►
From YouTube: Boise City Council - Work Session
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
C
Thank
you
very
much.
Madame
mayor
members
of
the
council.
We
have
four
interim
budget
changes
for
your
consideration
this
afternoon.
Two
of
those
interim
budget
changes
are
funded
by
the
American
Rescue
plan
and
the
other
two
are
funded
by
the
open
space
and
clean
water
Levy
fund.
The
first
one
is
a
American
Rescue
plan
act,
investment.
It
would
cover
Administration
costs
associated
with
the
overall
American
Rescue
plan.
The
amount
286
thousand
dollars
is
within
the
amount
that
was
approved
by
the
city
council
in
May
of
2022,
that's
recommended.
C
Out
of
the
Foothills
Levy
fund,
it
allows
for
a
carbon
mapping
project
within
the
city's
open
space
reserves
to
determine
how
much
capacity
the
Open
Spaces
have
to
store
more
car.
More
carbon
identify.
What
open
space
features
such
as
plant
species
and
soil
composition
are
the
most
impactful
for
carbon
sequestration
and
provide
insight
into
where
future
acquisition
efforts
should
be
focused
to
maximize
carbon
storage.
C
Our
third
item
is
a
property
acquisition
to
allow
for
the
Future
Park
development,
a
future
Park
development
within
West
Boise
on
Shamrock
Street.
This
item
here
would
would
allow
for
the
property
acquisition
in
the
future.
There
would
be
a
a
public
process
to
determine
the
types
of
the
types
of
amenities
that
would
go
into
that
Park
at
some
at
some
period
to
be
determined.
C
Our
fourth
item
is
an
American
Rescue
plan
act
item.
It
is
for
the
conversion
of
certain
buildings,
certain
Building
Systems
from
natural
gas
to
electricity,
natural
gas
emissions
currently
generate
about
just
under
10
percent
of
overall
City
emissions.
C
C
This
project,
similar
to
the
the
administration
one
I
mentioned
earlier,
was
contemplated
in
the
fiscal
year
23
budget
build
and
is
within
the
amounts
approved
by
Council
when
they
made
their
original
funding
recommendations
back
in
May
of
2022.
This
action
is
simply
moving
the
funds
out
of
the
general
fund
and
into
the
capital
fund,
where
we're
where
we
will
account
for
that
project.
With
that
I'd
be
happy
to
stand
for
any
questions.
D
Like
there
are
none,
thank
you
Eric
mayor,
yes,
I,
move.
We
approve
the
FY
2023
interim
budget
changes
for
January
10
2023
as
examined
second.
D
B
D
B
E
E
A
F
Thank
you
mayor
members
of
council,
Tim,
Keane,
director
of
planning
and
development
services,
I'm
going
to
go
through
these
slides
here.
There
are
others
in
attendance
that
know
much
more
about
this
than
I
do
and
thank
Lucas,
I'm,
sorry,
Justin
Lucas
for
attending
this
meeting
with
from
achd
one
of
our
partners.
We've
been
talking
a
lot
about
this
in
the
last
several
weeks.
F
I
also
want
to
introduce
Tessa
Greger
who's
here
who
recently
joined
us
in
the
planning
department,
she's
in
Jessica
zielag's
team
in
the
planning
area
leading
our
mobility
and
public
spaces.
Team
I
hope
you
all
know.
Tessa
we're
excited
to
have
Tessa
with
us.
I've
discussed
this
with
you
back
to
when
we
were
going
into
the
2023
budget
and
really
beefing
up
our
team
that
works
on
Transportation
Mobility
related
work
in
the
city
and
and
the
importance
of
public
spaces
as
it
relates
to
that.
F
So
we're
thrilled
to
have
Tessa
here
with
us,
so
I'm
going
to
go
through
some
slides
here.
This
came
up
at
a
meeting
that
you
had
I
think
in
early
December
related
to
a
development
proposal
on
Victory
Road
on
the
bench,
and
we
actually
have
two
development
proposals
on
Victory.
You
have
the
one
tonight
which
is
called
seasons
on
the
bench
and
then
one
you'll
be
seeing
very
soon
the
one
to
Planning
and
Zoning
Commission
in
December,
and
it
will
be
coming
to
council
I
think
in
February.
F
F
And
discussed
just
that
very
thing,
as
you
all
are
considering
these
important
developments
on
Victory
and
so
I'm
going
to
go
through
a
few
slides
to
give
you
some
context
regarding
achd's
five-year
work
plan,
it's
updated
annually
and
they
seek
our
recommendations
as
to
what
are
not
recommendations.
They
ask
us
for
our
priorities
as
it
relates
to
those
annual
updates.
F
So
we
actually
have
a
full
review
of
that
scheduled
for
your
January
31st
meeting.
Where
we'll
talk
about
city-wide
priorities,
you
know
for
the
whole
city
as
it
relates
to
the
update
of
the
five-year
work
plan
tonight.
Of
course
we're
really
discussing
the
central
bench
and
specifically
the
area,
that's
most
impacted
by
these
new
developments,
Vista
over
to
Federal
Way
and
from
the
canal
North
to
to
Canal
and
then
even
north
of
there.
So
we're
really
concentrating
on
that
area.
F
So
here
is
achg's
bike.
Network
and
I'll.
Show
you
the
city
pathway
map
in
just
a
second,
but
I
think
this
shows
yeah.
So
here's
the
area
we're
specifically
discussing,
but
you
can
see
the
context
around
it
as
it
relates
to
achd's
plan
for
a
bike
Network
and
what
you'll
see
here
is
these
blue
lines,
which
include
Victory
itself
and
then
Canal
to
the
north
of
it
and
other
streets
in
blue,
which
is
in
terms
of
the
hierarchy
of
bike
infrastructure,
as
it
relates
to
achd's
network.
F
The
blue
ones
are
the
ones
where
you
have
the
least
amount
of
infrastructure,
so
it
could
be
sharrows.
Basically.
The
idea,
of
course,
is
that
bikes
are
working
in
the
streets.
