►
From YouTube: July 23, 2020 Bloomington Planning Commission Meeting
Description
Bloomington Minnesota Planning Commission Meeting
A
Good
evening
and
welcome
to
the
july
23rd
bloomington
planning
commission
meeting,
the
planning
commission
advises
the
city
council
on
development
proposals,
development
standards,
long-range
planning
and
transportation
issues.
Some
of
the
issues
the
planning
commission
has
final
authority
for
and
others
the
city
council
will
make
the
final
decision.
A
The
planning
commission
is
made
up
of
seven
volunteers
that
are
appointed
by
the
city
council
for
to
serve
for
up
to
three
years.
At
a
time
tonight
we
have
four
regular
agenda
items
and
our
fifth
agenda
item
will
move
into
a
study
session,
but
before
we
start,
if
those
in
the
chambers
can
rise
and
say
the
pledge
of
allegiance,
I
pledge
allegiance
to
the
flag
of
the
united
states
of
america
and
to
the
republic
for
which
it
stands.
B
Sure
so,
mr
chairman,
due
to
the
pandemic,
we
are
remote
again
this
evening.
It's
our
ninth
time.
We've
been
remote
with
the
planning
commission
since
march,
but
the
meeting
is
definitely
open
to
the
public
and
open
to
testimony
you
can
call
in
and
we'll
get
you
signed
up
to
speak,
so
you
can
call
the
number
on
the
screen.
B
C
C
C
While
I'm
juggling
with
the
technology,
I
just
wanted
to
note
that
there
are
some
additional
staff
who
are
with
me
this
evening
to
make
this
presentation
amy
marone
from
the
city's
traffic
division
as
well
as
brian
hansen.
The
city
engineer,
julie,
long,
is
also
on
the
call,
and
in
the
case
of
this
application
there
was
some
traffic
analysis
done
by
a
third
party
consultant.
So
brian
nemeth
from
bolton
bank
is
also
available
for
questions
on
this
item.
So
just
wanted
to
make
that
clear
as
well.
C
The
cu
plea
cup
is
applicable
to
a
proposed
increase
of
student
enrollment
at
an
existing
pre-k
through
8th
grade
school,
as
well
as
for
a
greenhouse
edition,
and
the
final
development
plans
is
specifically
for
the
proposed
greenhouse
edition
to
the
school.
The
applicant
is
success
academy,
as
the
user
and
al-jazari
institute
property
llc
is
the
owner.
C
The
property
is
located
at
8201
park
avenue
south
the
property
is
surrounded
by
smith
park
to
the
east
and
to
the
north,
and
then
there
are
residential
single-family
neighborhoods
to
the
west
and
to
the
south
that
provides
a
general
outline
of
the
property
just
to
know
the
proximity
of
the
park.
There
also
is
some
shared
uses
between
the
public
park
and
the
school
by
agreement.
C
So,
as
I
mentioned
before,
there's
kind
of
two
facets
to
this
application.
One
is
the
proposed
increase
in
student
enrollment,
and
the
other
aspect
of
the
application
is
a
proposed
greenhouse
edition.
It's
just
a
little
under
a
thousand
square
feet
in
size.
You
can
see
in
green
outline
where
the
proposed
greenhouse
edition
would
occur
at
the
facility,
and
so
you'll
note
that
on
the
screen
here
in
this
blue
box,
the
school
is
highlighted
as
well
as
the
the
greenhouse
edition
is
in
a
different
highlight.
The
other
text
is
in
white
text.
C
The
the
reason
I
mention
it
in
that
way
is
that
this
site
operates
under
an
existing
conditional
use,
permit
that
was
approved
in
2018.
Some
of
you
were
actually
on
the
commission,
the
last
application
that
was
approved
for
this
site,
and
so
there
are
other
uses
at
this
facility.
There
is
a
place
of
assembly
and
community
center
use
in
addition
to
the
school,
so
those
uses.
What
I
want
to
emphasize
is
that
those
uses
are
proposed
to
remain
the
same.
They're
not
proposed
to
change
in
any
way
as
part
of
this
application.
C
So
really,
even
though
there
is
a
multi
multi-use
aspect
to
this
facility,
what
we're
really
focusing
on
tonight
is
the
school
enrollment
and
then
a
proposed
edition
that
would
be
a
greenhouse,
so
we'll
get
into
that
as
well.
I
would
note
that
key
to
the
proposed
enrollment
expansion
is
of
50
students.
That's
what
they're
proposing
to
increase
it
from
130
students
to
180
students.
What
they're
proposing
to
do
is
start
a
hybrid
education
program,
so
I
have
a
slide
here
on
that
per
the
applicant's
materials.
C
C
Certainly
in
the
the
pandemic,
people
are
getting
more
adjusted
to
virtual
instruction,
but
this
is
not
intended
as
a
response
to
the
pandemic
is
my
understanding.
It
is
intended
as
a
permanent
schedule
per
the
cup,
and
this
type
of
programming
is
utilized.
Other
schools
in
the
state
and
it
is
authorized
under
state
law
and
state
statute,
as
governed
by
the
minnesota
department
of
education.
So
there
is
a
state
statute
reference
there
on
the
screen.
That
is
the
the
base
statute
for
this
type
of
programming.
C
So,
as
I
noticed
noted
before,
there
is
an
existing
conditional
use
permit
for
this
site
and
there's
a
fairly
lengthy
history
of
use
at
this
site.
So
I
just
want
to
go
over
that,
maybe
more
for
the
benefit
for
the
public
and
for
the
commissioners
who
weren't
on
the
board
in
2018,
but
the
facility
was
originally
built
in
1962
as
a
public,
elementary
school
north
gate.
C
C
The
string
of
conditional
use
permits
for
the
the
use
mix
that
you
currently
see
there
was
established,
so
in
2011
is
when
they
started
use
of
the
facility,
not
the
specific
school
or
exactly
the
same
owner,
but
this
mix
of
uses,
I
would
say
just
to
note
there
was
a
daycare
that
was
originally
approved
in
2011
2011.
I'll,
speak
to
that
in
a
minute,
but
in
2018
there
was
two
conditional
use
permits
that
were
applied
for
and
were
approved
that
had
to
do
with
the
expansion
of
student
enrollment,
similar
to
kind
of
the
application.
C
That's
before
you
this
evening
in
2018,
the
enrollment
was
increased
from
60
students
to
84
students
that
application
was
approved
in
the
early
part
of
2018
and
then
in
2018.
A
additional
conditional
use
permit
to
expand
the
student
enrollment
from
84
students
to
130
students
was
approved.
It
was
part
of
that
2018
actions
where
the
daycare
use
was
vacated.
C
Daycare
is
no
longer
possible
at
this
facility
due
to
some
of
the
standards
for
daycares
and
institutional
uses,
so
just
to
note
that
that's
no
longer
a
part
of
this
facility
and
in
2018
the
key,
the
second
application
in
2018,
which
is
a
of
a
key
subject
matter
for
tonight's
review.
In
action,
there
was
a
traffic
study
and
numerous
traffic
mitigation
measures
that
were
deployed
as
part
of
that
action
in
september
of
2018.
C
So
we'll
get
in
to
that
and
we'll
provide
an
overview
of
those
trip.
Bolton
menk
completed
that
prior
traffic
study
and
we'll
get
into
more
detail
with
that,
but
they
collected
a
lot
of
tube
data,
so
traffic
counts
as
well
as
traffic
turning
movements.
It
was
a
pretty
extensive
study,
completed
by
bolton,
mink
so
we'll
get
into
how
that
analysis
informs
what's
before
you
this
evening
and
again,
just
to
reiterate
tonight's
application.
C
It's
not
uncommon
for
a
place
of
assembly
or
school,
or
these
types
of
uses
to
be
located
within
neighborhoods.
And
so
one
of
the
key
provisions
that
we'll
talk
about
is
when
one
of
these
uses
or
facilities
is
on
a
street
that
is
not
designated
as
an
articular
collector
road.
There
are
some
traffic.
C
There
are
some
limitations
of
expansion
that
have
to
do
with
the
number
of
trips
and
traffic
that
is
generated
from
the
facility,
and
so
that
is
what
we're
really
going
to
be
focusing
on
tonight.
Is
that
traffic
analysis
and
how
it
relates
to
the
institutional
use,
ordinance
and
we'll
get
into
those
standards.
C
So,
as
part
of
that
last
approval
in
2018,
there
was
a
number
of
traffic
mitigation
strategies
or
improvements
that
were
recommended
by
the
bolton
bank
study
in
2018,
and
they
were
all
deployed
prior
to
the
increase
of
the
student
enrollment.
So
I
just
want
to
go
through
those
with
you
to
kind
of
get
a
better
understanding
of
what
the
existing
condition
of
the
site
is.
There
was
a
one-way
site,
circulation
pattern
that
was
implemented
at
the
school
I'll
show
you
that
there
was
some
intersection
improvements
at
park
avenue
and
east
82nd
street.
C
There
was
a
driveway
connection
from
the
facility
down
to
east
83rd
street.
There
were
some
sidewalk
improvements
and
then
finally,
then
there
was
also
a
dedicated
driveway
to
the
smith
park
parking
lot
that
was
installed
to
park
avenue
so
getting
into
those
specifically
and
what
their
utility
or
what
their
value
are.
They
bring
to
the
site.
C
One
way
site
circulation
is
very
common
at
school
uses,
particularly
when
you
have
young
children.
So
there's
a
couple
things
to
look
at
here.
There
is
dedicated,
enter
only
or
exit
only
egress
driveways.
So,
prior
to
this
being
implemented,
you
could
leave
and
enter
the
site
at
both
of
those
driveways
that
you
see
along
park
avenue.
So
what
that
does
is
can
create
additional
congestion
that
is
unnecessary
as
well
as
turning
movements,
either
into
one
another
or
just
a
little
bit
more
unpredictable
traffic
situation
along
park
avenue.
