►
From YouTube: Boise City Council - Evening Session
Description
Tuesday August 16, 2022 at 6:00 PM MDT
E
D
F
B
D
A
Carries
thanks
and
next
up
we'll
move
into
a
special
business.
First,
we
have
the
appointment
of
ellie
cross.
The
public
works
commission
in
the
student
seat
for
a
one-year
term
that
ends
august,
2023
and
ellie
is
with
us
here
this
evening.
I'm
I'm
so
pleased
that
she
was
interested
and
willing
to
serve
and
with
that
I'd
ask
for
approval.
C
I'm
ellie,
I
just
want
to
say
thank
you
so
much
for
the
appointment.
I'm
really
excited
to
learn
more
about
the
government
processes.
A
The
next
step
we
have
the
appointment
of
linda,
I
want
to
say
matsu
or
mizzou
to
the
parks
and
rec
commission
for
a
three-year
term,
ending
august
2025.
and
linda,
oh
you're,
here,
wonderful,
I'm
sorry!
I
didn't
see
you
back
there.
I
was
looking
for
you
on
zoom
earlier
and
with
that,
her
linda's
appointment
is
before
the.
G
Council,
thank
you
before
I
go
to
that.
I'd
just
like
to
mention
how
important
these
student
seats
are
on
the
commission.
Our
very
first
student
commissioner
on
the
public
works
commission
is
now
the
director
of
the
local
highway
technical
assistance
council
for
the
state
of
idaho
leyla
crawl.
Oh.
B
G
And
so
you
know
good
luck,
hopefully,
you'll
go
on
and
do
great
things
with
this
too.
With
that,
madam
mayor,
I
ask
unanimous
consent
to
appoint
linda
mizzou
to
the
parks
and
recreation
commission
for
a
three-year
term
ending
august
2025..
A
I
A
And
just
if
any,
if,
if
you
all,
if
you
would
like
to
leave,
you
don't
need
to
feel
as
though
you
must
stay
for
this
meeting.
You're
welcome
as
long
as
you
want,
but
we
don't
take
it
to
this
light.
If
you
head
out
to
celebrate
or
move
on
with
your
with
your
evening.
Thank
you
both
very
much
and
with
that
we're
going
to
hear
from
er
eric.
J
Thank
you
very
much
mata
mayer,
members
of
the
council.
We
have
five
interim
budget
changes
before
you
this
this
evening
for
your
consideration.
The
first
three
are
airport
related.
All
three
are
rev
revenue
neutral,
meaning
that
the
funding
source
would
be
a
reduction
to
a
different
project
within
the
airport
fund.
J
Those
three
projects
are
the
checkpoint,
expansion
economy,
lot,
phase,
two
expansion
and
security
upgrade
projects.
The
increases
for
all
three
projects
are
in
response
to
cost
escalation,
as
well
as
passenger
growth.
J
J
This
adjustment
is
effectively
advancing
an
investment
that
was
included
in
the
fiscal
year.
23
proposed
budget
assuming
approval.
We
would
come
back
before
the
council
in
fiscal
year
23
to
bring
down
the
budget
that
was
that
is
going
through
the
approval
process.
Presently.
J
The
last
item
is
a
geothermal
project.
This
this
increase
is
due
to
a
higher
degree
of
work
this
this
fiscal
year
attributable
to
both
new
customers,
as
well
as
a
number
of
repair
and
maintenance
projects
and
upgrades.
The
increase
would
be
funded
from
increased
water
sales
attributable
to
new
customers,
as
well
as
from
fund
balance.
G
Made
ameer
eric.
I
appreciate
you
explaining
the
design
for
the
skate
park,
thought
that's
what
you
meant
in
the
memo,
but
I'd
appreciate
the
clarification
and
excited
to
see
all
the
airport
projects
to
serve
all
the
new
customers
that
we're
finding.
G
A
Thanks
eric
and
next
up,
we
have
missy,
I'm
sorry,
grothouse
growthhouse,
with
the
rfp2294
for
a
presentation
and
ultimately
for
council
action.
L
We
go,
madam
mayor
members
of
council.
My
name
is
missy
grotehouse.
I
am
the
purchasing
agent
for
the
city,
I'm
here
this
evening
to
request
an
award
decision
for
rfp22394
design,
structuring
and
implementation
of
fund
for
affordable
housing
for
the
mayor's
office.
One
proposal
has
significant
local
economic
presence.
However,
they
were
not
the
highest
ranked
proposer,
I'm
here
to
stand
for
any
questions
you
may
have
regarding
the
process,
and
we
have
nikki
helen
kemp
from
the
mayor's
office
to
address
any
project.
Specific
questions.
B
G
L
Forsyth
street
advisors
was
the
highest
ranked
okay.
I
just.
G
Want
to
make
sure
that
that
I
had
that
correct.
Thank
you.
A
Further
discussion,
all
right,
thank
you
clerk.
Will
you
call
the
roll
willits.
E
D
E
A
M
Thank
you,
madam
mayor
members
of
council,
so
in
july,
two
parties
of
record
filed
for
judicial
review
on
the
conditional
use
permit
regarding
interface
sanctuary
as
part
of
those
petitions.
Both
parties
requested
mediation
to
be
brought
before
the
council
for
action.
The
applicant
has
submitted
a
written
memo
included
in
your
packets
declining
to
participate
in
mediation,
and
this
is
not
a
public
hearing
as
a
reminder,
and
for
with
that,
I
would
stand
for
any
questions.
C
G
Ahead,
madam
mayor,
so
we
can
order
mediation,
but
the
parties
have
to
agree.
Is
that
correct.
A
H
Well,
there's
no,
I
met
a
mayor,
there's
no
action
item
here,
but
my
own
personal
experience
has
been
that
if
two
people
are
set
to
mediate
and
one
refuses
to
mediate,
not
a
lot
happens
and
it
you
know
it's
a
process
by
agreement
that
requires
agreement.
G
Okay,
madam
mayor
with
that,
I
would
move
that
we
affirm
the
direction
of
staff
that
we
not
pursue.
Mediation.
N
E
A
Okay,
thank
you.
Thank
you.
Next
up
we
have
the
consent
agenda.
All
items
with
an
asterisk
are
considered
to
be
routine
by
the
council
and
will
be
enacted
by
one
motion.
There's
no
separate
discussion
on
these
items
unless
a
council,
member
or
citizen
so
requests,
in
which
case
the
item
will
be
removed
from
the
general
order
of
business
and
considered
in
its
normal
sequence,.
A
Second,
we
have
a
motion
a
second
just
before
we
call
vote.
I
wanted
to
say
a
couple
things.
A
There's
a
travel
request
on
here
for
quite
a
bit
of
my
team
and
last
week
was
a
week
of
science
is
what
I
thought
about
the
week
afterwards
and
while
I
was
in
the
middle
of
it
and
first
off,
we,
I
had
the
opportunity
to
join
the
ceo
of
micron
at
the
bill,
signing
for
the
chips
and
science
act
last
week
and
mikron's
a
homegrown
company
that
we're
all
really
proud
of
in
terms
of
going
from
being
a
tiny
startup,
a
big
dream,
tiny
startup
to
the
fourth
largest
semiconductor
manufacturer
in
the
world,
and
we've
said
as
a
city
that
our
goal
is
to
make
sure
that
we
have
family
wage
jobs
in
this
community
that
we
do
all
that
we
can
to
partner
with
businesses,
of
course,
that
are
from
here
and
to
help
them
grow
here,
and
particularly
those
that
share
our
values
of
ensuring
that
we're
a
city
for
everyone.
A
And
this
the
I
went
with
with
the
express
intention
of
highlighting
again
what
a
priority
these
jobs
in
this
company
is
in
our
community,
because
there
will
now
be
the
opportunity
for
domestic
investment
and
we'd
like
to
see
some
of
it
here,
as
does
the
state,
and
then,
after
that,
I
went
straight
to
idaho,
falls
and
spent
time
with
the
national
lab
their
director
and
their
science
team.
A
They
have
deep
interest
in
expanding
their
research
as
it
relates
to
geothermal,
and
we
have
the
largest
geothermal
system
in
the
country
and
they're
doing
quite
a
bit
of
work
on
carbon
neutrality
themselves.
They
have
their
own
goals
to
be
carbon
neutral
and
then
to
look
at
how
they
use
research
to
meet
those
goals
and
then
to
bring
those
to
scale.
And
then
so.
Both
of
these
trips
were
designed
and
with
the
intent
of
fostering
deeper
partnerships
with
employers,
I'm
creating
more
opportunities
for
job
growth.
G
Madam
mayor,
thank
you
if
I
could
just
say
a
word
too.
G
There
were
a
couple
of
resolutions
on
our
agenda
tonight
that
I
asked
questions
about
just
to
ensure
that
we,
what
we
were
doing
with
those
resolutions,
17
and
18,
are
pre-approval
to
use
government
contracts
to
access
certain
things
in
this
case
buildings
that
we
don't
have
a
need
for
exactly
today
and
that
we
may
in
the
future
and
they're
the
kinds
of
buildings
that
you'll
want
to
be
able
to
access
very
quickly
if
we
do
need
them
so
pre-approval,
for
this
is
only
approval
to
use
those
contracts
and,
if
and
when
we
ever
need
to
we'd,
have
to
approve
the
actual
building.
G
That
was
that
was
going
to
be
part
of
it.
So,
just
with
that
comment
that
I
was
satisfied
that
this
was
the
correct
action.
Thanks.
K
That
clerk,
what
do
you
call
the
role?
Well,
it's
yes,.
D
D
A
Thanks
and
before
we
move
on
to
ordinances
on
my
agenda
script,
item
f,
which
was
asked
an
asterisk,
so
was
on.
The
consent.
Agenda
also
has
listed
as
a
presenter,
david
moser
and
the
applicant
mike
homan
was
david's
not
here,
so
this
was
meant
to
be
on
the.
This
is
a
typo
on
my
agenda.
Great
all
right.
We
are
good,
then
we'll
move
into
ordinances.
We
have
several
on
first
reading.
G
A
D
appropriating
1
billion
182
million
367
thousand
206
dollars
deemed
necessary
to
defray
all
expenses
and
liabilities
of
the
city
of
boise
city,
idaho.
For
said
fiscal
year,
specifying
the
objects
and
purposes
for
which
set
appropriation
is
made,
repealing
all
ordinances
and
parts
of
ordinances
and
conflict.
With
this
ordinance
approving
a
levy
of
a
sufficient
tax
upon
the
taxable
property
providing
for
a
waiver
of
the
reading
rules
and
providing
an
effective
date.
D
Or
dash
36-22
and
ordinance
car
for
21-0033,
located
at
1824,
south
fennell
street
emitting
zoning
classifications
of
the
city
of
boise
city
to
change
the
classification
of
rural
property,
particularly
described
in
section
1
of
this
ordinance
in
adjacent
rights
of
way
from
r-1a
to
r-1b
d-a.
Setting
for
the
reason
statement
in
support
of
such
zone
change
and
providing
an
effective
date
ord-37-22
an
ordinance
car21-0004.
D
For
property
located
at
8475
west
limelight
street
emitting
zoning
classifications
of
the
city
of
boise
city
to
change
the
classification
of
rural
property,
particularly
described
in
section
one
of
this
ordinance
and
adjacent
rights
of
way
from
r-1a
single-family
residential
2.1
units
per
acre
and
c
dash,
2d
general
commercial,
with
design
review
to
r-3d
multi-family
residential
43.5
unit
per
acre,
sending
forth
a
reason.
Statement
in
support
of
such
zone
change
and
providing
an
effective
date.
D
D
G
A
D
Sanchez,
yes,
all
in
favor
motion
carries
ord-33-22
and
ordnance
car21-00046,
rodney
evans,
plus
partners,
llc
for
property
located
at
3750,
south
maple
grove,
road,
annexing
8.08,
acres
of
certain
lands
and
territory
situated
in
ada,
county,
idaho,
adjacent
and
contiguous
to
the
corporate
limits
of
the
city
of
boise
city.
Establishing
and
determining
the
land
use.
Classifications
of
said.
G
Thank
you,
madam
mayor,
and
before
I
make
the
motion
just
note
that
there's
been
a
change
in
state
laws,
so
it's
no
longer
necessary
for
the
city
of
boise
to
regulate
this
particular
thing.
The
state's
doing
it
for
us.
A
E
G
That,
madame
mayor,
I
move
that
all
rules
of
the
council,
interfering
with
the
immediate
consideration
of
ord
3922,
be
suspended,
that
the
portions
of
idaho
code
5902
requiring
an
ordinance
to
be
read
on
three
different
days
twice
by
title
and
once
in
full,
be
dispensed
with
and
that
the
record
show
it
has
been
read.
For
the
third
time.
E
E
E
A
D
The
applicant
is
online.
Wonderful
thanks.
A
Go
ahead,
what
we'll
do
is
we'll
hear
from
sabrina
and
then
we'll
oh
ben,
yes,
ben's
often
online
we'll
see
if
the
applicant
has
anything
to
add.
We
don't
expect
the
neighborhood
association
to
be
here.
Cena
is
eric
berg
online.
O
Go
ahead,
madam
mayor
members
of
the
council.
The
item
before
you
is
a
preliminary
plot
for
the
breeze
subdivision.
The
subdivision
is
comprised
of
two
residential
lots
on
.15
acres
located
at
1719,
south
longmont,
ave
and
r2
zone.
The
surrounding
area
is
comprised
of
other
residential
uses
to
the
north
and
east,
with
commercial
uses
clustered
along
broadway
ave
to
the
west.
There
is
one
existing
dwelling
on
the
site
which
will
be
demolished
to
make
way
for
the
proposed
development.
O
Two
new
single-family
residences
with
detached
alley-loaded
garages,
are
proposed.
The
applicant
requests
a
waiver
from
the
requirement
to
install
curb
gutter
and
detached
sidewalk
along
the
subdivision,
trench
on
longmont
ave.
Prior
to
the
april,
4th
planning
and
zoning
hearing,
the
southeast
neighborhood
association
submitted
written
comments
requesting
that
the
applicant
be
required
to
install
street
improvements.
O
Although
these
improvements
are
typically
required
to
improve
pedestrian
connectivity,
comfort
and
safety,
the
planning
and
zoning
commission
recommended
approval
of
the
waiver
due
to
the
location
of
an
existing
irrigation,
ditch
adjacent
to
the
site.
The
potential
for
improvements
in
this
location
to
create
future
drainage
issues
and
the
past
approval
of
multiple
waivers
in
the
immediate
area
which
remove
potential
future
connectivity.
O
The
applicant
proposes
one
class
one
and
one
class
two
tree
in
the
front
yard
of
each
new
parcel.
