►
From YouTube: City Council Meeting - 6/30/2020
Description
Please visit the following link for information on how to testify during virtual public hearings:
https://www.cityofboise.org/departments/finance-and-administration/city-clerk/virtual-meetings/
B
C
C
A
D
Mayor
before
that,
I'd
like
to
move
to
amend
the
agenda,
thank
you
I.
Thank
you.
Madam
mayor
I,
moved
to
amend
the
agenda
to
include
consideration
of
ordinance,
21-20
and
ordinance
amending
boise
city
codes,
adding
a
provision
to
allow
non
permanent,
non-toxic
chalk
markings
on
sidewalks.
It
is
necessary
to
amend
them
agenda
and
include
this
item
because
it
was
still
being
vetted
with
community
partners.
Second,.
D
E
A
D
A
A
D
A
F
G
H
Thank
you.
Thank
you
for
the
opportunity.
I
appreciate
the
reappointment,
I'm,
also
thrilled
and
honored,
to
have
the
opportunity
and
experience
working
firsthand
to
preserve
these
areas
for
use
and
along
with
Michele,
it's
a
great
opportunity,
and
it's
been
a
great
community
to
be
a
part
of.
So
thank
you
for
allowing
us
this
opportunity.
C
A
A
I
Madam
mayor
councilmembers
saline
accord
with
planning
and
development
services
before
you
tonight
is
a
request
for
reconsideration
for
PUD
1942.
This
was
a
PUD
for
a
15
multifamily
unit
project
with
one
single
family
home
at
the
intersection
of
5-mile
McMillan
City
Council
reviewed
an
appeal
earlier
this
month
on
June
9th
and
ultimately
denied
the
appeal
and
upheld
the
decision
of
approval
for
Planning
and
Zoning
Commission.
I
The
appellant
submitted
a
request
for
reconsideration,
which
is
before
you
tonight.
You
merely
need
to
decide
if
a
reconsideration
should
be
approved
or
denied
in
our
minds.
The
documentation
provided
did
not
include
any
information
that
was
wasn't
previously
available
for
City
Council.
Therefore,
we
are
recommending
denial
of
the
reconsideration
request.
D
Madam
mayor,
yes,
I
could
just
ask
one
question:
I
just
wanted
to
put
this
some
more
specificity
around
this
I
I,
see
that
in
our
city
code,
11030
3-7
G
for
reconsideration
that
we
may
reconsider
a
decision
for
good
cause
based
on
a
few
different
factors,
whether
there's
relevant
information
that
was
not
brought
up
at
a
previous
hearing
and
whether
there's
information
that
was
not
previously
available,
I
I,
think
that's
what
you
just
said.
But
I
want
to
verify
that
that
is
the
case
about.
E
D
A
Second,
yeah
I'll
just
say
that
this
order
is
what
we've
been
doing,
which
is
looking
to
the
health
district
to
make
the
orders,
and
then
we
pass
right
and
pass
an
order.
That's
reflective
of
the
health
districts
rules
and
with
this
one
it
includes
additional
rules
related
to
the
airport
and
some
public
meeting
restrictions.
C
E
A
You
now
we're
at
we
have
the
consent
agenda.
All
items
with
an
asterisk
are
considered
to
be
routine
by
the
council
and
will
be
enacted
by
one
motion.
There'll
be
no
separate
discussion
on
these
items
unless
a
council,
member
or
citizens
so
requests,
in
which
case
the
item
will
be
removed
from
the
general
order
of
business
and
considered
in
its
normal
sequence.
Madam.
D
K
C
K
A
A
A
M
Please
note
that
this
is
not
a
typical
final
plan
application.
These
applications
are
usually
proved
on
the
consent
agenda.
However,
this
project
is
a
little
different
since
both
as
already
mentioned
Cena
and
the
public
wish
to
testify
in
this
application
tonight.
The
final
pot
before
you
is
the
green
heads
and
subdivision
here's
a
very
short
summary
of
the
project.
The
project
includes
a
preliminary
plat
rezone
or
the
project
included
a
preliminary
plat
rezone
and
Planned
Unit
development,
all
of
which
were
approved
by
the
City
Council
back
on
May
14th
of
2019
last
year.
M
At
this
hearing,
members
of
the
public
spoke
in
opposition
to
the
project,
which
included
concerns
regarding
saving
the
existing
trees
to
address
these
concerns.
City
Council
added
additional
conditions
on
this
slide
shows
the
project
layout
with
the
existing
trees
overlaid
on
the
project
design.
The
final
plant
is
consistent
with
the
approved
preliminary
plat
layout
and
the
Planning
and
Development
site
plan.
M
Additional
conditions
added
by
the
City
Council
are
listed
here.
To
address
these
conditions,
the
applicant
has
provided
additional
analysis
regarding
the
loss,
the
trees
and,
within
the
analysis,
they've
explained
why
the
trees
cannot
be
saved
with
the
development
of
the
site,
as
per
the
original,
originally
approved,
or
any
reasonable
changes
to
the
approved
plans
of
the
plumeria
plat
and
the
planet
of
Planned
Unit
development.
M
A
L
M
Madam
mayor
members
of
the
council,
I've
talked
to
the
applicant
briefly
about
that.
I
based
on
my
now
or
based
on
I,
think
their
analysis,
and
maybe
they
could
better
explain
it
is
that,
given
the
the
root
system
of
the
Sequoia
or
the
tree
or
the
lace
to
one
tree
and
the
drip
line,
any
adjustment
of
the
footprint
would
still
probably
result
in
the
loss
of
the
tree.
Although
I
think
they
can
better
explain
that
and
they
I
think
they
had
an
arborist
or
their
landscape.
Professional.
F
We've
modified
that
they've
agreed
to
do
the
rollout
service
with
the
garbage
trucks,
so
we've
eliminated
that
extra
width
between
the
buildings
that
appears
in
lot
12
we've
narrowed
that
down.
We
looked
at
shifting
the
buildings
around
to
try
to
save
the
sequoia.
The
problem
we
run
into
is
the
drip
line.
F
As
it's
approved
and
with
the
ally
low
these
units,
it
pushes
all
of
the
building
pads
into
the
area
where
the
trees
are,
with
the
exception
of
three
trees
along
the
south
boundary
that
are
built
right
on
the
line
or
that
were
planted
right
on
the
line
between
us
and
the
neighbor
to
the
south
and
those
trees.
