►
From YouTube: City Council Meeting - 5/12/2020
Description
Please visit the following link for information on how to testify during virtual public hearings:
https://www.cityofboise.org/departments/finance-and-administration/city-clerk/virtual-meetings/
A
D
B
E
A
C
E
A
A
F
Absolutely
I
just
wanted
to
say
I'm
very
honored
to
be
given
this
opportunity
to
serve.
Boise
spend
my
career
as
an
outdoor
educator
connecting
people
to
spaces
that
mean
a
lot
to
me
and
eventually
mean
a
lot
to
them
and
I
think
it's
really
an
important
part
of
the
civic
life
of
a
city
and
of
a
municipality
to
have
people
who
engage
with
their
open
spaces,
and
it's
something
that
Boise
does
well
and
I'm
excited
to
be
part
of
that
tradition.
So
thank
you.
A
Thank
you
for
your
service
and
welcome.
Thank
you
all
right
and,
of
course,
the
great
thing
about
having
these
zum
council
meetings
is.
You
can
leave
without
a
seeing
you
leaves,
but
people
are
always
welcome
to
leave
and
encouraged
and
given
the
opportunity
leave
after
their
their
approved
vics.
Thank
you
so
much.
We
look
forward
to
working
with
you
in
the
long
run.
A
A
A
That's
happened
this
last
week,
and
so
the
team
is
really
looking
now
at
what's
next
and
working
closely
with
on
the
county,
health
districts
and
others
to
figure
out
the
steps
that
we
take
and
I
there's
a
couple
things
I
wanted
to
say
just
on
that
and
then
on
the
resolutions
come
first
off.
I
am
optimistic,
cautiously
optimistic
as
I
think
we'll
hear
that
Kyle
and
Mallory
and
Wendy
from
their
conversations
with
health
districts
and
others
are
as
well
and
that
we'll
be
able
to
move
to
aged
to
two
weeks
ago.
A
You
know
nobody
knew
everybody
hoped
that
it
would
work
out
and
I
think
in
many
ways.
Well,
we
all
find
the
people
that
haven't
followed
and
the
requests
we've
made
to
physically
distance
and
do
things
for
the
most
part.
Our
residents
are
doing
that
and
trying
hard
to
do
that
and
it's
helping
us
be
able
to
advance
because
we're
not
seeing
an
increase
in
cases.
A
So
if
we
believe
that
by
so
first
off
I'll
say,
the
order
that
we
have
in
place
is
an
order
that
was
designed
for
30
days
or
when
and
if
the
County
Health
District
or
the
governor's
office
in
review
of
the
data
that
they
get
before
us
say
we
can
move
to
stage
2
and
at
that
point,
I
fully
intend
if
they
say
that
on
Wednesday
or
Thursday,
we're
not
sure
when
we
will
hear
that
news.
It's
my
intention.
A
A
But
as
soon
as
we
get
that
it's
our
intention
to
review
it.
And
if
the
governor
says
this,
they
can
move
to
stage
2
or
if
the
Health
District
and
the
Health
District
is
saying.
Yes,
it
makes
sense
in
Ada
County
to
move
to
stage
2.
Then
we
would
put
into
place
a
health
order
that
does
several
things.
A
A
Come
comes
a
little
later
than
what,
when
we
might
announce
what
we're
able
to
open,
because
we
have
to
see
his
language
person
so
Kyle
and
Mallory
and
Wendy
are
here
to
review
again
what
stage
two
looks
like
and
then
we
have
the
discussion
and
questions
and
whatever
you
want
to
talk
about
the
order
that
I
hope
is
only
in
an
order
for
another
three
four
days
because,
as
I
said,
I'm
optimistic
based
on
what
we've
seen
what
I've
heard
in
the
in
discussions
with
elected
officials,
county
level
and
the
emergency
group
that
has
CDH
central
district
health
is
that
we
haven't
seen
a
spike
which
is
really
incredible.
A
And
it's
my
sincere
hope
that
we
move
forward
and
we
don't
have
to
move
backward.
And
if
we
continue
being
vigilant,
it's
so
important
that
we
all
impress
upon
our
constituents.
How
important
is
that
we
can't
just
relax
and
think
it's
over
and
because,
if
we
do
this
right,
then
we'll
be
able
to
move
beyond
phase
two
into
phase
3
and
phase
4.
So
tonight
they'll
review.
What
what
phase
2
means,
as
well
as
I,
think
a
minor
update
on
anything
that
might
have
changed
since
last
week.
G
Alright,
thank
you,
madam
mayor
council
members
good
evening.
It's
a
beautiful
evening
out
there
tonight
I
hope
everybody's
having
a
great
day.
So
far.
We
have
a
couple
of
updates.
If
we're
going
to
provide
today,
I'll
go
over
a
brief
update
at
the
program
level.
Mallory
has
some
new
numbers
for
us
and
then
Kyle
is
going
to
talk
about
our
stage
two,
so
we
will
do
the
incredibly
fancy
screen
sharing
now
so
our
program.
G
As
you
know,
we
have
multiple
different
work
streams
going
on
the
updates
that
are
coming
across
from
the
departments
for
our
stage.
One
reopening
are
very
positive:
we've
had
good
responses
from
the
citizens.
I
myself
went
down
to
wave
one
at
White,
Water,
Park
purely
for
scientific
reasons.
Yesterday,
to
make
sure
everything
looks
good,
and
certainly
there
were
a
lot
of
people
out
I'm
enjoying
the
wave
at
an
appropriate
distance.
Our
composting
program,
which
also
started
pick
up
this
past
week,
was
very
popular.
So
that's
good
news
for
tomatoes
all
across
the
city.
G
This
coming
summer,
our
library
team
has
switched
gears
to
help
us
with
cloth,
masks,
they've
delivered
about
eight
hundred
of
them
and
then,
of
course,
our
Emergency
Operations
Center
has
been
giving
us
surgical
supply
mask
for
PPE
supplies
as
we
reopen
the
city
services.
We've
had
two
different
Commission's
have
live
public
testimony
over
the
course
of
the
past
business
week,
our
planning
and
zoning
committee,
as
well
as
historic
preservation.
G
We
have
very
positive
feedback
received
in
particularly
on
planning
and
zoning,
and
the
public
was
happy
to
be
able
to
provide
testimony
and
the
Historic
Preservation
Committee
was
able
to
catch
up
on
quite
a
backlog.
