►
From YouTube: Harris Ranch Community Infrastructure
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
C
Mr
chairman,
I
move
approval
of
the
minutes
of
the
regular
meeting
on
june
22
and
the
special
meeting
on
july
13th.
Second,
roll.
A
D
That
does
indeed,
can
you
all
hear
me:
okay,
okay,
wonderful.
Well,
mr
chair
members
of
the
board,
the
purpose
of
today's
meeting
is
twofold.
First,
the
board
will
hear
public
testimony
from
the
residents
regarding
the
proposed
budget,
and
then
second,
the
board
has
in
front
of
it
a
resolution
to
approve
the
proposed
fy
22
budget.
D
D
I
I
did
want
to
note
that
the
board
has
received
more
than
80
emails
from
residents
expressing
their
concerns
about
taxes
within
the
district
and
also
specifically
about
one
of
the
proposed
reimbursements
for
for
those
who
are
listening
online.
The
reimbursements
are
not
in
consideration
for
the
board
today,
however,
because
the
district
only
holds
one
public
hearing.
D
D
D
First,
each
reimbursement
item
is
confirmed
as
eligible
under
idaho
state
statute
and
then
second,
the
value
of
those
reimbursements
is
then
reviewed
as
well,
and
so
in
conducting
the
review
for
the
southern
half
roadways,
which
is
the
item
that
was
written
about
several
times,
the
staff
will
give
careful
consideration
to
the
appraisal,
objection
that
the
residents
have
raised
so
once
that
review
is
complete,
and
only
after
that
review
is
complete.
Are
the
items
then
presented
to
the
board
for
reimbursement
so
moving
on?
C
Itself,
david,
that's
great
timing.
I
was
just
gonna,
ask
you
what
is
the
timing
of
those
reviews
and
not
coming
to
the
board.
D
Yes
great
question
so
mr
chair
board,
member
woodings
plan
is
that
we
would
present
the
staff
would
present
those
to
the
board
at
the
very
end
of
the
recess.
So
about
the
middle
of
august.
D
E
Thank
you
david.
My
question
is
I'm
assuming
that
that
review
will
be
done
by
both
legal
staff
and
bond
counsel?
Is
that
correct.
D
D
Yes,
absolutely
we'd
be
happy
to
provide
it
and,
in
fact
I
think,
that's
a
great
suggestion.
We
can
make
sure
that
that
is
published
on
the
on
the
district's
website
ahead.
Even
ahead
of
the
the
meeting
schedule.
D
All
right,
so,
with
regards
to
the
the
budget
itself,
the
the
budget
contains
about
5.4
million
in
project
well
in
in
bond
issuance
and
as
well
as
the
capacity
to
refinance
the
2011
special
assessment
bond.
So
you
will
notice
that
the
overall
amount
that
is
included
in
the
budget
is
over
12
million,
which
is
significantly
higher
than
in
previous
years,
and
the
reason
for
that
again
is
primarily
driven
by
the
fact
that
we
intend
to
refinance
the
special
assessment
bond.
D
That
bond
has
currently
has
an
interest
rate
of
nine
percent,
and
our
hope
is
that
we
can
reduce
that
by
half
the
the
interest
rate.
There
is
also
1.6
million
dollars
in
contingency
that
is
in
place
if
a
bank
or
an
underwriter
were
to
offer
longer
terms
on
a
on
the
bonds
themselves.
That
did
not
happen
this
year,
and
so
we
do
not
expect
to
use
any
of
that
1.6
million
I
one
quick
aside.
D
Last
year,
one
of
the
residents
tom
payne
asked
us
to
consider
other
potential
lenders
and
invite
them
to
bid,
and
so
d.a
davidson
was
one
of
the
ones
that
he
had
asked
us
to
consider.
And
so
we
did
invite
them
to
to
bid
on
the
on
the
bonds
and
then
before
we
move
to
the
public
hearing
or
any
questions.
I
did
want
to
address
one
question
that
a
resident
david
williams
had
asked
via
email,
and
that
was
about
how
public
infrastructure
is.
