►
From YouTube: City Council Work Session - 3/9/21
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
C
B
D
E
B
You,
okay,
we've
got
a
couple
things
I
saw
sean,
I
think
both
sean
and
linda,
maybe
are
here.
Yes,
there's
sean
to
cover.
First,
the
public
health
order
update.
This
is
the
new
order,
hi
linda,
that
I
touched
on
last
tuesday,
because
we
signed
it
last
tuesday,
but
weren't
able
to
bring
it
until
today,
and
we
asked
linda
and
sean
to
come
and
join
us
today
to
explain
the
process
that
the
public
can
go
through
to
get
approval
from
the
health
district,
for
particular
events
and
just
to
kick
it
off.
B
I
want
to
reiterate
what
I
said
last
week
that
I
really
appreciate
this
new
partnership
that
we
have
with
central
district
health
that
makes
it
possible
for
us
to,
while
ensuring
that
we
all
stay
safe
to
to
allow
for
more
things
to
happen
in
our
community,
and
it
wouldn't
be
possible
if
central
district
health
hadn't
agreed
to
review
plans
both
from
private
individuals
and
events
organizers,
but
also
from
the
city
ourselves.
B
We're
going
to
be
sending
plans
for
our
facilities
to
central
district
health,
and
the
goal
was
to
make
it
possible
for
the
people
boise
to
do
more
while
making
sure
that
we
don't
lose
the
progress
that
we've
made
and
so
sean
and
linda
with
that
I'll
hand
it
over
to
you,
thanks
for
joining
us
today,.
F
Thank
you
very
much
mayor
and
thank
you,
members
of
the
council,
for
the
opportunity
to
present
on
the
most
recent
public
health
order.
Today,
I'm
going
to
share
my
screen
here
and
have
to
do
this
right.
F
Okay,
thank
you
mayor.
So
once
again,
thank
you
for
the
opportunity
to
present
today
we're
going
to
give
a
brief
overview
of
the
public
health
order.
Number
20-15,
which
was
signed
by
the
mayor
and
made
effective
on
march,
2nd
2021..
F
As
with
previous
health
orders,
this
current
order
requires
non-household
physical
distancing
face
coverings
in
public
places,
as
well
as
the
compliance
with
state,
healthy
guidelines,
stage
3
and
the
cdh
public
health
advisory,
notably
this
health
order
amended
previous
health
orders
to
allow
gatherings
of
50
or
more
persons
with
central
district
health
approval,
cdh
and
its
function
as
a
public
health
district
has
the
expertise
and
capacity
to
review
safety
plans
for
large
gatherings
and
ensure
alignment
with
applicable
public
health
guidelines
and
protocols,
and
I'll
note,
as
as
well
as
echo,
the
mayor
in
saying
that
this
this
approval
process
was
produced
in
close
collaboration
with
with
cdh
and
city
of
boise
staff,
to
come
to
an
agreement
on
a
workbook
point
forward.
F
So,
essentially,
from
the
standpoint
of
the
applicant,
the
applicant
will
visit
the
cdh
or
city
of
boise
website
to
download
the
safety
planning
form
that
was,
that
was
produced
collaboratively
by
cdh
and
city
of
boise.
I've
listed
the
links
for
both
the
cdh
website
here,
as
well
as
the
cia
boise
website,
and
also
note
that
there's
a
link
on
the
parks
and
special
events
sites
as
well
to
ensure
that
this
is
as
accessible
as
possible
to
our
constituents.
F
The
applicant
will
then
complete
and
submit
the
form
to
cdh
for
review
and
cdh's
stated
goal
for
review.
Time
is
48
hours,
certainly
could
take
more
or
less
than
that,
just
depending
upon
volume.
F
Cdh
will
review
the
the
plan,
the
safety
plan
for
alignment
with
state
protocols
and
safe
gatherings
and
events
and
we'll
make
an
approval,
determination.
F
I'll
also
just
mention
that
the
form
itself
contains
a
number
of
pieces
of
information
and
data
points,
including
the
start
and
end
date
of
an
event
number
of
number
of
attendees
anticipated
and
as
well
as
a
checklist
that
aligns
closely
with
city
of
boise
priorities
in
our
enter
and
those
that
are
listed
in
the
public
health
order
and
includes
some
listing
of
protocols
for
higher
risk
populations,
for
example,
signed
into
messaging
and
other
critical
measures.
F
If
cdh
does
not
recommend
approval,
boise
city
will
then
make
a
a
final
determination,
or
at
least
will
reserve
the
right
to
make
a
final
determination
on
approval.
F
The
city
boise
will
also
do
the
same
for
any
of
our
own
planned
city,
gatherings
of
50
or
more
people,
and,
of
course,
throughout
this
process.
The
city
will
continue
to
closely
monitor
the
status
of
the
covet
19
pandemic
and
will
change
or
modify
the
health
order
as
needed.
F
In
terms
of
messaging
and
outreach,
as
with
past
orders,
we've
worked
hard
to
ensure
that
the
intent
of
this
order
is
communicated
to
our
stakeholders.