There
are
still
some
challenges.
Social
distancing
in
our
open
spaces
remains
a
bit
difficult
to
help
educate
people
on
why
it's
important
so
we're
trying
a
different
approach.
The
community
wellness
and
Community
Engagement
team
is
working
on
a
play
differently.
G
Education
campaign
that
they
would
like
to
get
in
place
before
Memorial
Day
before
the
real
heat
of
the
summer
starts
taking
us.
So
those
challenges
haven't
gone
away.
We're
still
continuing
to
try
to
educate
people
on
the
whys
of
some
of
the
changes
to
our
open
spaces
in
our
parks
in
particular,
and
then
from
the
program
itself.
We
have
a
couple
of
pieces
of
information
that
we
thought
you
might
want
to
know
the
vulnerable
populations
work
and
all
of
the
hotel
space
that
we
have
set
aside.
G
We
have
transitioned
our
daily
management
of
that
to
interfaith,
as
well
as
our
medical
provider
partners,
so
that
daily
management
we're
stepping
back
into
more
of
a
consultative
role
there
and
the
second
piece
of
information
that
could
be
interesting.
Information
for
the
public
is
that
we
have
our
transparency
website.
That
is
up.
It's
now
linked
off
of
our
koban
site
on
the
city
of
Boise
main
website.
So
this
gives
us
a
chance
for
the
public
to
be
able
to
see
where
we're
spending
any
funds
that
we
get
from
the
federal
or
the
state
governments.
G
C
H
Gone
over
1.3
million
here
locally
I
p.m.
there,
the
state
is
reporting
almost
2300
cases
with
69
deaths
yesterday
were
actually
reporting,
70
deaths,
so
I'm
not
sure
if
someone
improved
dramatically
or
just
a
little
error
in
reporting,
but
today
they
are
reporting
that
69
deaths
within
80
County
I'm.
That
total
is
up
to
744,
with
21
deaths
and
again
that
contains
both
confirmed
and
probable
cases
at
both
the
state
and
the
county
level,
and
then
you'll
see
kind
of
the
total
tests
conducted
there.
H
D
H
I
H
They
do
both
the
the
state
and
the
health
districts
are
all
reporting,
both
the
confirmed
and
the
probable
numbers
as
separate
numbers.
I
combined
them
here,
I'm
just
some
ease
of
reporting
and
consistency
because
they
only
started
reporting
the
probables
a
couple
of
weeks
ago.
Early
on,
they
were
not
I
mean
so
to
try
to
maintain
some
of
that
consistency.
I've
just
been
reporting
the
totals,
but
on
both
the
Central
District
Health's
dashboard
and
on
the
state
dashboard
that
you
can
get
to
that
corner
of
IRC
Idaho
gov.
H
A
H
H
Just
trying
to
to
summarize
it
here
and
I
will
say
that
sometimes
the
probable
number
is
shift
around
a
little
bit
too
and
I
think
that
must
be
because
when
they
originally
thought
it
was
probable
if
it
got
tested,
then
it
can
move
to
that
confirmed
category,
and
so
that's
another
reason
to
kind
of
keep
the
just
the
total
number
for
the
reporting
purposes.
Right
now
that.
C
There,
since
we're
stopped
here
for
just
a
moment,
Thank
You
Mallory
do
I
know
nationally.
There
is
some
effort
to
track
how
many
deaths
would
have
been
predicted
to
happen
in
this
time
period
versus
the
total
number
of
deaths.
Just
as
a
I
know,
some
people
are
concerned
that
there
is
either
over
reporting
or
under
reporting,
and
that
seems
to
give
a
better
snapshot
of
where
we're
tracking
you
know
in
total
deaths
compared
and
and
sort
of
confirms.
That
number
is
that
happening
either
in
the
state
or
locally
you.
H
Know
I
haven't
I,
don't
know
that
I've
personally
seen
anything
on
that.
It's
not
something
and
I,
don't
know
that
I've
actually
heard
any
of
those
news
stories
either.
So
that's
interesting
just
to
kind
of
see
how
this
is
maybe
affecting
your
not
effecting
the
total
discounts
that
would
kind
of
see
on
average
ya
know,
I
haven't
heard
anything
I
can
do
some
looking
around
and
see
if
there's
anything
that
we
can
report
back
to
you
next
week,
but
yeah.
That's
not
something
I've
heard
of
yes
counsel,.
J
Thank
you.
If
I
may,
this
is
Kyle,
Patterson
I
think
it's
a
great
question.
There
was
some
New
York
Times
reporting
on
that
on
a
state-by-state
basis
about
three
weeks
ago,
so
that
data
was
available
through
that
reporting
for
the
state
of
Idaho,
and
it
did
show
a
larger
number
of
deaths
above
average
above
expected
for
Idaho
and
would
be
expected
from
kovat
and
so.
H
Thanks
Kyle
the
data
guy
chimed
in
on
with
the
data,
but
yeah
we
can
do
simply
isn't
looking
around
and
see
if
there's
anything
more
recent
or
reach
out
so
moving
on.
Here
is
just
kind
of
that
that
trend
graph
and
if
we
had
separated
out
the
the
probable
you'd,
see
a
little
bit
of
a
shorter
lower
line
there
on
each
of
the
top
two
things.
But
again
the
differences
is
not
that
much,
and
so
we
just
are
continuing
kind
of,
as
we
have
we're
doing,
a
good
job
of
finding
that
curve.
H
We
haven't
seen
any
significant
spikes,
either
kind
of
at
the
the
state
or
at
the
county
level.
And
again,
thankfully,
our
the
our
deaths
of
have
remained
relatively
low
and
I.
Think
I
haven't
looked
at
like
a
percentage
compared
to
other
areas,
but
that
line
has
stayed
I
feel
significantly
low,
which
is
good.
So
next
one
windy.
H
Since
we've
seen
cases
reported
in
the
county
or
in
this
are
in
the
district
of
what
they're
looking
at
so
we'll
go
to
the
next
one
Wendy
and
look
at
the
state
and
the
local
and
I
apologize
that
the
dates
on
these
are
a
little
bit
wonky
compared
to
the
last
graph.