A
tree
mitigation
plan
is
required
to
ensure
that
the
new
trees
which
are
proposed
will
sufficiently
mitigate
for
any
healthy,
mature
trees
which
are
to
be
removed
at
their
april
fourth
hearing
the
planning
and
zoning
commission
unanimously
approved
the
associated
pud
and
recommended
approval
of
suv,
22-5
and
I'll
stand
for
any
questions.
P
Mayor,
I
guess
just
some
questions
for
some
clarity,
so
the
street
improvements
was
would
be
potentially
the
request
to
have
sidewalks
on
the
street
and
what
we're
seeing
is
that,
because
of
an
irrigation,
ditch
and
then
the
lack
of
sidewalks
in
other
areas
that
that
wouldn't
be
feasible.
That
this
time
is
that
what
I'm
understanding.
O
Madam
mayor
council,
member
holly
burton
that's
correct.
Typically,
those
street
improvements
are
required.
The
applicant
is
requesting
those
due
to
the
drainage
issues
and
the
lack
of
adjacent
improvements.
Great.
Q
G
Not
america,
could
I
ask
ben
a
question?
Yes,
thank
you
ben,
so
I'm
going
to
ask
the
same
question
essentially
as
council
member
hallie
burton
and
since
we
don't
have
an
achd
person
here,
my
question
has
to
do
with,
if
you
don't
put
in
sidewalk,
as
the
other
lots
develop
on
this
lot,
how
are
on
this
block?
How
is
that
sidewalk
going
to
end
up
getting
built.
Q
Madam
mayor
and
council
member
clegg,
there
was
two
projects
that
were
completed
actually
on
either
side
of
this
project
that
were
granted
waivers
of
the
street
frontage
improvements
due
to
a
delivery.
Ditch
that
runs
on
the
west
side
of
longmont
avenue.
Q
Q
There
achd
had
some
concerns
about
drainage
along
here,
there's
kind
of
limited,
there's,
maybe
two
or
three
other
parcels
that
could
redevelop
along
here,
and
so
I
I
think,
according
to
my
correspondence
with
achd,
they
indicated
they
wanted
to
wait
until
they
could
do
a
full
redevelopment
of
the
sidewalk
because
they
were
concerned
about
just
again
the
drainage
and
then
that
irrigation,
ditch.
G
G
So
I
would
ask
that
the
planning
department
really
give
some
thought
to
this:
go
to
achd
and
figure
out
a
solution
that
we
can
begin
working
on
over
time.
That's
systemic
for
this
neighborhood,
so
that
we
don't
end
up
with
these
parcel
byparcel
redevelopments
without
sidewalk
and
then
well
gosh.
They
got
one,
they
got
a
waiver,
so
we
need
to
get
one
too,
because
I
I
I
think
we're
setting
we're
setting
up
yet
another
block
in
this
neighborhood.
For
this
same
problem
that
we've
seen
over
and
over
again,
thank
you.
P
Ben
mary,
if
I
could
just
add
one
thing
to
council
president's
comment,
100
agreement,
everything
that
she
had
to
say,
one
of
the
things
that
I've
been
noticing
recently
as
I've
been
working
with
the
city
on
invasive
species.
Removal
is
that
a
lot
of
times
those
invasive
species
are
growing
along
roads
that
don't
have
sidewalks
and
that's
typically,
where
kids
are
getting
flat
tires.
Dogs
are
getting
towards
in
their
paws,
all
surfaces
of
other
stuff
are
happening
and
because
cars
are
parking
on
those
areas,
they're
spreading
them
to
additional
areas
as
well.
P
A
Questions:
okay,
there's
nobody
online
or
in
the
room
for
testimony,
and
so
I'm
going
to
see
if
the
applicant
would
like
to
say
anything
further
before
we
close
this
hearing.
G
E
E
A
And
now
we
will
move
to
car
22-4,
just
a
little
bit
of
housekeeping
I've
got
one
person
signed
up
for
this
marc
andrews,
great
anybody
else
here
for
this
item
right
and
clerk.
We
let
me
know
if
anybody
is
online
for
this
item.
You
can
raise
your
zoom
hand
we'll
go
ahead
and
start
with
staff.
Jesse
lyle
welcome
and
then
the
applicant
andy
thompson
are
you
you
were
here
in
the
room.
A
Is
the
neighborhood
association
we
present
west
valley
nope,
all
right,
so
we'll
start
with
staff.
Go
the
applicant
there's
one
person
in
the
room
to
testify.
There
might
be
others
online
and
then
we'll
bring
it
back
to
you.
R
Gwen,
madam
mayor
members
of
the
council
item
before
you
is
car
22-4,
a
request
to
rezone
approximately
1.86
acres
located
at
2576
and
2623,
linda
vista
lane,
from
r1b
to
r1c
on
june
6.
The
planning
and
zoning
commission
recommended
approval,
with
some
neighborhood
opposition
to
the
potential
increased
traffic
parking
and
density.
G
G
R
Madam
mayor
councilwoman
clegg:
well,
we
did
have
just
a
very
basic
concept
plan
that
was
submitted,
but
this
asset
was
just
submitted
as
a
rezone
without
any
pud
or
other
entitlement.
This
is
you
know
not
something
that
we
have
set
in
stone.
I
believe
that
the
applicant
can
probably
answer
a
few
more
questions
about
their
plans
for
this
area,
but
if
they
had
to
go
through
a
pud
process
like
connectivity
and
sidewalks
would
be
required.
S
Better
yeah,
okay,
hi,
my
name
is
andy
thompson
and
jessie's
done
great
and
eloquently
advocated
for
the
projects.
I
have
nothing
really
to
add
to
that,
except
for
that
I
own
2605,
just
to
the
south
there
in
the
picture.
That's
me
with
that
that
house
there
I've
gone
through
the
the
zoning
and
the
pud
for
that,
and
so
my
neighbors
are
like
hey,
you
know:
can
we
move
forward
with
that
too?
I
said
yeah,
you
know.
Zoning
has
to
be
correct.
S
S
Do
the
do
the
zoning
change
that
way
it
it's
for
sure
that
you
can
fit
that
density
where
you're
at
so
I'm
kind
of
a
neighbor
doing
a
friend
or
doing
a
favor.
G
G
I
don't
know
if
there
was
a
cross-access
agreement
required
with
that,
but,
as
you
know,
from
these
kinds
of
areas,
how
difficult
it
can
be
from
to
get
from
one
of
the
collectors
to
the
another
and
getting
those
even
pedestrian
connections
through
in
those
places
where
we
can
is
incredibly
important,
so
that
people
don't
have
to
get
in
their
car
to
drive
when
they
might
have
a
quarter
of
a
mile
walk.
So
my
concern
is
that
we
still
have
the
opportunity
to
take
advantage
of
any
of
those
connections
that
might
exist
on
these
three
lots.
S
Yes,
and
to
that
I
say:
corey
lane
is
150
feet
to
the
south,
not
included
in
this
map
and
on
2605,
oh
yeah,
there
we
go
query
lanes
right
there
and
it
connects
mitchell
and
linda
vista.
The
one
that
I
had
done
just
to
the
south
is
r1c.
S
It
has
the
subdivision
behind
it
already
like
packed
in
there.
So
there's
that's
a
private
drive
rather
than
a
drive-through
and
my
my
approval
for
that
one
which
obviously
I
don't
want
to
go
too
far
into
because
you
know
you
have
your
time
and
restraints
so
yeah.
I
I
can't
say
to
those
things,
but
I
really
see
no
like
big,
like
there
wouldn't
be
no
reason
to
put
a
road
right
there
with
the
others
connecting.
G
Thank
you.
I
you
know
I
I
appreciate
that
sentiment.
I've
seen
over
time
when
those
can
make
a
real
difference
in
whether
people
choose
to
walk
around
a
neighborhood
or
get
in
their
car
drive,
and
so
I
bring
it
up
tonight
so
that
the
planning
department
is
aware
of
the
concern
and,
as
you
do
bring
the
platform,
they
can
make
sure
and
see
that
we
don't
lose
any
opportunities
that
otherwise
might
be
there.
Okay,
thank
you.
D
T
Council
mark
andrews,
I
live
at
2640
northland
at
this
time.
I've
got
several
concerns
on
this
problem:
the
property
to
the
south
of
me
on
the
east
side.
Obviously,
that
design
will
be
changed
again
because
there's
no
place
for
fire
trucks
to
turn
around
there's
no
access
to
get
to
anything.
T
T
The
grass
strip
is
pretty
much
a
waste
of
time,
waste
of
money
and
waste
of
energy.
It's
better
use
for
the
people
to
use
it
other
than
it
just
dies.
People
don't
take
care
of
it.
It's
just
a
pain.
The
other
thing
is
the
20
mile
an
hour
speed
limit.
So
you
really
don't
need
it.
People
can
walk
down
the
side
of
the
street
without
having
a
car
flying
by
them
at
80
miles
an
hour.
Sometimes
they
do,
though,
it's
the
problem,
the
other
one
is
the
rents
on
these
places.
T
The
elderly
people,
fixed
incomes,
cannot
afford
fifteen
hundred
dollars
a
month
rent
for
a
two
bedroom.
It's
getting
astronomical
in
this
town.
The
other
thing
is
we're
supposed
to
be
the
city
of
trees.
T
Where
are
the
trees
you
build
places,
there's
no
place
to
put
trees,
they
get
10
feet
tall,
they
cut
them
down,
they
never
replant
them.
I've
gone
through
this
several
times
with
the
planning
and
zoning
in
my
surroundings.
They
cut
them
down,
they
don't
plant
them
back.
My
suggestion
would
be
to
consider
a
more
livable
neighborhood,
not
a
city
like
l.a
las
vegas
san
francisco.
We
need
to
control
it
a
little
bit
better
and
I
guess
that's
it.
Any
questions.
F
F
G
Just
for
the
record
make
sure
that
if
we
grant
this
rezoned
tonight,
the
applicant
will
have
to
come
through
with
either
a
pud
or
a
subdivision
request,
and
at
that
time
the
staff
will
review
connectivity,
we'll
review
existing
trees
and
ensure
that
any
healthy
trees
are
not
lost
and
any
trees
that
are
lost
are
mitigated
in
ensuing
development.
Is
that
correct.
R
U
Madam
mayor,
yes,
I
had
another
question
for
staff,
so
I'm
assuming
at
that
time,
then
the
parking
question
would
also
be
answered.
R
Madam
mayor
councilwoman
willis,
yes,
that
is
correct.
We
look
at
parking
as
well
with
both
of
those
applications
super.
Thank
you.
G
Add
a
mirror,
I
move
approval
of
car
22-004.
F
U
Madam
mayor,
just
a
couple
of
things,
I
really
appreciate
your
testimony
and
as
somebody
who
lives
in
west
boise,
I
always
look
at
parking.
You
know
we
walk
when
we
can,
but
also
we
just
know
that
you
know
people
drive
to
get
where
they
need
to
go.
So
this
isn't
part
of
this
application,
but
when
you
come
back
would
be
very
interested
in
how
you're
going
to
address
that
because
we
know
lots
of
people
are,
are
living
together
to
to
reduce
cost
and
they
usually
have
cars.
U
A
A
Welcome
back,
thank
you,
we'll
hear
from
staff,
then
we'll
hear
from
the
appellants
tillman's
great
and
then
we
don't
expect
the
neighborhood
association.
I
have
amy
al
geyer
listed
here
if
amy
or
somebody
from
nina's
present
on
zoom,
please
let
us
know,
and
then,
after
hearing
from
the
appellants
we
will
head
into
testimony.
I've
got
a
couple:
people
that
are
signed
up
to
testify.
O
Madam
mayor
members
of
the
council,
the
item
before
you
is
an
appeal
of
the
planning
and
zoning
commission's
decision
to
deny
a
request
for
variants
to
encroach
into
the
street
side
setback
for
a
garage
edition
on
0.24
acres
located
at
1302
north
24th
street.
In
an
r1ch
zone
on
june
6,
the
commission
heard
a
request
for
a
variance
which
would
allow
the
existing
non-conforming
garage
on
the
site
to
be
expanded
to
encroach
19
feet
into
the
required
20-foot
setback.
With
the
eaves
of
the
garage
extending
to
the
property
line.
O
The
expansion
was
requested
to
allow
the
garage
to
accommodate
a
wheelchair,
accessible
van.
Following
a
public
hearing
and
deliberations,
the
commission
denied
the
variance
request
on
june
13th.
The
appellants
appealed
the
commission's
decision
based
on
multiple
grounds
which
are
summarized
on
this
slide.
O
The
ada
and
fha
require
municipalities
to
make
reasonable
accommodations
in
rules,
policies,
practices
or
services
to
afford
individuals
with
disabilities
equal
opportunity
to
use
and
enjoy
a
dwelling.
However,
the
commission
found
that
the
requested
accommodation
was
not
reasonable
due
to
the
safety
concerns
associated
with
encroaching
into
a
clear
vision
triangle.
The
potential
for
the
proposed
expansion
to
hinder
future
street
improvements
and
the
availability
of
alternative
options
for
providing
wheelchair
accessible
parking
on
the
site.
O
The
decision
was
based
on
the
application's
failure
to
comply
with
the
required
findings
of
the
development
code.
The
commission
found
that
there
was
not
a
hardship
associated
with
the
property
itself.
The
proposal
conflicted
with
the
policies
of
the
comprehensive
plan
and
granting
of
the
variants
would
be
detrimental
to
the
public
health,
safety
and
welfare.
Therefore,
the
commission
found
that
the
accommodation
requested
by
the
applicant
was
not
reasonable
and
directed
them
to
pursue
an
alternative
site
layout.
O
The
variance
application
was
reviewed
and
heard
in
compliance
with
the
requirements
of
the
development
code.
The
late
correspondence
provided
by
the
applicant
was
reviewed
by
the
commission
prior
to
the
hearing,
and
no
decision
was
rendered
until
after
a
full
public
hearing
and
deliberation
by
the
commission.
O
The
appeal
memos
indicate
that
the
project
architect,
who
attended
june
6th
hearing
virtually
wished
to
be
unmuted
during
the
applicant
rebuttal
portion
of
the
hearing.
However,
no
indication
was
made
during
their
hearing
that
they
wished
to
be
unmuted
and
the
applicant
utilized
the
full-time
allotted
for
their
rebuttal.
Therefore,
the
public
hearing
was
conducted
in
compliance
with
the
requirements
of
the
development
code.
O
In
conclusion,
staff
recommends
that
the
council
deny
the
appeal
and
uphold
the
planning
and
zoning
commission's
denial
of
the
variance
if
you
do
opt
to
approve
the
appeal.
