►
From YouTube: Boise City Council - Evening Session
Description
Tuesday June 14, 2022 at 6:00 PM MDT
A
B
E
Yes,
there's
a
couple
items
to
remove
from
the
to
one
to
eliminate
from
the
consent
agenda
for
a
later
date
and
then
another
one
to
pull
from
the
consent
agenda.
The
one
to
remove
for
a
later
date
would
be
three
one,
seven,
two
two
and
then
the
one
to
pull
for
further
discussion
would
be
resolution.
Three
one,
two
two
two.
A
F
A
G
A
F
A
H
A
E
Serve
as
the
council
liaison
to
the
library,
and
so
I
was
able
to
look
at
both
of
the
applications
and
it's,
it
is
really
exciting
to
see
some
someone
with
so
much
library
experience
from
a
school
standpoint
on
our
library
board
and
then
also
really
excited
to
see
rebecca
on
there
as
well.
So
we've
got
two
great
people
coming
onto
the
library
board.
A
E
A
Both
all
right
item
three
on
special
business
is
cup
21-26,
a
reconsideration
request,
just
information
for
members
of
the
public
on
reconsideration.
The
request
before
us
tonight
is
whether
or
not
the
council
would
choose
to
reconsider.
There's
not
it's
not
a
time
for
public
comment
or
public
testimony.
Only
if
an
item
does
come
up
for
reconsideration.
If
the
council
agrees
to
do
that,
then
you
reset
the
public
hearing
for
that
with
that
josh.
Thank.
I
The
requests
do
not
require
a
public
hearing,
as
you
mentioned
in
our
before
council
tonight,
to
decide
if
the
request
for
reconsideration
shall
be
granted.
If
they
were
granted,
staff
would
ensure
the
public
hearing
date
is
set
and
that
notice
is
adequately
given.
So
upon
request,
the
the
council
may
reconsider
a
decision
for
good
cause.
A
good
cause
includes
the
party
requesting
reconsideration
has
relevant
information.
I
E
I
looked
at
their
the
request
and
requests
plural
for
reconsideration.
I
read
them
from
top
to
bottom.
I
didn't
see
any
new
information
information
that
wasn't
appropriately
just
appropriately
discussed
during
the
hearing
or
information.
That
was
not
addressed
by
the
reason
statement,
and
so
I
would
move
that
we
deny
the
request
for
reconsideration.
F
A
I
guess
I
will
just
comment
that
it's
unusual
actually
to
have
a
motion
on
these.
We
typically
if
we
are
not
going
to
reconsider,
just
allow
it
not
to.
I
think
in
this
case,
council
members
felt
this
council
member
who
made
the
motion
probably
felt
it
was
important
to
make
a
state
a
clear
statement
rather
than
just
let
it
die.
A
D
G
D
A
G
D
A
D
A
A
E
For
our
gardeners,
and
really
just
for
our
ecological
system
in
general
and
what
they
found
was
that
about
a
third
of
the
trees
in
the
guide
already
were
fell
into
this
pollinator-friendly
category.
So
when
they
updated
the
guide,
what
they
did
is
they
ended
up
putting
a
symbol
labeling
which
trees
were
pollinator
friendly
and
the
resolution
that
we're
looking
at
here
is
really
kind
of
an
ongoing
commitment
to
building
out
our
city's
tree
canopy,
but
also
making
sure
that
we're
supporting
our
pollinators
in
the
process.
E
So,
with
this
resolution,
we're
really
announcing
a
goal
of
making
one-third
of
all
the
trees
that
we
plant
in
boise
to
fall
into
that
pollinator-friendly
category,
and
these
are
trees
of
all
sorts
of
different
sizes,
all
sorts
of
different
shapes
and
really
serving
all
sorts
of
different
purposes.
A
pollinator-friendly
tree
doesn't
cost
more
than
non-pollinator-friendly
tree,
and
so
it's
really
something
that
shouldn't
have
an
impact
on
the
city's
budget
or
any
of
our
developers
budget
as
well.
So
really
just
one
of
those
things.
E
In
my
mind,
that
seems
like
a
small
deal
but
really
adds
up
to
this
idea
of
when
change
happens.
Change
can
be
good,
we
can
continue
to
build
a
canopy
and
we
can
continue
to
support
and
even
grow
our
pollinators
here
in
boise.