F
We
also
followed
up
that
meeting
with
direct
outreach
and
messaging
to
individual
stakeholders,
with
information
about
the
order
and
and
our
coordination
with
cdh,
including
specific
links
to
the
to
the
website
and
where
the,
where
the
form
could
be
found
and
also
have
continued
to
message
on
social
media.
The
the
overall
intent
of
the
order.
G
We'll
have
our
normal
process
for
issuance
or
denial
of
a
permit
and
recommended
approval
by
cdh
does
not
necessarily
guarantee
that
the
city
will
approve
a
permit.
Obviously,
there
are
a
lot
of
other
things
to
consider
with
that
application
and
our
application
deadlines
were
we'd
like
to
keep
those
the
same
as
well.
So
that's
another
reason
why
we
ask
folks
when
they
do
apply,
for
a
permit
attach
already
have
attached
the
cdh
approval
with
that
there's.
G
A
five
business
day
deadline
for
alcoholic
kidding
permits
and
a
45
day
deadline
for
special
events
permits
and
then
parks
is
asking
anybody
that
needs
to
go
through
the
parks
permit
process
to
contact
parks
in
their
usual
manner
as
well,
but
contact
cdh
beforehand
as
well,
and
have
proof
of
that
cdh
approval
when
they
go
through
the
parks
process
as
well.
F
And
with
that,
thank
you,
linda.
That
is
the
end
of
our
overview
and
we
are
happy
to
take
any
questions.
H
Go
ahead,
sean
you,
you
kind
of
laid
out
what
the
process
will
be
are
those
from
on
the
cdh
side,
and
then
I
understand
on
the
city
side:
it'll
be
a
staff
level
approval.
Will
the
cdh
be
a
staff
level
approval
as
well
or
will
that
go
through
the
commission.
F
Mayor
mclean,
councilman
williams,
the
cdh
review
will
be
a
staff
level
review
and
their
their
review
will
essentially
be
a
recommendation,
not
not
an
explicit
approval.
I
think
it's
important
to
note
that,
but
it
will
be
a
recommendation
based
on
their
their
role
as
a
public
health
agency
and
then
return
that
recommendation
to
the
city
of
boise.
H
Great
may
everyone
follow.
Are
we
also
providing
any
guidance
on
how
to
safely
put
on
an
event,
or
is
that
kind
of
just
directing
people
to
cdc
guidance.
F
Mclean
councilmember
woodings
great
question:
the
guidance
for
for
large
gatherings
that
that
basically
cdh
is
using
to
make
their
determination
are
included
in
the
both
the
stage
3
state
guidelines,
as
well
as
the
cdh
advisory,
and
incorporate
it
into
our
order
and
then
additional
measures
that
are
explicitly
incorporated
into
our
order
also
apply
to
to
gatherings.
But
for
the
most
part,
the
the
protocols
that
are
listed
in
either
that
cdh
advisory
or
the
the
state
stage
stage.
F
Three
state
healthy
guidelines
are
those
that
we
will
expect
businesses
and
organizations
to
comply
with
for
their
lodge
gatherings.
D
A
couple
things:
first,
just
congratulations
and
good
job
at
getting
this
done
so
quickly
to
the
mayor
to
the
mayor's
team.
D
I
know
that
this
made
it
the
rounds
to
the
non-profit
sector,
pretty
quick,
and
I
really
appreciate
the
outreach
that
was
done
there
and
the
feedback
that
I've
gotten
so
far
from
different
organizations
has
been
super
positive
and
the
follow-up
that
you've
shown
that
you've,
given
them
personally
has
been
really
fast
as
well.
So
thank
you
for
the
hard
work
there.
D
I
I'm,
maybe
I'm
just
a
little
unfamiliar
right
now,
with
what
we're
doing.
As
far
as
our
special
events
committee
goes.
So
typically,
if
an
organization
is
putting
on
an
event,
they
you
know
they
go
into
a
room
and
they
sit
down
and
they've
got
the
fire
department.
There
they've
got
achd,
you
know
the
works
police
department.
D
Are
we
still
doing
virtual
formal
settings
in
that
format
or
as
far
as
special
events,
are
we
not
doing
things
of
that
scale
that
would
require?
You
know
the
full
special
events
committee
meeting.
G
Yeah,
council,
member
harley
burton
this
is
linda.
I
can
help
answer
your
question.
We
have
not
actually
had
special
events
committee
meetings
in
quite
a
few
months
because
of
the
health
order
and
the
limit
on
crowd
size
gatherings.
G
There
hasn't
been
a
need,
but
we
are
starting
to
get
some
special
events
applications
in
right
now,
and
so
we
anticipate
restarting
that
committee
and
it
has
been
virtual
in
the
past-
and
we
honestly
haven't
decided
whether
we'll
virtual
hybrid
at
this
point,
but
we
do
anticipate
a
meeting
coming
up
in
april
to
start
reviewing
the
event
applications
that
we've
got
and
to
start
discussing
specific
considerations
for
those
events.
