►
From YouTube: Boise City Council - Strategic Planning Session
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Yeah
we've
got
a
quorum
alrighty
well
good
morning,
everybody
and
Welcome
to
our
warning
strategic
planning
session,
we'll
go
ahead
and
just
have
the
clerk
call
us
I'll
call
us
to
order,
but
clerk
call
the
roll,
oh
hello,
you're
with
us
today
and
then
we'll
move
into
non-consent
only
Bajan.
Oh,
we
still
here.
C
A
Thanks
and
Jamie
is
here
not
to
call
roll
or
be
clerk,
but
to
talk
about
non-consent.
Knowing
sorry
about
that
all
right,
Jump,
On,
In,
all.
D
Right,
Madam,
mayor
council
members,
thanks
for
having
me
here
today
to
talk
about
non-consent
Towing,
let's
see
if
we
can
get
the
presentation
up
on
the
screen
excellent,
so
today,
I'm
here
to
talk
about
non-consent
Towing
and
want
to
provide
some
background
in
history
about
non-consent
Towing
talk
about
some
of
the
current
challenges
that
we've
had
talk
about
stakeholder
feedback
that
we've
received
thus
far
and
what
we're
hoping
to
do
in
the
future.
Talk
about
potential
amendments,
a
few
of
them.
D
So
with
regards
to
the
background
in
2008,
the
original
ordinance
was
developed.
At
that
time
it
was
created
by
the
Boise
Police
Department,
the
abandoned
vehicle
unit
and
with
stakeholder
input.
A
part
of
that
ordinance,
as
it
was
drafted,
was
to
include
licensing
and
the
clerk's
office
was
engaged
to
do
the
licensing
for
the
actual
businesses
for
non-consent
Towing,
as
we
continue
to
license
as
we
work
through
the
licensing
process.
D
Internally,
in
2013
clear
through
2015,
we
looked
at
some
different
approaches
on
how
we
could
maybe
amend
the
non-consent,
towing
ordinance
or
look
at
ways
to
manage
it.
We
began
with
an
ordinance
rewrite
and
we
work
with
stakeholders
at
that
time
to
do
that
rewrite.
However,
in
the
alternative
we
also
looked
at
establishing
an
RFP
to
have
a
single
or
multiple
service
provider
without
having
a
licensing
mechanism,
but
rather
look
at
providing
that
service
through
RFP.
D
Many
of
those
individuals
were
involved
in
the
2013
to
2015
process
and
again
have
come
back
asking
us
to
take
a
look
at
some
of
the
inconsistencies
that
they
see
some
of
the
safety
concerns
that
they
see
and
we'll
walk
through
those
here
shortly,
but
probably
at
the
Forefront
of
that
is
we
regulate
the
fees
that
they
are
able
to
charge
for
their
towing
services
for
non-consent,
toes
with
inflation
and
Rising
gas
prices.
They
are
concerned,
and
probably
rightfully
so
as
they're
not
able
to
actually
recover
their
costs.
D
As
I
mentioned,
some
of
the
current
challenges
that
we
see
is
really
the
inconsistency
with
how
we
license
other
Industries,
the
safety
standards
that
are
in
place,
and
particularly
with
regards
to
those
that
are
also
driving
services.
So,
like
taxis,
non-commercial,
Vehicles
Etc,
you
can
see
some
of
those
inconsistencies
listed
here
in
some
of
those
safety
concerns
and
in
the
proposed
recommendations
for
moving
forward.
I'll
address
these
a
little
bit
more
specifically.
D
In
addition,
there
are
enforcement
inconsistencies
that
really
cause
some
difficulties
for
us
in
regulating
the
tow
industry
for
non-consent,
toes
challenges
that
make
it
hard
for
us
to
enforce
some
of
those
regulations,
because
some
of
those
requirements
and
Authority
are
given
to
police.
Some
of
the
authority
is
given
to
our
code
compliance
office,
Tyler
Johnson,
is
here
and
can
talk
more
specifically
about
that.
D
If
you
have
any
questions,
but
it
really
causes
challenges
and
we're
trying
to
deal,
although
with
few
but
those
Bad
actors
that
we
have
within
the
industry,
so
I
wanted
to
touch
a
little
bit
about
stakeholder
Outreach
and
what
we
have
done
thus
far
back
in
the
2013
to
2015
timeline,
we
did
work
with
contractors
that
we
have
for
towing
services
to
go
through
the
ordinance
and
to
really
take
a
look
at
what
the
best
practices
were
that
they
had
seen
throughout
the
industry
in
their
work
within
the
industry.
We
currently
contract.
D
Excuse
me
with
service
providers
for
towing
and
parks
for
scofflatos
and
for
abandoned
vehicle
toes,
so
those
are
areas
that
we
worked
with
those
individuals
to
make
sure
that
we
understood
what
their
needs
and
concerns
were.
We
also
had
a
large
stakeholder
meeting,
both
internal
and
external
stakeholders.
There
were
probably
about
40
of
us
in
the
room
at
the
time
and
we
got
a
lot
of
really
good
feedback
and
had
a
lot
of
good
engagement
during
those
discussions,
as
I
mentioned
since
then,
the
Idaho
Towing
Association
has
reached
out
to
us.
D
We
did
have
them
review
our
existing
ordinance
and
have
their
feedback
based
on
an
initial
review
of
what
we
currently
have
in
place,
and
we
will
present
those
here
shortly
in
the
presentation
and
what
they're
hoping
to
achieve.
However,
as
we
move
forward
based
on
your
direction
today,
we
will
have
to
reach
back
out
to
the
industry.
We
want
to
gain
more
information
from
them.
D
So
when
we
focus
on
these,
excuse
me
the
licensing,
safety
and
consistency.
We
are
really
in
agreement
with
a
lot
of
the
goals
that
were
proposed
from
2013
to
2015
as
a
staff
to
really
align
the
regulation
of
non-consent,
Towing
businesses
with
other
driving
businesses
licensed
by
the
city,
as
I
mentioned,
like
taxis,
non-commercial
vehicles,
and
really
to
create
a
more
rigorous
safety
major
and
for
the
protection
of
our
community.
By
doing
such.
D
So
when
we
look
at
how
we
license
other
driving
businesses
within
the
city,
we
license
the
business
itself,
which
is
what
we
currently
do
with
non-consent
Towing.
But
we
also
license
the
individual
vehicles
and
we
also
license
the
individual
drivers.
We
do
that
for
a
variety
of
reasons,
primarily
from
the
safety
aspect.
As
you
can
see
here
from
the
vehicle
standpoint,
we
would
if
we
license,
have
an
initial,
an
annual
safety
inspections
of
those
Vehicles
right
now.
D
The
way
the
code
is
written,
inspections
of
those
Vehicles
don't
occur
until
90
days
after
a
vehicle
is
on
the
road,
so
it
could
be
on
the
road
in
a
non-safe
working
condition
for
up
to
90
days
so
again
to
be
consistent
with
taxis,
commercial
vehicles.
Limos
we
do
those
inspections
up
front
to
ensure
whatever
is
on
the
road
is
actually
in
safe
and
in
good
working
condition.
D
We
would
have
standard
safety
inspections
that
would
be
potentially
accepted
across
agencies,
because
these
Towing
drivers
are
required
to
be
licensed
at
the
county
level
and
at
the
state
level.
So
it
would
make
sense
that
we
have
consistent
and
not
duplicative,
Inspection,
Services
or
standards
across
all
of
our
agencies.
D
We
also
want
to
verify
the
class
of
trucks
so
making
sure
that
if
it
is
a
light
duty
truck
they're
only
hauling
things
that
are
appropriate
for
that
type
of
light
duty
vehicle
and
not
overloading
those
vehicles
again
standardization.
D
Additionally,
we
would
like
like
to
license
drivers.
The
code
currently
has
us
do
a
background
check
on
all
drivers.
However,
they
are
not
licensed.
So
if
there
is
somebody
who
is
not
acting
with
appropriate
conduct
or
they're
doing
things
unsafely,
we
don't
have
the
ability
to
pull
a
license
because
there
isn't
one
right.
D
So
we
can
go
back
to
that
business
and
ask
to
hold
that
business
accountable,
but
that
driver
who
has
an
ID
could
go
someplace
else,
potentially
and
work
because
they
pass
the
background
check
again,
it's
not
a
license
that
we
have
any
accountability
to.
So
we
would
like
to
be
able
to
do
that
as
well.
D
For
staff
recommendations
for
potential
policy
changes
would
be
to
amend
the
code
format.
You
often
hear
me
here
talking
about
31a,
which
is
our
general
business
licensing
regulation.
This
code
section
was
never
changed
to
be
in
the
same
format
as
the
other
code
sections
and
to
refer
to
that
higher
General
licensing
standard.
So,
for
example,
the
appeal
process
for
anybody
who
has
a
an
appeal
for
a
non-consent
tow
driving
license.
D
D
We've
been
working
with
police
and
we
do
see
challenges
with
our
rotation
list
that
is
used
and
provided
to
our
dispatch
service
and
we'd
like
to
develop
requirements
within
our
code
section
potentially
to
address
some
of
the
challenges
that
we
are
seeing
there.
We
would
also
like
to
create
a
professional
code
of
conduct,
because
many
of
the
complaints
that
we
get
address
the
code
of
conduct
and
how
these
professionals
are
acting
and
interacting
with
the
public
and
the
concerns
surrounding
that,
but
we
really
don't
have
any
teeth
in
how
we
can
regulate
that
foreign.
D
The
industry
recommendations,
many
were
in
alignment
with
the
ones
that
we
already
discussed
that
are
also
from
staff,
but
as
we
look
at
some
of
the
specific
ones
that
they
had,
we
look
at
the
increased
Towing
fees,
as
I
mentioned
those
fees
that
they
can
charge
for
doing
a
non-consent
toe
are
embedded
within
the
code
and
have
not
been
changed
since
2008.,
so
as
they
are
looking
at
inflation
costs
as
they
are
looking
at.
Obviously,
Staffing
costs
they're
looking
at
the
gas
prices.
D
Those
fees
that
we
created
in
2008
aren't
necessarily
keeping
up
with
the
cost
for
them
to
do
business
so
wanting
to
address
what
those
look
like
also
annual
full
DOT
inspections
is
a
recommendation
from
them.
So,
as
we
talk
about
inspections,
that's
something
that
we
would
like
to
look
at.
They
ask
us
to
clarify
various
definitions
in
the
code,
and
you
can
see
some
examples
of
the
specifics
that
they
had.
There
also
Vin
inspections.
D
They
would
like
to
address
the
release
of
vehicles
and
Industry
reimbursement
for
the
release
of
vehicles,
so,
for
example,
if
they
show
up
on
site
based
on
a
city
request,
somebody
comes
out
and
says:
please
don't
tow
my
vehicle,
we
ask
them
to
stand
down
they
if
they
have
not
hooked
up
to
that
vehicle.
They're
asked
to
walk
away
and
they're
asking
for
reimbursement
for
them
to
do
that.
D
Also,
they
are
asking
for
more
regular
Communication
in
standard
contacts
with
the
city
as
well,
and
I
think
that
that
is
something
that
we
always
aim
to
do,
but
can
always
do
better
at
is
having
those
ongoing
conversations
with
various
Industries
I
did
want
to
pull
out
and
specifically
talk
to
the
fee
structure
options
that
we
have.
So
what
we
could
do
is
look
at
the
existing
fees
that
are
within
code
adjust
those
and
potentially
add
an
administrative
fee
to
cover
those
additional
costs
for
processing
the
vehicles.
D
We
could
look
at
a
flat
fee
model.
We
could
look
at
providing
a
sliding
range
for
things,
such
as
mileage
fees
or
we
could
have
a
combination
of
all
of
those
things.
So
I
think
these
are
just
the
initial
thoughts
that
have
come
from
the
industry
initial
thoughts
that
have
come
from
staff.
We
would
like
to
go
back
out.
D
So
really,
when
we
talk
about
next
steps,
certainly
we
are
here
today
to
look
to
you
to
see
your
policy
direction.
Are
we
based
on
the
recommendations
from
the
industry
and
staff
headed
in
the
right
direction?
Are
there
other
things
that
you
would
like
to
see,
or
would
you
like
to
see
us
go
in
a
different
direction
than
what
we
have
proposed,
regardless
of
the
direction
unless
it
is
to
stand
down
from
this
project?
At
this
time
we
would
obviously
do
additional
stakeholder
meetings.
We
would
include
some
outside
agencies
as
well.
Just
like
anything
else.
D
If
there's
the
adoption
of
fees
or
change
in
fees,
we
would
potentially
need
to
do
a
public
hearing
for
that
and
come
back
to
you
at
a
further
or
future
work
session
to
address
some
of
these
potential
changes.
So
with
that
stand
for
questions
and
seek
counsel
Direction
on
how
to
move
forward
with
this
ordinance.
E
F
You
so
I
appreciate
this
I'm
glad
that
we're
finally
getting
here
2008
is
way
too
long
to
go
without
reviewing
a
fee
structure.
F
So
at
very
least,
we
have
to
do
that
in
addition
to
the
list
you
mentioned,
I
I,
like
the
list
that
you
mentioned
one
of
the
one,
is
a
question
about
one
of
the
things
on
there.
You
want
to
standardize
the
licensing
and
inspection.
Have
you
talked
to
Ada
County,
yet
I
know
that
they
have
a
licensing
and
inspection
I,
think
they
once
a
year.
They
do
something
that
everybody
can
come
if
they'd
like
have.
We
talked
to
them
yet
about
participating
in
that.
D
Madame
mayor
councilmember,
Clegg
I
have
been
in
discussions
over
the
last
year
or
two
with
Ada
County,
looking
at
that
having
one
inspection
process
also
for
the
state
of
Idaho
as
well,
because
they
do
something
that
is
similar.