So
that's
kind
of
the
context
of
this,
and
I
don't
know
if
there's
further
discussion
or
if
we
want
to
go
to
some
of
the
changes
you
were
talking
about.
A
Thank
you,
councilmember
hallie
burton.
I
would
like
to
make
just
a
few
comments.
I,
when
councilmember
hallie
burton
mentioned
to
me
that
he'd
like
to
bring
forward
a
resolution
to
ensure
that,
as
we
work
on
the
city
of
tree
challenge,
we
were
cognizant
of
and
attempting
to
plant
the
right
number
of
trees
that
were
also
pollinator-friendly.
A
I
was
really
excited
just
in
fact
recently
learned
as
as
this
was
all
happening,
that
one
of
the
trees
I
planted
on
the
parking
strip
in
front
of
our
house.
Unbeknownst
to
me
is
a
pollinator-friendly
tree,
a
linden
tree.
Some
of
you
may
have
one,
and
I
should
have
known
because
about
this
time
of
year,
when
the
tree
flowers,
you
can
stand
under
it
and
hear
it
buzz.
A
The
bees
really
really
love
it,
and
it's
exciting
to
think
that
we
can
both
build
a
tree
canopy,
which
has
so
many
co-benefits
and
add
yet
another
co-benefit.
By
by
doing
this,
I
would
make
a
request
of
council
member
halliburton
when
he
makes
the
motion
that
we
just
add
a
phrase.
It's
kind
of
a
clerical
phrase
in
the
first,
whereas
for
those
of
you
who
don't
know
the
city
of
trees
challenge,
we
are
challenging
ourselves
to
plant
a
tree
for
every
household
in
the
city.
A
That's
a
hundred
thousand
trees
and
also
to
plant
a
tree
for
every
resident
in
the
city,
a
seedling
somewhere
in
a
forest
nearby,
that's
been
impacted
by
insects
or
fire,
or
other
degradation
like
that,
and
so,
if
council,
member
hallie
burton
would
be
so
inclined.
I
would
like
to
add
that
boise
is
planting
one
forest
seedling
for
every
resident
in
an
idaho
forest.
E
E
That
mayor,
yes,
nothing
more
as
far
as
discussion,
I
just
thought
I
would
make
sure
that
I
acknowledged
a
few
people
who
had
worked
on
this
and
the
first
first.
Is
you
and
all
the
work
that
you've
done
to
make
boise
a
more
tree
friendly
place
and
our
continued
work
in
building
out
the
canopy?
It's
it's
something
that
you've,
like.
I
said
earlier,
you've
done
ever
since
I've
been
here.
You've
done
it
before.
E
F
Other
comments,
madame
yes,
thank
you,
madam
mayor.
I
just
want
to
thank
both
you
and
councilmember
hallie
burton.
I
know
this
is
a
project
that's
near
and
dear
to
your
heart,
and
I
really
appreciate
you
welcoming
a
collaboration
from
from
one
of
our
colleagues
and
it's
it's
something
I
I
hope
to
see
moving
forward,
more
opportunities
for
us
to
support
each
other
in
the
projects
that
that
are
that
are
very
special
to
us.
F
E
A
D
Ord-30-22
an
ordinance
car21-00047
for
property
located
at
2315,
south
broadway
avenue
emitting
zoning
classifications
of
the
city
of
boise
city
to
change.
The
classification
of
real
property,
particularly
described
in
section
1
of
this
ordinance
in
adjacent
rights,
way
from
r-1c
single-family
residential
8
units
per
acre
to
r-2-d,
medium
density,
residential
with
design
review,
14.5
units
per
acre,
sending
forth
a
reason.
Statement
in
support
of
such
zone
change
and
providing
an
effective
date.
F
G
F
D
A
A
J
Madam
mayor
council
members,
I
don't
know
the
exact
number
of
the
original
application.
However,
there
are
three
trees
in
the
right-of-way
that
are
diseased
or
damaged
that
are
going
to
be
removed
and
mitigated
for
in
the
right-of-way
and
three
trees
on
site
that
are
going
to
be
removed
and
mitigated
for
on-site.
K
Madam
mayor
members
of
city
council,
ben
semple,
1450
west
bannock
street
boise,
idaho
83702,
I
want
to
thank
jesse
for
her
presentation
encapsulated,
while
we're
back
here,
you're,
probably
familiar
with
the
previous
project
that
was
approved
there
to
get
right
to
your
question.
