►
Description
Please visit the following link for information on how to testify during virtual public hearings:
https://www.cityofboise.org/departments/finance-and-administration/city-clerk/virtual-meetings/
A
A
Second
wow
any
discussion
would
the
clerk
please
call
the
roll.
A
Thank
you
third
item
on
our
agenda.
Is
the
public
hearing
for
the
fy
2021
budget
for
the
infrastructure
district
and
a
resolution
h.r
cid
8
2020,
david
husseghwa
will
be
presenting
welcome
david.
D
D
The
district's
purpose
itself
is
to
accelerate
or
to
expedite
construction
of
public
infrastructure
within
the
district,
and
this
is
accomplished
primarily
through
the
issuance
of
of
bonds.
So,
let's
take
a
quick
look
at
the
budget
itself.
The
budget
is
primarily
focused
on
raising
support
for
the
debt
service
through
the
use
of
levies
and
an
assessment
for
both
the
outstanding
bonds
that
are
presently
with
the
district
and
for
future
debt.
Issuances
of
the
district.
D
D
Now
eligibility
is
based
off
of
two
things:
number
one:
it's
based
off
of
idaho
state
law
and
the
second.
It's
based
off
of
a
developer
agreement
that
was
signed
by
the
city,
the
district
itself
and
the
harris
family,
limited
partnership,
and
some
of
those
requirements
for
reimbursement
are
that
the
projects
have
followed
public
bidding
rules
and
that
the
projects
are
turned
over
for
public
ownership
or
public
right-of-way
or
easements.
D
The
projects
must
also-
and
this
is
critical
directly
or
indirectly
benefit
the
district
itself
by
having
a
substantial
nexus
to
the
district
and
then
similarly
to
the
city.
The
district
follows
a
public
approval
process
of
its
budget
each
year.
That
process
starts
with
a
budget
workshop
which
has
already
been
held,
and
then
we
hold
a
public
hearing,
which
is
what
we're
doing
today
and
then.
Finally,
upon
approval
of
the
budget,
the
budget
will
be
reaffirmed
in
a
third
meeting
prior
to
submission
to
ada
county
and
before
we
open
up
the
meeting
for
public
input.
D
I
wanted
to
identify
one
of
the
challenges
that
is
unique
to
the
district
that
is
distinct
from
the
challenges
that
the
city
is
facing.
The
district's
levy
is
set
at
2.85
mills
or
0.285
percent,
and
for
most
levies,
eric
billamoria.
The
city
budget
manager
last
month
testified
that
as
housing
prices
increase,
the
relative
proportion
of
the
levy
decreases
for
most
for
most
levees,
whether
that's
the
city
of
boise
ada
county,
the
school
districts,
however,
for
the
city
of
boise
or
I'm
sorry
for
the
harris
ranch
community
infrastructure
district.
D
That
levy
is
set,
and
so
what
happens
is
that
as
housing
prices
increase,
the
relative
proportion
of
that
levy
does
increase.
Now.
This
is
by
design
with
that
functionality
allows
for
new
debt
to
be
issued
to
pay
for
future
reimbursements,
and
the
way
that
it
was
originally
designed
is
that
rice
or
increased
construction
within
the
district
would
help
to
pay
for
that.
However,
when
you
have
rapid
increases
in
housing
prices
that
throws
that
balance
off,
and
so
that's
one
of
the
challenges
that
we're
facing
today
and
that
will
need
to
be
addressed.
D
C
A
C
D
The
developer
would
be
the
the
better
person
if,
if
they
are
available
to
answer
that
doug
fowler
yeah
I'll
just
give
my
my
understanding
is
that
primarily
those
prices
would
be
included
in
the
price
of
the
house
itself,
but
I
I'll
what
don't
get
things
available.
B
Yes,
doug
fowler
is
on
on.
E
Typically,
a
unless
you're
in
a
urban
renewal
district
or
like
ccdc
a
developer
would
pay
for
the
the
cost
of
the
infrastructure
and
one
of
the
and
and
would
not
get
reimbursed
for
that,
and
what
that
does
then
is
drive
the
price
of
higher.
What
the
so
here's
the
here
are.
E
The
if
you
didn't
have
a
cid,
you
would
probably
then
pay
four
hundred
and
twenty-five
thousand
dollars
for
the
house,
because
the
the
the
costs
have
to
be
reimbursed
somehow
or
the
project
doesn't
pencil.
So
it's
you
know
kind
of
six
to
one
in
in
one
way
of
thinking
a
half
dozen,
the
other,
but
the
what
the
cid
does
is.
Allow
you
to
plan
a
project,
the
size
of
harris
ranch
with.
E
In
this
case,
the
specific
district
ordinance
instead
of
piecemealing
a
development
and
selling
off
20
or
30
acres
at
a
time,
it
allows
you
to
have
a
cohesive
plan
for
a
large
project,
in
this
case
a
50
million
dollar
bonding
capacity.
So
the
you
can
ensure
that
the
project
has
a
financing
mechanism
to
get
finished.
E
When
the
bank
financing
dried
up,
the
project
was
left
unfinished.
So
that's
that
was
really
the
reason
for
forming
the
community
infrastructure
district
and
sorry
for
the
long
answer.
But
it's
a
it's
a
simple
question,
but
it's
a
complex
answer,
and
that
is,
it
allows
us
to
do
a
lot
of
things
that
we
wouldn't
be
able
to
do,
because
we
know
we're
going
to
get
reimbursed.
It
allows
us
to
do
things
like
six
foot
wide
sidewalks.
Instead
of
when
we
started
the
project,
you
could
do
four
foot
wide
sidewalks.
E
Even
now
you
can
do
five
foot
wide
sidewalks.
It
allows
us
to
do
eight
foot
wide
planner
strips
it
allows
us
to
have
a
ton
of
open
space
in
the
foothills
and
allows
us
to
have
some
some
many
parks
and
allows
us
to.
We
can't
get
reimbursed,
for
instance,
for
a
postal
pavilion
out
of
terrace
ranch
that
we
have
three
and
we're
getting
ready
to
start
a
fourth
one,
but
allows
us
to
take
the
take
other
funds
and
build
those.
E
So
it's.
I
hope
that
explains
it,
at
least
in
a
nutshell,.
C
Yeah,
thank
you.
It's,
I
think,
such
a
different,
such
a
different
structure,
than
I
think
what
a
lot
of
folks
are
used
to,
and
it
it
just
struck
me
that
it
very
closely
mirrors
a
lot
of
the
big
infrastructure
work
that
the
city
does.