The
last
I
spoke
to
Ada
County.
They
were
looking
at
reviewing
their
code
and
making
some
of
those
changes
and
that
had
been
just
placed
on
hold
temporarily,
so
I
need
to
reach
back
out
to
them
based
on
your
direction.
D
F
I
would
like
to
see
us
adopt
the
the
same
standard
if
we
can.
Similarly,
some
of
the
other
cities
around
the
valley,
especially
the
bigger
ones.
I
know,
Meridian
has
been
looking
at
theirs,
for
instance.
So
if
you
could
add
that
to
the
list,
I
appreciate
it,
one
of
the
things
I've
heard
from
the
industry
is
that
some
companies
are
licensing
separate
trucks
as
separate
llc's,
and
in
doing
that,
then
they
get
on
the
list
for
being
called
for
non-consent
towing
more
often
than
they
would
if
they
were
just
one
business
license.
D
Madam
mayor
councilmember,
Clegg
I
took
a
look
at
the
list
of
non-consent
tow
companies
that
we
have
and
out
of
all
of
the
companies
that
we
have.
We
don't
have
one
owner
that
has
multiple
companies,
so
I,
don't
know
that
that
in
fact
is
true
from
the
city
standpoint,
but
we
could
address
that
within
any
code
changes
we
do
that
with
our
taxi
industry
to
make
sure
that
they
are
not
creating
different
businesses.
F
Two
more
if
I
could
one
is
that
sometimes
there
are
difficult
toes
say:
a
car
goes
off,
Bogus,
Basin,
Road
and
somebody
has
to
get
it
today.
Those
toes
are
considered
whatever
fee
structure
there
is
and
there's
no
administrative
fee
for
the
difficulty
have
we
looked
at
as
we
look
at
fees
addressing
that.
D
Madam,
mayor
councilmember,
Clegg
I
think
there
are
multiple
ways
that
we
could
address
that,
based
on
the
weight
of
the
truck,
we
could
have
variable
fees
for
those
difficult
toes.
We
could
have
additional
fees
that
might
be
able
to
be
in
place
for
that.
Also
right
now
we
do
have
a
labor
fee
by
hour,
so
that
sometimes
addresses
some
of
those
things,
because
it
would
take
you
longer
to
deal
with
potentially
a
rollover,
so
you
can
charge
hourly
for
that.
D
So
I
think
there's
multiple
ways
that
we
could
address
that
and
again
we
would
want
to
look
at
the
other
local
agencies,
how
they
potentially
manage
that
and
work
with
the
industry,
but
I
think
it's
a
great
point
to
recognize
that
there
are
those
more
difficult
Toes
that
cost
the
industry
more
money
to
manage.
Thank.
F
You
and
last
question
and
then
and
a
a
suggestion
when
we
do
non-consentos
now
we
allow
so
what
you're
telling
me
is
we
allow
them
if
they've,
already
hooked
up
to
unhook
and
not
tow
the
vehicle.
If
the
owner
arrives,
and
in
that
case
they
can
charge
a
50
fee,
but
if
they
haven't
hooked
up
yet,
but
they're
there
they're
not
able
to
charge
a
fee,
am
I
I
just
want
to
make
sure
I
was
understanding
that
correctly
Madam.
F
And
so
the
fix
would
be
that
we'd
also
happen
to
administrative
fee,
just
for
showing
up,
okay,
perfect
and
then.
Finally,
my
suggestion
as
we
amend
this
code,
I'd
like
to
see
at
taking
the
taking
a
look
at
taking
the
fees
out
of
the
code
and
putting
them
into
a
fee
schedule
like
we
do
with
our
other
fees,
so
that
we
review
them
once
a
year
at
budget
and
see
if
they
need
changed.
F
E
All
right,
I
think
it's
my
turn.
Jamie
first
of
all,
I
just
cannot
even
fathom
the
amount
of
knowledge
about
licensing
and
code
and
like
business
licenses
and
everything
that
you
keep
in
your
head
like
every
time
you
come
to
us
I'm
like
oh,
she
knows
about
this
much
about
that
thing
too,
and
this
many
other
things
and
I
just
think
that
that's
really
extraordinary
anyway.
That
aside
I
have
a
couple
of
questions.
So
when
you
say
you're
a
towing
company,
you
need
to
get
your
vehicle
inspected.
D
However,
in
doing
some
research
there's
some
questions
about
what
those
requirements
are
and
we've
been
working
with
our
Fleet
Department
to
take
a
look
at
that
currently
I
think
the
only
Rec
Master
Certified
individual,
that
I
am
aware
of
is
down
in
Mountain
Home,
so
that
causes
some
challenges.
We
have
talked
about
our
own
staff
being
certified,
but
again
I
think
we
need
to
look
at
what
is
that
certification?
D
Madam
mayor
councilmember
readings,
that's
a
great
question.
That
is
the
requirement
in
our
code.
I
have
not
broached
that
question
with
the
other
agencies,
but
would
be
a
great
question
to
ask.
E
Yeah
I
think
it
would
be
good
to
have
you
know
kind
of
a
consistent
certification
across
everyone,
so
that
people
only
have
to
do
it.
One
time
whether
that's
at
the
city
shop
or
you
know,
wherever
it
might
be,
I
think
more
simple
and
consistent
is
better
and
I
have
a
question
about
the
administrative
fee.
E
So
if
my,
if
I
park,
my
and
I'm
not
saying
that
this
is
an
actual
scenario
that
has
happened
to
me
by
the
way,
if
I
park
in
an
illegal
spot
in
the
park,
I
walk
up
and
they're,
not
yet
hooked
onto
my
car,
and
so
they
leave
the
administrative
fee.
Is
that
charged
to
the
city?
Is
that
charged
to
me
like
how?
How
does
that?
How
would
that
work
under
a
new
scenario.
D
Madam,
mayor
councilwale,
woodings
great
question,
I
think
what
we
typically
do
is
it's
only
an
officer
that
can
tell
the
tow
company
to
stand
down,
and
so
then
that
question
would
be
is
that
paid
for
by
the
city,
because
we
called
for
that
or
is
that
something
that
the
individual
would
have
to
pay
right
now?
If
it
is
somebody
that
is
hooked
up,
the
individual
has
to
pay
that
fifty
dollars.
D
So
great
question,
I,
don't
know
that
we
have
gotten
down
into
the
weeds
of
that
yet,
but
certainly
something
that
we
will
want
to
look
at
and
address
yeah.
E
D
E
This
is
just
you
know,
my
off
the
cuff
idea,
but
if
somebody's
parked
illegally
I'm,
assuming
that
they
would
receive
a
parking
ticket
kind
of
regardless,
if
there
was
a
way
to
kind
of
Encompass
that
within
a
parking
citation,
I
think
that
that
could
be
a
good
way
to
recover
that
to
the
city,
if
we're
paying
an
administrative
fee
out
to
towing
companies
and
I.
E
E
If
you
like
say
my
car
gets
towed
at
eight
o'clock,
their
yard
closes
at
eight
o'clock,
so
I
can't
get
my
car
until
the
next
day,
they've
charged
me
an
extra
fee
on
top
of
the
fee
for
towing,
and
so
those
things
sometimes
kind
of
add
up
for
the
for
the
person
who
has
been
towed,
and
so
I
would
say.
If
there's
any
way
that
we
can
build
some
of
those
things
and
build
some
fairness
in
for
the
consumer.
E
G
D
Madam
mayor
council
member
agent,
so
this
is
non-contestent
towing
services,
so
this
can
be
any
type
of
toe
that
is
not
directed
by
the
owner,
so
it
could
be.
I
have
signs
in
my
personal
business
lot
that
says
you
cannot
park
here
unless
you're
a
customer.
This
is
our
tow
company,
then
I
can
call
the
tow
company
or
ask
them
to
patrol
my
lot
after
hours
to
make
sure
that
nobody
is
parked
there.
That's
not
supposed
to
be
there.
So
those
are
not
things
that
are
on
the
street.
D
D
What
we
are
doing
is
licensing
those
that
provide
that
non-consent
toe,
so
we
make
sure
that
we
have
safety
for
that
that
they
have
the
appropriate
equipment
to
be
Towing,
those
things,
because
it
is
not
at
the
discretion
of
the
owner.
So
that's
my
understanding
as
to
why
we
did
non-consent
toes.
We
do
not
license
anybody
who
only
does
consent
toes.
D
So
if
I
only
respond
when
I
am
called
upon
by
somebody
who
needs
their
car
towed
I'm
not
required
to
have
a
license,
and
actually
the
federal
government
doesn't
allow
us
to
license
those
that
only
do
consentos.
But
we
do
have
the
authority
to
license
for
non-consentos
that
are
conducted
and
again
that's
only
one
example
of
a
non-consento.
G
My
second
question
was
well
first,
a
comment:
yes
to
council
president
clegg's
thoughts
on
having
like,
ideally
one
place,
to
get
inspected.
G
It's
going
to
be
really
frustrating
for
people
who
are
getting
by
on
charging
predatory
fees
or
who
are
getting
by
on
you
know
being
on
this
list
to
go
possibly
three
different
places
to
be
inspected.
I
can
just
imagine
a
lot
of
frustration,
so
the
council
president's
comment
was
spot
on
then.
The
second
thing
I
was
curious
about
you
mentioned
in
passing
that
there
were
that
BPD
was
having
some
challenges
or
difficulties
with
the
rotation
list.
Can
you
elaborate
on
that?
A
little
bit
more.
D
Right
now,
I
think
one
of
the
requirements
is
that
for
the
rotation
list
you
have
to
be
licensed
as
a
non-consent,
tow
driver.
So
that's
one
of
the
requirements
for
the
list.
Bpd
can
certainly
manage
that
list
and
I
have
not
reached
out
to
them
to
see
what
their
current
rotation
policy
is,
but
they
can
probably
be
more
restrictive
than
that
I
think.
A
great
example
is
more
recently:
we've
had
somebody
who
had
a
non-consent
to
license
and
their
behavior
was
less
than
desirable.
D
D
What
we
want
to
see
with
that
non-consent
list,
and
how
can
we
embed
some
of
those
policy
things
to
be
able
to
then
hold
people's
licenses
accountable
to
some
of
those
challenges
and
conduct
just
being
one
of
those
another
one
is
somebody
who
might
not
clean
up
after
an
accident
requirement
of
code.
If
it's
proven,
we
can
hold
them
accountable
through
their
license.
D
But
again,
how
do
we
make
sure
that
the
rotation
list
is
also
part
of
that
reward
for
being
compliant
because
they're
getting
calls
off
that
rotation
list
and,
if
they're,
not
following
those
rules,
we
can
then
revoke
that
license,
therefore,
also
managing
them
within
that
rotation
list
for
place,
and
we
would
work
very
closely
with
them
to
make
sure
that
we
had
the
right
mechanisms
in
place.
I.
G
Think
that's
great
because
one
of
the
things
that
I've
heard
is
that
occasionally
people
will
refuse
a
toe
because,
based
on
their
assessment
of,
for
example,
the
economic
capacity
of
the
toei
like
hey
I'm,
not
going
to
get
to
collect
my
fees
in
the
Lots
from
this
person
I'm
not
doing
it.
I've
heard
that
that's
a
problem
I,
don't
know
if
that's
true,
but
it
would
be
a
bummer
if
we
have
Partners
on
a
rotation
list
who
somehow
get
the
discretion
to
refuse
jobs
that
that
that's
not
that's,
not
right.
G
So
I
appreciate
that.
Oh
one
other
thing,
one
last
thing
on
the
difficult
toe
issue
as
you're
looking
at
that
also
recognize
that
a
lot
of
toes
are
really
easy.
So
on
the
flips,
so
some
may
be
not
very
profitable
or
operate
a
loss.
Some
may
be
just
absolute
cash
cows,
and
so
it
should
net
out
and
I.
G
Wouldn't
you
know
without
more
information,
I
wouldn't
be
super
thrilled
about
paying
people
by
the
hour
to
tow
a
car
where
the
incentive
is
to
be
slow,
consume,
officer
resources,
while
they're
waiting
around
blocked
up
and
use
public
spaces
Etc.
So
just
things
to
think
about
as
you're
moving
through
it.
Thank.
A
H
D
Madam,
mayor
councilmember,
Holly,
Burton
I
think
there
are
pros
and
cons
to
each
approach.
We've
started
going
through
those
and
when
I
say
we
I
mean
the
legal
department
and
myself,
and
so
we
can
provide
that
list
of
pros
and
cons,
depending
on
the
various
approaches
that
we
might
want
to
look
at.
I
think
the
only
challenge
with
them
not
being
in
code,
however,
being
in
our
fee
schedule
and
being
online,
it's
still
transparent,
is
just
what
is
the
transparency
to
the
public,
so
they
know
when
their
vehicle
is
towed.
D
What
what
are
those
fees
that
they
can
actually
be
charged?
But
again
that
could
be
addressed
in
various
ways,
whether
in
code
or
on
our
fee
schedule.
Yeah.
H
It
makes
sense
to
me
to
do
it
that
way,
but
a
list
of
pros
and
cons
would
be
helpful
because
I
really
don't
know
and
the
way
that
would
be
easiest
for
you
and
the
easiest
for
them
would
really
be
probably
the
best
way.
I
Thank
you,
madam
mayor.
Thank
you
Jamie,
so
you
mentioned
that
there
were
complaints
about
some
of
these
folks
who
do
this
service?
Is
that
correct.
I
We
are
living
still
in
volatile
times
and
we
do
live
in
a
state
that
Embraces
gun
culture
and
I'm
wondering
if
there's
any
training
for
folks
who
do
this
service
and
how
to
de-escalate,
because
as
council
members
woodings
woodings
and
Beijing
mentioned,
you
know,
we've
got
folks
who
are
predatory
in
this
type
of
work,
and
there
are
folks
who
are
under
a
lot
of
stress.
