►
From YouTube: Boise City Council - Work Session
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
A
Almost
too
good,
so
it's
it
was
in
the
budget.
It
was
pulled
out
at
the
beginning
of
the
year
and
this
is
just
going
to
put
it
back
into
the
2022
budget
as
they're
seeing
passenger
accounts
take
up
and
there's
also
another
strategy
to
get
better
pricing
in
this
construction
environment
by
pairing
it
with
other
projects
that
are
ongoing
at
the
airport.
A
A
C
D
D
So
there's
a
few
statutes
and
our
ordinance
that
come
into
play
generally
an
abandoned
vehicle
is
a
vehicle
that
is
parked
on
the
roadway
for
24
hours.
However,
there
is
also
a
48
hour
notice
period
before
any
towing
occurs,
so
in
effect,
it's
a
72
hours
generally.
What
we
see
is
the
vehicle
has
been
parked
for
weeks
before
someone
finally
complains
about
it
and
then
at
that
point
it
triggers
that
48
hour
notice
period.
D
C
C
Follow-Up,
yes,
thank
you.
I
appreciate
that
information.
Well,
we
know
the
times.
We're
living
in
right
now
are
really
difficult
for
folks,
and
sometimes
those
policy
violations
can
really
present
a
hardship
to
folks,
I'm
wondering
are
we
taking
any
steps
to
be
kind
and
compassionate
in
our
response
to
absolutely
I
agree.
We
need
to
make
sure
that
our
streets
are
clear
and
and
that
there's
no
hazard
in
place
for
the
public,
but
we
also
need
to
be
mindful
of
the
times
we're
living
in.
Are
we
taking
any
steps
like
that.
D
We
are
the
so
the
entire
process
is
entirely
complaint
generated,
so
police
aren't
roaming,
the
neighborhoods
looking
for
these
sorts
of
violations.
It's
only
if
we
get
a
call
from
a
citizen
or
a
business
about
a
particular
vehicle.
If
the
vehicle
based
on
what's
observed,
when
officers
get,
there
appears
to
be
owned
or
possessed
by
a
person
experiencing
homelessness
or
other
similar
issues,
bpd
has
been
in
contact
with
ketch
and
our
other
community
partners
to
try
to
reach
out
and
provide
whatever
services
are
necessary
to
get
the
person
operational
and
running
again.
D
I
believe
catch
delivered
a
car
part
recently
to
someone
who
the
only
reason
their
vehicle
was
operational
was
because
there
was
a
small
part
missing,
so
they
coordinated
to
to
do
that.
To
get
the
person
going
so
generally,
towing
is
a
last
resort,
especially
when
we
know
that
vehicle
is,
is
the
only
option
the
person?
C
E
And
just
to
clarify
for
people
who
are
watching
those
timelines
are
functions
of
state
law.
They're,
not
our
city,
ordinance,
they're,
nothing
that
we
have
any
policy
direction
over,
so
that
the
state
law
and
the
state
rules
not
within
the
city
of
boise.
So
I
just
want
to
make
that
clarifying
comment
and
move
to
approve
the
interim
budget
changes
as
requested.
A
B
We've
been
seconded
any
further
discussion.
I
would
just
also
note
that
I
appreciate
the
the
questions
that
council
member
sanchez
added
or
asked
tonight.
I
would
note
that
this
isn't
a
change
in
how
we're
enforcing
this
policy
is
simply
a
change
in
in
the
administrative
end
of
it,
so
that
there's
less
confusion.
D
That's
correct
council
president
clega,
the
police
bike
unit
is,
I
think,
uniquely
positioned
with
their
connections
with
outreach
groups
and
programs
to
provide
maximum
contact
for
that
and
that's
one
of
the
real
advantages
of
sending
it
back
to
police.
B
Thank
you
any
other
comments.
What
the
clerk
please
call
the
roll.
B
Thank
you
next
item
on
our
agenda
is
internal
audit
fy22
work
plan,
steve
rand,
welcome,
steve.
H
I
appreciate
the
opportunity
to
come
for
you
today
and
present
a
proposed
work
plan
for
fiscal
year.
2022.
H
H
We
have
eight
standalone
projects
in
addition
to
those
recurring
tasks
that
will
consume
the
other
2600
hours
of
staff.
Time
available,
two
of
those
are
cross-functional,
as
they
appear
on
the
list.
There,
construction
management
and
an
ongoing
review
of
covet
programs
that
the
city
will
either
administer
or
will
pass
down
to
sub-recipients
for
administration
and
then
six
stand-alone
divisions,
ranging
from
the
security
group
at
airport
to
utility
maintenance
planning
and
development
building
division
it'll
be
a
it'll,
be
a
fairly
varied
group
of
projects
that
we'll
pursue.
H
But
that
is
the
proposed
plan
as
it
stands
today,
I
would
be
happy
to
address
any
questions
or
comments
that
mayor
and
council
might
have.
I
Madame
mayor,
thank
you.
Thank
you
I'll
just
make.
A
quick
note
is
all
that
myself
and
council
leadership,
which
make
up
the
audit
committee
also
delved
into
these
quite
deeply
with
steve
and
phil.
I
feel
quite
comfortable
with
the
word
plan
ahead,
thanks
steve.
Thank
you.
B
Any
other
questions
remember
that
this
is
the
one
department
that
is
under
our
purview
and
even
as
we
approve
this
work
plan
today
for
those
council
members
who
are
not
on
the
audit
committee,
it's
always
your
ability
to
bring
to
leadership
and
audit
committee
members
any
suggested.
Consulting
for
for
our
audit
for
our
internal
auditor.
C
And
mayor
yes,
thank
you
steve.
I
also
want
to
thank
you
so
much
for
entertaining
the
question
that
I
posed
to
you
during
our
last
meeting
about
how
we
can
incorporate
the
strategic
approach
to
dei
diversity,
equity
inclusion
and
the
work
of
of
you
as
an
auditor
in
your
department,
and
I
look
forward
to
finding
out
what
you
think
about
that,
because
we
do
want
that
work
throughout
our
organization
and
I
think,
when
it
comes
to
organization
to
departments
like
audit,
it
might
be
difficult
for
people
to
imagine
how
that
would
work.
H
A
H
B
B
All
right
item
three
on
our
agenda
is
animal
fees.
You'll.
All
remember
that
during
our
budget
workshop,
we
passed
a
motion
directing
dfa
to
explore
ways
to
change
our
animal
fees.
That
would
incent
higher
licensing,
and
I
think
councilmember
thompson
has
some
words
for
us
based
on
the
memos
we
got
and
then
we'll
have
some
discussion.
I
I
So
this
is
the
final
two
animal
related
proposals
specifically
for
dogs
that
I'll
be
bringing
forward
in
my
tenure
on
your
council
and
this
one
in
particular,
though,
the
the
licensing
one
is
a
complete
team
effort
between
council
member
beijing
council
president
clegg
and
myself
and
as
you
recall,
we
talked
about
a
strategy
to
try
to
incentivize,
increasing
dog
licensing
and
there's
a
there's,
a
good
reason
for
that.
Well,
dog
licensing
certainly
helps
offset
some
of
the
costs
associated
with
animal
enforcement
in
our
city.
I
By
far
and
away
the
most
important
reason
to
license
your
your
furry
fell.
Pal
is
to
ensure
that
you
can
get
him
back
home
or
her
in
the
case
that
they
are
lost,
and
with
that
tag
it
certainly
ensures
much
more
success.
I
So
we
do
want
to
incentivize
people
to
license
their
their
pe
their
dog
and
encourage
that
to
happen
so
wanted
to
take
a
strategy,
and
thanks
to
two
colleagues
on
my
left
and
right,
we
developed
this
plan
and
then
thanks
to
department
of
finance,
administration,
city
clerk
and
lots
of
heavy
lifting
as
well
by
councilmember
clegg.
I
They
came
up
with
some
an
analysis
and
answered
those
questions
that
we
proposed
to
them
as
a
council
a
month
or
so
ago
about
costs
total
potential
projected
revenue,
increases
staff
time
those
types
of
things,
and
they
came
back
with
two
analysis
that
were
I'm
hoping
that
council
will
come
to
a
conclusion
and
decide
which
one
they
would
like
to
pursue
and
what
each
one
does
is
for
the
amount
for
the
most
part
the
same.
I
It
gives
a
no
fee
for
the
six
months
of
all
new
licensees
or
nice
new
licenses
or
individuals
that
have
lapsed
in
the
past
for
the
first
six
months
of
this
program.
After
that,
our
our
program
would
cut
in
once
one
scenario
from
twenty
dollars
to
ten
dollars
or
twenty
dollars
to
fifteen
dollars.
I
Depending
on
the
scenario
you
choose
for
those
that
are
spayed
or
neutered
animals
and
it
would
drop
it
from
the
mid
50s
range
for
non-spayed
neutered
animals
to
either
30
or
35,
depending
on
the
scenario
and
then
also
anyone
that
renews
that's
currently
in
our
system
renews
would
begin
receiving
a
25
discount
which
in
effect
gets
them
to
that
same
rate.
It
also
assumes
in
each
strategy
a
30
compliance
rate,
so
which
would
be
a
very
great
compliance
right
if
we
were
to
achieve
it.
I
It
has
happened
in
some
cities,
some
different
parts
of
the
country
calgary,
and
I
think
we
can
do
it
too.
So
that's
the
strategy.
Here
it
comes
down
to
the
two
scenarios.
One
you'll
see
is
certainly
a
bit
more
pricey
and
doesn't
appear
to
result
in
revenues
going
forward.
While
the
second
scenario
which
the
difference
between
the
two
is
one
drops,
the
price
of
the
licensees
from
10,
either
10
or
the
other
one
is
15..
I
So
when
we
don't
drop
it
quite
as
much,
we
drop
the
license
rates
to
15
for
spade
neutered
and
35
for
non
altered.
Then
it
does
begin
showing
a
revenue.
