►
From YouTube: Bloomington Redevelopment Commission, November 21, 2022
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Good
evening,
everyone
welcome
to
the
Redevelopment
Commission
meeting
on
November
21st
2022.
First
item
of
business
is
roll
call.
A
Canarni
here
next
item
is
reading
of
the
minutes
for
November
7th
2022..
If
Commissioners
have
any
questions
or
comments,
if
not
I'll
entertain
a
motion.
C
A
D
A
All
right,
thank
you.
Is
there
a
legal
report.
A
New
business,
we
have
resolution
22-88
approval
of
lease
for
4th
Street
Garage
commercial
office
space
who
would
like
to
speak
regarding
this
I.
E
Can
Madam
president
a
little
bit
so
we
had
this
on
the
agenda
last
time.
As
you
recall,
we
had
to
pull
it
from
the
agenda.
Just
in
terms
of
there
were
some
details,
so
one
of
those
details
just
to
update
you.
So
this
is
for
the
Fourth
Street
Garage
first
floor
space.
There
would
be
two
bays
that
would
be
occupied
by
Hoosier
networks,
LLC,
which
is
operating
the
fiber
Network
that
you
all
had
approved
as
part
of
the
meridium
Tiff
District
spider
Tiff,
as
you
recall,
so
they
wanted
to
have
an
indiana-based
headquarters.
E
It
was
just
called
Hoosier
networks,
LLC
or
Hoosier
fiber
networks
as
their
commercial
name.
They
thought
that
this
downtown
location
would
be
the
perfect
location
for
their
business
to
be
set
up,
so
they
would
be
renting
two
bays
which
this
is
one
of
the
changes
from
last
time,
just
fys
from
2400
square
feet,
it's
actually
2436
square
feet
for
those
two
bays
split
up,
there's
a
little
bit
more
interior
space
than
we
thought
there
would
be.
The
initial
term
is
for
a
five-year
lease.
E
E
The
tenant
Improvement
allowance
from
the
RDC
everything
else
would
be
on
their
dime
and
also
in
the
meantime,
they
would
have
nine
months
to
perform
their
build
out,
but
in
the
meantime,
as
they
operate
in
Bloomington,
they
would
also
occupy
some
space
in
College
Square,
which
is
owned
by
you
as
a
temporary
on
a
temporary
basis.
So
we
had
vacant
office
space
in
that
that
space
so
that
they
would
occupy
and
that
there's
a
rent
rental
rate
for
that
I'm.
Happy
to
answer
any
other
questions
that
the
the
RDC
has
on.
B
C
Sarah
Bowie
danceman
I
motion
to
approve
resolution,
22-88.
I.
A
E
This
I
believe
I'm
also
on
the
hook
for
this
particular
Amendment
as
well.
So,
as
you
all
recall,
we
entered
into
a
purchase
agreement,
attended
a
purchase
agreement
for
the
CFC
portion
of
the
showers
building
to
look
at
turning
that
into
a
space
for
our
Police
Headquarters
and
also
fire
Administration
as
well.
The
original
purchase
price
for
that
was
1,
9.25
million
for
that
space,
and
we
entered
into
the
due
diligence
period
beginning
basically,
late
summer,
we
extended
that
due
diligence
period
by
agreement
into
November
we've
received
most
of
the
reports.
E
E
So
what
this
does
is.
This
would
approve
an
amendment
to
the
purchase
agreement
to
reflect
those
two
additional
terms
as
we've
discussed
in
the
past.
This
still
needs
to
be
approved
by
city
council.
So
the
next
step
is
that
we
would
take
this
to
city
council,
along
with
financing
of
potential
Renovations
the
purchase
and
the
renovations
of
the
area,
to
use
it
as
a
police
headquarters
to
city
council
for
their
review
and
potential
approval.
We
have
until
January
31st
under
the
purchase
agreement
to
secure
financing
for
this
renovation.
E
So
if
city
council,
for
some
reason
were
not
to
approve
it,
that
would
cancel
the
purchase
agreement,
we
would
have
to
cancel
the
sale
and
we
would
kind
of
come
back
to
you
for
further
options.