I
Financially,
you
mentioned
inflation
salaries
are
not
keeping
Pace
in
our
state
and
what
I
would
hate
to
see
is
for
someone
who's
already
on
the
edge
trying
to
survive,
to
have
something
like
this,
be
the
breaking
point
and
I
think
for
folks
who
are
doing
this
type
of
work.
I.
Imagine
they're
also
putting
themselves
in
a
dangerous
situation,
but
also
perhaps
they
also
need
to
be
trained
on
how
to
de-escalate
and
make
sure
they
can
do
this
work.
D
Madam
mayor
councilmember
Sanchez,
that
is
not
something
that
is
currently
within
the
existing
code.
However,
at
the
direction
of
Mayor
and
Council,
we
could
certainly
add
that
type
of
training-
I,
don't
know
what
type
of
training
that
the
industry
provides.
But
we
might
be
able
to
look
at
that
as
an
alternative
as
well
to
see
what
the
industry
might
already
provide
on
their
own
versus
the
city,
providing
that,
but
certainly
look
to
each
of
you
for
that
direction
and
how
to
proceed.
A
Great,
thank
you
so
with
that
I
think
you've
gotten
direction
from
various
council
members
on
what
more
they'd
like
to
know
and
I
expect
that
we'll
hear
from
you
Amanda
or
Courtney
on
next
steps
afterwards.
So
thanks
for
being
here
next
up,
we've
got
Hannah
press
Greer
on
the
cruising
ordinance.
B
J
Council
members,
Hannah
brass
crew
from
the
mayor's
office-
I
am
here
just
to
give
you
a
really
brief
update
on
cruising
and
ask
for
your
input
as
we
move
forward.
So
just
for
a
little
background.
I'm
cruising
as
I
think
you
all
know,
is
the
practice
of
driving
around
downtown,
usually
on
the
weekends,
often
with
loud
high
performance,
cars
and
oftentimes
for
us
downtown
it's
5th
to
14th
on
Maine
and
Idaho,
it's
been
happening
for
decades.
J
It
often
does
die
down
right
about
now.
Maybe
in
the
next
few
weeks,
we'll
see
we'll
see
reduced
numbers
of
cars
down
there
and
then
picks
back
up
in
the
spring
and
I
think,
as
you
know,
and
certainly
councilmember
winnings
I
know,
you've
been
part
of
these
conversations.
J
We've
seen
some
increase
in
complaints
to
BPD
and
to
mayor's
office
and
members
of
council
about
this
I
think
in
large
part,
because
we
have
more
businesses
and
more
residents
downtown
now
so
they're
there
are
just
more
people
complaining,
not
necessarily
a
huge
increase
in
those
participating
in
the
cruise
and
just
to
focus
really
on
the
negative
impacts
and
the
behavior
that
we're
looking
at
here.
J
It's
really
three
main
things:
excess
noise,
excess
exhaust
and
excess
speed
or
racing,
and
so,
as
we're
thinking
about
how
to
address
this,
we
really
want
to
focus
on
those
behaviors
and
and
with
that
in
mind,
just
a
couple
of
ideas
that
were
considered
and
have
been
rejected
at
this
point,
but
certainly
open
to
feedback.
One
was
to
create
an
entirely
new
ordinance.
Addressing
cruising
the
difficulty
there
is
defining
cruising
in
a
way.
J
That's
narrow
enough
to
really
focus
on
these
behaviors
ideas
about
you
know
you
can't
Circle
downtown
During
certain
hours
more
than
three
times,
but
that
would
catch
me
trying
to
find
a
parking
spot,
but
not
doing
it
loudly
or
racing
to
do
it,
and
another
idea
was
just
to
create
a
cruising
Zone
with
specific
hours
and
and
behavior.
You
can't
do
in
a
downtown
area.
J
J
So
the
recommendations,
I'm
working
with
BPD
and
other
staff,
are
as
follows:
an
increase
in
fines
for
exhaust
modifications
and
excess
noise
right
now.
Those
fines
are
at
67.
That
is
not
a
deterrent.
I've
been
told
stories
of
folks
who
are
being
cited,
they're
pulled
over
and
cited
for
excess
noise
and
they're
revving
their
engines,
while
they're
being
cited.
So
it's
not
that
that
fine
level
is
not
working.
J
Another
recommendation
is
to
enhance
fines
for
repeat
offenses,
so
going
up
second,
third
offense
and
or
making
those
second
or
third
offenses
a
misdemeanor,
especially
if
they're
in
within
a
specific
amount
of
time,
though,
we
do
think
that
we
have
the
ordinances
in
place,
we
need,
we
don't,
as
I
said,
think
we
need
a
separate
ordinance,
but
maybe
making
some
adjustments
specifically
about
Technologies
in
cars
related
to
Mufflers.
J
Please
don't
ask
me
any
detailed
questions
about
this
because
I
don't
know
all
the
details,
but
I
am
told
that
under
our
current
ordinances,
if
you,
if
you
have
something
other
than
stock
Mufflers,
that's
where
you
can
get
cited.
There
are
new
technologies
that
are
still
considered
stock,
but
then
have
these
negative
impacts
that
we
want
to
make
sure
we
can
address.
J
And
then
finally,
BPD
has
looked
into
and
wants
to
continue
to
look
into
additional
tools
to
measure
sound
and
exhaust
and
those
are
things
like
different
phone
apps
that
actually
can
make
the
measurement
a
lot
easier
than
they're
able
to
do
right
now
and
so
in
terms
of
next
steps.
Obviously
we're
here
today
to
ask
for
your
feedback.
Certainly
any
questions
you
have
I
can
attempt
to
answer
or
get
those
answers
for
you,
as
we
work
on
this
over
the
next
couple
months.
J
We'll
do
that
additional
research
and
the
plan
would
be
to
come
back
with
any
proposed
ordinance
changes
and
enforcement
plan
early
next
year
so
that
we
then
can
have
hopefully
your
approval
by
February
or
March
and
ready
to
implement
before
the
spring
uptick
in
Cruise
activity.
So
with
that
I
stand
for
any
questions.
G
Thank
you.
This
is
great.
I
was
expecting
to
be
really
skeptical
because
in
my
mind,
it
can't
be
illegal
to
drive
your
car.
It
can't
be
illegal
to
drive
your
car
in
circles
and,
although
the
cruise
isn't
my
jam,
I
get
that
it's
part
of
part
of
Boise's
culture
and
a
lot
of
people
really
value
it
and
I.
G
Think
a
lot
of
young
people
experience
our
city
and
their
Newfound
Liberty
in
that
way,
and
that's
that's
awesome,
that's
great,
being
loud,
being
Reckless
starting
fights,
littering
messing
up
the
rest
of
traffic,
all
archives
and
they're
already
crimes,
and
so
the
problems
that
we
hear
from
the
crews.
You
know,
although
they're
associated
with
the
crews,
we
talk
about
problems
with
the
crews,
they're,
really
just
criminal
activity
on
their
own
face,
regardless
of
whether
somebody's
driving
their
car
in
the
circle
and
the
approach
that
I
heard
was.
G
H
Thank
you,
yeah.
Thanks
for
bringing
these
forward
I
I
agree
with
council
member
Beijing,
there's
some
things
that
I
don't
like
about
what
happens
at
the
cruise
and
and
I.
Don't
necessarily
know
how
to
address
it.
H
I
think
that
the
third
thing
that
I
would
have
listed
with
noise
exhaust
and
excessive
speeding
would
be
harassment
that
comes
you
know
from
the
vehicles,
but
again
I
think
that
that's
also
part
of
downtown
nightlife
that
we're
seeing
with
an
increase
of
people,
not
necessarily
explicitly,
for
you
know,
people
that
are
doing
the
cruise
I
do
think
that
there
are
other
ways
of
making
the
cruise
less
appealing
of
a
place
to
to
drive.
H
As
far
as
you
know,
we
had
protected
bike
Lanes
on
those
several
years
ago,
where
we
had
reduced
the
amount
of
lanes
that
were
on
the
street
and
if
you
created
a
spot
where
it
didn't
look
like
there
was
a
three-lane
freeway
running
through
the
middle
of
downtown
Boise.
You
know
that
might
be
something
to
consider,
as
well
as
like
what
types
of
design
what
types
of
speed
limits.
H
What
types
of
traffic
light
timing
might
actually
make
that
a
less
appealing
place
for
people
to
go,
and
then
also
as
far
as
the
speeding
goes,
a
less
likely
place
that
they'd
be
able
to
reach
a
higher
speed.
Although
I
know
that
a
lot
of
the
problem
is
the
revving
between
light
to
light
and
speeding
up
the
excessive
acceleration,
but
there
there
is
an
opportunity
to
speed
that
could
be
addressed
in
a
variety
of
different
road
construction
ways,
and
so
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
that
we
put
that
on
the
table
as
well.
Okay,.
I
Thank
you,
Madam.
Thank
you.
I
think
we've
heard
complaints
about
from
businesses
about
the
cruise
for
many
years,
but
I
think
for
me,
the
most
complaints
I
heard
were
the
summer
of
2020.
I
The
first
was
a
business,
an
optical
company,
small
little
company
there
on
Fifth
lumos,
and
they
actually
would
close
on
Fridays
because
they
couldn't
do
business
because
you
couldn't
hear
they
couldn't
hear
the
conversation
with
their
clients,
so
they
just
would
close,
which
you
know
that's
too
bad,
because
it's
a
small
business
and
they
need
every
dollar
they
can
get.
I
And
then
another
experience
I
had
was
before
we
closed
down
that
section
of
Eighth
Street
between
Maine
and
Idaho
and
I
shared
this
with
council
president
Clegg
just
sitting
outside
enjoying
you
know
the
patio
dining
but
I
thought
about
it.
It's
like
it's,
not
just
the
fact
that
you've
got.
You
know
folks,
who
are
not
able
to
enjoy
our
city
peacefully.
It's
the
fact
that
you
know
I
remember
talking
to
the
wait
staff
who
have
to
be
out
there
subjecting
their
hearing
to
damage
breathing
in
these
fumes
for
hours.
I
You
know
my
friend,
Lucy
and
I
were
just
there
for
90
minutes,
they're
there
all
night,
and
so
I
I'm,
also
thinking
about
the
damaging
effects
to
our
labor
force,
who
has
to
work
downtown
and
be
subjected
to
these
high
decibel
sounds
and
the
air
pollution,
and
it
is
purposeful.
There
is
that
revving
there
is
the
coal
rolling
that
sort
of
thing
so
I
think
Beyond
a
quality
of
life
issue.
It's
also
a
safety
and
health
issue
for
people
who
are
making
their
living
by
working
in
our
downtown
businesses.
F
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
Hannah
I
also
really
appreciate
this
approach.
I
think
it's
the
right
one,
you
know
enforce
what
we
have
on
the
books
and
see
where
we
go.
My
as
as
I
was
listening
to
you,
the
one
thing
that
I
would
reiterate
is
that
we
make
sure
that
the
police
have
the
tools
that
they
need
to
make
this
work,
and
so
part
of
that
may
be
a
way
to
measure
exhaust
so
that
if
we
have
folks
rolling
coal,
for
instance,
we
can
cite
them
for
that
exhaust
right
now.
F
I
think
it's
hard
to
do
another
is
to
ensure
that
the
penalties,
as
you
mentioned,
are
sufficient
and
I'm
fully
supportive
of
going
all
the
way
to
misdemeanor
if
needed,
and
making
sure
that
we
have
a
system
that,
if
that
were
to
happen,
that
person
has
some
other.
You
know,
in
other
words,
if
they
go
all
the
way
to
misdemeanor,
they
don't
just
start
over
right,
so
that
they
they
don't
have
a
incentive
to
keep
doing
this.
F
So
look
forward
to
I
know
you
guys
are
really
good
at
figuring
out
how
to
actually
make
those
things.
Work
and
I.
Look
forward
to
seeing
what
those
Solutions
are.
E
Okay,
thank
you,
madam
mayor
I,
appreciate
all
of
my
fellow
council
members
comments.
A
lot
I
think
that
they're
all
Salient
and
an
important
part
of
the
conversation
we
did
quite
a
lot
of
Outreach
on
the
problems
that
are
presented
by
the
crews
and
I
think
that
they
really
get
back
to
what
Hannah
said
before
we
just
have
more
users
in
downtown.
Now
we
have
people
who
live
there.
E
We
have
you
know
vibrant
street
level,
businesses
and
so
any
any
additional
noise
and
any
additional
like
behaviors,
just
kind
of
create
this
chaotic
scene
downtown,
and
it's
not
consistent
with
our
vision
of
having
a
really
vibrant
downtown
that
people
can
come
and
enjoy
so
I
think
that
getting
to
those
behaviors
is
really
the
right
way,
and
even
after
talking
to
some
folks
who
are
part
of
the
cruising
community
and
they're
like
we
just
want
to
drive
our
car
around
like
dude,
that's
fine
like
you
should
absolutely
you
know.
E
If
you
spend
that
much
time
and
that
much
money
creating
your
prized
vehicle,
you
should
be
able
to
drive
it
around.
Do
not
modify
the
exhaust,
do
not
roll
down
your
windows
and
blast
your
music
because
it
just
contributes
to
that
really
kind
of
chaotic
environment.
That
I,
don't
think,
is
what
we
want
at
all.
So
I
think
that
this
plan,
if
you
know
the
penalties,
are
sufficient.
E
If
we
have
an
enforcement
plan
and
a
rollout
plan
and
I
think
also
education
plan
for
the
community
around
what
this
is
going
to
look
like
when
it
rolls
out
I
think
it
could
be
really
successful
and
if
it's
not
I
would
encourage
us
to
go
back
quickly
and
say:
okay,
how
can
we
adjust
this
so
that
we
can
make
it
successful,
not
next
fall,
but
subsequently
rolling
into
the
spring
and
summer?