I
know
this
is
hypothetical,
but
they
did
a
good
analysis.
I
believe
in
the
second
scenario,
I
want
to
hand
it
over
to
councilmember
craig
to
see
if
you
have
anything
to
add
to
that.
B
Sure,
thank
you
so
councilmember
thompson
and
I
met
with
dfa
and
met
with
each
other
to
go
over
these
and
make
sure
that
we
were
getting
the
information
that
got
us
to
the
goal
that
that
we
had
set
forth.
I
think,
with
a
little
bit
of
adjustment
from
what
our
first
proposal
was.
These
two
scenarios
do
get
us
to
that
goal.
As
councilmember
thompson
mentioned,
one
is
a
bit
more
expensive
and
I
can't
at
this
point
be
confident
that
it
will
bring
us
more
licensees.
B
And
so,
while
you
know
this
is
up
for
discussion,
I
guess,
if
I
was
going
to
make
the
recommendation,
it
would
seem
like
we'd
go
with
the
one.
That's
a
little
less
expensive,
monitor
the
results,
see
if
they
get
us
to
the
goal
that
we
have
of
of
getting
30
of
the
animals
registered
right
now
we're
at
18.
B
We
can't
find
a
city
anywhere,
that's
more
than
the
30
goal
that
we
set.
So
it's
actually
a
pretty
aggressive
goal.
Come
to
think
of
it.
You
know,
as
you
analyze
it,
but
we
think
that
it's
possible
with
the
outreach
that's
been
proposed.
B
E
You
know
we
all
got
the
information
ahead
of
time
and
we've
seen
the
the
different
scenarios
in
the
breakouts
and
they're
a
little
complicated,
but
I
think
the
main
takeaway
is
that
scenario:
two
is
a
one-time
upfront
cost
and
then
at
least
in
theory,
revenue
positive.
So
it
continues
to
generate
revenue
to
pay
for
our
programs.
E
And
that's
pretty
palatable
to
me.
The
other
thing
that
I
would,
I
guess
just
note
is
that
you
know
I've
always
been
a
little
unsure
about
dog
licensing
in
boise,
because
I
understand
the
purpose,
which
is
to
reunite
people
with
their
pets
and
to
allow
our
the
code
enforcement
people
in
the
humane
society
partners
with
us
to
identify
whose
animals
are
whose
but
it's
sort
of
one
of
these
situations
where
technology
has
overtaken
that
old
way
of
doing
it.
People
now
microchip
their
dogs,
every
veterinarian's
office,
every
petco
has
a
scanner.
I
Thank
you,
council,
member
and
madam
mayor,
if
I
may
add
so,
if
we
do
move
forward
with
that
that
scenario,
there
are
two
other
items.
I
would
ask
you
just
to
consider
whether
you
do
them
in
the
the
future,
whether
I'm
here
or
not,
or
that
we
asked
to
incorporate
them
at
this
time
are
other
ways
that
we
could
incentivize
licensing
and,
in
effect,
help
the
animal
reunite
to
the
owner
and
that's
a
microchip
discount
many
cities.
I
listed
several
examples:
washington,
caldwell,
actually
and
a
place
in
oregon
have
provided
discounts.
I
I
Know
two
bucks,
that's
what
caldwell
gives
and
it
would
just
be
a
box
that
they
check
if
they
have
their
dog
microchipped
again.
It
could
be
based
on
the
honor
system.
The
other
one-
and
I
know
councilmember
sanchez
has
asked
about
this
last
time-
is
the
low
income
discount?
I
And
they
give
a
50
discount
to
households
where
they
reach
a
certain
level
of
income.
Could
you
know
it
could
be
covering
hud,
low
income
level
and
and
below
which
is
80,
so
80
percent
of
median
income
would
qualify
something
along
those
lines,
but
it
probably
would
require
more
insight.
Discussion
from
you,
but
those
are
two
other
options
I
just
want
to
put
out
there
and
if
interested,
they
are
not
incorporated
into
that
scenario
too,
so
they
would
be
new
ideas.
I
G
B
And
I
I
might
add,
there's
also
work
being
done
to
look
at
the
way
that
we
enforce
both
the
licensing
and
also
various
citations
around
animals
and
well,
it
will
likely
be
after
councilmember.
Thompson
is,
has
left
the
council.
B
I
look
forward
to
working
on
potentially
changing
some
of
the
way
that
we
do
that
enforcement
to
make
it
more
aligned
with
the
goal
of
incentivizing
licensing
rather
than
being
a
punitive
major
one
of
the.
For
instance,
one
of
the
things
that
the
clerk's
office
is
looking
into
is
making
sure
that
the
handheld
device
that
our
animal
officers
have
has
the
capacity
to
license
a
dog
on
the
spot.
And
so,
if
you
pick
up
a
dog
rather
than
issue
a
citation,
you
could
issue
a
license.
B
Shall
we
shall
we
take
a
a
motion
and
a
vote
on
the
scenarios
first
and
then
get
into
the
rest
of
it.
I
Yes,
absolutely,
madam
mayor
I'd
move
that
we
move
ahead
with
scenario
two
and
see
happy.
F
J
J
I
think
that
councilmember
thompson
has
very
just
a
lot
of
heart
for
animals
and
really
wants
to
see
this
work
for
the
pets
and
the
owners
in
our
city,
and
I
know
that
it's
been
a
real
heavy
lift
and
a
huge
passion
project.
So
well
done,
and
thank
you
for
bringing
this
to
us.
C
Madam
mayor,
yes,
thank
you.
Yes
thank
you
councilmember
thompson
for
working
on
this.
I
think,
if
there's
anything,
we've
learned
over
the
past
18
months
is
the
powerful
role
that
our
animals
play
in
our
lives.
I
think
didn't
we
run
out
of
animals
for
people
to
adopt
at
some
point.
So
thank
you
so
much
for
highlighting
this,
the
very
important
role
that
they
play
in
our
quality
of
life.
C
I
I
got
my
cat
murray
about
13
years
ago,
something
like
that
at
the
humane
society
and
he
was
chipped
and
I
think
the
the
eaton's
good
at
my
house.
So
I
haven't
lost
him.
He
hasn't
wandered
off
too
far,
but
I've
often
wondered
about
the
how
long
those
chips
last
like
at
what
point
do
they
become
obsolete?
C
So
I
I
like
that
there
might
be
an
added
assurance
that
we
would
be
able
to
locate
our
pets
and
have
them
return
to
us
if,
for
some
reason
that
chip
became
obsolete
and
didn't
work,
I
don't
know
how
likely
that
is.
But
you
know
we
used
to
buy
cds,
and
now
we
don't
so.
Thank
you
for
your
work
on
this.
B
One
last
note:
I
I
had
this
in
my
notes
and
I
didn't
mention
it.
The
other
thing
that
the
clerk's
office
is
going
to
look
into
is
other
ways
to
make
licensing
a
benefit,
and
one
of
those
potentially
could
be
looking
to
allow
our
animal
control
officers
to
actually
return
a
dog
at
least
make
one
attempt
to
return
a
dog
if
they
have
a
license
versus
taking
them
to
the
shelter.
B
So,
as
we've
said
more
to
come
on
this,
but
I
I
think
we're
moving
in
the
right
direction.
E
Madam
mayor,
yes,
since
our
parks
director
is
sitting
here,
another
option
along
those
lines
that
we
can
think
about
is
early
morning
or
late
evening
off
leash
in
certain
parks,
particularly
having
waterfowl
issues
for
licensed
animals.
Only
that
may
be
another
way
to
nudge
people
towards
licensure.
I
Mayor,
yes
again,
I
I
want
to
thank
council
member
agent
and
yourself.
This
was
a
three
person,
100
percent
three-person
effort.
Thank
you
for
your
help,
outstanding
ideas,
patrick
and
anyways,
and
I'm
I
love
the
passion
you
show
them
for
it.
I
feel
very
happy
to
pass
this
baton,
as
I
believe,
city
health.
I
I
do
want
to
say
you
know
these
other
two
ideas
that
I
noted
the
50
and
that
I
know
the
microchip
is
quite
he's
much
easier
to
implement
if
we
were
to
have
interest
I'll,
just
leave
it
at
that,
but
I
won't
make
a
motion
on
those
two,
because
you
know
I
support
them.
I
would
want
to
know
that
there's
additional
support,
but
if
not
we
I
can
leave
those
two
with
council
in
your
lap
as
potential
future
ideas.
A
K
Yeah,
you
certainly
have
my
support
and
and
certainly
willing
to
continue
to
bring
these
types
of
animal
issues
to
the
table
and
to
have
your
ear.
If
you
ever
want
to,
you
know,
lend
it
this
direction.
I
do
appreciate
madame
era
council
president
klig's
suggestion
of
really
looking
at
that
carrot.
Instead
of
a
stick,
we
did
something
similar
several
years
ago
when
it
came
to
issuing
tickets
to
people
who
didn't
have
rear
lights
on
their
bicycles
and
the
police
officers
carried
around
around
lights
and
gave
them
to
people.
K
Since
so
many
people
don't
actually
know
what
the
rules
are.
So
there
was
that
wonderful
education
component,
and
I
think
that
there's
a
lot
of
opportunity
there
to
really
use
that
education
and
opportunity
and
technology.
You
know
to
kind
of
get
people
on
board,
but
certainly
happy
to
keep
pushing
and
keep
carrying
on.
B
Thank
you.
I
guess
I
would
make
one
comment
on
both
the
microchip
and
the
low
income
discount.
I
think,
they're
both
great
ideas.
I've
heard
from
the
clerk's
office
that
implementing
the
change
that
they
are
going
to
implement
is
going
to
be
a
relatively
heavy
lift.
You
know
they'll
have
to
make
changes
in
process,
and
I
guess
I
would
suggest
that
it
might
make
the
most
sense
to
let
that
play
out
see
how
it
rolls
out.