If
they
do
approach,
prove
it,
they
would
be
issuing
those
bonds
directly
because
those
will
be
paid
for
out
of
revenue
from
the
newly
passed
lit
and
specifically
that
that
what
is
approved
for
both
Economic
Development
and
Public
Safety,
so
that
wouldn't
be
necessarily
an
RDC
Bond
or
a
tiff
Bond.
It
comes
out
of
a
different
Revenue
source.
A
All
right
any
questions
regarding
resolution,
22-92.
B
A
D
To
that
one
commission
members,
starting
on
page
15
of
your
packet,
is
resolution
2293..
It
is
followed
by
a
summary
document
that
gives
you
sort
of
Direction
on
how
we
went
about
this.
Just
to
recap.
Earlier
this
year
we
saw
ourselves
quite
honestly.
Late
last
year
we
started
to
see
ourselves
see
rehab
projects
that
were
exceeding
the
traditional
cap,
which
requires
your
approval.
D
When
that
happens,
we
actually
have
one
tonight,
but
we
thought
it
was
time
to
look
at
the
amounts
that
are
allocated
to
those
individual
projects
and
what
they
are
so
forth
and
to
give
you
some
further
background
HUD.
So
the
the
city
of
Bloomington
is
a
participating
jurisdiction
for
head,
as
you
know,
which
allows
us
some
flexibility
to
set
our
own
program
guidelines
as
long
as
they
are
in
compliance
with
larger
HUD
guidelines.
So
we
create
our
home
Rehabilitation
programming
specific,
that
is
a
large
home
Rehabilitation
programming
under
the
home
program.
D
The
home
investment
Partnerships
program
is
the
large
larger
program,
and
then
we
create
our
programs
individually.
So
we
have
some
discretion
over
what
we
do
with
those,
and
so
the
department
has
had
a
number
of
those
programs
over
the
year.
There
are
five
that
we
traditionally
would
use.
There
are
three
that
we
use
mostly
the
last
two
we
haven't
used
in
quite
a
while
that
I
know
of,
and
so
tonight
we're
recommending
three
changes.
Some
changes
to
three
of
those
programs
and
the
first
of
which
is
the
owner
occupied
rehab
program.
D
We're
recommending
the
cap
be
raised
from
thirty
eight
thousand
five
hundred
to
fifty
thousand
for
individual
projects
for
the
Emergency
home
repair
program.
It's
currently
7
500
for
an
owner
occupied
structure.
We
recommend
raising
that
to
ten
thousand
for
an
owner
occupied
structure
for
manufacturer
mobile
homes.
It's
3500.
We
recommend
raising
that
to
five
thousand
and
then
a
lifetime
cap.
D
We
recommend
raising
for
the
recommend,
raising
to
twenty
thousand
dollars
for
an
owner,
occupied
structure,
sort
of
a
site
built
home
and
then
no
change
for
the
lifetime
cap
for
a
manufacturer,
mobile
home
and
then
for
housing,
modifications
for
accessible
living,
which
allows
for
adjustments
to
houses
for
those
with
accessibility
needs,
and
we
have
a
9
500
cap,
which
we
recommend
raising
to
twelve
thousand
five
hundred
and
then
for
non-profits.
This
does
allow
for
non-profit
facilities
to
apply
for
funds
to
make
modifications
to
their
facilities
with
a
match
a
full
match.
D
We
recommend
raising
that
to
five
thousand
dollars
with
a
full
match
required
there.
So
those
are
the
dollar
amount
change
recommendations
that
we
have.
We
also
have
the
last
section
of
starting
on
page
four
of
your
supplemental
sheet
there
and
we
can
handle
this.
How
you
would
like
we
I
have
laid
out
a
number
of
subject
items
that
I
recommend.
We
come
up
with
language
for
for
the
guidelines.
D
We
think
that
we
need
to
put
in
there
so
the
first
of
which-
and
we
talked
about
this
at
the
beginning-
is
how
often
would
we
reevaluate
these
programs,
otherwise,
as
needed
we're
recommending
every
two
years
that
we've
sort
of
reassess
these
and
say
what
other
changes
do
we
need
to
make
barring
any
other
program,
specific
changes
we
need
to
make
based
on
HUD
guidelines.