So,
thanks
I
appreciate
all
your
support.
H
Then,
maybe
just
one
more
quick
thing
to
add
one.
Thank
you
for
your
work
on
this
and
for
all
the
stakeholder.
Outreach
I
think
that's
really
important
for
the
people
who
are
doing
the
cruise
and
for
the
business
owners
as
well.
I
want,
to
maybe
just
add
one
more
specific
point
to
the
idea
of
addressing
some
of
the
ways
that
the
streets
look.
A
I
think
these
are
all
really
good
points
and
I
do
want
to
thank
council
member
woodings
for
your
work
on
this
and
Hannah
as
well.
Downtown
Boise
Association
is
here
thanks
for
the
Outreach
that
you've
helped
us
do
and
I
really
appreciate.
Councilmember
Hallie
Burton's
suggestions
too,
that
we
figure
out
if
there's
some
design
things
with
lights
for
people
Etc
that
we
look
at
in
addition
to
the
ordinance
changes
or
behavioral
changes,
we're
attempting
to
create
for.
B
B
Mayor
I
just
want
to
repeat
back
what
I
think
I'm
hearing
one
is.
The
staff
is
headed
in
the
right
direction
with
the
ordinance
and
then,
as
it
relates
to
further
enhancements
of
downtown
planning,
as
it
relates
to
traffic
and
pedestrians.
Perhaps
this
is
the
topic
of
a
joint
achd.
A
Meeting
I
think
that's
a
great
suggestion,
because
in
the
last
couple
years
we've
seen
downtown
has
used
so
much
more
than
it
was,
which
is
wonderful.
It's
helpful
to
our
businesses.
It
creates
a
great
neighborhood
for
folks
that
are
choosing
to
move
downtown,
we'll
see
2
000,
more
units,
I
believe
in
the
next
year
permitted
for
downtown
living.
A
So
these
interactions
will
continue
to
be
at
issue
and
the
more
that
we
can
do
to
ensure
that
downtown
is
people-centered
in
terms
of
how
streets
and
usage
are
managed,
I
think
the
better
off
we'll
all
be,
and
as
council
member
wedding
said
as
well,
it's
much
more
in
alignment
with
our
vision
for
the
experience
we
want
to
make
available
to
our
residents
than
just
addressing
the
behavior
piece.
So
the
more
we
can
do
in
parallel,
I
think
the
better
off.
We
are
great.
E
Thank
you.
Mayor
can
I
just
tag
on
to
Courtney's
idea
for
the
achd
work
session
as
well.
If
she
would
like
to
be
involved,
I
would
also
encourage
us
to
invite
DBA
executive
director
Jen
Hensley
to
that
conversation,
I'm
just
gonna
flag.
That.
A
C
Foreign
thank
you
very
much.
Madame
mayor
members
of
the
council
I
apologize
for
that
slight
delay
there
this
morning,
we'd
like
to
provide
an
overview
of
the
the
property.
K
C
Rebate
program
that
was
approved
by
the
city
council
as
part
of
the
2023
adopted
budget,
there's
really
been
a
lot
of
work
that
has
gone
into
getting
us
to
where
we
are
right
now
out
really
across
the
organization.
Many
of
those
folks
are
in
the
room.
I
see
Rob
up
there,
Rob
Lockwood,
the
community
engagement
team,
Lana,
Brady
and
Maria,
as
well
as
in
the
budget
team
and
really
Lisa
Owens,
has
been
The
Mastermind
of
all
of
this
and
she's
here
with
us
today.
C
The
recommendations
that
we'll
be
going
over
this
morning
were
really
carefully
crafted
in
order
to
comply
with
the
way
this
bill
was
drafted,
allowing
cities
the
ability
to
provide
these
rebates
after
we
go
through
the
recommendations
and
the
proposed
rollout
we'd
also
like
to
go
over
some
changes.
We
might
like
to
see
going
forward
to
this
bill
to
ease
in
the
administrative
burden
associated
with
this
program.
C
So
again,
to
reiterate
at
this
this
program
wasn't
allowable
for
cities
prior
to
this
fiscal
year
as
part
of
the
2022
State
legislative
session,
cities
were
granted
the
ability
to
provide
property
tax
rebates
for
the
first
first
time
through
house
bill
550.
C
seizing
the
opportunity
to
Boise
city
council,
approved
the
allocation
of
1.2
million
dollars
as
part
of
this
current
fiscal
Year's
budget
in
order
to
benefit
benefit
taxpayers
who
are
approved
to
participate
in
the
state's
property
tax
reduction
program,
otherwise
known
as
a
circuit
breaker
program.
C
Those
participants
needed
to
apply
for
that
program
no
later
than
April
18th
of
2022..
C
C
Currently,
that's
on
a
Statewide
basis,
three
hundred
thousand
dollars
there
was
an
amendment
to
those
limitations
as
part
of
this
past
legislative
session
that
increased
the
legal
limit
to
150
percent
of
the
median
assessed
value
within
the
county
and
within
Ada
County.
That's
approximately
eight
hundred
thousand
dollars
for
that
home
value.
C
The
total
income
for
calendar
year
2021
has
to
be
32,
230
or
less,
and
any
participant
must
meet
one
of
the
following
criteria:
either
be
65
years
of
age
or
older,
a
former
prisoner
of
war
or
a
hostage
a
blind,
a
widow
or
widower
or
disabled.
C
Specifically,
the
language
that
was
included
in
House
Bill
550,
allowing
property
tax
free
bases
outlined
on
this
slide.
City
councils
are
empowered
to
issue
property
tax
rebates
from
the
general
fund
to
property
taxpayers
within
its
jurisdiction,
there's
a
requirement
for
an
ordinance
and
that
ordinance
needs
to
describe
the
following.
C
It
needs
to
describe
the
total
amount
appropriated
for
the
program
and
for
the
city
that
would
be
1.2
million
dollars,
instructions
and
a
deadline
for
property
taxpayers
to
apply
for
the
rebate,
the
formula
for
determining
the
property
tax
rebate
and
the
method
for
Distributing
the
rebates
in
any
other
necessary
administrative
matters,
and
there
are
certain
requirements
that
cities,
you
know
must
abide
by.
C
So
the
first
one
is,
and
it's
less
less
of
a
requirement,
but
it's
outlined
in
the
ordinance
is
that
any
cities
that
choose
to
participate
in
the
circuit
breaker
program
will
receive
a
list
of
eligible
participants
from
the
State
Tax
Commission,
so
that
anybody
eligible
can
be
appropriately
noticed.
C
The
second
requirement
is
that
any
rebate
that
is
paid
on
behalf
of
the
applicant
through
the
circuit
breaker
program
may
not
exceed
the
property
taxes
payable
to
the
property
owner
on
that
particular
property.
So
the
circuit
breaker
program
provides
a
benefit
to
property
owners
when
you
add
that
benefit
to
any
potential
rebate
that
cannot
exceed
the
the
tax
the
tax
bill
for
that
particular
jurisdiction,
and
then
thirdly,
cities
aren't
required
to
do
this.
C
If
a
rebate
program
is
funded
in
an
insufficient
amount
to
rebate
all
claims,
the
proper
rebate,
claims
shall
be
added
up
in
every
every
rebate.
Share
should
be
reduced
in
a
uniform
amount.
When
we
came
up
with
the
recommendation
for
1.2
million
dollars,
it
was
based
on
prior
year
information,
and
we
did
our
best
to
try
and
alleviate
in
our
recommendation
property
tax
bills
for
those
who
would
be
participating.
But
again
it
was
based
on
prior
year
tax
rolls.
C
So
if
the
number
of
people
changed
or
their
tax
bills
look
significantly
different,
you
know
we.
We
may
end
up
in
a
situation
where
we
have
slightly
less
or
even
slightly
more
than
need,
be.
A
Just
a
couple
follow-up
questions:
there
are
when
you
say
that
you're
the
we're
the
only
city
that
you
know
of
doing
this,
do
you
mean
the
way
we're
doing
it
from
a
circuit,
breaker
perspective
or
we're
the
only
city
that
you're
aware
of
that
is
taking
advantage
of
this
property
tax
rebate
legislation,
I'm.
C
The
only
excuse
me
sorry
mayor,
we
are
the
only
city
that
I'm
aware
of
that
is
taking
taking
advantage
of
this
rebate
program
in
its
totality
okay.
A
Yes
and
then
on
the
other
question
or
the
other
question
I
have
is
related
to
the
if
we
get
fewer
or
more
claimants
as
it
relates
to
the
1.2
million
dollars,
if
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
all
of
those
that
currently
qualify
are
able
to
or
know
to
go
through
our
program.
So
does
that
happen
automatically,
or
will
we
see
that
there
are
folks
that
don't
request
that
are
getting
the
circuit
breaker
program
but
haven't
requested
it
from
the
city
and
we
can
return
to
them.
C
This
is
a
rebate
program,
so
there
is
an
active
role
that
the
folks
that
are
eligible
for
this
program
are
going
to
have
to
take.
Lana
is
going
to
go
through
how
we,
how
we
reach
those
those
eligible
taxpayers,
great.
C
So
as
as
outlined
in
House
Bill
550
cities
need
to
prepare
an
ordinance
pending
any
feedback
upon
the
conclusion
of
this
presentation,
staff
intends
to
bring
the
ordinance
forward
for
city
council
consideration
in
November
I'll
now
hand
it
over
to
Lana
to
go
through
the
Outreach
and
communication
plan.
L
Two
microphones,
I,
don't
know
if
I
need
to
be
that
loud
good
morning,
everyone
so
mayor's
email
search.
Our
goal
with
this
is
to
reach
as
many
people
as
possible
who
are
eligible
and
because
it
is
a
rebate
program,
they
will
have
to
apply
for
the
program,
so
our
Outreach
is
really
focused
on
the
number
of
people
who
qualify
and
getting
to
them
in
every
possible
way.
L
I
won't
go
through
this
because
Eric
has
already
spoken
to
it.
So
our
core
messages
are
that
we
are
launching
this
rebate
program
that
offers
qualified
Boise
ends
of
property
tax
rebate.
L
They
must
meet
this
criteria
that
we've
already
talked
about,
which
is
similar,
which
is
not
similar
exactly
the
same
as
the
circuit
breaker
program
and
qualified
homeowners
may
receive
a
tax
rebate
of
their
remaining
city
of
Boise
property
taxes,
after
accounting
for
the
circuit
breaker
program,
and
we
will
offer
eligible
homeowners
several
ways
to
access
the
program,
including
online
and
in-person
opportunities,
and
the
applications
will
be
open
from
December
1st
until
May
1st
2023.
A
L
C
Thank
you
mayor.
The
1200
is
the
number
of
folks
that
were
eligible
as
of
the
prior
fiscal
year.
Applications
to
participate
in
the
circuit
breaker
program
for
the
current
fiscal
year
were
due
April
18th
of
2022.
So
there
is
a
finite
number
of
participants
as
part
of
this
particular
cycle
and
we're.
A
Capitalizing
upon
we're
doing
it
retro
retroactively
in
a
way
they've
already
qualified
correct.
However,
for
the
public
there
are
possibly
folks
that
qualify
and
if
they
apply
it
in
the
future,
they
would
then
be
eligible
for
our
program
in
the
future.
There
are
more
than
1200
people
in
Boise
who
could
potentially
receive
the
circuit
breaker.
That.
C
A
So
this
Outreach
is
designed
for
those
currently
eligible
and
they're
eligible,
because
they've
already
filled
out
an
application.
So
I
would
like
over
time
for
us
to
have
a
strategy
as
well
to
connect
with
those
who
qualify
but
don't
or
haven't,
submitted
an
application
to
expand
the
property
tax
relief
as
far
as
possible
to
our
residents.
L
Foreign
thank
you
mayor.
So
we
have
a
couple
of
recommendations
for
how
to
reach
folks
who
qualify,
one
is
being
direct
mail
and
we
know
that
that's
still
our
best
Outreach
method
to
reach
a
broad
range
of
folks
and
so
we'll
announce
the
program
and
how
to
access
it.
This
will
include
a
letter
that
will
hit
mailboxes
the
same
week
that
people
receive
their
tax
bills
for
the
year
and
it'll
include
an
application
with
it
for
ease
of
use
for
people
to
be
able
to
fill
it
out
and
submit
it
at
that
time.
L
L
We're
also
looking
into
canvassing
Eric
mentioned
that
we'll
get
the
list
of
eligible
folks
from
The,
Tax
Commission
that'll
happen
likely
in
November
and
so
we'll
be
able
to
see
we'll
use,
work
with
it
and
look
at
our
GIS
system
to
see
where
folks
are
and
if
it
makes
sense
to
do
phone
calls
or
in-person
canvassing
or
both
so
we'll
have
kind
of
a
more
refined
process
there
once
we
see
who
the
folks
are
and
where
they
are
within
our
city.
E
E
We
know
you
know
where
they
live,
and
we
know
that
we
have
service
providers
who
are
already
likely
making
contact
with
a
lot
of
these
folks
like
Meals
on
Wheels,
so
exploring
some
of
those
potential
Partnerships
to
educate,
maybe
Meals
on
Wheels
volunteers,
about
the
program
and
make
sure
that
they
know
in
case
they
get
any
questions
from
their
from
their
folks
that
they
deliver
to.
G
I
guess
I
don't
understand
like
somebody
knows
right,
the
state
knows
everybody
who
paid
less
than
33
000
in
income
tax
in
their
age
and
their
address,
and
the
county
knows
what
their
house
is
assessed.
For
so
like
isn't,
aren't
there
two
spreadsheets
within
the
state
of
Idaho
that
could
be
cross-referenced
and
merged
and
make
a
list
of
every
person
who
qualifies?
