►
Description
Housing and Redevelopment Authority Meeting
A
Thank
you.
I
would
like
to
call
to
order
the
tuesday
september
14,
2021,
housing
and
redevelopment
authority
meeting
first
order
of
business
is
called
to
order
and
the
roll
call
myra
did
you
do
the
roll
call.
A
C
B
But
the
record
note
that
vicky
who
keem
is
not
present
tonight
there
is
a
quorum
of
commissioners.
Thank
you.
E
D
A
A
A
Thank
you.
So
it
has
been
moved
by
commissioner
thorson
seconded
by
commissioner
beloga
to
approve
the
agenda.
May
we
have
the
roll
call
vote?
Please
logan.
A
D
Chair
lewis,
commissioner
olsen
moves
that
we
approve
the
minutes
of
august
20th.
C
A
B
You
you
sure
you
weren't
at
that
meeting.
Well,
that's
right!
You
weren't
into
it
lewis,
aye
olsen,
hi
thorson.
The
motion
pass
three
to
zero
with
below
abstaining.
Thank
you.
A
E
Yes,
hi
thank
you,
erica
coleman,
hra
administrator
and
so
we're
bringing
the
budget
overview
to
you
today
for
a
review
and
discussion,
and
we
would
bring
it
back
at
the
next
meeting
to.
E
December
excuse
me,
november
november.
I
knew
it
wasn't
right
away,
but
you
know
come
on
we'll
bring
it
back
in
november
for
request
for
approval,
so
we
just
want
to
review
and
discuss
it
today.
E
Just
make
sure
you're
aware
so
for
the
2022
preliminary
operating
budget,
it
is
ten
million
five
hundred
forty
five
hundred
fifty
four
thousand
two
hundred
forty
seven
dollars
is
what
staff
is
proposing
and
it
shows
an
increase
of
five
hundred
forty
two
thousand
eight
hundred
twenty
dollars,
which
is
five
percent
from
the
2021
budget,
and
this
increases
due
to
primarily
due
to
federal
funding
of
for
the
housing
choice.
E
Voucher
program,
as
well
as
the
hra
levy
I
will
receive
the
information
from
hennepin
county
and
sold
aj
levy
is
at
point
zero,
one,
eight
five
percent
and
the
hra
levy
authority
to
be
requested.
This
time
will
increase
from
two
million
six
hundred
fifty
four
thousand
five
hundred
thirty
two
532
to
2
718
683,
as
determined
by
hennepin
county.
E
E
So
the
median
home
value
home,
valued
medium,
valued
home
excuse
me,
will
experience
a
minimal
tax
increase
of
37
cents
from
3.65
cents
per
month
to
four
dollars
in
two
cents
and
so
below.
I
have
used
the
format
that
brian
hartman
has
brought
forward
many
many
many
times
to
outline
the
information
of
the
budget,
and
so
we'll
start
with
our
general
administration.
E
This
is
for
operations
of
the
hra,
including
administrative
functions
unrelated
to
specific
programs,
and
so
we
are
proposing
increasing
the
payment
for
nonprofits
for
administration
support
from
five
thousand
dollars
per
nonprofit
to
ten
thousand
dollars,
and
those
nonprofits
are
oasis
for
you,
housing
link,
bridging
and
v,
so
we
have
typically
done
five
thousand
dollars
and
we're
asking
to
proposing
to
increase
it
to
ten
thousand
dollars.
If.
E
C
E
Those
are
the
four
that
we
have
done:
the
administration
support
for
so
just
those
four.
Yes,
all
right
next
is
development,
and
so
in
development.
This
is
the
redevelopment
activities
done
by
the
hra
and
so
levy
dollars
will
be
spent
on
activities
such
as
the
knox
and
american
project.
E
As
you
know,
we
still
have
1801
american
that
we
have,
I
want
to
say,
development
rights
with
stuart
co
and
united
properties
on
that
property,
but
we
own
it,
but
they
still
have
development
rights
and
then
it
also
includes
support
for
senior
community
services,
home
home
energy
squad
programs,
which
includes
from
last
year.
There
was
a
new
pilot
program
of
air,
sealing
and
installation
we're
offering
to
continue
the
support
for
that
program.
It
was
pilot
last
year,
so
this
will
be
the
second
pilot
this
year.
E
This
will
be
the
second
year
as
well
as
cee
center
for
energy
and
environment,
so
the
hra
levy
funds
are
including
this
fund
to
acquire
and
demolish
single-family
blighted
properties.
So
those
are
all
the
activities
that
happen
with
the
development
fund
section
eight.
This
is
through
the
federal
funding
that
we
received
for
section
eight
and
the
funding
from
the
hud
cares.
Act
grant
was
sufficient,
and
so
the
expenditure
of
leverage
funds
on
this
activity
are
not
anticipated
to
be
needed.
E
Neighborhood.
This
is
our
rehab
programs,
and
so
it
actually
comple
comprises
three
programs.
So
the
cdbg
rehabilitation
loan
program,
the
neighborhood
rehabilitation
loan
program
and
the
health
program,
which
is
the
housing
and
environmental
loan
program
cdbg
home
rehab.
E
If
budget
includes
grant
funds-
and
it
is
a
maximum
of
80
ami
for
participants
to
or
applicants
and
participants
and
the
program
sees
continue
to
see
a
low
level
of
repayments
of
old
loans
and
then
the
neighborhood
loan
program
is
anticipated
to
be
funded
in
2022,
with
hra
levy
dollars
at
500,
000
and
repayment
of
old
loans
and
the
loans
for
this
program
are
available,
citywide
up
to
100
ami
and
we'll
go
through
later
on
about
the
rehab
programs,
because
I
do
have
that
on.
C
C
E
So
last
year
or
this
year
we
did
receive
six
hundred
thousand
dollars
in
strategic
priorities,
funding
from
the
city
council
which
which
we
did
not
plan
on
and
it
increased
our
eligible
budget
for
loans
to
1.1
million.
E
So
without
the
six
hundred
thousand
dollars
with
repayments,
we
are
looking
about
seven,
eight
hundred
thousand
in
that
program
in
particular,
and
so
it's
it
could
be
considered
a
cut,
but
with
repayments
and
the
five
hundred
000,
and
then
the
program
being
paused
and
coming
back
up
right
now,
we're
pretty
confident
that
we'll
be
okay
in
2022.
C
So
just
to
clarify
so
the
first
of
all.
I
have
to
indicate
that
I'm
clearly
disappointed
with
the
city
council's
decision
on
on
that
one
last
year,
but
so
that
this
program
has
been
funded
at
500
000
in
past
years
by
the
hra.
Yes,
okay,
so
we're
at
the
same
level
of
funding
for
the
program
in
terms
of
the
hra.
As
we
have
been
both
this
year
and
past
years.
E
Yes,
I
believe
so,
but
brian
could
add
anything
if
I'm
missing
anything
from
that.
G
Yeah
so,
and
as
erica
mentioned,
we
did
not
budget
for
a
city
contribution
this
year
so
that
that
was
a
gift
yeah
that
we
didn't
expect.
So
thank
you,
miss
veloga
and
you
know,
but
we
have
been
you
know,
as
erica
mentioned,
we've
been
informed
by
finance
and
others
that
we
should
not
plan
on
receiving
strategic
priorities
funding
next.
Thank
you.
I
appreciate
the
information
so
chair.
F
F
F
F
The
only
thing
that
I'd
really
rather
do
is
go
back
to
the
funding
level
of
2011
and
12
when
we
were
doing
a
million
a
year.
E
Understood
the
help
program
is
anticipated
to
be
funding
to
be
funded
in
2022
as
a
forgivable
loan
available
city
wide.
So
right
now,
I'm
looking
at
help
pretty
much
having
a
set
amount,
but
it
would
be
coming
out
of
the
neighborhood
pot
so
in
doing
help
which
would
be
forgivable.
Loans
for
people
that
are
really
in
need
to
get
some
things
fixed
on
their
home
and
that
meet
those
requirements
and
eligibility
requirements.
E
E
Not
a
change.
Okay,
no,
but
I
just
want
to
be
clear
all
right,
so
the
next
one
is
assisted
rental,
which
formerly
public
housing.
So
this
fund
reflects
the
revenues
and
expenditures
of
the
operation
of
the
20,
hra,
scattered
site
rental
housing
units
that
the
aj
converted
from
public
housing
to
project-based
vouchers,
and
so
with
these
units
we
have
increased
rental
income
since
the
conversion
from
going
from
public
housing
to
project
base.
E
This
is
the
21
single-family
homes
under
the
rental,
housing
program,
rental
homes
for
future
home
buyers,
and
so
the
hra
escrows
a
portion
of
the
household's
rent
to
be
applied
to
the
purchase
of
their
home
in
the
future,
and
so
we
are
proposing
I'll
get
into
it
in
just
a
minute.
We
are
proposing
to
put
funding
into
these,
but
this
is
the
funds
that
we're
looking
at
and
so
on.
This
summary
we
have
proposed
for
the
general
general
fund,
a
general
admin,
386
886
dollars
from
the
levy
and
1.831797.
E
So
1.8
million
from
the
levy
to
the
development
fund,
nothing
for
section
8,
as
we
have
said
previously,
the
housing,
rehab
programs,
500
000
and
then
the
assisted
rental
and
the
home
rental
have
been
sustained,
and
so
we
are
looking
at
the
rents
for
those
programs.
It's
the
rents
that
we
would
be
putting
to
help
continue
to
manage
those
programs.
E
So
that's
how
the
levy
is
broken
out
and
proposed.
Excuse
me
proposed
broke
it
out
for
2022,
and
then
you
can
see
here
with
the
section
8
of
vouchers.
We
are
estimating,
based
on
numbers
that
we
have
5
million
717
thousand
19
dollars
to
continue
to
support
that
program
for
2022..
E
So
I
went
through
that,
but
I
can
stand
for
any
questions.
Comments,
discussion,
thoughts
that
what
we
think
we
should
do
with
this
proposed
budget,
because
this
is
just
review
and
discussion.
Okay,.
A
Thank
you,
administrator
coleman.
Are
there
additional
questions,
thomas
commissioner,
olson.
D
Thank
you,
chair
lewis.
I
didn't
break
in
at
that
point.