The
grounds
through
which
you
may
find
error
in
the
commission's
decision
are
included
on
this
slide
and
I'll
stand
for
any
questions.
A
G
This
particular
application
got
a
certificate
of
appropriateness
before
it
went
to
pnc.
Is
that
correct.
G
And
so
he,
the
strike
preservation
commission
did
not
find
any
particular
error
with
the
design
of
the
extended
garage,
and
so
the
decision
of
the
pnz
was
based
solely
on
the
setback.
Issues
is
that
am.
F
G
Then
my
last
question,
this
kind
of
odd
little
corner
of
the
north
end
there's
not
sidewalks
on
that
particular
side
of
the
street.
So
while
the
setback
is.
O
P
Through
the
the
appeal
report,
there
was
some
conversations
surrounding
clear
vision
triangles
that
I
was
having
a
little
bit
of
a
hard
time,
understanding
exactly
what
order
it
took
place.
It
looked
like
there
was
maybe
some
confusion
about
when
the
handout
was
submitted
when
it
was
presented,
and
I'm
trying
to
figure
out
where
that
ended
up
landing.
As
far
as
the
clear
vision
triangle.
O
Yeah,
madam
mayor
council,
member
holly
burton
I
have
a
couple
slides
to
help
clear
that
up
as
much
as
we
can,
so
this
is
directly
from
the
city's
zoning
code.
This
is
the
definition
of
a
clear
vision
triangle
showing
how
that's
defined
at
the
intersection
of
two
streets,
as
well
as
how
it's
defined
at
the
intersection
of
the
street
with
a
driveway
or
alley,
and
this
side
shows
where
that
clear
vision
triangle
is
in
relation
to
the
proposed
edition.
P
And
memory
of
the
follow
follow-up
question
there.
It
seems
like
there's,
maybe
some
debate
on
whether
or
not
this
was
submitted
and
planning
and
zoning
took
this
into
consideration
and
from
what
I'm
gathering
from
the
appeal
report
that
it's
the
staffs.
P
The
staff
believes
that
this
was
adequately
discussed
during
during
the
planning
and
zoning
hearing.
O
E
H
Guess
it'd
be
24th
street,
but
there's
also
a
tree
right
in
the
way
right
and
we
wouldn't
let
them
remove
that
tree
if
they
wanted
to
without
replanting.
It
is
that
right.
O
H
O
G
B
G
O
B
V
Okay,
great
good
evening,
I'm
john
tillman
9345
west
levitt
street
in
boise,
idaho,
honorable
mayor
mclennan,
mclean,
honorable
city
council
members.
V
We
please
ask
for
everyone's
understanding
and
approval
of
this
very
small
and
simple
setback,
variance
request
our
history,
my
wife
and
I
have
been
idaho
and
boise
in
boise
for
generations,
a
1966
boise
high
school
graduate
and
boise
state
bachelor
science
graduate.
My
wife
was
a
legal
secretary
and
court
reporter
my
swedish
father
hand
built
1302
north
24th
street
in
1937.
V
V
V
V
V
And
just
a
minute,
I
lost
my
police
here,
sorry,
and
it
also
has
approximately
75
feet
from
the
rear
of
the
garage
to
the
alley
property
line.
V
V
V
The
city
is
applying
the
clear
vision
which
it
mainly
applies
to
an
interior
or
flag
lot
or
a
corner
corner
street
access
across
street
access.
V
V
V
V
We
have
spent
nearly
twenty
five
thousand
dollars
in
architectural
fees
that
have
explored
every
option
on
our
entire
home
and
garage
renovation.
The
only
and
best
design
that
has
met
the
historic
and
the
appropriateness
approvals
is
have
the
existing
attached
garage
widen
five
to
five
and
a
half
feet.
There
will
be
no
overhang
over
the
property
line,
it's
just
a
slight
increase.
This
will
accommodate
a
standard
garage
door
and
internal
ramp
for
all
weather
access,
and
that
is
very
important.
V
We
have
commissioner,
chris
stanley
pointed
out
that
he
had
ada
and
hud
regulation
knowledge
and
they
the
pnz,
cannot
trump
federal
laws.
With
little
regard
to
our
expert
architects.
Testimony
and
my
wife's
severe
handicap
pnz
denied
the
variance
in
violation
of
state
and
federal
laws,
protecting
disabled
persons,
rights
so
variance
two
variants
approvals:
okay,
so
they
exceeded
their
statutory
authority.
V
At
a
recent
tv
meeting,
tim
keane
said
we
are
here
to
serve
the
people
and
not
the
regulations
and
the
policies
we've
got
to
be
focused
on
helping
people
and
help
serve
the
problem
solve
the
problems
that
they
are
facing
and
to
let
go
of
flawed
ideas.
V
Once
again,
please
approve
our
variance
jalen's
health
demands,
prudent
and
proactive
measures
and
end
our
stress
in
this
massive
legalities
and
return
our
family
home.
We
shall
dearly
miss.
Thank
you,
john
and
jaylene
tillman.
I
would
like
to
share
this
picture.
That's
in
our
deal,
okay
of
the
13
feet
from
the
property
line
to
the
curb
okay.
V
Okay
on
irene
street
there's
a
big
huge,
double
garage,
that's
being
built
right
next
to
the
street
there.
That
is
not
in
there
yeah.
V
Street
has
a
garage
and
a
fence
very,
very
close
to
the
sidewalk
one
other
thing
about
the
sidewalk.
I
I
messed
in
here
we
own
two-thirds
of
the
lot
okay.
I
spoke
with
achd
supervisor
concerning
a
sidewalk
there
when
we
were
having
the
driveway
rebuilt,
he
said
you
do
not
pour
sidewalks
around
trees
anymore.
V
That's
against
the
historic,
that's
against
the
historic
district's
approval,
so
in
essence
the
clear
vision
triangle
and
having
related
to
a
sidewalk
there
there'll
never
be
a
sidewalk
there
ever
so
I
thank
you
very
much
and
there's
the
front
steps
to
the
house
which
is
in
there.
You
know
it's
all
you
know:
you'd
have
to
have
a
30-foot
ramp
to
get
up
there
and
there's
also
other
pitches.
I'd
like
to
relinquish
some
of
my
time
to
my
son
and
and
brian
the
architect.
Thank
you.
A
Excuse
me,
sir
councilmember
halliburton
has
some
questions.
P
John,
I
just
got
a
couple
questions
for
you.
First
of
all,
a
really
beautiful
house
I
used
to
be
a
roofer.
It
looks
like
it
would
be
a
really
hard
house
to
roof,
but
it's
got
some
really
pretty
roof
lines.
P
I
realize
it's
emotional
to
come
up
here
and
to
do
this
again.
You've
already
done
this
in
firm
planning
and
zoning.
So
I
I
hope
you
don't
take
this
as
badgering.
You
I'm
wondering
if
you
could
talk
to
me
a
little
bit
more
about
how
you
see
this
as
a
hardship.
Sometimes
when
we
see
some
of
these
applications,
we
look
at
hardships
and
it
has
to
do
sometimes
with
an
abnormal
size
of
lot.
V
Well,
historically,
there's
been
flooding
along
irene
and
the
crane
creek
comes
down
there
at
elm
grove
park,
there's
also
a
canal
about
a
block
and
a
half
way
on
ryden
ball.
Okay,
the
whole
lot,
my
dad
knew
a
lot
of
history
about
boise,
okay
and
the
whole
lot
was
built
up
from
the
dirk
they
didn't
have
all
of
this
power
hydraulic
equipment.
Back
then,
okay,
it
was
actually
taken
out
by
a
horse-drawn
skid.
V
Okay,
and
I
met
the
lady
whose
father
did
it.
It
was
nick
ritchie
on
1620
north
19th
street,
but
at
any
rate,
the
whole
lot
is
built
up,
sod,
wise
dirt,
wise
higher
than
normal
grade,
and
so
the
foundations
of
the
house
to
prevent
flooding
getting
into
the
basement
were
also
built
higher,
and
that's
why,
on
the
front
step
there,
that
has
been
that
you
probably
have
close
to
three
feet:
okay,
my
wife
is
severely
handicapped
and
for
her
to
go
up
a
ramp.
How
about
snow
begin?
V
You
want
to
have
a
big
covered.
Ramp
it'll
have
to
be
covered
on
all
sides,
so
the
snow
doesn't
blow
in
that's
this
problem
with
the
site.
The
curved
driveway
was
built
that
way
and
the
bedrooms
were
extended
front
and
back,
but
the
original
front
door
faced
bryden
ball,
even
though
it
had
a
1302
address.
The
suggestion
that
we
build
a
grant
up
to
the
old
front
door
is
incorrect,
and
that
was
never
pointed
out
during
the
first
meeting,
because
the
front
door
is
going
to
be
relocated
to
extend
and
face
24th
street.
P
I'm
going
to
interrupt
you
just
real
quick
here,
because
I
think
that
you
maybe
identified
the
two
areas
that
you
were
identifying
it
as
a
hardship.
One
was
potentially
the
curved
driveway
that
was
originally
installed
and
then
the
second
one
was
the
height
that
the
house
was
originally
built
upon
being
higher
than
what
would
typically
be
built
today.
W
My
name
is
chris
tillman
880,
north
river
path,
lane
that
photo
up
there.
That
was
just
up
there
that
just
shows
the
extra
five
feet,
what
it
would
look
like
if
it
were
to
be
added
on,
and
also
a
quick
note
before
I
start
my
speech
is
the
clear
vision
triangle:
we
have
a
corner
lot,
so
I
think
they
took
it
off
of
an
interior
and
flag
lot
is
what
is
on.
The
website
is
what
they
have.
W
They
have
interior
flag,
lock,
clear
vision
triangle,
and
then
they
have
a
corner,
lock,
criteria
for
clear
vision
triangle,
and
I
have
that
slide
too,
that
we
can
look
at
okay.
Honorable,
mayor
and
city
council
pnz's
denial
of
cba
22-8
was
an
heir.
I
am
compelled
to
speak
on
my
parents
behalf.
This
should
not
be
a
hard
issue
to
rule
on
the
convention
of
the
rights
of
persons
with
the
disabilities
treaty,
ada,
fha,
rehab
act,
etc.
W
There
are
also
hardships
and
exceptional
circumstances
that
are
consistent
with
many
past
variance
setback
reduction,
cases
that
have
been
approved
and
we
submitted
quite
a
few
of
them.
One
case
in
particular
cva
14.00052,
on
eastman
street
states,
and
I
quote
there
is
an
exceptional
circumstance
in
that
the
garage
is
currently
non-conforming
with
a
13-foot
setback.
As
such
any
addition
would
require
a
variance.
W
The
applicant
has
limited
mobility
and
relies
on
an
electronic
scooter
and
garage
ramp
to
gain
access
to
her
van.
The
current
design
requires
her
to
exit
the
garage
and
drive
around
the
rear
of
the
vehicle
to
access
the
van
lift
in
inclement
weather.
This
can
be
quite
dangerous.
Approval
of
the
5-foot
variants
will
provide
the
necessary
room
to
modify
the
ramp
design
to
allow
access
without
opening
or
exiting
the
garage.
This
case
is
almost
identical
to
ours
and
was
approved
and
idaho
statute.
W
Title
67-5230
number
five
states
following
the
granting
of
a
waiver
or
variance
the
agency,
shall
consider
a
rule
change
that
will
allow
all
similarly
situated
persons
to
derive
the
same
benefit
granted
to
the
petitioner.
This
is
a
set
precedence
and
going
back
to
the
hardship
too
gillespie
stated
the
hardship
has
to
be
endemic
to
the
parcel
itself,
I.e
a
cliff,
an
unusual
grade,
a
creek.
This
parcel
isn't
flat,
it
is.
W
It
is
uneven,
it
is
higher
and
I
mean
it's
like
a
cliff
to
my
mom,
because
it's
long
story
short
the
question
for
you
all.
Now,
that
is
of
reasonable
accommodation,
is
widening
an
existing
garage
just
five
and
a
half
feet
to
allow
safe
covered
handicap
access
into
and
out
of
the
house,
a
reasonable
accommodation.
The
fact
that
the
city
staff
recommended
excessive
travel
distance
from
the
alley
into
the
rear
of
the
house
for
someone
who
is
mobility
impaired,
is
appalling
and
shows
a
complete
disregard
for
her
impairment.
W
After
exhausting
all
scenarios
on
access
by
architectural
experts,
we're
asking
you
to
please
vote
according
to
law
and
grant
us
a
small
variance
which
is
more
than
reasonable.
Thank
you
for
your
time
and
consideration.
One
more
side,
note
is
the
our
architect
said:
the
ramp
would
have
to
be
probably
about
42
feet
out
front
because
of
each
inch
you
get
regain
in
height,
you
have
to
have
a
foot
of
ramp,
so
that's
what
would
be
with
the
existing
height.
Thank.
N
Thank
you,
madam
mayor.
Thank
you.
I
just
have
a
question,
so
it
sounds
like
you
consulted
with
an
architect.
Did
you
happen
to
consult
with
an
attorney
who
deals
with
fair
housing,
law
or
ada.
W
We
talked
briefly
my
dad's
neighbor
is
an
attorney,
so
he
yeah.
We
talked
to
him
a
little
bit
about
it.
Yeah
uncouples
his
name.
N
G
Another
question:
did
you
consider
closing
the
second
access
to
the
driveway
and
making
it
just
a
regular
driveway
rather
than
a
circular
one?
Wouldn't
that
take
away
any
issue
with
the
vision
triangle.
W
I'm
I
have
a
slide
that
has
the
alternate
ones
that
our
architect
propose
and
maybe
he's
online.
He
can
maybe
give
you
more.
W
A
X
A
Hi
there,
brian,
if
you
could
start
by
answering
the
council,
president's
question
if
you
heard
it
or
she
can
restate
it
and
then
feel
free
to
jump
into
what
you
wanted
to
share
with
us
today.
Okay,.
Y
Well,
we
didn't
look
at
abandoning
the
the
circular
drive
there,
because
we
were
looking
at,
as
is
the
the
house
has
always
been
approached
from
the
the
corner
side
there
through
this
through
this
drive
into
the
garage.
So
actually
they
can't
use
the
garage,
so
it
hasn't
been.
So
we
were
trying
to
maintain
the
existing
drive
and
we
did
not
look
at
it
straight
on
approach.
G
Thank
you.
So,
as
I
understand
it,
you
did
not
look
at
closing
it
because
in
the
scenarios
you
looked
at,
you
wouldn't
have
had
the
backup
room
if
you'd
done
that.
