►
From YouTube: Bloomington Redevelopment Commission, January 19, 2021
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
503,
let's
start
with
the
roll
call
commissioner's
present,
I'm
don
griffin,
chair.
A
Okay,
next,
let's
have
a
reading
of
the
minutes.
B
A
Claims
register
for
now,
but
I
don't
have
the
date
there.
What's
the
date.
A
A
A
Carries
next
we'll
have
reports
of
the
officers
and
committees?
Is
there
a
director's
report
today.
H
To
the
two
of
you,
so
they
will
be
alternating
their
the
the
representation
of
the
mccsc.
H
H
H
H
I
think
many
of
you
have
met
and
prior
redevelopment
commission
meaning
meetings.
A
I
A
prior
resolution
and
just
take
a
voice
vote
on
a
change
there
regarding
the
sale
of
1100.
C
Okay,
is
there
a
treasure's
report,
we
have
a
hospital
update
for
you.
I
was
gonna
suggest.
E
Don
that,
if
alex
had
anything
he
wanted
to
do,
he
could
say
that
and
then
we'll
jump
into.
F
To
I'm
going
to
skip
because
the
stuff
I
have
is
in
the
agenda,
so
we
can
go
straight
to
the.
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
The
end
of
our
brief
presentation,
so
is
just
described.
The
area
that
we're
talking
about
is.
F
Basically
gathers
the
parcels
that
that
we're
considering
and
if
you
go
to
the.
F
Next
page,
what
we
did
first,
because
this
will
be
underlying
you
know
some
of
the.
F
F
The
same
area,
one
slightly
lower
than
the
other,
so
the
the
the
one
up
top
is
184.6
million
dollars.
F
F
Is
the
unit
count
and
the
size
of
multi-family
both
affordable
and
and
market
rate
units.
F
Over
the
over
the
development
period
that
again
could
take
as
much
as
as
a
decade
and
then.
F
I
can
maybe
ask
jeff
to
quickly
talk
about
the
return
on
investment
number
over
the
right
side.
F
Of
the
chart
so
jeff,
if
you
can
take
us
through
that
yeah,
essentially,
we
would
anything
that.
E
Grows
above
the
base,
which
this
would
all
be,
will
get
approximately
90
cents
on
the
investment
of.
E
We'll
end
up
around
in
today's
dollars,
obviously
it'll
be
a
phased
in
investment,
but
that,
on
a.
D
Thanks
alex
so
as
as
mick
had
pointed
out
a
moment
ago,
the
this
is
pulled
directly
from
the.
D
Bottom
of
the
the
graphic
to
show
you
from
exactly
where
it
comes
from
in
the
report.
But.
D
On
the
optional
piece,
we
think
that
that
may
be
have
a
lot
of
interactivity
with.
D
This
sort
of
be
the
the
forward-looking
repeated
map
or
or
methodology,
as
we.
D
D
D
D
D
Needs
to
be
reviewed
formally
reviewed
against
what
the
redevelopment
demands
will
look
like.
D
D
Will
absolutely
bring
those
to
bear,
but
we
think
moving
in
this
phase.
One
gives
us
a
really.
D
Utilities
as
a
reference,
once
we've
cleared
that
we
look
at
the
planning
review
against
the.
D
D
That
be
strictly
infrastructure
or
eventually
the
the
actual
inhabited
improvements.
So
that's.
D
D
D
D
D
D
Mick
brought
up
so
we're
gonna
focus
on
them,
each
through
the
next
few
slides
so
phase.
One.
D
Of
the
civil
infrastructure,
this
is
a
timeline
put
together.
You
can
see
that
that
these
are
the.
D
Releasing
an
rfi
rfq
for
design
engineering.
I've
talked
to
andrew
seymour
he's
the
he's.
D
D
D
The
award
dates
on
here
then
there
is
the
summer.
I
call
it
the
bid
specific
performance.
D
That's
a
great
question.
I
think
I
would
call
it
the
same
as
what's
been
done.
D
That
is
simply
a
step
that
would
be
completed
any
time
we're
looking
at.
D
D
B
D
Okay,
moving
along
here
is
what
we're
seeing
this
is
from
the
shrewsbury
report.
They
were.
D
D
And
design
work
that
also,
once
you
take
this.
Obviously
this
work
to
bid
you
will.
D
See
the
competitive
nature
of
the
marketplace
reveal
itself
and
and
we're
hoping
that
then.
D
Even
less,
but
that
would
be
determined
at
the
actual
construction
bid
phase.
B
Can
you
maybe
you
can
or
can't
speak
to
this,
but
the
bid
process
for
the
work
who.
B
B
In
that
space,
I
think
it'd
be,
I
think,
we'd
be
frankly
crazy,
not
to
there's
so
much.
D
D
But
being
shallow,
so
many
fundamentals
that
that
you
would
not.
You
certainly
wouldn't
want.
