►
From YouTube: Boise City Council - Evening Session
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
D
E
F
E
G
A
Thank
you,
and
now
we've
got
a
couple
items
on
our
special
business:
first,
the
appointment
of
Bernie
Zimmerman
to
the
ethics
commission
for
a
four-year
term
and
Bernie
you're
with
us
tonight.
Thank
you
so
much
for
your
service
after
the
motion
you're
more
than
welcome
to
say
a
few
words
if
you'd
like,
but
really
appreciate
that
you're
willing
to
join
the
commission,
Madam.
F
Thanks
for
being
here,
Madam
mayor,
yes,
I
had
the
distinct
privilege
of
working
with
Bernie
for
a
few
years
in
our
master's
program
at
Boise,
State
and
Bernie's,
a
counselor
by
training
he's
been
in
this
community
for
a
very
long
time.
I
think
that
he's
going
to
be
a
wonderful
addition
to
our
ethics,
commission
and
I
just
really
appreciate
him
stepping
up
into
this
role.
It's
really
important.
F
H
Ben
Mary
I
haven't
had
the
chance
to
to
work
with
Bernie,
but
I
did
have
a
chance
to
look
through
your
your
resume
and
it
was
really
impressive
and
really
exciting
to
have
somebody
with
so
much
experience
that
council
president
woodings
mentioned
honor
ethics,
commission
I'm,
always
amazed
by
community
members
who
decide
to
step
up
and
serve
our
city
as
volunteers
and
really
really
great
and
interest
interesting
ways.
H
I
think
it's
cool
that
we've
got
a
group
of
students
here
tonight,
because
we
have
all
sorts
of
different
commissions
that
people
have
the
ability
to
serve
on,
to
learn
more
about
the
city
to
be
able
to
help
the
city
in
a
variety
of
different
ways.
So
I'd
encourage
our
students
here
who
are
here
tonight
to
look
for
some
of
those
opportunities
because
sometimes
there's
actually
student
positions
on
some
of
those
commissions,
and
so
it's
always
great
to
see
students
in
here
and
great
to
see.
People
apply
for
these
community
positions.
F
It
yes,
I
have
one
additional
motion
regarding
the
agenda:
I
request
that
we
move
SUV,
22-55,
Easy,
Street,
subdivision
and
SUV
22-64
can
sell
Crow
Cove
subdivision
to
the
subdivision
section
of
new
business.
The
items
were
mistakenly
listed
as
public
hearings
when
the
agenda
was
originally
posted.
H
E
A
A
I
Thank
you,
madam
mayor
members
of
Council
on
January
31st
2023
Council
denied
the
appeal
of
drh
22-00345
and
directed
staff
to
draft
additional
conditions
of
approval
for
inclusion,
the
revised
conditions,
the
appeal
findings
and
reason
statement
under
your
packet
tonight
and
we
are
requesting
approval
with
that.
I
would
stand
for
any
questions.
Thank
you.
E
G
J
J
J
Each
year
the
city
is
audited
by
an
external
accounting,
firm
independent
from
the
city,
the
fiscal
year
22
audit
was
performed
by
I
Bailey.
The
results
of
the
audit
is
an
unmodified
opinion
over
both
financial
statements
and
federal
Awards.
This
means
the
audit
was
clean
or
free
from
material
misstatements.
J
J
J
Gatsby
is
the
governmental,
Accounting
Standards
Board
loves
to
issue
new
statements
in
fiscal
year
22
the
city
implemented
Gatsby
standard
number.
87.
J
These
leases
were
reviewed
to
determine
if
they
qualify
to
be
accounted
for
under
this
standard,
to
account
for
the
lease
required
a
complex
calculation
to
determine
either
a
long-term
receivable
offset
by
deferred
inflow
or
a
long-term
liability
offset
by
a
right
to
use
asset.
Either
calculation
had
a
minimal
impact
to
the
statement
of
revenues,
expenditures
and
changes
in
fund
balance
or,
if
you're,
outside
of
the
governmental
World
your
income
statement,
you
can
find
additional
detail,
including
amortization
schedules
in
the
footnotes
of
the
act
for
or
annual
comprehensive
financial
report.
J
J
J
F
Got
a
mirror
I
just
want
to
say
thank
you
to
Sabrina
and
her
team
for
working
with
the
Auditors,
so
well.
One
of
the
pieces
of
feedback
that
we
received
from
the
Auditors
is
that
working
with
the
team
at
city
of
Boise
is
always
a
very
professional
experience
and
they
always
are
very
appreciative
for
our
financial
controls
and
what
we
have
in
place
so
I
think
that
that's
a
reflection
of
our
admin
team
and
and
just
their
very
high
standards
on
taking
care
of
our
finances.
F
A
We
could
could
someone,
please
fix
the
computer
screen.
I'm,
not
sure.
We've
now
got
news
flashing
on
it.
A
Great,
thank
you.
Okay,
we
are
going
to
move
into
the
consent
agenda.
All
items
with
an
asterisk
are
considered
to
be
routine
by
the
council
and
will
be
enacted
by
one
motion.
There's
no
separate
discussion
on
these
items
unless
a
council,
member
or
citizen
so
requests,
in
which
case
the
item
will
be
removed
from
the
general
order
of
business
and
considered
in
its
normal
sequence.
K
E
G
A
F
C
Ord-14-23
and
ordinance
and
many
Boise
city
code,
title
6,
chapter
17,
excessive
exhaust
and
Muffler
noise,
amending
the
scope
of
the
chapter,
a
meaning
and
replacing
certain
definitions
contained
within
the
chapter
repealing
titles,
6,
chapter
17
sections,
5
and
9
and
renumbering
the
subsequent
Provisions
accordingly
amending
existing
muffler
exhaust
requirements
and
prohibitions
and
adding
a
new
prohibition.
Subsection
amending
the
penalty
provisions
of
the
chapter
to
provide
for
a
misdemeanor
penalty
upon
subsequent
violations
of
this
chapter
within
a
year,
a
proving
a
summary
of
the
ordinance
and
providing
an
effective
date,
ord-15-23.
C
4D-11-23
and
ordinance
car22-00018
for
property
located
at
800
West
State
Street
emitting
zoning
classifications
of
the
city
of
Boise
City
to
change
the
classification
of
real
property,
particularly
described
in
section
one
of
this
ordinance
in
adjacent
rights
of
way
from
l-od
limited
office,
with
design
review
to
c-5dd
d,
a
central
business
with
downtown
design,
review
and
development
agreement.
Zone
setting
forth
A
Reason
statement
in
support
of
such
zone
change
in
providing
an
effective
date.
C
A
H
E
A
There,
what
I
saw
yes
on
the
council
members
lips
I
think,
can
you
are
you?
Will
you
test
your
audio
again?
Councilmember
Willits,
yeah,
no
I
think
you've
got
the
wrong
audio
plugged
in
because
you
look
unmuted,
but
we
can't
hear
you
weddings.
C
G
A
You
and
now
we'll
move
on
to
subdivisions,
so
the
first
one
we're
going
to
pick
up
is
Easy
Street
subdivision
sub
22-55.