Y
Right
we
wouldn't
be
able
to
in
order
to
get
the
room
to
get
the
the
van
in
and
approach
off
of,
ryden
bought,
90
degrees
off
ryden
bar,
as
indicated
in
the
number
two.
That's
kind
of
these
little
outlines
here
are
showing
the
same
same
size
garage
placed
in
different
locations
as
as
we
did
with
studies,
as
recommended
by
pnz
and
and
our
own.
You
know
kind
of
due
diligence.
Y
We,
these
are
the
different
locations
we
looked
at.
So
in
order
to
get
20
foot
off
the
number
four
is
indicating
20
foot
off
the
property
line.
Number
one
is
they
had
indicated
that
you
know?
Maybe
they
could.
Y
We
could
do
something
there
and
have
a
an
alley
approach
which
we
can't
do
an
alley
approach,
because
there's
an
existing
cmu
wall,
slash
fence
there
and
then
there's
it's
showing
the
creating
it
like
a
pergola
or
breezeway
all
the
way
from
number
one
to
the
back
of
the
house
so
which
isn't
it
would
bisect
the
site
essentially,
and
it
would
be
it
wouldn't
fit
in
with
the
neighborhood.
Y
G
Thank
you.
Yes,
it
did.
Y
Okay,
madam
mayor
and
counts
city
council
members,
thank
you
for
we
appreciate
your
time
for
listening
to
our
appeal.
We
believe
that
there's
multiple
hardships
associated
with
the
property,
both
design
guideline
wise,
as
well
as
personal
hardships
and
the
hardships.
Y
Essentially
one
of
the
criteria,
is
in
regards
to
the
existing
the
removal
of
existing
mature
trees,
which
we
would
have
to
do
if
we
located
the
garage
elsewhere
on
site
and
it
would
lose
its
connectivity.
Y
Y
There
also
exists
personal
hardships
from
the
owner's
requirements
for
accessibility
from
a
safety
perspective
in
the
case
of
a
fire
or
another
emergency.
Mrs
tillman,
who
requires
the
use
of
a
wheelchair,
is
not
able
to
safely
exit
the
home
in
its
current
configuration.
We
looked
at
many
alternatives,
as
well
as
those
recommended
by
planning
and
zoning.
Y
One
of
the
alternatives
we
looked
at
was
remodeling
the
existing
detached
garage
located
at
the
rear
of
the
property
and
providing
access
to
the
home
via
a
pergola
or
breezeway
from
that
location.
This
is
not
a
solution,
as
it
would
require
too
far
the
travel
distance
from
the
garage
to
the
home
at
42
feet.
A
sheltered
walkway
in
that
location
would
both
bisect
the
site
and
not
be
harmonious
to
the
property
improvements
in
the
area.
Y
Another
option
was
positioning
the
expanded
garage
further
to
the
east
and
north,
but
due
to
the
lack
of
space,
available,
circulation
issues
and
aesthetics,
this
solution
was
was
not
viable
either.
Large
mature
trees
would
not
allow
development
in
that
area.
So,
given
the
hardships
presented
by
the
site
itself,
we've
arrived
at
the
best
possible
solution
that
will
have
the
least
impact
and
provide
a
harmonious
addition
to
the
existing
neighborhood,
a
few
more
items
that
we
feel
present,
hardships
that
are
unique
to
this
home
number.
Y
One
pnz
discourages
garage
openings
to
face
the
street
in
this
area,
but
since
construction
in
1937,
this
garage
has
always
faced
the
street.
In
this
instance,
the
garage
location
and
orientation
is
unique
and
we
feel
that
it
contributes
to
the
variety
of
the
neighborhood
to
reorient.
The
garage
would
be
a
detraction
from
the
established
street
rhythm
number
two
for
over
20
years.
This
home
has
been
erroneously
categorized
as
contributing
status.
We've
we've
met
with
idaho
shippo
and
they
agreed
that
this
is
non-contributing.
Y
This
misclassification
has
placed
an
undue
burden
upon
this
family
for
two
decades.
They
have
been
unable
to
make
any
improvements.
Due
to
this
now
corrected
miscalce
misclassification
planning
and
zoning
have
indicated
that
the
hardships
presented
are
not
unique
within
the
district
feel
that
that's
incorrect,
that
this
home
is
a
multi-generational
family
home
since
its
construction
85
years
ago,
with
the
need
for
an
accessible
garage
for
a
disabled
family
member,
so
that
the
original
family
can
remain
would
certainly
define
this
scenario
as
unique
within
any
district.
Y
H
Mayor,
yes,
I
do
have
a
couple
of
questions
for
the
architect.
The
first
is
whether
there
was
a
design
that
could
accommodate
the
needs
of
your
client,
but
that
would
not
have
been
approved
by
the
historic
preservation,
commission
and.
E
Y
Well
right
so
we're
fighting
battles
on
a
couple
different
fronts,
so
you
know
we
have
to
do
something.
That's
that
will
be
accepted
by
the
historic
preservation.
Folks-
and
you
know,
the
powers
would
be
for
the
neighborhood
and
we
wanted
to
do
something
that
was,
you
know
more
harmonious
for
the
neighborhood.
You
know
they
did
it.
Despite
this,
this
home
actually
being
in
the
contributing
or
you
know
it
had
an
erroneous
contributing
status.
Y
They
were
still
allowed
to
remodel
the
entry.
I
think
it
was
back
in
97-
maybe
I
don't
recall
the
date
right
now,
but
that
45
degree
entry,
that's
on
the
front
of
the
house.
Y
If
you
look
at
that,
you
can
definitely
say
that
that
is
not
in
keeping
with
the
any
of
the
other
homes
in
the
neighborhood.
So
I
don't
know
how
that
was
approved
personally,
but
we
are
in
our
remodel,
we're
looking
at
as
john
indicated,
reorienting
the
the
entryway
and
creating
a
you
know
a
patio
space
kind
of
there.
That
looks
is
more
fitting
with
the
neighborhood.
Y
Y
H
You
did
great,
it
was
a
perfect
answer
to
the
wrong
question,
so
my
question
was
what
I
was
trying
to
ask
was.
It
seems
like
in
order
to
meet
the
needs
of
your
client
at
this
home.
Something
has
to
give
and
it's
either
the
variance
or
maybe
something
else,
and
so
what
I
was
asking
and
kind
of
aiming
at
is.
Is
there
a
way
to
get
what
your
client
needs,
while
respecting
the
variants?
If
we
depart
from
the
historic
guidelines
instead.
Y
Y
Yeah,
I
don't.
I
don't
believe
that
with
without
getting
the
variance
we
can
accomplish
what
we
need
to,
because
I
I
think
that
we've
done
many
more
design
charts
than
what
we're
indicating
here
to
to
try
to
avoid
getting
close
to
the
property
line.
This
is
our
best
bet
for
getting
connectivity
and
and
also
still
adhering
to
kind
of
the
historic
guidelines.
Y
So
you
know
encroaching
into
the
the
setback
which
is
far
back.
You
can
see
and
you
can
see
the
extent
of
our
or
improvements
there's
plenty
of
room
still
later,
even
if
they
did
come
in
with
the
sidewalk
later,
which
we
looked
at,
that
they
came
in
with
the
sidewalk
later
you'd
still
be
able
to
have
a
public
sidewalk
along
there
and
the
buffer
zone
between
the
street
and
the
sidewalk.
So.
H
Thank
you
and
madam
mayor
one
follow-up
sure
my
other
question,
sir,
had
to
do
with
ramps
and
encroachment.
I
took
it
from
the
testimony
that
we
heard
so
far,
and
you
can
tell
me
as
the
architect
if
this
is
true,
that
if
this
home
is
to
be
ada
accessible
either
a
ramp
will
have
to
encroach
into
the
setback
because
of
the
grade
of
the
property
and
the
length
of
the
ramp
or
a
garage
will
have
to
encroach
into
the
setback.
Is
that
correct,
like
if
you.
Y
If
you
know
the
ramp,
the
the
total
run
of
the
ramp
would
be.
You
know,
anywhere
from
35
to
40
feet
long
or
longer,
depending
on
the
number
of
landings
we
had
to
do
it
could
stay
within
the
a
ramp
could
stay
within
the
setback,
but
it
would
take
up
a
third
of
the
front
yard
to
do
all
the
returns
on
the
ramp
to
get
up
to
that
height.
So
the
whole
front
yard
would
be
taken
up
with
not
the
whole
point
yard,
but
quite
a
bit
of
the
front
yard.
Y
We've
taken
up
the
ramps
and
you
know
they
don't
want
to
do
that
for
aesthetic
reasons
for
one
another.
It
doesn't
offer
them
the
protection
to
for
entry
from
outside,
and
the
other
thing
is,
it's
studies
have
shown
that
you
know.
Houses
with
with
permanent
ramps
sometimes
can
invite
crime
a
little
bit
because
the
people,
you
know
some
criminals,
understand
that.
There's
someone
that's
in
the
home,
that's
helpless.
Basically,
so
it's
that's
a
kind
of
a
safety
concern
on
their
part.
There.
H
Y
H
A
Z
I
don't
talk
very
loud
anyway,
so
that's
what
I
wanted
to
say.
I
have
been
mass.
I
can't
help
it
I'm
handicapped
to
having
this
and
it's
a
debilitating
deal
to
get
going
to
go
worse
and
worse
and
worse
and
worse,
it's
going
to
get
worse
as
instead
of
better
unless
they
come
up
with
a
cure,
which
I
doubt
anyway,
you
know
I
can't
hel
I'm
handicapped
and.
AA
Z
Z
F
N
N
A
Thank
you,
thank
you,
so
I
have
two
people
that
signed
up
a
daniel
hutchinson
daniel.
So
we
don't
have
you
listed
as
a
party
of
record
okay.
So
then
I
can't
allow
you
to
testify
this
evening,
but
I
see
here
that
you
were
here
in
favor
of
yes,
thank
you
for
being
here.
I'm
sorry,
I
can't
have
you
testify,
and
mr
klinger
also.
I
do
not
have
you
as
a
party
of
record.
A
Yeah,
mr
klinger,
this,
I
believe,
is
the
same
issue
we
had
before,
and
so
you
need
to
be
present
at
the
planning
and
zoning
commission
hearing
to
establish
being
a
participant
in
order
to
be
heard
at
the
appeal.
So
I'm
sorry,
you
can't
testify
this
evening.
A
Yes,
thanks
and
with
that
we,
yes,
sir,
oh
I'm
sorry,
I
didn't
see
your
name
on
here.
I
was
going
to
ask
if
anybody
else
is
here
to
testify.
So
you
are
anybody
else.
George
forbes,
I
did
speak
at
the
planning
sure
come
on
up
and
we'll
just
double
check.
But
if
you
were
present
at
the
at
the
planning
and
zoning
hearing,
yeah
go
ahead.
AB
AB
My
address
is
1301
north
23rd
street.
My
name
is
george
forbes
thanks.
I
support
the
variants,
as
he
stated
his
dad
built
the
house.
His
mom
lived
there
until
her
passing
at
just
about
104
years
of
age.
AB
AB
Anyway,
if
you
move
that
triangle
down
you
still,
you
probably
have
the
vision
you're
talking
about
I'm,
not
an
expert
on
that.
The
original
planning
and
zonings
committee.
Our
report
project
reports
showed
lots
of
pictures.
None
of
them
addressed
or
actually
showed
the
pr
the
vision
triangle,
none
of
them.
I
haven't
seen
anything
until
tonight
that
actually
showed
the
triangle
and
their
picture
of
the.
AB
What
the
new
garage
would
look
like
shows
that
I
don't
think
it's
an
issue,
unprofessional
opinion,
the
other
one
was
the
planning
and
zoning
sites,
some
obscure
section
of
the
boise
comprehensive
plan.
I
don't
know
if
it
even
pertains,
but
I
do
know
if
the
comprehensive
plan
is
not
addressing
the
needs
of
disabled
citizens.
AB
Finally,
the
third
thing
is
the
other
design
options
and
we've
talked
a
lot
about
that.
At
the
planning
and
zoning
committee
meeting,
great
emphasis
was
put
into
the
option
of
building
a
portico
at
the
front
of
the
house.
This
just
astounds
me,
given
the
vision
triangle
concerns
a
portico
would
definitely
create
an
obstruction
versus
the
five
feet
more
requested
for
the
garage,
I'm
not
a
lawyer,
and
these
are
just
my
opinions,
which
you
can
take
with
a
grain
of
salt
and
deciding,
but
I
sincerely
hope
you
can
grant
this
variance.
A
A
So
they're
providing
five
minutes
right
so
before
you,
so
you
have
a
final
five
minutes
is.
Are
there
further
questions?
Yes,
go.
G
Ahead,
I
do
have
one
thanks:
staff
yeah.
F
G
Is
a
question
for
staff?
So
you
know
I
I've
lived
in
this
neighborhood
for
quite
some
many
years
and
I
was
just
trying
to
count
in
my
head
and
I
was
looking
online
on
google
earth
here.
I
can.
I
can
easily
identify
five
or
six
garages
that
clearly
come
to
the
property
line
with
a
straight
in
driveway
into
them,
which
would
clearly
obstruct
vision.
So
I'm
just
curious.
You
know
we.
We
have
our
setback
rules
that
were
written
in
1966
well
after
this
neighborhood
was
built.
G
G
O
O
If
detached
sidewalks
were
ever
to
be
installed
in
this
location,
there
would
only
be
a
separation
of
a
foot
and
a
half
between
you
know
that
pedestrian
improvement
and
the
side
of
the
garage
expansion
and,
additionally,
the
clear
vision
triangle
encroachment
with
that
sidewalk
being
right
against
where
vehicles
are
coming
in
and
out
of
the
garage,
that's
right
in
contact
with
where
people
are
trying
to
walk
in
so.
G
If,
if
a
sidewalk
were
to
go
here,
then
the
vision
triangle
is
would
come
into
play
and
that
does
make
sense
to
me.
I
understand
that
the
ones
that
I'm
thinking
of
the
sidewalk
is
directly
adjacent
to
the
garage
and
it's
a
front.
It's
a
garage,
that's
facing
the
sidewalk,
so
I
guess
the
vision
isn't
as
big
a
deal,
but
certainly
the
the
crossing
of
where
the
the
cars
are
is
right
there.
G
P
Vladimir
one
question
so
I
believe
it
was
is
chris
chris
brought
up
an
example
of
a
variance
that
we
had
done
very
similar
to
this,
and
I
think
chris
kind
of
maybe
the
quote
was.
This
is
a
an
exact
example
that
maybe
set
some
precedent.
Do
you
have
any
thoughts?
Was
that
brought
up
in
the
png
meeting,
or
is
there
anything
that
can
be
discussed
as
far
as
what's
different
from
this
one?