I
realized
after
I
kind
of
put
it
together,
they're
reporting
the
numbers
are
for
the
same
week,
but
the
central
district
health
graph
puts
the
date
at
the
beginning
of
the
week,
and
mine
is
at
the
end
of
the
week.
H
But
it
should
be
about
the
same
time
period,
which
is
I'll,
say
one
of
the
challenges
in
looking
at
some
of
this
data.
There's
a
lot
of
different
ways
to
look
at
it
as
I'm
sure
Kyle
can
highlight.
Based
on
how
you
look
at
in
position
your
week.
Sometimes
the
numbers
look
a
little
different,
but
we
can
see
there's
still
a
trend
of
trending
downward,
both
in
the
state
and
in
the
county.
H
I
was
looking
at
the
averages
today
and
these
most
recent
two
weeks
we
are
seeing
within
Ada
County
an
average
of
five
point
six
cases
a
day
and
the
previous
two
weeks
was
7.4
cases
a
day
so
that
that
trend
is
going
down,
and
I
did
note
that,
since
we've
went
into
stage
1,
obviously
we
still
have
a
couple
of
days
before
we
could
see
the
end
of
the
effects
of
that.
We
were
down
to
five
point
three
cases
per
day
within
the
county,
since
that
made
first
I.
H
Think
that
is
the
end
of
the
the
kind
of
data
sharing
for
the
cases
that
I
had
so
but
yeah
generally,
the
case
doesn't
get
I'm
sure
Kyle
will
expand
a
little
bit
more
on
some
of
the
indicators
and
how
we
were
looking
there,
but
I
think
as
the
someone
else.
Maybe
the
mayor
had
alluded
to.
I
was
on
the
county
planning
call
this
afternoon
and,
and
things
are
feeling
relatively
stable
there
as
well.
So
so,
hopefully
we
can
continue
on
that
trend.
H
A
J
J
J
So
generally,
the
average
time
between
when
somebody's
infected
and
they
start
experiencing
symptoms,
is
about
5
to
6
days,
and
then
it
can
be
another
five
to
six
days
between
then
and
when
they
get
tested
and
get
test
results.
So
we
expect
to
start
seeing
in
the
coming
days
if
we
see
an
outbreak
as
a
result
of
lifting
restrictions
in
stage
one,
and
so
we
will
continue
to
watch
those
numbers
closely
jump.
A
In
here
and
clarify
I
know,
it
says
it,
but
just
so
the
public
understands,
because
we
get
questions
about
what
data
we're
looking
at
and
how
we
make
the
decision.
The
data
listed
here
is
the
data,
the
parameters
that
were
developed
by
the
state,
they're
they're
referenced
in
our
order,
and
we
will
be
making
judgment,
calls
on
this
data.
It's
District
Health
Department
for
Ada
County
and
the
state
Health
and
Welfare,
with
the
governor's
committee
for
the
state.
J
Right
Thank,
You
mayor,
madam
mayor.
Yes,
the
idea
is
that
we'll
continue
to
consult
with
central
district
health
on
how
we're
doing
on
these
metrics
and
my
hope
is
in
the
future
to
be
able
to
bring
to
you
updates
on
a
weekly
basis
from
central
district
health
on
how
we're
performing
relative
to
these.
These
new
metrics
that
you
see
on
this
page
next
slide.
Please
windy!
J
So
this
slide
shows
what
the
state
has
planned
for
Stage
two.
You
can
see
that
restaurants,
gyms
and
then
hair
salons
are
all
allowed
by
the
state
to
reopen
in
stage
two
as
long
as
they
have
business
protocols
in
place
and
specifically
for
restaurants,
they
must
submit
a
plan
to
Central
Church
health
and
the
city
intends
to
follow
the
state's
plan
for
Stage
two,
as
the
mayor
mentioned
previously
next
slide.
Please.
J
And
then,
finally,
I'm
working
with
departments
to
update
our
plan
for
which
city
services
and
facilities
will
reopen
in
stage
two.
Those
plans
should
be
finalized
by
the
end
of
the
day
tomorrow.
But
I
wanted
to
give
you
all
a
quick
teaser
on
some
of
those
services
and
facilities.
So
they
include
reopening
the
library
on
a
limited
basis
by
appointment
only
for
use
of
the
computers
there.
The
idea
is
that
folks
will
need
access
to
those
computers
to
do
things
like
file
for
unemployment
claims.
J
There
would
be
limited,
curbside
pickup
starting
that
next
week,
but
that
would
probably
phase
in
we
do
a
small
scale
soft
opening
next
week,
and
if
that
works
out,
we
didn't
expand
that
service
in
the
following
week
and
then,
as
far
as
facility
reservations,
Parks
and
Recreation
would
be
allowing
facility
reservations,
but
with
a
maximum
of
less
than
ten
people
for
any
facility
reservation.
Dog
parks
would
reopen
completely.
J
The
bike
skills
park
would
reopen,
except
for
the
pump
track
and
then
some
core
restrooms
would
reopen
so
those
kind
of
downtown
adjacent
core
park
restrooms
would
be
open
as
well
as
restrooms
at
trailheads,
and
then
Quail
Hollow
and
Warm
Springs.
Golf
courses
with
both
reopen.
They
would
require
a
single
rider
carts.
Only.
E
J
L
Mayor
good
I
have
a
question
about
this:
is
it
I
don't
know
I
guess?
Is
it
kind
of
relates
to
businesses?
Also,
so
one
of
the
closure
is
one
of
the
Hart
closures
until
I
think
it's
phase
four
is
large
venues,
but
where
we
have
the
Boise
Depot,
which
would
generally
be
considered
a
large
venue,
but
we're
just
limiting
the
capacity
of
that
large
venue
I'm
wondering
if
there
would
be
space
for
owners
of
large
venues
like
movie
theaters,
to
also
operate
in
a
limited
capacity
without
kind
of
getting
sideways
on
orders.
A
Well,
the
the
key
here
is
for
opening
it
for
group
limits
of
no
more
than
ten
so
and
then,
of
course,
they
be
providing
us
and
the
plans
to
show
that
they
are
have
social
distancing.
We
are
not
opening
things
sooner
than
the
state
and
we
have
not
proposed
that
and
so
haven't
thought
about
allowing
large
venues
to
open
in
advance.
It's
something
we
could
potentially
have
a
conversation
with
Central,
District,
Health
and
others.