That's
what
the
the
blue
lines
represent,
but
you
can
see
the
connectivity
here
over
to
Federal
Way
and
the
Federal
Way
pathway,
which
exists
and
among
the
discussions
that
you're
meeting
recently
was
the
issue
of
how
do
you
get
from
the
neighborhoods
over
to
the
pathway
on
Federal
Way?
F
This
is
important
because
in
the
planning
we've
done
with
the
developers
in
question,
that
pathway
has
been
embraced
and
is
being
implemented,
as
the
plans
suggest
and
more
than
just
including
the
pathway
and
saying.
Okay,
we'll
do
that.
We
actually
have
the
developers
really
designing
around
that
pathway.
It
will
be
a
really
extraordinary
space
for
not
just
the
people
that
live
in
the
new
developments,
but
for
the
whole
neighborhood
to
connect
to
then
with
regard
to
the
work
program.
F
This
is
the
current
achd
five-year
work
plan
and
you
can
see
kind
of
the
sequencing
of
things
that
are
in
there
as
currently
composed,
so
the
the
green
here
and
is
the
active
stuff
which
was
really
Bikeway
signage.
And
then
you
can
go
through
the
hierarchy
here,
most
closely
aligned
with
that
area
around
Victory
and
Vista
and.
B
F
Way
you'll
see
some
some
of
that
Bikeway
or
a
bike-
signage
I'm,
sorry
in
green,
but
also
the
gray
lines
there
that
provide
some
connectivity
were
in
the
future.
That
includes
the
crossing
of
the
railroad
track,
which
was
much
discussed,
and
it
was
discussed
at
your
meeting
that
it
was
in
The
Five-Year
work
plan.
But,
as
you
can
see,
it
was
a
kind
of
a
future
thing
to
invest
in
we've
been
talking
with
achd
about
making
that
a
higher
priority.
F
Again,
of
course,
I'll
come
back
to
that
in
a
minute,
but
that
also
includes
a
couple
of
well
I'll,
get
I'll,
show
some
other
maps
and
get
zero
in
on
this
area
in
just
a
moment
so
yeah
here
it
is
okay.
So
this
is
the
one
specifically
that
was
discussed
so
much
in
its
relationship
to
the
five-year
work
plan.
So
on
Victory
in
that
crossing
of
the
railroad
and
the
discussion
was
primarily
around
the
the
bike
or
I'm.
Sorry,
the
sidewalk,
the
lack
of
a
sidewalk
connection
and
you'll.
F
Remember
the
photographs
of
the
the
cliff
adjacent
to
the
the
the
railroad,
right-of-way
and
legitimate
obviously
concerns
about
that,
and
so
in
the
five-year
work
plan
that
is,
as
I
said
in
an
out
year,
not
not
really
programmed
just
identified
as
something
we
need
to
be
concerned
about
foreign.
F
Over
to
Federal
Way
and
questions
about
additional
bike,
pedestrian
facilities
and
then
also
the
crossing
a
crossing
of
Federal
Way,
and
so
there
are
plans
for
additional
sidewalks
here,
which,
again
we
can
talk
about
making
a
higher
priority
in
the
five-year
work
plan.
There
are
some
commitments
that
have
been
made
with
regard
to
these
developers
to
participate
that
are
working
on
Victory
to
participate
in
the
improvements
that
are
needed
off-site
over
here
towards
Federal
Way.
F
That
does
include
I'm,
trying
to
remember
what
other
maps
are
here,
yeah
that
does
include
the
the
in
terms
of
the
requirements
for
the
developers.
This
is
getting
into
the
development
itself,
which
is
later
on
your
agenda,
but
just
to
point
out
at
Malad
and
Federal
Way
that
there
be
a
pedestrian
signal
installed
there.
F
One
other
thing,
though,
is
too
that
in
we've
been
discussing
in
the
context
of
coming
back
to
council
around
priorities
for
this
work
plan
update
some
discussion
of
victory,
certainly
as
it
relates
to
the
railroad
crossing,
but
but
maybe
even
over
to
Federal
Way,
because
you
probably
know
I,
don't
know
if
well
I'm
kind
of
getting
into
this
here.
F
Next
steps
for
the
five-year
work
plan
would
include
discussing
with
you
bringing
up
in
priority
some
of
the
sidewalk
improvements
there,
but
also
adding
to
the
scope
of
that
railroad
crossing
such
that
we're,
including
a
bike
facility
there
as
well
and-
and
we
were
discussing
perhaps
even
looking
at
that
where
Victory
gets
the
Federal
Way,
which
is
a
bit
of
an
it's
close.
It's
a
little
bit
of
an
awkward
situation
there,
because
you
have
a
crossing
a
Federal,
Way
kind
of
right
before
the
interchange.
F
If
you're
going
south,
you
know
right
before
you
get
to
the
Broadway
interchange,
there's
a
Crossing
there,
which
gets
you
over
to
the
pathway
but
Victory,
which
comes
towards
that
intersection,
doesn't
quite
have
the
facility
it
needs
for
bike
so
to
to
maybe
add
to
that
to
identify
that
area.
It's
all
within
right
of
way,
so
that's
good,
but
to
make
some
improvements
there.
F
For
this
neighborhood,
as
it
relates
to
these
improvements
and
expanding
the
scope,
perhaps
even
a
little
bit
as
it
relates
to
victory
in
the
railroad
crossing
and
victory
and
its
connection
to
Federal,
Way's
pathway,
so
I
think
that's
my
last
slide
and
I'm
happy
to
answer
questions
about
what
I've
presented
tonight
or
or
asked
someone
to
answer
questions
if
needed.
G
Better
mirror:
yes,
I'll!
Kick
it
off,
so
we're
talking
about
the
railroad
crossing
at
Victory,
then
also
a
little
bit
about
Malad
I.
Don't
think
that
there's
a
single
railroad
crossing
until
you
get
down
to
Overland
that
has
any
sort
of
pedestrian
or
bicycle
facilities.
