►
Description
November 17, 2022 Bloomington Minnesota Planning Commission Meeting
0:00:00 Start
0:04:00 ITEM 1 PL2022-222
(public hearing) City of Bloomington
Miscellaneous Issues Ordinances
0:17:24 ITEM 2 City of Bloomington
(study item) Capital Improvement Plan
0:28:15 ITEM 3 City of Bloomington
(study item) Gyropolis TIF and Redevelopment Plan
0:47:27 ITEM 4 City of Bloomington
(study item) Consider approval of draft September 29, 2022, October 13, 2022 and October 27, 2022 Planning Commission meeting synopses
0:49:41 ITEM 5 City of Bloomington
(study item) Adopt 2023 Planning Commission Meeting Schedule
0:53:10 ITEM 6 City of Bloomington
(study item) Planning Commission Policy and Issues Update
A
A
A
A
Good
evening
and
welcome
to
the
November
17th
meeting
of
the
Bloomington
Planning
Commission,
the
Planning
Commission
is
made
up
of
seven
volunteer
Bloomington
residents
appointed
by
the
city
council.
Tonight
we
have
five,
which
is
a
quorum.
The
commission
advised
that
the
city
council
on
development
proposals,
development
standards,
long-range
planning
and
transportation
issues.
Our
work
is
informed
by
the
city's
comprehensive
plan,
various
District
plans
and
the
city
code.
A
For
some
items.
The
commission
makes
a
recommendation
with
the
city
council
having
the
final
decision-making
Authority.
We
have
three
of
those
items
tonight.
In
other
cases,
the
Planning
Commission
can
approve
or
deny
an
application
subject
to
an
appeal
to
the
city
for
each
action
item.
There
will
be
a
staff
report,
an
opportunity
for
the
applicant
to
present
at
any
time
for
any
member
of
the
public
to
provide
testimony.
A
A
A
D
D
C
C
and
you
all
are
familiar
with
what
we're
doing
here
with
miscellaneous
issues,
but
for
the
viewers
at
home.
As
a
reminder,
this
is
we
prepare
as
a
planning
division
to
collect
and
consider
right.
Many
small
changes
to
our
code
that
by
their
own,
would
not
Merit
the
process
of
of
reviewing
and
and
going
through,
the
process
of
public
hearings,
and
so
that's
what
we're
doing
here
today
with
miscellaneous
issues,
and
so
let's
get
started.
C
C
So
we
did
reorganize
so
from
the
time
that
you've
seen
us.
Last
till
now
we
have
reorganized
our
ordinances
into
two
categories.
The
category
that
you
see
on
the
screen
with
the
red
box
indicates
that
it
is
considered
a
cleanup
or
a
housekeeping
note,
and
that
means
that
it
is
either
a
word
change
or
removing
a
reference
or
removing
a
reference
to
a
section
of
code
or
to
a
a
principal
use
that
no
longer
exists.
C
E
So
the
first
amendment
has
to
do
with
catering
businesses
adding
them
to
the
use
table.
Currently
catering
major
catering
business
is
permitted
in
i1,
I2
and
I3,
but
not
in
fd2
and
catering
business
is
similar
to
food
manufacturing
or
restaurant
use,
which
is
an
allowed
use
in
the
fd2
zoning
District.
So
this
would
be
just
adding
catering
major
business
as
permitted
use
and
the
next
one
has
to
do
with
exterior
storage.
The
city
has
seen
issues
with
businesses
displaying
outdoor
merchandise
improperly,
such
as
unblocking
sidewalks
or
putting
them
in
a
parking
space.
E
C
Ordinance
C
is
the
tent
code,
and
so
the
definition
of
tent
did
not
specify
the
composite
parts
of
a
tent
it.
It
just
talked
about
the
structure
in
and
of
itself,
and
this
has
resulted
in
some
enforcement
issues
where
the
frame
of
the
tent
was
left
up
for
longer
than
the
allowed
time,
and
so
with
working
with
our
environmental
health.
