.

G

13 acres of the 40 acres that are being set aside and that's the high quality.

G

Vegetation, the preservation area always also includes the creeks and the.

G

Wetlands, as well as that, 50-foot buffer, that they were able to establish along.

G

The east side of the site as well, so we certainly feel that the amount of.

G

Environmental preservation is setting aside the high quality stuff that we.

G

So that is that is shown and has been increased since the last petition. So as.

G

I mentioned the public streets would all be following the complete streets profile, taking into account vehicles as well as pedestrians, so there would be.

G

Sidewalks ten foot drive aisles a minimum five foot tree plot and ten foot.

G

All-Purpose path along one side of the streets to connect to connect and help.

G

Transportation through the system through the through the site. So as I.

G

Mentioned at the beginning of bloomington transit has been contacted.

G

And an agreement has been arranged with the petitioner and bloomington transit.

G

To provide a shuttle, this is not an exclusive shuttle, but is mostly used by.

G

The tenants here this would connect to iu and would run monday through friday.

G

To help facilitate transportation from this site to campus, so one of the things.

G

That's been a continual discussion point about this site and this property is how.

G

It relates to the comprehensive plan, so the comprehensive plan designates.

G

This as a neighborhood residential district, the neighborhood residential.

G

District is primarily composed of residential land uses, which, as petition.

G

Does include, there is a limited commercial component with the apartment.

G

Building and the petitioners in included prospective land uses in their.

G

Petitioners statement, so that was something that staff was looking to get.

G

Some improvements on from the previous hearing, so they've listed possible land.

G

Uses for the commercial building, those are centered around the commercial.

G

Limited zoning district, so they're kind of light intensity, commercial uses.

G

So the comprehensive plan encourages density between 2 and 15 units. This.

G

Petition accomplishes that there is nothing that it increases beyond the 15.

G

Units per acre that is allowed single-family residential development is.

G

The dominant land use activity is with the comprehensive plan, encourages.

G

There's certainly been a great increase in that, and a good portion of this.

G

Property has been set aside for single-family uses and as.

G

Mentioned will be given to the city to help us best address some of the housing.

G

Needs of our community, so the comprehensive plan goes on to.

G

List a lot of considerations for projects in this area, environmental.

G

Preservation, creation of yard space public streets, wide range of.

G

Architectural styles high density development, when appropriate on-site.

G

Parking is not the dominant site, design features, so that's been scaled back from.

G

The previous petition that was heard last year, so there are a lot of sections.

G

Of the comprehensive plan, the disposition accomplishes they've.

G

Certainly made a lot of improvements since the previous petition and so staff.

G

Is here tonight to recommend approval of the petition with the six conditions.

G

That are listed in staffs report and that we had to wanted to add just a.

G

Seventh condition that the the single-family just to, although it is, is.

G

Clarified in there petitioner statement that the loss will be dedicated to the.

G

City, we did have a seventh condition, just stating that again that the 45.

G

Single-Family loss will be dedicated to the city so with that we are.

G

Recommending approval with the six conditions and staffs report, plus the.

G

Seventh condition that I've just outlined and I'm happy to answer any.

G

Questions, thank you. Is there. Someone from the petitioner would like to.

A

Continue add to the presentation.

J

No, it's missing. I don't have my clicky thing. This yes point exam, I'm kimberly.

L

Hanson, I'm a manager of design and development with trinity ventures. I'm.

L

Excited to be here again today to talk to you about west 17th street. Thank you.

L

For doing an amazing job eric, this is certainly gonna be repetitive, but could.

L

It go for it anyways. So again, this is an aerial of the location. So to get your.

L

Bearings, you have I-69 on the left side of your screen and arlington road to the.

L

Right and west 17th street to the south, our proposed development is thirty. Nine.

L

Point two: nine acres. We are proposing three hundred and eighty seven units.

L

With a variety of housing, types, apartments, townhomes, duplexes and.

L

Single-Family homes, we have fourteen point six, two acres of screened, green.

L

Space, which is approximately thirty-five percent of the site, we have 458 parking.

L

Spaces: that's point: five: six on a per bed ratio.

L

We're also offering a centrally located retail space of 1700 square feet.

L

Community amenities, complete streets that will be dedicated to the city and.

L

We will have three access points to off 17th street and one off arlington road.