We
are
mitigating
for
the
there
are
three
additional
trees
that
were
along
that
shared
lot
line
of
the
new
lot
that
was
purchased
and
the
previous
parcel
on
the
corner.
So
we
are
mitigating
for
those
fully.
K
Actually,
I
think
we
have
more
trees
going
in
that
than
our
them
were
removed
in
terms
of
the
caliper
inches.
The
trees
that
were
diseased
within
the
right-of-way
have
already
been
removed,
but
we
are
committed
to
planting
some
class
3
as
well
as
some
class
2
trees
there,
because
the
planter
strip
is
ten
feet
wide,
so
it
accommodates
the
class
three
trees
and
then
knowing
that
there's
been
some
modifications
to
the
looking
at
trying
to
encourage
pollinators,
we're
definitely
looking
at
the
varieties
of
trees.
That's
actually
the
first
I've
heard
of
it.
K
So
I
will
be
looking
into
that,
so
how
we
can
incorporate
at
least
a
third
of
those
to
be
pollinator,
friendly
and
yeah.
The
project
really
is
pretty
similar.
There
was
a
single
family
home
that
was
going
to
be
constructed
on
the
site
as
part
of
the
original
project
that
has
since
gone
away
and
has
become
two
town
homes,
but
we
feel
the
project
was
improved.
K
We
can
actually
self-park
every
house
we're
adding
an
attached
garage
to
the
existing
structure
on
the
corner,
so
each
home
will
have
a
two-car
garage
on
their
lot
instead
of
previously,
where
there
were
some
flags
and
kind
of
some
unique
orientation
of
flag
lots
to
get
back
to
garages,
so
we
also
removed
an
adu
that
was
part
of
the
original
proposal
from
this
project.
So,
ultimately
we
have
the
same
number
of
living
units
as
we
did
with
the
previous
project,
and
with
that
I
would
stand
for
additional
questions.
If
you
have
any.
A
A
D
A
A
B
A
G
L
A
M
M
Each
home
will
take
vehicular
access
from
its
adjacent
street
via
the
existing
individual
driveways
on
the
site.
There
are
existing
street
improvements
along
tucker
road
and
the
applicant
will
install
curb
gutter
and
five
foot
wide
attached.
Sidewalk
along
the
site's
frontage
on
girard
street
attached.
Sidewalks
are
appropriate
in
this
instance
due
to
the
location
of
the
existing
home,
which
would
prevent
the
installation
of
detached
sidewalks
of
the
landscape
buffer.
M
No
changes
are
proposed
to
the
existing
landscaping
on
the
site
and
all
trees
will
be
retained.
One
neighbor
did
express
opposition
to
the
proposed
subdivision.
However,
the
planning
and
zoning
commission
did
find
that
the
applicant
or
the
application
complied
with
all
approval
criteria
and,
at
their
april
fourth
hearing
the
commission
approved
the
associated
plan,
mutant
development
and
recommended
approval
of
suv,
22-3
I'll
stand
for
any
questions.
A
A
Yes,
so
here's
my
question:
it
sets
the
kind
of
sets
the
scale
and
the
design
of
the
sidewalks
going
east.
We
know
even
on
residential
streets,
that
attached
sidewalks
aren't
always
the
best
did
we
ask.
I
know
that
the
house
is
very
near
the
road
the
existing
adu
did.
We
consider
at
least
trying
to
create
some
safe
space
along
the
edge
for
pedestrians.
A
L
Yeah
hi,
thank
you,
madam
mayor
and
city
council
members
yeah.
I
don't
have
much
to
add
from
what
the
city
planner
sabrina
had
provided.
I
I
guess
I
would
comment
that
the
sidewalk
is
a
little
awkward
in
this
in
this
space,
since
it
you
know,
starts
and
stops
on
either
side
and
and
kind
of
enters
into
the
backyard
of
of
the
grassy
apartments
on
on
gerard
street
there,
but
I'm
fine
either
way,
obviously
sidewalks
add
a
lot
of
like
neighborhood
value,
but
yeah.
That's
my
only
comment.
A
A
E
Madame
americas,
I
do
have
a
quick
question
for
stop
just
because
I
got
thrown
off
by
maybe
just
some
miswarding
on
the
north
side,
which
would
be
gerard
street.
There
is
a
sidewalk
proposed,
but
it's
not
a
detached
sidewalk.