D
D
However,
that
component
does
not
necessarily
mean
that
the
quality
of
the
infrastructure,
the
timing
of
the
infrastructure
or
the
amount
of
infrastructure
is
going
to
be
the
same
in
one
of
those
in
an
area
that
does
not
have
a
community
infrastructure
district.
So
I
did
want
to
to
bring
that
that
up.
D
Those
are
my
prepared
remarks.
I'll
stand
for
for
any
questions
before
we
move
to
the
public
hearing.
E
Mr
chairman,
thank
you
david
one,
more
question.
If
we
were
to
receive
a
bond
bid
that
included
the
contingent
appropriation,
the
purpose
of
that
would
be
to
I
just
I
just
want
to
be
clear.
I'm
understanding
this
as
we
stand.
The
developer
has
already
paid
for
many
of
these
items,
they're,
incurring
interest
charges
and
the
more
that
we
can
bond
early,
the
more
we'll
eva,
avoid
paying
higher
interest
charges
for
extended
interest
charges.
Is
that
correct,
and
that
would
be
the
purpose
of
the
contingency
if
we
were
to
receive
it.
D
We
you
can
think
about
it
in
regards
to
the
fact
that
there
is
a
50
million
dollar
authorization,
so
the
district
is
authorized
to
issue
up
to
that
amount,
and
so
the
doing
issuances
and
refunding
quickly
means
that
more
of
that
50
million
is
used
to
pay
for
public
infrastructure,
as
opposed
to
paying
for
interest
costs
that
the
developer
ends
up
accruing
along
the
way.
So,
yes,
that
is
correct.
A
Okay,
thanks
david,
I
think
you
did
a
great
job
of
laying
the
the
groundwork
here.
Just
so
you
all
know
how
we'll
do
this
I'll
open
up
the
public
hearing
now
and
grant
anyone
that
wants
to
speak
up
to
three
minutes
we've
received,
I
think
hundreds
of
emails
and
we've
read
all
those.
So
I
really
appreciate
the
input
from
the
public
to
this
point.
I
think
I'll
start
with
the
folks
in
the
room
first
and
then
we'll
move
to
individuals
that
are
online.
A
This
is
the
only
public
hearing,
that's
scheduled
regarding
the
budget.
So
while
we
are
not
voting
on
or
speaking
of
specifically
the
reimbursable
items,
that
will
be
part
of
the
bond
meeting
in
mid-august,
because
this
is
the
only
public
hearing
you're
more
than
welcome
to
speak
on
those
issues
as
well
today,
so
I'll
open
up
the
public
hearing-
and
I
think
I'll
just
start
from
right
to
left.
If
that
works
for
you
all,
would
you
like
to
go
first?
A
F
Hello,
thank
you
for
your
time.
Thank
you.
I,
although
I
am
unprepared
I
I
will
speak
briefly.
My
name
is
darren
donna
thorne.
F
Sometimes
my
last
name
is
known
by
nice
guy
and
I
live
at
3,
8,
3,
south
eckert
road
part
of
the
cid,
which
was
unknown
to
me
at
the
time
of
the
purchase
of
the
home.
Although
I
do
have
a
signature
on
file
that
apparently
I
did,
it
was
known
to
me,
so
my
simple
comment
in
principle
is
principally
based
upon
the
price
of
homes
that
have
obviously
gone
up
in
our
area,
I'm
under
the
impression
which
I
could
be
wrong-
that
no
one
ever
foresaw
the
price
of
a
home
back
over
a
decade
ago.
F
When
this
was
put
in
place,
is
my
understanding
and
again
it
could
be
wrong
that
no
one
foresaw
the
price
of
homes
being
what
nearly
what
they
are
today,
that's
first.
My
first
point,
therefore,
I
think
it's
at
least
at
a
minimum
needs
to
be
revisited
number
two,
the
I
I
think
it's
and
beca
because
of
that
I
for
one
may
need
to
move
out
of
of
my
home,
especially
if
the
increases
continue
on
number
two
that
I,
as
a
I've,
done
some
real
estate
investing
development.