This
is
one
of
those
ones
that
was
moved
by
motion
from
the
public
hearings
to
the
subdivision.
Section
We've,
Got,
Sabrina,
welcome
Sabrina
the
applicant
been
simple:
I,
don't
see
you
Ben,
so
I.
Imagine
you're
online.
Do
we
have
Cena
the
neighborhood
association
present
tonight
we
don't
expect
to
but
wanted
to
check.
A
B
Evening
Madam
mayor
members
of
the
council,
the
item
before
you
is
a
request
for
a
preliminary
plot
for
a
residential
subdivision,
comprised
of
one
common
and
five
buildable
Lots
on
0.64
Acres,
located
at
478
and
506
West
Highland
Street
in
an
r1c
Zone.
The
subject:
property
is
located
within
a
half
mile
radius
of
the
community,
Activity
Center
at
the
intersection
of
Boise
and
Broadway
Avenues,
and
the
surrounding
neighborhood
is
comprised
of
a
mix
of
single-family,
duplex,
multi-family
and
Commercial
uses.
B
There
are
two
existing
homes
which
the
applicant
proposes
to
retain
and
three
additional
homes
are
proposed
in
the
northern
portion
of
the
site.
Access
to
the
subdivision
will
be
provided
by
a
20-foot
wide
common
driveway
from
Highland
Street.
The
applicant
proposes
to
replace
the
existing
attached
sidewalk
along
Highland
Street,
with
detached
sidewalk
and
an
eight-foot
wide
landscape
left
for
containing
Street
trees.
Sidewalks
are
also
proposed
along
the
southern
and
western
edges
of
the
common
driveway
in
order
to
provide
pedestrian
connectivity
within
the
development.
B
Public
opposition
was
received
from
the
neighborhood
association
and
two
members
of
the
public
and
that's
outlined
in
your
packets
and
summarized
on
this
slide
here.
One
member
of
the
public
did
also
speak
in
favor
of
the
project,
as
shown
on
the
slide.
Ultimately,
the
commission
found
that
the
proposal
complied
with
all
required
findings.
B
D
B
Madam
mayor
council
member,
the
adjacent
properties
do
have
attached
sidewalk.
Currently,
so
the
applicant
is
proposing
detached.
That
would
then
connect
back
down
to
the
attached
on
either
side.
So.
D
They'll
they'll
connect.
This
way
just
seems
silly
that
we
can't
do
all
of
it
at
once,
but
I
I
understand
anyway,
it's
good
to
get
this
section.
Thank
you.
L
I
have
Madame
mayor
members
of
city
council
I
am
online.
Thank
you
to
Sabrina
for
her
presentation.
I,
don't
have
a
whole
lot
to
add.
We
are
in
agreement
with
the
conditions
of
approval
in
the
staff
report,
and
I
would
stand
for
any
additional
questions.
Thank.
A
E
A
A
B
You,
madam
mayor
members
of
the
council.
This
next
item
is
a
request
for
preliminary
plot
for
residential
subdivision,
comprised
of
one
common
and
four
buildable
Lots
on
0.58
Acres,
located
at
1022
West,
turkey,
Street
and
an
r1c
Zone.
The
subject.
Property
is
located
approximately
250
feet,
west
of
the
intersection
of
Targhee
Street
and
Broadway
Avenue,
and
the
surrounding
neighborhood
is
comprised
of
a
mix
of
single-family
homes,
duplexes
and
Townhomes,
with
commercial
uses
clustered
along
Broadway
Avenue
to
the
east.
B
There
is
one
existing
home
and
several
Associated
accessory
structures
on
the
site
which
the
applicant
proposes
to
remove.
In
order
to
accommodate
the
proposed
development,
the
applicant
proposes
to
construct
for
detach
single-family
homes
on
the
site,
which
will
be
accessed
by
a
20-foot
common
driveway
from
Target
Street.
There
is
existing
curb
and
gutter
along
the
site's
Frontage
On
Target
and
the
applicant
proposes
to
install
five
foot
attached
sidewalk,
while
detached
sidewalks
are
generally
preferred.
B
The
Planning
and
Zoning
commission
recommended
approval
of
the
applicant's
proposal
due
to
unique
features
of
the
site,
including
the
narrow
ride
of
lay
width
and
limited
opportunities
for
future
connectivity.
The
applicant
also
propose
a
sidewalk
along
the
northern
and
Eastern
edges
of
the
common
driveway
in
order
to
provide
pedestrian
connectivity
within
the
development.
The
landscape
plan
submitted
by
the
applicant
indicates
that
all
healthy,
desirable
trees,
which
will
be
removed
from
the
site,
will
be
mitigated
through
the
planting
of
new
trees.
B
A
Sabrina
all
right
I'll
just
check
in
with
the
applicant,
then
are
you
in
agreement
with
terms
and
conditions
great
for
the
record.
The
answer
from
Catherine
Sewell
was
yes.
I
mean
I
confirmed
that
nobody
is
here
to
testify
on
this
item
all
right
with
that
I'm
going
to
go
ahead
and
close
this
one
thanks,
Sabrina
Madam.
F
H
F
Excuse
me:
yes,
go
ahead.
Sorry
Mary's,
my
child
Madame
mayor
I,
just
wanted
to
note
that
these
are
two
really
great
little
infill
subdivisions
that
we've
seen
two
in
a
row
and
thank
the
Developers
for
doing
these.
I
mean
I
know
that
it
doesn't
seem
like
a
big
deal,
but
when
we're
taking
something,
that's
had
one,
maybe
two
homes
on
a
large
lot
that
are
really
close
to
large
roadways
and
a
lot
of
commercial
opportunities
and
making
those
into
several
more
homes
for
families.
I.
Think
that's
really
impactful.
So
thank
you.
A
Right
and
now
we'll
head
back
to
the
regular
order,
Abracadabra
subdivision,
SUV,
22-72,
Ben,
simple
applicant
I,
imagine
is
still
in
line
hello.
Delaney.
Is
anybody
here
planning
on
testifying
on
this
one
all
right.
M
M
The
project
site
is
located
at
915
North
Shamrock
Street
in
an
r1c
Zone.
The
applicant
has
previously
received
approval
of
a
PUD
and
preliminary
plot
that
was
originally
comprised
of
23
single-family
dwellings
in
three
common
Lots.
However,
since
that
original
approval,
one
acre
of
the
subject,
property
has
been
split
and
dedicated
for
our
future
Park
site.
With
the
dedication
of
the
park.
The
residential
plan,
development
and
subdivision
is
now
comprised
of
fewer
residential
units
and
lots
on
February
6
2023.
M
The
Planning
and
Zoning
commission
unanimously
approved
via
consent,
the
modification
to
the
Pud
and
recommended
approval
for
the
revised
preliminary
plot.
Before
you,
the
Abracadabra
sub
number
two
is
now
comprised
of
16
buildable
and
one
common
lot.
The
site
will
be
accessed
via
Shamrock
Street
through
a
public
Street
which
will
provide
future
connectivity
to
the
adjacent
parcel
on
the
west.