That's
correct,
yeah,
great
yeah,
because
for
some
reason,
when
hearing
from
the
applicant
it
almost
sounded
like
there
wasn't
going
to
be
a
sidewalk,
and
it's
like
I
can
understand
why
it
might
not
be
detached.
E
D
M
The
resound
to
r1c
is
also
supported
by
the
eustic
neighborhood
plan,
which
calls
for
infill
development,
with
a
density
of
five
to
seven
units
per
acre.
The
applicant
proposes
to
develop
the
site
with
five
new
residential
dwelling
units
and
the
rezone
is
needed
in
order
to
accommodate
that
desired
density.
With
no
opposition.
The
planning
and
zoning
commission
approved
the
associated
planned
unit
development
and
recommended
approval
of
car
22-q
and
I'll
stand
for
any
questions.
O
Madam
mayor
members
of
council,
kathy
sewell
with
platform
architecture
design,
don't
really
have
anything
to
add.
We
appreciate
staffs
work
working
with
us
throughout
the
process
to
put
forth
the
application
and
the
the
pud,
but
with
that,
if
you
have
any
questions
for
us,
we
can
certainly
answer
them.
The
my
client,
the
owner,
is
here
as
well.
O
A
O
A
N
O
Madam
mayor
council,
member
hollings
one
one
comment
from
from
staff
during
the
the
pud
was
in
question
of
that
one
unit
on
the
north.
That
has
an
entry
that
does
not
face
the
street.
That
is
something
that,
as
a
conditional
approval,
we
need
to
work
through.
You
know,
as
we
in
in
our
planning
for
this
not
only
looking
at
the
architecture
but
also
just
sort
of
the
approach.
O
We
felt
that
you
know
with
the
idea
of
a
sidewalk
and
the
landscaping
and
overall
articulation
area
that
that
will
still
read
as
a
front
entry.
We
understand
staff's
comment
and
so
that
one
unit
on
the
north
will
get
reconfigured
so
that
all
the
doors
entries
face
face
to
street
and
in
terms
of
the
overall
layout
you
know
we
were
working
with
achd
and
their
requirements
in
terms
of
where
site
access
could
be
taken
and
meeting
their
intersection.
N
A
Further
questions
of
the
applicant,
thank
you.
I
do
have
a
quick
question
for
staff
after
that,
so,
first
of
all
there
it
looks
like
there's
a
curb
bulb
out
at
the
corner
of
cory
and
linda
vista,
and
then
so.
If
you'd
comment
was
that
a
requirement
of
achd
given
the
streets,
the
functional
class
of
these
streets
and
also
then
comment
on,
should
we
add
a
condition
for
the
street
facing
entries
in
order
to
ensure
that,
as
you
work
through
to
the
final
plot,
you
can
get
that.
M
Yes,
madam
mayor
council,
president
clegg,
the
site,
improvements
and
access
were
designed
in
compliance
with
the
chd's
standards,
including
the
sidewalk,
along
corey
lane
that
was
planned
to
meet
up
with
achd's,
further
improvement
of
that
entire
street
and
the
condition
for
all
units
adjacent
to
a
street
to
have
a
front
door
that
faces
that
street
was
included
with
the
associated
pud.
That
was
approved
by
the
commission.
A
D
A
A
G
A
D
A
Thank
you
item
number
two
is
our
second
public
hearing
cup
22-7
stephen
shapps
at
1604,
south
phillippi
street
and
appeal
of
the
planning
and
zoning
commission
approval
of
a
conditional
use
permit
to
operate
a
group
home
on
point
three
acres
in
an
lod
zone
and
to
present
for
staff.
We
have
delaney.
Thank
you
delaney.
Sorry,
thank.
P
You
good
evening,
madam
mayor
members
of
the
council,
before
you
is
an
appeal
of
a
conditional
use
permit.
The
project
site
is
0.3
acres
and
an
lod
limited
office
with
design
review
zone
located
at
1604
south
phillippi
street.
The
site
is
currently
developed
with
a
vacant
2
354
square
foot
commercial
office,
which
was
originally
constructed
as
a
single
family
home
in
1954
and
then
converted
into
an
office
in
the
1990s.
P
P
P
The
element
of
this
proposed
project
that
triggers
the
need
for
a
conditional
use
permit
is
the
conversion
from
office
to
residential
use.
The
proposed
use
is
compatible
with
the
surrounding
neighborhood
and
is
large
enough
to
accommodate
the
proposed
use
with
all
dimensional
and
developmental
standards
of
the
lo
zone
being
met.