D
And
madam
mayor
just
quick,
follow
up
sure,
and
so
the
same
process
would
be
done
there.
Somebody
would
go
to
central
district
health
to
get
that
approval
first
and
then
the
special
events
committee
would
happen.
Wonderful,
great
again,
thank
you
for
all
the
hard
work
and
the
fast
work
that's
done
on
this.
I
know
that
they're
from
also
whether
it's
you
know
sports
or
arts
organizations,
or
you
know
you
name
it.
D
I
One
question:
I'm
not
sure
if
this
is
for
sean
or
for
linda
so
we'll
see,
maybe
who
pipes
up
first,
there's
some
confusion
with
respect
to
youth
league
sports
like,
for
instance,
soccer
who
is
the
applicant
for
for
that
process?
Is
that
was?
Is
the
city
going
to
handle
that
application?
Will
each
league
need
to
apply
separately
to
cdh,
or
is
it
a
team
by
team
basis?
How
are
how
does
that
workflow?
G
Yeah,
that's
a
good
question.
My
understanding
is
that
the
event
organized
organizer
who's,
sponsoring
the.
If
it's
a
tournament,
whoever
sponsoring
the
tournament
or
if
it's
a
specific
team,
whoever's,
organizing
that
specific
game
or
or
the
like,
would
need
to
be
the
applicant
with
cdh
and
fill
out
the
form
of
cdh
and
then
contact
parks
for
the
for
the
permit
for
the
use
of
the
parks
facility.
I
Okay,
if
I
can
follow
up.
B
Let
me
jump
in
here
too,
just
to
clarify
each
sports.
Each
sports
league
that
is
currently
in
their
planning
for
games
should
have
received
communication
from
the
parks
director
to
parks
department,
with
an
explanation
of
how
it
works
so
because
in
some
instances
like
the
sim
plot
fields
are
ours,
and
so
there's
you
know
a
field,
complex
plan,
and
but
each
of
those
teams
or
clubs
that
might
use
it
needs
to
work
with
the
parks
department
to
make
sure
that
everybody's
in
agreement
as
to
how
the
games
play
out.
I
B
I
A
I
was
just
going
to
say
thank
you
for
working
to
make
this
happen.
I
had
had
a
lot
of
contact
from
a
lot
of
sports
teams
and,
since
all
of
them
at
least
the
ones
that
contacted
me
had
received
guidance
from
their
club
about
how
this
would
work,
and
they
seem
very
pleased
with
it.
So,
apparently,
whatever
parks
did
is
working,
at
least
from
the
input
I've.
B
B
I
want
to
thank
you
both
for
the
work
of
your
teams
in
helping
make
this
possible,
in
addition
to
the
thanks
that
I
gave
to
central
district
health
early
on,
because,
as
we
said
last
week,
we
started
talking
about
the
possibility
on
you
know,
on
a
what
was
it
a
monday
or
tuesday,
we
learned
that
there
was
only
now
an
advisory
at
the
county
level,
but
because
there
was
an
advisory
and
we
will
continue
to
have
an
order
as
the
largest
city
and
economic
engine
of
this
region
and
then
suddenly
we
found
ourselves
because
we
were
the
city
with
the
order
without
the
systems
that
we'd
had
in
place
before
when
the
county
had
maintained
that,
and
so
we
pivoted
quickly,
because
of
and
and
it
was
possible
because
of
the
work
of
your
teams
to
come
up
with
a
new
way
to
do
this.
B
It's
been
it's
an
experiment.
It'll
continue
to
be
experiment
really
appreciate
the
thinking
that
you
put
into
it
and
and
the
partnerships
we've
been
able
to
build
because
of
it,
and
I'm
optimistic
that
this
will
make
it
possible
for
so
many
more
things
to
happen
in
our
community,
while
keeping
us
all
safe.
B
Thank
you.
Both
all
right,
welcome,
you're
here
in
person.
Next
up
we're
gonna,
I
got
too
close
to
the
mic.
Welcome
rob
we
are
going
to
discuss
our
city
facilities
and
one
facility
in
particular,
but
just
to
kind
of
set
the
stage
for
this
as
all
of
us
and
council
as
you've
made
it
clear
as
I
am
committed
to,
as
we
think
about
how
we
do
everything
possible
to
address
affordability
and
housing
in
our
community.
B
B
What
have
you,
but
also
to
free
up
some
space
for
future
projects
of
for
homes
and
through
our
land,
trust,
and
so
we've
asked
staff
to
begin
to
do
a
deeper
analysis
on
all
the
holdings
we
have
and
part
of
that
is
this
facilities,
planning,
update
and
plan
for
how
to
combine
things,
but
also
the
analysis
of
on
what
land
that
we
have
is
is
most
appropriate
for
housing,
and
so
we've
asked
rob
to
join
today
to
give
some
background
into
where
we're
at
and
where
we
might
be
headed
with
some
priority
pieces.
B
J
Up
a
little
bit
louder
too,
so
thank
you
for
the
for
the
time.
