►
From YouTube: November 23, 2020 Bloomington City Council Meeting
Description
Bloomington Minnesota City Council Meeting
A
A
I'm
going
to
start
our
meeting
as
we
always
do
with
the
pledge
of
allegiance.
If
you
would
please
rise
if
you're
able
and
join
us
in
the
pledge,
I
pledge
allegiance
to
the
flag
of
the
united
states
of
america
and
to
the
republic
for
which
it
stands.
One
nation,
under
god,
indivisible
with
liberty
and
justice
for
all.
A
Here
the
record
show
all
seven
members
of
the
bloomington
city
council
are
present
this
evening.
Next
up
is
our
approval
of
agenda
council.
What
I
would
like
to
offer,
as
a
possible
amendment
to
the
agenda,
is
to
move
items
8.6
and
8.7
ahead
of
8.4
and
8.5,
so
we'd
go
from
8.3
to
8.6,
to
8.7
and
then
back
to
8.4
and
8.5.
A
That
way
it
would
bundle
the
the
budget
issues
all
together
in
one.
That
would
give
us
eight
point.
Four
eight
point:
five
and
then
nine
one
two
and
three,
which
are
budget
items
as
well.
So
we
could
just
kind
of
keep
on
topic
in
terms
of
talking
budgets
and
all
in
in
one
lump
all
in
one
grouping.
A
If
that
makes
sense,
if
everybody's
in
a
minimal
I'd
like
to
offer
that
as
a
as
an
amendment
to
the
to
the
agenda.
A
A
We
will
start
with
item
move
now
to
item
5.1
on
our
agenda,
which
is
approval
of
the
veterans,
memorial
design,
concept
proposal
and
site
location.
We've
been
talking
about
a
possible
veterans
memorial
here
on
the
the
the
grounds
of
bloomington
civic
plaza
for
some
time,
and
we
are
to
the
point
of
the
design
concept,
proposal
and
site
location
proposal
very
excited
to
hear
this
proposal
and
look
forward
to
this,
and
so
I
will
turn
this
to.
A
E
Okay,
just
wanted
to
make
sure
we
were
all
on.
Let
me
just
pull
out
my
presentation
here
for
us.
E
Let's
see,
I
don't
have
the
option
available
amy.
Can
you
give
me
the
option
to
share
my
screen
to
be
a
presenter.
B
E
B
B
Did
you
send
it
to
my
email?
Yes,
okay,.
E
Sure
sounds
good,
so
thank
you,
mr
mayor
and
council
members.
E
We
are
very
excited
to
be
here
tonight,
as
I,
my
name
is
melissa,
wurst
prasad
and
I'm
manager
of
the
community
outreach
and
engagement
division,
and
so
tonight
we
are
here
to
share
the
selected
design
concept
proposal
for
the
veterans
memorial
also
joining
me
tonight
for
the
presentation
you'll
be
hearing
from
mike
dardis.
He
is
vice.
E
And
I
just
want
I'm
trying
something
quickly
here:
to
be
able
to
pull
up,
you
should
be
able
to
know
earthquake.
E
E
And
it's
just
loading
here,
so
you
can
just
bear
with
me
for
one
other
quick
minutes.
I
will
share
with
the
update
I'm
going
to
be
going
over.
The
design
selection
process
overview
that
we
used
then
mike
dardis
will
review
the
design
concept,
selection
and
then
dave
hanson
will
cover
the
maintenance
considerations
of
the
design
proposal
and
then
leah
hughes
will
go
over
the
site,
usage
and
impacts.
E
And
I
think
amy
do
you,
I
don't
have
there,
we
go
okay,
I'm
sorry
for
that.
So
I'm
going
to
jump
ahead
to
where
we
are.
So,
if
you
recall
back
in
2000
in
weather
september,
mike
dardis-
and
I
were
here-
and
we
shared
this
project
timeline
with
you,
so
I
just
wanted
to
highlight
that
again
and
show
you
where
we
are
in
the
process.
E
We
did
begin
in
2016..
This
project
was
identified
and,
as
I
mentioned
previously,
we
are
very
excited
to
be
here
at
the
green
button,
with
our
selected
design
presentation
for
you
and
then
following
that
will
be
the
fundraising
we'll
begin
more
aggressively
now
that
there
is
a
concept
proposal
that
we
can
use
for.
Fundraising.
E
All
right
so
now
the
design
selection
process
overview
just
to
remind
everyone.
These
are
the
members
of
bloomington
remembers
veterans,
which
are
the,
which
is
the
organization
that
we
are
partnering
with
on
this
project,
and
I
just
wanted
to
highlight
that,
in
addition
to
serving
as
board
members
of
bloomington
remembers
veterans.
E
And
these
individuals
served
as
our
design
proposal
panelists,
and
so
there
was
a
mix
of
individuals
from
bloomington
remembers
veterans.
Those
listed
here
mike
dardis,
francis
stackhauer,
david
griffin,
william
boxford
dwayne,
brookman,
brinkman,
don
wilson
and
les
fordahl,
and
then
city
staff
who
served
on
the
panel
included
dave
hansen,
who
you'll
be
hearing
from
later
on,
as
well
as
our
creative
placemaking
director
ali
honda,
polinka
leah
hughes,
and
I
served
as
facilitators
for
that
discussion
and
led
the
conversation
and
debriefs
from
each
of
the
proposals
and
then
also
for
the
final
design
selection.
E
E
A
F
F
That
proposal
comes
from
leo
leo
a
daily,
and
we
are
pleased
that
and
you'll
see
that
from
the
design
here
this.
This
is
a
design
that
runs
parallel
with
the
water
course
beginning
in
the
parking
lot
running
off
to
the
to
the
left,
which
will
go
into
more
detail
with
the
various
design
elements.
But
we're
very
pleased
with
this,
because
over
100
of
their
employees,
who
are
veterans,
became
involved
with
their
company
and
making
recommendations
as
to
what
they
would
have
liked
to
have
seen
in
abundance
or
more
honoring
their
service
as
well.
F
They
also
are
interested
in
partnering
with
the
city
to
further
community
and
engagement
by
a
zoom
and
the
bloomington
engagement
vehicle
to
finalize
the
design
elements.
So
we're
very
pleased
with
the
enthusiasm
that
this
group
has-
and
I
think
this
model
is-
is
going
to
be
a
very
handsome
handsome
and
resource
and
respectable
model
for
the
bloomington
memorial.
For
us
next
slide,
please.
F
This
is
the
beginning
of
at
the
parking
lot.
It
will
begin
with
a
four-sided
sign
that
will
begin
to
address
the
history
and
the
purpose
of
the
memorial
as
people
who
walk
in
it's
a
very
level
very
flat,
so
it's
very
accommodating
for
ada
purposes,
and
you
can
see
it.
Oh,
it's
a
very
inviting
situation
next
slide.
Please.
F
The
basic
design
for
the
memorial
encompasses
several
different
elements,
but
here
we're
showing
that
there
are
two
paths:
one
path
in
the
center,
which
is
really
designed
for
the
veteran
walking
alone,
reflecting
the
veteran's
own
responsibility
and
service
and
the
path
on
the
far
right,
which
is
designed
as
a
wider
path
for
the
families
and
we'll
go
into
some
of
these
other
design
elements
in
a
couple
of
couple
of
other
slides
too.
Thank
you
next
slide,
please
this
la
this.
This,
these
metal
tubes
reflect
the
six
military
organizations
that
that
presently
exist.
F
Army,
navy
air
force,
coast
guard
marines
and
space
force,
and
they
flow
across
this
this
memorial
and
they
come
to
an
end
with
one
with
a
flagpole.
So
it's
six
service,
service
academies
or
service
units
that
wind
up
under
one
flag
and
hanging
from
these
these
metal
poles
will
be
various.
We
call
them
dog
tags,
but
they're,
probably
larger
than
that.
That
provides
basically
recognition
for
individual
veterans
stories
and
so
forth.
That's
probably
shown
more
clearly
in
the
next
slide,
there's
a
several
several
different
options.
F
As
far
as
what
can
be
put
on
those
metal
tags.
This
could
be
useful
for
us
in
fundraising
purposes,
for
the
sake
of
discounting
where
we
were
talking
about
them
being
dog
tags,
but
obviously
they're
going
to
be
much
larger
than
that.
I
would
think,
but
they
could
be
messages
in
themselves
hanging
from
these
on
these
metal
metal
metal
items,
but
they
can
also
carry
various
things,
such
as
embedded
messages
for
families
from
veterans
and
other
other
things
as
well.
F
Next
slide,
please
off
to
the
on
the
left.
Side
of
this
are
six
basically
circular
benches
that
have
embedded
symbols
of
the
various
armed
forces
categories,
beginning
in
the
sequence
that
they
were
formed,
beginning
in
the
army,
going
to
the
navy
and
winding
up
the
space
force
in
2020.
F
They'll
be
the
the
inside
will
be
metal,
metal
symbols
of
the
various
various
medical
excuse
me
military
formations,
and
these
will
be
lit
at
night,
which
will
show
a
little
later
next
slide.
Please,
at
the
far
side,
far
end
of
this
we'll
be
proposing
an
area
which
will
be
for
contemplation
and
reflection
with
again
some
benches.
That
would
be
there.
One
of
the
features
would
be
there
would
be
a
veterans
light
which
has
to
be
worked
out
as
far
as
the
meet
code
requirements
and
so
forth.
F
Next
slide,
please
for
expansion
purposes
and
future
use
off
to
the
towards
the
building.
There
will
be
an
area
for
group
gatherings
like
memorial,
day
and
veterans
day
and
such
and
so
forth,
and
there's
you'll
see
the
flagpole
there
that
flagpole
right
now
you'll
see
the
tube
that
comes
out
is
reflected.
That's
the
one
tube
six
tubes
coming
together,
reflecting
the
academy
one
flag,
one
flagpole
we'll
also
have
a
pow
and
mia
flag,
probably
on
that
on
that
post
as
well
next
slide.
F
This
is
a
scene
where
we
propose
what
it
would
look
like
in
winter.
This
would
be
an
all
season,
type
of
memorial
people
could
get
out
there.
I
mean
it
would
be
accessible,
assuming
it's
plowed
and
so
forth,
but
a
little
idea
for
the
winter
scene
and
how
the
trees
would
look
and
so
forth
next
slide,
and
this
is
how
I
would
be
looking
at
night
again.
We're
looking
at
the
these
circular
benches
would
be
would
be
lit,
led
lights,
very
cost,
effective,
very
soft
light.
G
Thank
you
mayor.
Thank
you,
council.
Thank
you,
mike
I'm
going
to
talk
about
maintenance
and
how
how
the
materials
are
lined
up
for
this
proposal
melissa.
Could
you
flip
to
the
next
slide.
G
G
So
you
saw
this
one
a
few
minutes
ago
when
mike
was
talking
about
it.
I'll
just
touch
on
the
materials
that
the
design
team
proposed
using
so
first
of
all,
the
metal
is
either
going
to
be
anodized,
aluminum
or
stainless
steel.
These
are
both
considered
excellent
corrosion
resistance,
low
maintenance,
material
for
exterior
use.
G
Stainless
steel
is
more
expensive
to
fabricate
so
that
may
be
a
consideration
as
the
memorial
develop.
The
round
structure
is
off
to
the
left.
G
The
bases
are
planned
to
be
concrete
and,
like
mike
said,
the
the
top
insignias
for
the
branches
of
the
military
are
going
to
be
made
out
of
the
same
metal
that
the
sculpture
is
made
of
and
then
there'll
be
some
led
lights.
Shining
down
from
underneath
the
base
where
they're
built
in
the
landscaping
shown
is
all
going
to
be
native
plants
so
similar
to
the
rest
of
the
site.
G
Like
mike
said.
The
light
element
at
the
end
is
designed
to
be
a
focal
point,
but
not
not
completely
developed,
but
we'll
meet
all
code
and
regulatory
requirements
at
the
end.
So
with
that,
I'm
going
to
turn
it
over
to
leah
who's,
going
to
talk
about
site
considerations.
B
All
right,
thank
you.
Thank
you,
mary
thank
you,
council,
and
thank
you
dave.
As
mike
and
dave
both
mentioned,
the
design
is
located
in
the
area
immediately
next
to
the
pond
by
the
east
side
parking
lot.
B
There
are
two
main
reasons
for
this
location
being
chosen
by
the
design
team,
first
and
foremost,
accessibility,
especially
for
those
who
may
have
mobility
issues,
so
this
design
would
be
closer
to
the
parking
lot
with
direct
access
off
of
the
sidewalk,
so
there
would
be
no
need
for
use
of
any
steps
stairs
or
ramps.
It's
a
shorter
walk
to
gain
access
to
the
memorial
and
enter
the
memorial.
B
The
second
reason
is
aesthetics.
The
design
team
felt
strongly
that
this
location
had
a
better
symmetry
in
connection
with
the
the
site
as
a
whole,
and
it
had
a
greater
connection
to
the
already
existing
landscape
and
architecture
located
near
and
adjacent
to
the
site,
so
the
symmetry
with
the
sidewalk
that's
lined
with
trees
and
the
symmetry
with
the
pond
and
other
walking
areas
in
this
grassy
area.
On
the
east
side
of
the
the
building
is
where
the
design
team
felt
that
aesthetically
and
accessibility-wise
the
design
would
have
the
most
impact
and
availability.
B
Historically,
this
amphitheater
has
been
underutilized,
and
so
in
conversation
with
both
melissa
and
other
members
of
the
panels,
the
design
team
felt
that
this
was
a
stronger
location
and
that,
if
need
be,
if
the
council
did
not
approve
the
memorial
taking
place
of
where
the
amphitheater
is
that
it
could
be
relocated
either
higher
up
closer
to
the
building
or
converse
to
that
amphitheater
that
is
currently,
there
could
potentially
be
rebuilt
in
another
location,
potentially
close
to
the
building.
So
that
way,
both
of
those
things
could
coexist
together.
D
No,
not
not
much
of
a
question
more
so
a
comment
I
just
wanted
to,
and
I
don't
want
to
stop
you
mayor
from
saying
anything
either,
but
we
just
want
to
thank
staff
and
also
the
committee
and
those
folks
who
worked
along
with
this
to
kind
of
bring
this
to
fruition.
I
know
that
we
looked
at
this
way
back
so
many
years
ago.
D
I'm
just
happy
to
see
that
we're.
Finally
getting
this
to
a
point
to
where
it
is
today
again,
just
just
a
hearty
thanks,
just
being
a
military
brat
family,
just
great
to
see
something
like
this
happening
in
bloomington.
H
Thank
you,
mr
mayor
melissa.
I
know
that
these
are
plans
and
that
there
is
fundraising
to
do,
but
this
is-
and
I
speak
as
the
only
vet
on
the
city
council.
H
E
H
A
Well,
I'd
just
like
to
say
I
appreciate
the
work
of
the
committee.
I
appreciate
the
work
of
staff
involved
in
this
and
everybody
who
has
seen
this
through
a
this
multi-year
project
through
you've
done
outstanding
work,
and
I
think
this
is
this
is
spot
on
in
a
lot
of
different
ways.
I
couldn't
agree
more
with
the
location
I
like
it
running
parallel
to
the
water
and
using
that
as
a
feature
along
with
it.
I
do
understand,
moving
the
amphitheater.
A
I
think
it's
easier
to
move
the
amphitheater
than
to
try
and
reconfigure
this
this
memorial
in
such
a
way
that
it
would
do
what
you
want
it
to
do,
make
it
as
accessible
as
possible
and
as
easy
to
get
to
as
possible,
which
I
certainly
understand-
and
I
think
it's
a
a
notable
goal
and
a
laudable
goal
is
certainly
something
that
we
should
follow,
but
I
think
it
it
hits.
So
many
other
white
notes,
it's
simple:
it's
not
overly
extravagant
it's.
It
tells
a
story.
A
Obviously
it's
got
pieces
of
it
different
elements
that
you
can
see
at
different
times
in
different
ways
as
you
walk
through
it.
I
think
the
design
is
is
impressive
and
I
tip
my
cap
to
you.
I
think
it's
well
done
and
look
forward
to
seeing
it
coming
to
fruition
and
to
echo
council
member
baloga
boy,
the
sooner
the
better
on
this.
I
think
this
is
this
is
late?