B
I
suspect,
we'll
be
making
some
changes
at
the
end
of
it
anyway
and
by
then
we
could
have
more
information,
especially
on
the
low
income
discount.
The
other
other
thing
I've
begun
to
think,
and
I
think
council
member
of
agent
can
speak
to
this
as
well,
is
that
we
have
a
variety
of
ways
that
we
treat
various
of
our
residents
who
fall
below
the
the
poverty
level
in
the
city
and
over
the
next
year.
B
So
I
guess
from
from
my
vantage
point,
I
think
the
action
we
just
took
is
is
a
great
start.
I
think
the
education
that's
going
to
come
along
with
this
action
and
at
the
end
of
the
year.
Maybe
the
one
thing
I
would
offer
is
that
we
direct
staff,
as
we
do
on
many
new
things,
to
come
back
to
us
in
a
year
with
a
review
and
a
report,
and
at
that
point
we
can
look
for
further
action.
I
E
Madam
mayor,
I
I
also
concur.
I
would
just
add,
as
we're
giving
direction
that
you
know.
I
don't
know
our
system
and
I
don't
know
what
work
is
needed
on
the
back
end.
But
it's
difficult
to
imagine
that
the
microchip
discount
in
particular,
is
that
burdensome,
and
maybe
there
are
things
that
I
don't
understand.
But
if
it's
an
honor
checkbox
that
reduces
your
fee,
it
really
is
worth
pushing
and
exploring
that
because
the
fundamental
purpose
of
licensure
is
to
identify
people's
pets.
E
People
who
have
undertaken
to
microchip
their
pets
have
already
done
that
work,
we're
essentially
requiring
them
to
duplicate
work
and
duplicate
expense
in
ways
that,
for
the
ultimate
purpose,
reuniting
with
your
pet
are
not
necessary,
and
so
just
from
my
perspective,
there's
a
little
bit
of
maybe
extra
onus
on
us
to
get
that
ironed
out,
because
it
really
isn't
fair
to
be
requiring
people
to
do
again.
What
they've
already
done.
One
time.
C
C
C
I
remember
during
the
last
recession
I
was
pleased
to
find
out
that
the
humane
society
had
a
food
pantry
for
animals,
and
I
made
sure
to
make
to
make
sure
that
my
cat
had
food.
I
had
no
problem
seeking
that
assistance
up
for
murray.
I
would
never
do
that
for
myself.
C
I
would
never
go
to
the
food
bank
and
ask
for
a
box
of
food,
so
I
just
want
us
to
be
aware
of
the
of
just
how
important
animals
are
to
people
and,
if
there's
a
way
for
us
to
assist
them
to
make
sure
that
they
provide
a
good
quality
of
life
for
their
animal,
that
that
we
create
that
avenue
and
it,
and
it
may
be
that
we
we
subsidize
that
I
mean
we
just
want
to
make
sure
that
people
have
those
resources
available
to
them,
and
it's
been
my
own
experience
that
we
put
our
animals
first.
I
Thank
you,
madam
mayor
I'll,
move
on
to
my
next
proposal
and
I'll
be
quick
about
it.
As
I
know
how
much
time
we're
allotted
it
looks
like
you
have
something
you
might
want
to
say
doug.
If,
if
you,
okay,
you're
okay,
you
might
have
something
to
say
on
this
one.
So
we'll
see
this
one,
I'm
very
excited
about
so
I've
I've
been
in
in
contact
with
citizens
in
our
city
that
have
brought
this
to
my
attention
in
in
having
these
hot
asphalt
warning
signs
placed
within
the
city,
primarily
within
parks.
I
To
it's
it's
been
done.
I
put
several
examples
in
the
memo
with
a
q-pop
and
showing
how
hot
the
asphalt
actually
is,
depending
on
the
air
temperature
just
to
serve
as
a
educational
campaign
when
someone's
out
with
their
their
pet.
F
I
That
they
realize
just
how
quick
the
paws
can
be
burnt
and
sometimes
severely
in
a
short
amount
of
time,
and
this
these
would
be
in
strategic
places
and
a
phase
strategy,
and
I
want
to
thank
doug
and
his
staff
for
helping
put
that
strategy
in
place.
Well,
I
mean
hypothetically
in
this
memo
and
I
think
it's
a
good
one.
It
hits
they
did
a
great
job
of
looking
at
where
the
asphalt
is
and
where
these
could
be
placed
and
how
many
they
did
an
estimate
on
the
costs
and
then.
I
I
This
would
be
a
one-time
expense
and
I
propose
it
would
be
in
the
range
of
ten
to
fifteen
thousand
dollars
is
all
one
time
with
these
permanent
signs,
which
would
be
designed
by
our
ce
team
where
the
mayor
ce
team,
they
do
an
outstanding
job,
and
hopefully
it
would
look
somewhat
like
one
of
the
ones
I
gave
in
the
example
which,
which
I
think
really
catched
the
eye.
So
that's
the
proposal
I
wanted
to
see
if
their
support
to
move
forward
and
it
would
come
out
of
the
council
strategic
initiative.
E
Yes,
I
do
support
these
signs.
I
think
we
should
do
it
and
here's
why
we,
we
revise
the
animal
code
to
make
it
a
violation
of
city
ordinances,
to
do
things
that
are
reasonably
harmful
to
your
pet
in
public,
and
it
would
be
a
bummer
to
cite
or
otherwise,
criminalize
people's
behavior
without
giving
them
a
reasonable
opportunity
to
know
what's
against
the
law-
and
I
think
the
asphalt
awareness
with
canines
in
particular
is
less
well
understood
than
it
should
be.
This
is
a
relatively
modest
expense.
E
We
have
it
in
the
strategic
initiatives
budget
and-
and
I
support
doing
it
now-.
B
L
Matami
I'll
turn
this
over
to
you
thanks.
I
was
still
letting
you
be
in
charge.
Is
this?
Why
don't
you
finish
this
one
out.
L
E
I
moved
to
do
everything
I
just
suggested,
which
is
approved
council
member
thompson's
request
for
10
to
15
000,
one-time
expenditure
for
hot
asphalt,
awareness
signs
and
locations
that
he
outlined
in
his
memo.
I
Madam
mayor
could
add
one
potential
amendment
that
it
would
be
for
the
15
000,
which
we
may
not
use
all
of
and
that
I'd
ask
just
the
doug
parks
department
if
they
could
look
at
those
additional
ideas
for
possibly
around
six
more
signs
to
be
covered
as
well,
and
with
that.
I
second
that
motion.
If
you
accept
that.
K
E
G
A
L
All
right
well,
next
up,
we
have
doug,
welcome
doug
and
when
you
were
standing
up
there,
I
thought
you'd
already
started
this
so
to
talk
about
the
undeveloped
park
sites,
and
I
just
want
council
to
know
and
the
public
to
know
too,
that
I
asked
doug
holloway
with
and
his
parks
and
rec
team
to
come
present
information
on
our
undeveloped
park
sites,
the
city
and
our
residents
deserve
to
know
what
the
status
of
these
park
parcels
is
and
what
plans
are
funding
if
any
of
the
city
has
to
develop
them.
L
You
know,
in
the
last
couple
of
months
it's
become
clear
that
handshake
deals
potentially
from
the
past
have
made
the
status
of
these
parcels
unclear
and
in
some
ways
in
some
cases
complicated.
So
this
is
our
first
step
of
investigating
the
status
trying
as
a
council
and
with
me
to
understand
where
we're
at.
L
If
there
are
things
and
discussions
that
were
held,
that
we
don't
know
about
that,
we
need
to
find
the
status
of
impact
fees
and
everything
else
so
that
it's
clearly
laid
out
there
for
all
of
us,
and
then
I've
also
asked
staff
to
analyze
parks
and
open
space
to
ensure
that
permanent
protections
are
in
place
for
future
generations
and
with
that
doug's.
Here
to
start
the
conversation.
M
Great,
thank
you,
madam
mayor
council,
members.
The
only
thing
that
people
love
more
than
their
parks
or
their
dogs,
so
I
will
go
ahead
and
put
that
out
there
councilmember
thompson,
if
you
don't
believe
that
go
to
dog
island
at
any
time
during
the
day
at
anne
morrison
park
and
you'll,
see
30
40
50
people
frolicking
with
their
dogs
in
that
in
that
location.
So
it's
a
good
marriage
between
parks
and
and
and
dogs.
M
So,
thank
you,
madam
mayor,
for
teeing,
that
up
yes,
the
mayor
has
asked
that
we
come
back
with
periodic
updates
on
the
various
undeveloped
sites
that
we
have
in
our
inventory
and
what
the
status
is
current
status
is
of
when
those
sites
would
be
developed.
So
today
the
focus
of
our
presentation
is
to
look
at
each
of
those
park
sites
where
they're
located.
M
Essentially,
how
long
we've
had
the
sites
how
large
they
are?
What
the
timeline
is
in
potentially
developing
or
proposed
timeline
and
developing
those
sites
and
or
going
through
the
phased
green
up
and
adding
amenities?
M
And
this
is
something
that
we
signed
on
to
with
the
national
recreation
and
park
association,
along
with,
as
you
see,
a
number
of
other
communities
across
the
country
to
try
to
create
a
park
within
a
10-minute
walk
of
every
household
within
the
city
limits
of
the
city
of
boise,
and
we
currently
are
at
about
63
of
our
households
right
now
in
the
entire
city
limits
only
that
are
within
that
10-minute
walk,
which
at
first
glance
seems
like
a
pretty
good
number.
We
want
to
be
at
100,
though,
and
I
think
that's.
M
Why
updates
like
we're?
Providing
today
continue
to
stay
out
in
front
of
council
as
we
look
at
how
we
will
fund
getting
some
of
these
park
sites
that
haven't
been
developed,
getting
getting
them
developed,
and
I
will
show
you
how
we
used
the
science
and
it
is
a
complicated
formula
that
that
we
utilize
in
our
gis
system
to
determine
how
that
10-minute,
walk
or
how
each
park
that's
developed,
affects
that
10-minute
walk
and
it
really
is
based
on
a
number
of
factors,
certainly
the
location
of
the
park,
the
neighborhoods
surrounding
the
park.