F
This
is
the
first
exposure
that
I've
ever
had
to
it,
and
principally
it
seems
to
me
again
that
that's
wrong
that
the
builder
should
incur
those
costs.
I
will
admit
that
this
is
new
to
me
and
I'm
learning.
I
did
not
have
any
prepared
comments,
but
I
thought
I
would
share
those
two
principally
based
concerns
that
I
and
my
wife
have
as
part
of
those
who
are
actually
accountable
to
actually
pay
the
money
so
as
one
that
doesn't
have
a
day
job
anymore
and
lives
primarily
on
a
fixed
income.
F
A
A
G
G
In
terms
of
my
background,
I'm
a
retired
lawyer,
I
worked
for
35
years,
as
a
municipal
finance
lawyer
also
referred
to
as
a
bond
lawyer.
Initially
in
seattle
for
the
last
30
years
of
my
career,
I
worked
at
a
large
international
law
firm
which
had
the
largest
municipal
bond
practice
in
the
country
and,
I
believe,
still
does
for
25
of
those
years.
I
was
a
partner
and
then
senior
council.
G
G
G
G
G
G
C
I
do
have
one
question,
because
this
has
been
coming
up
over
the
past
year
since
folks
have
become
a
little
bit
more
aware
of
the
cid.
H
C
It's
my
understanding
that,
upon
sale
of
the
homes
in
harris
ranch,
homo
prospective
homeowners
are
supposed
to
be
given
notification
kind
of
given
the
pamphlet
on.
G
That's
a
misunderstanding,
so
what
the
development
agreement
requires
in
my
understanding
and
reading
of
it
is
only
that
the
initial
purchasers
be
provided
a
disclosure
statement
and
the
content
of
that
disclosure
statement,
as
you
may
know,
is
an
exhibit
to
the
developer
agreement.
But
any
subsequent
purchasers
receive
no
notice
whatsoever.
G
G
The
point
I
would
like
to
make
is
that
the
broader
point
is
that
under
the
idaho
constitution,
in
order
for
any
taxing
district
to
incur
debt
and
and
therefore
to
impose
taxes
to
pay
that
debt,
there's
got
to
be
a
two-thirds
vote
of
the
qualified
electors,
which
is
a
legal
provision,
it's
a
defined
term
under
the
state's
constitution.
G
What
cids
do
is
they
attempt
to
bypass
that
in
a
variety
of
ways,
but
one
of
the
ways
is
providing
what
you're,
referring
to
by
a
notice
in
in
connection
with
the
purchase
of
property.
G
With
a
closing
document,
you've
probably
already
made
the
decision
to
purchase
the
property
you're
sitting
across
the
table
from
a
real
estate
sales
agent,
who
has
some
influence
over
over
your
decision
to
sign
the
little
disclosure
document
and
that
this
is
the
reason.
That's
that's
not
the
impartial
dispassion
consideration
that
folks
are
able
to
give
to
a
proposition
put
before
them.
When
they're
about
to
vote.
G
C
C
I
think,
since
I
really
came
onto
the
cid
and
understood
the
implications
of
it,
and
I
think
that
that's
really
important,
so
I'm
not
sure
what
the
answer
is:
we've
improved
our
website
so
that
there's
better
transparency
there
on
the
city
side
and
I'm
not
sure
of
the
answer,
but
I
would
like
to
work
on
a
solution
so
that
folks
don't
find
folks
don't
find
themselves
in
that
situation.
C
You
know,
I
think
people
need
to
understand
that
they
would
pay
for
roads
if
they
were
in
a
neighborhood
that
didn't
have
a
cid,
they
would
just
pay
for
it
up
front.
They
wouldn't
pay
for
it
over
a
series
of
years.
They
would
probably
have
lesser
infrastructure
than
what
harris
ranch
has
harris
ranch
has
beautiful
infrastructure
because
of
this
cid
structure
that
likely
would
not
have
been
paid
for
in
a
traditional
development
scenario.
