►
From YouTube: Boise City Council - Work Session
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Well,
we
will
go
ahead
and
get
started.
The
council
president
is
on
her
way.
So
let's
go
ahead
and
call
the
order
work.
C
D
A
E
Members
of
council,
thank
you
I'll,
very
briefly.
Just
give
you
an
update
on
where
we
stand
with
micro
Mobility
as
we're
in
a
period
of
transition
right
now
so
wanted
to
make
sure
you
all
knew
that
and
knew
what's
coming
next.
E
Of
course,
you've
recently
taken
some
action.
That's
part
of
this
process
that
we're
in
the
midst
of
right
now
and
I'll
mention
that
in
just
a
moment,
I
guess
the
context
I'll
provide
before
I
dig
into
a
little
bit
of
detail
in
the
next
two
slides.
Is
that
Boise,
like
all
cities
was
the
micro
mobility
and
scooters
was
thrust
upon
Boise
fairly
quickly
and
in
response
to
the
introduction
of
these
new
devices
into
our
community?
E
The
reaction
was
at
the
time
which
made
sense
and
was
a
similar
reaction
in
a
lot
of
places
that
we
would.
We
would
regulate
these
private
companies
through
agreements
that
we,
ultimately
you
know,
we
had
to
create
an
ordinance
related
to
how
we
regulate
them
and
then
agreements
that
we
would
enter
into
with
the
companies
to
operate
within
the
city.
E
So
essentially,
it's
somewhat
of
a
kind
of
regulatory
role
that
the
city
was
playing
and
what
we're
proposing
at
this
time
is
to
shift
to
I
would
call
it
more
of
a
partnership
arrangement
with
a
single
provider.
As
you
know,
we
have
three
companies
working
in
the
city
today,
and
the
process
we're
in
the
midst
of
is
to
shift
to
a
the
selection
of
an
individual
vendor
who
would
operate
in
the
city
in
some
kind
of
relationship
with
us
such
that
we're.
E
We
think
we'll
have
a
much
better
control
over
the
outcomes
that
we
get
by
these
by
a
company
operating
these
devices
in
the
city.
Kind
of
for
us,
so
where
we
are
in
terms
of
the
process
is
that
you
had
recently
approved
some
legislation
that
would
allow
us
to
extend
a
couple
of
the
vendors
licenses
of
another
number
of
months,
because
the
way
we
had
it,
we
had
two
vendors
whose
agreements
were
expiring
in
October,
and
then
we
had
one
vendor
whose
agreement
was
expiring
in
March.
E
So
we
wanted
all
of
those
vendors
to
continue
to
just
operate
until
the
same
time.
So
we
extended
the
two
operators
licenses
until
the
spring
of
next
year,
so
we've
done
that
so
those
agreements
and
renewal
licenses
renewal
of
licenses
is
in
progress.
Now,
with
lime
and
bird
we're
gonna
we're
working
on
among
a
group
of
Staff
requests
for
proposals
that
will
go
out
very
early
in
November,
and
we've
been
looking
at
lots
of
other
cities
and
and
talking
through
all
the
kinds
of
issues
that
we
would
want.
E
You
know
to
be
represented
in
any
kind
of
sound
proposal
to
us.
Of
course,
the
companies
are
very
used
to
this
there's
other
cities
that
have
done
the
same
thing.
So
this
is
a
a
process
that
everybody
is
has
experienced
and,
and
it's
been
approached
in
different
ways
in
different
cities.
But
a
lot
of
the
outcomes
have
been
similar.
E
As
you
can
imagine,
that's
going
to
be
an
interesting
discussion
around
all
the
things
that
we
hope
to
achieve
as
a
city
when
it
comes
to
the
availability
of
of
my
of
Micro
Devices
to
support
Mobility
around
the
city,
then
we
would,
after
discussing
that
with
them
and
getting
having
selected
a
vendor.
E
E
So
then,
some
key
issues
to
address.
Obviously
we've
got
the
e-scooters,
but
also
e-bikes,
and
you
know,
there's
different
issues
associated
with
that
the
companies
aren't
as
interested
in
e-bikes.
We
have
a
pilot
e-bike
program
going
on
right
now
in
the
city,
as
you
know,
to
to
through
brt.
E
So
we've
started
discussions
with
VRT
about
what
the
implications
of
that
are
relative
to
where
we're
headed,
because
we
certainly
do
want
us
all
working
together
and
I
mentioned
here
in
one
of
the
bullets
Boise
State
University,
which
had
gone
through
process
of
their
own
to
select
a
vendor
on
the
campus.
So
they
have
a
separate
agreement
right
now
with
an
individual
vendor
for
the
Boise
State
campus.
We
want
to
integrate
them
into
this
as
well,
so
we've
we
don't
have
multiple
agencies
with
separate
contracts
with
vendors.
E
We
have
one
overall
system
that
we're
all
jointly
working
together
on
such
that
we
can
really
work
on
issues
like
her
in
some
of
these
bullets,
the
deployment
of
devices
Beyond
just
downtown
to
locations
where
we
think
it
would
be
helpful
relative
to
access
to
transit
or
certainly
there's,
there's
kind
of
equity
issues.
E
Here
both
in
the
geographic
deployment
of
the
devices,
but
also
just
in
the
as
you
can
see
on
the
bottom,
just
the
what
what
are
the
steps
that
we
need
to
take
to
make
sure
that
there's
affordable,
rides
available
to
people
and
there's
different
ways
to
approach
that
so
that'll
certainly
be
among
the
things
that
we're
going
to
want
the
vendors
to
address
in
any
kind
of
proposal
to
us.
So
in
this
list.
E
What
you're
seeing
here
are
issues
that
we're
working
on,
but
also
things
that
will
certainly
and
be
included,
as
as
among
the
things
that
we
want,
the
vendors
to
speak
to
and
the
proposals
that
they'll
be
submitting
to
us.
So
so
that
is
a
quick
update
on
where
we
are
I'm
excited
about.
E
This
I
think
it's
a
good
next
step
in
terms
of
the
evolution
of
of
this
micro
mobility
in
Boise
and
is
going
to
present
a
lot
of
opportunities
for
us
as
a
community,
and
the
big
issue
is
rather
than
just
regulating
them.
Let's
work
with
someone
to
actually
try
to
address
issues
that
we
would
like
addressed,
whether
it's
the
affordability
issue
or
the
geographic
distribution
or
other
issues
around
how
we
deal
with
safety
and
and
and
just
the
deployment
of
the
devices
around
the
city
when
we're
in
a
regulatory
mode.
E
F
Yes,
thank
you.
Thank
you,
madam
thank
you.
Tim.
So
I
have
some
questions
that
a
constituent
wanted
me
to
ask.
So
if
it's
all
right
with
you,
I'll
make
it
so
this
is
somebody
who
is
very
Avid
user
of
our
Pathways
bicycles
uses
the
bus
system.
She
has
a
question
about
do
we.
E
Yes,
council
member,
thank
you.
That
is
true
that
the
city
used
to
have
I
think
it
was
the
bike
and
pedestrian
advisory
committee
that
is
no
longer
operating.
E
We
are
discussing
the
the
recreation
of
such
a
committee
in
association
with
our
and
I've
recently
written
you
about
the
mobility
and
public
spaces
team
within
planning
which
is
going
to
give
us
a
lot
more
capacity
to
to
not
only
regulate
but
also
lead
on
issues
related
to
this,
and
so
in
association,
with
the
we're
hiring
a
director
right
now
and
and
building
out
that
team.
We
have
been
discussing
that
very
thing:
council
member,
the
recreation
of
a
committee
that
could
provide
advice
and
Counsel
on
all
these
issues,
including
this
one
great.
F
Just
to
follow
up
Madame
mayor
the
other
question
that
she's
posing
is
about
the
use
of
the
green
belt.
As
we
all
know,
we
have
had
an
influx
of
new
boiseans
to
the
area
and
she's
concerned
with
the
fact
that
we
have
new
people
using
this
vital
resource
that
we
have
and
that
we,
of
course
want
people
using,
but
that
there
may
be
newcomers
who
don't
know
the
rules,
don't
know
the
language
to
preserve
safety.
F
E
You
know:
education
and
communication
around
protocols,
sometimes
rules
not
just
protocols,
but
both
rules
and
protocols
around
how
to
operate
devices,
how
to
be
how
to
follow
the
rules,
but
also
how
to
be
a
good
neighbor,
so
to
speak
in
terms
of
how
we
utilize
public
spaces
in
the
city.
So
that
will
be
among
the
things
we
feel
like.
E
We'll
have
a
much
more
kind
of
much
more
capacity
to
do
that
when
we're
kind
of
in
partnership
with
a
single
vendor,
because
one
of
our
our
standards,
one
of
the
goals
we'll
have,
is
that
very
thing
that
we're
we're
using
our
spaces
in
ways
that
don't
conflict
with
others
that
are
using
those
spaces.
Like
the
green
belt.
There's.
B
H
Thank
you,
madam
mayor
Tim,
couple
of
questions,
one
I
guess
at
the
heart
of
it.
This
essentially
will
be
a
new
policy
for
how
we're
going
to
handle
e-bikes
and
e-scooters,
and
the
RFP
will
reflect
that.
So
what
role
do
you
see
for
Council
in
developing
the
scope
for
the
RFP.
A
The
more
appropriate
question
is
not
the
RFP,
but
the
policy,
because
it's
actually
two
different
things.
The
policy
would
be
contained
within
the
RP.
So
if
you
have
suggestions
as
a
council
president
for
the
role
that
you'd
like
to
see
Council
playing
that
we're
happy
to
hear
that
as
well
as
perhaps
hear
from
Brie
or
Tim
for
feedback,
but
there's
more
than
the
policy
in
an
RFP.
Oh.
H
Certainly
and
I
I,
that's
exactly
what
I
was
trying
to
say,
but
the
RFP
should
reflect
whatever
policy
we
decide.
We
want
to
see
going
forward
and
that
really
is
a
policy
decision
and
rather
than
allow
you
know,
rather
than
rely
on
staff,
to
understand
what
policy
we'd
like
to
see.
I
would
like
to
see
some
process
for
us
to
give
direction
on
that.