C
So
now
those
are
dedicated
as
egress
only
or
ingress
only
and
then
secondarily
they
they
implemented
a
one-way
drive
aisle
for
the
drive
aisle
that
is
along
the
school
where
all
the
drop-offs
occur,
including
the
school
buses
on
the
eastern
drive
aisle.
That
is
northbound
only
as
you
can
see
there,
and
so
what
that
does
is
again
pretty
it's.
C
It's
more
predictable
traffic
pattern
within
the
site,
that's
important
when
you
have
pedestrians,
particularly
children,
coming
to
the
site
and,
in
addition,
makes
it
just
ease
for
drop-off,
it's
a
very
common
circulation
model
for
schools,
some
intersection
improvements.
So
as
part
of
the
payment
management
program,
the
city
worked
with
the
applicant
to
assess
some
improvements
at
the
intersection
of
park,
avenue
and
east
82nd
street.
They
installed
crosswalks
with
truncated
domes,
as
well
as
a
pedestrian,
refuge
and
median,
and
so
that
serves
as
a
couple
benefits
one.
C
It
gives
pedestrians
a
shorter
path
to
travel
to
cross
the
street.
It
is
a
much
better
visual
for
drivers
to
see
that
this
is
a
dedicated
area
for
pedestrians
across
the
street,
again
important
with
children
and
then
secondarily,
it
also
serves
as
a
traffic.
Calming
measure
so
with
a
narrower
drive
lane
through
that
area,
cars
automatically
get
that
perception
to
slow
down,
which
is
also
an
important
safety
feature.
C
So
the
next
measure
that
they
implemented.
If
you
can
see
the
map
on
the
right
screen
on
the
right
side
of
the
slide,
that
is
the
parking
lot.
The
southern
portion
of
the
parking
lot
at
the
site
and
the
traffic
study
recommended
completing
that
section
of
driveway
down
to
east
83rd
street,
and
the
reason
that
that
recommendation
was
made
and
ultimately
followed,
is
that
currently
all
of
the
traffic
that
was
coming
to
this
facility
only
came
through
or
had
to
travel
up
and
down
park
avenue
by
completing
this
driveway
segment.
C
It
gives
visitors
and
patrons
another
option
for
ingress
and
egress.
It
allows
them
to
another
way
to
leave
the
site.
This
is
particularly
important
for
the
place
of
assembly
if
they
have
larger
assemblies
at
events
or
holidays
or
things
of
that
nature,
including
the
school
too.
But
if
you
have
a
large
number
of
patrons
at
a
facility
like
this,
it's
good
to
have
multiple
ways
to
get
in
and
out
of
the
site.
Just
it
does
a
much
better
job
of
distributing
the
traffic
throughout
the
neighborhood.
C
C
There
were
some
minor
sidewalk
improvements
that
were
completed
as
part
of
the
the
study
by
bolton
make
they
just.
Basically,
there
was
a
missing
section
of
sidewalk
that
provided
connection
to
the
public
sidewalk
network
and
also
the
missing
sidewalk.
They
completed
also
provided
ada
pad
ramps,
ada
compliant
ramps.
C
C
You
had
actually
had
to
circulate
through
the
school
site
in
order
to
get
to
the
city's
park
parking
lot.
It
was
through
a
access
easement
and
that
actually,
that
easement
still
exists
to
this
day,
but
in
other
words
it
just
brought
unnecessary
traffic
further
south
and
also
had
it
circulating
through
the
school
parking
lot
with.
You
know
again,
with
smaller
children
attending
the
school
as
much
of
that
traffic.
That's
just
headed
to
the
dedicated
to
the
park
as
much
of
that
traffic.
You
can
remove
from
the
equation
of
the
school
facility.
C
One
thing
to
understand
about
the
study
is
that,
although
the
current
enrollment
of
the
school
is
130
students,
because
the
institutional
use
standards
are
measured
or
applied
from
the
first
expansion
of
the
use
following
the
adoption
of
that
ordinance,
school
was
originally
60
students.
So
that
is
why
that
serves
as
the
baseline
for
any
subsequent
expansion
of
the
facility,
because
if
it
was
not
tied
back
to
that
original
baseline,
then
any
institutional
use
could
continue
to
modestly
expand
and
still
stay
under
all
the
traffic
thresholds
if
it
was
not
tied
to
the
original
baseline.
C
C
So
I
just
want
to
note
that
these
are
the
three
thresholds
that
we're
looking
at
tonight,
but
what's
important
to
emphasize
is
that
this
facility,
as
a
result
of
the
last
traffic
study,
did
pursue
all
of
the
mitigation
measures
that
were
recommended
by
that
study.
They
made
significant
safety
improvements
to
the
area
for
traffic
for
vehicles
for
pedestrians,
as
it
just
related
to
that
last
action
in
2018,
but
getting
into
the
thresholds
themselves.
C
So
bolton
bank
did
produce
a
study.
It
was
in
your
packet
again.
Brand
nemeth
is
on
the
call,
as
well
as
cities,
traffic
staff.
If
you
have
questions-
but
this
is
the
the
basics
of
the
findings-
they
go
through
all
three
of
these
thresholds
so
again
adding
300
trips
per
day
to
a
local
residential
street.
C
So
from
that
baseline
of
60
students,
180
students
at
the
established
rate,
the
trip
rate
per
student,
the
daily
trip
rate,
would
get
you
up
to
298
trips,
so
this
is
bumping
up
right
up
to
that
threshold
of
the
maximum,
where
exceeding
that
would
require
in
the
judgment
of
city
council.
That
mitigation
has
occurred
to
go
above
that
number,
so
they're
staying
below
the
numbers
established
in
the
in
the
ordinance.
C
So
this
is
the
second
threshold.
This
is
again
adding
100
trips
or
more
when
it
would
exceed
a
thousand
trips
over
a
local
residential
street.
There's
a
couple
different
colors
I
want
to
draw
your
attention
to
green-
is
the
baseline
number.
So
that's
the
multi-use
facility,
with
the
60
student
baseline,
the
blue
number
that
you
see
monday
through
thursday.
C
This
represents
an
increase
of
120
students
at
the
school,
because
again
it
includes
those
additional
50
students
in
the
hybrid
program
we're
only
attending
school
monday
through
thursday
on
site
and
then,
finally,
on
friday,
you
see
that
purple
color
that
represents
the
increase
of
trips
from
the
last
application
in
2018
when
they
went
up
to
130
students,
so
they
went
up.
They
were.
The
traffic
analysis
showed
that
that
expansion
on
on
fridays.
C
D
C
Application
is
not
exceeding
the
second
threshold.
The
third
threshold
has
to
do
with
the
peak
hour.
Trips
again
cannot
go
over
100
without
crashing
the
established
threshold,
the
expansion
from
60
students
to
180
students,
again
120
student
increase
at
a
peak
hour
rate
of
0.8
trips
per
student.
That
gets
you
to
96
peak
car
trips
so
again,
still
under
the
established
threshold.
C
Getting
to
the
study
recommendations.
What
the
findings
were
the
conclusions
by
bolton,
mink
and
again
they're
available
if
there's
questions,
but
basically
they
talked
about
what
mitigations
were
deployed
and
what
mitigations
might
be
valuable
to
going
forward
or
what
just
needs
monitoring.
So
at
this
time,
they're
not
recommending
any
additional
mitigations
be
deployed
at
this
time.
C
They
take
note
of
the
mitigations
that
have
already
been
deployed,
but
they
do
say
that
there
are
some
things
that
the
city
traffic
staff
should
keep
an
eye
on
in
terms
of
some
smaller
things
that
could
provide
improvement.
Should
there
be
a
problem
in
the
future,
so
just
a
just
a
note
to
keep
an
eye
on
these
things,
but
no
additional
mitigation
is
being
recommended
at
this
time
by
bolton
mike.
C
C
The
one
that
I
want
to
draw
the
most
attention
to
is
condition
number
eight,
and
what
that
condition
is
it
really
relates
to
the
occupancy
of
the
facility
and
more
specifically,
non-concurrent
use.
Non-Concurrent
use
conditions
are
very
common
for
cups,
for
places
of
assembly,
and
the
reason
being
is
that,
if
you
think
about
most
place
of
assembly,
they
have
multiple
larger
areas
to
assemble
in,
and
so
very
rarely
is
the
full
occupancy
of
a
place
of
assembly
all
occurring
in
the
full
aspect
of
the
building.
C
All
at
the
same
time,
if
that
were
the
case,
you
know
these
sites
simply
wouldn't
have
enough
parking
and
it
would
be
a
significant
amount
of
use
all
occurring
at
the
same
time.
So
what
non-concurrent
use
conditions
do?
Is
they
just
state
that
it
really
just
kind
of
limits
the
full
use
of
the
building
all
at
the
same
time?
And
so
that's
what
you
see
in
condition
number
eight
and
then
what.
E
C
C
I
just
want
to
talk
briefly
about
smith
park
and
the
joint
use
agreement,
just
because
we
get
some
questions
from
the
public
about
the
joint
use
and
then
just
thinking
about
for
the
commission.
How
does
the
expansion
of
student
enrollment
by
50
students?
You
know?
How
does
that
interact
with
the
park
and
whatnot?
C
The
joint
use
agreement
was
actually
established
with
the
private
high
school
that
was
the
previous
occupant
of
this
site.
So
it's
been
a
long
standing
agreement
in
place
in
this
location
and
in
addition
to
that,
these
types
of
agreements
are
very
common
between
the
city
of
bloomington,
that
are
public
parks
and
other
schools,
including
a
number
of
bloomington
public
schools.
C
So,
basically,
what
it
states
is
that
there
is.
You
know
some
shared
facilities
in
the
standpoint
of
parking.
The
success
academy
site
can
utilize
parking
on
the
smith
park
site
and
vice
versa.