Colleagues,
we
have
updated
the
definition
of
tent
to
include
the
composite
parts.
C
C
Work
vehicle
parking
storage.
This
one
is
putting
in
code
a
practice
that
we
have
been
using
in
the
planning
division.
When
we
talk
about
site
development,
if
there
are
spaces
for
vehicles
that
are
for
the
on-site
business,
we
would
require
that
the
parking
for
those
Vehicles
not
be
part
of
the
required
parking
that
is,
is
needed.
E
The
next
one,
the
city
code
currently
does
not
have
an
exception
for
temporary
fences
for
construction
purposes,
and
this
issue
can
arise
when
non-residential
buildings,
such
as
fire
stations
and
park,
structures
which
are
in
residential
zoning
districts
are
constructed
and
they
want
a
temporary
fence.
So
this
basically
gives
them
allowance
to
have
a
temporary
fence
for
construction
purposes.
C
We
looked
at
this
and
we
are
it.
It
seems
like
this
isn't
really
speaking
to
that.
It's
speaking
to
more
of
a
more
of
a
business
operation
where
people
acquire
cars
from
auctions
and
then
are
selling
multiple
vehicles
on
their
home
lot
effectively
running
a
commercial
operation
which
is
not
the
intent,
but
in
terms
of
like,
if
there
is
a
family
member
or
a
vehicle
sale
that
needs
to
happen
I'm
talking
with
our
our
compliance
that
it's
they
are
working
with
with
members
of
the
public.
C
C
So
we
we
have
with
that
understanding.
We
have
kept
the
ordinance
as
part
of
miscellaneous
issues
and
then
body
art,
so
body
art
is
piercing
tattoo
parlors,
looking
at
the
the
spaces
where
this
use
type
was
allowed
or
or
the
zoning
districts
that
these
use
types
were
allowed,
it
seemed
restricted
in
a
way
that
perhaps
was
based
on
a
stigmatization
of
this
form
of
art
of
this
of
this
retail.
C
So
we
are
proposing
that
we
open
up
body
art
to
be
much
like
any
other
retail
sales
and
services
accessory
dwelling
units,
the
utility
hookup
requirements,
the
this
is
based
off
of
the
guidance
from
our
city
engineering
department,
about
how
should
we
manage
the
requirements
for
adus
for
metering
and
hookup
for
sanitary
sewer,
and
so
with
this
we
are
recommending
that
detached
and
that's
something
that
I
believe
that
we
have
added.
Since
the
last
time.
C
And
and
then
so
begins
our
J
through
S,
which
are
the
cleanup
I'm
happy
to
talk
with
or
speak
about
those
oh
wait.
I'm
sorry
I
got
a
little
carried
away
there
and
then,
of
course,
there's
Jay
platin
exception
for
government
and
park
facilities,
and
that
is
saying
that
we
do
not
require
planning
or
we
will
allow
for
an
exception
of
planning
when
we
are
constructing
a
park
facility
that
does
not
exceed
a
thousand
square
feet,
subject
to
final
site
and
building
plan
approval
and
then
so
Begins.
C
A
A
D
A
A
A
I
I
will
note
that
Larry
economy
scholler
who's,
the
city's
Chief
Financial
Officer,
is
in
attendance
in
the
chambers.
As
my
understanding
to
answer
any
questions
you
might
have
that
are
more
detailed
about
the
CIP
but
yeah.
Let's
just
jump
in
I
have
a
very
short
slide
deck
here.
So,
as
I
mentioned
this,
this
action
before
tonight
is
required
by
state
law.
I
I
So
some
of
the
major
or
I
should
say
that
the
way
the
CIP
breaks
it
down.
Some
of
you
have
gone
through
this
before,
but
they
break
it
down
in
five
categories:
City
facilities,
Park
development,
sewer
water
and
storm
water,
South,
Loop,
port
authority
projects
and
surface
Transportation
projects.