A
Well,
not
late,
I
won't
say
late
I'll
say
this
is
overdue
here
in
the
city
of
bloomington,
we
should
we
should
absolutely
have
a
veterans
memorial
in
the
city
of
bloomington
and
I'm
glad
we're
moving
forward
on
it
now
and
look
forward
to
see
it
continue
and
look
forward
to
to
the
ribbon
cutting
just
as
soon
as
possible.
E
D
Mayor
I'd
be
happy
to
second
emotion,
if,
mr
baloga,
being
our
lone
veteran,
would
like
to
go
ahead
and
move
this.
H
A
B
B
A
Hi
motion
carries
7-0,
and
I
want
to
reiterate
once
again
for
folks
who
are
watching
that
this
is
contingent
completely
on
private
fundraising,
so
this
will
be
a
privately
funded
memorial
for
our
veterans
in
the
city
of
bloomington.
A
A
I
Mayor
before
we
move
on,
I
just
want
to
clarify
the
motion
who
made
the
motion
who
made
the
second.
C
Thank
you
mayor.
I
have
not
heard
from
anyone
who
would
like
to
hold
anything,
but
I
will
confess
that
I
missed
the
memo
did
not
see
that
I
consent
for
this
evening.
So
I
will
make
a
call
here
and
now,
if
there
is
anyone
who
would
like
to
hold
anything
from
the
consent
agenda,.
A
L
C
Sorry
again
about
that,
I
I
obviously
missed
the
vote
on
that
one.
So
I'm
not
seeing
or
hearing
anybody
else.
So
with
that,
I
will
move
items
six
point
three
through
six
point:
eight.
A
Very
good
and,
as
I
said,
I
held
that
in
6.2,
which
is
an
amendment
to
the
2020
city
council
calendar
and
just
wanted
to
make
the
council
aware
that
this
calendar
change
is
actually
going
to
add
a
couple
of
meetings.
A
We're
going
to
have
two
study
meetings
added
to
the
calendar,
one
on
november
30th
and
the
next
on
december
14th.
They
weren't
on
the
calendar
originally
and
those
were
off
monday
nights
for
us,
but
we're
going
to
add
two
study
meetings,
because,
frankly,
we've
got
a
lot
of
work
to
do
between
now
and
the
end
of
the
year
and
appreciate
the
the
opportunity
to
do
so
appreciate
that
staff
is
willing
to
take
this
on
appreciate
the
council
for
taking
on
those
monday
nights,
even
though
originally
they
were
off
monday
nights
on
your
schedule.
A
So
thanks
much
for
consenting
to
be
part
of
those,
and
I
just
wanted
to
let
the
the
general
public
know
that
those
would
be
as
part
of
the
council
calendar
november,
30th
and
december
14th.
We
will
be
having
study
meetings
so
just
wanted
to
make
that
public
and
everybody
aware,
and
with
that
I
will
move
approval
of
item
6.2.
A
B
Thank
you:
hi
carter,
hi
colter,
hi
coleman,
hi,
martin
hi,
nelson
hi,
mayor
bussey,.
J
Mr
mayor
and
council
members
just
a
technical
correction
on
the
resolution.
If
adopted
is
in
your
packet,
it
actually
has
a
number
assigned
to
the
resolution,
which
is
a
little
bit
of
a
formatting
snafu
in
our
system.
So
just
if
anybody's
wondering
it's
going
to
be
resolution,
number
2020
dash
blank
and
then
we
fill
in
the
resolution
numbers
after
the
fact.
J
So
if
we
can
just
acknowledge
that,
I
don't
think
it
needs
to
be
part
of
the
formal
action,
but
I
didn't
want
to
call
it
out
and
also
the
the
resolution
you
may
notice
is
not
in
the
standard
format
again
a
little
bit
of
a
formatting
snafu
with
our
peak
agenda
system.
So
it
will
be
put
into
the
standard
format
once
approved.
If,
if
done.
H
I'll
move
6.9
for
adoption.
Second,.
C
Thank
you,
mr
mayor.
As
always
we're
we're
very
appreciative
of
the
folks
who
make
donations
to
the
city
of
bloomington.
In
this
week
we
have
a
number
of
donations,
including
one
from
hunger
solutions
minnesota
to
our
public
health
department,
a
number
of
individuals
and
organizations
made
donations
to
the
bloomington
police
department
and
we
received
or
the
blooming.
I
should
say
the
bloomington
center
for
the
arts
received
two
sculptures
as
donations
this
week
as
well,
and
so
I
I
trust
that
staff
will
be
sending
out.
C
Thank
yous
is
appropriate,
but
I
just
wanted
to
call
out
those
generous
contributions
to
the
city
of
bloomington.
So
with
that,
I
will
move
item
6.1
for
adoption.
A
We
have
a
motion.
Do
we
have
a
second?
We
have
a
second
by
council
member.
We
have
a
motion
by
council
member
coulter
and
a
second
by
council
member
carter
to
accept
item
6.1
on
the
council
of
business
or
the
consent
business
hearing
no
further
discussion.
Ms
christensen.
B
Okay,
thank
you.
Hi
carter,
hi,
colter,
bowman,
martin.
A
We
will
move
on
now
to
item
7
on
our
agenda,
which
is
our
public
comment
period.
Public
comment
period
is
a
20-minute
period
at
each
council
meeting
where
we
accept
public
comment
on
items
not
on
tonight's
agenda.
We
start
with
item
7.1,
which
is
a
response
to
prior
meetings.
Public
comments,
mr
fabregi.
I
believe
we
did
not
have
any,
but
I
will
ask
this
correctly,
mr
mayor,
nothing
to
report.
A
We
did
not
have
any
public
comment
at
the
last
public
comment
period,
so
we'll
move
on
to
item
7.2,
which
is
the
public
comment
period
and
a
reminder
to
the
folks
who
are
tuning
in
and
hope
to
be
part
of
public
comment
period.
A
It's
a
20-minute
period
and
each
speaker
will
have
five
minutes
and
you'll
be
stopped
at
five
minutes,
not
because
we're
being
mean
or
trying
to
stifle
your
your
free
speech,
but
rather
we're
trying
to
make
it
as
fair
and
as
equitable
to
everyone
who
calls
in
everyone
who
is
part
of
the
public
comment
period,
the
city
council
and
myself
or
the
city
manager.
We
won't
be
responding
to
you
immediately
unless
it's
a
simple
statement
of
fact:
when's
new
year's
day,
for
example-
something
like
that.
A
But
we
won't
be
responding
to
the
item
that
is
brought
up
at
this
time,
but
it
will
be
responded
at
the
next
meeting
when
the
city
manager
gives
his
response
to
public
comment
period,
and
so
I
will
ask
amy
chaney
by
the
way
chris
wilson,
who
is
typically
seated
just
to
my
right
here
and
typically
handles
all
the
technology
is
not
with
us
this
evening.
She
has
the
week
off
so
good
for
her.
I
hope
she's
enjoying
her
down
time.
A
E
Thank
you,
mayor
jerome.
This
is
amy.
B
B
A
We
can
indeed,
if
you
could
just
repeat
your
name
for
the
for
the
record
and
then
please
go
ahead.
Andrew.
A
L
Mayor
yeah
evening,
guys
well
welcome,
say
hi
to
council
members,
mayor
manager.
I
wanted
to
talk
about
the
seventh
pillar
of
transparency
and
engagement
or
lack
thereof
back
well,
ann
catre,
our
park
and
rec
director
in
a
youtube
video
dated
august
27
of
2019,
said
valley,
view
pool
needs
replacement
likely
in
2026
or
in
a
few
years.
L
L
So
recently,
here
october
26
in
the
city
council
study
session
and
catrae
says
again,
an
evaluation
has
been
done
of
the
pool
shell
and
good
news:
great
maintenance,
painting
and
caulking.
They
had
an
outside
firm,
come
and
analyze
a
pool,
and
the
pool
is
good
now
for
20
years.
So
who
is
zooming?
Who,
in
the
ann,
could
trade
thing
so
then
pulling
up
an
old
sun
current
article
by
mike
hanks
in
a
bloomington
sun
current
article,
updated?
L
May
1st
2019
city
manager,
robrugi
stated
that
valley
view
pool
needs
replacement
in
a
couple
years
at
an
estimated
cost
of
12
million
dollars
in
2026..
Now,
council,
mayor
and
manager,
this
is
all
public.
It's
out
there
on
youtube.
You
can
look
at
the
videos
who
is
zooming,
who
and-
and
just
so
you
know-
100
000
was
actually
spent
of
taxpayer
money
in
pursuit
of
the
design
at
valley
view
park.
Why
was
a
a
study
or
why
didn't
you
hire
a
firm
to
come?
L
Look
at
the
the
pool
before
falsely
marketing
that
the
pool
needs
replacement.
I
assure
you
the
pool
is
in
rough
shape.
Our
city
does
a
fine
job,
maintaining
the
pool
so
in
the
next
council
meeting
city
manager.
Rabugi.
Can
you
please
tell
the
public
why
park
and
rec
director
lied
directly
and
pushed
the
valley
view
park
narrative
also,
can
you
respond
on
why
an
analysis
was
not
performed
on
the
pool
before
spending
a
hundred
thousand
dollars
on
design
and
marketing
of
the
valley
view
park?
L
J
If
I
could,
mr
verbruge,
I'm
not
gonna
provide
the
response
right
now,
because
that's
not
how
we
do
things
and
mr
thul,
I
will
have
a
full
response
on
december
7th,
but
I'm
not
going
to
allow
a
member
of
our
staff
to
be
called
a
liar
in
the
middle
of
a
meeting
and
not
have
that
corrected.
Ms
catry
did
not
lie
we'll
present
the
information
to
council
and
back
to
the
public
in
the
future,
and
I
think
it's
important
that
we
not
let
comments
like
that
go.
Thank
you.
A
A
N
N
The
I
believe,
all
of
the
all
of
the
council
members
now
are
very
familiar
with
the
lindell
flats
project
at
9320
lindale
avenue
south.
This
is
the
first
project.
Affordable
housing
project
that
received
funding
with
the
launch
of
the
opportunity.
Housing
ordinance
window
flats
is
a
20
million
high
density,
multi-family
rental
development
with
81,
affordable
units
that
60
area
of
median
income.
N
The
amenities
include
underground
parking,
a
fitness
center,
a
community
room,
on-site
management,
in-unit
laundry
and
balconies,
and
we're
working
to
meet
a
deadline
for
closing
by
december
31st
of
this
year,
and
then
construction
will
start
in
early
2021
and
be
completed
by
december
of
2021..
N
N
We've
find
ourselves
now
tonight
at
the
city,
council,
tiff,
public
hearing
and
approval,
as
recommended
by
the
hra
commission,
and
then
the
second
piece
of
this
item
that
will
be
presented
by
our
chief
financial
officer
is
regarding
the
authorized,
draw
and
land
reimbursement.
N
I
Mayor
and
council
on
the
tiff
items,
those
three
require
the
public
hearing.
I
The
actual
draw
does
not
require
a
public
hearing
so
depending
on
how
the
council
would
like
to
to
move
the
items
before
you
is
a
potential
draw
of
one
point:
seven
and
a
half
million
dollars
out
of
the
initial
15.2
million
dollars
that
the
council
authorized
in
the
2019
sea
bonds,
and
this
would
be
for
the
the
land
swap
that
we
are
working
on
with
glendale
flats
and
to
pay
the
the
seven,
the
one
million
seven
hundred
and
fifty
thousand
dollars
back.
I
We
would
be
utilizing
the
tif
stream
from
this
project,
and
so
there
would
be
sufficient
tiff
afterwards
of
approximately
20
to
go
into
the
housing
trust
fund
for
future
projects.
I
So
if
the
council
has
any
questions,
I'm
on
the
here
and
julie
eddington
is
also
available.
Should
the
council
have
questions
in
regards
to
the
actual
technical
bond
activities
of
this.
A
Again,
I
see
no
hands
going
up
so
with
that
I
will
open
the
public
hearing.
This
is
item
eight
point,
one
of
public
hearing
to
approve
the
tax
increment
financing
for
lindell
flats,
affordable
housing,
development
at
9320,
lindelof
new
south,
and
to
approve
the
taxable
general
obligation
tax,
increment
revenue
bonds.
It
is
a
public
hearing,
miss
cheney.
Do
we
have
anyone
on
the
line
who
wishes
to
speak
to
item
8.1.
B
A
H
Oh,
I
was
going
to
offer
the
motion.
Oh.
A
A
H
C
C
This
entire
project
is
is
affordable
at
sixty
percent
of
area
median
income,
and
we
know
that,
while
that
there
is
still
a
need
for
that,
there
is
quite
a
bit
more
need
for
housing
at
lower
income
levels,
and
I
I'm
not-
I
wouldn't
say
I'm
worried
about
it
now,
but
I
I
think
we
in
the
future
may
want
to
consider
being
more
judicious
with
some
of
the
options
that
we
have
in
particular,
I
think
with
with
establishing
tip
districts,
to
ensure
that
we
are
getting
at
some
of
that
lower
level
affordability
housing.
C
So
I
just
wanted
to
to
take
the
opportunity
to
say
that,
because
I
think
we,
you
know,
as
we
consider
to
sort
of
dig
down
into
addressing
the
affordable
housing
crisis
we
need
to,
I
think,
just
be
much
more
creative
and
and
intentional
about
our
efforts.
So
that's
all
I
wanted
to
say.
M
Thank
you
mayor,
so
I
would
agree
with
council
member
coulter's
comments
about
prioritizing
as
we
move
forward
since
we've
done
a
pretty
good
job
getting
enough
units
at
that
60
percent
ami
price
point.
The
other
thing
that
I
wanted
to
bring
up.
You
know
there
have
been
new
stories
over
the
past
couple
years.
Around
increasing
issues
related
to
you
know,
workers,
compensation
and
labor
trafficking
at
a
lot
of
the
a
lot
of
I
shouldn't
say
a
lot
of
at
some
job
sites,
and
I
just
wanted
to
you
know.
M
We
haven't
really
had
explicit
conversations
like
that
in
general
or
about
that
issue
in
general,
and
I
don't
want
to
say
that
the
developer
has
any
of
those
practices
happening
at
their
sites.
M
But
I
would
like
to
know,
especially
since
they're
going
to
be
benefiting
from
you-
know:
public
assistance
through
the
tif
resources
and
other
things.
You
know
what
are
they
doing
in
terms
of
their
own
policies
and
practices
as
a
developer
and
in
terms
of
who
they
subcontract
with
to
make
sure
that
they
don't
have
any
of
these
unfair
labor
practices
happening
on
their
job
sites,
because
I
know
sometimes
it
could
it.
It
may
even
be
something
that
a
subcontractor
is
a
part
of,
and
they
may
not
have
any
idea
it's
happening
so
anyways.
M
I
just
want
to
put
that
out
there
and
I
would
love
it
doesn't
have
to
be
right
now,
but
you
know
in
the
future
for
us
to
have
a
broader
conversation
about
that
and
then,
if
the
developer
could
respond
offline
around
some
of
the
different,
you
know
policies
and
practices
that
they
have
in
place
themselves
to
make
sure
those
things
aren't
happening.
I
would
appreciate
hearing
about
that.
A
Thank
you
councilmember
carter,
michelle
quist,
if,
if
you
could
maybe
work
with
the
the
developer
and
if
we
could
get
a
check
in
a
report
back
from
the
developer
about
some
of
council
member
carter's
concerns,
that
would
be
greatly
appreciated.
N
Mayor
busey
council
member
carter,
thank
you
very
much
for
raising
this
important
issue.
We
have
looked
into
it
and
can
report
that
eagle
building
has
compliance
and
monitoring
measures
in
place
to
prevent
these
things
from
occurring.
We
have
more
detail
and
we
will
follow
up
with
council
members
offline.
O
Thank
you
mayor.
I
first
just
wanted
to
echo
council
member
coulter's
points
with
regards
to
our
focus
on
the
sixty
percent
ami
here
I
think
it's
a
good
project
that
will
support
it,
but
I
think
there's
a
lot
of
work
to
do
in
other
areas
as
well
and
to
use
limited
resources
is,
is
tough
here.
O
The
other
point
that
I
want
to
bring
up
is
just
that
conversation
with
regards
to
integration
of
units
and
having
all
of
these
basically
at
the
same
price
point
or
near
the
same
price
point
is
something
you
know
from
a
policy
level.