To
that
one.
O
Madam
mayor
council,
member
hallie
burton
that
variance
was
not
discussed
during
the
planning
and
zoning
commission
hearing.
If
it's
the
one
that
I
believe
it
is,
I
have
looked
at
it.
There
are
some
differences
in
terms
of
the
lot
size.
That
lot
is
a
substandard,
regularly
shaped
lot
where
any
addition
onto
the
primary
home
or
the
garage
would
have
had
some
encroachment.
P
Okay
and
then,
madam
mayor,
one
more
question-
and
I
think
this
is
maybe
just
I'm
looking
at
the
the
picture
wrong-
we
keep
talking
about
the
sidewalk,
and
this
is
detached
sidewalk
across
the
street.
This
is
like
one
of
the
on
the
other
block,
just
right
next
to
it
to
the
west,
there's
a
detached
sidewalk
that
continues.
It
looks
like
at
some
point
we
constructed
part
of
another
sidewalk
on
that
corner
with
the
intention
of
eventually
connecting
it
in
the
future.
O
P
I'm
not
sure
that
I
need
to
see
this
slide,
maybe
just
confirmation
if
we
were
to
grant
the
variance
there
still
is
the
ability
to
put
in
a
attached
or
slightly
detached
sidewalk.
It
would
just
have
a
very,
very
it'd,
be
very,
very
close
to
the
ability.
I
think
that
we
that's
what
we've
we've
heard
in
this
picture.
Maybe
was
just
making
my
mind,
do
something
different,
but
that's
correct.
W
Okay,
thank
you
so
for
the
clear
vision
you
can
see,
there's
a
corner
lock.
W
Yeah,
I
didn't
I
just
made
that
you,
the
mic
chris
tillman
880
north
river
path,
lane
you
can
see,
there's
the
corner
lot
and
then,
if
she
scrolls
down
there's
interior
and
flag
lot
they're,
taking
the
clear
vision
from
the
interior
flag
lot.
We
have
a
corner
lot,
so
that
doesn't
pertain
to
our
lot.
So
when
they
quoted
they're,
quoting
from
an
interior
flag
lot,
not
the
corner
lot.
W
W
That's
we're
just
five
feet
is
all
in
and
when
you
round
the
corner,
there's
still
14
feet,
they're
never
gonna
be
a
sidewalk
there.
I
hate
to
say
never,
because
city
can
kind
of
do
what
it
wants,
but
they
would
have
to
remove
all
the
three
huge
historic
trees
on
the
side
and
it
would
take
out
all
the
landscaping
driveway
and
our
detached
two-car
garage
cleared
by
the
alley.
W
They'd
have
to
tear
down
the
whole
original
cement
wall
and
that
would
make
the
two-car
garage
a
clear
vision
issue
but
they're
pulling
the
clear
vision,
all
the
way
to
the
property
line
where
it
should
be
from
the
curb
where
pedestrians
and
stuff
are
coming
and
then
they're
kicking
it
we're
getting
penalized
for
not
having
a
sidewalk
and
it's
pushing
it
all
the
way
into
the
property
line
where
the
existing
garage
already
is.
I
do
have
a
couple
other
slides
of
just
other
homes.
W
If
you
go
to
20th
and
rydenbaugh,
that's
where
the
house
is
right
up
to
the
sidewalk,
I
still
don't
believe
they're
ever
going
to
put
a
sidewalk
in
there
and
then
there's
one
other
one.
I
think
one
that
you
were
talking
about,
not
that
one
sorry
is
the
clear
vision
issues,
the
third
one
down
where
the
fence
is.
I
mean,
I
think
that's,
maybe
the
one
you
were
referring
to.
I
think
they're,
taking
wrong
information
for
the
clear
vision,
also
the
precedence.
W
I
have
the
approval
for
the
eastman
street,
one
where
the
precedence
has
been
set
and
also
the
hardship
of
having
an
elevated
lot.
It's
not
I
mean
yeah,
it's
a
rectangular
lot,
but
it's
not
a
normal
block
because
it's
the
elevation
so
yeah.
That's
about
all!
I
have
to
say
I
I
think
the
diagram
on
the
clear
vision
is
wrong
because
it's
yeah,
if
that
makes
sense,
they're
taking
it
from
an
interior
flag
lot
when
we
have
the
corner
lot.
V
If
we
go
back
to
the
original
house
plant,
is
there
one?
I
don't
know
if
brian's
there
is
there
one
will.
V
The
front
door
entrance
is
going
to
be
designed
to
fit
in
with
the
historic
district,
and
so
is
the
garage.
The
garage
is
just
barely
extended
and
when
you
pull
out
back
out
of
the
the
garage
you're
in
the
driveway,
you
make
a
40
a
90
degree
turn
and
you're
facing
riding
ball
and
the
full
front
of
that
vehicle
has
13
feet
of
clear
vision.
V
So
in
85
years
my
parents-
and
I
and
george
forbes
will
agree,
he's
lived
there
32
years,
there's
never
been
an
accident,
so
we
want
the
roof
lines
to
fit
in
and
look
nice
it's
a
very
nice.
Neighborhood
couple
did
destroyed
a
home
a
few
years
ago
there
that
was
needed
to
be
gone
and
he
built
a
mcmansion,
it's
beautiful,
but
we
need
a
functional
home.
Thank
you.
P
We're
going
to
close
so
one
of
the
things
that
was
brought
up
as
far
as
a
potential
hardship
was
the
way
that
the
house
was
originally
built
on
an
elevated
in
an
elevated
format
and
construction.
P
Is
that
something
that
we
would
maybe
consider
as
a
hardship?
I
mean
it
was
built
that
way,
but
somebody
else
is
now
using
the
house
and
like
the
in
order
to
actually
accommodate
the
needs
to
make
it
ada
compliant.
Certainly,
that
seems
like
it
would
be
more
complex
than
if
it
was
built
originally
differently.
So
is
that
could
that
be
construed
as
a
hardship.
O
A
P
O
Madam
mayor
council,
member
holly
burton
not.
B
H
H
H
Given
the
unique
circumstances
of
the
way
it
is
graded,
under
our
variance,
rules
are
faced
with
a
choice,
give
up
a
third
of
your
property
to
a
ramp
or
encroach
a
little
bit
in
the
public
space
and
continue
using
your
home
on
the
other
side
of
the
hardship
burden
I
mean,
I
know
this
street
really
well,
I
live
really
close.
I
walk
my
dogs
by
I'm
sorry,
they're
male
dogs.
You
have
a
lovely
yard,
but
the
way
that
you
want
to
use
your
property
here
on
this.
H
This
line
without
a
sidewalk
is
not
going
to
bother
anybody.
It's
not
a
hardship
to
the
public.
It's
not!
You
know.
I
understand
the
vision
triangle
issue,
but
I
don't
see
it
as
a
safety
issue
for
the
public,
so
we
have
no
burden
to
the
public,
the
true
hardship
to
the
acqui
to
the
applicant
and
the
appellant
that
is
tied
to
the
nature
of
the
land
there.
It's
not
their
fault.
The
land
is
shaped.
That
way.
G
Vladimir,
I
agree
with
that
assessment
would
have
one
question,
as
the
encroachment
was
originally
proposed,
the
eaves
of
the
garage
were
going
to
actually
encroach
on
the
public
right-of-way.
I
believe
there
was
agreement
that
the
eaves
of
the
garage
would
not
encroach
across
the
property
line.
I
think
it
would
be
appropriate
to
put
that
in
the
motion.
Perhaps.
U
I'd
like
to
lend
my
enthusiastic
support
to
the
motion.
Thank
you
for
coming.
I
respect
the
pnc
commission.
They
do
hard
work,
but
I
think
they
got
it
wrong
and
I
think
we
need
to
support
your
private
property
rights
to
do
what
you
need
to
do
for
your
family
and
clearly
you
need
this
for
your
family
and
I
want
to
do
everything
I
can
to
get
you
what
you
need.
N
Madam
mayor,
thank
you.
I'm
not
quite
sure
how
we
approach
situations
like
this
before
they
get
to
this
public
setting.
You
know
when
when
it
comes
to
folks
living
with
disabilities,
I
think,
if
there's
anything
we
can
do
to
preserve
somebody's
dignity.
We
should
do
that.
N
So
I
don't
know
at
what
point
our
legal
counsel
here
at
the
city
is
consulted
in
moments
like
this,
but
you
know,
I
think,
if
we
don't
have
lawyers
on
staff
who
are
able
to
give
a
good
consultation
when
it
comes
to
a
situation
like
this,
where
we
have
ada
fha
intersecting,
with
the
other
laws
that
we
implement
here
at
the
city,
that
that's
something
we
should
make
note
of
moving
forward
and
if
it's
something
that
maybe
we
need
to
consult
with
outside
council
to
make
sure
that
we
get
it
right
simply
because
I
just,
I
think
it's
a
shame
that
miss
tillman
had
to
had
to
be
here
and
and
talk
about
something
that
should
be
private
in
advocating
for
herself,
and
so
I
wholeheartedly
support
the
motion.
G
Vladimir,
just
one
added
comment:
I
think
this
highlights
some
of
the
issues
that
we've
talked
about
in
the
zoning
code
in
ensuring
that,
as
we
rewrite
the
code,
we're
able
to
accommodate
these
unusual
circumstances
in
some
of
our
really
old
neighborhoods,
especially
where
there
are
historic
districts
to
accommodate
the
use
and
continued
use
of
those
properties.
A
A
I
appreciate
that
you
I'm
called
out
our
vision
of
ensuring
we
have
a
city
for
everyone,
and
this
city
has
taken
steps
in
the
last
two
years
to
address
ada
needs
in
our
community,
so
that
not
only
can
residents
access
the
work
that
we
do
here
at
city
hall,
but
they
can
access
events
and
opportunities
throughout
our
city
more
effectively
and
more
often
and
the
the
motion
on
the
table
is
the
right
one.
I'm
sorry
that
it
got
to
this,
and
yes,
we
have.
A
This
was
flagged
by
our
department
head
of
pds
as
something
that
we
one
were
aware
of
what's
coming
tonight,
but
two.
I
need
to
make
sure
that,
as
we
have
a
mishmash
of
regulations
and
in
particular
this
area,
we've
got
historic
and
zoning
and
variances,
and
all
these
things
that
that's
not
getting
in
the
way
of
us
thinking,
as
tim
has
said
about
how
our
policies
are
supposed
to
serve
people.
A
Thank
you,
and
I
just
want
to
say
also
I
should
have
zone
I
was
making
remarks.
I
think
it's
incredible
that
your
dad
built
this
house
and
that
you
are
still
there
and
that
you've
got
neighbors,
that
all
of
whom
were
with
you
in
this
but
share
the
history
and
the
value
of
of
the
little
bit
of
the
neighbor,
the
hood
that
you
have
so
thanks
for
sharing
that
story
with
us
tonight.
A
Well,
welcome
back
everybody
and
we
are
going
to
move
into
the
final
item
for
this
evening.
Cr
21-37
and
this
is
a
rezone
application
and,
as
has
been
noted
in
the
original
application,
this
included
both
a1
and
a2
parcels
on
in
two
different
areas.
Staff
will
present
tonight,
as
was
noticed,
and
that
this
is
looking
at
the
the
a
one
parcels
off
of
you're
gonna
have
to
tell
give
me
the
street
across
from
costco
pretty
much
correct.
AC
It's
just
the
a1
parcels
located
at
5121,
west
galwan
road.
It's
two
parcels,
totaling
75.5,
acres,.
A
AC
A
Pieces
were
dropped
from
the
request.
Great
thank
you
and
with
that
so
we've
got
so
is
the
airport
presenting
as
well
or
crystal?
Is
this
evening
the
airport
is
the
applicant
okay,
so
we'll
have
crystal
presenting
for
the
city
the
airport,
presenting
as
an
applicant.
A
I
have
listed
here
earl
henricks,
but
you're
here
for
the
neighborhood
association
right.
Okay,
great!
So
then
we'll
have
the
neighborhood
association.
I've
got
a
couple
folks
signed
up
here.
If
you
haven't
signed
up,
you
want
to
testify.
Just
let
me
know
as
well
as
folks
online
and
so
we'll
go
ahead
and
get
started.
AC
Great.
Thank
you,
madam
mayor
members
of
the
council.
The
next
item
is
a
rezone
of
two
parcels:
totaling
75.55
acres
from
a1,
open
lands
to
m1da
light
industrial
with
design
review
and
development
agreement.
The
subject
area
is
located
at
a
southwestern
edge
of
the
boise
city
limits
at
the
intersection
of
gown
road
and
orchard
street
to
the
north
area
is
comprised
of
a
varied
mix
of
uses
and
zones,
mostly
characterized
by
assorted,
commercial
and
industrial
operations
to
the
south,
west
and
east
lots
are
vacant
or
undeveloped.
AC
The
airport
is
less
than
a
half
mile
away
to
the
northeast.
The
applicant
requests
m1d
zoning
to
allow
for
aviation
compatible
industrial
development.
As
outlined
in
your
report.
The
planning
and
zoning
commission
finds
the
proposed
m1d
zone
to
be
most
appropriate
for
the
property
based
on
the
allowed
zones
of
the
industrial
land
use
adjacent
uses
and
the
airport
influence
area
c,
of
which
the
site
is
within
again
as
detailed
in
your
packets
car
2137
has
gone
through
quite
a
bit
of
a
journey
before
coming
for
you
this
evening.
AC
The
original
request
heard
by
pnz
on
january
10
2022
also
included
an
additional
77.5
acres,
comprised
of
the
four
a2
zones
parcels
82
zone
parcels
to
the
west
and
did
not
include
a
development
agreement.
A
da
was
proposed
to
order
in
order
to
mitigate
any
impacts
from
rezoning
the
a2
parcels
adjacent
to
existing
residential.
AC
However,
the
applicant
has
withdrawn
the
at
parcels
from
the
request
to
enable
the
airport
to
more
fully
assess
the
viability
of
those
parcels
for
future
development.
As
the
proposed
da
primarily
addressed
the
a2
zone
parcels,
the
planning
and
zoning
commission
recommended
removing
the
da
from
the
current
request.
AC
Throughout
the
process,
the
planning
team
has
received
received
a
great
deal
of
public
comment,
including
a
late
submittal
email
directly
to
you
all
earlier
this
afternoon.
However,
the
vast
majority
of
the
comments
are
focused
only
on
opposition
to
the
rezone
of
the
four
parcels,
zoned
a2
that
are
no
longer
part
of
this
request
closest
to
the
existing
unincorporated
neighborhood
located
one
half
mile
from
the
current
subject
area
and
specifically
state
no
issue
with
the
rezone
of
the
a1
parcels.