D
The
way
we've
done
bids
in
the
past,
they
would
be
open
public
bids.
They
would
be
with
coordinated.
D
Would
be
a
the
city's
engineer?
City
engineering
would
be
the
owner
of
this
rfp,
but
we're
still.
D
D
E
As
far
as
the
actual
on
this
infrastructure
that
would
be
considered
a
public
work
project.
E
And
it's
regulated
by
state
statute,
and
it
would
be
a
public
bid
that
would
be
presented
with.
E
E
D
Okay
well
jeff:
here
we
are:
let's
talk
about
the
project
review
form
refresh.
E
Yeah
just
very
quickly,
we
came
to
you
with
a
10
million
dollar
authorization
through.
E
Through
that
process,
right
now
leaving
us
just
under
1.2
million
dollars,
we
estimate
that
the.
E
Phase
one
design
will
be
1
million,
so
we
believe
we've
got
enough
authorized
right
now.
K
Question
do
a
quick
question.
So
if
we
say
this
is
just
extrapolating
but.
E
We
look
at
the
phases,
then,
yes,
you
would
get
a
revised
roi.
So
in
this
first
phase.
E
E
Sewer
storm
sewer,
sidewalks
street
improvements.
We
would
definitely
have
to
come
back
and.
E
E
As
anything
else,
we
might
have
available
on
the
overall
site,
you
know
as
far
as.
E
This
really
focuses
on
the
east
side
of
the
main
hospital
site
right
now.
Okay,
thanks.
D
K
J
J
J
J
D
I
think
somewhat
pursuant
to
that,
if
I,
if
it's
okay,
to
move
along
the
other
critical
work.
D
As
mick
said
to
kick
it
off
by
by
following
this
core
building
redevelopment
path
in
2021,.
D
You
know
how
we
come
out
of
the
gates
if
you
will
so
alex.
Why
don't
you
talk
a
little
bit
about.
F
You,
the
core
building,
as
you
may
recall,
is
attached
to
the
rest
of
the
hospital
and.
F
F
First
question:
is
you
know,
what
do
we
think
is
a
likely
future
use
of
that
building
in
a.
F
And
you
know,
frankly,
that
that's
not,
especially
in
this
day
and
age,
it's
not
as
appealing
as.
F
F
In
2021,
to
put
together
an
rfq
or
maybe
an
rfi,
and
to
put
that
under
the
marketplace
to
get
some.
F
F
Design
and
and
due
diligence
study
also
an
another
important
part
of
the
timing.
F
Is
low-income
housing,
tax
credits,
so
this
type
of
building
will.
F
Likely
require
that
kind
of
external
support,
and
that
happens
on
a
schedule.
So
if
you,
if.
F
You're
familiar
with
that,
it
can
be
pretty
competitive.
There's
been
some
change
actually.
F
In
the
regulation
for
some
some
litec
funding,
so
that
may
make
it
even
more
competitive.
F
So
that
we
can
have
a
go
no-go
decision
on
the
future
of
the
building
in
2022,
you
may
know
that.
F
The
building
is
currently
being
looked
at,
for
you
know
the
the
historic
preservation
and.
F
You
know
if,
if
in
the
end,
there's
no
viable
use
for
it
and
it
needs
to
be
taken
down
that
could.
F
Be
more
more
complicated
but
not
impossible,
but
historic
designation
actually
works
positively
for.
F
The
building
in
terms
of
it
helps
someone
applying
for
low-income
housing
tax
credits
on.
F
D
Here
we
go
so
this
is
just
a
side
by
side.
If
you
look
on
the
left,
that's
how
the.
F
And
then
on,
the
right
is
a
potential
future.
Look
at
that
building
where
the
the.
F
The
east
side
of
the
building
and
the
you
know
the
middle
section
exist
and
a
redevelopment
could.
F
Potentially
turn
what
you
know
currently
is
a
t
into
an
h,
so
you
could
imagine
an
addition.
F
Being
built
to
the
west
side
of
the
building,
which
would
help
in
its
in
construction
efficiencies,.
J
A
A
Shall
we,
the
next
item
of
business,
is
resolution
21-04.
A
Llc
for
the
trades
district
garage
who
would
like
to
speak
in
regards
to
this
resolution.
I
I
But
mr
bravo
has
created
an
excellent
art
design.
As
you
can
see,
it's
included
in
the.
I
Exhibits
to
the
contract,
it's
a
it's
kind
of
a
textured
3d
design.
That
also
includes
some.
I
Light
elements
that'll
shift
over
time
and
are
able
to
be
customized,
so
this
will
be
installed.
I
I
This
year
and
let
me
just
pull
up
the
agreement
really
quickly.
Forgive
me.
I
Yeah,
so
the
total
total
amount
is
75
000
for
this,
and
that
includes.
I
I
I
Bloomington
requires
on
public
works
projects
such
as
this
for
us
to
reserve
one
percent
to.
