►
From YouTube: October 17, 2022 Bloomington City Council Meeting
Description
October 17, 2022 Bloomington City Council Meeting
0:00:00 Start
0:05:09 1. Approval of Agenda
0:07:08 2.1 Introduction of New Employees
0:11:54 2.2 Proclamation: Friends of Libraries Week
0:16:13 2.3 Historical Society Presentation: Bloomington's Notable Residents
0:30:49 2.4 2022 Community Survey Results
2:59:04 Consent Business
3:00:27 3.1 Resolution to Accept Donations
3.2 Appoint City Assessor
3.3 Resolution: 2023 Medical, Dental, and other Insurance Contract Authorization and Contribution Rates
3.4 Authorizing Agreement with 4RM+ULA for Small Business Development Center Architectural Services
3.5 Approve Second Amendment to CNH Architects, P.C. Services Agreement
3.6 Resolution Authorizing American Rescue Plan (ARP) Expenditure and related Budget Adjustments (2022-402 Dred Scott Trails Improvement Project)
3.7 Encroachment Agreement Approval - 8116 Lea Road (PL202200155)
3.8 Resolution for Peer Breastfeeding Support Program Grant Funds from the Minnesota Department of Health
3.9 Mutual Aid Agreement Between Public Health and Environmental Health Entities in Metropolitan Minnesota
3.10 Resolution of Withdrawal from Metro Alliance for Healthy Families Joint Powers Agreement
3.11 Approval of the Assignment and Assumption of City Lease
3.12 Approval of Public Purpose Expenditure Policy Revision
3.13 Resolution Authorizing Execution and Recording of Mortgage Satisfaction Document for 8425 Irwin Road
3.14 Award Bid for Water Treatment Façade Repair
3.15 Approve Purchase of Sensus Water Meters
3.16 Resolution Accepting Hennepin County Youth Sports Equipment Grant Funds - Football Equipment/Bloomington Athletic Association
3.17 Resolution Authorizing Filing of Hennepin Youth Sports Program Equipment Application - Fall 2022 Bloomington Traveling Baseball Association
3.18 Resolution Authorizing Filing of Hennepin County Youth Sports Program Equipment Application - Fall 2022 Bloomington Fastpitch Association
3.19 Resolution Accepting Second Amendment to Overdose Detection Mapping Application Program (ODMAP) Grant
3.20 Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes
3:02:05 4.1 Public Hearing: Ordinance Amending Chapter 5 of the City Code Related to Parks and Playgrounds
3:07:25 5.1 Time of Sale Program Update
3:19:08 5.2 Proposed 10-Year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) 2023-2032
3:34:50 5.3 2023 Budget Discussion: Utility Enterprise Funds, Fleet and Facilities Internal Service Funds, and Public Works General Fund budgets
4:26:21 5.4 2023 Budget Discussion: Information Technology fund budget
1:25:53 5.5 Artistry Update to the City Council
4:30:51 5.6 City Council Policy & Issue Update
A
A
A
A
A
A
Our
agenda
this
evening
actually
has
a
number
of
different
things
we
have
under
our
introductory
items.
We
have
an
introduction
of
new
employees.
We
have
a
proclamation
for
our
friends
at
the
library's
week,
a
presentation
from
our
Bloomington
from
the
Historical
Society
folks
about
bloomington's
notable
residence
and
a
review
of
our
2022
Community
survey
results
our
consent
business
is
lengthy.
Council
member
Coulter
is
going
to
be
giving
us
20
items
under
the
consent,
business
hearings
and
resolutions.
A
We
have
one
public
hearing
and
it's
an
ordinance
amending
chapter
five
of
the
city
code
related
to
parks
and
playgrounds.
Once
we
move
to
our
organizational
business,
we
have
our
time
of
sale
program,
update
we're
going
to
have
a
discussion
on
a
proposed
10-year
Capital
Improvement
plan
2023
budget
discussions,
which
will
include
a
variety
of
different
funds.
Also,
a
budget
discussion
for
our
information
technology
fund
budget,
we're
going
to
have
an
Artistry
update
to
the
city,
council
and
I.
A
Don't
think
item
5.6
or
city
council
policy
and
issue
update
was
officially
on
the
agenda
that
went
out
so
I
would
like
to
do
a
couple
of
things
if
I
may
Council.
First
of
all,
I'm
going
to
add
item
5.6
our
city
council
policy
and
issue
update
and
then,
if
it
would
please,
the
council
I
would
like
to
move
item
5.5
the
Artistry
update
to
the
city
council.
A
So
Council
any
other
suggestions
or
changes
or
corrections
to
the
agenda
tonight.
Hearing
none
I
will
move
tonight's
agenda
with
the
changes,
as
stated.
Second,
we've
got
a
motion
to
and
a
second
to
approve
tonight's
agenda,
as
stated
hearing
no
further
Council
discussion
on
this.
All
those
in
favor,
please
signify
by
saying
aye
aye
opposed
motion,
carries
7-0.
We
have
an
agenda
item.
A
2.1
is
our
introduction
of
new
employees,
something
we've
been
doing
on
a
regular
basis
to
make
sure
that
we
introduce
our
new
employees
to
the
not
only
to
the
council,
but
also
to
the
public
on
camera.
So
if
the
folks
that
they're,
seeing
either
at
City,
Hall
or
on
the
street,
they
they
recognize
them
in
their
familiar
face,
and
we
are
going
to
start
today
with
Amy
Chaney
our
CIO
good
evening
and
welcome
good
evening.
They
are
members
of
the
council
tonight
I'm
pleased
to
introduce
Lizzie
Potts.
A
So
Lizzie
joined
the
I.T
Department
in
August
of
this
year.
She
is
our
office
support,
specialist
and
she's
she's
responsible
for
purchasing
and
maintaining
software
maintenance
agreements,
and
she
also
does
a
variety
of
support
for
the
internal
I.T.
Department
Lizzy
is
a
lifelong
Minnesotan
and
she
and
her
grandparents
have
lived
in
Bloomington
for
almost
70
years,
she's
a
former
teacher
and
school
librarian.
A
She
is
taught
in
schools
across
the
Twin
Cities,
where
she's
worked
with
students
from
kindergarten
to
11th
grade
and
her
and
next
spring
she
will
be
graduating
from
Saint
Cates,
with
her
Masters
in
library
and
information
science.
Welcome
Lizzy.
Do
you
want
to
say
a
few
words
thanks
glad
to
be
here
nice
to
meet
you
all?
A
Well,
thank
you,
Lizzy,
thanks
for
for
being
here
what
what
propelled
the
move
from
from
education
to
to
city
government
I
kept
getting
laid
off
oh
well,
trying
to
find
something
more
stable,
well.
Well,
good!
Welcome
aboard
we're
very
excited
to
have
you.
Thank
you
for
being
here
today.
Bear
loss.
Is
our
game
the
reality
of
teaching
today?
Yes,
thank
you
good
good
of
you
to
be
here
thanks.
A
A
I
really
wanted
to
take
this
opportunity
to
talk
about
how
we
got
here
so
last
July
shortly
after
our
former
City
Assessor
had
submitted
his
resignation.
I
met
with
Kent
Smith,
and
the
first
thing
he
said
to
me
was
I'm
not
interested
in
the
job.
So
as
we
continued
our
discussion,
Kent
shared
with
me
that
he
had
planned
to
retire
in
September
and
as
we
discuss
the
timeline
for
hiring
a
new
assessor
Kent
agreed
to
postpone
his
retirement
and
stay
until
April.
A
I
would
like
to
use
this
opportunity
to
publicly
thank
Kent
for
his
leadership,
dedication
and
commitment
to
the
city
of
Bloomington,
its
residents,
community
and
stakeholders.
Ken,
provided
us
with
the
gift
of
time,
and
for
that
I
am
grateful
to
him.
So
I
hope
he's
I
know
he's
at
home
watching.
Thank
you.
Kent
I
just
wanted
to
say
that,
because
I
know
he'd
much
rather
be
riding
his
bike
somewhere
and
here
he
is
to
allow
some
overlap
with
our
hopefully
New
City
Assessor.
A
So
with
that
being
said,
I
would
like
to
introduce
you
to
our
new
City
Assessor.
Pending
approval,
Tim
Bulger
Tim
has
a
degree
from
U
of
M
in
applied
economics.
It
started
his
career
at
Scott
County
as
a
residential
appraiser.
He
continued
in
the
residential
area
with
the
City
of
Minnetonka
and
then
went
to
Hennepin
County,
where
he
worked
as
a
senior
commercial
appraiser
before
before
returning
back
to
Scott
County
as
their
Deputy
County
Assessor,
where
he
has
served
for
the
last
four
years.
A
A
I'm
just
excited
to
be
here
and
I
completed
my
first
day
today
and
met
with
many
smart,
dedicated
and
friendly
staff
here
at
the
city,
I'm
very
excited
to
continue
that
Journey.
Thank
you.
Well
welcome,
Tim,
we're
very
glad
to
have
you
and
in
a
very
important
role
as
we're
definitely
learning
over
the
past
few
years.
The
importance
in
the
how
vital
a
good
City
Assessor
is,
so
we're
very
glad
to
have
you
on
board
and
welcome
glad
to
ask
you.
Thank
you
both
Tim
and
Lizzy,
welcome
on
board.
A
So
I'd
like
to
call
up
Judy,
basso
and
Ryan
and
Carolyn
and
then
Caroline
I'm,
sorry,
I
missed
your
last
name,
come
on
up
and
join
me
while
I
read
our
Proclamation
and
we'll
do
the
the
whole
picture
thing
and
everything
so
come
on,
make
sure
yep
don't
be
shy.
Here
we
go
Proclamation
National
friends
of
libraries
week,
October
16th
through
the
22nd
2022.,
whereas
Friends
of
the
pen
Lake
Library,
raise
money
that
has
enabled
our
library
to
provide
for
additional
programming,
much
needed
equipment,
support
for
children's
summer
reading
and
special
events
throughout
the
year.
A
And
whereas
the
work
of
the
friends
highlights
how
our
libraries
are,
the
Cornerstone
of
the
community
providing
opportunities
for
all
to
engage
in
the
joy
of
lifelong
learning
and
connect
with
the
thoughts
and
ideas
of
others
from
ages
past
to
the
present.
And
whereas
the
friends
understand
the
critical
importance
of
well-funded
libraries
and
Advocate
to
ensure
that
our
library
gets
the
resources.
It
needs
to
provide
a
wide
variety
of
services
to
all
ages,
including
access
to
print
and
electronic
materials.
Along
with
expert
assistance
in
research,
readers,
advisory
and
Children's
Services.
A
Now,
therefore,
I'm
mayor
Tim
Bussey
to
hereby
Proclaim
October
16th
through
the
22nd
as
friends
of
Library
week
in
the
city
of
Bloomington
Minnesota,
and
call
upon
the
people
of
Bloomington
to
join
the
friends
of
Penn,
Lake
library
and
all
Hennepin
County
Libraries,
and
thank
them
for
all.
They
do
to
make
our
libraries
a
vital
part
of
this
community.
Signed
this
day.
The
17th
of
October
2022.
A
I
want
to
extend
my
heartfelt
thanks
for
you
and
for
the
work
that
you
do,
making
our
libraries
a
better
place
and
our
community
a
better
place
and,
as
I
said,
I
have
such
fond
memories
of
a
library
and
I
know
there
are
so
many
people
that
do
and
I
know
that
there
are
so
many
people
who
are
having
building
wonderful
memories.
Now
because
of
the
work
you
do
so.
B
C
On
bloomington's
notable
residence-
and
we
have
two
folks
here
who
know
a
little
something
about
being
notable
in
Bloomington,
obviously,
but
who
have
done
a
great
deal
of
work
and
I'm
going
to
turn
it
over
to
you
Don
and
just
let
you
talk
your
way
through
this
welcome
good
evening.
Thank
you,
I'm
pleased
to
be
here
and
greetings,
mayor
Tim,
Bussey
and
staff,
and
residents
who
are
watching
walking.
A
Watching
my
name
is
Don
heinzmann
I'm,
a
retired
journalist
living
in
Bloomington
with
me
to
my
left,
is
Jean
belfi,
a
curator
of
the
Bloomington
Historical
Society
Town
Hall
Museum.
Tonight
we
are
announcing
a
project
that
we
have
prepared
for
this
community.
The
project
is
three
books
like
this
with
the
inside.
A
A
A
And
what
do
you
think
there
were
70
nominees?
I
thought
what
am
I
going
to
do
with
this,
so
I
turned
to
Gene
and
she
took
over
so
I
noticed
that
Don's
request
for
nominations
were
predominantly
professional.
Athletes
who
grew
up
in
Bloomington
and
I
wanted
to
see
the
nominations
to
become
more
diverse,
so
I
nominated
Mary
Grand
pray.
She
was
my
neighbor
growing
up
in
Bloomington.
She
Illustrated
the
Harry
Potter
books,
and
so
this
is
how
Don
and
I
connected.
We
realized
that
a
collaboration
would
be
mutually
beneficial.
A
Here
are
the
samples
the
first
one
on
your
left
is
Ernie
Johnson.
He
founded
the
Bloomington
Athletic
Association,
and
he
had
a
philosophy
that,
no
matter
what
the
abilities
of
the
kids
they
would
play
on
a
team
later.
He
founded
the
born-again
jocks
for
men
over
55,
who
would
then
exercise
to
the
right
is
Fran
heitzman,
who
Heights
men
that
is
founded
bridging.
He
said
we
can
create
Bridges
between
those
who
have
and
those
who
have
not
so
interesting
since
1987
bridging
inspected
more
impacted
more
than
one
hundred
thousand
households
and
300
000
individuals.
C
Department
elected
him,
the
first
Chief
of
the
volunteers,
and
he
was
active
in
Bloomington
six
years
on
the
Town
Council.
The
next
one
is
Peter
doctor.
He
grew
up
in
Bloomington.
He
won
three
Academy
Awards
for
Best
animated
features
and
he
helped
produce
toy
store.
Toy
Story,
Toy,
Story,
2
and
A
Bug's
Life
for
a
Walt
Disney
accompanying
quite
a
record.
Next
one
is
Mary
Grand
Prix,
who
was
nominated
by
Jane.
He
was
a
graduate
of
Minneapolis
College.
D
Used
editions,
U.S
editions
of
the
Harry
Potter
books
now
living
in
Florida
our
next
one
on
arts
and
entertainment,
you'll
recognize
as
Earl
Benson
directed
an
award-winning
Jefferson
High
School
band
for
26
years,
founded
the
Medalist
and
directed
the
concert
band
for
36
years.
He
had
a
major.
He
had
a
real
interesting
band
that
band
those
bands
rather
played
for
three
presidents
and
in
Three
Tournament
of
Roses
parades.
A
A
A
D
A
Home
runs
batting
over
those
years,
282
played
on
two
World
Series
teams
Kent
her
back.
The
next
person
we
have
here
is
Tom.
Gray
grew
up
in
in
Bloomington.
He
was
a
talented
speed
skater
his
best
event
was
the
500
meter
sprint.
He
competed
in
the
1964
and
1968
Olympic
Games.
The
next
one
up
is
the
Morgan
Brothers
John
Morgan,
a
1981
state
champion
Kennedy
High
School
four-time
All-American
wrestler
at
North,
Dakota
University.
He
completed
in
Graco
Roman
wrestling
in
1988,
Olympics
finishing
seventh,
the
other
Morgan
brother
is
Gordy
Morgan.
A
He
was
a
state
champion
wrestler
at
Kennedy
in
1985..
He
competed
nationally
and
internationally
in
the
1996
Olympics
and
he
was
inducted
into
the
Hall
of
Fame
by
the
Minnesota
wrestling
coaches
association.
And
now
you
can
see
bloomington's
the
hometown
of
at
least
14
professional
hockey
players.
Four
of
them
also
played
in
the
Olympics.
A
D
Residents
who
died
in
service
to
our
country,
13
young
men,
died
in
Vietnam
and
one
in
Iraq.
The
two
we
highlight
for
you
today
are
Kenneth
Paul
and
Ron
teschendorf
just
18
years
old,
Kenny
Paul
is
the
youngest
Bloomington
resident
to
be
killed
in
Vietnam.
He
had
only
been
there
three
months
when
he
was
killed
by
an
accidental
explosion
in
Camp
Sergeant
Ronnie
teschendorf
was
a
popular
hockey
player
at
Lincoln,
High
School,
and
he
served
a
year
in
Vietnam
and
was
flying
home
when
his
plane
crashed
into
a
Mountainside
in
bad
weather.
D
Additional
nominees
will
be
added
over
time
by
the
Historical
Society
researchers.
The
albums
will
be
available
to
the
public
at
any
time.
The
Bloomington
Old
Town
Hall
museum
is
open
and
by
appointment
it
is
our
hope
that
having
these
stories
available
to
the
public
will
inspire
pride
in
our
community
and
encourage
people
to
reach
their
full
potential
through
the
example
of
these
notable
Bloomington
residents.
A
Thank
you
for
the
work.
That's
a
lot
of
work
that
you
put
in
I,
appreciate
that
and
understand
it
and
really
do
appreciate
the
work
that
went
into
this
and
not
just
the
work,
but
the
obvious
love
and
care
that
went
into
it.
Also.
So
thank
you
for
that,
and
thank
you
for
for
your
your
service
to
this
community
and
doing
this
kind
of
thing
documenting
this.
In
this
way,
it's
wonderful
thanks,
counsel,
any
questions
on
this.
A
D
So
we
can
continue
to
you
know.
That
is
a
possibility,
particularly
for
the
students
who
are
studying
history.
You
know
we
could
bring
the
books,
you
know
to
their
classroom
and
or
they
should
tour
this
they
could
there
you
go.
We
would
be
happy
to
collect
elaborate
with
teachers
who
are
interested
yes,
well.
My
kids
definitely
found
it
interesting,
so
I
think
one
thing
I
just
want
to
quit
end
with
this
is
a
positive
project
about
positive
people
in
boomington
and
at
a
time
when
there's
Division
I
like
this
project,
because
there
is
no.
A
B
I
won't
blame
you
at
all
item.
2.4
is
a
a
presentation
on
the
results
of
our
2022
Community
survey
good
evening.
Diane
welcome
mayor
and
city
council
tonight.
I
am
delighted
to
bring
forward
the
results
from
our
2022
National
Community
survey
at
Bloomington
residence.
This
is
the
11th
year
in
a
row
that
we
have
collected
information
on
how
people
are
feeling
about
Bloomington
services
and
programming,
and
so
tonight
we're
going
to
have
the
director
of
survey
research
from
the.
A
H
H
G
A
A
And
before
I
dive
into
the
results,
I
do
just
want
to
acknowledge
both
our
long
time
contact,
Diane
Kirby
for
being
such
an
invaluable
part
of
the
survey
process.
We've
been
working
together
for
a
long
time
with
the
city
of
Bloomington.
She
is
always
enormously
helpful
along
each
stage
of
the
process
and
I
definitely
also
want
to
acknowledge
my
colleague,
Brandon
Barnett,
who
was
the
project
manager
for
this
year's
survey
and
who
actually
did
the
bulk
of
the
work
for
this
year's
project.
A
So
what
a
bit
about
who
we
are
before
I
continue
on
so
National
Research,
Center,
I'll
start
there
founded
in
1994.
We
are
one
of
the
oldest
survey
companies
in
the
country
that
has
been
conducting
Community
surveys,
standardized
Community
surveys
Nationwide
and
has
one
of
the
most
robust
Benchmark
databases
in
the
country
and
we're
best
known
for
our
benchmarking.
Surveys,
such
as
the
national
Community
survey,
the
NCS
and
also
the
national
business
survey,
which
Bloomington
conducts
with
us
all
and
then
Poco
is
a
resident
online.
A
We
now
also
offer
this
additional
Outreach
method
to
your
residents
as
part
of
the
services
that
are
included
with
the
cost
for
your
annual
contract
with
us
and
then
looking
at
the
role
of
Resident
surveys
in
local
governments.
What
do
our
clients
move
forward
and
use
their
results
for
most
commonly
resident
survey?
Results
are
used
to
monitor
Trends
over
time
when
the
survey
has
been
conducted
repeatedly
to
measure
ratings
for
government
performance
and
public
Trust
to
inform
land
use,
budget
and
plant
and
strategic
planning
decisions,
as
well
as
resource
allocation.
A
We
provide
benchmarks
to
other
communities,
I'll
talk
about
that
in
a
bit
more
detail
shortly,
because
we
do
have
a
database
of
other
communities
across
the
country
and
then,
finally,
using
the
survey
results
to
find
Focus
areas
in
which
to
dig
deeper.
We
highly
suggest
doing
that,
rather
than
letting
the
survey
be
the
end
of
your
data
collection
into
resident
opinion,
we
like
to
think
of
it
as
more
of
a
starting
point
in
identifying
areas
of
focus
so
some
background
about
the
national
Community
survey.
A
I
J
As
being
key
drivers
for
their
satisfaction
when
the
communities
in
which
they
live,
these
key
facets
also
tend
to
dovetail
nicely
with
City
departments,
and
this
is
how
the
report
is
structured
is
by
each
of
these
topic
areas.
So
it
makes
it
easier
to
find
specific
pieces
of
information
that
you
are
looking
for.
As
you
review
the
report.
J
I
will
cover
the
methods
for
the
survey
before
we
go
into
the
actual
results,
so
this
was
the
11th
time
that
Bloomington
has
conducted
the
NCS
of
previous
surveys
annually
from
2012
up
to
2021..
The
survey
this
year
was
conducted.
The
data
collection
was
conducted
from
May
20th
to
July
8th
and
we
employed
a
mailing
approach
in
which
4
500
households
were
sampled.
J
F
In
addition
to
what
we
call
this
random
sample
a
portion
of
the
survey,
there
was
also
an
online
only
non-probability
open
participation
survey
conducted.
We
received
55
responses
to
that
survey.