L

This is a picture of the overall site plan. You would be turning the aerial on.

L

The side, so you have west 17th street to the left side and then arlington road to.

L

The bottom again there's four primary areas of development that emerged as we.

L

Were going through this area, a is the single family lots that we will develop.

L

And make build ready to be conveyed to the city of bloomington for the purpose.

L

Of workforce housing area b is townhomes area c. Is that four-story multi-family.

L

And limited commercial building and area d is primarily.

L

Edges or duplexes so what's changed since we last spoke. This outlines the.

L

Changes that we've made so to go through them. We increase the buffers along I-69.

L

In the eastern boundary 250 feet, where possible, we submitted an updated traffic.

L

Impact analysis we changed area a to r4 to allow for single-family attached.

L

Single-Family in plexus, we provided a full response to environmental.

L

Commission memo and additional information regarding the bloomington.

L

Transit proposal, our access roadways and what that would look like and then also.

L

The view form I-69, so the areas in red are the buffers that we added you can.

L

See the additional 20 feet that we added to make it 50 along I-69 and then also.

L

The 50 feet by area a which is the single family lots. This is the same.

L

Exhibit I think the eric showed, but this is the typical complete street, so we.

L

Will on our access roads have to drive lanes of 5 foot trees plot on either.

L

Side, a sidewalk on one side, a 10-foot multi-use path on the other and then two.

L

Rows of trees on either side, and then we had been asked about the view from I-69.

L

So we had this rendering put together. As you can see, the trees really do help.

L

Shield it and you primarily see the pitched roofs, and then I left these in.

L

Here we are still in the beginning stages of conceptual design, but this is.

L

That four storey multi-family building, that has the commercial space on the.

L

Corner, hopefully, to serve as a central gathering area- and this is of you.

L

Looking into area d of our difficult townhomes in the forefront and then.

L

Cottages in the background- and that's all I've got so if you have any.

L

Questions would be happy to answer. I have adrian reed who's, our traffic.

L

Engineer here, as well as jeff daniel civil engineer and jeff knable, whose.

L

Project executive from trinita: thank you. Are there any questions from.

A

Commissioners, for either staff or for the petitioner, let's start.

A

On my right, mr. sandberg, I did have a question for staff. I was not quite clear.

J

On the six conditions, for the recommendation is, there is seventh or is.

J

That one that has not been articulated so the whoops, so the seventh one and I'm.

G

Apologize, they didn't all fit, so I tried to make it smaller just now, so the.

G

Seventh condition says per the petitioner statement: the 45 single.

G

Family loss will be dedicated to the city, so it's just reiterating something.

G

That was already outlined in their petitioners statement, but we wanted to put it as a condition of approval just to make it clear got it. Thank you any.

A

Questions to my left.

E

Question is for staff, I believe, will your comments about the parcels and.

E

Final site plans suggest that the each parcel will be approved separately for.

E

Final, so it's kind of up to the petitioner. You know if they feel like.

G

They've got everything together and they've got everything outlined. They can.

G

Come back for the whole thing, what I expected will probably happen is we'll.

G

See you know parcel a and d come in or a parcel a c and d come in and then b will.

G

Come in sometime later- or you know, some combination thereof, so it just kind of.

G

Depends on them and their schedule and how they're going of you know, which.

G

Areas come forward at what time yeah each portion will have to come back and.

G

Final, okay, I'm just clarifying that they can do that that that's a way that to.

E

Manage it is to have them, come separate parcels, okay, all right, and then I do.

E

Have some questions a little bit more about the traffic study? Can you talk a.

E

Little bit more about that and what you learned or what that suggests for I'll.

L

Let adrienne 2000c is the expert you.

M

I could evening adrienne read with aztec engineering group. What was in your.

M

Report is an update of the last study we did for this, and so all that this study.

M

Does is update the numbers to reflect number of bedrooms that sort of stuff.

M

The changes to the site in the report, we did not apply any reduction, which is any.

M

More commonly done with student oriented housing had we done that the.

M

Recommendations don't really change due to the sort of the baseline volume of.

M

Traffic on both arlington road and 17th street- and I know craig probably has.

M

More questions, but does that answer well yeah? I see how why you're responding the.

E

Way, you are so it essentially even with the changes to the site plan. It didn't.

E

Alter anything in your initial recommendation, I guess maybe I'm asking.