J
Over
the
last
year,
plus
the
facilities
team
has
been
looking
at
our
kind
of
longer
term
plans
for
meeting
our
building
needs,
and
tonight,
as
as
mayor
indicated,
would
we
want
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
our
support
facilities
and
a
primary
interest,
I
think,
is
what
that
means
for
some
of
our
key
downtown
sites,
and
tonight
I'll
talk
a
little
bit
about
kind
of
where
we're
at
right
now
a
strategy
approach
that
we've
developed
and
kind
of
next
steps
and
the
by
support
facilities.
J
I
mean
things
like
our
we're
talking
about
things
like
our
park
shops,
our
fire
logistics
center,
some
of
our
storage
facilities,
some
of
these
back
of
house
functions
that
really
enable
us
to
deliver
services
and
the
because
some
of
the
sites
are
really
important.
I
kind
of
have
a
few
slides
up
here
for
a
quick,
visual
tour
in
case
anybody's
not
familiar
with
some
of
these
facilities.
J
J
J
Fire
logistics,
what
they
do
is
some
of
the
specialized
maintenance
of
like
fire
engines,
etc,
as
well
as
like
their
air
packs.
That
kind
of
thing
the
the
third
site-
that's
really
key
in
the
downtown
area,
is
right
across
the
street.
From
that.
J
So
again,
the
connectors
at
the
top
of
the
picture
and
shorelines
on
the
left,
the
building
on
the
right
is
houses,
are
building
our
facilities,
maintenance
team,
there's
a
few
other
functions
in
there
as
well,
and
then
the
building
on
the
left
is
our
communications
or
radio
shop
and
those
are
three
key
sites
that
are
of
key
interest
and-
and
I
think
we'll
probably
reference
back
to
those
as
we
go.
J
I
wanted
to
start
a
little
bit
about
about
why.
Why
are
we
looking
trying
to
develop
a
long-term
plan?
As
mayor
indicated?
Optimizing
land
use
is
a
key
driver
for
us
having
these
facilities,
where
they're
at
probably
made
sense
50
years
ago-
probably
less
so
today,
and
we
are
really
interested
in
better
use
of
these
sites,
primarily
for
housing.
J
Apart
from
that,
these
facilities
are
getting
fairly
old
and
they
also
are
limited
in
terms
of
how
much
growth
you
know
as
the
city
grows.
We
need
more
facilities,
there's
just
limited
opportunities
with
some
of
these
sites,
so
we
need
to
do
something,
and
so
that's
that's
kind
of
all.
That
kind
of
wrapped
into
us
wanting
to
develop
a
longer
term
plan,
a
longer
term
strategy.
For
this,
the
planning
process
that
we
used.
We
try
to
get
out
the
crystal
ball
and
and
try
to
anticipate
what
we
might
need.
J
We
used
a
20-year
planning
horizon
to
try
to
estimate
what
we
might
need
for
these
facilities.
Then
we
went
through
a
process
of
trying
to
brainstorming
different
strategies.
You
know:
do
we
leave
them
where
they're
at
do?
We
consolidate
them
all
to
one
location,
really
just
try
to
think
through
those
different
options,
far
enough
to
really
get
a
sense
of
an
understanding
of
how
they
might
play
out,
and
then
we
compare
those
different
strategies
against
each
other,
using
a
multi-criteria
analysis
looking
at
not
only
how
well
do
they,
how
how
well
do
they
perform?
J
Do
they
function
for
the
department,
but,
of
course,
things
like
cost
as
well
as
how
well
do
they
align
to
our
other
city
goals?
Do
they
do
they
match
up
with
blueprint
boise
in
our
land
use
goals?
Do
they
do
they
work
for
or
against
our
climate
goals?
So
that
kind
of
thing,
and
so
that's
kind
of
how
we
developed
our
strategy
and
before
I
talk
about
a
little
bit
more
just
a
little
bit
more
background
on
our
existing
facilities.
J
This
is
maybe
a
little
bit
hard
to
to
see,
but
the
the
on
the
map
to
the
right
there's
different
little
kind
of
cartoon
icons,
of
where
our
existing
facilities
are,
and
we've
talked
about
several
in
the
downtown
the
park
shop
and
facilities,
communications,
fire
logistics.
J
We
also
have
in
the
near
down
downtown
I
mentioned
there
are
actually
several
different
parks
shop
sites,
there's
one,
for
example,
kind
of
on
the
edge
of
the
morris
hill
cemetery
and
then
the
little
box
things
if
you
can
see
them
are
different
sites
that
we
lease
for
storage,
some
for
like
a
record
center
in
our
archives,
police
lease
is
a
facility
out
in
the
southeast
and
and
of
course,
we've
got
our
fleet
shop
and
forestry
shop
and,
and
that
are
west
of
the
airport.
J
A
couple
of
things
stand
out
to
me
when
I
looked
at
this
map
and
why
I
kind
of
wanted
to
show
it
one
is
the
vast
majority
of
these
sites
are
in
different
they're
independent
sites,
they're
kind
of
at
different
locations,
even
if
they're
close
to
each
other,
most
of
them
are
or
again
kind
of
independent
operations.