I
didn't
know
how
we
were
proceeding
with
this,
but
I'd
like
to
go
back
to
the
development,
the
second
category
that
you
discussed
bottom
of
that
page
and
there's
a
such
as
knocks
in
american
development.
Yes,
and
one
of
the
things
that
I
think
coveted
and
going
for
a
period
of
time
without
a
a
full-time
administrator,
we
kind
of
lost
the.
D
E
So,
thank
you,
chair
lewis,
commissioner
olson.
One
of
the
things
I'll
point
out
is
that
its
levy
dollars
will
be
spent
on
activities
such
as
such
than
as
maximum
american
part
of
that
is
the
way
those
deals
are
structured.
We
owe
payments,
we
are
making
a
half
a
million
dollar
payment
to
the
developers
of
knox
in
america.
Okay,
so
part
of
this
statement
is
more
so
about
our
obligations
and
less
about
our
opportunity
to
do
other
developments
that
would
be
in
line
with
the
that
district.
D
E
Does
not
negate
that
we
are
still
managing
the
oho,
the
affordable
housing
trust
fund
and
we
are
still
working
through
potential
projects
that
would
be
contributing
to
more
of
our
affordable
housing
development
as
well
as
market
rate
housing,
because
that
can't
stop
so
we're
still
working
on
that.
D
And
if
I
can
just
do
a
trailer
here
appreciate
this
overview
that
you've
given
us
and
we've
got
the
support
information
to
look
in
detail
if
we
want.
But
it
helped
me
to
pull
it
together
in
my
head,
because
budget
sometimes
blur.
E
A
Are
there
any
other
questions
for
administrator
coleman,
as
this
was
just
really
a
discussion
item?
I
think
we
got
some
good
questions
out
there
and
we
will
then
move
on
to
item
4.2,
which
is
the
2021
hra
annual
plan
update.
E
Yes,
thank
you,
chair
lewis,
so
I
wanted
to
bring
this
back
before
you.
I
know
we
just
did
it
in
march,
but
we
haven't
talked
about
it
and
there's
a
lot
of
things
happening,
and
so
I
wanted
to
quickly
walk
through
this.
So
economic
impact,
education
and
health
there's
been
a
lot
going
on
here.
There's
a
lot
of
collaboration
with
city
state
and
national
leadership,
we're
doing
a
little
bit
more
with
national
leadership,
around
housing
and
priorities
and
proposal
of
bills
and
how
they
would
impact
our
work
or
the
city.
E
We
are
also
in
talks
with
the
federal
reserve,
so
the
itasca
project,
which
is
a
part
of
the
housing
focus
that
they
have
the.
I
am
on
that
committee
that
bore
to
to
meet
with
the
federal
reserve
and
grow
that
relationship
as
well
as
others
around
the
region
in
terms
of
housing
and
how
we
can
leverage
different
relationships
and
funding
and
then
bloomington
public
schools.
E
This
is
starting
to
become
a
big
one.
Bloomington
public
schools
does
have
a
housing,
housing,
stability
and
homelessness
district
liaison,
and
so
I
had
previously
told
you
that
we
know
of
about
300
students
that
are
experiencing
homelessness
and
what
is
happening
with
our
coordination
with
bloomington
public
schools
is.
We
are
talking
through
how
to
work
better
together
on
stably
housing,
students
and
families,
and
what
does
that
look
like
in
bloomington
to
remain
in
bloomington
and
sherry
working
towards
sharing
data
to
really
get
that
information?
E
So
just
growing
that
relationship
and
then
working
with
the
equity
office
of
educational
equity,
with
bloomington
public
schools,
and
so
that's
really
expanding.
They
would
like
to
do
a
more
of
a
housing
series,
but
we're
looking
into
how
do
we
do
that?
Bringing
information
forward
about
housing
and
renting
and
ownership,
so
that
is
growing
and
then
public
health.
There
is
a
health,
equity
and
renter
health
survey
that
was
going
to
be
done
with
a
their
lead
person
left,
and
so
they
put
that
survey
on
pause
until
spring
2022..
E
We
are
participating
that
our
person
left,
who
was
also
helping
with
that,
and
so
that
was
danielle
burkhoffer
our
office
assistant.
So
she
did
move
on
to
opportunities
around
her
degree
that
she
was
fulfilling
so
an
internship
with
that.
So
we
actually
had
both
people
kind
of
leave.
E
So
I've
been
in
talks
with
the
public
health
administrator
nick
kelly,
and
so
that
survey
is
just
on
hold
until
2022,
but
in
the
meantime
we
are
collaborating
more
when
it
comes
to
our
property
like
blooming
metal
south
and
how
public
health
is
engaging
with
different
people
around
the
city
and
their
needs
and
housing
keeps
coming
up.
So
there's
going
to
be
opportunities
to
coordinate
better
with
our
public
health
nurses,
because
they're
just
asking
all
kinds
of
questions
about
that.
So
there's
a
lot
of
coordination
going
on
here.
D
Administrator
coleman,
part
of
the
value
of
the
health
connection,
is
that
they
are
in
homes
in
a
lot
of
homes.
Yes,
that
affect
quality
of
life
and
and
housing
issues,
and
that
kind
of
thing.
So
what
is
is
that
what
the
survey
is
kind
of
aiming
for
or.
E
So
I
solved
some
of
the
questions.
I
didn't
see
the
final
survey
and
I
think
it
wasn't
finalized
before
both
of
the
staff
members
left,
but
I
did
see
a
lot
of
the
questions
and
it
did
deal
with
the
health
safety,
mental
health,
but
also
like
their
knowledge
or
understanding
about
what
their
rights
are
around
housing.
E
You
know
because
it
all
it
kind
of
all,
goes
together,
and
so,
if
you're
having
these
health
issues
but
you're
scared
to
report
it
or
you
don't
actually
know
what
your
rights
are
in
reporting
it
and
what
how
it's
supposed
to
be
fixed.
They
were
kind
of
getting
into
that.
E
So
I
had
a
little
bit
more
a
little
more
questions,
because
I
didn't
want
public
health
to
be
perceived
as
an
us
versus
them,
so
we
have
built
relationships
with
our
managers,
our
property
managers,
our
property
owners,
and
so
I
wanted
to
understand
better.
So
we're
positive.
We'll
talk
more
about
that,
because
I
want
to
understand
better
how
we,
how
are
we
coordinating
with
residents
who
are
renters,
but
also
property
managers
and
property
owners
and
not
picking
a
side
so
to.
D
Speak
one
of
the
values
that
I
think
is
tremendous
is
that
the
the
model
for
public
health
is
that
they
have
workers
that
oftentimes
are
work,
interacting
one-on-one,
and
so
it's
just
a
rich
source
of
understanding.
What
life
is
like
beyond
the
necessarily
the
particular
reason
for
coming,
so
I'm
looking
forward
to
what
the
results
will
be
great.
B
F
You
you
should
look
it
up.
A
very
glowing
result,
a
report
of
her
time
spent
within
the
hra
and
the
friendships,
and
it's
it's
just
very.
Where
was
that
linkedin
guys?
So
you
want
to
take
a
look.
E
Nice,
thank
you.
Yes,
absolutely
engagement
and
transparency,
so
we
did.
F
E
A
F
We
go
back
to
number
one.
Yes
in
strategy,
the
advancement
of
economic
priorities
with
state
policy
makers,
in
particular
you're
aware
of
the
legislation
that's
going
to
be
introduced
in
the
coming
session
by
district
or
representative
elkins.
I
am,
and
I'd
like
to
have
some
conversation
amongst
this
group
about
that
legislation:
okay,
because
the
essence
of
it
removes
local
rule
and
I'm
personally,
not
in
favor
of
that,
and
while
I'm
limited
in
how
many
of
my
council
colleagues
I
can
talk
to
about
that.
F
E
Do
you
know
if
there
is
a
conversation
planned
at
all
for
the
council
to
because
that
bill
holds
so
much
the
the
proposed
legislation
that
we
have
seen
hold
so
much,
and
it
has
started
a
lot
of
conversations,
but
it's
a
big
planning
document
or
sends
a
big
plain
document.
It
pertains
more
to
planning
and
so
because
people
see
housing
they're
coming
to
the
hra,
but
it's
been
the
planning
manager.
F
I
not
as
yet
but
later
in
the
year,
while
the
council
does
its
strategic
or
its
legislative
priorities,
okay,
and
that
will
certainly
have
that
deep
dive
at
that
time,
because
we'll
have
to
decide
as
a
council
what
our
position
is
with
respect
to
that
bill
or
segments
of
it
at
least
okay
and
then
right,
because
while
there
are
favorable
parts,
you
know
being
dictated
on
lot
sizes
and
you
know
building
materials.
And
you
know
I
think
it's
a
real
overreach
because
it
does
remove
local.
E
F
Would
like
us
too,
so
we
can
get
concerts,
yeah,
okay,
yeah,
because,
interestingly
enough,
when
steve
was
on
the
console,
he
was
a
very
pro
local
rule.
D
Thank
you,
administrator
coleman.
I'm
I'm
wondering
if
we
have
a
four
organizations
dealing
with
housing
that
are
meeting
on
the
29th
visit
or
I
don't
know
if
it's
appropriate
to
at
least
put
that
on
the
table
or
something.
E
So
real
quick,
the
29th
is
the
uli
panel
I
wanted
to
one.
I
did
want
to
bring
that
up.
It's
not
at
city,
county
city,
plaza
civic,
plaza
it's
actually
at
fire
station
one,
and
that
will
be
the
planning
commission,
hra,
commission,
city,
council
and
port
authority.
E
What
I
do
want
to
ask
is:
are
the
council,
the
commissioners
that
are
here?
Do
you
all
plan
on
attending,
because
I
need
to
get
a
number
back
to
okay
and
I'm
into.
F
I'm
uncertain
because
the
the
date
for
surgery
for
marilyn's
knee
is,
I
understand
it's.
It's
been
moved
three
times
in
the
past
weeks.
Okay,.
E
All
right
so
so
there's
that
and
then
two
I
can
find
out,
because
that
will
more
so
what
I
understand
will
more
so
be
in
the
audience,
and
the
panel
will
be
by
those
that
are
out
here
doing
development
from
different
viewpoints.