We're
proposing
to
save
and
we'll
have
to
just
get
creative
with
the
fencing
down
there.
Actually,
it's
four
trees
and
we'll
have
to
get
creative
with
the
fencing
to
fence
out
and
around
those
as
their
planet.
F
F
Jane
Suggs,
when
she
was
with
our
office,
contacted
the
the
Neighborhood
Association,
as
well
as
the
Sage
School,
and
put
them
in
touch
with
the
entities
to
create
a
neighborhood
parking
district
for
that
I'm.
Not
sure
if
anything
has
been
done
to
continue
that,
but
it
was
our
understanding
from
that
conversation
that
it
needs
to
be
brought
forward
by
the
Neighborhood
Association,
not
by
a
single
development.
F
So
we
put
them
in
touch
with
the
people
that
they
need
to
talk
to,
and
we've
been
working
with
a
CHD
for
signage,
to
improve
the
signage
on
the
frontage,
denoting
that
the
public
street
ends
at
logger,
Creek
Lane,
and
that
it's
a
private
road
from
there
out.
I
guess
with
that.
I
would
stand
for
any
questions
that
you
might
have.
L
F
L
Thank
you,
madam
mayor
I.
Guess,
as
we
had
some
discussions
during
the
original
hearing,
I
seem
to
remember
at
least
some
discussion
about
having
one
or
a
few
of
these
lots
access
a
driveway
and
garage
off
of
Londoner.
Instead
of
off
of
the
alley.
Recognizing
that
that
does
compromise,
the
sidewalk
does
lose
some
on
street
parking
I'm.
Bringing
this
up
I,
don't
know
what
the
neighborhood's
gonna
have
to
say,
but
I
I
just
want
to
know
that
all
of
the
various
options
were
were
looked
at.
F
N
Thank
you,
dear
mayor
and
city
council
members,
when
any
project
is
approved,
there's
a
long
list
of
conditions
attached
to
its
approval
by
the
city
and
they
range
from
a
dressing
procedure
to
the
work
hours.
But
each
of
these
conditions
is
important
to
making
sure
that
the
project
is
done
according
to
what
was
agreed
to
by
the
city
and
the
applicant.
They
must
be
taken
seriously
and
not
seen
as
option
in
the
case
of
this
project.
N
Isn't
shall
be
given
Y
Cena
and
the
neighbors
greatly
appreciated
these
conditions.
A
previously
approved
project
on
this
lot
subdivision
of
zero
six
zero
zero
one,
one
four
that
had
been
supported
by
the
neighbors
included
saving
the
Sequoia
tree
among
others.
We
therefore
were
confident
that
a
revised
site
design
to
save
this
over
seventy
year
old
tree
could
be
developed.
N
Council
member
Thompson
said
when
you
say
you
have
to
prove
that
you
can
or
can't
say
you
use
the
term
proof
I
think
coming
back
and
saying,
building
it
exactly.
How
we've
been
describing
does
not
prove
that
you
can't
save
the
Sequoia
I,
think
downsizing
one
end
unit
or
something
along
those
lines
is
appropriate
to
sable
council
president
clave
responded
or
other
trees,
which
council,
member
Thompson
agreed
or
other
trees.
This
firmly
established
that
not
only
was
it
required
to
save
the
Sequoia,
but
that's
simply
bringing
back
the
original
site.
N
N
The
applicant
then
sent
a
letter
to
the
city
in
January
3rd
2020,
addressing
these
conditions
stating
that
all
trees
included
the
noted
Sequoia
tree
will
require
removal
to
allow
for
the
construction
of
the
town,
homes,
garages
and
access
Drive,
as
approved
this
letter,
and
the
attached
are
submitted
to
satisfy
the
two
conditions
note
above
no
different
plans
were
submitted
with
this
letter.
No
alternatives,
no
hypothetic,
no
downsizing
have
any
units
changing
of
a
unit
moving
of
our
garage
or
any
other
option
was
suggested
or
even
alluded
to.
N
In
fact,
no
apparent
attempt
was
made
to
save
a
single
tree
as
the
applicant
states
in
their
letter
that
every
single
one
would
be
removed.
The
idea
that
there
is
no
possible
way
to
save
even
a
single
tree
in
this
project
seems
absurd,
I'm
glad
they're
now
talking
about
the
or
along
the
property
line,
although
I
would
point
out
that
those
are
along
a
property
line.
So
there's
you
know
anything
that
would
not
be
in
someone
else's
property
would
be
directly
affected
by
someone
else's
property
they
are
proposing
to
removed.
N
They
did
nothing
more
than
bring
back
the
exact
same
design
with
no
changes
whatsoever
and
then
claim
that
this
met
the
conditions
of
the
council,
which
it
just
it
doesn't.
The
words
of
the
council
were
clear:
coming
back
with
the
same
design
was
not
sufficient
to
show
that
it
could
not
be
saying
the
only
way
for
the
applicant
to
not
say
the
sequoia
tree
would
be
to
show
it
is
not
possible.
N
However,
the
existence
of
the
previous
design
that
was
proposed
for
this
lot
subdivision
zero,
six,
zero
zero
one,
one
four
that
had
been
approved
for
these
things
same
long,
while
retaining
the
Sequoia
proves
that
preserving
the
tree
is
not
impossible.
Otherwise,
how
could
we
have
an
approved
drawing
for
this?
It
also
proves
that
the
applicant
did
not
uphold
their
condition
of
approval,
which
automatically
means
the
final
plot
must
be
rejected.
A
couple
other
quick
things
I
do
want
to
touch
on.
N
We
did
Cena
did
receive
an
email
from
Jane
Suggs
in
October,
saying
that
there
was
there
was
an
email
for
someone
at
Sage
and
that
we
should
talk
to
them.
I
responded
to
that
email
asking
for
an
update
on
the
project
and
also
what
the
game
plan
was
or
what
moving
forward
we
could
do
in
terms
of
handling
and
parking
or
trees.
No
response
was
ever
sent.
It
looks.
N
Sina
understands
that
not
all
projects
will
include
conditions
put
on
them
by
the
council
to
preserve
trees
or
mitigate
parking.
We
we
know
this
is
a
very
special
case.
It's
a
very
special
tree.
You
can
see
on
that
photo
what
conditions
are
preclude
and
projects,
however,
agreed
to
by
the
applicants.
They
become
a
promise
to
the
city
and
the
neighbors
of
how
the
we'll
proceed.