J
J
I
I
continue
to
use
this
travel
planning
and
analogy
of
right
now,
we've
kind
of
decided
the
direction
that
we
want
to
go
like
we're
going
to
go
to
the
oregon
coast
next
summer,
but
but
really
the
next
step
in
this
is
really
to
start
to
detail
out.
When
exactly
are
we
going
to
go?
What
are
we
going
to
see
along
the
way?
Where
are
we
going
to
stay?
J
That's
kind
of
still
a
lot
of
questions,
and
that's
really
the
next
phase
of
this,
but
the
strategy
that
we
landed
on
was
to
establish
a
new
campus.
We
think
it
we
know
it
wants
to
be
an
industrial
zone.
We're
thinking,
probably
west
of
the
airport,
makes
a
lot
of
sense
just
because
that
meets
the
land
criteria
and
yet
is
reasonable,
drive
times
proximity
to
the
facilities
to
the
services
that
these
facilities
support.
J
We
do
think
that
there
are
a
couple
of
facilities
that
we
think
that
are
smaller,
have
more
travel
associated
with
them.
That
might
make
sense
to
make
closer
in
and
and
to
move,
basically
with
the
idea
of
trying
to
decrease
how
much,
how
much
driving
we
have
to
do,
both
from
a
staff
time
and
and
again
from
a
climate
standpoint.
J
That
might
be
a
location
that
might
fit
fit
for
them
and
then,
of
course,
as
these
facilities
start
to
get
relocated
to
the
to
the
new
campus,
then
that
frees
up
the
existing
sites
back
to
the
the
site
there
by
julia
davis
and
both
of
those
shoreline
sites,
we're
anticipating
that
those
would
go
toward
the
land
trust
for
housing.
J
There
could
also
be
variations
that
you
know.
Maybe
one
of
those
gets
sold
off
for
redevelopment
instead.
So
that's
kind
of
all
of
those
are
questions
that
will
be
really
sorted
through
in
the
next
phase
of
planning
to
be
up
front.
This
is
this
is
a
significant
investment.
J
In
order
to
achieve
this,
you
know
we're
right
now,
very
preliminary,
of
course,
but
we're
thinking
it
could
be
in
the
20
to
35
million
dollars
over
time
to
you
know
to
the
cost,
to
move
those
facilities
out
and
but
again
compare
back.
It's
not
like
it's
free
if
we
leave
them
where
we're
at
we're
going
to
need
investments
in
these
facilities,
regardless,
so
the
in
the
next
phase
of
planning.
J
What
we
really
hope
to
do
is
is
to
have
take
this
high
level
strategy
and
really
make
it
into
more
of
a
detailed
plan,
really
study
and
understand
the
actual
scope
needs
for
each
of
these
facilities
really
refine
the
size
of
them.
How
much
is
each
of
these
is
going
to
cost.
J
Take
really
take
a
a
good
look
at
the
sites.
You
know
what
what
sites
are
are
available.
What
really
makes
sense
for
these
and
really
nail
those
down
and
and
get
a
site
lined
out
and
then,
as
we
understand
the
costs,
the
sites,
we
can
develop
the
master
plan
and
we
can
start
to
look
at
the
priorities
you
know.
Obviously,
freeing
up
land
is
a
is
a
is
a
high
priority
beyond
that.
J
What
else
makes
sense
to
to
stage
these
things
and
then,
obviously,
as
as
we
understand
the
cost
priorities,
then
we
can
start
to
work
out
the?
What
is
the
timeline?
What
is
are
is
are
these
facilities?
Is
this
a
10-year
plan?
Is
this
a
15-year
plan?
You
know
how
what's
a
reasonable
cadence
to
be
able
to
start
to
collect,
collect
these
up
and
move
them
out,
so
our
our
next
step
in
this
process.
J
J
We
think
that
effort
will
take
a
little
over
a
year
and,
of
course,
during
that
process,
we'll
coordinate
with
airport
in
terms
of
potential
sites,
but
also
with
you
know,
parks
and
fire,
etc,
with
the
impacted
departments
to
really
try
to
develop
this.
This
plan
to
that
that
greater
level
of
detail
beyond
that,
I
wanted
to
provide
a
timeline
of
just
a
sense
of
how
this
might
play
out.
J
Obviously,
a
lot
could
change
with
this,
but
I'm
thinking
that
if
a
year
from
now
we
start
to
have
a
pretty
good
sense
of
of
the
site,
we
can
start
to
get
that
secured.
J
So
that's
kind
of
gives
you
a
sense
of
how
that
timeline
might
play
out,
and
then
I
have
a
note
on
there
about
overlapping
assuming
it
goes
to
the
land,
trust,
the
land
trust
process
of
of
going
through
the
rfp
process
and
starting
that
that
planning
and
entitlement
process.
J
I
would
envision
overlapping
the
parks,
planning
and
design
significantly
so
that
essentially
the
day
we're
open
up
the
new
facilities
and
we
move
parks
out.