P
The
proposed
project
complies
with
the
comprehensive
plan
because
it's
located
at
an
intersection
of
a
major
transit
corridor,
adjacent
to
public
transit,
near
community
activity
center
and
within
walking
and
biking
distance
to
employment,
education,
amenities
and
other
services
on
may
3rd.
2022
stephen
stephen
shops
appealed
the
planning
and
zoning
commission's
approval
with
the
following
two
grounds
of
appeal,
one
being
that
the
site
is
unsafe
for
human
habitation
due
to
idaho
power
infrastructure
being
located
adjacent
to
the
property.
P
P
P
The
planning
and
zoning
commission
did
not
honor
this
request
to
defer
from
the
appellant
because
it
did
not
meet
the
qualifications
to
defer,
which
is
set
by
boise
city
code.
Additionally,
idaho
power
does
not
comment
on
conditional
use
permits
unless
it's
somehow
impacting
a
facility
or
property
that
they
own.
P
Additionally,
I'd
like
to
note
public
comments
were
received
during
the
the
appeal
review.
A
letter
from
the
hillcrest
neighborhood
association
was
received,
requesting
that
the
city
impose
additional
monitoring
to
help
protect
the
neighborhood.
Other
public
comments
discussed
concerns
with
compatibility
transient
use,
devaluing
of
neighboring
properties
and
number
of
group
homes
owned
by
the
operator.
P
A
P
A
All
right
with
that,
this
is
an
appeal,
and
so
we
have
the
appellant,
steve
shapps.
Who
is
a
party
of
record
in
order
to
testify
at
an
appeal
hearing
you
had
to
have
testified
or
given
written
testimony
at
the
original
hearing
and
so
from
our
records.
The
only
other
person
who's
signed
up
tonight
who
is
eligible
to
testify
as
ruthmatics,
because
you
test
fight
at
the
other
hearing.
Q
Q
These
group
homes
are
all
for
x,
convicts
on
parole,
just
to
clarify
that
they're
all
owned
by
joe
howell
of
joe's
house
llc
and
in
the
last
six
years
he's
put
in
37
bedrooms,
four
ex-convicts
on
the
boise
bench,
plus
eight
more
bedrooms
in
meridian
for
a
total
of
45
bedrooms.
You
can
see
on
the
stars
here
where
they
are
they're
all
kind
of
in
the
same
general
vicinity,
maybe
a
little
bit
outlier
there
and
he
already
owns
one:
that's
less
than
200
meters
up
the
street.
Q
Q
Q
It
was
a
health
effect
created
by
the
power
lines
and
I'll
show
you
why
in
a
few
minutes,
but
I
was
able
to
confirm
that
with
don
amex
this
morning
and
then
on
december,
30th
of
1994,
idaho
power
settled
the
lawsuit
by
buying
the
house
from
the
amics
family
and
they
signed
a
settlement
agreement
which
is
referenced
by
yakora
daniels
and
I'd
like
to
play
her
voicemail
message.
For
you.
Q
Q
Boise's
planning
and
zoning
supported
conversion
of
that
property
to
non-residential,
and
it
was
rezoned
as
commercial
property
and
boise
planning
and
zoning
supported
the
rezoning,
because
the
power
lines
had
significant
impact
upon
the
property
and
in
their
own
words,
made
it
quite
undesirable
for
residential
use
and
then
for
the
last
26
years.
It's
been
used
as
commercial
property,
but
now
all
of
a
sudden,
joe
hell,
has
bought
the
property
and
he
would
like
to
make
it
into
a
back
into
a
residential
property
for
eight
eight
people
to
live
in.
P
Q
So
my
appeal
ground
is
that
this
is
unsafe
structure
for
residential
use
that
was
previously
subject
to
a
lawsuit
settled
at
a
court.
Idaho
power
according
to
don
amex,
came
out
and
did
some
measurements
on
the
electrical
field
at
the
house
and
determined
that
it
was
unsafe
for
residential
use.
They
bought
it.
It
was
rezoned
with
their
support
to
commercial
property,
and
you
can
see
the
power
lines
in
this
photo.
Q
The
easement
is
40
feet
into
this
into
here,
so
it
cuts
through
the
house
at
an
angle,
and
the
house
is
flat
and
the
power
lines
are
dipping
down
very
steeply
down
the
boise
bench
there.