Is
that
correct,
I.
G
Mean
looking
out
to
remember
looking
at
the
map,
that's
what
it
looks
like.
Sometimes
the
maps
are
out
of
date,
Google
Maps,
and
so
you
said
that
the
Malad
railroad
crossing
is
one
of
the
the
projects
that
is
identified
in
the
five-year
work
plan.
G
F
No,
it's
identified
it's
just
that
it
doesn't
have
funding
in
a
particular
year
so
with
the
the
two.
Let
me
go
back
to
that.
So
you
can
see
them
here,
they're,
actually
the
same
in
terms
of
their
how
they're
designated
within
the
five-year
work
plan
they're
in
Gray
here
so
they're
identified,
but
they
don't
have
funding
associated
with
them.
They
don't
have
a
year.
F
You
know
they're
kind
of
an
out
year
so
that
whole
collection
of
things
we
need
to
zero
in
on
and
decide
should
that
be
in
our
five-year
work
plan
update
as
a
high
priority
that
and
been
tried
it
and
just
discuss
where
it
sits
on
our
priority
list,
I
mean
obviously
we're
going
to
be
coming
to
you
with
that
recommendation,
but
we'll
have
to
discuss
where
it
sits.
Among
all
our
priorities,.
G
G
D
Yes,
thank
you.
So
a
little
bit
of
follow-up
on
that
I
think.
If
I'm
understanding,
council
member
Holly
Burton's
last
question
correctly,
should
we
be
asking
at
that
five-year
work
program,
review
for
The
Crossing
and
the
facilities
on
Victory
to
be
prioritized
ahead
of
any
improvements
on
Malad.
F
Well,
you
know
the
it's
interesting
just
because
you
know
all
of
this
relates
to
the
development
that
we're
anticipating
and
that
you're
reviewing
on
Victory
to
the
question
and
and
the
all
the
Malad
discussion
over
to
Federal
Way
has
to
do
with
what
those
impacts
are
and
how
people
get
around
and
the
safety
of
people
walking
and
biking
and
so
forth.
So
I
mean
it's
all
part
of
one
issue.
F
Really
it's
a
it's
a
matter
of
it
and
probably
we'll
have
to
work
through
that
and
including
with
achd,
to
talk
about
you
know,
what's
the
scale
of
that
Improvement?
What's
the
cost
of
it?
How
long
will
it
take
those
kinds
of
things
just
to
Think
Through
the
sequencing
of
these
things,
but
they're
all
kind
of
of
the
same
priority,
because
they're
responding
to
new
development
and
how
that
will
impact
streets
in
the
existing
neighborhood.
D
So
a
second
question
that
I
have
again
council
member
Hallie
Burton
brings
up
that
there's
not
a
good
Crossing
of
this
railroad
up
in
this
part
of
the
bench
that
includes
pedestrian
facilities
other
than
in
the
really
Urban
parts
of
the
city.
I,
don't
I've
been
looking
for
really
good
examples
of
how
to
do
pedestrian
and
bike
facilities
on
these
Crossings
well
and
as
I
look
at
the
livable
streets
guide.
I
didn't
see
a
really
good
example.
So
do
we
know
what
kinds
of
improvements
We'll
be
asking
for?
What
they'll
look
like?
F
And
we
we
haven't
looked
at
it
close
enough
really
to
to
know
what
the
design
solution
is
that
either
of
these
intersections,
you
know
whether
it's
a
victory
or
a
moad,
so
I
think
we'd
want
to
hold
off
on
that.
Maybe
we
can
have
a
little
bit
more
of
an
idea.
You
know
when
we
come
back
in
January
31st,
but
we
haven't
looked
closely
at
what
the
right
design
solution
is.
Yeah.
F
D
My
last
question:
we
we,
you
know,
we
can't
separate
this
really
from
the
two
applications
that
we
have
both
before
us
tonight
and
and
coming
forward,
and
so
as
part
of
this
in
the
past,
achd
has
been
willing
to
allow
developers
to
go
forward
with
building
some
of
these
kinds
of
improvements
in
return
for
some
forgiveness
of
impact
fees
and
I,
wonder
if
any
of
that
has
been
discussed.
F
Because
you
know
to
your
point,
the
developers
have
been
willing,
as
you
know,
throughout
this
process,
they've
been
willing
to
make
whatever
improvements
we
we've
decided
are
needed
in
association
with
this
development,
so
any
decision
to
speed
up
some
of
these
improvements
through
their
investment
are
things
that
we
should
absolutely
okay
figure
out.
Thank.
D
H
Mayor
I'm
I,
don't
really
have
any
questions
for
Tim
just
more
comments.
H
I
know
that
you
guys
have
will
have
a
lot
to
contend
with
on
deciding
what
gets
pushed
off
to
Future
years
in
the
five-year
work
plan,
and
that's
going
to
be
a
really
tough
decision
process
and
I
wish
you
the
very
best
in
that
work,
because
I
know
that
it's
going
to
be
really
tough.
H
It's
so
interesting
to
me
that
it
these
things
are
brought
to
our
attention
via
development
applications.
It's
like
oh
I,
didn't
actually
think
about
before
that.
There's
not
a
sufficient
pedestrian
and
bike
Crossing
across
the
railroad
tracks
between
Overland
and
gosh
I
mean
where's
the
next
one.
It's
foreign
there's,
really
not
one
so
bringing
up
these.
H
Bringing
up
these
deficiencies
it
just
you
know
it's
both
great-
that
we're
getting
development
it's
hard,
because
now
we
are
faced
with
a
new
set
of
decisions
on
what
we
prioritize,
but
I
do
think
that
this
connectivity
makes
a
whole
lot
of
sense,
and
without
this
application
we
wouldn't
have
known
about
it,
which
is
really
interesting.
H
I
liked,
council
president
clegg's
suggestion
on
looking
at
different
ways
that
we
can
treat
impact
fees
and
I
know
that
I've
said
this
again
and
I'm
going
to
start
sounding
like
a
broken
record
on
it.