This
is
an
opportunity
for
all
residents
of
Bloomington
to
participate
in
the
survey,
not
just
those
who
received
the
invitation
in
the
mail.
A
Of
the
report
contains
the
results
just
from
the
random
selection
of
728
responses.
Finally,
the
results
were
statistically
weighted
to
ensure
representativeness
of
Bloomington
residents.
We
use
American
Community
survey
and
census
data
to
perform
that
statistical
waiting,
and
it
is
a
essential
parts
of
gold
standard
survey
research
to
to
conduct
that
statistical
weighting
with
728
total
responses.
That
gives
us
a
margin
of
error
of
plus
or
minus
four
percent.
For
this
year's
result.
A
Looking
a
bit
more
into
how
the
mailings
were
conducted
so
as
I
noted,
the
4500
households
will
each
household
received
first,
a
postcard.
All
of
these
materials
were
printed.
The
instructions
were
printed
in
both
English
and
Spanish,
so
they
first
received
a
postcard
with
a
web
link,
instructing
them
to
go
online
to
fill
out
the
community
survey
and
that
also
that
they
could
wait
a
few
days
if
they
preferred
for
the
survey
to
arrive
in
the
mail.
A
About
a
week
later,
each
household
received
a
paper
survey
in
the
mail,
as
well
as
a
postage
pay
return
envelope
for
them
to
return
that
to
our
data
entry
team
and
these
mailings
as
well.
The
cover
letter
for
the
paper
survey
also
contained
a
web
link,
so
folks
opening
that
envelope
could
opt
to
either
complete
it
online
or
the
paper
version.
A
B
This
is
communities
that
have
surveyed
within
the
last
five
years,
so
The
Benchmark
averages
are
sort
of
a
rolling
five-year
average
They
do
change
over
time.
We
drop
out
older
data
as
that
data
ages
out,
and
then
we
are
consistently
adding
new
surveys
to
our
database.
As
we
have
a
new
client
survey
with
us
as
well.
We
also
have
the
ability
to
provide
custom
Benchmark
comparisons
to
a
subset.
F
A
I
mentioned
before
there's
10
facets
of
community
livability
and
I
wanted
to
call
attention
to
there's
two
questions
on
the
survey
that
ask
about
these
facets
in
a
very
broad
sense.
They
ask
there's
two
questions,
because
one
of
them
asks
about
the
quality
of
each
of
those
facets
of
community
livability
and
then
the
second
question
is
worded
a
bit
differently
and
it
asks
about
the
importance.
F
Of
each
and
the
reason
why
I'm,
showing
these
two
is
to
show
you
how
we
populate
this
quality
and
importance
Matrix.
This
is
also
included
in
the
report,
and
this
is
just
one
of
many
ways
to
interpret
and
evaluate
your
data
as
you
review
the
report.
But
the
quadrants
that
you
see
here,
the
one
that
we
usually
call
your
attention
to
is
the
the
one
in
the
lower
right
hand,
corner.
F
A
Particularly
with
the
facets
of
livability
that
they
find
most
important,
so
that
is
notable
an
overview
of
the
national
benchmarks
now
so
out
of
a
total
of
119
items
for
which
we
could
provide
Benchmark
comparisons.
103
of
these
were
similar
to
the
National
benchmarks
and
when
I
say
similar.
That
means
within
10
points
of
the
national
average
15
or
higher,
and
then
only
one
was
lower.
A
116
were
similar
to
or
higher
than,
the
local
the
peer
Community
average,
and
that
was
those
two
were
drinking
water
as
no
removal
and
then
one
received
more
negative
ratings,
and
that
again
was
the
expected
economic
impact
on
family
income
and,
finally,
comparisons
to
2021
and
I
am
going
to
spend
just
a
moment
here
to
to
dig
into
this.
We
did
see
a
notable
number
of
declines
from
the
previous
survey
year
so,
as
you
can
see,
out
of
the
items
for
which
Trends
were
available,
69
were
similar
to
the
previous
year
survey.
A
Ratings.
Zero
were
more
positive
and
50
were
more
negative
on
the
surface.
This
does
appear
to
be
broadly
not
great
news.
I
do
want
to
point
out
some
things
that
are
important
context
for
this.
However,
first
of
all
the
margin
of
error,
the
by
year
margin
of
error,
as
we
refer
to
it
across
survey
years,
is
only
five
percent,
so
anything
higher
than
five
percent
to
six
percent
or
more
in
either
direction
is
considered
statistically
significant.
F
So
with
that
in
mind,
I
do
want
to
point
out
that
of
the
50
items
that
decrease
since
the
previous
survey.
24
of
those
saw
changes
between
six
and
seven
percent.
Another
16
saw
changes
between
eight
and
ten
percent
and
only
10
items
on
the
survey
declined
by
more
than
10
percent
over
time.
So
just
important
context
again
to
keep
in
mind
as
you
evaluate.
A
So
we
will
start
with
the
bright
spots
first.
If
there
were
a
number
of
those
within
the
facet
of
economy,
these
ratings
tended
to
be
strong,
many
or
higher
than
the
national
averages,
as
you
can
see
off
to
the
right
of
anything
that
has
that
higher
text,
it's
in
blue,
that
is
higher
than
the
national
Benchmark
comparisons,
and
you
can
see
the
long-term
trend
lines
to
going
back
to
all
the
way
back
to
2016.
Here
there
are
full
Trends
going
all
the
way
back
to
2012
available
in
a
different
section
of
the
report.
A
But
generally
we
saw
about
eight
in
ten
residents,
give
positive
ratings
to
the
city
as
a
place
to
work.
Overall,
quality
of
business
and
service
establishment,
shopping
opportunities
in
Bloomington
is
a
place
to
visit,
were
positively
rated
by
three-quarters
of
residents
and
a
variety
of
business
and
service
establishments
and
employment
opportunities
as
well.
A
Six
and
10
residents
were
pleased
with
the
vibrancy
of
the
shopping
area,
and
that
was
similar
to
the
National
benchmarks,
say
Jade
before
you
move
on.
Could
you
move
back
one,
please
yeah,
so
the
the
text
there
says
that
64
residents,
rated
bloomington's
economic
development
is
excellent
or
good.
My
math,
looking
at
the
pie,
chart
there
excellent,
plus
good.
B
Is
76
percent?
Is
that
am
I
not
reading
it
correctly?
You
are
it's
just
two
different,
it's
too
different,
but
very
similarly
worded
items.
Oh
my
God
okay,
so
one
of
those
items
is
overall
economic,
health
and
then,
in
this
there's
a
whole
separate
question
that
asks
us
about
city
services
and
within
that
city
services
question
we
ask
specifically.
D
B
B
Variability
of
certain
aspects
here-
future
economic
Outlook-
that's
that's
Gray
Line
on
the
on
the
bottom,
and
you
can
see
that
one
has
the
most
variability
is
most
volatile
really
over
time
and
then
going
up
from
there.
We
see
you
know
affordable
qualities,
housing
which
is
black
cost
of
living,
which
is
pink,
portable
quality,
Mental,
Health,
Care,
reduced
and
also
affordable
quality,
child
care
and
preschool.
J
Why
and
we
have
the
availability
of
the
focal
platform
to
do
that
digging
and
there's
other
opportunities
to
do
that
as
well
within
the
community
other
contexts
that
is
important
to
keep
in
mind
so
ratings
that
were
relatively
stable
up
until
2020
to
2021
and
then
dropped
coinciding
with
the
beginning
of
the
in
the
middle
really
of
the
pandemic,
and
also
more
recently,
with
increasing
rates
of
inflation.
So
that's
a
fairly
new
topic
that
may
be
more
front
of
mind
for
residents
as
they
take
the
survey.
B
D
L
And
then
about
looking
at
parks
and
recreation
in
Bloomington
about
eight
in
ten
residents,
all
the
typically
rated
the
availability
of
cats
and
walking
trails,
Fitness
opportunities,
recreational
opportunities,
Recreation
programs
or
classes
and
also
city
parks.
They
rated
these
as
excellent
or
good,
and
all
of
these
ratings
also
were
similar
to
those
seen
in
other
communities.
L
So
we
can
see
here
the
overall
proportion
of
those
giving
an
excellent
workload
rating
for
each
of
these
items
related
to
government
performance.
Again,
these
ratings
were
all
similar
to
National
averages,
even
though
we
did
see
some
declines
year
over
year.
I
would
say
that
just
again
for
additional
context
without
cluttering
up
this
particular
slide
with
a
bunch
of
numbers.
The
declines
here
ranged
from
five
percent
decrease
in
the
overall
direction.
That
Bloomington
has
taken
up
to
a
nine
percent
decrease
for
generally
acting
in
the
best
interest
of
the
community.
L
L
Be
binding
them
before
safety
and
related
Services
continue
to
receive
high
ratings,
contributing
to
Residents
quality
of
life,
so
residents
continue
to
feel
very
safe
within
the
community,
as
you
can
see,
virtually
all
residents
reported
feeling
very
somewhat
safe
in
their
neighborhood
during
the
day
and
then
about
9
and
felt
safe
in
the
bloomington's
commercial
area,
as
well
as
from
natural
disasters
about
eight
and
ten
felt
safe
from
violent
crime
and
property
crime.
These
ratings,
again
all
similar
to
the
National
averages,
looking
at
specifically
safety
related
services
in
Bloomington.
L
Many
of
these
were
also
highly
rated
by
strong
majority
of
residents,
with
those
emerging
at
the
top
fire,
Services
ambulance
and
EMS
bio
prevention
and
education,
and
then
also
between
7
and
10,
and
8
and
10,
get
positive
ratings
to
Police,
Services,
animal
control
and
crime
prevention.
All
of
these
evaluations
were
also
similar
to
National
averages.
It
is
virtually
impossible
to
be
above
the
national
average
rating
for
fire
Services.
Everybody
loves
the
fire
department,
so
even
with
a
very
high
rating
that
is
actually
still
within
the
national
average
range
and
I'm.
L
There
is
a
five-page
survey
meant
to
mention
that
during
the
section
on
the
mailed
material,
but
it's
an
overall
five
page
survey
with
three
and
a
half
pages
of
standardized
questions
and
a
full
page
of
demographic
questions,
so
that
we
can
perform
that
statistical
waiting,
there's
an
additional
additional
half
page
available
for
unique
questions
to
Bloomington.
So
we
don't
have
Benchmark
comparisons
available
for
these,
since
they
are
unique.
But
this
these
were
the
custom
questions
on
the
tier
survey.
Take
a
look
at
those
one
by
one.
L
L
The
city
website
about
6
and
10,
roughly
6
and
10
use
the
Bloomington
some
current
social
media,
any
social
media
and
then
a
Star
Tribune
and
then
the
least
utilized
sources
of
information
were
the
email,
Subscription,
Service,
e-subscribe,
BTV,
cable
channel
and
then
the
online
version
of
the
Bloomington
Sun
current.
So
that
is
on
here
twice.
The
paper
version
is
utilized
more
so
than
the
online
version.
L
Whenever
this
question
is
asked,
this
is
a
pretty
commonly
added
custom
questions
for
custom
questions
for
our
clients.
It's
really
important
to
note
that,
even
though
you
might
have
less
engagement
or
interaction
with
certain
information
sources,
different
types
of
residents
interact
with
each
of
these,
and
so
we
are
always
highly
encouraging
our
clients
to
if
you've
got
important
information
to
get
out
into
the
community
to
use
as
many
any
and
all
avenues
of
communication
as
possible
and
different
folks
consume
information
in
different
via
different
channels.
L
Then
another
question
asked
about
social
media
usage
compared
to
one
year
ago
about
half
so
that
they
used
social
media
about
the
same
amount
about
2
in
10,
reported
using
it
more
or
much
more
and
then
six
10,
so
they
use
it
less,
six
percent,
much
less
and
then
two
and
about
two
in
ten,
so
they
don't
use
social
media
at
all
I'm.
Finally,
looking
at
a
question
asking
about
covid-19
challenges,
residents
were
asked
to
rate
how
much
of
a
problem
each
of
these
was
on
their
house
for
their
household.
L
Currently,
there
have
been
different
coping
related
questions
asked
since
the
beginning
of
the
pandemic,
and
so
we've
shifted
from
to
asking
about
impact
current
impacts
by
far
the
most
the
item,
rated
as
the
largest
Problem
by
residents
of
the
impact
of
inflation
on
household
finances,
currently
sits
at
65
percent
of
residence
rating.
This
is
a
major
or
moderate
problem.
Roughly
one
quarter
noted
the
loss
of
income
from
retirement
savings,
lack
of
paid
sick
leave
or
time
off
benefits
from
their
employer
and
then
loss
of
employment
income.
L
That
is
a
recap
of
the
key
findings
that
we
found
through
our
interpretation
of
the
data.
I
do
want
to
point
out
again.
There
are
a
very
large
number
of
data
points
in
this
survey,
so
these
are
what
stood
out
to
us
as
survey
research,
highly
encourage
you
to
take
a
closer
look
at
the
report
and
identify
other
additional
key
findings
as
well,
and
then
before
I
open
it
up
for
questions.
I
do
just
want
to
I've
already
said
it.
L
The
polko
platform
continues
to
be
available
to
you
to
do
further
Outreach
with
your
residence
Bloomington
currently
has.
These
are
just
screenshots
of
what
the
interface
of
local
platform
looks
like
city
of
Bloomington
currently
has
3886
subscribers.
So
that
means
that
those
folks
will
receive
it's
optional
for
you
to
do
this,
but
email
notifications,
if
you
do
Post
new
content
to
your
profile,
so
it's
a
really
great
way
to
do
follow-up
engagement
with
your
residents,
I'm
happy
to
take
questions.
L
L
L
L
We
are
on
the
in
the
about
section.
Sorry,
yes,
it
says:
weights
were
calculated
using
an
iterative
multiplication,
multiplicative
raking
model
known
as
the
anes
weighting,
algorithm,
yeah,
so
I
guess
yeah.
You
could
explain
that
that'd
be
great.
Absolutely
so.
I
just
wanted
to
have
the
actual
numbers
in
front
of
me.
While
I
spoke
about
waiting.
M
L
I
Back
up
a
little
bit,
the
reason
why
waiting
is
a
survey
industry
best
practice
is
because
we
hear
from
certain
demographics
and
certain
characteristics
of
residents
we
hear
from
them
more
or
less
than
others
so
hard
to
reach.
Residents
are
what
we
call
these
folks
and
they
tend
to
be
people
who
are
younger
people
who
are
not
whites.
People
who
live
in.
L
M
L
M
I
And
then
the
target
is
it
the
norm
that
we
have
established
from
the
most
recent
census
or
American
Community
survey
data
available
to
us
for
the
city
of
Bloomington?
So
we,
the
CFS,
has
this
raking
model.
That
is
part
of
the
software.
That
makes
a
statistical
adjustments
to
give
slightly
more
weight
to
the
under
represented.
L
Voices
that
we
hear
from
okay
so
for
Bloomington,
the
people
who
actually
responded
about
73
of
the
people
were
over
55.
But
then
you
used
the
statistical
waiting
to
kind
of
get
to
that
42
Target.
And
is
there
a
point
at
which,
like
you
just
can't
like
it,
doesn't
work
like?
If
you
don't
hear
from
anybody
who.
M
Is
18
to
34
African-American
who's,
a
renter
like
how
does
that
work
sure?
So
it's
rare!
So
that's
why
we
we
aim
for
a
minimum
number
of
responses
in
any
given
Community
with
to
ensure
that
that
sort
of
discrepancy
doesn't
happen
where
we're
not
here,
we
don't
have
any
responses
at
all
from
certain
subgroups
of
folks
was
not
the
case
in
Bloomington
we
do
limit.
However,
we
will
not
what
we
call
over
correct
to
the
data.
M
You
know
housing
status,
gender
age,
all
of
those
things
are
being
factored
in
for
each
person
and
they
are
assigned
a
weight
typical
weights.
I
mean
this.
It
may
sound
a
little
bit
more
dramatic
than
it
actually
is.
We
do
the
actual
weight.
So
if
you
consider
any
given
resident
to
have
at
the
start
a
weight
of
one,
then
one
person
equals
a
weight
of
one.
Most
weights
tend
to
be
somewhere
between.
M
You
know
you
might
see
a
weight
of
0.80
for
someone
or
a
way
to
point
of
1.2,
so
it's
making
adjustments
to
the
results,
but
we
do
have
absolutely
checks
in
place
to
make
sure
that
we
are
not
going
too
far
it
just
in
order
for,
in
the
name
of
checking
the
box
to
get
all
the
way
to
the
population
normant
as
a
balance.
Okay,
that's
helpful
and
then
I
guess
I
just
have
one
comment
and
I.
Just
I
was
kind
of
struck
by
the
of
course.
M
The
affordability
ratings
slide,
but
I
was
also
struck
by
the
fact
that
four
of
the
seven
things
that
were
on
that
slide,
so
food
Healthcare
child
care
and
preschool
Mental
Health
Care,
are
things
outside
of
the
city's
Direct
Control
and
but
of
course,
that
also
just
emphasizes
or
reiterates
the
importance
of
working
in
partnership
with
others
and
and
as
we
think,
about
policy
priorities.
How
are
those
things
showing
up
in
in
our
policy
agenda
so
just
really
appreciate
having
the
data
in
front
of
us
and
and
for
you
taking
the
time.
D
Actually
hit
one
of
the
questions
I
had
was
around
the
analyzing,
the
data,
because,
when
I
saw
16
unweighted
for
the
fourth
district,
that
that
said,
I
said
wait
a
minute
now
that
doesn't
make
a
whole
lot
of
sense
to
me.
So
thank
you
for
you
to
clarifying
that
for
me.
So
let
me
just
jump
to
my
questions
so
so
when
I
look
at
this
balancing
performance
and
importance,
number
nine
I
I
see
here
inclusivity
and
engagement.
It's
in
the
bottom
left-hand
Corner
Holland.
D
My
supposed
to
look
at
that
help
me
understand
if
you
could
just
be
short
as
possible,
but
be
precise.
I
got
a
couple
other
questions
here.
Okay,
let
me
navigate
to
that
and
while
you're
navigating
to
that,
I
will
just
say
how
much
I
I
appreciate
seeing
the
the
survey
results
on
safety,
we
really
seem
to
be
holding
holding
steady
on
that
absolutely
so
inclusivity
engagement.
D
M
Me
understand
what
that
means:
yeah,
there's
equipment.
There
are
two
questions
on
the
survey
asking
residents
to
rate
the
quality
of
each
of
these,
as
well
as
the
importance
of
each
of
these,
and
then
it's
cross
plotting
them
on
the
same
chart.
So
for
inclusivating
engagement,
it
looks
like
about
just
shy
of
70
rated
it
as
essential
or
very
important,
whereas
somewhere
around
55
percent
rated
the
quality
of
this
facet
as
excellent
or
good.
Thank
you
that
helps
me
understand
that
a
little
bit
better.
M
M
Thank
you,
mayor
I'm,
actually
on
the
report
now
here
too
just
to
clarify
this
is
we're
on
the
polka
platform.
Looking
at
the
report
now,
let
me
go
ahead
and
shoot
it.
So
that
leads
me
to
my
next
question
around
some
of
the
the
as
you
try
to
parse
the
information
in
terms
of
demographics
and
District
level
areas.
Is
that
still
available
to
to
look
at
in
this
report
or
is
that
online?
Or
can
we
look
so?
M
This
is
on
the
actual
Pro
on
your
full
goat
profile.
However,
this
rope
support
has
been
generated
in
Tableau
public,
so
there's
also
just
a
link
that
can
be
shared
and
that
you
can
more
easily
access
I.
Just
this
is
the
fastest
way
for
me
to
get
to
this
for
screen
sharing
purposes.
But
so,
if
you
click,
you
see
the
tabs
here
that
I'm
kind
of
quickly
scrolling
across-
and
this
will
look
very
similar
in
the
Tableau
public
report-
just
splits
up
all
the
different
sections
of
the
report.
D
Then
also
called
cross
tabulations,
so
yeah
that
is
still
here
and
you
it's
a
little
bit
tricky
because
you
do
have
to
select
the
demographic
that
you'd
like
to
look
at
cross-section
the
data
by
but
say,
let's
pick
area
here,
you
can
still
see
those
and
comparisons
by
in
this
case
area,
but
also
age.
Gender
Etc,
there's
also
statistical
significance
to
factor
in
here
as
well
that
it
is
on
a
separate
tab.
D
L
But
it's
important
not
to
not
over
interpret
differences
and
just
to
keep
that
in
mind
like
ballpark.
You
would
want
to
see
you
know
this
various
category
by
category
as
you
can
see,
but
somewhere
between
10
and
13,
different
more
than
that
would
be
statistically
significant
difference
in
ratings
or
income
specifically
and
same
thing
here,
there's
a
drop
down
menu
and
you
can
select
each
variable
and
look
at
the
statistical
significance
threshold.
L
Well,
that's
very
useful,
thank
you
and
then
just
one
other
question
for
you
and
then
just
a
couple
more
comments
and
then
I
will
move
on.
So
when
I
looked
in
the
governance
area,
I
looked
at
transparency,
it
dropped
from
66.
This
is
on
page
12.
down
to
59,
and
then
there
was
another
one
that
went
from
68
to
60
and
I'll.
L
Try
to
see
what
that
question
was
here
exactly
I
just
wanted
to
clarify
that
in
terms
of
you
know,
if
those
questions
are
asked
at
you
know
how
do
we
rate
with
our
peers
with
that
just
trying
to
have
an
understanding
of
what
that
means.
What
the
definition
of
that
is,
so
the
the
interpretation
of
the
question
wording
for
these
items.
You
mean
well
yeah
I
mean
so
it
says,
being
open
and
transparent
to
the
public.
We
went
from
looks
like
66
percent
last
year
down
to
59.
So
that's
that
that
drop.
L
You
talked
about
more
than
more
than
five
percent
help
me
understand,
I.