M
A
There
was
a
venue
that
was
interested
in
having
no
more
than
ten
people
at
any
time
in
it,
but
that
I
mean
that
that
gets
that
could
also
from
an
Operations
standpoint,
get
really
tough.
Because
then
we
are
trying
to
review
plans
and
forest
plans
and
taking
steps
sooner
than
the
state
would
have
do
you
have
a
proposal
or
a
thoughts
on
how
that
could
work.
L
Not
necessarily
it
just
kind
of
it
just
caught
my
attention
that
we
were
opening
a
large
venue
with
limited
capacity,
and
so
I
had
heard
from
a
small
theater
owner
last
week
that
they
might
be
considering
something
like
that
and
at
first
I
was
like
that's
ridiculous
and
then
I
was
like
whoa.
Wait,
we're
opening
a
large
venue
with
a
limited
capacity.
So
would
it
make
sense
to
allow
private
businesses
to
do
that
too?
So
I'll
send
them
to
the
State.
J
Council,
member
weddings,
this
is
Kyle.
It's
a
great
question,
a
fair
point
from
my
perspective,
I,
don't
think
the
Boise
depo
meets
that
definition
as
I
seen
it
for
a
large
facility,
our
large
venue
from
the
state,
although
there's
a
very
definition,
I
think.
The
key
point
is
that
we
can't
allow
more
than
the
state
allows
so,
regardless
of
whether
we
think
it
could
be
appropriately
reopened
as
a
large
venue.
Now
we
can't
do
that
because
the
state
has
has
prohibited
that
and.
A
I'll
chime
in
here
Kyle
can
I
appreciate
that
clarification,
because
that's
true
and
we
can't
open
things
ourselves
or
the
city
in
advance
of
the
state.
So
it
must
be
that
the
depo
doesn't
fall
under
that
definition.
Jade
keeps
showing
up
in
a
picture,
I
don't
know
if
he
has
something
to
say
or
not,
but
that
I
appreciate
that,
because
thinking
on
my
feet,
that
wasn't
one
of
the
things
that
I
came
up
with,
but
you're
right
we'd
be
in
violation.
If
we
were
opening
something
that
qualified
is
a
large
menu
and.
N
Madam
mayor
Councillor
was
the
only
thing
I
was
gonna.
Clarifies
several
of
us
did.
Have
a
conference
call
with
the
large
facility
owners,
the
Boise
Center
Boise
State,
some
of
the
big
hotels
who
have
conference
centers
and
their
their
interest
is
really
in
more
Stage.
Four
of
group
sizes
meets
facility
sizes
and
so
we're
we're
getting
some
potential
best
practices
from
some
other
progressive
cities,
and
then
gonna
run
that
by
the
mayor
to
see,
if
there's
some
other
interest,
but
none
of
the
major
facilities
were
interested
in
stuff
in
stage
two
or
three.
C
J
Yes,
so
the
the
the
technology
appointments,
I
believe
would
only
be
at
the
main
library
and
I
believe
that
has
something
to
do
with
the
space
available
and
whether
or
not
they
can
adequately
provide
that
social
distancing.
But
the
book
drops
and
the
curbside
pickup
would
be
at
all
locations.
Okay,.
A
C
C
Is
it
takes
a
month
or
two
to
plan
one
and
if
we
don't
begin
in
taking
until
Stage
four,
then
we're
still
another
month
out
and
I
couldn't
I
was
looking
through
my
stuff
today
and
I
I
must
have
missed,
but
I
couldn't
quite
remember
when
we'd
at
least
begin
to
intake
those
with
no
promises
of
a
date,
just
only
when
it
reaches
stage.
Four
and
that's
appropriate.
N
For
logs
makes
sense
for
Stage
four
type
of
thing,
but
we've
not
we've
not,
you
know
closed
off
communications.
I
guess
is
what
I
want
to
reiterate.
We
basically
just
keep
you
know,
keep
on
discussing.
You
know
those
those
pieces
so
so
we're
in
close
communication
with
all
the
special
events,
operators
and
that's
really
where
kind
of
Boise
State
was
coming
from
from
this
call
that
we
did
last
week,
so
we're
just
gonna
continue
ongoing
discussions
and
then
just
figure
out
which
ones
make
sense
in
stage
four
and
then
you
know
beyond
so
right.
A
My
wall
again
we're
no
longer
safe,
all
right,
see
and
there
what
the
openings
that
Kyle
shared
are
just
some
of
the
openings
that
staff
is
proposing
and
so
they'll
continue
to
work
on
it
through
tomorrow.
Once
we
hear
whether
or
not
we
are
progressing
to
stage
two
then
we'll
put
that
together
as
a
formal
package
to
release
to
the
public,
so
they
can
understand
I'm
from
the
city
perspective.
What
services
are
now
available.
A
A
L
To
read,
intervener
yeah
I'll
go
ahead
and
kick
it
off.
I
I
just
wanted
to
recognize
that
with
this
first
order,
the
phase
one
order
there
was
a
lot
of
confusion
caused
around
our
local
businesses
and
what
they
could
expect
and
so
I'm
hoping
that
in
subsequent
orders
it
can
be
a
little
bit
clearer
that
we'll
be
following
the
same
timeline
as
the
governor.
Unless
there's
something
very
local,
that's
happening.
That's
really
out
of
character
with
what's
happening
in
the
rest
of
the
state.
L
I
think
that
would
give
people
a
lot
more
comfort,
create
a
lot
less
confusion,
and-
and
just
you
know,
people
just
want
to
get
back
to
work.
They
want
to
do
it
safely.
They
want
to
be
responsible.
We
have
people
who
have
been
waiting,
seven
plus
we
for
unemployment
at
this
point,
and
it's
created
some
really
dire
circumstances
for
folks
in
our
community.
So
I
would
just
like
us
as
a
city
to
be
really
cognizant
of
that
and
really
make
sure
that
we're
taking
that
into
account.
A
I,
you
know
I,
agree
with
you
and
think
we
are
all
cognizant
of
how
hard
this
has
been
on
people
very
much
so,
and
the
or
and
I
agree
that
there
was
a
lot
of
confusion
around
how
we
would
progress
and
that
the
very
important
Clause
of
when
this
would
expire
and
how
was
lost
and
in
the
next
ones.