However,
I
don't
see
why
that
bill
would
not
come
up
because
that's
their
work
as
well,
so
I
can
bring
it
back
to
the
coordination,
for
this
event
has
been
carla,
henderson
community
development,
director
and
shane
redline,
the
port
authority
administrator.
So
I
can
bring
back
to
them.
D
Council
did
one
of
those-
I
don't
know
four
or
five
years
ago,
and
there
were
some
legislators
there:
okay
and
somebody
from
the?
U
of
m.
I
think
and.
E
They
reached
out
and
contacted
the
panelists
and
invited
them
and
set
up
the
focus.
It
was
just
shane
and
carla
have
been
more
lead
on
that
I've
kind
of
just
been
told
like
yep,
that's
the
date,
that's
what
we're
doing
so.
F
Okay,
thank
you
and
if
I
might
give
a
culture
to
that,
I
I
think
that
eli,
injecting
their
opinions
to
our
discussions
for
very
local
items,
needs
to
be
thought
through
prior
to
you
know
doing
that.
At
that
point
you
know
because
at
the
end
of
the
day,
they're
they're
value
partners
they're
very
knowledgeable,
but
they
don't
they're
not
living
in
bloomington.
F
That's
the
best,
I
can
say
yep
understood
and
we
want
to
keep
bloomington
bloomington.
F
E
Thank
you
so
engagement
transparency.
We
did
release
the
annual
housing
report
with
ongoing
tracking.
We
are
tracking
information,
we're
giving
we're
getting
so
much
information.
That's
not
a
bad
thing.
I
think
we're
you
know
we're
just
realizing
how
much
is
really
going
on
in
housing
and
in
this
space
and
how
it
impacts
everybody,
but
being
able
to
continue
with
that
ongoing
tracking.
E
For
so
many
reasons,
one
of
them
being
you
know,
how
are
we
structuring
our
programs
and
our
services,
but
also
are
we
able
to
meet
the
changing
demographics,
the
aging
population,
the
aging
housing
like
how
you
know
just
getting
that
tracking
information,
which
also
the
data
helps
us
in
leveraging
other
funding
opportunities
or
other
partnerships
and
collaborations.
So
that's
a
big
one
b-hat.
E
So
the
b-hat.
What
is
it's
moving
along
great?
It's
a
really
good
good
team.
It's
really
been
hard
with
colbit.
It's
really
been
hard
in
the
virtual
space,
and
so
that's
really
a
struggle
for
b-hat
and
I
so
far
we
have
not
had
conversations
about
bringing
b-hat
back
in
person,
and
I
think
you
know
right
now
in
this
world.
We're
dealing
with
colvin
and
and
more
people
want
this
hybrid
type
of
situation,
and
we
haven't
really
figured
out
how
to
crack
that
nut.
E
So
that's
that's
where
b
hat
is,
but
it's
still
moving
or
still
they're
still
meeting
they're
still
setting
agendas,
we're
still
engaging
in
conversation
with
residents
and
different
community
partners
so
and
then
collect
track
and
analyze
program
participation.
E
So
with
this
one,
even
though
this
is
the
annual
plan,
we
will
be
launching
a
customer
satisfaction
survey
in
2022
and
what
we'll
start
with
are
our
coordination
and
collaboration
with
bloomington
public
schools
and
the
families
that
participate
in
some
of
our
programs.
So
that
way,
we'll
start
we'll
start
there
and
how
we
can
get
increased
engagement
to
actually
complete
the
survey.
E
So
that
will
be
more
to
go
on
that
one.
Okay,.
D
A
E
And
then
we
are,
we,
we
don't
have
a
formal
plan
with
community
outreach
and
engagement
division.
What
we
do
have
is
more
of
a
guideline
and
how
we
engage
them
and
on
our
different
projects
and
different
programs
and
engaging
them,
and
we
do
reach
out
to
them
quite
a
bit
and
with
people
experiencing
homelessness,
really
reach
out
to
co-ed
because
they
used
to
be
in
human
services
department
and
they
still
have
those
skills
and
knowledge
and
connections,
and
we
are
seeing
where
we
really
need
that
now
in
the
hra.
E
So
for
people
experiencing
homelessness
and
housing
instability.
This
is
starting
to
be
a
big
one,
that
we
really
don't
have
a
space
field
for
that
type
of
resources
and
services,
and
so
we're
engaging
a
lot
with
community
outreach
and
engagement
on
this.
E
All
right
so,
as
we
get
into
housing
creation
preservation,
rehabilitation,
we
are
moving
along.
I
have
to
look
at
the
count.
We
are
at
60
loans,
rehab
loans.
We
are
not
the
program's
been
paused
and
we
are
having
under
reviews
the
single
family,
duplex
standards,
that's
really
with
planning,
but
mike
palermo,
who
does
is
in
the
hra
part-time,
is
actually
who's
leading
that
review
and
then
maintain
enhanced
energy.
Efficient
housing
programs
is
really
our
coordination
with
cee
and
support
for
the
improvements
on
our
age.
Very
own
properties.
F
And
erica,
you
are
aware,
of
course,
that
council
passed
on
monday,
the.
A
C
And
I
don't
know
if
this
is
the
right
place
for
it
or
not.
But
at
one
point
we
talked
about
re-visiting
the
guidelines
for
the
home
improvement
loans.
C
To
I
mean
I
believe
that
now
we
cover
things
like
landscaping
and
with
a
smaller
budget
this
this
coming
year
than
we
had
last
year.
I
wonder
if
we
need
to
both
revisit
the
kinds
of
improvements
that
we're
allowing
under
the
program
and
maybe
even
the
the
income
which
we
really
put
at
a
pretty
high
level.
C
If
I
recall
now
that
might
be
a
little
touch
here,
because
I
think
it's
a
program
that
you
know
everybody
could
could
use,
but
I
think
it's
worth
putting
on
the
agenda
that
we,
you
know,
look
at
some
of
those
aspects
of
the
program.
C
E
So
next,
3.2
of
integrate
resources
and
partnerships
create
and
preserve,
affordable
units
update
commercial
commercial
redevelopment
priorities,
so
this
is
underway
because
gateway
is
so
big
and
there
has
been
the
focus
on
the
penn
american
district
and
then
normandale
lake.
But
there
was
not
well
I
couldn't
say
there
was
not.
E
There
is
a
need
to
focus
more
on
where
our
small
businesses
are
and
one
of
the
part
one
of
the
spots
that
keeps
coming
up
is
90th
and
pin
yeah
and
there's
a
lot
of
construction
work
being
done
over
there,
and
so
this
is
underway.
E
This
is
with
planning
and
the
hra
as
well
as
430
as
some
say
so,
but
then
also
as
a
community
development
director,
and
so
I
was
just
getting
some
information
to
our
community
development
director
and
updating
strategic
priorities
performance,
the
performance
I
can't
think
of
the
name,
but
it's
the
performance
measures
there.
We
go
strategic
priorities,
performance
measures-
I
just
updated,
because
this
is
one
of
the
strategic
priority
goals
of
the
city
council.
E
So
this
is
trivia.
I
know
this
is
other
way:
housing
amendments
tracking
outreach.
So
this
was
some
of
the
amendments
that
we
did
to
the
opportunity
housing
ordinance
already
and
then
we're
reviewing
it
again,
as
we
are
learning
more
information.
One
of
the
things
that
comes
up
is
in
in
allowing
incentives
and
doing
the
ohl.
How
are
we
incorporating
payment
standards
of
section
8?
E
E
We
did
have
a
facilitated
discussion
with
multiple
departments
and
divisions
around
the
ohio
and
its
creation
and
moving
forward
and
doing
a
checklist
and
things
like
that.
So
that's
what
that
is:
noaa
property
review,
tracking
work
group
participation,
so
we
are
using
our
b
hat
work
group,
but
we're
also
looking
at
properties
because
normandale
lake
sold
again
it
did,
and
then
we
have
the
90-day
tenant
protection
ordinance
that
was
in
place
there.
That
is
in
place,
and
so
we
are
looking
at
that
and
then
ongoing
projects
management.
E
So
this
is
just
the
projects
that
we
have
for
preserving,
affordable
housing.
So
we
have
80
12
volt
cedar.
We
have
glendale
flats,
we
have
pintair
pinterest.
I
think
pinterest
that
we
are
waiting
to
hear
in
november
and
close
contact,
then
yeah
pin
places
existing
okay
yep.
They
were
waiting
to
hear
november
about
minnesota
management
and
budget
if
they
got
the
the
lights
that
they
applied
for
the
credits
and
then
we
are
in
discussions
about
8200,
humboldt
and
a
couple
other
properties
that
people
have
also.
E
It's
the
port
and
the
air
crown
closet
air
apartments,
so
we
come
in
kind
of
when
it's
the
oho
or
payment
and
boom.
So
we
know
about
it
that
way.
But
then
we
do
have
700
american
that
we
haven't
move
forward
with
how
we're
going
to
develop
that
yet
in
the
98th
street
station,
which
is
the
the
lot
that
we
own
that
we
did
apply
for
150
000
from
the
met
council
for
livable
communities,
development
account,
transit,
oriented
development,
pre-development
site
planning.
E
Yes,
I
know,
however,
with
all
those
words
we
were
recommended
by
the
community
development
committee
for
the
full
hundred
fifty
thousand
dollars,
and
so
we
will
hear
about
awards
by
end
of
september
and
what
that
will
be
used
for
is
because
that
lot
was
purchased
using
right-of-way
loan
acquisition
funds.
E
It
was
held
for
possible
interchange
for
35.
We
have
to
do
a
road
study
and
so
we're
using
that
funding.
So
we
can
finally
do
the
real
estate
to
say:
does
it
necessitate
an
interchange
which
I
believe
it
does
not,
but
then
also
what
does
it
look
like
in
terms
of
pedestrian
bike
path,
bike
way,
things
like
that
and
then
getting
on
to
the
development,
which
will
include
housing,
all
of
that's
happening,
and
then
we
ongoing
support
private
market
development.
We
do
not
restrict
private
market
development
by
any
means
housing
stabilization.
E
This
is
so
this
one
has
really
been
big
and
people
experiencing
homelessness.
The
hotel
conversion
study
that
is
still
underway
by
planning-
and
that
is
you
know
seeing-
is
it
going
to
be
single
room,
occupancy
standards?