Think
the
next
one
is
informing
residents
about
issues
facing
the
community
community
68
down
at
60.
I'm.
Just
trying
to
you
know
trying
to
understand
that
in
the
context
is
there
something
going
on?
Is
there
something
from
a
trend
I'm
just
trying
to
understand
what
that?
What
that
means
sure
and
it's
a.
B
G
Area
to
dig
deeper
in
because
with
just
this
survey
and
no
further
dancing
it's
hard
for
us
to
answer
that
question,
asking
in
an
open-ended
question
on
the
platform
or
putting
questions
like
that
out
to
Residents,
where
they
can
write
in
their
own
words.
Those
questions
are
are
more
time
intensive,
because
you
know
you
do
have
it's
not
as
it's
more
qualitative
and
quantitative,
but
still
really
useful,
to
gain
more
specific
insight
into
why
residents
might
be
having
a
change
of
heart
or
change
of
pinion
and
ratings.
G
So
for
follow-up.
That
is
something
an
easy
first
step
is
you
know,
sort
of
posting
a
short
question
set
asking
them
to
rate
these
items
and
then
asking
for
their
reasons
for
why
they
rated
this
way.
It's
kind
of
the
nice
thing
and
years
ago
we
used
to
suggest
focus
groups
for
this
type
of
interaction
with
residents
which
are
costly
and
they
are
difficult
to
get
people
to
attend.
G
Now,
with
so
much
available
at
our
fingertips
with
online
engagement,
it
can
be
almost
as
valuable,
if
not
as
valuable
as
as
that
in-person
focus
group,
because
you
can
reach
a
much
larger
audience
with
your
your
subscribers
already
on
your
platform
as
well
as
the
rest
of
the
community.
Thank
you
for
that.
I
know
that,
one
time,
several
years
back,
when
we
were
doing
this,
we
found
out
that.
D
Based
on
when
we
did
the
survey
that
really
drove
some
of
those
results,
and
that's
why
I
was
kind
of
hoping
you'd
say
something
with
this
year
and
so
I'm
just
curious.
You
know,
as
I
would
like
us
to
look
a
little
deeper
into
this
one
here,
because
I
that
that
seems
out
of
the
norm
so
I
just
wonder
if
there's
something
else,
that's
driving
that
so
and
I've
got
some
other
ones
around
on
Transportation
that
I'd
like
to
like.
F
I
think
overall,
very
interesting
results.
Thank
you
for
bringing
this
forward.
I
do
want
to
mention
too
in
terms
of
digging
deeper.
We
have
an
entire
library
of
questions
that
are
already
ready
to
go
in
our
library,
and
so
we
don't
ask
you
all
to
reinvent
the
wheel,
and
we
have
ongoing
access
to
our
platform
in
all
of
our
library
of
questions
that
are
available
to
you
to
to
repost,
as
well
as
ongoing
customer
support
from
our
team
as
well.
F
F
L
Morris
Leatherman
survey
that
we
heard
about
last
month
and
the
results
were
strikingly
different
than
what
we're
hearing
here
and
I'm
wondering
if
we
have
a
little
context,
a
little
information
or
just
some
ideas
as
to
why
they
might
be
as
different
as
they
are
and
I
don't
know,
Mr,
Sable
or
Diane,
or
and
actually
Mr,
Mayor
and
city
council
I
did
have
a
conversation.
I
had
an
opportunity
to
talk
to
Jade
about
that
and
I'm
going
to
hand
it
off
to
her.
She
has
some
context
that
she
knows:
okay,
okay,.
L
The
time
and
I
really
appreciate
the
question,
because
it's
a
valid
it's
a
valid
question.
Why
would
we
ask
very
similar
questions?
They
get
such
different
results
and,
just
broadly,
knowing
you
know,
more
North
Leatherman's,
their
methods
are
different
from
ours.
They
primarily
conduct
phone
surveys
which
definitely
have
their
own
usefulness
time
and
place.
They
are
faster
to
conduct
than
the
mail
survey.
So,
but
one
thing
that
is
is
pretty
well
known
in
the
survey
research
industry
is
that
residents
will
it's
called
positive
response
bias
and
it's
not
just
phone?
L
It's
any
in-person
interviewer.
It's
our
people
are
more
likely
to
give
a
positive
response
when
they
are
speaking
to
a
human,
then
if
they
are
completing
an
anonymous
web
survey
or
filling
out
a
paper
survey
without
the
person
asking
them
the
question
we
see
this,
the
effect
does
vary.
There's
a
few
articles
that
kind
of
enumerate
it,
but
so
it
is
something
that
to
be
taken
into
account.
I
guess.
My
short
answer
would
be.
If
it's
a
phone
survey
and
ours
is
a
mail-based
survey,
I
would
have
been
surprised.
We
would
have
been
surprised.
L
The
survey
research
researchers,
if
the
results
weren't
different,
we
would
expect
a
phone
survey
to
have
more
positive
results.
Just
because
of
that
and
I
could
not.
Could
there
be
other
factors?
Could
it
be
that
a
little
bit
of
time
has
elapsed?
People's
opinions
have
changed
a
little
bit
sure
there's
not
really
a
good
way
for
us
to
be
able
to
measure
that
or
quantify
that,
but
we
do
know
about
the
response
effects
of
different
modes
of
surveying.
So
hopefully
that
is
helpful
and
it
is
helpful
dude.
L
So
the
difference
between
in
person
or
talking
to
a
person
versus
a
paper
survey
which
has
been
found
to
be
more
accurate
in
terms
of
accuracy,
and
it's
why
we
have
stuck
with
the
mail-based
approach
for
as
many
years
as
we
have
and
then
you
know,
branching
into
online.
We
have
found
that
male
based
random
sample
and
that's
the
random.
The
randomization
is
also
important
of
your
residence.
L
It
tends
to
be
more
accurate
and
it's
hard
to
say
because
it's
again,
it's
not
really
a
matter
of
it's
one
is
more
positive
than
the
other.
So
as
long
as
you
are
taking
that
into
account
when
you
were
evaluating
those
ratings,
that's
that's
the
important
piece.
I
will
say
that
we
have
in
our
database.
B
L
When
they
switch
to
a
mail-based
survey,
their
ratings
go
down
in
almost
every
case.
So
it's
just
a
it's
a
known
effect.
As
far
as
accuracy
yeah,
we
we
feel
more
confident,
even
though
the
ratings
appear
to
be
lower.
We
do
feel
more
confident
in
the
the
honesty
of
the
respondent
when
they
are
giving
their
responses
when
they
feel
truly
Anonymous
and
they're
not
trying
to
produce
a
socially
desirable
result
from
their
interviewer.
L
Thank
you,
Mr
Sable,
anything,
something
to
add.
Thank
you
mayor,
council
members.
The
only
thing
I
was
going
to
add
was
sort
of
the
dates
of
the
surveys,
because
whether
these
two
were
done
so
the
pollco
survey
was
in
the
field
from
May
20th
to
about
June
30th.
So
about
a
seven
week
period,
the
Morris
Leatherman
survey
was
July
27
through
August
11th,
so
different
months,
compressed
time
frame.
L
I
think
the
other
thing
I'll
just
mention
is
that
the
the
phone
survey
is
able
to
sort
of
distinguish
where
households
are
so
the,
for
example,
Ward
4
had
22
respondents
in
the
morsel
in
the
phone
survey
and
16
of
the
pollco
survey.
So
it's
weighted
even
differently.
Based
on
geography,
so
there's
some
for
the
survey
research
junkies
out
there
there's
a
lot
of
raw
data
that
can
be
extrapolated.
B
But
I
think
those
are
some
of
the
things
and
I
think
the
other
one.
That
I'll
note
is
the
renter
mix
in
the
phone
survey
was
29
renters
and
then
the
mail-in
survey
was
16,
so
those
things
can
shape
the
responses,
but
so
date
mix
and
then
speed
I
think
are
the
three
sort
of
big
factors
that
may
have
played
a
role
in
some
of
the
different
numbers.
L
Question
for
you
about
the
national
Benchmark
I
know
we
had
one
slide
in
our
packet
around
the
comparison
communities,
but
I.
Think
you
also
mentioned
in
your
presentation
that
staff
made
some
specific
suggestions
or
or
selections.
Can
you
describe
a
little
bit
more?
What
your
National
Benchmark
includes?
L
L
Cases
some
of
the
surveys
in
our
database
are
actually
not
conducted
by
us,
but
it's
other
vendors
that
have
asked
similar
questions
on
their
surveys
and
for
which
we
have
data
that
we
can
pull
in.
That's
all
within
the
last
five
years.
There's
no
constraints
on
size
of
community
location
of
community.
That's
everyone.
So
the
national
comparisons
are
just
included
as
part
of
the
NCS
package.
B
Those
things
sometimes
also
our
clients,
what
we
call
hand
pick
from
a
list,
so
it'll
start
with
a
pretty
good
best
fit
list
of
communities
that
you
know.
These
are
geographically
close
to
you
and
they
are
relatively
similar
size
and
relatively
similar
income,
and
then
they'll
evaluate
the
list
and
say:
okay,
we
want
all
40
of
these
would
take
out
these
five
because
they're
two
different
from
us,
so
we
really
do
leave
it
up
to
our
our
clients
to
make
those
decisions.
L
Thank
you,
Mr
Mayor.
How
how
many
peer
groups
communities
make
up
that
num?
The
custom
number
versus
the
500
that
make
up
the
is
Kirby.
Can
you
help
me
with
that?
One?
Not
even
I,
don't
recall
I
have
or
you
do.
Okay,
there
are
19
in
the
list
of
customers,
which
is
fairly
fairly
small
curated
list.
We
tend.
B
N
M
G
N
L
Here
we
don't
currently
provide
that
just
because
the
difference
in
some
some
of
our
clients
survey
annually
some
survey
every
three
years,
some
survey
every
two
years-
that's
actually
most
common
it'll
be
two
years
before
the
same
survey,
so
it
wouldn't
necessarily
be
an
Apples
to
Apples
comparison,
and
then
there
would
be
far
fewer
to
be
able
to
to
compare
to,
because
we
have
far
fewer
Community
to
survey
and
and
again
in
any
given
12
months
than
we
do
in
a
five-year
period.
If.
L
G
The
news
related
to
particularly
around
safety,
or
it
could
be,
as
I
mentioned
earlier-
housing
shortages
or
affordability.
Those
do
seem
to
have
an
impact
on
resonant
perception
again
without
digging
deeper
and
specifically
asking
it's
difficult
for
us
to
make
the
further
jump
and
to
hypothesize
as
to
the
why.
N
Some
of
our
some
of
our
clients,
we've
seen
their
Trend
over
time,
remain
pretty
stable
and
then
some
we've
seen
some
declines.
Others
we've
seen
some
modest
increases
it
just
it.
It
does
really
vary
and
I
can't
I,
don't
think
I
can
generalize
more
than
that.
Unfortunately,
no,
that's
okay,
I
appreciate
the
opportunity.
L
I
was
taking
there
if
that
makes
sense.
I
appreciate
that.
Thank
you
that
does
make
sense.
I
would
just
I
would
highlight
too
that,
because
some
so
many
of
the
ratings
drops
we
saw
for
the
Bloomington
issue
were
pretty
minor.
It's
still,
you
still
stayed
within,
so
you
know
what
one
thing
that
we
didn't
do
for
the
slideshow
is
compare
how
many
were
above
the
Benchmark
last
year
versus
similar
this
year.
So
that
is
an
additional
thing
that
we
could
look
at
in
terms
of
you
know.
Where
was.
G
This
mix
different
last
year
than
it
is
this
year,
but
again
the
the
differences
were
slight
enough,
so
that
very
few
only
one
was
lower
than
both
sets
of
benchmarks.
Oh,
and
that
is
I,
actually
meant
to
speak
to
that
a
little
bit
more
I
know
that
we've
talking
a
lot
but
the
the
impact
on
economic
family
on
family
income,
which
is
the
one
item
that
is
lower
than
both
nationally
and
pure
benchmarks.
N
N
Councilmember
Lowman
your
comment
earlier
about
the
the
timing,
reminding
me
what
that
was.
If
you
recall,
we
came
out
of
a
survey
with
just
terrible
ratings
for
our
quality
of
Roads
and
if
you
remember
they
did
the
survey
in
April
right
after
a
tough
winter
yeah
and
it
was
and
I
think
there
are
others
who
remember
that
as
well
and
I.
N
Think
then
it
was
a
matter
of
kind
of
taking
that
in
context
and
looking
at
what
might
the
reasons
be
so
it's
interesting
I
mean
it's
thanks
for
reminding
me
of
that,
because
I
was
trying
to
think
of
what
that
was
because
I
remember
that
and
we
we
did.
We
did
a
phone
survey
after
that
and
it
ended
up
shifting
some.
P
P
If
you're
just
tuning
in,
we
did
make
an
adjustment
to
the
agenda
tonight
where
we
moved
item
5.5
the
update
on
Artistry
to
the
city
council.
We
moved
that
to
this
point
in
the
city
council
agenda,
so
we'll
put
that
right
ahead
of
our
consent:
business,
if
that's
okay,
with
councilmember
Coulter,
we're
fine
with
that,
so
I
will
call
Item
5.5
now,
which
is
an
Artistry
update
to
the
city
council.
Mr
Sable
is
going
to
lead
us
off,
but
I
know
we'll
be
hearing
from
Mr
Milan.
P
The
Artistry
board
chair,
I,
see
Mr
Gibbs
there
as
well
I
believe
the
acting
executive
director
I
haven't
seen
Kelly
Foster
Warder
here
yet,
but
she's
oh
she's
gonna
be
joining
us
virtually
as
well.
So
I'll
turn
this
over
to
Mr
Sable
to
kick
us
off,
Mr
Sable.
Thank
you
mayor
and
council
members,
I
also
one
of
Jamie
for
Boogie
pops
up
on
screen
as
if
On
Cue.
P
N
The
city
with
regard
to
Artistry
and
the
financial
challenges
that
they
have
at
that
meeting,
the
council
approved
a
150
000
grant
for
Artistry
and
as
a
condition
of
that
Grant,
they
were
asked
to
present
a
report
to
the
city
council
today
on
October
17th,
outlining
the
actions
they've
taken
to
date
and
then
some
business
plan
requests
for
the
coming
year.
Artistry
did
provide
an
update
and
communicated
that
to
the
city
manager
I'm
going
to
stop
there,
because
this
is
an
opportunity
for
discussion
and
maybe
ask
city
manager
verbugi.
P
J
B
L
Gibbs,
thank
you
very
much.
Mr
Mayor
and
up
here
at
the
podium
with
me,
is
Shelly
Peterson.
The
new
treasurer
of
our
of
our
Artistry
board,
Pat
Milan,
who
you
mentioned,
is
our
chair
he's
in
the
room,
as
is
our
vice
chair,
Mary,
pretnicks
and
several
other
board
members
Annette
Lee
is
here:
Cara
Nordstrom
is
here
and
we've
got
Kelly
I
see
her
now,
hey
Kelly,
so
you
met
Kelly
last
month.
L
Kelly
warger
is
our
new
interim
and
fantastic
executive
director
and
rounding
out
our
new
leadership
team
at
Artistry,
Ben
Bakken
in
the
bag,
maybe
wave
Ben
and
Allison
Richard,
and
so
this
is
a
new
leadership
team
in
Artistry.
All
of
them
knew
in
the
last
month.
So
the
duty
here
is
first
to
provide
an
update
and
and
suggest
a
couple
of
other
thoughts
moving
forward.
So
the
update
is
that,
thank
you
very
much.
L
We
received
the
150
000
grant
that
the
mayor
referenced
and
that's
allowed
us
to
make
payroll
and
pay
some
past
invoices
due
to
artists
and
to
set
up
payment
plans
for
select
past
due
vendors
since
last
month.
We've
also
adjusted
the
Staffing
at
Artistry.
So
we
now
have
11
full-time
equivalents
contrasted
with
15..
L
N
Hired
an
audit
firm
cbiz,
which
is
a
specialist
in
non-profit
corporations.
Some
of
you
may
be
familiar
with
cbiz.
We
have
started
the
fall
art
classes
on
schedule,
both
at
the
Center
for
the
Arts,
as
well
as
throughout
the
community.
We've
Advanced,
the
visual
arts
programming
that
was
anticipated
and
so
actually
last
Friday
started.
The
juried
art
exhibition
here
in
the
gallery
in
the
building
we've
ramped
up,
the
promotion
for
and
ticket
sales
for
the
holiday
show,
Bing
and
initial
results
are
encouraging
and
we
created
the
initial
outline
for
a
development
exercise
and
began
executing.
N
L
Simultaneously
we're
continuing
the
forensics.
We
really
feel
like
we've
got
a
pretty
good
handle
and
we're
so
appreciative
of
Allison
and
Ben
joining
along
with
Kelly
to
really
you
know,
get
under
the
tires
on
this
thing
beyond
that
board
level,
review
and
exercise
that
you
would
anticipate,
but
really
the
staff
level
and
and
deep.
We
appreciate
that.
We've
picked
up
a
lot
of
feedback
over
the
last
month
from
several
of
you
from
a
long
time.
Community.
C
L
We
have
a
revised
proposal
and
that
is
a
750
000
repayable
loan
rather
than
that
350
000
forgivable
loan
that
we
discussed
last
month.
That
was
essentially
a
taxpayer
infusion
into
Artistry
and
still
left
us
with
a
very
large
not
to
raise
quickly
from
other
sources
and,
frankly,
that
plan
didn't
stand
the
test
of
time
or
broader
input.
L
We
went
to
a
lot
of
the
traditional
donors
when
we
first
identified
this
crisis
a
few
months
ago
and
then
again
here
over
the
last
month
and
and
some
you
know,
you
don't
want
to
start
naming
names
but
I,
just
think
about
Debbie
and
Alan
Schneider
and
there's
just
so
many
that
have
been
there
in
the
past
and
they're
with
us
again.
Right
now,.
O
C
For
executing
a
plan
still
to
be
finalized,
but
to
assure
a
successful
and
sustainable
operation,
so
that's
the
thinking
on
the
amount
and
it
does
provide
us
seven
months
or
so
sort
of
building
on
what's
the
rationale,
seven
months
or
so,
of
operating
wow.
This
is
about
a
hundred
thousand
dollar
a
month
operation.
At
this
point,
when
you
look
at
what
our
ongoing
expenses
are,
plus
the
payment
plans,
we've
been
working
out
and
the
like.
So
this
would
allow
us
seven
months
to
really
create
that
organizational
stability.
C
C
It
enables
the
retention
that
we
think
it
enables
the
retention
of
a
development.
Professional
that's
been
missing
and
you
know
we
can't
stay
in
an
organization
like
this
at
this
level,
without
more
professional
expertise
and
that
can
sustain
it
enables
capacity
for
a
realistic
evaluation
process
of
our
programming
and
and
to
make
adjustments
during
this.
Even
this
upcoming
season
should
allow
us
to
plan
for
the
next
season,
which
is
already
beginning
and
the
summer
program,
and
this
should
give
us
that
Runway
we
need
for
Success.
B
Timing,
I've
got
to
tell
you
that
realistically,
we
need
a
significant
amount
of
this
money
this
month.
So
we're
we're
asking
that
you
really
consider
this
in
in
in
real
time
and
not
this
evening,
we're
not
asking
for
a
vote.
Mr
mayor
council
member
Lawman
heard
that
you
know
of
us,
but
we
really
would
love
to
have
the
discussion
tonight
that
paves
the
way
for
Action
this
month
by
the
council.
B
H
Just
a
little
bit
ago
about
the
reports
that
we
might
Envision.
So
this
is
the
report
that
was
requested
and
agreed
to
a
month
ago,
but
we
would
Envision
and
we've
got
a
sort
of
term
sheet
laid
out
that
would
Envision
another
report
next
month,
suggesting
November
14th.
That
would
be
an
update
on
the
management
plan
I've,
given
you
some
of
that
already,
as
we
stepped
in
into
you,
know,
fast
track
mode,
but
we
will
really
provide
an
updated
management
plan
and
and
audited
financial
statements.
Next.
B
I
D
D
Calling
that
and
it's
a
term
that's
been
used
here
previously
a
return
on
investment
report,
so
I
think
I
might
yield
unless
Shelley's
from
Bank.
She
that's
her
day
job
but
I
think
that
she's
been
working
full-time
for
Artistry
as
our
board
treasurer
for
the
last
six
weeks
and
I
I
can't
be
more
appreciative.
So
between
the
two
of
us,
we
think
we
either
can
answer
some
questions,
give
you
some
feedback
or
look
behind
us
and
find
someone
who
can
here
this
evening.
M
D
M
D
Is
working
but
it's
a
combination
of
people
in
the
seats
as
well
as
the
expense
associated
with
the
Productions,
so
Kelly
has
has
moved
in
and
and
others
previously
really
took
a
look
at
okay.
What's
a
manageable
payroll
and
the
expense
related
to
the
shows
and
Shelley
might
be
able
to
to
go
into
that
in
some
detail.
This
up
and
I
realize
now
that
my
technology
just
provided
the
whole
world
that
information,
so
fortunately
I
had
it
the
one
thing
that.
L
D
D
L
L
I
had
a
just
a
couple
of
questions
that
I
wanted
to
ask
and
before
I
say
anything
I
want
to
just
say
how
much
I
appreciate.
It
appears
that
you've
taken
comments
and
statements
that
have
been
made
here
at
this
body
very
seriously
and
come
back
with
a
plant,
although
very
quickly
and
very
difficult
to
turn
around
I
understand
the
almost
the
impossibility
of
doing
that.
So
I
want
to
want
to
just
thank
you
for
doing
that.
L
But,
as
we
you
know,
he
had
made
a
statement
during
their
presentation
with
regards
to
needing
to
have
this
money,
yet
this
month
help
me
understand
why
that
is
of
critical
importance.