I'd
like
to
see
a
little
bit
more
integrated
projects,
which
I
think
is
consistent
with
the
opportunity.
Housing
ordinance
calls.
So
just
those
two
kind
of
policy
questions.
I
think
it's
a
good
project
and
look
forward
to
adding
some
nice
units
into
our
housing
stock.
D
Omer,
I
think
this
is
a
great
proposal.
I
just
want
to
a
little
friendly
advice
to
my
my
my
colleagues.
We
should
be
careful
about
talking
about
policy
when
we're
getting
ready
to
pass
a
particular
item.
That's
not
policy
related
to
really
save
that
for
our
policy
and
issue
update.
I
think
it's
a
great
proposal.
We've
got
moving
forward
and
I
look
forward
to
seeing
with
your
passes.
A
Aye
motion
carries
seven
zero
council
member
baloga.
There
is
a
second
a
second
motion
that
we
have
to
make
a
second
resolution
that
we
have
to
adopt
here
as
well.
H
Indeed,
thank
you,
mr
mayor,
so
I
moved
to
adopt
the
resolution
relating
to
the
city's
taxable
general
obligation:
tax,
increment
revenue,
bonds,
series,
2019
c,
amending
resolution,
number
2019-11,
approving
amendments
to
documents
executed
in
connection
with
the
bonds
and
approving
the
execution
and
delivery
of
a
tax
increment
pledge
agreement.
A
I
Mayor
this
is
laurie
economy,
scholar.
Again
there
was
one
edit
on
the
document
of
the
resolution.
I
wanted
to
just
point
out
on
item
1.110.
We
changed
the
date
on
that
from
november
24th.
From
tomorrow's
date,
the
hra
board
actually
approved
pledging
the
tiff
on
november
10th,
so
we
moved
it
from
the
24th
to
the
10th,
so
the
atari
has
pledged
the
tiff
for
the
payment
of
these
bonds
on
that
line,
so
that
was
the
edit
that
was
made.
C
A
B
A
We
we
did
continue
this.
We
asked
the
staff
to
answer
a
couple
of
questions,
understanding
and
recognizing
some
of
the
financial
hardship
we
asked
look.
We
asked
staff
to
look
at
some
options
or
possibilities
about
ways
that
we
could
lessen
this
financial
hardship
on
residents
with
who
are
facing
the
their
payment
management
reconstruction
projects
in
front
of
their
homes
this
year.
So
I
believe
mr
brian
hansen
is
here
to
lead
us
through
this
one.
Mr
hanson
good
evening.
P
Presentation
all
right,
are
you
able
to
see
the
presentation.
P
Perfect
excellent.
Thank
you
again
again.
This
is
brian
hansen
development
coordinator
here
at
the
city.
P
All
right,
thank
you,
mr
mayor
council,
member
members.
As
mayor
boosie
mentioned,
we
were
at
city
council
here
on
november
9th
to
ask
you
to
consider
ordering
of
the
2021
pmp
reconstruction
project
at
that
time.
Given
the
current
pandemic
and
economic
issues
created
by
it,
council
had
asked
staff
to
explore
ways
to
provide
economic
assistance
to
those
who
may
need
additional
help
in
paying
an
assessment
if
it
was
levied
at
that
time.
So
staff
went
back
and
explored
three
different
options.
P
P
P
an
advantage
of
going
this
route
to
provide
some
assistance
would
be.
It
would
treat
all
properties
the
same.
So
all
properties,
residential
and
commercial
would
all
be
treated
the
same.
P
It
does
provide
a
larger
prepayment
window
so
using
this
option
for
the
2020
assessments
that
were
levied
in
october
on
a
typical
schedule
when
those
are
levied
in
early
october,
we
have
until
november
29th
for
that
prepayment
window,
which
is
typically
seven
to
eight
weeks
from
the
levying
of
the
assessment
to
the
certification.
P
So
with
the
2020
assessment,
that
window
is
actually
closing
on
wednesday
due
to
the
holiday
and
actually
just
as
a
side
note
here,
we
have
received
40
of
those
assessments
that
were
assessed.
This
past
october
have
prepaid
already,
so
a
majority
of
those
have
paid
in
full
for
their
assessments.
P
We've
received
some
partial
payments
as
well,
but
with
this,
if
we
were
to
delay
the
certification
of
the
assessment
role
until
march
2022,
it
would
give
from
march
2022
until
november,
29th
of
2022
for
that
prepayment
window,
which
would
extend
that
to
roughly
seven
to
eight
months
as
opposed
to
seven
to
eight
weeks.
It
is
right
now,
so
it
would
give
property
owners
who
are
subject
to
an
assessment
more
time
to
save
and
possibly
pay
down.
P
If
the
certification
of
the
roll
was
delayed
until
the
spring,
there
would
be
an
additional
interest
or
carrying
cost
for
assessed
properties
with
this
right
now,
with
our
current
schedule,
when
the
role
is
certified
in
october
that
first
year,
interest
is
actually
calculated
over
15
months,
because
it's
the
three
months
of
the
of
2020
as
a
the
previous
year,
plus
the
full
year,
the
12
months
for
the
the
subsequent
year.
P
So
right
now
our
current
schedule-
that's
15
months-
is
assessed
or
the
interest
applied
to
15
months
for
that
first
year
and
then
the
12
months,
the
proceeding
nine
years
with
this
possibility
again
that
interest
would
go
to
from
without
initial
nine
months.
So
it
would
be
21
months
of
interest,
so
that
equates
to
roughly
90
additional
90
dollars
on
an
average
assessment.
P
P
This
will
provide
short-term
loans
to
only
those
that
have
a
demonstrated
need.
Some
benefits
of
this
of
this
option
would
be
it
avoids
additional
interest
costs
for
all
project
properties.
So
only
those
properties
that
were
seeking
the
assessment
loan
assessment
loan
program
would
be
affected.
All
other
properties
would
seek
would
have
the
same
interest
applied
as
previous
year's
pmp
projects.
P
Staff
has
identified
an
internal
source
of
revenue
funds
to
fund
this
program.
If
this
were
a
route
that
the
council
chose
to
go
down
one
one
issue
with
this
with
this
route
is,
it
does
not
treat
all
properties
the
same,
and
that
comes
into
play.
When
you
look
at
the
assessment
rules
by
state
statute
and
depending
on
the
number
of
people
that
would
choose
to
participate
in
this
program,
it
may
make
the
need
to
issue
taxable
bonds,
as
opposed
to
our
current
tax-exempt
bonds.
P
P
So
you
can
see
that
there
are
some
overhead
costs
that
are
a
good
portion
of
the
actual
loan
amount
itself,
and
we
also
think
there
may
be
some
difficulty
in
finding
finding
a
servicer
to
administer
this
loan
given
other
newly
created
loan
programs,
and
it
could
pose
challenges
to
staff
to
be
able
to
certify
the
eligibility
of
applicants.
P
P
P
Adding
a
covent
hardship
clause
to
our
existing
hardship.
Deferral
program
again
would
not
treat
all
properties
the
same
and
again
may
cause
that
same
issue
with
making
our
not
ours.
Current
non
taxable
bonds
into
taxable
bonds,
depending
on
the
number
of
people
who
participate
in
the
program.
P
The
entire
balance
of
that
deferred
assessment
must
be
paid
when
that
assessment
comes
out
of
deferment,
along
with
the
accumulated
interest.
That's
due
whenever
the
person
or
persons
that
are
in
the
hardship,
referral
program
no
longer
meet
those
criteria
or
if
the
property
is
sold.
P
So
if
we
were
to
establish
a
covent
hardship
when,
if
that
was
the
the
reason
for
that
person
or
property
being
in
deferral,
when
that
situation
no
longer
exists,
then
that
assessment
will
become
due
and
the
option
of
spreading
that
out
and
paying
it
out
over
over
10
years
no
longer
applies.
So
I
think
that's
an
important
thing
to
point
out
in
this
option.
P
P
Street
reconstruction
project
staff
also
also
recommends,
following
up
with
the
city
council
in
late
july
of
2021,
to
consider
implementing
an
assessment
relief
program
if
it's
determined
it's
needed
and
if
assessment
relief
is
desired,
staff
would
recommend
option
a
which
would
be
deferring
the
certification
of
the
entire
assessment
role
to
the
spring
of
2022.,
and
also
staff
is
also
recommending
modifying
the
existing
assessment
hardship
deferral
program
to
include
the
military
personnel
language,
as
stated
in
state
statute
currently,
and
actually,
staff
is
working
on
drafting
on
that
language
to
bring
the
council
here
at
a
future
council
meeting.
P
So
tonight
I
had
you
a
recommended
motion
for
you
in
front
of
you
and
I'm
available,
as
well
as
other
staff
to
answer
any
questions
this
time.
A
Thank
you,
mr
hanson
council
questions
and
actually
I'll
kick
it
off.
If
you
could
just
clarify
a
bit
and
go
back
to
your
conclusions
page
if
you
could
please
mr
hansen,
so
you're
recommending
that
we
adopt
the
the
pmp
reconstruction
projects
tonight,
which
I
understand
the
second
bullet.
The
following
up
with
the
city
council
in
july
2021.
So
is
what
you're
saying
with
that
bullet.
Is
that
basically,
a
a
decision
isn't
necessarily
needed
tonight,
but
we
could
rather
wait
eight
months
until
july
of
2021
to
consider
this.
Is
that
correct.
P
That
is
correct.
Yes,
because
we
would
come
a
typical
schedule.
We
would
present
the
send
out
the
notes
of
public
hearing
and
hold
a
public
hearing
for
an
assessment
and
send
out
those
notices
of
of
the
final
assessment
amount
to
property
owners
in
mid
october
early
to
mid
october.
P
Excuse
me,
early
to
mid
september,
so
yeah
staff
would
recommend
coming
back
in
july,
and
that
would
give
enough
time
to
if,
if
it
was
the
desire
of
the
council
to
continue
on
our
normal
schedule
and
be
able
to
calculate
those
final
assessment
amounts
and
send
out
those
notices
on
our
typical
schedule
or
if
it
was
determined
that
the
council
wanted
to
delay
certification
until
march
or
spring
of
2022.
A
Console
anything
additional,
so
the
recommendation
here
staff
recommending
that
we
adopt
the
resolution,
but
understanding
that
we
can
basically
come
back
to
this
next
summer
in
july
of
2021.
A
Be
able
to
take
a
second
look
at
things.
Be
able
to
take
a
look
at
the
economic
conditions
where
we
stand
with
the
pandemic,
where
we
stand
with
everything
else
and
if
need
be,
adopt
some
possible
mitigations
to
the
economic
impact
on
folks.
Regarding
the
pavement
management
program,.
O
I
just
I
had
a
question
with
regards
to
108th
street.
I
know
a
survey
was
going
to
be
done
there
and
I
just
was
wondering
if
we
had
the
results
back
or
what
the
timing
of
that
was.
P
Yeah
councilman
customer
nelson,
mr
mayor,
I
would
defer
that
question.
I
believe
darren
rezak.
The
project
engineer
is
on
the
call
as
well.
He
may
be
able
to
find
some
more
information
on
that.
B
The
end
of
last
week,
so
we'd
be
looking
to
send
that
out
early
this
week
with
results.
I
believe
we
gave
them
about
a
two-week
time
frame
to
respond
back
to
the
survey.
O
Thank
you
and
I
just
one
other
follow-up
question:
if
the
neighborhood
wants
the
wider
street,
are
there
other
alternatives
that
we
could
look
at
for
traffic
calming?
I
know
that's
a
big
concern
for
that
street.
Given
the
commercial
node,
that's
right
there
and
put
some
traffic
onto
the
street
there.
B
Mayor
members
of
council
councilmember
nelson,
the
the
survey
that
was
sent
out
was
the
it
was
the
32
foot
width
and
then
it
the
the
two
options
was
the
32
foot
width,
as
well
as
the
28
foot
width
and
with
the
neighborhood
putting
their
desired
side
of
the
street
for
where
that
would
be
signed
as
no
parking.
But
we
certainly
there
are
other
options
for
doing
bump
boats.
Things
of
that
nature
that
could
be
incorporated
into
the
final
design.
O
A
Questions
now
this
officially
was
officially
we
closed
the
public
hearing
on
this
at
our
last
meeting,
but
I
know
that
it
was
listed
here
on
the
agenda
as
a
public
hearing
on
this.
So
what
I
would
like
to
do
is
kind
of
open
a
an
abbreviated
public
hearing.
If
I
could
to
see
if
there's
anybody
on
the
line
who
has
tuned
in
for
this
and
would
like
to
comment
on
this
so
miss
chaney.
Is
there
anyone
for
item
8.2
who
would
like
to
talk
on
item
8.2.
N
N
We
still.
We
renew
our
objection
to
the
project
from
gerard
to
lindale
and
and
more
specifically,
the
the
heavy
burden
of
the
tax
assessed.
So
I
just
wanted
to
say
that
one
more
time
and-
and
I
appreciate
the
opportunity-
and
I
appreciate
the
conversation.
A
And
I
appreciate
your
phone
call,
ms
bishop,
and
I
and
I
understand
your
concern.
I
certainly
do
and
it's
it's.
It's
always
a
tricky
one
when
people
are
on
corners
when
they're
affected
by
a
couple
of
different
projects,
but
it's
an
especially
tricky
one
when
there's
four
different
lots
as
as
is
the
case
with
with
christ,
the
king,
and
so
it's
a
I'm
afraid
this.
This
might
be
a
a
difficult
situation
that
we
may
or
may
not
be
able
to
work.
A
Our
way
out
of
I
just
don't
see
how
we
can
work
our
way
out,
considering
the
the
equity,
considering
the
the
looking
at
the
totality
of
the
project
and
how
it
specifically
applies
across
the
city
when
we're
talking
about
specific
different
lots
on
the
different
streets
and
I'm
afraid,
that's
that's
just
kind
of
a
a
quirk
of
this
one
and
it
looks
like
you're
going
to
be
caught
on
the
bad
side
of
the
quirk,
and
I
do
apologize
for
that.
But
it
looks
like
that's
the
way
it's
going
to
work
out.
A
N
Oh
gosh,
I
didn't,
I
didn't
know
I
had
an
opportunity
for
a
dialogue,
but
yes
we.
We
appreciate
that
and
understand
that
and
and
when,
when
I
was
listening
to
brian's
options,
it
doesn't
like
we
were
thinking
about.
You
know.
Perhaps
the
you
know
when
he
was
talking
about
expanding
the
hardship
program
that
doesn't
really
still
doesn't
apply
to
anyone.
That
is
not
residential.
So
we
were
hoping
for
something
in
that
category,
but.
A
B
Thank
you,
hi
carter,.
A
K
Thank
you
very
much
mayor
just
real
briefly.
I
just
wanted
to
to
say
thank
you
so
much
to
staff.
I
feel
like
the
options
that
were
put
forward,
especially
option
a
really
got
to
kind
of
the
heart
of
what
we
were
talking
about,
and
I
know
especially
now
kind
of
in
all
this
craziness
to
walk
that
fine
line
of
keeping
up
with
our
investments
in
this
critical
infrastructure,
while
being
mindful
to
the
precarious
spot
that
a
lot
of
our
residents
are
in.
K
So
I'm
sure
that
wasn't
easy
and
thank
you
for
being
so
responsible.
The
conversation
we
had
last
time
around.
H
Thank
you,
mr
mayor
two
items.
First,
is:
I
believe
that
the
first
option
apply
to
all
properties?
Am
I
correct
in
that,
or
is
that
incorrect.
D
There,
if
I
could,
because
councilmember
lowman,
I
think
what
he
said
is
that
an
option
for
the
church.
A
Yes,
absolutely
it's,
it
would
apply
to
everyone
covered
under
this
resolution.
Absolutely
all
the
properties
covered
under
this
resolution.
Yes,.
D
And
so
the
impact
for
that
for
the
church
would
be
that
they
would
be
able
to,
along
with
other
folks,
to
be
able
to
make
this
payment
at
a
later
time.
A
That
that's
correct.
If
we,
if
we
decide
to
to
move
forward
with
this
resolution,
with
the
understanding
that
we
can
come
back
in
july
of
2021
and
look
at
this
again,
it
would
then
affect
the
september
issuance,
which
would
have
move
it
from
all
the
way
to
march
of
2023.
Basically
before
payments
would
begin
for
for
all
properties
in
this
project.