M
But
more
importantly,
it
is
the
access
points
into
the
park.
And
so,
when
you
see
a
park
that
has
just
one
access
point
to
it,
it's
going
to
serve
fewer
residents
than
if
we
have
multiple
access
points
to
the
park,
and
so
the
the
10-minute
walk
formula
and
how
that's
calculated
is
fairly
complicated
in
looking
at
not
only
the
site,
the
size,
the
neighborhood
around
the
park,
but
also
really
looks
at
how
many
points
of
contact
that
you
can
actually
get
into
the
park.
M
For
the
purposes
of
this
presentation.
Madam
mayor
council,
members,
most
of
the
sites
we'll
show
you
today
are
we're
proposing
greenup
phases
in
the
timeline
for
the
greenup
phases
and
to
just
refresh
everyone's
memory.
A
green
up
phase
is
where
we,
the
first
phase
of
a
park
that
we
have
in
our
asset,
that
we
will
provide
the
turf,
the
landscape,
all
the
parking
any
pathways
or
sidewalks
that
are
included
in
the
master
plan
and
then
restroom
facilities.
M
And
so
that's
our
current
standard
of
greening
up
a
park
and
then,
as
funding,
continues
to
become
available
down
the
road,
whether
that
be
impact
for
your
general
fund,
then
the
amenities
are
added
back
in
and
those
amenities,
as
you're
aware,
would
be
things
like
playgrounds
and
shelters,
sports
fields,
splash
pads
and
things
like
that.
M
So
for
most
of
what
we'll
talk
about
today,
we'll
be
really
centered
on
that
green
up
phase,
piece
that
that
we'll
be
proposing
to
counsel-
and
I
want
to
point
out
as
well
that,
even
though
we
have
dates
on
some
of
these
projects
that
are
out
a
little
ways,
this
we
we
are
sticking
to
our
capital
improvement
plan,
which
bases
our
development
of
parks,
space
on
impact
fees
and
impact
fees
collected.
M
So
the
the
proposal
you
see
today
are
us
assuming
that
we'll
get
the
impact
fees
when
they
come
in
and
we
have
adequate
amount
of
impact
fees,
then
we
would
propose
when
the
park
would
be
to
be
greened
up
and
then
amenities
would
follow
that
council
at
your.
You
know
it's
within
obviously
your
purview
to
add
general
fund
dollars
to
change
those
schedules
to
change
those
priorities.
M
M
To
that
timeline,
and
do
you
want
to
augment
that
with
maybe
general
fund
dollars,
so
the
first
site
up
is
in
southwest
boise
and
we
call
this
our
saringa
park
site
because
it's
in
the
syringa
project
development
it
also
has
been
referred
to
as
the
coughlin
site.
This
was
a
a
complex
purchase
trade
arrangement
that
happened
back
in
in
2006,
and
it
also
included.
M
So
it's
about
10
acres.
It's
been
a
moving
target
for
us
in
this
development
development,
in
that
the
development
itself
has
continued
to
change
hands
with
developers,
but
also
some
of
the
adjustments
that
continue
to
happen
to
the
project
have
made
it
tough
to
actually
pin
down
where
the
park
is
going
to
end
up
being
located,
there's
also
an
elementary
school
that
will
be
developed
within
this
housing
project
as
well.
M
So
we
have
had
pretty
good
luck
with
our
collister,
our
shadow
hills
locations
where
we
have
parks
sites
that
are
contiguous
to
school
districts,
and
so
we've
kind
of
piggybacked
on
the
on
where
the
school
is
going
to
end
up.
Do
we
want
to
look
at
something
that's
more
closely
related
to
that
to
that
site?
The
the
information
on
this
is
really
it's
very
interesting
in
our
files.
M
We
don't
have
a
lot
of
information
on
this,
and-
and
I
appreciate
the
mayor
mentioning
that
there's
more
research
that
needs
to
be
done
on
some
of
these
sites,
and
in
this
one
in
particular,
our
legal
team
is
doing
some
extensive
title
research
to
get
more
details
on
it.
But
at
this
point
we
have
very
little
on
the
transaction
we
do.
M
There
is
a
2016,
updated
project
on
our
website
city
website
in
in
planning
and
development
services
that
does
call
out
the
city
park
to
be
named
kirsten
coughlin
park,
and
so
we're
we're
working
on
what
that
what
that's
supposed
to
entail,
but
unfortunately,
in
the
file
we
have
for
this
particular
park.
We
don't
have
that
information
available
to
us
doesn't
mean
that
it
wasn't
in
any
of
the
in
documents
that
possibly
could
be
uncovered
through
the
through
the
title
search.
M
But
at
this
point
that's
the
only
kirsten
coughlin
park
is
the
only
notation
that
I
found
and
it's
in
a
document
that's
actually
on
the
city
website.
So
we
will
develop
this
park.
The
timeline
is
really
based
upon
what
happens
with
the
project,
so
we'll
follow
it
closely
and
obviously
we'll
bring
that
back
to
council,
as
that
continues
to
move
forward
and
as
far
as
what
the
park
will
look
like,
there
hasn't
been
a
master
plan
done.
M
So
we
need
to
do
that
and
right
now
we're
anticipating
that
in
2028
there
would
be
funding
available
through
impact
fees
to
be
able
to
green
that
site
up,
but
again
based
upon
how
the
project
itself
moves
forward.
The
10-minute
walk.
It
is
impact
fee
eligible,
so
the
green
up
would
be
about
2
million
and
would
be
paid
with
impact
fees,
a
10-minute
walk
analysis
based
on
the
project
development.
Now
it
would
add
another
122
households
to
our
vision
in
getting
every
household
in
the
city
within
that
10-minute
walk.
M
Yes,
madame
council,
president
clay
correct
and
it's
moved
around
actually
depending
on
the
developer
we
have
worked
with,
and
I
think
the
original
agreement
that
I
inherited
is
that
we
would
have
some
fluidity
with
this
and
flexibility
on
where
it
ends
up.
I
believe
the
school
district
council
president
has
determined
where
they
want
their
school
site
to
be.
I
don't
know
if
that's
changed
in
the
last
year,
but
I
believe
it
is
at
a
corner.
I
don't
know
if
it's
at
the
at
this
particular
site,
so
we're
following
that.
Yes,
all.
C
M
Yeah
so
madam
mayor
council,
president
or
excuse
me,
council
protest
sanchez,
it's
so
so.
Growth
is
to
pay
for
itself
when
it
comes
to
parks,
fire
stations,
fire
and
police
and
on
park
sites
developers
pay
into
a
fund.
That
is
that
we
can
utilize
to
build
parks
to
keep
up
with
the
growth
that
the
development
that
they
are
building
has
impact
on
our
community.
Theoretically,
we
have
not
always
collected
100
of
the
impact
fees.
M
In
fact,
we
have
just
started
collecting
100
within
the
last
few
years,
but
theoretically
you're
to
collect
the
full
amount
of
impact
feed
that
would
pay
for
the
entire
growth.
So
again,
theoretically,
we
would
be
able
to
build
parks
out
of
in
planning
areas,
and
this
is
the
southwest
planning
area
from
impact
fees
that
developers
have
paid
for
the
potential
impact
of
growth,
so
it
should
pay
a
hundred
percent
and
our
cip
is
predicated
on
it
pain,
100
percent.
M
M
We
build
up
the
account
and
then
we
put
it
in
the
cip
based
upon
when
the
money
would
be
available,
that
we
would
be
able
to
pay
for
it,
but
also
we
have
to
look
at
other
priorities
in
that
account
and
also
look
at
work
plans
for
our
own
team
and
what's
coming
up
in
that
2028
time
range,
in
order
to
be
sure
that
if
we
put
it
in
there
that
we're
able
to
get
it
done.
Okay.
C
M
Madam
president,
excuse
me,
madam
mayor
council,
pro
tem.
No,
those
are
separate,
collected
impact
fee
buckets,
so
fire
gets
hits
amount,
police
gets
its
amount
and
then
parks
gets
our
amount.
So
it's
exclusively
for
park
development.
Only.
C
M
Yeah,
madam
mayor
councilmember
sanchez,
yes,
okay,
more
than
likely
the
funding
wouldn't
be
available
to
do
that.
We've
only
done
that
on
a
couple
of
park
sites.
The
bowler
site,
which
we
just
cut
the
ribbon
on
here
six
seven
weeks
ago,
was
a
full
development
with
green
up
and
amenities.
At
the
same
time,
great
thank
you.
Doug.
E
When
we
do
the
10-minute
walk
estimate
is
that
the
analysis
is
that
based
on
existing
homes
or
projected
like
this
site
in
particular,
is
going
to
look
really
different
in
2028
because
there's
location
and
that
the
gridiro
development,
that's
migration,
family
development,
the
muriel
project,
all
the
stuff
that's
going
on
is
gonna
really
change
those
numbers.
Do
we
do
we
build
that
in,
or
is
this
just
based
on?
What's
there
now.
M
Yeah,
this
is
because
there
is
excuse
me,
madam
mayor
council,
member
of
agent.
This
is
based
on
what
we
think
that
area
will
look
like
at
that
time,
based
upon
the
latest
project
plans
that
we
have
seen.
So
it's
it's.
It's
looking
in
the
crystal
ball
this
this
number,
my
guess,
is.
This
number
is
going
to
go
up
from
122
households
based
upon
how
this
project
progresses.
E
M
Yeah,
madam
mayor
council,
member
of
agent,
actually
we
do
have
actual
data
on
on
some
of
these
as
I
go
through
these,
and
I
can
show
that
demonstrate
that
to
you
and
actually
we're
looking
at
the
houses
that
are
already
there
and
here's
how
many
households
it
will
provide
by
building
that
site
out.