What
does
the
code
call
for
and
what
is
allowed
and
that's
usually
going
to
take
a
change
to
the
code?
E
We
are
working
to
prioritize
30
to
50
percent
ami
unit
development,
like
I
said:
80,
12,
old,
cedar
pintairs,
both
of
those
are
prioritizing
30
to
50
units
and
then
the
proposed
conversations.
We
are
always
asking
for
30
units.
However,
that
comes
with.
They
need
more
funding
to
fill
the
gap
and
then
temporary
pandemic
housing
is
over
technically.
E
E
However,
we
are
still
seeing
that
people
need
housing
due
to
the
pandemic
and
we
don't
have
it
tied
to
any
type
of
order.
E
Nor
do
we
expect
to
get
any
additional
funding
from
the
federal
government,
so
we're
looking
at
creative
ways
and
collaborating
to
see
who's
doing
what
and
talking
with
hennepin
county,
since
they
have
put
out
that
they
support
housing,
and
so
that's
where
we
are.
I
think
we're
in
the
same
place
that
a
lot
of
cities
and
places
are
in
and
trying
to
help
residents
and
then
support
services
for
seniors.
E
Home
with
senior
community
services,
but
also
a
brush
with
kindness,
we
have
found
that
it
helps
more
seniors.
The
brush
for
kindness
program
that
I
did
bring
before
you
to
talk
about
is
also
something
it'll
be
more
with
environmental
health,
but
what
they
are
seeing
is
typically
seniors
that
need
the
help
and
that's
why
they're
pushing
for
that
capability.
E
Right
and
then
maintain
rental
assistance,
offerings
expand
were
feasible.
We
went
through
that
with
our
budget
and
then
lastly,
operational
efficiency,
so
definitely
working
on
creating
team
cohesion
supported
by
training
and
development,
but
also
just
breathers.
E
I
mean
culver's
hard
right,
so
just
really
having
gatherings-
or
you
know,
breaks
and
just
talking
with
staff
and
finding
out
how
you
know
can
help
different
things
like
that,
but
I
think
that's
probably
the
first
thing
to
team
cohesion
outside
of
development
is
like
hey.
How
are
you
doing
being
able
to
see
each
other
in
the
office
and
whatnot
and
then
enhanced
organizational
and
governance
structure
for
high
quality
service
delivery?
E
So
we
did
update
hra
board
policies
and
procedure
with
our
bylaws
and
whatnot.
We
can
always
review
them
again.
That's
as
we
navigate
and
work
through.
We
do
have
a
new
process,
application
process,
that's
looking
to
be
rolled
out
and
the
hra
is
kind
of
the
first
that
would
be
experiencing
that
because
we
do
have
two
seats
that
end
in
2022
in
2021,
so
there'll
be
applications
open
and
then
going
through
the
new
process.
E
I
will
say
that
I
have
asked
that
I
understand
it's
a
city
process,
but
I
have
asked
for
more
inclusion
of
at
least
the
administrator,
but
also
the
chair
and
possibly
another
board
member.
When
it
comes
to
interviews
or
application
review,
I
really
was
able
to
just
say
I
don't
know
that
council
knows
what
we
need,
and
so
I
would
like
to
have
some
input
as
a
separate
entity
as
a
separate
board
that
is
not
under
the
city
charter
on
how
commissioners
are
picked.
E
So
then
I
will
jump
back
up
to
the
high
quality
service
needs
assessment.
So
for
this
it
will
be
underway.
Kyla
henderson,
the
cd
director
and
jamie
verbruge,
the
city
manager,
have
been
leading
the
search
for
a.
E
I
guess
consultant
to
do
a
service
to
do
a
service
assessment
of
how
we
do
development
as
a
city,
and
you
can't
do
that
without
including
the
hra,
and
so
with
that
assessment
it
would
include
how
the
hra
is
staffed,
broken
up
work
and
does
the
work,
because
we
have
one
position
outside
the
administrator:
that's
appointed
to
development.
E
So
it's
a
service
assessment
of
the
that
will
be
rolled
in
with
that
looking
to
be
six
months
or
less
total
for
the
assessment
to
be
done,
and
I
do
know
that
proposals
have
been
sent
in
by
at
least
two
different
consultants
and
they
are
being
reviewed.
E
I
am
included,
I'm
just
not
leading
it
with
carl
and
jamie
for
for
that
one
and
then
strengthen
financials
and
operating
policies,
so
development
procedures
and
process
manual-
and
this
is
happening
more
so
with
not
necessarily
like
a
big
development
manual-
that's
gonna,
take
a
lot
more,
as
I
had
to
facilitate
a
discussion.
I
learned.
That's
gonna,
take
a
whole
lot
more
than
what
I
initially
thought
just
because
so
many
departments
are
engaged
in
development
and
we
weren't
necessarily
coordinating
early
on
on
developments.
E
So
that's
ongoing.
We
continue
to
have
staff
changes
at
the
city,
not
just
the
hra
but
at
the
city,
and
so
we'll
see
how
we
coordinate
moving
forward
with
new
staff
coming
up.
So
that
was
a
lot
of
information,
but
that
was
the
whole
update.
Just
no
work
is
moving
and
staff
is
very
busy.
A
D
Olson,
thank
you,
chair
lewis.
D
In
other
words,
there's
there
were
times
when
I
was
looking
through
the
material
that
I
was
thinking
well,
this
is
really
the
most
important,
but
really
the
whole
package
is
really
needed
and
I
do
have
one
question:
in
the
column
on
accountability,
I've
been
involved
in
a
variety
of
organizations
and,
and
typically
it
ends
up.
Accountability
is
asking
a
person
and
to
be
or
group
or
whatever,
and
many
of
them
talk
about
policy
yeah
and
that
kind
of
thing.
E
And
so
thank
you
for
the
question.
The
reason
that
accountability
is
is
tied
to
more
of
the
programs
who's.
Our
program
side
is
because
we're
a
team
and
if
we
tie
it
to
one
person,
we
are
stretching
that
one
staff
member
to
do
that
work.
What
is
happening
now
is
that
there
may
be
one
or
two
staff
that
are
taking
the
lead,
but
through
the
hpo
process,
we're
engaging
engaging
amongst
each
other.
E
Just
today,
with
the
home
improvement
program,
I
may
be
bringing
it
forward,
but
that
included
me
brian
hartman,
brian
derwachter,
stephen
schmidt,
assessing
legal.
So
it
ends
up
being
the
team
that
is
coming
together
and
that's
why
it's
not
tied
to
a
person
that
we're
engaging
each
other
and
having
conversations
to
make
sure
that
different
viewpoints
are
heard
and
seen
and
that
people
that
are
actually
doing
work
are
able
to
say
yeah.
That
looks
good
on
paper,
but
that
may
not
work
out
that
way.
D
I
I
really
like
the
idea
of
the
team.
I
mean
it
makes
sense
to
do
it
that
way
and
covet
has
really
confounded
a
lot
of
things
in
our
lives,
but
part
of
it,
too,
is
if
how
out
of
the
accountability
by
a
group
like
this
or
a
resident
in
a
city?
How
is
it
kind
of
nailed
down
at
some
point?
D
In
terms
of
I
mean,
are
there
like
goals
for
the
programs
or
the
goals
for
the
outcomes
of
this
teamwork
that
can
be
kind
of
more
clear,
digestible,
yeah.
E
We
can
work
towards
that.
We
can
work
towards
that,
making
that
more
clear
in
a
written
format
that
we
can
go
back
to
and
also
be
able
to
share
communion.
D
When
I
was
in
school
systems,
one
of
the
things
was
to
make
sure
that
there
was
somebody
that
we
could
end
up.
Saying
is
going
to
make
sure
that
that
the
shepherding
of
the
process
happens
and
that's
the
piece
that
I'm
I'm
missing
and
was
used
to,
but
and
there's
other
ways
to
get
it
done.
So
I
look
forward
to
how
that
will.
E
And
I
think
for
this,
just
as
the
way
the
organization
is
set
up,
it's
the
administrator
and
then
the
tasks
are
assigned
and
coordinated
like
I
work
with
brian
and
myra
on
a
lot
of
different
things
and
that's
how
I'm
informed
and
included.
But
it's
really
the
administrator.
That's
the
lead
and.
D
Just
understood
and
there's
a
good
feel
in
my
mind
about
the
stuff
that
we
deal
with
in
our
meetings
that
we
are
making.
As
you
said,
I
think
the
word
progress
you
know
and
there's
a
process
to
get
to
it,
and
so
it's
an
upbeat
feeling
it's
just
you
know
sometimes
or
not
happens
or
whatever
yeah.
So
thank
you.
Thank
you.
A
Are
there
any
other
questions
for
administrator
coleman
all
right?
Well,
thank
you
again
for
that
very
thorough
update.
Now
we
will
be
moving
on
to
new
business
and
our
first
item
of
new
business
item.
5.1
is
approval
of
a
memo
of
understanding
with
hennepin
county
for
the
foster
youth
to
independence,
housing
choice
vouchers.
G
Manage
commissioners
we're
very
excited
tonight
to
bring
forward
to
you
for
approval
the
memo
of
understanding
for
hennepin
county,
which
is
the
first
step
in
establishing
the
foster
youth
to
an
independence
program
in
the
city
of
bloomington.
We
talked
to
you
about
this.
I
think
was
it
two
years
ago,
maybe
somewhere
in
that
neighborhood
and
through
a
different
amount
of
delays
and
setbacks
and
covet
and
pandemic
and
lawyers.
We
are
now
ready
to
take
that
stuff
on
board.
G
Yes,
we're
ready
to
talk
to
you
well,
hud
was
in
there
too
let's,
but
we're
really
excited
to
bring
the
mou
to
you
for
approval,
so
we
can
move
forward
with
making
an
application
for
up
to
10
vouchers.
G
Just
to
remind
you
that
this
is
a
special
program
and
set
aside
vouchers
that
hud
has
created
to
serve
foster
youth
who
are
aging
out
of
the
system
or
have
aged
out
and
are
at
risk
of
homeless,
and
it
does
have
a
service
component
to
it
and
stacy
ray
from
hennepin
county
here
is
gonna,
be
our
partner,
the
lead
for
the
for
the
county
and
also
there'll
be
six
different
service
providers.