You
know
you
have
the
choice
of
either
paying
for
it
up
front
and
having
all
of
the
current
users
pay
for
all
of
that
infrastructure
or
potentially
going
in
to
debt
for
it
and
paying
for
it
over
a
series
of
years
and
having
future
users
also
paying
for
that
infrastructure.
E
Sure-
and
one
thing
I
would
add,
even
as
low
as
mortgage
rates
are
today,
the
with
the
exception
of
the
special
assessment,
which
is
going
to
be
refinanced
here,
not
too
distant
future.
The
cid
general
obligation
bonds,
which
make
up
the
majority
of
it
that
interest
rate,
I
believe,
has
been
running
in
the
in
the
twos.
So
it's
it's
good
financing.
A
Thank
you
david.
I
have
a
couple
of
questions
and
doug.
If
you'll
hang
out
here,
some
of
them
might
be.
You
might
want
to
pipe
in
on
these
as
well,
so
the
2.85
levy
amount
is
set
by
state
law.
D
Yes,
absolutely
we,
the
the
lower
bound,
is
really
the
commitment
that
the
district
has
already
made
to
the
existing
bonds.
So
as
long
as
we
maintain
that,
then
yes,
we
could
part
of
the
reason
to
to
keep
things
level
at
that
2.85.
Mills
is
simply
to
try
and
avoid
large
changes
in
in
the
levy
itself.
But,
yes,
less
could
be
collected
as
long
as
it
did
not
fall
below
what
the
district
has
committed
to
paying
for
debt
service.
A
Okay
and
another
question
then
related
to
that
when
the
development
agreement
was
written,
this
kind
of
a
two-part
question
there
was
a
50
million
dollar
limit
that
cannot
be
increased
if
I'm
correct,
but
in
addition,
the
plan
that
was
certified
in
that
development
agreement
was
for
infrastructure
and
services
that
substantially
serve
harris
ranch
residents.
A
D
I
am
not
aware
of
one
I'll
ask
our
council
if
he's
aware
of
of
anything
in
there,
but
having
just
reviewed
the
the
developer
agreement
prior
to
this
meeting,
I'm
not
aware
of
any
intent
to
to
do
so.
Okay,.
E
Yes,
madam
chair
and
council
member
woodings,
yes,
the
you
know,
unfortunately,
the
for
instance,
when
you
we
put
in
the
bypass
road,
we
have
to
pay
a
hundred
percent
of
that,
even
though
that
may
serve
people
at
either
end
of
harris
ranch.
E
The
highway
district
does
not
say
okay
here
and
and
have
a
factor.
Neither
does
the
you
know
the
power
company.
You
know
idaho
power
if
you're
gonna
put
some
lines
underground.
Idaho
power
does
not
tell
you.
Okay,
look
you're
running
lines
that
are
going
to
take
care
of
properties.
E
East
of
harris
ranch,
so
what's
actually
going
to
harris
ranch
is
only
about
80
percent
of
this,
so
we
idaho
power
are
going
to
pay
20
of
that
cost
that
no
you,
you
pay
for
all
of
the
costs
that
runs
through
the
property
you're
developing
the
the
city
of
boise.
E
A
Okay,
thank
you
final
question
that
I
have
I'm
trying
to
remember.
The
cid
is
now
almost
a
decade
old
and
at
what
point
is
there
any
call
in
the
documents
to
renew
the
plan
for
the
infrastructure
that
hasn't
been
completed
yet.
A
Okay,
and
is
there,
is
there
any
desiring
on
the
part
of
the
harris
ranch
developers
to
look
at
that
plan
and
make
sure
everything's
still,
as
should
be,
or
are
you
confident
that
it
is.
E
Madam
chair
and
councilmember
woody,
we
are
right
now
in
negotiations
with
some
people
to
for
the
town
center.
That
would
involve
looking
at
the
village
green
and
you
know,
could
there
be
some
modifications
to
that?
There
certainly
could
be,
but
as
far
as
the
overall
infrastructure
it
is
it's
pretty
well
set.
We
have
right
now
at
one
in
one
form
or
another.
We
have
all
the
remaining
developable
property
in
harris
ranch,
either
under
contract
or
being
negotiated.
A
A
So
before
I
open
the
public
hearing,
which
we
will
do
here
in
just
a
second
one,
more
little
quick
note
about
community
infrastructure
districts,
the
state
of
idaho
created
the
statute
that
allows
those-
and
in
this
case
this
was
formed
in
that
statute,
the
there's
a
requirement
that
the
three
board
members
of
the
district,
be
three
council
members
or
three
commissioners
from
the
jurisdiction
that
governs
the
land,
and
so
that's
why
city,
council
members
are
the
board
members
of
this.
A
I
just
didn't
know
if
some
of
the
folks
who
might
be
testifying
today
knew
that,
so
I
wanted
to
make
sure
that
you
did
so
with
that
we
have
no
one.
I
will
open
the
public
hearing.
We
have
no
one
in
chambers
in
person,
we
do
have
five
people
who
pre-signed
up
online
so
we'll
go
through
those
in
order
to
begin
with,
and
then
we'll
see
if
there's
anyone
else
online.
That
would
like
to
testify.
F
Yes,
ma'am,
I
am
thank
you,
so
I
appreciate
the
the
information
that
you
provided.
It's
it's
good
to
get
the
background
as
a
new
resident
that
moved
in
a
year
and
a
half
ago,
I
found
it
rather
challenging
to
find
information
about
the
cid.
F
Specifically,
what
projects
have
been
done
to
date,
what
what
budgets
were
allocated
were
they
on
budget?
Were
they
were
they
completed
and
was
just?
It
was
very
difficult
to
find
that
information
out
there
publicly
on
the
website.
It
was
kind
of
a
choose.
Your
own
adventure
books
would
be
great
if,
if
the
council
could
provide
that
detail
in
fact,
miss
clay
guy
had
emailed
your
office
specifically
and
was
never
received
anything
back
number
two
doug,
you
mentioned
all
the
benefits
of
the
cid
one.
F
One
thing
that
is
that
I
would
like
to
say
that
would
be
great
to
have
under
consideration
is
the
fact.
A
F
The
the
next
is,
you
mention
all
those
benefits,
one
one
thing
that
is
a
little
bit
of
a
collateral
out
of
that
is
the
fact
that
the
re,
the
cid,
is
drawn
with
some
irregular
lines
that
puts
homeowners
on
one's
right
next
to
each
other,
paying
and
some
not
paying.
So
whenever
these
fees
are
levied
and
they're
continued
to
increase
that
that
puts
an
unfair
or
a
disadvantage
to
homeowners,
trying
to
sell
with
their
neighbor
right
across
the
street
or
right
next
to
them.