As
you
write
the
RFP.
Does
that
make
sense.
It.
E
Does-
and
we
have
been
discussing
clearly
there'd-
be
action
by
Council
associated
with
this
before
we
have
a
vendor.
You
know
before
we've
been
through
the
RFP
process,
that
there
would
be
action
of
counsel
and
to
enable
where
we're
headed
with
this,
because
we
have
a
code
now
which
was
drafted
under
very
different
circumstances,
so
that
we
would
be
coming
to
you
for
that.
So
yeah
we'll
provide
that
specificity,
council
member
great.
H
Thank
you
and
then
the
second
question
is
sort
of
related
other
places
that
originally
pursued
a
bike.
Share
system
have
evolved
into
a
contract
with
their
bike,
Sheriff
provider,
but
it
still
covers
many
of
the
same
kinds
of
Provisions
that
the
Bike
Share
system
originally
did
with
the
addition
of
equity
and
some
of
those
other
things.
Are
we
envisioning
something
like
that
or
much
more
hands-off
you
private
provider
do
all
of
that?
No.
E
We
we
see
this
as,
as
I
said,
as
a
partnership,
not
as
just
an
arms
distance,
we're
regulating
you
based
on
this
agreement.
We
have,
we
see
it
as
as
a
as
a
pretty
close
partnership
akin
to
what
you
were
describing
in.
H
Other
cities,
one
follow-up:
if
I
could
and
and
within
that
then
do
you
see
room
for
localized
branding
of
this
yeah.
E
That's
an
interesting
part
of
it,
you
know
and
and
the
context
yes
localized,
branding
even
questions
about,
depending
on
what
kind
of
public
benefits
we're
expecting
of
this.
You
know
where
does
that?
Take
us
in
terms
of
sponsorships
and
things
like
this,
an
association
with
even
one
of
private
vendors
operating
the
system.
E
You
know
that
in
cities,
in
the
northwest,
where
you,
where
you
to
achieve
the
goals
that
you
have
for
the
public,
that
they're,
that
it
helps
to
have
some
private
sponsorship
so
that
you
can
get
fares
down
so
that
you
can
get
perhaps
deployment
in
places
that
don't
in
and
of
themselves,
generate
Revenue.
You
know
we've
got
to
work
through
those
things.
H
Thank
you,
I
I
thought
that
that
was
where
we
were
headed
and
those
are
some
of
the
concerns
I've
heard
from
people,
so
I
just
want
to
make
sure
we
got
that
on
the
record.
Thank
you.
I
Thank
you,
mayor
Tim,
thanks
for
the
presentation
and
the
work
of
your
team,
this
is
it's
exciting.
It's
important
I've
used
these
in
other
cities
and
and
so
I
think
it's
part
of
what
we
need
to
do
in
the
city
of
Boise
I'm
interested
in.
Why
you
we
want
to
do
one
vendor.
You've
mentioned
some
of
the
benefits
I'd
like
to
dig
in
a
little
bit
more
on
the
purpose
of
having
one
vendor
and
then,
if
there's
been
other
cities
that
have
done
one
vendor
and
why
that
is
and
educate
us
on
that.
E
More
yeah
I
think
you
know,
cities
are
really
moving
to
this
way
of
doing
it,
and-
and
some
have
taken
that
step
quite
some
time
ago,
but
the
it
was
very
common
initially
for
cities
to
be
in
that
regulatory
mindset
like
we
were
in,
but
After
experiencing
the
situation
for
some
time.
Most
cities
are
headed
this
way.
The
the
the
question
is
the
degree
to
which
there's
kind
of
a
private
sponsorship
of
the
system.
You
know
or
not.
E
Those
are
among
the
things
that
this
affords
us,
but
the
question
is
again
I.
Think
the
big
threshold
question
is
what
are
the?
What
are
the
things
that
we
really
want
to
go
further
on
as
a
city
that
might
justify
some
kind
of
private
sponsorship?
In
addition
to
the
individual
business
vendor
running,
you
know,
running
the
devices
and
the
system
does
that
make
sense.
Council,
member.
I
Yeah
I
was
wondering
if
it
had
to
do
with
Logistics
too,
because
you
have
lots
of
different
modalities
and
then
how
do
you
ensure
that
they
that
you
got
the
right
place
to
to
deposit
them?
I
wondered.
E
I
mean
there
are
Logistics
you're
right,
I
mean
there
are
definitely
logistical
issues
here.
When
you
got
multiple
vendors
operating
and
you
know,
and
all
the
devices
managing
the
devices
maintenance
of
the
devices
you
know,
keeping
the
devices
off.
You
know
out
of
places
where
you
don't
want
them,
and
we
all
know
everybody
struggles
with
this.
A
E
A
And
so
what's
the
benefit
of
that
is?
Is
it
additional
funds
that
allow
you
to
do
more,
like
I,
don't
I,
don't.
E
E
You
it
wouldn't
be
an
RFP
for
the
sponsor,
probably
it
would
be
us
seeking
a
sponsor.
You
know:
we'd
have
to
fundraise
essentially
to
to
find
a
sponsor
and
and
and
there's
potential
around
that,
of
course,
but
you
described
it
well.
So
if
you
know
all
of
these
are
companies
seeking
to
make
money
so
they're
they're
bidding
on
the
opportunity
to
provide
the
service
in
the
city.
They're,
not
thinking
I'm,
going
to
deploy
in
a
place
with
relatively
few
rides,
where
we
feel
like
it's
important
to
have
those
devices.
Oh.
E
E
A
E
Place
right
exactly
so,
there's
two
things:
there's
that
the
coverage,
so
we
could
get
better
coverage
if
we
as
a
city,
feel
like
it's
important
to
touch
more
places.
Then,
okay,
that
helps
with
that
and
then
the
second
thing
is
just
the
rate.
You
know
what
you're
paying.
As
you
know,
you
know
you
take
a
ride
on
a
scooter
right
now
it
can
cost
you
a
fair
amount,
depending
on
where
you're
going.
Can
we
get
these
prices
down,
especially
for
specific
constituencies,
but
maybe
overall
get
the
prices
down
some.
A
And
does
this
also,
then,
just
getting
back
to
council
member
Will's
question
on
Logistics?
Does
this
create
the
potential
then
to
even
Target
that
so
like
that
last
mile
off
of
bus
routes?
Exactly?
If
are
you
able
to
negotiate
that
we
want
coverage
in
specific
places
or
rates
at
specific,
reduce
in
specific
places
to
kind
of
hit
our
ideal
coverage
areas,
measures
like
the
fun
downtown
late
at
night,
but
instead
our
priority
like
we
want
that
and
we
want
Last
Mile
off
the
bus
right
off
Fairview
exactly.
J
I
guess
a
comment
and
then
a
question,
so
you
know
that
I
love
e-bikes
a
lot.
We
have
had
this
conversation
before
and
so
I
was
excited
when
we
ended
up
with
an
e-bike
pilot
downtown,
but
it
hasn't
been
working
that
great
and
here's.
Why?
J
Because
you
have
to
use
a
dock,
and
the
docs
are
so
far
apart,
that
it's
like
well,
I
could
grab
an
e-bike
for
my
meeting
at
Idaho
Power,
but
like
the
dock,
is
a
few
blocks
away
and
I'm
gonna
have
to
pay
an
extra
couple
of
bucks
to
just
lock
it
to
whatever
bike
rack
I
want,
so
I
haven't
been
using
it
very
often
so
as
we're
going
about
this
I
think
that
that's
really
important
to
take
into
account
is
how
are
we
keeping
it
convenient
for
people
so
that
they
actually
use
them
in
places
like
downtown,
where
you're
not
necessarily
going
a
half
mile
you're
going
a
few
blocks
and
you're
using
it
for
like
speed
and
efficiency
instead
of,
like
you,
know,
long
longer,
distance
Transportation?
J
So
that's
kind
of
comment
number
one
and
my
ongoing
frustration
with
the
e-bike
pilot
downtown
and
then
number
two
is
I.
Had
the
opportunity
this
summer
to
visit
many
cities
with
many
different
models
of
Bike
Share
of
scooters
of
e-bikes.
J
E
I
think
some
of
what
you're
describing
is
is
to
be
worked
out.
You
know
in
negotiation
with
a
with
a
successful
vendor
that
submits
because
it
doesn't
necessarily
have
to
do
with
whether
it's
one
vendor
or
multiple
vendors.
So
what
we
think
we
feel
strongly
about
is
is
in
cities
that
have
successful
programs.
There's
one
vendor
providing
service.
What
and
and
in
some
cases
that's
things
like
Divi
in
Chicago,
which
has
one
vendor,
but
that's
that's
a
different.
E
It's
a
little
bit
different
than
what
I'm
talking
about,
but
it's
a
single
vendor,
the
the
the
so
that
the
thing
that
we
think
is
consistent
across
cities,
where
it's
being
done
successfully.
Is
that
there's
a
single
vendor
that
somehow
is
working
with
the
city
number
one,
but
then
to
your
point
about
the
different
types
of
devices
and
dockless
versus
Doc
and
all
those
kinds
of
things
that
is.
That
is
something
for
us
to
work
with
them
on
to
determine.
What's
the
best,
you
know
approach
here
in
Boise,
so
we'll
have
more
discussion
about
that.
E
J
It
charged
me
two
dollars.
Oh.
E
D
Mary
Tim
I
just
maybe
want
to
put
a
finer
point
on
the
regulatory
versus
partner.
So
as
a
regulatory
agency,
when
we
have
three
different
vendors
out,
there,
there's
no
real
incentives
for
them
to
do
a
wonderful
and
beautiful
job,
and
sometimes
you
have
scooters
that
are
blocking
things
that
are
creating
accessibility
issues
and
that,
frankly,
when
they're
lying
on
the
ground
over
the
place,
kind
of
look
like
garbage-
and
we
get
a
lot
of
complaints
about
that.
D
But
what
our
hope
is-
and
let
me
know
if
you,
if
I'm
right,
is
that
by
going
with
one
vendor,
we're
having
one
partner
that
will
have
to
communicate
with
instead
of
three
if
we're
disappointed
in
how
things
are
being
done.