That
will
provide
services
to
those
youth.
G
So
we're
very
excited
about
this.
This
is
a
program
that
lasts
for
up
to
36
months
of
rent
assistance
for
those
youth
if
they
are
still
in
need
of
rent
assistance.
At
the
end
of
that
36
months,
we
are
going
to
update
our
admin
plan
at
our
next
meeting
to
include
a
preference
for
them,
so
they
can
pop
at
the
top
of
the
waiting
list
and
receive
a
regular
voucher
if
they
should
need
that.
So
we'll
be
talking
about
that
at
our
next
meeting,
but
stacy
is
here.
I
think
I'm
excited
you're.
G
Here,
that's
been
a
long
road
but
she's
here
to
answer
any
questions
you
might
have
about
the
program,
the
youth
that
are
being
served
and
maybe
frankly,
a
little
bit
of
the
demand.
Maybe
you
want
to
talk
about
that
stacy,
just
about
kind
of
the
pent-up
demand
for
these
vouchers
and
how
now
it's
not
only
bloomington,
that's
going
forward,
it's
st
louis
park,
it's
mpha
indianapolis
housing
authority
and
metro
council
hra.
B
H
So
thanks
for
having
me
it
was
about
a
year
and
a
half
or
two
years
ago
I
was
here.
I
think
it
was
my
actual
one
of
my
last
in-person
meetings,
because
the
county's
got
us
on
lockdown.
We
can't
go
in
person,
so
this
is
my
first
in-person
meeting
again.
So
it's
exciting
to
be
here
so
yeah.
We
are
in
addition
to
bloomington
hra,
it's
minneapolis,
my
council,
in
st
louis
park,
and
each
housing
authority
has
access
to
up
to
25
of
these
vouchers
for
these
young
folks.
H
So
we're
looking
at
you
know
a
massive
impact
to
our
young
people
in
hennepin
county
who
can
access
these
three-year,
basically
section
8
vouchers
or
housing
choice,
vouchers
for
housing,
private
market,
and
it
has
been
a
lot
of
project
management
in
involving
these
six
non-profits
who
aren't
getting
paid
any
service
dollars
these.
This
funding
does
not
come
with
service
dollars.
It
is
only
the
the
dollars
that
the
housing
authority
gets
to
administer
the
rents
and
the
admin
fees
that
you
guys
collect
on
that.
H
So
a
lot
of
partnering
with
these
community
providers,
who
are
already
serving
these
youth,
that
they've
prioritized
and
trying
to
tap
into
the
services
and
expertise
of
the
community
that
that's
already
offering
this
service
to
the
young
people.
So
we've
got.
I
don't
know
if
you
want
to
know
the
six
non-profits
okay.
H
So
we
have
youth
link,
the
ymca
connections
to
independence,
avenues
for
youth,
oasis
for
youth
and
the
link
and
two
of
those
organizations
target
youth
who
have
or
who
are
about
to
age
out
of
extended,
foster
care
and
then
the
other
four
organizations
target
those
young
people
who
are
homeless
or
at
risk
of
being
homeless
and
through
the
the
partnering.
With
these
six
organizations,
they
have
set
the
tone
and
created
a
prioritization
kind
of
chart.
It's
really
massive
and
it's
attached
to
the
mou.
H
If
you
want
to
see
it,
but
they
in
their
expertise
and
identifying
the
youth
that
could
benefit
from
this
resource.
Knowing
that
there's
way
more
youth
eligible
than
opportunities
that
we
have
they've
created
a
prioritization
of
youth
who
they
would
refer
to
these
vouchers
and
it's
really
small.
It's
really
small.
A
H
Basically,
it
kind
of
summarize
it
they've
identified
five
kind
of
groups
or
prioritization
levels,
so
the
priority
one
and
the
bottom
they've
broken
it
down
into
a
couple
different
categories,
if
you're
homeless
or
at
risk
of
being
homeless.
Those
are
different
factors,
whether
you
are
a
parenting,
youth
or
expecting
parenting,
youth
versus
non.
H
If
you
have
a
history
of
exploitation,
if
they
have
ex
experienced,
foster
care
in
hanover
county
versus
other
counties-
and
I
think
those
are
those
are
the
main-
those
are
the
categories
that
they've
kind
of
narrowed
as
the
focus
points
of
of
referral
and
prioritization.
So
those
are
all
embedded
into
this
very
lovely
chart.
That's
hard
to
read.
H
Yeah
yeah
it's
in
the
it's
attached
to
the
mou
because
we've
so
in
addition
to
the
mlus
with
the
housing
authorities,
I've
also
enacted
mlu's
with
all
six
non-profits
with
the
candidate
county,
just
to
make
sure
everyone's
on
the
same
page
and
so
that
we
all
read
this
over
and
over
and
over
and
understand
who's.
Doing
what
and
what's
expected
expected
expected
of
the
county
of
the
housing
authority,
as
well
as
the
providers
themselves?
H
That's
kind
of
it
and
yeah
I've
been
living
breathing
this
for
past
couple
years.
So
ask
me
any
questions.
I'm
sure
I
just
kind
of
blurted
out
a
whole
bunch.
A
D
Have
some
questions
I
I
I
tried
to
expand
my
screen
and
I
still
couldn't
read
a
lot
of
it
well,
but
two
that
I
was
wondering
about
are
the
two
squares
on
an
angle
or
whatever
at
the
top
in
the
peach
color
or
whatever,
and
it
looks
like
that's
showing
what
okay
that's
like
it's
out,
they're,
not
qualifying
or
something
well.
H
They
do
well
so
we're
trying
to,
because
we
only
have
a
finite
number
of
these
vouchers,
we're
trying
to
prioritize
hennepin
county
folks,
young
people
who
experienced
foster
care
in
hennepin
county
other
communities
are
doing
this
across
the
state
we
are
hennepin
county
is
the
first
in
the
metro
to
be
doing
it.
So
it's
not
so
much
that
those
young
people
would
never
get
served.
H
However,
if
there's
youth
that
have
experienced
foster
care
in
hennepin
county
and
meet
some
of
these
other
crucial
points,
they
would
be
prioritized.
This
is
not
a
an
itemization
of
who's
eligible
and
who's.
Not
everyone
on
here
is
eligible.
It's
just
a
matter
of
who's
prioritized
over
if
we
have
10
openings
and
they
have
25
people
who
do
they
prioritize
to
send
their
referrals.
D
F
Logan,
thank
you.
It
strikes
me
that
do
youth
from
bloomington
get
referred
to
bloomington
or
from
minneapolis
to
minneapolis.
You
know
there
seems
to
be
a
continuity
of
surroundings
and
familiarity
that
you
know.
Moving
someone
who's
from
brooklyn
center
to
bloomington
would
seem
to
create
a
hardship
on
the
person
because
they
lose
connectivity
and
understanding
of
things
around
them
and
the
environment.
So.
H
Absolutely
so
we've
we
did.
We've
discussed
that
in
our
meetings
with
our
partners
as
well
as
so,
we've
convened
all
housing
authorities
with
the
hud
field
office
here,
as
well
as
the
the
non-profits
involved,
and
that
comes
up-
and
I
think
brian
you
might
know
more
about
this,
but
all
the
housing.
All
four
housing
authorities
have
agreed
to
allow
for
the
young
people
to
port
within
the
four
jurisdictions.
H
So
hopefully,
because
we
know
a
referral
that
comes
in
might
not
know,
you
know
at
their
initial
onset
that
they
want
to
live
in
bloomington,
but
minneapolis
is
overseeing
their
fyi
voucher.
How
do
we
work
through
those
nuances
amongst
the
housing
authorities,
and
I
think
that's
when
the
housing
authority
is
all
great,
and
you
can
speak
more
to
that
brian
than
I
can.
G
Sure
thank
you,
stacey
and
thank
you,
commissioner
logan
for
the
question,
and
we
did
address
that.
One
of
the
important
recognitions
is
just
what
you
said
is
that
if
somebody
has
a
support
system
and
networking
and
his
established
job,
perhaps
in
a
particular
community
just
because
they
come
up
on
the
top
of
our
list
and
it's
eligible
for
bloomington
voucher
does
not.
We
don't
want
to
force
them
to
move
here
if
they're
already
established
in
brooklyn
park,
I
think
was
your
example.
G
So
we
would
allow
that
person
to
tort
or
take
that
voucher
with
them
from
bloomington,
and
we
would
allow
them
to
move
that
or
remain
in
that
city
and
we
would
still
support
them
with
our
renaissance
voucher.
There
and
the
other
housing
authorities
have
agreed
to
accept
them.
So
we
have
that
agreement
amongst
the
four
housing
authorities
that
cover
the
vast
majority
of
hennepin
county.
At
this
point,
so
excellent
yeah.
A
Are
there
any
other?
Yes,
commissioner,.
D
Also,
just
an
observation
and
a
question
with
the
six
I'm
quite
familiar
with
four
of
the
six,
but
not
so
much
for
the
other
two,
but
in
terms
of
programs
that
go
through
existing
government
agencies
by
whatever
definition
is
an
important
way
for
getting
it
to
be
implemented.
D
But
getting
buy-in
from
the
general
public
involves
a
certain
amount
of
important
connection
with
the
public
and
that's
always
a
difficult
thing.
But
like
the
y
and
so
forth,
like
have
have
a
lot
of
people
and
maybe
that's
the
way
that
it's
happening.
Is
that
it's
getting
the
word
out
to
people
who
are
kind
of
kid-oriented,
because
they're
engaged
you
know
our
members
or
whatever
and
supporters
financially
of
the
y
or
these
other
organizations
and
like
oasis.
D
D
H
Yeah,
it's
a
that's
a
good
point.
A
limitation
of
this
particular
program
is
that
there
are
no
dollars
that
are
there's
no
support
dollars
to
this.
So
all
six
of
these
organizations,
fortunately,
and
unfortunately,
are
using
these
vouchers
for
the
young
people
that
they're
already
serving
so
it's
really
them
leveraging
the
support
services
that
they're
already
being
paid
for
and
targeting
the
young
people
on
that
prioritization
who
need
housing.
Who
would
be
a
great
fit
for
this
voucher
and
supporting
them
in
housing
with
the
voucher?