The
conditions
the
applicant
agreed
to
were
not
onerous,
Norton
possible
to
uphold
a
previous
project
demonstrates
that
Cena
does
not
oppose
development.
N
This
can
persist
the
wrong
project
because
they
can't
even
uphold
the
own
conditions
that
they
agreed
to
when
they
were
here
in
May
Sina
and
the
neighbors
would
be
happy
to
work
with
them
to
develop
plans
that
fit
for
this.
But
this
simply
isn't
it
and
should
be
rejected.
Thank
you
and
all
myself,
two
questions.
L
N
Madam
mayor
council,
president,
yes
you're
right
the
previous
project
that
I'm
inferring
too
had
eight
units
as
test
14.
They
were
larger
units,
so
I
think
the
square
footage
is
somewhere
similar.
But,
having
said
that,
even
at
the
proposed
density,
Sina
would
be
happy
to
sit
down
with
the
applicant
and
come
up
with
ideas
to
to
make
it
work
at
the
proposed
density.
N
L
J
J
Can
you
hear
me
yes,
hello
there
we
go.
Thank
you.
Yes,
I'm
just
fine
for
Jane
Elizabeth
witty!
We
live
at
121,
East,
Highland,
Street,
just
a
stone's
throw
from
this
property.
We
understand
your
time
is
valuable
and
we
appreciate
the
opportunity
to
speak,
even
if
it
is
virtual.
We
are
here
in
opposition
to
the
approval
of
the
final
clap
four
two
one
one
West
Highland
Street
sub
20
zero,
zero,
zero,
seven
four.
J
We
did
not
expect
to
be
in
front
of
the
City
Council
again
when
we
last
testified
during
the
May
14th
City
Council
meeting.
We
were
all
informed.
We
would
have
the
opportunity
to
further
discuss
our
concerns
about
the
trees
and
other
issues
in
front
of
the
design
review
committee
and
when
Councilwoman
Alan
Clegg
asked
about
the
trees
as
well.
It
was
once
again
stated
that
the
next
step,
I
quote
next
step-
is
design
review
where
the
trees
could
be
reviewed.
J
After
watching
for
an
announcement
on
the
property
about
a
design
review
committee
meeting,
we
never
did
see.
One
I
personally
called
last
fall
to
see
if
there
was
any
word
on
a
design
review
committee
meeting
and
the
message
I
received
back
was
that
there
was
no
new
updates
and
that
they
had
two
years
to
get
the
final
plat
approved
Judy
Smith
called
a
few
months
ago
to
also
check
on
the
design
review
meeting.
She
was
informed.
J
The
design
review
had
already
been
approved
at
the
staff
level
and
there
would
be
no
hearing
and
then
to
see
that
the
design
review
approval
was
made
15th
the
very
next
day
after
our
meeting
with
yuan
made
xiv
frustrating
for
us,
our
neighbors,
our
neighbors
we've
all
worked
so
hard
to
play
by
the
rules
and
have
a
voice
and
the
substantial
change
in
our
neighborhood.
However,
this
process
has
proven
to
be
extremely
frustrating
for
us,
so
our
concerns
is
the
loss
of
the
Sequoia
tree.
J
It's
heartbreaking
to
all
of
us,
it's
over
70
years
old,
to
read
in
the
document
from
WH
Pacific
that
the
lot
is
going
to
be
clear-cut
is
devastating.
Many
of
the
council
members
supported
saving
the
tree
during
the
hearing
on
May
14th
council
members,
TJ
Thompson
and
Alan
Clegg
specifically
addressed
saving
the
tree.
Boise
is
the
city
of
trees
and
we
love
the
new
initiative,
the
city
of
trees,
challenge
which
was
launched
on
Arbor
Day
of
this
year.
Maybe
we
can
work
to
save
this
beautiful
Sequoia.
J
Also,
we
were
going
to
talk
about
loggers.
Creek
Lane
is
private
property.
Why
is
the
setback?
Not
twenty
feet
like
has
been
enforced
on
the
private
portion
of
Highland
Street
just
to
the
east
of
this
property,
and
we
were
to
talk
about
the
transition
of
the
end
units
to
a
single
level,
particularly
on
the
east
side
of
this
property.
J
This
will
provide
a
much
better
transition
and
not
drawer
a
couple
of
the
smaller
homes
along
the
private
Lane,
while
adding
a
transition.
Excuse
me
a
transition,
that's
not
a
30-foot
high
wall.
During
the
design
review
process,
we
were
also
going
to
request
a
little
bit
of
a
design
change
to
fit
a
little
better
with
the
neighborhood
Harris
Ranch
is
an
amazing
neighborhood
and
the
design
of
the
front
porches
fits
perfect.
There
is
there
a
way
to
change
the
front
awnings
to
match
the
surrounding
architecture,
possibly
a
little
better.
J
K
Men,
rear
I,
guess
I'm,
not
quite
familiar
with
when
we
use
the
term
if
possible,
when
we're
putting
conditions
on
something
if
possible,
with
the
same
amount
of
Units,
is
14
if
possible.
If
we
subtract
one
unit
to
make
space
in
there
and
so
I
guess,
that's
I
could
use
some
clarification
and
I.
Don't
know
if
that's
possible
or
not
a.
L
You
council,
member
Halliburton,
my
memory
of
the
discussion
that
night,
though
this
was
approved
with
that
condition,
was
that
the
City
Council
supported
the
density
in
terms
of
the
number
of
units
we
there
was
discussion
about
whether
or
not
there
could
be
some
variation
in
the
exact
size
and
layout
of
the
units
which
today
there
is
not
so
the
motion
as
I
understood
it
was
with
the
same
number
of
units.
Was
it
possible
to
lay
out
this
project
differently
and
save
at
least
the
Sequoia
tree?
If
not
more.
K
Madam
mayor,
thank
you
I,
don't
know
if
there
was
anything
additional
from
from
staff
as
far
as
I.
K
M
Madam
mayor
members
of
the
council,
if
possible,
is
a
somewhat
subjective
term
and
I
would
defer
to
councilmember
Clegg's
definition
of
it.
I
think
she
was
one
of
the
makers
of
the
motion
back
in
May
of
last
year
as
to
what
they
were,
what
they
were
in
the
intent
was
at
that
time
and
as
for
reviewing
other
plans,
I
have
not
seen
anything
new
or
any
different
iterations
of
this
or
different
designs
that
might
be
moved
around.