But
they're
also
coming
to
us
with
an
agreement
that
they're
going
to
be
better
at
these
issues.
D
Because
that
really
is
one
of
the
number
one
complaints
that
we
get
is
how
bad
they
look
when
they're
laying
on
the
ground-
or
you
know,
blocking
somebody,
especially
somebody
who
has
accessibility
issues
when
they're
trying
to
get
somewhere
absolutely
and
they've
got
a
scooter,
that's
locked
up
and
difficult
to
move.
D
My
other
kind
of
question
is:
is:
do
you
think
that,
within
our
within
the
RFP,
do
you
think
that
we'll
be
able
to
get
access
to
any
of
their
data?
Is
that
something
that
we're
seeing
in
any
other
cities?
Because
that's
one
thing
that
would
be
really
nice
to
be.
E
D
Yeah,
thank
you.
That's
great,
because
I
think
that
one
of
the
things
that
we're
trying
to
figure
out
is
like
how
are
these
being
used,
what
what
paths
are
people
taking?
Are
they
reducing
single
occupancy
vehicle
traffic?
Are
people
actually
using
them
for
transportation
and
are
they
being
used
in
an
equitable
way?
You
know
when
we
move
them
into
different
areas
of
town
and
seen
that
use
into
that
data.
I
think
is
really
really
great
to
have.
So.
Thank
you.
J
I
have
kind
of
a
follow-up
on
to
the
technology
question,
so
one
thing
that
I've
noticed
in
other
places
is
that
like,
for
example,
in
San
Francisco,
when
you
rent
a
bike,
you
can
rent
it
on
the
Lyft
app.
You
can
use
their
transit
app
or
you
have
one
other
option.
I
believe
what
kind
of
Technology
can
we
expect
to
have
deployed
to
make
it
a
little
bit
more
accessible
and
maybe
a
little
bit
easier
to
access
for
folks.
E
Council,
member,
that's
the
reason
I
mentioned.
There's
a
that
was
one
of
the
benefits
of
having
a
single
vendor
is
that
we
can
integrate
access
to
micro,
Mobility
with
other
Mobility
options
that
they
have
Transit
being
the
most
important
one.
But
there
may
be
other
aspects
that
we've
got
to
integrate
into
one
system
for
people
to
access
this
service,
and
so,
among
the
things
that
will
be
in
the
RFP,
is
that
very
thing?
We've
got
to
have
a
technology,
that's
integrated
across
agencies
here,
so
you
go
one
place
for
that
service.
That's
the
goal.
F
Mayor
Tim,
one
of
the
one
of
the
hesitations
that
some
of
us
had
when
scooters
were
first
proposed
a
few
years
ago,
was
safety
and
I.
Don't
I
really
don't
know
if
we
have
any
record
of
how
safe
these
have
been,
but
I'm
wondering
if,
if
we
do
move
forward
and
and
we
end
up
seeking
a
sponsor,
you
know
to
also
and
I,
also
appreciate
you
mentioning
the
equity
in
terms
of
folks
being
able
to
afford
this
and
and
folks
who
who
actually
need
it
and
it's
not
for
recreation.
F
But
it's
for
transportation,
I'm
wondering
if
there,
if
it's
a
possibility
for
there,
also
to
be
sponsorship
of
of
helmets
for
safety.
That
sort
of
thing,
okay,.
A
All
right
that
looks
like
it
for
now
so
am
I
correct
and
that
they'll
be.
This
will
come
back
for
another
work
session,
with
some
updates
based
on
the
conversation,
other
questions
related
to
policy.
That
staff
needs
guidance
on
in
advance
of
putting
together
the
final
RFP.
B
J
Yes,
so
will
we,
it
seems
like
we'll,
have
to
repeal
the
existing
ordinance
and
insert
a
new
ordinance
for
the
for
micro
Mobility?
Is
that
kind
of
how
it's
going.
E
A
Right,
yeah
yeah,
the
work
session
will
bring
the
stuff
we
reviewed
anything
that
came
up
today
and
questions
from
staff
related
to
policies
and
desires.
So
information
kind
of
data,
as
you
mentioned,
or
whatever
else
it
is
that
you
want
to
see
in
that
RFP,
okay
and
then
breed.
You
don't
have
to
come
up
here,
but
did
you
have
something
else
say?
I
can
repeat
it
in
the
mic.
A
Were
you
able
to
get
that?
Okay?
Just
for
the
record,
then
re-brush
from
my
office
said
they'd
be
they'd,
be
back
likely
in
two
weeks
with
follow-up
that
would
include
discussion
of
policies,
RFP
possible,
then
potential
new
ordinance
for
review
dates
and
next
steps.
Great.
Thank
you.
A
G
A
Well-
and
this
is
timely,
because
there
have
been
quite
a
few
questions
of
latest
to
how
it's
working
if
some
of
the
times
and
deadlines
should
change,
and
so
I
was
glad
to
know
when
to
let
some
members
of
the
public
know
that
we
are
working
on
this
today.
G
Thank
you,
madam
mayor
council,
members,
I'm
Tyler
Johnson
with
the
Code
Compliance
and
Community
Resources
team
I'm
here
today
to
talk
to
you
about
the
extended
parking
program
and
just
to
go
over
kind
of
the
format
for
today's
discussion.
I'll
go
over
the
background
of
the
ordinance.
G
G
The
background
on
this
is
that
on
street
parking
is
a
shared
resource
for
everybody.
What
the
parking
compliance
team
does?
It's
not
just
about
writing
tickets
to
cars,
downtown
it's
actually
to
promote
turnover
so
in
the
downtown
core.
Obviously
we
use
parking
meters
to
promote
that
churn.
G
Make
sure
we
have
short-term
parking
available
for
businesses
move
out
a
little
bit
further,
and
you
have
time
zones
that
we
also
enforce,
and
then
the
rest
of
the
city
is
covered
by
what
I
call
the
blanket
rule
of
the
72-hour
parking,
and
this
is
the
ordinance
that
we're
talking
about
today.
Basically,
a
vehicle
can
only
remain
on
the
street
in
one
place
for
72
hours,
and
then
it
has
to
move
on
to
another
location.
G
We
get
a
lot
of
complaints
about
this.
The
numbers
I
have
at
the
bottom
here.
This
is
just
people
that
have
filled
out
the
online
parking
compliance
request.
In
addition
to
these
numbers,
police
gets
many.
Many
calls
we
get
other
calls
and
emails
and
I
posted
a
couple
of
kind
of
just
random
ones.
That
I
pulled
out
of
here.
That
were
just
to
kind
of
give
you
a
flavor
of
the
different
complaints
that
we
get.
Basically,
we
get
a
lot
of
calls
for
service
asking
for
this.
G
Vehicle
has
been
parked
in
front
of
my
house.
This
trailer's
been
parked
at
this
intersection.
It's
it's,
it's
definitely
one
of
our
and
you
can
see
the
numbers
have
actually
increased
over
the
years.
G
G
And
last
year
in
April,
we
added
a
qualifier
to
this
ordinance.
Basically,
this
was
not
in
here
before,
but
we
put
a
the
vehicle
must
move
600
feet
or
more
because
we
were
getting
a
lot
of
vehicles
that
would
be
marked.
They'd
move
a
couple
feet
up
or
down
the
block
just
to
avoid
getting
a
parking
ticket
or
avoid
being
towed.
We
also
work
very
closely
with
the
Boise
Police
Department's
abandoned
vehicle
team,
which
used
to
be
in
DFA
but
was
moved
over
to
BPD
last
August.
G
We
still
work
very
closely
with
that
team,
as
well
as
the
neighborhood
contact
officers,
but
those
are
the
two
changes
that
we
made
last
year
and
then
the
numbers
I
pulled
down
below
just
three
snapshots
same
time
frame
as
those
complaints
you
saw
in
the
last
slide,
but
you
can
see
the
the
number
of
these
parking
tickets
pretty
static
over
the
years.
There
was
an
increase
from
the
19
to
20
and
then
a
slight
decrease
the
year
after
we
implemented
that.
That's
that's
pretty.
That
just
means
we're
really.
G
C
Mayor
yes
on
this
can
I
jump
in
real
two
things.
First,
I'm
pleased
and
surprised
that
we
changed
the
code
and
issued
fewer
tickets.
That's
that's
good,
but
we
also
have
a
lot
more
contact.
So
can
we
infer
that,
like
there's
a
lot
more
of
officers
talking
to
people
educating
people
interacting
with
the
public
about
this,
even
though
we're
not
using
the
more
heavy-handed
enforcement
of
tickets?
Is
that
the
right
way
to
interpret
this
data.
G
Yeah
I'm
at
a
mayor
council,
member
Beijing,
that's
that's
very
true.
We
we
probably
have
a
lot
more
discussions
about
this
code.
Now
we
get
a
lot
of
people
that
call
in
hey
my
tire
got
marked:
hey
I
got
this
orange
notice
from
abandoned
vehicles
on
my
vehicle.
What
can
I
do
so?
I
think
we
probably
that
could
probably
be
a
factor
of
why
that
number
did
go
down
slightly
in
that
Year
great.
Thank
you.
G
So
just
a
really
quick
case
example.
This
is
just
one
that
I
pulled
randomly
out
of
our
our
system.
Vehicle
Impound
unit,
which
I
referred
to
as
the
abandoned
vehicle
program
they've
received.
Multiple
complaints
about
this
same
vehicle
complaint
was
basically
there's
an
abandoned
car
on
the
street.
No
license
plates
been
sitting
here
for
weeks,
so
the
abandoned
vehicle
officer
from
BPD
went
out
six
separate
times
to
Mark
the
vehicle
and
noticed
each
time
that
the
notice
was
being
removed
and
the
vehicle
would
move
a
little
bit
up
and
down
the
block.
G
So
because
of
the
600
foot
rule,
they
ultimately
did
Issue
two
parking
tickets.
Both
tickets
have
been
paid.
The
vehicle
now
has
license
plates
on
the
vehicle
is
now
being
used
more
frequently.
So
in
this
specific
instance,
we
did
gain
compliance
by
having
those
parking
tickets
available,
whereas
before
moving
a
little
bit
resets
the
time,
if
you
will
where's
the
600
foot,
roll
basically
says
you
know
you
have
to
leave
access
equal
to
everyone
else
to
park
on
the
street.