We
will
just
for
to
make
it
clearer,
be
sticking
with
the
same
dates
recognizing,
while
some
people
believe
that
it
was
a
promise
that
things
would
open
on
the
16th.
A
It
wasn't
because
we're
all
waiting
for
information
and
so
we'll
keep
those
same
dates,
but
I'm
gonna.
You
know
be
really
upfront
that
it's
true.
We
will
move
on
if
the
central
district
health
locally
and
the
states
say
we
can
but
putting
the
date
on
the
piece
of
paper
isn't
a
promise.
If
it's
the
date
at
which
we
review
that
we
hear
from
the
state
and
health
district
that
they've
reviewed
the
data
and
can
tell
us
if
we
can
move
forward
or
not
and.
L
Madam
mayor,
all
due
respect,
but
I,
don't
think
it
was
clear
to
anybody
that
we
would
be
moving
with
the
state.
I
think
that
there
was
a
lot
of
communication
coming
out
of
the
city
that
would
cause
people
to
believe
that
we
were
on
a
completely
separate
timeline
and
I.
Think
that's
where
the
confusion
came
from
so
I
mean
I,
don't
know
what
the
intention
was
originally
with
that
order,
but
that's
not
that
wasn't
how
it
was
communicated
to
the
community
so
but
I
appreciate
all
the
clarification
that
you
provided
today
around
it.
A
M
A
couple
of
comments,
I
think
and
thoughts
that
maybe
will
help
us
all
next
time
around,
and
so
the
first
is
I
appreciate
the
clarification
that
you've
given
to
me
privately
and
then
to
all
of
us
in
this
meeting
about
the
city's
intention
to
move
to
stage
2
with
the
rest
of
the
state.
So
as
the
evidence
in
the
data
in
Ada,
County
is
commensurate
with
that
goal.
That's
not
how
I
read
this
previous
order.
M
M
Procedurally
it'd
be
good
not
to
be
in
this
situation
again,
and
you
know:
here's
how
I
think
this
got
teed
up,
but
the
emergency
powers
ordinance
authorizes
the
mayor
to
issue
an
order
with
or
without
consultation
from
the
council
and
then
at
the
next,
duly
notice,
council
meeting,
which
is
where
we
are
now.
The
council
gives
an
up
or
down
vote.
We
don't
have
authority
to
amend
or
to
change
or
to
propose
suggestions
to
how
the
order
should
be
written
during
these
meetings,
and
we
don't
have
authority
to
postpone
building
on
it.
M
We
can
only
say
yes
or
no.
I
have
substantive
and
procedural
issues
with
this
order.
That
I
very
much
would
like
to
have
had
an
opportunity
to
have
addressed
it's
absolutely
within
the
mayor's
authority
to
issue
these
orders
and
have
these
conversations
in
these
public
meetings
on
the
up
or
down
vote,
but
I
think
it
would
help
avoid
some
of
the
confusion
that
the
public
had
last
time
if
we
had
a
more
iterative
process,
particularly
because
we
know
now,
you.
N
M
We
do
have
a
phase
two
order
coming
it's
on
there,
it's
on
the
horizon
at
some
point,
there's
no
specific
date
for
it,
but
we
know
it's
coming
and
and
to
the
you
know,
to
the
greatest
extent
that
we
can
be
iterative
among
the
mayor's
office
and
the
council
and
anyone
else
who
needs
to
provide
input.
I
think
we
can
avoid
a
lot
of
these
problems
so
bite.
C
Madam
mayor,
if
I
could
follow
up
on
that,
so
first
of
all,
I
appreciate
the
comments
from
my
fellow
council
members.
You
and
I've
also
had
these
discussions.
I
felt
from
the
beginning
that
your
intent
was
to
move
with
the
state
if
we
could
at
all
possibly
do
that
if
all
the
data
showed
that
that
was
the
right
thing
to
do.
C
Like
fellow
council
members,
wasn't
it
wasn't
clear
to
me
as
it
was
written
and
so
as
councilmember
bagent
points
out,
we
will
have
a
subsequent
order.
Coming
I
know
that
there's
some
real
substantive
things
in
that
order.
That
will
follow
the
governor's
order
in
terms
of
exactly
what
the
restrictions
will
be.
C
What
protocols
will
have
to
call
out
separately
but
I
think
the
the
framework
of
the
order
will
hopefully
maybe
already
be
produced
in
terms
of
you
know
many
of
the,
whereas
is
many
of
the
the
separable
'ti
clause,
the
the
one
that
caused
us
the
problem
this
time,
the
end
of
the
effective
date
clause
and
I.
Wonder
if
there's
an
opportunity
to
work
on
those
clauses
as
soon
as
tomorrow,
just
at
least
let
everybody
see
them
have
a
comment
on
them.
C
A
Am
I
ugly
you're
good
man
am
I
good
now,
okay,
I,
don't
know
why
that
was
a
couple
things
on
that.
Of
course,
I
can't
predict
the
future
in
terms
of
timing,
but
I'm
always
open
for
input
and,
as
I've
always
hoped
to
be
in
working
with
you,
council,
president
and
President
Pro
Tem
in
leadership.
When
we've
had
conversations
about
these
things
we
are
now
we
have
the
framework
set
up
and
we
could
share
that
tomorrow.
But,
as
I
said
at
the
beginning
tonight,
my
expectation
is
unless
something
changes.
A
Now
the
governor
has
produced
protocols,
so
we
will
incorporate
those
by
reference
as
requirements
for
businesses
operating
in
our
city.
The
date
will
be
the
end
of
March
in
terms
of
referencing
the
date
not
March
May
I
keep
doing
that.
It's
like
Groundhog's
Day
every
every
day
in
terms
of
referencing,
the
expiration
of
the
order
tied
to
the
date
when
the
governor
in
central
district
health
review
the
data
and
make
a
call.
So
then
we'd
have
to
be
ready
with
the
next
one
to
go
immediately.
A
C
C
D
A
Thank
you
all
right.
Next
up,
we
have
our
consent
agenda.
The
one
item
that
the
council
president
took
off
the
agenda
correct.
Yes,.
C
E
C
Yes,
madam
mayor
just
so
explanation
for
some
of
the
members
of
the
public
we've
had
this
ordinance
back
and
forth
on
our
agenda
for
a
number
of
times
in
order
to
timely,
actually
apply
the
rules
in
this
order.