Maybe
the
applicant
might
provide
a
better
explanation
to
that,
but
none
of
that
was
provided
to
the
staff.
K
F
Madam
mayor
members
of
the
council,
councilman
Halliburton
yeah
the
the
areas
that
we
looked
David.
If
you
could
put
the
preliminary
plat
back
up
yeah
that
one
the
landscape
plan
will
work,
that's
got
good
separation
too.
You
can
see
in
the
actually.
This
is
a
pretty
good
picture
of
the
site
because
you
can
see
actually
how
much
of
the
site
is
building
when
you
go
to
lots
that
are
that
small
and
the
layout
that
you
see
there
on
the
landscape
plan.
Has
that
turnaround
on
the
the
one
pathway
lot
between
the
two?
F
So
basically
that's
the
space
that
we
had
to
try
to
utilize
in
here
for
that
to
save
that
tree.
So
we
narrowed
that
down
to
the
same
10-foot
width
that
the
other
pathway
is
and
pushed
that
space
over
between
the
garages
where
the
tree
is
located
on
and
even
if
we
took
those
buildings
and
push
them
all
the
way
together
and
eliminated
that
pathway
connection,
we
still
couldn't
get
out
of
the
drip
line
of
the
Sequoia.
F
F
You
know
it
at
one
point
with
one
of
the
topos.
You
know
we
sent
the
surveyors
back
out
there
to
get
a
better
location
on
those
trees
so
that
we
could
plan
that
better
is
one
of
the
options
originally
was
to
flip
the
the
site
push
the
driveway
to
the
north
and
Bank
the
garages
along
the
south
boundary,
but
all
that
did
was
move
the
road
to
the
tree
and
the
building's.
F
F
O
You,
madam
mayor
I,
don't
even
know
if
this
is
an
appropriate
questions,
but
I'm
just
gonna
ask
it
do
we
know
if
this
is
a
hardy
tree?
If
has
it
been
checked
out
to
make
sure
that
this
tree
is
actually
healthy
and
should
still
be
standing,
I,
love,
trees,
just
just
thought,
I'd
put
that
out
there
and
see.
If
that's
something
we're
aware
of.
F
F
F
E
A
A
E
Is
maybe
a
question
for
staff,
or
maybe
some
of
the
institutional
knowledge
on
the
council?
But
if
this
property
were
not
subject
to
development
that
we're
gonna
remain
a
single-family
residence
with
the
landowner
have
any
restriction
on
just
going
out
with
a
chainsaw
and
cutting
the
tree
down?
No,
so
okay.
Thank
you.
M
L
E
A
F
Yeah
I
just
have
a
couple
quick
things.
You
know,
I
think
the
discussion
has
led
to
where
we're
we're
really
out
on
this.
This
project
is,
you
know
doing
what
we
can
to
save
the
trees
and
and
I
agree
with
Councilwoman
Clegg
that
when
this
came
through
the
first
time,
the
the
condition
to
save
the
tree
if
possible.
F
L
A
L
Mayor
I'm
gonna
give
this
a
shot
if
I
could
and
I
would
move
that
we
defer
this
project
for
no
longer
than
one
month.
I
I,
don't
have
a
calendar
in
front
of
me
for
a
date
certain
and
allow
the
neighborhood
and
the
developer
to
at
least
discuss
whatever
ideas.
The
neighborhood
has.
That
might
lead
to
a
solution
to
save
at
least
this
one
tree,
and
then
let
it
come
back
before
us
with
discussion
about
how
that
process
goes.
E
E
F
E
During
my
time
here
this
is
a
70
year
old
tree
that
could
be
cut
down
now
and
we're
imposing
a
requirement
as
a
condition
of
development
that
wouldn't
be
a
requirement
on
a
landowner.
If
this
developer
wasn't
trying
to
accomplish
the
density
and
housing
goals
that
we
need
in
our
city,
I
I'm
happy
for
another
month,
but
I
would
also
be
happy
to
vote
to
approve
the
plan.
E
O
Thank
you,
madam
mayor
I,
agree
with
council
president
Craig
and
with
councilmember
Baigent
that
I
love
the
Third,
Way
and
so
I
I
would
I
would
support
council
president
Clegg's
motion
that
we
see
if,
if,
if
the
developer
and
the
in
the
neighborhood
could
come
to
some
sort
of
understanding
and
if
we're
not
able
to
reach
that
well,
we'll
move
from
there.
But
if
the,
if
it
is
possible
for
them
to
reach
some
sort
of
agreement,
I
would
be
supportive
of
that.
D
D
P
A
B
Or
D
20-20
and
ordinance
c
AR,
19,
0,
0,
0
30,
our
property
located
in
1919
and
98
31,
west
Shields
Avenue
for
a
minor
modification
to
a
previously
approved
development
agreement.
My
name
is
only
classifications.
The
City
of
Boise
City
to
change
the
classification
of
real
property,
particularly
described
in
section
1
of
this
ordinance
from
single-family
residential
are
1c
to
medium
density.
Residential
with
Design
Review
and
development
agreement
are
DDA
setting
forth
a
recent
statement
in
support
of
such
zone
change
and
provide
an
effective
date.
A
D
Madam
mayor
I
move
that
all
rules
of
the
council,
interfering
with
the
immediate
consideration
of
ordinance
21-20,
be
suspended
that
the
portions
of
Idaho,
Code
5902,
requiring
an
ordinance,
be
read
on
three
different
days
twice
by
title
and
once
in
full
be
dispensed
with
that
the
records
show.
It
has
been
read
the
third
time
in
full.
Second,
the.
K
E
C
L
L
Our
ordinance
as
written
does
not
allow
chalk
drying
on
sidewalks,
and
there
is
some
good
reason
for
that,
because
it
can
be
abused,
but
there's
also
a
lot
of
people
who
do
it,
especially
kids,
and
especially
in
this
time,
with
unable
to
have
our
usual
fireworks
display
and
other
4th
of
July
celebrations.
It
seems
like
a
real
opportunity
to
encourage
people
to
stay
home
in
their
own
neighborhood
and
help
celebrate
the
4th
of
July
by
doing
fun.
L
Chalk
drawings
on
their
sidewalks
I
will
say
that
if
people
do
abused,
it
I
am
happy
to
bring
this
back
and
repeal
the
action
that
we're
taking
tonight.
This
isn't
done
so
that
we
can
begin
using
our
sidewalks
for
statements
or
other
things
like
that.