AC
As
such,
the
planning
and
zoning
commission
maintains
that
the
proposed
m1d
zone
is
most
appropriate
for
the
properties.
For
all
the
reasons
outlined
in
your
packets,
owned
by
the
airport
and
adjacent
to
current
airport
infrastructure,
the
site
has
been
planned
to
cite
aviation
supported
industrial
since
the
time
of
purchase
further,
if
approved,
any
future
development
will
be
required
to
go
through
added
review
through
the
design
review
process,
which
includes
a
traffic
impact
study
to
ensure
compatibility
and
may
include
additional
hearings.
AC
P
AC
It's
got
the
tiniest
bit
there.
Oh,
not
a
mayor
council
council
member
halliburton,
tiniest
bit
on
the
corner
of
the
northwest.
B
G
Thank
you.
So
the
removal
of
the
development
agreement
is
because
it
includes
the
a2
parcels.
AA
You
don't,
I
got
it
all
right
good
evening,
madam
mayor
members
of
the
city
council,
rebecca
hupp,
I'm
the
airport
director
and
I'm
going
to
share
with
you
some
of
the
airport's
objectives
with
this
particular
project
crystal
is
going
to
go
ahead
and
run
the
presentation
for
me,
since
I
don't
have
a
clicker
if
you
would
scroll
through
to
our
first
slide.
AA
AA
As
our
city
planner
alluded
to,
this
rezone
request
strictly
is
focused
on
a1
and
we
removed
the
a2
from
the
package
because
we
want
to
fully
more
fully
assess
how
we
might
use
a2
in
the
future.
So
we're
not
doing
anything
with
that
at
this
point
in
time.
The
rezone
is
strictly
for
a1
and
this
was
recommended
by
planning
and
zoning
for
approval,
and
so
we
would
ask
that
city
council
uphold
the
recommendation
from
planning
and
zoning.
A
And
rebecca
just
for
the
record
I
misspoke
earlier
the
parcels
I
was
referring
to.
We
actually
addressed
just
before
council
recess,
and
I
was
thinking
we
were
addressing
them
all
this
evening,
but
the
the
two
off
of.
AA
AA
So
this
is
around
orchard
and
the
other
ones
were
off
of
victory
and
coal.
AA
So,
just
for
your
information,
this
is
outside
of
any
future
runway
protection
zone.
We
did
not
use
federal
grants
to
purchase
this
property
and
it
previously
has
been
used
for
farming,
so
it
is
currently
vacant.
AA
I
did
want
to
mention
amazon
because
I
know
in
the
initial
public
hearing
there
were
some
questions
about
how
this
project
relates
to
amazon,
and
I
think
maybe
there
was
some
some
confusion
about
this
being
an
amazon
project
and
it
is
not
an
amazon
project.
The
airport
does
have
an
amazon
project.
You
can
see
it's
the
little
blue
square,
that's
over
on
the
right-hand
side
of
the
photo
there.
This
yellow
parcel
is
the
parcel
that's
in
question
so
they're
completely
unrelated.
AA
AA
This
is
a
conceptual
site
plan
for
how
we
might
develop
this
property
in
the
future.
If
the
rezone
is
approved,
it
would
be
included
in
our
master
developer
agreement
and
it
would
be
developed
for
light
industrial,
and
I
think
this
of
all
the
slides
to
me
is
the
most
telling,
because
I
think,
there's
been
a
lot
of
conversation
about
how
this
particular
parcel
these
particular
parcels
fit
into
the
overall
city's
comprehensive
plan
and
in
accordance
with
blueprint
boise.
AA
This
is
shown
as
future
industrial
and
you
can
see
based
on
the
zoning
around
it
all
of
the
property
around.
It
is
zoned
as
industrial.
This
is
one
of
the
few
parcels,
that's
not
zoned
as
industrial,
so
you
can
see
that
it's
zoned
completely
around
this
parcel
for
future
industrial
use,
and
you
can
see
the
future
lake
hazel
road
too.
That
would
connect
the
west
side
of
boise
to
the
east
side
of
boise
and
vice
versa.
AA
So,
in
summary,
we
would
ask
council
to
uphold
the
recommendation
from
planning
and
zoning
and
just
state
again
that
it
is
in
compliance
and
is
compatible
with
what
the
council
has
adopted
as
its
blueprint
voicey.
It
is
compatible
with
the
surrounding
areas
and
any
future
development
would
be
in
accordance
with
design
review,
and
the
designation
would
go
under
would
undergo
agency
review
as
well
with
that,
I
would
be
happy
to
answer
questions.
U
Questions,
madam
mayor,
thank
you
director
hub,
you
know
light
industrial
is
a
pretty
big
category.
Can
you
give
us
some
sense
of
like
what
would
that
look
like
what
could
go
there.
AA
Warehousing
light
manufacturing
storage,
those
kind
of
things.
Okay,
thank
you.
G
Madame
yeah,
thank
you
rebecca
the
land,
that's
zone
a1
today,
that's
under
consideration
also
has
much
better
access
to
infrastructure
than
the
other
land
that
was
originally
included
in
the
rezone.
We
can
all
see
the
road
running
through
the
middle
of
it,
but
it's
my
understanding.
There's
other
infrastructure
as
well.
Is
that
correct.
AA
That
is
correct.
I
don't
know,
I
don't
recall
the
specifics
of
the
other
infrastructure,
but
you
can
see
it
is
heavily
developed
around
there,
and
I
would
note
that
the
parcel
just
to
the
north
is
one
of
the
parcels
that
the
city
has
identified
for
its
combined
facilities
for
maintenance
facilities
as
well.
So.
G
And
then
you
showed
us
a
conceptual
plan
that
the
developer
has
perhaps
brought
forward.
It
does
include
a
quite
a
large
warehouse
on
the
parcel
to
the
west.
G
How
far
is
the
corner
of
that
facility
from
the
easement
of
the
new
york
canal?
G
This
is
I'm,
but
I'm
I'm
assuming.
My
question
is
actually
this:
if
this
comes
forward
in
this
configuration
that
will
have
to
go
to
design
review
and
ensure
that
it
meets
all
setbacks
and
correct
that
the
access
to
it
does
not
impose
a
new
impact
on
the
surrounding
property.
P
B
P
Med
mayor
I've
been
trying
to
figure
out
that
the
best
way
to
ask
this
question.
So
the
city
of
boise
has
some
very
clear,
clean
energy
goals
that
we
have
as
a
city.
The
airport
is
applying
as
an
enterprise
entity,
but
also
part
of
the
city,
but
the
airport
does
participate
in
those
same
goals
as
well.
Is
that
correct.
AA
We
do
participate
in
the
energy
goals
that
the
city
has
overall.
I
think
that
this
is
actually
consistent
with
the
city's
energy
goals,
because
it
allows
us
to
develop
property
closer
into
our
city
as
opposed
to
pushing
development
to
the
outer
reaches
and
even
into
what
suburbs,
or
even
existing
farmland,
which
would
create
more
admissions,
more
trips
and
all
those
other
things.
So
I
think
that
this
project
is
very
compatible
with
the
city
of
boise's
sustainability
initiatives.
Thank
you.
I
should
have
mentioned
that.
P
Amen,
maybe
just
a
follow-up
question
there.
I
know
that
the
airport
itself
is
doing
a
lot
of
work.
You
know
on
making
sure
that
it's
doing
his
part
meeting
those
goals
we
would
be.
P
AA
N
Thank
you
madame
rebecca,
so
I'm
wondering
I
know
this
is
not
downtown
boise,
where
we
tend
to
focus
a
lot
of
our
public
art,
which
I
think
is
phenomenal,
and
I
don't
know
if
it's
appropriate
to
mention
this
at
this
time.
I
never
do
so.
I
just
do
it,
but
I
think
about
some
of
the
the
comments
that
we've
had
over
the
years
about
certain
buildings,
not
looking
aesthetically
nice.
AA
I
I
guess
I'm
not
as
familiar
with
what
those
requirements
are.
I
do
know
that
it
does
have
to
come
back
for
design
review,
so
there
will
be
an
opportunity
to
require
things
in
terms
of
the
construction
and
landscaping
and
some
of
those
other
points
specifically
for
art.
Our
focus
on
art
has
primarily
been
closer
to
the
terminal
and
where
it
has
more
substantial
impact.
AA
N
N
In
fact,
I
remember
the
first
time
I
ran
into
a
piece
of
art
on
a
trail,
so
I
think
it's
something
maybe
to
take
into
consideration.
If
we've
got
folks
who
are
inhabiting
and
and
recreating
in
that
part
of
boise,
maybe
it's
not
something
that
we
would
do,
but
maybe
that's
where
they
are
and
what
would
it
be
like
to
see
art
out
there?
Just
a
thought,
excellent.
U
A
U
Ahead,
chris,
you
know
what
I
mean
with
the
zoning
code
rewrite.
AC
Madam
mayor
council
member,
well,
it's
I
can't.
If
that's
still
in
the
works,
we
haven't
firmed
anything
up.
I
believe
that
this
would
be
open
space
municipal
that
might
be
just
the
a2
to
the
to
the
west,
but
we're
still
working
through
that
and
it
hasn't
been
firmed
up.
AC
U
A
B
AD
AD
AD
AD
Now
I
want
you
to
look
at
the
boise
city
code,
boise
city
ordinance,
11-4-2,
classifies
zoning
district
a-2
as
open
land
reserve.
It
further
defines
a-2-s
to
provide
for
permanent,
open
space
and
to
properly
guide
growth
of
the
french
areas
of
the
city.
The
a2
district
classification
should
be
applied
to
property
that
is
not
intended
for
development
or
for
property
that
the
city
desires
to
be
subject
to
stronger
development
limitations
than
would
be
provided
by
the
a1
district.
AD
G
AD
AD
And
this
is
how
the
current
structure
of
the
land
looks.
The
current
a2
parcels
are
to
the
west
and
the
a1
parcels
are
to
the
east,
where
the
orchard
street
and
lake
hazel
interchange
goes
through
and
connects
those
a1
parcels.
That's
really
where
there
is
connectivity
to
the
city,
that's
where
there's
already
road
access
and
really
there
is
no
road
access
or
infrastructure
to
the
a2
parcels
to
the
west.
Really
all
all
you're,
seeing
there
are
dirt
trails.
AD
I
want
you
to
take
a
look
at
the
overall
adler
industrial
development
project
and
there
are
currently
original
was
31
industrial
buildings
near
the
project
site,
and
now
there
are
still
28
that
are
planned.
What
you're,
looking
at
in
the
top
portion
of
this
graphic
and
the
map,
shows
the
industrial
and
warehouse
buildings
along
victory.
Road,
so
you'll
see
that
line
through
the
map.
That's
that's.
On
the
right
hand,
side
that's
victory
road
that
goes
across
there.
AD
It's
in
between
coal,
road
just
to
the
south
of
costco
and
orchard
street
on
the
east,
and
then
the
map
that
is
shown
on
the
bottom
shows
where
they've
removed
three
of
the
warehouse
buildings
from
the
a2
development,
but
they
still
have
three
warehouse
buildings
on
the
a1
parcels.
Again
I
wanted
to
point
out
there's
28
industrial
warehouse
buildings
and
that
this
is
a
substantial
and
large
development
for
southwest
boise.
AD
We
have
hundreds,
if
not,
you
know
more
than
many
hundreds
of
people
in
southwest
boise
that
have
dry
wells,
and
this
is
a
really
difficult
time
for
some
of
these
families.
They
have
been.
Some
people
have
been
without
water
since
april
and
they're
using
the
hoses
of
their
neighbors
to
fill
up
buckets,
so
they
can
flush
their
toilets.
AD
So
it's
really
a
critical
issue,
and
it
it's
something
that
I
don't
think
is
like
seen
very
often
in
the
city,
but
this
is
happening
all
throughout
southwest
boise
and
ada
county
and
it's
because
of
the
development
that's
going
on
through
the
area,
whereas
these
wells
are
drying
up
because
they
are
paving
over,
the
developers
are
paving
over
a
lot
of
the
farmland
in
southwest
boise.
That
would
allow
the
the
rain
water
to
infiltrate
into
the
ground
and
replenish
that
aquifer.
AD
This
graphic
is
showing
the
comprehensive
plan,
and
I
just
wanted
to
show
you
that
the
comprehensive
plan
seems
to
have
indicated
that
the
parcels
to
the
south
of
the
airport
were
going
to
be
in
the
industrial
region
in
the
original
1997
plan
and
that
the
parcel
next
to
the
indian
lakes
golf
course
was
actually
not
included
in
the
hash
marks.
AD
Now
I
want
to
talk
about
slick,
spot
pepper
grass,
which
is
listed
on
the
endangered
species
list,
and
there
is
a
parcel
called
2c
you'll,
see
it
kind
of
in
the
middle
of
ada
county,
and
what
this
describes
in
the
federal
register
is
airport
lands
approximately
3.7
miles
southwest
of
boise.
AD
It
says
it
includes
other
lands
as
well:
blm,
private
lands
and
municipal
lands
associated
with
the
boise
airport.
We
believe
this
is
the
area
that
is
truly
one
of
the
areas
that
this
endangered
species
possibly
lives,
and
I
want
to
show
you
that
this
is
the
sagebrush
step
ecosystem,
that
is,
the
prime
location
for
this
endangered
species
to
to
propagate.
AD
AD
And,
in
summary,
the
south
cold
neighborhood
association
would
like
to
see
a
development
agreement.
I
know
that
the
the
city
is
proposing
that
the
development
agreement
be
pulled,
but
as
far
as
we're
concerned,
we
would
like
to
see
that
development
agreement
be
still
included
for
the
a1
parcels
that
are
being
considered
for
rezoning
tonight.
AD
U
I
have
a
couple
questions.
Madam
mayor.
I
have
a
couple
questions.
Thanks
for
your
presentation,
I'm
trying
to
parse
out
exactly
what
you
like
and
what
you
don't
like.
So
it's
very
clear
that
you're
happy
that
the
that
the
permanent
open
space
has
been
taken
off
the
table.
Yes,
so
that's
that's
a
win!
Yes,
okay,
but
it's
the
other
partial
which
is
the
a1
that
you're
concerned
about,
and
is
your
concern
about
that
in
development
in
general?
AD
So
I,
as
I
understood
and
I
may
be
incorrect,
but
I
thought
the
development
agreement
goes
along
with
the
design
review,
maybe
such
that
you
would
kind
of
have
the
have
knowledge
of
what
is
going
on
those
parcels
prior
to
rezoning
them,
so
that
you
would
have
something
in
place
that
you
could
see.
This
is
actually
what's
going
to
be
there.