With
this
modification,
the
subdivision
in
this
project
will
now
be
served
with
a
one
acre,
Park
and
future
pathway
directly
to
the
South.
M
A
Delaney
all
right,
thank
you.
Ben
simple,
are
you
still
with
us
hi.
L
Madam
mayor
members
of
city
council,
I
am
still
here
I.
We
are
in
agreement
with
the
conditions
of
approval,
for
the
project
really
excited
to
have
been
able
to
work
with
the
Boise
city
parks
department,
in
identifying
this
area
and
working
with
the
developer
to
get
the
park,
property
split
off
and
dedicated
over
to
the
city.
I
think
it's
a
it's
a
huge
win
for
everybody.
I
know
during
the
original
application
review
and
approval
at
city
council,
there
was
some
discussions
about
how
to
get
some
lots
that
fronted
more
on
a
park
here.
L
So
it
was
good
to
see
that
that
was
able
to
come
to
fruition
other
than
that
I
would
stand
for
any
additional
questions
that
you
may
have.
Thank
you.
A
D
Admira,
yes,
thank
you.
I
just
wanted
to
thank
the
developer
for
being
willing
to
redesign
this
and
divest
a
part
of
it
to
the
city
for
Parkside.
This
is
such
an
important
site
for
Park.
It's
going
to
serve
a
lot
of
residents
that
currently
don't
have
good
access
and
really
really
appreciate
willingness
to
work
hard
with
the
city
to
make
this
work.
Thank
you.
D
K
I'd
like
to
Echo
councilwoman
Clark's
comments,
this
is
going
to
be
fantastic.
K
I
know
this
area
really
well,
in
fact,
when
we
approved
the
park
side
from
another,
quite
a
bit
just
to
take
a
look
at
it
and
I
I
think
for
those
who
live
near
it's
gonna
be
fantastic,
but
also
having
the
park
adjacent
to
this
development
is
really
special
and
I'd
like
to
Echo
my
thanks
to
the
developer,
for
not
only
an
excellent
infill
development,
but
also
the
opportunity
to
you
know,
provide
more
Boise
an
opportunity
to
have
a
park
in
their
neighborhood
in
West
Boise.
So
thank
you.
A
And
Next
Step
SOS
2229,
a
vacation
of
a
plot
note
Jesse,
welcome
for
the
city
is
Jeffrey
Cartwright
here,
wonderful,
great,
just
let
us
know
if
you
agree
and
you
can
go
from
there.
The
neighborhood
association
again
south
Boise
Eric
Berg,
has
not
been
here
tonight.
N
Thank
you,
Madame
Mary
members
of
the
council
and
before
you
today
is
SOS
22-29,
a
request
to
vacate
a
platinum
for
the
rear
setback
on
lot.
9
of
The
Londoner
Square
subdivision
located
on
0.24
Acres
at
210
halcourt
in
the
r1c
zone,
London
Square
subdivision
was
recorded
in
1978
with
a
plot
note,
defining
the
setbacks
for
the
subdivision,
with
the
rear
setback
at
15
feet.
N
While
this
15
foot
setback
is
typical
for
the
r1c
Zone,
the
development
code
allows
for
reduced
rear
yard
setback
of
nine
feet
for
open
post
patio.
Shade
covers
pergolas
or
similar
structures
under
250
feet
in
area
in
less
than
15
feet
at
height,
which
are
attached
to
the
home.
As
such,
the
applicant
is
requesting
to
vacate
the
Platinum
to
construct
an
attached
covered,
rear
patio
on
the
east
side
of
the
home,
located
approximately
11
and
a
half
feet
from
the
rear
property
line
as
Allowed
by
the
development
code,
and
in
conclusion,
the
planning
team
recommends.
A
Any
questions
for
Jesse
all
right,
thanks
and
Sir.
If
you
are
in
agreement
with
terms
and
conditions
of
the
report,
you
can
take
that
from
you.
You
are
all
right.
The
record
will
reflect
that
just
to
confirm
nobody
is
here
to
test
finalists
and
with
that
I'll
close
this
matter.
F
H
G
A
N
The
applicant
proposes
to
convert
the
existing
historic
structure
on
the
corner
lot
back
into
a
residential
unit
and
add
another
single
family
home
on
November
7th.
The
poor
learning
and
Zoning
commission
approved
the
association
PUD
for
reduced
internal
setbacks
and
a
recommended
approval
on
the
subdivision.
The
existing
structure
does
not
meet
the
street
side
setbacks
and
is
considered
legal
non-conforming.
N
The
applicant
does
not
propose
any
exterior
modifications
and
the
applicant
also
plans
to
utilize
the
existing
driveway
off
of
15th
Street
instead
of
the
alley
as
the
building
is
contributing
and
the
gradu
is
constructed
with
direct
access
onto
15th
Street.
The
planning
and
funding
commission
found
this
to
be
appropriate.
The
newly
constructed
lot
will
take
vehicular
access
from
the
Natalie.
However,
there's
an
existing
detached,
sidewalk
adjacent
to
the
development,
as
well
as
existing
Street
trees,
which
the
applicant
proposes
to
retain
and
the
property
is
located
in
the
historic
district
with
a
design
review
overlay.
N
D
Mayor
yep,
quick
question:
the
driveway
that's
shown
on
this
is
where
I
think
there
is
a
garage.
Is
that
garage
going
to
be
demolished
or
moved.
N
Madam
mayor
members
of
the
council,
they're
planning
to
keep
the
existing
Garage
in
its
place
and
as
it
is
a
contributing
structure,
planning
and
zone
18
found
that
to
be
appropriate
great.
D
I
just
want
to
make
sure
so
it's
a
great
building,
both
both
the
garage
and
the
building
so
good
to
hear.
L
L
The
owner
has
obtained
the
certificate
of
appropriateness
for
the
existing
home
if
you've,
driven
by
there
recently
you've
seen
that
it
was
painted,
but
there's
been
no
changes
to
the
architectural
condition.
I
think
they've
replaced
a
couple
Windows,
all
of
that,
compliant
with
that
certificate
of
appropriateness.
The
new
lot
to
be
constructed,
we're
exploring
trying
to
find
a
candidate
for
relocation
of
an
existing
home
that
hasn't
panned
out
yet,
but
we
have
to
wait
to
get
the
the
lot
established
before
we
really.
L
You
know
get
this
approval
before
we
were
really
comfortable
digging
in
any
further
on
that,
regardless
anything,
whether
it's
a
new
build
or
a
relocated
structure
on
that
lot,
it'll
go
through
a
separate
certificate
of
appropriateness,
application
process
as
well,
and
so
we
look
forward
to
that
coming
to
fruition
sometime
soon
other
than
that
I'd
stand
for
any
questions
that
you
may
have.
Thank
you
thank.
A
F
H
F
I
look
forward
to
seeing,
if
there's
an
opportunity
to
relocate
a
house
here,
I
think
that
those
home
relocations
have
really
made
this
particular
area
of
the
North
End,
interesting
and
vibrant.