This
is
done
so
that
people
can
enjoy
what
can
and
should
be
a
really
fun
activity
with
their
families.
So
with
that
I
support
this
motion
I
help
bring
it
forward
and
hope
that
we
can
pass
it
tonight.
O
O
You,
madam
mayor
Thank,
You
council,
president
Craig.
As
you
know,
we've
tried
very
hard
to
ensure
that
people
in
the
City
of
Boise
participate
in
the
census
and
our
canvass
team
wanted
to
embrace
sidewalk
chalking
as
part
of
the
way
to
keep
the
momentum
going
to
keep
people
interested
and
excited
about
participating
in
this
in
the
census,
and
that
was
when
I
first
learned
about
the
issue
of
being
able
to
to
you
to
do
sidewalk
chalk.
O
E
I
Before
you
tonight
is
a
request
to
vacate
a
landscape,
easement
and
associated
plat
notes
for
a
lot
v
of
block,
one
of
the
Natalie
Springs
subdivision
number
four.
This
is
just
south
of
McMillan
Road
near
Centennial,
High
School,
when
Natalie
Springs
subdivision
number
four
was
plotted
in
1996,
there
was
an
existing
home
which
faced
and
took
access
from
Cloverdale
Road,
a
landscape,
easement
and
plat
notes
were
added
to
the
subdivision
for
this
lot
to
help
screen
the
backyard
of
the
existing
home.
I
Now
traffic
has
increased
on
Cloverdale
and
the
new
owners
would
like
to
remodel
the
home
and
take
access
from
Acura
Avenue,
a
local
roadway,
necessitating
the
vacation
of
Platts
plot
notes,
10
and
12.
In
order
to
install
in
your
driveway
on
Acura
Avenue,
the
20-foot
landscape,
easement
will
also
need
to
be
vacated.
The
HOA
has
provided
a
relinquishment
letter
in
support
of
the
vacation.
An
ACD
has
required
that
the
existing
driveway
in
Cloverdale
Road
be
closed
and
that
the
7-foot
wide
sidewalk,
curb
and
gutter
be
installed.
Q
I,
just
think
that
the
way
that
that
property
is
laid
out
and
the
way
that
it
currently
backs
into
that
cul-de-sac
right
there
in
the
subdivision,
it's
a
you
know
it's
a
perfect
plan
to
have
that
you
know
have
the
front
flip
flop
to
basically
have
the
front
of
the
house
facing
Acura
and
clothes
off
Cloverdale.
As
we
know,
Cloverdale
is
pretty
busy
busy
street
and
I
think
as
a
safety
measure.
Just
you
know,
for
all
parties
involved
I
think
it's
the
best
best
way
to
go
best
thing.
You
do.
C
A
A
All
right,
you
can
raise
your
if
you
are
on
the
zoom.
You
may
raise
your
hand,
there's
a
little
button
under
participants,
and
if
you
raise
your
hand,
then
we
can
open
up
your
portal
for
testimony
nope.
Alright,
it
looks
like
the
Neighborhood
Association
is
not
here.
We
have
nobody
from
the
public
signed
up
in
advance
again,
raise
your
hand
if
you
would
like
to
if
you're
on
there
and
would
like
to
testify.
A
D
A
M
Madam
mayor
members
of
the
council,
the
applicant
is
requesting
a
modification
of
a
development
agreement
on
0.32
acres
located
at
2507
and
West
State
Street
in
a
PCD
da
zone.
The
proposed
development
agreement
modification
will
facilitate
a
10
unit
plan
resident
residential
development
comprised
of
two
buildings
along
State
Street,
with
parking
access
from
the
alley.
A
variance
was
also
included.
These
planning
approvals
were
not
appealed
and
therefore
not
before
the
City
Council
tonight
from
the
air
photo
of
our
air
photograph.
Here.
P
M
A
photograph
here
you
can
see
that
the
surrounding
area
is
comprised
of
residential
neighborhoods,
with
the
exception
of
the
properties
along
State
Street,
which
includes
the
st.
Mary's
crossing
commercial
uses
at
the
intersection
of
27th
and
state
adjacent
to
the
site
on
the
northwest
and
office
buildings
at
the
intersection
of
25th
and
State
Street
State
Street
is
a
principal
arterial,
roadway
and
a
gateway
street.
M
During
the
Planning
and
Zoning
Commission
hearing
several
neighbors
express
concerns
with
the
proposal,
because
it
would
have
ersity
impact
the
adjacent
neighborhood
by
increasing
traffic
along
the
alley.
They
also
expressed
concerns
with
the
removal,
the
CMU
all
since
it
screened
the
sub
screen
the
property
from
the
neighborhood.
M
Here's
a
I'll
start
with
a
brief
short
history
of
the
site.
In
2000,
the
property
between
27th
and
25th
Street
along
state
was
rezone
to
PCD
da,
with
the
exception
of
the
parcel
right
at
the
intersection
of
25th
and
state,
which
is
not
included
in
that
project.
The
intent
of
the
development
greement
was
to
develop
the
entire
site
with
a
commercial
property
or
project.
According
to
the
conceptual
plan,
however,
only
the
st.
M
Mary's
Crossing
was
constructed
at
the
corner
of
27th
and
State
in
the
remaining
three
parcels
to
the
east
were
never
developed
and
then
were
sold
to
individual
parties.
This
diagram
here
shows
the
approved
site
plan
of
the
original
development
of
regional
development
rement.
The
blue
line
along
the
back
indicates
where
the
where
the
CMU
wall
was
going
to
be
required,
and
the
green
arrows
mark
back
in
and
out
mark
the
three
access
points
to
into
the
the
project
that
were
approved
with
the
site
plan
and
were
specified
in
the
development
agreement.
M
The
DA
required
cross
access
with
the
three
required
cross.
Access
for
the
whole
whole
parcel
or
the
whole
project
cross
access,
however,
is
not
really
possible
at
this
point
in
time.
Since
the
three
parcels
on
the
east
are
individually
owned
and
would
not
be
possible
until
they
are
until
they
until
they
redevelop
as
such,
the
subject
property
in
between
is
effectively
landlocked
since
access
to
State
Street
is
prohibited.
I
would
also
know
that
alley.
Access
along
arterial
roadways
is
encouraged
by
the
development
code
and
by
a
comprehensive
plan.
M
This
diagram
demonstrates
the
clear
vision
triangles
associated
with
the
access
point
for
the
for
the
development
along
the
alley.
