►
From YouTube: City Council Regular Evening Meeting - 4/20/21
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
B
B
B
E
Madam
mayor,
yes,
I
move
approval
of
the
city
council
minutes
of
the
work
session
and
regular
evening
meeting
of
april
13th.
Second.
F
B
G
Yes,
good
evening,
madam
mayor
council,
members
as
you'll
recall,
you
approved
a
rezone
with
a
development
agreement
on
march
30th
for
a
175
unit,
building
at
boise
avenue
and
protest
road.
We
received
a
request
to
reconsider
your
decision
from
anna-marie
stark
weather,
which
was
in
your
packet
this
evening.
It
doesn't
seem
that
any
new
information
was
submitted,
so
the
planning
team
is
recommending
denial
of
the
request.
Ultimately,
it's
your
decision
and
if
you
approve
we'll,
be
sure
to
go
through
those
proper
procedures
and
with
that
I'll
be
here.
If
there's
any
other
questions.
B
All
right,
I'm
saying
what
is
that
shaking
of
heads?
So
if
no
action
is
taken,
then
that
is
pretty
much
that
the
reconsiderations
decided
not
to
be
taken
up
by
council.
So
if
the
record
would
please
reflect
that
great?
Thank
you
for
joining
us
this
evening.
Appreciate
it
next
up,
we
have
the
consent
agenda.
All
items
on
the
con
with
an
asterisk
excuse
me
are
considered
to
be
routine
by
the
council
and
will
be
enacted
by
one
motion.
E
D
B
Right
next
up,
we
have
ordinances,
yes,
item,
seven
on
the
agenda
under
first
reading,
a
we
have
quite
a
few.
E
We
do
madam
mayor,
I
I
ask
unanimous
consent
that
all
ordinances
on
the
first
reading
by
be
read
by
number
and
title
only
and
filed
for
the
second
reading
calendar.
D
Without
objection,
ord-16-21
and
ordnance
car2000
for
property
located
at
3805,
north
coal,
road
emitting
zoning
classifications
of
the
city
of
boise
city
to
change
the
classification
of
real
property,
particularly
described
in
section
one
of
this
ordinance
from
r-1ch
single-family
residential
with
historic
district
overlay
to
a-1-h,
open
lands
with
historic
district
overlay.
Setting
forth
a
reason,
statement
in
support
of
such
zone
change
and
providing
an
effective
date
ord-17-21.
D
An
ordinance,
d-annexing,
6.22
acres
of
certain
lands
and
territory
located
within
boise
ada,
county,
idaho,
near
lake
moore
subdivision,
setting
forth
a
reason.
Statement
in
support
of
the
de-annexation
directing
the
city
engineer
to
lodge
and
file
a
legal
description
and
map
the
deannex
lands
and
territory
directing
that
copies
of
this
ordinance
shall
be
filed
with
the
ada
county
auditor.
D
Ord-19-21.
An
ordinance
emitting
the
development
code
regarding
specific
procedures,
section
11-03-1,
including
changes
to
the
posting
requirements
for
specific
application
types,
the
radius
of
neighborhood,
meeting
notice,
mailings
and
the
timeline
for
submittal
of
administrative
variance
applications.
D
Ord-13-21
and
ordnance
car20-00023
for
property,
located
at
1717,
south
federal
way,
emitting
zoning
classifications
of
the
city
of
boise
city
to
change.
The
classification
of
real
property,
particularly
described
in
section
1
of
this
ordinance
from
medium
density,
residential
r-2
to
multi-family,
residential
with
design,
review,
r-3-d,
studying
for
the
reason
statement
in
support
of
such
zone
change
and
providing
an
effective
date.
D
Ord-14-21,
an
ordnance,
car20-00016
williams,
family
number,
two
trust
for
property
located
at
6506,
north
eugene
lane
and
I've
seen
2.9
acres
of
certain
lands
and
territory
situated
in
ada,
county,
idaho,
adjacent
and
contiguous
to
the
corporate
limits
of
the
city
of
boise
city.