So
they're
actually
closer
to
the
house
on
the
far
side
than
they
are
on
the
near
side
and
then
you've
got
four
power
lines
crossing
overland
road
coming
this
direction.
So
if
you
look
up
the
power
pole,
you
see
a
whole
bunch
of
lines
and
they're
crossing
right
at
the
house.
Q
Q
Next
slide,
please
so
how
do
power
lines
and
electric
magnetic
fields?
Why
are
they
such
a
concern?
Now?
This
is
kind
of
a
simple
example
showing
a
simple
power
line
and
there's
the
house
for
scale
roughly
for
scale
and
the
strength
of
the
magnetic
field
is
is
not
linear,
it's
very
non-linear,
so
the
closer
you
are
to
it,
the
stronger
it
is
and
the
more
dangerous
it
is,
and
power
lines
are
considered
sources
for
extremely
low
frequency
electromagnetic
fields.
So
this
is
different
from
you
know
your
microwave
oven
or
your
your
ct
scan.
Q
Q
Q
Q
So
during
the
planning
zoning
commission
hearing
the
commissioner
blanchard
stated:
if
power
lines
were
killing
people
or
making
them
sick,
we
would
see
it
everywhere,
including
the
school
next
door
he's
referring
to
the
puente
spanish
language
preschool
next
door,
and
you
can
see
from
this
photo
pierce
the
proposed
group
home
here.
Here's
the
spanish
language
preschool
and
the
power
lines
are
are
much
less
severe
of
a
problem
there
and
their
office
school
is
offset
from
the
lines.
K
K
K
The
two
grounds
that
were
are
currently
listed
were
that
the
property
is
unsafe
for
human
habitation
and
that
the
appellant
was
denied
their
deferral
request
at
pnz,
we've
determined
through
a
lot
of
research
that
the
deed
has
no
restrictions
on
it
for
use
as
a
residential
use.
This
was
confirmed
by
idaho
power.
They
have
no
vested
interest
in
the
property.
K
K
K
We've
received
no
confirmation
or
information
from
idaho
power
that
they
have
any
record
of
a
lawsuit.
Regarding
the
property,
we
also
have
not
reviewed
or
received
any
documents
or
information
from
the
appellant
or
related
parties,
including
the
son
of
the
previous
mayor.
That
would
indicate
that
there
was
a
lawsuit
or
what
that
contained.
K
This
did
not
restrict
his
use
of
that.
Yes,
he
turned
it
into
an
office,
but
he
could
have
just
as
easily
turned
it
into
a
single
family
home
if
he
wanted
to
the
transfer
of
the
property
states
that
the
owner
may
use
the
property
without
limitations.
As
long
as
the
structure
and
materials
on
the
site
remain
compliant
with
the
setback
from
the
overhead
power
lines,
a
copy
of
the
transfer
was
included
in
the
in
the
appeal,
as
well
as
a
portion
of
it
was
included
with
our
response.
C
E
E
A
It
appears
that
there
is
not
four
foot
clearance
around
that
corner
on
the
sidewalk
and
additionally,
if
anyone
is
going
to
use
the
bus
stop
on
the
other
side
of
the
street,
there's
no
crossing
between
curtis
no
marked
signaled
crossing
between
curtis
and
orchard.
Do
you
have
any
discussions
about
that.
K
Madam
mayor,
the
achd
did
not
indicate
or
provide
any
feedback
on
that
we
did
not
have
any
conversations
with
achd.
Regarding
that,
it's
my
understanding
that,
because
this
was
fairly
limited
in
terms
of
site
development,
really
no
site
development
happening
at
all
and
all
facilities
were
in
place
that
they
did
not
see
the
need
to
condition
this
with
any
additional
improvements
and
that's
kind
of
where
we
we
stand
right
now.
K
A
R
I
feel
like
that
as
a
previously
incarcerated
individual
having
to
live
in
a
bedroom
with
another
man,
it's
counterproductive
for
someone
to
move
on
with
their
life
and
try
to
move
forward.
I
do
work
with
local
law
enforcement.
I
work
with
idaho
department
of
corrections.
I
talk
with
them
regularly.
I
keep
them
apprised
of
who's.
Moving
in
and
out
of
my
homes.
R
R
I
test
for
suboxone
fentanyl,
all
the
new
stuff,
that's
scary
out
there
that's
killing
people
in
our
community.
I
run
safe,
sober
homes,
my
residents
they
feel
like
my
houses
are
home.