Not
everybody
who
applied
and
not
everybody
like
is,
is
it
do
I
mean
I
get
that
working
with
multiple
agencies
is
difficult,
but
why
can't
we
just
go?
Do
that
yeah.
A
And
that
sounds
like
it's
part
of
the
long-term
Outreach
strategy.
If
our
goal
is
to
increase
the
usage
of
the
circuit
breaker
program
within
our
community
and
then
we've
got
the
Outreach
strategy
for
those
who
can
currently
get
it
in
this
current
budget
year
with
the
1.2
million
dollars
that
we
provided
for
Relief
yeah.
G
Fair
that
that's
really
I'm
like
this
is
great,
but
it
just
seems
like
we
can't
every
year
be
going
out
looking
for
people
who
the
governor
the
tax
assessor
like
know
who
they
are.
So
that
was
just
my
observation.
Second
adding
to
council
member
woodings
list
is
this
group
of
people
is
probably
also
very
likely
to
be
using
my
libraries,
and
so
that's
a
great
place
to
be
doing
this
Outreach
as
well.
F
A
You
it
occurs
and
we're
moving
into
tactical,
so
I
want
to
give
Lana
a
chance
if
there
are
additional
tactics
that
you
have
here
for
him
to
cover
them
after
the
council
president
make
some
comments.
F
Okay,
I'll
be
real,
quick
I
was
going
to
say.
The
healthcare
providers
probably
also
have
a
lot
of
contact
with
some
of
these
folks,
and
so
we
we
might
reach
out
there
and
then
I.
I,
really
appreciate
council
member
agents
idea,
and
you
know
this
year
we
have
who's
qualified
and
we
can
only.
We
can
only
rebate
to
them
as
I
understand
it,
but
next
year
we
should
be
looking
really
hard
to
reach
out
more
broadly.
I
C
Customer
Sanchez
I,
don't
unfortunately,
I
don't
have
that
that
information
available
right
now
we're
kind
of
dependent
upon
you
know
the
applications.
There
could
be
further
work
that
we
could
could
do
along
the
lines
of
council
member
of
agent's
question
to
try
and
determine
the
number
of
people.
C
There
are
certain
requirements
that
we'd
have
to
layer
into
that
analysis.
The
assessed
value
for
the
home,
some
of
the
criteria
for
participation
which
might
not
be
available
on
you,
know,
income
tax
returns
or
other
returns.
So
it's
very
difficult
to
answer
that
question,
but
the
speculation
is
that
there
probably
are
a
number
of
folks
that
aren't
participating
in
that
program
or
aware
of
it.
I
C
Councilmember
they
have
to
be
enrolled
in
the
circuit
breaker
program.
They
have
to
be
approved,
they
had
they
had
to
have
applied
by
April
18th,
so
gone
through
the
active
process
of
registering
for
the
program,
seeing
if
they
met
the
criteria
and
approved
by
the
by
the
state.
L
You
want
to
note
that'll
be
important
for
applications.
We
talked
about.
Libraries
is
that
people
won't
be
able
to
submit
them
there
they'll
still
because
they
have
social
security
numbers
and
private
information
they'll
still
be
required
to
mail
them
in,
but
we
will
have
envelopes
that
people
can
have
that'll
be
pre-stamped
to
be
able
to
send
them
in
approach
so
kind
of
moving
into
the
timeline
of
things.
We
will
look
to
go
to
council
in
may
or
may
November.
L
Sorry
I,
don't
know
where
I
got
May
I'm,
hoping
it's
May,
because
I
don't
like
cold
weather
in
November,
so
we'll
announce
right
after
the
ordinance
goes
before
mayor
and
Council.
We
will
receive
that
list.
We're
thinking,
it'll
be
early
to
mid-november
from
The
Tax
Commission,
which
again
will
help
us
really
refine
our
Outreach
strategy
and
tactics
and
then
we'll
launch
the
web
page
and
do
internal
talking
points
of
all
of
our
staff.
We
imagine
DFA
and
our
front
counter.
L
Staff
will
get
quite
a
few
questions
to
make
sure
we're
all
providing
the
same
information
to
our
residents.
December
1st
is
when
the
application
opens
and
that's
when
the
letter
will
be
in
mailboxes,
with
the
application
again
to
be
around
the
same
time
that
people
receive
their
tax
bills.
And
then
we
will
start
with
phone
calls
to
Residents
who
qualify
for
the
program
and
then
looking
into
the
new
year
and
February.
L
L
Who
who
qualifies
based
on
who's,
been
qualified
for
the
circuit
breaker
program
and
who's
applied
for
this
program,
so
that
we're
not
reaching
out
to
people
who
have
already
applied,
but
we're
really
targeting
folks
that
weren't,
just
not
able
to
reach
to
help,
hopefully
get
them
to
apply
for
this
program
and
then
we'll
do
a
final
reminder.
Postcard
in
April
and
then
may
is
when
the
application
closes.
L
I
L
So
Madam
mayor
council,
member
Sanchez,
yes,
we
will
do
social
media
outreach.
We
have
her
in
the
no
newsletter.
This
is
just
a
highlight.
I
can
provide
a
more
detailed
Outreach
plan,
but
it
includes
all
of
that
as
well.
A
Yes,
before
you
move
into
desired,
I
just
want
to
kind
of
wrap
up
some
of
this
and
point
out
that
you
can
see
from
this
and
I
appreciate
that
you've
looked
beyond
this
current
designation
so
because
these
are
some
of
the
things
that
we
were
getting
at
because,
as
you
can
see,
we
want
to
make
sure
as
many
boiseans
as
possible,
that
I
don't
even
know
which
word
to
use
because
we're
all
there's
technical
words
and
then
there's
like
normal
people,
words
that
were
that
we're
all
using
around
the
table.
A
We
want
to
make
sure
that
every
boisean
that
could
get
the
circuit
breaker
in
the
future
gets
the
circuit,
breaker
and
so
I
appreciate
that
you
have
put
together
a
plan
to
reach
out,
and
you
know
to
to
find
and
Converse
with
and
connect
any
boisean
that
could
get
the
circuit
breaker
with
the
circuit
breaker
in
the
future,
because
it's
our
desire
to
provide
that
additional
rebate
to
our
residents
and
I
appreciate
that
you've
put
together
a
plan.
Also.
A
I
appreciate
that
and
as
and
you
know,
I
look
forward
next
to
the
conversation
of
what
might
make
it
easier
for
us
to
make
sure
that
any
boisean
that
could
get
the
circuit
breaker
gets
it
both
from
the
state
or
the
county,
whichever
one
technically
gives
it,
but
most
importantly,
the
city,
and
so
this
next
piece
of
the
conversation
will
help
inform
the
work
that
Kathy
and
our
team
at
the
legislature
does
to
provide
meaningful
property
tax
relief
to
not
just
boiseans
I'd
encourage
any
city
to
do
the
same
for
their
residents.
A
E
You
can
I
just
add
one
one
comment
to
your
remarks.
One
thing
that
one
conversation
I
often
have
with
Boise
residents.
Is
they
ask?
Why
can't
you
do
this
and
Idaho
is
what
is
called
a
Dylan's
rule
state?
The
city
can
do
things
that
the
legislature
gives
us
express
permission
in
State
Statute
to
do.
We
can't
really
do
things
without
the
risk
of
getting
into
lawsuits
that
the
state
either
says
we
can't
do
or
doesn't
give
us
express
permission
to
do
so.
E
A
E
Make
meaningful
contributions
to
our
community,
which
isn't
always
the
case
with
State
Statute,
but
this
is
a
really
good
example
of
how
it
worked.
Madam.
I
Mayor
just
to
thank
you,
council,
member
weddings
for
highlighting
that,
because
you're
right,
I,
think
you
know
our
residents
can
get
frustrated
with
some
of
the
work
that
we're
not
able
to
do
and
I
would,
in
particular,
like
to
thank
representative
Gannon
of
District
17,
who
worked
really
hard
to
ensure
that
this
element
was
in
this
legislation,
so
that
we
could
do
this
and
I
would
like
to
Echo
mayor
McLean,
I,
hope.
Other
cities
will
follow
suit
and
embrace
this
opportunity
to
offer
relief
to
their
residents.
I
C
Thank
you
very
much
for
those
comments.
It's
a
nice
segue
into
the
next
slide
because
we're
very
appreciative
of
this
program.
We
do
think
that
there
might
be
some
modifications
to
the
bill
that
might
increase
participation
and
reduce
administrative
burden
associated
with
this.
So
I'll
go
through
those
the
first
one.
C
The
first
potential
Improvement
could
be
to
eliminate
the
application
process
as
it
stands
right
now,
there's
a
there's,
an
active
thing
that
anyone
who
wants
to
participate
in
this
must
do
which
is,
in
addition
to
you,
know
any
work
that
they
might
have
done
to
actually
get
on
the
property
tax,
Reduction
Program
roles.
C
C
If,
if
a
programs
are
structured
around
the
circuit,
breaker
program
allow
cities
to
directly
offer
rebates
or
Credits
based
on
the
application
for
that
program,
so
in
other
words,
when
they
apply,
they
are
instantly
eligible
for
any
City
rebate.
That
would
be
associated
with
that,
as
opposed
to
making
them
go
through
a
separate
second
secondary
process.
C
The
second
idea
would
be
if
cities
wished
in
the
future
to
offer
a
property
tax
reduction
program
to
everybody
effectively
allow
them
to
buy
down
the
levy
rate
on
a
one-time
basis,
while
still
allowing
base
growth
and
that
could
be
structured
similarly
to
the
Governor's
Public
Safety
property
tax
Grant
initiative
from
2021..
C
One
is
that
the
rebate
process,
based
on
the
way
that
the
bill
is
structured,
doesn't
get
the
the
funding
into
the
the
hands
of
folks
participating
in
this
program
until
their
second
payment
has
been
made,
because
we
need
to
validate
that
the
rebate
doesn't
exceed
their
their
total
liability
and
that
they
have
actually
paid
their
property
taxes.
C
The
second
thing
is
that
the
rebate
versus
a
credit
requires
1099-g
form
to
be
issued,
so
it
requires
the
city's
two
to
cities
to
provide
a
check
and
then
requires
the
participants
to
figure
out
what
that
1099-g
does
to
their
tax
to
their
future
tax
returns.
Whereas
if
a
credit
was
issued,
there
would
be
no
1099-g
required
because
there
wouldn't
be
any
wouldn't
be
considered
as
income.
So.
A
So
I
just
have
a
question
on
that
to
make
that
real,
because
that
is
complicated
and
I'm
going
to
turn
it
back
to
what
just
happened
at
the
state.
So
my
kids
just
got
checks
from
the
state.
Was
that
a
rebate
for
their
taxes?
Does
that
mean
whatever
the
governor
just
sent
out
to
everybody?
Does
that
mean
that
everybody
that
gets
a
rebate
so
I
need
to
tell
my
kids
to
look
for
a
new
tax
form
so
that
they
don't
mess
up
their
taxes
next
year?
A
And
the
reason
I
ask
is
because,
if
that's
how
this
is
designed,
that
is
something
that's
really
tough,
especially
when
you
think
about
the
folks
that
get
the
circuit
breaker
to
then
be
like
on
the
lookout
for
another
form
that
they
then
have
to
give
to
somebody
to
do
the
right
thing.
So
they
don't
make
a
mistake
on
their
taxes,
that
that
would
be
a
great
like
help
to
the
people
and
change
in
the
bills
to
not
to
prevent
that
right,
because
they
don't
necessarily
have
parents
saying
like
go,
find
this
tax
form.
C
Absolutely
and
and
mayor
to
to
answer
your
question:
I
don't
have
specific
knowledge,
but
based
on
my
understanding
of
how
these
1099-g
forms
would
work,
it
would
make
sense
to
me
that
folks
that
are
receiving
the
rebates
that
are
currently
going
out
right
now
would
be
receiving
one
of
those
forms.
Wow.
A
C
G
Just
two
additional
comments
on
the
desired
modifications.
First,
if
you
have
to
apply
for
it,
it's
a
wonderful
piece
of
legislation
and
I
love.
It
and
I'm
glad
we're
doing
it.
But
since
the
legislature
is
listening,
if
you
have
to
apply
for
it,
it's
not
a
circuit
breaker.
Yet
that's
a
switch.
The
circuit
breaker
happens
automatically
so
taking
the
application
process
out
of
it
makes
our
circuit
breaker
an
actual
circuit
breaker,
which
is
what
we
want
so
I,
I
hope
that
happens
and
then
second
on
on
the
second
proposed
modification.
G
In
addition
to
everything
you
pointed
out
about
the
complicated
tax
stuff,
the
administrative
burden
of
writing
checks.
The
other
point
is
like
for
these
people.
We
don't
want
their
money
in
the
first
place
right,
so
anything
we
can
do
to
not
collect
it
and
let
them
keep.
It
is
easier
on
us
because
we
don't
have
to
issue
checks.
Do
all
this
administrative
work
it's
easier
on
them
because
they
get
to
keep
their
money.
So
that's
just
another
great
reason
for
that.
Second
modification:
we
proposed
as
well.
H
Question
so
earlier
in
the
presentation
you
talked
about
the
city
of
Boise,
being
the
only
city
that
you
know
at
this
point,
that's
taking
advantage
of
this
opportunity.
Do
you
think
that
that
is
because
of
the
administrative
burden
that
it
placed
on
the
cities
to
try
to
figure
all
this
out?
Do
you
think
that
if
this
were
to
change,
if
you
eliminated
the
application
process
that
it
might
make
it
more
possible
for
other
cities
to
examine
it
as.
C
Well,
yeah.
Thank
you
very
much
council
member
for
that
question.
I
would
strongly
suspect
that
it
is
due
to
the
administrative
burden.