D
We
know
that
we
just
dealt
with
an
issue
of
temporary
relocation,
so
we
think
we
need
to
sort
of
State
in
there.
How
we
tackle
that.
It's
not
something
hand
is,
quite
frankly,
built
to
do
to
rehouse
people
ourselves,
their
programs
in
in
the
community
that
help
people
who
are
at
risk
of
homelessness.
D
But
we
need
to
be
very
mindful
of
our
practices
in
doing
that,
and
there
are
programs
set
up
to
do
that
here
and
there
so
to
speak,
as
can
be
done,
but
we
are
not
built
from
the
staff
capacity
into
re-house
people
temporarily.
This
is
a
bit
of
an
anomaly,
so
we
think
we
need
to
put
something
in
there.
In
addition,
if
things
involves
permanent
rehousing,
we
have
to
follow
the
uniform
relocation
act.
We
have
pretty
good
comfort
about
where
our
bid
language
is
through
City
procurement
processes
and
our
programs.
D
D
We
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
moving
with
the
modular
versus
manufacturer
versus
mobile,
which
we
talked
about
at
the
last
meeting,
and
so
we
want
to
be
sensitive
to
that,
making
sure
that
the
correct
terminology
is
adapted
as
well
as,
quite
frankly,
how
we
discuss
disability
versus
accessibility,
I
think
that
language
is
evolving
and
I
want
to
be
making
sure
we're
doing
that
as
well.
So
I
think
that's
important.
The
one
point
I'll
make-
and
this
is
one
again
it's.
D
We
came
up
with
a
situation
recently
where
we
had
a
an
appliance
that
needed
purchasing
and
it
was
350,
and
how
do
we
tackle
that
can
the
hand
director
if
something's,
under
a
certain
amount
like
a
thousand
dollars.
It
wasn't
part
of
the
change
order
or
something
approved
by
the
RDC.
Can
the
young
director
have
discretion
to
do
that,
and
that
is
a
request?
D
I
guess
we
don't
have
to
address
it
tonight,
but
I
do
think
it's
important
from
a
practical
sense
when
a
Project's
moving
forward
is
there
a
certain
threshold
where
the
hand
director
could,
as
long
as
it
complies
with
HUD
guidelines,
could
the
hand
director
authorize
something
like
that.
So
these
our
recommendation
has
come
up
with
language.
We
can
revisit
it
or
you
approve
the
outline
and
we
can
move
forward
that
way.
So
we
can
also
bring
it
back
to
a
future
meeting.
So
that
summarizes
the
recommendations.
F
B
B
From
ten
thousand
twenty
thousand
or
whatever,
but
in
this
section
the
record
other
recommended
program
changes
it's
more
here
are
the
categories
that
we
think
need
changes,
but
we're
not
doing
them
right
now,
we're
not
being
specific
yet
very.
B
D
B
Oh
yeah,
we
we
trust
you
so
yeah.
Those
are
good
categories
to
make
changes
and
go
make
them.
D
Yeah
or
or
would
you
like
to
see
the
specific
language?
Okay,
so
these
are
as
we
sort
of
move
along
and
especially
this
latest
one
we
that
you
approved
a
couple
of
weeks
ago.
We
just
realized.
There
are
some
things
that
we
need
to
tweak
I
think
with
the
programs
that
are
important,
so
they
don't
run
in
conflict
with
HUD
guidelines
as
long
as
they're
in
so
it's
sort
of
a
local
discretion,
I
guess
and
I,
don't
know
how
much
you
wanted
to
take
on
tonight.
So.
B
C
First
is
the
last
bullet
point
recommendation
for
other
recommended
program.
Changes
is
about
changing
like
basically,
one
of
the
recommendations
is
to
move
basically
put
stick
belt
and
manufactured
homes
into
the
same
category
and
put
Mobile
on
its
own,
but
at
the,
but
also
above
in
terms
of
the
actual
caps
there's
caps
for
for
their
specific
caps
for
manufacturer,
slash
mobile
homes,
so
I'm
confused
as
to
how
these
relate
like.