Is
it
manufacturing?
AD
Is
it
a
warehouse?
So
I
think
that
was
one
of
the
concerns
is
that
you,
you
would
rezone
without
having
a
plan
in
front
of
you
just
blanket
rezoned
to
industrial.
AD
The
other
concern
is
certainly
that,
with
such
a
large
span
of
development
of
industrial
throughout
southwest
boise
and
28
possible
warehouse
buildings
that
really
this
is
a
huge
amount
of
growth
over
the
next
five
to
ten
years.
That
is
going
to
affect.
Not
only
you
know,
traffic
in
the
area,
but
also
paving
over
possibly
all
of
this
land
that
that
would
be
open
to
irrigation
or
rainfall
that
could
replenish
the
aquifer
got.
U
It,
madam
mayor,
I'm
wondering
if
planning
has
any
insight
in
terms
of
the
development
agreement
piece
that
was
mentioned
in
the
testimony.
AC
Not
a
mayor
councilmember
will
it's.
The
proposed
d.a
is
still
attached
to
the
request.
It's
not
been
updated
since
the
a2
parcels
were
removed,
as
the
recommendation
was
to
remove
the
da
from
the
request,
but
council
does
have
to
have
the
discretion
to
maintain,
alter
or
remove
the
proposed
da
from
rezone.
H
G
Adam
one
further
point
of
clarification:
if
I'm
not
mistaken,
much
of
this
would
be
governed
by
not
a
development
agreement
on
the
rezone,
but
by
the
master
agreement
that
the
airport
holds
with
the
developer
and
that
the
clauses
that
were
in
the
development
agreement,
specifically
the
ones
prohibiting
certain
uses,
are
in
that
master
development
agreement.
Am
I
correct.
AC
G
Okay,
thank
you.
That's
that's
a
good
clarification.
One
question
I
I
for
the
neighborhood
association.
I
I
understand
that
you're
concerned
about
water,
as
you
should
be.
However,
my
understanding
of
what's
happened
with
water
out.
There
is
not
natural
rainfall
and
the
lack
of
percolation
of
it,
but
in
fact,
the
piping
of
many
of
the
canals
and
the
lack
of
water
seeping
out
of
the
previously
unpiped
canals
that
had
unnaturally
frankly
raised
the
water
table
so
that
you
could
put
wells
into
the
shallow
aquifer
rather
than
the
deep
one.
G
So
explain
to
me
how
you
think
the
loss
of
you
know
we
don't
we
don't
want
to
pave
over
all
the
land,
I'm
not
suggesting
that,
but
how
the
loss
of
natural
percolation
from
the
development
of
these
lands
would
have
the
kind
of
impact
on
the
water
table
that
I'm
aware
of
is
due
to
the
piping
of
the
irrigation
canals.
I.
AD
Think
the
piping
of
the
irrigation
canals
does
play
a
part
in
it.
I
think
it
is
some
percentage
that
go
goes
along
with
the
lands
that
are
also
being
pulled
from
properly
irrigating
them
such
that
they,
the
farmlands,
are
being
built
upon
and
aren't
being
watered
on
a
regular
basis
affecting
the
water
table.
AD
So
I
do
know
that
both
of
those
things
play
play
a
role
in
it.
I
don't
know
the
percentage
of
which-
and
I
do
know
that
the
the
new
york
canal
certainly
hasn't
been
been
lined,
so
that
is,
that
is
also
something
that
that
plays
into
the
water
table.
So
all
of
those
locations
where
water
has
the
ability
to
infiltrate
into
the
ground,
it
is,
you
know,
is
going
to
be
helpful
in
replenishing
that
aquifer,
and
so,
if
we're
paving
over
them,
really
that
you
know
is
relying
on
just
runoff.
G
But
isn't
it
true
that
the
land
that
is
in
the
master
development
agreement
for
development
is
not
land
that
has
ever
been
irrigated?
It's
all
desert
land
that
wasn't
under
irrigation,
so
there
isn't
much
natural
filtration.
There.
A
X
X
C
AE
Is
amy
russell?
I
live
at
5310,
south
umatilla,
madam
mayor
and
city
council
members.
So
first
I
want
to
say
thank
you
to
the
airport
and
to
those
that
have
heard
us
at
pnc
for
hearing
our
concerns
and
taking
more
time
to
evaluate
the
best
use
of
the
currently
zoned
a2
parcels
adjacent
to
indian
lake
subdivision
and
the
western
writing
club.
But
I'm
concerned
that
we're
just
delaying
this
to
deal
with
another
day.
AE
So
I'm
asking
in
the
meantime
that
we
consider
ways
to
work
with
the
airport
to
make
this
find
a
permanent
solution
that
we
can
all
live
with,
so
that
we're
not
just
coming
back
to
this
and
talking
again
in
a
little
bit
of
what
we'll
do.
I
think,
with
the
planned
pathways
that
are
going
through
this
property,
that
it
would
make
an
incredible
natural
park
and
hiking
area,
and
particularly
if
we
were
to
combine
it
with
the
state
land
to
the
south.
AE
I
would
ask
that
the
city
maybe
reconsider,
with
whether
the
comp
plan
for
this
area
still
makes
sense.
I
did
not
live
in
my
home
and
the
comp
plan
determined
that
all
of
this
area
in
that
part
of
boise
should
be
industrial
and
that
that
was
the
best
use
for
the
area.
So
I
don't
know
what
kind
of
input
happened
from
the
neighbors
at
that
time,
but
I
know
that
we
didn't
have
a
neighborhood
association
when
that
occurred.
AE
And
then
we
know,
in
addition,
that
the
boise
city
owns
property,
that's
across
the
street,
from
locale,
that's
in
the
same
area
and
just
questioning
whether
it
really
makes
sense
to
have
this
all
industrial
and
warehouses
in
this
location.
Knowing
that
we
have
a
lot
of
residential,
we
may
have
a
school.
So
just
please
consider
what
would
create
a
true
and
reasonable
separation
of
industrial
and
residential,
so
that
we
all
can
that
find
a
plan,
that's
beneficial
to
everybody
in
this
area.
So
thank
you.
Thanks.
A
Amy
and
I'll
just
slide
to
amy
a
couple
weeks
ago.
It
was
probably
longer
than
that,
because
council
has
been
recess
for
a
while.
The
planning
director
came
and
started
a
conversation
with
pdf
staff
and
council
about
what
the
future
development
in
southwest
I
mean
it's
ada
county
looks
like,
and
so
I'd
encourage
you
to
stay
involved
in
that,
because
he
had
some
suggestions
that
you
know.
We
we,
like
think
strategically
about
locales
there
there's
some
land
kind
of
in
between
homes
and
locale
that
exists,
but
there's
some
other
area.
A
This
is
airport
impact
land,
so
it
won't
be
residential,
but
there
could
well
be
some
other
area
that
the
council
would
have
a
discussion
about
whether
or
not
it's
appropriately
annexed
for
residential
or
if
we
have
to
recognize
from
a
kind
of
capacity
perspective.
It
doesn't
make
sense.
So
I
just
encourage
you
to
stay
involved
in
that.
Thank
you
appreciate
that,
madam.
U
AE
So
I
think
for
me
you
know
I'm
conflicted
on
this
with
having
this
is
what
we
asked
for
this
is
the
compromise
that
we
asked
for
to
remove
the
a2
I'd
like
to
know
that
that's
going
to
actually
stay
and
that
we're
not
going
to
be
coming
back
to
this
doing
this
down
the
future.
AE
I'm
not
opposed
I'm
conflicted
about
the
part,
because,
yes,
it's
down
the
hill,
it's
away
from
us,
but
we
don't
know
what's
going
to
be
in
there,
so
I
would
feel
better
if
I
knew
what
kind
of
industrial
we're
putting
in
there.
You
know,
I
think,
there's
some
reports
coming
out
of
california,
that
they're
finding
even
they're
looking
at
a
thousand
feet
away
from
homes,
because
they're,
finding
asthma
and
other
things
and
health
negative
health
impacts
that
are
coming
from
having
you
know,
industrial
so
close
to
home.
AE
G
Madam
mayor,
so
I
hope
I'm
not
out
of
line
asking
this
question,
but
it
is
one
that
interests
me
in
this
area.
I've
been
on
council
long
enough
to
know
that
many
of
your
neighbors
have
opposed
annexation
in
the
past
and
so
question
we
have,
as
a
city,
preserved
a
lot
of
open
space.
AE
I
think
we've
talked
I'm
not
sure
if
we've
necessarily
thought
about
like
a
taxing
way,
but
I
think
that
was
one
of
the
questions
we
had
with
the
airport
initially
was:
can
we
fundraise
to
buy
the
land
from
you
when
we
were
told?
No,
so
I
think
we
would
be
opening.
I
think
we're
open
to
having
discussions
about
whatever
would
make
sense,
I'm
personally
not
opposed
to
annexation.
I
don't
know
that
it
makes
any
sense,
but
I
think
from
some
of
what
happened
long
ago.
It's
it's
different.
AE
AF
A
AF
Like
john
okay,
thanks
so
jill
mon,
I
love
that
58-59
cobbler
lane
boise
and
I'm
here
to
represent
the
western
riding
club,
which
is
the
property
that
was
north
of
the
a2
and
so
to
madam
mayor
and
boise
city
council.
The
western
writing
club
thanks
you
for
following
the
planning
and
zoning
recommendation
to
leave
the
parcels.
AF
AF
AF
Lastly,
we
thank
the
city
of
boys
city
of
boise
airport,
for
allowing
the
use
of
this
open
space
to
ride
out
to
blm
land
and
also
to
department
of
idaho
state
lands.
We
hope
this
can
continue
in
the
future
and
if
any
assistance
is
needed
for
planning
and
protecting
this
open
space
for
recreation,
western
writing
club
would
be
an
advocate
and
an
active
participant.
F
AG
You
aren't
okay.
Today
I
live
at
49.80,
south
umatilla
avenue.
I
didn't
realize
that
I
had
signed
up
to
testify
when
I
signed
that,
but
I'm
here
and
I
just
I
think
I
don't
have
anything
different
to
say
I
pretty
much
agree
100
with
what
amy
had
said.
You
know
I,
when
we
moved
to
our
house
four
years
ago.
AG
It
was
a
perfect
neighborhood
and
I
never
imagined
that
I'd
have
a
warehouse
or
vehicle
exhaust
behind
me,
especially
now
with
two
young
kids,
and
so
I
think
I
agree
with
amy.
I
just
don't
want
to
revisit
this
anymore.
I've
sent
emails,
testified.
AG
U
U
So,
are
you
I'm
trying
to
piece
this
out
a
little
bit?
Are
you
comfortable
with
the
compromise,
or
does
this
still
give
you
angst
and
what
wouldn't
give
you
angst.
AG
AG
What's
the
impact
going
to
be,
am
I
going
to
be
impacted?
I
don't
even
know
for
sure,
so
I
feel
more
comfortable
that
there's
space
between
you
know
with
the
a2
their
space
between
me
and
whatever
is
going
to
be
built.
A
AH
All
right,
I'm
sorry,
my
name
is
miles
fosbee
and
I
have
a
hearing
problem.
I
live
at
5184,
south
vietnam,
I'm
at
a
loss
right
now,
because
I
can't
see
anything
on
any
of
these
that
has
umatilla
and
where
this
supposedly
was
going
to
happen
like
it
used
to
be.
I
don't
know
what
the
changes
are
and
I
can't
could
not
tell
by
the
what's
in
the
designation
now,
if
you
can
help
me
I'll,
be
happy.
Thank
you.
A
AC
AI
Thank
you,
madam
mayor
and
honorable
council
members.
As
you
said,
my
name
is
shiva
raj
bhandari.
I
represent
myself
today,
but
I'm
part
of
the
idaho
climate
justice
league,
which
is
a
group
of
students
across
the
state
working
for
a
sustainable
future
on
a
livable
planet
here
in
idaho.
So,
oh,
I
also
should
know
I
work
for
the
idaho
conservation
league,
which
I
think
submitted
some
recommendations
on
this
reason,
and
tomorrow
is
my
first
day
of
senior
year
at
boise
high.
AI
I
don't
live
in
the
in
the
area
right
next
to
that,
but
I
think
this
definitely
affects
all
of
us
as
a
community,
and
so
I
wanted
to
share
some
some
thoughts
growing
up
in
the
13th
fastest
warming
city
in
the
country.
I
know
how
pivotal
the
time
is
now
to
prevent
the
anthropocene
and
I
love
to
run
on
the
boise
hills
and
recreate
in
the
open
space.
AI
AI
I've
also
seen
some
of
the
more
severe
repercussions
of
the
crisis
of
our
time
in
2012,
my
grandma
contracted
lung
cancer,
which
is
an
increasingly
common
disease,
especially
in
nepal,
where
pollution
levels
are
rarely
healthy
and
it
wasn't
for
another.
Few
years
before,
I
realized
that
you
know,
fossil
fuels
were
responsible
for
her
death
smog.
Isn't
the
the
largest
problem
facing
my
family?
AI
However,
within
the
next
20
years
due
to
climate
change,
the
receding
himalayan
glaciers
will
unleash
a
water
crisis,
so
severe
it'll
destabilize,
the
entire
indian
subcontinent
and
we'll
have
a
water
crisis
here
in
idaho
too.
But
it
pales
in
comparison.
AI
So
you
know
I
want
to
to
be
involved
in
you
know
environmental
activism
and
help
preserve
the
world
that
we
have.
So
one
of
the
things
I
do
love
about
growing
up
here
in
boise
is
that
we
live
in
a
community
that
takes
climate
action
seriously
and
that's
something
I
want
to
thank
all
the
city
council
members
for
we've
made
bold
commitments
to
clean
energy
and
sustainability
in
our
city
operations,
and
we
truly
are
leaders
in
idaho
and
across
the
northwest
for
an
equitable
transition
away
from
fossil
fuels.
AI
But
leadership
on
climate
action
is
not
a
one
and
done.
It
is
imperative
that
we
continue
to
set
policy
that
reflects
the
values
of
a
clean,
livable
city
for
all
in
order
to
meet
our
current
commitments
to
fight
climate
change
and
demonstrate
to
cities
across
the
region
that
we
really
can
reduce
global
warming
and
mitigate
its
effects
on
our
residents.
So
growth
is
not
necessarily
a
bad
thing.
You
know,
we've
seen
our
city's
population
increase,
we've
seen
expanded
resources
for
for
our
residents
and
warehouse
and
distribution
service
centers.
AI
You
know,
allow
boys
to
participate
in
the
global
economy
and
get
what
we
need
sooner
and
during
the
the
pandemic.