C
So
I
think,
there's
a
lot
of
benefit
to
it,
but
I
also
want
to
see
that
transparency
side
so
that
folks
know
what
they're
getting
into,
because
I
think
that
that's
only
fair.
So
thank
you
for
your
comments.
H
D
H
Idaho
83716,
my
comments
really
are,
are
kind
of
a
continuation
of
the
comments
that
we
had
last
year.
Last
year
was
the
first
year
as
I
understand
in
the
11
or
so
years,
at
this
boardsman
meeting
that
there
was
any
public
participation
or
discussion
of
issues
that
directly
affected
the
homeowners
and
taxpayers
that
reside
within
the
cid
bills
pointed
out
a
couple
of
issues.
I
think
I
wanted
to
speak
to
as
well
after
he
brought
them
up.
One.
A
H
We
purchased
our
house
about
three
years
ago
just
over
three
years
ago
and
at
that
time
received
no
notification,
no
disclosure
or
any
idea
of
the
impact
that
the
cid
would
have
on
our
property
taxes.
H
It
wasn't
until
we
received
our
first
property
tax
bill,
2019
that
we
began
looking
into
it
and
trying
to
figure
out
where
all
this
money
came
from
and
where
is
it
going
and
how
does
it
get
there?
So
the
disclosure
issue
is
a
really
important
one
bill
points
out
when
we
went
through
closing
we.
D
H
Matter
of
how
it
all
works
and
the
impact
that
it's
having
on
on
people's
budgets
and
what
we're
getting
for,
what
are
what
we
are
paying.
There
may
be
some
some
nice
amenities
within
harris
ranch,
but
one
should
have
the
opportunity
to
say
I
agree
that
they're
nice
and
I'm
willing
to
pay
for
them.
We
don't
get
that
chance.
H
I
H
It's
not
the
answer
to
the
core
issues
since
last
year.
I
just
wanted
to
bring
the
board
up
today.
What
we
have
been
doing
and
so
you'll
be
aware
of
what
we're
doing.
Since
the
last
public
hearing,
we
have
put
together
an
executive
committee
of
eight
volunteers
from
different
neighborhoods
within
harris
ranch
and
that
may
be
expanded.
We
have
a
couple
more
people
who
expressed
interest.
H
We
have
also
incorporated
an
incorporated
non-profit
association
under
the
code,
idaho
code,
allowing
for
such
associations
and
will
be
moving
to
formalize
the
structure
of
that
board
and
its
activities,
so
that
we'll
have
you'll
have
somebody
that
you'll
be
able
to
get
in
contact
with
on
questions
or
issues
as
they
arise.
Hillary.
Could
you
wrap
it
up
here,
just
real,
quick
yeah.
Thank
you.
Sorry,
one.
The
one
one
point
I
wanted
to
make
is
is
the
question
about
the
amenities
and
how
much
we're
paying
for
them.
H
A
I
Okay,
that
better,
I
just
wanted
to
make
the
comment,
and
I
think
it
has
been
referred
to
somewhat
already
by
the
other
individuals
that
have
spoken,
that
the
operation
and
application
of
the
cid
here
within
the
harris
ranch
association
is
inappropriate
and
incorrect.
That
is
that
we
are
paying
for
improvements
that
are
open
and
available
to
the
general
public
and
used
by
the
general
public.
I
J
Good
morning,
can
you
hear
me?
Yes?
Yes,
thank
you
very
much.
My
name
is
jim
reilly.
2367
south
trapper
place
part
of
the
harris
north
ranch
development,
I'm
here
to
express
my
dissatisfaction
and
the
serious
concerns
about
the
organization,
management
and
financial
impacts
of
the
harris
ranch
community
infrastructure
district
number
one.
I
am
part
of
the
hr
taxpayer
association
membership
and
I'm
also
writing
to
speaking
to
express
my
support
for
the
opposition
to
the
proposed
payments
by
the
to
the
developer
appearance.
Harris
ranch,
as
outlined
in
a
letter
of
opposition.