A
A
I
Good
for
that
we
talked
to
to
mr
bravo
about
making
sure
that
it's
covered,
so
that
the
the.
I
I
I
I
Lighting,
so
that
has
a
very
long
lifespan.
There
shouldn't
be
anything
more
than
the
cleaning
cost.
I
A
A
A
A
A
Architecture
interiors,
who
wants
to
speak
in
regards
to
this
resolution.
This
is
alex
crowley.
F
Economic,
sustainable
development-
I
can,
I
can
speak
to
it
so
just
to
remind
everybody
that
we
in.
F
That
grant
request
was
for
a
trades
district
technology
center
building
the
the
grant.
F
Request
I'm
going
to
round
numbers
here,
but
the
grant
request
was
roughly
for
six
million.
F
Dollars
and-
and
we
put
in
just
shy
of
two
million
dollars
and
we
submitted
it-
we
in.
F
Support
for
the
project
but
unable
to
fulfill
on
the
entirety
of
the
request
that
we
made.
F
In
terms
of
eda
funding,
so
they
came
back
and
they
have
not
fully
committed
to.
But
but
you.
F
Dollars
and
and
if
you
recall,
the
building
itself
is
essentially
what
we're
asking
for
funding.
F
Support
for
and
but
the
building
is
really
a
means
to
an
end
and
and
what
what
the
end
is
is.
F
The
commercialization
support
programming
that
would
that
would
happen
within
the
building.
F
So
the
exercise
that
we
are
undertaking
is
and
and
requesting
additional
funding
support.
F
F
Today,
in
this
resolution,
is
funding
support
for
really
two
two
parts
of
the
exercise
to
resubmit.
F
One
part
is
a
redesign
of
the
building
itself,
so
we're
basically
shrinking
the
building
from.
F
F
And
then
we,
as
part
of
that
have
to
as
in
in
a
sense,
resubmit
a
revised
application.
F
F
So
we
are
working
pretty
hard
to
make
to
make
that
deadline
and
we're
asking
the
rdc
today
to.
A
Okay,
any
questions
from
the
redevelopment
commissioners.
F
F
With
with
the
eda
just
after
receiving
their
letter-
and
you
know,
they're
they're
interested.
F
F
F
F
F
A
I'm
going
to
open
it
back
up
to
the
public
in
regards
to
resolution.
21.
A
F
Of
the
building,
but
it's
also
the
kind
of
rewriting
of
the
application,
the
help.
G
And
if
this
goes
through
and
we've
got
a
couple
million
dollars
right,
that's
the
idea.
Well,
how.
G
Could
I
not
be
in
favor
of
that
I'd
like
to
make
a
motion?
We
approve
this
resolution
2105.
B
A
L
L
They
were
one
of
three
that
we
talked
to
and
there
were
two
things
in
their
scope
of
work.
L
Cultural
and
historical
issues
and
the
it
also
includes
digging
actually
at
the
site
to
make
sure.
L
There
aren't
artifacts
and
things
the
other
piece
is
most
primarily
redoing.
The
nepa
doc.
L
L
Involves
a
lot
of
stakeholder
interviews
and
then
this
this
digging
portion,
then
they
need
to.
L
L
By
five
thousand,
so
the
bid
for
this
additional
work
is
twenty
one
thousand
seven.
Forty.
L
The
amendment
that
they
will
do
this
in
stages,
all
of
them
well
all
of
the
pieces-
are
happening.
L
D
A
Okay,
none
are
opposed,
and
so
the
motion
does
carry.
Thank
you.
I
Which
is
in
back
in
november,
in
resolution
2085,
the
rdc
approved
a
resolution
to
convey.
I
1100
west
10th
street
to
habitat
for
humanity.
In
that
resolution
it
made
don
the
signatory.
I
For
the
rdc,
unfortunately,
the
closing
couldn't
be
accomplished
before
the
end
of
2020
and
in
the.
I
Us
to
go
back
and
correct
a
few
things
to
make
a
proper
closing,
so
one
we
wanted
to
make.
I
I
Department,
acting
by
and
through
its
redevelopment
commission
door
seems
to
be
the
signatory
on.
I
I'm
sure,
and
one
last
time,
just
giving
me
her
disappointing
head
shake.
I
That
I've
done
everything
wrong,
but
she
can
give
you
more
information.
H
H
Sales
disclosure
form
changed
which
that
had
to
be
updated
as
well
as,
if
you
recall,
we
changed.
I
G
Doris
sims
to
sign
this
document,
new
quick
claim,
deed
for
transfer
of
the
property.
The
cap
is.
K
A
A
A
We've
had
enough
of
that
for
the
last
four
years
haven't
we
did.
I
say
that
I'm
not
supposed.
A
To
say,
okay,
can
we
have
a
motion
for
adjournment?
This
is
david
walter
and.