There
was
really
a
lot
of
of
work
to
ensure
that
we
could
make
this
happen
for
for
the
community,
and
you
know,
as
Lana
went
through
all
the
various
Outreach
approaches
and
ensuring
that
you
reach
people
participating
in
the
circuit
breaker
program.
That
really
does
represent
a
lot
of
work.
H
Yeah,
that's
fantastic!
Just
a
second
question:
there
do
we
know
what
the
state
does
as
far
as
Outreach
for
folks
that
are
eligible
for
the
circuit,
breaker.
C
Council
member
I'm
not
aware
of
any
Outreach
I,
think
the
program
is
available
and
it's
incumbent
upon
the
the
applicants
to
find
the
information
and
apply
on
their
own.
Okay,
I
I
will
say
that
you
know
as
part
of
the
the
the
dialogue
that
has
been
around
property
taxes.
It
frequently
comes
up,
but
I'm
not
aware
of
active
Outreach
efforts.
There
may
be
some
but
I'm,
not
aware
of
them.
L
Vladimir
council,
member
Halliburton
I
will
just
add
that
we've
done
Outreach
this
last
year
on
the
state's
behalf
through
our
out,
because
it's
on
their
website
I
think
they've
included
it
in
a
newsletter,
but
they're
definitely
not
reaching
the
folks
that
are
eligible,
and
so
we've
also
tried
to
do
our
diligence
in
getting
it
out
to
people
who
may
be
eligible
yeah.
I
My
previous
Life
as
a
paralegal
I,
worked
with
a
lot
of
folks
who
were
living
in
poverty
and
the
agent,
and
what
I
found
is
the
more
help
you
need
the
harder
it
is
to
get
it
I
remember
going
to
a
continuing
like
legal
education
course
that
was
for
lawyers
on
how
to
work
with
Medicare
and
I
saw
a
lot
of
lawyers
scratching
their
heads.
So
if
there's
anything,
we
can
do
I
think
to
minimize
the
confusion
for
folks
to
be
able
to
access
this
really
important
resource
anything.
I
We
can
do
to
encourage
that
I,
I,
fully
support
and
I.
Think
it's
very
telling
thank
you
for
sharing
with
us.
The
fact
that
you
know
you
didn't
wait
for
the
state
to
do
more
to
reach
out
to
these
folks
that
we
need
that
for
our
residents
and
that
we
will
do
that
if
we
have
to
to
make
sure
that
folks
get
that,
but
I
would
agree
with
council
member.
I
This
should
be
out
automatic,
especially
when
you're
considering
the
whole
point.
The
whole
point
is
to
help
people
who
are
vulnerable,
who
they
need
the
assistance
to
begin
with.
To
add
another
level
of
bureaucracy
that
makes
it
onerous
for
them
to
get
the
the
resources
they
need
doesn't
make
sense.
So
thank
you
for
your
efforts
on
our
residents.
Behalf
mademere.
E
I
just
had
one
more
thought,
so
my
mom
might
actually
apply
for
qualify
for
a
circuit
breaker
program
in
Oregon,
where
she
lives
and
I.
Don't
really
know
she
probably
doesn't
really
know
so.
E
I
think
that
going
back
to
kind
of
the
community
engagement
plan,
those
more
General
kind
of
Outreach
opportunities
are
great
because
then
maybe
I
would
find
out
about
something
that
my
mom
could
qualify
for,
that
she
doesn't
know
she
could
qualify
for,
because
I
think
that
as
we
get
older
as
our
parents
age,
sometimes
it's
the
children
who
are
the
ones
who
make
those
connections.
So
just
an
initial
thought
that
I
had
thank
you.
A
Well,
thank
you
both
really
appreciate.
It
look
forward
to
seeing
the
ordinance
and
getting
this
program
rolling
for
our
residents
in
this
next
calendar
year
and
working
on
improvements,
so
that
all
of
those
who
could
receive
it
are
able
to
receive
it
more
easily
in
the
future.
With
that
we're
going
to
take
a
10-minute
break
and
then
we'll
be
back.
A
Well,
we're
gonna
move
into
the
presentation
Now
by
our
team
I'm
on
our
I'm,
going
to
call
it
Micron
Readiness,
but
first
I
just
wanted
to
say
a
couple
things,
and
this,
as
we
all
know,
is
the
the
announcement
that
Micron
made
the
investment
they're
making
in
our
community
truly
is
a
generational
investment.
A
It's
a
Once
in
a
generation
opportunity
for
our
kids
and
theirs,
and
Beyond
and
I'm
really
proud
of
the
work
that
our
team
has
done
and
is
doing
to
support
the
Investments
and
and
also
to
have
brought
this
investment
to
our
city
because
it
wasn't
a
given
and
we
knew
that
when
we
were
approached
by
Micron
with
what
they
hope
to
do.
If
the
chips
and
signs
Act
passed
and
that
is
Bring
Back
manufacturing
to
our
country
and
that
we
had
both
incredible
potential
for
our
future
and
future
jobs.
A
Here
in
Boise
and,
frankly
in
the
state
and
incredible
potential
to
keep
or
return
the
Innovation.
That
has
been
part
of
their
history
here
in
Boise
to
Boise,
and
that
was
our
goal
that
we
attract
importantly,
the
r
d
investment
that
Micron
would
have
to
make
when
they
started
to
build
their
chips
here
in
in
the
United
States
rather
than
abroad.
So
we
attract
that
r
d
investment
and
that
we
attract
the
highest
paying
jobs
possible
for
our
residents
and
be
the
center
of
Next
Generation,
ship
manufacturing
and
research
and
development.
A
Importantly
in
our
country,
and
that's
what
this
investment
will
do
for
our
residents
now
and
into
the
future,
and
we
really
appreciate
that
the
company
continues
to
partner
with
us
on
the
goals
that
we
share.
The
values
that
we
share.
You
know
I,
wanted
to
make
it
clear
that
we're
working
closely
with
Micron
in
our
shared
Pursuits
of
growing
our
economy
and
protecting
our
clean
water
and
we'll
hear
a
little
bit
about
that
today.
A
Attracting
and
sustaining
a
diverse
and
dynamic
Workforce-
and
you
know,
as
we
all
know,
we've
evolved
together-
the
history
partnership
and,
importantly,
the
shared
values
and
the
shared
goals
that
I
just
mentioned
exist,
and
it
was
both
that
and
our
willingness
to
innovate
and
lead
on
things
that
are
important
to
the
company,
such
as
clean
water,
and
that
made
it
possible
for
us
to
convince
them
to
make
this
investment
here.
So
today
our
team
has
some
updates.
A
But
that
also
need
to
be
expended
in
terms
of
people
in
partnership
with
the
company.
To
make
this
happen,
I
mean
that's
some
of
what
we'll
talk
about
today,
our
Readiness,
the
plans
that
we've
developed
and
what
we
know
we
have
to
do
and
to
be
able
to
deliver
on
and
in
partnership
with
Micron
on
the
development
of
this
next
Fab.
M
Well,
thank
you
very
much
mayor
mayor
members
of
the
council.
It's
an
honor
to
be
here
today
with
all
of
you
and
my
staff,
colleagues
I'm,
going
to
give
a
broad
overview
of
the
project
and
what
we
know
where
we
are
today
provide
an
update
on
some
of
the
good
work
that
our
staff
has
done
to
move
this
project
forward
in
the
last
couple
of
months
since
the
announcement
and
set
the
context,
as
mayor
mentioned,
for
the
interim
budget
change
and
what
that
may
mean
in
terms
of
future
agreements
for
this
Council.
M
So
with
that
I'll
I'll
start
with
this
overview
and
and
mention,
as
the
mayor
said,
that
this
was
this
was
an
effort
that
it's
a
culmination
of
over
a
Year's
worth
of
work
on
the
the
city's
behalf,
as
well
as
a
collaborative
effort
with
a
number
of
Partners
across
the
valley
and
I'll
also
mention
that
it
was
a
competitive
process.
This
was
this
was
never
a
guarantee.
M
This
was
work
that
involved
a
number
of
different
sites,
potential
sites
across
the
country
and
even
abroad,
and
the
work
that
our
city
did,
along
with
our
partners,
to
make
Boise
the
opportunity
that
the
company
ultimately
chose
was
was
something
that
was
intentional
and
was
a
result
of
the
hard
work
of
a
number
of
partners
and
staff
that
were
involved
in
this
effort
at
the
at
the
end
of
the
extensive
selection
process
that
that
we
were
involved
in,
we
were
proud
to
receive
a
project
of
both
significant
size
and
scope,
but
also
one
that
was
right
size
for
a
community
and
very
much
aligned
with
our
existing
goals
for
strategic
economic
growth.
M
The
project
itself
represents
a
15
billion
dollar
investment
in
our
community,
which
is
the
largest
investment
of
its
kind
in
Idaho,
certainly
Boise.
M
The
investment
will
result
in
approximately
2
000
direct
jobs
by
the
end
of
the
decade,
as
well
as
fifteen
thousand
ancillary
jobs
such
as
jobs.
That
will
support
the
manufacturing
efforts
of
This
research
and
development
and
Manufacturing
facility.
M
The
jobs
will
focus
on
both
r
d
and
advanced
Manufacturing
for
semiconductors,
specifically
memory
chips
with
wages
that
are
well
above
average
for
a
city,
the
city
and
the
company
worked
hard
to
come
to
mutual
agreement
on
a
number
of
key
priorities
for
the
project.
These
include
an
efficient
and
timely,
permitting
process
providing
right
opportunities
to
right
size
things
like
permitting
fees.
For
example,
our
typical
permitting
fee
calculations
are
based
upon
overall
project
value.
M
This
project,
value
being
in
the
15
billion
dollar
range
required
us
to
come
to
an
agreement
with
the
company
that
involved
extensive
work
with
our
staff
to
understand
what
was
fair
and
and
what
was
appropriate
for
a
permitting
fee
based
upon
a
project
valuation
and
what
are
some
alternative
ways
that
we
could
have
used
to
come
to
that
so
proud
to
say
that
using
some,
some
creative
thinking
and
Innovative
approaches,
we've
come
to
more
or
less
a
an
agreement
with
the
company
on
how
to
approach
those
permitting
fees.
M
It
also
involved
close
collaboration
on
the
development
of
advanced
water
renewal
facilities
that
will
both
meet
the
specific
needs
of
the
company,
as
well
as
provide
an
exceptional
value
to
the
public.
This
was
helped
by
the
fact
that
our
Public
Works
team
has
worked
in
partnership
with
the
company
in
the
recent
past
on
a
advanced
pilot
project
and
and
Steve
can
speak
more
to
that,
but
that
set
the
stage
for
much
of
the
work.
That
is
being
right.
M
Also,
at
a
high
level,
the
project
team
required
an
understanding,
a
mutual
understanding
that
this
growing
Workforce
would
need
places
to
live
and
and
ways
to
to
get
to
and
from
home
and
work.
So
on
the
housing
side.
That
means
a
commitment
that
we
made
it
to
to
cooperate,
ensuring
that
we
could
use
our
Regulatory
and
policy
tools
to
work
proactively
to
support
the
private
sector's
ability
to
build
new
housing,
as
well
as
move
forward
significant
housing
initiatives
that
are
underway
with
the
city
of
Boise.
M
So
with
that
I
will
pass
that
pass
it
to
Steve.
To
speak
more
to
the
specifics
of
the
water
renewal
facility
plans,
ahead,
work
underway
and
and
our
overall
picture
there.
Thank
you
Steve.
N
Thanks
John
good
morning,
Steve
Burgos,
Public,
Works
director
and
just
want
to
give
you
an
overview
of
the
work
that
we're
planning
for
the
Micron
facility,
but
before
I
do
that.
Let
me
take
a
step
back
and
just
as
a
reminder
for
the
for
the
council.
Back
in
2020,
we
passed
the
water
renewal
utility
plan
as
part
of
that
project.
N
We
specifically
called
out
the
potential
for
a
recycled
water
program
to
start
in
the
Southeast
portion
of
the
city
and
part
of
the
idea
was
we
could
in
in
that
area
that
was
Zone.
Industrial
potentially
promote
Economic
Development,
and
so
that
was
the
start
of
what
we
refer
to
as
a
recycled
water
program.
N
So
thinking
about
the
specific
project
for
micron,
we're
really
excited
about
the
opportunity
that
it
presents
for
us
on
several
fronts.
One
is
being
able
to
build
off
the
foundation
of
the
original
plan
that
we
developed
and
and
being
able
to
go
back
to
the
community
who
expressed
their
interest
and
recycled
water.
They
were
that
was
one
of
the
probably
the
number
one
items
that
came
from
the
feedback
from
the
public
was
to
pursue
recycled
water
program
and
keep
that
water
local.
N
So
this
project
helps
us
support
that
Vision
again
at
an
even
larger
scale,
than
we
initially
thought
we're
going
to
be
able
to
leverage
alignment
with
the
company
on
climate
action.
They
are
very
much
engaged
on
renewable
energy
on
recycling
water.
It
is
a
very
intentional
part
of
their
Vision
moving
forward.
We're
really
excited
about
that
alignment
that
we
have
on
those
issues
with
the
city
and
micron.
N
This
particular
treatment
plan
is
going
to
be
leveraging
some
really
interesting.
Innovation
and
Technology
it'll
be
one
of
the
most
advanced
wastewater
treatment
plants
in
the
country.
It's
going
to
be
looking
at
new
technologies
that
really
have
not
been
used
in,
but
just
a
couple
of
places
in
the
country.
We're
excited
about
that.
N
That's
in
part,
because
we
have
the
pilot
program
set
up,
hopefully
going
to
get
the
equipment
on
site,
this
fall
and
winter
to
start
the
pilot
project
that
will
help
support
the
selection
of
some
of
the
treatment
technology
that's
coming,
and
then
it's
going
to
enhance
that
long-term
Community
water
supply.