J
J
I
would
also
request
that,
for
any
new
bonds
are
authorized
or
issued
on
behalf
of
the
harris
ranch
developers
that
the
homeowners
who
are
directly
affected
by
the
issuance
of
such
bonds
have
the
opportunity
to
review
and
vote
on
the
issuance
of
any
bond
to
affect
their
property
taxes
to
deny
the
cid
homeowners.
The
basic
right
to
vote
on
bonds
that
affect
our
property
taxes
is
to
deny
us
due
process
and
equal
protection
under
idaho
law.
J
None
of
us
who
were
purchasing
property
were
aware
of
a
50
million
dollar
price
tag
of
what
that
tax
burden
would
be
to
us,
in
addition
to
25
years
of
taxes
that
only
we
would
be
paying,
as
opposed
to
other
residents
within
harris
ranch,
and
I
would
additionally
remind
everyone
that
you
know
nothing
was
disclosed
about
the
fact
that
it
would
cost
us
163
000,
potentially
on
average,
to
participate
in
the
hrc
id,
and
I
think
we
all
would
potentially
argue
and
question
the
amount
of
value
we
get
based
off
of
that
price
tag.
K
K
A
You
know
I'll,
let
you
do
your
whole
presentation
and
brittany
and
then
we'll
bring
david
in
and
see
if
he
can
answer
those
questions
for
you.
So
if
you
want
to
put
them
both
out
first.
K
Right,
so
if
that
is
correct,
that
the
proportion
is
variable,
my
question
would
be:
how
is
the
board
going
to
manage
in
the
long
term
that
proportion
so
that
it
doesn't
get
to
be
egregious
because
when
we
look
at
our
property
tax
bill
for
2020,
as
it
compares
to
our
home
value,
we're
at
roughly
say
1.3
of
the
property
value
which
is
high?
K
And
I
mean
if
it
goes
to
you
know
two
three,
four
percent.
That's
I
would
echo
the
sentiment
of
you
know
the
gentleman
who
spoke
who
said
that
they
would
move
out
of
the
area
so
that
that
would
be
our
questions.
A
D
Yeah,
mr
chair
and
and
brittany,
that's
a
very
good
question,
and
so
we'll
I'll
try
and
keep
it
brief.
But
this
goes
into
the
dynamics
of
how
the
cid
works
compared
to
the
the
other
budgets.
So
you
have
your
school
district,
you
have
the
city
itself,
you
have
ada
county
and
the
way
they
work
is
that
they
have
a
budget
that
increases
at
a
at
a
pretty
slow
rate.
Their
budget
will
increase
a
few
percent
each
year,
and
so,
as
per
your
property
taxes,
that's
not
going
to
change
very
much.
D
D
0.285
percent
or
what's
called
2.85
mills,
and
so
that
2.85
mills
is
going
to
be
the
same
every
single
year,
and
so
the
challenge
that
the
that
has
happened
all
throughout
the
the
treasure
valley
is
also
true
for
the
district
itself
where,
by
as
your
property
taxes
increase
and
especially
if
they
increase
rapidly,
then
that
2.85
mills
actually
becomes
a
larger
and
larger
percentage
of
the
property
tax.
D
And
so
that's,
what's
the
dynamic
that
that
you're,
seeing
is
as
property
tax
or
as
home,
values
have
skyrocketed
that
2.85
mills
becomes
a
larger
percentage
of
your
property
tax.
I
hope
that
that
helps.
D
Yeah
absolutely
so
there's-
and
this
is
where
I
think
the
the
board
gets
to
weigh
in
in
terms
of
the
the
budget,
and
we
also
work
with
the
developer.
To
better
understand-
and
one
of
the
items
I
did
not
say
is
that
I
will
be
working
with
a
developer
to
bring
forth
their
their
plans
on
where
the
district
is,
and
I
hope
to
address
that
in
the
next
meeting
for
this
meeting,
I
wanted
to
focus
on
resident
input,
but
you're
right
it
is.
K
Right
and
do
I
still
have
a
couple
seconds.