A
H
But
I
lost
audio,
so
wouldn't
another
option
for
the
church
to
solve
this
issue
be
to
re-plat
their
parcels
into
a
single
parcel,
and
maybe
the
city
manager
could
respond
to
that.
One.
J
Mr
babruggy,
mr
mayor
and
council
members,
council
member
baloga,
we
haven't
looked
at
the
different
options
that
might
be
available.
I
can
go
back
to
staff
and
ask
them
to
research
that
a
little
bit
more,
maybe
mr
hanson
knows
right
off
the
top
of
his
head,
but
I
think
the
the
key
here
for
the
council
is
for
this
discussion
to
get
confidence,
that
there
are
several
different
options
for
how
we
handle
any
any
hardships
or
deferrals
and
know
that
there
are
options
available.
J
Since
we
don't
actually
have
to
make
the
decision
about
what
policy
we
will
select
until
august
of
next
year.
Brian
did
you
have
any
thoughts
along
the
different
parcels.
P
Yeah,
thank
you
guys,
jamie,
the
actual
the
this
church
parcel
itself
is
one
parcel.
They
do
have
four
frontages,
though,
and
I
think
that's
the
that's
the
distinction
there.
It
is
actually
one
parcel
so
be
planning
there'd
be
no
need
to
reply
to
just
one
parcel.
However,
the
way
that
the
church
is
situated,
the
part
of
the
lot
with
the
public
right
away
that
surrounds
it
actually
has
four
adjusted
front
footages
when
we
get
into
our
afs
calculations,
which
we've
gone
over
before
for
the
council.
P
A
H
A
A
Hi
motion
carries
7-0,
I'd
like
to
echo
council
member
martin's
thanks
to
staff
on
that
one.
I
think
they,
you
did
a
very
nice
job
to
bring
forward
different
options
and
look
at
possibilities,
understanding
and
recognizing
the
concerns
that
we
heard
from
residents
and
the
concerns
that
the
council
had
about
moving
this
forward,
especially
in
this
very
difficult
economic
time
for
a
lot
of
folks.
So
thank
you
to
staff
for
that
and
for
the
work
that
you've
done
on
this.
A
We
can
move
now
to
another
public
hearing
on
the
ordinance
of
a
temporary
pandemic
response
housing.
This
was
another
one
that
we,
I
think
opened
on
november
9th
and
we
laid
over
until
tonight
for
a
variety
of
different
reasons,
because
the
I
think
the
planning
commission
was
going
to
take
this
up
in
a
variety
of
different
ways.
So
we
will
turn
this
over
now
to.
A
Q
Q
All
right
great,
so
this
is
a
proposed
code.
Amendments
related
to
a
temporary
pandemic
response,
housing.
A
Q
Okay,
sorry
for
that
technical
difficulties,
so
I
will
be
doing
the
main
presentation,
but
I
am
joined
here
by
a
few
other
staff
who
can
answer
questions
if
needed.
Q
So
I
just
wanted
to
give
a
little
bit
of
context
here,
so
the
original
ordinance
was
really
crafted
in
response
to
a
proposal
by
the
county
to
purchase
the
extended
stay
property
and
that
was
scheduled
for
original
public
hearing
before
the
planning
commission
on
november
5th.
Right
before
that
hearing
the
county
withdrew
their
proposal
and
in
part
because
of
that,
the
planning
commission
thought
it
was
best
to
just
kind
of
take
a
pause
and
they
recommended
continuing
of
the
item
to
their
november
19th
meeting,
which
was
last
thursday.
Q
So
last
thursday,
then
they
did
take
action
on
a
narrowed
version
of
the
original
ordinance,
which
would
call
option
a
and
that
was
included
in
your
packet,
and
it
really
focuses
on
items
that
we
would
consider
kind
of
clean,
more
related
to
modifying
existing
definitions
and
adding
penalty
language.
Q
The
planning
commission
also
directed
staff
to
prepare
a
new
ordinance
focused
on
the
proposed
new
interim
use,
the
temporary
pandemic
response
housing
and
bring
that
back
for
public
hearing
at
their
january
14th
meeting
that
ordinance
once
drafted
would
be
noticed
appropriately.
We
would
also
do
some
outreach
to
affected
property
owners
and
hotels
in
the
city.
Q
So
I'm
going
to
just
provide
an
overview
of
what
the
planning
commission
recommended.
So
again,
they
recommended
a
slimmed
down
version
of
the
original
ordinance
which
we're
calling
option
a,
and
it
really
consists
of
kind
of
two
parts.
There's
the
modifications
to
a
handful
of
existing
definitions.
Q
Q
This
language
is
included
in
several
other
city
code
chapters,
for
whatever
reason,
it
was
never
incorporated
into
chapters
19
and
21,
which
are
the
chapters
that
deal
with
zoning
and
development,
so
digging
down
a
little
bit
more
into
what's
actually
in
option
a
so
there's
a
couple
of
different
definitions
proposed
to
be
modified,
starting
with
congregate
living
facility,
basically
clarification
to
what
is
and
what
is
not
included
in
this
use
type
government
facilities
general,
adding
language
to
clarify
that
these
are
non-residential
uses.
Q
The
code
currently
has
two
definitions
related
to
hotels,
one
full
service
hotel,
we're
proposing
to
delete
because
it's
really
redundant,
it's
not
necessary
and
is
pretty
much
incorporated
under
the
other
definition
which
we're
proposing
to
modify
for
one
to
shorten
it.
Q
It
currently
includes
a
reference
to
a
motor
hotel,
which
is
an
outmoded
term
and
then
also
adding
clarification
to
the
term
of
occupancy,
making
making
that
clear
that
that
is
30
days
or
less
and
once
again
clarifying
what
is
and
what
is
not
included
in
this
type
of
use
and
the
other
piece
of
option.
A
as
I
said
before,
is
the
addition
of
the
penalty
clause
to
both
chapter
19
and
21..
Q
And
with
that
again,
the
planning
commission
recommended
to
the
city
council
approval
of
this
option
a
and
I
have
a
motion
teed
up.
Accordingly,
there
is
also
in
your
packet,
a
resolution
of
summary
publication
and
there's
a
motion
to
that
effect
as
well.
So
I
will
stop
there
and
open
it
up
for
questions.
A
H
Thank
you
julie,
good
evening,
so
I
have
a
couple.
Questions
learning
congregate,
living.
H
Q
Mayor
bussey,
council,
member,
logan,
belogan,
sorry,
I'm
not
sure
I
heard
the
entire
question.
You
were
breaking
up
a
little
bit.
You
said
something
about
congregate.
How
living
could
be
something
but
not
something
else.
H
Q
Mayor
bussey,
councilmember
beloga.
No,
in
fact,
if
the
proposed
language
to
be
added
the
modification
to
congregate
living
makes
it
clear
that
congregate
living
does
not
include
a
hotel
or
temporary
pandemic
response
housing.
So
so.
H
They're
two
different
uses,
and
so
a
hotel
cannot
have,
for
instance,
two
floors
of
hotel
and
two
floors
of
congregate
living.
If
it's
four
story.
H
Thank
you,
the
period
of
time
how
how
was
two
years
selected
it's.
It
seems
like
an
awfully
long
period
of
time,
especially
in
light
of
when
we
look
at
the
distribution
of
vaccines.
Q
Why
was
that
duration
recommended
in
the
original
ordinance
and-
and
I
do
want
to
just
make
clear
before
I
answer
that
and
that
none
of
the
language
in
the
original
ordinance
that
is
pertaining
to
the
new
interim
use,
is
included
in
option
a
so
I
just
want
to
make
that
very
clear,
but
the
the
two-year
duration,
I
think,
was
in
part
so
an
iup
generally
the
the
standard,
iup
language
and
the
code
allows
an
iup
for
up
to
five
years.
Q
The
council,
the
planning
commission,
can
recommend
something
less
than
that,
depending
on
the
circumstances.
The
two
years,
I
believe,
was
felt
an
an
adequate
amount
of
time.
Given
you
know
that
the
time
it
would
take
to
convert
something
to
this
and
then
have
the
shelter
and
then
make
sure
that
there
was
enough
time
to
transition
to
to
something
else.
Q
B
Mayor
bossie,
councilmember
beloga.
I
would
just
add
that
I
think
this
was
really
trying
to
take
into
account
the
sort
of
predicted
length
of
a
pandemic,
so
just
to
give
you
an
idea
of
of
the
current
situation,
we're
about
not
quite
a
year
into
the
coven
19
pandemic.
B
Q
Pandemic
situation
would
likely
be
somewhere
in
the
range
of
two
years.
In
terms
of
that.
H
The
question
so
these
are
really
temporary,
homeless,
shelters.
It's
not
that
the
other
homeless
shelters,
the
majority
of
which
are
in
downtown
minneapolis,
were
insufficient
to
handle
the
needs.
As
I
understand
it,
it
was
the
ability
to
during
covet
space
people
out
so
since
covet
has
a
life
cycle
that
we
hope
and
anticipate
will
be
shortened
with
the
vaccine
and
once
the.
H
Four-Tier
elevation
priorities,
which
will
most
likely
occur
in
the
first
or
second
quarter
of
2021..
It
seems
as
if
this
may
be
a
what
you're
saying.
B
A
Broke
up
a
couple
of
times
there
jack,
could
you
could
you
summarize
very
quickly
what
you
said
there?
I
think
we
got
the
gist
of
it,
but
your
your
basic
question
is
why
why
a
two-year
time
period
here
is
that
correct
jack.
H
It's
just
that
with
the
evolving
information
that's
now
available
with.
H
A
shorter
window,
rather
than
a
longer
window
of
two
years,
continue
being
in
make.
B
Yeah
mayor
busy
council
member
beloga,
yes
with
regard
to
covid.
Q
This
this
type
of
strain
of
sars
covid,
will
have
a
vaccine
in
place.
There
may
be
different
pandemics
in
the
future.
Q
B
The
the
community
in
terms
of
providing
shelter
or
socially
distant
shelter
in
the
case
of
in
case
of
an
infectious
outbreak
like
covid
or
some
other
kind
of
some
other
kind
of
virus.
Q
Mayor
bussey
and
customer
below,
if
I
could
just
expand
on
that
a
little
bit,
I
just
want
to
also
say
that
this
is
as
as
proposed
in
the
original
ordinance.
The
maximum
of
two
years
is
is
a
maximum.
Q
The
city
council
could
approve
something
less
than
two
years
as
well
looking
at
the
facts,
so
there's
findings
that
have
to
be
made
when
you're,
when
you're
approving
an
interim
use
permit
similar
to
a
conditional
use
permit
and
the
specific
circumstance
could
suggest
a
shorter
time
period,
and
so
the
council
would
have
the
discretion
to
to
perhaps
do
something
less
than
you
would
want
to
make
sure
that
there
was
good.
You
know
it.
There
was
good
findings
for
for
doing
that.
O
Yeah,
thank
you
mayor
just
a
few
questions
here,
quick
first,
I
just
for
clarification,
the
the
two-year
issue
and
all
of
the
changes
that
were
related
to
the
pandemic.
That
is
not
what
was
recommended
by
planning
commission
correct,
they're,
going
to
revisit
that
in
january.
Am
I
understanding
that
correctly.
Q
Yes,
mayor
bussey,
council,
member
nelson,
yes,
that
is
correct,
so
the
ordinance
has
originally
drafted
really
kind
of
consisted
of
two
parts.
There
is
this.
This
part
that
we
are
calling
the
shortened
version
option
a
which
really
dealt
with
more
cleanup
sorts
of
issues,
the
definitional
modifications
and
the
penalty
clause.
Q
The
rest
of
the
original
ordinance
really
focused
on
the
creation
of
the
new
interim
use
category
for
temporary
pandemic,
with
response
housing
and
the
related
standards
that
would
go
along
with
that
use
so
that
portion
of
the
ordinance,
the
planning
commission,
it's
essentially
a
new
ordinance
planning
commission,
asked
staff
to
to
go
back
and
make
some
changes
and
and
bring
back
a
new
ordinance
essentially
for
public
hearing
in
january.
O
Okay,
quick
follow-up
question
on
that:
what
is
the
advantage
to
the
city
of
moving
this
definition?
Part
ahead
at
this
time
versus
just
waiting
until
they
come
back
with
the
the
fully
cooked
version.
Q
Sure,
mayor
a
bussy
council
member
nelson-
I
I
will
start
this
and
then
I
think
I
would
hand
it
off
to
megan
rogers,
to
give
you
the
the
legal
interpretation.
So
really,
there
is
no
again
the
the
option.
A
portions
are
really
considered
kind
of
cleanup
items
that
don't
materially
really
affect
the
creation
of
a
new
interim
use
permit
category,
so
they
can
be
handled
separately.
Q
Part
of
the
reason
we
put
them
together
in
the
first
place
was
because
it
was
going
along
faster
last
week,
also
at
planning
commission.
They
considered
their
annual,
which
they
do
annually
the
cleanup
ordinance
the
miscellaneous
issues,
ordinance,
which
will
probably
be
coming
to
you
in
a
few
weeks.
Q
Some
of
these
changes
here
are
the
types
of
things
we
would
have
included
in
that
ordinance,
but
because
this
ordinance
was
originally
teed
up
to
happen
to
go
at
on
a
faster
timeline,
we
included
it
in
in
the
original
ordinance
and
with
that
I
think
I'll
turn
it
over
to
megan
rogers
to
see
if
she
has
anything
else
to
add.
B
Mayor,
thank
you
so
much.
Mr
mayor,
councilmember
number
nelson
members
of
council.
The
additional
language.
O
Okay,
that's
very
helpful.
I
appreciate
that
one
last
question.
During
the
conversation
earlier
or
the
questions
it
was
referred
to
several
times
what
the
county
is
doing,
what
is
happening
in
these
hotels
as
shelters
and
in
the
congregate
living
facility
definition?
The
word
shelters
has
been
added.
O
Is
that
consistent
with
the
intent
not
to
allow
that
type
of
use
without
further
consideration
by
planning
commission
on
how
that
part
of
the
ordinance
goes?
I
just
I'm
wondering
if
adding
the
word
shelters
in
there
opens
up
what
is
happening
currently
so.
Q
Q
We
already
have
certain
types
of
shelters
like
state
licensed,
shelters
and
such
that
are
are,
you
know,
very
defined
in
terms
of
how
many
people
can
be
there
and
and
they
are
allowed
via
conditional
youth
permit,
and
I
think
we
wanted
to
include
those
in
here
just
again
for
clarity,
but
mr
marker
guard,
if
you
could
expand
on
that.
P
Sure,
good
evening,
mayor
busy
council
member.
B
B
An
umbrella
term
that
covers
a
lot
of
uses,
congregate.
P
Living
facilities
are
allowed
in
multi-family
districts
as
a
conditional
use.
They
are
not
allowed
in
virtually
all
commercial
districts.
So
there's
very
little.
If
any
crossover
between
hotels
and
congregate
living
facilities,
the
intent
was
to
clarify
where
shelters
fall
and
where
they
do
not
fall
in
the
various
definitions
in
the
zoning
ordinance.
O
P
All
right,
correct,
mayor
busy,
council
member
nelson,
it's
clarifying
that.
B
A
hotel
is
not
a
shelter.
A
congregate
living
facility
could
be
a
shelter.
K
Thank
you
very
much
mayor,
so
real,
quick,
the
additional
conversation
the
planning
commission
is
going
to
be
having
kind
of
mid-january
about
this.
Do
we
have
a
rough
idea
of
when
whatever
recommendations
they
move
forward,
are
going
to
be
in
front
of
council
for
us
to
take
a
look
at
if
they
move.
Q
Mayor
bussey,
council
member
martin,
our
normal
schedule,
when
we
have
a
hearing
on
something,
is
it's
about
three
to
four
weeks
afterwards,
unless
we
pre-advertise
so
between
planning,
commission
and
council.
So
if
it
goes
to
planning
commission
on
the
14th
of
january
would
probably
be
the
first
meeting
in
february,
whatever
the
date
of
that.
I
don't
know
that
the
dates
have
been
set
yet,
but
but
that's
the
kind
of
a
typical
sort
of
a
timing
spacing
between
hearings
at
planning,
commission
and
city
council.
K
A
With
that,
I
would
like
to
open
our
public
hearing
on
this.
This
is
a
public
hearing
on
our
ordinance
regarding
temporary
pandemic
response
housing
item
8.3
on
our
agenda.