So
we
don't
once
we
start
recycling
water,
we're
not
going
to
be
consistently
going
back
to
the
community
water
supply,
in
effect,
we'll
be
creating
close
to
a
closed
loop
system,
hopefully
as
the
project
moves
forward.
N
N
N
It's
a
pretty
quick
turnaround,
and
so
that's
one
of
the
reasons
for
the
the
IBC
both
to
amend
the
contract
with
our
recycled
water
program
consultant,
but
also
as
for
ftes,
because
we
need
to
really
start
to
define
the
project
quickly
so
that
we
can
then
move
into
design
and
construction
phase
to
meet
a
pretty
tight
deadline
on
the
on
the
Micron
side
for
the
project.
N
N
So
what
you'll
see
this
afternoon
or
I
guess
at
12
at
council
meeting,
is
going
to
be
that
interim
budget
change
for
the
for
that.
Those
changes
to
support
the
project.
Certainly
I,
can
stand
for
any
questions.
You
may
have
lots
of
questions.
We're
still
working
through,
probably
I,
think
we'll
probably
get
to
this
at
the
end,
but
I'll
just
I'll,
steal,
Christine.
F
Had
a
mirror:
yes,
so
Steve!
F
If
I'm
understanding
you
correctly,
then
what
this
allows
us
to
do
is
move
forward
on
our
renewable
water
facility
more
quickly
than
we
would
have
otherwise
and
maybe
at
a
a
deeper
bigger
rate
than
we
would
have
envisioned
without
this
kind
of
a
partnership,
and
in
order
to
do
that,
we'll
have
to
make
budget
amendments
to
move
the
funding
forward,
funding
that
has
already
been
approved
by
the
Public
Funding
that
we've
already
arranged
to
bond
for
but
move
it
forward
in
the
budget
so
that
we
can
get
started.
N
Madam
mayor
councilmember,
Clegg,
yes,
but
I
want
to
be
very
clear.
We
are
not
intending
on
to
use
any
of
the
bond
financing
for
the
Micron
specific
project.
Oh.
A
Okay,
we're
not
planning
I,
would
say
the
Micron
portion
of
the
project
correct.
A
A
I
Madam
mayor,
thank
you
thank
you
Steve,
so
so
you
said
that
this
technology
is
relatively
new
and
you
talked
about
how
mostly
this
will
be
a
closed
system
right.
I
What
will
do
we
know
what
the
water
will
be
used
for?
What
the
re
with
that
cycle
of
water
will
be
used
for.
N
Madam
mayor
council,
member
Sanchez,
don't
know
just
yet
that's
what
we're
working
with
the
company
to
figure
that
out.
That's
one
of
the
the
next
kind
of
really
important
first
steps
to
get
to
find
that'll
start
to
set
the
treatment,
technology
and
design
criteria
to
make
sure
that
we're
meeting
the
needs
of
the
company.
But
a
lot
of
that
is
to
be
determined
based
on
conversation,
we're
currently
having
Madam.
I
Mayor
just
a
quick
follow-up,
so
I'm
just
asking
that
in
terms
of
those
folks
who
might
be
watching
who
may
be
trepidatious
about
new
technology
and
our
willingness
to
be
Innovative
and
to
be
the
first
penguins
off
the
ice
flow
as
it
were
in.
How
do
we
ensure
that
there's
safety
involved
that
there's
not
long-term
consequences
for
our
community
and
embracing
this
new
technology?
Madam.
N
Mayor
councilmember
Sanchez,
thank
you
for
the
question.
So
a
couple
things
one,
the
technology
that
we're
proposing
is
is
a
proven
technology.
It
exists,
oftentimes
used
for
drinking
water
systems.
The
Wastewater
industry
has
initially
used
it
yet
because
we
haven't
had
to
because
recycled
water,
at
least
in
Idaho
hasn't
been
a
huge
priority
and,
secondly,
we're
going
to
continue
to
move
forward
with
our
community
engagement
pieces.
N
We
started
back
a
year
and
a
half
ago,
two
years
ago,
with
the
National
Water
Research
Institute
panel,
where
we
flew
in
experts
from
around
the
country
to
help
us
better
Define.
What
are
the
key
questions
around
recycled
water
so
that
we
can
be
ahead
of
the
issues
as
they're
coming?
We
have
the
pilot
test
that
we're
going
to
continue
with
to
prove
up
the
technology,
we're
going
to
invite
the
public
out
to
see
that
pilot
test
and
show
them.
Okay,
here's
here's
what
we
say:
Advanced
treatment.
What
does
that
look
like
touch?
N
O
Mayor
members
of
council
I'm
just
going
to
give
you
a
brief
update
on
where
we
stand
in
planning
as
it
relates
to
this
project.
This
is
something
that
the
planning
department
has
experience
with,
of
course,
having
enabled
the
original
construction
of
what
we
have
at
the
Micron
campus
today
years
ago.
O
The
difference
today,
of
course,
is
the
city
is
growing
in
a
way
that
is
different
than
then.
We
have
a
lot
more
development
happening
in
cases
and
buildings
that
we're
processing
for
us
on
the
day,
the
announcement
happened
on
micron's
decision.
We
got
together
and
prepared
a
schedule
for
them.
The
Planning
and
Zoning
team
within
planning
and
development
services
quickly
got
together.
O
Of
course,
this
is
just
the
first
phase
of
that
that
will
continue
for
the
foreseeable
future
as
information
becomes
available
and
as
these
plans
evolve,
so
that
team
will
be
heavily
engaged
for
for
quite
some
time,
but
that
process
has
begun
and
it's
going
well,
then
we
will
shift
and
have
already
started
to
shift
into
buildings
to
do
the
permitting
for
the
buildings
themselves.
O
We've
we've
begun
discussions
with
Micron
around
how
we
will
phase
those
permits
and
and
those
that
that
process
has
begun.
It
will,
of
course,
be
picking
up
steam
after
they
get
through
the
entitlement
process
and
even
during
the
entitlement
process.
Because
of
the
way
we
can
phase
permits-
and
this
isn't
unusual
for
micron
as
we
can
face
the
permit
such
that
they're
not
wasting
time.
O
You
know
so
that
once
they're
through
the
entitlement
process,
they
can
proceed
as
quickly
as
possible,
with
construction,
so
will
be
hand
in
hand
with
them,
as
we
are
with
other
applicants
to
make
sure
we're
being
as
as
deliberate
and
efficient
with
our
time
as
it
relates
to
permitting
as
we
possibly
can
when
it
comes
to
permitting.
One
lesson
learned
from
the
previous
work
here
is
that
we
really
need
a
dedicated
person
to
to
be
responsible
for
plan
review
and
permitting
and
then
also
inspections.
There
we've
had
at
times
inspectors.
O
You
know
kind
of
housed
much
of
their
time
at
Micron
to
deal
with
inspections
that
need
to
need
to
occur,
so
that
can
construction
can
continue,
and
that's
especially
important
right
now,
given
the
volume
of
work
that
everybody
has,
including
our
plans,
examiners
and
our
inspectors.
O
So
one
of
the
things
that
you
will
see
in
the
interim
budget
change
is
the
addition
of
two
positions
in
buildings
to
help
with
that,
because
over
the
course
of
the
next
several
months,
this
will
become
a
bigger
and
bigger
part
of
their
responsibilities,
and
we
certainly
don't
want
to
in
any
way
reduce
our
the
way,
the
the
the
the
service
that
we're
providing
to
other
customers.
So
that
is
an
element
of
the
interim
budget
change
that
we'll
be
presenting
today.
So
with
that,
that's
the
status
of
our
work
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
E
Tim,
thank
you
for
thank
you
for
that,
and
thank
you
for
mentioning
the
importance
of
additional
Staffing
so
that
we
can
continue
our
level
of
service
to
our
current
customers.
I've
been
hearing
from
a
few
folks
in
the
community
like
well,
what
happens
when
Micron
starts
building?
Is
there
going
to
be?
E
You
know,
like
that's,
going
to
be
a
huge
Demand
on
a
lot
of
the
services,
a
lot
of
the
service
providers
and
so
I
think
it's
really
important
to
know
that
the
city
is
doing
our
part
to
ensure
that
we're
still
able
to
handle
that
additional
capacity.
In
addition
to
what
we
already
do
for
people
every
day.
F
O
F
And
just
for
other
council
members
information,
we
we
did
that
originally,
because
Micron
had
some
permitting
and
inspection
requirements
that
really
were
unique
and
so
having
the
staff
actually
there
and,
as
part
of
the
process,
made
it
much
more
efficient
for
us
to
to
get
them
through
the
process
in
a
way
that
meant
all
of
our
code
requirements.
E
Okay,
one
more
question:
Tim:
can
you
kind
of
outline
how
we're
paying
for
these
staff
members
will
that
be
coming
out
of
general
fund
or
how
will
that?
How
will
that
work.
O
Mayor
councilmember
woodings,
the
we
can
speak
to
the
funding
of
these
positions
as
it
relates
to
the
inner
budget
change.
But,
as
Sean
mentioned,
you
know,
we've
been
in
discussions
with
Micron
from
the
beginning
about
what
their
fees
would
be
associated
with
permitting
so
we're
going
to
generate
a
substantial
amount
of
Revenue
through
permitting
in
association
with
the
Micron
work.
So
something
I
try
to
remind
everybody
of
PDs
is
a
revenue
generating
department,
and
that
will
be
the
case
here.
I
O
Well,
you
know
it's
going
to
be
years
that
will
that
we'll
have
to
have
people
likely
embedded
the
only
reason
I'm
hesitating
on
the
embedded
thing
is.
We
have
changed
since
Micron.
Investments
of
this
scale
happened
previously.
We
now
have
electronic
plans
of
metal
and
a
lot
of
things
that
are
done
online.
That
were
not
at
that
time.
Now.
The
inspectors,
of
course,
have
to
be
there
because
they're
they're
inspecting
construction
as
it's
happening,
but
so
this
will
be.
O
You
know
this
will
be
a
multi-year
commitment
and
responsibility
and-
and
we're
certainly
expecting
during
this
time
and
we're
seeing
as
you
can
tell
by
our
numbers,
that
that,
even
though
we've
got
some
uncertainty
in
the
market
as
it
relates
to
real
estate,
we're
still
seeing
more
significant
Investments,
especially
in
large-scale
multi-family
and
mixed
yeast
developments.
Continuing
in
the
city,
we
are
seeing
some
softening
of
the
single
family,
but
big
scale.
Stuff
will
continue.
So
we
see
this
as
a
as
a
long-term
commitment
of
the
city
to
to
keep
people
moving.
K
O
P
And
Madam
mayor
members
of
the
council,
maybe
this
is
a
good
time
to
transition
into
the
what
we
expect
to
be
forthcoming,
which
I
think
will
help
answer
council
member
willett's
questions,
if
that's
okay,
yeah,
okay,
great
so
as
Sean
referenced
and
then
Tim
also
referenced.
P
There
are
many
details
that
we
are
still
working
through
with
the
company
and
we
there
are
lots
of
mutual
considerations
that
we
are
trying
to
figure
out
and
get
into
formal
agreements
that
will
come
back
before
the
council.
As
to
the
specifics
on
the
funding,
as
per
particularly
related
to
the
fees
is
it?
Is
it
better
to
do?
P
You
know,
team
members
that
are
working
on
this
project
kind
of
tracking
their
time
and
billing
by
the
hour,
or
are
we
better
off
to
use
a
percentage
of
a
fee
based
on
valuation,
minus
the
equipment
so
they're
they're,
as,
as
we
have
said,
we
feel
like
we
have
more
questions
than
we
have
answers
at
this
point
on
some
of
the
very
detailed
specifics,
because
we
want
to
make
sure
to
document
those
in
agreements
and
bring
those
back
before,
but
I
think
it
is
very,
very.
P
Very
safe
to
say
that
the
anticipated
revenues
from
this
project
will
easily
cover
the
cost
of
these
additional
resources.
The
exact
mechanics
of
the
how
behind
the
scenes
will
come
back
to
you
in
some
agreements
and
so
to
to
put
a
finer
point
on
that.
We
have
outlined
a
couple
of
agreements
that
we
know
we
need
to
work
closely
with
Micron
to
develop.
P
One
of
those
is
the
facility
development
agreement,
which
specifically
relates
to
the
water
renewal,
and
we
anticipate
having
that
back
before
Council
within
60
days,
and
then
we
have
an
overall
overarching
funding
agreement
that
will
follow
that
that
will
be
related
to
some
of
the
project.
Definition
work
that
public
works
and
Micron
will
be
embarking
on
with
our
consultant
Partners,
Brown
and
Caldwell,
and
we
anticipate
that
agreement
being
back
before
Council
within
three
to
four
months.
So
those
are
those
are.
P
That
is
where
the
actual
detailed
detail
will
be
found
is
in
those
agreements,
and
because
this
is
such
a
large
and
ambitious
project,
we
have
been
working
as
quickly
as
we
can
to
get
as
many
of
those
lined
out,
but
also
trying
not
to
wait
and
hold
up
really
critical
project
milestones
and
timelines
with
giving
every
Last
Detail
ironed
out
is
like
we've
got
to
make
a
first
step,
and
so
today
is
the
representation
of
our
first
step
within
a
formal
agreements
and
and
many
more
details
to
follow.
P
Did
that
help?
Yes,
okay,
thank
you.
So
then
I
wanted
to
touch
just
a
little
bit
on
Sean
had
reference.
There
are
many
many
people
across
the
city
working
on
this,
so
I
wanted
to
just
kind
of
drive
home
the
program
structure
that
the
city
has
established
and
we
have
found
to
be
really
helpful.