K
We,
we
did
send
in
a
letter
as
well,
but
I
wanted
to
echo
the
sentiment
that
we
weren't
advised
as
part
of
the
home
purchase
process
about
the
cid,
and
so
we
purchased
our
home
in
november
2020,
and
we
didn't
find
out
about
this
until
you
know
2021
and
then
we
were,
we
felt
like
we
didn't
understand
for
a
long
time
what
was
going
on
and
we
educated
ourselves,
and
so
that's
why
we're
here
and
then
I
I
just
wanted
to
voice
the
feeling
that
we
generally
just
feel
powerless
like
we
were
surprised
that
this
wasn't
handled
as
part
of
a
homeowners
association
or
something
like
that
that
this
was
you
know.
K
A
statute
is
something
that
we
would
have
imagined
to
be
private
contract
law,
as
opposed
to
it
being
state
law
and-
and
I
feel
at
this
point
like
I-
don't
understand
the
ways
that
I
can
affect
the
change
in
this
important
matter
that
you
know
affects
my
bottom
line
and
my
cash
flows
but
anyways.
That
was
all
thank
you
very
much.
A
Thank
you
for
your
comments,
brittany
and
I'll.
I
just
want
to
emphasize
as
well
for
everyone
that,
for
you,
brittany,
as
well
as
everyone,
that's
listening
online,
that
while
this
is
the
only
public
hearing
related
to
the
cid
in
the
coming
months,
we
do
encourage
you
to
continue
to
send
your
input
and
feedback
to
us
and,
as
we
come
up
on
that
mid-august
date,
we
could
continue
to
consider
all
that
information.
L
Hi,
thank
you
for
your
time.
My
name
is
steve
carlson.
I
live
at
3782,
south
single
tree
avenue,
boise,
83716..
I'll,
be
brief.
I
wanted
to
re-echo
what
the
other
homeowners
had
said.
The
other
part
that
I'm
confused
about
or
not
in
agreement
with,
is
that,
because
we're
part
of
the
cid,
the
value
of
our
home,
reflects
that
versus
someone
who
supposes
a
value
of
a
house
that
lives
outside
the
cid
and
doing
a
little
bit
of
research.
L
B
We
have
two
additional
tim
carlson.
I
C
A
Okay,
well,
there's
no
one
else
additional
in
the
room.
So
unless
there's
follow-up
questions
I'll
close,
the
public
hearing
go
ahead.
E
Mr
chairman,
I'd
like
to
ask
one
question
of
david
before
we
close.
If
I
could
please
so
david,
especially
the
questions
that
brittany
ask,
I
think
something
we've
talked
about
the
last
two
years
is
that.
E
Certainly,
the
the
board
could
make
a
decision
that
would
generate
lower
payments
per
year,
but
the
outcome
of
that,
if,
if
I
understand
it
correctly,
is
that
those
lower
payments
would
pay
off
the
debt.
That's
been
incurred
earlier
or
later
and
result
in
a
higher
overall
debts
interest
debt
service
to
principal
than
if
the
cid
continues
to
pay
off
at
the
0.285
mills
0.285
mills.
E
The
district
is:
is
it
true,
if
that's
the
case,
that
the
district
would
simply
be
able
to
build
less
of
the
expansive
infrastructure
that
they've
got
planned.
D
Yeah
so
mr
chair
board,
member
clegg,
that's
that's
a
good
question.
D
Ultimately,
if
the
budget,
for
example,
were
to
be
lowered
so
that
smaller
bond
issuance
would
be
made,
then
you
are
correct
that
less
infrastructure
could
be
reimbursed,
and
ultimately
there
is
a
an
agreement
between
the
developer
and
the
district.
And
so
I
would
say
that
it
would
be
important
to
include
the
developer
in
that
conversation
to
understand
how
that
would
change
what
would
be
built
under
sp01
the
the
master
plan.
D
But
at
the
same
time
the
the
residents
have
raised
an
important
point,
which
is
that
that
I
believe
the
board
also
needs
to
consider
which
is:
has
the
the
level
of
that
tax
become
so
high
that
it
becomes
makes?
What
even,
if
there's
great
infrastructure
it
makes
it
too
difficult
to
to
be
able
to
afford
to
live
there.