You
know
right
behind
us.
The
developers
could
be
moving
in
to
to
start
initiating
the
redevelopment
of
that
site.
J
What
facilities
are
next
again
I
I
kind
of
have
I
have
some
guesses
to
be.
What
would
what
would
be
next,
but
really
that's.
That's
part
of
the
kind
of
the
next
planning
effort
just
to
really
start
detailing
that
out,
so
that's
kind
of
where
we're
at
where
we're
headed
and
with
that
that's
the
end
of
my
presentation.
I'd
stand
for
any
questions.
H
Madam
mayor,
thank
you
rob.
I
think
this
is
really
important
work
and
evaluating
what
we
already
have
is
obviously
a
huge
piece
of
our
land
trust,
I'm
curious,
because
it's
in
my
neighborhood-
and
so
you
know
like
I
always
want
some
for
myself
a
little
bit.
J
J
We,
unless
we
want
to
sacrifice
like
some
park
type
functions,
then
we
we,
we
kind
of
envisioned
that
we
would
want
to
move
these
more
industrial
uses
more
out
into
industrial
zone,
as
opposed
to,
I
think,
most
of
that.
That
area
is,
is
ultimately
zoned
and
planned
for
more
park
type
facilities.
There
are
some
industrial
type
functions
like
the
bureau
of
reclamation.
Has
their
lay
down
yard
in
that
in
that
area,
but
again
we
kind
of
see
that
more
as
like
the
old
and
not
not
where
we
want
to
go.
H
A
J
Madam
mayor
councilmember
clegg,
the
the
the
for
more
significant
projects
like
this:
it's
the
timeline
of
having
roughly
a
year
to
design
a
facility
make
sure
we
really
know
what
we're
doing
and
get
good
documents
put
together
and
then
about
a
year
to
construct.
It
is,
is
really
hard
to
accelerate
without
really
taking
significant
risks
about
what
we're
doing
the
third
year
in
this
process
is
really
to
make
sure
that
we
get
the
right
site
that
we
have.
J
It
planned
out
the
whole
sequence
of
things,
and
so
again
to
kind
of
avoid
that
risk
of
starting
to
build
and
then
realize.
Well,
we
should
have
had
more
land.
J
You
know
for
these
other
facilities
down
the
road.
So
I
I
do
understand.
This
is
a
high
priority.
I'm
hopeful
I'm
hoping
I'm
conservative,
but
I
I'm
I'm
reluctant
to
to
promise
that
we
can.
We
can
accelerate,
but
I
I
I
do
totally
understand
the
message
of
we
need
to
push
on
this
and
and
get
this
completed
as
fast
as
we
can.
B
I
think
we
all
share
your
urgency.
Council
president.
I
do
have
one
clarifying
question
rob
as
you
talked
about
the
timing.
If
I
heard
you
correctly,
it
would
be
possible
for,
while
we're
the
julia
davis
site,
for
instance,
it's
not
just
to
be
clear.
It's
not
in
the
park.
We
just
keep
calling
it
that,
because
it's
right
next
to
the
park,
while
we
are
going
through
the
process
of
making
it
possible
to
move
everything,
we
could
at
the
same
time
be
initiating
the
land
trust
rfp.
B
J
Mayor,
that's
that's
correct.
I
see
no
reason
why
we
would
not
want
to
start
the
rfp
process
for
the
land
trust,
I'm
thinking.
I
think
I'm
not
super
familiar
with
their
process.
But
I've
talked
enough
with
leon
that
I
believe
they
take
roughly
a
year
to
kind
of
go
through
the
rfp
process,
get
the
get
the
developer
selected
and
spun
up,
and
then
that
developer
also
needs
roughly
a
year
to
go
through
their
their
permitting
process
design
process.
J
And
so
I
kind
of
envision
that
that
that
timeline
could
really
line
up
pretty
well
where,
while
we're
planning
our
facility
they're
planning
theirs.
So
again,
that
kind
of
again
back
to
exactly,
as
you
said,
as
we're
kind
of
moving
parts
out
there
moving
right
in
behind
us
to
start
redevelopment.
A
A
Could,
as
part
of
our
analysis-
and
so
I
guess
what
I'm
not
sure
of
is
whether
this
would
be
part
of
the
land,
trust
work
or
your
work.
J
J
I
I
really
envision
that
as
a
partnership
between
the
support
facility
planning
effort
and
also,
I
think,
discussions
with
with
the
with
the
grower
housing
team
to
see
first
does
is
that
a
good
you
know
match
to
go
to
the
land,
trust
or
not,
and
then
I
think
if,
if
so,
then
I
think
there
that
that
discussion
could
start
to
identify
what
are
the
fences
or
parameters
around
that
because
there
are,
you
know
certain.
J
You
know,
structures
we
need
to
look
at
the
the
park
site
has
like
our
geothermal
injection,
well
that
we
need
to
protect
and
plan
around
that
kind
of
thing.
So
I
kind
of
envision
that
to
be
a
partnership
as
we
conduct
our
planning
process.