There
is
some
share
of
use
on
the
athletic
fields.
You
know
one's
able
to
use
the
other
and
vice
versa,
and
so
that
this
is
a
really
common
thing
that
exists
at
schools
that
are
also
adjoining
bloomington
public
parks.
C
I
just
want
to
note
for
the
record
that
planning
staff
did
speak
and
meet
with
our
parks
and
recreation
staff
and
did
ask
them
if
the
expansion
of
the
student
enrollment,
you
know,
gave
them
any
pause
or
consideration.
As
far
as
you
know,
impacts
on
the
use
of
smith
park
and
there
was
no
concern
listed
whatsoever.
C
They
are
happy
with
the
arrangement
and
agreement
that
they
have
in
terms
of
working
with
the
applicant
and
feel
it's
an
appropriate
use
of
the
park
and
the
playground
equipment
as
well
yeah.
I
think
that's
enough
said
on
that,
so
this
is
kind
of
transitioning
to
my
second
part
of
the
presentation,
this
part
is
a
little
bit
shorter
than
the
first
half
just
getting
on
that
specific
greenhouse
edition.
So
here
you
see
a
rendering
of
the
the
addition
in
that
location
that
I
mentioned
earlier.
C
Again,
that
is
the
site
plan
of
where
the
proposed
greenhouse
edition
is
located.
So
this
building
addition
is
located
very
far
away
from
the
property
boundaries,
so
certainly
complies
with
all
setback
requirements.
One
thing
to
note
that
has
to
do
with
why
the
greenhouse
also
is
tied
to
the
cup.
Is
that
place
of
assembly
sites,
and
even
though
this
is
a
mixed
use
facility,
it
still
is
tied
to
those
place
of
assembly
standards
in
our
code
there's
a
maximum
structure
coverage
of
15
percent.
C
Actually,
the
baseline
is
12
percent,
and
when
you
go
above
the
baseline
of
12,
you
can
go
up
to
a
maximum
of
15
percent.
It
requires
city
council
approval
to
go
above
to
expand
on
a
place
of
assembly
site,
so
they
are
expanding
from
14.2
to
14.3
percent.
It's
a
very
modest
increase
again.
This
addition
is
only
a
thousand
square
feet
in
size.
C
The
classroom
uses
are
in
blue.
The
gyms
are
in
orange,
there's
a
number
of
different
offices.
You
see,
the
place
of
assembly
is
in
the
southern
portion
of
the
facility,
with
the
school
being
more
in
the
northern
two-thirds.
If
you
will
so
that's
just
basically
how
the
facility
lays
out
and
again
there's
no
changes
to
the
facility,
except
for
the
proposed
greenhouse
there's
the
floor
plan
of
the
greenhouse.
C
There
is
also
actually
a
49
stall
proof
of
parking
agreement
that
is
also
recorded
against
the
property.
Should
they
ever
need
to
construct
more
parking
here,
so
there's
more
than
enough
adequate
parking
supply
just
from
a
code
perspective.
What
the
expansion
of
the
school
does
is.
It
expands
use
scenario
number
one
from
106
space
parking
requirement
to
107
space
parking
requirement,
so
substantively
it
has.
No.
The
greenhouse
edition
has
no
impact
on
the
required
parking
for
the
facility
just
from
a
miscellaneous
standpoint.
I
just
want
to
note
a
couple
other
conditions.
C
They
are
required
to
enter
into
a
site
development
agreement
with
the
city.
What
that
basically
does
is
memorialize
all
the
conditions
of
approval
and
an
acknowledgement
on
the
part
of
the
property
owner.
There
is
a
kitchen
at
the
school
that
they
currently
use
on
a
limited
basis
only
with
catering
only
for
the
students.
If
they
were
ever
to
expand
their
use
of
the
kitchen,
they
would
have
to
get
a
revised
food
service
plan
approved
by
our
environmental
health
division.
C
So
there
is
a
condition
that
speaks
to
that
and
then
finally
just
a
more
minor
issue,
but
there
are
some
trees
that
may
need
to
be
removed
to
install
the
greenhouse
edition.
The
site
is
non-conforming
for
landscaping,
so
if
they
remove
some
existing
trees
on
site,
they
would
have
to
replace
that
elsewhere
and
provide
us
with
a
plan
of
where
they're
doing
that.
But
that
would
just
be
prior
to
the
issuance
of
a
building
permit
for
the
greenhouse.
C
I
think
we
received
24
emails
from
13
different
parties,
some
of
the
themes
you're
familiar
from
2018,
but
I
continue
concerns
about
traffic
on
street
parking,
usage
of
smith
park
facility
use
and
the
occupancy
and
then
opposition
to
the
expansion
of
the
student
enrollment,
and
then
there
was
also
a
fair
amount
of
correspondence
that
was
supportive
of
the
expansion
and
the
student
enrollment
submitted
as
well.
So
that
just
gives
you
a
kind
of
flavor
overview
of
the
correspondence
received
just
as
a
reminder.
Glenn.
C
The
planning
manager
mentioned
this
at
the
start
of
the
meeting,
but
this
is
a
public
hearing
and
if
you
want
to
provide
live
testimony,
you
do
have
the
phone
number
to
call
and
the
email
address
that
you
could
send
comments
to
as
well
with
that
staff
does
recommend
approval.
There's
two
suggested
motions
that
we
have
here
for
you
and
I'm
happy
to
take
any
questions.
A
Thank
you,
mr
johnson,
a
couple
questions
and
probably
more
to
do
with
the
parking,
the
traffic
analysis.
So
I
don't
know
if
amy
marone
wants
to
handle
that
or
brian
nemeth,
but
really
one
of
them
is
the
use
that
was
done
for
the
traffic
analysis
was,
I
believe
it
was
referred
to
as
private
school
are
there.
Other
options
that
are
available
just
wondering
is
that
did
was
that
the
most
appropriate
use
or
how?
How
do
you
determine
that
amy
maron.
E
Do
you
remember
I
can
I
can
speak
up
on
this?
We
looked
at
multiple
different
options
for
what
type
of
school
we
looked
at.
The
charter
school
use,
private
school
use
elementary
school
use
and
it
was
a
junior
high,
high
school
use
and
we
took
the
highest
rate
available
from
any
of
those
uses
to
kind
of
cover,
as
more
of
a
conservative
account
for
that.
A
Okay,
thank
you
and
then
the
the
second
question
is
really.
Mr
nemeth
is
on
the
recommendation
and
I
just
wanted
to
verify.
I
think,
recommendations.
If
there
were
what
was
the
reference
additional
there,
you
go
if
traffic
demand
shows
the
additional
parking.
The
question
I
have
there
was
that
is
that
on
top
of
the
existing
and
proof
of
parking
or
was
that
would
that
take
into
account
the
proof
of
parking
on
the
site.
D
C
I
certainly
would
welcome
brian
nama's
thoughts
on
that
as
well,
but
my
my
take
on
that
is
that,
under
the
current
conditions
of
the
pandemic,
it
would
really
not
yield
you
good,
solid
results
in
terms
of
what
the
existing
condition
is
today,
but
I
let
the
traffic
folks
seek
to
it,
but
I
think
data
that's
collected
within
a
span
of
just
short
two
years
ago,
or
even
less
than
that
now
would
still
be
considered
significant
or
statistically
significant
data
in
the
traffic
world.
But
I
would
let
them
confirm
that.
E
This
is
brian
newman,
yes,
usually
any
counts
done
within
a
three-year
time.
Span
are
considered
to
be
generally
the
same,
and
no
change
be
done
with
that
yeah
because
of
the
pandemic.
We
feel
that
you
know
any
new
accounts.
You're
gonna
do
are
gonna,
be
exceptionally
low
and
we
wouldn't
want
to
use
those
as
a
condition.
D
I
understand
the
the
three
year
aging.
However,
there
was
a
significant
change
in
use
on
weekdays
after
the
last
tdp,
and
I
get
that
the
pandemic
is
obviously
thrown
all
that
for
a
loop.
I'm
not
sure
do
we
know
when
did
the
applicant
indicate
that
they
were
interested
in
making
this
expansion
and
would
that
have
affected
our
decision?
C
Yeah
commissioner,
chairman
solberg,
commissioner
roman,
I
can
confirm
that
staff
was
not
contacted
about
this
application
prior
to
the
start
of
the
pandemic.
If
you
will,
when
some
of
the
shutdowns
occurred-
and
I
think
you
saw
the
associated
drop
in
traffic,
I
would
let
the
applicants
speak
for
themselves
on
this
one.
But
I
don't
think
that
that
in
my
judgment
it
did
not.
It
wasn't
a
strategic
move
on
their
part,
that's
just
from
being
around
the
situation.
C
A
D
F
Yes,
mr
chair,
thanks
for
your
time,
one
of
my
questions
is
around.
You
know
traffic
study,
but
the
question
is
on
busing,
so
I
know
that
we
have
bussing
of
these
of
these
children
to
and
from
school,
and
I
remember
from
the
previous
conversation
or
the
the
previous
cop
was
there
was
discussions
on
bussing,
so
I
guess
a
question
that
I
have
is:
do
we
know
what
percentage
of
these
children
are
bust?
C
Chairman
chairman
solberg,
thank
you
for
the
question.
Commissioner
goldsmith.
I
don't
know
the
percentage
at
this
time.
I
know
magdi
rabia,
who
is
the
executive
director
of
the
school,
is
on
the
call,
so
he
could
speak
to
the
existing
snapshot,
but
just
from
a
staff
perspective.
The
reason
why
some
of
that
data
you
know,
while
it
is
anecdotal
and
may
provide
support
for
certain
actions,
why
we
don't
use
it
for
as
a
baseline,
is
that
those
conditions
are
highly
subject
to
change
from
year
to
year.
C
So
with
conditional
use
permits,
you
know,
approvals
that
run
for
long
periods
of
time.
