►
From YouTube: May 26, 2020 Emergency Bloomington City Council Meeting
Description
Emergency Bloomington Minnesota City Council Meeting
A
A
A
B
D
A
A
It's
it's
gonna,
be
a
change
and
something
we're
gonna
have
to
get
used
to
a
little
bit,
but
it
is
now
part
of
the
guidelines
within
City
Hall,
for
staff
that
are
still
working
here,
that,
if
they're,
if
they
have
business
beyond
their
own
desks,
they're
expected
to
wear
a
mask.
So
if
they're
headed
to
and
from
the
restroom
or
sitting
in
meetings
with
other
members,
that
a
mask
would
be
expected,
and
so
we
figured,
it
was
just
appropriate
that
we'd
also
wear
masks
here
at
the
emergency
City
Council
meeting.
A
So
if
you'll
see
if
you'll
notice,
both
the
city
manager,
the
assistant
manager,
the
city
manager
and
I
are
always
wearing
masks
and
the
council
chambers,
and
that
I
expect
will
be
the
expectation
going
forward
for
the
foreseeable
future.
So
we
have
one
item
on
our
agenda
this
afternoon:
it's
it's
a
public
hearing
regarding
an
emergency
ordinance
regulating
the
temporary
creation
and
extension
of
commercial
spaces.
Mr.
Farooqi
Thank.
D
You
mr.
mayor
and
councilmembers,
just
the
quick
history
of
how
we
came
to
be
sitting
here
today
as
I
think
most
members
of
the
public
are
aware,
and
certainly
the
council
is
the
governor
last
Wednesday
May
20th
provided
the
stay
safe,
Minnesota
plan
for
allowing
restaurants
and
bars
to
reopen
slowly
and
part
of
those
guidelines
included
operations
only
outside
of
the
restaurant
there's,
no
dining
that's
allowed
inside
the
premises.
D
Recognizing
that
the
spacing
requirements
and
the
limitations
on
the
number
of
people
meant
that
there
was
likely
going
to
be
some
encroachment
beyond
the
premises
for
most
establishments
and
because
a
number
of
these
establishments
are
licensed
for
on
sale
liquor.
We
had
to
make
sure
that
Public,
Safety
and
is
is
addressed
as
we
consider
how
to
allow
them
to
reopen
and
to
conduct
business
as
normal,
which
means
going
beyond
the
defined
premises
with
most
of
the
liquor
licenses,
and
we
also
have
a
number
of
situations.
Mr.
D
mayor
and
councilmembers,
where
these
establishments
do
not
own
the
entirety
of
the
property
or
even
none
of
the
property
where
they
operate,
and
so
there
has
to
be
some
accommodation
within
those
shared
spaces,
especially
with
parking,
lots
and
sidewalks,
and
so
before
I
say
anything
else.
I
do
want
to
say
thank
you
to
the
staff
because
we
had
a
day
and
a
half
to
research.
D
These
issues
prepare
the
ordinance
put
out
the
packet
and
our
staff
in
legal
planning,
building
inspections,
the
clerk's
office,
environmental
health
administration,
we're
just
amazing
frankly,
turning
all
this
information
around
so
real
quickly,
hats
off
to
staff
for
doing
that.
So
what's
the
effect
of
what
we're
doing
here,
mr.
mayor
and
councilmembers,
what's
in
front
of
you
is
an
ordinance
that
will
allow
for
these
establishments
to
operate
outside
of
the
confines
of
their
building.
There's
a
process
that
they
have
to
go
through
staffs
intent
in
putting
this
together.
D
Not
just
the
ordinance,
but
also
the
process
itself
was
to
make
this
as
user-friendly
as
possible
with
the
intent
of
getting
these
businesses
in
position
so
that
they
can
open
on
June
1st,
with
very
very
limitation
or
at
least
impediment
from
the
city
of
Bloomington
as
it
comes
to
permitting.
There
is
no
fee,
that's
attached
to
anything
within
the
ordinance
for
reviewing
their
site
plans
that
come
in
or
any
of
the
requests
for
expansion
of
the
commercial
space.
That's
an
important
consideration.
D
We
have
looked
at
issues
related
to
the
parking
in
the
encroachment
into
the
parking.
We
are
maintaining
Public
Safety
we're
not
allowing
encroachment
into
fire
lanes,
but
we
are
providing
accommodations
throughout
the
area,
so
we
maintain
access,
but
we
also
again
try
to
facilitate
this
as
easily
as
possible
and
then
there's
a
checklist.