Establishing
and
determining
the
land
use
classification
of
said.
2.9
acres
is
a-1da
open
lands
with
the
development
agreement,
sending
forth
a
reason
statement
in
support
of
such
annexation
and
zone
change,
directing
the
city
engineer
to
lodge
and
file
a
legal
description
and
map
for
said,
annexed
lands
and
territory.
D
Providing
that
copies
of
said
ordinance.
Copies
of
this
ordinance
shall
be
filed
with
ada
county
auditor,
the
ada
county,
treasurer,
the
aida
county
assessor
and
the
aydah
county
recorder
and
the
idaho
state
tax
commission.
Providing
that
a
copy
of
said
legal
description
and
map
of
said.
Annex
lanes
and
territory
be
recorded
with
the
ada
county
recorder
and
filed
with
the
ada
county
assessor
in
the
idaho
state.
D
Tax
commission
is
required
by
law
and
providing
an
effective
date
ord-15-21
an
ordinance
repealing
boise
city
code,
title
9,
chapter
12
and
replacing
it
with
boise
city
code,
title
9,
chapter
12.
Moving
deconstruction
or
demolition
of
buildings
adopting
standards
for
the
moving
deconstruction
and
demolition
of
buildings,
including
material
and
waste
management
practices,
permitting
administrative
procedures
and
penalties.
Approving
a
summary
of
the
ordinance
and
providing
an
effective
date.
E
D
Agent,
yes
clegg;
yes,
halliburton,
yes,
woodings!
Yes,
all
in
favor
motion
carries
ord-11-21
an
ordnance
car
20-004
for
property
located
at
13984
west
jasmine
lane,
boise,
idaho,
83713
emitting
zoning
classifications
of
the
city
of
boise
city
to
change
the
classification
of
real
property,
particularly
described
in
section
1
of
this
ordinance
from
open
lands
8-1
to
general
commercial,
with
design,
review
and
development
agreement.
C-2-D
d-a
setting
forth
a
reason,
statement
in
support
of
such
zone
change
and
providing
an
effective
date.
F
B
The
subdivisions
and
then
public
hearings
after
that,
first
off,
we
have
cody
with
us
thanks
for
being
here
for
sos
21-4.
A
Thank
you,
madam
mayor
members
of
council.
This
item
is
a
request
to
remove
a
temporary
easement
on
the
side
yard
of
two
homes
located
along
annette
and
virginia
avenues.
The
easement
end
note
was
part
of
moonbeam
subdivision
that
was
planted
in
2000
2003..
A
The
easement
endnote
did
require
the
area
in
question
to
subject
as
a
turnaround
until
that
street
was
extended,
as
you
can
see
in
that
street
has
since
been
extended
to
elder
that
provides
access
back
out
to
victory
road
to
the
north.
So
the
concern
with
safety
that
was
present
when
that
note
was
in
place
no
longer
exists,
as
suggested.
The
note
can
be
vacated
at
this
time
that
has
been
confirmed
by
the
fire
department
and
comments
dated
march
8
of
this
year.
A
Removal
of
the
easement
will
allow
the
homeowners
to
fully
use
their
properties
and
perhaps
remove
a
significant
amount
of
paving.
That's
no
longer
necessary,
should
have
no
impact
on
other
properties,
including
adjacent
adjacent
ones,
and
we're
unaware
of
any
opposition
at
this
time.
So
with
that,
we
are
recommending
approval
of
this
application
this
evening.
Thank
you.
E
A
Madam
mayor
councilmember
clegg,
not
not
to
my
knowledge,
I
assume
with
that
much
paving
if
it
wasn't
fenced
off
by
by
default,
it
could
have,
but
it
was
private
property
simply
in
that
in
that
easement.
E
A
B
All
right
the
applicant
is
jason
newman
is
jason
with.
B
B
B
All
right
justin,
I'm
not
sure.
If
will
you
can
he
send
you
a
note.