Some
of
the
more
notable
projects
in
this
this
10-year
cycle
include
the
494
35W
interchange
associated
with
that
is
the
Portland
Avenue
Bridge.
It's
part
of
the
494
project.
I
I
You
know
certain
larger
projects
like
the
Community
Health
and
Wellness
Center
or
fire
stations
when
it
talks
about
Community
facilities.
But
most
of
these
things
on
the
on
the
180
are
going
to
be
very
kind
of
in
the
weeds
of
nuanced
and
detail
that
you're
not
going
to
find
in
a
comp
plan.
So,
just
as
a
reminder,
what
the
meaning
of
compliance
is
is
that
the
projects
themselves
are
consistent
with
the
goals,
objective
strategies
and
the
the
text
of
the
plan
and
in
the
Judgment
of
planning
staff.
I
After
reviewing
the
list
and
reviewing
those
chapters
of
the
comprehensive
plan,
we're
confident
that
the
projects
and
the
CIP
are
consistent
and
in
compliance
with
the
comprehensive
plan.
So
with
that
I
would
present
a
recommended
motion
and
certainly
I
can
stand
for
questions
and,
as
I
noted,
the
city
CFO
is
in
attendance
as
well.
G
I
Yeah
chair,
commissioner
cook
done,
CFO
controller
might
have
having
served
on
the
CIP
committee
might
even
have
a
better
answer
for,
but
my
understanding
it
more
so
has
to
do
with
a
lot
of
the
funding
sources
for
those
projects
coming
from
specific
sources
of
Taxation.
That
fund
a
lot
of
improvements
in
the
South
Loop
probably
inform
why
it's
broken
out
into
a
separate
category,
but
I'd
certainly
welcome
Lori's
guidance
and
knowledge
in
that
Arena
as
well.
If
she's,
willing
or
able.
J
Chairman
Roman,
going
back
into
history,
DeMarco
guard,
wouldn't
know
this
self
was
identified
as
one
of
the
city,
pearls
back
in
I
would
say
very
early
2000s
and
it
just
stuck
in
the
CIP
as
an
area
because
it
had
so
much
development
potential
that
it
just
created
an
area
that
really
identified
all
the
projects
in
that
very
specific
area.
For
a
long
period
of
time.
I
Yeah
true
Roman,
thanks
for
that
question,
that's
a
good
question.
One
thing
I
would
say
about,
as
it
relates
to
equity
and
Community
Health
I
think
the
CIP
committee,
its
roster
and
kind
of
Who's
involved
in
that
conversation
of
prioritization
and
what
projects
get
added
is
broader
than
it's
ever
been.
Is
my
understanding.
So
there's
a
lot
more
people
at
the
table
who
are
kind
of
you
know
talking
about
and
debating
the
merits
of
certain
projects
versus
others
and
through
different,
and
they
all
come
from
different
disciplines
and
lenses.
I
I
And
so,
when
there's
a
lot
of
Staff
collaboration
having
taken
part
in
the
park
master
plan
process,
for
example,
that
was
led
by
Park
staff
and
their
Consultants.
There
was
a
very
wide
range
of
staff
that
were
involved
in
that
from
Public
Works
to
Community
Development
to
other
departments
within
the
city,
and
so
I
would
just
say
that,
as
the
city
is
kind
of
working
on
these
long-range
planning
efforts
throughout
the
seven
divisions
of
the
city
and
and
kind
of
what's
going
on
throughout
the
community.
I
A
You
for
that
and
I
just
I
raise
that
for
us
to
think
about,
because
when
we
worked
on
the
comprehensive
plan
and
commissioner
Corbin
who's,
not
here
tonight
and
I
were
on
that
committee,
we
did
talk
about
some
of
those
goals
around
helping
to
close
some
of
those
gaps
and
and
work
on
those
issues
and
and
I
think
one
of
the
areas
where
we
can
have
an
eye
on
that.