So
would
this
mean
actually
that
everything
that
says
manufactured
versus,
like
slash
mobile
home
is
actually
going
forward?
C
D
Yeah,
that's
a
great
question.
We
would
not
recommend
any
language
changes
on
the
Caps
right
now
they
would
still
be
in
the
same
category.
The
issue
is
the
language.
The
industry.
Language
is
changing
on
how
someone's
considers
Manufacturing
Housing
I
mean
there's
Hud's
definition
of
it.
So
all
we
need
to
do
is
make
sure
that
those
get
all
aligns
together.
We
wouldn't
recommend
changing
the
categories,
because
the
idea
is
that
for
a
site
built
home,
it's
one
category
for
a
manufactured
or
mobile
home,
it's
another.
D
So
we
don't
want
to
confuse
you
that
way,
but
we
need
to
make
sure
that
we're
sort
of
keeping
up
the
language
if
you
will
and
because
these
were
done.
The
last
update
to
these
was
in
2018
and
then
2013
before
that
I
think.
So
we
want
to
make
sure
that
as
we
move
that
language
is
moving
with
us,
so
that's
the
idea
there
tonight.
C
F
C
Not
for
the
rental
units
or
manufactured
mobile
homes,
and
could
you
explain
why
why
you
chose
that?
Because,
from
my
vantage
point,
the
people
that
would
most
need
help
with
this
issue
are
people
that
are
probably
renting
so
it.
Why
is
it
the
case
that,
if
someone's
in
their
like
owns
their
home,
that
they
need
more
money
for
these
modifications,
but
we
don't,
but
at
the
same
time
we
don't
need
to
increase
the
cap
for
people
who
are
renting
sure.
D
The
there's
a
rationale
there
is
that
for
three
thousand
dollar
parental
unit,
if
it's
a
registered
rental
in
town,
there
are
other
things
that
landlord
to
be
responsible
for
or
if
it's
a
per
unit.
If
it's
a
single
family
unit,
if
that
makes
sense,
there
could
be
a
per
unit
depending
on
how
what
the
unit
is.
D
So
it
doesn't
come
from
sort
of
raising
that
writ
large
because
it
could
be
in
a
that
building
with
a
number
of
units
or
not
so
I,
think
you're
sort
of
trying
to
I
don't
want
to
broaden
it
too
much,
because
when
you're
looking
at
per
three
thousand
dollar
per
rental
unit
is
a
door
widening
with
newer
housing.
Some
of
that's
already
in
place
just
didn't
feel
that
we
had
a
good
reference
point
for
what
type
of
rental
unit
is.
So
my
thought
was.
D
We
would
just
come
back
if
there
was
a
rental
okay,
we
would
come
back
to
you
if
there
was
an
increase,
but
we're
just
kind
of
it's
not
as
precise,
because
you
have
a
housing
that's
been
built
for
those
with
accessibility
needs.
There
might
be
a
ramp
in
a
more
commercialized
rental
unit
versus
a
single
family
home.
It's
kind
of
it's.
C
D
H
Yeah
when
like
when
it
comes
to
that,
when
you're
talking
about
building
just
a
simple
brand,
okay,
you
have
to
go
by
the
Ada
guidelines
with
the
state
outlines,
which
is
you
can
only
go
one
inch
for
every
12
inches
that
you
put
7912
world.
So
if
you
had
a
40
inch
drop
from
the
door
to
the
Grave,
that
means
you
have
to
have
40
feet
of
rain,
to
meet
that
and
and
to
do
that
it
just
it's
virtually
impossible
to
do
for
less
than
ten
thousand
dollars.
A
I
I
just
had
a
question
on
the
discretionary
spend
that
you
talked
about
what
would
be
an
example
of
something
that
wouldn't
have
already
been
part
of
a
project
scope
that
would
come
up.
You
mentioned
you
had
to
buy
a
stove
or
whatnot,
but
wouldn't
that
have
already
been
included
in
the
the
scope
of
a
specific
project.
Hopefully.