But
it's
it's
a
frustration
that
this
development
is
going
to
pay
huge
impact
fees
to
achd.
Those
impact
fees
are
going
to
be
shipped
out
to
support
development
of
roads
that
beget
more
urban
sprawl
instead
of
staying
in
the
city
where
they're
improving
our
transportation
system
locally-
and
this
is
not
a
criticism
of
achd.
H
It's
just
a
frustration
that
I've
had
for
a
long
time
that
that
interpretation
of
where
we
can
use
impact
fees
doesn't
allow
us
to
really
use
those
to
do
smart,
infill
development
and
improve
a
deficient
transportation
system
where
it's
been
built
years
ago
and
is
no
longer
supporting
the
needs
of
neighborhoods.
So
I
just
wanted
to
register
that
once
again,
and
hopefully
that's
something
that
we
can
look
at
policy
wise
in
the
future
to
remedy.
So
if.
A
Kelly
got
Hallie
Burton
and
then
Sanchez.
G
Yep
matter
mayor
just
a
quick
comment
here
when
we're
looking
at
this,
you
know:
there's
there's
the
bicycle
infrastructure
and
pedestrian
infrastructure,
and
it's
maybe
debatable
on
whether
or
not
a
sharo
still
qualifies
as
bicycle
infrastructure.
That's
really
going
to
get
people
comfortable
out
there
writing,
but
I
think.
One
thing
we
know
for
sure
is
that
it's
not
going
to
make
it
easier
for
somebody
who's
trying
to
walk
across
those
railroad
crossings,
and
so,
in
my
mind,
I'd
love
to
see
more
Bicycle
Connection
anywhere.
G
We
can
possibly
get
it,
but
like
the
real
emphasis
here
is:
how
do
we
make
sure
somebody
can
walk
across
this
that
doesn't
have
transportation
options
or
is
trying
to
get
to
a
bus
route
or
is
maybe
using
a
walker
or
a
wheelchair,
and
so
I
think
that
that's
the
the
biggest
concern,
especially
on
the
victory
one
but
on
both
locations
is
not
just.
Can
we
put
a
sharrow
on
there,
but
is
it?
Can
we
make
it
so
that
people
can
walk
across
the
other
side.
E
Hi,
thank
you,
madam
mayor
Tim
and
I.
Think
this
question
might
be
for
the
gentleman
from
achd.
Typically
how
long
or
how
many
of
these
projects
actually
come
to
fruition
during
those
five-year
plans?
Is
it
100
80
percent
50,
because
I
I
know
a
lot
of
it's
tied
to
funding
just
wondering
what
what
that
looks
like.
I
Good
evening,
Madam
mayor
for
the
record,
my
name
is
Justin
Lucas
I'm,
the
deputy
director
of
planning
and
project
management
at
the
Iowa
district.
It's
nice
to
see
you
all
I
don't
get
to
come
here.
Very
often,
it's
a
good
good
to
see
you,
council,
member
Sanchez.
It's
a
really
good
question.
You
know
it's
a
there's,
there's
a
lot
of
projects
in
that
plan,
hundreds
and
hundreds
of
projects,
but
typically
when
a
project
is
identified
with
a
design
year,
for
example,
this
section
of
of
a
victory.
I
This
isn't
the
right
slide,
but
I
believe
this
section
of
victory
has
a
design
year
established
once
it
gets
a
design
year.
They
pretty
much
move.
You
can
potentially
move
that
design
year
up
but
depending
on
the
priority,
but
once
you
get
a
project
going
on
design,
they
move
pretty
well,
I
would
say
within
three
to
five
years
most
projects
that
receive
that
complete
design
are
completed
in
construction.
The
timeline
is
typically
controlled
by
the
necessary
right-of-way
that
is
required,
which
can
be
lots
of
negotiations
there
and
specifically
with
the
railroad
crossings.
I
The
railroad
or
the
operator
of
the
railroad
plays
a
significant
role
in
the
in
the
process.
They
have
to
approve
all
of
the
designs
that
are
basically
proposed
within
the
railroad
right-of-way
there's
a
hierarchy
when
it
comes
to
right-of-way
and
the
railroad
right-of-way
was
established
long
before
the
achd
right-of-way.
So
basically
they
get
to
tell
us
what
what
they're
going
to
allow
within
their
right-of-way.
We
work
with
them
a
lot,
but
it
is
a
lengthy
process
to
work
with
the
railroad,
but
getting
that
design
going
and
started
is
is
one
of
the
keys.
I
So
I
don't
know
if
that
perfectly
answers.
Your
question,
but
I
hope
that
that
at
least
that
idea
of
once
you
get
design
going,
you're,
you're,
you're,
making
progress,
and
it's
very
it
would
be
very
rare
for
achd
to
start
design
on
a
project
and
not
construct
it
within
I
would
say
a
three
to
five
year
period.
E
Thank
you,
and
so
within
those
that
have
a
date
assigned
to
them.
What
percentage
would
you
say
actually
are
completed
in
that
three
to
five
year
timeline.
I
I
would
say:
90
plus
percent
of
projects
that
have
a
date
associated
with
design
are
completed
within
that
three
to
five
year
timeline.
Great.
Thank
you.
J
Anime
Tim,
thank
you
so
much.
This
is
really
insightful
and
Justin
you
may
you
may
not
want
to
sit
down.
Is
this
may
end
up
going
to
you?
You
know
what
I
think
about
all
of
the
different
developments
that
we
get
and
95
of
the
objections
are
infrastructure
and
transportation
and
how
you
get
people
here
and
there.
So
we
clearly
have
some
things
we
want
to
have
happen.
We
want
it
in
the
five-year
work
plan.
Achd
has
a
lot
of
competition
when
it
comes
to
other
municipalities.
J
I
Hi,
council,
member
willitz,
Madame
mayor,
it's
it's
a
it's
a
good
question,
I!
Think.