So
that's
where
we're
seeing
a
little
bit
of
compliance
gained
with
this
education.
G
So
in
summary,
the
the
change
that
we
made
last
year
did
give
us
an
additional
tool
to
help
gain
compliance.
It
does
help
address
some
citizen
complaints
and
in
many
situations,
without
Towing.
That
Mercedes
and
last
slide
was
a
great
example
of
someone
who
never
got
their
vehicle
towed,
which
is
a
positive
situation.
G
It
can
also
help
make
those
contacts
educate
people
on
on
what
they
can
do
to
find
other
solutions
for
storing
their
vehicles.
Sometimes
people
buy
recreational
vehicles,
utility
trailers,
things
like
that,
don't
have
a
place
to
storm
and
think
they
can
just
park
them
on
the
street.
So
sometimes
a
parking
ticket
is
a
good
way
for
our
team
to
actually
make
contact
with
a
vehicle
owner
and
see
if
we
can
get
them
to
move
it
into
their
backyard,
find
a
storage
location
for
it.
G
So
with
that,
that's
kind
of
my
presentation,
hoping
to
spark
a
little
bit
of
conversation
with
you
guys
answer
any
questions
you
have
and
see.
If
we
can
come
up
with
any
tweaks
to
to
get
this
program
a
little
bit
better
for
where
we
have
it
today,.
C
Matter,
man
I've
heard
anecdotally
from
the
public
that
at
least
some
people
feel
the
600
foot.
Distance
is
not
far
enough
and
that
and
the
the
constituent
feedback
that
I've
gotten
is
there
are
some
areas
of
town
where
abandoned
or
long-term
vehicles
are
a
problem
and
those
areas
are
bigger
than
600
feet,
and
so
people
are
shuffling
within
that
area
and
the
feedback
from
the
constituents
is.
C
It
would
be
really
great
if
that
distance
were
increased
so
that
at
least
some
of
the
time
I
could
have
access
to
the
space
in
front
of
my
business
or
in
front
of
my
home
and
I
I've,
certainly
gotten
that
feedback,
but
I
wonder
if
you
have
any
feedback
or
information
on
point
from
the
city
or
from
BPD
or
from
other
people.
Apart
from
just
you
know,
a
certain
number
of
concerned
constituents.
G
Yeah
Madam
mayor
council
member,
this
is
like
I
said
before
we.
We
definitely
get
a
lot
of
complaints
about
this.
There
are
specific
pockets
of
of
the
city
where
we
get
vehicles
being
stored
on
the
street
weeks
weeks
on
end
they're,
aware
of
the
rules
and
the
distance,
and
some
of
these
like
quasi-industrial
areas,
a
vehicle
can
move
and
stay
on
the
same
block,
move
600
feet
and
move
600
feet.
G
They're
really,
you
know
the
spirit
of
the
laws
that
vehicles
cannot
be
stored
on
the
street,
so
increasing
the
distance
could
definitely
help
gain
compliance
and
getting
the
vehicle
owner
to
find
another
place
to
store
that
vehicle
or
move
to
another
part
of
town
and
not
be
clogging
up
one
part
of
the
town
and
causing
other
issues,
because
we
have
some
of
these
vehicles
cause
trash
and
needles,
and
things
like
that
around
them
and
and
there's
obviously
more
reasons
behind
that,
but
increasing
that
distance
could
help
move
that
problem
to
another
location
or
help
it
from
not
occurring
because
they're
not
staying
at
location
for
a
much
longer
period
of
time.
A
H
You
I
guess
absent,
trying
to
increase
the
distance
and
essentially
focusing
on
this
as
the
regulation.
What
other
regulations
can
we
use
if
the
if
the
problem
is
really
related
to
specific
vehicles
and
the
activities
around
those
specific
Vehicles,
rather
than
further
regulating
where
you
park
on
the
street?
H
Is
there
a
different
tact
that
we
could
take?
Have
you
thought
about
that
and
I'm
thinking
about
neighborhoods,
where,
frankly,
people
don't
have
anywhere
else
to
park,
except
on
the
street
and
from
their
house
and
we're
telling
them
that
we
want
them
to
drive
their
car
all
the
time
yeah?
So
there's
this
there's
a
bit
of
a
disconnect.
G
Yeah
Madame
mayor
council
president,
what
I
would
like
to
do
going
forward
is
is
probably
do
some
research
and
actually
the
the
NCO
team
at
BPD
has
been
already
doing
a
lot
of
research
on
on
other
cities
and,
what's
out
there,
the
reason
I
haven't
really
like
presented
any
larger
options
at
this
meeting
is
because
I
want
to
basically
say
hey.
We
made
a
change
last
year.
Let's
check
in
on
that
see
how
it's
going
and
if
it's
the
desire
of
the
council
I
think
we
could
probably
take
another
whack
at
this
code.
G
Section
I've
heard
different
ideas.
Maybe
different.
Zoning
of
different
parts
of
town
have
different
rules
that
could
be
brought
with
other
issues,
but
there's
definitely
other
options
out.
There
I
think
we
could.
We
could
also
look
at
is
72
hours,
the
right
time
frame,
maybe
that's
shortened
up,
but
but
there's
definitely
other
other
Solutions
out
there.
We
could
do
some
research
and
come
back
with
some
some
recommendations
to
update
that
code
to
see
if
we
could
get
better
compliance.
I
I
G
Madam,
mayor
council,
member
I,
I
think
the
great
points
I
think
there's
there's
definitely
some
some
more
work.
We
could
do
on
this
and
then
maybe
take
some
of
those
populations
and
point
them
in
in
directions.
You
know
if
they're,
if
they're
continuing
to
maybe
get
parking
tickets,
maybe
that
would
help
them
go,
seek
other
services
that
would
potentially
get
them
out
of
those
situations.
So
I
think
there's
some
stuff.
We
could
do.
That
would
definitely
get
us
into
a
better
position
here.
F
Thank
you
for
the
presentation,
I
guess
I'm,
going
to
go
the
other
way
with
that
I
I
had
a
constituent
reach
out
to
me
complaining
about
an
RV
part
in
the
residential
area,
and
you
know
I.
Let
him
know
that
they
could
file
a
complaint,
I
said
or
you
could
go
knock
on
the
door
and
see
if
they
need
any
help.
F
That's
another
approach.
You
know
we
could
tap
into
this
Boise
kindness
that
we
talk
about
so
much.
I
know
that
you
know
we're
not
wearing
masks
anymore.
We
a
lot
of
us,
have
our
shots
and
you
know
it
looks
like
we've
moved
on
from
covid,
but
the
reality
is
it's
still
here.
F
There
are
still
people
getting
sick
and
they
are
finding
all
kinds
of
ways
to
get
through
it
and
I
know
personally
somebody
who
used
an
RV
to
be
able
to
care
for
their
loved
one
and
there
was
no
place
on
the
property
for
them
to
park
the
RV,
and
so
my
concern
is
that
we
are
falling
in
love
with
the
regulation
and
we
are
not
being
compassionate
in
terms
of
people
trying
to
survive
the
situation
that
we
are
still
in
and
I.
Think.
F
So
it
does
concern
me
that
we
are
trying
to
press
the
gas
on
that
when
people
are
still
suffering.
So
that's
something
I
have
an
issue
with.
C
Madame
mayor
I
think
that
councilmember
Sanchez
is
right,
but
we
should
also
recognize
that
the
data
shows
that
in
this
post-covet
time,
with
this
increased
regulation,
we're
writing
fewer
tickets.
And
to
me
that
says,
the
officers
are
doing
that
work
that
they
are
being
compassionate
and
that
they
are
working
with
people
on
the
street
to
suss
out
what
the
situation
is
and
act
appropriately.
So
the
regulation
I
mean
the
evidence
we
saw
indicates
that
the
regulation
is
not
being
used
in
a
heavy-handed
way
or
coming
down
on
people.
C
I'm
curious
to
know
whether
we
have
ever
in
My
Mind
Tyler
you're
the
parking
Guru,
and
that
might
be
really
unfair.
So
you
can
say:
I,
don't
know
that's
okay,
but
whether
we
have
ever
or
whether
we
currently
have
repeat
offender
type
Provisions
in
our
parking
code
or
our
parking
rules,
because
if
it's
really
the
case
that
there's
a
handful
of
people
who
are
spoiling
it
for
everyone,
I
wonder
if
an
escalating
enforcement
with
the
problem,
children
is
a
better
way
to
handle
it.
G
Made
America
council,
member
Sanchez
and
Beijing
both
great
points
and
and
I.
Guess,
if
I
understand
the
question
correctly,
is
it
a
couple
of
bad
apples
that
spoil
the
bunch
I
would
say?
Yes,
there's
definitely
some
repeated
vendors.
We
we
do
cite
people
multiple
times
in
all
in
all
walks
of
parking.
G
What
I
would
say
is
that
we
we've
taken
a
good
step
in
the
right
direction,
but
I
think
we
could
probably
do
some
more
I
think
a
lot
of
the
my
team.
The
parking
officers
are
not
equipped
to
go
knock
on
the
the
door
of
an
RV
in
a
lot
of
situations.
So,
most
of
the
time
those
contacts
are
done
by
police,
I.
Think
they've
done
a
really
good
job
of
educating
those
folks,
but
I
think
we
could.
G
We
could
probably
find
another
balance
and
also
keep
those
things
in
mind,
but
also
gain
compliance
and
address
some
of
these
vast
number
of
complaints
that
we're
getting
so
I
think
I
think
a
little
bit
more
tweak
to
this
code
could
definitely
accomplish
all
these
goals.
Thank.
F
A
I
think
I'm
gonna
I'm
gonna
pick
up
a
on
a
couple
things
here
and
because
you're
right
Tyler
is
the
parking
person,
and
so
it
makes
sense
that
you
brought
this
today
for
the
for
the
update,
because
you
know
we
were
hearing
from
folks
that
we
needed
to
address
the
time
and
manner
in
which
people
could
park.
A
But,
as
Tyler
said
in
the
beginning
of
his
presentation,
we
also
moved
the
abandoned
vehicles
and
some
of
that
parking
enforcement
to
the
police
department.