F
Not
part
of
the
cid
so
would
like
to
know
from
from
the
council's
perspective,
who,
who
in
the
council
has
is,
is
responsible
for
being
the
voice
for
the
the
neighborhood?
You
said
that
there's
council
members
that
are
on
this
board,
but
is
there
any
any
representation
from
someone
directly
impacted
by
the
the
levees
of
the
cid.
A
We'll
stop
the
clock
here
for
a
second
and
I'll
answer
that,
as
you
know,
boise
city
does
not
have
districts,
which
means
all
of
your
council.
Members
represent
you.
I
would
say
in
this
case
it's
actually
easier
for
council
members
who
are
not
on
the
cid
board
to
work
with
you,
because
those
of
us
who
are
if
we
work
with
you,
then
perhaps
buy
us
our
actions
as
board
members.
A
A
Certainly
we
will.
This
is
the
first
time
we've
had
a
lot
of
public
input
on
these
and
we
are
trying
to
pull
together
some
information
to
get
out
to
you
and
we'll
make
a
commitment
to
do
that.
F
I
would
greatly
appreciate
that
because,
as
I
had
mentioned
previously,
I
sent
multiple
emails
and
requests
for
meetings
for
you
personally,
ms
kleck,
to
be
able
to
discuss
these
questions
that
many
of
our
residents
moving
into
harris
north
are
experiencing
as
they're
learning
about
the
cid
and
the
impacts
to
our
taxes
and
our
value
of
our
home
next
to
a
home.
Next
to
us.
C
Yes,
I
just
wanted
to
respond
to
mr
hooker
a
little
bit.
We
did
receive
emails
from
many
people.
We
have
never
received
emails
or
had
any
kind
of
public
interest
in
these
hearings
in
the
past,
and
so
it
was
kind
of
surprising
I
think
to
those
of
us
on
the
board.
I
did
read
all
of
them.
I
didn't
respond
because
it
would
in
many
ways
bias
my
position
on
this
board,
and
so
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
that
folks
know
that
their
emails
were
received
and
read.
C
Maybe
I
should
have
sent
that
back
in
a
short
email
just
to
let
everyone
know,
but
I
didn't,
I
think,
like
everyone
else,
I'm
you
know
perhaps
struggling
a
little
bit
stay-at-home
full-time
parent
and
part-time
city
council
member.
So
it's
hard
to
keep
up,
but
I
did
want
to
just
let
everyone
know
that
we're
not
used
to
having
this
much
input.
There
was
a
lot
of
input
received
and
read,
and
I'm
sorry
if
it
wasn't
responded
to
in
the
ways
that
people
would
have
liked
it
to
have
been.
F
Miss
winning
I'm
referring
to
emails
that
I
sent
starting
over
18
months
ago
with
no
response
as
well
as
recently.
So
it's
I
understand
the
current
situation.
I
understand
the
strength
that's
under
and
to
your
q
to
your
point
about
not
not
finding
interest.
I
found
it
very
hard
to
even
find
these
meetings.
They
seem
to
have
been
scheduled
and
then
rescheduled
with
limited
input
or
limited
notice
to
the
to
the
to
the
public
at
large
to
be
able
to
make
accommodations
to
be
able
to
attend
and
view
these.
A
Meetings,
thank
you.
I
appreciate
that
input
and
I
would
echo
council
member
woodings
and
agree
that
our
email
response
system
is
not
as
strong
as
it
needs
to
be
we're
working
on
it.
I
hope
everyone
recognizes
that
in
these
awkward
times
we
have
received
over
5000
emails
on
the
subject
of
police
funding
and
not
to
say
that
other
things
got
lost
in
the
translation,
but
it
has
been
quite
a
struggle
to
attempt
to
keep
up
with
actually
responding
to
every
email
that
we
get.
A
I
have
also
read
all
of
them
and
certainly
would
echo
that
this
the
first
time
we've
received
interest
in
this
in
terms
of
changing
the
schedule.
I
would
tell
you
that
again
because
of
the
issues
around
the
police
budget,
we
were
forced
to
change
a
lot
of
things
on
our
schedule.
It
frankly,
wouldn't
have
been
my
first
choice
to
do
that,
but
it
was
in
the
best
interest
of
the
public
at
large
to
do
that
on
the
larger
budget
of
the
city.
A
G
There
we
go,
can
I
I'm
just
gonna
pass
my
time
it
was
a
new,
very
new
to
the
neighborhood,
only
a
couple
months
and
I'm
learning,
and
I
thought
I
had
to
check
that
box.
In
order
to
get
into
this,
we
had
some
difficulty
and
you'll
find
the
same
from
roger.
G
Some
of
our
questions
are
are
being
answered
right
now
and
believe
me.
We've
got
a
lot
more
questions,
but
I
need
to
hear
everything
so
if
you
could
put
roger
and
charlene
put
us
off
on
doing
any
testimony
at
this
point,
thank.
H
You
can
okay.
Thank
you.
My
name
is
larry
crowley
address
is
3738
south
harris
ranch
avenue
in
boise,
idaho,
I'd
like
I'm
here
this
afternoon
to
speak
to
the
existing
and
growing
dissatisfaction
with
the
harris
ranch
community
infrastructure
district
number.
One
I'd
like
to
respond
in
part
to
the
question
raised
by
board
member
woodings
and
to
some
of
doug's
comments
about
the
differences
between
what
normally
happens
in
developments
and
what
the
cid
does.
H
We
had.
We
received
our
first
full
year
tax
bill
just
about
two
and
a
half
months
ago
and
started
looking
at
it
and
found
that
20
of
our
total
property
tax
was
cid
tax
related,
which
far
exceeded
that
which
we
were
told
it
was
going
to
be
at
the
time
we
were
considering
buying
property
in
harris
ranch.
H
We
the
same
as
as
mr
hooker
mentioned,
that
it
was
difficult
to
find
information
about
the
cid,
how
it
functions
and
how
we
got
ourselves
into
a
situation
where
we're
paying
thousands
of
dollars
more
in
property
taxes
than
most
boise
residents.
And
so,
as
we
looked
into
it,
we
became
more
dissatisfied
with
it
and
that's
why
you're
now
seeing
the
kind
of
responses
and
participation
by
the
public
that
you
probably
haven't
seen
in
the
past
notification
to
homeowners
or
property
taxpayers
in
harris
ranch
is
virtually
non-existent.
H
A
I
I
appreciate
that
you
are
now
almost
a
minute
over
your
three
minutes.
I
don't
want
to
truncate
the
discussion
here.
I
do
realize
that
many
of
you
have
some
of
the
same
concerns,
given
that
the
valentines
chose
not
to
testify
I'll.