We
don't
want
to
depend
on
kind
of
an
operational
plan
on
the
part
of
the
applicant.
That
may
not
be
sustainable
if
you
will,
but
I
think
that
would
be
a
good
question
for
the
applicant
to
put
that
on
the
record
as
well.
E
C
Chairman
solberg,
commissioner
albrecht
thanks
for
the
question,
I
think
what
that
number
is
tied
to
and
glenn
can
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
but
what
that
number
is
that
they
reference
is
that
that
was
one
of
some
of
the
kind
of
peak
historic
enrollment
numbers
of
the
public,
elementary
school
and
or
private
high
school.
So
I
think
the
reason
why
you
know
some
people
kind
of
key
into
that
number
want
to
reference.
F
C
Chairman
solberg,
commissioner
corman
thanks
for
the
question
just
similar
as
to
before,
I
think
all
those
things
are
great
to
know.
We
don't
you
don't
use
that
data
to
make.
You
know
to
form
our
recommendation,
we're
more
reliant
on
the
study,
but
that
that
is
definitely
good,
anecdotal
information,
just
as
long
as
with
the
understanding
that
it
is
subject
to
change
from
as
the
students
who
are
in
the
school
matriculate
or
move
on.
A
Okay,
thank
you,
mr
johnson,
just
if
I
could,
or
maybe
one
of
the
traffic
professionals.
I
know
you
talked
a
little
bit
about
the
specifics
of
in
commissioner
corman's
question
and
I
think
others
a
little
bit
if
somebody
could
explain
a
little
bit
more
about
the
the
general
practice
of
of
traffic
studies
and
and
why
they
don't
go
to
the
potential
for
land
use
if
they
boss
or
don't
bus
or
how
many
ride
in
a
multi
multi-students
riding
a
vehicle.
E
Yeah,
I
kind
of
speak
to
that
for
sure.
So
you
know.
Typically,
what
we're
looking
at
is
the
institute
of
transportation.
Engineers
does
collect
information
throughout
from
different
consultants
and
areas
around
the
united
states,
and
so
what
they're
doing
is
developing
rates
based
on
the
number
of
students,
typically
for
schools,
and
so
they
have
different
school
categories
and
that
gets
into
why
we
chose
kind
of
the.
We
have
a
charter
school.
E
We
have
the
the
private
school
and
those
kind
of
relate
a
little
bit
to
the
busing,
like
public
schools
tend
to
have
a
lot
more
students
that
are
that
are
busing,
especially
you
know.
If
you
look
back
20
years
compared
to
today,
and
private
schools
and
charter
schools
tend
to
have
more
people
driving
and
dropping
off.
The
mix
of
you
know
multiple
grade
grades
together
that
accounts
for
there's
different
ite
rates
for
a
private
school.
E
E
A
G
Want
to
say
thank
you
to
staff,
of
course,
for
doing
a
great
job
on
that
summary
and
presentation.
This
is
very
complex
issues
and
staff
has
done
a
good
job,
as
nick
indicated,
we
are
applying
for
a
conditional
use
permit
to
increase
the
number
of
students
from
130
to
180.
But
of
course
this
is
a
hybrid
program.
G
G
Success
academy
is
committed
to
using
this
model
and
has
proven
this
model
during
the
last
several
months,
and,
of
course
it
is
a
mde
approved
model.
However,
this
is
intended
to
be
a
permanent
program,
so
even
if
and
when
things
return
to
normal,
even
though
that
may
not
be
in
the
fall
whenever
that
occurs,
this
will
continue
to
remain
a
hybrid
model
in
perpetuity.
G
Now
we
do
understand
that
traffic
has
been
a
concern
in
this
area,
particularly
back
in
2018,
when
the
school
expanded.
However,
success
academy
has
made
a
concerted
effort,
as
staff
indicated,
to
mitigate
those
issues
and
reduce
the
amount
of
traffic
that
includes
substantial,
curb
and
intersection
improvements,
the
drive,
aisle
circulation
conversion
to
one-way
traffic,
additional
driveways
and
additional
pedestrian
improvements.
H
Yes,
thank
you
very
much
for
for
having
us
here
and
thanks
for
the
commissioners
and
for
the
staff
who
provided
a
detailed
report.
I
just
want
to
highlight
a
few
points
here
about
the
families.
The
question
regarding
the
families.
Yes,
the
majority
of
the
families
in
the
middle
school
are
will
be
students
from
the
families
that
we
currently
have
in
the
school
that
are
that
they
were
with
us
in
lower
grades.
H
For
example,
sixth
graders
will
be
the
ones
who
will
be
in
seventh
grade
this
coming
year
and
we
are
hoping
that
this
will
get
approved.
So
we
can
start
this
fall
and
regarding
transportation,
we
do
have
school
buses,
we
have
four
school
buses
and
one
minivan,
and
we
also
have
a
lot
of
students
who
are
walkers.
We
have,
I
would
say,
between
20,
to
25
students
who
live
very
close
to
the
school
and
they
do
walk
to
the
school,
and
I
would
be
more
than
happy
to
answer
any
other
questions.
A
F
Thank
you,
mr
chair.
So
basically
the
expansion
is
because
of
the
newcomer,
not
newcomers,
but
kindergarteners
correct.
I
mean
like
younger
siblings
if
you're
talking
about
if
the
middle
school
expansion
for
the
middle
school
is
because
our
students
that
are
coming
from
the
from
the
the
from
fifth
grade,
it's
that
that
means
then
that
this
increased
enrollment
has
to
do
with
with
the
young
kids
the
younger
siblings
that
are
actually
just
coming
into
school.
Am
I
correct.
B
H
There
may
be
for
planning
purposes
that
we're
talking
about
one
or
two
teachers,
because
currently
our
system
is
we're
overstaffed
for
130
students,
because
we
have
single
classrooms,
so
teachers
may
come
and
do
their
distance
learning
or
online
part
from
the
school.
We
would
not
be
able
to
tell
them
work
from
home
because
they
need
to
make
copies.
They
need
to
make
to
use
the
computer
and
the
internet.
D
Well,
thank
you,
mr
chair
wondering.
If
someone
from
the
applicant
can
speak
to
you
know,
and
one
of
the
things
for
the
planning
commission
is,
we
have
to
again,
as
we
did
last
time.
This
is
a
new
condition
to
use
from
it.
So
while
we
are
looking
at
the
school
having
a
larger
occupancy,
we
are
to
look
at
the
entire
use
of
the
site
beyond
even
the
school
in
2018.
H
H
So
what
I
see
that
they
are
doing,
they
have
some
volunteers
standing
outside
in
the
parking
lot
in
the
entrances
of
the
parking
lot,
trying
to
control
the
traffic
and
guide
the
vehicles
to
go
to
the
empty
spots
and
avoid
off
street
parking
as
much
as
possible,
and
also
that
they
do
have
two
sessions
on
friday
to
separate
the
the
traffic
or
to
reduce
the
traffic
a
little
bit.
But
of
course
they
are
better
equipped
to
talk
about
this,
because
I'm
just
witnessing
that
side
of
the
operation.
B
E
Was
talking
I
didn't
know,
I
was
new,
so
I
yes,
we
we
did
made
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
changes
and
making
sure
that
you
know
on
people
who
are
parking
off
the
street,
and
sometimes
you
can
see
some
of
the
parking
lots
empty
inside
the
major,
bigger,
bigger
parking
lot
and
also
in
the
back.
You
know
of
the
model.
E
So
we
do
also
hire
a
security
that
dedicated
that
day,
just
making
sure
that
everybody
you
know
does
like
avoid
to
park
on.
You
know
on
the
street
except
few
times
that,
where
the
two,
the
two
settlements
that
get
closer,
so
some
people
might
stay
in
the
car
where
the
other
one,
the
other
group
of
the
first
ceremony,
people
are
leaving
and
that's
the
time.
E
Sometimes
they
stand
on
the
side
of
the
street
to
read
when
they,
when
other
people
vacated
their
partner
to
the
company
so
and
we're
talking
about
in
a
time
that
maybe
less
than
20
minutes
all
this
is
happening
like
you
know
or
15
minutes.
Sometimes
it's
10
minutes
when
the
first
term
is
ending
and
ending
the
people
are
leaving
the
parking
lot
and
the
second
area
of
you
are
coming.
E
So
in
that
what
we
did
was
we
kind
of
made
sure
that
the
time
is
very
you
know
we
we
added
another
ten
more
minutes,
so
so
the
people
who
used
to
be
only
30
minutes
in
between
now
we
added
40
minutes.
We
made
it
40
minutes
and
we
did
a
lot
of
reduction
of
people
parking
on
the
street
and
still
working,
and
I
we're
hoping
that
people
will
eventually
move
into
the
inside
parking
lot
and
not
use
out
in
our
office.
F
Thanks
mr
chair
one
question:
I
have
just
to
clarify
things
this
hybrid
program
for
the
sixth
to
eighth
graders,
so
the
50
students
on
fridays
would
be
taking
their
distance
learning
from
home.
I
know
that
the
reason
I'm
asking
this
question
is:
I
know
that
this
property
is
used
in
multiple
different
ways:
there's
a
community
center,
so
just
making
sure
or
just
questioning
that
friday
session
would
be
at
home
or
at
their
respective
homes
versus
you
know,
within
a
community
center,
a
different
location
that
could
impact
traffic.
H
A
B
A
B
A
E
Yes
hi,
my
name
is
amina
aden.
I
live
in
bloomington
avenue.
I
want
to
speak
about
as
a
parent
of
success
academy,
I'm
seeking
to
show
my
strong
support
for
the
applicants
for
success
academy
to
add
a
middle
school
program.
Success
academy
provides
exponential
services
and
resources
for
our
community.
I
encourage
you
to
approve
the
school's
application.
As
a
building
is
used
to
be
a
school
for
450
students,
the
school
did
a
traffic
study
that
shows
they
did
not
exceed
the
allowed
number
of
trips.