So
that
would
be
a
really
great
opportunity
and
I
think
the
property
owners
for
bringing
this
to
us.
D
Madam
mayor,
yes,
like
council
president
woodings
I'm
excited
to
see
the
surface
parking
lot
go
away
and
a
building
a
residential
building
back
in
its
place.
I
did
a
quick
survey
three
or
four
years
ago,
and
we've
lost
about
30
residential
units
in
this
neighborhood
to
surface
parking
lots,
and
so
everything
we
can
do
to
get
a
few
of
those
back
is,
is
a
move
in
the
right
direction.
Thank
you.
E
A
All
right
now
we'll
move
to
public
hearings.
First
up
we
have
cr
22-36
with
Sabrina
again
Scott
Michael
or
Michael
Ria.
That
is
the
applicant,
is
the
applicant
here,
perhaps
online.
We
don't
expect
Eric
Berg
from
Cena
to
be
here
and
we
didn't
have
any
public
sign
up
in
advance.
Is
that
still
the
case
all
right
go
ahead.
B
Madam
mayor
members
of
the
council,
the
item
before
you
is
a
request
to
Annex
approximately
4.16
Acres,
located
at
7050
South
Federal
Way,
with
a
zoning
designation
of
m1d.
The
site
is
located
approximately
0.15
miles
south
of
the
intersection
of
Federal
Way
and
Cowan
Road,
which
is
designated
as
a
regional,
Activity
Center.
The
subject
parcel
is
within
the
city's
area
of
impact
and
abut
city
limits
to
the
south,
east
and
west.
B
The
surrounding
areas
primarily
comprised
of
commercial
and
Industrial
developments
with
vacant
land
owned
by
the
Idaho
Department
of
lands
located
to
the
north
and
Northeast
public
agencies
have
confirmed
that
services
are
available
to
or
already
provided
to,
the
site.
The
Planning
and
Zoning
commission
found
the
proposed
m1d
Zone
to
be
the
most
appropriate
for
the
site.
As
the
land
use
map
designates,
the
site
is
industrial
and
there
is
existing
M1.
B
Zoning
adjacent
to
the
West
The
Proposal
is
consistent
with
the
comprehensive
plan
which
encourages
maintaining
a
sufficient
supply
of
land
for
industrial
uses
in
developing
land
within
the
airport
influence
area
B
with
non-residential
uses
following
annexation.
The
applicant
intends
to
construct
an
indoor
agricultural
operation
that
will
utilize
sustainable
techniques
to
cultivate,
produce
and
fish.
The
proposed
use
would
be
an
allowed
use
in
the
m1b
zone
and
would
be
subject
to
design
review
prior
to
the
submittal
of
building
permits.
A
O
H
Memory,
yes,
I
think
this
is
really
cool
and
I
guess.
Maybe
I'll
ask
for
a
pointer,
Personal
Privilege,
just
to
learn
a
little
bit
more
about.
What's
going
to
happen
here,
because
it
seems
like
a
really
awesome
way
to
use
a
building.
So
I
don't
know
if
you
have
any
extra
information
as
far
as
how
it's
going
to
be
used.
O
Problem
yeah,
as
Sabrina
explained,
the
intention
is
to
create,
what's
called
a
controlled
environment
agriculture
facility,
which
will
produce
both
the
fish
and
vegetables
in
a
sustainable
Manner
and
by
sustainable
means
very,
very
low
water
use,
as
well
as
not
any
use
of
of
fertilizers
in
order
to
produce
create
that
produce,
and
it
would
be
for
consumption
by
the
local
Boise
Community,
with
the
volumes
that
are
being
that
the
site
would
be
capable
of
it's
It's
kind
of
really.
Frankly,
the
scale
is
sort
of
a
pilot.
O
H
I
just
I
think
it's
such
a
great
use
for
an
area
of
town
and
a
Innovative
use
for
a
space
in
a
building.
So
I'm
excited
to
see
how
this,
how
this
builds
out.
A
A
Right
are
there
further
questions
for
staff
or
the
applicant
I'm,
going
to
go
ahead
and
close
this
public
hearing
Madame.
H
D
A
mirror-
yes,
thank
you,
councilman
president
protem
Hallie
Burton
for
asking
that
question
and
thank
you
to
the
applicant
for
bringing
this
forward.
I've
been
advocating
for
industrial
use
out
in
this
area
for
a
long
time,
we've
mostly
gotten
gotten
warehousing
and
distribution,
and
this
kind
of
production
is
so
exciting
because
it's
so
unique.
It
also
shows
the
possibilities
of
what
could
happen
out
here.
So
I'm
really
excited
about
this.
A
Any
further
discussion,
I
agree,
I
hope
this
proof
of
concept
facility
demonstrates
that
this
works
and
that
we
can
see
a
more
local
food
production
in
this
way
on
some
of
our
AG
lands
and
I
love
the
fact
that
now
in
airport
area
of
impact
lands,
it
sounds
like
we're
going
to
have
some
fish.
Some
vegetables
and
we've
got
some
gelato
nearby
too.
So
a
whole
meal
deal
underneath
the
airport
guys
so
clerk.
Will
you
call
the
roll.
G
A
A
B
Madame
Mary
members
of
the
council.
This
next
item
is
a
request
to
rezone
approximately
0.29
Acres,
located
at
one
and
two
South
Mesa
Vista
Drive
and
145
Westover
Lane
from
R2
to
r1c
in
2013,
a
property
line
adjustment
between
the
subject
parcels
and
the
adjacent
Parcels
to
the
north
was
approved.
This
approval
caused
the
subject
Parcels
to
be
split.
Zoned
with
the
northern
portions
of
the
lot
zone
to
R2
and
the
remainder
of
the
lot
zone
is
r1c.
The
applicant
now
requests
to
rezone
the
R2
portions
of
the
parcel
to
r1c
to
provide
consistent
zoning.
B
The
Planning
and
Zoning
commission
found
that
the
requested
rezoned
to
r1c
complies
with
the
code
requirements
and
is
compatible
with
the
Compact
and
mixed-use
land
use
designations
on
the
Lots.
The
commission
found
that
the
rezone
is
in
the
best
interest
of
the
public,
as
it
will
allow
the
northern
portion
of
the
properties
to
conform
to
the
predominant
zoning
of
the
Lots,
while
maintaining
compatibility
with
the
surrounding
residential
uses.
B
F
Madam
mayor,
yes,
Sabrina
I
know
that
the
lots
to
the
north
are
probably
expected
to
redevelop
at
some
point.
Does
this
rezone
impact
the
potential
Redevelopment
of
those
lots
in
any
way.
B
P
P
A
H
G
A
Next
up
the
final
item
of
the
evening
car
22-11
we've
got
David
Mosher
here
to
present
for
staff.
Nicolette
Womack.
Don't
oh
sorry,
gosh,
sorry
about
that,
and
then
the
neighbors
Association
John
Mooney
Gary
Busey,
and
then
we
expect
that
there
will
be
public
signed
up,
but
I
don't
have
any
names
in
advance.