B
A
O
A
A
Hearing
none.
So
if
you
look
at
we're
on
it's
a
bit
convoluted
on
our
motion
sheet
but
on
on
page
301
and
then
bleeding
onto
page
302
on
the
council
packet,
it
basically
shows
where
we
are
so.
The
planning
commission
has
recommended
city
council
approval
of
code,
amendments
related
to
definitions
and
the
penalty
clause,
which
is
ordinance
option
a,
and
so,
if,
if
the
council
was
in
agreement
with
that,
that
would
be
the
motion.
We
would
be.
A
Making
so
council,
I
would
either
look
for
additional
discussion
questions
or
some
action
on
this.
C
C
A
B
A
You
motion
carries
seven
zero.
I
think
council
member
belong
is
switching
devices
electronically,
so
I
think
we're
gonna
catch
up
a
little
bit
so
very
good.
A
So
thank
you
on
that.
Thank
you.
Thank
you
on
that.
Thank
you
very
much
to
staff
for
for
your
work
on
that.
One.
A
We
are
gonna
move
now
to
the
amended
portion
of
our
agenda
where
we
agreed
at
the
start
of
the
meeting.
We
were
going
to
move
8.6
and
8.7
up
in
the
agenda.
So
right
now,
I'd
like
to
call
item
8.6,
which
is
a
public
hearing
resolution
regarding
the
proposed
changes
to
fees
and
charges
schedule
and
that
I
believe,
is
cary
carlson
our
budget
manager.
Is
it
not.
I
Mayor
this
is
chief
financial
officer,
laurie
economy,
scholar
I'll
be
joining
you
on
this
item.
Oh.
B
B
I
Mayor
council
annually
we
bring
our
fees
schedule
to
the
city
council
for
approval
at
a
public
hearing
a
while
a
few
weeks
ago,
we
sent
out
that
through
the
one
weekly
and
then
we
also
sent
the
16
pages
on
the
the
ledger
size
to
the
council
to
review
the
small
print
of
all
those
fee
changes.
Majority
of
those
fee
changes
are
in
the
public
park
and
rec
area.
I
We
have
a
few
in
the
the
general
funding
parks
and
rec
education
and
enterprise
funds
and
country
our
park
and
rec
director
is
also
available
and
several
of
your
staff.
If
you
have
questions
in
regards
to
the
fee,
increases
in
the
park
and
rec
area,
and
so
in
general
we'd
like
to
take
council
questions
and
then
have
the
public
hearing.
Thank
you.
C
Thank
you
mayor,
I'm
just
wondering
I
know
in
the
past
we've
had
conversations,
and
this
is,
I
suspect,
a
question
more
for
our
parks
and
recreation
director,
but
we've
had
conversations
related
to
the
fees
at
the
ice
garden,
big
and
based
on
the
information
we
have.
It
looks
like
the
I
think
it's
a
five
percent
increase
in
schedule
is
still
relatively
significantly
below
what
it
looks
like
some
similar
rates
for
communities
around
around
us
are.
C
So
I'm
just
wondering
if
you
could
talk
a
little
bit
about
why
that
is,
and
if
there's
any
discussion
about
getting
closer
to
those
rates.
At
some
point.
K
Thank
you
very
much,
councilmember
coulter
mayor
bussy,
members
of
the
council.
We
are
definitely
working
in
the
direction
of
getting
our
fees
up
to
market
rate.
We
are
proposing
that
we
increase
our
fees,
another
five
percent
this
year,
so
we
have
had
two
very
significant
rate
increases
over
the
last
two
years.
K
We
also
have
some
facility
improvements
to
make.
We
do
have
three
sheets
of
ice,
which
is
very
comparable
with
the
best
facilities
in
town,
but
some
of
our
facilities
aren't
quite
up
to
the
standards
of
some
of
those
other
facilities,
but
we
do
feel
that
a
five
percent
rate
increase
is
very
significant
for
our
user
groups.
At
this
stage,.
C
O
Nelson,
thank
you
mayor
just
a
couple
quick
questions
here
in
aquatics
we
have
the
the
swim
teams
that
use
that
that
are
non-resident
swim
teams,
and
I
am
wondering
if
we
have
any
indication
of
how
our
rate
really
compares
to
other
50
meter
pools,
which
I
understand
there
aren't
too
many
of
in
the
area.
If,
if
we're,
if
we're
low
there
or
if
we're
comparable,
do
we
do,
we
know
what
other
pools
are
charging
for?
That.
K
Council
member
nelson
mayor
bossie,
members
of
the
council,
I
have
allison
warren
on
the
call
alison.
Would
you
be
available
to
answer
that
question?
Please.
B
Absolutely
we
contacted
the
other
metro
pools
that
have
50
meter.
Left.
Excuse
me,
swim
team
rentals
today
and
did
not
hear
back
from
them
prior
to
this
meeting,
but
we
are
of
the
understanding
that
we
are
at
a
comparable
rate,
as
we've
done
studies
in
the
past,
but
don't
have
that
information
available
right
now.
O
G
Council,
member
nelson,
the
rate
as
proposed
would
be
in
alignment.
All
our
junior
fees
would
be
the
same.
So
if
approved
or
rated
highland
greens
would
be
fourteen
dollars
per
player.
O
So
if
I
understand
correctly,
that's
about
a
three
dollar
increase,
at
least
at
highland.
I
didn't.
I
don't
see
it
right
in
front
of
me
for
dwan,
but
or
just
about
30
percent
increase.
O
My
last
question
is-
and
I
had
got
the
answer
to
this
a
little
bit,
but
what
I'm
trying
to
figure
out
is
how
to
separate
this
fee
from
that
budget
discussion,
because
some
of
these
things
overlay
in
terms
of
the
options
that
the
community
budget
advisory
committee
gave
us,
and
so
some
of
those
are
integrated
into
this
and
then
maybe
some
would
be
made
separately
through
the
budget
discussion.
J
Mr
mayor
and
council
members,
council
member
nelson,
that's
a
good
question.
As
you
note
in
several
of
the
recommendations.
You'll
see
that
the
proposed
increase
is
actually
in
the
area
of
scenario
b
or
scenario
c,
and
the
council
obviously
hasn't
made
a
decision
yet
about
which
of
the
options
and
and
hasn't
really
discussed
whether
they're
going
to
move
items
around
what
I
would.
J
What
I
would
suggest
doing
is
take
if,
if
you're
comfortable
taking
action
tonight
and
then
at
the
time
that
we
adopt
the
budget
and
some
of
these
fees
are
considered
as
part
of
those
options,
we
can
address
those
at
that
time
and
then
come
back
and
make
an
adjustment
to
them.
If
the
council
deems
that
appropriate.
A
A
M
K
K
Also,
as
we've
had
many
conversations
with
the
city
council
over
the
past
six
months,
or
so
as
it
relates
to
the
park
system,
master
plan
we're
working
very
hard
on
our
cost
recovery
expectations,
and
this
is
a
goal
to
try
to
get
us
in
line
with
the
cost
recovery
expectations
that
we
would
expect
at
the
department
moving
forward
as
well.
M
And
then
just
a
couple
other
quick
questions
so
for
the
child
care
or
for
the
youth
programs.
Sorry,
I've
got
so
many
papers
in
front
of
me
here
so
the
summer
playgrounds
and
the
good
grief.
I
know
these
too
summer
venture
playgrounds
and
the
view
many
of
you.
Those
fees
are
for
the
entire
summer
right
and
then
camp
coda
and
coda.
Kids
would
be
weekly
fees,
correct.
M
I
just
I
wanted
to
make
sure
when
I
saw
the
playground
fee.
I
was
like
oh
that
can't
be
weekly
so
and
then
for
the
the
organizations
that
would
be
paying
the
15
of
the
standard
fee.
Have
we
already
identified,
who
those
organizations
are,
what
how
could
organizations
become
qualified
to
kind
of
fit
in
that
that
buckets
to
pay
the
15.
B
Council
member
carter,
thanks
for
the
question
we
do
have
a
athletic
field,
use
policy
that
identifies
what
would
qualify
an
athletic
youth
organization
to
be
recognized.
They
have
to
have
a
specific
number
of
participants
that
are
bloomington
residents,
as
well
as
be
a
non-profit
and
a
couple
other
requirements.
We
currently
have
seven
of
them
right
now
and
if
anyone
else
were
interested,
they
would
be
able
to
qualify
based
on
those
qualifications
listed
in
the
field.
Use
policy.
D
Thank
you,
so
I
just
had
just
a
real
real
brief
question,
just
kind
of
looking
through
these
fees,
I'm
just
curious
in
other
cities.
Do
they
use
other
categories?
D
For
example,
you
know
I
did
notice
that
in
aquatics
they
had,
you
know
senior
across
one
of
the
fees
here,
but
do
do
they
do
other
cities
break
down
some
of
these
fees
and
use
categories
such
as
veteran
and
other
categories
that
we're
not
currently
utilizing
to
either
distinguish
those
fees
or
to
capture
additional
revenue
in
different
different
ways
to
provide
different
experiences
for
different
residents.
K
Councilmember
lohman
I'd
be
happy
to
answer
that
question
for
you.
It
is
not
unusual
that
different
cities
will
have
different
classifications
and
then
it's
also
not
unusual
that
different
programs
or
different
facilities
within
a
city
would
have
different
classifications
as
well.
I
think
a
really
good
example
is
is
what
we
have
for
the
pool
you're
seeing
some
really
really
inexpensive
rates,
because
we
have
a
variety
of
different
pricing
classifications
for
the
pool
and
we're
the
only
city
that
has
that
type
of
a
classification
other
other
facilities
have
one
fee
for
everyone
across
the
board.
K
K
The
other
big
difference
that
I
think
is
probably
the
biggest
difference
that
some
cities
have
and
some
don't
is
resident
rate
versus
non-resident
rate,
but
those
are
really
the
biggest
biggest
classification
differences.
D
Thanks
for
bringing
that
up,
I
just
I
wonder,
kind
of
long
term
again,
not
today,
you
know,
I
know
these
are
some
of
the
things
that
are
out
there.
If
we
want
to
look
at
some
of
that
stuff,
you
know
to
be
an
advantage.
I
know.
Certainly
we've
got
that
in
the
aquatic
pieces,
but
I
just
wonder
if
there
are
some
advantages
to
bringing
some
of
those
classifications
in
or
or
pairing
those
back.
D
I'm
just
curious
what
you
know
what
the
market
is
kind
of
demanding
and
what
I
know
some
private
institutions
utilize
that
I
wonder
if
that
might
help
us
with
some
of
our
golf
courses,
maybe
some
other
pieces
kind
of
looking
at
some
of
those
different
classifications
to
help
to
drive
revenue,
but
not
a
discussion
for
today,
but
just
just
a
curiosity
question
for
myself.
K
That's
great,
we
will
definitely
be
thinking
of
those
things
council,
member
lowman,
as
we
move
forward
in
the
standardization
of
our
fees.
Thank
you
for
the
thank
you
for
the
question
and
comment.
A
A
Motion
carries
7-0
to
close
the
public
hearing
on
anime
0.6
council
discussion
on
this
in
years
past.
As
I
recall,
the
the
discussion
on
specific
fees
and
and
charges
have
led
to
a
lengthy
discussion
at
some
point.
People
with
concerns
questions,
ideas
about
what
the
charges
should
be,
and
I
think
I
think
this
is
a.
A
And
so
I
know
that
it's
a
difficult
thing
for
staff
to
to
try
and
balance
that
and
work
toward
the
goals
of
the
council
of
the
maximizing
revenue,
but
also
understanding
that
you
don't
want
to
raise
the
fees
to
the
point
where
you
don't
recover.
The
money
that
you
were
hoping
to
make,
because
the
the
number
of,
for
example,
golf
rounds
drops
off
significantly
because
of
the
the
price
increase.
So
council,
any
questions
or
discussions
on.
A
D
I
guess
the
question
I
would
ask
staff
just
such
a
general
question,
given
what
we
know
now,
given
the
pandemic,
you
know,
would
there
be
anything
that
you
would
have
done
differently,
given
these
fees
and
then
I'd
also
be
curious
about
what
you're
thinking
about
in
terms
of
moving
into
next
year's
fees
that
that's
going
to
be
impacted
by
what's
happening
this
year,.
K
K
K
So
I
think
it's
very
safe
to
say
that
staff
feels
very
comfortable
with
the
fees
that
we're
proposing
before
you
this
evening,
and
we
did
actually
over
that
period
of
six
months
have
many
conversations
with
our
staff
team
and
we
made
many
revisions.
But
we
do
feel
very
comfortable
with
what
we're
proposing
this
evening
and
we
will
definitely
continue
as
we
work
our
way
through
the
park
system,
master
plan
and
our
pricing
strategies
and
our
cost
recovery
expectations.
K
Look
forward
to
many
continued
conversations
with
the
city
council
over
the
next
several
months
to
to
really
solidify
our
plan
for
pricing.
Moving
forward.
I
Mayor
bussey
and
council
members
that
is
very
consistent
with
all
the
other
departments
that
are
increasing
their
fees,
is
that
they
have
had
considerable
amount
of
time
to
look
at
what
we're
bringing
forth
with
the
budgets
and
considering
moving
forward
with
those.
So,
yes,
we're
comfortable
with
what
is
in
the
feast
schedule.
A
Hearing
now
that
look
for
action
on
this
console.
B
O
Thank
you
mayor.
I
just
want
to
say
that
that
I'll
support
this,
but
I
do
want
to
as
part
of
the
budget
conversation
come
back
to
one
of
the
items,
maybe
a
couple,
but
in
particular
that
were
on
the
recommendations
by
the
budget
advisory
committee
related
to
increased
or
new
charges
to
youth
sports
groups
and
things
of
that
nature.
I
just
personally,
I
brought
that
up
when
we
had
the
budget
conversation
and
think
that
merits
some
additional
conversation
and
including
the
golf
in
that
as
well.
O
I
Mayor
bussey
and
council
members
throughout
the
year
we
have
a
number
of
fee
schedules
that
come
to
the
city.
Council.
Finance
is
working
with
our
legal
department
and
legal
is
systematically
reviewing
each
chapter
of
the
city
code
to
relocate
and
reference
all
the
fees
to
an
appendix
a
so.
At
this
point,
we're
going
through
is
chapters
one,
two,
five,
nine
and
ten.
I
Hopefully
this
spring
we
can
bring
you
back
another
chapter,
two
as
we're
getting
into
chapter
eleven
there's
a
lot
more
financial
references
and
forward
through
the
rest
of
the
the
code.
So
at
this
point
we're
bringing
you
these
chapters
and
the
city
attorney
melissa
manoshai-
might
have
a
comment
or
two.
If
you
would
like
to.
I
Mayor
members,
this
was
one
of
the
things
we
had
talked
about
internally
as
an
organization,
probably
18
months
ago,
or
so,
and
part
of
the
reason
driving.
This
was
well
the
two
reasons
driving
this
are
first.
I
This
offers
a
an
easier
way
for
staff
to
systematically
review
those
fees
on
an
annual
basis
when,
instead
of
having
to
search
for
them
in
the
code,
but
then
the
other
reason
is
that
by
relocating
them
to
one
document,
we
can
annually
update
them
in
a
more
systematic
way,
instead
of
doing
it
on
a
step
by
step,
because
each
time
we
do
it
individually,
we
have
to
pay
to
publish
a
public
hearing
notice,
as
well
as
the
document
after
it's
been
adopted
by
the
council.
So
this
is
also
a
cost
saving
measure
as
well.
I
And
I
was
also
add,
under
our
strategic
priority
of
trans
transparency,
once
we
put
this
all
in
an
appendix
a
any
resident
can
go
to
this
appendix
and
look
at
all
of
our
fees
as
part
of
our
transparency
goal
too.
A
A
A
C
A
I
think
it's
pretty
straightforward
and
actually
makes
some
good
sense
to
create
the
fee
schedule
appendix
so.
It's
kind
of
a
one-stop
shop
not
only
for
for
staff
and
for
council
to
take
a
look
at,
but
certainly
for
residents
to
know
where
they
can
find
their
fee
schedules
and
and
how
much
it's
going
to
cost
to
do
x,
y
or
z,
to
have
it
all
in
one
place.
A
I
think
just
makes
things
a
lot
easier
and
makes
good
sense
to
do
this,
and
and
just
a
good,
continued
clean
up
and
simplification
and
making
a
bit
more
transparent
and
easier
to
use
of
our
city
code.
