►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Okay,
welcome
everyone
to
the
discussion.
First,
discussion
of
r4
and
the
plex
proposal
for.
A
I
will
be
going
over
a
presentation
tonight
for
you
about
the
topic.
We're
gonna,
discuss.
A
Get
answers
for
those
myself
and
senior
planner
eric
grulick
and
then
keegan
and
ryan
as
well.
A
Doing
no
video
no
audio
to
keep
it
simple,
so
you
can
not
be
distracted,
and
so
I.
A
Won't
be
distracted,
so
we
will,
for
those
of
you,
who've
been
going
to
council
recently.
That's.
A
What
they
have
adopted
and
we
are
taking
that
on
for
these
meetings
as
well.
So
if
you
turn
your.
A
Camera
on
and
we
turn
it
off,
no
don't
be
offended,
we
are
just
leaving
them
all
off
for
the.
A
Sake
of
simplicity,
so,
as
I
said,
I
will
give
a
briefish
presentation
and
then
we
will
go
into.
A
Questions
or
comments,
so
we
will
a
couple
things.
We
will
answer
as
many
questions
as
we
can.
A
Here
for
you,
we
will,
if
we
can't
get
an
answer
for
you
all.
The
questions
are.
A
Tabulated
in
the
comment
section
and
we
will
be
putting
up
answers
to
all
of
the
questions.
A
We've
been
getting
in
these
various
meetings
on
the
website
shortly,
hopefully,
and.
A
Up
on
the
website,
we
will
consolidate
them
into
topics,
probably
and
then
put
as.
A
A
Okay,
so
this
website
is
where
we're
currently
taking
input
from
the
public
so
also.
A
Of
the
process
yet
so
this
is
kind
of
like
a
precursor
to
the
more
regulated
stringent.
A
Process
that
will
go
forward,
starting
in
plan
commission,
hopefully
in
january
and
then
on
to.
A
Common
council,
after
that,
for
the
map
and
text
amendments,
so
this
web
page
has
information.
A
A
Had
various
feedback
forms
and
we'll
likely
post
another
feedback
form
next
week
related.
A
Zoom
meeting
links
are
here
also
we've
also
today,
added
on
the
right
side,
the
most
frequently.
A
Asked
questions
we've
been
getting
about
the
process
so
feel
free
to
check
that
out
as
well.
A
A
And
hopefully,
addressing
questions
for
both
tonight
so
as
a
refresher,
the
r4
zoning
district.
A
And
adopted
in
april
of
this
year,
and
that
district
was
added
in
order
to.
A
Address
a
few
things
so
allowing
for
a
smaller
scale
district
to
be
used
located
near
amenities.
A
A
A
Size
and
to
bring
them
into
compliance
with
that
which
has
an
effect
sometimes
on.
A
Their
development,
such
as
setbacks
that
were
intended
for
larger
lots
or
uses
such
as
adus.
A
A
Small
urban
scale
lots
to
offer
a
diverse
mix
of
housing
to
be
consistent
with
the
comprehensive.
A
To
many
public
services
and
including
be
more
accessible
for
pedestrian
cyclists
and.
A
A
Identified
custer
clusters
of
those
existing
parcels
with
those
compatible
minimum
lot.
A
Size
included
in
the
lot
to
create
the
district.
So
I'm
going
to
go
over
exactly
how.
A
Some
of
the
other
story
maps
describing
what
I'm
about
to
go
through
in
detail.
A
So
we
just
used
a
real
world
example
located
here
in
elm
heights.
A
Where
newly
created,
our
four
lots
should
be
located,
was
that
we
used
our
three
and
our.
A
Two
parcels
that
were
currently
substandard
that
did
not
meet
the
minimum
lot
size
for
r3.
A
Based
on
the
minimum
lot
sizes
of
the
districts
that
were
in
the
texts
that
had
been
approved
so.
A
A
A
Or
buffers
and
then
looked
for
areas
where
those
connected
and
started
to
form
clusters.
A
So
you
can
see
that's
what
the
blue
is
here,
the
more
the
round
areas
around
the
parcels.
A
So
then
we
removed
our
four
size
parcels
that
were
not
within
those
areas
that
did
not
stay.
A
Then
those
were
removed
for
a
potential
analysis,
because
then
they
lacked
kind
of
a
grouping.
A
Of
the
same
character
as
other
r4
other
r4s
that
had
r4
in
the
area
may
have
had.
A
And
we
use
the
buffers
to
select
all
of
the
existing
parcels
that
intersect
with
those
clusters,
and
so
you
can
see
those
here
in
purple.
A
Let's
see
you
can
see
here
what
we've
done
and
it's
described
again
in
the
text.
A
Is
that
we
took
the
purple
lots
that
were
identified
and
extended.
A
Single
less
than
single
family
and
other
more
commercial
or
industrial
or
institutional
uses.
A
So
you
know
moving
those
boundaries
for
r4
slightly
out,
based
on
based
on
that
as
well.
A
That
as
well,
so
that
you
could
see
how
it
was
done-
and
you
know
something-
we've
said
a
few
times.
A
A
A
Lot
of
heard
a
lot
of
discussion
about
is
this
area
here,
east
of
woodlawn,
between
university
and.
A
First,
we've
gotten
calls
from
people
inside
of
that
area
wondering
why
there
are
four
and
the.