A
six-foot
high
CMU
wall
is
not
allowed
within
the
clear
vision
triangles,
which
leaves
very
little
space
left
to
install
CMU
all
along
the
alley.
Basically
only
about
a
four
or
five
foot,
section
of
CMU
all
would
be
allowed
here
on
the
west
side
and
then
there's
an
area
on
the
east,
which
is
essentially
where
the
trash
enclosure
is
I'm,
going
to
be
located
and
I
would
note.
M
A
Hearing
none
either
Travis
Perry
or
Ward's
wider
or
maybe
you're
both
here,
the
applicants.
Are
you
prepared
to
testify.
A
A
B
A
R
S
S
I
Right
Madame,
mayor
councilmembers
come
back
a
little
back
and
forth
tonight
before
you
tonight
is
a
rezone
of
5.14
acres
located
at
1/3
984
West,
Jasmine
Lane.
This
is
off
Eagle
Road
near
youstick
Road
in
West
Boise.
The
request
is
to
rezone
the
property
from
a1
to
C,
to
D
with
the
development
agreement
in
order
to
facilitate
a
150
units
senior
living
facility.
I
The
land
use
designation
is
mixed
use.
This
allows
almost
all
zoning
districts.
Typically,
the
c2
is
not
our
most
favorable
zone
because
of
the
automobile
use
is
allowed,
but
the
planning
team
recommended
a
development
agreement
to
prohibit
those
types
of
uses
and
a
commercial
zone
rather
than
a
residential
zone,
while
our
broader
range
of
uses
suitable
for
development
along
a
major
highway
like
Eagle
Road.
In
the
event,
the
senior
living
facility
does
not
materialize.
I
The
development
agreement
also
details
cross
access
for
the
site,
as
you
can
see.
Currently
there
are
two
private
roads
that
take
access
off.
Eagle
Road
to
the
north
is
Eagle
view
lane
and
to
the
south
is
Jasmine
lane
residential
property
to
the
west.
Take
X
takes
access
from
these
locations
as
well
and
will
continue
to
do
so
until
redevelopment
of
those
properties
occur
or
Center.
Point
Way
is
built
out.
I
The
DA
also
notes
cracks
at
across
access
to
the
north
for
this
parcel
in
order
to
someday
consolidate
the
access
from
Eagle
view
lane
for
future
redevelopment
to
the
south,
in
coordination
with
the
city
of
Meridian,
as
required
with
the
fast
Eddy's
development
agreement
and
to
the
West
for
the
existing
homes
until
an
alternative
access
is
provided
or
redevelopment
occurs
afterwards,
this
access
would
be
blocked
off
for
vehicles
and
only
used
for
emergency
access.
Pedestrians
and
bicycles,
while
taking
access
to
Eagle
Road
is
not
preferred.
I
Itv
would
not
allow
Eagle
view
Lane
or
Jasmine
Lane
to
be
expanded
to
a
private
or
public
street
due
to
the
distancing
between
other
intersections
on
Eagle,
also
with
so
many
properties
in
the
area
not
yet
developed.
The
future
Centrepointe
way
is
not
viable
access
for
this
site
either.
Icd
has
stated
that
only
the
traffic
created
from
the
future
senior
living
facility
can
take
access
from
Eagle
Road.
Anything
else
to
the
west
would
overload
this
access
point.
I
Therefore,
requiring
the
land
use
decision
to
not
allow
cross
access
for
future
development
to
the
west,
only
the
existing
homes
can
use
this
access
point
and
once
the
properties
have
alternative
access
provided
or
redeveloped
with
alternative
access
weld
across
access
from
the
site
be
terminated.
There
was
a
late
letter
included
in
your
packet
from
a
neighbor
they've
been
in
touch
with
the
applique,
and
that
has
since
been
resolved.
I
P
L
Madam
mayor,
yes,
go
ahead,
Celine,
so,
if
I
understand
correctly,
the
single-family
houses
that
are
remain
on
Jasmine
Lane
will
either
be
able
to
continue
to
access
north
eagle
road
with
a
righty
and
right
out
on
the
edge
of
this,
or
they
will
eventually
be
connected
with
Centrepointe
ways
so
that
they
can
move
in
and
out
via.
That
roadway.
Is
that
correct?
Madam.
I
Mayor
councilmember
click
that
is
correct.
Just
to
show
you
on
the
screen.
This
parcel
to
the
north
is
off
of
Eagle.
There's
actually
two
driveways
here,
there's
one
for
this
as
well
as
Eagle
view
lane.
This
parcel
right
here
will
take
access
from
this
driveway
and
then
this
parcel
this
home
and
then
there's
actually
home
off
over
here
will
take
access
from
jazz.
Well
what
we
used
to
be
Jasmine,
Lane
right
here,
Center
Point
does
not
connect
into
Jasmine
Lane
right
now,.
L
I
R
R
A
R
We
have
some
guiding
values
and
principles,
but
the
main
thing
is
this:
we
just
know
that
you
know
our
primary
goal
is
to
take
care
of
seniors,
take
care
of
residents
our
residents
the
best
way
we
do,
that
is
by
taking
care
of
our
employees,
particular
our
line
staff
employees
as
we
take
care
of
those
employees.
They
then
take
care
of
our
residents
and
everything
just
works
out.
We've
been
business
for
about
eight
years.
R
We
have
two
properties
already
in
Idaho
Northstar
retirement
community
in
Coeur
d'alene,
as
well
as
Lincoln
Court
retirement
community
over
in
Idaho
Falls.
Both
have
been
with
us
since
the
beginning.
Both
are
two
of
our
most
premier
properties
and
both
have
received
multiple
awards
from
State,
Health
and
Welfare
regards
to
operations
and
quality
of
care.
Nora
has
a
Silver
Award,
which
means
on
their
last
state
survey.
R
They
only
received
two
minor
deficiencies
and
Lincoln
Court
has
the
gold
award,
which
means
they
receive
zero
deficiencies,
which
is
very
unique
because
they're,
the
only
building
larger
than
60
beds,
they
have
over
120
beds
with
this
award.
This
Ward's
often
won
by
smaller
properties,
but
have
a
community
of
this
size.
This
size,
an
operation
when
that
is,
is
quite
unique.
We're
very
proud
of
our
team
for
for
doing
that,
so
we
definitely
know
how
to
operate.
R
R
In
regards
to
why
this
location,
it's
very
simple,
the
Treasure
Valley
is
growing
tremendously.