D
To
adopt
an
ordinance
amending
chapters,
1
2,
5,
9
and
10
of
the
city
code
and
creating
a
fee
schedule
appendix.
A
We
have
a
motion
by
council
member
loehmann
and
a
second
by
council
member
carter
to
to
adopt
an
ordinance
amending
chapters,
one
two:
five:
nine
and
ten
of
the
city
code,
creating
a
fee
schedule
appendix
hearing.
No
further
council
discussion.
Ms
christensen.
D
Move
to
adopt
a
resolution
directing
summary
publication
for
the
ordinance
for
amending
chapters,
one
two:
five,
nine
and
ten
of
the
city
code
and
creating
a
fee
schedule
appendix.
A
A
With
our
amended
agenda,
we're
going
to
double
back
to
item
8.4
now,
which
is
another
public
hearing,
and
this
is
an
ordinance
to
increase
water
rates,
and
this
is
kari
carlson,
our
budget
manager.
I'm
sorry,
I
tried
to
call
on
you
a
little
bit
too
early.
Miss
carlson
carlson
is
going
to
read
us
through
this
good
evening.
Welcome.
A
Yeah,
if
I
could
counsel
on
it,
I'm
going
to
suggest
why
don't
we?
If
we
could,
why
don't
we
combine
8.4
and
8.5
into
a
single
public
hearing,
maybe
I'll?
If
I
could
recall
the
item
and
call
it
for
8.4,
the
public
hearing
to
increase
water
rates
and
8.5
a
public
hearing,
an
ordinance
to
increase
solid
waste
and
refuse
collection
fees?
Why
don't
we
get
I'll
call
these
together?
A
Why
don't
we
get
the
presentations
and
then
we'll
we'll
open
the
public
hearing
to
here
on
both
items
at
the
same
time,
if
everyone's
amenable
to
that,
we
will
plan
on
that.
Ms
carlson.
R
R
R
R
R
Here
we
just
have
for
your
reference.
The
water
rate
increases
over
the
past
few
years,
so
there
were
9.5
increases
from
17
through
19
for
each
year
and
then
2020
had
an
eight
and
a
half
percent
increase.
R
For
21
we
are
recommending
increases
of
three
percent
for
the
tier
one
and
tier
two,
so
this
is
lower
than
in
past
years,
as
I
just
showed
also
lower
than
what
we
had
been
projecting
in
the
long
term
plan.
But
we
are
very
mindful
of
the
economic
impact
of
the
pandemic.
R
It
does
remain
positive
but
is
lower
than
the
goal
that
we
would
like
for
this
fund.
So
that's
something
we'll
talk
about
a
little
bit
more
with
the
wastewater
fund.
R
R
So
this
came
up
during
the
study
meeting
when
we
talked
about
the
utility
funds,
but
with
a
healthier
working
capital
balance
in
the
wastewater
fund,
there
could
be
an
opportunity
in
the
future,
in
the
next
couple
years
to
transfer
money
from
wastewater
to
the
water
fund,
if
needed,
to
help
with
some
of
the
water
funds,
capital
balance
and
get
it
closer
to
its
goal.
R
This
graph
shows
an
annual
family
storm
water
utility
rate
and
it's
comparing
the
bloomington
residents
rate
compared
to
some
surrounding
communities.
So
in
this
graph
the
lowest
is
champlain
on
the
left
at
37.56
cents
per
year
and
minneapolis
is
the
highest
at
201.36
cents
per
year,
and
then
bloomington
is
currently
at
95.64
cents
for
2020
and
proposed
to
be
at
97.56
that
yellow
bar
there
for
2021.
R
The
working
capital
balance
is
projected
to
be
with
in
line
with
the
goal
of
this
fund,
and
the
final
utility
fund
is
the
solid
waste
utility
fund
and
that
accounts
for
garbage
recycling
and
yard
waste.
The
spring
curbside
cleanup
program,
also
forestry
and
removal
of
diseased
trees.
That's
in
this
fund,
as
well
cleanups
after
major
storm
events
and
also
private
property,
environmental,
health,
abatements.
R
So
here's
the
solid
weight,
solid
waste
rate
structure
and
garbage
rates
are
made
up
of
four
components:
there's
a
collection
disposal,
city
administration
fee
and
there's
also
a
state
solid
waste
tax
and
county
fee,
and
the
collection
part
of
that
component
for
garbage
is
going
to
increase
by
two
and
a
half
percent,
as
is
set
in
our
2021
contract,
with
the
garbage
haulers
also
for
recycling.
That
recycling
rate
is
made
up
of
two
components:
there's
collection
and
a
recycling
commodity
adjustment
offset
and
same
as
the
garbage
collection.
R
R
M
R
This
is
the
solid
waste
long-term
budget
model,
with
the
request
for
2021
budgeted
revenues
at
8.2
million
and
total
budgeted
expenses
at
just
over
8.6
million,
and
then
I'll
point
out
that
this
is
a
one
utility
fund
that
does
have
some
property
tax
support.
There
is
a
hundred
and
eighty
five
thousand
dollars
of
property
tax
support.
That's
requested
for
forestry
and
removal
of
disease,
trees.
R
So
kind
of,
in
summary,
the
key
drivers
of
utility
rates,
there's
a
need
to
build
capital
reserves
for
repair
and
replacement
of
aging
infrastructure
for
water,
sewer
and
storm
water,
and
also
then,
there's
the
impact
of
those
wet
summers
that
we've
been
experiencing,
resulting
in
declining
water
sales
and
revenue.
R
R
How
that
how
that
differs
from
2020
versus
2021
and
just
pointing
out
that
the
utility
bills
are
billed
for
residents
every
other
month.
So
six
times
a
year,
they're
built
by
monthly.
R
And
with
that,
if
you
have
any
questions.
A
Council
questions
on
these
two
funds:
the
these
for
all
of
ms
carlson's
presentation,.
D
So
if
I
could
a
mayor
and
mrs
carlson,
could
we
go
back
and
have
a
look
at
the
the
garbage
cart
piece,
just
something
that
occurred
to
me?
You
had
a
chart
there
and
I
just
wanted
to
just
be
sure
that
residents
were
clear
as
to
where
those
fees
are
coming
from.
D
R
Mayor
members
of
the
council
council,
member
lohman,
I
do
believe
laura
horner
is
also
on
at
on
the
meeting
tonight
is
laura.
Are
you
available.
N
N
D
So
that
2.5
increase,
that's
not
something
the
city
is
putting
forward.
That's
something!
That's
that's
something!
That's
within
the
contract
that
was
asked
for
by
the
haulers
right.
I
just
want
to
be
sure
we're
really
clear
about
that,
so
that
folks
understand
that
this
increase
that
they're
going
to
see
on
their
bill.
That's
a
part
of
this
this
whole
package
here,
so
it's
easy
to
miss.
That's
not
something
the
city
is
putting
forward,
that's
something
that
is
being
asked
by
the
haulers
and
by
their
consortium.
N
Mayor
and
council
members-
yes,
this
is
a
the
price
escalators
are
set
in
our
contract,
so
there
is
an
escalated
price
of
about
two
and
a
half
percent
up
to
three
and
a
half
percent
over
the
five
and
a
half
years
of
this
contract,
and
I
will
say
that
that
is
about
it's
about
standard
for
a
price
escalator
like
that
to
occur
in
any
sort
of
negotiated
or
competitive
contract.
D
And
just
so
I'm
clear
when
we
say
that
there's
going
to
be
a
price
escalator
that
price
escalator
is
going
to
be
every
single
year,
so
residents
can
be
they'll
know
that
that's
going
to
be
an
increase
they'll
see
each
year.
N
D
Thanks
for
that
clarification,
I
just
want
to
be
sure
that
folks
understand
where
the
increase
in
their
their
bill
is
is
coming
from
thanks
for
making
that
clear
and
straightforward.
A
B
B
A
A
Have
a
motion
by
councilmember
coulter
and
a
second
by
council
member
lowman
to
count
to
close
the
public
hearings
on
item
8.4
and
8.5
hearing
no
further
public
or
council
comment.
Ms
christensen.
C
Thank
you
mayor.
This
isn't
actually
a
question,
but
kari
could
you
go
back
to
the
slide?
Titled
water
utility
asset
outlook.
C
Perfect,
thank
you
again,
no
question,
but
this
I
just
wanted
to
point
this
slide
out
here,
because
I
I
felt,
like
we
kind
of
moved
past
it
quickly,
but
you
know
one
of
the
things
that
I
hear
about
from
residents
pretty
frequently,
as
I
imagine
all
of
you
do
too
is
you
know
essentially
why
you
know:
why
do
you
increase
rates
all
the
time?
Why
do
you
do
this
every
year?
Why?
You
know?
Why
are
you?
C
Are
you
continuing
to
do
this,
and
I
mean
the
answer
frankly
is
is
right
in
front
of
you
with
this
slide,
because
you
know
we
have
the
need
to
replace
this
infrastructure
and
it
it's
really
expensive
and-
and
you
know,
to
to
not
increase
rates
in
a
way
that
keeps
up
with.
That
would
result
in
these
huge
kind
of
spikes
that
we
see
on
this
graph.
So
I
just
wanted
to
you
know
I
don't
know
for
for
folks
who
are
are
watching
at
home.
C
I
just
kind
of
wanted
to
review
that
again
because
I
think
that's
a
really
really
important
piece
to
the
puzzle
that
we
are
are
proactively
keeping
up
with
the
need
to
invest
in
this
infrastructure
in
a
way
that
sort
of
flattens
to
to
to
use
a
term
that
we've
all
come
to
know
that
that
flattens
the
curve
a
bit.
A
A
I
do
want
to
add.
I
know
that
we
have
brought
up
in
the
past
the
overall
cost
of
the
the
aggregate
of
all
of
these
different
fees
that
we
do
have
in
the
city,
and
I
understand
there
are.
There
are
a
lot
with
water
and
wastewater
and
and
and
trash
and
a
number
of
different
things,
and
I
think
sometimes
they
they
to
look
at
them
individually.
A
A
The
samples
of
the
the
residential
utility
bills
that
the
increases
every
month
or
bi-monthly
are,
I
mean
they're
increases
granted,
but
they're
not
significant
increases,
they're
minimal
increases-
and
this
is
this-
is
that
aggregate
cost
that
we've
been
talking
about
and
the
understanding
that
people
pay
these
and
they
all
add
up,
and
they
add
up
to
a
significant
amount
of
money
and
certainly
you're
getting
a
benefit
for
those
things
and-
and
there
are
certain
there-
there's
a
as
I
said,
a
benefit
for
for
what
you're
paying
you
get,
what
you
pay
for
and
you're
getting
quite
a
bit
for
what
you
pay
for,
and
I
understand
that
it
isn't
an
impact,
and
so
I
appreciate
that
the
staff
has
worked
to
keep
that
aggregate
total
as
low
as
possible,
especially
this
year.
A
A
D
Merit
be
happy
to
go
ahead
and
make
a
motion
to
adopt
an
ordinance
amending
section
11.63
to
increase
water
rates.
Second
mark.
A
We
have
a
motion
by
council
member
lowman
and
a
second
by
council
member
martin
to
adopt
an
ordinance
and
amending
section
11.63
to
increase
water
rates
council.
Any
further
discussion
hearing
none
ms
christensen.
D
A
D
Well,
I
guess
I'm
still
still
up
I'll
keep
it
going
here,
I'll
move
to
adopt
a
ordinance
amending
section,
11.65
point
to
increase
solid
waste
and
refuge
collection
fees.
A
D
A
A
R
Thank
you
mayor
and
council
members.
I
so
I
have
a
few
more
slides
here.
So
the
one
presentation
I
gave
that
encompassed
all
of
the
ordinances
and
resolutions
for
the
utility
rates
and
then
also
for
the
budgets.
R
A
You're
jumping
into
item
9.1
for
us,
so
no.
This
is
an
actual
agenda
item
for
us
and
this
is
kind
of
why
we
move
things
around
in
the
budget
because
then
or
in
the
agenda,
because
then
it
lumped
all
of
the
budget
stuff
together.
So
with
that,
I
want
to
call
item
9.1,
which
is
a
resolution
to
change
our
storm
water
charges.
R
A
K
Thank
you
mayor.
I
will
move
that
we
adopt
the
resolution
resolution
establishing
a
basic
system
rate
for
the
purpose
of
calculating
stormwater
drainage
charges,
pursuant
to
section
16.17
and
city
code.
M
A
H
B
C
A
I
have
a
motion
by
council
member
below
and
second
by
council
member
coulter
to
adopt
a
resolution
adopting
the
2021
water
wastewater,
stormwater
and
solid
waste
enterprise
fund
budgets.
A
R
R
So
there
are
a
total
of
eight
internal
service
funds
and
I
will
just
be
presenting
five
budgets
for
you
this
evening:
five
internal
service
funds
and
that
would
be
fleet
public
safety,
technology
and
equipment,
insurance
fund
support
services
fund
and
facilities
and
parks
maintenance.
So
the
other
three
internal
service
funds
are
the
it
fund.
R
As
as
you
may
recall
that
this
year,
the
staff
was
reduced
from
15
down
to
12
employees
after
this
fleet
service
assessment,
they
also
have
materials,
supplies
and
services
and
internal
charges
like
I.t
and
charges
from
the
insurance
fund
and
then,
of
course,
capital
outlay
for,
for
example,
for
purchases
of
vehicles,
and
so
the
charges
are
based
on
the
maintenance
and
replacement
for
departments,
and
in
past
years
this
was
lumped
together
and
won
fleet
equipment
charge.
R
But,
beginning
with
this
2021
budget,
it's
more
transparent
for
departments,
they
can
better
see
what
is
driving
their
charges
and
they
have
two
different
line
items
in
their
budgets.
One
is
for
maintenance
and
repairs,
and
one
is
for
future
vehicle
replacement.
R
So
for
the
fleet
budget
request,
revenues
are
7.6
million
and
expenses
are
7.9
million,
with
a
planned
drawdown
of
funds
for
2021
of
322
000,
and
there
was
a
question
asked
about
why
the
large
differences
in
the
capital
line
item
and
the
capital
spending
over
the
years
that
are
on
this
long-term
model,
and
so
the
fleet
manager,
michael
kaim,
responded
that
the
big
dip
in
2019
for
capital
outlay
that
was
actually
spent
isn't
is
due
to
there
were
late,
deliver
deliveries
on
some
high
ticket
items
such
as
some
police
vehicles
that
were
delayed
due
to
manufacturing
changeover
and
a
tank
truck
for
the
water
treatment
plant.
R
So
those
vehicles
they've
been
encumbered
in
in
the
2019
budget,
but
weren't
actually
delivered
until
2020.
So
that's
kind
of
where
you
see
the
fluctuations
there
next
fund
public
safety
technology
and
equipment,
and
this
fund
covers
the
portable
radios
and
the
dash
mounted
radios
for
the
city,
mostly
in
police
and
fire
public
works
and
public
health
also
do
have
supportable
radios.
R
It
also
manages
operations
and
replacement
of
those
mobile
data,
computers
that
you'll
see
in
police
and
fire
vehicles,
and
there
are
also
some
other
police
and
fire
equipment
purchases
that
come
through
this
fund.
R
R
Next
internal
service
fund
is
the
insurance
fund,
and
this
fund
pays
for
costs
and
premiums
and
losses
related
to
following
types
of
insurance
workers
compensation.
We
are
self-insured
for
workers,
compensation
up
to
five
hundred
thousand
dollars
and
that's
when
the
workers
compensation,
reinsurance
reinsurance
association
kicks
in,
but
up
until
that
is.
This
fund
does
fund
that
then
for
general
liability,
automobile
property
and
some
miscellaneous
policies
that
we
have
for
fireworks
for
summer
fed
and
medical
for
public
health
quicker
for
the
golf
courses.
R
For
the
insurance
fund
request,
revenues
are
2.3
million
in
the
2021
budget
request,
expenses
are
2.4
million,
with
a
plan
drawdown
of
funds
of
86
000
and
for
this
fund
there
was
a
question
asked,
which
is.
This
is
highlighted
here
in
on
this
budget
model,
about
the
increase
in
the
working
capital
goal
specifically
for
workers
compensation,
and
so
our
risk
and
litigation
manager.