Every
year.
A
D
A
A
G
G
I
A
G
A
K
Evening,
hi,
so
this
evening
my
name
is
Erica.
Coleman
I
am
the
HRA
administrator
here
and
this
evening.
What
we
have
before
you
is
that
the
city
and
Authority
are
considering
the
establishment
of
a
tax,
increment
financing,
Redevelopment
district
for
nine
thousand
Penn
Avenue
South
and
2325
West
90th
Street,
better
known
as
europolis.
K
K
So
what
is
this
project?
Well,
this
project
is
proposed
to
be
about
a
2400
square
foot.
Restaurant
expansion,
the
West
Edition,
would
include
an
enlarged
kitchen
storage,
freezer
space
and
new
trash
room,
and
the
East
Edition
would
include
74
additional
indoor
seats.
There
would
also
be
an
outdoor
patio
seating
with
58
seats
and
a
new
facade
that
includes
stucco
metal
and
a
substantial
amount
of
glass.
K
K
Excuse
me
sorry.
This
Redevelopment
would
be
using
incompatible
land
uses
and
or
outdated
buildings.
In
particular,
there
is
a
current
blighted
building
on
one
of
those
Parcels
that
this
would
be
removing
and
redeveloping
where
that
blighted
building
currently
is
and
then
goal
number
four
promote
continued
economic
development
for
the
city
and
the
region,
and
so
there
are
two
strategies
here
that
are
closely
identified
with
this
Redevelopment
proposal:
strategy,
4.4
of
leveraging,
Partnerships
and
funding
tools
to
Foster
public
and
private
investment
in
infrastructure,
Economic,
Development
and
Community
Services.
K
Yes,
this
is
an
application
for
tax
increment
financing.
However,
this
project
in
particular,
has
leveraged
funding
from
the
state,
in
particular
from
deed
for
the
Redevelopment
and
the
removal
of
this
blighted
building
on
that
second
parcel,
so
we
are
definitely
leveraging
Partnerships
and
funding
tools
and
then
strategy,
4.6
of
fostering
entrepreneurship,
job
growth,
business
retention,
expansion
and
recruitment,
specifically
business
retention
and
expansion,
is
a
part
of
this
strategy
for
this
free
development.
K
So
what
is
the
process?
Well,
we
are
here
before
you
this
evening
to
request
that
you
determine
if
this
proposed
Tiff
plan
and
project
area
are
conformed
to
the
2040
comprehensive
plan,
and
then
we
would
go
before
the
city
council
on
December
5th,
for
a
public
hearing
and
then
the
HRA
board
on
December
13th
for
review
and
possibly
approval
of
the
Tiff
plan
and
agreement
and
to
enter
into
the
agreement
with
the
HRA
for
the
Tiff
and
I
can
stand
for
any
questions.
I
have
a
recommended
motion
before
you.
Thank.
F
Thank
you
just
a
clarifying
question,
the
previous
slide
that
talked
about
the
process
where
it
would
go
because
you're
from
the
HRA
commission
at
least
you
represent
that
group.
Did
your
committee
get
to
see
this
proposal
force,
or
does
it
come
first?
The
first
body
of
the
city
would
be
the
City
Planning
Commission
to
kind
of
make
sure
the
land
use
in
kind
of
meets
those
goals
for
the
city
before
a
tiff
is
proposed
and
it
kind
of
goes
through
the
channels
or
yeah
is
that
is
this,
like
the
first
committee
yeah.
K
Thank
you,
chair
Roman
and
commissioner
Abdi,
so
to
clarify
that
the
city
is
allocated
by
Statute,
a
certain
percentage
of
tax,
increment
financing
and
what
the
city
of
Bloomington
has
chosen
to
do
is
to
allocate
a
percentage
to
the
port
authority
and
a
percentage
to
the
HRA.
So
the
HRA
board
has
heard
about
this
project.
I
provide
them
updates.