Give
you
another
three
minutes.
A
If
you
can,
we
did
read
all
of
the
letters
that
came
with
those
three
points
in
them,
so
I
believe
we're
all
clear
on
what
those
are,
but
if
you
want
to
talk
to
them
specifically
in
those
three
minutes,
I,
if
you
can
do
that
in
that
time,
I'd
sure
appreciate
it.
H
H
One
of
the
most
frustrating
things
about
all
of
this
is
that
people
are
making
decisions
that
affect
us
and
our
property
without
ever
notifying
us
about
it
and
telling
us
what
the
impacts
of
these
projects
and
the
financing
is
going
to
be
until
we
get
that
part
of
it
straightened
out,
we'd
like
to
have
everything
stopped
with
respect
to
encumbering
any
more
debt
on
our
property
and
creating
the
the
this
unreasonable
and
unfair
tax
obligations
that
we're
dealing
with.
H
So
one
of
our
requests
to
you
were
were
to
suspend
anything
that
would
create
additional
debt
obligations
that
homeowners
would
have
to
bear
instead
of
the
developer
a
lot
of
the
expenses
that
mr
fowler
referred
to,
I
view
as
being
pretty
standard
development-related
kind
of
expenses
and
should
be
the
responsibility
of
the
developer
and
if
they
increase
the
price
of
the
property,
that's
for
sale!
H
That's
how
market
works!
Everybody
all
the
developers
are
dealing
with
the
same
issues.
Harris
ranch
is
no
different
and
you
probably
have
gotten
letters
from
some
of
our
homeowners
who
are
more
direct
about
their
concerns
and
feelings
about
this
process
than
what
I
have
suggested
and
we'll
just
keep
it
at
that.
So
what
we're
asking
is
that
we
suspend
any
additional
financings
that
would
just
do
nothing
but
increase
our
current
tax
burden.
H
H
The
other
part
of
this
is
that
we
were
hoping
to
be
able
to
talk
about
getting
some
immediate
relief
on
a
current
tax
situation,
either
reducing
the
mill
levy
or
expanding
the
boundaries
of
the
cid
to
include
other
neighborhoods
in
harris
ranch.
Those
of
us
in
the
cid
constitute
about
one
third
of
the
property
of
harris
ranch.
The
other
two
thirds
do
not
pay
the
cid
tax,
and
so
it
goes
back
to
the
point
being
made
by
mr
hooker.
H
Now
I
I
don't
know
what
the
authorities
are
of
this
board
and
what
your
capabilities
are
with
respect
to
dealing
with
that
request
or
dealing
with
these
issues
of
such
unjust
tax
differences.
H
But
we
are,
we
are
very
concerned
about
it
and
we're
here
because
of
that
and
we're
hoping
that
we
can
find
some
ways
to
to
get
some
parity
in
our
property
taxes.
A
Thank
you.
I
appreciate
that
I
am
going
to
ask
one
question
about
notification:
how
does
notification
of
the
budget
and
the
budget
workshop
go
out
and
to
whom.
D
We
set
up
notifications,
so
we
work
with
with
the
developer
and
their
team
to
set
up
notifications
prior
to
these
meetings,
and
so
in
this
particular
case
for
today,
because
the
meeting
was
rescheduled,
we
did
repost
those
notifications
in
both
the
statesmen
as
well
as
the
postal
pavilions.
A
Okay-
and
then
you
mentioned
this
budget
hearing,
do
all
of
the
cid
board.
Meetings
are
all
of
them
notified
in
that
way
or
just
the
hearing.
A
Okay,
so
that
is
something,
though,
that
we
could
choose
to
do
more
than
the
state
law
requires
as
a
minimum.
A
Thank
you
all
right,
madam
chair,
did
you
have
any
questions
or
comments.
C
Yes,
I
I
think
I
asked
this
question
almost
every
year
since
I've
been
on
this
board
about
how
potential
residents
of
paris
ranch
inside
the
cid
are
informed,
that
they
live
within
this
community
and
infrastructure
district
and
what
that
impact
might
be.
C
And
so
I'm
wondering,
if
there's
a
better
way
to
inform-
and
I
I
don't
think
that
this
is
like
the
silver
bullet
to
what's
going
on
in
this
situation.
But
I'm
wondering
if
there's
a
better
way
to
inform
potential
residents
potential
property
owners
in
in
the
community
infrastructure
district
of
what
the
impacts
could
be.
D
Road,
madam
chair
board,
member
woodings,
the
the
state
statute,
does
require
that
each
homeowner
within
the
district
receive
notification
of
the
the
levy
that
will
be
placed
on
the
the
property
there's
and
actually
I've
hinted
at
the
beginning.
There's
two
there's
actually
a
general
obligation
bond
and
a
special
assessment,
and
so
disclosures
are
required
to
be
placed
on
both
of
those.
D
And
so
the
district,
as
well
as
the
developer,
have
worked
with
the
title
companies
which
helps
to
give
a
little
bit
of
impartiality
so
that
it's
not
the
real
estate
agent
themselves
to
to
have
those
be
provided
at
at
the
actual
signing
of
of
the
of
documents,
and
so
we're
working
with
the
developer
to
review
and
to
strengthen
that
process
to
make
sure
that
those
documents
do
go
out
to
each
homeowner.
Every
single
time.
A
Thank
you.
Next,
I
have
tom
payne.
A
Okay,
tom
payne
is
not
on
the
line.
Is
there
anyone
else
who
would
wish
to
testify.
B
A
A
All
right,
larae
wilson,
are
you
ready
to
testify?
We
have
you.
G
I
I
So
this
is
brian
and
larae
wilson
and
we
live
at
3716
south
millbrook
way.
Obviously
here
in
boise
and
harris
ranch,
I
think
a
number
of
our
concerns
have
already
been
addressed,
but
I
think
I
get.
I
would
say
that
our
principal
concern
is
based
on
the
nature
of
the
expenditures
and
the
improvements
that
the
improvement
district
is
paying
for
benefit
a
much
broader
group
of
individuals
than
those
of
us
that
are
in
the
district
and,
in
fact
paying
for
the
improvements.
I
I
think
in
my
mind
the
best
example
of
that
is
the
fire
station,
which
covers
the
entire
area
out
here,
and
yet
we
as
residents
in
the
district
paid
for
that
fire
station.
As
I
understand
my
second,
I
guess,
concern
would
be,
and
again
this
has
been
addressed
already
is
that
we
have
very
little
information
about
what
is
in
the
district
what
it
has
paid
for
thus
far
what
it
is
planned
to
pay
for
in
the
future.