So
we'll
get
we'll
get
to
that.
Thank.
E
M
So
our
next
one
is
our
pierce
park
site.
This
is
at
the
very
top
part
of
pierce
park
lane
we
purchased
this
in
2015
from
a
local
architect,
it's
about
2.1
acres
and
it's
just
below
the
29
acres
that
we
just
purchased
at
foothills
property
from
the
per
from
the
pursley
family.
That
council
approved
that
a
purchase,
sale
agreement
I
believe
a
week
ago.
So
it's
in
a
great
spot,
as
you
can
see,
it
would
add.
M
90
households
in
the
10-minute
walk
at
that
location
and
that's
primarily
the
households
that
are,
I
guess,
would
be
to
the
to
the
west
of
the
site.
The
green
up
is
estimated
at
four
hundred
thousand
dollars
and
we
believe
we
could
get
this
greened
up
in
2024.
M
We
have
been
working
closely
with
the
with
the
land,
with
the
donor
on
some
possible,
not
only
donations
from
the
family,
but
some
fundraising
opportunities
to
help
get
the
green
up
phase
done
a
little
sooner
than
2030,
but
right
now
the
impact
fees
it
is
impactfully
eligible.
We
would
have
an
adequate
amount
in
2030
to
be
able
to
cover
the
3.2
million
dollars
that
would
that
it
would
cost
to
do
this.
It's
about
16
acres
and
if
you're
not
familiar
with
this
site,
is
actually
a
pretty
cool
site.
M
It's
right
on
the
greenbelt
and
on
the
river,
and
it's
just
below
that's
highway,
21
that
you
see
there
at
the
top
of
it,
and
the
only
issue
with
this
is
there
are
no
sidewalks,
no
pathways,
there's
nothing
that
connects
anyone
to
this
site
at
this
time.
There
are
some
houses
being
developed
across
warm
springs,
but
there's
no
even
crosswalk
to
get
people
across
that
location
to
this
site.
M
So
we
will
do
this
analysis
once
we
get
the
the
master
plan
plan
completed,
adopted
and
and
have
a
plan
to
get
it
greened
up
that
we
will
do
the
the
analysis
to
see
by
adding
the
sidewalks
and
adding
more
connectivity
other
than
from
the
green
belt.
What
what
additional
households
this
would
cover.
M
Spalding
ranch
we
threw
this
in
because
it
still
has
some
undeveloped
pieces,
but
I
think
we've
been
updating
council,
we
were.
We
were
here
in
the
springtime
to
give
you
an
update,
I
think
after
we
planted
the
fruit
trees,
which
was
per
the
master
plant,
so
we're
implementing
those
pieces
of
the
plan.
M
We
are
planning
in
2023
to
get
what
we
refer
to
as
a
drive
aisle
through
the
property,
so
that
now
we
can
get
our
farmers
that
we
will.
We
will
be
initiating
contracts
with.
We
can
get
them
all
over
the
site
now
and
we're
in
the
process
this
year
of
completing
all
of
the
the
irrigation
systems.
So
we
have
access
to
water.
M
We
just
need
to
get
the
water
from
its
point
of
entry
out
to
all
the
different
parts
of
the
property
and
we're
working
on
that
actually
this
year
and
then
once
we
get
the
road
in
then
we'll
be
able
to
really
get
the
goal
is
to
get
plants
in
the
ground
by
2023.
We're
still
amending
the
soil
at
this
point
in
time
to
get
it
ready
to
plant,
but
a
lot
of
progress
is
happening
almost
on
a
daily
basis.
M
Out
there
we
have
about
a
million
dollars
in
impact
fees,
that's
been
allocated
and
there's
another
three
million
that
would
be
allocated
between
2023
and
2026
for
this
site,
and
so
it's
exciting
to
see
things
are
starting
to
happen,
but
I
will
tell
umada,
mayor
and
council
members
that
this
this
definitely
is
going
to
start
looking
like
a
farm
in
the
next
about
18
months
and
we're
real
excited
to
to
see
that
we've
got
a
number
of
partnerships
in
the
community
that
are
going
to
that
are
extremely
excited
to
have
an
opportunity
to
educate
and
grow
crops
at
this
site.
M
So
it's
really
going
to
it's.
It's
going
to
turn
out
the
way
you
all
envisioned
it
to
turn
out.
The
buildings
themselves
are
going
to
require
a
lot
of
work
and
a
lot
of
funding.
We
have
had
conversations
with
a
number
of
companies
in
town
that
appear
to
be
very
excited
about
partnering,
with
some
donation
opportunities
and
fundraising
opportunities.
So
there'll
be
more
on
that
to
come.
The
10-minute
walk
analysis,
we'd
already
done
that
on
this
site
and
it
does
add
529
households
to
this
locations.
It
is
very
dense.
M
There's
a
lot
of
houses
that
are
that
are
around
this
area
again
is
acquired
in
2016,
and
if
you
recall
it
was
a
trade
with
local
construct
that
traded
for
property
that
we
have
down
on
maine
and
fairview
for
this
property
here.
So
it's
been
in
an
inventory
since
then,
and
about
20
acres
and
we're
excited
to
see
things
starting
to
starting
to
occur
out.
There.
K
Doug,
just
before
you
get
too
far,
I
was
going
to
ask
you
on
the
suhal
park.
If
there,
if
we
had
an
estimate
of
when
we
were
going
to
start
or
finish
the
master
plan,
or
if
we
knew
that
yet.
M
We
madame
mayor
council,
member
halliburton,
we
have
not
done
the
master
plan
yet
on
this
site.
The
donor
did
hire
an
outside
firm
to
do
one
for
him
and
we
will
probably
take
pieces
of
that
to
to
look
at
and
it
really
was
creating
his
vision
of
what
he
wanted
to
see
in
the
park.
But
some
of
that
may
not
may
not
work
or
happen
as
quickly
as
he
would
like
or
may
have
some
maintenance
issues
moving
down
the
road.
So
I
think
he
aaron
just
had
this
broad
view.
M
He
wanted
to
see
this.
He
had
this
real
interesting
vision
and
he
went
out
and
hired
someone
and
said
here's
my
vision
and
bring
that
back.
So
there
wasn't
very
little
community
engagement
and
that's
really
what
our
forte
is
when
we
develop
a
master
plan,
so
that
still
needs
to
be
done
for
this
site.
M
So,
madam
mayor
council,
member
halliburton,
the
public
outreach
timeline
I
put
is
2028,
give
us
about
a
18
month
to
two
year
window
before
we
would
have
the
the
opportunity
for
the
green
up
in
2030.
So
we
want
to
give
that
kind
of
space.
When
we're
when
we
feel
like
we,
when
we
have
a
date,
we
could
do
the
green
up.
If,
for
some
reason
this
was
would
be
to
would
be
expedited,
then
we
would
just
kick
that
out,
maybe
another
year
ahead.
M
F
M
Alta
harris
park
site
this
is
in
the
harris,
ranch
development,
southeast
southeast
planting
and
barber
valley,
planting
area.
It's
at
south
eckert
road
right
along
the
boise
river.
M
This
has
been
in
more
or
less
a
even
though
we
didn't
have
possession
of
the
property.
It's
been
considered
an
asset
of
the
city,
since
the
original
agreement
was
done
in
2008
to
create
a
park
site
at
this
location.
That
would
be
a
ribbon
a
jewel
and
it
would
be
named
after
the
matriarch
of
the
harris
family,
family
alta.
M
The
site
was
officially
conveyed
to
the
city
in
2018
and
will
be
a
has
to
be
a
park
site
in
perpetuity
per
deed
restrictions
and
and
also
will
be
named
after
after
alta.
We
have
done
all
the
public
outreach
on
this
park
and
created
a
master
plan.
M
We
had
a
plan
to
do
the
green
up
in
2020,
but
the
cost
came
in
significantly
higher
than
the
impact
fees
which
this
is
impactfully
eligible
that
we
had
available,
and
so
it
was
put
off
and
now
our
timetable
is
looking
at
2025
for
and
it
would
be
a
full
build
out
and
that's
the
agreement.
We
have
with
the
harris,
is
it
wouldn't
be
a
green
up
and
then
an
amenities
down
the
road?
It
would
be
a
full
build
out
and
per
the
agreement.
M
The
build-out
needs
to
occur
by
2025.,
so
we
have
between
now
and
then
to
figure
out
our
funding
mechanism
with
our
impact
fees.
It
may
require-
and
I
put
the
note
there-
some
general
fund
resources
to
get
us
to
that
finish
line
by
2025,
but
this
is
something
we
hear
from
weekly
from
the
neighborhood
out
there
when
it's
going
to
occur
so
right
now
it
it
appears
it
would
not
happen
before
2025.
M
M
So
the
gary
lane
fire
and
park
parcel
in
northwest
boise
on
gary
lane.
This
was
acquired
in
2008.
Originally,
as
council
knows,
I
think
all
too
well
the
long
history
of
this
parcel.
It
was
originally
required
to
be
a
fire
station.
Then
our
our
fire
department
decided
to
move
that
station
over
to
our
magnolia
park
before
it
was
developed.
M
That
appeared
to
not
be
the
exact
location.
They
wanted
a
fire
station.
So
then
pierce
park
property
was
purchased
on
pierce
park
lane
for
a
fire
station,
and
then
it
was
determined
that
well,
maybe
gary
lane
is
a
good
site
for
the
fire
station,
so
it
came
back
to
being
a
fire
station
and
we
asked
you
asked:
could
we
still
make
this
like
a
combination,
location
where
it
would
be
the
fire
station,
but
it
would
also
have
public
park
components,
and
so
that's
how
it
sits.
M
We
don't
know
if
that's
here
or
at
another
location,
so
at
this
point
in
time,
we've
got
to
be
determined,
construction
and
timeline,
timeline
on
construction
and
public
outreach.