D
But
things
get
missed
or
things
which
isn't
a
great
professionals
that
we
miss
stuff,
but
we
do
and
things
come
up
and
oh,
we,
you
know,
got
this
far
and
turns
out.
The
dishwasher
doesn't
work
anymore.
What
if
we
had
to
I
just
sort
of
authorize,
the
per
the
the
dishwasher
was
already
in
the
scope
of
work,
but
there
was
a
there
was
confusion
about
who
could
replace
the
dishwasher,
and
so
we
went
through
I
found
some
HUD
regulations
that
authorized
was
a
dishwasher,
a
luxury
item
or
not,
and
so
I
found
out
hub
regulation.
D
I
said
No.
In
fact,
it
is
not
a
luxury
item.
It's
fixed.
It's
not
going
to
go
anywhere
because
it's
going
to
be
built
into
the
cabinet,
it
will
help
sustain
the
marketability
of
the
home,
which
is
a
HUD
regulation,
so
I
sort
of
went
through
all
this
rationale
for
a
350,
dishwasher
and
thought.
Okay.
Are
we
going
to
need
there's
going
to
be
something
if
something
pops
up?
Do
we
need
to
take
it
back
to
the
rec?
How
do
we?
How
do
we
handle
that
to
keep
the
project
moving
because.
E
D
Thought,
if
we're
in
a
position
of
a
project
needing
to
get
done
in
weather
situations
or
where
the
resident
has
to
leave
they're,
not
going
to
be
in
or
out
of
their
house
based
on
the
dishwasher.
But
it's
an
example
of
something
that
could
stall
a
project.
And
how
do
we
keep
the
project
moving
to
get
the.
B
A
F
B
A
So
the
the
other
point
that
I
would
make
is,
you
know
I
feel
like
this
is
a
every
two-year
process
which
is
appropriate,
but
it
seems
appropriate
to
recommend
specific
changes
to
the
language
and
have
that
reviewed,
as
opposed
to
just
broad
categories
that
aren't
necessarily
reviewed,
and
we
may
not
know
what
that
language
is.
You
know
going
forward.
I
would
prefer
something
more
specific.
Okay,.
B
C
A
I
would
say-
or
we
could
approved
part
of
the
request
to
change,
because
I
think
the
dollar
amounts
are
really
straightforward.
You
know,
from
my
perspective,
a
7
500
project
five
years
ago,
as
a
ten
thousand
dollar
project
today,
so
inflationary
concerns
makes
makes
those
numbers
you
know,
need
to
be
adjusted
so
I
I
feel
comfortable
adjusting
those,
but
want
more
specifics.
On
the
other
changes
requested.
We.
E
Could
certainly
do
that
I
would
just
say:
whoever
makes
the
motion
to
approve
this
resolution
just
make
a
motion
to
approve,
as
amended,
exhibit
a
as
amended
per
the
discussion
to
take
out
other
recommended
program
changes,
so
those
are
not
explicitly
approved
that
those
should
come
back
to
the
RDC
and
but
everything
else
at
exhibit
a
would
be
approved.
Since
those
are
the
specific
numbers
and
then
we
would
bring
back
the
program
guidelines
with
the
red
line
changes
for
those
specific
changes.
E
Otherwise
you
could
also,
if
you
wanted
to
do
it
the
other
way.
The
way
to
do
that
would
be
to
make
a
motion
to
postpone
consideration
of
this
resolution
until
the
next
meeting.
B
C
Okay,
all
right.
Well
then,
Sarah
Bauer
legansman
I
motion
to
approve
resolution
22-93,
as
amended
per
our
discussions
today,
such
that
exhibit
a
is
approved,
accepting
everything
underneath
other
recommended
program
changes,
and
instead
those
changes
will
be
discussed
at
a
later
date.
A
April
second
motion:
all
right:
we
have
a
first
and
a
second
all
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye
all
right
resolution,
as
amended
passes
next
item
of
business
is
resolution
22-94
to
increase
funding
for
an
emergency
home
repair
project
at
4214,
West
lilac.
We
would
like
to
speak
to
us
regarding
I'll.