I
And
again
we
have
no
say
as
to
whether
or
not
those
expenditures
would
appear
to
be
proper
that
they
would
benefit
us
principally
and
directly.
I
don't
think
it's
correct
and
appropriate
that
we
are
paying
for
improvements,
that
we
only
have
an
indirect
interest
in
and
yet
a
very
broad
group
of
individuals
benefit
from
that.
You
know.
As
been
mentioned,
we
have
received
absolutely
no
communication
regarding
the
improvement
district.
Nothing
has
ever
been
posted
at
our
postal
pavilion.
A
Thank
you
is
rory
o'connor
now.
B
Available
no
he's
still
having
difficulties
calling
in
madam
chair.
A
Okay,
shall
we
go
to
edward
winkelmann,
okay,.
A
J
And
I'd
like
to
just
kind
of
redirect
it
back
to
trying
to
get
an
answer
from
you
or
a
commitment
to
future
information
here
to
what
mr
hooker
was
asking
about,
because
when
I
look
at
this
map
and
how
these
lines
were
divvied
up,
they
really
don't
make
a
lot
of
sense
to
me
again.
I've
been
here
just
one
year
in
harris
north.
So
a
lot
of
this
is
you
know
new
information
I'm
trying
to
get
caught
up
on.
J
So
I
guess
I'd
like
to
push
you
back
to
you
know
giving
us
an
answer
on
the
original
question
mr
hooker
asked,
which
was
how
did
who
made
up
these
lines?
You
know
who
made
up
the
and
why
are
some
included?
Because
when
I
look
at
this,
it
looks
to
me
like
part
of
my
lot,
is
in
it
and
part
of
it
isn't.
A
Thank
you
I'll
attempt
a
quick
answer
to
that
question
and
then
I'll
turn
to
our
staff
person.
A
The
district
is
based
on
a
state
statute
that
allows
large
developments
like
this
ranch
to,
rather
than
know,
the
infrastructure,
as
the
development
goes
forward,
actually
build
the
infrastructure
with
an
understanding
that
it
will
get
reimbursed
over
time
in
a
in
a
typical
development,
they'd,
build
it
and
reimburse
themselves
by
charging
for
it
in
the
lot
price.
In
this
case,
they
do
it
through
the
cid
that
cid
is
set
at
the
time
the
development
is
approved
and
the
infrastructure
district
is
created.
A
I
think
I'm
hearing
a
lot
of
questions
today
that
actually
bring
up
good
questions.
In
my
mind
about
whether
the
state
statute
is
adequate,
it
may
not
be.
We
don't
control
that.
What
we
control
is
the
existing
plan
that
included
all
of
harris
ranch
and,
as
I
understand
it,
a
few
ancillary
subdivisions
adjacent
and
not
other
subdivisions
within
the
barber
valley.
I
recognize
that
doesn't
seem
to
be
quite
equitable,
but
it
was
set
up
that
way
prior
to
those
subdivisions,
even
being
thought
of,
so
we
are
where
we
are
today.
A
I
think
there's
been
a
couple
of
very
minor
modifications,
thus
my
question
early
in
the
hearing
today
about
whether
or
not
there
was
a
need
to
review
it
or
at
least
take
a
look
at
it.
So
I
think
all
of
these
are
good
questions.
A
D
Madam
chair,
I
believe
you.
Yes,
you
are
correct,
especially
when
it
comes
to
the
state
statutes.
I
think
that
I
would
love
to
hear
doug's
input
on
the
original
lines.
If
you
still
would
like
to
address
that
side,
I
would
say
that,
from
what
we've
seen,
that
is
one
of
the
challenges
of
the
development
being
overlaid
on
top
of
of
the
district
itself,
but
I
would
defer
to
to
developers
experience
with
the
actual
drawing
of
the
district.
J
Do
I
still
have
do
I
still
have
time
for
on
my
allotment
for
a
quick
question.
A
J
Yeah,
I
can
talk
really
quickly.
Just
again,
I've
only
been
out
here
a
year
actually
moved
from
the
north
end
question
as
I'm
trying
to
kind
of
figure
out
who's.
All
in
you
know
connected
to
this
is
there
anybody
on
the
council
that
actually
resides
in
harris
north
or
in
harris
ranch.
A
At
present,
no,
even
if
we
went
to
districts,
it's
frankly
there
wouldn't
be
any
guarantee
of
that.
J
A
B
Madam
chair,
we
actually
have
rory
or
connor,
has
been
able
to
call
in,
but
we
also
have
tom
payne,
who
had
signed
up
in
advance
and
he's
now
back
online.
A
Okay,
I
think
we'll
go
with
tom
payne
first
and
then
rory
will
get
you
after
mr
payne
tom.
Are
you
ready.
K
A
Thank
you
very
much
all
right
now
we
have
rory
o'connor.
M
Thank
you
very
much
for
your
patience
to
be
able
to
hear
me.
Okay,.
A
M
You
I
just
wanted
to
throw
my
support
behind
mr
crowley's
well
thought
out
response.
I
I'm
wondering
about
what
the
board's
powers
in
this
case
are.
I
think,
he's
very
proposed
very
reasonable
expectations
and
remedies.
M
For
the
remedies
that
mr
crowley
had
laid
out
in
his
letter
to
the
council,
members
is,
are
the
remedies
that
he
proposed
actionable
by
the
council
members.
D
Yeah,
madam
chair,
the
the
yes
they
are
actionable.
However,
the
developer
agreement
does
have
certain
constraints,
and
so
those
constraints
are
things
that
the
council
or
the
the
board
of
directors
will
need
to
consider.
For
example,
the
developer
agreement
states
that
the
district
cannot
or
shall
not
unreasonably
deny
or
refuse
to
consider
a
report,
and
if
it
is
eligible,
it
cannot
be
unreasonably
denied,
and
so
that's
one
of
the
constraints
that
the
board
must
consider
is.
D
Is
that
four
projects
that
were
part
of
the
plan
for
the
district
and
are
also
eligible
per
some
of
the
criteria
that
I
stated
at
the
beginning
that
they're
publicly
bid
that
they
be
turned
over
for
public
ownership
and
that
they
substantially
benefit
the
district.
Then
the
expectation
of
the
board
is
that
they
approve
those
those
projects
as
submitted
by
the
developer.
D
So,
while
the
board
could
choose
to
take
action,
they
they
do
have
a
duty
to
the
agreement
that
was
signed
between
the
the
district
itself,
the
city
of
boise
and
the
harris
family.
Limited
partnership.
M
So,
can
you
tell
me
who
determines
the
reasonableness
of
of
the
you
know?
What
is
being
proposed
is
that
determined
by
the
council
members
is
that
department
by
the
developer,
or
is
that
some
outside
court.