B
D
F
B
You
know
what
I'm
gonna,
I'm
gonna
propose
that
we
pause
this
for
a
moment
while
trying
to
fix,
because
we
I
don't
want
to
do
this
without
him
since
he's
there.
So
why
don't
we
table
this
move
into
the
first
public
hearing
item
and
then,
if
ever
we
hear
from
justin,
we
can
pick
it
back
up
again.
Does
that
make
sense
or.
B
I
Good
evening,
madam
mayor
members
of
the
council,
tonight's
public
hearing
I
can
get
there
we
go.
Tonight's
public
hearing
is
in
support
of
declaring
a
parcel
west
of
the
west
boise
water
renewal
facility,
a
surplus
with
the
intention
to
transport
transfer
it
to
the
city
of
eagle
for
an
extension
of
their
park.
I
I'll
give
you
a
really
quick
overview
orientation
to
the
to
the
parcel,
and
then
mary
will
talk
you
through
the
process
so
quick
overview
of
the
of
the
of
the
site.
I'm
presuming
everybody
can
see
my
screen.
I
always
have
to.
C
I
But
over
to
the
right,
just
orient
to
everybody
over
to
the
right
is
the
west
boise
water
renewal
facility
toward
the
bottom
is
chin
and
boulevard
eagle,
eagle
road
would
be
just
off
the
picture
and
then
roughly,
the
top
of
the
picture
is
the
south
channel
of
the
boise
river.
The
subject
parcel
is
in
red
here.
I
The
green
kind
of
squiggly
line
shows
the
the
property
that
the
city
will
still
maintain
after
this
process,
and
the
blue
shows
the
the
existing
parcels
that
would
make
up
eagles
pamela
baker
park,
and
you
can
see
that
this
would
be
extended
to
it.
I
This
parcel
is
a
part
of
an
old
gravel
pit
and
is
just
a
pond.
You
can
see
that
we
are
not
currently
utilizing
it
and,
as
we
think
about
the
water
renewal
facility
expansion
plans,
we
we
don't
see
any
use
for
this.
I
This
process
is
part
of
an
older
land
trade
agreement
that
dates
back
to
1998
and,
I
think,
has
been
amended
at
least
once
since
then
it
really
made
some
real
wins.
I
think,
for
the
whole
community,
one
of
the
more
recent
wins
was
connecting
up
the
green
belt.
That
runs
along
the
river
to
chendon
boulevard
through
a
section
that
that
we
own
is
in
yellow.
I
The
eagle
owns
and
maintains,
is
in
this
peach
salmon
color
and
then
it
extends
on
up
through
the
lake,
more
development
up
to
china
boulevard
and
provides
that
connection
to
the
green
belt.
For
our
residents.
South
of
shendon
maintains
a
good
buffer
space.
Good
transition
space
for
the
water
between
the
water
renewal
facility
and
other
uses
allows
panel
of
baker
park
to
be
created
which
in
itself
really
serves
as
part
of
that
buffer
and
transition
zone,
and
then
of
course,
allows
the
lake
more
development
to
proceed.
I
That's
a
quick
overview
and
for
the
complicated
part
of
how
the
process
needs
to
happen.
I'll
hand
it
over
to
mary.
J
This
is
just
a
overview
of
why
we're
here
tonight
in
terms
of
what
the
process
is
for
making
sure
can
go
through.
I
would
direct
your
attention
primarily
to
idaho
code
50-1402,
which
requires
that
we
first
declare
the
property
of
or
the
value
or
minimum
price,
if
any
of
a
property
that
we
would
like
to
have
declared
as
surplus.
J
If
we're
not
declaring
a
particular
value,
then
we
can
just
provide
an
explanation
of
the
intended
exchange
or
conveyance
for
other
than
monetary
monetary
consideration.
Following
that
declaration
for
a
surplus,
we
do
have
to
have
this
public
hearing
as
part
of
our
statutory
requirements.
B
J
Thank
you.