There's
a
need
for
additional
senior
living
services.
We've
done
our
studies
and
realize
that
there's
definitely
a
market
for
it.
Here
we
know
when
we
fail.
We
provide
a
really
quality
service
in
this
regard.
We'd
love
to
bring
that
here.
This
location
is
also
very,
very
easily
accessible
to
most
of
the
Treasure
Valley,
20
or
30
minutes.
R
You
can
get
to
almost
any
place
in
the
valley,
which
makes
it
very
convenient
for
someone
to
put
their
loved
one
there
and
be
able
to
visit
them
regularly,
I'd
be
able
to
access
it
quickly.
It's
also
very
close
to
st.
Luke's
Hospital,
as
well
as
many
other
healthcare
services
and
providers,
which
is
what
our
seniors
and
our
residents
would
need
access
to.
So
it
just
provides
an
ideal
location
for
those
reasons.
R
This
is
a
basic
site
plan
of
some
of
the
landscaping
and
what
it
look
like,
as
you
know,
Spiegel
roads
there
on
the
right
running
north
and
south.
We're
planning
on
doing
about
150
units
it'll
be
two
stories
on
the
northern
portion
and
then
potentially
three
stories
on
the
on
the
southern
portion
of
the
building,
consisting
mainly
of
Studios
one
and
two-bedroom
apartments,
so
have
a
nice
mixture
of
those
to
meet
the
various
needs.
R
R
S
Hi
there
Thank
You
Deborah
Nelson
601
West
Banach,
madam
mayor
members
of
the
council,
pleasure
to
be
here
tonight
on
behalf
of
the
applicant
as
well.
I
just
want
to
give
a
little
additional
overview
of
the
site
and
the
uses
around
us
and
the
access,
in
addition
to
what
you
heard
from
Saline
this
evening,
as
has
been
noted
with
the
the
properties
currently
served
by
two
private
driveways
one
in
the
north,
that
serves
a
single
family
home
to
our
west
and
one
on
the
south
of
our
property
that
serves
three
single-family
homes
on
the
west.
S
Neither
of
these
existing
private
lanes
would
meet
ID.
These
current
spacing
standards
or
be
adequate
to
serve
any
redevelopment
of
any
of
these
parcels,
and
so
a
new
access
approval
is
needed
to
utilize
and
develop
this
site.
So
we've
worked
hard
with
ITV
to
do
that,
there's
also
a
limited
space
along
our
frontage,
which
creates
some
challenges.
There's
not
enough
room
for
a
right
turn
lane,
and
so
the
type
of
use
that
can
be
located
on
this
property
is
relatively
limited.
S
S
It's
an
infill
and
difficult
to
develop
for
the
reasons
that
I've
just
identified,
that
you
need
a
new
access
that
the
spacing
doesn't
allow
a
more
intensive
use
to
come
in
on
the
site,
as
you
would
normally
expect
to
see
on
Eagle
Road,
and
so
this
creates
some
opportunities.
And
so
we
were
able
to
consolidate
the
existing
private
drives,
which
eliminates
a
driveway
and
creates
some
increased
safety
and
functionality
on
Eagle
Road.
It
also
provides
better
spacing
because
we're
able
to
relocate
that
Jasmine
Lane
further
north.
S
It
gets
it
further
away
from
the
fast
Eddy's
access
point.
This
to
our
south
Meridian,
in
fact,
the
current
Jasmine
Lane
falls
within
the
fast
Eddie's
decent
lanes.
So
this
will
create
some
nice
new
safety
there
because
of
that
limitation
on
the
number
of
trips
that
can
use
this
access
safely
without
a
right
turn.
Lane
itd
did
condition
or
approval
and
saying
that
we
can
continue
to
serve
the
existing
single
family
homes
to
our
West.
S
But
when
those
sites
redevelop
increasing
the
number
of
trips
that
they
will
need
to
use
other
streets-
and
that's
really
what's
been
expected
for
this
area
anyway,
on
the
dotted
orange
line
that
runs
north-south.
There
is
the
center
point
that
is
expected
to
connect
through
there,
and
so
that's
always
what's
been
planned
on
a
CH
DS
master
Street
map.
Anyway,
the
the
development
agreement
that
we've
proposed.
That
say
we
mentioned
it.
S
I
want
to
make
sure
it's
clear
that
we
are
providing
pedestrian
and
bike
access
to
all
directions,
we're
also
providing
permanent
cross
access
to
the
north.
The
blue
property.
That's
highlighted
on
this
slide
and
to
the
south,
the
Tripoli's
property,
and
we
will
provide
that
temporary
access
to
the
west
until
the
parcels
redevelop
and
then
only
emergency
access
consistent
with
the
condition
from
itd
the
the
land
to
our
immediate
West
was
proposed
as
the
delano
project,
but
whether
whether
it's
Delano
or
any
other
future
projects
on
on
those
properties,
our
concerns
remain
the
same.
S
You
know,
in
addition
to
what
I've
mentioned,
that
we
are
at
risk
of
losing
our
itd
approved
access.
If
we
exceed
the
number
of
trips
by
creating
anymore
cross
access
there,
we
also
have
a
real
safety
concern
about
cut
through
trips
and
not
wanting
to
increase
the
number
of
trips
cutting
through
our
property
to
get
to
Eagle
Road
such
as
would
what
seemed
likely
to
occur
from
the
proposed
multi-family
immediately
to
our
west,
where
we
were
the
closest
location.
S
This
was
a
significant
concern
at
the
Planning
and
Zoning
Commission
Commissioner
Stephens
Gillespie
Bratton
over
in
Finn
frock
all
spoke
out
strongly
against
the
permanent
cross.
Access
to
the
West
stressed
that
not
only
were
they
concerned
about
losing
the
itd
access
on
Eagle
Road,
but
really
they
were
very
concerned
about
the
cut
through
traffic
and
the
safety
that
that
presents
for
any
any
business
like
ours,
but
in
particular
our
senior
residents
and
their
guests,
and
then
just
just
to
wrap
up.
S
You
know,
given
the
properties,
Eagle,
Road
frontage
and
the
mixed
use,
designation
and
your
comprehensive
plan.
This
property
really
is
currently
under
utilized
with
the
a1
zoning
and
a
single
residence.
The
site
has
remained
vacant
and
is
surrounded
by
other
development.