D
Yeah,
madam
chair,
mr
o'connor,
the
the
reasonableness
is
established
by
the
the
district
staff
and
then
recommended
to
the
board
of
directors,
and
so,
when
we
look
at
a
project,
we
are
looking
to
make
sure
that
it
meets
the
the
specific
criteria,
and
I
I
would
say
that,
since
I
know
we
are
running
towards
the
end
of
our
meeting,
that
if
you
are
interested
in
continuing
continuing
the
conversation
with
me
directly,
I'm
always
happy
to
answer
any
of
the
residents
questions
you
can
reach
me
at
boise
treasury
at
city
of
boise.org
and
I'll
be
happy
to
go
through
more
of
those
details
with
you.
M
Thank
you.
I
will
take
you
up
on
that
offer.
I
apologize.
I
didn't
give
my
address
at
the
beginning.
It's
2862
southpaw
mature
way,
boise837116.
Thank
you.
A
I
was
just
going
to
add
that,
based
on
today,
it's
it's
clear
to
me
that,
as
a
board,
we
need
to
determine
a
better
way
to
report
on
the
activities
of
the
infrastructure,
district
and
I'll
make
the
commitment
today
to
work
with
staff,
to
figure
out
what
that
is.
I
can't
tell
you
exactly
what
it
will
be,
but
clearly
we
need
to
make
this
information
more
easily
accessible
and
available.
A
C
Chair,
I
just
like
to
add
to
that.
I'm
one
of
the
benefits
of
being
at
home
is
that
I
have
two
screens
here,
so
I
can
pull
up
websites
and
kind
of
like
go
through
the
process
that
a
new
resident
might
go
through
when
they're
looking
for
information
on
the
cid,
and
I
think
that
we
can
do
much
better
with
getting
the
information
out
on
which
projects
are
being
included
in
the
cid
where
the
boundaries
are,
and
I
think
that
there's
a
lot
of
transparency
that
we
can
work
through
to
make
available.
A
Thank
you.
Did
you
have
anything
else,
mr
o'connor,
you
still
have
a
bit
of
time.
M
M
You
know
I
I've
gotten
mail
for
many
years
in
boise,
idaho,
just
in
my
mailbox
and
there's
no
heating
and
air
conditioning.
So
I
guess
I
would
like
that
to
be
as
part
of
the
reasonableness.
Reasonableness
of
that
it
just
seems
like
there
needs
to
be
someone,
that's
watching
those
kinds
of
things.
M
A
Thank
you.
I
believe
that
those
operating
costs
are
actually
paid
for
by
the
hoa
and
not
through
the.
A
All
right,
madame
clerk,
so
who
would
be
next
on
our
list.
A
Right,
karen
henderson,
if
you
are
ready
name
and
address
please
and
we'd
love
to
hear
from
you.
N
Yes,
can
you
hear
me
excellent
karen
henderson
3716
south
harris
ranch
avenue
boise,
madam
chairman
board?
Thank
you
for
your
time.
I
just
said
two
quick
things.
I
have
a
lot
of
comments,
but
just
to
keep
it
short,
I
just
so
we're
all
clear.
The
map
does
not
the
boundaries
of
the
cid
does
not
include
all
of
harris
ranch.
N
I
think
if
the
you
did
include
all
of
harris
ranch
and
all
of
harris
north,
including
new
construction,
there's
new
construction
being
done,
that's
not
included
in
the
boundaries,
then
it
would
be
a
little
bit
more
equitable
in
the
sense
that
everyone
who
says
I'm
part
of
the
harris
ranch
development
is
paying
all
the
same.
Taxes.
N
N
N
But
that
aside,
if
the
public
pays
to
own
the
entire
property,
not
just
to
have
the
right
of
an
easement,
then
they
need
to
own
in
full
that
property,
and
I
would
like
to
know-
and
I
think
that
needs
to
be
consistent-
going
forward
before
the
cid
reimburses
for
any
future
projects
that
title
be
properly
handed
over
to
either
the
city
or
the
county
in
fee
full
fee
title.
If
that's
what
it's
going
to
be
based
on.
So
I
would
just
like
to
know
what
the
timing
is
on
a
full
fee.
N
A
Thank
you
does
staff
have
any
answer
for
that
question.
We
may
not
be
able
to
answer
your
question
today,
but
we
can
get
one
or
perhaps
it
looks
like.
Perhaps
the
developer
has
an
answer.
I'd
accept
that
if,
if
you're
willing
doug.
E
Yes,
madam
chair
and
council,
member
weddings
and
karen
henderson
and
everybody
else,
we'll
certainly
look
into
that
and
and
make
sure
that
title
has
been
transferred.
If,
if
it
has
not,
it
certainly
will
be
we're
aware
of
the
political
subdivision
of
the
state
needs
to
take
ownership.
E
E
There
was,
I
think,
a
hundred
thousand
dollars
of
cid
funds
spent
on
the
land
itself
and
on
some
other
roads
around
the
fire
station,
but
nothing
on
on
the
building.
As
far
as
the
disparity
on
property
taxes
of
when
the
cid
was
formed,
we
could
only
form
a
cid
on
property
that
the
harris
family
limited
partnership
owned.
E
There
are
six
blocks
in
dallas
harris
estates
which
we're
in
the
first
phase
of
development,
first
phases
of
development
that
are
not
owned
and
they're
we're
not
on
at
the
time
by
the
harris
family,
limited
partnership,
there's
also
a
small
section
in
the
foothills
that
that
is
not
in
the
cid
and
and
we
can
expand
the
cid
without
a
if
I
recall
correctly,
without
a
two-thirds
vote
so.
But
that
is
why
you
see
that
disparity.
We
have
tried
to
be
very,
very
open
to
anyone.
E
That's
ever
wanted
to
come
in
and
ask
for
any
information
at
all.
We
haven't
had
that
to
date
that
we've
turned
anybody
down
yet,
nor
will
we
in
the
future
and
we're
happy
to
sit
down
and
and
show
anybody
what
what
it
is
that
has
been.
E
E
We
got
all
the
all
the
real
estate
brokers
together
early
on
and
said,
taxes
are
going
to
be
higher,
there's
a
special
assessment
and
there's
a
and
a
maximum
three
mills,
and
we're
doing
that.
So
we
had
to
ensure
the
long-term
financial
success
of
harris
ranch
and
to
give
you
an
idea
of
what
I
mean
by
that
we
currently
have
about
18
million
in
items
that
are.
E
That
will
eventually
be
submitted
that
we
believe
are
in
accordance
with
the
statute,
because
we've
counted
on
that
development
agreement
and
the
50
million
bonding
capacity
and
have
gone
ahead
and
spent
funds
accordingly.