E
My
daughters
attend
success
academy
and
we
love
it
here
very
much
since
it
exceeds
our
past
experience
in
every
category
we
look
for
in
a
school.
I
believe
this
school
provides
a
strong
foundation
for
my
child
to
be
successful
in
the
future.
At
this
academy
gives
my
daughter
us
daughters,
a
sense
of
community
and
belonging.
E
B
J
J
I
support
the
application
of
success
academy
to
add
the
middle
school
program,
because
success
academy
I
understand,
provides
you
know
a
great.
You
know,
educational
program
here
at
our
school
here
at
bloomington
and
my
kids
had
a
wonderful
experience
here
at
success,
academy,
yeah
teachers
and
staff
that
work
hard
with
them,
and
you
know
the
school,
even
though
we
had
challenges
with
some
people
harassing
our
kids
at
the
park.
But
you
know
they
handled
the
situation
very
professionally.
J
This
past
year
my
first
grader
learned
how
to
garden
and
do
art
which
he
loves.
My
third
grader
learned
how
to
ride
bikes,
so
they
connect
kids
to
good
programs
and
mentoring
programs
and
so
forth.
I
understand
also
some
of
the
parents
love
this
school
and
even
they
want
to
continue
bringing
their
kids
to
success
academy,
and
so
I
I
definitely
encourage
because
I
understand
even
the
traffic
study
that
was
done
mainly
highlighted
the
friday
traffic
and
just
listening
to
the
presentation
and
what
the
success
academy
plans
to
do
with
the
hybrid
program.
J
That
will
not
add
anything
to
the
traffic.
You
know
thresholds,
and
so
this
is
basically
providing
opportunities
for
the
parents
to
continue
this
great
educational
experience
here
in
bloomington
and
and
and
grant
this
for
them.
So
definitely
I
encourage
all
of
you
guys
to
you
know
to
give
this
application.
You
know
a
goal
and
thank
you
so
much
for
your
time.
B
E
B
A
F
F
A
F
A
A
A
So
when
we
talk
about
this
particular
application,
certainly
traffic
is
a
major
issue,
but
I
think,
based
on
that
2018
application
and
again
now
here
today
they
are
meeting
the
standards
on
that
and
then
additionally,
we
look
at.
I
look
at
what
have
they
done
to
mitigate
that
and
they
did
all
the
mitigation
that
was
requested
of
them
and
required
of
them
back
in
2018
and
they've
done.
Some
additional
work
is
what
I've
heard
now.
A
A
I
have
some
of
the
same
levels
of
traffic
in
my
neighborhood
and
certainly
understand
that.
So
but
again,
I
think
the
thresholds
are
not
being
met
and
therefore
I
can
support
the
application.
I
certainly
forward
to
the
fact
that
the
facility
is
going
to
be
able
to
have
an
additional
50
students,
another
option
in
our
community,
as
you
heard
from
the
school.
A
A
E
D
D
Some
of
the
things
that
we've
heard
from
in
the
past,
especially
the
2018
proposal,
was
specifically
regarding
levels
of
traffic.
On
friday.
This
proposal,
I
think,
helps
to
eliminate
the
additional
traffic
by
not
having
inflation
education
on
fridays,
and
it
also
the
daytime
hours
of
school
also
are
a
mitigating
factor
for
some
of
the
other
concerns
that
I
believe
we
saw
in
some
of
the
public
comments
about
late
night
usage.
D
So
for
those
reasons,
I'm
I'm
comfortable
with
that
one
thing
I
I,
I
recognize
the
unique
nature
of
the
situation
we're
in
with
the
pandemic,
and
it's
not
a
reason
to
control
approval
of
this,
but
because
this
is
a
new
conditional
use
permit.
I
I
think
it
was
just.
I
know
we
did
a
lot
of
mitigation.
It
required
a
lot
of
mitigation
last
time
those
things
were
put
in
place.
It
really
would
have
been
nice
to
be
able
to
test
if
those
actually
were
effective
if
the
numbers
were
such
if
the
impact
was
different.
F
So
I
really
in
favor
of
that,
and
I
I
also
want
to
just
kind
of
reflect
on
on
the
meeting
that
we
had
in
2018
and
because
this
site
is
not
on
a
collector
road,
it
comes
with
having
a
couple
of
different
situations
that
are
unique
to
the
site.
I
think
a
lot
of
the
contention
or
the
concern
from
residents
is
really
because
this
is
in
the
middle
of
the
neighborhood.
F
It's
not
on
a
collector
road
like
we
would
see
in
in
most
more
modern
type
of
buildings
or
projects,
so
for
them
to
use
an
existing
site
and
really
invest
in
the
in
the
community
in
the
school
and
then
also
do
the
mitigations.
I
think
it's
it's
a
great
project,
so
I'm
in
support-
and
I
think
I
think
that
they've
done
a
nice
job
of
of
working
creatively
to
come
up
with
a
solution
for
their
community
as
well
as
the
students.
A
I'll
just
add
one
point,
and
I
think,
commissioner
roman,
maybe
I
don't
necessarily
think
you
meant
it
this
way,
but
I
do
think
the
the
traffic
study
that
was
done
and
the
age,
and
I
know
it
is
pretty
much
industry
standard
of
three
years
or
less
and
since
there
has
not
been
significant
growth
or
change
over
and
uses
in
the
neighborhood.
I
think
that
the
traffic
data
is
good
and
I
just
wanted
to
make
that
clear.
A
D
A
E
A
F
F
E
E
E
B
A
E
F
B
A
K
Yes,
thank
you,
mr
chair
and
I'll
echo.
Mr
johnson's
sentiment
a
welcome
to
our
planning
commissioners
and
thank
you
for
your
service
and,
and
we
look
forward
to
working
with
you.
My
name
is
mike
centenario,
I'm
another
one
of
the
planners
on
staff
and
the
second
item
on
your
agenda
again
won't
be
new
to
to
the
folks
that
have
been
on
the
commission
for
a
couple
years,
but
we're
looking
at
interim
use
permits
for
the
park
and
fly
remote
airport
parking
facility.
K
It's
actually
made
up
of
two
sites:
3700
and
3750
american
boulevard
east
as
part
of
those
of
the
application
and
I'll
get
into
more
detail.
But
the
applicant
is
looking
to
extend
previously
approved
interviews
permits
by
a
year
and
then
as
part
of
that
application,
to
modify
some
development
milestones
that
were
established
last
year.
K
So
here's
the
here's,
the
site
that
we're
reviewing
tonight
again.
This
is
the
park
and
fly
remote
airport
parking
facility,
and
so
obviously
this
this
is
very
close
to
the
airport
as
you'd
imagine
and
near
by
the
west.
The
site
is
34th
avenue
south,
which
of
course,
is
where
the
lrt
is
located
to
the
south,
immediately
budding
the
size
of
american
boulevard
and
then
to
the
east.
K
The
applicant
would
like
to
establish
new
iups
and
set
the
expiration
date.
One
year
later
to
july
1st
2025.,
it's
a
slightly
different
view
of
the
parking
fly
facility.
So
again
you
have
the
the
structured
parking
which
is
about
a
thousand
stalls,
and
then
you
have
the
surface
lot,
which
is
just
a
little
bit
more
more
stall.
So
in
total
a
little
over
two
thousand
parking
stalls
for
this
whole
facility
and
in
terms
of
the
the
use
remote
airport
parking,
it
was
always
intended
to
be
a
holding
use.
K
If
you
will,
then
the
intent
was
to
allow
a
use
on
the
property,
while
other
land
was
being
redeveloped
and
the
intent
all
along
was
for
it
to
redevelop
at
some
point
to
a
non
parking
parking
storage
type
use,
and
that's
that's
really.
What
we've
been
trying
to
to
do
with
last
year's
interviews
permit
by
establishing
development
milestones,
because
we
understand
when
you
have
a
12
acre
site
like
this-
it's
not
all
going
to
develop
at
once,
and
so
we
want.
K
We
wanted
to
establish
development
milestones
that
led
towards
the
phased
implementation
of
permanent
development,
and
so
when
we're
reviewing
inter
use
permits,
there
there's
the
purpose
statements,
and
this
is
directly
out
of
the
city
code.
There's
several
purpose
statements
and
one
I
highlighted,
is
to
ensure
that
temper
uses
remain
temporary
nature,
and
one
of
one
of
the
facts
on
this
site
is
that
this
was
originally
approved
in
1988,
so
the
the
site
has
been
used
for
remote
airport
parking
for
a
little
over
30
years.
K
And
then
related
to
the
interim
use
permit
findings
in
order
to
approve
an
interviews.
Permit
the
planning
commission,
the
city
council
need
to
make
certain
findings
and
for
and
it's
a
little
tricky
in
terms
of
how
we
structure
the
report
and
our
recommendation,
but
for
related
to
the
changes
to
development
milestones
which
again
I'll
detail
a
little
bit,
we
felt
the
findings
were
met.
K
K
First
of
this
year,
they
were
to
commence
construction
of
phase
one,
obviously,
that
that's
not
a
possibility
at
this
point,
and
then,
by
july
1st
of
2022,
they
were
to
submit
a
conceptual
plan
for
phase
two.
The
idea
there
is
phase
one
would
be
well
under
construction.
Maybe
even
complete
and
they'd
have
a
good
idea
of
what
what
could
be
supported
by
the
market,
what
sort
of
financial
incentives
the
city
may
or
may
not
be
able
to
provide,
and
essentially
what
would
be
the
best
fit
for
the
site.
K
K
So,
to
provide
a
little
bit
of
background
for
the
commissioners
again,
this
is
a
general
graphic
of
the
pdp
that
we
have
for
the
park
and
fly
site
and
on
the
southwest
corner,
you'll
see
phase
one,
that's
the
apartment
building
and
I
have
a
rendering
that
can
show,
but
then
there's
also
phase
two
three
and
four
and
then
3750.