That's
been
prepared
for
the
businesses,
so
they
know
exactly
what's
expected
of
them
and
to
the
extent
that
we
will
take
these
permit,
requests
in
and
turn
them
around
right
away.
D
I
would
say
that
there's
a
presumption
of
approval
here
in
that
you
know,
once
they
satisfy
the
requirements
on
that
checklist.
We
will
work
with
the
establishments
to
gain
compliance,
but
we're
going
to
assume
that
they
are
doing
everything
to
stay
within
the
rules
here
and
we're
going
to
do
everything
to
make
sure
that
that
happens.
So
we
have
our
city
attorney
is
on
the
line
we
have
staff
from
environmental
health
and
planning,
I,
believe
clerk
and
others
that
are
available.
D
If
you
have
questions,
but
this
is
relatively
straightforward
and
our
intent
is,
should
the
council
approve
this
emergency
ordinance,
we
would
immediately
contact
all
of
our
licensed
liquor
holders,
as
well
as
all
of
the
restaurants
which
environmental
maintains
a
database,
and
so
we
have
contact
information
either
through
email
or
mail,
and
if
we
can't
reach
those
we'll
start
making
phone
calls
too
so
we'll
make
sure
that
we're
reaching
out
to
folks
right
away
so
that
they
understand
the
process.
So
mr.
C
Thank
You
mr.
mayor
I
just
wanted
to
clarify
something
and
I
had
already
emailed
the
city
manager
about
this,
but
I
gotten
a
few
questions
from
folks
and
and
just
wanted
to
clarify
that
there
are
no
fees
associated
with
this
expanded
capability
that
we're
not
charging
businesses
anything
to
to
take
advantage
of
these.
This
opportunity,
that's
correct.
D
C
E
F
And
I
appreciate
staff.
Turning
around
some
answers
for
questions,
I
had
asked
earlier
that
showed
generally
that
I
think
the
approach
will
be
to
be
as
flexible
as
possible
with
our
businesses.
Things
like
using
restrooms
different
ways
of
accessing
outdoor
spaces,
we'll
try
to
make
it
work
for
people
as
long
as
it's
safe.
As
you
know,
in
summary,
what
I
heard
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
that
was
kind
of
from
the
staff
side?
What
the
approach
is.
D
Mr.
breech,
mr.
mayor
and
council
members,
councilmember
Nelson,
the
answer
is
yes.
That
is
what
the
approach
is.
We
did
have
some
clarification
from
the
Minnesota
Department
of
Health
on
several
of
the
questions
that
council
asked
and
among
those-
and
this
is
more
for
the
public's
interest-
that
the
restroom
facilities
within
the
restaurants
will
be
open,
so
people
can
go
inside
to
utilize,
restrooms,
obviously,
sanitation,
hand-washing.
D
We
don't
have
an
expectation
of
what
the
time
line
is,
and
so
we're
gonna
be
working
closely
with
them
and
also
with
the
joining
properties
as
well.
We
recognize
in
some
areas
of
town
that
we
have
different
types
of
uses,
so
there
may
be
residential
uses
that
are
close
to
some
of
these
commercial
areas,
and
so
the
addition
of
outdoor
dining
may
somewhat
increase
the
noise.
One
of
the
important
elements
in
here
is
that
any
any
noise
has
to
be
ended
by
10:00
p.m.
so.
D
If
there's
a
outdoor
music
or
something
along
those
lines
that
for
a
neighboring
residential
areas,
they
don't
have
the
addition
of
noise
as
a
result
of
this,
but
for
the
most
part,
we're
gonna
try
to
make
sure
that
the
businesses
can
do
this
successfully.
Recognizing
this
is
challenging
situation
for
everybody.
Oh.
F
Thank
you
appreciate
that
I
just
want
to
make
sure
people
are
aware
of
that
I'm
sure
there's
interested
parties
watching
this
trying
to
figure
out
how
to
operate
their
business
going
forwards.
With
regards
to
the
buffet
I
know
this
isn't
really
covered
in
there,
but
I
do
believe.
There's
one
in
Edina
that
has
provided
a
way
for
people
to
like
check
off
what
they
want,
and
then
someone
could
bring
that
food
out
to
them.
F
D
Mayor
encounters
councilmember
Nelson.