E
We
hope
people
say
yeah,
but
have
you
seen
it
out
here
because
all
of
those
extra
things,
a
lot
of
which
are
not
covered
by
the
cid
cost
money.
E
A
Thank
you
for
those
clarifications.
You
still
have
a
little
bit
of
time.
Karen
did
you
have
anything
more.
N
A
Jim
riley,
you
are
up.
O
Good
morning,
madam
chair
good
morning,
board
jim
reilly,
2367
south
trapper,
I
would
just
want
to
reiterate
a
comment
and
a
line
to
what
I
heard
so
far
this
morning
from
I
believe
mr
crowley,
mr
van
kampen,
mr
wilson,
mr
broyles,
in
regards
to
their
requests.
O
In
addition
to
that,
I
believe
in
another
conversation
was
around
just
a
continued
expansion
of
the
city's
surroundings
to
ensure
that
there
is
better
parity
of
the
tax
implications
of
the
cid.
O
I
think
what
we've
heard
over
and
over
again
there
is
a
there's
just
a
certain
group
of
homeowners
that
are
within
that
cid
that
are
are
paying
a
a
larger
tax,
and
then
I
just
had
a
question.
I
don't
know
if
this
was
addressed
earlier.
O
But
if
I
understand
that
the
bond
financing
is
at
about
a
seven
percent
interest,
is
there
an
opportunity
to
go
ahead
and
refinance
that
bond
at
a
better
interest
rate
than
what
would
be
paid
today,
which
you
know
hopefully
would
offset?
You
know
any
future
tax
costs.
A
I
will
turn
that
question
over
to
our
staff.
D
Yeah,
madam
chair,
the
the
seven
percent
I
believe,
was
calculated
as
in
looking
at
the
budget,
and
while
I
have
not
calculated
that
myself
to
confirm
that
that
the
average
is
seven
percent,
I
would
believe
that
that
is
is
a
reasonable
calculation.
D
At
this
point,
the
district
is
issuing
at
a
much
lower
rate,
for
example
the
the
bonds
proposals
that
the
district
has
received
for
this
year
are
at
about
2.2
percent,
and
so
one
of
the
opportunities
that
the
district
has
next
year
with
the
special
assessment
is
that
the
special
assessment
bond
is
callable.
D
A
Thank
you.
So
I
think
what
you're
saying
to
us
is
that
the
special
assessment
has
not
been
eligible
to
be
refinanced
until
now,
but
will
be
eligible
next
year,
and
that
we
would
certainly
take
a
look
at
doing
that,
given
current
interest
rates
versus
what
that
one
is
at.
Madam
chair,
that's.
D
O
Riley
yeah,
yes,
ma'am!
Thank
you.
I
think
it
was.
I
think
it
was
just
to
again
reiterate.
I
think
what
I
heard
was
having
a
more
transparent,
open,
invite
to
residents
of
cid
meetings.
Just
wanted
to
make
a
note
of
that.
I
think
that
will
help.
A
C
Madam
sure,
can
we
have
david?
There
was
a
question
about
david's
email
address
david.
Will,
you
repeat
your
email
address
once
again
for
folks
tuning
in.
A
A
Thank
you,
madam
clerk.
B
A
K
K
G
L
C
K
K
Sure,
and
as
I
was
saying,
I
I
got
into
this
only
because
I
had
heard
about
a
cid
and
I
was
trying
to
learn
about
it.
I
want
to
re
re-emphasize
how
difficult
it
was
for
me
to
learn
anything
about
this,
and
I
called
it
a
random
walk
through
through
the
politicians
to
find
how
to
deal
with
this
and
what
I
could
learn.
It
was
strictly
a
learning
curve
for
me
and
finally,
I
received
david
hasekawa's
email
and
called
him,
and
he
was
very
helpful.
K
K
I
don't
know
if
the
bond
within
the
cid
has
the
ability
to
be
pre-funded
or
not,
but
my
emphasis
would
be
to
simply
say
pre-funded
as
soon
as
you
can,
unless
it's
statutorily
set
at
that
rate
and
a
date
is
set.
The
other
thing
I
was
concerned
about
is
that,
mr
hasagawa,
again,
we
were
talking
briefly
about
bonding
rates
and
I
called
connections.
I
have
with
municipal
bond
companies
and
talked
to
them
about
this
and,
as
it's
described,
this
country
is
in
a
income,
starved
position.
K
There
are
all
kinds
of
places
looking
for
solid
bonds,
even
non
non-rated
bonds,
in
other
words
that
aren't
rated
for
for
exceptionally
good
rates,
and
I
want
to
emphasize
the
need
to
be
competitively
bid.
I'm
not
sure
if
this
particular
bond
issue
is
required
to
go
to
a
local
bank.
Many
are,
it
depends
on
the
specifics
of
the
levy,
but
I
would
just
ask
that
those
in
making
that
decision
please
be
as
competitive
as
you
can
be.
The
10-year
treasury
is
around
0.6
right
now,
and
many
municipals
are
coming
in.
K
You
know
not
not
very
high.
Even
2.25
sounds
good
and
a
reissue
of
our
9
is
essential
to
help
lower
the
costs.
I'm
retired
and
I'm
here
enjoying
where
I
live.
I
can
completely
agree
with
doug
fowler,
there's
a
quality
of
life
to
living
in
harris
ranch
and
there's
a
quality
of
life
and
a
value
to
what
we
have
there.
K
But
I
ask
in
terms
of
the
committee
in
terms
of
mr
fowler
and
those
making
decisions
about
my
bonding
and
my
taxation,
that
you
act
as
full
fiduciaries
in
my
behalf
when
the
money
is
spent
that
I
provide
to
you-
and
I
appreciate
the
opportunity
to
speak
to
you
and
the
opportunity
particularly
to
learn
more
about
this
from
all
those
involved
and
want
to.
Thank
so
many
if
the
information
about
this
meeting
had
been
wider,
known
and
I'd
had
more
time
to
talk
with
my
neighbors,
unfortunately,
I'm
over
on
the
oregon
coast
for
a
month.
K
I
think
the
participation
and
the
feedback
to
you
would
have
been
even
greater
and,
as
this
grows,
you'll
probably
hear
more,
and
I
just
think
the
the
information
issue
that
you've
addressed
is
going
to
be
so
important
in
the
future
as
we
go
forward,
not
only
for
those
looking
to
buy
my
home
potentially
in
the
future,
but
also
those
people
that
are
looking
to
buy
in
the
harris
ranch.
Thank
you.