The
parking
structure
is
really
identified
as
the
future
phase.
K
As
part
of
pdps,
we
do
require
that
they
provide
at
least
some
level
of
three-dimensional
graphics
for
the
entire
site.
So
you
see
phase
one
which
has
a
lot
of
detail,
they're
looking
to
build
that,
but
then
for
the
future
phases.
They
really
just
have
masks
and
graphics
to
kind
of
give
you
a
flavor
for
what
for
what
the
intensity
would
be
on
the
site.
Again,
it's
a
12,
it's
a
12
acre
property.
K
So
this
is
this
is
a
really
large
site
very
impactful
and
can
have
quite
a
bit
of
development
on
it
and
refresh
the
focus
of
memory
or,
if
you
haven't
seen
this
graphic
before
this
is
a
three-dimensional
architects
drawing
for
the
phase
one
site.
This
is
looking
from
american
boulevard
towards
phase
one,
and
so
we're
really
excited
about
phase
one.
We
think
the
applicant
did
a
fantastic
job
with
the
design
they
they
were
a
pleasure
to
work
with
and
we're
really
eager
to
to
for
phase
one
to
move
forward.
K
That
being
said,
so
we
do
not
believe
that
extending
an
interim
use
permit
from
2024
the
current
termination
to
2025
is
warranted
and
I'll
provide
a
little
more
detail
on
that.
But
we
do
believe
that
the
findings
are
met
for
the
milestone
revisions.
The
pandemic
isn't
something
that
the
applicant
can
control
and
the
challenges
that
are
we're
seeing
throughout
throughout
the
economy.
K
K
K
K
This
is
really
where
we
anticipate
and
require
the
most
intense
development
transit
supporting
development,
and
we
feel
that
delaying
that
without
any
movement
or
completion
of
phase
one,
as
well
as
an
understanding
for
how
the
pandemic
will
play
out
frankly,
isn't
warranted
and
then
the
third
finding
we
did
not
believe
it
met
was
the
data
event
will
terminate
with
with
certainty
again
without
progress
on
future
phases
in
the
form
of
a
completed
phase.
One
development.
K
So
the
the
tricky
part
for
staff
was
to
craft
a
recommendation.
That
is
a
is
what
we
call
a
partial
approval
and
partial
denial
we're
in
support
of
some
of
the
elements
proposed
by
the
applicant.
Changing
those
development
milestones.
We
think
that
is
appropriate
and
warranted,
but
we
are
not
in
support
of
extending
the
termination
dates
for
the
two
iups
from
2024
to
2025.
K
and
again
the
main
reasons
are
really
we
we
want
to
see
phase
one
implemented.
We
want
to
see
progress
towards
the
phase
two
and
and
frankly,
the
the
iups
still
have
just
about
four
years
left
until
2024,
and
by
that
time,
I'd
like
to
think
that
we'll
have
a
pretty
good
handle
on
what
the
market
can
support
and
what
the
long-term
implications
of
the
of
the
pandemic
are,
and
the
city
council.
As
2024
approaches,
they
will
have
the
ability
to
extend
the
iep
at
a
later
date.
K
A
A
K
A
K
K
F
Yes
thanks,
mr
chair,
so
the
question
for
mr
centenario
is
really
around
that
timeline.
Can
you
walk
us
through?
I
see
that
the
timeline
of
june
1st
has
obviously
come
and
gone.
What's
the
type
of
communication
you
know,
the
response
to
you
know
missing
this
timeline
from
the
applicant
to
the
to
the
city
staff.
K
Sure,
mr
chair,
commissioner,
I
I
would
say
that
the
applicant
has
been
in
communication
with
the
city
throughout
this
entire
process,
from
2019
working
towards
an
interim
use
permit
application
last
year
through
today
they
have
been
very
much
communicating
well
with
the
city,
and
you
know
ultimately
there's
you
know,
there's
communication
on.
You
know
what
what?
Next?
What
should
we
do?
Next,
you
know
we're
not
going
to
be
able
to
meet
this
june
1st
deadline.
K
What
do
we
need
to
do,
and
so
staff
did
work
with
the
applicant
and
their
representative
to
figure
out
well
what
what
application
should
they
consider
submitting?
And
you
know
I
think
there
was
a
little
bit
of
a
wait-and-see
approach.
You
know
june
1st,
that's
really
not
that
much
into
that
far
along
into
the
pandemic,
so
there's
a
lot,
a
tremendous
amount
of
uncertainty
in
april
and
may
and
then
to
try
and
submit
a
permit
application
with
how
much
time
it
takes
to
produce
construction
documents
that
just
wasn't
a
possibility.
E
Thank
you,
mr
chair.
I
just
want
to
follow
up
on
a
sister
centenario
that
the
answer
you
gave
to
chair
goldberg's
question
you
mentioned
assessing
the
market
regarding
future
phases.
Can
you
just
elaborate
that
on
that,
just
a
little
bit
about
what
that
means,
based
on
the
city's
approach
to
assess
the
market,
given
timelines
for
future
phases.
K
Sure
you
know,
I
think
it's
more.
It's
a
really
a
general
statement
on
what
sort
of
land
uses
do
we
think
both
are
acceptable
from
a
market
perspective
that
are
financiable
but
then
also
further
the
comprehensive
plan
and
south
of
district
plan,
because
it
really
has
to
be
both
it's
something
that
the
market
can
support
from
a
financial
standpoint
to
see
that
something
can
actually
be
financed
and
built,
but
that
we
also
want
to
always
keep
in
mind
and
review
that
phase
with
consistency
to
our
long-range
plans.
K
So
knowing
that
probably
unlikely,
for
example,
that
a
new
hotel
is
going
to
be
developed
within
this
area
for
the
foreseeable
future,
however,
housing
seems
to
be
still
a
very
viable
and
needed
development
or
land
use
and
so
trying
to
analyze
what
are
occupancy
rates
for
housing.
What
are
what
are
the
rental
rates?
Are
people?
Is
there
still
development
pressure
for
for
multi-family
housing?
K
L
Thank
you
bill.
Griffith.
I've
got
a
fan
above
my
head
there.
So
sorry
about
that
distraction.
Thank
you
for
this
opportunity
to
address
you.
I
will
wrap
up
with
some
comments.
Kristen
muir
is
also
on
the
line.
She's
the
developer
and
julie
kimball
is
her
development
consultant
who's
worked
with
her
throughout
the
process,
so
both
may
have
comments.
I
know
kristen
muir
will
have
opening
comments
and
then
I
would
like
to
address
the
findings
for
the
application.
So
with
that,
if
kristen's
available,
I
would
turn
it
over
to
her.
L
Why
don't
I
get
started
and
then,
if
kristen
can
join
me
on
the
line,
we'll
we'll
turn
it
over
to
her?
I
we,
we
discussed
the
presentation,
so
I
understand
what
she
wanted
to
address
and
I
I
think
the
first
point
is
a
is
a
really
important
one
and
mr
centenario
addressed
it.
There's
been
a
very
good
collaboration
over
the
last
18
months
between
the
developer,
the
developers
consultant
and
city
staff,
and
that's
resulted
in
a
fully
entitled
project
on
this
site
and
we're
very
excited
about
that.
L
For
the
milestones
and
for
the
interviews
permits
is
fairly
modest.
It's
one
year.
I
don't
think
anybody
expects
that
we'll
be
back
to
normal
in
a
year,
but
it's
very
likely
that
this
project
could
move
forward
in
that
time
frame
because
it
is
fully
entitled
and
in
a
in
a
spot
within
the
city
that
has
seen
a
great
deal
of
interest
in
multi-family
housing.
But
still
it
is
with
some
some
risk.
L
L
That's
going
on
for
the
last
18
months
and
now
enter
the
pandemic
and
you
can
drive
by
the
site
and
see.
There's
you
know.
Activity
is
greatly
reduced
down
significantly
also
as
planning
staff
has
outlined,
and
so
we
really
view
the
parking
operations
and
the
parking
revenues
and
the
redevelopment
of
the
site
as
kind
of
hand
and
glove.
L
And
one
thing
I
wanted
to
point
out
in
one
of
the
early
slides,
you
saw
the
embassy
suites
site
on
the
west
and
you
saw
the
hilton
site
on
the
east,
and
then
you
saw
this
park
and
flyer
the
park
and
fly
remote
airport
parking
in
the
center.
And
so
I
want
to
put
this
in
the
context
of
the
1980s
development
approvals
that
occurred.
In
fact,
development
did
occur.
L
This
was
part
of
a
large
master
plan
development
that
actually
even
included
a
convention
center
which
ultimately
went
downtown,
but
it
was
part
of
a
large
master
plan
and
two
ends
of
that
master
plan
were
developed
and
then
the
market
change,
and
so
always
the
the
intention
of
the
owners
was
to
redevelop
this
site
and
those
parking
revenues
are
really
key
to
that
opportunity.
As
we
look
to
the
the
next
couple
years,
and
so
we
look
at
those
parking
revenues
as
creating
certainty,
not
creating
uncertainty.
What
they
do
is
they.
L
L
I
want
to
walk
through
the
the
findings,
so
the
proposed
use
will
not
delay
permanently
permanently
delayed
development
of
the
site.
A
one-year
extension
under
the
existing
conditions
will
not
permanently
delay
development.
In
fact,
if
you
look
at
the
other
conditions,
the
developer
has
to
meet
the
milestones
within
the
four
to
five
year
window
that
we're
talking
about
so
the
developer
can't
sit
still
and
and
continue
to
have
remote
airport
parking
rights.
So
to
add
one
year
to
the
interim
use
permit
does
not
permanently
delay
development.
L
The
proposed
use
will
not
adversely
impact
implementation
of
the
comprehensive
plan
or
adopted
district
plan.