It
makes
a
person
nervous
when,
when
I
hear
that,
so,
if
you
could
just
talk
a
little
bit
about
that
and
I've
got
a
couple,
other
questions
yeah
well
we're
nervous.
L
G
We
made
payment
plans
and
provided
initial
payments
towards
those
payment
plans
of
our
past
due
vendors,
and
then
we
had
a
performance
obligation
with
the
Wonderland
performance
to
pay
out
so
that
pretty
much
rested
that
Revenue
we
have
been
getting
additional
Revenue
in
we've
continued
to
accelerate
some
of
the
payments
for
on
our
payment
plans,
but
we
have
a
another
payroll
next
week
and
and
typically
payroll
is
in
the
range
of
thirty
eight
thousand
and
then
we've
identified.
You
know
what
our
other
operating
costs
are.
You
know
rent
Financial.
G
G
So
then,
when
I
hear
you
say
seven
months
from
now
that
if
you
got
the
payment
now
seven
months
from
now,
that
also
makes
me
a
little
bit
nervous
as
well.
You
know
help
walk
me
through,
because
I
have
nothing
in
front
of
me.
You
know
other
than
you
know
what
you
said,
but
when
you
say
seven
months
they
go
okay.
Well,
we've
got
you
know,
October
November
December.
That
gets
me
there
and
then
I
got
four
more
months.
G
That
gets
me
to
April,
and
then
this
is
theoretically
through
the
end
of
the
next
quarter.
The
last
quarter
in
2023
helped
me
understand
how
you
bridge
that
gap
between
here
and
there
and
obviously
it's
a
you
know.
It's
a
loan.
So
just
help
me
understand
what
what
that
means
right.
So
so
big
picture
on
that
Mr,
Mayor
and
councilman
you,
you
really
do
you
do
get
the
point.
So
we
by
not
having
a
show
right
now
we
don't
have
the
revenue
coming
in
from
that
show.
G
H
Puts
a
crunch
on
the
on
the
cash
flow,
if
you
will
of
of
this
season
right
now,
which
is
a
reason
why
time
is
of
the
essence
on
getting
enough
cover
the
next
few
payrolls,
that's
the
the
biggest
picture.
Why
should
you
feel
comfortable
downline
that
you
know
we
raise
the
million
through
these
various
sources
that
will
be
in
decent
shape?
H
Well,
first
of
all,
we
will
have
Revenue
coming
in
as
we
could
in
deeper,
but
the
whole
point
of
of
this
reset-
and
this
pause
now-
is
to
build
out
a
meaningful
development
plan
that
can
get
our
our
percentages.
Our
post
covet
percentages
better
relative
to
contributed,
as
opposed
to
earned
income
than
they
were
pre-covered
and
get
us
in
any
event
into
a
post-covet
world
where
we're
at
least
where
we
were
two
three
years
ago
in
terms
of
the
earned
Revenue
side
of
it.
H
So
we
need
to
change,
we
think
the
percentage
of
contributed
versus
earned,
and
we
think
we
can
do
that
with
with
this
plan.
We're
building
and
we've
got
all
the
indicators
that
yeah
the
values
here,
but
we
also
need
to
have
that
amount
of
time
to
get
the
earned
Revenue
back
to
the
level
it
had
been.
H
Thank
you,
it'd
be
okay,
if
I
I'm
sorry,
would
it
be
okay,
if
I,
if
I
answered
that
a
bit
please
hello,
Mr,
Mayor
and
council
members
I'm
so
grateful
to
be
here,
I'm,
sorry
to
not
be
there
in
person.
I
just
want
to
add
simply
that
by
giving
us
a
general
operating
ramp,
it
allows
us
to
stabilize
the
organization
we
can
get
out
of
survival
mode
and
into
planning
mode,
as
Mr
Gibbs
has
said,
but
just
an
understanding
last
season
ticket
sales
were
down
because
we
were
still
coming
out
of
a
pandemic.
H
H
We
don't
close
Artistry
down,
but
we
cancel
the
season
and
Kelly
was
already
on
board
and
she
gave
me
about
seven
really
good
reasons
why
that
was.
Actually
she
wasn't
even
that
polite
I
think
she
said,
that's
just
really
a
bad
idea
and
then
she
gave
about
seven
reasons
and
I
and
I
yielded,
but
but
as
I've
thought
about
it
more
because
it
has
some
appeal
to
to
us
that
have
to
go
through
some
of
this.
H
The
essence
of
our
success
is
having
credibility
with
the
con.
You
know
the
contributors,
the
contributed
community
and
in
the
environment,
we're
in
the
the
thinking
is
going
to
corporations
the
Arts
philanthropical
organizations
or
even
the
government
Arts
grantors,
when
you
have
paused
and
and
probably
for
two
years,
I
think
your
number
isn't
isn't
a
bad
one.
H
They
look
at
everybody
else,
that's
out
there
who
is
actually
in
operation
and
has
something
to
produce
in
in
the
foreseeable.
It
basically
seems
like
an
on
sellable
pitch
and
so
I
think
more
than
anything,
it's
that
now.
The
other
argument
that
Kelly
is
a
you
know.
You've
got
a
lot
of
very
valuable
employees
who
are
contributing
a
great
deal,
aren't
responsible
for
the
mess
we're
in
and
when
they
go
elsewhere.
There's
no
reason
to
think
they
come
back
so
I
got
to
thinking
about
that
and
I.
H
H
It
was
of
for
like
14
months
or
something
the
other
one
was
out
for
a
couple
of
months,
but
it
was
in
a
different
environment
and
it
and
we
didn't
furlough
employees
well
the
consequence
of
the
one
where
the
workforce
was
gone
and
when
they
came
back
it
was
a
very
different
Workforce
and
it
was
some
more
expenses
and
that
that
has
stuck
with
me
that
that
Kelly
was
speaking
a
lot
of
wisdom
there
in
terms
of
just
that
very
practical.
How
are
you
going
to
get
it
done
in
the
two
years?
H
But
for
me
it's
the
the
not
really
having
a
product.
If
you
will
to
pitch
to
The
contribution
side
of
it
and
do
we
lose
our?
Do
we
lose
our
long
time,
Patron
based
probably
some
they
get
other
habits,
some
would
say:
yeah
well,
kova
gave
them
other
habits
anyway.
So
don't
you
know,
don't
overplay
that
argument
and
I
I'm
sort
of
convinced
by
that,
but
but
that's
in
the
mix
so
long-winded
answer,
but
I
love
that
question,
because
I
was
convinced
I
had
the
solution,
we're
going
to
pause
and
I.
H
So,
if
you
could
Mr
Gibbs
explain
to
me
the
the
shift
from
the
350
000
forgivable
loan
to
the
750
000
repayable
loan
yeah.
Well,
the
person
to
my
left
is
a
big
part
of
it
because
she
was
never
too
enthused
about
the
350
plus
150,
which
gets
us
a
half
a
million
when
she's
set
all
along.
We
need
a
million
and
Pat
and
I
said
yeah,
but
we
can
raise
the
other
million
and
we
still
thought
we're.
Gonna
have
a
show
right
now.
God
spell,
and
this
would
be
some
you
know
money
coming
in.
B
Formulation
was
put
too
much
pressure.
It
was
unrealistic
to
think
we
were
going
to
get
the
other
half
so
so
we'll
cop
to
that.
Secondly,
just
some
of
the
feedback
we've
received,
you
know,
there's
there's
a
difference
between
a
legitimate
loan
that
you're
legitimately
going
to
pay
back
with
a
very
high
probability
of
success.
B
So
basically,
what
we're
asking
for
is
to
borrow
capacity
from
the
council
priorities
fund,
recognizing
that
capacity
will
be
restored
over
time
and
in
future
years,
but
basically
taking
some
capacity
out
of
service,
but
not
taking
taxpayer
dollars
as
opposed
to
the
350
000
forgivable
loan
really
was
a
put
you
in
a
different
policy
position
and
I
think
had
a
different
reaction
in
the
community,
which
is
taxpayers
paying
for
Arts,
which
might
be
great,
but
maybe
they're,
not
taxpayer
priority.
So
it's
really
those
two
things:
Mr
Mayor
I
appreciate
that.
Thank
you.
B
So
I'm
glad
you,
you
talked
about
the
high
probability
of
success
here
and
I've
got
a
couple
of
different
pieces
of
language
here
that
the
term
sheet
talks
about
repayment,
beginning
on
June,
30th
2024
at
75,
000
a
year
and
I
think
that's
the
city's
language
and
then
there's
the
loan
agreement
draft,
which
is
on
December
31st
2025.
It's
250
000
on
that
day
and
then
a
hundred
thousand
dollars
a
year
for
five
years
and
I
think
that's
Artistry
language.
Is
that
correct?
C
B
How
many
times
has
Artistry
ended
with
a
fiscal
year
with
75
000
in
the
bank
to
be
able
to
pay
off
something
like
this
well
in.
In
the
event,
there
was
a
75
000
obligation
for
them
most
of
the
years,
because
it
would
be
embedded
into
the
the
budgets
for
for
the
year
as
as
a
an
obligation
of
artistry.
C
L
Would
be
appropriate
to
stick
with
Artistry
fiscal
years,
probably
for
the
purpose
of
forcing
us
to
budget
that
obligation
into
our
you
know,
revenue
and
expense
projections,
but
we
we're
not
envisioning
ending
a
fiscal
year
with
audited
Financial
reports
that
don't
that
don't
balance
out
I
mean
that
makes
sense.
I
appreciate
that
and
just
from
a
you
know,
just
from
a
practical
standpoint.
I've
heard
this
from
a
couple
of
folks
I
mean
this
is
basically
a
a
10-year
interest-free
loan.
D
Lender,
have
you
approached
banks
at
the
possibility
of
of
getting
a
loan
like
this,
and
if
the
city
of
Bloomington
is
the
lender
here,
do
we
have
any
do
we
have
any
collateral
of
any
kind?
Basically
to
back
this
up,
Mr
Mayor,
thank
you
and,
and
the
manager
raised
some
of
that
inquiry
over
the
last
several
days
and
we
are
prepared
to
pledge
the
collateral
you
know
in
the
event
Artistry
goes
under.
B
P
B
P
B
I
I
C
Right
we
have,
we
have
from
Collide,
we
have
something
I'm
talking
with
the
folks,
but
we're
not
I,
don't
believe
we're
behind,
but
I
believe
we're
up
to
date,
but
I
will
see
if
I
can
confirm
that,
while
we're
chatting
the
second
question
in
our
listening
session,
we
had
heard
from
one
of
the
Arts
organizations
other
Arts
organizations,
that,
since
you
do
the
box
office,
that
they
maybe
had
money
that
had
been
paid
for
their
event,
that
they
had
not
had
access
to.
What
is
the
status
of
that?
B
Is
still
well,
there
seem
to
be
no,
not
this,
that
we're
aware
of
this
outstanding
right,
but
I
there
seemed
to
be.
There
seemed
to
be
a
report
of
quite
a
delay
between
one
of
the
groups
like
February,
I,
think
performances
and
the
payment
over
like
like
three
months
and
which,
frankly,
given
what
we've
uncovered.
Nothing
would
surprise.
F
Me
in
terms
of
those
kinds
of
delays,
but
we're
surely
prepared
to
Escrow
those
monies
and
and
make
this
virtually
automatic,
Mr
mayor
council
members.
We
did
reach
out
to
all
of
our
our
resident
Arts
Partners
to
let
them
know
that
we
do
have
have
secured
them
their
money
that
has
come
in
it's
for
their
ticket
sales.
F
Just
to
make
sure
the
other
Arts
organizations
are
in
a
good
spot,
but
it
sounds
like
they
likely
are
so
from
what
I
heard
get
art
classes
going
on
now,
you've
got
exhibits
going
on
and
you
have
being
coming
up
so
Revenue
generating
activities.
Are
those
activities
any
and
or
all
of
them
positive
Revenue,
generating
activities,
or
do
they
run
at
some
level
of
deficit
needing
to
be
offset
by
other
sources
of
revenue,
or
are
they
Revenue
positive
on
their
own?
F
Well,
we
sure
hope.
Bing
is
positive
on
itself
and
we
do
have
gifts
in
the
galleries
coming
up,
which
is
a
positive
item.
The
I
think
the
classes
it
would
depend,
and
maybe
Kelly
could
jump
in
here.
It's
going
to
depend
on
the
class.
Some
of
them
I
mean.
Ideally
you
know
some
of
it's
how
you
account
for
it
all
I
suppose,
but
in
the
moment
the
idea
would
be
that
they
would
break
even,
but
there
are
overheads
that
you
know.
F
Artistry
provides
subsidies
to
those
classes
right
for
each
for
each
activity
that
we've
chosen
to
move
forward
with
we've
analyzed
the
financial
implications
of
each
of
those.
Before
we
said
yes,
so
our
our
classes
are
able
to
cover
the
cost
of
their
classes
themselves,
so
there's
not
cost
there.
Games
gifts
in
the
gallery
raises
money.
The
Minnesota
state,
Arts
board
funds,
help
support
the
gallery
money
there
and
we
have
that
money.
F
Thank
you
and
then
this
is
probably
a
question
more
for
the
city
manager
in
terms
of
and
I,
don't
city
manager,
it's
for,
but
one
of
them
in
terms
of
the
revenue
to
the
city,
because
I
know
we
own
the
art
center.
It's
a
it's
a
city
asset
and
we
have
other
organizations
that
have
expressed
concerns
about
when
they
can
get
dates,
and
things
like
that.
So
if
we
have
Artistry
with
their
performance,
what
is
the
financial
model
for
the
city
like
you
know?
F
B
B
But
I
don't
I,
don't
think.
Currently
there
are
other
things
that
are
being
what
was
the
word
used:
councilmember
Nelson
other
things
that
are
being
squeezed
out
currently
and
there's.
There's
consistently
been
frustration
by
all
of
the
Arts
organizations
about
the
limited
amount
of
capacity
within
the
Arts
Center,
which
is
a
you
know,
a
driving
reason
behind
the
discussion
to
expand
our
Arts
Center
and
we'll
have
that
discussion
later
so
I'd
say:
there's
been
an
ongoing
tension
for
many
years
about
availability
and
capacity
of
stage.
H
P
B
P
We'd
lose
that
revenue
for
that
time
period
as
a
city
on
the
other
side
of
it
and
just
trying
to
get
a
whole
sense
of
of
that
impact
as
well
Mr,
faroogie
or
Mr
Sable.
Whoever
wants
this
one
Mr
mayor
council
members,
councilmember
Nelson.
We
did
look
at
that
number
last
month.
I
don't
have
that
number
at
the
tips.
B
D
Nelson
rough
math,
27
000
for
the
last
three
shows
for
Memphis
Shrek
and
Collide
Wonderland
27,
000.,
okay,
thank
you
and
and
I
think
I
would
add,
also
because
I
know
that
there
would
be
an
added
cost
to
taking
over
the
box
office
work
as
well.
That
is
currently
being
handled
by
artistry
yeah
Mr
Mayor.
If
I
might
embellish
more
on
that
I
believe
the
someone
in
the
staff
did
do
an
analysis
of
if
Artistry
shut
down
or
disappeared.
D
D
It
may
be
higher
I
understand,
but
trying
to
conservatively
it
could
well
cost
the
city
300
000,
plus
each
year
of
artistry,
disappeared
and
so
over
the
course
of
the
repayment
of
this
loan.
You
know
you're
somewhere
between
three
and
four
million
dollars
and
and
and
the
loan
of
course
is
going
to
take
some
capacity
out,
but
750
000
capacity
and
build
it
up
over
time.
So
in
that,
in
that
cost
benefit
analysis,
if
the
300
plus
is,
is
accurate
in
others.
N
A
bargain,
and-
and
why
is
it
a
bargain?
Why
does
all
this
work?
Well,
the
truth
of
it
is
by
this
proposal
we're
finding
other
people's
money
to
spend
for
the
things
that
the
city
otherwise
would
be
spending
taxpayer
money
for
and
who
are
those
other
people?
Well,
they're
corporate
donors,
their
non-profit
institutional
investors,
if
you
will
or
philanthropists
they're
individual
donors
and
they're
the
patrons
who
are
paying
the
ticket
prices.
N
And
then
last
question
mayor,
if
I
might
be
as
part
of
the
planning
process
you're
going
through,
are
you
going
to
be
looking
at
each
of
the
lines
of
businesses
and
is
the
city
going
to
be
involved
in
that
conversation
in
terms
of?
Is
it
more
efficient
to
have
the
city?
Do
the
box
office
or
a
different
company?
Do
the
box
office
versus
Artistry?
N
Looking
at
what
other
opportunities,
what
other
Partnerships
there
may
be
with
other
Arts
organizations,
things
of
that
nature
is
in
in
what
is
the
role
of
the
city?
In
that
conversation,
yeah
I
mean
Mr
Mayor.
That
is
really
the
reason
we
didn't
want
to
rush
to.
You
know
get
a
business
plan
out
there.
N
N
Oh
we're
in
a
hard
situation,
Mr
Mayor.
We
certainly
have
commenced
the
the
exercise
of
figuring
out.
Are
there
other
Arts
philanthropic
institutions
out
there
that
are
in
the
business
of
you,
know
strategic
loans
and
the
like
and
and
we've
commenced
that
process,
but
there
are
a
whole
lot
of
competitors
for
that,
and,
and
so
the
city
looks
so
much
better
than
the
others,
because
the
city
is
is
the
one
that
is
actually
a
stakeholder
in
these
outcomes,
as
opposed
to
some
of
these.
N
You
know
large,
very
generous
and
and
attractive
institutions
that
lend
money
to
Arts
organizations
in
situations
like
this,
so
you
know
we
haven't
just
been
putting
all
the
eggs
in
that
basket,
but
this,
but
the
more
we
look
at
that
basket
of
eggs.
The
better
this
basket
looks
we
shared
a
fair
amount
about
the
financials.
F
Parade
isn't
isn't
pretty.
I
do
think
that
this
conversation
has
been
super
helpful.
A
lot
of
good
I
feel
like
I,
have
a
lot
better
of
understanding
of
everything
that
you
guys
have
been
doing
to
try
to
address
the
situation.
I
do
think
it
would
be
helpful
as
a
council
to
have
a
conversation
around
the
risks
and
the
benefits
of
the
options
in
front
of
us.
F
What
are
the
risks
and
benefits
of
us
moving
forward
or
not
moving
forward
in
the
support
for
Artistry
and
I
know,
you
have
a
pretty
tight
timeline,
but
I
just
feel
like
we
have
to
have
that
transparency
for
people
who
I
mean
we're
getting
a
lot
of
emails,
and
a
lot
of
questions
from
residents
who
you
know
are
are
questioning
whether
or
not
we
should
do
this
and
I
just
feel.
For
me
personally,
I
mean
I'm.
F
M
B
B
B
Council
member
I
I
would
agree
with
that
I
think
the
and
I
I,
like
the
idea
of
a
presentation
and
a
discussion
from
a
public
hearing
standpoint,
given
their
timeline
I
think
we
would
need
a
decision
by
next
week
and
I.
Don't
think
we
have
time
to
publish
and
and
open
up
for
a
public
hearing
so
but
at
the
same
time,
I
think
and
as
I
look
to
the
city
managers
here
and
say
that
it
I
think
this
would
be
a
good,
a
good
agenda
item
to
have
a
council
discussion.
B
Councilmember
Coulter,
thank
you
mayor,
just
I
think
it
would
help
for
myself
understanding
and
I'm
sure
others
as
well.
I
guess
my
maybe
I
misunderstood
what
the
action
is
that's
being
requested
here
tonight
is,
but
I
mean
we.
We
are
receiving
this
update
and
authorizing
directing
City
staff
to
negotiate
the
term
sheet.
Would
that
I
mean
that
term
sheet
and
that
loan
that
would
have
to
come
back
to
the
council?
B
Would
it
not
so
we
I
mean
this
would
not
be
the
final
action
on
the
loan
even
I
mean,
even
if
we
were
to
vote
positively
on
the
motion
before
no
I.
Think
I
think
our
task
tonight
is
to
provide
Direction
and
I
think
as
we
kind
of
scaffold
this
direction,
it
might
be
to
continue
work
on
this
term
sheet.
N
Going
forward
with
okay,
okay,
that's
helpful
and
I
I
have
a
few
comments
to
share,
but
I
don't
want
to
jump
on
anyone,
who's
who
may
still
have
questions
or
or
so
council
member
Martin
with
a
question.
Okay,
just
real
briefly!
If,
in
that
presentation
it
comes
back,
there
could
be
some
explanation
around
I
I,
just
think.
If
I'm
quite
familiar
with
the
aim,
Center
in
Burnsville,
that's
managed
by
venue,
works
and
chain
has
some
dinner
through
they've
got
a
lot
of
them,
so
if
there
would
be
a
way
to
program
the
space
potentially.
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
H
D
H
I'm
just
and
I'm
asking
for
something
that
doesn't
have
a
structure
around
it,
but
it's
difficult
to
to
make
that
assessment,
because
we
don't
have
the
plan
with
the
Top
Line.
You
know
what
are
we
going
to
bring
in
contributed
Revenue
versus
earned
Revenue.
We
have
a
good
idea
about
the
earned
Revenue,
but
it
all
depends
on
the
contributed
Revenue.
That's
that's
the
driver
of
everything
and
and
the
driver
of
our
budget
and
how
we
manage
expenses.
B
H
At
some
point
you
know
in
those
10
years
there
is
no
risk
that
Artistry
can't
make
that
first
75
000
payment
in
the
middle
of
2024
so
long
as
Artistry
has
a
budget
and
business
plan
that
has
factored
in
that
75
000
payment,
and
given
that,
by
the
end
of
that
seven
months,
this
roughly
whether
it's
six
hundred
thousand
or
seven
hundred
thousand
dollar
earned
Revenue
stream
is
coming
in.