H
So
it's
not,
and
hopefully,
as
we
launch
this
and
and
I'm
assuming
it's
successful,
we
can
there's
an
ability
to
grow
each
year
by
25
if
we're
at
90
utilization
per
housing
authority.
So
so
the
numbers
can
grow
exponentially
depending
on
the
success
of
the
program,
and
I
and
I'm
hopeful
that
you
know
after
some
time,
we
would
be
able
to
find
some
support
dollar
somewhere
so
that
we
can,
to
your
point,
publicize
this
a
little
more
broadly
because
it
isn't,
as
it
is
now
we're
having
to
create
a
one-pager
to
fend
people
off.
H
We
have,
since
this
planning
has
been
doing
where
we,
the
staff
at
the
county,
and
then
maybe
the
hra
at
some
point
will
also
be
getting
emails
from
people
wanting
to
access
this
resource
and
because
it's
limited,
we
just
don't
have
capacity,
whereas
hopefully
in
the
future.
We
can
get
to
a
point
where
we
have
service
dollars
and
we
can
grow
it
and
respond
to
the
nofa,
which
I
would
assume
will
come
out
again.
So
you
can
have
like
an
actual
set
dollar
amount
and
a
set
number
of
vouchers
that
you
can
access.
D
E
Lewis,
yes,
so
trader
coleman.
Thank
you.
So
oasis
is
one
entity
out
of
the
group
that
is
in
bloomington,
yes
correct,
so
I
think
this
is
an
opportunity
I
have
yet
to
be
able
to
sit
down
with
the
oasis
for
you
and
talk
with
their
leadership.
E
However,
we
do
have
the
american
rescue
plan
at
dollars
of
250
000
that
was
allocated
for
homelessness
response
and
prevention,
and
so
one
of
the
things
that
I
had
already
brought
was
a
was
to
speak
with
oasis
for
you,
because
that's
what
those
dollars
are
for.
So
there
may
be
opportunity
here
to
look
at
further
support
under
those
dollars
and
especially
focusing
on
youth
that
are
experiencing
housing,
disability
and
or
homelessness,
and
some
of
it
tied
to
exacerbation
by
coping.
I
just
wanted
to
bring
that
up.
A
D
Commissioner,
olsen
makes
a
motion
that
we
approve
that
memo
of.
A
Understanding
is
there
a
second.
A
A
Hearing
none,
I
would
ask
for
the
roll
call
vote
ira,
hello.
A
A
G
Ma'am
chair
commissioners,
we
are
bringing
forward
to
a
proposed
increase
in
payment
standards
for
several
bedroom
sizes.
G
Hud
recently
published
the
new
fair
market
rents
for
the
twin
cities,
metro
area
and
they
are
listed
in
the
chart
lower
down
in
the
item
by
bedroom,
size
really
saw
kind
of
modest
increases
in
the
fmrs.
This
was
after
last
year's,
rather
large
increases
in
some
of
the
fair
market
rents
that
we
saw,
but
given
our
current
state
of
our
our
budget
and
funding
from
hud,
we
saw
quite
a
substantial
increase
this
year.
G
Thankfully,
we
as
staff
feel
we
are
able
to
at
this
time,
increase
the
payment
standards,
which
is
the
subsidy
amount
which
determines
the
subsidy
amount.
Excuse
me
for
participants
in
the
program,
so
in
the
chart
in
front
of
you
in
your
packets,
we
are
proposing
increases
to
the
zero
one,
two
and
three
bedroom
sizes,
with
the
largest
increases
being
in
the
one
bedroom
sizes.
G
This
is
the
bedroom
size
that
has
had
the
hardest
time
with
we've
had
the
hardest
time.
Keeping
up
with
the
market
increases
as
they've
kind
of
really
kind
of
skyrocketed
over
the
last
several
years.
So,
by
providing
a
60
amount
increase
in
that
subsidy
standard,
we
really
hope
to
assist
those
families
already
in
existing
units
and
those
looking
to
move
or
coming
new
onto
the
program
again.
G
A
A
G
Chair
commissioners,
this
is
information
only
item
hud
has
made
it
known
this
this
summer
to
housing
authorities
that
congress
had
authorized
additional
funding
for
the
veterans,
administration,
supportive
housing
program
or
vash
vouchers,
and
would
award
that
funding
based
on
first
of
all
interest
and
then
based
upon
a
formula
after
they
receive
letters
of
intent
or
letters
of
interest
from
those
interested
housing
authorities.
G
So
this
program
works
similarly
to
the
foster
youth
to
independence
program
that
we
just
talked
about
where
we
would
work
with
a
population
of
veterans
who
are
currently
homeless
and
or
at
risk
of
becoming
homeless.
Who
would
be
recommended
through
the
veterans
administration
and
they
would
be
paired
with
services
and
that
what
the
hra
will
do
is
then
pair
will
bring
bring
the
housing
choice,
voucher
for
grant
assistance
to
them.
So
it's
again
a
combination
of
services
and
rent
assistance
to
those
who
are
either
experiencing
or
are
a
threat
of
being
homeless.
G
By
submitting
that
letter
of
intent
that
erica
signed
in
august,
it
just
kind
of
gets
us
in
the
queue
and
hud
will
then
allocate
the
the
vash
vouchers
to
those
interested
housing
authorities
across
the
nation.
It
doesn't
mean
and
then
they'll
come
up
with
a
number
that
go
bloomington's
eligible
for
10
or
25..
G
So
what
we'll
do
at
that
point,
once
we
find
out
that
number
is
determine,
what's
the
appropriate
level
of
vouchers
that
we
would
want
to
accept,
we
may
not
want
to
take
all
of
them
right
now,
we're
thinking
that
five
would
probably
be
an
appropriate
level
just
that,
so
the
commissioners
are
aware
these
the
population
served
by
both
these
programs
require
a
higher
level
of
staff
interaction.
G
Typically,
they
need
a
lot
of
more
time,
understanding
how
the
program
works,
and
they
may
experience
issues
that
the
hra
staff
might
need
to
get
involved
in
during
their
tenure
in
their
apartment.
So
we
want.
We
don't
want
to
bite
off
too
big
of
a
chunk
to
start
with,
but
when
we
get
that
notification
from
what
the
formula
allocation
is
to
us
as
a
housing
authority,
then
we'll
bake
back
a
recommendation
for
formal
approval
of
the
funding
request.
F
Two
questions:
four:
this
is
the
second
sort
of
new
program.
What
does
this
do
to
staff?
Are
we
stretching
staff.
E
Not
breaking,
but
we
are
stretching
staff
which
also
this
all
of
this
is
in
consideration
with
the
assessment
staff
does
have
a
lot
in
the
way
the
caseload
workloads
are
broken
up,
and
so
looking
at
how
we
can
adjust
that.
However,
I
am
so
appreciative
of
staff
and
their
willingness
and
their
interests,
because
to
serve
youth
and
veterans.
These
are
two.
You
know
very
wide
populations
that
just
are
underserved,
and
so
I'm
appreciative
of
staff's
willingness
and
interest
to
understanding
that
they
are
stretched,
but
still
interested.
F
Yes
and
thank
you
because
there
certainly
is
need
out
there,
I'm
a
vet,
so
I
I
relate
to
this
group
and
I
may
be
overly
picky
with
this
next
question,
but
in
the
I
think
it's
you
know
the
the
note
yes
in
the
third
paragraph
in
the
second
line
midway
through
it
says,
va
case
managers
may
connect
veterans
with
support
services.
F
E
E
F
Can
fill
in
anything
you
know
and
I'm
all
for
giving
helping
hand,
but
I
think
it
has
to
be
accepted
and
that
acceptance,
in
my
view-
and
this
is
you
know,
without
spending
days
and
weeks
in
conversation
like
you
all
have
on
this-
is
that
I
would
prioritize
those
who
are
willing
to
accept
help
to
improve
their
lot
in
life
as
opposed
to
those
who
don't
for
you
know
priority
in
the
vulture
line.
If
that's.
E
And
so
with
that,
I
will
have
to
say
that
we're
learning,
because
I'm
not
sure
how
much
flexibility
we
have
when
we
are
referred
the
clients,
it
doesn't
necessarily
come
in
a
batch.
F
F
I
I
I
I
don't
have
the
intimate
experience,
but
you
know
from
from
the
literature
that
I
read:
there's
more
homeless
vets
than
there
are
resources
for
them,
and
I
suspect
that
will
be
the
case.
So
if
we
can
help
move
people
into
mainstream
society
out
of
homelessness,
I
mean
that's,
that's
the
real
objective
here
right
right
and
if
we
could
parse
those
people
to
the
ones
who
are
willing
to
accept
a
first
case.
You
know
the
assistance
that
will
you
know,
help
facilitate
that.
That's
that's
my
whole
point
of
it.
A
E
So
this
program
was
put
on
pause
and
since
then,
we've
had
many
discussions
and
with
staff
legal
others
in
the
city
and
so
wanted
to
bring
forward
a
few
things.
One
guidelines
that
are
like
easily
digested
one
pagers
for
the
public,
so
for
staff
and
public.
So
that's
what
you're
looking
at
here.
So
this
is
the
help
program,
so
housing
environmental
loan
program
guidelines,
the
change
to
this
one
and
there's
gonna-
be
a
couple
more,
but
the
change
to
this
one
is
increasing
it
from
500
to
7
500.
E
It
is
the
second
change
is
making
it
a
forgivable.
Loan
that
does
not
collect
does
not
accrue
interest.
Previously.
It
was
a
loan
that
accrued
interest
and
was
not
forgivable
correct
if
it's
truly
going
to
be
help
and
it's
going
to
be
for
housing
and
environmental
situations,
making
it
a
forgivable
loan
that
does
not
accrue
interest.
E
One
of
the
changes
that
staff
recommended
those
that
actually,
minister,
the
programs
was
to
increase
the
asset
limits
of
fifty
thousand
dollars,
and
so
that'll
be
a
change
not
only
for
help.
But
what
you'll
see
is
this
eligible
borrower?
Information
and
eligible
property
is
pretty
much
the
same
in
the
in
the
neighborhood
and
cdbg,
and
so
changing
that
to
50
000
in
terms
of
asset
limit,
and
that
is
because
it
does
get
into
in
the
guidelines
what
is
used
for
assets.