Due
to
the
uncertainty
of
what
exactly
is
going
to
happen
here,
but
I
believe,
council
has
said,
it'll
be
either
both
or
one
or
the
other,
and
so
we
just
need
to
see
when
that
actually
does
occur.
M
It
is
impactfully
eligible
the
greenup
on
this
site's
about
490
000,
and
we
threw
in
a
little
extra
money,
I
believe,
about
120
000,
so
to
not
only
do
the
green
up,
but
on
this
one
potentially
to
do
some
amenities
here
as
well
at
this
site,
the
10-minute
walk
analysis,
and
this
is
really
an
interesting
number.
So
look
at
the
size
of
this
park-
it's
1.4
acres,
but
to
tell
you,
but
but
to
really
get
a
grasp
of
the
density
here.
M
It
adds
almost
1100
households
to
our
10-minute
walk
analysis,
and
I
think
this
plays
right
into
council
president
clegg's
push
that
even
small
micro
parks
in
dense
areas
can
have
huge
impact
on
on
on
our
citizens,
and
this
is
a
perfect
example
of
adding
almost
1100
households
with
such
a
small
location
really
is
a
big
win
when
we're.
When
we
have
an
initiative
and
a
standard
of
that
10
minute
walk,
not.
C
M
So,
madam
mayor
council,
member
sanchez,
so
this
is
a
vacant
lot
that
we
have
on
gary
lane.
So
there's
nothing
else
that
would
be
happening.
It's
completely
built
out
with
homes
all
the
way
around
it
and
across
the
street
as
well,
and
the
kensington
apartments
are
just
kitty
corner
very
close
to
this
location
as
well.
So
it
really
is
us
developing
a
park
and
it
is
impactfully
eligible
and
we
do
have
impact
fees
available
in
this
account
that
could
speed
this
up.
M
J
J
M
Madam
mayor
council,
member
woodings,
we
are
not
currently
calculating
in
the
10-minute
walk.
I
believe
we've
gone
back
and
forth
on
whether
schools
and
whether
homeowners
association
parcels
should
be
included
in
that
because
it
is
open
space.
It
is
access
to
green
space.
M
The
standard
right
now
we're
looking
at.
I
believe
that
we've
settled
in
on
is
just
our
park
sites,
but
I
think
that
that
an
argument
can
be
made
even
though
there's
like
a
school
site,
wouldn't
be
available
to
you
at
10
o'clock
on
a
monday
during
the
school
year,
but
it
would
be
at
3
30.,
and
so
that's
the
only
rub.
J
Yeah,
madam
mayor,
the
argument
I
would
make
for
specifically
the
common
sites
and
developments
is
we
we
give
developers
additional
density
in
exchange
for
amenities
like
green
space,
like
tot
lots
and
that
type
of
thing,
and
so
my
argument
would
be
we've
given
something
in
exchange
for
public
good.
That
public
good
is
something
that's
accessible
to
those
residents
and
it
would
make
sense.
J
I
think,
in
that
case,
because
we've
given
something
they've
given
something
in
return,
that
that
would
be
potentially
counted
in
that
10-minute
calculation
and
that's
not
to
say
that
we
shouldn't
have
parks
all
over
the
city
by
any
means,
but
just
to
show
that
you
know
to
give
an
actual
representation
of
access
that
people
have
to
open
space.
Yeah.
M
America,
council,
mayor
williams,
that's
a
great
point.
The
only
argument
I've
heard
from
some
of
those
neighborhoods
is
that
they
don't
want
the
public
coming
into
their
area,
so
it
would
be
limited
to
just
their
immediate
subdivision
newer
developments,
though
I
think
we
have
that
up.
You
have
that
opportunity
to
say
let's
develop
something
that
is
at
a
higher
standard.
M
J
Madam
mayor,
just
to
follow
up
on
that,
we
actually
did
that
on
a
development
not
too
long
ago
in
southwest
boise,
where
there
was
an
opportunity
to
have
some
open
space
and
we
made
sure
in
the
conditions
that
that
was
publicly
accessible.
So
I
think
that's
a
really
great
point
that
we
should
do
going
forward.
Thank
you,
doug,
for
that.
E
Discussion,
madam
mayor,
I
hadn't
actually
thought
of
council
member
whitting's
point
before
it's
a
really
good
one
that
we're
trading
and
that
never
occurred
to
me.
The
only
thing
I
wanted
to
add
to
it
is
this
particular
site
is
a
really
good
example
of
the
kind
of
concern
or
the
kind
of
thinking
that
councilmember
williams
brought
up
because
river
glen
junior
high
school
is
right
there
and
the
open
space
there
is.
E
I
mean
if
you're
familiar
it's
easily
10
12
times
bigger
than
whatever
our
park
would
be,
and
so
I
don't
know
that
we
need
to
like
break
or
change
our
formulas,
but
I
think
that's
relevant
to
know,
and
that
kind
of
fact
is
relevant
to
know
as
we
think
about
prioritizing
or
moving
things
around.
You
know
this.
This
community
on
north
gary
lane
is
in
fact
very
served
by
some
form
of
open
space.
They
can't
access
it.
E
You
know
during
recess,
but
there's
a
there's,
there's
open
space
there
that
can
be
used
by
this
community,
it's
much
larger
than
our
proposed
park
site.
That
kind
of
soft
factor
may
affect
how
we
think
about
ranking,
particularly
if
we're
talking
about
general
fund
dollars,
how
we
think
about
ranking
some
of
these
other
sites.
So
I
just
wanted
to
say
out
loud
that
at
least
that's
part
of
the
thinking.
In
my
mind,.
K
I
guess
click
comment
and
then
that
question
so
I
guess
one
thing
just
as
we're
talking
about
this
related
subject,
the
nice
thing
about
having
it
be
a
park
and
not
something
that
goes
with
the
development
is
there
typically
is
a
master
planning
process
that
involves
the
neighborhood,
the
neighbors
in
the
area,
so
that
they
do
have
the
ability
to
have
some
input
versus
if
the
development's
coming
in
there's,
not
quite
as
much
public
engagement
around
what
that
park
may
look
like
bathrooms,
splash
pads
other
different
types
of
things
there,
and
so
I
guess
that's
just
one
thing
that
I
think
about.
K
Is
it
like
what
a
great
opportunity
whenever
there
is
going
to
be
a
park
in
the
neighborhood
to
get
that
master
planning
process
going
and
if
we
were
really
looking
at
it
from
a
development
standpoint
and
what
we're
asking
them
to
do
would
be
figuring
out?
How,
then,
do
you
involve
neighbors
kind
of
creating
the
vision
that
they
want
to
see?
So
I
guess
that's
my
comment.
My
question
doug
and
I
apologize
for
asking
you
to
do.
M
Madam
mayor
council
member,
I
would
I
would,
I
really
am
hesitant
to
get
carts
before
horses.
K
M
M
We
have
to
weigh
that
in
with
other
priorities
that
may
have
sat
longer
in
this
list
and
then
look
and
make
sure
that
that
we're
that
we're
being
fair
to
all
the
different
planning
areas
in
the
city,
so
there's
other
factors
to
look
at,
but
I
think
you
you're
generally.
Your
comment
is
is
correct.
Yeah.
M
The
mcgradio
site,
I
think,
you're
all
very,
very
familiar
with
this
in
southwest
boise
it
it
is
bordered
between
south
coal
and
maple.
Grove
goes
completely
across
between
those
two
those
two
streets
acquired
in
by
the
department
in
1998.
It
was
acquired
sooner
than
that
by
the
airport,
157
acres
and
then
just
an
update.
M
We
have
been
working
with
outside
council
that
does
specific
faa
guidance
and
works
with
the
faa
very
closely
on
just
what,
if
there
are
any
restrictions,
if
there
are
any
issues
with
this
continue
to
move
forward
with
that
or
whatever
the
city
decides
to
do
at
this
site,
and
we
don't
have
those
details
worked
out
with
the
outside
council.
Yet
obviously,
madam
mayor
and
council
members
will
be
the
first
to
hear
that,
but
I
think
it's
getting
fairly
close.
M
If,
depending
on
what
council's
direction
is,
we
are
committed
just
like
we
would,
with
any
other
park
site
to
work
closely
with
the
neighborhood
associations
that
are
out
in
that
southwest
area
to
work
on
a
park
design
work
on
how
it
would
sit,
what
the
timing
would
be
the
scope
of
the
of
the
site
and
also
what
the
size
of
the
of
the
park
could
end
up
being
again,
that's
directed
by
you
mayor
and
council,
not
by
our
department.
I
just
I
know
you
know
our
commitment
to
how
we
do
these
things.
M
As
council
member
holly
burton
pointed
out,
we
do
perform
a
robust
public
outreach.
So
when
we're
ready
to
make
those
moves,
we
would
be
prepared
to
be
able
to
to
do
that.
So
construction
timeline,
obviously,
would
be
determined
by
all
those
other
factors,
and
the
green
up
and
amenity
costs
again
will
be
driven
by
what
that
park.
Design
and
neighborhood
outreach
ends
up.
Looking
like
the
10-minute
walk
analysis,
as
it
sits
today
with
no
development
on
this
site,
but
a
park
adds
467
households
to
the
10-minute
walk.
M
If,
indeed,
all
those
households
were
annexed
into
the
city,
that
would
be
the
caveat
to
this,
because
the
the
initiative
is
based
on
houses
within
the
city
limits
not
outside
the
city
limits.
So
any
questions
on
this
okay,
so
we
actually
have
three
other
southwest
boise
sites
that
we
have
in
our
inventory.
M
M
So
there
are
some
covenants
that
related
to
the
neighborhood
association.
That
would
provide
some
restrictions
on
how
we
use
the
property
and
so
we're
working
through
those
at
this
point
in
time,
if
indeed
this
was
annexed
into
the
city
and
it
was
earmarked
for
for
a
green
up
or
future
development,
but
again
it's
located
outside.