If
you
were
to
look
at
the
city
of
Boise's
current
integrated
five-year
work
plan
requests
list.
You
would
see
that
the
majority
of
the
projects
in
your
top
20
are
moving
forward
in
some
form
or
fashion.
I.
I
Think
you
have
the
State
Street
Corridor
highly
prioritized
within
your
within
your
prioritization
list
and
there's
a
lot
of
action
on
that
Corridor
and
a
lot
of
investment
that
has
gone
in
and
certainly
there's
a
lot
of
discussions
about
how
to
continue
that
investment
when
it
comes
to
the
specific
sidewalk
and
pedestrian
bicycle
bicyclist
projects
that
we
that
we
work
on
achd
over
the
years
has
completed
probably
hundreds
of
projects,
since
we
significantly
started
this
plan
since
my
time
at
achg
this
about
15
years
ago,
hundreds
of
projects
within
the
city
of
Boise
we've
completed
a
lot
of
projects
on
the
bench.
I
I
Think
if
you
were
to
go
and
look
at
the
bench,
we're
completing
projects
now
and
have
completed
many
that
have
been
high
priorities,
historically
Roosevelt's
being
completed
kootenay's
being
completed,
these
were
very
high
priority
projects
for
the
city
of
Boise
and
if,
if
indeed
this
area
becomes
a
higher
priority,
due
to
this
potential
pressure
from
the
development
I
think
achd
has
the
ability
to
respond
to
that.
Even
some
of
those
projects
in
gray
that
show
a
design
year,
that's
a
little
further
out.
Is
it
possible
to
move
those
forward?
I
Certainly
it
is
there's
always
a
shuffling
and
trade-offs.
I
have
to
be
honest,
as
with
anything
there's
a
fiscal
constraint,
but
if
that
becomes
a
higher
priority
for
the
city,
I
think
achd
has
the
ability
to
respond
and
I
speak
on
behalf
of
those
that
are
doing
the
prime
project
programming.
Ultimately,
the
commission,
they
can
make
a
project
move
very
quickly
if
they,
if
they
designate
it,
to
go,
it's
going
to
go,
go
pretty
darn,
quick,
so
there's
a
there's
a
lot
of
moving
Parts
there,
but
I
think
this
annual
process
is
predictable.
I
I
think
it's
transparent.
You
have
a
list,
we
have
the
ability
to
respond
and
we've
been
doing
this
I
think
I
I
hope
in
a
way
that
is
responsive
to
the
needs
of
the
city
of
Boise
oftentimes
there's,
you
know,
there's
always
challenges
and
funding
issues,
but
for
the
for
the
most
part,
I
think
there's
been
a
lot
of
really
good
collaboration
in
these
types
of
areas
and
we
look
to
continue
that.
A
Well
well,
thank
you.
We
look
forward
to
continuing
to
collaborate
as
well.
The
I
think
that's
it
doesn't
look
like
there's
any
more.
So,
let's
move
into
the
zoning
code,
rewrite
we've
got
till
5,
30.,
I,
I
didn't
say
it
that
way,
because
we
can
go
longer.
I
said
it
that
way,
because
we
might
have
less
time,
but
no
we're
supposed
to
be
here
till
5
30.,
and
then
we
have
about
a
five
minute
executive
session.
F
Mayor
members
of
the
Council
on
I'm,
going
to
give
you
an
update
on
where
we
stand
with
the
zoning
code,
rewrite
and
first
couple
of
slides
I
wanted
to
show.
You
relates
to
what
this
opportunity
is
that
the
city's
facing
right
now
to
address
how
we
grow
as
a
city,
and
this
councilmember
Willits
gets
a
little
bit
to
your
last
point.
F
F
The
City's
population
was
500,
000
people,
the
regional
population,
was
1.8
million.
Today,
the
region
has
grown
to
6
million
people,
and
the
City's
population
is
still
500
000
people.
So
there's
been
this
massive
consumption
of
land
associated
with
the
previous
period
of
development
that
was
enacted
through
all
these
zoning
ordinances.
So
success
has
been
realized.
F
Here's
an
example
closer
to
home.
This
is
Salt.
Lake
City
looks
like
the
exact
same
chart.
Well,
it
is,
except
for
the
numbers
are
smaller,
so
in
1970,
Salt
Lake
City
itself
was
200,
000
people
and
the
region
was
less
than
a
million.
It
was
pretty
comparable
to
Boise's
region.
Today
and,
and
now
the
regional
population
for
Salt
Lake
City
is
more
than
two
and
a
half
million
people
in
the
City's
population
is
still
200
000
people
so
again
that
last
round
of
zoning
ordinances,
you've
achieved
success.
F
You've
consumed
a
tremendous
amount
of
land
which
almost
is
impossible
to
serve
with
any
kind
of
transportation
system,
because
you
expected
everyone
to
drive
and
turns
out,
they
are,
and
so
I
I
start
with
that,
because
here's
our
chart
for
Boise
and
where
we're
headed
and
what's
being
projected
is
that
this
pattern
will
continue
in
Boise,
where
the
reason
will
go
tremendously.
The
city
not
so
much
so
that
the
regional
population
will
grow
much
more
than
the
City's
population.
The
City's
population
be
fairly
modest.
F
The
issue
with
these
charts
is
the
issues
that
people
associate
it
with
negatives
associated
with
growth,
especially
transportation
problems,
congestion
and
and
issues
related
to
housing.
They
they
don't,
they
have
to
do
with
the
dispersion
of
people,
not
the
concentration
of
them.
This
idea
that
growth
within
the
city
or
a
place
like
Victory
is
somehow
contributing
to
the
problem.
What
history
tells
us
is
no,
it's
the
opposite
of
that
when
you
disperse
yourselves
in
low
density
ways
across
the
entire
landscape.
F
So
here's
where
we
stand
with
the
zoning
rewrite
you
all
are
familiar
with
this.
It
started
in
the
fall
of
2020
we've
had
a
tremendous
amount
of
community
outreach
associated
with
the
standards
that
are
now
being
proposed
in
this
ordinance.