They
also
were
informed
and
on
board
when
the
application
was
submitted
to
deed
for
the
funding.
K
The
grant
funding
that
this
project
has
been
awarded
last
or
earlier
this
week,
I
actually
did
have
a
HRA
board
meeting
where
I
updated
them
to
let
them
know
here
is
the
process.
We
would
go
to
the
Planning
Commission
first,
because
it
does
need
to
be
determined
that
it
does
conform
with
comprehensive
plan
as
a
whole.
K
Then
it
goes
to
the
city
council,
for
the
city
council
to
approve
creation
of
a
tiff
District
approving
the
project
area
in
the
Redevelopment
plan,
and
then
it
goes
to
the
HRA
board
to
also
review
and
approve
the
plan,
but
also
approve
entering
into
a
tiff
agreement,
which
is
how
it
becomes
executed
completely.
So
they
know
about
it.
But
they
have
not
ruled
or
approved
anything
yet.
H
It's
and,
and
one
question
I
had
is
really
around.
The
existing
building
has
been
vacant
for
some
time,
but
could
could
it
be
used
or
is
it
truly
condemned
in
the
sense
that
it
can't
be
redeveloped
in
the
manner
that
it
is
and
I
don't
think
you
yeah
that's
a
question
that
came
up
when
I
was
reading
the
packet.
K
Thank
you,
chair
Roman,
commissioner
coltsman.
Thank
you
for
that
question.
So
one
in
order
for
the
deed
application
to
be
submitted,
there
had
to
be
a
process
and
Report
completed
on
the
building,
so
our
building
official
actually
did
do
an
inspection
of
the
building
and
did
confirm
that
the
building
is
actually
blighted
and
cannot
be
redeveloped
in
its
current
state.
It
would
have
to
be
removed
and
the
new
building
would
have
to
be
erected.
I
do
believe
on
manager.
K
Market
guard
can
correct
me,
but
I
do
believe
that
the
use
for
this
area
cannot
be
a
gas
station
again.
So
there's
that
and
then
I
do
believe
that
what
came
before
you
was
the
re-platting
and
the
rezoning
so
that
there
could
be
a
development
here
and
part
of
the
rezoning
was
that
it
needed
to
be
rezoned,
because
previously
looking
housing
would
not
work
there.
K
H
Thank
you
for
the
clarification
and
it
may
have
a
second
one
of
the
things
I
look
at
for
tiffs
is
really
understanding
what
the
impact
to
our
residents
from
a
dollars
and
cents
perspective
I
understand
it
helps
the
div
the
the
financing
piece
for
the
owner
of
the
property.
But
could
you
explain
just
so
I
understand
in
the
to
five
people
that
might
be
watching?
What
does
a
tiff
do
and
how
does
it
impact
residents
from
like
I
said
financially
dollars
and
cents
from
tax
perspective?
Absolutely.
K
Thank
you,
chair,
Roman,
commissioner
goldsman.
So,
in
a
very
simple
term,
we
are
taking
a
structure,
a
building,
a
plot
of
land
that
isn't
has
no
tax
base.
It's
not
collecting
anything,
it's
not
bringing
any
value
to
the
area,
and
it's
also
is
blighted.
So
even
though
that's
not
really
the
best
term.
That
is
the
term
that
we
have
it's
it's
an
eyesore,
and
so
by
being
able
to
offer
a
mechanism
such
as
tax
increment
financing,
we
are
allowing
for
redevelopment
to
happen
which
overall
increases
the
tax
base.
K
That
is
able
to
be
collected
and
also
increasing
the
taxes
that
are
broken
up
between
the
taxing
agencies
and
jurisdictions,
which
include
the
county,
the
city
and
the
school
board.
And
excuse
me,
the
school
district
and
so
in
very
simple
terms.
What
it
does
for
those
around
in
terms
of
dollars
and
cents
is.