We're
going
to
read
it
for
the
third
time
tonight
and
then
go
ahead
and
issue
those
rules.
The
resolution
with
the
rules
so
with
that
I
would
move
that
all
rules
of
the
council
interfering
with
the
immediate
consideration
of
Ord
10-20,
be
suspended.
C
C
B
C
C
E
B
Yes,
agent,
yes,
Clegg,
yes,
Oh
Rd,
10
20,
an
ordinance
amending
Boise,
City,
Code,
title
3
licenses
and
permits
to
enact
a
new
chapter,
18
entitled
newsracks
setting
forth
the
authority
purpose
and
intent
to
create
such
license
and
fees
incorporating
existing
general
licensing
provisions
setting
forth
general
provisions,
including
the
definition
of
key
terms
requiring
a
license
establishing
fix
at
isola
zones,
providing
implementation
procedures
detailing
nuisance
and
non
use
procedures,
providing
obligations
of
licensees
incorporating
an
existing
denial.
Revocation
suspension
review
and
penalty
procedures
are
proving
summary
of
the
ordinance
and
providing
an
effective
date.
E
C
In
order
to
approve
this
resolution,
so
this
resolution
could
not
be
on
the
consent
agenda.
What
this
resolution
does
is
actually
do
propose
the
fees
and
charges
for
the
newsracks
that
we
just
approved
in
the
subsequent
order
for
the
proceeding
or
ordinance.
So
with
that
all
is
that
correct?
Thank
you.
That
is
correct
all
right.
C
So
with
that
now
that
we
have
passed
the
ordinance
I
would
move
that
we
approve
resolution
one
23-20,
a
resolution
declaring
the
intent
of
the
City
of
Boise
and
proposed
through
its
finance
and
administration
department,
and
proposing
fees
and
charges
for
newsracks,
approving
the
placement
of
these
fees
on
the
city's
master
fee
schedule
and
providing
an
effective
date.
Second,.
B
E
A
The
first
subdivision
is
SLS
20,
and
this
is
our
and
if
I
understand
correctly,
we
have
staff
that
will
be
presenting,
and
it
looks
as
though
the
first
applicant
for
the
first
subdivision
is
not
on
the
line.
But
if
that's,
if
you
are
here
in
our
facilitator,
Amanda
doesn't
know
it.
Just
please.
Let
us
know
in
the
chat,
I
raise
your
hand
and
we'll
be
sure
to
have
you
and
present
to
us
as
well,
but
first
off
we'll
start
with
Cody.
It
looks
like
since
you've
popped
up
and
for
the
staff
presentation.
O
O
However,
in
this,
in
this
case,
the
setbacks
were
actually
cited
on
an
old
subdivision
plat.
This
subdivision
platted
in
1972,
actually
specified
a
50-foot
front
and
10-foot
side
yard
setbacks.
The
applicant
is
simply
asking
to
use
the
setbacks
of
the
zone
again
for
a
single-story
addition
from
staff
perspective.
We
don't
have
any
issues
with
the
request
and
the
applicant
has
obtained
relinquishment
from
all
the
easement
holders
to
use
those
proposed
setbacks.
We
remain
unaware
of
any
opposition
to
the
request,
and
so
we
are
recommending
approval
of
the
application
this
evening.
Thank
you.
C
E
A
E
O
Madame
mayor,
can
everyone
see
my
see
my
screen?
Thank
you
this.
This
is
a
request
again
too
similar
to
the
last
item
to
vacate
a
plátano
related
to
a
side
and
rear
yard
setback
in
Phase,
three
of
Hewitt
Park
subdivision
property
is
addressed
at
one
one:
three,
one:
eight
west
patty
patty
court
for
those
unfamiliar
with
the
area.
It's
located
just
southeast
of
the
McNeil
shamrock
intersections
in
West
Boise.
G
O
Zoned
r1
c
or
single-family
residential,
which
again
allows
15-foot
rear
and
5-foot
side
yard
setbacks,
and
that's
the
applicants
request
this
evening
is
to
simply
use
the
setbacks
of
the
zone.
The
setback
is
actually
consistent
with
other
Lots
in
the
subdivision,
including
other
adjacent
phases
of
the
development.
It's
kind
of
an
odd
situation
in
that
it
appears
that
30
foot
requirement
was
maybe
an
oversight
at
the
time
and
that
it
doesn't
actually
reflect
what's
occurred
in
a
lot
of
the
area.
O
We
remain
unaware
of
opposite
of
opposition
to
the
request
and
can
identify
any
negative
impacts
on
other
properties
in
the
area.
This
will
allow
very
minor
addition
to
a
single-family
home.
All
existing
easements
will
be
will
be
honored,
and
so
with
that
we
are
recommending
approval
of
the
application
this
evening.
Thank
you.
C
And
Emeric
question
for
cody:
we,
you
know
this
is
a
second
one.
We've
gotten
tonight,
we've
seen
a
few
of
these
as
we
approved
new
subdivisions.
Are
we
being
careful
not
to
approve
development
agreements
that
are
different
from
what
our
underlying
ordinance
and
setbacks
are
accepting
in
very
special
situations,
where
there's
some
physical
reason
to
do
that?
I,
just
don't
want
to
set
up
more
of
these
for
future
councils
in
there
sometime
in
the
distant
future.
Oh
hey,
Cody,
yeah,.
O
I'm,
not
a
mayor
council,
member
Clegg,
we,
this
was
kind
of
a
common
practice,
I
guess
before
my
time,
70s
80s,
that
we
would
list
setbacks
on
subdivision,
Platts
and
you're.
Absolutely
right,
we'd
run
into
situations
where
they
conflicted,
maybe
with
the
conditional
use
permit
or
something
so
we
haven't
in
many
years
listed
those
setbacks
on
on
subdivision
Platts
like
this,
because
it
does
lead
to
all
kinds
of
confusion.
Thank.
C
A
I
E
O
O
The
subdivision
will
consist
of
two
buildable
Lots
each
occupied
by
detached
single-family
homes
that
includes
the
existing
home
that
will
remain
on
the
eastern
half
of
the
site.
The
project
was
approved
with
a
Planned
Unit
development
earlier
this
year
that
allowed
a
slight
reduction
in
area
or
just
about
60
square
feet
for
that
western
lot,
it
also
allowed
3-foot
interior
side
yard
setbacks.