We
can
certainly
look
into
that
environmental
health
is
going
to
be
the
one
that
enforces
that
and
provides
guidance
to
the
establishments.
So
we
can
see
if
there's
somebody
that's
doing
it
in
a
different
way,
but
I
think
what
you've
described
is
essentially
server
service.
It's
just
that
the
servers
are
getting
the
food
from
a
buffet,
that's
laid
out.
So
it's
not
that
the
the
rest
of
the
customers
have
access
to
it.
Okay,.
F
And
then
I
appreciate
your
comments
on
the
permit
with
regards
to
the
presumption
of
approval,
because
I
do
know,
a
few
cities
have
moved
forward
with
similar
ordinances
that
did
not
require
a
permit
and
so
I'm.
Just
if
you
could
just
touch
on
what
that
would
look
like
if
somebody
say,
for
example,
got
their
information
into
the
city
on
Friday,
would
they
still
be
able
to
move
forward
on
June
1st
if
the
city
hasn't
had
a
chance
to
review
it?
I'm.
E
That
are
what
what
you
have
in
your
form
before
you
is,
is
a
hybrid
of
what
we've
researched
and
found
be
the
case.
If
you
look
at
the
way
the
form
was
drafted,
it's
very
much
an
on
your
honor
approach.
We
want
to
see
the
plans.
We
want
to
understand
it's
important,
that
the
police
and
licensing
and
fire
know
where
certain
activities
are
occurring
for
licensing
and
public
safety
reasons
and
same
similarly
with
environmental,
health
and
planning.
E
But
if
you
look
at
the
form,
it's
an
initial
here
approach
and
that
folks
need
to
be
cognizant
and
prepared
to
do
what
they're
about
to
do,
but
if
they
submit
their
their
form
on
Friday
and
they
have
and
they're
able
to
initial
all
other
relevant
boxes
and
collect
signatures
for
their
restaurant
owner
and
the
pretty
owner.
If
that's
a
different
party,
then
you
know
absent
some
sort
of
extraordinary
concern.
I
would
think
that
that
would
be
possible
for
them
to
still
open
up
on
June
1.
F
My
last
question
has
to
do
with
win
this
because
it
is
temporary
terminates
and
according
to
section
16
of
it,
it
terminates
when
the
umber
local
emergency
is
terminated
and
I'll.
Be
honest.
I
just
have
a
little
bit
of
a
concern
about
that,
as
opposed
to
maybe
putting
a
year-end
deadline
or
something
like
that,
because
one
I
don't
know
if
or
why
we
would
extend
the
emergency
after
I
forget
I,
think
it
goes
through
June
or
July
I
create
the
exact
date,
but
you
know
why
are
those
two
things
tied
together?
D
Mayor
and
council
members,
council,
member
Nelson
part
of
the
authority
for
doing
the
emergency
ordinance
is
that
we
have
a
locally
declared
peacetime
emergency
and
that's
the
same
authority
that
the
state
has
used
for
the
actions
they're
taking
our
our
local
emergency
has
been
declared
through
June
30th.
We
will
expect
to
get
more
direction
from
the
state
of
Minnesota
June
12th
is
when
the
current
emergency
expires
that
the
governor
has
declared.
D
So
this
is
one
of
those
things
that
we're
going
to
have
to
monitor
and
if
the,
if
the,
if
the
environmental
conditions
change
before
our
emergency
expires,
so
before
June
30th
currently
and
the
restaurants
are
allowed
to
operate
differently,
and
this
ordinance
was
no
longer
necessary
than
the
City
Council
can
terminate
the
ordinance
at
that
time
as
well
see.
The
attorney
is.
E
E
Similarly,
with
regard
to
that
section,
16
acknowledging
that
you
know
there
are
ever-changing
situations
and
there
are
underlying
basis
of
authority
that
that
come
into
play
as
to
whether
or
not
this
ordinance
will
continue
forward.
So
just
as
a
reminder
with
regard
to
all
of
the
the
actions
that
have
been
taken
by
this
council
with
regard
to
the
covet,
the
ordinances
that
you've
been
passing
hat
can
be
rescinded
at
any
time
by
resolution
of
the
City
Council
and.
D
F
A
Councilmember
Nelson
I
want
just
want
to
say,
I
appreciate
the
fact
that
councilmember
Nelson
actually
brought
this
forward.