Is
anybody
here
for
this
one
if
you're
online
and
you're
planning
on
testifying
just
go
ahead
and
raise
your
Zoom
Hannon,
we'll
get
to
you
and
with
that
I
had
asked
David
to
start
foreign.
R
Thank
you,
madam
mayor
members
of
the
council.
The
applicant
is
requesting
to
Annex
3.2
Acre
Site,
with
an
r2d
da
Zone,
located
at
6776
East,
Warm,
Springs
Avenue,
and
a
preliminary
plot
for
residential
subdivision
comprised
of
33
buildable
lots
and
three
common
Lots.
As
you
can
see,
from
the
aerial
photograph.
R
The
surrounding
areas
comprised
of
residential
neighborhood
containing
detest
single-family
houses
to
the
north,
south
and
east
single-family
residential
homes
are
adjacent
to
the
west
across
Warm
Springs
Avenue
and
zoned
R2,
a
large
Wildlife
Corridor
abuts
the
property
to
the
north
and
connects
the
undeveloped
Foothills
to
the
east,
with
Boise
River.
This
application.
This
application
was
initially
heard
before
the
Planning
and
Zoning
Commission
on
August
1st
2022
and
denied
the
applicant
requested
reconsideration
and
proposed
substantial
changes
to
the
project
to
address
the
commission's
concerns.
R
As
such,
it
was
heard
Again
by
the
commission
on
January
9,
2020,
2023
and
approved.
In
summary,
as
seen
on
the
slide,
the
planning
zoning
commission
recommended
approval,
since
the
annexation
is
consistent
and
compatible
with
the
development
code.
The
proposed
R2
zone
is
supported
by
the
commercial
land
use
designation
of
the
comprehensive
plan.
In
addition,
it
complies
all
the
required
findings
as
per
code.
It
is
also
surrounded
on
four
sides
by
Boise
City
Limits.
Finally,
the
proposed
D.A
is
requested
and
required
to
tie
this
development
to
the
Harris
Ranch
wildlife
mitigation
plan
and
Association.
R
The
development
consists
of
33
attached
two
and
three-story
townhouses.
In
summary,
the
applicant
has
made
substantial
changes
from
its
original
design
and
the
project
into
the
project
which
now
incl,
which
includes
those
changes,
reducing
the
density
of
33
units
for
the
project
for
project
density
of
10,
point
unit,
10.3
units
per
acre
and
providing
direct
public
Street
connection
to
Warm
Spring
Avenue,
increasing
the
open
space
of
the
of
the
project
and
enhancing
Warm
Springs
Warm
Springs
Avenue
street
Frontage.
R
Basically,
the
project
design
includes
public,
a
public
Street
which
Loops
through
the
subject
property
with
direct
public
Street
connection
to
Warm
Springs.
The
right-of-way
width
for
the
public
street
is
proposed
at
27
to
27
foot
street
street
wide
or
25
7
wide
Street
section
and
allows
for
parking
on
one
side.
R
In
addition,
a
five
foot
detached
sidewalk
with
landscape
buffers
proposal
on
Whitten,
Winton,
Avenue,
Narrow,
Street
and
Brian
Avenue
within
the
development
several
neighbor
Neighbors
and
the
barber
Valley
neighborhood
association
did
Express
concerns
with
the
original
project
design
in
terms
of
its
access
to
Warm,
Springs,
Avenue
compatibility
and
traffic.
These
current
these
concerns
have
been
addressed
with
the
proposed
changes.
In
particular,
two
of
the
concerns
have
been
addressed
with
the
public
Street
roadway
connection
to
Warm
Springs
Avenue.
R
This
is
the
proposed
landscape
plan
for
the
project,
and
it
shows
the
draft
version
of
the
street
improvements
along
Warm
Springs
Avenue,
along
with
the
landscaping
for
the
site.
The
applicant
is
proposing
a
10
foot,
wide
multi
or
10
foot
wide
pathway
along
the
street.
However,
due
to
site
constraints
such
as
underground
utilities,
adjacent
to
the
roadway
and
overhead
power
lines,
the
proposed
Landscaping
along
the
roadway
has
been
impacted.
R
Please
note
that
the
Pud
was
not
appealed
and
only
the
annexation
of
preliminary
platter
before
council
tonight,
the
Planning
and
Zoning
commission
recommend
recommended
approval,
the
annexation,
cr22-00011
and
SUV
22-0035,
since
they
comply
with
all
the
required
required
findings
as
per
the
development
code.
Thank
you,
foreign.
D
Yes,
David
really
excited
to
see
the
pathway
here.
I
wonder
if
there
was
any
discussion
of
making
it
a
12-foot
wide
pathway
which
is
closer
to
the
current
standard.
I
know
we
thought
10
foot
was
going
to
be
enough,
but
we
found
really
that
12
foot
is
better.
It
also
occurs
to
me
that
that
could
move
the
trees
further
closer
to
the
roadway
and
out
of
the
line
of
the
overhead
wires
and
maybe
allow
for
bigger
trees.
R
Madam
mayor
council,
member
Clegg,
a
discussion
of
a
12-foot
wide
path,
was
not
discussed
with
this,
although
I
think
there
might
be
room
to
achieve
it,.
D
So
you
mentioned
that
there
will
be
further
work
at
design
reviews,
so
I
guess
I
just
you
know,
as
this
goes
forward
depending
on
what
the
discussion
is
tonight,
maybe
take
that
to
them.
R
Q
Mayor,
yes,
David,
there's
a
something
while
this
application
was
pending,
achd
reclassified,
this
portion
of
Warm
Springs
and
that
affected
the
conversation
with
the
neighborhood
and
others
about
Street
access
off
of
Warm
Springs
in
some
way
that
I
couldn't
quite
suss
out
of
the
packet.
So
could
you
spend
maybe
like
four
sentences
explaining
how
that
classification
change
affected?
The
plan
here
sure
Madame.
R
Council
member
agent,
the
the
issue
was,
is
that
initially
Warm
Springs
of
this
section
was
classified
as
a
an
arterial,
roadway
and
I
believe
highway
district
policy
doesn't
allow
for
a
direct
or
minimum
requires
the
minimization
of
Street
access
onto
our
Toyota
roadways.
There
was
a
lot
of
discussion
with
planning
staff
and
the
neighborhood
to
the
highway
district
and
they
reconsider
this
and
reclassified
as
a
collector,
which
would
allow
that
additional
Street
connection
to
go
through
and
meet
their
policy.
S
Mayor
council
members,
Nicolette
Womack
with
kimlyhorn
I'm,
just
gonna
live
this
up.
The
address
is
1100
West,
Idaho,
Street
number
210,
Boise
Idaho
83702
foreign.
S
Thank
you
for
having
us
tonight
shown
here
is
the
developer
on
the
property
Mark
Russell,
our
civil
engineer,
Abby
landscape,
architect,
myself,
as
the
planner
Kelly,
is
our
engineer
here
tonight
and
Ian
with
pivot.