A
A
Wonder
why
they're
not
r4?
These
are
the
kinds
of
things
that
we
are
hoping
to
have
identified.
A
A
Okay,
so
now
I'm
going
to
discuss
the
plex
changes
just
a
moment.
A
So
the
first
question
we're
getting
a
lot
of
course
makes
sense
is
why
are
you
reintroducing.
A
The
plex
discussion,
so
we
with
this
zoning
code,
something
that
we're
looking
to
do.
A
Areas
that
we
know
are
will
imminently
redevelop
on
a
large
scale,
so
2nd
street
old
hospital.
A
A
Housing
stock
in
existing
developed
areas,
so
we
have
a
little
bit
of
that
in
the
code
now
with.
A
A
A
These
areas
are
close
to
existing
amenities
or
employment,
such
as
parks
or
downtown
or
iu.
A
These
are
places
where
it
could
it
benefits
whoever
lives.
There
benefits
greatly
from
living.
A
There-
and
we
would
like
to
include
as
an
option
for
development
that
some
slightly
more.
B
B
B
Fix
yes,
thank
you
for
pointing
that
out.
Yes,
so
in
the
code,
the
way
that
it
was
amended.
A
By
council,
when
the
table
was
changed,
permitted
and
conditional
markings
were
removed.
A
But
asterisk
asterisks
remained
and
we
have.
We
have
been
advised
by
legal
because.
A
We
have
tried
to
use
it
numerous
times
since
april
and
it's
not
usable
and.
A
That
back
no
matter
what
we
also
would
like
to
point
out,
as
I
said
a
little
bit,
you
know
we.
A
Are
looking
for
in
the
whole
code
to
find
ways
to
encourage
more
housing,
stock
and
more
housing.
A
For
inclusion
of
workforce
and
affordable
housing
and
that
will
take
that
will
contribute
to
that.
A
That
portion
of
maybe
a
lower
income
need.
We
also
have
proposed,
as
kind
of
the
other
side
of.
A
A
A
Neighborhoods
that
focus
on
the
student
population
and
a
place
for
places
for
them.
A
To
be
located
that
make
sense
for
why
they're
here,
so
you
know
it
close
to
town
but
as
well
very.
A
Close
to
campus-
and
we
think
that
that
that
can
help
take
off
some
of
the
pressure
that
we.
A
Hear
about
for
the
neighborhoods
and
student
rentals
as
well,
so
we
are
looking
to
find.
A
Redeveloped,
just
for
those
who
don't
know
the
process
very
well,
we
also
wanted
to
clarify.
A
A
Forward
previously
right
now
we're
just
in
an
information
gathering
process
we
are,
we
did.
A
Taking
feedback
on
those
so
that
we
can,
that
can
help
us
craft.
A
draft
of
the
zoning
map
and.
A
Is
the
same
as
it
has
been
in
the
past?
So
we
think
that's
important
to
note
because
there
has.
A
Been
a
lot
of
discussion
about
whether
or
not
taking
input
on
a
text
amendment
in
this.
A
Way
that
has
already
been
discussed
recently
is
democratic
and
yes,
it
is
we
and
we
want.
A
To
get
as
much
input
as
possible,
and
we
again
would
like
to
find
a
way
which
we.
A
A
Two
things
that
one
is
won't
the
addition
of
plexus
increase,
my
property
value
and
taxes
beyond.
A
The
threshold
that
I
would
be
able
to
bear
so
we
yes,
we
hear
that
concern
that
makes
sense.
A
We
understand,
logically,
that
that
would
be
a
concern
for
people
who
have.
A
A
A
A
The
assessor
to
revalue
your
neighborhoods
and,
in
some
cases,
increasing
your
tax
burden
beyond.
A
A
Happening
what
we
need
to
what
we
are
hoping
that
this
that
this
proposal
could
help
do
is.
A
Rentals,
we
do
want
to
encourage
home
ownership
and
if,
if
we
can't
figure
out
a
weight.
A
A
Lower
that
percentage
right
so
creating
more
units
that
are
available
to
renters
can
free
up
units.
A
That
are
renting
now
to
be
homeowner
occupied,
a
second
kind
of
other
side
of
the
coin.
We've.
A
A
Their
property
value
our
plan.
What
we
would
like
to
do
and
again
are
looking
for
input
on.
A
The
property
values
in
the
neighborhood
very
unlikely.
We,
you
know
when
we
did
ad
when.
A
We,
when
ads,
were
approved
by
council
the
first
time
they
we
reported
to
them
year
yearly.
A
And
that
was
helpful
for
them
to
see
we
would
report
how
many
had
been
petitioned.
You
know.
A
Been
something
that
that
was
not
meeting
our
goals
and
their
goals,
then
we
could
have
stepped
in.
A
And
changed
the
process,
and
that
is
what
we
would
anticipate
happening
here,
that
we
would.
A
Monitor
greatly
and
monitor
closely-
and
we
said
this
last
time,
but
just
for
everyone
who.
A
A
Single
one
and
the
three
planners
issue
them:
we
monitoring
them
and
keeping
track
of
how
many.
A
There
are
where
they're
located,
who
is
building
them?
These
are
all
things
that
we
can
easily
do.
A
And
we
can
have
a
set
standard
for
what
we're
looking
for
for
things
that
we're
afraid.