They
can
go
in,
they
feel
safe.
They
can
keep
their
belongings
there.
They
don't
have
to
worry
about
their
food
being
stolen.
R
A
S
S
But
what
we're
not
happy
about
is
that
when
we
did
our
research
that
he
has
seven
already
in
our
neighborhood
within
two
miles
and
then
he's
already
got
one
200
feet
away
from
this
one
and
when
he
was
at
planning
and
zoning,
he
mentioned
his
first
convict
down
there,
but
he
forgot
to
mention
he
also
housed
another
five.
You
know
he
wasn't
clear
to
you
know
to
planting
zoning
when
they
they
didn't
know
that
he
had
that
many
houses
around
us.
S
The
other
thing
is,
is
when
he
first
came
here
last
summer
and
talked
to
me
and
totally
told
me
what
he
was
doing.
I
said
you
know.
I
know
that
we're
not
going
to
be
happy
about
that.
I
don't
know
anybody
that,
like
you,
I
don't
think
you
would
like
that
in
your
backyard
and
so
anyway
he
immediately
started
getting
that
house
without
any
kind
of
permits.
I
called
planning
and
zoning.
I
didn't
know
any
better.
I
just
said:
can
this
be
possible?
S
They
said
well,
no,
he
hasn't
filed
anything,
but
he
continued
to
get
it
and
redo
the
eight
bedrooms
without
the
without
going
to
planning
and
zoning
for
the
rezoning.
So
he
had
already
decided
he
was
going
to
do
that
anyway
without
the
proper
permits.
So
you
know
that
that
was
disturbing
and
then
so
you
know
like
I
said
again,
I
get
it,
but
you
know
you
don't
plant
that
many
on
our
block
and
you
don't
plant
one
200
yards
from
another
one.
S
You
already
own
that
had
an
incident
in
2019
that
the
neighbors
said:
10
cars
surrounded
that
house,
they
kicked
him
out
and
then
he
went
down
to
ann
morrison
park
and
killed
somebody.
It
was
on
the
news,
so
you
know
I
mean
as
safety
we
buy
our
houses
to
protect
our
families.
We
hope
that
our
property
values
aren't
going
to
plummet
with
stuff
like
this.
We
also
we're
just
trying
to
be
in
a
protective
neighborhood
and
that
doesn't
make
us
as
a
neighborhood
feel
very
protective.
S
S
There's
people
in
the
audience
right
here
that
knew
the
amex
family
for
40
years.
So
you
know
it's
it's
a
true
state
story.
When
you
we
talk
about
that.
The
other
thing
is
mr
hal
he's
in
a
protected
neighborhood
in
eagle.
He
has
protected
hoas
he's
come
into
the
to
the
bench
because
he's
picking
on
neighbors
that
don't
have
hoas,
and
so
he
can
run
his
own.
You
know
his
own.
S
Okay,
I
just
I
just
want
to
thank
my
neighbor
for
coming
today
and
supporting
this,
and
I
oh
one
last
thing
this:
the
the
school
the
school
is
selling,
so
they
really
they're
supporting
that,
but
they
don't
it's
not
gonna
affect
him.
The
owners
of
poenta
school
are
selling.
I
learned
that
two
days
ago.
A
K
Madam
mayor,
I
don't
really
have
much
else
to
add
two
of
the
group
homes
that
were
shown
on
the
map
are
connected
to
the
joe's
house
llc
office
at
eagleson
and
franklin
where
joe
works
every
day.
That's
approximately
a
mile
from
this
location
and
then
the
other
ones
are
anywhere
from
a
mile
and
a
quarter
to
a
mile
and
a
half
from
that
same
office.
K
I
would
say
that
seven
locations
in
an
area
that
contains
thousands
of
residential
homes
is
not
indicative
of
a
high
concentration.
It
just
happens
to
be
the
homes
that
joe
has
purchased.
I've
been
working
with
him
for
the
entire
time.
Yes,
he
did
start
a
process
that
if
this
was
not
in
an
lod
zone,
if
this
was
a
residential
zone,
he
would
not
be
required
to
do
anything
other
than
remodel
and
obtain
the
permits
necessary
to
do
that
remodel
which
he
does
have.
There
was
a
stop
work
order
placed
on
it
during
this
process.
K
E
Q
This
property
has
been
commercial
for
26
years,
and
it
should
remain
that
way.