E

Just maybe a little bit more clarification about any concerns that.

E

This suggests about space. I don't know if there's I don't know if there's.

E

Anything else that you're concerned about, I concern. No, I mean the the the.

M

Result would indicate that the delay in entering and leaving the site during.

M

Peak hours is at a certain level of service, which is just a measure of delay.

M

And I think the worst case is a level of service ii, which is a 45 second wait or.

K

Something there abouts, so it ends up.

M

Being a little bit of a delay during peak times too, and from this site, and as.

M

I stated before the result of that is mostly due to existing or projected.

M

Traffic conditions on 17th street in arlington road. So even if we had taken.

M

Even a you know, a larger reduction. It would still result in the same condition.

M

To and from the site, okay, thank you so jillian, just kind of follow up a little.

C

On that, I'm saying you know, the petitioners have submitted a traffic studies showing a you know, a certain level or recommendation of design for.

G

17Th street we're still not comfortable with all of that information. In that.

G

Recommendation but we want to study it a little bit more so we'll be making a.

G

Recommendation or an analyzation of that when they come forward for final plan.

G

Approval so we're not. You know, as I mentioned, the staff report, we're not.

G

We're not giving any approvals tonight for any changes to 17th street we're not.

G

Making any recommendations at this time for changes to 17th street and we'll.

G

Continue to evaluate that and have a better grasp of that when it comes back.

G

For final plan approval, thank you excellent. Okay, any other questions. My.

A

Left or my right a couple, quick questions for staff. Can you maybe just.

A

Give us a little sense of what the city's plan might be for lotting no. At.

C

This time you know we wanted to give maximum flexibility for how those might.

G

Be best used, so that's why we recommended that they incorporate the.

G

Our four district standards that allow for detached units attached.

G

Single-Family and you know to some degree the plexes just to kind of give.

G

Us the maximum flexibility, so no at this point haven't really been given much direction of how we see those being used.

G

Or developed you know, this is a kind of a unique blessing that we have and so.

G

We're not really quite sure how to best use that yet so we'll just kind of have.

G

This in our pocket and see what we can come up with, but I mean almost certainly.

A

These will be developed as single-family homes.

G

It'll, be it will be housing of some type. Yes, you know whether it's all.

G

Single-Family or a mix of single-family and attached single-family, you know I.

G

Think the the administration just wanted to leave as much on the table as.

G

Possible for flexibility, so they would be what potentially could be in the.

A

Future lots offered for sale, yes or lots that the city develops and then offers.

A

For sale or for rent, I mean all of those would be. I doubt that we would probably.

G

Be long-term landlords in this situation, but you know I can't say definitively.

G

Okay, but all of those things would be possible within the structure of this.

A

The agreement could be yes and then just a quick clarification on the the shuttle.

A

You mentioned that that shuttle is going to go from this, this location to campus.

A

Will it have other scheduled stops on the route as well, or will it be just a.

A

Point-To-Point shuttle.

C

I'm gonna, let's petitioner, try to answer that.

L

So one of the route that we received from loom a offers, the following stops.

L

So I used stadiums via wells library, the musical arts center, the last school, the.

L

Downtown transit center and then a stop that just reads: downtown okay, so it.

A

Would at least stop at the transit center and and tie into other routes.

A

That way, okay, good! Thank you all right! That's all! I have any other questions if.

A

There are no further questions. I think it's time for a motion. Public comment. Oh.

A

Thank you. Is there anyone from the public who.

A

Would like to speak to pewdie three 6-1, nine, all right, seeing none.

A

We're back to the commission, and it would be time for emotion. I move that we.

I

Approve pud 36:19 with the recommendations of the staff. Second, so.

A

The motion is that we approve pud three six, one: nine, with the seven conditions.

A

As outlined on in the staff presentation, there were only six in the in the packet.

A

So we're is that correct. Your motion is, with the seven conditions of approval in.

A

The presentation all right- and we have a second yes, all right.

A

Any final comment all right and I think we are ready for the roll.

B

Coin? Yes, whistler! Yes, saint john, yes, burrell, yes, kate! Yes, jean.

B

Cuyler, yes, kenzie, yes, sandburg! Yes,.

A

All right, so that is approved. Congratulations! Thank you all that is.

A

Our final petition on the agenda tonight, so our business is concluded and we are.

A

D