That
includes
you,
know
a
rewrite
of
the
entire
zoning
map,
so
we
would
move
to
New
zoning
designations,
new
use,
permissions
on
property
and
then
into
the
design
standards.
F
So
here
we
are
today
now
in
the
winter
and
we're
proceeding
with
what
the
the
submission
of
a
of
a
actual
new
ordinance
that
can
begin
its
public
hearing,
process
and
round
of
considerations
by
the
Planning
and
Zoning
commission
and
and
ultimately
city
council
here
regarding
community
outreach
overall
I
wanted
to
make
the
point
that
this
is
the
way
the
process
works
in
the
sense
that
you
have
ideas
and
seeking
to
address
the
problems
that
people
are
most
concerned
about
and
Boise's
case.
Certainly,
transportation
is
one
and
housing.
F
Affordability
is
another
and
protection
of
nature.
All
these
kinds
of
things.
We
have
very
important
things
that
people
are
telling
us
are
important
to
them
about
this
city,
so
we
have
public
meetings
and
we
seek
input,
and
then
we
respond
to
that
with
changes
that
that's
the
way
the
process
works,
I
I
know
it
can
be
frustrating
for
people.
Sometimes
they
come
to
a
meeting
and
express
an
opinion
or
send
an
email
or
a
letter,
and
they
sometimes
expect
a
new
ordinance
immediately.
F
So
that's
it's
an
iterative
process
as
we're
going
through
these
public
processes
and
getting
feedback
from
residents,
and
this
slide
just
shows
you
the
the
number
of
meetings
that
we
we
had
the
surveys
that
were
done
all
the
ideas
that
we've
been
receiving
throughout
this
process.
That
includes
most
recently
with
this
module
3
talking
about
the
zoning
processes.
These
are
the
meetings
that
we
had
for
in-person
meetings
around
the
city
and
then
one
Zoom
meeting
for
module
three.
F
We
did
a
survey
of
people
that
were
participating
during
module
three
meetings,
and
this
is
the
kind
of
results
that
we
got
here.
You
can
see
from
the
surveys
where
people
were
and
the
age
of
most
of
the
participants
or
the
age
groups
where
we
had
the
most
people
participating
in
these
public
meetings
around
module.
F
Three
I
just
wanted
to
remind
you
of
you-
were
all
I
think
at
some
point
at
one
of
these
meetings
at
least
one
of
them
on
module
three,
but
just
to
remind
you
of
some
of
the
contents
of
that.
So
one
issue
with
this
process
part
is
that
we,
you
know
when
you're
regulating
construction
of
all
kinds
on
thousands
of
parcels,
there's
some
degree
of
complexity
associated
with
it.
But
what
we
were
trying
to
do
in
this
process
module
is
simplify
as
much
as
we
could.
F
You
know
still
some
complexity,
but
but
the
way
that
we
approached
it
to
try
to
simplify
is
to
create
these
different
application
types.
So
there's
four
types
I'll
remind
you
of
what
those
are
in
just
a
minute.
So
that's
the
first
thing
we
did
create
this
alternative
or
approved,
allowed
use,
allowed
form
versus
alternative
form
idea,
which
has
gotten
plenty
of
debate
on
all
sides
and
we'll
get
into
that.
F
The
inter-departmental
review
process
to
kind
of
formalize
early
reviews
of
developments
involving
all
of
our
inside
the
city
departments
that
are
involved
in
this,
but
our
partner
agencies
as
well
reintroducing
the
hearing
examiner,
elevating
the
design,
Review
Committee
to
a
commission
which
helps
with
some
of
the
process
issues
and
then
updating
all
of
our
development
findings
to
be
consistent
with
the
kinds
of
things
that
we're
saying
we
want
for
Boise
now
in
the
future.
Through
this
new
ordinance.
F
These
are
the
four
application
types,
so
they
run
on
the
left
from
the
simplest
things
which
you
know
you
do
with
the
counter
when
you
come
in
type,
2
is
more
complex,
but
these
are
things
that
don't
have
a
public
process
associated
with
them
type
3
or
projects
that
do
have
to
go
to
a
public
meeting,
whether
it's
the
Planning
and
Zoning
commission
or
design
review
or
historic
preservation,
commission
and
then
the
type
four
of
those
things
that
actually
come
to
council.
So
these
are
the
highest
level,
things
that
involve
some
kind
of
policy
decision.
F
F
It
was
part
of
the
ordinance,
so
everybody's
had
time
to
weigh
in
on
this
lots
of
opinions,
as
you
can
imagine
about
this
idea
in
general,
and
also
about
specific
things
and
where
they
fall
in
this
list
and
some
of
the
things
we
heard
you
know
as
themes
through
this
process
in
module.
Three,
the
quality
of
developer
and
neighborhood
meetings
is
key
to
success.
F
Having
a
consistent,
predictable
process
for
all
parties
involved,
a
lot
of
positive
feedback
on
the
interdepartmental
review
agency,
still
things
to
work
out
as
to
making
sure
that
that
works
in
a
in
a
predictable
way,
a
lot
of
discussion
towards
the
end
of
the
module
three
public
meetings
about
5G
and
additional
potential
city
regulations
related
to
that
concerns
about
whether
neighborhood
associations
are
really
representative
of
the
community
questions
about
the
hearing,
examiner
role
and
responsibilities,
suggestions
as
to
maybe
additional
responsibilities
for
the
hearing
examiner
a
lot
of
discussion
about
partner
with
other
cities.
F
If
Boise's
seeking
to
achieve
certain
outcomes
with
this,
how
are
we
working
with
our
neighboring
cities
and
and
counties,
and
so
forth?
A
lot
of
support
for
the
development
tracker
which
our
staff
developed
has
developed,
which
gives
people
a
lot
more
easy
site
into
what
development's
happening
in
their
neighborhood?
F
F
These
top
the
two
on
the
top
here
are
related.