It
helps
to
increase
not
only
the
value
of
that
particular
parcel,
but
the
value
of
all
the
other
properties
in
the
area
so
that
people
are
actually
taking
advantage
of
Real
Estate.
G
K
You
chair
Roman
and
commissioner
cookton.
So
first
your
only
asked
to
see
that
it
conforms
with
the
comprehensive
plan,
so
the
city
council
would
have
to
actually
approve
the
Tiff
district
and
then
there
are
two
different
Tif
districts
that
are
available
redevelopments
if
district
and
housing
TIF
district,
and
so
this
project
in
particular
in
particular,
is
using
a
Redevelopment,
Tiff
and
I
do
want
to
mention
that
there
has
been
a
project
that
has
come
before
you
before
8200
Humboldt,
which
was
building
housing
but
was
also
a
Redevelopment
TIF
district.
K
A
G
It
was
that
I
didn't
think
this
project
met
the
comprehensive
plan
that
site
is
Zone
B4
and
that
that
application
had
a
lot
of
things
that
we
had
to
sort
of
bend
on
to
make
it
work.
It
did
not
meet
the
B4
in
its
by
definition,
and
there
were
a
lot
of
things:
closeness
to
the
street
floor
area
ratio
parking
in
front
of
the
building,
a
lot
of
things
that
we
typically
would
not
allow
in
before.
We
did
allow
for
that
particular
application.
But,
from
my
perspective,
that's
still.
G
The
comprehensive
plan
is
to
find
the
highest
and
best
land
use
for
the
zone
that
you
have
and
I.
Don't
think
this
project
accomplishes
that,
and
that
was
the
reason
I
did
not
approve
this
application,
or
this
Redevelopment
when
it
came
before.
Is
two
weeks
ago
and
I'm
not
sure
I
can
find
it
tonight
either
and
it's
not
a
reflection
on
the
Tiff.
It's
a
reflection
on
the
the
project
itself
and
the
zone
that
it's
in.
F
Sorry,
I
I
missed
the
last
meeting,
so
I
can't
really
recall
what
was
discussed,
but
it
is
my
understanding,
based
on
the
description,
how
Ms
Coleman
described
the
project
and
what
is
before
us.
It's
not
necessarily
about
the
use.
Is
it
or
is
it
just
a
development
I
think?
Could
you
maybe
refresh
what
our?
F
K
Thank
you,
chair
Roman,
commissioner
Abdi,
so
one
as
you
know,
with
the
comprehensive
plan,
there
are
a
few
areas
that
have
identified
goals
and
strategies.
What
I
have
brought
before
you
today
is
the
area
of
land
use
and
according
to
the
area
of
land
use
and
the
multiple
goals
that
are
listed
because
it's
comprehensive
plans,
so
one
project
would
not
Encompass
every
last
thing
in
our
comprehensive
plan.
A
The
comprehensive
plan
doesn't
get
to
that
level,
so
the
question
of
zoning
and
the
before
I
think
we
all
had
kind
of
a
general
kind
of
a
yeah,
not
not
exactly
what
we
had
in
mind,
but
the
comp
plan
doesn't
get
down
to
that
level.
The
comp
plan
is
the
35
000
foot
plan.
So
I
hear
you
what
you're
saying
I'm,
just
not
sure
that
that
specific
issue
is
is
carries
into
this
scope
of
the
comp
plan.
H
Thank
you
chair,
just
a
quick
clarification
that
we
as
a
body
are
looking
at
these
goals
and
it's
a
we
can.
We
can
have
a
finding
for
one
of
them
and
that
would
be
sufficient.
Is
that
an
accurate
statement?
So,
if
I
looked
at
2.2
and
said,
okay,
yes,
that
one
is
consistent
with
the
plan
4.4
and
4.6,
we'll
just
put
those
we
could
do
an
or
not
in
and
type
of
determination.
Is
that
accurate.
K
Thank
you,
chair
Roman
and
commissioner
goldsman.