The
first
time
that
we
had
heard
about
it,
I
think
through
contacts
for
information
he
leaned
through
the
chamber
of
commerce,
so
in
addition
to
staff
and
their
quick
work
on
it.
Thank
you.
The
council
member
Nelson,
for
for
bringing
this
forward
and
moving
this
onto
our
radar
screen
so
well
done.
G
Thank
you,
I
did
have
my
hand
rage,
just
unraised,
because
I
wanted
to
acknowledge
constant
under
Nelson's,
bringing
us
forward
at
the
last
council
meeting,
which
you
just
did
so
that
and
I
had
a
few
questions
that
were
in
parallel
with
what
customer
Nelson
also
asked.
So
no
further
questions
on
my
thank
you.
A
E
A
H
H
C
A
F
Thank
You
mayor,
the
only
thing
I'd
later
said:
I
want
to
follow
up
a
little
bit
on
the
termination
time
frame
and
tying
it
to
the
emergency
declaration.
I
think
for
the
sake
of
a
lot
of
our
businesses
within
the
community.
Having
that
uncertainty
that
this
might
go
away
in
a
month
provides
a
disincentive
for
them
to
make
some
of
the
necessary
investments
that
they
might
need
to
to
implement
this
site.
F
I
can
also
see
a
period
of
time
in
which
there's
a
crossover
where
they
may
want
to
have
and
be
allowed
to
have
people
inside
of
the
establishments,
but
also
in
order
to
get
as
much
revenue
since
they've
been
so
impacted
by
this.
Having
that
outdoor
space
this
year
would
make
would
help
them
through
this
situation,
I
mean
they've
been
right.
F
You
know
one
of
the
industries,
that's
been
mostly
directly
impacted
by
this
situation
and
anything
we
can
do
to
help
them
this
year
and
provide
some
certainty
that
they
could
continue
that
outdoor
service,
if
it
makes
sense
for
their
business
model
in
my
mind,
makes
sense
and
I
would
prefer
to
put
a
time
an
expiration.
You
know
you
know
at
the
end
of
the
year,
obviously
I
don't
think
they're
gonna
seek
people
outside
in
the
winter,
but
just
to
give
them
that
certainty.
F
A
D
Mayor
and
councilmembers
I'm
not
going
to
address
the
legal
issue.
Although
we
talked
to
the
logistical
issue,
I
I
think
that
we
expect
that's
going
to
be
the
case.
As
councilmember
Nelson
said,
there's
gonna
a
hybrid
at
some
point
as
the
as
the
governor
and
the
Department
of
Health
allow
for
in
indoor
dining
to
resume.
It's
likely
going
to
be
again
with
spacing
or
capacity
limitations,
and
so
it
makes
sense
that
restaurants,
to
the
extent
they're
able
to
do
it,
would
want
to
maintain
outdoor
and
indoor
I.
Won't.
D
I,
won't
presume
the
the
position
of
the
council.
From
from
my
perspective,
it
makes
sense
to
continue
to
allow
an
expansion
of
the
commercial
area
for
a
certain
period
of
time
until
we
understand
how
that
plays
out.
I
think
the
other
logistical
issue
just
has
to
do
with
how
it
impacts
some
of
the
other
adjacent
properties
so
where
some
of
these
establishments
are
located
in
like
strip
malls
and
other
places
where
they
have
shared
parking.
D
It's
not
expected
that
this
is
going
to
create
a
parking
capacity
issue
right
away,
because
obviously
the
parking
is
based
on
the
number
of
people
inside
the
restaurant.
The
outdoor
accommodation
is
probably
still
going
to
be
less
than
those
people,
so
I,
don't
think
we're
gonna
have
a
parking
issue
right
away
as
we
return
to
something
that's
closer
to
normal
if
we're
still
allowing
expanded
outdoor.
While
we
still
while
we
have
indoor
parking
may
become
a
problem,
so
we
just
want
to
be
cognizant
that
that's
an
issue
that
we
may
have
to
work
through.
D
I,
don't
think
at
this
point
in
time,
it's
fair
to
forecast
that
that
should
be
a
limitation.
I
think
this
is
one
of
those
things
that
we're
gonna
monitor
to
see
how
it
goes
and
again
it
will
take
the
direction
of
the
council
on
this,
but
I
think
we
want
to
do
what
we
can
to
make
our
our
business
is
successful.
E
Mayor
members,
I
believe
that
section
16
should
stay
the
way.