North
is
the
architect
so
again
we're
requesting
that
annexation,
rezone
development
agreement
and
preliminary
Platt
and
the
Pud
was
approved
by
PNC
just
super
high
level.
We
have
a
lot
of
slides
in
here,
but
I
think
we
can
hit
them
a
lot
quicker
and
we
originally
had
our
pre-application
back
in
February
of
2022.
S
We
held
that
neighborhood
meeting
in
April
and
then
we
submitted
our
application
in
April
of
2022..
We
had
that
first
pnz
Hearing
in
August
and
instead
of
moving
forward
to
council.
At
that
time
we
decided
to
go
back
to
the
drawing
board,
look
at
the
plans
in
more
detail
and
take
that
feedback
into
consideration.
So
we
had
reconsideration
approved
in
September
achd,
again
reclassified,
Warm
Springs,
giving
us
the
ability
to
take
access
on
Warren
Springs
in
November,
and
then
we
had
a
pnz
hearing
in
January.
So
it's
been
a
long
road.
S
You
know
where
we
are
so
I
won't
hit
the
slide
in
general,
we're
filling
in
a
county
Enclave
with
r2d
D.A
zoning
similar
to
the
property
on
the
west
side
of
Warm
Springs.
Just
for
common
knowledge.
These
are
the
subdivision
names
in
the
area.
S
Again,
the
site
has
a
lot
of
opportunities
and
constraints
and
we're
completing
a
road
network
with
changing
policies
and
requirements
throughout
the
process
and
we're
completing
The
Pedestrian
Network,
we're
honoring
our
woolly
setbacks,
we're
fronting
our
homes
on
Warm
Springs
and
we're
trying
to
honor
the
perimeter
setbacks
with
the
adjacent
subdivisions
where
possible.
S
S
We
are
connecting
to
the
homestead
Trail.
There
is
a
little
bit
of
a
small
disconnect
with
the
neighborhood
associations
of
the
East,
so
we'll
continue
to
work
with
everyone
to
resolve
that
connection
and
we
are
providing
that
10-foot
pathway
along
Warm
Springs
and
there
are
Regional
connectivity
opportunities.
So
there
are
rapid
flashing
beacons
in
achg's
work
plan
shown
at
Maynard
and
Sky
Bar
in
the
area.
So
you
can
cross
Warm
Springs
to
get
to
the
green
belt.
S
S
S
So
here
you
can
see
just
how
far
away
we
really
are
from
everyone
adjacent
to
us
high
level.
This
is
their
duplex
units,
three
Plex
units
and
five
Flex
units
and
again
since
the
reconsideration
we
have
provided
that
direct
access
to
Warm
Springs,
we've
added
20-foot,
deep
driveway
aprons
to
avoid
guest
parking
blocking
sidewalks.
S
We
have
provided
a
continuous
network
of
detached
sidewalks
we've
reduced
our
unit
count
to
33
units,
so
we've
increased
setbacks,
open
space,
amenities,
Landscaping
added
that
10
foot
sidewalk
on
Warm
Springs
and
that's
results
in
an
overall
reduction
in
hard
copy
materials.
We're
happy
to
talk
through
the
Warm
Springs
treatment
in
more
detail,
and
we
are
comfortable
with
the
conditions
as
written.
S
We
will
take
questions
or
address
it
in
rebuttal.
If
needs
be,
we'll
stand
for
your
approval
thanks
any
questions.
D
Thanks
Nicolette
I
appreciate
your
presentation.
The
trees
along
Warm
Springs
are
being
shown
on
your
property.
Is
there
any
opportunity
to
move
them
into
the
right-of-way
so
that
you
could
potentially
get
a
bigger
tree
in
in
those
spots?.
S
Yes,
happy
to
address
that
question
mayor
and
council
members,
and
so
this
is
the
existing
treatment
of
Warm
Springs
today,
so
because
of
those
M
large
power
lines,
most
properties
have
only
been
able
to
locate
their
trees
on
the
other
side
of
the
power
lines.
They're
also
facing
a
similar
issue
that
we
are
where
and
I'll
show
you
here,
there's
underground
Telecom
and
gas
facilities
in
that
area
between
our
new
curb
and
our
new
sidewalk.
So
our
sidewalk
basically
follows
the
sidewalk.
S
P
J
A
T
Madam,
mayor
and
council
members
good
evening,
my
name
is
Gary
veezy
4150
Macbeth
Avenue
here
in
Boise
I'm
Secretary
of
bbna,
thanks
in
advance
for
considering
our
position
tonight.
This
has
been
a
long
haul
and
a
small
but
important
infill
project
that
is
not
encumbered
by
sp01
or
sp02.
We
first
met
with
the
developer
15
months
ago,
and
it
has
been
an
active
engagement
since
then
stating
our
position
up
front
bvna
supports
the
rezoning
and
the
annexation
applications
and
recommends
approval,
as
expressed
at
the
January
9th
pnz
hearing.
T
T
T
T
Not
only
did
the
plans
not
get
revised
to
comply
with
staff
comments,
they
were
modified
between
the
two
hearings
and
are
now
inferior
number
two.
There
is
no
provision
for
traffic
calming
or
Street
speed
mitigation
methods
incorporated
into
this
project
and
three.
The
application
claims
that
satisfying
the
requirements
cannot
be
achieved
due
to
utility
company
requirements.
T
T
T
I'll
provide
some
comments
regarding
the
the
the
exhibits
up
on
the
on
the
screen.
There
are
a
couple
notable
differences
on
January's
plan.
There
was
a
landscape
buffer
and
Street
trees,
immediately
adjacent
to
Warm
Springs.
On
the
current
plat
map,
the
same
area
is
now
noted
as
a
drainage
Swale
and
contains
nose
trees.
T
T
We
have
gone
from
a
pleasing
landscape
buffer
with
trees
to
a
borrow,
ditch
a
ditch,
which
we
explicitly
stated
was
not
our
goal
in
our
p
and
Z
testimony.
The
deficiencies
are
obvious.
We
are
not
getting
what
pnz
approved
and
what
staff
conditioned,
while
the
Pud
allows
the
applicant
to
resolve
the
frontage
design
up
to
count
up
to
council's
review
of
the
final
map,
which
is
too
late
in
our
opinion.
T
Revisions
were
made
since,
since
the
pnz
hearing
that
are
contrary
to
staff's
position
and
have
been
put
in
front
of
you
tonight.
Our
second
concern
is
the
lack
of
speed
mitigation
or
calming
plans
clearly
show
an
absence
of
physical
measures
to
mitigate
speed,
with
the
exception
of
a
bit
more
Turf
out
to
the
pavement
and
a
curb.
The
proposed
streetscape
is
no
different
than
at
the
adjacent
East
Valley
and
River
Heights
subdivisions,
no
visual,
cues
or
physical
design
elements
exist
to
slow
speeds.
T
T
There
are
other
methods
such
as
such
as
landscape,
medians,
bulb
outs
and
altering
the
street
alignment,
to
name
a
few
with
a
goal
of
calming
as
a
requirement.