A
Are
shifting
from
what
our
goals
were
initially
that
I
had
discussed
previously.
A
What
those
goals
were
and
how
we
intended
to
meet
them
so
jackie,
real
quick,
I
just
want
to.
B
When
those
were
approved
and
in
that
first
year
we
only
did
maybe
two
or
three
approvals
for.
B
B
A
lot
of
costs
that
were
realized
after
the
fact,
so
you
know
I
just
wanted
to
point
out
that.
B
That
a
lot
of
these
concerns
were
with
the
adus,
but
didn't
really
come
to
the
the
realization
that.
B
A
lot
of
people
were
fearful
of
yes,
thank
you,
so
we
have
so.
We
were
able
to
report
to
council.
A
What
was
happening,
I
think
we
maybe
had
six
that
were
in
the
pipeline
of
approvals.
The
first.
A
Time
we
reported
to
them
and
then,
through
the
next
zoning
update,
we
changed
the
regulation.
A
The
top
of
my
head
I'd
say
probably
only
maybe
eight
have
actually
been
constructed,
although
you.
A
Any
of
those
bear
out-
and
it's
been
more
than
three
years
I
believe,
but
again
we
still.
A
Do
track
those
and
if
that
were
to
change
or
if
it
seemed
like
the
regulations
we
put
in
place.
A
That
people
were
skirting
them
somehow
we
could
change
that,
and
that
is
what
we
would
propose.
A
To
do
with
the
flexes,
I
guess
my
last
my
last
point
of
things
that
we
have
heard
before
I
go.
A
Back
to
the
presentation
is
some
people
have
said
they
don't
think
we
have
a
need
for
more.
A
A
A
Very
low
vacancy
rate
and
incredibly
low
so
lower
than
then
the
threshold
of
when
you.
A
Housing
project
and
that
it
that
is
true,
but
we
are
like
we
are
at
a.
We
would
benefit.
A
A
Asterisks
those
four
asterisks
in
the
middle
that
don't
have
c's
or
p's.
That
is
the
problem
that.
A
We
have
to
address
per
legal,
so
we
we
do
have
to
bring
this
forward
either
way,
whether
or.
A
Not
we
make
them
permitted
and
conditional
in
these
areas,
and
this
is
the
proposal
that
we.
A
A
Code,
that's
in
r4
and
there
is
a
restriction
on
number
of
units.
I
believe
it's
eight.
A
So
for
those
of
you
who
don't
spend
your
time,
looking
at
zoning
code,
p
means
permitted
so.
A
A
Conditional
use
of
permit,
which
requires
a
conditional
use
approval
from
the
board
of.
A
We
are
proposing
in
any
of
the
four
main
zoning
districts,
residential
zoning
districts,.
A
Carried
over
from
what
has
already
been
approved,
and
we
are
open
to
suggestions,
this
is
what.
A
We're
looking
for
does
this
seem
like
enough.
Does
this
seem
like
duplexes
could
be
built
sensibly.
A
In
your
neighborhoods
and
still
be
viable
same
conditions
for
triflexes
and
fourplexes.
A
So
there's
some
comprehensive
plan
guidance
here
that
encourages,
of
course,
smart
growth.
A
Be
focused
on
affordable
housing,
of
course,
when
a
new
area
has
to
put
in
all
of
the
infrastructure.
A
Properties
can
only
be
so
affordable
without
incentives
from
from
the
government.
A
Can
zoom
in
and
you
can
type
in
your
address?
You
can
turn
the
short
districts
on
and
off.
A
So
we
have
duplexes
and
as
we've
stated
before-
and
you
know.
A
Has
been
said
many
times
at
these
meetings
and
the
ones
that
we
had
last
year,
they.
A
Already
exist,
we
have
them
in
bloomington
and
in
some
of
these
older
historic
neighborhoods
and.
A
Some
areas
and
again
we
have
those
in
town
already
and
four
plexes
again
restricted
again
so.
A
Of
the
districts
are
more
things
permitted
as
opposed
to
being
conditional
or
not
allowed.
A
So
the
answer
is
tied
into
what
I
said
about
the
infrastructure
and
amenities
that.
A
Just
if
you
were
you
know,
building
a
new
city
we
would
like
to.
We,
as
a
community
have
said.
A
You
have
to
allow
development
in
town,
and
you
know
it's
all
relative
and
you
know
if
building
a.
A
Building
downtown
is
obviously
closer
to
amenities
and
existing
infrastructure.
A
We
heard,
and
then
I'll
wrap
up
here
is,
will
my
will
the
properties
and
my
property
or
properties.
A
A
And
we
route
them
to
a
planner
to
issue
the
necessary
planning
permit
to
go
back
to.
A
Houses
just
at
varying
scales,
each
district
is
different,
but
for
demolition
across
the.
A
A
A
Approval
then,
the
planning
and
transportation
department
issues
you
a
certificate
of
zoning.
A
Compliance
and
the
building
department
will
issue
you
a
demolition
permit
second
option.
If.
A
For
the
city
of
bloomington
that
was
recently
updated
in
2018,
those
properties
are.
A
Gets
to
weigh
in
on
the
historic
value
of
the
property,
and
if
they
believe
that
it
is.
A
A
So
it's
slightly
less
restrictive
because
if,
if
they
don't
feel
that
your
property
on
its.
A
That
it
be
designated,
but
they
do
have
that
extra
layer
of
review.