P
Romeo
Gervais,
who
is
our
assistant
fire
chief,
but
on
loan
to
us
for
this
project
and
I,
are,
are
leading
the
efforts
here
and
maintaining
kind
of
the
single
point
of
contact
for
micron
leadership
as
we
move
through
this,
and
then
we
have
about
six
work
streams
that
we
are
tracking
underneath
this
and
we
have
a
schedule
of
I
think
it's
five
ongoing
weekly
check-in
meetings
between
City
and
Micron
staff
on
the
various
different
work
streams.
P
So
those
include
the
PDS
permitting
piece,
the
Recycled
water
piece,
Miss
Sean
referenced
some
of
our
plans
for
the
broader
housing
and
transportation.
So
all
of
of
these
are
moving
in
parallel
to
make
sure
that
we
are,
the
city
is
prepared
and
structured
and
ready
to
meet
this
really
ambitious
project
and
very
ambitious
timeline
that
Micron
has
set.
So
that
seems
to
be
working
well
kind
of
several
several
weeks
into
that
Cadence
and
structure
and
I
anticipate
that
we
will
be
back
before
you.
P
You
know
in
another
45
to
60
days
with
the
first
of
those
agreements
and
then
I
anticipate
we'll
we'll
probably
be
wanting
to
do
like
a
maybe
a
quarterly
check-in.
On
this,
because
it's
it's
big
and
it's
moving
fast
at
this
outset-
I'm
guessing
within
three
to
six
months,
that
will
kind
of
settle
and
then
we'll
be
on
a
very
predictable
Cadence.
But
we
might
want
a
couple
of
check-ins
in
the
near
term
more
frequently
as
we
get
everything
settled
and
sorted.
A
Further
we're
we
need
to
wait
on
a
budget
piece,
so
if
anybody
has
anything
that
you
would
like
to
say,
please
do.
E
Madame,
mayor
I,
just
I,
don't
have
a
question
just
a
comment:
I
just
want
to
commend
everyone
for
the
work
that's
been
done.
E
I
know
that
government
can
sometimes
move
a
little
bit
slower
than
business
and
I
know
that
you
all
have
been
diligent
in
the
speed
in
which
you're
responding
to
things,
while
still
being
cognizant
of
the
resources
that
we
have
and
the
service
that
we
usually
provide
to
our
citizens,
making
sure
that
that's
still
maintained
I
also
really
appreciate
the
cognizance
around
where
the
funding
is
coming
from
for
various
portions
of
this
project.
I
think
that
that's
really
important
to
keep
in
mind
as
we're
moving
through
it,
because
I
mean
this
is
a
big
project.
E
It
has
elements
of
Economic
Development.
It's
going
to
benefit
our
citizens
with
great
paying
jobs.
It's
going
to
benefit
the
city
for
years
to
come,
and
so
I
think
that
there's
a
lot
to
consider
there
when
we,
when
we
think
about
what
we're
putting
in
what
micron's
putting
into
our
community,
then
there's
a
lot
of
give
and
take
there.
So
I
appreciate
the
thoughtfulness
that
I've
seen
displayed
from
from
staff
and
from
the
mayor's
office
as
we
move
through
this,
and
that's
it
I,
don't
I,
don't
have
any
questions.
E
I
know
that
you
guys
are
doing
a
great
job.
I
know
that
Romeo
is
going
to
be
making
sure
that
this
place
is
super
safe
for
all
the
employees,
even
though
we
don't
usually
build
clean
rooms
like
this
is
a
newish
thing
and
I
know
that
Tim
staff
is
going
to
be
doing
very,
very
much
the
same
thing,
making
sure
that
these
are
safe,
structurally
and
safe
for
the
workers.
So
thanks.
That's
all
I
wanted
to
say.
H
This
is
a
pretty
exciting
project.
Romeo,
it's
great
to
have
you
on
this
project,
a
lot
of
faith
in
you
and
the
work
that
you've
done
here
at
the
city.
I've
got
a
couple
of
just
like
real
broad
questions
and,
and
you
know,
I
kind
of
feel
bad
for
how
broad
they
are
and
Sean.
Maybe
you
can
speak
to
this,
but
you
talked
about.
There
was
other
supporting
sort
of
discussions
and
initiatives
that
we
need
to
be
thinking
about
moving
forward
when
it
came
to
housing
when
it
came
to
brt.
H
Are
there
discussions
that
we
need
to
kind
of
have
on
our
radar
that
we
need
to
be
thinking
about,
pushing
and
moving
forward
and
being
proactive
with
it
support
the
other
aspects:
Child
Care,
Facility,
that's
going
in
next
door.
Other
types
of
things
along
those
lines,
foreign.
M
Councilmember
Halliburton,
so
thank
you
for
bringing
up
the
the
child
care
facility
that,
as
I
understand,
is,
is
underway.
I
know
that
Tim's
team
is
working
at
I,
I,
don't
know
exactly
which
stage
the
project
is
at
at
this
very
moment,
but
I
know
that
it's
it's
it's
it's
well
on
its
way
to
to
being
completed.
M
That's
certainly
a
critical
piece
of
this
overall
project,
just
ensuring
that
we
have
the
the
infrastructure.
The
the
Child
Care
is,
is
a
broad-ranging
infrastructure
type.
That
goes,
you
know
well
into
Economic,
Development
and
other
critical
needs
of
our
community.
So
yes,
that's
that's
something!
That's
almost
as
far
as
I
know,
almost
on
its
way
to
completion
on
the
on
the
transportation
and
housing
piece,
I.
Think
most
critically.
M
You
know
this
is
a
time
to
work
collaboratively
with
our
our
partner
agencies,
specifically
Valley
Regional
Transit
to
as
well
as
with
the
company
to
best
understand
the
needs
of
the
workforce
and
what
will
be
most
effective
in
terms
of
providing
meaningful,
Transit
opportunities
for
the
growing
Workforce,
not
just
for
for
micron
but
for
employers
across
our
city.
So
it's
certainly
an
opportunity
to
take
a
closer
look
at
that
and
something
that
the
company
made
very
clear
was
a
priority
for
them.
M
So
yes,
I'd,
say
that
now
is
the
time
to
look
forward
to
closer
collaboration
and
making
sure
that
our
our
city
is
focused
on
what
will
be
most
meaningful
in
that
regard
on
the
housing
piece
I.
M
Just
you
know,
I
wanted
to
broadly
speak
to
that,
because
it
was
something
that
the
company
also
made
clear
as
a
as
a
foremost
priority
for
ensuring
that
their
Workforce
is
able
to
to
to
have
Alternatives
and
and
housing
options
that
are
near
to
where
they
work,
so
that
it's
part
and
parcel
with
the
transportation
piece
and
Transit
ensuring
that
those
options
are
available
across
our
city.
M
H
O
If
I
could
address
that
as
well,
just
to
make
sure
that
everyone
understands,
we
have
very
high
expectations
about
how
this
investment
in
our
city,
which
is,
as
the
mayor
has
said,
is-
is
generational
can
further
our
goals
as
it
relates
to
transportation
and
housing
and
council
member
mayor,
you
know
we're
engaged
in
these
big
conversations
about
how
do
we
solve
these
intractable
problems
that
cities
have
had
so
much
trouble
with,
and
so
our
our
expectations
certainly
is
that
working
with
Micron
and
others.
We
will
determine
how
this
investment
can
further.
O
The
discussion
we're
already
having
about
solving
the
housing
problem,
which
is
one
that
we
have
to
solve
by
looking
within,
not
outside
the
city
and
addressing
Transportation
such
that
as
many
people
as
possible
are
not
in
single
Vehicles
driving
to
and
from
work.
So
we
have
very
specific
expectations,
as
you
know,
with
regard
to
how
the
physical
shape
of
the
city
should
be
should
be
curated
and
expect.
This
should
further
the
goals
we're
discussing
with
the
community
I.
O
H
Perfect
and
then
we're
just
to
kind
of
follow
up
on
there
real
quick
and
it
doesn't
need
to
don't
need
an
answer
here.
I
think
the
the
work
that
our
public
works
department
is
doing
right
now
and
the
need
that
we
might
have
to
push
our
finger
on
the
accelerator
button
just
a
little
bit.
H
You
know
in
some
of
those
areas
when
we
do
get
to
the
point
where
we
have
a
few
more
answers
and
a
few
more
ideas,
I
think
it
would
be
nice
to
know
if
there
are
some
areas
that
yes,
these
are
are
our
goals
for
the
future,
and
this
is
our
vision,
and
also
we're
going
to
have
to
you
know,
push
a
little
bit
faster
in
this
area
to
meet
the
specific
need
as
it's
coming
online.
So
those
types
of
things,
I
think,
would
be
helpful
too.
I'm
very
excited.
A
One
I'd
say
too
just
to
follow
up
on
that
council
member.
You
know
one
of
the
things
that
our
team
did
shortly
after
the
announcement
was
and
Tim
referenced.
This
was
pull
all
the
different
departments
together
and
walk
through
the
needs,
as
we
saw
them
and
those
of
course
included.
A
A
A
So
it
can't
all
be
an
expectation
of
the
city,
but
instead
we're
going
hand
in
hand
to
address
the
needs
today
and
into
the
future
of
our
community
with
a
key
partner,
and
that
is
Micron
and
whether
it
be
the
zoning
code
rewrite
the
work
that
we're
doing
on
Transit
that'll
need
to
grow
the
growth
that
we've
seen
at
the
airport
and
the
future
expansion
that
we
know
will
be
a
part
of
this
and
housing.
A
All
of
that
is
a
conversation
that
not
only
will
benefit
Micron,
but
truly
will
benefit
this
community
in
partnership
with
them,
and
there
will
be
times
as
we
see
more
of
the
specific
agreements
that
need
to
be
approved
have
more
clarity
on
the
action
steps
that
will
be
taken
in
the
timeline
to
also
have
those
other
conversations
in
terms
of
like
the
needs
from
in
partnership
with
Council
the
company
and
then
other
agencies
in
the
region.
A
I
Mayor,
thank
you.
Madam
mayor
I
was
very
pleased
and
moved
to
see
at
our
dedication
for
the
Irma
Hammond
house
to
have
members
of
Micron
from
their
Dei
Department
show
up
and
support
our
efforts
to
highlight
people
like
Irma
Hayman
and
our
community,
and
one
of
the
things
I
appreciate
about
Micron
is
that
you
know
it's.
I
It's
an
employer,
that's
going
to
create
opportunities
for
a
diverse
Workforce
to
be
working
in
a
place
where
they're
welcome,
where
they're
invited
to
be
their
authentic
selves
and
where
they're,
making
that
effort
to
make
sure
that
we
have
folks
who
may
be
graduating
from
Boise
State
with
their
engineering
degrees
and
can
keep
that
education
and
keep
that
Talent
here
in
Boise.
And
so
for
that
reason,
I'm
really
excited
for
this
project
and
see
how
they
deeper
in
bed
within
our
diverse
community
that
we
have
here
in
Boise.
F
Something
just
real
quickly:
I
just
wanted
to
Echo
what
we've
heard
from
a
lot
of
folks.
That
really
appreciate
the
fact
that
the
staff
and
the
mayor's
office
jumped
in
and
began
organizing
so
quickly,
so
that
we
can
at
least
to
the
extent
that
we
have
the
power
to
do
so,
ensure
that
this
both
goes
smoothly
for
micron
and
for
us,
but
also
doesn't
disrupt
the
rest
of
the
development
in
the
valley
and
I.
Think
the
recognition
of
that
is
really
important.
F
Quick
question
for
you,
Tim
as
I've
been
listening
to
this
and
thinking
through
the
sort
of
policy
things
that
may
face
us
that
we
might
want
to
think
about.
Sooner
than
later.
One
is
to
ensure
that,
as
the
zoning
code
rewrite
goes
ahead,
that
we
really
look
at
that
Regional
communities,
activity
center
and
understand
if
we've
got
got
it
right
at
this
point
in
the
in
what
we're
proposing
and
if
we
don't
what
changes
we
might
need
to
make.
F
And
as
we
talked
about
the
last
time,
you
talked
to
us
about
the
zoning
code
rewrite.
F
What
can
we
learn
from
this
facility
in
terms
of
what
we
need
to
do
with
our
industrial
zones
to
make
them
better,
so
I
think
I
think
there's
a
couple
of
policy
things
that
may
come
up
and
I.
At
least
this
council
member
is
certainly
willing
to
jump
in
and
work
on
those
to
the
extent
we
need
to
to
move
forward
more
quickly
than
we
otherwise
might.
A
All
right
well,
thank
you.
The
next
step
in
this
will
be
the
interim
budget
change
and
what
we
want
to
do
is
we
wanted
to
give
everybody
this
context
for
the
changes
that
you'll
see
and
Eric,
we
will
provide
an
interim
budget
change
document
and
then
it'll
be
on
the
agenda
for
approval
at
next
week's
meeting
to
give
time
to
review
it
with
the
context
that
you've
been
provided
today
and
that'll
just
be,
will
be
work
session
or
right.
Regular
meeting
foreign.
K
A
Great
and
with
that
I
want
to
thank
each
and
every
one
of
you
for
all
that
you've
done
to
move
us
to
this
point
and
look
forward
to
the
next
conversations
we'll
be
having
and
then
really
looking
forward
to
I
thought
about
it.
Kids
that
are
in
sixth
and
seventh
grade
right
now
will
be
graduating
from
college
in
year.
A
10
of
this
program
so
think
about
like
six
and
seventh
graders
that
you
know
go
to
Boise,
State
or
elsewhere,
get
a
material,
science
or
engineering
degree,
and
then
actually
we'll
have
more
opportunity
to
come
home
and
work
and
build
a
career
here
than
they
have
today
and
I
think
that's
pretty
cool
so
and
each
and
every
one
of
you
on
our
team.
That's
been
working
so
hard
on.
That
has
a
big
part
in
that.
So
thank
you.
A
Without
we
will
take
a
break
until
noon
when
we're
back
for
a
regular
meeting.