We
are
disappointed
and
frustrated
that
the
developer
is
presenting
you
with
a
plat
tonight
that
has
no
com
calming
provisions
regarding
our
third
concern.
The
applicant
asserts
that
the
Landscaping
cannot
be
incorporated
adjacent
to
the
street,
despite
showing
it
at
the
last
hearing.
T
T
H
And
mayor
yes,
thanks
for
coming
tonight,
you
had
mentioned
some
different
traffic
calming
Majors,
one
of
the
things
that
you
specifically
said
was
bulbs
up,
bulb
outs,
which
you
know
the
extension
of
the
sidewalk
into
the
street.
Are
you
talking
about
at
the
entryway?
You
know
with
the
10-foot
path.
Is
that
where
you're
talking
about
wanting
to
see
bull
belts
or
is
there
a
specific
areas
in
the
map
that
you're
calling
that
or
are
you
just
talking
about
in
general.
T
Yeah
Madame,
mayor
and
and
council
members
I,
it
was
just
a
general
statement
about
those
being
a
bulb
out
in
this
case.
Really
bull,
Belcher
I
think
are
traditionally
referred
to
at
at
intersections.
To
your
point.
So
really
you
know
the
opportunity
there
was
would
be
to
somehow
change
the
alignment
of
the
of
the
of
the
travel
Lanes,
which
in
effect
has
a
calming
effect
on
on
drivers.
So.
H
Good
and
then
just
a
quick
follow-up
there
you
mentioned
some
other
traffic
calming
measures,
I
think
mostly
related
to
where
trees
and
kind
of
land
Landscaping
stuff
other
areas
are
I
just
want
to
give
you
an
opportunity
if
there
was
any
other
specific
things,
you're
asking
for
related
to
sidewalk
or
Street
design
to
put
those
forward
if
you
had
any
or
if
it
was
just
kind
of
looking
at
it
in
general,
yeah.
T
We
were
not
proposing
a
specific
solution.
We're
just
I
was
just
offering
those
as
an
opportunity
to
investigate
as
an
opportunity
the
rarely
what
we're
trying
to
do
is
Achieve
calming.
E
T
That's
done
whether
it's
through
Landscaping
Street
realignments,
a
median
out
in
you,
know
in
the
street,
which
would
slightly
affect
travel
Lanes.
Any
of
those
could
be
used
to
achieve
that.
At
that
end,
great.
H
D
Yeah,
thank
you,
madam
mirror.
Thanks
for
being
here,
you
heard
that
I'm
also
concerned
about
the
trees.
It
does.
You
know
I
in
looking
at
the
existing
utilities
plan.
It
does
look
like
that
would
be
problematic.
D
You're
asking
us
to
either
hold
it
tonight
or
require
some
changes
that
would
require
the
trees,
I
guess
in
my
mind,
I'm
wondering
if
it
would
be
instead
of
requiring
trees
if
it
would
be
acceptable
in
your
mind,
to
require
that
there
be
vertical
elements
in
the
landscape
strip
that
it
not
be
used
for
a
drainage
swell
whether
they
be
trees
or
grasses
or
something
else,
depending
on
what
can
be
achieved
based
on
the
utility
plans.
T
Yeah
I
think
we
would
be
open
to
anything
that
upon
review
would
have
as
effectively
calm
traffic
again
we
were
just
offering
the
landscape
option
because
it's
probably
the
cheapest,
but
obviously
there
there
are
some
yeah
I
was
encouraged
to
hear
Nick.
Let's
say
that
they
are
investigating
the
possibility
of
relocating
utilities,
hope
that
would
be
a
win-win
if
we
could
achieve
it
in
that
manner.
T
T
Yeah,
the
the
other
thing
that
I
think
is
a
challenge
from
time
to
time
and
bbna
has
had
some
recent
experience
with.
It
is
when
these
resolutions
are
when
we're
able
to
push
them
back
to
the
final
map
stage.
Sometimes
the
final
map
occurs
after
construction
has
commenced
and
then
all
of
a
sudden,
it's
like,
oh
it's
too
late
to
do
anything
and.
P
T
That's
a
that's,
that's
frustrating!
So,
in
our
opinion,
the
earlier
we
can
address
these
things,
the
better
so
that
that
condition
is
already
part
of
the
Pud.
So
there's
nothing
we
can
do
about
it,
but
I
think
in
the
future
going
forward.
If
we
can
try
to
pull
those.
The
resolution
of
these
design
matters
forward
a
little
bit
it'll
be
in
everyone's
best
interest.
A
G
H
I'm
wondering
if
you
have
I
know
that
you
mentioned
connection
to
the
the
pathway
behind
the
development.
Do
you
have
any
is?
Are
there
any
illustrations
anywhere
or
can
you
describe
what
that
connection
looks
like?
Is
it
just
the
dirt
path
that
connects
to
the
dirt
path.
S
Thank
you,
I'm,
not
sure
if
we
have
it
as
zoomed
in
as
you
probably
would
like,
but
my
truck,
you
can
kind
of
see
here
to
our
East
where
those
homes
about
our
property
line,
it
does
basically
Trail
into
a
dirt
Trail,
it's
more
of
a
cow
path.
At
that
point,
perfect.
S
Mayor
Collins
members,
thank
you
for
your
time
tonight.
I
am
we
appreciate
the
neighbors
her
best
discussion
on
these
fine
details.
S
It's
unfortunate
that
it's
coming
up
at
this
moment
and
not
earlier
today
when
we
could
have
looked
into
them
in
more
details
in
general,
we
are
comfortable
with
the
conditions
as
we're
in
and
potentially
a
condition
like
Elaine
mentioned.
We
I,
guess
high
level
want
to
remind
everyone
where
we
started.
S
We
began
with
our
pre-application
in
February,
where
at
that
time
it
was
made
extremely
clear
to
us
that
we
were
not
going
to
be
getting
access
to
Warm
Springs,
so
we
have
been
able
to
design
with
that
in
mind
and
then,
basically,
up
until
November
of
last
year,
we
were
informed
that
achd
actually
would
consider
the
reclassification
of
Warm
Springs,
which
greatly
changes
many
factors
on
the
site.
So
we
are
designing
real
time
as
real
information
can
news
to
come
out
across
the
board.
I
just
want
to
look
forward.
S
Across
the
board,
there
are
General
Corridor
concerns
along
Warm
Springs,
and
you
can
see
that
our
property
is
not,
unlike
any
other
properties
in
the
adjacent
area
where
there
is
not
enough
traffic
calming
to
meet
all
of
the
neighborhood's
ultimate
desires,
and
so
we
feel
strongly
that
traffic
calming
should
be
considered
on
a
court
or
wide
approach
and
not
implemented
inappropriately
in
in
random
places.
Maybe
where
there's
not
as
much
effectivity
as
a
corridor
study
would
be
able
to
achieve.
S
In
general,
we
did
receive
the
exhibit
that
was
shared
by
the
neighborhood
association
from
the
staff
report
we
took
that
exhibit
and
I
wish.