For
a
reason
and
council
member
I
think
I
appreciate
that
you've
pointed
out
that
there
have
been
few
fewer
tickets
issued.
It
was
interesting
to
see
that
what
I
would
like
to
hear
is,
as
Tyler
suggested,
from
the
ncos
and
the
and
the
police
team.
A
Some
more
of
information,
I
think
a
work
session
on
more
information,
understanding,
more
the
nature
of
the
calls
and
the
geography
of
the
calls
and
to
see
if
there
are
Trends
there
and
determine
whether
or
not
there
are
other
interventions
that
need
to
be
made
or-
and
there
are
definitely
geographies
that
folks
are
concerned
about
we've
heard
from
a
constitution-
went
up
on
the
bench
about
an
area
that
continues
to
be
a
problem.
There's
an
area
I'm
downtown
that
continues
to
be
a
problem
and
I
believe
that
we
can.
A
We
can
do
this
differently.
We
can
address
both
people
with
compassion
and
the
expectation
that
we
hold
folks
accountable,
but
we've
got
to
be
able
to
point
them
in
the
direction
of
the
services
and
support
that
they
need,
while
we
are
holding
them
accountable
for
the
ordinances
that
we
have
in
the
books,
and
so
I'd
appreciate
and
Christine
and
I
have
talked
about
this.
A
Some
a
little
bit
I'm
having
a
deeper
conversation
about
some
of
the
other
things
that
play
in
this,
so
that
we
don't
necessarily
take
a
step
of
saying
we're
going
to
make
it
a
thousand
feet.
A
Instead
of
600
and
it's
48
Hours
instead
of
72
and
then
what
we're
seeing
is
just
a
little
bit
more
movement,
but
still
not
addressing
the
root
of
the
problem
and
being
able
to
connect
folks
with
the
services
they
need
in
order
to
hold
them
accountable
to
the
ordinances
and
roles
that
we
want
to
create,
to
protect
everyone
to
treat
folks
with
dignity,
protect
and
and
acknowledge
that
everyone
in
this
community
needs
to
be
part
of
the
solution.
A
So
I
expect
that
this
is
something
that
we
could
bring
back
for
a
work
session
at
the
right
time.
Once
some
of
more
of
the
information
has
been
pulled
together
and
our
housing
team
and
some
folks
in
these
areas,
where
there
tend
to
be
more
issues,
have
come
together.
Also
to
talk
about
some
solutions.
Solutions
tied
with
accountability,.
A
C
If
there's
a
couple,
you
know
at
least
over
I
forget
the
number
over
a
thousand,
maybe
two
thousand
complaints
and
BPD
is
primarily
handling
them.
The
administrative
burden
cost
officer
time
that
we
are
consuming
on
this
parking
thing
in
the
BPD
site
would
be
helpful
to
know
because
that's
I
know
that's
something.
That's
on
all
of
our
minds
as
we
as
we
look
at
policing.
A
Yeah
I
appreciate
that
you
know
and
I've
gone
out
in
some
ride-alongs
with
officers
that
are,
you
know,
knocking
on
the
doors
of
the
RVs
and
others
and
having
conversations
about
what
folks
know
and
it
it's
time
consuming,
there's
quite
a
bit
of
care
that
they
offer
to
these
folks
and
recognizing
the
time
that
it
takes
and
the
costs
and
then,
frankly,
that
they're,
all
at
this
point,
I'm
doing
so
much
Beyond
just
policing.
It
could
well
be
that
we
determine
that
there
are
additional
Services
interventions
or
supports
that.
J
Madam
mayor,
yes
on
a
similar
thread
to
that
Tyler
I
know
that
you
are
a
very,
very
busy
person
and
I
know
that
code
enforcement
increasingly
has
a
larger
workload.
Every
time
we
pass
an
ordinance
every
time.
Somebody
else
moves
to
the
city
as
our
population
grows.
The
demand
on
Code
Enforcement
grows
as
well.
So
I
think
that
that
would
be
a
really
great
thing
to
add
to
work
session.
Two
is
how
our
staffing
is
in
Code
Compliance
and
what
your
all
workload
looks
like
and
if
that
needs
to
be
adjusted.
F
That
a
mayor
yes
just
to
piggyback
on
on
Council
Pro
tem,
just
to
say
thank
you
to
Code
Compliance.
F
You
know
we,
we
often
hear
from
folks
different
complaints
and
I
received
one
about
a
property
that
had
a
lot
of
stuff
and
and
I
reached
out
and
whoever
it
was.
That
reported
did
a
wonderful
job
heard
back
from
the
constituent
and
said
you
guys
have
a
great
Code,
Compliance
team,
so
just
passing
that,
along
from
a
grateful
constituent,
thank
you.
K
Foreign
members
of
council,
following
Tim's
presentation
on
micro,
Mobility
I,
feel
like
I
need
to
start
with
a
disclaimer
that
my
broken
wrist
was
not
an
e-assist
device,
and
it
was
entirely
me
on
my
bicycle
attempting
a
hill
or
attempting
a
ride
in
the
Foothills.
That
was
beyond
my
capacity.
Oh,
my
goodness,
I.
K
And
the
second
question
I
was
I
was
definitely
wearing
a
helmet,
so
when
helmets
were
mentioned
in
your
previous
discussion,
I
went
out
and
bought
two
new
ones.
Because
of
that,
so
just
wanted
to
point
that
out
and
I
want
to
thank.
You.
I'm
really
excited
to
be
here
today
to
talk
to
you
and
to
share
with
you
some
of
the
work
that
we
have
been
doing
with
our
library
strategic
plan.
K
To
thank
you
both
for
your
support
and
then
to
thank
members
here
who
have
been
interviewed
or
her
Sue
in
the
case
of
council
member
Hallie
Burton
serve
on
our
steering
committee
that
have
really
helped
us,
and
while
it's
me
before
you,
this
has
really
been
a
group
effort
with
a
lot
of
involvement
from
our
community
engagement
team
and
then
obviously
the
Consultants
support
where
we
brought
in
and
outside
expert
in
libraries.
K
That
could
really
help
us
with
some
of
the
data
analysis
and
really
some
of
the
peer
benchmarking
so
really
for
today's
goals.
It's
daunting
to
try
to
summarize
the
last
six
months
of
this
work
that
we
have
done,
but
really
want
to
give
you
where
we
are
in
the
strategic
planning
process.
I
think
this
is
a
great
opportunity
to
highlight
some
of
the
work
we've
done
and
particularly
to
preview
some
of
those
next
steps
and
I
want
to
start
with
this
anchor
slide
and
a
disclosure.
This
is
not
our
strategic
plan.
K
This
is
us
having
done
a
great
deal
of
community
and
partner,
listening
and
so
I
want
you
to
really
see
that
where
we
are
I
call
this
our
anchor
slide,
because
we
use
it
in
all
of
our
staff
meetings.
All
of
our
steering
committee
meetings,
our
board
meetings,
this
outlines
what
we're
trying
to
do
in
this
process
and
it
starts
with
listening.
First,
the
role
of
libraries
is
changing,
the
community
of
Boise
is
changing,
and
so
we
really
want
to
make
sure
we're
hearing
from
the
community.
K
I've
heard
a
lot
about
the
failed
main
library
project
and
the
key
Takeaway
on
that,
and
there's
lots
of
different
lessons
in
that.
But
what
I've
heard
repeatedly
is
we
want
to
be
involved
in
understanding
how
the
library,
as
a
system,
serves
our
needs
in
a
community
and
how
we
are
maximizing
our
resources,
so
those
outcome
goals,
a
library
that
is
outwardly
focused-
has
a
positive
impact
for
the
community
and
an
entire
system
aligned
to
Maxima.
Our
value
has
really
been
our
driving
force.
K
As
you
know,
we've
talked
about
covid
we've
talked
about
growth
and
the
role
of
libraries
changing
and
those
are
pieces
that
were
really
important,
and
so,
when
I
had
discussions
with
the
library
Board
of
Trustees,
they
were
very
clear.
Take
the
time
to
do
this
right,
take
the
time
to
really
deeply
listening
and
make
sure
that
everybody
has
a
chance
to
participate
and
as
we're
able
to
reflect
back
what
we've
heard.
So
that's
why
I
talk
about
where
we
are
in
our
project
timeline?
K
We
kicked
it
off
this
spring.
We
started
with
deep
staff
listening.
You
know
that
is
our
most
valuable
resource.
That's
the
people
who
know
the
community
the
best.
Then
we
moved
into
some
partner
engagement
in
the
summer.
We
continued
that
partner
engagement,
but
really
led
into
that
public
engagement.
You
know
how
we
did
our
survey,
how
we
did
our
listening
sessions,
how
we
were
out
in
the
community,
as
I
mentioned,
some
of
the
pure
benchmarking,
and
so
here
we
are
in
the
fall
of
2022
and
we're
going
into
that
analysis
and
summary
development.
K
K
So
let
me
talk
a
little
bit
more
about
our
engagement
approach.
We
have
three
what
we
saw.
You
know
sort
of
our
our
key
stakeholders.
I
mentioned
staff
earlier
yeah.
You
know
this
was
really
important
to
have
a
staff
who
work
with
our
community
every
day
start
that
process.
So
they
we
did
a
staff
survey.
Before
we
did
a
community
survey.
We
had
80
of
our
staff.
Do
that
survey
with
us.
We
asked
staff
to
do
those
Community
listening
sessions,
so
we
did
staff
listening
sessions
first.
K
So
that
we
could
practice
what
we
wanted
to
do
with
our
community,
then
obviously
our
community
is
our
largest
stakeholder,
but
then
also
some
key
partners
that
I'll
speak
to
as
well.
K
K
So
at
all
locations
we
had
what
we
call
intercept
or
passive
activities
where,
when
you
walked
in,
we
would
have
a
question
and
we'd
want
you
to
answer
that
question,
but
we
would
also
use
it
right.
You
could
see
maybe
the
QR
code
at
the
bottom,
hey
if
you're
interested
in
providing
us
feedback,
here's
a
link
to
our
survey
we
did
tabling
at
community
events
like
I
mentioned.