It's
unsafe
property
to
live
in
it's
next
to
a
preschool
and
who's
going
to
be
responsible
for
issues
that
might
happen
if
you
do
approve
this
at
least
require
an
updated
study
of
the
emf
field
that
could
determine
if
it's
safe
or
not
safe.
That
would
give
you
hard
scientific
data
to
go
by,
and
these
sorts
of
things
are
relatively
simple
and
could
probably
be
done
by
a
independent,
third-party
contractor
or
perhaps
even
bsu,
which
I
would
say
was
acceptable.
Q
C
E
I
guess
these
questions
aren't
they're
related
to
the
application,
they're
not
related
to
the
decision
I'm
going
to
make
here
shortly.
But
to
me
there
are
some
obvious
street
issues,
especially
with
not
being
able
to
go
around
the
corner
of
that.
That
poll-
and
I
don't
know
what
opportunity
we
have
to
address-
that
with
achd
at
this
point
or
with
the
rezone.
P
Yeah,
madam
mayor
council,
member
holly,
burton
I
think,
ben
sort
of
touched
on
it
when
we're
looking
at
a
simple
change
of
use,
we're
not
looking
at
a
full
infill
development,
we're
not
tearing
down
buildings,
we're
keeping
everything
relatively
the
same.
There's
very
minimal
site
improvements
required
the
parking
was
there,
the
structure
is
there
so
looking
outside
the
pedestrian
connectivity
was
not
part
of,
I
think,
staff's
review
and
looking
at
the
compatibility,
but
it's
definitely
an
option
for
a
condition
here.
If
you
so
see
fit.
E
E
P
E
A
E
G
G
There
were
three
appeal
grounds:
the
first
was
that
the
decision
to
put
this
property
near
a
school
was
racist.
We
didn't
hear
any
argument
about
that
at
all.
I
don't
think
that
was
a
serious
argument,
but
at
the
extent
it
was
there's
no
evidence
for
it
in
the
planning
and
zoning
commission's
record
and
there's
certainly
no
evidence
for
it
here.
The
second
ground
was
that
the
property
is
unsafe
for
human
habitation.
G
The
basis
of
that
was
an
alleged
lawsuit
from
the
1990s.
That
would
be
a
matter
of
public
record
and
could
be
obtained
nobody's
found.
It
doesn't
seem
to
exist,
but
at
any
rate
it's
not
evidence
of
anything,
because
there
was
never
a
final
verdict
or
a
ruling
that
decided
anything.
The
two
parties
made
an
agreement
and
it
went
away
so
there's
no
finding
of
health
hazard
there
at
any.
P
G
Any
review
body
or
anybody
has
the
ability
to
control
this
docket
and
make
decisions
about
when
it
wants
to
hear
things,
including
deferment,
and
even
even
if
that
were
an
error
which
it
was
not
there's
still
an
avenue
or
remedy
for
redress
by
appealing
to
city
council,
which
is
where
you
are
now
so,
even
if
it
should
have
been
deferred.
The
lack
of
the
failure
to
do
that
was
harmless
because
we're
here
now
reviewing
it.
N
N
N
E
I'm,
like
councilmember
beijing,
said
our
when
we
look
at
an
appeal:
it's
a
pretty
narrow
scope
of
what
we're
able
to
do
based
off
of
re-looking
at
the
evidence,
and
so
I
didn't
see
anything
in
there
as
well.
That
would
that
would
make
me
overturn
their
decision.
I
would
say
that
we
have
a
very
large
housing
shortage
in
boise
for
everyone.
E
We've
got
community
members
who
face
additional
barriers
on
top
of
everyone
else
and
when
you
are
being
released
from
prison
and
you're
trying
to
get
that
next
start,
there's
transportation
barriers,
there's
housing,
barriers,
there's
job
barriers.
Luckily,
right
now
is
a
good
time
to
get
a
job
and
we
need
places
for
people
to
stay,
and
these
are
people,
and
so
I
do
appreciate
you
putting
forward
an
application.
I
appreciate
the
work
that
you
do.
A
Further
comments,
I'm
going
to
make
one
quick
comment.
I
appreciate
the
concern
of
neighborhoods
that
don't
have
hoas
and
their
ability
to
control
things
versus
neighborhoods
that
do,
and
I
do
hope,
living
in
a
neighborhood
that
doesn't
have
an
hoa
by
choice,
because
I
don't
like
the
restrictions
that
an
hoa.