In
case
your
property
were.
A
To
have
value
to
be
designated
on
its
own
or
in
case
then
they
wanted
to
look
in
your
area
to.
A
By
either
of
those
historic
preservation,
either
the
guidelines
or
the
survey.
A
For
the
certificate
of
zoning
compliance
that
we
issue
to
the
building
department
and
then.
A
They
can
issue
a
demolition
permit,
so
it's
really
just
one
of
three
options
related
to
demolition.
A
A
Like
to
have
it
included
as
an
available
option
for
people
who
would
like
to
utilize
it
to.
A
For
various
different
reasons,
we
have
also
heard
you
know
that
people
are
worried
about.
A
More
renters,
well
plexus,
don't
preclude
ownership,
they
could
be.
Oh,
each
side
could
be
owned.
A
Separately,
we
will
have
some
data,
we're
still
culling
through
it
related
to
existing.
A
Providing
more
opportunity
across
racial
and
socioeconomic
lines
for
diversity,.
A
That
are
beloved
but
making
them
available,
possibly
to.
A
A
wider
swath
of
people
who
otherwise
currently
can't
afford
it
because
of
our
inflated
prices.
A
And
our
shortage
of
housing,
so
that
is
what
we're
trying
to
keep
in
mind.
Moving
forward
and.
A
Trying
to
encourage
and
ask
members
of
the
community
to
think
about
ways
that
they
think.
A
B
Out,
there's
there's
a
misconception
that
all
rentals
are
student
housing.
You
know
there.
A
We
have
heard
from
some
people
that
they
don't
that
they're
not
focusing
on
students.
A
And
at
these
meetings
a
lot
of
other
people
are
concerned
about
students.
So
we
do.
A
Want
that
is
a
great
point
to
point
out
that
all
rentals
in
this
town
aren't
students.
A
And
can
are
obviously
available
to
young
professionals
as
well.
Okay,
so.
A
A
Or
were
here
but
didn't
understand,
please
send
them
to
keegan
or
ryan
roebling.
So
when
you
start.
A
A
chat
you
can
choose
who
you
are
communicating
with,
and
we
will
try
to
answer
those
here.
A
And
or
put
answers
up
on
the
website
after
tonight,
so
do
either
of
you
have
anything
yeah.
C
C
A
Very
complicated-
and
I
maybe
didn't
do
a
great
job,
so
the
r4
is
the
district
that
was.
A
Identified
in
the
udo
text
as
the
one
that
was
intended
for
most
urban
and
most
diverse.
A
Housing
options
and
that
it
is
also
the
smallest
district,
so
those
areas
near
town
are.
A
The
ones
that
can
offer
the
most
benefit
if
we
can
add
density
in
those
areas
so
because
of
that.
A
Then
it
then
this
they
are
the
smaller
lots
and
those
are
the
ones
that
have
the
most
intense.
A
To
the
same
size
that
a
house
with
you
know
four
four
separate
one
beds
or
whatever.
A
Could
fit
in
on
the
lot
could
also
be
built,
so
that
is
why
the
r4
has
the
most
intense
and.
A
But
I
just
wanted
to
note
that
the
development
standards
that
limit
development
on
those
lots.
C
What
was
the
strategy
sure
so,
when
we
put
our
when
r4
came
through
in
the
code,
we
we
did.
A
We
do
need
we
felt
that
we
needed
it,
for
one
of
the
reasons
that
we
mentioned
briefly
is
something.
A
That
we
see
a
lot
if
you
are
in
the
historic
neighborhoods,
especially
on
the
west
side,.
A
There
and
so
variances
are
very
common
for
things
that
you
would
normally
not.
A
Make
make
continued
development
of
those
properties
easier
and
also
so
we
we
knew.
A
A
And
left
it
all
the
same
or
changed
the
development
standards
and
uses
for
that
and.
A
We
went
through
out
of
adding
a
district
working
with
our
consultant
last
time
and
then.
A
A
A
A
Goes
to
plan
commission,
it
certainly
will
change
and
that
it
may
change.
You
know
to
make.
A
The
lines
more
regular
or
to
move
more
toward
the
intent,
but
that
that,
where
we
are
now.
A
Was
done
through
the
analysis
process
and
we
know
that
we
know
that
it
will
change.
But
we
just.
C
Ones
and
then
we
can
move
on
to
someone
else,
but
the
next
questions
were:
how
do
you
plan.
C
A
Some
who
muted
me,
I
think
we
talked
about
this
in
another
meeting
from
mr
dorfman,
but
mcdole.
A
Was
not
selected
because
of
the
reasoning
that
we
gave
the
analysis.
The
analysis
that
we
just.
A
It
we
didn't
make
calls
outside
of
the
analysis
at
this
point,
and
so
they
weren't
included,
will.
A
A
Start
that's
already
happening,
so
investors
are
already
buying
houses
in
town.
Some.
A
To
buy
homes
in
town
but
most
are
not
in
the
historic
neighborhoods,
which
I
think
is
what
he's.
A
Referring
to
so
that's
already
an
ongoing
process
so,
as
I
described
what
we
would
like
to
do.
A
Is
put
forth
a
plex
plex
proposal,
plex
addition
into
the
code
that
makes
sense.
A
Scale
wise
on
a
small
small
scale
as
far
as
being
compatible
with
the
neighborhoods
and.