In
fact,
what
we
now
have
is
a
framework
that
fits
very
very
nicely
into
that
comprehensive
plan
and
that
district
plan,
and
if
you,
if
you
go
back
into
the
details-
and
I
won't
go
into
all
of
them-
but
it's
actually
transit
oriented-
it
meets
your
housing,
your
affordable
housing
goals,
it
provides
green
space,
and
so
it
fits
very
nicely
and
I
could
go
on.
L
But
staff
has
been
very
complementary
of
the
project,
so
I
won't,
but
it
fits
very
very
nicely
into
that
district
plan
and
into
that
comprehensive
plan
and
so
again
a
one-year
addition
which
provides
parking
revenues
which
funds
redevelopment
actually
is
consistent
with
that
plan
and
then,
finally,
the
I
think
the
easiest
one
to
make
is
the
last
one.
The
data
event
that
will
terminate
the
use
has
been
identified
with
certainty
by
moving
it
one
year.
L
We
still
know
with
certainty
when
that
permit
terminates,
and
so
I
think
that
one
is
relatively
easy
to
make
because
of
the
extension
is
a
one
year
to
a
date
certain
we
have
been
on
the
same
page
with
staff
throughout
this
process
and
and
I'm
grateful
for
that,
and
I'm
grateful
for
all
their
support.
I
I
just
don't
see
this
one-year
extension
of
the
interviews
permit
as
a
significant
slowdown
in
the
redevelopment
process.
In
fact,
as
I've
stated,
it
funds
the
redevelopment
process
and
it
does
so
with
certainty.
L
In
a
time
when
the
city
council
has
looked
at
ways
to
lessen
the
burden
of
this
pandemic.
This
is
a
very
easy
way,
at
least
in
our
view,
a
very
simple
way
to
do
that:
create
certainty
for
the
owners
that
their
parking
operations
will
continue
through
that
one-year
extension,
and
then
we
can
continue
to
get
to
the
business
of
the
redevelopment
plan
with
that,
I'm
going
to
just
see
if
kristen
muir
is
able
to
come
on
the
line
and
if
she
would
like
to
add
anything
at
this.
L
L
M
Oh
okay,
great,
I
don't
know
what
was
I
was
trying
to
use
my
headphones,
but
it
was
not
working
anyway.
Thank
you
all
commissioners
and
city
staff,
for
you
know
all
the
time
and
energy
that
we've
had
and
in
this
project
you
know
I
actually
wanted
to
echo
some
of
bill's
thoughts.
This
you
know
the
the
partners
have
not,
you
know
been
receiving
distributions.
All
of
the
cash
that
we've
had.
M
You
know
in
the
past
year
has
been
going
to
fuel
development
and
you
know
keep
up
with
our
property
taxes,
which
actually
are
all
current
and
things
were
actually
going
along.
Fine
until
you
know
march,
and
as
you
may
imagine,
it's
just
everything
more
or
less
just
fell
off
a
cliff
and
for
the
first
time
ever,
we
actually
had
to
rosa
actually
had
to
reimburse
park
and
fly
just
to
keep
the
lights
on
and
the
salaries,
and
you
know
the
vans
gassed
and
all
of
that
because
there
was
just
simply
no
travel.
M
So
you
know
spring
is
typically
our
best
time
of
the
year
march
april
and
may
and
and
this
year
you
know
it
was
just
completely
negative.
So
it
is
going
to
take
time
to
recoup
some
of
those
losses
and
but
but
really
it's
you
know,
I
don't.
I
don't
feel
like
I'm,
I
feel
like.
I
am
asking
more
a
little
bit
for
flexibility
for
the
later
phases.
I
you
know
phase.
One
is
definitely
gonna
be
happening
within
this,
this
time
frame,
but
you
know
we.
M
M
So
any
additional
revenue
stream
looks
very
beneficial
to
lenders
and
would
help
also
that
process
immensely
and
just
in
closing,
if
we've
learned
anything
at
all
from
the
past
few
months,
it's
that
you
cannot
predict
exactly
what's
going
to
happen
and
there
is
much
uncertainty
so
time
to
pivot
and
flexibility
are
the
tools
that
really
can
combat
challenging
times
and
and
that
flexibility
is
really
what
we're
requesting
from
the
commission.
So
I
just
wanted
to
thank
you
all.
A
A
M
It
would
definitely
make
I
believe,
financing
the
projects
easier
because
any
any
sort
of
revenue
you
know,
banks
would
like
to
see
that
it
looks
it
looks
much
better.
It
would
also
give
us
time
to
have
another
year
to
build
up
reserves
to
fund
phase
two
and
finish
off
phase
one.
So
you
know
this
is
a
pretty
tight
project
with
the
returns
I,
the
city
has
been
great
working
with
us,
but
still
it
is
very
costly
to
build.
M
You
know
a
quality,
high
quality
building
that
we
all
would
like
to
see
there,
and
so
so
really
the
parking
revenue
is
in
a
way
you
know.
Feeding
this
redevelopment
and,
and
so
any
additional
funds
is
obviously
is
very
helpful
to
to
use
in
a
multi-phase.
You
know
12
12,
acre
big
project
like
we
were
talking
about
here.
A
L
Mr
chair
and
commissioners,
just
I
want
to
reiterate
the
the
cooperative
nature
of
the
the
project
and
end
this
request.
I
I
don't
think
that
we're
far
off
the
the
staff
was
very
supportive
and
understood
that
the
milestones
should
move
a
year
given
the
pandemic,
and
we
just
thought
it
was
very
sensible
that
that
all
of
the
dates
would
move
one
year
and
we
didn't
ask
for
three
and
we
didn't
ask
for
five.
We
simply
asked
for
a
12-month
extension
all
the
way
around.
B
F
A
F
E
F
B
A
D
B
B
When
we
extend
the
iups
for
the
rest
of
the
site,
what
we're
ending
up
with
is
another
year
of
airport
parking
which
does
not
conform
to
the
comp
plan,
and
so
I
too
am
able
to
make
the
required
findings
for
modifying
the
development
milestones.
However,
I
do
struggle
as
the
state
city
staff
recommendation,
to
make
the
required
findings
for
continuing
the
iups
for
the
rest
of
the
site.
A
A
So
certainly
when
we
look
at
the
modification
to
developing
the
timelines,
I
can
understand
and
agree
with
the
planning
staff's
requirements.
The
time
extensions
is
where
I
question
this
to,
and
I
guess
throw
this
out
to
the
rest
of
the
planning
commission,
understanding
the
two
previous
commissioners
and
I'm
trying
to
under
stand
how
a
pandemic
and
the
issues
that
it
is
causing
across
our
our
world
really
shouldn't
be
thought
of
when
we
think
about
the
development
of
these
properties.
A
I
certainly
can
see
the
point
of
our
previous
commissioners
of
yes
that
permanently
delays,
so
finding
number
one
it
it
does
give
that
permission
to
delay
development
on
the
site.
Yet,
on
the
other
hand,
there's
there's
not
a
guarantee
that
it
will
take
place
because
of
this
now
I,
as
I
think
about
this
there's
the
other
side
of
this
is
that
they
can
apply
at
a
later
time.
A
A
And
it
really
does
become
to
some
degree,
a
mode
to
further
ensure
development
because
they
have
income
moving
forward
in
the
short
term
rather
than
you
know
it
would
end
in
a
year
later
they
would
have
potentially
four
years
of
income
or
five
years
of
income
rather
than
four.
So
I
am
still
undecided
on
this
one.
F
Thanks,
mr
chair,
I
think
I
I
echo
what
has
been
said
prior
one
of
the
things
that
I
look
at
is
you
know
I
I
understand
that
we're
we're
going
to
be
delayed
in
the
development.
I
also
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
flexible
with
these
types
of
developments,
as
well
as
understanding
the
safety
that
comes
along
with
it.
F
If
we
rush
it
through,
you
know,
thinking
about
the
current
pandemic
and
the
people
that
are
going
to
be
involved
with
this
project
without
knowing
when
there
is
going
to
be
viable
treatments
or
vaccines,
we
have
to
take
into
account
the
public
safety
as
well.
So
I
think
allowing
that
extension
for
the
phase
one
is,
is
a
justifiable
prudent
decision
and
and
from
safety
as
well
as
financing,
makes
sense,
and
then
I,
I
think,
the
long
term
you
know,
phase
two
etc.
F
If
things
come
faster
and
we
are
able
to
open
things
up
and
have
safe
working
environments,
etc,
we
can
continue
down
the
path
or
in
a
in
a
few
months.
If
we
know
it's
not
viable,
they
can
come
back
and
ask
for
that
extension
and-
and
I
think,
based
on
the
interactions
with
the
staff
as
well
as
the
applicant,
I
would
be
amenable
to
that
as
well.
F
Thank
you,
mr
chair.
I
would
also
echo
the
same.
The
the
the
same
thought
of
you
know
the
uncertainty
of
this
time
and
without
knowing
for
sure
what
could
happen
in
the
in
the
following
months
and
in
the
way
that
it
would
affect
not
only
the
projects
but
also
the
community
and
even
the
the
plans
that
the
community
might
have
in
the
future
too.
D
Thank
you,
mr
chair.
I
think
having
listened
this
on
this
conversation,
it
raised
a
question
for
me.
You
know
one
of
the
one
of
the
reasons
that
the
applicant
has
asked
for
they
want
the
iup
extended
it's
from
a
revenue
perspective.
Nobody
knows
if
or
when
revenue
for
this
type
of
use
is
going
to
be
found.
D
Even
if
things
become
somewhat
that's
normal.
I
think
people
in
the
aviation
industry,
whatever
either
expecting
2023
or
later
before
things
return
to
2019
levels,
and
so
is
the
difference
between
four
and
five
years.
Significant
from
a
revenue
perspective
or
is
you
know
now
is
a
good
time
to
be
borrowing
money
with
interest
rates.