K
We
wanted
to
be
where
people
were,
so
we
were
able
to
go
to
concerts
at
Lost
Grove,
a
Boise
Farmers
Market
first
Thursday
at
City
Hall,
like
really
wanting
to
be
where
people
were,
and
we
were
able
to
have
interactions
with
a
lot
of
people
in
those
that
we
also
did
in
person
in
Virtual
listening
sessions,
where
we
got
to
have
more
in-depth
discussions
with
the
community
and
then
our
community
survey,
which
we'll
have
a
lot
more
detail
on
that
that
to
us,
was
just
a
really
important
way
of
of
hearing
from
the
community,
and
we
were
pleased
by
how
many
responses
we've
gotten
and
what
those
represent.
K
So,
as
you
see
here,
here's
a
a
shot
of
our
one
of
our
staff
members.
This
is
Gates
Marquez,
who
works
at
the
Hillcrest
branch
and
they
are
leading
a
community
discussion
that
we
heard
we
in
we
had
a
focus
of
three
areas,
sort
of
in
those
discussions.
You
know
where,
where
does
the
library
Excel?
Where
can
we
improve?
How
can
we
help
it?
You
know
create
the
best
future
for
Boise
and
what
role
can
the
library
play
in
making?
K
You
know
improving
your
quality
of
life,
so
those
were
really
substantive
feedback
discussions.
We
heard
how
much
people
like
their
neighborhood
branches,
how
much
they
like
the
staff
that
they
know.
You
know,
then
the
fact
that
we
have
Gates
here,
who
knows
the
people
in
that
Community
was
having
that
discussion.
I
think
that
was
really
important.
K
We
also
heard
a
lot
about
how
the
library
can
do
better
at
Outreach
and
Partnerships,
and
particularly
some
challenge
some
people's
challenging
us.
Like
you
know,
how
can
you
be
more
visible?
How
can
you
be
more
in
the
community
where
we
want
to
see
you
and
then
also
because
of
those
place-based
discussions?
We
also
had
some
really
interesting
feedback
on
you
know.
How
can
the
library
provide
a
role
in
providing
a
place
for
Community
discussion
and
a
place
for
the
community
together
to
tackle
challenges.
K
The
community
survey
we
had
open
July
to
the
end
of
August.
We
ended
it.
We
ended.
We
ended
up
extending
it
based
on
feedback
hey.
This
is
the
summer,
and
people
are
really
busy
I.
Think
if
you
open
it
longer
like
past,
when
school
starts,
you'll
get
a
higher
response
rate.
That
was
absolutely
great
feedback.
K
Our
CE
team
also
was
tracking
where
we
were
getting
responses
from
and
did
some
targeted
advertisement
in
certain
ZIP
codes,
where
we
didn't
have
as
higher
response
rate
as
we
wanted.
So
we
wanted
to
really
have
a
great
sample
size
so
that
we
could
have
you
know
real
substantive
feedback
on
how
what
are
we
doing
well,
what
we
can
improve?
What?
What
does
the
community
want
us
to
prioritize
and
how
can
we
be
relevant
to
more
community
members?
It
was
by
far
the
largest
public
survey
the
library
has
ever
done.
K
It
was
22
questions
on
Vision
usage.
It
had
11
open-ended
questions,
12
demographic
questions.
It
was
a
real
investment
of
time
and
I
cannot
thank
the
community
enough
for
the
feedback
that
they
provided.
Us
I
want
to
thank
everyone
who
took
this
survey.
We're
also
still
working
through
it.
We
have
more
than
9
000
open-ended
survey
responses,
which
I
think
shows
the
level
of
Engagement
that
we
got,
and
that
is
a
piece
of
analytical
work
that
continues
so
now.
K
I
want
to
move
on
to
sort
of
well
who
took
this
survey
and
and
what
did
they
tell
us
so
when
I
start
with
who
took
the
survey?
One
thing
that
was
really
important
to
us
was
to
be
able
to
identify
who
took
you
know
who
took
the
survey
and
then
how
what
percentage
of
the
Boise
population
does
that
represent,
because
we
were
really
wanted
to
be
thoughtful
about
where
we
might
have
under
or
over
representation.
K
So
in
this
graph
you'll
see
we
broke
this
down
by
ZIP
code
and
you
can
see
what
percentage
of
people
identified
that
they
live
in
that
zip
code.
That's
the
darker
purple
and
the
lighter
purple
is
actually
the
city
average.
So,
like
I
said,
we
wanted
to
know
where
we
would
have
over
representation
and
underrepresentation,
and
we
were
able
to
talk
to
CE
about
this,
because
there
are
places
where
you
know.
City
of
Boise.
K
Surveys
happened
to
have
over-representation,
Library
service
have
over
representation,
so
this
is
where
I
said
like
we
were
watching
some
of
those
zip
codes
really
closely
to
see
like
Hey.
How
do
we?
How
do
we
make
sure
that
we
get
enough
so
that
overall,
we've
got
confidence
in
our
survey
sample,
but,
like
I
said,
we
had
a
great
response
from
from
our
public.
K
Another
question
that
we
really
wanted
to
focus
on
is:
are
we
getting
where
do
people
go,
and
how
do
we
make
sure
that
that
sort
of
matches
where
we
see
people
walking
in
our
doors
as
well?
So
as
you
know,
the
downtown
library
is
our
largest
location.
It
has
the
highest
use.
We
expected
that
a
couple
things
that
I
want
to
point
out
that
are
kind
of
interesting.
The
last
the
sort
of
tan
bar
is
people
who
filled
out
our
survey.
K
That
reported
that
they
use
another
library
and
there's
a
really
interesting
Geographic
element
in
that,
for
instance,
you
can
be
a
city
of
Boise
resident,
but
you're
actually
going.
You
know
you
go
to
eight
two
of
the
two
of
the
Ada
community
libraries
and
then
Garden
City
and
because
we're
part
of
a
Consortium
we
see
we
expected
to
see
that
I
think
the
the
fact
that
that's
a
larger
bar
I
think
if
we
had
broken
that
out
by
actual
locations
and
other
we
would.
K
A
Other
one
that
was
also
sorry
to
interrupt
would
be
interested
in
I
know
that
the
main
library
gets
the
most
use.
But
if
we
looked
at
total
usage,
not
counting
the
outside
the
system.
But
if
we
looked
at
total
usage
and
like
I,
don't
know
if
you
do
it
by
individual
visits
or
what
it
is
for
a
system
with
these
numbers.
B
K
A
Future
as
we've
taken
the
next
steps
just
to
understand
the
level
of
Engagement
in
users
based
on
Library,
if
there
are
other
things,
we
ought
to
be
doing.
K
Yeah,
thank
you.
Thank
you,
madam
mayor
one
other
one
that
I'd
really
like
to
call
your
attention
to,
because
this
I
think
has
been
very
interesting
to
have
internal
discussions
the
just
above
the
use,
another
Library.
So
that's
a
fuchsia-ish
color
the
online
only
so
that
we
have
a
five
percent
of
our
users
that
reported
that
they
only
use
our
our
library
online.
So
this
is
the
people.
These
are
the
people
that
have
moved
entirely
digital
and
when
I
move
to
the
next
slide.
K
What's
interesting
about
this
is
frequency
of
use.
So
we
ask
people:
how
often
do
you
use
a
library?
How
often
have
you
visited
the
Boise
Public
Library,
so
in
person,
visits
sort
of
the
highest
bar
is
that
monthly,
but
online.
Only
that
is
our
highest
percentage
of
people
who
are
using
our
digital
resources
and
they
report
a
much
higher
percentage
of
daily
or
weekly
and
I.
Think
what's
interesting
about
that
is
that's
got.
You
know,
really
interesting
implications
for
how
we
work
with
it
on
our
website.
K
K
K
I
want
to
talk
a
little
bit
more
about
what
what
they
told
us
about,
how
they
use
the
library
and
what
they
see
the
library's
role
in
the
community
is-
and
this
is
the
you
know
the
first
one
where
we
asked
people
to
look
at
some
of
our
statements
that
are
really
built
on
the
library's,
Mission
and
values
and
I
just
want
to
call
out
the
top
three,
because
I
think
the
the
top
three
supporting
Early
Childhood
literacy
and
education
and
lifelong
learning
in
a
community,
enhancing
the
quality
of
life
and
providing
universal
access
to
information
for
all
members
of
the
community.
K
You
see
overwhelming
support
for
that
role,
and
this
is
really
for
us
exciting.
You
know
this
is
what
we
do
every
day,
and
this
is
why
we
have
chosen
the
profession
that
we
we've
Chosen
and
so
to
see
the
community
reinforce.
That
I
think
was
just
really
gratifying
and
also,
you
know,
shows:
okay,
we've.
We
are
providing
a
real
important
role.
K
We
also
asked
people
to
rate
our
current
services,
and
this
is
one
that
I
want
to
call
out,
because
this
is
I
think
a
real
indicator
of
Us
coming
out
of
covid
curbside
pickup,
which
is
the
highest
ranked
as
an
excellent
service
to
users,
was
not
a
was
not
something
that
we
had
pre-coveted
at
all
locations.
We
had
it
in
a
couple
locations,
but
with
covid
that
pivot,
to
make
curbside
available
was
you
know
overwhelmingly
positive
and
I?
K
Think
what's
interesting
is
that
you
know
that
convenience
is
to
me
the
piece
that
really
stands
through
like
how
are
we
making
sure
that
we
are
providing
access
to
materials?
The
other
thing
I
want
to
call
out
is
how
low
in
comparison
is
our
programming,
particularly
programming
for
teens
children,
adults.
This
is
one
of
those
places
where
we
know
people.
K
You
know
we
heard
childhood
education,
we
heard
you
know
we
want
lifelong
learning,
I
think
that's
lower,
quite
frankly,
because
during
covet
we
weren't
doing
in-person
programming
and
we
haven't
been
able
to
you
know
we
haven't
had
that
back
as
long
and
as
at
the
volume
we
had
pre-covered.
So
this
is
one
of
those
things
that
I
think
you
see
that
covid
switch.
K
A
Question
on
that,
was
there
a
place
for
people
to
give
feedback
on?
You
know
what
they
wish
we
had.