A
We
would
like
to
monitor
that
very
closely
over
the
course
of
months
and
probably
years
to
see.
A
A
We
change
them
often
again,
as
mr
grueller
pointed
out,
this
similar
concerns
were
raised
on.
A
The
adu
process
that
we
wouldn't
keep
track
of,
who
was
building
them,
and
you
know
that
local.
A
Over
town
basically-
and
that
has
not
happened-
but
we
do
what
we
do
look
out
for
them
and
we
we.
A
Are
we
were
monitoring
them
very
closely
at
the
beginning
to
make
sure
that
a
lot
of
the
concerns.
A
Would
have
to
try
it,
and
you
know
we
could
take
legislation
forward
in
a
matter
of
months.
A
Less
desirable
for
larger
developers-
and
we
are
working
on
that,
and
that
is
the
kind.
A
Of
input
that
we
are
hoping
to
kind
of
solicit-
or
we
we've
gotten
some
good
idea.
A
A
A
D
Viewer
participant
in
the
zoom
call
they're
not
all
worded
as
questions,
so
I'm
going
to
try.
D
But
some
of
these
may
be
better
answered
just
on
the
website
anyway.
I'll
just
say
that.
D
So
the
first
is
when
and
how
often
or
explain
excuse
me
explain
what
conditional
use
means.
A
Is
is
appropriate
for
that
area,
but
that
it
needs
an
extra
scrutiny,
then
permitted.
A
Use
normally
would
so.
It
has
to
be
shown
that,
through
the
conditional
use.
A
A
An
area
where
that's
atypical,
your
zoning
code
may
allow
that
if
it's
as
a
conditional
use.
A
So
you
have
to
then
go
and
show
how
you're
going
to
how
your
use
isn't
going
to
cause
the
issues.
A
That
sometimes
that
use
does
cause
and
that
you
meet
the
requirements
of
the
zoning
code.
A
Some
specific
to
your
use
that
don't
change
the
character
of
the
area,
even
though
it's.
A
Possible
that
the
type
of
use
you're
requesting
sometimes
does
eric
do
you
have
additional.
A
Great,
which
is
how,
when,
and
how
often
does
the
board
of
zoning
appeals,
deny
it
conditional.
D
Use,
oh
that's
a
good
question.
Well,
let's
see
we
had
when
we
had
a
number
of
medical,
assisted.
A
Facilities
over
near
the
old
hospital
site,
that
is
probably
the
last
time
conditional.
A
A
And
then
people
don't
file
them,
so
I
think
that's
kind
of
a
misleading
thing
about
variances.
A
But
that
you
know
variances
are
never
denied
and
conditional
uses
are
never
denied.
If
you
meet.
A
Are
written
in
such
a
way
that
they
meet
the
community
goals
and
protect
the
existing.
A
So
usually,
once
it
gets
to
that
point
at
the
board
of
zoning
appeals,
then
they
do.
B
Homeowner
was
there
they
would
hear
concerns
from
adjacent
neighbors.
If.
B
Move
something
you
know,
those
those
conversations
were
very
beneficial
and
resulted
in.
B
A
A
Ones
from
other
people
too,
so
the
the
next
is
about
height
and
I'll,
expand.
D
That
to
to
the
entire
building
envelope
and
then
also
parking.
D
Know,
oh
okay
regarding
the
building
envelope
so
in
the
r4.
The
currently
proposed
well.
A
It's
actually
it's
already
in
the
code,
the
height
maximum
is
40
feet
and
the
height
maximum
in.
A
The
r3,
which
is
some
you
know
similarly
developed,
is
35.
in
both
districts,
so
in
the
r4.
A
Requirements,
setback
requirements
on
all
four
sides
open
space
or
what
we
call
impervious.
A
Surface
coverage
requirements
once
those
four
things
are
met,
then,
depending
on
the
size.
A
Did
that
answer
it
ryan?
There
was
a
second
smaller
part
about
sorry
parking
that
that's.
D
A
Okay,
hold
on
there
are
prescribed
parking
requirements
on
the
lot
for
plexus.
A
Sorry,
I
didn't,
I
didn't
realize
you
were
asking
me:
it's
halfway,
half
a
parking.
I
should
have
no.
A
That's:
okay:
it's
half
a
parking
space
per
per
unit
per
dwelling
unit;
okay,
so
yeah.
So
there
is.
A
Some
parking
on
the
lot
required
and
then
I
got
a
question
as
well
asking
you
know,
isn't.
A
Isn't
on
straight
parking
available
for
these
uses?
It
is
in
areas
where.
A
A
A
If
you
wanted
parking
needed
to
be
on
site,
so
for
the
the
on-street
parking
they
can
only.
B
Count
the
spaces
directly
in
front
of
their
lot.
So
you
know
if
it's
a
40-foot
lot
for.
A
A
A
Not
proposing
any
changes
with
that
currently,
so
that
is
just
in
the
udo
that
you
can
find.
A
Obviously,
on
our
website,
if
you
want
to
go
there,
but
we
will
link
that
to
the
update
page.
A
Who's
only
messaging
me
a
couple
people,
but
let's
see,
can
you
define
affordable?
Is
there
a
target.
A
Amount
of
monthly
rent
mortgage
payment
utilities,
equaling
affordability,
so
great
question.