D
Well,
I'm
not
a
business
person
and
I'm
not
a
banker,
but
I
don't
think
there's
any
guarantees
that
another
year
on
an
iup
will
provide
sufficient
revenue
such
that
would
make
a
difference
in
the
viability
of
the
project.
I
think
the
revenue
is
certainly
helpful.
It
leads
the
applicant
to
perhaps
borrow
less
money,
but
the
project,
I
think,
will
stand
on
its
own,
regardless
of
the
amount
of
revenue
that
comes
from
of
the
parking
lot
function.
D
E
Thank
you,
mr
chair,
you
know
I
was
having
very
similar
thoughts
to
commissioner
roman's
remarks.
So
thanks
for
starting
that
out,
I
you
know.
I
think
that
the
revenue
is
a
big
question
mark
and
I
a
couple
things
you
know
I
do
agree
with
the
applicant's
perspective
in
that
you
know
now
is
the
time
to
be
nimble
and
and
sort
of
creative,
but
from
my
perspective
not
quite
yet.
I
don't
think
we're
at
that
point.
A
Thank
you,
commissioner,
albrecht
any
additional
comments
from
any
of
the
commission
members.
I
think
just
I
appreciate
the
commission
members
discussing
their
thoughts.
I
think
that's
given
me
some
additional
confidence,
especially
the
fact
that
they
can
apply
for
an
extension
later
on
down
the
road.
I
think
to
commissioner
albrecht.
I
think
your
point
hit
home
with
me.
A
A
E
In
case
pl
2020-102
having
been
unable
to
make
the
required
findings,
one
two
and
five
city
code,
section
21.501
e.
I
move
to
recommend
approval
of
an
interim
use
permanent
permit
with
modifications
to
previously
adopted
development
milestones
for
phase
development,
but
denial
of
an
extended
expiration
date
at
3700
american
boulevard
e
subject
to
the
listed
conditions
of
approval
and
denial
of
an
interim
youth
permit
with
a
new
expiration
date
at
3750
american
boulevard.
F
A
B
I
Sorry
about
that
there
you
go
so
tonight
so
introductions.
I
am
jason
schmidt.
I
am
one
of
the
economic
development
analysts
for
the
port
authority,
and
tonight
I
am
before
you
on
a
proposed
tax,
increment
financing
district
to
be
created
for
the
american
square
development,
just
a
quick
overview
of
what
tax
increment
financing
is
for
the
commissioners.
It
is
a
method
of
capturing
a
tax-based
growth
resulting
from
new
development,
in
essence,
we're
capturing
that
increment
to
pay
for
public
costs
and
eligible
costs
related
to
development.
I
And
so
why
I'm
here
to
before
you
today
is
pursuant
to
the
state
statutes.
The
city
needs
to
make
certain
findings
that
include
the
following,
but
the
tis,
the
tif
district
qualifies
as
a
housing
district,
which
this
tif
district
will
be
a
housing
district
for
this
development
that
the
proposed
development
in
the
opinion
of
the
city
would
not
occur.
But
for
this
assistance
it's
called
the
but
for
test
that
the
city
is
getting
the
maximum
opportunity,
consistent
with
the
whole
development
of
the
city
in
the
project
area
and
then.
I
I
So
the
american
square
development
so
back
in
june.
This
was
before
the
planning
commission.
So
I
understand
a
few
of
the
commission.
Members
are
new
and
were
not,
or
did
not
act
on
that
it
was
the
american
square
development,
so
within
the
south
loop
district.
So
mall
of
america
is
over
here
where
my
cursor
is
so
it's
on
the
eastern
side
of
the
south
loop
district
and
it
encompasses
the
three
boundaries
of
the
project
or
of
the
proposal
so
zooming
in
here's
a
closer
look.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
It's
kind
of
next
steps
for
this
project
after
tonight.
If
the
planning
commission
approves
the
planning
commission
resolution
that
it
conforms
with
the
comp
plan,
this
will
be
going
before
the
city
council
for
public
hearing
at
the
august
third
meeting,
and
that
will
be
going
before
the
port
authority
for
consideration
of
the
tif
plan
at
their
august
11th
meeting
phase,
one
construction
is
looking
to
begin
later.
I
This
fall
and
then
final
development
plan
for
the
phase
two
is
potentially
going
to
come
before
the
planning,
commission
and
city
council,
either
the
fall
or
winter
of
2022,
which,
at
the
end,
the
same
time.
The
port
authority
would
consider
the
development
agreement
and
the
final
financial
assistance
for
this
package.
I
F
Thanks,
mr
chair,
I
have
a
couple
of
different
questions.
So,
first
of
all,
I
know
we,
we
reviewed
this
application
approved
it
last
month,
this
tiff
process.
I
guess
the
question
I
have
is:
who
who
is
the
initiator?
What
was
the
initiator
of
defining
this
parcel
or
this
project
as
part
of
a
tif
project.
I
A
I
This
to
see
you
know,
but
for
that
tax
increment
will
this
development
occur,
and
so
right
now,
based
on
staff's
initial
review
of
the
early
proforma,
there's
a
very
large
gap
in
providing
affordable
housing
in
this
area,
and
so
what
we're
looking
to
do
is
to
capture
the
increment
from
both
the
phase
one
and
phase
two
to
bring
in
more
affordable
units.
So
a
hundred
percent,
so
those
86
versus
either
40
percent
at
60
or
20
at
50.
and
so
kind
of
the
adverse
impact
would
be
the
phase.
I
I
Sure,
mr
chair
and
commissioner,
and
so
with
the
creation
of
a
tif
plan,
we
have
to
follow
multiple
state
statute
requirements
and
so
30
days
prior
to
this
meeting
and
I'm
going
to
get
the
days
wrong
here,
but
it
was
over
30
days.
We
had
to
send
a
letter
to
the
county,
commissioner,
letting
them
know
that
we
were
looking
at
creating
this
tif
district
in
this
area
within
30
days
of
the
notice
of
the
public
hearing
with
which
the
public
hearing
was
published.
A
B
A
E
A
F
E
A
C
C
C
What
they
are
proposing
to
construct
is
two
columbaria
structures.
You
know
columbaria,
for
those
who
don't
know
are
structures
that
hold
cremains,
and
this
type
of
structure
is
permitted
as
an
accessory
use,
but
must
get
final
site
and
building
plan
approval
from
the
planning
commission.
So
they
are
proposing
two
of
these
structures.
In
this
approximate
location
there
you
can
see
their
site
plan
from
the
agenda
packet.
They
are
proposing
to
have
a
plaza
in
between
the
two
column,
various
structures.
C
They
is
in
just
anecdotal
conversations
with
the
applicant.
They
propose
to
install
some
landscaping
in
the
area
as
well
the
structures
themselves.
Each
structure
holds
200
urns,
it's
constructed
out
of
granite
and
limestone,
it's
four
feet
tall
and
a
little
under
20
square
feet
in
footprint
size.
So
these
are
not
very
large
structures
by
any
means.
C
Just
a
couple
things
to
think
about
these
structures
must
be
screened
from
adjacent
residential
uses,
so
there
is
residential
uses
across
the
street,
so
there
is
a
condition
of
approval
recommended
that
they
screen
the
columbarius
structures.
That
likely
can
be
done
with
plantings,
likely
evergreen
plantings
are
some
type
of
fence.
C
In
terms
of
other
miscellaneous
issues,
you
know,
site
disturbance
is
typically
done
or
landscaping
is
typically
installed
by
the
amount
of
site
disturbance.
So
we'll
keep
an
eye
on
that.
What
the
full
site
disturbance
of
the
project
is
and
then,
if
any
similar
to
item
one
tonight,
if
any
existing
landscape
material
is
removed,
that
would
have
to
be
replaced
on
site
if
any
lighting
is
installed
with
the
column
barrier.
Sometimes
we
see
architectural
lighting
that
would
be
need
to
comply
with
city
code
from
a
dark
sky's
perspective
and
power,
etcetera,
snap's,
recommending
approval.
A
F
Thanks,
mr
chair,
one
question
about
the
plaza:
is
there
going
to
be
seating?
Do
you
mind
pulling
that
back
up
just
thinking
about
the
use
of
that
area,
so
the
plaza
is
just
a
cement
pad,
or
is
it
going
to
be
a
permeable
surface,
think
about
water,
runoff
and
then
obviously
usage
by
people
that
would
like
to
you
know,
reflect
and
visit
those
those
individuals.
C
Yeah,
chairman
solberg,
mr
goldman
good
question:
I
don't
believe
the
material
for
the
patio
or
plaza
has
been
finalized,
yet
certainly
some
material
is
more
pervious
than
others
in
terms
of
just
a
disturbance
standpoint,
just
from
a
code
compliance
factor.
You
know
it
doesn't
it's
not
large
enough
to
trigger
typical
stormwater
management
requirements,
but
we'll
certainly
keep
an
eye
on
that
as
well.
I
don't
know
if
the
church
has
fleshed
out
full
programming
or
use
of
the
plaza
area.
A
C
A
A
E
E
A
B
This
looks
like
a
good
application,
mr
chair
there's
plenty
of
existing
screening
on
the
site
which
will
help
the
applicant
screen
these
two
structures
from
the
residential
uses
across
the
street,
and
it
looks
to
me
to
be
a
good
application.
If
there's
no
further
comments
from
other
commissioners,
I'm
happy
to
make
a
motion.
E
F
A
Commissioner
corman
hi
commissioner
roman
aye,
commissioner
albrecht
aye
commissioner
abdi
aye
and
commissioner
crook
dunn
right
and
I
for
myself
that
motion
passes
unanimous
final
decision.
That
will
be
a
final
decision
on
item
number
four
okra
presbyterian
church
final
decision,
unless
there
is
an
appeal
received
by
4
30
on
july,
28th
and
item
number
four
concludes
our
regular
meeting
for
this
evening.