Due
to
these
complex
access
issues
that
I
walked
through
this
use
creates
a
unique
opportunity
for
the
city
to
fully
utilize
this
entire
property
along
the
Eagle
Road
frontage.
S
It
doesn't
create
new
access
problems.
In
fact,
it
has
solved
some
through
the
consolidation.
It's
a
use
that
creates
some
nice
compatibility
transition
to
the
residential
behind
it
and
we
we
are
grateful
for
the
support
we
received
from
staff
throughout
this
project
and
for
the
unanimous
approval
that
we
received
from
the
pnz
they
approved
the
conditional
use
permit,
which
was
not
appealed.
They
recommended
this
rezone
to
you,
and
now
we
ask
for
your
approval
of
the
b-zone
as
well,
and
I
would
stand
for
questions.
A
A
A
J
A
A
Melissa,
if
you
oh
great,
you
raise
your
hand
now.
I
can
see
it
perfect.
Amanda
we'll
get
you
ready.
Oh
yes,
okay,
Amanda!
You
are
sorry.
Melissa
go
ahead.
Hello.
T
My
name
is
Melissa
Barnard
I
live
at
four
zero,
two
five
north.
What
place
in
Meridian
Idaho
a
three
six
four
six
I
guess.
My
primary
concern
is
with
the
infill
development
that
is
coming
in
the
future
and
the
high
density
and
other
uses
for
the
infill
projects.
The
web.
Is
there
any
extra
money
being
allotted
towards
itd
or
any
other
streets
for
improvements
for
these
memories?
T
Heavy
traffic
flows
that
are
coming
in
the
future
and
also
I
do
have
a
primary
concern
with
cross
s
access
aspect
that
seems
to
plague
the
infill
projects
in
lieu
of
proper
commercial
and
residential
lanes,
especially
with
the
Delano
project.
As
you
can
see,
there's
going
to
be
a
lot
of
cross
access
proposed
in
lieu
of
a
proper
Lane
shared
by
stellar
and
Delano
project.
T
What
are
we
going
to
do
to
try
to
keep
the
flow
to
the
South
instead
of
cutting
through
a
residential
or
hood
right,
hope,
Boise,
planners
and
Meridian
planners
are
interacting
together
and
planning
a
flow
that
works
for
these
uses
without
expecting
my
neighborhood,
which
connects
north
to
Macmillan
and
also
connects
to
settlers
bridge
to
Locust
Grove.
So
my
neighborhood,
planned
in
2005,
is
being
retrofitted
to
handle
much
of
these
traffic
woes.
I
know
the
traffic
counts
for
the
a.m.
T
or
counted
at
18,
which
isn't
particularly
high,
but
they
are
still
going
to
be
using
a
light
at
Eagle
and
Wainwright,
and
if
there's
going
to
be
any
money
set
aside
for
improving
that
intersection
and
I'm,
not
against
him,
Phil
I'm
against
piecemeal
development,
but
those
thoughts
and
concerns
for
existing
traffic
patterns
and
for
future
traffic
and
note
Delana
was
remanded.
It
was
denied,
and
now
it's
up
for
recommendation,
so
Delano
might
be
the
project
on
the
table
for
this
in
the
future,
but
it
might
be
somebody
else.
So
are
these
two
developments
working
together?
T
Is
there
a
plan
in
the
future?
I
know
there
is
a
fire
lane.
Is
there
any
way
that
there
could
be
some
other
sort
of
lane
to
interconnect
these
two
projects
in
the
future
and
especially
there's
a
parcel
to
the
north?
The
Wong
parcel
there's
somebody
that
lives
there,
they're
not
selling
that
at
this
point,
but
in
the
future
there's
going
to
be
need
to
be
some
sort
of
flow.
A
E
M
I
About
Americans
member
Clark
I
believe
if
I
can
foresee
what
your
question
will
be
is
the
Delano
subdivision,
which
is
in
Meridian,
was
denied
by
their
City
Council
for
annexation,
rezone
in
a
planned
community
on
May
12th.
They
are
asking
for
reconsideration,
which
will
be
before
Meridian
on
July
28th,
so
we're
not
sure
of
the
fate
of
this
project.
Quite
yet,
however,
I
believe
most
of
what
was
contested
were
the
Lots
up
here
to
the
north
and
not
necessarily
the
multifamily
project.
We
have
been
in
communication
with
city
of
Murray
and
planners,
though.
L
I
L
Thank
you
and
it
won't
be
our
problem.
It
will
be
meridians
because
of
the
change
in
area
of
city
impact,
but
I
guess
it
would
concern
me
that
the
eventual
connection
would
then
be
opposed,
because
all
of
this
for
now
would
be
traveling
to
the
south
down
to
you
stake
rather
than
up
to
Wainwright
and.
I
Metameric
on
something
look
like
that
is
correct
and
on
the
screen
now
is
the
overall
area
for
connectivity
where
you
can
see
that
Centrepointe
way
goes
to
the
south
and
runs
into
youstick
Road.
So
that
is
correct.
The
traffic
would
run
south
until
we
Centrepointe
is
connected
to
Wainwright
and
then.
L
I
L
I
Madam
mayor
councilmember
Clegg
the
the
zoning.
The
zoning
request
is
before
you,
but
it
does
have
a
development
agreement
that
development
agreement
does
detail
out
this
cross
access.
However
Planning
and
Zoning
did
go
back
and
forth.
You
know
obviously
wanting
to
not
have
access
points
on
Eagle
Road,
but
this
project
has
been
told
the
itd
that
if
any
other
traffic
comes
from
the
western
properties
that
they
will
eliminate
their
Eagle
Road
access
and
then,
depending
on
what
is
proposed
to
the
west,
like
what
is
currently
or
was
proposed
with
Delano.
I
L
S
You,
madam
mayor
members
of
the
council,
just
very
briefly:
Deborah
Nelson
again
I
appreciate
the
responses
that
have
already
been
made.
I
think
to
the
neighbors
concern
just
to
be
clear
whether
it's
Delano,
because
it
successfully
reconsidered
or
another
future
development
project.
You
know
at
that
point.
Yes,
our
access
points
on
our
western
border
would
switch
to
controlled
emergency
access
only
and
that
is
what's
proposed
in
the
current
draft
of
the
development
agreement
that
was
recommended
by
the
pnz
and
before
you
this
evening.
A
C
J
L
A
B
A
Believe,
there's
a
was
that
I
believe
there's
no
further
business
to
come
before
the
council,
Madame.