A
A
percentage
of
involving
the
area,
median
income
and
percentage
of
that
income
and
how
much.
A
You're
still
spending
for
this
particular
proposal.
We
are
just
using
it
in
a
more
broad
term
of.
A
Of
toward
the
goal
of
creating
more
units
so
that
all
units
or
units
in
some
areas
that
the.
A
Price
would
go
down,
so
no,
we
do
not
have.
We
are
not
currently
discussing
a
target
monthly
rent.
A
Amount
for
the
plexes-
oh
thanks,
kevin
sorry,
I
just
some
people
were
only
able
to
send
to
me.
A
Oh
parking,
okay,
good
keegan
you
have
another
one
yeah.
I
have
two
questions
from
kevin
atkins.
A
Okay,
so
adus
have
size
restrictions,
they
are
required
on
lots
of
owner
occupancy
and
but
and.
A
They
also
cannot
be
sold,
so
I
think
those
are
the
big
difference
they.
They
also,
I
believe.
A
Including
size
where
that's
particular
to
the
unit
where,
in
this
where,
in
this
current
proposal.
A
Lives
on
the
lot
so
either
in
the
main
house
or
in
the
adu,
and
that
is
not
required.
A
Currently,
in
the
proposal
for
duplexes
and
I'm
sorry,
I'm
blanking,
I
said
a
third
thing,
but.
A
They
are
pretty
they're
restricted
in
that
their
their
size,
maximum,
there's
a
size
maximum,
a.
A
Maximum
number
of
people
who
can
live
there,
the
family
limitation
would
be
similar
to
duplexes.
A
A
Oh
perfect,
yes,
thank
you.
The
second
question,
I'm
not
sure
if
we
can
address
it's
more.
C
Which
would
pay
higher
taxes
if
they
have
high
occupancy?
Well,
the
professionals
that
we.
A
Hired
to
do
this
study,
who
do
them
all
over
for
the
housing
study,
did
indicate
that
they
think.
A
They're
real,
I
think
it's
a
fair
question.
I
mean
you
know
I
think,
there's
a
I
think.
A
It's
a
fair
question
that
there's
a
lot
of
concern
in
town
about
whether
or
not
what
sort
of.
A
Impacts,
the
large
apartment,
complex
houses
have
and
how
much
influence
they
have.
So
I
think.
A
If
you
look
at
the
study,
they
actually
post
two
two
vacancy
rates,
one
that.
A
One
that
was
slightly
larger
and
then
one
that
was
determined
after
more
interviews
with
the.
A
Existing
developments
in
town,
they
were
both
very
low,
so
I
I
do
think
it's
a
real
issue.
I.
A
Rent
in
this
town
and
how
long
it
takes
to
how
long
in
advance
you
have
to
find
something.
C
Clarify
kevin
says
that
his
the
question
about
adus
was
more
related
to
eric's
comment.
C
About
how
adus
and
duplexes
that
ada
used
didn't
wouldn't
create
as
big
of
a
disruption.
A
So
I'll
try
and
then
let
us
know
if
I
missed
the
mark.
We
think
that
while
we
understand.
A
A
A
We
understand
the
concern.
We
think
that
adding
plexus
as
a
sensitive
option
is
not
going
to.
A
It
will
mirror
the
adus
and
that
the
fears
will
not
be
found
founded
yeah.
That's
what
we
think.
A
Based
on,
we
have
seen
plexus
included
in
single
family
areas
in
other
communities.
A
And
they
have
rolled
out
very
softly.
We
have
heard
comments
from
some
local
developers.
A
A
As
needing
the
most,
which
is
people
who
can
who
aren't
students
and
can
have.
A
You
know
a
family
development
or
small
scale
owner
occupied
renting
the
other
side,
setups.
C
Thanks
patrick
asked:
can
two
or
more
lots
be
combined
to
create
a
larger
building
site.
A
Yes,
the
code
allows
for
for
yes,
the
code
allows
for
that,
but
also.
A
Just
to
make
it
just
to
be
clear,
allows
for
that
now
for
single
family
houses.
But
yes.
A
Okay,
ryan:
do
you
have
any
or
keegan
yeah?
So
there
is
a
question
about
you
mentioned.
D
That
the
code
could
be
changed
later,
so
what
type
of
data
would
you
be
monitoring?
How.
D
Often
do
you
plan
on
looking
at
it?
Would
this
data
be
shared
with
the
public
and.
D
Yeah,
oh,
could
there
be
a
mandatory
review
or
a
reevaluation?
Should
this
approval
go
first
sure.
A
Yes,
yes,
there
could
be
a
mandatory
review,
so
you
know
I
think
the
administration
tries
to.
A
Try
new
things
in
a
like
a
pilot
format
trying
to.
A
A
Or
yearly
and
give
or
give
a
report
on
some
of
the
things
I
mentioned,
you
know
how
how
much.
A
Inquiry
are
we
even
getting
for
plexus?
How
many
applications
are
we
getting
for
those
that.
A
It,
or
is
anybody
actually
pulling
permits
for
that?
What
are
the,
what
are
the
characteristics
of.
A
People
who
are
using
them
because
it
has
been,
you
know
we
are
trying
to
increase
number
of
units.
A
That
it
will
be
only
student
housing
developers,
you
know,
for
us,
a
success
looks
like
a
slow.