D
So
there's
there's
not
an
immediate
answer
that
that
we
can
provide
today.
However,
I,
if
I
hear
you
correctly,
it
sounds
like
working
with
a
developer
to
understand
how
a
chain
a
hypothetical
change,
if
we
were
to
look
at
at
a
different
amount
of
bond
issuance
or
a
lower
mill
rate.
What
kind
of
effect
that
would
have
on
the
district
and
be
able
to
present
that
as
a
scenario
for
the
board
to
consider
might
be
something
that
would
be
helpful?.
E
Follow
up,
mr
chairman,
thank
you
david.
I
wasn't
necessarily
suggesting
that
we
should.
I
was
just
trying
to
understand
the
impact.
If
we
did,
I
don't
know
at
this
point
haven't
had
the
discussion
with
my
fellow
board
members
about
what
what
the
you
know
what
action
will
take,
but
I
just
I
I
guess
overall
just
want
to
make
sure
I
understand
that,
first
of
all
we're
following
state
law
as
it
was
written,
we're
doing
that.
E
We've
done
that,
as
I
understand
very
carefully
every
year,
and
that
is
based
on
a
vote
that
was
taken
certainly
prior
to
these
folks.
Moving
in,
although
I'd
note
that
the
school
district
here
took
a
vote
10
years
ago
and
has
over
time
been
issuing
more
and
more
bonds
against
the
vote
that
the
people
who
have
moved
in
since
weren't
a
part
of
it
is
not
an
unusual
way.
Frankly
for
those
kinds
of
things
to
work.
E
A
C
Mr
chair,
I'm
going
to
put
a
motion
on
the
table
for
discussion
if
that's
appropriate.
Yes,
I
would
like
to
move
that
we
approve
hrcid
8-2021,
a
resolution
approving
the
fy
22
operating
budget
for
the
harris
ranch
community
infrastructure
district
number
one
and
providing
an
effective
date.
Second,.
C
Yeah,
mr
chairman,
I
am,
I
appreciate
everyone
showing
up
and
sharing
your
concerns
and
some
of
your
concerns
I
share,
and
that's
that
this
is.
This-
is
a
it's
a
really
a
pretty
cool
mechanism
to
get
fantastic
infrastructure.
However,
it
needs
to
have
certain
market
forces
applied
to
it
in
order
for
it
to
work
the
way
that
it
should
and
that's
transparency
when
you're,
seeing
properties
that
are
across
the
street
from
a
property,
that's
in
the
cid
and
those
have
the
same
value.
C
C
If
that
isn't
provided
up
front,
then
people
aren't
able
to
make
that
decision
for
themselves
on
whether
they
want
to
pay
upfront
for
for
that
property,
knowing
that
they'll
have
that
additional
tax
burden,
so
I
think
that
that's
really
important
and
I'm
I'm
not
sure
what
the
remedy
is.
I
would
love
to
work
with
the
taxpayers,
association
and
the
developer
to
make
sure
that
we
we
have
that
level
of
transparency.
C
For
folks
that
are
buying-
and
it
may
be,
that
people
don't
care
that
people
are
like,
okay,
I'll,
you
know
I'll
pay,
what
I
have
to
pay
to
live
in
this
beautiful
neighborhood,
but
that's
a
market
force
and
that's
how
assessments
are
produced
by
the
county
they're
based
on
on
what
the
market
dictates,
and
so
it's
you
know
it's
not
like
some
made-up
number,
it's
based
on
sales
and
actual
performance.
C
C
That
is
increasing
taxes
out
here,
because
we
have
the
same
mill
rate
that
we've
always
had,
and
now
we
have
this
discussion
that
we
should
be
having
about
do
we
want
to
build
out.
Do
we
want
the
developer
to
be
able
to
build
out
all
of
the
infrastructure
more
quickly
or
do
we
want
to
pay
more
in
interest
over
time
and
get
less
infrastructure?
C
So
I
think
that
that's
kind
of
where
we
are.
I
moved
that
we
approve
this
budget
because
I
think
it's
really
important
that
we
get
a
lower
interest
rate
on
the
bonds
already
outstanding.