There's
very
little
doubt
about
that
piece,
because
if
we
take
the
low
number,
we
know
that
we're
at
585,
000
or
whatever.
H
B
Payment
comes
due
and
believe
me,
the
first
item
in
the
expense
budget
is
going
to
be
the
payment
of
this
particular
loan.
That
risk
isn't
there
is
there
a
risk
that
Artistry
disappears?
Well,
there's
more
risk.
If
we
don't
do
this
infusion
now
than
if
we
do,
I
would
say
that
council,
member,
as
best
I,
can
do
I.
Think
all
right.
So
let
me
just
wrap
up
here
quickly,
mayor,
so
just
a
statement
here,
nervous
that
the
it
wasn't
clear
in
what
was
given
to
us
today
about
the.
I
You
know
a
real
reasonable
one
in
terms
of
trying
to
get
to
an
endowment,
because
those
are
the
two
things
that
I'm
really
looking
for
again:
tough
to
turn
it
around
I
do
think
this
was
good
what
you
brought
forward,
but
then,
finally,
my
question
is-
and
this
is
what
I
I
struggle
with
definitely
a
supporter
of
artistry.
My
wife
is
a
big
time
supporter
of
artistry.
I
The
question
that
I
have
for
you
is:
what
is
my
response
to
other
art
organizations
that
have
not
gotten
this
opportunity?
I
guess
this
would
be
the
third
bite
at
the
Apple.
Depending
on
how
folks
look
at
history,
how
do
I
respond
to
those
other
art
organizations
that
see
this
this
Regional?
You
know
historic
organization
come
before
the
city,
you
know
kind
of
for
the
third
time.
How
do
we
respond
to
them
in
terms
of
why
it
makes
sense
to
get
this
loan?
I
So
if
you
could
answer
that,
for
me,
I'd
be
appreciative,
that's
it
all.
I
have
well
Mr
Mayor,
absolutely
there's
for
this
all
to
be
working
correctly,
there's
got
to
be
a
symbiotic
relationship
between
all
of
the
half
dozen
Arts
organizations
that
are
housed
here
or
call
this
a
significant
piece
of
their
home.
I
N
B
Services
that
benefit
the
city
in
the
beautiful
Art
Center
that
the
City
built,
but
most
of
the
art
services
that
happen
in
the
art
center
are
presented
by
Artistry.
So
it
is
a
different
relationship
than
perhaps
a
theater.
That's
housed
in
a
different
way.
We
are
providing
Arts
Services
in
partnership
with
the
city,
and
that
makes
us
unique.
It
makes
us
a
national
model
and
what.
B
Big
10-year
we're
going
to
blow
this
baby
up
plan,
but
we
cannot
get
there
unless
we
can,
unless
we
can
ramp
up
in
this
moment,
but
I
truly
believe
that
the
unique
business
model
of
artistry
and
the
city
and
the
Arts
organizations
is
something
that
we
can
be
proud
of
as
a
as
a
city
and
a
region
that
we
want
to
build
upon,
we
don't
want
to
bring
back
Artistry
as
it
was.
We
want
the
opportunity,
as
has
been,
has
been
stated.
B
D
B
And
working
in
the
state
of
Minnesota,
so
supporting
Artistry
is
a
bigger
support
that
that
ripples
out
to
our
entire
Arts
community,
and
we
want
to
demonstrate
that
and
we
want
you
to
go
around
touting
the
relationship,
I,
think
of
the
Minnesota
Zoo
and
their
relationship
with
the
state
and
how
unique
and
special
that
is
what
does
that
look
like
for
us
as
we
as
we
move
forward.
We
want
the
chance
to
do
that
with
the
city
as
our
as
our
partners.
E
If
we
get
the
chance
councilmember
excuse
me,
council,
member
Coulter.
Thank
you,
mayor
I,
as
I
said,
I
I
have
some
some
thoughts
and
I
really
just
wanted
to
again
kind
of
sit
back
and
and
let
this
discussion
go
the
way
it
was
going
to
go
because,
obviously,
as
you
all
know,
I'm
I
am
on
the
Artistry
board,
as
our
our
ex-official
Council.
E
Appointing
so
I
did
just
want
to
share
a
few
thoughts
about
why
I
think
it
is
important
for
us
to
continue
this
discussion
and
and
ultimately
move
forward
and
I.
Think
that's
the
case
not
only
for
Artistry
but
I
think,
as
has
been
demonstrated
here
tonight
for
the
city
of
Bloomington
as
well
and
I'm,
going
to
start
off
by
acknowledging
that
that
may
be
a
somewhat
unpopular
opinion.
E
Looking
at
my
colleagues
on
the
board
here
tonight,
even
beyond
the
the
financial
programming
side,
clearly
there
is
a
lot
of
work
to
do
there
is
there
are
relationships
that
need
to
be
built
and
and
strengthened
with
the
Arts
organizations
here
and
and
I've
heard,
multiple
people
tell
me
there
is
long,
even
the
city
manager
tonight
there
is
long-standing
intention.
I,
don't
want
that
tension
to
be
standing
anymore,
that
work.
That
needs
to
be
done
and,
quite
frankly,
it's
work
that
Artistry
needs
to
do.
E
I
recognize
that
art
for
its
own
sake
was
not
why
any
of
us
up
here
were
elected
the
city
council,
but
I
think
it
is
worth
remembering
what
Artistry
has
contributed
to
our
our
community
to
the
people
who
live
and
work
right
here
in
Bloomington,
and
we
talked
about
it
earlier.
There
is
a
cost
for
doing
nothing
and
I
I
think
you
know.
E
In
their
investors,
pockets
and
I
recognize
that
this
is
a
difficult
ask
and
part
of
the
reason
for
that
is
that
the
impact,
the
real
impact
that
Artistry
has
goes
beyond
this
building.
It
goes
even
Beyond.
This
city
I
wish
you
all
could
have
been
at
that
fundraiser
that
they
had
the
other
night
it.
It
really
was
a
remarkable
night.
I
know
mayor
Bussey
was
there
and
former
mayor
Neil
Peterson
was
there
as
well
and
I.
E
Think,
first
of
all,
the
fact
that
they
raised
forty
thousand
dollars
basically
in
one
night,
shows
what
Artistry
means
to
the
folks
out
there.
But
had
you
been
there,
you
would
have
heard
story
after
Story,
unprompted
I
might
add.
This
was
not
part
of
the
program
and
actually
made
it
run
a
bit
longer
a
bit
longer
from
successful
artists
in
this
area
who
got
their
start
at
Artistry,
including
Tyler,
Michael's
King.
And
if
that
name
sounds
familiar
to
you,
you
may
have
seen
a
TPT
special
about
him.
E
A
few
years
ago,
you
may
have
seen
him
at
Chanhassen
at
the
Ordway
or
as
I
did
at
the
Guthrie
in
their
production
of
My
Fair
Lady,
but
the
first
time
I
actually
saw
Tyler
on
stage
wasn't
at
the
Guthrie.
It
wasn't
even
at
artistry.
It
was
about
a
mile
or
two
that
way
at
Jefferson
High
School.
He
is
a
Bloomington
native
and
graduated
from
Jefferson.
Just
a
few
years
after
I
did
and
I
first
saw
him
as
Tony.
E
In
the
Bloomington
summer,
musical
production
of
West
Side
Story
Artistry
gave
Tyler
his
start
as
it
did
for
so
many
and
he's
turned
that
into
an
impressive
career
as
one
of
the
Twin
Cities
Premier,
performers
and
directors,
and
he's
paying
that
forward
by
planning
to
to
direct
an
upcoming
show
at
artistry,
and
that
stage
was
full
of
artists
with
similar
stories.
How
Artistry
gave
them
the
opportunity,
the
potential
that
they
had
and
I?
E
Think
that's
really
the
ask
before
us
is:
does
Artistry
have
a
future
or
not,
and
no
the
city
of
Bloomington
is
not
a
bank,
but
Artistry
is
not
just
another
non-profit
city
manager
and
council
member
aren't
appointed
to
just
anything.
We
don't
allocate
space
in
our
seat
of
government
to
just
anyone,
and
you
know
we
as
I
said.
We
all
agree
that
near
need
to
be
changes
made
and
those
changes
are
already
underway.
E
E
Purpose
of
this
fund
and
I
still
believe
that
that
is
the
case,
but
I
was
thinking
too
about
our
recently
adopted
strategic
plan
and
its
Mission
and
I'm,
quoting
here
to
cultivate
an
enduring
and
remarkable
Community
where
people
want
to
be
not
just
live,
not
just
work,
not
just
drive
through
on
their
way
to
Minneapolis,
be
and
I.
Think.
E
Given
that
statement,
it
is
absolutely
worth
it
to
give
an
Artistry
an
opportunity
to
have
a
future,
and
if
this
is
a
loan,
it
does
include
collateral
and,
as
has
been
discussed,
it's
not
forgivable,
so
it
you
know
it
will
be
repaid
as
Artistry
succeed
but
I
think
again.
We
need
to
be
clear
that
it
is
on
Artistry
to
earn
its
future
and
I
I.
B
F
To
make
that
budget
adjustment,
and
so
as
we
look
at
these
options
of
moving
forward,
I
I
hope
we
can
I
want
to
make
sure
we
make
it
in
such
a
way
understanding
that
we're
we're
at
least
moving
forward
with
enough
nodding
heads
that
this
is
a
worthwhile
discussion,
because
if
this
is
you
know
if
this
is
for
nodding,
Heads
This
is
not
a
worthwhile
discussion.
If
we're
talking
the
750
000,
because
it
it
needs
the
five
votes
to
pass.
F
That's
that's
one
thing
to
consider
the
other
thing
to
consider.
Thank
goodness,
the
lawyer
is
sitting
just
two
people
away
from
me,
because
in
fact
we
don't
need
10
days
notice
to
do
a
public
hearing.
So
if
we
wanted
to
come
back
and
have
a
a
public
hearing,
a
more
broad
discussion
on
this,
a
fuller
discussion,
I
could
simply
announce
it
tonight
that
one
week
from
tonight
we'll
be
having
a
public
hearing
on
this,
and
we
could
do
it
that
way,
and
so
a
public
comment,
that's
what
it
would
be.
F
E
That
we
want
an
analysis
of
the
options,
the
three
options
with
the
risks
and
benefits
so
like
what
would
it
look
like
if
we
didn't
do
anything
risks
and
benefits?
What
would
it
look
like
at
350
and
what
would
it
look
like
at
7.50,
and
that
was
going
to
be
my
final
Point
here?
Okay,
is
that
that
would
be
four
days
that
we'd
have
to
have
the
staff
turn
this
around
in
four
days
in
order
to
get
into
a
a
packet,
and
that
is
a
that's
a
quick
turnaround
and
so
I
I
agree.
E
F
B
I
wonder
if
it
makes
some
sense
to
bring
this
back
at
a
later
time
frame
to
get
the
specificity
I.
Certainly
don't
want
to
look
at
any
other
plan
that
was
350
but
I.
Think
the
seven
is
what
they're
looking
for
I
wonder
if
it
makes
some
sense
to
bring
this
back
either
on
the
31st
I'm,
not
sure
if
you
have
a
meeting
but
or
or
or
later
on,
I'm
just
curious
about
that,
because
that
would
give
us
an
opportunity
to
have
a
more
sober
look
at
a
you
know.
B
I
mean
this
is
I
mean
this
is
a
large
amount
of
money
and
and
I
think
we
we
need
to
if
we're
going
to
have
a
public
input.
It
gives
folks
the
opportunity
to
be
here
and
have
that
conversation
mayor.
Is
that
possible
I'm,
pretty
sure,
council
member?
We
don't
have
a
meeting
the
last
Monday
of
this
month
and
the
first
Monday.
A
Q
Month
either
I
believe
it
would
be
November
8th
before
we
would
meet
again
Minnesota
mayor,
November
14th
would
be
our
first
meeting.
November
14th
would
be
our
next
meeting
in
November
and
I.
Think
that,
in
terms
of
their
timing
for
to
meet
payroll
and
to
make
to
make
this
work,
I
don't
think
that
works.
Councilmember
Martin.
Thank
you
mayor.
Just
from
my
perspective,
in
terms
of
I
appreciate
that
we
we
may
not
get
a
volume
back
on
kind
of
the
risk
benefit
analysis,
but
the
risks
seem
pretty
obvious.
To
me.
Q
Q
Thank
you,
mayor,
I
think
it
might
be
like
we
may
understand
that,
but
for
people
who
might
not
be
tracking
all
of
the
changing
dollar
amounts
and
Nuance
like
the
public,
it
may
not
be
totally
obvious
that
there's
going
to
be
additional
costs
to
the
city.
If
the
Artistry
ceases
to
exist
and
why,
why
would
there
be
exist
like
continuing
costs
for
us
I?
Don't
I,
actually,
don't
think
that
probably
the
majority
of
residents
watching
would
unders
like
would
no
would
have
that
level
of
information
around
the
partnership.
Q
Thank
you,
mayor
council,
members,
I
guess
the
the
question
I
have
in
terms
of
a
as
a
in
my
head
thinking
about
a
sort
of
a
risk
Matrix
solely
from
the
perspective
of
the
city
or
to
be
inclusive
of
our
partners
with
Artistry.
Is
it
sort
of
a
joint
shared
document
about
the
the
risks
of
each
choice
from
the
partnership
perspective
or
solely
from
the
as
the
owner
of
the
facility
and
and
landowner
of
the
facility?
Q
My
sense
is
start
internally
start
with
the
city
again
knowing
full
well.
This
is
a
heavy
lift
in
four
days,
so
I
would
start
with
that.
But
then
perhaps
whatever
analysis
we
can
glean
from
artistry's
standpoint.
I
guess
will
be
helpful
for
the
discussion,
so
councilmember
dalessandro.
Thank
you.
Mr
Mayor
I
thought
about
it
a
little
bit
more.
Q
Maybe
maybe
I
can
construct
my
thoughts
and,
and
it
might
be
a
way
to
kind
of
present
the
information
so
I
think.
If
I
can
infer
from
councilmember
Carter's
comment,
there
is
an
ongoing,
we'll
call.
It
deferred
cost
to
the
city
as
a
result
of
artistry
doing
what
it
does.
I,
don't
think
that
we've
been
very
blunt
about
what
that
number
is,
and
so
I
think.
Q
Q
What
is
that?
What
is
that
number?
If
we
could
start
with
that,
then
I
think
we
could
put
in
front
of
people
that
if
Artistry
was
not
the
provider
of
that
anymore,
someone
could
be
a
poor
profit
could
be.
The
city
could
be
another
entity
would
have
to
pick
up
that
tab,
assuming
we
kept
the
business
running
the
way
that
we
do
it
today.
Q
So
if
you
still
wanted
to
have
your
shows
in
the
theater,
and
you
wanted
to
have
that
programming
and
you
wanted
to
have
the
Arts
education
Etc,
so
I
think
we
need
to
present
that
information,
because,
personally
right
now,
the
struggle
that
I
have
is
I'm
I'm,
not
sure
why
the
city
of
Bloomington
is
the
one
being
asked
for
these
dollars.
I
gotta
be
honest,
like
and
I
think
that,
because
we're
not
a
bank
number
one
and
because
we
do
grants
to
our
art
organizations,
we
don't
do
loans,
we've
I,
don't
think.
Q
We've
ever
done
one
and
so
I
I'm
struggling
to
understand
how
we
got
into
this
position,
and
so,
if
somebody
could
articulate
for
us
the
position
that
we're
in
the
uniqueness
of
the
position
that
we're
in
to
use
the
terms
I
think
that
I've
heard
here
tonight,
then
it
would
help
a
lot
of
folks
make.
That
makes
more
sense
now.
Q
It
doesn't
necessarily
change
the
outcome,
but
at
least
people
would
have
a
much
bigger
Clarity,
because
without
that
right
now,
A
lot
of
people
are
just
asking
the
question
you
know
this
is
this:
is
the
equivalent
of
one
percent
of
our
tax
levy
that
our
tax
levy?
Everyone
percent-
is
about
700
Grand
right,
so
that's
that's
significant
in
a
in
a
in
a
city
that
right
now,
we've
all
agreed.
Hopefully.
Q
So
it
has
nothing
to
do
with
like
where
I'm
placing
my
interests
or
anything
like
that,
but
it
it
becomes
a
fiscal
responsibility,
question
and-
and
so
I
would
prefer,
if
somebody
could
lay
out
for
us
over
the
course
of
the
last
five
years
artistries
can
Artistry
has
on
behalf
of
the
city
in
exchange
for
whatever
it
is
right,
the
numbers
and
say:
okay,
that
goes
away.
What
do
we
have?
What
do
we,
as
a
city,
have
obligations
to
do
with
right?
Q
If,
if
it
giving
them
the
750
guarantees,
it
doesn't
go
away
and
to
I
think
the
the
term
was
a
bargain
over
in
four
years,
then,
let's,
let's
lay
the
numbers
out
that'd,
be
my
suggestion,
agreed
and
I.
Think
that
number
the
number
we've
been
talking
here
is
the
385
000
that
we'd
still
have
to
responsibility
for
for
a
box
office
type
operation
to
to
do
the
work
and
to
do
some
of
the
Arts,
the
the
gallery,
the
gallery
and
the
and
the
some
of
the
different
classes
and
so
on.
Q
But
yes,
I,
agree
I
mean
to
lay
that
out
in
yeah
in
very
Stark
detail,
I'm,
not
sure
people
know,
for
example,
Mr
Mayor
that
that
you
know
if,
if
the,
if
the
folks
that
are
doing
the
lighting
here
are
Artistry
people
and
the
folks
that
are
doing
set
are
Artistry
people
I,
don't
know
that
people
know
that,
and
so
I
think
it
would
be
helpful
to
lay
that
out.
Okay,
so
I
saw
Mr,
stable,
jotting
notes
very
feverishly
here
so
I
think
as
part
of
the
ongoing
discussion.
Q
If
we
bring
this
back
next
week
and
maybe
have
a
presentation
and
open
up
a
public
hearing
and
talk
more
about
this
public
comment.
Excuse
me
public
comment.
Opportunity
on
this
is:
is
everyone
comfortable
if
we
move?
If
we
give
the
direction
to
to
move
this
toward
the
750
000,
that
we've
been
talking
about,
at
least
that
we
continue
this
discussion
to
next
week.
Based
on
again
the
public
comment
and
some
of
the
information
that
folks
have
asked
for
am
I.
Q
Seeing
enough
nodding
heads
that
we
want
to
be
able
to
do
that,
council,
member
Coulter,
I
didn't
realize
my
mic
was
still
on
I,
guess,
mayor
my
my
question
was:
do
we
feel
that
that
direction
is
encompassed
with
the
motion?
That's
in
the
in
the
packet
and
if
so,
I
would
be
willing
to
make
that
motion?
If
not,
I
would
be
willing
to
make
an
alternatively
worded
emotion,
I,
don't
know
if
we
have
a
motion
this
evening
or
if
this
is
Direction
right
now,
I,
don't
think
I.
Don't
think
this
is
emotion.
Q
I,
don't
know
that
we
need
emotion,
so
Mr,
Mayor,
I
think
you're
right.
We
don't
need
a
motion
for
direct
for
direction.
I
think
it
would
be
good
to
have
a
statement
of
you
know
a
reiteration
of
what
the
understanding
is
that
council
members
can
shake
their
head
at
and
so
Mike
has
been
taking
notes
seriously.
B
D
D
I
I
think
trying
to
bring
the
presentation,
I
think
is
one
thing:
having
public
dialogue
is
another
thing,
but
having
both
those
two
things
go
off
very
well:
I
I,
just
don't
know
that
that's
a
wise
thing
to
do
in
four
days,
so
I
I
don't
agree
with
that
I.
Certainly,
if
folks
feel
that
way,
I
think
that
we've
certainly
got
what
we
we
have
here.
Q
In
into
this
thing,
so
I
I
would
be
I
would
be
surprised
if
we
next
week,
given
that
short
time
frame,
making
any
other
type
of
decision
other
than
what
what
our
issue
is
asking
for
so
I
just
I.
Just
don't
think
this
is
wise.
I
just
want
one
one
council
members
up
here,
thank
you
for
the
input
counts,
remember
councilmember,
Nelson
yeah!
Q
D
Q
And
stuff
like
that,
and
don't
take
this
to
infer
I'm
going
any
particular
direction.
I
just
want
that
that
data
point
for
for
myself
for
the
community
and
then
the
other
thing
I
think
that's
important.
I
got
some
advice
from
a
mentor
of
mine
who
knows
about
the
city
of
Bloomington
a
little
bit
and
you
know
I
understand
we're
looking
at
a
loan
here
and
I
think
it
makes
sense
why
you
did
that
because
that'd
be
paid
back.
So
it's
so
it's
not
a
grant.
It's
not
a
direct
infusion.
Q
It's
not
coming
out
of
the
levy.
It's
temporarily
going
out
and
coming
back
is
at
least
the
goal.
I
think
we
need
to
just
be
straightforward
with
the
community
about
what
it
costs
to
have
Arts
here,
Community
Sports,
Arts
Community
loves
Arts.
Let's
just
put
it
out
there.
What
does
it
cost
I
mean
we.
We
pay
a
lot
of
money
for
this
facility.
D
Regardless
of
what
we're
talking
about
with
Artistry
I
mean
we're
spending
a
lot
of
money
every
year,
it's
in
the
budget,
I
think
we've
talked
about
it,
but
I
don't
know
that
the
community
totally
understands
the
level
investment
that
the
city
has
in
that
and
I.
Think
part
of
the
question
related
to
that
is
that
when
the
facility
was
built,
it
was
built
for
the
community
and
now
for
for
many
reasons
and
and
decisions
that
were
made.
C
Q
B
Program
I
mean
versus
how
much
of
the
tab
are
we
picking
up
for
the
region?
How
much
are
we
asking
Bloomington
residents
to
pick
up
for
the
region,
and
you
know
that
may
be
nothing.