Madam
mayor
councils
had
already
approved
this
declaration
of
the
intent
to
declare
this
surplus
by
resolution
145-21
on
march
30th.
The
findings
are
captured
here
on
this
slide
and
for
the
sake
of
efficiency,
I
won't
read
those
out
to
you,
but
basically
overview
of
what
rob
just
outlined
next.
Thank
you
rob.
So
what
we've
done
is
provided
the
first
ordinance
by
statutory
code
50-1403,
where
this
is
being
exchanged
to
another
governmental
unit.
D
J
For
any
questions,
but
given
that
then
following
second
and
third
readings
staff
will
take
undertake,
whatever
additional
steps
are
necessary
to
finalize
the
conveyance.
B
E
You
are
there,
questions
for.
My
only
question
was
whether
or
not
any
maintenance
of
the
greenbelt
section
was
going
to
change.
It
looks
like
it's
not
because
the
portion
adjacent
to
this
property
is
still
going
to
be
owned
and
maintained
by
the
city
of
boise.
Is
that
correct.
I
Banner
mayor
council,
member
council,
president
clerk,
that
is
correct,
the
path
that
we
own
still
just
inside,
of
our
property
line.
The
transition
really
occurs
right
at
that
corner.
I
The
madame
council
president
clegg,
I
guess
I
would
have
to
loop
back
to
parks,
to
see
I
mean
the
they're,
both
the
the
section
of
the
of
the
the
pathways
are
on
our
respective
city
properties
and
then
from
from
beyond
there.
It
is
in
public
right
away.
I
E
Not
that
we
can
control
it,
whether
we
go
forward
with
this
or
not,
but
it
just
seemed
like
a
question
worth
asking
at
this
point.
I
assume
you
know
by
establishing
this.
There
must
be
some
easement,
but
it
would
be
good
to
know
that.
B
B
E
D
Ord-18-21,
an
ordinance
reaffirming
boise
city's
declaration
that
certain
real
property
owned
by
the
city
adjacent
to
lake
moore
subdivision,
located
in
boise,
ada
county
idaho,
with
an
area
of
approximately
6.22
acres,
is
underutilized
or
not
used
for
public
purposes,
authorizing
the
conveyance
of
the
defined
rural
property
to
the
city
of
eagle
for
certain
improvements,
namely
a
buffer
zone
for
the
west.
Boise
water
renewal,
plant,
expanded
park
area
and
a
greenbelt
connection
approving
as
to
both
form
and
content,
is
special
warranty
deed
to
affect
the
conveyance
authorizing
the
mayor
and
city
clerk
respectively.
D
B
B
K
Right
we
intend
to
to
fence
the
property
line
and
reclaim
it
as
as
basically
the
side
and
backyard
of
the
property
since
the
the
road
up
north
has
been
completed
at
this
time.
Is
that
what
you
meant
or
were
you
asking
if
we
were
doing
construction.
E
President,
thank
you
justin.
I.
E
Wondered
as
this
easement
existed,
was
it
ever
used
by
neighbors,
or
did
it
just
sit
there
unused.
K
You
know
people
do
walk
through
they
cut
through
the
neighborhood
there
and
sometimes
they
leave
trash
or
they
let
their
dogs
go.
It's
kind
of
like
an
alleyway
between
the
four
properties
that
are
there
so
we'd
really
like
to.
We
have
kind
of
a
substandard
yard,
and
so
does
the
property
behind
us.
K
When,
when
my
brother
purchased,
he
was
really
hoping
to
look
forward
to
reclaiming
that
as
his
private
property,
and
now
that
there
is
a
road
one
block
up,
it
seems
like
you
know,
all
the
sidewalks
are
in
and
it's
it's
safe
to
walk
now.
So
I
think
we'd
like
to
take
it
back
as
as
property,
not
for
construction,
but
just
as
as
yard,
yeah.
E
Thank
you.
I
appreciate
that
and
I
think
in
a
future
application.
We
probably
would
ask
that
there
be
a
public
connection,
but
this
was
not
done
that
way
and-
and
I
don't
believe
we
can
ask
of
it-
ask
it
now.