We
had
yes.
K
Okay,
yeah
and,
and
some
of
that
is
in
some
of
that,
was
in
sort
of
questions
where
you
had
to
select
like
prioritizing,
and
some
of
it
is
in
the
open-ended.
So.
K
Some
of
that
so
then
another
question
that
we
asked
to
really
building
on
that.
You
know
that
role
for
us
in
the
quality
of
life.
Where
is
the
library's
highest
and
best
use?
What
should
our
role
be
in
some
of
those
things
that
lead
to
a
quality
of
life
so
again
access
to
education?
You
know
we
are
having
a
lead
role.
K
That
Community
clearly
sees
the
importance
of
a
library
having
a
lead
role
and
when
you
think
about
sort
of
how
libraries
have
really
focused
on
kindergarten,
Readiness
and
every
child
ready
to
read
I
think
that's
a
reflection
in
that
I
think
what's
also
interesting.
Is
that,
then
you
see
where
we
have
a
much
larger
percentage,
saying
that
you
should
have
a
large
or
small
or
even
no
role
and
I.
To
me.
K
What's
really
interesting
in
this
slide
is
how
how
there's
never
a
majority
of
these
issues
where
people
say
the
library
should
have
no
role,
but
there
are
very
clear
places
where
we
should
be
a
supporting
role
that
allows
us
to
really
focus
on.
How
do
we
provide
resources?
How
do
we
provide
support?
How
do
we
convene?
We
think
that
there's
a
a
real
role
for
the
library,
not
as
a
leader
but
isn't
enabling
others
and
I
think
that
this
is
really
indicative
of
this
and
then
I
think
one
thing
else
that
I'll
call
out.
K
F
Thank
you
so
Jessica
when
you
showed
us
the
list
of
zip
codes
that
participated
in
the
survey
and
we
saw
the
over
representation
of
certain
neighborhoods.
F
Does
that
figure
into
you
know
here
we've
got
at
the
bottom.
You
know
where
we've
got
folks,
thinking
that
the
library
shouldn't
play
a
very
strong
role
in
affordable
housing,
affordable
and
quality
Child
Care,
those
sorts
of
things.
Do
you
think,
that's
part
of
why
we're
seeing
those
types
of
responses.
K
That
Amer
council
member
Sanchez,
let's
hold
that
question
I've
got
I,
want
to
talk
about
how
we
approached
the
demographics
or
the
how
we
approached
the
underrepresented
part
because
I
I'm,
not
sure
I'll
answer
your
question.
So
we
can
come
back
to
it.
But
I
do
have
some
thoughts
on
that
coming
forward.
K
And
then
you
know,
one
of
the
things
I
think
was
really
important
for
us
was
to
understand.
Well,
how
well
does
the?
How
well
does
the
community
think
Boise
Public
Library
is
doing
in
serving
our
community
overall,
and
you
know
in
some
ways
this
is
our
report
card,
as
you
can
see
very
well
and
pretty
well
we're
85
percent,
okay,
10,
the
not
well
and
I,
don't
know
are
places
where
we
really
have.
You
know
this
is
why
we
put
in
a
lot
of
those
open-end
questions.
K
If
we're
not
meeting
your
needs,
tell
us
why
not
and
so
we're
doing
that
work
to
really
dive
into
that
and
then
I.
We
also
are
spending
a
lot
of
time
on
the,
if
you're
not
currently
using
our
library.
Why
not?
What
prevents
or
discourages
you
you
know
this
to
us?
Is
you
know
also
that
bit
of
we
want
our
use?
K
We
want
our
resources
to
be
as
useful
and
used
by
the
community
as
possible
and
see
here
are
some
of
the
ways
that
people
told
us
things
that
prevented
or
discouraged
them
from
using
our
location.
They're
not
convenient
I,
don't
have
a
need
for
Library.
Services
hours
is
a
not
convenient,
I'm,
not
interested
in
the
materials
that
you
have
I,
don't
know
what's
available
or
how
to
use
it.
I
don't
feel
welcome
in
the
library
and
it
takes
too
long
to
get
materials.
K
These
are
things
that
we've
all
you
know
need
to
dig
into.
We
take
them
seriously.
You
know-
and
this
is
why
we
had
those
open-ended
questions,
because
we
want
to
make
sure
that
we
are
intentional
about
making
sure
that
when
we
can
address
these
issues
that
we
are.
K
And
as
as
council
member
Sanchez
said,
one
of
the
things
that
we
really
wanted
to
do
was
think
about
how
we
get
non-users.
How
do
we
understand
who
isn't
using
the
library
and
how
we
can
reach
them
and
make
sure
that
we're
meeting
their
needs?
K
So
one
of
the
things
we
wanted
to
do
is
really
activate
our
partners
and
really
make
sure
that
we
were
hearing
from
the
people
who
work
with
Community
organ
community
members
and
serve
the
public
in
different
ways.
What
they
can
help
us
understand.
K
We
did.
We
asked
our
consultant
to
do
interviews
with
the
to
the
city
and
Library
leadership
and
City
departments
and
key
Partners
to
us.
It
was
really
important
that
we
had
a
an
honest
conversation
that
would
be
really
sort
of
brutally
honest
like
where
we
were
stepping
up
and
where
we
were
not.
K
So
we
wanted
to
make
sure
that
that
was
that
gave
people
the
opportunity
to
provide
us
an
anonymous
feedback,
Community
organizations,
because
those
are
organizations
based
here.
We
wanted
those
relationships.
So
staff
did
those
interviews
because
we
use
this
as
an
opportunity
to
build
long-term
Partnerships.
K
So
you'll
see
here
lots
of
thanks
to
my
colleagues,
every
Department
director
that
I
said
I
would,
like
you
know
someone
on
your
team
to
help
us
really
see
opportunities
for
engagement,
we're
here
what
the
takeaways
that
we
got
from
that
huge
appreciation
for
Library
staff
and
what
they
do
and
how
they
serve
the
public.
You
know
hearing
from
different
parts
of
the
city
that
actually
refer.
K
You
know
people
have
questions
where
they
get
referred
to
the
library,
because
they
know
that
we'll
be
able
to
answer
questions,
a
recognition
that
we
are
an
organization
in
transition,
both
the
city
and
the
library,
and
then
we
really
had
a
call
to
collaborate
and
partner
in
new
ways
that
the
issues
that
the
city
of
Boise
is
facing
can't
be
handled
by
one
organization
alone.
It
really
does
require
all
of
us
to
be
at
the
table
together,
which
I
thought
was
a
a
great
message
and
then
that
Community
organization
piece.
K
So
this
is
how
we
are
approaching
some
of
those
non-users
from
demographic
groups
that
we
thought
that
we
knew
were
underrepresented
and
that
we
want
to
really
make
sure
that
we're
serving
well.
So
that
you
know-
and
this
is
an
ongoing
piece-
we
did
Outreach
to
about
20
different
organizations-
we've
done
interviews
with
14
of
them-
you
see
education,
you
know
right
there,
but
also,
how
do
we
make
sure
we're
serving
the
small
business
Community?
How
do
we
reach
renters
or
low-income
housing
residents?
Immigrants,
refugees,
English
Learners?
K
This
was
a
really
positive
place
for
us
to
either
reinforce
Partnerships
that
we
already
had
or
to
build
Partnerships
with
new
organizations.
In
a
you
know,
a
tip
of
the
hat
to
Kate
Nelson
and
the
mayor's
office,
who
really
helped
us
make
sure
we
were
reaching
out
to
the
right
right
team
on
this
Madame
mayor.
I
Thank
you,
director
I
would
like
to
add
another
organization
in
the
education
and
that's
the
West
data
School
District,
because
there's
two
school
districts
that
incorporate
in
the
city
of
Boise-
it's
not
just
Boise
school
district,
so
I
think
we
need
to
make
sure
that
that
there's
another
school
district
represented
there.
K
Madam
mayor,
thank
you,
member,
thank
you,
council,
member
Willis.
Yes,
absolutely
West
Ada
is,
and
it's
such
an
interesting
and
we
actually
spend
a
lot
of
time
with
the
Ada
Community
Library,
which
serves
more
of
those
students
but
you're
right.
They,
you
know
a
student
could
be
served
by
either
library
or
either
School
District.
So
that's
a
very
good
point.
Thank
you.
Not.
H
A
mirror
thank
you
director,
while
we're
on
this
I
wonder
if
you
thought
about
reaching
out
to
the
Small
Business
Development
Center,
and
also
the
Idaho
non-profit,
Development,
Center,
I
I
think
those
would
be
too.
That
would
be
pretty
valuable,
there's
also
a
women
in
business
resource
center.
I
can't
remember
the
exact
name
of
it,
but
it
councils
women
who
are
trying
to
start
businesses.
K
Thank
you
for
the
council
president
clay.
Yes,
this
I
only
put
the
list
of
the
who
we've
reached
out
to
or
actually
who
we've
had
a
conversation
with,
but
would
love
to
have
additional
ideas,
because
I
think
the
more
that
we
can
promote
our
resources
and,
quite
frankly,
that's
one
of
the
things
that
we
learned
in
our
some
of
the
open-ended
survey.
Questions
is
like,
oh
I
think
you
should
have
this
resource
and
it's
like.
K
Oh,
we
have
that
resource
there,
there's
a
real
there's,
a
lot
of
work
for
us
to
do
in
helping
people
be
more
aware
of
what
resources
we
have
and
helping
them
navigate
and
find
them
and
I
think
some
of
those
places
where
we
can
use
our
convening
power
to
help
organizations
connect.
I.
Think
that
you
know
having
the
idea
of
thinking
about
different
sectors
and
how
we
support
them
is
really
is,
is
really
important
to
us.
Madame.
A
Mayor
here's
a
second
I
was
just
going
to
say
the
organization
that
the
council
president
is
talking
about.
I
can't
remember
what
it's
called
either,
but
it's
led
by
Diane
Bevin
and
it's
connected
with
the
Small
Business
Development
Center
they're,
both
SBA
grantees,
so
the
Small
Business
Development
Center
would
be
able
to
connect
you
with
the
women's
Business.