It
may
be
something
that's
part
of
where
we
look
at
the
financial
stuff
that
I'd
like
to
get
my
head
around,
because
I,
don't
frankly,
think
that's
totally
fair
to
the
city
of
Bloomington
to
its
residences,
businesses
that
pay
pay
the
taxes
here
so
I
would
also
to
councilmember
lowman's
proposal.
Q
You
know
I
do
believe
we
have
the
opportunity
to
call
a
special
meeting
and
I
would
be
open
to
looking
at
a
different
date
if
we
did
the
first
second,
something
like
that.
I
would
be
open
to
making
myself
available
for
that
opportunity
to
give
Artistry
to
give
staff
and
a
little
bit
of
additional
time.
Q
B
H
Us
have
to
say
yes
and
I
I'm,
not
sure
if
you
were
asking
for
a
temperature
reading
on
that
from
us
tonight,
but
I'm
so
imposing
the
question.
Are
you
asking
for
a
temperature
breathing
on
that
tonight
from
us?
Because
you
know
I
mean
I
know
that
the
original
150
000
number
was
a
five
to
two
vote.
But
you
know
that's
when
we
thought
we
were
going
to
get
a
350
000
ask
around
the
corner
and
that's
not
what's
in
front
of
us
today.
So
I.
A
B
And
all
this
stuff,
if,
at
the
end
of
the
day
you
don't
have
five
votes
here
and
nothing
that
you
would
hear
from
there
is
going
to
change
your
mind
now.
I'm
I'm
of
the
opinion
personally
that
maybe
but
I'm
not
sure
that
it's
over
50
Maybe
I'm,
not
sure,
like
that's.
Why
I
would
like
to
ask
you?
What
do
you
think
I'm
always
hesitant
to
take
a
practice
vote
a
pretend
vote,
I'm,
always
I'm,
always
very
hesitant
to
do
that.
So
is
the
the
attorney.
R
And
I
what
I'm
hearing
and
maybe
I'm
wrong,
but
what
I'm
hearing
is
there's
a
lot
of
folks
who
are
seriously
and
honestly
on
the
fence
on
this
and
I
know.
This
Council
in
many
instances
has
asked
for
that
little
bit
more
information
to
continue
the
discussion
just
to
think
about
it,
a
bit
more
to
get
a
bit
more
detail
a
bit
more
reference,
a
bit
more.
You
know
substance
there
before
they
make
a
decision
and
I
I.
O
O
personally
I
think
I'd
feel
better
with
one
more
night
of
discussion
on
this.
We
talked
about
this
a
long
time
tonight
and
I'd
like
to
wrap
it
up,
but
but
I
think
some
of
the
questions
that
I
keep
hearing
from
folks
and
some
of
the
not
quite
ease
with
one
one
way
or
the
other
I
think
it
might
benefit
for
another
couple
hour,
discussion
with
whatever
level
of
information
we're
able
to
Garner
and
I
understand
I
mean
we
could
put
this
off
forever.
We
could
talk
about
this
forever.
O
We
could
ask
keep
asking
for
more
information
and
I.
Don't
know
that
we're
ever
going
to
get
to
the
point
where
we
say
yep.
Now
we
have
enough
information.
Now,
we've
got
now
we're
really
100
comfortable,
but
I
think
to
get
us
a
little
bit
further
down
the
road
one
week
from
tonight
might
be
worthwhile
time.
O
Councilmember
Nelson
I
was
just
gonna,
say:
I
agree
with
you,
I
think
there
are
substantive
issues
to
this,
isn't
just
kicking
it
down.
The
can
I
think
we've
heard
you
know
a
serious
conversation
about
costs
and
things
like
that,
as
well
as
the
public
comment
period,
so
I
think
those
are
substantive
enough
that
this
is
not
just
delaying
at
another
meeting,
because
you
know
it's
an
uncomfortable
decision.
It's
a
tough
decision.
It's
going
to
be
a
tough
decision.
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
I
at
this
time
have
not
heard
of
any
specifically
requested
holds
and
I'm
not
seeing
oh
well
I
thought
about
holding
3.2
to
make
our
somebody
nervous
over
there,
but
I
won't
I
won't
hold
that
I.
Thank
you.
I
was
actually
going
to
to
make
a
note
of
that
that
we
item
3.2
was
to
appoint
our
City
Assessor
and
I'm
I'm
sure
our
new
City
Assessor
looks
forward
to
the
long
phone
calls,
explaining
the
assessment
process
and
and
property
taxes,
and
so
on.
O
So
with
that
I
will
hold
item
3.1
the
resolution
to
accept
donations,
as
we
always
do,
but
with
unless
anyone
else
has
any
holds.
I
will
move
items
3.2
through
3.20
second
motion
by
councilmember
Coulter,
second
by
council
member
Lohman,
to
accept
our
Council
consent
business
as
stated
no
further
Council
discussion
on
this.
All
those
in
favor,
please
signify
by
saying
aye
aye
opposed
motion,
carries
6-0
with
council
member
Carter
stepping
away
for
a
moment.
Council
member
Coulter
item
3.1.
Thank
you
mayor
as
I
I
mentioned.
O
This
is
the
resolution
to
accept
donations.
I
just
wanted
to
call
out
a
few
very
generous
donations
to
the
city.
Our
Parks
and
Rec
Department
received
a
donation
of
a
canoe
which
is
not
something
you
see
every
day,
but
a
tree
donation
that's
made
to
dwan
golf
course.
A
variety
of
donations
to
Creekside
one
thing
I
did
want
to
point
out.
It
looked
to
me.
O
O
O
Most
of
my
council
member
Colter,
second
by
council
member
Carter
to
accept
item
3.1
on
a
consent,
business
no
further,
Council
discussion
on
this.
All
those
in
favor,
please
signify
by
saying
aye
aye
opposed
motion,
carries
7-0
item.
Four
is
our
hearings,
resolutions
and
ordinances,
and
we
have
but
one
public
hearing
this
evening
item
4.1,
it's
a
public
hearing
regarding
an
ordinance
amending
chapter
five
at
the
city
code
related
to
parks
and
playgrounds,
Allison
Warren,
our
Recreation
manager,
is
with
us
this
evening.
Thank
you
for
your
patience.
Welcome
good
evening,
happy
to
be
here.
O
I
am
here
presenting
to
you
some
changes
to
our
cool
our
city
code
here
from
chapter
five
last
time
I
was
here
was
in
2020
and
we
made
a
couple
of
changes
there.
So
I'll
go
through
them
in
order
on
the
sheet
there.
The
first
one
is
in
reference
to
allowing
alcohol
in
some
of
our
Parks
last
time,
I
was
with
you.
We
allowed
regular
beer
and
at
that
time
we
did
not
include
wine
into
that
list,
and
so
we
are
requesting
to
make
that
addition
to
our
parks.
O
In
addition
to
that
item,
we
have
in
that
language
is
set
in
designated
picnic
areas,
but
within
our
definitions
we
did
not
Define
what
a
designated
picnic
area
is.
So
we
have
made
that
adjustment
to
allow
for
areas
as
given
permission
by
our
director
and
catry
back
here,
and
that's
it
for
that.
First
section.
There
pretty
basic
changes.
The
next
session
section
is
relation
to
the
hours
of
our
Parks.
O
So
adding
that
ordinance
allows
us
to
have
different
hours
for
different
facilities
that
we
require
for
those
types
of
facilities
and
the
final
one
is
removing
the
language
that
requires
a
permit
for
usage
of
a
drone
in
a
city
park.
Following
some
conversation
with
some
federal
agencies
and
our
fire
department,
we've
determined
that
and
the
league
of
Minnesota
cities
has
requested
that
the
federal
government
kind
of
overtake
that
and
not
have
our
local
municipalities
manage
that
situation
there.
O
If
there
are
other
things
that
come
up
in
the
future,
we
have
the
ability
to
add
other
ordinances,
but
not
adding
the
requirement
for
a
permit
from
the
city.
With
that,
I
will
take
any
questions
you
may
have.
Thank
you
very
much.
I
think
the
only
question
that
I
have
regarding
the
Drone
drones
would
still
be
a
subject
to
all
applicable
laws
and
regulations
such
as
flying
over
crowds
and
that
kind
of
thing
correct
yep,
so
they
still
follow.
Oh
sorry,
excuse
me
Mr,
mayor
council
members.
That
is
correct.
O
You
would
still
be
able
to
use
a
drone
as
long
as
you're
following
federal
regulations,
Council
any
additional
questions
here:
council,
member
Nelson
yeah,
just
a
quick
question
with
regards
to
the
the
beer
and
wine
there's
so
many
different
varieties
of
things.
Now
does
this
Encompass?
All
of
those
like
you
can
buy.
You
know
like
a
tank
rain
tonic
in
a
can
or
a
shelter.
You
know
things
like
that.
O
Does
this
prohibit
allow
I
mean
because
I
think
that's
a
little
bit
different
than
bringing
your
bottle
of
vodka
to
the
field
and
hanging
out
watching
your
kids
play
all
day.
It
is
my
understanding,
but
I
would
go
towards
our
my
City
attorney
here
that
it
would
include
anything
Malt
Liquor,
so
that
would
be
your
seltzers
or
wine.
In
a
can,
or
you
know,
your
regular
beer
is
management
shine.
Anything
to
add
correct.
That
is
accurate,
very
good.
It's
it's
good
that
you
all
know
your
malt
liquor
is
better
than
me
additional
question.
O
O
We
have
a
motion
by
councilmember
Lowman,
second,
by
councilmember
dallasandro
to
close
the
public
Hearing
in
item
4.1.
No
further
Council
discussion
on
this.
All
those
in
favor,
please
signify
by
saying
aye
opposed
motion,
carries
7-0
closing
the
public
hearing
Council.
Any
additional
questions
comments
concerns
on
this.
If
not
I'd,
look
for
action.
O
Motion
by
councilmember
Lowman,
second
by
council
member
dalessandro
to
amend
chapter
five
of
the
city
code
related
to
parks
and
playgrounds
through
ordinance.
No
further
Council
discussion
on
this.
All
those
in
favor,
please
signify
by
saying
aye
aye
opposed
motion,
carries
7-0
council
member
Lohman
summary
publication,
where
I
move
a
to
adopt
a
resolution
at
authorizing
summary
publication
of
the
ordinance
amending
Park
regulation
motion
by
councilmember
Lowman,
second
by
council
member
Coulter
for
summary
publication
on
M
4.1,
no
further
Council
discussion.
All
those
in
favor,
please
signify
by
saying
aye
aye
opposed
motion
carries
7-0.
O
Moving
on
item
five,
our
organizational
business
this
evening,
first
item
under
organizational
business
is
our
time
an
update
on
our
time
of
sale
program
and
we've
got
to
Bernadette
Gillespie
our
community
from
Community
Development
here
and
I.
Think
there's
Duke
Johnson
as
well
with
our
building
and
inspections
team
good
evening
and
welcome
good
evening
Barron
city
council.
So
back
in
February
we
presented
and
so
I'm
here
to
give
our
six
month
time
to
sell
program
update
starting
out
I
just
want
to
go
over
our
restating
our
goals.
O
H
O
And
expectations
of
evaluators,
as
well
as
to
discuss
expectations
of
the
city,
should
we
no?
There
you
go
so
we
had
two
virtual
meetings,
one
in
March,
one
in
June
with
Realtors
and
inspectors
and
then
private
evaluators.
In
may,
we
did
have
a
briefing
publication
that
talked
about
the
time
of
sale
program
as
we
went
into
the
busy
season
for
the
time
of
cell
inspection
program,
and
so
that
went
out
to
Residents
in
the
briefing
and
then
our
ongoing
efforts
to
provide
a
more
continuous
information
and
to
gain
feedback.
O
O
538
of
those
were
completed
by
independent,
evaluators
and
357
were
completed
by
City
inspectors
in
2022,
771,
total
time
of
sale
inspections.
Only
two
of
those
were
completed
by
independent,
evaluators
and
769
of
those
were
completed
by
City
inspectors,
so
that
additional
staff
gave
us
the
capacity
to
complete
those.
O
The
number
of
Hazards
found
on
Timeless
cell
initial
inspections,
so
in
2021
512
of
the
895,
were
found
with
hazards.
So
at
least
one
Hazard
found
or
57
percent,
and
of
those
57
percent
that
had
at
least
one
Hazard
found
the
city
inspectors
were
the
ones
who
found
the
90
percent
of
Hazards
and
private
inspectors
found.
10
percent
6
out
of
10
homes
inspected
were
found
to
have
at
least
one
hazardous
item
in
2021
in
2022,
674
of
the
771
were
found
with
hazards
or
87.4
percent.
Q
H
R
R
So,
in
addition
to
the
other
time
of
sale
changes,
the
energy
audit
went,
live
April,
1st
and
I
just
wanted
to
highlight
some
of
those
numbers,
so
736
evaluations
through
September,
with
our
highest
month
being
May
with
174,
and
some
of
the
facts
that
were
pulled
out
of
that
data.
Over
50
percent
of
Bloomington
homes
need
additional
attic
insulation
and
over
40
percent
of
Bloomington
homes
have
outdated
or
inefficient
heating
equipment.
R
O
So
yep,
thank
you
so
going
back
to
those
time
of
sales
surveys,
so
we
didn't
get
as
many
survey
responses
as
we
were
hoping.
We
are
hopeful
to
get
a
response
rate
up
by
working
with
our
permit
and
inspection
software
vendor
to
provide
an
additional
link
to
the
survey
to
be
sent
out
at
the
conclusion
of
each
inspection
So.
Currently,
it's
sent
out
when
they
pay
for
the
inspection
and
that
inspection
could
be
scheduled
in
two
weeks
by
the
time
that
inspection
rolls
around.
O
They
forgot
about
the
survey
so
we're
working
on
that
and
then
of
the
15
total
survey
responses.
13
rated
responses
were
either
very
good
or
excellent.
Regarding
their
experience
with
two
skipping
that
question
14
responses
were
given
on
recommending
the
time
of
sale
inspector
to
a
colleague
with
14
agreeing
or
strongly
agreeing,
and
one
skipping
that
question.
O
As
part
of
that
feedback,
I
just
wanted
to
share
examples
of
some
of
the
comments
that
we
did
receive.
These
are
additional
feedback
comments
outside
of
the
standard
survey
questions,
so
the
survey
taker
chose
to
add
additional
comments
regarding
service
that
they
experienced.
So
when
asked
for
additional
comments
on
the
survey,
they
stated
that
inspectors
were
exceptional
and
courteous
comfortable
presence,
knowledgeable,
communicating,
clearly
very
personable
and
answering
all
their
questions
and
when
asking
asked,
if
they
face
any
barriers
while
trying
to
schedule
the
inspection,
none,
the
entire
experience
was
smooth
and
straightforward.
O
O
And
with
that,
I
will
answer
any
questions
that
you
may
have
well.
Thank
you.
Thanks
for
the
update
to
the
six-month
update,
the
the
question,
or
the
suggestion
I
was
going
to
have
is
find,
try
to
find
a
way
to
increase
those
that
number
of
14.
I
mean
I.
Understand
that
a
first
time
kind
of
thing-
and
somebody
may
have
made
the
example
today,
you
know
if
you
have
a
good
experience
at
McDonald's.
You
don't
necessarily
rate
that.
So
it's
that
that
tells
me
that
people
are
satisfied
if
they
were
dissatisfied.
O
We'd
certainly
hear
about
it,
and
so
the
fact
that
we
only
got
14-
and
we
were
mostly
positive-
is
I-
think
a
good
thing,
but
do
what
you
can
to
try
and
get
that
number
up
and
we'll
be
able
to
get
a
better
handle
on
things
better
understanding,
so,
but
otherwise
it
looks
great
good
job.
Thank
you.
Councilmember
dalessandro,
good
evening,
thanks
Mr
Mayor
I
feel
like
I
feel
like
this
is
a
great
start
and
I
just
wanted
to
say.
Thank
you.
I
know.
O
I
was
pressing
the
city
staff
a
lot
for
data
as
a
result
of
the
decision
we
made
early
on,
and
so
I
want
to
be.
I
want
to
acknowledge
the
work
that
the
team
has
done
to
get
this
information
I
hope
you're,
finding
it
as
valuable
as
we
are
the
228
number
I
I,
wanna
I,
don't
want
to
assume
it
feels
like
you're,
making
a
correlation
not.
R
That
you
can't
necessarily
determine
it
one
to
one,
but
a
correlation
between
the
number
of
of
permits
that
were
pulled
as
a
result
of
the
inspections
that
228
fixes
were
made.
If
you
will
now,
can
you
can
you
tell
me
of
the
this
I
apologize
I?
Don't
have
the
numbers
in
front
of
me,
the
700
or
so
that
issues
that
were
found
did
they
all
requirement
permits
being
pulled
and
so
like
how?
How
should.
D
We,
how
should
we
look
at
whether
or
not
people
did
the
work
that
was
def
was?
Was
you
know,
found
in
the
during
the
inspection?
Well,
mayor,
council,
member
time,
a
cell
inspection?
They
look
at
52
plus
items,
and
so
they
can
have
from
one
hazardous
item,
which
is
a
smoke
detector
that
isn't
working
or
they
can
have
a
water
heater
that
needs
to
be
replaced.
So
on
the
smoke
detector.
That's
not
working
they're
allowed
to
replace
that
call
for
re-inspection
they
get
their
instruction.
We
don't
get
a
permit
on
the
Water
Heater
replacement.
D
D
D
R
I
I
So
our
CIP
is
truly
a
planning
tool.
It's
long
range,
it's
a
10-year
tool.
We
try
to
match
up
our
CIP
along
with
our
budget
cycle
over
the
last
three
years.
We've
really
mirrored
the
same
timeline
and
as
we're
looking
through
our
budget
process,
here's
23
and
24.
We
match
to
those
long-range
plans
to
make
sure
that
everything
in
what
people
are
budgeting
for
is
in
the
CIP.
The
CIP
we've
only
included
items
that
are
50,
000
and
greater
and
then
probably
about
five.
I
Six
years
ago,
we
added
a
in
a
report
an
executive
summary,
and
these
are
items
that
are
in
the
five
main
categories.
We
need
to
correct
that
area.
There
we
used
to
have
a
larger
one.
We
had
an
alternative
transportation
and
now
that's
included
in
the
surface
transportation
area,
one
million
dollars
each
so
for
the
project,
so
that
executive
summary
is
in
the
beginning
of
the
report,
and
if
the
council
does
approve
this
report,
when
it
comes
forward
in
December
with
a
public
hearing,
it's
still
no
guarantee
that
the
project
moves
forward.
R
K
Discussion
items
and
then
this
Planning
Commission
normally
needs
about
a
month
to
review
because
they
do
go
through
in
detail
and
look
at
each
project
and
they
need
to
make
sure
that
those
projects
are
in
compliance
with
our
comprehensive
plan
and
then
we'll
have
a
public
Hearing
in
December,
and
this
is
on
the
executive
summary.
Our
10-year
expenses
majority
are
in
City
facilities
because,
as
we
know,
we've
had
a
number
of
fire
stations-
garages,
public
Community,
Health
and
Wellness
Center
expansion
of
the
Arts,
a
big
golf.
K
All
of
those
are
in
the
city
facility
area,
surface
transportations,
there's
a
lot
of
Roads
activities
out
there
there's
some
activities
in
the
South
Loop,
mainly
in
water
and
sewer
areas,
and
then
some
Park
development.
We
have
some
projects
out
there
in
the
park,
Development
Area,
but
big
and
those
items
are
in
City
facilities.
K
K
In
a
two-year
time
frame,
the
big
project
in
the
park,
Development
Area
in
the
2324
area,
is
Bryant
Park
storm
water.
A
lot
of
that
is
normal
enhancements
in
the
water
sewer
and
storm
again.
The
surface
Transportation
are
the
roads,
City
facilities,
the
big
area
that
we're
looking
at
in
2324
is
Big
South,
Loop,
again
the
water
little
bits
right
now:
the
water
mains
coming
up
in
the
23
and
24
projects,
how
we
divided
the
funding
sources.
K
There's
a
lot
of
balances
that
come
in
through
time,
so
City
funds
would
include
anything
in
the
utility
funds
that
are
coming
through
those
facility
funds
that
we
are
loving
or
moving
monies
through
as
charges
for
services.
Those
goes
into
the
city
funds
and,
as
you
see
in
a
PIR
bonds
and
assessments
at
7.5
million,
we
already
bonded
for
that
piece
in
August
of
this
year.
K
K
So
a
little
updates
on
some
nice
pictures
of
what's
happening
in
the
art
center
black
box,
theater
multi-use
space.
A
lot
of
changes
are
happening
there
that
have
been
long
overdue
for
some
of
those
pieces.
There's
a
lot
of
Public
Safety
pieces
for
the
Arts
that
are
in
the
CIP
in
the
next
few
years.
K
Some
pictures
of
the
Civic
Plaza
roof
the
chiller
Fleet
garage
doors,
the
Civic
plastic
doors
on
those
doors.
They
were
bit
out
early
early
spring
and
waiting
on
the
last
pieces
of
the
supply
chain
issues.
So,
as
you
know,
they're
underway
right
now
to
get
done,
and
hopefully
within
the
next
month
or
so
they'll
be
finished.
Several
trench
drains
were
finished
this
year,
Park
development
at
Dred
Scott
a
lot
of
the
improvements
that
have
been
happening
out
at
Dred,
Scott
tennis
courts,
fencing
Trail
activities.
K
Some
things
coming
up
in
23-24
we've
gathered
where
some
of
the
bigger
projects
are
so
the
32
million
for
the
big
renovation,
community,
health
and
wellness,
and
then
the
Garage
are
some
of
the
bigger
projects
coming
forward
and
then
just
in
the
23-24
area.
Look
at
the
some
of
the
big
areas
on
the
facilities
again
on
the
ice.