A
B
Good,
so
I
think
what
we're
hearing
is
the
reality
that,
while
this
seems
like
a
long
way
away-
and
it
does
feel
like
a
long
way
away
the
time
it
takes
to
go-
I
mean
think
about
how
the
length
of
time
has
been
with
franklin
and
orchard
we're
going
to
be
faster
than
that,
because
now
we
know
more
of
what
we're
doing
and
how
to
do
it.
But
it
really
does
parallel
nicely
with
the
time
that
will
be
required
to
build
to
build
up
these
plans
and
systems
and
then
move
everything.
D
Yeah.
Thank
you,
madam
mayor,
a
question
a
little
bit
similar
to
council
president
craig's
question.
So
in
one
of
the
slides
we
talked
about,
it
was
about
an
estimated
20.
J
Madam
mayor
and
council
member
real,
really
good
questions,
the
the
best
guess
at
the
the
site.
Next
to
julia
davis,
there
was
an
appraisal
done,
it's
it's
getting
a
little
bit
old,
but
I
think
that
somewhere,
maybe
in
the
5
million
dollar,
range.
Something
like
that,
and
I
do
think
as
we
evaluate
these
sites
and
talk
with
the
with
the
grow,
our
housing
team,
about
the
opportunities.
J
I
think,
then,
that
that
really
comes
back
to
you
as
a
policy
decision
of.
I
think
that
we
can
bring
back
recommendations
of
hey.
This
works
great
for
grower
housing.
This
is
you
know
the
the
sweet
spot
for
it
or
it
could
be
like
some
of
these
sites,
like
especially
like
some
of
the
like
the
shoreline
site.
J
Maybe
one
of
those
sites
maybe
doesn't
work
so
good
for
housing,
then
we
could
come
back
and
with
that
kind
of
recommendation,
but
ultimately
that
is
a
policy
decision
as
we
as
we
frame
up
the
opportunities
for
you
to
decide,
is
it
better?
We
would
obviously
be
coming
back
with.
You
know
current
appraisals,
land
values
as
well.
J
As
you
know,
zoning
was
the
potential
either
way
for
that
kind
of
decision,
but
but
that
you
know
really
super
tentative
discussions
with
leon,
but
that's
the
kind
of
thing
we've
talked
about
is
if
it,
if
we
do
sell
it,
that
does
free
up
opportunities
to
purchase
more
land
in
other
locations
if
it
doesn't
work
well
for
them.
D
Yeah,
thank
you
rob,
I
think,
having
some
of
those
appraisals
and
things
like
that
would
be
helpful
in
kind
of
making
those
decisions,
decisions
to
kind
of
weigh
in
the
future
when
we
know
that
we
are
talking
about
a
20
to
35
million
dollar
cost
it'd,
be,
I
think,
really
exciting
to
explore
all
those
different
options.
Thank
you.
I
First,
I
I
agree
with
the
council
president
and
the
mayor
on
the
timeline.
I
mean
it
only
seems
like
a
long
timeline
because
you're
we're
on
the
front
of
it
and
it's
only
longer
if
we
wait
another
year.
My
question
was
about
the
price
that
the
estimated
price
and
it's
a
big
range-
and
I
understand
why
does
that?
J
Madam
mayor
council,
member
agent,
the
that
we
do
have
some
some
dollars
included
in
that
estimate
to
secure
land,
even
if
we,
even
if
it
is
a
land
that
the
airport
currently
owns,
and
we
and
we
buy
it.
We
need
to
essentially
purchase
it
from
them
to
make
the
airport
enterprise
fund
whole.
So
I
can't
remember
the
number
right
off,
but
we
did
get
some
some
older
appraisals,
some
some
high
level
estimates
that
that
is
included
in
that
in
that
range.
D
J
I
Question
I
just
didn't
understand
that
and
you
know
knowing
the
airport
director,
she
drives
a
hard
bargain,
so
maybe
we
should
private
property
buy.
H
Mayor
yeah
go
ahead,
I
just
have
I
mean,
maybe
I'm
just
being
a
little
bit
dense,
but
just
kind
of
trying
to
get
some
clarity
around
the
process
of
evaluating
the
various
properties
that
we
have.
I
just
there's
a
lot
of
talk
about
the
julia
davis
site
as
being
like
the
site,
but
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
we
have
all
of
the
information
that
we
need
and
we're
looking
at
it
really
objectively
based
on
that
information,
and
so
what?
J
Madame
aimer,
madam
mayor
councilmember
woodings,
I
I've
kind
of
envisioned
two
kind
of
I
don't
see
coordinated,
but
separate
kind
of
pieces
of
information.
One
is
what
seems
to
be
the
right
decision
as
we
get
down
into
the
details
about
these
support
facilities,
in
terms
of
you
know,
scope
cost.
You
know
priorities
timeline
that
that
kind
of
thing,
I
think,
there's
a
a
separate
it
it
does.