It
was
as
simple
as
designing
a
streetscape
and
Street
mix
conceptually,
but
that
exhibit
does
not
match
the
existing
conditions.
S
There
are
different
amounts
of
right-of-way
and
different
amounts
of
required
area
per
achg
comments,
and
so
we
were
not
able
to
implement
that
exhibit
the
way
it
exactly
is
shown
and
at
that
time,
when
we
worked
with
City
staff,
they've
been
very
agreeable
to
working
through
these
items,
one
by
one
and
we
were
informed.
There
was
not
a
requirement
for
double
trees
between
our
new
sidewalk
and
Warm
Springs,
so
we
only
planned
for
one
row
of
trees.
S
I
believe
we
can
likely
work
into
looking
at
the
second
row
of
trees.
If
you
want
to
mention
that
in
a
condition
but
I
can't
guarantee
we'll
be
able
to
fit
all
that
in
appropriately,
there
are
requirements
from
the
Idaho
Idaho
Power
Corridor
that
you
have
to
use
a
Class
1
trees,
which
are
smaller
to
remain
out
of
the
growth.
S
In
general,
we
had
the
option
between
the
two
hearings
to
work.
Through
these
items.
We
are
doing
it
as
fast
as
we
possibly
can.
We
had
some
feedback
on
the
Telecom
facility,
but
not
enough
feedback
on
gas
or
power
to
make
those
types
of
changes.
S
The
reason
why
we
submitted
the
alternative
plan
last
minute
is
because
we
did
switch
from
a
Swale
that
open,
ditch
that
was
discussed
into
seepage
beds
where
that
actually
gets
stored
underground,
and
it's
not
seen
at
the
streetscape
level.
So
we
wanted
everyone
to
know
that
we
had
a
better
plan
for
that
and
will
stand
for
any
questions.
Q
Yes,
I
hope
it's
not
an
unfair
question,
but
we're
talking
about
vegetation
of
some
sort
in
where
the
Swale
used
to
be
where
now
the
secret
like
this.
This
is
the
unfair
part.
Do
you
know
if
your
engineer
has
any
thoughts
on
that
I
mean
that's
a
it's
a
drainage
issue,
apart
from
the
utilities
issue
and
I,
wonder
what
that
input
would
be
if
an
appropriate
answer
might
be
I,
don't
know
I'm,
not
the
engineer,
but
I'm
curious.
If
you
have
any
input.
S
Yeah
I
mean
we're
welcome
to
bring
up
mayor
and
council
members
welcome
to
bring
up
the
engineer,
but
the
seabis
bet
is
no
longer
in
that
area,
and
so
the
trees
would
not
impact
any
drainage
issues
in
that
area.
We've
moved
that
out
of
it
trying
to
free
that
up
to
work
through
these
items
got.
D
A
mirror-
yes,
thank
you.
You
know,
I,
don't
know
if
a
second
row
of
trees
is
achievable
either,
but
I
do
wonder
if
it's
possible
to
do
some
larger
columnar
trees
like
a
tulip
tree
or
a
horn,
beam
further
closer
to
the
roadway
than
what's
shown,
and
maybe
out
of
the
utility
path
of
the
overhead
utilities
and
would
appreciate
you
know
investigating
all
of
those
kinds
of
of
issues.
D
I
don't
know
if
a
second
row
of
class
one
trees
further
in
makes
a
difference
or
not,
but
work
with
the
neighborhood
association
with
our
staff
on
on
trying
to
see
if
any
of
those
would
work,
I
think
would
really
be
helpful.
I
do
I
agree
that
you
can't
ask
just
one
developer:
to
do
traffic
coming
on
a
whole
Corridor,
but
here's
an
opportunity
to
do
some
and
set
the
stage
for
more
of
it
to
happen
along
the
corridor.
So
whatever
can
be
achieved
here
would
be
really
helpful.
S
D
A
G
D
F
F
Metamere,
this
is
only
the
rezone
and
annexation.
It's
a
very
appropriate
rezone,
very
appropriate
annexation
and
I
think
that
this
will
really
bring
it
in
bring
this
parcel
in
to
allow
it
to
be
developed
for
the
benefit
of
the
neighborhood.
H
Yes,
I
think
that
there
are
additional
opportunities
for
traffic
calming
to
be
addressed
in
the
design
review
process
and
looking
at
the
different
neighborhoods
that
are
in
this
area.
This
kind
of
completes
a
major
section
of
sidewalk
that
people
might
be
using
to
get
all
the
way
to
the
entrance
of
the
green
belt,
which
I
think
is
several
hundred
yards
further
west.
H
And
so,
when
we're
thinking
about
the
crossings
of
the
neighborhood
streets
getting
into
the
neighborhoods
there's,
there's
paint
you
know,
there's
there's
race,
Crossings,
there's
a
variety
of
different
things
that
we
see
all
along
Warm,
Springs
and
so
I
think
that
that
can
be
part
of
the
discussion
when
we
get
into
to
that
aspect,
and
so
I
think
that
this
actually
does
do
a
fair
amount
of
traffic.
H
Calming,
though,
with
within
the
development
within
the
separated
sidewalks
within
trees
that
are
inside
the
area
and
increasing
pedestrian
activity
along
the
sidewalks
as
well,
I
think
will
help
with
traffic
coming.
But
I
think
that
that
can
continue
to
be
part
of
the
discussion.
So
I'm
in
support
of
the
motion.
Q
I'll
be
supporting
this
motion
too.
I
just
want
to
make
a
comment
about
the
annexation,
because
there
was
some
discussion
about.
You
know
annexation,
coming
with
an
obligation
to
bring
something
to
the
table
and
I
I
just
wanted
to
register
a
little
bit
of
disagreement
with
that.
We've
had
a
long
history
of
difficulties
with
annexation
in
Boise
and
I.
Think
creating
the
illusion
that
being
annexed
into
our
city
is
something
that
the
city
is
then
going
to
impose.
A
bunch
of
costs
on
you
for
doing
is
not
correct.
Q
We
want
people
to
be
within
our
city
limits.
We
want
people
to
be
within
our
sewer
system.
We
want
people
to
be
participating
within
the
tax
structure
of
the
city,
and
so
my
personal,
View
and
I
don't
think
it
actually
matters
on
this
one.
But
my
personal
view
is
that
you
know
annexation
is
welcome
particularly
and
little
piecemeal
places
like
this,
where
it
makes
a
lot
of
sense,
and
it's
not
something
that
we're
going
in
my
mind.
We
should
impose.
Q
You
know
burdensome
taxes
for
tax
on
the
broad
sense
for
for
somebody
who
wants
to
participate
in
join
in
the
city
of
Boise.
D
Madame
mayor,
yes,
I
move
approval
of
woven
subdivision,
SUV
22-35
Boise
City
preliminary
Platt
at
6776,
East
Warm,
Springs
Avenue,
with
one
additional
condition
that
before
final
plat,
the
developer
bring
forward
a
landscaping
plan
in
the
landscape
area
between
the
pathway
and
Warm
Springs
Avenue.
That
has
vertical
elements
that
act
as
traffic
calming.