So
there
has
been
no
master
plan,
that's
been
done
on
it,
and
so
no
construction
timeline
or
funding
mechanism
as
it
sits
today.
M
If
it
was
developed,
it
would
have
220
households
if
it
was
annexed
into
the
city
to
our
10
minute,
walk
initiative,
the
pearl
jensen
side,
also
outside
the
city
limits
in
southwest
boise.
This
one
was
treated
a
little
bit
differently.
There
was
a
master
plan
and
community
outreach
done
on
this.
It
was
acquired
in
2062
acres,
similar
to
spalding
ranch.
It
is
a
it
could
be,
so
it's
a
farming
homestead,
the
jensen
family,
discounted,
the
price
of
the
property
to
the
city
under
the
condition
that
it
would
always
be
a
park.
M
So
there
is
a
deed
restriction
that
it
will
be
a
park
and
it
would
be
named
after
pearl
jensen,
no
construction
timeline
or
cost
funding
mechanism.
As
again
it
sits
outside
the
city
limits,
so
would
be
council's
mayor
and
council's
wishes
on
how
they
would
want
to
move
this
forward.
The
10-minute
walk
analysis
does
add,
604
more
households
go
to
our
10,
walk
minute,
walk
initiative.
B
Doug
two
questions,
so
you
mentioned
that
similar
to
the
spalding
site.
It
apparently
has
irrigation
and
farming
capacity
so
have
we
thought
even
outside
the
city,
whether
that
is
a
valuable
asset,
maybe
in
in
terms
of
urban
farming,.
M
F
M
B
And
then,
finally
does
the
deed
restriction
allow.
I
always
understood
that
if
this
ever
did
end
up
in
the
city,
we
might
look
at
a
fire
station
here.
Does
the
deed
restriction
allow
that.
M
L
M
I
just
got
a
couple
mountain
of
air
and
I
could
just
run
quickly
through
them.
This
is
the
other
southwest
side.
It's
called
wrigley
again,
you
see
when
it
was
acquired.
It's
outside
the
city
limits
the
borah
park,
parcel
4.6
acres
acquired
in
2006.,
and
we're
currently
looking
at
doing
a
public
outreach
on
that
piece.
But
we
want
to
do
it
in
coordination
with
our
pds
team,
which
is
working
on
a
neighborhood
association
master
plan
and
that's
slated
to
start
in
2025.
M
So
we
would
just
mirror
that
to
come
up
with
what
the
neighborhood
would
like
to
see
on
that
additional
4.6
acres
and
it
is
impactfully
eligible
the
mcdevitt
parcel
against
six
acres
undeveloped
for
the
life
of
me,
madam
mayor
and
council
members.
I
don't
know
why
we
didn't
go
ahead
and
develop
this
additional
six
acres
when
we
built
the
park,
but
it
never
did
get
never
did
get
developed
and
so
as
you're,
where
it's
named
after
chuck,
mcdevitt
and
but
we're
talking
about.
M
Maybe
a
fy26
construction
timeline
to
go
ahead
and
green
up
that
additional
six
acres-
and
it
is
impact
fee
eligible
and
does
add,
does
not
add
any
additional,
but
you
can
see
the
park
itself
added
almost
1300
different
households,
liberty
park.
This
is
currently
under
a
life
estate
to
finish
off
this
2.6
acres.
So
we
don't
have
a
timeline
on
when
we
will
be
greening
that
up.
L
And
I
just
want
to
clarify
that.
That's
because
a
family
member's
living
on
the
property.
M
Yes,
mrs
ray
ryder,
who
we
purchased
the
property
from,
has
a
life
estate
to
stay
there
indefinitely
until
she
chooses
to
no
longer
yeah
and
then
the
final
one
madame
mayor's
warren
springs
parcel.
This
is
an
interesting
one.
It's
a
it's
just
a
natural
area
that
we've
taken
out
neighborhood
outreach
on
a
number
of
occasions
and
and
the
neighborhood
is
really
interested
in
seeing
it
kind
of
stay.
The
way
it
is
right.
Now
we
think
we
can.
M
We
can
come
up
with
a
an
arrangement
that
that
we
do
a
little
bit
of
development
with
it,
but
mainly
keep
it
in
its
natural
state
as
as
it
is
now,
it
is
not
impact
fee
eligible
and
we
don't
have
a
funding
mechanism
for
it,
but
we
do
believe
it's
land
and
water
conservation
grant
eligible
and
that's
a
one-to-one
match
with
with
the
city.
It
would
add,
195
additional
households
so-
and
this
is
right
behind
just
for
your
everyone's-
been
it's
right
behind
the
natatorium.
L
B
M
L
C
M
I
met
mayor
council
member
sanchez,
that's
kind
of
where
we
were
thinking
that
we
could
provide
some,
maybe
some
sitting
areas
in
there
in
this
in
the
location
not
doing
anything
else,
but
just
provide
some
benches,
possibly
as
low
level
development,
because
right
now
the
green
belt
is
just
on
the
other
side
of
what
you're
looking
at
right
there.
It's
it
does
have
good
access
to
the
green
belt
and
and
also
from
martin
lane
as
well,
but.
L
Pretty
much
something
to
look
at.
Thank
you
thanks
doug.
So
next
week
as
courtney
is
coming
up,
I
just
want
to
kick
off
the
presentation
she'll
be
doing
on
behalf
of
the
committee,
like
any
community
in
our
country,
we're
challenged
by
balancing
both
how
to
respond
to
an
immediate
crisis
faced
by
those
who
need
a
safe
and
welcoming
space
to
shelter
tonight
or
at
night,
with
housing
solutions
that
we're
all
committed
to
developing
to
end
homelessness.
L
L
The
conversations
of
the
task
force
were
centered
around
values
of
compassion,
community
and
service.
That's
what
I
asked
them
from
day,
one
to
remember
as
they
tackled
this
tough
issue,
and
I
received
the
final
report
on
friday
and
courtney
is
here
today
to
present
pieces
and
parts
of
that
and
look
forward
to
them.
Seeing
how
we
put
these
recommendations
into
action.
G
Madam
mayor
members
of
the
council,
thanks
for
having
me
back,
I
gave
you
a
preview
of
where
we
were
in
this
process
who
made
up
the
task,
force
and
kind
of
the
subject
matter
that
was
covered.
So
today
I
stand
before
you
to
do
my
best
job
of
representing
the
final
recommendations
of
a
large
task
force.
So
just
a
quick
thing
to
remember,
I'm
speaking
to
you
as
a
task
force
chair,
it's
my
intention
to
bring
to
you
the
collective
consensus
of
this
group.
G
So
when
I
say
we
I'm
not
talking
about
the
city,
I'm
talking
about
the
task
force,
I've
confused
many
in
that
space.
So
I
thought
I'd
point
that
out
as
a
reminder.
The
task
force
members
spent
many
hours
over
a
summer
in
a
pandemic
talking
about
a
very
challenging
community
issue
and
we
have
a
lot.
We
had
a
lot
of
diverse
input
from
tax
from
task
force
members
we
had
neighborhood
support
and
opposition.
G
G
What
I
can
tell
you
is
there's
a
lot
of
pride
in
ownership
in
the
report
you
received
and
the
recommendations
all
go
through,
but
I
don't
want
you
to
be
under
the
belief
that
everyone
is
happy
with
everything
that
was
discussed.
The
recommendations
represent
the
majority,
not
a
full
consensus
of
the
task
force
members,
and
there
are
some
issues
yet
to
be
resolved,
which
I
will
cover
later
in
the
presentation.
G
So
there
were
two
main
outcomes
in
the
charge
of
the
task
force.
One
was
the
shelter
needs
analysis
which
I
will
cover
here.
The
other
was
a
land
scan
in
regards
to
where
else
the
shelter
may
be
able
to
go
outside
of
the
proposed
day
street
location.
So
this
is
a
snapshot
in
time.
It
was
provided
by
the
corporation
for
supportive
housing.
G
G
G
G
Seven
percent
of
the
city
is
available
for
shelters
and
our
current
code
so
that
reduced
the
list
substantially
to
the
properties
that
would
be
eligible
to
be
a
shelter
and
then
the
size
needs
as
per
interface,
sanctuaries,
current
plan
or
300
square
feet,
building
or
a
one
to
two
acre
lot.
So
when
you
apply
those
filters,
we
went
from
56
properties
to
three,
so
one
is
an
achc
parcel
on
front
street.
G
L
Well
and
courtney,
I'd
say
too
I
mean
we
wanted.
I
I
appreciate
the
work
of
the
task
force
and
these
these
three
items
are
things
that
we
wanted
out
of
this
report
as
well.
So
I
I
don't
know
that
I
can't
characterize
it
as
changing
course,
because
this
was
very
much
in
line
with
expectations
and
and
the
asks
that
we
had
in
terms
of
receiving
information
and
best
and
recommendations
on
best
practices,
sighting,
etc.
G
Madam
mayor,
to
your
point,
the
land
scan
produced
such
little
options
that
we
felt
our
time
was
best
spent
diving
in
particularly
of
an
area
that
the
task
force
did
not
feel
we
had
allocated
enough
time
to
which
was
the
is
the
community
criteria?
Great
to
your
point,
these
are
again
all
areas
of
general
agreement.
G
I
will
hit
on
the
ones
that
do
not
have
that
shelter
policies
should
be
aligned
with
national
best
practices,
for
system-wide
approaches
to
emergency
shelters
and
really
the
sentiment
behind
this
is
one
shelter
at
one
point
in
time
doesn't
reflect
the
needs
of
this
community
and
the
partners
who
exist
in
this
space
and
must
so
every
conversation
was
about
the
interaction
between
interface
sanctuary
day
shelter.
G
G
G
G
Again,
these
are
the
highlights
you
all
probably
saw
in
your
email.