These
are
permitted
allowances.
Under
the
plan
unit
development
ordinance,
the
new
home
will
meet
all
required
perimeter
setbacks
and
no
variances
were
required.
O
The
applicant
has
also
indicated
that
the
majority
of
the
existing
trees
on
the
site
will
remain
and
then
a
condition
of
accrual
approval
requires
mitigation
for
any
that
are
removed.
As
indicated
in
your
packet.
The
item
was
not
a
pope
opposed
at
the
Planning
and
Zoning
Commission
hearing
the
PUD
was
not
appealed,
and
so
it
is
only
the
subdivision
before
you
this
evening.
The
Commission
did
recommend
approval
of
the
preliminary
and
final
plat
and
we
are
recommending
that
council
do
the
same
this
evening.
Thank
you.
E
P
O
Madam
mayor
account,
councilmember
Halliburton
I,
don't
believe
we
conditioned
that
that
with
this
subdivision,
I
mean,
if
you
look,
we
certainly
could
add
something.
If
you
look,
the
area
to
the
south
and
southeast
is
all
but
built
out
with
established
single-family
single
family
home,
so
there's
very
little
in
the
way
of
kind
of
a
reed
redevelopment
here,
so
it
it
would
certainly
be
a
challenge.
I.
Suppose,
sir.
C
Madam
mayor
go
ahead.
Thank
you.
A
little
bit
of
follow
up.
I
did
just
a
quick
bit
of
research
this
afternoon,
and
this
is
the
electric
light,
switch
lateral,
which
is
kind
of
an
interesting
name,
and
it
comes
off
of
the
bigger
canal
there
at
Rose
Hill,
but
as
I
look
at
it,
it
has
a
60
foot
right-of-way
and
so,
instead
of
it
being
an
easement,
a
lot
lined
as
I
could
look
at
as
I
can
see
at
the
lot
line
of
these,
two
new
thoughts
are
on
the
edge
of
that
right-of-way.
C
My
guess
is
the
rest
of
the
development
follows
that
same
pattern,
although
it's
quite
thickly
grown
with
pretty
mature
trees,
so
I
don't
know
that
there's
any
room
for
a
pathway,
but
if
there
was
such
a
pathway,
it
would
be
on
the
right-of-way
of
the
Cannell
anyway,
so
it
wouldn't
be
an
easement,
at
least
from
what
I
could
tell
from
what
I
looked
at
quickly
this
afternoon.
Thank.
K
A
K
C
O
O
The
combination
of
easements
and
plat
notes
on
these
parcel
making
building
on
these
two
Lots
quite
difficult.
As
you
can
see
on
the
the
illustration,
the
request
is
essentially
to
remove
a
small
corner
from
the
easements
shown
in
the
red
there
and
to
also
remove
a
setback
line.
That
was
that
the
parallel
that
that
easement,
the
result
is
effectively
a
more
usable
or
buildable
area
for
lot.
O
Ten,
after
speaking
with
the
resident
that
lives
nearby,
that
did
provide
written
comment
that
I
believe
was
included
in
your
in
your
packet
I
believe
we
were
able
to
clarify
their
concerns
or
answer
their
questions
and
they're
unaware
of
the
request.
All
utility
providers
have
granted
their
approval
of
this
request
and,
most
importantly,
all
perimeter,
setbacks
will
be
will
be
maintained.
The
vacation
of
this
small
portion
of
easement
won't
allow
for
a
larger
building
envelope,
as
it
relates
to
the
perimeter
of
the
of
the
project.
O
C
O
Q
Q
C
A
O
Thank
you,
madam
mayor
members
of
council.
We
are
proposing,
as
you
noted,
an
amendment
to
chapter
8
of
the
development
of
the
development
code
FEMA,
as
you
know,
issued
new
new
flood
insurance
rate
maps
and
a
flood
insurance
study
back
in
December.
The
primary
purpose
of
this
amendment
is
actually
to
update
the
ordinance
to
reflect
those
new
studies.
The
amendment
also
updates
definitions
and
clarifies
existing
languages
that
are
already
included
in
the
ordinance.
These
updates
in
the
language
and
the
language
you
saw
in
the
underlying
strikeout
version
are
essentially
required
language
by
FEMA.
O
They
will
ensure
that
we
remain
eligible
for
participation
in
the
National
Flood
Insurance
Program
again
the
updates
are
required
and
they
that
language
and
represents
the
minimum
standards
required
by
FEMA
I
would
note
that
we
are
proposing
one
notable
change
in
the
ordinance.
The
minimum
federal
the
minimum
federal
standard
requires
new
structures
for
their
first
floor
to
be
elevated
only
to
the
base
flood
elevation.
Any
requirement
to
elevate
further
is
referred
to
as
free
board.
O
Our
ordinance
currently
requires
just
a
foot
of
free
board
along
the
river
and
none
at
the
base
of
our
foothills
cultures.
It
allows
the
first
floor
to
be
at
at
the
flood
level,
so
we
are
recommending
an
increase
that
the
free
board
be
increased
to
two
feet
along
the
river
and
a
foot
at
the
base
of
our
gulches.
That
new
standard
will
apply
to
any
residential
structure
and
could
also
be
applied
to
commercial
buildings.
However,
I
would
know,
as
is
currently
allowed
commercial
structures
as
an
alternative
could
be
flood
proofed.
Now
we
did
actually
anticipate.
O
We
might
receive
some
resistance
to
this
part
of
the
proposal,
but
we've
actually
only
heard
only
heard
support
today.
Now
it
will
cause
this
added
free
board
will
cause
a
slight
increase
in
construction
costs,
a
FEMA
estimates
with
most
homes.
The
cost
would
increase
from
about
a
quarter
to
one
and
a
half
percent
increase
in
total
construction
cost.
O
Now,
that
might
add,
for,
for
one
example,
might
add
twenty
dollars
a
month
or
two
hundred
and
forty
dollars
a
year
to
a
more,
but
the
insurance
savings
on
that
same
mortgage
would
be
more
than
a
thousand
dollars.
I
think
it's
important
to
note
that
the
benefits
of
freeboard
are
not
only
financial,
though
it
provides
an
S
extra
degree
of
safety
in
the
event
of
a
flood.