As
you
know,
e-commerce
has
has
increased
and
that's
that's
kind
of
been
a
lifesaver
right,
but
there
are
a
number
of
things
that
that
come
with
industrial
development
that
we
have
to
consider-
and
I
know
this
is
I
was
this-
is
all
thank
you,
madam
mayor
and
council
member
hallie
burton
for
clarifying
this
was
all
kind
of
processed
in
the
development.
AI
But
I
want
to
provide
some
recommendations
just
going
forward,
based
on
reasons
like
this
and
additional
reasons
that
that
have
to
do
with
this
development.
How
they'll
affect
our
climate,
so
you
know
medium
and
heavy-duty
vehicles
like
the
ones
the
rezone
promote
or
will
promote,
make
up
about
10
of
the
vehicles
on
our
roads.
A
K
AI
I
know
one
more
thing:
one
sentence.
AI
Those
sagebrush
step,
ecosystems
are
giant
carbon
sinks
for
our
community
and
it
is
important
that
those
are
conserved
and
they
activate
with
with
the
rainfall.
So
that's
something
to
do.
A
Okay,
I
want
to
make
sure:
is
there
anybody
else
if
you
want
to
testify,
raise
your
hand
and
come
all
right,
I'm
going
to
see
so
this
is
we're
going
to
have
the
applicant.
A
G
A
Oh
goodness,
I'm
sorry
there
are
people
online.
I
didn't
catch
that,
so
the
council
president
will
ask
go
ahead
with
this
question
and
then
we'll
go
to
folks
online.
G
AH
AC
Mayor
council
president
clegg
with
just
a
straight
rezone,
any
of
the
allowed
uses
will
go
on
there.
I
would
leave
it
up
to
them
to
answer
any
other
restrictions.
Thank
you.
AA
AA
D
A
Right
with
that
I'll
see,
if
there's
any
further
questions
for
crystal.
U
Thank
you,
director,
hub
and
I'll
I'll.
Ask
you
the
same
version
of
the
question
from
a
different
perspective.
It
seems
like
we've,
we've
hit
a
good
compromise,
there's
still
some
angst,
but
there's
this
notion
that
that
there's
still
not
clarity
about
what
will
be
there
and
can
we
offer
our
residents
any
more
specificity
to
help
calm
nerves
about
what
might
be
there.
Knowing
that
you
might
not
be
able
to
answer,
you
might
not
know
but
help
us
any
details.
You
have
would
be
very
appreciated
this
time.
AA
Okay,
madam
mayor
councilmember
willets,
it's
really
hard
for
us
to
say
with
specificity.
What
will
go
there,
because
this
will
be
billed
to
suit.
However,
it
will
be
property
that
is
developed
again
in
accordance
with
blueprint
boise
in
accordance
with
our
m1
zoning.
AA
It
will
not
involve
trucking
fueling,
and
I
would
note
that
this
is
a
half
mile
away
from
any
existing
residential
and
it
is
surrounded
by
other
industrial
uses
and
property.
That's
zoned
industrial,
so
I
certainly
understand
their
concerns.
That's
one
of
the
reasons
we
took
the
a2
parcels
out.
It's
there's
also
some
natural
buffering
between
this
parcel
and
the
other
parcel
because
of
a
very
high
ridge
line
that
goes
through
that
parcel.
So
that
was
another
reason
we
wanted
to
take
that
the
a2
out
this
time.
U
AC
Madam
mayor
council,
councilmember
willits,
if
this
rezone
goes
through,
if
the
any
of
the
allowed
uses
in
the
m1
are
selected,
then
they
are
just
allowed
outright.
It
does
have
the
d
designation,
so
design
review
will
see
it.
Okay,
thank
you.
AA
All
right
go
ahead.
All
right.
We've
heard
a
lot
of
testimony
today,
primarily
concerned
about
the
a2
parcels
and
conservation,
and
I
think
there
were
some
misconceptions
about
what's
actually
on
the
a1
parcels.
These
are
parcels
that
have
been
farmed
in
the
past.
There
is
not
endangered
species
on
this
parcel.
They
it's
actually
been
reviewed
when
achd
looked
at
the
gowan
road
realignment,
so
it's
been
looked
at
there.
We
also
know
that
it's
been
farmed.
AA
It
is
compatible
with
the
surrounding
areas
that
are
zoned
as
industrial
and
it
is
in
compliance
with
blueprint
boise.
So
I
do
think-
and
I
think
it
also
helps
us
to
attain
our
sustainability
goals,
of
keeping
development
close
to
our
core,
as
opposed
to
pushing
development
out
into
the
developable
farmland
or
even
actual
desert,
where
we
do
have
some
of
those
endangered
species
or
the
sagebrush.
AA
This
is
area,
that's
very
close
into
the
airport
and
it's
very
close
to
our
urban
core.
So
with
that,
I
hope
that
city
council
will
uphold
the
recommendations
of
planning
and
zoning
and,
what's
contained
in
blueprint,
boise
madame.
AA
Council
does
have
the
authority
on
this.
This
is,
we
haven't,
really
discussed
a
plan
b.
I
would
say
this
was
plan
b.
The
initial
proposal
was
to
look
at
all
of
the
industrial
land.
We
don't
have
other
land
that
we
can
develop.
AA
That
has
the
access
that
this
has
and
the
infrastructure
that
this
has
an
ore
that
is
not
constrained
by
grants
in
other
ways
a
lot
of
our
property.
While
we
have
substantial
amounts
of
property,
most
of
it
is
dedicated
toward
aviation
uses
our
runway
protection
zones,
our
safety
areas,
all
of
those
things
so.
P
I
think
one
of
the
great
things
when,
when
the
city
has
property,
we're
able
to
work
with
developers
and
we're
able
to
flex
the
muscles
that
we
may
not
be
able
to
on
some
other
developments,
and
we've
got
a
really
good
list
of
recommended
ideas
that
were
presented
with
idaho
conservation
league
sierra
club
people
who
are
involved
in
their
organizations.
I
know
their
pds
department
has
access
to
those.
P
I
don't
know
if
the
airport
has
seen
them
yet,
and
so
I
guess
I
would
just
ask
that
we
take
a
look
at
those
when
we,
when
we
continue
to
move
forward
with
these
relationships.
The
other
thing
I
want
to
make
sure
that
I
make
note
of
is
there
is
a
massive
opportunity
here
for
some
connection
between
that
neighborhood
orchard
and
gallon,
whether
that's
along
the
canal
or
whether
it's
along
those
city-owned
properties-
and
I
know
that
we
do
this
with
every
single
development
that
we
see
here.
P
But
we,
I
think,
really
have
a
cool
opportunity
to
work
with
a
really
unique
neighborhood
with
indian
lakes,
with
the
writer's
club,
with
some
of
the
cool
things
that
are
in
that
area
and
create
a
cool
connection
part
as
well,
and
so
I
would
ask
that
you
know
we'd.
Look
at
those
things
as
well.
The
same
way
that
we
would
and
kind
of
flex
those
muscles
as
hard
as
we
can
in
those.
I
A
N
Yeah,
that's
a
question
so
rebecca
I,
you
know
some
of
the
concerns
that
were
shared
by
the
public
tonight
were
about
health
and
about
how
folks's
health
might
be
affected
by
whatever
does
go
in
in
that
area
in
terms
of
industrial
is.
Is
there
something
already
in
place?
Is
there
already
law
in
place
that
would
protect
folks
from
light
pollution,
air
pollution,
noise
pollution,
that
sort
of
thing,
or
is
that
something
that
would
have
to
be
put
in
place.
AA
Madam
mayor
councilmember
sanchez,
I
don't
know
about
specific
laws.
I
don't
think
that
this
area
is
any
different
from
any
other
part
of
boise,
where
we
might
experience
emissions
or
light.
I
know
at
the
airport
we
do
have
restrictions,
for
example,
on
heights
of
buildings,
also
for
lights
and
light
pollution.
There
are
some
some
restrictions
on
lights
in
in
that
area,
but
I
would
say
it
would
be
no
different
than
any
other
part
of
boise.
I'm
not.
A
Well-
and
I
think
I'll
just
jump
in
here-
I
mean
north
above
it
below
it.
It's
the
same.
Zoning,
designation
and
and
industrial
uses
are
governed
by
state
air
quality
laws,
if
applicable
depending
on
the
use,
and
this
would
this
parcel
would
be
treated
and
the
people
on
this
parcel
will
be
treated
in
the
same
way
that
the
people
on
the
parcel,
just
above
it
and
just
below
it,
would
be
treated.
G
A
G
B
A
Have
two
different
yeah.
G
G
Things
sorry
about
that
yeah
there
we
go
a
rezone
from
a1
up
to
m1d
without
a
development
agreement
for
light
industrial
development
on
the
parcels
depicted
in
our.
G
In
our
packet
as
a
one.
G
Madam
mayor,
so
first
of
all,
I'm
I
applaud
the
airport
for
taking
the
a2
lands
out
so
that
we
can
have
a
much
larger
discussion
about
what
what
those
lands
can
and
should
be
used
for
in
the
future,
and
also
a
much
larger
discussion
about
what
open
space
means
in
the
southwest
and
how,
in
this
sort
of
fractured
governmental
landscape
that
we
have
out
there.
G
Where
some
people
are
in
the
city
and
some
are
in
the
county,
we
can
figure
out
a
way
to
go
about
that
collaboratively
and
in
a
way
that
that
serves
all
the
citizens
in
this
part
of
the
county.
Well,
so
I
appreciate
that
I'm
comfortable
taking
the
development
agreement
out
because
the
airport
does
have
a
master
agreement
with
the
developer
and
as
council
member
beijing
pointed
out,
this
development
agreement
would
simply
be
an
agreement
between
one
arm
of
the
city
and
the
other.
G
G
A
much
better
way
to
govern
that
that
relationship,
I'm
also
not
concerned,
especially
because
the
airport
pointed
out
this
wouldn't
involve
the
kinds
of
heavy
trucking
or
fueling
that
were
included
in
the
development
agreement
that
the
proposed
uses
in
this
as
an
m1
zone
are
the
kinds
of
uses
that
are
scattered
all
over
the
city
very
near
other
residential
and
other
uses,
and
it
works
because
of
the
kind
of
zone.
It
is
it's
not
heavy
industrial,
it's
not
m2.
G
I
would
further
state
that
these
two
parcels
have
good
infrastructure
access,
they're
already
compromised
in
some
ways
in
terms
of
their
ability
to
provide
open
space,
they
don't
have
the
same
kinds
of
environmental
characteristics
as
some
of
the
other
land
further
out
does
so
and
then,
finally,
they
are
surrounded
on
three
sides
by
existing
m1
zoning
and
seems
like
an
appropriate
extension
of
that
zoning
certainly
would
not
be
an
appropriate
place
to
put
residential,
for
instance,
because
of
the
proximity
to
the
airport,
so
it
allows
the
airport
to
and
the
city
frankly
to
get
some
benefit
from
this
land,
while
still
not
impacting
the
surrounding.
F
P
Madam
mayor,
I
think
my
input
came
in
earlier
in
the
form
of
a
question
that
I
think
came
out
as
more
of
a
comment
or
direction.
So
I
don't
know
if
there's
anything
else,
I
need
to
add
that
I
didn't
already
say
all.
H
We
have
to
do
this
kind
of
stuff
somewhere
and
particularly
as
it's
a
pertinent
to
the
airport,
you
can't
you
can't
put
a
hanger
in
you
know
southeast
boise,
that's
not
where
the
airport
is,
it
has
to
be
somewhere
and
gowan.
Road
and
orchard
are
right.
There,
it's
tied
into
the
long-term
land,
use
planning
for
this
spot.
It's
really
the
right
place
and
the
reason
I
say
that
is
not
because
I
think
that's
true,
but
because
the
alternative
is
more
sprawl
into
the
desert,
it's
more
sprawl
into
our
open
spaces.
H
It's
sprawl
that
could
potentially
affect
pepper
grass.
It's
sprawl
that
really
could
potentially
ruin
the
pronghorn
habitat.
That's
out
there,
it's
sprawl
that
really
could
potentially
drain
more
of
the
aquifer
farther
from
our
city,
so
tying
this
kind
of
development
into
the
airport
that
needs
it.
That's
been
planning
for
it
for
a
long
time
in
a
place,
that's
so
accessible
for
traffic,
it's
right
across
from
the
armory.
It's
it's
got
a
good
wide.
You
know
thorough
road
after
the
after
gallon
road
was
rerouted,
it's
really
the
right
place
for
it.
In
my
mind,.
C
U
U
U
We
want
to
support
industrial
developments
because
it's
good
for
the
economy,
but
we
also
want
to
support
the
airport
because
it's
an
economic
driver,
but
we
are
losing
open
space
and
there's
a
lot
more
open
space
in
other
parts
of
the
city,
and
that
often
feels
unfair
and
in
this
case
we're
really
asking
at
this
point
for
you
to
go
on
faith.
U
I
mean
there's
a
certain
there's,
a
certain
delineation
here
in
terms
of
where
things
can
go,
but
once
this
leaves
this
body,
it
really
is
in
the
hands
of
folks
outside
of
this
body,
and
I
know
that's
hard
because
you're
acting
on
faith
and
and
here's
what
I
would
say
about
it,
because
we
do
have
to
do
these
things
and
we
want
things
to
grow
in
the
right
way
way
is
that
I
just
hope
that
the
airport
will
take
the
opportunity
to
continue
to
communicate
and
that
so
that
your
voices
are
heard,
and
obviously
you
have
our
email
addresses
and
all
of
these
things
so
that,
if
something
happens,
we
can
be
aware
of
it,
because
we
want
you
to
feel
comfortable.
U
But
at
this
point
the
major
piece
of
this
that
was
such
a
a
driver
of
worry
and
angst,
is
off
the
table
because
that
was
that
seemed
like
a
promise
to
me.
That
was
permanent
and
this
is
now
been
open.
So
I'm
going
to
vote
for
the
motion,
I'm
first,
so
I
know
it's
coming.
We
often
joke
about
that
here.
U
I'm
like
it
needs
more
time,
but
I
think
in
this
case
we've
struck
a
compromise
and
we
need
to
embrace
it,
but
also
know
that
we're
going
to
be
asking
the
airport
to
be
as
communicative
as
possible,
every
step
of
the
way
and
to
the
council
president's
point
and
others.
You
know
the
the
big
heavy
things
that
I
think
we
would
all
hate
in
any
part
of
you
know
close
to
our
neighborhood
are
off
the
table.
So
I'm
going
to
brace
this
a
compromise
and
vote.
Yes,.
E
A
Thank
you
there's
nothing
else.
Oh
that's
it,
but
we
do
need
emotion.