R
Amy
larson,
has
some
information
about
why
that
is
so
early
in
2020,
the
state
legislature
broadened
the
workers
compensation
statute
to
presume
that
any
frontline
worker,
including
police
fire
and
public
health,
that
was
infected
with
coven
19,
was
exposed
at
work
and
thereby
making
that
workers
compensation
claim,
and
then
the
legislature
also
attempted
to
work
out
a
monetary
cap
that
entities
would
have
to
pay
related
to
workers
compensation
expenses.
However,
that
was
not
camp
accomplished
during
the
session.
R
R
So
the
working
capital
goal
has
increased
over
a
three
year
period
to
allow
the
city
to
pay
the
maximum
retention
under
our
mandatory
coverage
with
the
workers,
compensation,
reinsurance
association
of
five
hundred
thousand
dollars.
So
as
we
receive
additional
information
on
the
cost
of
cover,
19
claims
to
our
employees,
specifically
the
long-term
effects
of
the
virus
on
the
front
line
employees,
this
working
capital
goal
may
be
decreased.
R
R
It
is
part
of
the
community
services
department
and
the
communications
division,
and
they
have
the
mail
room,
the
print
shop
and
the
information
desk
and
there's
out
just
one
full-time
employee
in
the
print
shop
and
then
two
part-time
employees
in
the
mail
room
and
two
part-time
employees
at
the
information
desk
and
that's
charged
out
to
departments
based
on
for
the
print
shop.
It's
based
on
actual
print
jobs
and
the
fees
related
to
that
and
costs
the
mailroom's
based
on
annual
postage
expense.
R
And
this
you
know
the
amount
of
usage
by
department
and
then
phone
charges
based
on
number
of
phones,
and
that
is
actually
part
of
that
phone
charge.
Fee
goes
to
the
information
desk,
but
then
the
other
part
goes
to
it
because
they're
very
heavily
involved
in
the
maintenance
of
our
phones
in
support
of
our
phone
system.
R
R
The
custodial
services
that
are
contracted
out
contractors
for
electrical
work,
hvac
plumbers,
the
garbage
removal
from
the
city's
buildings
and
from
the
city
parks,
part,
maintenance,
expenses
and
then
internal
charges,
and
then,
of
course,
a
capital
improvement
projects
and
those
are
charged
to
departments
based
on
like
square
footage
for
space
and
occupancy,
and
then
also
building
repairs
based
on
history
of
past
projects
that
were
needed
and
then
for
the
park.
R
Maintenance
piece
that
is
100
allocated
to
the
parks
and
recreation
department,
and
that
includes
salaries,
materials,
services,
supplies
and
capital,
and
so
for
the
facility
and
parks
maintenance,
budget
fund
requests
for
2021
revenues
are
at
13.3
million
and
expenses
are
16.7
million.
So
it's
a
planned
drawdown
of
funds
of
3.3
million
and
that
there
was
a
question
about
that
the
council
and
why
that
was
why
the
expenses
are
so
much
more
than
the
revenues
and
the
answer
to
that.
R
B
R
So
this
2021
budget
request
has
a
capital
outlay
budget
request
item
of
four,
almost
4.9
million,
and
that
includes
like
the
public
works,
roof
plate
replacement
and
some
elite
garage.
R
And
that
was
the
end
of
my
presentation.
If
there's
any
questions
on
any
of
those
funds
be
happy
to
answer
them.
A
K
Thank
you
very
much
and
I
appreciated
the
response
that
staff
provided.
I
just
want
to
make
sure
I'm
reading
this
right.
I
know
when
we
went
through
the
fleet
services
assessment.
What
seems
like
quite
a
while
ago
now
one
of
the
findings
was
that
some
of
our
replacement
schedules
were
substantially
more
accelerated
than
some
of
our
surrounding
communities,
especially
in
some
of
our
public
safety
vehicles.
R
Yes,
mayor
members
of
the
council
councilmember
martin,
so
I
just
wanted
to
bring
this
up.
So
if
you
look
at
the
2020
budget
request
for
total
revenues,
it
is
a
split.
It's
an
it's,
a
difference
between
what's
being
charged
for
maintenance
and
what's
being
charged
for
replacement,
but
overall,
it's
very
close
with
the
total
budget.
So
it's
7.6
million,
which
is
mostly
made
up
of
these
internal
charges
for
2020
and
then
for
2021,
there's,
also
7.6
million.
R
You
see
that
for
the
the
budgeted
internal
department
charges,
so
it
is
different
between
the
maintenance
charges
and
the
replacement
charges.
After
that
fleet
service
assessment,
that's
more
correctly
reflecting
what
those
actual
charges
are.
K
R
A
Hi
motion
carries
7-0
and
once
again,
thanks
to
to
miss
carlson
thanks
to
all
of
our
budget
staff
for
pulling
all
of
this
together.
It's
I
know
it's
a
yearly
task
and
it's
a
long
task
and
it's
an
arduous
task,
and
I
appreciate
the
work
that
goes
into
it
to
to
pull
all
those
funds
and
all
the
budgets
together.
So
thank
you
very
much.
J
Mr
barugi,
thank
you,
mr
mayor
and
council
members.
I
have
four
items
for
you
I'll
move
quickly
through
them.
The
first
and
I
think
the
most
salient
for
residents
of
the
community
is
that
the
state
of
minnesota
has
just
today
opened
a
saliva
testing
station
for
people
to
get
tested
for
covet
19..
J
That
testing
station
in
bloomington
is
at
ridgeview
elementary,
which
is
at
94th
and
nesbit,
which
is
about
a
quarter
mile
west
of
normandale
and
94th,
and
it
is
a
buy
appointment
testing
station.
However,
I
believe
they
have
limited
walk-up
opportunities.
They
are
operating
from
noon
until
6.
it'll
be
open
tomorrow,
tuesday
it'll
be
closed
over
the
long
thanksgiving
weekend,
and
then
they
will
be
back
open
again.
Next
monday,
it'll
be
a
monday
to
friday
operation
noon
until
6
pm
again
it's
at
ridgeview
elementary.
J
The
state
of
minnesota
is
strongly
encouraging
anybody,
ages,
18
and
35
to
get
tested,
whether
you
feel
any
symptoms
or
not,
as
that
age
group
is
amongst
the
most
likely
to
be
asymptomatic
and
obviously
engaging
in
you
know,
social
activities
that
may
be
contributing
to
the
spread
of
covet
19.
also
encourage
anybody
else.
J
If
you're,
if
you're
feeling
unwell
in
any
way
or
you're
concerned
just
about
whether
you
may
have
it,
there's
really
no
restriction
at
this
point
on
getting
tested,
there's
no
reason
not
to
with
the
state
opening
as
many
testing
stations
as
they
can.
J
Obviously,
everybody
at
this
point
is
aware
that
the
the
state
of
minnesota
has
been
put
on
a
four
week,
hiatus
here
from
many
activities,
and
we
want
to
contribute
to
what
people
of
bloomington
can
do
to
protect
themselves,
protect
their
family
members
and
protect
the
rest
of
the
community,
so
encourage
everybody
to
either
get
to
the
bloomington
testing
station.
There's
also
stations
conveniently
located
at
the
airport
and
in
burnsville
in
the
there
may
be
a
couple
more
coming
online
shortly.
J
The
second
item,
the
governor,
announced
new
technologies
that
are
being
used
to
help
with
contact
tracing
for
people
to
opt
into
with
the
use
of
their
cell
phones.
We
will
be
sharing
that
information
when
we're
comfortable,
that
we
have
the
details
right
so
that
our
community
is
aware
of
what
tools
are
available
again
to
protect
yourself
and
to
protect
your
family,
because
we
are
in
this
four
week
period.
Now
where
restaurants
and
bars
are
closed
and
gyms
are
closed.
J
I
want
to
make
sure
that
hennepin
that
everybody
knows
in
the
business
community
or
if
you
are
a
person
who
has
friends
or
family
running
a
business
of
that
nature,
that
hennepin
county
has
announced
a
business
assistance
program
that
businesses
meeting
certain
criteria
will
be
eligible
for
up
to
fifteen
thousand
dollars
of
assistance
to
try
and
make
it
through
the
four
weeks
here
and
that
eligibility
is
whether
a
business
did
or
did
not
participate
earlier
in
the
year
and
other
assistance.
J
Although
the
amount
of
assistance
that
may
have
been
received
will
be
subtracted
from
that
fifteen
thousand
dollar
total
this
time,
and
we
have
mr
mayor
and
council
members
shared
that
information
with
our
business
community.
Last
friday,
our
staff
sent
that
information
from
hennepin
county
about
the
program
out
through
our
email
contacts
to
our
licensed
establishments
and
the
businesses
that
participated
in
the
small
business
emergency
assistance
loan
program
that
the
city
and
the
port
authority
supported
earlier
this
year.
J
So
we're
making
sure
that
the
business
community
here
in
bloomington
is
aware
of
what
assistance
is
available
to
them,
and
it's
important
that
if
a
business
here
in
bloomington
wishes
to
apply
for
that
program,
that
information
is
due
by
december
1st.
So
there's
a
relatively
quick
turnaround
to
in
to
find
out
if
you're
eligible
for
those
funds
and
then
finally
the
state
that's
been
reported
in
the
media.
The
state
is
also
looking
at
some
relief
package
options
that
they
may
be
introducing
in
the
upcoming
special
session.
J
We
will
be
tracking
those
very
closely
as
well
and
as
information
about
that
becomes
available
and
whether
it
is
likely
that
that
sort
of
assistance
will
be
provided.
We
will
make
sure
to
share
that
information,
just
as
we
have
the
hennepin
county
program.
So,
mr
mayor
and
council
members
with
that,
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
You
have.
A
Hearing
none
council,
member
coulter,
I
I
council,
member
martin,
I
I'm
sorry
I
didn't
see
who
got
who
got
in
there.
First,
who
got
councilmember
martin
accounts
from
agriculture.
I
wasn't
sure
who
got
in
first.
C
Thank
you
mayor.
Well,
actually
what
the
city
manager
just
mentioned
leads
in
nicely
to
what
I
wanted
to
bring
up,
because
I
think,
like
all
of
us,
I'm
I'm
getting
more
and
more
concerned
about
our
ability
to
combat
coved.
You
know
when
we
talked
about
the
when
we
talked
about
and
extended
the
emergency
declaration.
C
C
I'm
sure
we
all
saw
just
recently
the
article
in
the
star
tribune
about
the
state
fire
marshal
signaling,
some
real
concern
over
our
fire
department's
ability
to
respond
to
emergencies
and,
of
course,
the
city
managers
are
has
and
all
also
detailed,
some
other
ways
in
which
covet
is
affecting
city
operations
and
I've
been
thinking
a
lot
as
well
about
what
dr
kelly
said
at
our
last
covet
update,
particularly
in
light
of
the
information
that
the
minnesota
department
of
health
has
released
on
where
outbreaks
have
originated,
and
you
know.
C
But
we
don't
know
when
or
how
quickly
a
vaccine
is
going
to
be
widely
distributed,
or
how
long
the
governor
will
extend
the
measures
he
announced.
Last
week's
last
week.
Excuse
me
and
well,
given
the
results
of
the
election.
I
don't
know
really
what
we
can
expect
from
a
state
legislature
or
for
congress
from
that
for
that
matter.
C
We
are
seeing
here
and
now
in
bloomington,
in
a
very,
very
real
way
that
it
is
absolutely
essential
for
everyone
to
be
able
to
take
time
off
if
they're,
sick
or
if
they
need
to
care
for
a
sick,
family
member.
It's
essential
for
public
health,
it's
essential
for
rebuilding
after
kobit
and
it's
essential
for
an
economy,
that's
better
able
to
weather,
whatever
storms
may
come
in
the
future.
C
You
know
I
know.
Obviously
we
are
where
we
are
in
the
year
and
the
budget
in
the
levy
should
be
our
top
priority
right
now.
So
I
recognize
that
this
isn't
going
to
happen
right
away,
but
I
do
think
we
owe
it
to
our
community
frankly
to
move
as
soon
as
possible
to
boldly
address
the
gaps
that
have
been
made
there
to
do
what
we
can
to
help
fight
and
then
move
beyond
kobit
and
to
ensure
greater
stability
and
success
for
everyone
who
works
in
bloomington.
C
So
what
I'd
like
to
do
tonight
is
ask
staff
to
let
us
know
when
we
can
expect
another
discussion
on
it
when
we
can
expect
and
when
we
can
expect
concrete
steps
or
a
proposal
for
the
council
to
consider
to
take
shape.
I
guess
I
would
just
say
that
that
my
expectation
would
be
sometime
in
the
first
few
months
of
next
year.
This
just
to
me
this
is
just
very
much
an
urgent
need,
and
I
I
just
think,
we're
beyond
the
point.
Frankly,
of
waiting
around
wishing
and
hoping
for
others
to
act.
J
Thank
you,
mr
mayor
and
council
members,
council
member
coulter
staff
is
preparing
to
bring
that
conversation
back
to
the
city
council
in
january
or
february,
as
we
over
the
next
couple
weeks.
Look
at
our
calendar
for
council
meetings
in
those
two
months,
we'll
figure
out
when
we
have
the
the
best
time
available
to
do
that.
A
Thank
you,
mr
verbrugen.
I
agree
with
you,
council,
member
culture.
We
we
need
to
start
that
conversation.
We
have
to
stop
pushing
it
off
and
we
actually
need
to
have
the
conversation
and
see
where
it
leads,
because
it's
I
agree,
there's
this
dire
need,
there's
this
important
policy
issue
that
we
need
to
think
about,
and
we
need
to
think
about
the
best
ways
to
address
that
as
the
city
of
bloomington.
So
I
think
we
need
to
start
that
conversation
and
sooner
rather
than
later,
I
would
agree
with
you,
council,
member
martin.
K
Thank
you
very
much
mayor
yeah
and
just
very
briefly,
I
guess
I'm
pretty
hard
to
hear
that
staff's
gonna
have
that
in
front
of
us
pretty
quick.
I
just
keep
coming
back
to
we've
done
a
lot
of
great
work
and
staff
has
done
a
lot
of
great
work.
K
Putting
together
financial
supports,
I
think
of
folks
in
our
restaurant
industry,
going
through
opening
and
closing
and
trying
to
figure
out
how
to
pay
rent
and
then,
when
the
restaurant
is
open,
to
get
sick
and
not
have
a
choice,
and
I
know
how
to
move
forward.
It
can
be
counterproductive,
but
the
item
I
just
wanted
to
speak
to
real
quickly
here
kind
of
as
we
look
to
the
horizon,
both
from
that
long-term
planning
perspective
and
kind
of
the
current
community
conversations
we
have
going
on.
I
just
thought
it
was
really
interesting.
K
The
approach
to
public
safety
improvement
that
st
paul
very
recently
launched
folks
might
have
seen
it
in
the
star
tribune
they're,
calling
it
the
community
first
public
safety
commission,
but
essentially
it's
just
members
of
the
public,
the
non-profit
community,
the
business
community.
I
know
xl
has
representation
and
city
government
just
coming
together
to
figure
out
how
to
handle
it
more
efficiently,
specifically,
they're
focused
on
what
they're
calling
priority.
K
Four
and
five
calls
can
a
lower
priority,
not
an
emergency,
but
wondering
are
those
better
fielded
by
folks
like
frontline
social
service
professionals,
shelter,
assistance,
folks
or
even
just
being
proactive
about
deeper
neighborhood
engagement
to
get
out
ahead
and
be
cracked
about
preventing
crime
in
the
first
place.
K
So
obviously
we're
not
saint
paul
and
bloomington
issues
need
bloomington
solutions,
but
just
as
as
we're
starting
to
get
our
heads
out
to
what
economic
recovery
looks
like
our
budget
situation
situation,
starting
to
improve,
I
just
kind
of
wanted
to
put
a
conversational
bookmark
out
to
say
that
something
like
this
about
what
are
the
smart
investments
we
can
make
on
the
back
end
of
all
this
innovative
investments
we
can
make,
I
think,
could
really
pay
dividends.
K
So,
hopefully,
again,
once
we
get
to
the
strategic
planning
stuff,
we
can
dig
in
a
little
bit
more
but
wanted
to
call
it
out
now.
D
Oh,
thank
you
folks.
I
ended
up
getting
something
in
the
mail
just
a
couple
days
ago.