I
just
wondered
what
what
your
plans
were.
Thank
you.
B
B
Okay,
all
right!
Well,
if
you're
in
agreement
then
I'll
make
sure
that
there's
if
there
are
other
questions
for
the
applicant
all
right,
thanks
for
calling
in
I'm
going
to
go
ahead
and
close,
the
hearing.
F
L
M
Yes,
just
because
council
president
clint
brought
it
up,
I
think
it's
always
wonderful
to
have
stuff
on
the
record
that
for
staff
to
explore
stuff
like
this
in
the
future.
I
certainly
wouldn't
want
to
ask
this
of
any
private
property
owner
who
didn't
agree
upon
that
at
the
very
beginning,
and
that
wasn't
the
intention
so
certainly
no
reason
to
to
do
anything
different.
But
I
appreciate
bringing
it
up
to
the
staff
to
explore
things
in
the
future.
F
B
A
A
A
As
noted
in
the
packet,
the
commission
did
hear
this
item
on
march
8
and
without
opposition
unanimously
recommended
approval
of
the
request.
A
The
property
is
designated
commercial
on
the
land
use
map
where
c3
is
a
permissible
zone.
C3
zone
does
allow
a
few
more
intense
uses
than
the
existing
zone.
In
this
case,
the
commission
did
find
that
to
be
appropriate.
The
site's,
certainly
in
a
transitional
locate
location.
We
actually
have
industrial
zoning
to
the
south
and
to
the
east
commercial
development
to
the
north
and
then
residential
zoning
to
the
west.
A
The
primary
concern,
or
the
main
concern
with
the
rezone,
was
really
to
interface
with
that
single-family
residential
neighborhood
to
the
west.
Those
impacts
are
mitigated
by
a
subdivision
plot
that
prohibits
any
vehicular
access
out
to
ash
park,
there's
also
an
opportunity
to
ensure
appropriate
transition
through
the
required
design
review
process.
With
that
we
can
look
at
appropriate
use
of
screens
sound
walls,
enhanced
landscaping
and
appropriate
light.
A
Treating
in
conclusion,
the
commission
again
did
find
the
rezone
to
be
consistent
with
the
standards
for
approval,
that
included
policies
specific
to
the
southwest
planning
area
and
projects
in
the
airport
influence
area,
and
so
with
that
we
are
recommending
approval
of
the
rezone
this
evening.
Thank
you.
E
E
Not
a
question
but
for
council
members
who
haven't
been
here
very
long,
we've
dealt
with
this
property,
probably
four
times
in
the
time
that
I've
been
on
city
council
and
despite
our
housing
shortage
at
the
moment,
it's
really
not
a
place
where
we
can
talk
about
housing
because
of
the
airport
influence
zone
and
so
well,
I'm
not
a
terribly
excited
fan
of
this
kind
of
a
use.
It
looks
like
it
is
something
that
can
finally
get
this
property
into
some
use.
So
just
just
a
little
history
for
those
who
didn't
know
it.
E
B
A
C
Mayor
council
members,
penelope
constantis,
post
office
box,
405
boise,
idaho
83701,
I
don't
really
have
much
to
add.
I
I
just
wanted
to
point
out
that
we
do
have
some
commercial
space
that
will
be
along
saturn
way,
so
a
portion
of
the
site
will
be
the
condominium
storage
but
we're
also
adding
commercial
uses
along
the
street
frontage
and
other
than
that.
I
really
don't
I'm
happy
to
answer
questions.
I
don't
know.
If
there's
anything,
we
need
to
talk
about.
B
B
B
And
anyone
in
the
building
would
like
to
testify.
Okay,
all
right
with
that.
For
the
record,
please
reflect
that.
There
was
no
testimony
on
this
item
so
unless
there
are
further
questions
for
cody
I'll
go
ahead
and
close
this
all
right,
I'm
gonna
go
ahead
and
close.