E
E
E
I
would
like
you
to,
but
if
you
don't
feel
comfortable,
we
can
come
back
just
because
the
program's
on
pause,
and
so
once
the
hra
is
comfortable
with
changes
and
how
we're
proposing
it
and
wants
to
approve
it.
Then
we
would
bring
the
program
back
up.
Okay,.
C
Because
I'm
I'm
seeing
a
lot
of
pretty
dramatic
changes
from
what
we've
had
in
the
past
and
I
believe,
there's
been
a
need,
but
a
couple
times.
I
brought
up
the
fact
that
we
need
to
discuss
these
things,
and
I
think
a
discussion
to
me
means
the
board,
discusses
it
and
and
provides
advice
to
the
staff
on
along
the
lines
of
what
we
think
needs
to
be
done
and
to
have
a
document
with
this.
C
Many
changes
put
before
us
to
approve
this
evening
to
me
is
both
a
backwards
process,
at
least
not
in
the
way
it's
worked
in
the
past,
but
also
just
an
awful
lot
to
think
about,
and
I
would
like
to
see
some
comparisons
to
what
we
have
today
versus.
What's
here,
okay-
and
I
don't
know-
it's
been
all
night
going
back
and
forth
on
that
necessarily
so
no.
H
C
H
C
C
E
So
the
other
change
that
it's
not
for
this
one,
sorry,
so
that
would
be
the
changes
for
this
one
for
this
health
law.
E
However,
for
the
home
improvement
loan,
and
so
this
is
cdbg
and
neighborhood
combined.
I
think
because
we
did
not
have
a
separate
application
before
there
was
no
need
to
separate
the
programs
out
because
it's
confusing
to
the
public
and
so
we're
not
proposing
separating
it
out
at
all.
So
that's
not
a
change.
E
So
again,
this
girl's
assets
would
be
fifty
thousand
dollars,
as
we
did
not
have
asset
limit
before
now.
We're
proposing
an
asset
limit.
This
difference
here
is
a
pretty.
This
is
a
pretty
big
one,
so
neighborhood
changed
a
few
years
ago
to
go
up
to
100
ami
well,
the
hra,
according
to
state
statute,
is
supposed
to
serve
those
that
are
not
adequately
served
by
the
marketplace
and
low
and
moderate
income,
and
it
actually
calls
out
low
and
moderate
income,
and
so
I
went
back
and
forth
with
legal
and
legal
said.
E
E
What's
another
change
is
borrowers,
age,
55
or
older
are
exempt
from
the
equity
limits,
so
I
was
proposing
that
we
would
have
equity
limits
of
twenty
percent
or
twenty
thousand
dollars,
whichever
is
greater,
so
this
is
expensive.
E
That's
a
major
change
right
and
this
is
pertaining
to
the
property
that
you
are
living
in
right.
Staff
has
asked
that
we
not
do
an
equity
limit,
but
that
we
do
a
value
limit,
and
so
the
value
limit
would
be
not
to
exceed
current
median
home
value
for
the
city
of
bloomington
as
set
as
defined
by
the
city
assessor.
E
E
So
again,
this
is
getting
at
those
that
would
not
be
adequately
served
by
the
marketplace,
which
is
the
thought
process
around
the
asset
limit.
If
you
have
a
hundred
thousand
dollars
in
the
bank
and
you're
applying
for
thirty
five
thousand
dollar
loan,
do
you
have
other
options?
E
C
So
I
again
that's
why
I
think
we
need
a
real
discussion,
a
detailed
discussion,
but
in
thinking
about
it
there
are
a
lot
of
people
in
those
you
know,
homes
that
are
of
greater
value
than
that
that
are
you
know,
seniors
and
and
others
who
you
know
and
they've
been
there.
The
values
are
going
crazy
right
now.
I
would
almost
rather
see
us
have
an
equity.
C
Limit
I
mean
or
a
value
limit,
that's
higher.
I
mean
there
are
so
many
people
that,
for
whom
you
know
ma
you
know
either
either
the
improvement
or
unexpected.
A
C
And
I
know
two
people
in
my
neighborhood
or
their
friends
in
bloomington
who
were
surprised
by
a
sewer
issue,
the
connection
to
the
street,
which
is
about
a
ten
thousand
dollar
unexpected
and
yeah.
If
expense
and
not
a
very,
not
a
very
sexy
thing
to
do
to.
C
E
Yep,
so
what
I
I
will
say,
because
staff
brought
up
the
same
thing
yeah.
What
I
will
say
is
that
one
on
a
fixed
income
as
a
primary
source
of
income,
they
would
be
exempt
from
property
equity
limits.
We
could
look
at
property
value
limits
if
we
go
that
route
so
either
or
as
well
as
55
and
older
would
be
exempt
from
the
equity
limits.
E
C
E
C
F
You
know
the
the
equity
part
or
value
part
I
my
gut
reaction
is,
is
I
I'm
not
real
fond
of
either
of
those
okay
and
it's
because
the
ability
to
repay-
and
you
know
in
bloomington,
I've
met
so
every
other
person
you
meet
on
the
street
who's
a
bloomington
resident
has
lived
here
for
50
years.
F
I
mean
I,
I
one
one
of
the
parades
the
heritage
days
parades
okay,
there
was
a
tent
that
was
in
operation
by
the
bloomington
education
foundation,
and
I
manned
that
attempt
and
what
it
was.
I
had
a
map
of
the
city
of
bloomington
and
people
who
strolled
in.
F
So
you
know
these
are
people
because
they
lived
in
this
house
some
of
them.
You
know,
as
their
parent
cells
they've
lived
in
these
homes
when
they
were
worth.
F
You
know
five
digits,
yes
and,
and
today
the
market
value
is,
you
know,
tripled
or
better
on
those
properties
through
the
years
they're
still
in
the
same
basic
financial
condition,
but
the
property
you
know
so:
they're
property,
rich
cash,
poor,
yes,
and
I'm
looking
at
these
kinds
of
programs
as
ways
to
keep
our
seniors,
who
are
able
to
continue
living
independently
in
their
own
residencies,
and
I'm
going
a
long
way
of
saying
that
I'm
not
sure
that
either
evaluation,
cap
or
a
equity
camp
would
work
for
them
because
through
the
years
I
know
that
that
generation
having
her
home
debt
free
was.
E
E
So
if
you
needed
to
borrow
35
000,
you
needed
to
have
35
000
equity
in
your
property,
and
if
you
did
not,
you
could
not
meet
the
the
minimum
requirements,
so
there
are
still
people
that
we
weren't
helping.
But
if
we
make
a
program,
that's
broad
where
we
have
no
limits
to
help
the
seniors,
then
we're
going
to
get
other
people
that
have
other
means
that
we're
going
to
take
the
money
from
the
seniors
yeah.
F
And
so
I'm
I'm
saying
all
this
because
I
think
there's
a
lot
of
points
of
view
that
need
to
have
discussion
amongst
the
members
here
before.
I
would
at
least
feel
comfortable
looking
forward
and
I'd
almost
suggest
because
of
the
length
of
this,
that
we
have
the
better
part
of
an
agenda
for
that.
Okay,.
C
Well,
put
I
mean
you
did
a
better
job
than
I
am
explaining
some
of
why
but
you're
knocking
on
doors
to
her.
Have
that
so
you've
got
an
extra
word
in
there
by
the
way
people
over
55,
who
are
oh
yeah,
so
who.
C
C
As
you
know,
we
need
to
make
some
changes,
but
we
also
viewed
it
in
past
and
in
the
past,
we've
discussed
this
each
year
and
the
board
has
passed
on
our
recommendations
as
a
motion
I
hate
to
lose
as
a
side
comment.
I
hate
to
lose
that
ability
throughout
the
process
to
each
year
re-evaluate
what
the
current
needs
are
and
and
approve
a
program.
C
But
I
think
we
have
also
viewed
it
in
the
past
as
a
kind
of
a
neighborhood
improvement
program,
in
the
sense
that
a
lot
of
times,
one
you
and
it's,
we
have
a
targeted
program
and
then
we
have
a
general
program
in
the
city
and
it
always
amazes
me
how,
when
one
or
two
homes
make
a
an
upgrade,
which
I
think
for
a
lot
of
seniors,
it
gets
really
hard
to
do
because
they
start
to
worry
about
their
financial
future.
C
D
C
C
C
I
I
think
that
that
excludes
large
numbers
of
people
both
prior
to
colbit,
but
especially
after
covet,
who
are
at
an
age
where
they're
earning
power
they're,
maybe
on
a
second
career,
because
you
know
for.
A
F
C
You
know
it's
a
very
it's
not
a
great
position
to
be
in,
and
people
are,
you
know
finding
themselves
in
their
60s
working
two
jobs
or
something
like
that,
and
so
there
again
things
like
asset
and
value
are
not
helping
to
serve
those
needs.
A
statement
is
a
great
you
know,
term,
to
put
it
at
you're,
essentially
on
a
fixed
income
yeah,
and
yet
you
still
have
to
go
in
and
work.
You
know
40
hours
a
week.
So
those
are
the
kind
of
concerns
I
have
about
some.
A
E
C
That
that
the
what
we
come
back
to
is
to
discuss
this
as
a
board
kind
of
fresh
here's,
what
we
do
today
here,
here's
what
we're
trying
to
do
rather
than
another
permutation
of
something
that's
given
to
us
to
react
to.
I
think
that
we
need
to
talk
through
the
basics.
A
D
Chair
lewis,
I
would
second
emotion.
A
All
right,
so
it
has
been
moved
by
commissioner
thorson
second
by
commissioner
olson
to
table
this
item,
which
is
to
approve
the
resolution
improving
home
improvement
loan
program,
procedural
manual,
home
improvement,
loan
program
guidelines
in
housing
and
environmental
loan
program
guidelines.
Is
there
any
discussion
of
promotion
at
this
time.
D
I
mean
the
discussion
we've
had
is
enough
for
tonight,
but
it
really
has
brought
out
quite
a
few
issues
and
one
of
the
things
I
think,
commissioner,
got
use
the
phrase
ability
to
pay,
or
maybe
would
you
mention
a
question
but
that
that
can
be
a
real
can
of
worm,
and
one
of
the
things
that
came
to
mind
is
when
we
end
up
being
upset
in
some
way.