C
K
A
C
Madam
chair,
yes,
I
have
some
comments
that
aren't
necessarily
questions
that
are
germane
to
the
budget
resolution.
So
I'm
wondering
when
I
could
offer
those
all.
A
Those
until
after
we've
determined
what
to
do
on
the
budget
resolution,
I
think
it
would
be
appropriate
to
have
a
little
bit
more
discussion.
Great
all
right.
Thank
you.
Well,
I
don't
have
any
more
that
I
guess
I
do
have
one
more
that's
germaine
to
the
budget
resolution.
That's
before
us,
and
that
is
the
budget
and
david.
I
wonder
if
you
could
pull
the
budget
up
so
that
folks
online
could
see
it
and
those
of
us
I've
got
it
in
front
of
me,
but
I
know
some
people
may
not.
D
D
Yes,
absolutely
so,
if
you
can
see
the
the
line
above
total
revenue
says
that
and
let
me
zoom
in
a
little
bit,
because
that
looks
a
little
small.
D
All
right,
so,
if
you
see
the
line
above
total
revenue
that
says
total
other
financing
sources,
2
million-
that
is
when
we
drop
the
budget.
We
put
together
an
estimate
in
conjunction
with
our
financial
advisor
based
on
rates
and
based
on
the
available
capacity
within
the
levy
on
what
we
expect
to
be
able
to
receive
from
a
lender,
and
so
that
is
the
expectation
of
that
two
million.
Now
there
are,
there
is
a
chance
that
a
lender
could
come
back
and
offer
a
low
either
a
much
lower
rate
or
a
bond.
D
D
Now,
last
year
we
did
receive
a
20-year
bond
and
had
more
capacity,
and
so
those
contingent
revenues
are
a
a
reserve
so
that,
if
a
lender
comes
in
and
offers
a
20-year
bond
at
a
much
lower
rate
than
we're
expecting
that
we
can
do
a
budget
adjustment
and
and
use
those
additional
revenues.
The
the
offers
that
we
received
are,
in
fact
just
slightly
over
2
million
they're
about
2.1
million,
and
so
we
will
in
fact
end
up
doing
doing
that.
D
A
Thank
you.
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
that
was
clear
for
folks
and
here's.
My
question
then
around
that
if
we
end
up
with
a
15-year
or
we
end
up
with
out
a
need
to
use
that
contingent
appropriation,
if
we
have
already
certified
the
budget
at
2.85,
that
would
that
would
be
the
levy
that
would
be
set,
and
we
have
to
do
that
by
september.
17Th.
Is
that
correct.
D
Yes,
madam
chair,
we
we
do
need
to
ultimately
submit
the
budget
in
early
september,
okay
to
ada,
county.
A
A
A
Okay,
so,
just
for
with
that
end
of
questions,
I'm
going
to
go
ahead
and
close
the
public
hearing,
I
never
like
to
close
the
public
hearing
while
we're
still
or
close
it
before.
We
ask
all
the
questions
with
that.
As
chair,
I'm
going
to
make
one
comment
and
then
ask
councilmember
woodings,
since
I'm
chairing
the
meeting
to
decide
what
what
direction
we
should
we
should
go
here.
A
My
comment
is
this:
as
we
said
in
the
beginning,
we've
never
gotten
a
lot
of
comment
on
this
process
or
on
this
budget,
it's
clear
to
me
that
there
are
some
things
that
we
can
do
a
lot
better
and,
as
I
said
earlier,
I
make
a
commitment
to
figure
those
out
and
and
do
that,
especially
in
terms
of
communication
and
access
availability
of
records.
A
Having
said
that,
we
also
have
an
obligation
based
on
state
law,
to
the
development
agreement
that
we
built
this
community
infrastructure
district
around
and
as
such,
we
have
an
obligation
to
reimburse
those
expenses
that
have
been
deemed
eligible
and
those
included
in
this
year's
budget
have
in
fact
been
deemed
eligible
by
our
staff,
which
looked
at
them,
not
through
any
bias,
but
through
the
state
law,
through
the
development
agreement
and
through
the
information
that
was
that
we
collected
and
was
provided
around
the
infrastructure,
that's
being
proposed,
and
so,
at
least
in
my
mind.
A
C
C
Second,
madam
chair,
I
just
want
to
know
that
I
really
appreciate
everyone
really
speaking
up
this
year.
This
is
like
actually
when
I
say
that
we
have
never
heard
anything
from
residents
of
harris
ranch.
I'm
not
I'm
not
exaggerating
like
this
is
actually
the
first
year
we
have
heard
a
peep
from
people
living
in
the
cid,
and
so
I
really
appreciate
all
of
the
feedback
allowing
us
to
really
gain
better
understanding
of
how
things
are
rolling
out
how
things
are
going.
C
C
We
visit
quite
a
lot,
and
so
that's
that's
my
justification
for
making
the
motion
and
thank
you
for
the
second,
madam
chair.
A
A
I
see
two
more
questions
on
the
chat,
which
include:
is
there
a
detailed
list
of
the
plant
expenditures?
I
will
ensure
that
we
get
that
out
and
we'll.
I
don't
know
exactly
how
we'll
get
it
to
you.
I
think
we
have
emails
of
most
of
the
people
who
have
testified
today.
If
we
don't
have
your
email,
if
you
want
to
send
it
to
david,
I
did
put
his
email
in
the
chat,
we'll
make
sure
and
email
that
detail
to
all
of
you
and
then,
in
addition,
ongoing.
A
Motion
carries,
although
that's
all
that's
listed
on
our
agenda
today.
I
think
we
can
always
have
discussion
on
items
that
came
up
during
hearing
and
I
think
council
member
weddings
has
such.
C
Yes,
madam
chair,
I
would
just
like
to
I'd
like
to
ask,
I
think,
probably
david,
and
perhaps
mr
fowler-
I
have
a
list
of
things
that
I
would
like
to
have
on
our
on
our
cid
page
on
the
city
website,
and
I
think
some
of
these
are
the
map
of
the
cid
district
boundary,
the
inventory
of
those
reimbursable
projects
by
year.
C
Another
note
that
I
had
was,
I
think
you
know
the
planning
and
development
services
department
sends
out
little
notification
postcards
on
development.
I
feel
like
we
could
probably
do
something
similar
for
the
community
infrastructure
district
to
all
members
residing
inside
the
district
detailing
the
budget
process
in
advance
of
our
budget
next
year,
and
what
those
dates
will
be.
You
know,
of
course,
this
year
we
didn't
we
weren't
able
to
stick
to
the
dates
as
closely
as
we
usually
do,
but
normally
our
dates
are
pretty
pretty
well
set
out
for
the
process.