O
Keep
in
mind
that
our
new
maps
aren't
perfect
they're
only
based
on
the
best
available
data
doesn't
account
for
things
like
bridges
being
blocked
by
debris,
also
because
they're
not
updated
too
too
often,
it
doesn't
account
for
changes
in
hydrology
that
just
naturally
occur
along
the
river
or
development
that
simply
alters
the
floodplain.
Ultimately,
flooding
is
going
to
happen
and
we've
actually
been
quite
fortunate.
If
you
think
about
it,
we
probably
do
count
on
those
dams
upriver
a
little
more
than
maybe
we
should,
as
it
relates
to
to
flooding
when
flooding
does
occur.
O
This
added
freeboard
is
going
to
reduce
impacts
on
on
property.
Finally,
I
would
note-
and
this
is
important-
that
increased
freeboard
benefits
everyone
in
the
community
with
a
flood
insurance
policy.
We
participate
in
the
CRS
or
community
rating
system.
It's
a
voluntary
program
that
actually
provides
insurance
discounts
for
everyone
in
that
participating
community.
Our
policyholders
actually
receive
a
20%
discount
on
their
on
their
flood
insurance.
Increasing
the
freeboard
is
going
to
help
us
maintain
our
rating
and
that
discount
we
did
receive
a
few
comments
that
were
included
in
your
packet.
O
They
weren't
really
opposition,
rather
suggestions
on
alternative
rate
language
in
the
ordinance
I
want
to
note
that
we
did
work
very
very
closely
with
FEMA
on
the
draft.
That's
before
you
and
in
conclusion,
other
than
a
couple
words.
The
changes
are
proposed
or
effectively
required
again
the
only
substantive
changes
that
is,
that
increase
in
free
freeboard
and
no
one
has
opposed
that.
O
In
our
mind,
the
change
to
free
board
is
consistent
with
the
approval
criteria
and
as
detailed
in
your
packet,
we
believe,
is
clearly
supported
by
the
comprehensive
plan
and
certainly
in
the
best
interest
of
the
community,
the
Planning
Commission
when
they
heard
this
did
unanimously
recommend
approval
of
the
proposal,
and
we
are
recommending
approval
of
the
amendment
this
evening.
Thank
you.
M
O
P
O
Madam
mayor
counts:
councilmember,
halliburton,
yeah
I
was
unfortunately
that
our
time
he
wasn't
wasn't
ideal,
but
we
couldn't
control
that
we
did
early
in
the
year.
We
did
a
series
well
back
in
2015,
when
the
preliminary
maps
were
issued,
the
city
did
a
series
of
open
houses
and
communicated
the
pending
changes.
Then,
when
FEMA
introduced
the
official
maps
in
December,
we
sent
out
mailings
to
every
property
that
was
impacted.
We
then
scheduled
to
open
houses,
the
first
of
which
we
did
conduct,
and
it
was
very
well
attended.
O
I
would
I
would
guess
there
were
more
than
a
hundred
hundred
people
there.
Unfortunately,
we
did
have
to
cancel
the
second
open
house
because
it
was
scheduled
to
occur,
occur
about
the
same
time
the
shutdown
occurred.
If
this,
if
this
is
approved,
it
probably
be
in
our
best
interest
to
send
one
final
mailing
to
people
to
answer
any
questions
they
might
have.
Madam.
O
Madam
mayor
councilmember
Halliburton,
probably
the
biggest
thing
is
in
MI
in
the
floodplain
or
am
I
not,
and
that
was
the
biggest
question,
because
the
boundaries
did
change
and
then
for
some,
the
question
was
on
was
related
to
insurance.
We
did
invite
representatives
of
FEMA
that
were
at
the
open
house
and
they
were
able
to
actually
answer
a
lot
of
questions.
So
I
think
people
are
generally
satisfied
with
the
information
we
provided.
O
P
C
You
so
Cody
I
just
wanted
to
note
it
for
the
record,
a
couple
of
other
I
think,
while
there
requirements
I,
think
of
the
new
FEMA
process,
a
couple
of
other
I
think
notable
changes
in
the
ordinance.
One
is
that
we
no
longer
require
a
licensed
engineer
to
certify
flood
increased
flood
levels,
but
we
do
note
that
it
has
to
be
shown
to
be
in
accordance
with
standard
engineering
practices.
C
O
I'm
in
County
Armagh
clay,
yeah
that
that
specific
language
in
that
section
was
was
part
of
FEMA's
model
model,
ordinance
and
yeah
I
I.
Don't
have
it
in
front
of
me
here,
but
it
talks
about
the
a
hydrological
hydrostatic
study
and,
yes,
we're
very
comfortable
that
it
would
take
a
competent
individual
to
complete
that
task.
Thank.
C
You
and
then
council
member
major,
had
already
noted
the
variances
for
historic
structures
and
then
the
final
one.
Previously
this
really
only
applied
to
subdivisions
and
not
to
individual
rebuilds,
but
one
of
I
think
a
very
significant
and
I.
Think
very
good
change
is
that
individual
buildings,
as
they
rebuild,
cannot
get
rebuilt
in
such
a
way
that
they
continue
to
be
a
flood
hazard,
and
that
includes
in
manufactured
home
parks.
Is
that
am
I
understanding
that
part
correctly
as
well.
O
Madam
mayor,
that
was
always
madam
mayor
council,
member
Clegg.
That
was
always
the
case,
but
this
this
added
language
makes
that
very
clear
that
it
applies
to
substantial
improvements
to
existing
homes.
That
probably
will
be
the
biggest
struggle
is
when,
when
someone
comes
in
for
substantial
improvement
to
their
home
and
compliance
with
the
floodplain
ordinance
will
be
required,
but
long-term,
that
is
in
the
best
interest
of
the
overall
community
when
it
comes
to
safety
in
insurance.
For
everyone.
O
C
A
P
C
E
A
P
B
Yes,
major,
yes,
clay,
yes,
Oh
Rd,
15
20
in
ordinance,
amending
title
11,
chapter
8,
flood
hazard,
regulations
of
Boise,
City,
Code,
referencing,
a
new
flood
insurance
study
and
rate
maps,
updating
definitions
of
regulations
and
increasing
the
Freeport
requirement
in
the
floodplain
providing
for
a
waiver.
The
reading
rules
approving
the
summary
of
this
ordinance
and
providing
an
effective
date.