Garden
is
down
there
for
the
32
million
in
the
Parks.
The
Bryant
Park
is
in
the
five
million
dollar
range
and
then
just
normal
activities
for
some
of
the
park
and
playground
replacements.
K
K
And
again,
I'm,
currently
in
the
23
time
frame,
we
do
not
anticipate
issuing
any
bonds,
at
least
what's
in
the
plan,
we
issued
bonds
in
August
and
in
early
part
of
the
year
for
fire
station
4..
So
right
now
the
the
nearest
time
that
this
plan
would
indicate
that
we
would
have
bonds
would
be
early
in
2024
for
the
Bryant
Park
activities
and
then
later
in
24,
for
the
PMP.
K
K
It
just
wants
to
be
done
with
that.
So
quick
Fingers,
so
I'll
stand
for
questions,
so
the
council
has
any
at
this
time
tonight.
Otherwise
you
can
send
them
to
me
and
we'll
keep
discussing
Council
any
questions.
Councilmember
Lowman
I
gave
you
kind
of
a
heads
up
that
it
was
coming
and
I
know
that
this
is
not
a
traditional
questions
around
natural
resources.
K
K
K
So
on
page
209
is
the
new
project.
So
PD
is
the
project
starting
identification,
23
indicating
for
that
CIP
23
would
be
the
first
year
and
it's
project
zero,
zero
five
and
it's
labeled
Moyer
Dash,
Central,
Park,
natural
resources
and
Trail
improvements,
and
currently
it
has
for
design
and
construction
in
2025,
just
under
17.2
million
dollars
for
that
project,
on
page
209
of
the
299
pages,
so
there
is
a
net
a
natural
resource
and
Trail
Improvement
project
listed
in
there
and
I
believe
and
catry
are
Park
and
recreational
director
is
here.
K
K
Looking
into
this,
you
know,
I
mean
we've
got
the
Minnesota
Valley
Bryant
Park
I
mean
there
are
just
a
ton
of
things
that
we're
doing
around
this
and
I
just
want
to
thank
staff
for
turning
this
around
so
quickly.
At
the
beginning
this
year.
That's
a
lot
of
work
and
there's
still
more
work
to
be
done
in
that
area,
but
again
thanks
staff
for
for
that
work,
and
it
is
in
the
CIP.
K
K
Think
the
way
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong
after
hearing
this
presentation
for
a
dozen
years
now,
I
think
within
our
Capital
Improvement
plan
within
our
cop
we
put
in
all
projects,
regardless
of
whose
projects
they
are
and
who's
paying
for
them.
For
example,
for
years
the
the
redo
of
the
35W
bridge
over
the
Minnesota
River
was
in
our
was
in
our
plan.
K
Although
that
was
strictly
a
MnDOT
project
in
mid
dot,
funded
project,
and
so
it's
just
a
matter
of
keeping
track
of
everything,
tell
me
if
I'm
off
track
here,
it's
a
it's
a
matter
of
keeping
track
of
everything.
It's
making
sure
that
everything
is
there
that
we've
got
going
within
the
city
and
I'm
this
far
off.
Is
that
what
you're
telling
me
mayor
and
council
member
Carter?
K
We
we
have
eliminated
most
of
those
ones
where
we've
only
touched
the
project
in
this
one,
what
had
been
indicated
as
other
sources
where
they
needed
to
get
Grant
monies
or-
and
this
needs
to
be
in
this
document-
for
them
to
apply
for
Grants
to
get
other
locations.
So
that
was
more
of
the
piece
of
that,
so
I
don't
know
where
they
they
may
have
put
grant
requests
into
it.
K
K
Thank
you,
man,
just
a
a
quick
one,
because
I
know
we
always
enjoy
seeing
the
fruits
of
our
labors
and
because
it
was
mentioned
in
this
presentation
tonight,
but
as
I
came
to
the
Farmers
Market
on
Saturday,
to
get
my
emergency
supply
of
rhubarb,
not
once
but
twice
I
heard
separate
individuals
comment
about
how
much
they'd,
like
the
new
doors
on
that
side
of
Civic
Plaza,
it
is
I
mean
folks,
are
already
noticing
that
Improvement
and
I
would
not
have
expected
that
from
doors.
But
here
we
are
yep.
K
K
If
not
thank
you.
Thank
you.
Once
again,
we'll
see
you
on
this
one
again
soon,
I'm
sure.
Let's
move
on
to
item
5.3
first
of
two
budget
discussions.
This
is
on
our
2023
utility
Enterprise
funds,
Fleet
and
Facilities
internal
service
funds
and
Public
Works
general
fund
budgets.
Sorry
Carlson!
Our
budget
manager
is
with
us.
This
evening,
good
evening,
good
evening,
Marion
Council
this
evening,
we
have
a
lot
of
budget
information
for
you.
K
We're
going
to
start
off
with
the
four
utility
funds,
then
we're
going
to
also
do
the
fleet
fund
and
the
facilities
Fund
in
public
works,
followed
by
that
we
will
do
some
more
of
a
deeper
dive
into
the
Public
Works
portion
of
the
general
fund.
To
give
you
some
information
about.
What's
in
that
2023
proposed
budget,
and
then
we
also
are
going
to
have
our
Chief
Information
officer,
Amy
Cheney
talk
about
the
int
proposed
budget,
so
I
won't
be
doing
as
much
talking
this
evening.
R
D
Infrastructure
has
an
approximate
age
it
ages
out,
it
fails,
that's
its
replacement.
The
Orange
Line
shows
what
we're
actually
expecting
to
expand
after
applying
actual
asset
condition,
as
well
as
accounting
for
things
like
reliability,
criticality
and
redundancy.
This
is
this
is
only
a
model,
an
approximation,
and
it's
a
little
bit
dated.
We've.
We've
made
some
adjustments
to
this
along
the
way
and
when
we
get.
H
It'll
that'll
give
you
a
better
representation
of
of
what
we're
aiming
for
next
slide,
please
so
a
lot
of
what
what
drives
Revenue
requirements
for
the
utility
you
know,
along
with
with
those
expenditure
requirements
with
regard
to
operations
maintenance,
as
well
as
asset
renewal,
water
consumption.
So
what
this?
H
What
this
graph
shows
you,
the
blue
line
buried
in
there
is,
is
kind
of
our
what
we're,
what
we're
using
as
our
current
average
2013
through
2018.,
the
red
line
represents
2020,
as
we
were
impacted
by
coveted
and
I
was
hoping
not
to
talk
a
lot
of
kind
of
getting
used
to
not
saying
that
word
anymore.
But
it's
it's
relevant
here,
particularly
when
looking
at
the
last
few
years,
but
you
can
see
very
clearly
when,
when
shutdowns
and
things
began
in
March
and
early
spring,
that
red
line
dropped.
K
Way
off
from
our
from
our
average
and
then
you
know,
with
some
seasonal
variation
in
the
summertime
generally
remained
below
below
our
average
consumption
and
and
you'll.
We'll
look
at
this
in
another
format
in
the
next
slide,
but
the
The
Gray
Line,
then
2021
again
early
in
the
season.
Definitely
displaying
impacts
due
to
covert
and
those
impacts
were
business
closures,
particularly
in
the
hospitality
and
hotel
Industries
here
in
Bloomington
and
then
come
Springtime.
We
had
the
start
of
the
drought
in
2021
and.
H
N
K
N
K
So
this
is
this
is
this
is
one
of
my
favorite
and
I
think
most
useful
slides
when
starting
to
dig
into
water
use
from
our
customers.
We've
got
our
through
our
three
primary
customer
classes,
here:
commercial,
multi-family
and
single
family
residential
in
an
annual
winter
and
summer
time,
time
frame
along
with
tier
two
usage,
and
so
what
what
this
gives?
You
is
a
look
into
winter.
N
Use
which
is
important
because
it
represents
sort
of
that
those
those
typically
non-discretional
uses
things
that
are
going
on
within
the
household
and
summertime
clearly
then
contains
what
what
can
be
considered
a
little.
You
know
discretional
uses,
irrigation
water,
recreation
activities,
car
washing
things,
things
of
that
nature.
N
Single
family
residential
customers
to
try
to
determine
if
there
was
an
inequitable
impact
to
large
families
or
or
low-income
properties
and
and
what
what
we
found
out
at
that
time
and
and
I'll
talk
a
little
bit
more
about
some
of
our
other
affordability
and
Equity
efforts
in
a
couple
of
slides.
But
what
we
found
out
when
we
did
at
that
time
was
that
was
on
the
order
of
90
percent
of
our
single-family
residential
properties.
Utilized.
N
F
Use
dropped
to
about
two
dollars
a
month
in
tier
two
use
and
and
up
and
I
think
65
percent
of
those
properties
use
no
tier
two
water
at
all
and
about
49
of
of
our
of
our
entire
single
family.
Residential
customer
base
use
no
tier
two
water
on
an
annual
basis,
and
so
the
conclusion
from
that
was
that
we
didn't
think
at
that
time
that
tier
two
youth
was
was
a
significant
impact
to
to
our
customers.
F
Next
slide,
please!
So
speaking,
you
know,
other
you
know,
climate
being
the
one
of
the
biggest
factors
that
that
influence
customer
use,
particularly
that
tier
2
use
water
that
you
saw
in
the
summertime.
The
the
climate
and
I
apologize.
This
slides
a
little
different
from
the
one
in
your
presentation,
I.
L
F
F
We
have
just
moved
into
just
recently
moved
in
kind
of
to
into
that
extreme
drought.
Most
of
the
summer,
we
were
in
more
of
a
moderate
to
severe
drought,
characteristics,
the
difference
biggest
difference
between
the
drought
this
summer
and
last
summer,
I
think
was
timing.
We
had
a
decent
snowfall
with
early
spring
rains
and
so
River
levels
and
and.
B
With
with
enough
precipitation
in
the
northern
part
of
the
state,
River
levels
remained
high.
That
was
our
biggest
trigger
in
2021.
With
regard
to
the
restrictions
that
we
had
in
outdoor
water
use
we
haven't
experienced,
you
know
we
didn't
experience
that
this
year,
our
well
levels
have
remained
within
normal
range
and
hence
no
restrictions
this
year.
B
Our
contract
with
the
city
Minneapolis
allows
us
to
purchase
ample
water
supply.
We
do
we
like
the
water
we
make
at
our
plant
and
we
can
do
that
a
little
more
cost
effectively
than
purchasing
water.
So
so
we
do
that
and-
and
that's
the
the
preference,
but
we
do
have
that
operational
flexibility.
That
is,
is
really
unique
and
nice
thing
to
have
next
slide.
Oh
sorry,
go
back.
R
Sorry
this
is
just
this
is
just
kind
of
a
drought
comparison
from
last
year
this
year,
so
you
can
see
certainly
more
significant
last
year,
but
we're
we're
moving
in
in
that
direction
again.
So
looking
for
some
snow,
all
right
impacts
to
revenue.
So
this
you
know
2020
is,
is
our
covet
year
and
these
numbers
are
our
distribution
and
production
through
August.
H
What's
an
acceptable
delinquency
and
what's
what's
a
typical
tier,
two
water
usage,
those
those
conclusions
aside,
we
can,
we
can
definitely
see
some
Trends
on
this
map,
and
so
two
two
things
we're
we're
working
on
currently
is
one.
We
have
a
in
place
received
some
grant
money
from
met,
Council
and
The
Nine
Mile,
Creek,
Watershed
district
for
water,
efficient,
fixture
and
appliance
rebate
program.
That's
aimed
toward
updating,
inefficient
appliances.
B
P
2018
to
2022
2021
was
was
a
strong
effort
to
address
be
sensitive
to
the
impacts
from
covid,
and
so
we
we
tried
to
keep
that
rate
increase
down
that
year
and
then
2022
was
was
a
little
more
typical
next
slide
and
for
2023
we're.
We
will
be
proposing
a
seven
and
a
half
percent
rate
increase,
and
that's
both
for
tier
one
and
for
tier
two
next
slide.
I
think
is
just
a
snapshot
of
our
long-term
model.
That
Kari
might
have
some
some
words
on
yeah.
P
Hello-
oh
sorry,
so
I
just
want
to
say
to
him.
I
realized
the
time
and
we
started
late
this
evening,
so
I
think
the
rest
we're
going
to
try
and
go
through
pretty
quickly
and
I
know.
There's
a
lot
of
information,
that's
in
in
the
agenda
packet
and
that
has
been
prepared.
So
I
just
want
to
mention
that
so
as
we
go
through,
we'll
try
and
go
a
little
quick,
but
this
is
a
long-term
model.
P
And,
however,
you
can
also
see
that
we,
we
are
forecasting
to
go
below
the
80,
which
brings
us
into
the
red
when
we're
comparing
the
working
capital,
the
cash
in
this
fund
to
the
working
capital
goal.
So
we're
still
we're
not
getting
down
to
a
really
low
amount,
but
it
is
the
American
Rescue
plan
funds
did
help
and
some
of
the
things
that
have
been
causing.
That
is
what
Scott
was
talking
about
with
the
in
the
past,
the
wetter
than
average
Summers
or
the
impact
of
covid
on
Revenue.
P
So
so
that's
water
and
then
I'll
just
stay
up
here,
while
you're
gonna
go
through
a
couple
slides
here
with
Wastewater
Scott
couple
slides
with
Wastewater,
it's
a
lot
faster
than
water,
and
primarily
so
the
Wastewater
utility
Wastewater
utility
is
designed
to
to
operate,
maintain
and
renew
the
Wastewater
sanitary
sewer
system,
with
with
the
goal
of
providing
again
that
uninterrupted
service
minimizing
system
blockages
and
infiltration
and
inflow
that's
important
because
we
pay
for
that.
We
pay
met
Council
for
that
treatment
of
that
Wastewater.
P
Wastewater
version
of
that
water
utility
asset
Outlook,
so
this
is
just
sanitary
main
line,
and
so
the
the
blue
bars
represent
the
the
proposed
expenditures
after
2031
2032.
It's
it's
kind
of
a
placeholder
number,
so
we're
a
little
more
accurate
in
the
Years
prior
The
Gray
Line
is
our
is
our
no
funding
line.
The
orange
line
is,
is
the
funding
or
is
the
condition
so
the
gray
lines
of
condition
assuming
no
funding?
The
orange
line
is
the
condition
with
the
funding.
P
P
P
P
B
B
B
All
right
thanks,
Scott,
thank
you.
So
next
we
have
storm
water.
Oh,
so
is
that
all
right
there?
If
we
have
questions
yeah
question,
sorry,
just
really
I'm
just
trying
to
keep
this
as
succinct
as
possible.
So
with
the
fire
pension,
we
have
ways
in
which
to
kind
of
try
to
control
that
you
know,
because
it
can
kind
of
go
up
and
down
with
with
the
with
the
Water
Utility
Fund.
B
Is
there
any
way
to
follow
such
a
model
to
kind
of
lessen
that
impact
in
tier
one
or
or
tier
two?
Could
we
do
some
type
of
model
like
that,
where
we
could
Bank
some
money
to
try
to
as
we
as
we
go
through
year
after
year
and
have
those
increases?
Is
there
a
way
to
kind
of
try
to
stabilize
that
I
know:
we've
done
that
with
other
things.
B
We
do
have
working
capital
goals
to
cover
that,
knowing
that
we're
going
to
have
the
the
variable
revenues,
so
we
do
have
amounts
in
the
working
capital
goal
in
case
there
are
drops
in
Revenue.
Is
there
a
way
to
further
do
that,
so
we
can
lessen
that
impact.
I,
guess
that's
more
sort
of
what
my
question
is
is
to
kind
of
from
year
to
year,
not
it'll,
try
to
keep
it
between
one
and
and
in
just
a
few
percentage
points
by
increasing
the
amount
that
we
put
in
there.
B
F
B
B
So
so
the
stormwater
Utility
Fund,
we
use
it
to
our
some
of
our
goals,
are
minimizing
disruption
to
the
traveling
public,
protecting
structures
from
damage
related
to
stormwater,
runoff
and
providing
for
the
construction,
maintenance
and
operational
strategies
that
help
us
improve,
runoff
water
quality.
So
and
what
this
kind
of
means
is
you
know
it's?
B
B
B
And
a
chart
with
the
same
cities
that
Scott
uses,
so
in
2022,
our
our
annual
rates
for
a
single
family
was
99.48
and
with
the
five
and
a
half
percent
rate
increase,
we
are
at
almost
105
on
an
annual
perspective
for
the
single
family
home.
So
it
puts
us
in
kind
of
that
upper
half
of
those
cities
that
are
listed
there,
so
the
orange
line
on
the
graph
there
being
what's
proposed
for
23.
B
B
B
B
Good
evening,
good
evening,
mayor
council,
so
the
city's
residential
Solid
Waste
program
includes
the
collection
of
garbage
recycling,
Organics
recycling
service
and
our
yard
waste
program.
It
also
accounts
for
our
bulky
item,
Management
program
and
Forestry,
and
the
removal
of
diseased
trees
such
as
the
Emerald
Ash
Borer.
It
accounts
for
the
cleanups
after
major
storm
events
and
private
property,
environmental
health
abatements
next
slide.
So
tonight,
I
will
run
through
our
proposed
rates
for
a
residential,
Solid
Waste
program,
beginning
here
with
our
garbage
rate.
B
So
our
garbage
rate
is
made
up
of
four
different
components:
that
first
component
being
our
collection
rate,
which
is
set
in
our
contract
with
the
Consortium
for
2023.
That
rate
will
increase
three
percent
this
year,
given
the
price
escalators
that
are
set
in
that
contract.
The
next
component
is
the
disposal
rate,
that's
also
set
in
our
contract
with
the
Consortium.
B
It's
based
on
the
garbage
tipping
fees
that
the
Hennepin
energy
recovery
center,
where
our
garbage
is
processed
that
is
proposed
to
increase
in
2023
4.6
percent
from
66
dollars,
a
ton
to
69
a
ton,
so
that's
reflected
in
the
rate
there.
We
also
include
an
administrative
charge
that
covers
the
city's
billing
customer
service
education
and
contract
Administration.
We
are
proposing
an
increase
by
10
this
year
and
will
note
that
this
has
not
been
increased
since
2020.
B
This
increase
does
reflect
just
the
increased
cost
within
our
Solid
Waste
fund
for
our
Utility
Billing
Services
Credit,
Card
fees
and
other
City
internal
service
costs
that
we
operate
under
and,
lastly,
the
The
Rake
is
composed
of
our
the
state
Solid
Waste
tax
in
Hennepin
County
fee
that
we
collect
on
behalf
of
the
county
and
state
and
pass
that
on.
So
given
these
elements
of
our
rate,
we're
proposing
the
four
and
a
half
about
a
four
and
a
half
percent
increase
for
our
garbage
rates
this
year,
next
slide
so
for
our
recycling
rate.
B
So
the
market
price
for
recycling
Commodities
over
this
past
year
has
been
very
high,
and
so
the
cities
we
will
be
paying
less
for
about
to
the
haulers
for
processing
our
material
than
in
previous
years,
and
this
does
help
to
keep
our
monthly
customer
recycling
rate
fairly
stable.
We
do
know
that
there's
a
potential
for
this
portion
of
our
rate
to
change
in
future
years
of
recycling
markets,
change,
which
can
happen
in
periods
of
economic
downturn.
B
I
also
just
want
to
note
briefly
here
that
during
our
recycling
sort,
we
did
see
a
picture
here
on
the
slide.
More
overall
residents
are
doing
a
great
job
recycling
putting
the
right
stuff
in
their
carts,
but
we
did
notice
that
some
residents
are
continuing
to
bag
their
recyclables,
so
you
can
see
a
perfectly
great
bag
of
recycling
there,
but
because
it's
in
a
plastic
bag
that
whole
thing
goes
to
the
garbage.
B
So
as
a
city
we're
going
to
do
a
better
job
of
you
know,
educating
two
residents
that
you
cannot
put
your
recycling
in
plastic
bags.
The
plastic
film
gets
Tangled
in
the
gears
at
the
recycling
facilities.
It's
a
big
Hazard
there.
So
it's
just
another
message
that
we're
going
to
work
hard
to
get
across
to
residents
next
slide.
Please.
B
The
next
rate
is
our
Organics
recycling
rate.
The
Organics
rate
is
made
up
of
two
components
again.
That
first
component
is
based
on
our
collection
rate,
which
is
set
with
the
haulers
in
our
contract.
That
will
also
increase
by
three
percent
in
2023,
and
the
second
portion
of
that
rate
is
a
small
administrative
fee
to
assist
with
the
city's
operation
of
the
program.
We
are
not
proposing
to
increase
this
rate
in
2023,
as
Council
will
recall.
Organics
recycling
is
a
new
service
that
began
in
March
of
2022
here
in
Bloomington
like
regular
recycling.
B
B
Our
goal
for
the
first
year
of
the
program
was
to
reach
that
25
sign
up
rate,
which
is
seen
and
pretty
typical
in
communities
with
new
Organics
programs
that
are
all
pay,
so
we
think
we're
right
on
track
with
that,
hitting
that
25
percent
Target
for
our
first
year,
and
we
expect
this
number
will
continue
to
uptick
as
more
residents
become
familiar
with
the
program
next
slide.
Please.
B
B
B
You
know
with
the
understanding
that
they
can
help
us
get
the
word
out
about
the
program
as
we
have
rolled
out
the
program
as
as
you
might
understand,
we
get
a
lot
of
calls
from
residents
as
well
with
feedback
or
questions,
and
one
of
the
items
we
hear
is
they
would
like
the
compost
back.
They
want
some
of
that
finished
compost
that
they're
they're
helping
to
create.
B
So
we
did
hold
a
compost
giveaway
this
this
year
and
we
gave
out
600
bags
of
compost
and
we
intend
on
doing
those
in
future
years
as
well.
Also
when
we've
surveyed
residents
about
Organics,
we
know
that
one
of
the
main
barriers
residents
have
for
getting
started
is
just
not
having
their
kitchen
set
up
for
Success.