C
I
think
that's
critical,
there's
no
reason
in
this
market
to
be
paying
nine
percent
interest
on
anything
unless
you
have
a
really
bad
credit
card,
so
I
think
that
we
should
get
that
done
as
quickly
as
possible,
and
I
think
this
is
an
ongoing
conversation
about
what
that
balance
is
between
getting
all
of
that
incredible
infrastructure
that
is
included
in
the
master
plan
that
was
worked
on
over
year.
C
I
mean
decades
and
then
passed
adopted,
and
then
this
cid
board
is
now
tasked
with
ensuring
compliance
with
state
statute
and
the
build
out
of
that
infrastructure
and
making
sure
that
the
tax
burden
isn't
so
much
that
it's
causing
folks,
like
mr
nice
guy
here,
to
be
priced
out
of
his
home.
So
thank
you
so
much
for
coming
and
sharing
with
us
your
experience.
C
E
Chairman,
thank
you.
Well,
I
seconded
the
motion
because
I
also
believe
that
it's
in
everyone's
best
interest
to
refinance
this
special
assessment
bond
and
move
into
the
lower
interest
rates
that
are
now
available.
I
also
think
it's
important
to
be
able
to
do
the
legal
analysis
on
the
request
for
reimbursement
that
will
be
done
now
in
preparation
for
actually
determining
if
we
go
to
bond
on
those
items.
E
I'd
also
add
that
you
know
I
appreciate
everyone
who's
come
today
and
I
I
think
councilmember
weddings
or
board
member
whittings
in
this
case
really
hit
the
key
point
and
that's
disclosure.
E
But
it
may
also
prove
differently,
but
we
won't
know
if
that
disclosure
isn't
isn't
achieved,
and
I
I
think
if,
if
the
one
thing
that
we've
heard
over
and
over
in
the
last
couple
of
years,
it's
that,
while
people
admit
they
have
in
fact
signed
a
title
document
that
where
they
were
told
that
this
tax
existed,
because
that
is
required
as
part
of
the
sale,
the
disclosure
about
what
that
was
how
it
worked
was
not
very
robust.
So
I
look
forward
to
working
on
that.
E
I
suspect,
knowing
this
developer
they'd
be
more
than
happy
to
have
that
be
made
better,
and
you
know
if
we
can
figure
out
how
to
do
that.
I
think
that's
the
first
step
after
we
refinance
this
nine
percent
bond,
so
I
will
be
voting
in
favor
of
this.
A
Thank
you
I'll.
Just
briefly,
have
a
few
comments.
I
agree
with
everything
that's
been
said,
and
I
I
really
appreciate
the
input
that
we've
been
receiving,
because
you
know
this.
This
particular
board
hasn't
always
received
that
type
of
robust
input,
and
it's
very
helpful
to
all
of
us
to
understand
where
you
are.
Your
thought
process
is
and
how
you
feel
about
how
it's
all
going
I'll
again
emphasize
that
you
know
in
mid-august.
That's
when
there'll
be
the
actual
bond
resolution
meeting.
A
Well,
it's
not
a
public
hearing,
that's
where
you
can
continue
to
send
that
information
our
way,
because
we
are
looking
at
we're
reading
it-
and
I
know
many
of
many
of
the
emails
that
we
received
were
about
a
particular
roadway
in
the
project
and
that's
going
to
be
highly
scrutinized
as
david
noted
to
ensure
that
a
project
like
that
or
any
of
them
are
items
that
can
actually
be
eligible
for
reimbursement
and
if,
yes,
then,
what
the
appropriate
price
is.
A
E
Mr
chairman,
could
I
can
I
just
make
one
further
comment.
One
of
our
folks
who
testified
today
said
that
we
had
not
had
public
input
prior
to
this,
and
while
it's
true,
we
didn't
have
a
lot
of
participation.
I'd
just
like
to
note
for
the
record.
We
have
always
had
a
public
hearing
on
the
budget
and
we've
always
invited
the
public
to
participate.