When
we
we
know
a
particular
person,
has
some
kind
of
resources
to
take
care
of
it,
but
they
want
to
come
to
the
government.
D
Instead
is
family
members,
you
know
if
if
there
are
wealthy
children
or
whatever
and
I'm
not
suggesting
we
go
there.
But
all
I'm
saying
is
that
I
think
the
more
that
we
think
through
different
scenarios
and
we'll
never
get
it
perfect,
but
I
think
okay,
it
illustrates
the
need
to
have
this
memory.
E
With
supporting
information
of
what
we're
trying
to
achieve,
who
we're
here
to
serve
and
what
is
the
comparison
of
changes
proposed
and
why.
A
All
right,
so
it
has
been
moved
and
seconded
to
table
this
item.
May
we
have
the
roll
call
vote.
Please.
A
You
now
moving
on
to
item
5.5,
blooming
meadows,
north
and
south
first
amendment
to
declaration.
May
we
have
the
staff
report
please.
Yes,.
E
Thank
you.
So
what
this
is
is
that
blooming
meadows
north
is
the
new
building
blooming
metal
south
is
the
existing
building
blooming
metals
south
has
a
community
room
and
pool
blooming
metals.
North
has
more
of
like
a
technology,
educational
room
and
a
couple
different
amenities
like
that.
This
is
an
agreement
to
say
that
they
can
work
they
can
each
residents
at
each
property
can
use
the
different
other
properties
stuff.
E
This
has
to
come
before
us
because
it
changes
the
declaration
of
reciprocal
easements,
covenants
conditions
and
restrictions,
and
so
that's
why
it's
coming
before
you
today,
but
basically
it's
it's.
Allowing
residents
of
blooming
meadows
south
to
use
those
north
at
amenities
and
residents
of
blooming
meadows
north
to
use
blue
metal,
stop
amenities,
there's
no
money
changing
or
anything
like
that.
A
A
Hearing
no
questions
we
need
is
there
a
motion
to
approve
the
resolution
of
proving
consent
to
first
amendment
to
declaration
of
reciprocal
easements
covenants
conditions
and
restrictions
for
blooming
meadows,
north
and
blooming
meadows,
south
housing
projects.
A
It
has
been
moved
by
commissioner
beloga
second
by
commissioner
thorson
to
approve
resolution
approving
consent,
I'm
just
going
to
make
it
short
to
blooming
meadows,
north
and
south's
first
amendment
to
declaration.
A
Is
there
any
discussion?
A
E
So
we
have
had
conversation
about
a
down
payment
assistance
program
and
funding
through
american
rescue
plan
at
dollars,
and
city
council
approved
250
000
for
a
down
payment
assistance
program.
E
I
had
talked
to
you
previously
and
had
said
this
program
will
be
set
up
as
a
zero
percent
interest
deferred
loan
at
80,
ami
or
below
to
be
administered
by
non-profit
organizations
that
have
experience
in
our
cdfis.
E
E
So
this
is
the
change
and
why
it
doesn't
say
down
payment
assistance
program
as
you've
seen
in
our
budget,
the
hra
does
not
have
money
to
fund
a
down
payment
assistance
program
this
year
this
coming
year,
2022..
E
However,
in
the
information
that
I
provided
in
the
research
that
was
done,
I
really
didn't
have
information
on
what
bloomington
needed.
I
had
information
from
the
state
level
from
the
regional
level
from
the
national
level,
but
not
bloomington,
specific
and
so,
and
proposing
that
we
do
a
home
buyer
mortgage
assistance
grant
program
funded
through
the
american
rescue
plan
dollars
by
in
using
the
guidelines
supplied
by
treasury.
For
the
use
of
this
funding,
which
means
it
must
be
a
grant
the
loan.
E
The
grants
must
be,
I
guess,
awarded
used
by
december
31st
2024
and
that
money
must
be
forgiven
by
december
31st,
2026.,
so
yeah
yeah.
So
with
that.
That
is
why
I
am
proposing
to
use
the
funds
this
way
and
that
staff
would
monitor
the
activity
and
the
usage
of
funds
and
collect
the
information
zip
code.
Where
are
the
people
coming
from
that
are
using
the
program
zip
code
of
where
they're
buying
the
property?
How
much
is
the
property
that
they
are
buying?
What
is
their
background
information?
Is
it
a
female
head
of
household?
E
What
is
the
type
of
mortgage
they're
using?
If
they
have
one?
Is
it
conventional?
Is
it
fha
like
starting
to
gather
information
to
inform
what
a
down
payment
assistance
program
should
look
like?
Also,
how
much
do
they
need
I'm
still
saying
up
to
thousand
five
hundred
dollars,
but
we
may
look
and
see
the
data
and
say:
oh
they
don't
even
need
according
to
this
data.
That's
not
the
number
people
need
they.
They
need
only
up
to
seventy
five
hundred
dollars.
So
use
this
as
an
opportunity
for
information
gathering.
E
That
are
that's
why
it's
still
here
today,
but
it's
totally
different
than
what
we
talked
about
and
the
the
thought
I
have
would
be
to
possibly
in
2023's
budget
cycle,
request
strategic
priority
funding
for
down
payment
assistance
program,
but
we
will
see
how
this
grant
dollars
get
spent
when
we
can
finally
get
it
off
the
ground.
E
A
D
Lewis,
the
wording
of
the
the
language
to
recommending
creation
is
really
generic
yeah,
and
so
I
think
we've
talked
about.
I
think
enough
that
I
would
be
inclined
to
say
that
it
would
be
worth
doing
that
that
generic
motion
kind
of
you're
not
going
to
make
it
at
this
point,
but.
E
So
it's
very
generic
because
the
hra
does
not
have
the
arp
dollars
and
we're
not
getting
the
arp
dollars.
This
would
be
really
a
city
program
because
the
arp
dollars
are
allocated
to
the
city,
and
so
the
hra's
only
recommending
to
the
city
council
that
yep,
based
on
the
information
that
the
us
treasury
has
provided
we
support
and
recommend
city
council.
You
create
this,
so
that's
very
confusing
with
asp,
I'm
sorry.
But
that
is
why
it's
so
generic
yeah.
E
E
E
I
have
kept
it
the
same
as
what
we
discussed
in
the
down
payment
assistance
program
and
proposing
up
to
ten
thousand
dollars
five,
ten
thousand
five
hundred
dollars
for
for
down
payment
for
that
mortgage
assistance,
but
to
the
non-profit
organizations
that
administer
they
would
get
a
fee
of
twelve
hundred
dollars
per
closed
grant
filed
and
because
that
total
splitting
two
hundred
fifty
thousand
dollars
down
the
middle
would
be
a
hundred
twenty
five
thousand
dollars
and
if
they
did
at
least
ten
of
those
grants,
they
would
surpass
the
ten
thousand
dollar
threshold.
F
So
can
the
that
the
city
does
an
rfp
and
I'm
parsing
here
the
hra:
can
they
be
a
respondent
to
the
hr
or
to
the
rfp?
We.
E
A
A
Second,
to
none
all
right,
all
right
so
motion
by
commissioner
thorsen
second
by
commissioner
veloga,
to
table
the
item
to
approve
resolution,
recommending
creation
of
home
buyer
mortgage
assistance
grad
program
by
the
city
of
bloomington.
D
Chair
lewis,
just
one
question:
administrator
coleman:
is
there
a
timeline
and
leads
on
to
the
council?
Is
there
a
timeline
in
terms
of
how,
realistically,
if
we
want
to
have
our
input
into
it,
we
need
to
act.
E
Thank
you
chair,
commissioner
olson
for
the
question
I
would
say,
probably
by
october
I
I
have
to
understand
what
the
process
is
to
release
an
rfp
and
then
get
it
approved,
and
I
I
don't
want
the
board
to
miss
out
because
I
do
want
to
move.
I
did
do
a
scope
of
work
already,
and
so
I
do
want
to
move
forward
as
quick
as
possible
with
an
rfp.
A
E
This
these
dollars
have
to
be
spent
by
december
31st
2024,
which
the
understanding
that
I
have
is
that
the
city
could
allocate
the
funding
to
different
priorities
that
still
align
and
therefore,
if
the
funding
is
not
being
spent,
we
could
possibly
lose.
D
React:
okay
and
then
what
was
the
and
forgiven
by
1231-26?
Yes,.
E
A
C
B
To
table
this
item,
okay,
look
at
this
item.
A
D
It's
just
a
simple
issue
of
administrative
coleman,
often
times
you
talk
about
staff,
I
mean
it's
often
times
in
our
agendas.
The
staff
have
talked
about
this
and
so
forth,
and,
to
begin
with,
I
was
thinking
it
was
just
hra
staff,
but
I
think
I've
come
to
understand.
D
I
don't
necessarily
have
a
problem
with
this,
but
if
maybe
you
could
give
some
kind
of
an
idea
of
which
staff
I
mean
like
somebody
from
you've,
talked
about
legal
issues,
so
I
mean
it's
apparent
that
somehow
or
another
people
who
work
in
this
building
would
end
up
connecting
with
each
other
about
it
with
their
legal
issue,
and
so
what?
What
do
we
need
to
do
about
it,
for
example,
or
environmental
health?
D
I
mean
we've
been
talking
about
that
department
or
whatever
it
is
and
so
forth,
so
it
I
I
don't
know,
maybe
maybe
it's
by
simply
saying
that
I'm
kind
of
giving
an
answer.
Okay
to
my
own
question,
is
all
that's
needed,
but
it's
just
something
that
kind
of
I
think.
Procedurally,
maybe
we
just
get
you
know,
particularly
with
people
coming
on
board,
that
they
get
understanding
early
on
about
what
is
meant
by
whether
it's
that.
E
D
E
No,
that
makes
sense,
I
think
previously
it
has
been
more
like
in
the
past.
It
has
been
more
hra
staff
when
referencing
staff,
but
with
me
it
is
more
hra
staff
and
community
development
staff,
so
assessing
environmental
health
building
inspections,
planning.
D
E
D
E
A
A
You
motion
by
commissioner
beloka
second
by
commissioner
olson
to
adjourn
the
meeting
myra.
May
we
have
a
vote.