You
have
the
report,
but
the
appendix
is
not
something
I
can
claim
to
have
gone
through
in
great
detail
since
friday,
so
I
am
attempting
to
just
hit
the
highlights
so
community
criteria,
the
process,
reciting
shelter,
should
have
concrete
ways
to
engage
with
and
respond
to
community
considerations,
both
leading
up
to
and
after
the
sighting
of
shelter.
G
There
was
a
lot
of
discussion
and
a
recommendation
about
a
community
engagement
board
that
shelter
providers
should
create
a
body
of
leaders
who
formalize
a
process
for
community
engagement.
In
parallel
with
the
sighting
effort,
proactive
emergency
and
safety
plans,
the
shelter
provider
and
partners
should
develop
a
responsive
and
collaborative
safety
plan.
G
The
city
has
a
role
in
this
space.
Well,
our
police
and
fire
made
it
clear.
We
could
respond
to
any
needs,
regardless
of
where
the
shelter
was
located.
There
was
definitely
much
more
interest
in
a
proactive
policing
and
fire
strategy
to
help
with
this
community,
and
so
I
think
that
was
some
of
the
reasoning
behind
this
recommendation.
E
Madam
mayor,
I'm
sorry
courtney
really
quickly.
In
the
previous
slide,
there
was
a
community
engagement
board
and
then
I
assume,
I
think
the
recommendation
was
some
form
of
organizational
infrastructure
for
engaging
with
us
in
the
process,
and
my
question
is:
did
the
task
force
envision
that
that
would
be
different
than
a
neighborhood
association
and
its
participation
in
the
conditional
use
permit
process
like
something
in
addition
to
or
above
because
I
see
that
as
serving
that
function,
so
I'm
confused.
G
I
know
I
have
notes
the
task
force
envisioned
both
so
both
the
community
engagement
board
and
the
city's
outreach
efforts
associated
with
the
conditional
use
permit
think
of
moore's
outreach
ambassadors
with
the
time
limited
in
duration.
That
would
be
aligned
with
the
conditional
use
permit,
but
there
is
truly
a
sense
of
the
task
force
that
not
enough
engagement
has
been
happening
in
this
space.
G
That
address
concerns
an
important
point
with
a
good
neighbor
agreements
is
they
are
responsive
in
real
time.
So
it's
not
one
of
those
agreements
that's
signed
and
has
never
revisited
the
task
force,
envisioned
these
being
kept
up
to
date
and
revisited
to
ensure
that
all
parties
were
getting
what
they
needed
to
have
out
of
those
agreements
and
then
residential
buffers.
G
G
Recommendations
for
leadership
there
are
many
leadership
bodies
impacted
by
or
who
influenced
the
process
to
cite
an
emergency
shelter.
You
all,
of
course,
the
planning
and
zoning
commission,
the
entity
itself,
in
this
case
interface,
sanctuary
and
their
board
of
directors
and
our
path,
homes,
executive
committee
and
as
leadership
bodies
approach
decisions
regarding
the
shelter.
The
task
force
would
like
you
to
consider
the
following
recommendations.
G
G
Address
shelters
in
the
zoning
code
updates
the
city's
owning
code,
as
I
mentioned,
have
not
been
finalized.
The
task
force
would
like
you
when
that
time
is
appropriate
to
have
a
robust
discussion
and
more
considerations
of
any
setbacks
or
any
specific
codes
as
they
relate
to
emergency
shelters
and
conditional
youth
permit.
G
G
Invest
in
housing
solutions,
it
is
clear
that
the
best
path
to
help
support
this
community
is
to
find
housing
solutions.
G
Emergency
shelters
are
temporary
and
called
emergency
for
very
good
reason,
and
the
most
we
can
do
in
this
space
is
to
invest
in
housing
solutions
in
order
to
alleviate
the
challenges
and
consider
alternatives
was
another
recommendations.
Partners
should
look
beyond
the
shelter
model
and
either
programs
that
would
enhance
the
situation
or
create
better
pipelines.
Out
of
the
shelter
examples
were
residential
work
plans
and
community
based
public
safety
systems
and
I'll
touch
on
the
multi-site
potential,
and
then
upcoming
slide.
G
So
task
force
non-alignment.
I
like
it's
clear
that
there
was
not
consensus
around
this
point.
As
I
mentioned,
the
minimum
of
300
feet
from
residential
zones
is
being
contemplated
in
the
draft
zoning
code
rewrite
the
consultant.
Did
the
research
to
support
that
recommendation
and
the
consideration
of
what
other
cities
are
doing
in
this
space?
G
G
G
G
Another
was
to
just
to
desire
to
evaluate
feasibility
resulting
in
smaller
shelters
cited
through
throughout
the
community,
regardless
of
the
operator
of
the
shelter
and
then
thirdly,
is
the
intention
to
develop
shelter,
locations
that
serve
gas
by
population
segments.
So
I
would
think
more
like
valor
point,
where
the
target
market
is
veterans
coming
out
of
the
shelter
system
into
housing
or
in
this
case,
which
was
mentioned
in
the
task
force
families
as
a
separate
shelter
from
other
distinct
populations.
G
So
I
think
the
confusion
of
the
lack
of
definition
of
this
word
and
that
it
was
clearly
being
interpreted
in
different
ways,
resulted
in
the
task
force
just
sharing
with
you,
these
several
different
ways.
This
term
was
used
during
this
process.
G
G
So
they
did
provide
this
picture
of
a
future
shelter
engagement
timeline,
ideally
how
the
task
force
would
like
to
see
the
setting
of
a
shelter
handled
with
the
steps
included.
So
this
is
a
snapshot.
It
does
a
much
clearer
job
than
I
did
of
the
seven
steps.
This
task
force
envisioned
having
a
better,
more
robust
process
associated
with
setting
a
shelter.
G
And
then,
lastly,
because
I
know
you're
going
to
ask
me
the
next
steps
with
the
interfaith
sanctuary
proposal,
specifically,
the
city,
expects,
in
our
faith,
to
restart
the
conditional
use
permit
for
the
state
street
project,
and
these
are
the
steps
associated
if
and
when
interfaith
chooses,
to
restart
the
process.
G
So
if
the
staff
did
a
really
nice
job
with
this
whole
process
and
did
a
super
good
job
of
doing
the
appendices,
that
probably
has
every
piece
of
information
you
might
want
to
know.
In
addition
to,
I
asked
them
to
pull
all
the
emails
we've
gotten
on
this
topic,
so
everyone
could
see
them
all
in
one
place,
and
it
also
we
did
a
lot
of
stakeholder
surveys
with
folks
who
we
thought
could
bring
expertise
or
insights
into
the
recommendations
of
the
task
force.
B
Thank
you,
madam
mayor.
Thank
you,
courtney.
We
are
short
on
time,
so
I'll
keep
this
relatively
short
and
we'll
look
for
another
time.
Maybe
when
we
can
ask
and
answer
questions
more
in
a
strategic
planning
format.
B
Yeah,
so
that
that
was
the
plan
along,
I
think
courtney
did
a
good
job
of
setting
the
stage
for
how
the
task
force
work
and,
and
first
I'd
like
to
thank
any
task
force
members,
those
in
the
audience
and
those
online
who
are
watching
tonight.
B
B
So
thank
you,
the
things
that
I,
I
guess
I'd
highlight
they're,
partly
the
things
that
courtney
talked
about,
but
I
think
the
very
first
one
is
shelter
best
practices,
and
I
think
there
was
a
fair
amount
of
consensus
and
discussion
around
making
sure
that
shelter
and
housing
aren't
co-located,
that
the
two
things
really
aren't
compatible,
even
even
temporary
housing.
If
it's
meant
to
last
for
a
long
time-
and
I
I
think
there
was
a
you
know,
if
you
just
look
at
how
shelter
works
around
the
country
really
important.
B
The
other
part
in
terms
of
the
buffer
that
came
up,
I
will
say
I
followed
up
on
it
personally,
because
I
wanted
to
know
you
know
from
a
planning
perspective
as
a
planner.
What
are
the
best
practices
now
and
I
I
would
say
that
what
I
learned
would
align
with
what
our
consultant
told
us,
which
is
those
places
that
do
have
buffers
and
most
places
are
moving
toward
them.
B
I
would
say
in
addition
to
that,
that
the
shelter
task
force
itself
really
thought
deeply
about
that,
and
one
of
the
solutions
that
did
emerge
and
and
this
sort
of
gets
into
the
kind
of
understanding
of
what
does
multi-site
mean.
One
of
the
discussions
that
did
emerge
is:
would
it
be
acceptable
to
site
shelter
adjacent
to
residential
if,
if
it
were
a
certain
small
size
and
what
would
that
size
be,
and
would
that
actually
be
healthy
for
everybody?
Not
not.
B
B
The
task
force
was
somewhat
concerned
with
cu
enforcement.
Part
of
it
is
a
lack
of
understanding
of
our
process,
but
part
of
it
is
especially
if
a
shelter
is
cited
in
a
residential
neighborhood.
B
We
will
face
as
a
city
a
different
enforcement
regime
than
we've
faced
in
the
past,
and
so
I
think
that's
just
something
we
all
need
to
be
aware
of,
and
then
I
would
encourage
you
all
if
you
haven't
it's
much
of
it
is
in
the
appendix,
but
some
of
the
presentations
that
were
offered
to
the
task
force
were
really
informative,
and
if,
if
you
have
more
questions
about
those
things
we
can
make
those
available,
I
think
you
know
some
of
the
statistics
about
what's
happening
in
our
area,
what's
happening
in
other
places.
B
B
So
you
know
this
is
now
going
to
be
something
that
I
hope
as
a
community.
We
can
embrace
together
and
work
on
a
solution
together.
I
don't
know
that
it's
going
to
be
anybody's
best
day
to
force
people
into
corners
and
and
make
those
corners
square
off.
So
I
hope
that
this
information
provides
us
a
basis
to
go
forward
and
see
if
we
can
find
a
collaborative
solution.