D
Speak
to
this
other
device
from
Mr
Collins
to
chime
in
as
well
so,
but
ironically,
this
one
goes
above
the
cap
that
you
just
approved
to
me
higher,
but
we
did
talk
about
this.
This
is
a
this
is
a
mobile
home
rehab
the
resident
is
needs,
breathing
assistance,
and
so
replacing
the
floor
is
what's
causing
the
higher
increase
here,
moving
to
a
solid
surface
floor
instead
of
a
carpet
which
will
help
the
resident
with
mobility
and
things
like
that
and
I
defer
to
Mr
Collins,
say
anything
else
about
this
yeah
this.
E
H
Of
window
components
of
this
and
now
there's
the
carpeting,
the
carpeting,
that's.
E
H
The
home
today
is
just
it's
worn
out
and
it's
a
trip
Hazard
everywhere
you
go,
and
this
woman
is
in
a
walker,
getting
ready
to
go
into
a
wheelchair
and,
as
you
know,
carpet
for
the
floors
are
not
advantageous
to
someone
getting
around
or
in
a
wheelchair
or
something
like
that,
so
we
figured
plus
you
know
she
has
a
breathing
issue.
She
has
breathing
machines.
H
She
has
on
oxygen
all
the
time,
so
it'd
be
far
better
to
put
a
hard
surface
floor
in
there
like
a
vinyl
floor
that
is
easily
clean
and
readily
you
can
see
the
dirt.
You
can
clean
it
up
quickly
throughout
there
her
having
to
breathe
all
the
sin
included
in
this
total
amount
is
another
amount
to
clean
all
the
air
ducts
in
the
house.
We
fixed
our
furnace
already.
H
So
that's
that's
working
just
fine,
but
it's
been
12
years,
since
her
deaths
have
been
cleaned
so
you're
recirculating,
all
that
dirt
and
dust,
and
so
we're
going
to
clean
her
hair
dust
as
well.
So
and
that's
reason
for
the
improves
so
you're
looking
at
you
know:
7
900,
just
for
the
flooring,
the
other
IO
Savage
until
it
comes
out
to
the
94.
C
Okay,
so
just
as
a
plant
clarification
there's,
the
exhibits
included
are
just
for
the
flooring
and
not
for
the
other.
C
E
Like
it
looks
like
there's
a
so
there's
a
handwritten
option,
that's
added
to
the
to
the
invoice
on
the
exhibit
that
looks
like
it
takes
it
up
to
the
94.
So
what
I
see
there
is
that
it
says
options
B
to
add,
vinyl
plank
received
and
that
it's
a
it's
just
hand
written
so.
G
H
G
B
Just
a
I
suspect,
a
typo
that
we
were
talking
about
Lilac
Lane,
but
in
the
on
the
first
page
of
the
resolution
right
above
Bloomington
route,
the
Redevelopment
commission
says
the
funding
amount
for
EHR
project
at
1017,
West
House
Street,
with
the
same
amount.
So
my
suspiciousness
is
a
yeah
just
a
typo.
E
A
So
so
I
would
follow
up
on
the
question
that
was
posed
earlier
regarding
it
sounds
like
some
things
have
already
been
done
and
paid
for
under
the
cap.
Correct.
So
really
all
we're
looking
to
approve
is
the
amount
that
takes
us
over
the
cap.
C
F
E
Just
as
yes,
commissioner
Hutton
pointed
out,
because
the
operative
phrase
in
the
resolution
list-
1017
West,
Howe
Street-
is
the
address.
This
will
also
need
to
be
amended
to
be
4214
West,
Lilac
Lane,
so
whatever
you
approve
will
have
to
be
amended.
B
So
Deborah
and
I
make
a
motion
to
accept
or
approve
resolution
22
knife
or
with
the
change
of
address
in
the
appropriate
line.
A
A
Next
resolution
is
resolution:
22-95.
A
G
Electrical
contractors
for
services
on
Hopewell
pay,
20
East
project.
These
Services
include
providing
power
to
safety
positions,
outdoor
lights,
Sandstone
parking
area.