You
know
concerns
about
when
it's
best
to
have
information
get
public
about
an
individual
development,
and
then
you
know
when
is
too
soon
to
have
details
come
out
just
because
if
it's
too
soon,
it
may
be
information.
That's
not
even
that
important
yet
and
could
concern
people
or
whatever,
just
questions
about
being
careful
about
that.
F
Quite
a
bit
of
discussion
about
standardizing
the
the
communications
related
with
to
the
neighborhood
meetings
around
individual
development
projects.
It's
not
consistent
now,
and
can
we
develop
a
way
in
which
we're
getting
consistent
communication
on
that
and
then
an
allocated
a
definitive
amount
of
time
where
neighborhood
associations
are
allowed
to
speak
on
any
individual
application?
That
comes
to
a
public
meeting.
F
I
wanted
to
mention
a
few
other
topics
we're
still
discussing.
We
we
talked
with
the
citizen
advisory
committee
about
these
in
I
guess
it
was
December
at
our
meeting,
just
some
things
that
have
just
come
up
consistently
or
come
up
at
these
CAC
meetings
that
we
still
are
working
on.
Honestly,
the
staff
that's
here
and
and
all
of
the
staff
working
on
this
Jessica
zelag's
team,
Andrea
and
Delaney
and
I'm.
F
Sorry,
Deanna
and
Lena
in
particular,
are
doing
such
an
incredible
amount
of
work
to
try
to
get
this
get
us
to
the
Finish
Line
on
this.
So
this
list
is
not
all
inclusive,
but
these
were
some
headline
issues,
issues
related
to
the
affordability
and
sustainability
incentives
and
whether
those
should
be
coupled
together
or
split
apart
question
mark
industrial
zones
and
just
some
additional
protections
within
industrial
zones
for
adjacent
residential
use.
F
You
all
had
the
big
discussion
about
Blue
Valley,
Council,
Express,
mayor
and
Council
expressed
a
lot
of
interest
in
finding
ways
to
better
protect
Not,
Just
Blue
Valley,
but
where
you've
got
adjoining
neighborhoods
zone
changes,
we're
keeping
the
t2
Zone,
which
is
around
Micron,
we're
keeping
the
health
services
Zone,
which
is
where
our
big
hospitals
are
Saint,
Alice
and
St
Luke's
in
particular
keeping
those
zones
we're
not
changing
the
zoning
that
exists
for
those
campuses,
questions
about
height
limits
or
how
we
regulate
height,
that
includes
in
the
MX3
and
the
mx-4
or
60
feet
enough,
and
then
also
residential,
more
residential,
related
height
questions.
F
F
So
adding
that
and
then
discussion
about
drive-throughs
and
and
where
we
permit
those
and
the
draft
that
we
had
discussed,
including
over
the
summer
in
module
two.
What
was
in
the
draft
throughout
the
summer
and
throughout
the
year
with
the
drive-throughs,
would
only
be
permitted
in
the
MX2,
which
is
you
know,
pretty
restrictive
area
and
so
there's
discussion
of.
Should
we
expand
that
and
if
we
do,
what
might
the
restrictions
around
drive-throughs
in
other
districts
like
an
MX3
for
instance?
F
So
here
we
are,
as
it
relates
to
the
remainder
of
2023
in
the
process.
So
we're
working
I
sent
a
memo
to
everybody
here
before
Christmas
about
would
like
your
feedback.
So
we
can
discuss
it
and
incorporate
it
as
needed
as
we're
working
on
a
draft
that
could
get
officially
submitted
at
the
end
of
February.
So
the
official
prog
process
can
begin
then.
F
So
we
would
release
the
official
ordinance
and
end
of
February
such
that
it
could
get
to
the
Planning
and
Zoning
commission
for
public
hearings
at
the
end
of
April
and
then
ultimately,
the
city
council
in
June
for
public
hearings
such
that
we
could
get
it
adopted
in
the
in
the
in
the
summer
and
then
we
can
decide
at
that
point.
What
the
effective
date
of
the
ordinance
would
be
and
there'll
be
discussion
about
that.
What
would
be
the
the
best
date
to
to?
Basically,
you
know,
transition
from
the
current
ordinance
to
the
new
one.
F
H
Right
thanks,
Tim
I
was
really
pleased
to
see
the
amount
of
work
that's
been
done
and
the
speed
with
which
module
3
really
got
a
lot
of
Citizen
feedback
and
had
all
of
those
meetings,
a
couple
of
which
I
attended,
and
it
was
really
well
done
and
I'm
think
our
staff
is
just
incredible
at
performing
public
meetings.
It's
not
easy
to.
You
know,
stand
up
in
front
of
people
and
give
them
information.
H
That
is,
you,
know,
wonky
and
confusing,
and
then
expecting
folks
to
then
respond
to
that
information
that
was
given
to
them,
and
so
I
just
am
I
think
that
you
all
are
really
amazing.
H
My
question
is
about
the
pipeline
of
potential
development
projects.
How
do
you
foresee
this
timeline
impacting
development
applications
coming
in
like?
Do
you
think
that
there
will
be
a
bunch
that
come
in
before
the
new
zoning
code
goes
into
effect,
or
do
you
think
that
people
will
hold
off
until
the
new
zoning
code
goes
into
effect?
F
F
It
I
think
it's
going
to
cut
both
ways
really
you're
going
to
have
and
we've
had
cases
where
people
are
very
interested
in
the
new
regulations
and
feel
they
they
would
be
helpful,
and
so
you
may
have
cases
where
you've
got
folks
delaying
submission
as
a
result
of
that
and
then
you'll
have
other
cases
where
perhaps
it
will
accelerate
submission
of
some.
So
we're
trying
to
track
that
and,
and
and
and
and
come
to
you
with
a
that,
has
a
lot
to
do
with
this
effective
date.
F
Question
that
I
left,
as
as
a
question
mark
as
to
what
what
that
effective
date
would
be,
is
to
your
very
point.