A
Small
increase
in
densities
can
happen
in
areas
that
already
have
supportive
uses
around
them.
A
So
yeah,
that's
something
that
we
would
work
out.
Of
course,
with
the
appointed
and
elected.
A
Officials,
of
course,
of
how
often
do
would
they
want
to
see
something
and
what
types
of
things.
A
Allowance
of
them
is
working
toward
the
goals
that
we
set
and
not
putting
the
community
at
risk.
A
Great
question:
yes,
I
think
so
so
what
we've
kind
of
tried
to
mention
before
is
that.
A
A
It's
in
the
name
and
it's
immediately
adjacent
to
campus
and
the
purpose
is
for
purposeful.
A
Zoning
for
that
use,
this
plex
use
really
is
for
a
wider
swath
of
the
community.
We
hope
so.
A
If
plexus
were
approved
would
be
that
I'm
sorry,
the
relationship
between
them
would
be.
A
A
People
think
that
once
we
hit
the
cliff,
we
will
have
less
students
around
that
that
you
know
that.
A
May
that
may
be,
but
we
have
a
lot
of
other
people
in
town.
Besides
students,
we
have
growing.
A
You
know
economic
sectors,
catalans
growing,
you
know
we're
trying
to
grow
our
our
other.
A
Sectors
downtown,
you
know
attracting
business
to
bloomington
and
one
way
to
do
that
is
to
have.
A
Those
other
goals
unrelated
to
whether
or
not
students
would
be
occupying
those
units.
A
Students
in
these
communities
in
these
neighborhoods
and
more
units
doesn't.
C
Two
follow-up
questions:
what's
the
incentive
for
developers
or
landlords
to
build
and
operate.
C
Affordable
housing
and
is
there
any
way
that
we
can
assure
that
the
city's
rental
inspection.
A
Sure
great
questions,
thank
you.
So
the
first
question
some
things
happen.
A
Inside
of
the
udo
in
our
regula
in
our
regulatory
world,
we
have
some
development
incentives
for.
A
Typical
kind
of
reduced
setback
standards
to
additional
units,
if
you
were
building
a
larger.
A
A
larger
development,
I'm
sorry
keegan
what
was
the
last
one.
The
second
question
was
regarding.
A
But
especially
because
of
a
regulatory
change
like
this,
then
that
would
be
something
yes,
so.
A
We
would
need
to
explore
with
department,
heads
and
the
administration
of
what
sort
of
resources.
A
Are
needed
beyond
what
exists
today
and
yeah?
We
would
be
we
that
may
need
to.
A
Title
or
city
services
and
how
the
how
these
will
affect
that,
and
so
we
are
continuing.
A
To
look
at
it,
it's
a
fair
question.
We
know
that
that
is
a
concern
of
people
who
feel.
A
That,
sometimes
now
that
they
worry
that
some
of
the
existing
rentals
that
they
have
in
their.
A
D
So
yeah
the
there
was
a
question
about
maybe
a
misunderstanding
or
misspeak.
That
said,
you.
D
D
Do
to
keep
code
zoning
code
violations
from
happening,
so
I
think
that
was
you
know
probably.
D
A
A
That's
probably
in
relation
to
covenants
and
restrictions.
That's
what's
gonna
say
we
don't.
A
Enforce
covenants
and
restrictions
so
that
that
may
have
been
something
that
was
discussed
and.
A
A
Do
is
enforce
code
our
code
only
so
we
do
enforce
title
20..
We
don't
enforce
other
titles.
A
To
figure
that
out
and
clarify
on
the
website,
but
but
we
do
have
enforcement
and
we.
A
We
take
it
very
seriously
and
we
we
escalate
enforcement
as
needed.
A
Larger
scale,
you
know
when
we
have
larger
scale
issues,
but
also
on
smaller
scale,
with.
A
Smaller
neighborhoods,
so
what
I
was
trying
to
say
was
that
the
r3
that
existed
there
before.
A
Small
made
it
difficult
to
do
additions
and
further
develop
those
lots
by
changing
the.
A
Vein
of
what
you're
asking-
and
I
think
I
said
this
earlier-
but
just
to
be
more
clear.
Yes,
there.
A
These
lots
may
not
support
larger,
larger
developments,
larger
plex
developments,
some.
A
As
I
mentioned,
like
a
duplex
or
a
triplex
with
three
one
beds,
or
you
know
they,
they.
A
Aren't
going
to
be
able
to
easily
everyone
isn't
going
to
easily
support
a
four-plex
with.
A
Multiple
bedrooms
in
each,
but
that's,
okay,
that's
that's
a
that's
good.
We
want
the
option.
A
The
code
since
april,
but
some
can-
and
so
we
want
it
to
be
in
there
for
that-
to
be
available.
A
Okay,
who
else
I
have
a
question
about
how
are
we
tracking
adus
that
are
being
added
to
existing.
D
A
Through
the
building
permit,
so
even
interior
work
on
your
home
requires
a
building
permit.
A
May
not
be
true,
but
in
in
bloomington
you
have
to
get
a
building
permit
for
pretty.
A
Much
everything
you're
doing
on
your
building,
so,
as
I
said
before,
we
see
all
of
those.
A
And
so
one
of
the
three
current
planners
works
with
the
property
owner
to
make
sure.
A
A
Be
included,
so
you
guys
can
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong
is
the
zoning
commitment.