These
flights
were
previously
powered
from
how
you
helped
buildings
that
were
on
the
site,
but
with
those
buildings,
mountains,
the
lights
in
the
filter,
power
and
these
lights
are
temporary
until
the
new
parking
areas
for
Center
Stone
are
constructed
next
year.
Services
also
include
installation
of.
E
G
New
concrete
pad
conduit
and
wiring
for
the
new
Center
Stone
Transformer
that
will
be
installed
by
Duke
Energy.
A
contractor
will
coordinate
with
Duke
Energy
on
the
transfer
of
power
to
the
new
Transformer.
The
relocation
of
the
Transformer
is
necessary
for
the
infrastructure
project.
The
agreements
were
not
to
exceed
amount
of
73
550.
G
The
contractor
has
expressed
that
they
submit
a
disk
vote
for
the
specifications
we've
provided,
but
they
have
an
idea
on
how
they
could
do
the
work
for
a
lesser
amount.
So
we'll
discuss
that
and
if
the
contract
is
approved,
work
would
take
place
as
soon
as
possible
solidity.
The
city
solicited
three
contractors
for
quotes
for
this
work.
The
two
other
contractors
responded.
They
were
too
busy
at
this
time
to
supply
a
quote.
So
we
have
the
one
quote
from
Cassidy.
You
can
take
any
questions
you
may
have.
B
G
E
C
G
So
we
had
put
a
coil
packet
together,
we
emailed
that
packet
to
three
contractors
during
the
process
to
the
contractors
emailed
back,
stating
that
they
were
not
going
to
provide
a
quote.
They
did
not
do
that
until
the
end
of
last
week,
so
it
was
a
little
late
at
that
point
to
try
to
find
more
quarters.
C
G
C
G
E
That's
correct,
yeah,
there's
a
threshold
amount
for
the
types
of
bidding,
so
whether
you're
able
to
solicit
quotes
directly
via
email
versus
put
out
a
formal
request
for
proposals
this
Falls
below
that
amount.
So
it's
subject
to
the
quoting:
it's
not
limited
to
three.
You
could
of
course
contact
as
many
as
you
want,
but
it's
a
minimum
of
three
non-responses
like
this
are
still
counted
for
that
requirement.
E
So
if,
if
somebody
does
respond
and
say
I
don't
want
to
quote,
we
count
that
as
just
a
negative
response,
but
it
still
qualifies
under
the
statute
for
right.
C
E
It's
not
there's
not
it's
not
a
harm.
I
mean
you.
You
can
speak
to
this
better,
but
in
terms
of
just
what
we
see
practically
is
so
there's
a
lot
more
requirements,
a
lot,
a
lot
more
expensive
to
put
it
out.
If
you
follow
all
the
statutory
requirements
for
updating,
so
you
have
to
you
have
to
notice
it
for
a
certain
amount
of
time
it
has
to
it
stays
open
longer.
Then,
there's
formal
requirements
in
terms
of
the
way
you're
going
to
contract
that
out.
E
So
typically,
what
you'll
try
to
use
the
quotes
for
is,
if
you
do
kind
of
what
you
alluded
to
before,
commissioner,
which
is,
if
you
want
it
to
be
a
little
bit
faster,
a
little
bit
more
streamlined,
and
you
feel
very
confident
that
the
responses
you're
going
to
get
are
are
pretty
much
in
line
with
what
you
would
get
for
for
an
open
quote.
Any.
E
G
Also
with
the
lighting
not
working
this
time,
Center
Stone
has
security
safety
issues
for
their
employees,
so
they
would
like
to
see
address
as
soon
as
possible.
So
we
were
trying
to
get
us
done
as
quickly
as
possible.
C
A
Any
any
public
comment.
A
Have
a
first
and
the
second
all
in
favor
signify
by
saying
I
resolution
passes
all
right.
Is
there
any
General
business
discussion
tonight
that
we
need
to
have.
E
You
just
know
the
word
of
concern
for
our
capacity
from
the
passing
of
his
mother.
I
know
that
we
all
knew
that
in
just
sent
our
deep
consultances
from
City
staff
and
I'm
sure
the
Redevelopment
commission
to
him
and
his
family.