It
is
it's
my
recommendation
that
that
that
that
be,
that
way,
I
can
appreciate
the
desire
to
have
more
certainty,
but
I.
Just
don't
think
that
that
certainty
is
really
there
in
that.
The
situation
is
fluid.
I
think
that
what
we
have
before
you
consideration
is
as
flexible
as
possible
and
well.
I
can
appreciate
that
there
will
be
some
investments
necessary
to
pull
this
off
for
businesses.
We're
hopeful
that
they'll
be
able
to
do
that
with
minimal
expenditures.
E
Given
the
flexibility
that
we've
crafted
into
this
document,
I
would
also
add
that
there
you
know,
in
addition
to
being
flexible
as
the
city
manager
indicated.
This
is
a
very
changing
situation
and
we
we
know
that
we
have
to
be.
We
would
know.
We
know
that
we
want
to
be
reasonable
during
this
process,
but
at
the
same
time
there
are
certain
limitations,
and
even
if
we
did
put
a
date
on
on
section
16,
the
council
could
still
by
resolution
rescinded
at
any
time.
F
That
answers
that
part,
you
know
open
it
up
to
my
colleagues
if
there
was
any
interest
in
changing
that
you
know
you
know
I'm
in
favor
of
this
either
way.
I
think
this
is
a
good
step
for
our
restaurants.
Our
business
community
absolutely
necessary
for
them
I.
Just
you
know,
as
a
small
business
owner
and
very
sensitive
to
making
sure
I
have
certainty
when
I'm
looking
forward
and
trying
to
plan-
and
this
is
a
time
of
great
uncertainty
for
a
business
community.
G
Affected
soul,
so
much
by
the
shutdown
and
even
the
limited
opening
is
still
going
to
continue
that
effect
and
whatever
we
can
do
to
support
them.
Is
it's
reasonable
to
do
I
support,
obviously,
I?
Don't
think
anyone
is
going
to
go
and
want
to
sift
and
heart
mater
on
the
grass
area
during
the
winter,
so
some
time
in
fall
seems
reasonable
to
me
and
we
do
have
an
expectation
that
we're
going
to
change.
The
ordinance
is
other
changes
come
true
by
the
governor.
G
The
ordinance
says
it's
crafted
I
think
the
staff
did
a
wonderful
job
of
making
it
flexible,
because
I
expect
to
see
a
step
up
in
the
number
of
people
which
will
cause
us
to
look
at
it
again
being
uncertain
as
to
when
that
would
happen.
I
just
think
that
at
fall
date
and
I
threw
out
September
30th
as
a
suggestion,
although
I'm
flexible
with
then.
C
You
mr.
mayor
I'm,
not
gonna,
repeat
what
council
members
Nelson
envelope
said:
I
I,
think
that
is
a
reasonable
thought
process
to
to
put
in
a
date
certain
I
think
you
know.
Nothing
is
for
certain.
Nothing
is
a
100
percent
certainty
in
anything
that
we
do,
but
I
I
think
you
know
knowing
that
that
we're
looking
farther
out
than
just
the
end
of
June
I
think
that
that
is
gonna
provide.
However,
you
know
greater
a
degree
of
certainty.
I
think
that
would
that
would
definitely
be
preferable.
I
would
also
just
add
and
I.
C
You
know
like
councilmember
Nelson,
I'm
gonna
support
this
either
way.
I
think
it's
a
logical
and
in
common-sense
thing
to
do.
I
just
want
to
I
want
to
encourage
us
as
we're
thinking
about
responding
to
things
moving
forward
that
that
we're
also
thinking
about
how
we're
supporting
the
folks
who
are
are
working
in
these
businesses
and
making
sure
that
that
they
can
be
healthy
and
do
the
things
that
they
need
to
do.
In
addition
to
the
the
folks
who
own
and
and
manage
the
businesses
as
well.
H
So
I
would
be
in
supportive
of
putting
some
kind
of
fall
date
on
it,
whether
it's
councilman
belogus
suggestion
or
another
just
to
provide
a
baseline
of
expectations
and
then
how
we
step
this
process
of
moving
forward,
with
the
caveat,
obviously
that,
following
the
governor's
recommendations
and
any
curveballs,
we
see
coming
up
so
again.
Thank
you
staff
and
council
member
Nelson.
This
is.