F
Thank
you,
madam
mayor,
thank
you
so
Jessica
when
we
were
leading
efforts
for
the
2020
census
here
at
the
city
of
Boise,
we
put
together
a
list
of
what
we
call
informal
Community
leaders.
H
F
These
are
folks
who
probably
wouldn't
be
associated
with
these
wonderful
organizations.
We
did
partner
with
them
as
well,
but
these
are
folks
who
have
just
earned
the
trust
of
their
Community.
They
don't
have
any
official
titles
they're
just
that
person
that
that
folks,
trust
and
I
believe
I
hope.
Community
engagement
still
has
that
list
so
and
if
not,
we
can
certainly
talk
to
the
consultant
who.
B
K
K
So
I
just
want
to
mention
one
other
thing
that
is
going
to
go
into
sort
of
the
culmination
of
our
phase.
One
listening-
and
this
is
the
work
that
we
asked
our
consultant
Burke
to
do-
is
to
do
some
peer
benchmarking
with
us
to
really
help
us
understand.
K
How
do
we
compare
to
peer
libraries,
and
particularly,
where
can
we
learn
from
other
libraries
that
are
doing
really
well
in
some
of
the
areas
that
were
identified
so
some
the
the
city
has
had
a
list
of
sort
of
peer
cities,
but
some
of
those
cities
have
a
different
Library
structure,
so
they
don't
matches
appear
to
us.
You
know
comparing
a
District
Library
versus
comparing
a
Municipal.
K
Library
are
very
different,
and
so
we
asked
Burke
to
really
look
at
okay,
find
us
some
peers
and
try
to
find
some
that
are
just
a
little
bit
further
ahead
of
us
in
some
cases,
in
growth
or
in
services
that
they
provide
and
really
what
I'm
excited
about.
Is
these
in-depth
proton
in-depth
profiles
that
they
did
because
one
of
the
things
when
we
you
know
have
all
this
data
and
listening
and
we're
trying
to
think
about
where
we're
going?
Having
somebody
say
like
oh
Scottsdale,
really
has
the
partnership
with
the
school
districts
figured
out.
K
K
So,
as
I
mentioned,
we
are
really
coming
to
the
culmination
of
that
phase
one
and
we're
working
to
provide
a
comprehensive
summary
of
all
those
inputs
that
pull
that
together
and
give
us
a
really
robust
report
about
where
Boise
Public
Library
is
right.
Now
what
is
the
community?
How
does
the
community
value?
How
does
the
community
want
to
use
it
and
where
some
of
the
you
know
places
that
we
see
comparing
it
to
peers
is
either
above
or
below
and
where
it
can
grow
we're
going
to
come
back
after
that?
K
This
is
when
we
actually
draft
the
plan,
so
this
is
when
we're
going
to
come
up
with
our
you
know
three
to
five
year
priorities
for
the
next
three
to
five
years:
spoiler
alert
you'll,
see
education
in
it.
Right
like
that,
is
so
clear
that
we're
going
to
really
make
sure
that
we
are
focused
on
that
lifelong
learning
and
and
particularly
early
childhood
and
and
education
support.
K
That's
going
to
be
something
that
we're
going
to
continue
to
engage
with
staff
partners.
The
public
aboard
come
back
to
you,
City
Council
of
saying,
like
hey,
here's,
what
we
heard
and
here's
the
direction
that
we're
setting
and
then
we'll
move
into
phase
three,
where
we're
really
going
to
have
opportunities
to
put
that
plan
in
place
have
some
new
initiatives
that
come
out
of
it.
J
Mayor,
thank
you
for
that
Jessica,
it's
great
to
get
an
update
on
where
you
all
are.
We
use
Library
all
the
time
and
my
son
loves
to
see
his
dollar
amount
ticking
up
every
time
on
how
much
he
saved
by
checking
out
his
books
at
the
library.
So
it's
really
fun
what
so
on
the
phase
three,
because
I
think
one
of
the
ways
we
went
one
of
the
one
of
the
ways
we
got
a
little
bit
sideways.
J
Last
time
we
developed
a
strategic
plan
and
went
about
implementing
it
is
that
it
had
a
very
long
timeline
for
execution.
I
believe
it
was
20
years
by
the
end
of
that
20
years,
Boise
looked
very
different.
We
had
a
lot
of
folks
who
didn't
feel
connected
to
that
initial
strategic
plan
and
I
think
that
we
all
saw
the
The
Fallout
from
that.
So
have
you
considered
that
in
the
implementation
schedule
for
this
strategic
plan.
K
Madam
mayor,
thank
you,
councilmember
woodings.
We
thought
really
carefully
about
that.
The
20-year
plan
that
you're
referring
to
was
actually
a
facilities
plan.
Okay
and
you,
actually,
you
want
to
have
your
facilities
planned
longer,
just
because
of
the
time
frame
that
it
takes
to
do
building
stuff.
As
you
can
see.
This
is
why
we
now
have
Public
Works,
helping
us
manage
our
buildings
and
not
me,
but
what's
important
in
that,
is
that
the
strategy
like
what
are
the
programs
and
services
that
should
lead
the
facilities
plan
yeah?
What
are
we?
K
What
are
we
trying
to
do
and
what
does
the
city
want
us
to
do
as
a
community
organization,
then
use
that
to
say?
Okay,
knowing
the
assets
that
we
have,
let's
put
together
a
plan
that
addresses
you
know.
Others
are
there
gaps
in
locations?
What
are
ways
that
we
could
fill
those
is
it
we
need
another
location
here.
Is
it
that
we
need?
You
know
more
lockers?
Is
it
pop-up?
You
know
we
have
a
lot
of
potential.
K
I
want
to
really
be
clear
from
what
the
community
wants
and
the
programs
and
the
services
before
we
do
that
planning,
but
I
expect
we'll
need
to
do
that
facilities
planning
shortly
thereafter
because
of
the
growth
of
the
city.
Because
of
you
know
the
the
different
buildings
that
we
have
and
where
they
are
in
their
life
cycle.
That
will
come
next,
but
I
think
it's
really
important
to
lead
with.
A
Well
and
then
also
I
just
say:
I'm
a
councilman
that
puts
them
that
you
know
that
feedback
is
noted
and
important.
So
you
know
for
the
record
for
the
library
folks
it
might
be
here
longer
than
we
are
and
knowing
that
when
we
move
into
that
facilities
plan,
we
should
also
be
like
cognizant
of
the
fact
that
can
like
it's
20
years
is
a
long
time.
A
So
if
the
final
big
project
is
a
year
20,
then
we
likely
need
to
do
continuous
feedback
and
communication
with
the
public
throughout
that
plan,
so
that
it
so
we
don't
repeat
the
mistakes
in
the
past
better
mayor.
F
Thank
you
so
Jessica.
There
was
a
slide
where
you
showed
how
folks
are
using
the
library
that
there
are
folks
who
go
to
the.
F
K
Little
closer
Madame,
America,
councilmember,
Sanchez
yeah,
that's
one
of
the
things
we're
working
with
it
is
to
really
understand
that
that
was
a
fascinating
finding
for
me
and
was
fascinating
for
it,
and
so
one
of
the
things
that
they've
started
doing
is
actually
turning
on
like
their
tracker
of
okay.
Where
do
people
go?
K
F
You
Jessica
just
a
quick,
follow
it
mattamere
I,
really
appreciate
the
questions
about
affordable
housing.
You
know
issues
about
you
know
basic
needs
that
people
have
I
think
when
folks
are
struggling,
having
to
go
to
different
locations,
to
find
information
to
find
resources
can
be
really
demoralizing
and
and
if
folks
are
using
the
library
to
access
job
opportunities,
housing,
medical
information,
I,
I,
think
we
should.
We
should
Supply
that,
so
we
don't
have
people
living
in
their
cars,
we
don't
have
people
showing
the
signs
of
poverty
that
we
don't
want
to
see.
F
I
I
think
we
should
absolutely
support
that
and
I
hope.
If,
if
that's
what
we
see
in
the
internet,
use
I'm
hoping
it
will
will
change
folks
Minds
about
the
purpose
of
our
library,
and
so
thank
you
for
that.
H
Thank
you,
quick
question
in
your
slides,
I
didn't
see
much
open-ended
questioning
and
what
is
it
we're
not
doing
like
we
weren't
doing
curbside
service
three
years
ago
that
people
would
like
to
see
us
doing?
How
are
we
getting
that
information.
K
K
C
K
Know
you
know
three
paragraphs,
because
we
really
want
to
do
it
well,
so
that
when
we
come
back
with
that
information,
it
has
been
read
and
analyzed
great.
Thank.
I
You
director,
thank
you
so
much.
This
is
a
treasure
Trove
of
information,
I,
really
like
that.
You
broke
it
out
by
ZIP
code.
I.
Think
that's
great
I
liked
that
it
was
so
comprehensive
I,
like
the
best
practices
that
it
was
interesting,
that
it
reflected
some
of
my
personal
experience
using
the
library
both
during
the
pandemic.
I
You
know
having
books
shipped
to
your
house,
amazing
and
then
also
just
the
use
of
the
County
Libraries,
because
of
where
I've
I've
lived,
there's,
not
a
Boise
branch
close,
so
you
have
to
go
to
the
county
and
with
that
in
mind,
I'm
really
Keen
to
see
what
the
survey
said
about
location,
I,
understand
the
importance
of
services,
but
if
you
can't
get
to
a
location,
the
services
aren't
relevant
because
they're
not
close
to
you
and
I
I,
think
we've
seen
that
there's
a
donut
hole
in
some
parts
of
our
city,
particularly
in
the
west
and
I'm
interested
to
see
how
we're
going
to
make
sure
that
there's
equal
access
to
those
services.
K
Madam
mayor
kasmo,
Willis
I,
really
appreciate
you
saying
that
at
that
point
about
equal
service,
I
think
is,
is
is
so
important
and
I
in
a
survey
that
was
about
programs
and
services.
The
facilities
need
came
in
loud
and
clear.
You
saw
it
as
a
barrier,
and
so
you
know
this
I
think
it
was
why
it
was
so
important
for
us
to
do
this.
Is
the
community
is
telling
us
to?
You
know
to
move
that
to
move
that
conversation
forward
as
quickly
as
possible.