That
is
accurate
and
I
would
say,
that's
accurate,
because
there
is
not
a
minimum
floor.
That
says,
in
order
to
make
a
determination
that
the
Tiff
plan
and
Redevelopment
plan
conform
with
the
city's
comprehensive
plan,
it
has
to
meet
X
number
of
goals
that
doesn't
exist.
So
at
least
one
goal
identified
in
a
project
in
a
development
would
technically
conform
with
the
city's
comprehensive
plan,
and
so
you
can
do
an
or
or
you
can
do,
an
and
in
your
determination.
F
A
F
A
A
Our
next
item
is
to
consider
several
Planning
Commission
meeting
synopsis.
Some
of
these
have
been
lingering
for
numbers
and
so
I
want
to
go
through
them
individually
because
we
may
or
may
not
have
the
right
number
to
approve
certain
meetings
so
on
September
29th
all
were
present,
except
for
commissioner
Albrecht.
So
we
could
entertain
a
motion
on
September
29th.
A
Second,
thank
you
have
a
motion
in
a
second
any
discussion,
all
those
in
favor
say:
aye
aye
aye
opposed
motion
passes.
The
next
item
is
October
13th
and
present
on
October
13th
were
myself,
commissioner
cookton,
commissioner
McGovern
and
commissioner
Albrecht
who's.
Not
here
so
with
three
who
were
present.
Are
we
able
to
approve
that
with
this
body
or
not?
We
probably
it
would
be
three
yes
and
two
abstain.
I
would
assume
that
would
yeah.
A
B
A
A
A
B
Chair
Roman
Commissioners,
we
had
a
discussion
at
your
last
meeting
about
third
2023
schedule
in
general
and
since
then
the
city
council
on
Monday
night
did
adopt
their
schedule
for
2023,
and
that
shows
up
here
on
the
screen,
the
change
they
made.
They
added
one
additional
meeting
versus
what
we
had
discussed
at
the
last
meeting,
so
they
do
now
have
27
meetings
and
staff
is
proposing.
B
D
B
Discussed
we
try
to
avoid
any
holidays
or
conferences,
school
breaks
and
we're
really
trying
to
get
11
days
between
the
Planning
Commission
meeting
and
the
city
council
meeting.
As
an
illustration
of
that,
for
example,
January
12th
would
feed
to
the
city
council
meeting
on
January
23rd
January
26th
would
feed
to
February
6th
Etc.
So
as
much
as
we
can
we're
trying
to
get
11
days
between
the
meetings
that
is
the
most
efficient
it's
fastest
way
to
get
an
item
through
Planning
Commission
and
Council
I'll.
B
Note
that
a
few
of
the
relationships
between
Planning
Commission
meetings
and
City
Council
meetings,
unfortunately,
it's
impossible
because
we
have
holidays
either
on
Thursdays
or
Mondays
one
or
the
other.
So
we
don't
always
have
that
11
days,
but
most
of
the
proposed
meeting
dates
are
11
days
between
them.
B
A
E
A
B
Roman,
looking
ahead
to
your
next
meeting,
which
is
December
8th,
you
get
a
couple
weeks
off
before
the
next
meeting.
We
have
just
two
items
on
that:
Agenda
One
is
a
conditional
use
permit
for
auto
repair
use
at
1700,
East
Old,
Shakopee
Road,
and
the
second
item
is
the
ordinance
to
update
single
family
and
two
family
residential
standards.
That
would
be
a
public
hearing.
B
A
B
A
A
No,
that
meeting
is
coming
up
on
the
6th.
This
was
a
different
one
that
was
sponsored
by
Community
engagement
that
was
open
to
I,
don't
remember
who
all
it
was
open
to,
but
there
were
approximately
15
20
folks
who
attended.
It
was
just
kind
of
a
workshop
on
issues
of
equity
and
it
touched
on
sustainability.
It
touched
on
public
health,
it
touched
on
racial
equity
and
and
just
ways
that
it
was.