I
A
H
E
Members
I,
of
course,
I
can't
predict
the
future
with
regard
to
what
the
City
Council
will
do
or
what
the
governor
would
do.
But
if
the
governor
extends
the
peacetime
emergency,
the
City
Council
could
similarly
extend
its
peacetime
emergency
at
that
second
meeting
in
June,
and
so
that
would
push
the
deadline
out
as
well.
I
think
that
that
is
a
moving
target.
E
E
That
said,
business
owners,
as
you
all
know,
are
very
creative
and,
and
who
knows
what
will
happen,
what
will
be
going
on
in
the
winter?
With
regard
to
this
endemic
and
this
virus
I
think
if
I
was
going
to
suggest
some
sort
of
a
alternative
language,
I
think
what
I
would
probably
recommend
is
just
simply
ending
section
16
after
the
word
resolution
and
taking
off
for
until
the
local
emergency
related
to
this
bubble.
Bubble
is
terminated
and
then
I
would
bring
a
council
action.
Put
it
on
before
you
an
action
to
rescind
this
particular
resolution.
E
D
Thank
You
mr.
mayor
and
council
members
I
think
the
recommendation
from
the
city
attorney.
He
is
a
good
one.
I
think
the
question
that
staff
has
is
just
the
authority
to
continue
to
operate
beyond
having
an
emergency
declaration
in
place
and
with
the
state
I
believe
the
governor
can
only
do
30
days
at
a
time.
So
the
special
session
that
we've
been
forecasting
for
June
12th
is
because
the
governor
is
expected
to
extend
the
emergency
declaration
for
the
state
on
that
day.
D
The
way
that
it
works
is
that
the
legislature
has
the
ability
to
override
the
governor's
declaration,
but
it
requires
both
of
the
chambers
to
do
so.
The
Senate
may
have
concerns
as
they've
expressed
concerns.
The
house
is
probably
likely
going
to
go
along
with
the
governor
and
so
I
would
expect
that
there'll
be
another
30-day
extension,
but
that
gets
us
to
July.
So
the
only
reason
I
point
that
out
is
our
ability
to
to
extend
our
own
deck
raishin.
You
know
I
think
we
have
to
track
what
the
state
is
doing.
A
So
a
couple
of
thoughts
that
I
think
when
this
man
is
had
laid
out,
I
do
think,
makes
sense,
but
mr.
broody,
what
she
just
said
also
makes
sense.
I
think
we
can
extend
this
as
long
as
we
want
knowing
full
well
that
if
the
state
repeals
the
emergency
declaration,
then
we
are
going
to
be
forced
to
repeal
this
declaration,
but
I
think
it's
a
worthwhile
it's
worthwhile
to
move
forward.
As
some
folks
have
stated
it.
A
It
gives
restaurant
owners
a
little
bit
more
flexibility,
probably
some
more
time
and
frankly,
those
of
you
who
are
thinking
that
just
isn't
gonna
go
into
the
winter.
You've
never
tailgated
before.
Clearly,
because
this
could
very
easily
I
think
go
into
November
and
even
in
December,
with
just
a
little
bit
of
creativity.
A
So
I
would
be
supportive
of
a
September,
30th
understanding
and
as
long
as
we
all
understand
it,
full
well
and
and
the
restaurant
owners
understand
it
full
well
that
if
the
the
legislature,
if
the
governor
rescinds
the
state
emergency
order,
that
this
will
have
to
be
rescinded
as
well
and
I,
think
if
we
just
go
forward
with
our
eyes
wide
open
on
this
I
think
it's
possible.
We
could
do
that.
Consumer
blogan.
A
E
Section
16
would
then
read:
this
ordinance
shall
take
effect
immediately
upon
passage
as
permitted
by
section
3.09
at
a
city
charter
and
shall
remain
in
place
until
September,
30th
2020
unless
rescinded
by
the
City
Council
by
resolution
or
until
the
local
emergency
related
to
this
coalbed
19
pandemic
is
terminated.
That.
E
A
A
C
A
G
C
B
C
A
A
A
That
we
are
adjourned.
Thank
you
all.
Thanks
for
staff
for
pulling
this
together,
I'm
very
short
notice.
Thank
you
to
our
council
for
coming
together
on
short
notice,
greatly
appreciated
and
looking
forward
to
seeing
those
outdoor
seating
areas
at
our
restaurants
here
in
Bloomington.
So
thank
you
all
very
much.
We're
adjourned.