I
know
that
dan
kirby
talked
about
it
a
couple
weeks
ago,
but
I
got
this
voice
of
the
people
award
sent
to
me
in
the
mail
and
want
to
let
you
know
that
I'll
make
sure
that
that
gets
in
the
in
the
cabinet.
D
So
we
can
add
that
onto
our
words
for
those
folks
that
may
have
heard
about
it,
for
whatever
reason
they
they
had
actually
sent
the
application
to
me
and
I
had
sent
it
on
to
staff.
But
it's
the
polanco,
an
international
city
and
county
management,
association
or
icma.
D
The
more
commonly
known
has
announced
the
city
of
bloomington
is
a
winner
of
the
voice
of
the
people
award
for
2020.
the
words
of
excellence,
recognizing
the
city's
strength
and
engaging
residents
online.
The
city
has
been
expanding
its
online
presence,
providing
a
forum
for
residents
to
share
feedback
and
suggestions
and
questions
in
a
quick
and
easy
manner
and
I'll
I'll
be
sure
that
we
get
this
in
here.
D
I'll
drop
this
off
of
my
yellow
bags
later
on
this
week,
but
there
it
is
so
you
all
can
see
it
and
I'll
make
sure
we
get
it
in
there
along
those
same
notes.
It's
just
an
example.
You
know
really
mayor
of
just
how
excellent
our
staff,
the
hard
working
staff
has
done
with
that
and
just
any
number
of
the
other
items
that
we
work
on
over
the
last
couple
of
days.
D
The
national
league
of
cities
has
had
its
it's
conference
and
I
had
the
opportunity
to
attend
it
virtually
and
certainly
given
the
events
that
have
taken
place
over
the
last
year.
Given
the
economy,
the
george
floyd
events
and
the
items
with
kovid,
the
themes
have
really
been
around
at
the
conference
around
resilience
and
how
do
we
basically
help
our
cities
get
past
the
types
of
things
that
were
that
we're
facing?
I
had
the
opportunity
to
attend
a
number
of
different
classes.
D
One
was
around
resilient
leadership,
a
new
way
of
seeing
thinking,
leading
an
excellent
conference
to
kind
of
get
me
thinking
outside
of
the
box.
Hope
to
share
some
of
those
ideas
with
the
rest
of
my
colleagues
and
then
closing
the
analytical
gap
for
the
economic
economy.
It's
just
another
one,
and
I
also
know
that
our
city
manager
had
the
opportunity
also
to
present
at
the
conference
as
well.
I'm
not
sure
if
he
wants
to
mention
at
all
about
his
presentation
that
he
gave.
J
Thank
you,
mr
mayor
and
council
member
lohman
appreciate
the
recognition
for
our
staff,
who
really
have
done
a
fantastic
job
trying
to
stay
engaged
with
the
community
during
a
very
difficult
time,
and
I
I
had
the
chance
to
talk
about
that
in
one
of
those
sessions
which
was
actually
about
engaging
with
with
community
in
a
time
of
crisis,
and
it
was
again
with
the
poco
folks.
J
It
was
a
part
of
the
solutions
session
track
and
the
poco
team
invited
me
to
be
a
member
of
their
panel
to
talk
about
how
we
have
done
engaging
with
people,
especially
virtually
over
the
last
eight
months,
and
making
sure
that
residents
continue
to
be
involved
in
the
decision
making
process,
with
a
particular
emphasis
on
our
community
budget
advisory
committee
and
the
way
that
that
work
unfolded
over
the
course
of
the
last
four
or
five
months.
J
J
But
I
think
the
the
way
that
our
staff
put
that
process
together
and
worked
with
the
budget
advisory
committee
and
made
sure
that
they
were
doing
outreach
to
the
rest
of
the
community
to
have
listening
sessions.
To
have
information
about.
You
know
to
really
put
a
frame
around
what
some
of
those
budgeting
decisions
meant
for
people
in
the
community
and
to
get
authentic
feedback
from
residents
has
really
contributed.
I
think
to
a
a
good
budget
process
this
year.
J
That
really
serves
as
a
template
for
us
going
forward,
and
you
know
some
is
the
old
phrase.
You
don't
want
to.
Let
a
good
crisis
go
to
waste
and
you
know
we're
forced
to
innovate,
sometimes
in
the
in
the
face
of
crisis,
and
I
think
the
work
that
our
staff
has
done
this
year.
Our
outreach
and
engagement
team,
our
budgeting
team
in
in
the
various
departments,
all
of
them
who
are
front
line
folks
working
with
the
community,
have
had
to
completely
rethink
how
we
engage
with
people,
and
I
gotta
tell
you.
J
D
Thank
you,
city
manager
and
mayor,
and
I
do
hope
to
to
get
a
chance.
They
they
save
all
of
the
the
presentation.
So
I
will
get
an
opportunity
to
to
watch
your
presentation.
D
I
promise
I'll
get
get
that
done
sometime
by
the
end
of
december,
just
three
extra
real,
really
quick
things
here.
I
wanted
to
echo
councilmember
coulter's
items
around.
They
earn
sick
and
leave
policy.
I
want
to
just
remind
staff.
There
are
a
number
of
us
council
members
who
also
wanted
to
make
sure
that
we
have
business
involvement
with
that
chamber
to
be
sure
that
we
are
addressing
all
sides
of
that
particular
issue.
No
more
needs
to
be
said
about
that.
D
I
think
that's
those
prior
conversations
earlier
this
year
us
next.
I
wanted
to
bring
up
recently,
there's
been
some
stuff
out
there
on
the
on
the
web
regarding
an
accident
in
my
district,
around
france
avenue
and
overlook,
and
residents
are
looking
for
a
way
to
get
that
resolved.
I
know
I
brought
that
up
with
the
city
manager
no
need
to
talk
about
that
now,
but
just
hoping
that
staff
will
look
into
that
help.
D
Us
get
that
resolved
and
then,
finally,
I
wanted
to
bring
forth
that
something
that
councilmember
carter
had
brought
forward,
that
I
would
be
interested
in
having
a
conversation
around
labor
practices
with
workers
that
do
work
within
the
city,
especially
around
our
affordable
housing
pieces,
to
make
sure
that
those
fit
with
our
high
levels
of
standards
of
work.
D
We
talked
about
that
just
at
the
beginning
of
of
this
about
how
we
kind
of
kind
of
exude
that
as
a
as
a
city,
and
so
I
would
expect
that
those
folks
that
work
in
our
city
would
also
fit
those
high
standards
as
well,
and
I
think
jenna.
I
really
hit
on
a
good
point
earlier
today,
and
I
want
to
just
lend
my
my
support
for
us
continuing
to
have
conversation
around
that.
A
Thank
you,
councilmember
councilmember
carter,.
M
M
You
know:
we've
we've
been
having
this
conversation
for
about
a
year
now,
so
I
feel
during
my
time
on
council,
I
should
say
maybe
they've
they
were
being
had
before
that,
but
you
know
I
know
I
myself
brought
this
up
as
a
priority
in
that
one
of
our
very
first
meetings
of
the
year
talking
about
the
things
that
we
wanted
to
get
done
this
year
and
obviously
so
much
has
happened,
things
that
we
never
could
have
even
anticipated,
and
so
I
understand
that
there
have
been
a
lot
of
things
that
have
come
up.
M
That
has
you
know
that,
has
you
know
back
burnered
a
couple
things,
but
this
has
continuously
popped
up
this
year
and
I
know
for
myself:
I've
been
trying
to
make
the
public
health
case.
It's
been
very
obvious
to
very
many
people,
a
lot
of
people
in
the
public
health
community
that
essential
workers
are
often
people
who
are
in
hourly
positions
who
are
making
minimum
wage.
They
are
not
people
who
can
quarantine
for
14
or
even
longer
days,
and
I
will
give
an
example
for
my
own
family.
M
Thankfully
I
have
a
job
that
has
benefits,
so
I
you
know
was:
I
was
able
to
continue
to
earn
income
and
I
had
a
job
when
I
was
finished
with
quarantine.
But
when
my
daughter
tested
positive,
she
had
to
be
in
court
isolation
for
10
days
and
then
my
quarantine,
my
14
corn
day,
quarantine
didn't
actually
start
until
her
last
day
of
isolation.
M
M
I'm
feeling
very
passionate
about
this
tonight
and
I'm
feeling
a
little
bit
frustrated
because
I
would
have
loved
to
have
seen
us
do
something
months
ago,
because
people
need
it
right
now,
and
so
I
hope
that
we
can
kind
of
put
our
foot
on
the
gas
for
that.
I'm
asking
and
begging
that
we
that
we
get
that
going
quickly
and
I
respect
the
fact
that
we
need
to
engage
the
business
community
and
I
think
that
the
business
community
sees
the
writing
on
the
wall
and
they
want
to
do
the
right
thing
too.
M
So
my
second,
my
second
thing
brought
up
earlier
in
council
member
loman
just
brought
it
up
the
prevailing
wage
issue
and
I
would
encourage
staff.
I'm
glad
that
there's
more
interest
among
my
colleagues
here.
I
would
encourage
staff
to
look
at
richfield,
so
I
know
they
just
passed
a
prevailing
wage
ordinance
that
included
protections
for
wage
theft
and
human
trafficking,
and
I
think,
I'm
not
sure
if
they're
the
first
in
the
state,
but
I
think
that
they
were
highlighted
in
some
of
our
local
newspapers
and
things
like
that.
M
So
I
will
leave
it
at
that.
Thank
you.
O
Nelson
thank
you
mayor.
First
of
all,
I
appreciate
all
the
calls
to
have
the
necessary
conversation
about
the
earned
sick
time
and
leave
and
all
that-
and
I
just
want
to
bring
up
one
thing
and
it's
not
to
contradict
anything
that
has
been
said,
but
by
federal
law.
People
have
a
benefit
related
to
covid.
O
Today
there
you
can
get
your
you
have
to
get
paid
leave
if
you
are
sick
and
quarantined
because
of
covet.
If
you
have
to
stay
home
to
take
care
of
a
child
or
something
like
that,
your
employer
is
supposed
to
provide
that
benefit
by
federal
law
right
now
and
that
cost
to
the
business
is
reimbursed
by
the
federal
government.
So
it
isn't
an
additional
cost.
At
this
point,
however,
that
expires
on
december
30th,
and
so
it's
going
away
very
quickly.
O
So
I
think
the
timeliness
of
the
conversation
makes
sense,
but
if
there
is
I
the
reason
I
bring
this
up
is:
if
there
is
anybody
in
the
community
that
is
trying
to
make
that
choice
between
going
to
work
and
you're,
maybe
thinking
you
might
have
symptoms
of
kobit
by
law
by
federal
law.
You
have
the
right
to
that
time
off.
You
have
the
right
to
go
in
and
get
tested.
O
You
have
the
right
to
get
paid
for
the
time
that
you
miss,
that
is,
that
is
current
federal
law
right
now,
so
again,
not
trying
to
contradict
anyone
just
really
trying
to
encourage
people
that
aren't
feeling
well
to
understand
that
they
have
that
benefit
provided
by
the
federal
government
right
now,
at
least
for
a
week
and
a
month.
So
that's
just
want
to
bring
that
up.
C
Yes,
I'm
thank
you
mayor.
I'm
sorry.
I
meant
to
to
just
ask
one
other
quick
question.
I've
got
some
questions
from
residents
about.
When
are
the
the
process
around
the
recount
for
the
the
ballot
question
question
number
three
regarding
ranked
choice,
voting
and
I'm
wondering
if
staff
has
any
more
details
on
that
yeah.
J
Thank
you,
mr
mayor
and
council
member
coulter
for
jogging
my
memory
that
was
supposed
to
be
on
my
list
of
update
items
for
you.
There
will
not
be
a
recount
for
a
ballot
question
number
three.
The
petitioners
had
until
5
pm
this
past
friday
to
provide
a
bond
for
the
cost
to
perform
the
recount
and
they
did
not
come
forward
with
such
a
surety.
So
as
such,
the
results
will
stand
and
we
will
move
forward.
A
Anything
else
counts
member
culture.
A
couple
quick
things
to
end
on
then
that
I
will
end
on
first.
I
I
just
want
to
say
that
I
like
a
lot
of
people.
I
was
disappointed
and
saddened
in
the
way
that
the
dnr
dealt
with
penny.
The
turkey-
I
mean
I'll,
just
I'll
just
say
it-
it's.
It
should
have
ended
differently.
I
wish
it
would
have
ended
differently.
A
Unfortunately,
it
didn't
one
of
the
best
parts
about
living
here
in
bloomington
is
the
urban
wildlife
that
we
get
the
pleasure
of,
seeing
whether
it's
the
raccoons
or
the
turkeys
or
the
deer
in
your
yard,
or
the
albino
squirrel
in
my
backyard
or
the
geese
or
whatever,
and
it
makes
it
a
special
place
to
live,
and
it's
disappointing
that
one
of
those
wild
animals
at
the
end
that
he
did
it's
important
to
understand.
A
I
think
the
the
definition
I
mean
they
are
wildlife,
they
are
wild
animals
and
they
should
be
treated
as
such,
and
I
think
it's
a
lesson
to
be
learned
on
on
behalf
of
the
folks
who
fed
penny,
also
and
kind
of
domesticated
him
a
little
bit
and
kind
of
led
to
this.
But
I
I
am
very
disappointed
and
saddened
about
the
way
it
ended.
It
should
have
ended
differently
and
I
wish
it
had
so
that's
kind
of
the
downer
note,
the
other
downer
note.
A
Obviously
the
governor
announced
the
dial
back
last
week
and
talked
about
how
things
are
closing
down,
and
we
we
know
that
times
are
even
more
difficult
for
so
many
of
our
businesses
here
in
bloomington
and
what
I
want
to
do
this
weekend
in
particular,
but
also
for
the
rest
of
the
year.
A
I
strongly
encourage
you
do
what
you
can
to
shop
locally
in
bloomington.
There
are
plenty
of
opportunities
to
shop,
non-big
box
to
shop
locally
to
shop,
the
shops,
the
businesses
that
have
supported
so
many
different
organizations
and
sports
teams
and
and
community
organizations,
and
done
so
in
the
past,
and
now
it's
our
turn
to
support
them.
Please
please
spend
this
weekend,
spend
your
dollars
this
weekend,
supporting
local
business
and,
along
those
lines,
the
restaurants
who
are
now
forced
to
to
go
back
to
take
out
or
carry
out
only
by
listen
by
saturday.
A
Folks
are
going
to
be
tired
of
turkey.
I
I
want
to
see
everybody
ordering
takeout
and
supporting
our
local
businesses
support
those
local
restaurants.
From
now,
all
the
way
through
the
new
year
give
as
much
business
as
you
can
to
them.
We've
got
to
get
through
to
the
other
side
we
all
have
to
get
through
to
the
other
side,
and
especially
those
small
businesses
hanging
by
a
thread.
A
Their
margins
are
razor
thin
to
begin
with,
we've
got
to
be
able
to
to
get
them
along
get
them
through
until
we
get
to
a
point
where
they
can
start
to
trend
in
the
other
direction,
so
buy
local
shop,
local
and
please
order
order
take
out
from
any
any
of
our
local
restaurants.
A
Here
in
bloomington
you'll
be
happy,
you
did
it
it'll
make
their
day,
it'll
be
a
good
thing
for
them,
and
I
also
just
want
to
finish
by
saying
wishing
everybody
a
happy
thanksgiving
weekend:
it's
it's
a
great
holiday
one
of
my
favorite
holidays,
but
please
do
what
you
need
to
do
to
keep
yourself
safe,
to
keep
your
family
safe,
to
keep
the
community
safe
to
keep
healthcare
workers
safe.
Let's
keep
everybody
safe.
We're
all
in
this
together.
A
Do
what
we
need
to
do
to
keep
everybody
safe,
please,
because
it's
it's
going
to
be
a
long
cold
winter
if
we're,
if
we're
not
only
facing
down
darkness
in
the
typical
minnesota
winter,
but
this
pandemic
still
raging
like
it
is
right
now.
So
please
do
what
you
can
do.
What
you
need
to
do
counsel!
Is
there
anything
else?
A
M
B
Sorry,
you
caught
me
off
guard
and
I
didn't
hear
councilmember
carter
made
the
motion
who
made
the
second
martin.
Oh
thank
you
all
right,
hello,
hi
carter,
I'm
colder
hi
woman.