J
It
is
related,
but
there's
a
separate
decision
about
what's
the
best
in
use
for
these
three
properties,
and
from
that
to
be
frank,
I'm
I
haven't
given
as
much
thought
into
into
that
decision-making
process,
but
I
I
do
think
that
that's
some
level
of
discussions
as
councilmember
clegg,
indicated
some
sort
of
analysis
of
what
opportunities
what's
on
the
site,
what
are
opportunities
and
constraints,
but
I
also
think
it's
discussions
with
the
grower
housing
team
in
terms
of
what
are
the
potential
you
know:
does
it
work
good
for
for
housing?
J
You
know
as
some
sort
of
split
decision
kind
of
thing,
but
then
I
think
that
we
would
come
back
to
you
with
with
all
of
that
information
about.
You
know.
These
are
some
of
the
challenges
or
opportunities
with
the
sites.
This
is
the
grow,
our
housing
team's
perspective.
J
I
think
the
the
financial
information
that
council
member
holly
burton
mentioned
is
you
know,
is
key,
so
that
so
that,
again
that
there
can
be
kind
of
that
that
policy
decision
of
you
know
site
by
site.
What
is
the,
what
is
what's
the
best
use
for
those.
J
Right
there
was
no
the
the
interim
budget
change
request,
I
think
is,
is
part
of
your
next
council.
B
B
So
travis
is
here:
if
anybody
has
questions
or
comments
on
the
ibc.
E
So,
and
just
to
give
you
a
bit
more
background
so
without
discussing
anymore,
what
rob
just
walked
you
through
in
greater
detail
frankly
than
I
could
so
we
have
a
total
of
five
ibc's
rods
is
just
one
of
them.
It
was
actually
last
in
the
order,
but
we
can
discuss
it
first
and
and
the
the
budget
request
is
for
the
300
000
to
do
that.
Preliminary
planning
work
that
rob
referenced.
E
We
have
three
parks.
Ibcs
one
is
for
the
memorial
river
node,
which
is
a
memorial
as
you're.
All
aware.
E
Excuse
me
for
the
for
the
helicopter
pilots
that
died
in
the
in
the
crash
last
month.
It'd
be
building
a
memorial
for
them
and
julia
davis
park.
E
There
is
also
another,
and
that
would
be
as
excuse
me,
a
75
000
one-time
appropriation,
there's
also
a
hundred
and
forty
thousand
dollar
request,
and
it's
just
the
ability
to
use
already
received
donations
to
rebuild
the
catherine
albertson
rookery
shelter
again,
a
one-time
cost
that
is
covered
by
existing
donations.
E
That
and
the
third
park's
request
is
for
80
000
to
address
the
city
of
trees,
challenge
that
jennifer
tomlinson
discussed
with
you.
I
believe
that
was
on
february
23rd,
so
it's
just
aligning
the
funding
for
that
initiative
and
then
finally,
we
have
the
the
fifth
ibc
is
for
arts
and
history.
E
K
K
Yeah,
thank
you.
My
my
only
comment
is
on
the
memorial
river
node,
which
I'm
a
hundred
thousand
percent
in
support
of,
and,
I
think,
was
an
excellent
idea
by
our
community,
our
our
mayor's
office
and
others
who
brought
forward
this
idea.
I
I
think
it's
it's
a
great
way
to
memorialize
these
heroes.
K
I'm
sure
it's
not
just
myself,
but
others
have
heard
from
others
within
our
community
over
the
week,
and
you
know
really
reminded
of
the
the
sad
and
horrific
incident
that
also
occurred
six
years
ago
with
other
guard
pilots
in
particular
stein,
gerhart
and
john
hardaway
lost
their
lives
in
the
apache
crash
next
to
the
airport,
and
I
think
it's
important.
K
I
know
that
from
others
in
our
community,
their
their
widows
still
live
here,
some
of
their
parents,
and
it
would
be
a
great
thing
to
consider
to
include
them
and
any
others
past
our
future.
As
part
of
this
great
memorial
for
these,
these
heroes
in
our
community.
E
Absolutely
council,
member
mayor,
I
will
absolutely
make
sure
jennifer
tomlinson
is
not
listening
right
now.
I
will
make
sure
to
deliver
that
message
to
her.
L
Councilmember
thompson
is
correct.
We
have
received
messages
from
different
members
of
the
community.
L
It
is
unfortunate
when,
when
we
try
to
honor
a
situation
like
this,
and
the
intention
is
100
good-
that,
unfortunately,
in
that
effort,
other
people
are
made
to
feel
excluded
and,
like
their
loved
ones,
don't
hold
the
same
value
in
our
community.
So
I'm
not
exactly
sure
the
way
around
that,
but
but
it
is
important
that
we
convey
that
that
we
have
received
those
messages
from
other
people.
So
thank
you.
Travis.
A
Madam
mayor,
thank
you
travis,
just
a
real,
quick
question,
although
it's
not
very
much
money
out
of
the
neighborhood
reinvestment
program,
I
assume
that
arts
and
history
will
be
that
these
traffic
boxes
will
be
in
neighborhoods
or
where
are
they
going
to
be
located.