A
A
Each
year
and
as
they
come
through,
we
see
them
come
through
as
a
building
permit.
We
add
them
to.
A
The
list
we
check
in
with
them
we
make
sure
through
work
with
the
auditor's
office,.
A
That
they
are
in
fact,
owner-occupied
and
then
also
ask
them
to
separately
confirm
that.
A
Jenny
says
this
sounds
I'll.
Just
paraphrase
this
sounds
like
it's
for
developers,
because.
A
A
A
So
what
we're
trying
to
do
to
change
that
is
by
adding
the
easier,
more
predictable,
develop.
A
Developability
of
student,
housing,
large
scale
and
small
scale
in
the
multi-family
student.
A
At
some
point
is
that
when
houses
turn
over
to
plexes,
and
especially
if
we
are
going
to
hit.
A
A
A
A
A
Second
original
lot
to
be
owned
and
that
we
would
see
hope
to
see
on
a
wider
scale
that
the.
A
Small
inclusion
of
plexus
across
town
would
open
up
the
availability
of
being
able
to.
A
Pick
up
those
homes
for
first-time
homebuyers,
and
but
yes,
we
under
we
completely
understand.
A
A
Instead
of
two-
and
we
understand
that
and
that's
why
we're
trying
to
create
regulations
that.
A
That
make
that
less
likely
and
also
to
track
track
moving
forward
so
that,
if
it
appears.
B
A
A
They're
not
written
for
developers,
we
are
trying
to
find
a
way
to
help
to
help
increase
owner.
A
Ways
that
we
think
could
work
together
to
do
that
and
that's
why
we'd
like
to.
C
C
A
Point
out,
I
think
the
message
gets
a
little.
I
think,
maybe
I'm
being
a
little
unclear,
we
don't.
A
We
think
the
addition
of
units
to
the
overall
unit
count
could
have
an
effect
of
bringing
down.
A
Unit
cost
across
the
board
or
in
a
neighborhood.
If
so,
yes,
those
might
be
more
expensive
as.
A
You
know,
and
others
probably
do
too,
I
believe
a
number,
if
not
all,
of
the
homes
on
the.
A
South
dunn
street
pud
are
sprinkled
because
of
their
proximity
to
one
another,
even
though.
A
They're
single
family-
and
I
mean
they
are
not
affordable,
but
they
are
not
wildly
more.
A
Expensive
than
homes
in
our
historic
neighborhoods
either
so
it's
definitely
doable
yes,
there's.
A
Definitely
a
cost
factor
included
and
I
think
I
think
the
focus
is.
I
think
what
I
my
main.
A
Response
is
that
no,
we
do
not
think
that
every
unit
to
be
built
will
be
will
necessarily.
A
Be
affordable.
We
are
looking
to
kind
of
put
a
dent
or
have
an
effect
on
the
total
number.
A
Of
units
available
in
town
with
a
lot
of
our
processes,
but
with
this
one
as
well,
do
we
have
a.
A
D
So
one
is:
do
duplexes
lose
their
six
unrelated
occupancy
limit
if
they
were
reverted
back.
D
Into
a
house
yes,
so
that
is
something
we've
heard
over
the
years.
So
I
have
I've
worked
here.
A
For
five
years,
I've
been
manager
of
this
division
for
two,
maybe
in
the
two
years
that.
A
I've
been
involved
in
enforcement,
we
definitely
we
work
closely
with
hand
and
have.
A
A
Issue
that
we
deal
with
and
yes,
if
you
it's
per
unit,
so
if
you
decide
to
take
your
duplex
and
turn.
A
A
Because
now
you've
lost,
you
know:
you've
lost
your
ability
to
have
six
there.
Unless
you
can.
A
Turn
it
back
into
a
duplex
yeah,
so
once
something
goes
back
to
a
single
family
design.
D
Okay
and
then
another
one,
why
not
make
plexes
owner
occupied
required?
Oh
great
question.
A
We
looked
into
that
last
time
and
it's
not
allowed
it's
illegal.
That
would
be
an
easy.
A
That
would
be
an
easy
answer.
I
think,
to
kind
of
get
to
address
what
the
majority
of
people
would.
A
Prefer
that
plexus
be
we
aren't
allowed,
and
we
do
sometimes,
I
think
lose
focus
also
that.
A
A
Know
that's
probably
part
of
why
it's
not
allowed
to
do
that,
but
but
it's
not
even
something.
A
We
can
explore
it's
illegal
to
say
that
they
have
to
be
there's
a
special
stipulation,
and
I.
A
Don't
know
what
it
is
off
hand.
I
apologize
that
allows
us
to
include
that
requirement
for
adus.
A
Nobody's
on
muting,
okay,
we
just
want
to
say
thank
you
so
much
for
everyone
spending
your
time.
A
Here
with
us,
we
will
have
another
very
similar
meeting
to
this
on
monday,
so
the
presentation.
A
A
Text
amendments
that'll
that
will
come
forward
on
tuesday
evening.
Both
meetings
at
5,
30.
A
A
final
feedback
form
for
any
more
general
comments
and
then
comments
on
these
proposals.
A
As
well,
please
do
here
in
the
next
couple
minutes
I'll
leave
it
open,
submit
any
questions.
A
Are
appreciate
your
input
and
really
are
looking
forward
to,
hopefully
being
able.