You
know:
what's
the
impact
going
to
be
in
terms
of
volume,
and
and
where
do
we
stand
and
as
a
result
of
that,
how
how
do
we
best
identify
when
that
effective
date
is
so
it's
a
really
important
question
that
you
put
your
finger
on
that
we're?
Really
digging
into
right
now,
great.
D
D
Thank
you
so
boy
to
this
team
out
here
in
the
audience.
Thank
you.
This
has
been
a
incredible
lift
over
the
last
couple
of
years
and
you've
all
done
really
great
work.
So
you
know,
first
of
all,
my
thanks
to
all
of
you.
D
I
think
that
we're
at
a
really
good
spot
with
this.
You
ask
us
all
to
provide
some
comments
on
that
last
draft
I
expect
that
those
will
be
addressed
some
way
in
whatever
we
see
in
February
and
look
forward
to
seeing
some
of
those
changes.
I
guess
my
biggest
question
is:
will
we
have
a
chance
once
we
see
that
to
respond
back
again
to
whatever
changes
are
made
in
response
to
those
comments
that
we
we
provided
for
you
and
also
the
comments
that
you
referenced,
that
we
saw
from
the
public.
D
F
Well,
there
will
not
be
another.
You
know
work
session
to
talk
through
other
edits
that
could
occur
with
the
with
the
proposal.
I
think
any
of
you
that
would
like
to
talk
through
any
of
the
suggestions.
You've
made
I'm
happy
to
do
that
and
we
can
get
with
staff
as
well
to
talk
through
any
details
that
you'd
like
to
over
the
next
couple
weeks.
F
But
of
course
you
know,
as
it
goes
through
the
public
hearing
process,
there's
certainly
the
opportunity
to
make
edits
in
conjunction
with
your
consideration
in
any
kind
of
vote
on
it.
But
we're
really
I
would
really
offer
that.
Ideally,
if
you
have
anything
you'd
like
to
talk
to
even
related
to
things
that
you've
submitted
to
us,
let's
do
that
right
now
and
and
we
can
talk
through
what
what
our
thoughts
are
about,
what
you
suggested
yeah.
D
Thank
you
so
just
for
reference
for
my
fellow
council
members,
since
they
weren't
part
of
the
comments
that
you
referenced.
Two
of
the
things,
especially
that.
C
D
Sent
comments
on
that
probably
weren't
otherwise
part
of
the
public
record
I
think
in
part,
because
people
probably
haven't
gotten
to
that
level
of
detail.
Frankly,
one
is
parking.
D
Lots,
I,
think
that
as
I
look
at
the
parking
lot,
standards
that
we're
proposing
we
can
probably
do
better,
especially
as
it
relates
to
sustainability
and
trees,
and
you
know
those
kinds
of
things
in
parking
lots
so
looking
forward
to
see
seeing
how
you
all
respond
to
that
and
then
the
other
one
that
that
I
have
suggested
is
that
if
you're
adaptively
reusing
an
existing
residential
building
that
the
process
to
do
that
is
much
easier
than
even
the
process
that
we've
already
currently
outlined
for
adding
three
or
four
plexes
with
new
construction.
D
So
I
just
wanted
to
make
those
public
that
those
were
things
that
I
had
commented
on
added
to
the
public
comments
that
that
you
daylighted
for
us
in
those
the
presentation
that
you
gave
us
and
thank
you
for
all.
E
You
madamir
thank
you.
Tim
I
just
want
to
Echo
my
colleagues
in
praising
our
staff
and
what
a
wonderful
job
they
did
in
engaging
with
the
community
I,
like
my
colleagues,
had
a
opportunity
to
attend
a
variety
of
those
meetings,
and
you
know
it
is
a
public
meeting.
We
get
folks
with
different
interests
and
different
passions,
and-
and
there
are
folks
who
are
very
passionate
about
their
particular
issue
and
what
I
observed
was
the
high
amount
of
respect
that
you
showed
people.
E
It's
it's
very
easy
to
dismiss
a
person
because
they
don't
they
don't
communicate
like
everybody
else
and
all
I
saw
was
the
the
kind
of
professionalism
I'd
like
to
see
throughout
our
entire
organization,
exemplified
by
this
department,
and
so
I
just
want
to
thank
you
for
treating
people
with
dignity
and
respect.
E
The
other
thing
I
want
to
say,
is
I
I
have
an
appreciation
for
the
difficult
challenge
that
this
is.
You
know
a
lot
of
the
folks
I
think
who
tend
to
show
up
to
those
Community
conversations.
E
Those
listening
sessions
were
folks
from
neighborhoods
I've
had
an
opportunity
to
talk
to
at
least
one
small
developer,
and
they
explained
to
me
the
challenges
of
trying
to
have
this
type
of
a
career
trying
to
make
a
living
and
having
deadlines,
be
pivotal
and
so
I'm
hoping
that
we're
getting
some
input
from
from
those
small
developers
who
can
give
a
unique
perspective
of
what
it's
like
to
to
do
these
jobs
in
an
environment
where,
where
the
deadlines
are
so
important
and
hopefully
have
some
reassurance
that
that
our
new
zoning
code
is
going
to
make
it
possible
for
for
that
work
for
their
work
to
continue.
E
If
there's
anything,
we've
learned
over
the
last
few
years,
it's
the
importance
of
the
smaller
businesses
in
our
community
and
I
think
we
tend
to
paint
developers
with
all
one
brush
and
the
truth
is
we
have
women
who
work
in
development?
My
guess
is:
that's
that's
a
small
group
of
folks.
You
wouldn't
guess
that
from
what
we
see
in
our
audience
today
of
the
folks
who
work
in
that
capacity
for
the
city,
but
I
think
it's
important,
that
we
get
those
voices
at
the
table
and
that
we
reassure
them.
E
A
D
Thank
you,
madam
mayor
I,
move
that
we
go
into
executive
session
to
discuss
pending
and
probable
litigation
pursuant
to
Idaho
code,
section
742061,
2061f.