It's
you
got
to
get
a
new
container
in
your
kitchen
to
separate
out
the
materials
you
have
to
have
specific
bags.
B
This
is
just
a
brief
comparison
slide.
It
shows
that
our
Organics
rates
are
competitive,
with
what
we're
seeing
in
surrounding
communities
that
have
that
same
all-pay
program
and,
as
you
can
see,
on
the
bottom
there
below
the
green
line,
our
communities
that
have
subscription
programs
where
you
just
pay,
if
you
want
access
to
the
service
and
those
rates,
are
consistently
higher
and
the
participation
rates
are
much
much
lower
next
slide.
Please.
B
It
includes
an
annual
community
drop-off
event,
periodic
swap
events
for
items
like
gardening
tools
and
a
regular
monthly
curbside
collection
of
reusable
and
recyclable
bulky
items.
The
goals
of
this
new
program
included
really
reducing
the
volume
of
waste
that
sent
to
landfills,
increasing
access
to
bulky,
item
management
and
keeping
our
program
convenient.
B
So
with
this
new
program
rolling
out
this
year,
we
are
proposing
a
16
decrease
in
this
curbside
cleanup
fee
for
2023,
and
this
is
really
attributed
to
moving
the
curbside
cleanup
to
an
every
other
year
service.
So
that
allows
us
to
bring
this
fee
down
significantly,
but
we
will
note
that
the
cost
to
landfill
items
during
curbside
cleanup
does
continue
to
increase.
B
Significantly
year
after
year,
we
had
a
26
percent
in
that
tipping
fee
this
year
for
land
filling,
and
we
do
anticipate
that
that'll
continue
to
increase
in
the
future,
so
that
is
kind
of
included
in
our
long-term
modeling
of
costs.
For
our
bulky
item
Management
program
overall,
a
small
portion
of
this
rate
does
go
towards
cleanup
after
a
major
storm
event,
and
residents
will
notice
a
change
on
the
name
of
the
fee
on
their
utility
bill
for
2023.
B
B
And
I
will
go
over
these
briefly
here,
but
several
components
of
this
program
did
begin.
This
year
we
held
our
first
city-wide
recycling
drop-off
event.
This
fall.
We
had
over
900.
Well,
we
had
994
exactly
Vehicles
come
we
were
anticipating
just
about
a
thousand
or
so
so
this
was
kind
of
in
line
with
what
we
were
hoping
residents
could
bring.
B
Appliances
tires,
scrap
metal,
mattresses,
paper
for
shredding
and
bikes
to
that
event,
and
we
did
receive
a
lot
of
feed
good
feedback
and
importantly,
it
expanded
access
to
residents
living
in
multi-family
dwellings
to
have
an
opportunity
dispose
of
their
bulky
items.
We
did
hold
our
first
swap
event,
which
again
we
did
consider
a
success.
B
So
this
slide
here
is
just
again
a
summary
of
our
our
rates
overall
and,
as
you
can
see
again,
this
includes
our
the
cost
for
garbage
recycling,
Organics
Recycling
and
that
bulky
item
management
fee
with
the
difference
in
each
of
these
lines.
Just
being
the
size
of
the
garbage,
cart
is
the
only
difference
there.
So,
as
you
can
see,
overall
residents
will
see
less
than
a
one
percent
increase
in
their
Solid
Waste
charges
for
2023
in
this
proposed
budget.
B
And
so
these
are
just
a
few
things
to
keep
in
mind
that
will
likely
continue
to
drive
our
rates
into
the
future.
As
we've
shared,
we
will
continue
to
have
price
escalators
set
in
our
contract
with
the
Consortium
we'll
continue
to
see,
you
know
increasing
costs
for
disposal
of
garbage
and
land
filling
that
will
be
reflected
in
our
rates.
We
also
know
again
that
at
the
recycling
markets
are
can
have
highs
and
lows
and
that
can
to
some
extent
affect
our
recycling
rate
and,
lastly,
we
also
do.
B
The
main
task
of
the
solid
way
staff
person
would
include
assistance
with
those
elements
of
the
bulky
item
program,
including
coordinating
the
swap
events
planning
for
our
annual
drop-off
event
and
helping
us
with
the
communications
and
coordinating
on
the
new
monthly
pickup
of
bulky
items.
They'll
also
assist
with
expanding
participation
in
curbside
Organics
program,
as
well
as
assist
with
expanding
participation
and
just
expanding
our
ability
to
provide
capacity
and
support
for
multi-family
dwellings.
Currently,
the
solid
waste
does
not
have
the
capacity
to
be
supporting
Recycling
and
multi-family
units.
B
They
are
required
to
recycle
by
the
city
as
well
as
the
county.
We
There
is
kind
of
increasing
County
support
for
expanding
access
to
recycling
at
these
buildings.
So
we
would
like
the
staff
person
to
really
help
us
dial
in
what's
going
on
in
multi-family
properties,
as
well
as
just
help
us
expand
Recycling
and
Organics
collection
at
our
city
facilities
and
parks
that
are
also
managed
by
this
fund.
B
Lastly,
we
do
have
a
placeholder
within
our
budget
for
consulting
services
to
assist
with
a
rate
study.
We
know
that
Council
has
talked
in
the
past
about
Solid
Waste
staff,
looking
at
our
overall
rates
to
see
how
we
might
make
those
pay,
as
you
throw
tiered
garbage
rates
more
aggressive
in
future
years.
This
would
help
us
further
incentivize
residents
to
reduce
overall
waste
generation
again,
so
we
do
have
just
some
money
set
aside
in
our
budget.
B
If
council
is
interested
in
in
us
taking
that
step
forward
and
going
in
that
direction,
we'd
be
happy
to
provide
more
information
to
council
at
a
future
meeting.
If
that
was
directed
so
I.
Think
that
wraps
up
so
for
the
long-term
model
that
shows
the
working
capital
balance
I'll
just
highlight
in
the
expenses
where
it
has
curbside
cleanup.
You
can
see
expenses
from
2020,
21,
22
and
then
nothing
for
2023
and
then
up
for
24..
So
that's
been
worked
into
this
model
with
a
new
program
and
the
with
this
proposed
budget.
B
Councilmember
Lawman,
so
I
just
wanted
to
say
I
hope.
My
understanding
in
terms
of
the
study
is
this
is
the
same
story
I've
been
asking
for
diversion,
but
also
creating
the
incentive
for
those
those
folks
to
try
to
pick
Organics
for
that,
but
I'd,
be
fully
in
support
of
that
and
I
know
have
some
other
council
members
who
would
also
like
to
look
at
some
other
things
with
that
I
hope.
Those
are
all
included
in
that
that
study
as
well.
B
B
The
question
I
had,
though,
was
about
the
bulky
item
rate
there.
It
is
so
doing
the
math,
reducing
the
rate
by
71
cents
per
month
say,
would
save
a
household
roughly
eight
and
a
half
bucks
a
year.
My
question
is:
is
I
mean
is
the
goal
you
know
knowing
that
we're
going
now
to
every
other
year,
curbside
cleanup
and
that
sort
of
thing
is
the
goal
to
further
reduce
that
rate
in
future
years
or
what
I
mean
I,
I
guess
what
I'm
getting
at
is.
B
Sure,
mayor
council,
member,
so
that
the
16
decrease
in
the
rate
is
actually
taking
into
account
what
we
think
future
years,
curbside
cleanups
might
what
those
what
those
expenses
might
look
like
as
I
have
mentioned.
We
do
know
that
the
cost
to
landfill
is
continuing
to
increase,
so
we're
projecting,
because
this
is
an
every
other
year
program
that
could
increase
by
50
for
our
next
cleanup,
and
we
also
do
now
have
new
program
components.
B
So
this
new,
the
monthly
pickup
of
bulky
items
that
is
estimated
to
cost,
maybe
about
a
hundred
and
fifty
thousand
dollars
a
year,
and
we
do.
We
do
think
once
that
is
rolled
out
residents
are
going
to
see
that
as
a
big
as
a
great
new
service,
that's
still
kind
of
providing
and
every
other
year
program,
sure
and
I
I
guess
what
I'm?
What
I'm
getting
at
is.
B
B
B
Yeah
I?
Don't
have
those
numbers
off
on
me
at
the
top
of
my
head,
but
the
the
collection
rate
is
probably
two-thirds
of
that
rate
and
then
the
Tipping
fee
is
what's
variable
in
each
rage
for
the
small,
medium
and
large
garbage,
so
that
continues
to
increase
as
the
cost.
The
your
cart
size
increases,
okay,
okay
and
remind
me
just
a
quick
follow-up
there
that
we
adjust
every
year
based
on
how
many
tons
we
actually
send
there
we're
measuring
that
with
the
Haulers.
Is
that
accurate?
B
It's
just
a
portion
of
that
rate,
so
back
when
our
contract
was
first
negotiated,
there
were
estimations
kind
of
placed
in
there
for
what
we
might
anticipate
a
resident
to
generate
and
I
think
in
future
contracts.
That's
something
that
we
can
look
at
as
again.
I
think
that's
something
that
we
did
push
for
in
our
this
last
contract.
Renegotiation
to
better
reflect
what
our
actual
disposal
costs
are.
Currently,
how
it
said
is:
it
is
a
fixed
portion
of
our
raid,
okay
and
then
on
the
recycling
component.
B
You
said
the
recycling
Market
was
really
good,
but
you're
proposing
a
three
percent
increase
which
is
matches
the
three
percent
service
increase.
Why
is
that
not
lower
if
the
recycling
Market
was
good
and
we
have
that
price,
escalator
or
I?
Guess
an
escalator
can
go
up
or
down
right,
certainly
mayor,
council,
member
and
that's
sort
of
the
re.
The
reason
why
we
are
not
proposing
to
reflect
that
is
a
decrease.
In
our
rate,
we
do
have
a
cost
savings
this
year,
so
we
are
paying
a
little
bit
less
to
the
haulers
for
recycling.
B
However,
we
know
that
those
rates
really
could
change
in
future
years.
Over
these
past
two
months,
already,
we've
seen
significant
drops
in
recycling
markets,
so
we're
anticipating
we're
going
to
be
having
to
pay
more
to
the
haulers
next
year
for
for
recycling.
So
it's
just
a
way
for
us
to
try
and
keep
that
rate
steady
overall
instead
of
residencying
larger
fluctuations
that
they
might
not
fully
understand.
What's
happening,
you'll
ask
questions:
do
we
have
an
idea
on
the
Organics?
How
many
tons
of
garbage
have
how
many
tons
have
gone
into
that
program?
B
How
much
is
being
diverted
I
don't
have
that
at
the
top
of
my
head,
but
I'm
happy
to
provide
that
to
Council
in
a
one
weekly
with
an
update,
I
just
I
think
that's
an
important
thing
for
us
to
continue
to
track,
which
relates
to
my
first
question,
which
we
need
to
incorporate
into
future
negotiations
with
them.
If
we're
reducing
how
many
times
we're
bringing
to
the
herc,
we
should
be
saving
that
money
as
a
community.
B
My
last
question
is
where
what
is
the
funding
source
for
the
staff
position
and
the
consultant
is
that
Levy
and
is
that
built
into
the
levy,
or
is
that
the
administrative
fee
and
or
some
combination
I'm
here
in
Council?
So
that
would
be
in
our
administrative
fees
for
the
program
as
well
as
through
our
grant
funding
provided
by
Hennepin
County,
so
we're
able
to
use
some
of
that
funding
for
a
staff
position
as
well?
Okay,
so
that
that
is
not
coming
out
of
the
lobby.
B
B
Although
I
recognize
that
that's
you
know
that,
can
that
can
have
an
impact
on?
You
know
larger
families
and
things
like
that
too.
So
we
have
to
be
careful
there,
but
I
just
think
that
there's
a
way
for
us
to
get
a
little
bit
more
I,
don't
know
what
the
right
word
is.
One
size
fits
all,
isn't
really.
B
B
We
we
finish
things
up
here:
yeah
I'm,
sorry,
I
know,
look
at
the
daggers
they're
shooting
at
me
right
now.
We
finished
this
up
and
then
we
get
to
the
policy
and
issue
update
and
we
we
don't
go
too
too
far.
Past
11.,
I.
Think
I
would
ask
the
council
for
a
motion
to
to
both
do
that
to
move
those
continue,
those
items
till
next
time,
but
then
also
to
extend
our
time
to
run
no
later
than
say.
11
10.
so
moved
second
Motion
in
the
second.
B
On
what
I
just
said,
all
those
in
favor,
please
signify
by
saying
aye
aye
opposed
motion,
carry
7-0,
I'm,
sorry
gang
it's.
We
got
a
little
taco
chip
tonight
and
I
apologize.
So
no,
it
never
happens.
So
cart.
How
about?
If
we
finish
up
this,
this
two
seconds
here
to
finish
up
I,
think
there's
a
couple
slides
left
that
I
saw
the
the
utility
bill,
the
totals
that
kind
of
thing,
and
then
we
can
have
that
done
and
be
done
with
it
and
we'll
wrap
this
section
up.
B
There
you
go
so
utility
bills
are
sent
once
every
eight
weeks
for
residents
and
you'll
see
on
here.
We
have
a
comparison
for
kind
of
a
small
minimum
usage,
a
medium
and
a
large,
and
what
those
different
impacts
would
be.
We
also
in
blue
have
switched
out.
The
city-wide
curbside
cleanup
fee
will
now
be
on
a
utility
bill
as
the
bulky
item
management
fee
so
for
small
usage
to
2.95
for
a
two-month
period.
B
B
B
B
That's
a
six
dollar
a
month
difference
not
hugely
significant
in
terms
of
huge
significance
in
terms
of
a
monthly
budget,
but
it
shows
how
it
all
ends
up
kind
of
over
the
course
of
the
year
and
why
it
makes
sense
for
folks
to
to
sort
of
think
about
these
things
in
in
sort
of
an
economy
of
scale.
So
just
wanted
to
add
that
thank
you
councilmember
anything
else.
B
B
I
got
a
couple
items
for
you:
air
buds
aren't
working
so
I'm
just
going
to
take
those
out.
Can
you
hear
me?
Okay?
Without
him,
we
can
hear
you
just
fine
yep,
great
okay,
so
one
item
I
did
want
to
update
on
is
Expo
2027.
As
council
is
aware,
the
inquiry
Mission
from
the
Bureau
of
International
expositions
was
in
Minnesota
and
Washington.
Dc
yesterday
found
that
they
were
yesterday
last
week
they
were
vetting
the
Minnesota
and
USA
application
to
host
the
World's
Fair
in
2027..
B
There
are
four
other
locations
that
are
competing
for
that
shared
before
Argentina,
Spain,
Serbia
and
Thailand,
and
the
purpose
of
the
inquiry
mission
is
to
do
a
federal
review
of
all
of
the
details
within
the
application.
Do
a
site
visit,
try
to
gauge
the
level
of
community
and
Civic
and
business
and
governmental
support,
and
make
sure
that
the
financial
projections
are
reasonable
and
adequate
and
generally
just
get
a
strong
feel
for
each
of
the
communities.
B
I
think
the
feedback
that
we
received
last
week
was
very
positive
from
the
members
of
the
inquiry
Mission,
and
you
probably
saw
that
the
governor
hosted
a
press
conference
with
the
president
of
the
inquiry
Mission
and
Senator
Klobuchar
as
well,
and
they
spoke
very
favorably.
So
the
next
step-
and
let
me
just
if
anybody's
watching
this
for
the
first
time
Bloomington
is
proposed
as
the
host
Community
for
the
Minnesota
USA
Expo
2027..
B
So
let
me
talk
real
quickly
about
what
happens
next.
The
Bureau
of
International
expositions
will
have
their
general
assembly
at
the
end
of
November.
Each
of
the
candidates
will
make
a
presentation
to
the
general
assembly,
and
then
it
begins
about
a
six-month
campaign
up
until
the
subsequent
general
assembly
in
June
of
next
year,
when
the
delegates
of
the
bie,
that's
a
representatives
of
the
170
countries
that
are
members
of
the
bie
will
vote
on
what
what
country
will
host
2027..
B
So
we
have.
We
have
a
little
bit
of
time
before
we
know
the
answer
to
that,
and
you
know
this
I
know,
there's
been
quite
a
bit
of
press
around
that
visit,
a
couple
of
comments
that
I
want
to
reiterate
once
again
that
there
is
an
independent
non-profit
organization
that
has
its
own
board
and
staff
that
is
shepherding.
This
application
through
Bloomington
is
a
partner
with
that
organization.
B
The
mayor
and
I
both
sit
on
the
board
of
directors
and
that
organization
Works
closely
with
the
federal
government,
especially
with
the
state
department
and
the
Commerce
Department.
The
state
department
has
the
voting
Delegate
for
the
United
States
at
the
bie,
and
those
two
federal
agencies
are
responsible
for
Expo
related
activities
in
federal
law,
so
the
city
is
not
responsible
for
this
application.
B
The
the
funds
that
are
supporting
this
are
being
raised
by
the
501c6
organization,
Minnesota
USA,
Expo,
2027
and
again
that's
a
separate
organization,
they're
responsible
for
all
the
fundraising
and
for
the
budget,
that's
necessary
to
advance
the
application.
If
the
Minnesota
USA
candidacy
is
voted
and
approved
by
the
bie,
there
would
need
to
be
a
new
organization,
because
the
current
one
is
for
the
purposes
of
the
campaign.
B
They
would
pivot
that
to
being
a
host
committee,
a
very
similar,
or
at
least
as
an
analogy-
the
Super
Bowl
committee,
when
the
Super
Bowl
was
in
Minnesota
back
in
2019..
So
it's
a
very
similar
structure
in
how
the
event
itself
would
be
managed.
The
role
for
the
city
is
that
we
will
continue
to
work
with
that
committee,
as
well
as
our
partners
at
the
state
of
Minnesota
and
Hennepin
County
and
the
federal
government
to
play
our
role
as
the
host
Community.
B
That
will
that
will
continue
the
build
out
of
South
Loop
and
continue
to
grow
the
tax
base
of
the
city
of
Bloomington.
And
then
there
are
other
Legacy
advantages
and
benefits
from
being
a
host
community
and
I.
Think
in
consultation
with
the
mayor
council
members
I'm
going
to
place
the
presentation
on
the
council
agenda
so
that
we
can
go
into
this
information
in
Greater
detail
at
a
subsequent
council
meeting
likely
in
the
middle
of
November
any
questions
else.
Any
questions
of
Mr
verbrugge.
B
No
questions
on
that
anything
else,
Mr
brogie!
No!
Sir.
Thank
you.
Thank
you,
quick
recap
of
our
city
council
listening
session
that
was
early
held
earlier
today.
We
had
I
think
the
highest
number
of
speakers
we've
had
at
a
listening
session.
Matthew
limbert,
a
first-time
speaker,
talked
to
us
about
issues
with
his
evict
his
efforts
to
evict
tenants
during
the
pandemic,
which
led
to
issues
with
mowing
his
grass
and
ultimately
having
it
mowed
by
environmental
health,
and
he
missed
the
appeal
process.
B
B
We
started
the
conversation
talking
about
the
use
of
a
park
and
ended
up
with
a
conversation
of
the
definition
of
what
a
public
school
is,
whether
or
not
a
charter
schools
are
public
schools
or
not,
which,
by
definitions
specified
very
specifically
and
clearly
in
state
law.
They
are
public
schools.
Natalie
morose
talked
to
us
wanting
us
to
turn
on
the
commenting
on
YouTube
during
City
Council
meetings
we
heard
from
Kevin
Heinen
Mr
Heinen
has
had
issues
parking
his
work
truck
at
his
place
of
employment,
where
he's
had
issues
with
his
catalytic
converter
being
stolen.
B
So
now
he's
parking
his
work
truck
at
home
and
is
having
issues
with
environmental
health,
saying
it's
not
a
legally
compliant
truck
parked
in
a
residential
area
and
Becky
jerkas.
The
president
of
the
Bloomington
Symphony
Orchestra
raised
some
concerns
about
Artistry
and
had
to
we
had
a
discussion
about
Artistry.
Unfortunately,
that
was
very
limited
because
of
our
our
time.
Limitations
at
the
point
at
that
point,
but
I'm
sure
that
both
Becky
and
Jen
Herron
who's,
the
vice
chair
of
Angelica
cantante,
who
is
also
looking
to
speak
and
wasn't
able
to
because
of
time.
B
I'm
sure
they'll
be
interested
to
know
about
our
public
hearing
next
week
regarding
Artistry.
So
that
was
what
we
had
in
our
city
council
listening
session
this
evening,
Mr
Sable,
do
you
have
anything
to
add
many
council
members
I
do
not
thank
you.
Mr
Sable,
Council,
anything
councilmember,
dalessandro
really
quickly.
B
A
reminder
that
I
am
hosting
the
next
town
hall,
this
Thursday,
the
20th
of
October
I,
know
I'm
competing
with
mea,
but
if
you're
in
town
please
come
and
join
me
it'll,
be
at
Northwest
Sciences
University,
looking
forward
to
hanging
out
with
the
public
very
good.
Thank
you.
Thank
you,
Council
anything
else,
hearing
nothing
else.
I
can
also.
We
are
to
the
point
where
I
will
look
for
a
motion
to
adjourn
so
moved,
got
a
motion
and
a
second
to
adjourn
this
evening.
B
No
further
Council
discussion,
all
those
in
favor,
please
signify
by
saying
aye
aye
opposed
motion-
carries
7-0
Council
thanks
for
your
discussion
this
evening,
good
job.
Thank
you
to
staff
for
sticking
it
out
with
us
and
I'm.
Sorry,
we
missed.
We
had
some
people
who
didn't
get
a
chance
to
talk.
Thank
you
to
the
members
of
the
public
who
came
forward
and
everybody
who
watched
everybody
have
a
good
Tuesday
thanks
much.