This
public
hearing
got.
H
L
B
B
All
right,
thank
you.
So
if
we
have
marianne,
dick
or
marianne
payne
we're
not
certain
or
john
price
or
both-
and
we
have
you
listed
as
applicants,
so
after
cody
presents
we'll
see
if
you're
online
and
want
to
talk,
then
the
borah
neighborhood
association
is
the
association
of
record,
and
then
I
don't
have
anybody
signed
up
in
advance.
So
if
you're
online
wanting
to
talk
on
this
one
after
the
applicant
presents
go
ahead
and
raise
your
hand
with
that,
pretty
thanks.
A
Thank
you,
madam
mayor
members
of
council.
This
is
a
request
to
rezone
1.75
acres
from
r2
or
medium
density,
residential
to
r3
or
multi-family
residential
with
design
with
the
design
review
overlay.
The
site
is
located
at
the
southeast
corner
of
allenbaugh
and
franklin
road,
just
east
of
bishop
kelly
high
school.
A
The
change
in
zoning
is
requested
to
accommodate
a
42-unit
planned
residential
development.
The
existing
zone
would
allow
only
25
dwellings.
The
commission
did
hear
both
the
rezone
and
plan
unit
development
on
march
8th.
At
that
time
they
approved
the
plan
unit
development
and
recommended
approval
of
the
rezone.
The
decision
on
the
plan
unit
development
was
not
appealed,
so
it
is
only
the
rezone.
That's
before
you
this
evening.
A
A
The
project
is
on
the
edge
of
a
neighborhood
at
the
corner
of
an
arterial
and
collector
roadway
on
an
existing
bus
route.
In
short,
it
includes
many
of
the
features
that
would
make
higher
density
residential
housing.
Appropriate,
surrounded
uses
also
include
school
offices,
assisted
living.
Even
industrial
uses
some
distance
across
franklin
road
to
the
north.
A
However,
in
terms
of
in
terms
of
noise
and
traffic,
all
traffic
will
actually
be
routed
out
to
the
major
roadways
resulting
in
minimal
impact
on
the
neighborhood
of
the
south.
The
design
itself
will
still
be
subject
to
the
design
review
process
and
then,
ultimately,
ultimately,
the
buildings
and
landscaping
and
landscaping
on
this
vacant
lot
should
actually
provide
some
degree
of
buffering
from
the
noise
of
franklin
road.
A
M
And
mary
cody,
I
thought
I
saw
a
couple
questions
or
comments
about
height
when
I
was
looking
at
this
and
I
guess
I'm
just
curious
the
difference
between
the
r
r
2
d
and
the
r
3
d,
and
I
guess
my
understanding
I
think
it's
the
same.
But
I'm
not
sure
if
that's
correct
or
not.
A
A
Yeah,
madam
mayor
councilmember,
halliburton
to
the
peak
of
the
roof,
and
we
actually
averaged
to
the
average
of
the
highest
gable.
The
peak
of
the
roof
was
40
feet,
so
the
new
buildings
that
were
approved
are
right
at
that
35
feet.
That's
allowed
in
the
in
the
r2
zone
now
with
apps
in
a
development
agreement,
there's
a
chance
that
this
project
wouldn't
materialize
and
that
the
zone
would
allow
a
building
up
to
the
45
feet.
Okay,
thank
you.
M
B
All
right
thanks
cody
next
up,
I
did
I
see
well,
the
name
is
john
price,
but
it
does
not
look
like
john
price,
but
the
applicant.
It
looks
like
you're
with
us.
N
So
in
terms
of
the
project
cody
did
describe
it
well,.
O
We,
after
our
city
council
or
after
our
design,
our
planning
and
sodium
meaning.
Oh,
what
happened?
We
did
go
and
meet
with
the
neighborhood
before
the
meeting.
I
had
not
had
any
response
from
the
neighborhood
meeting
and
no
one
had
attended,
so
I
hadn't
had
an
opportunity
to
work
with
the
neighborhood,
which
I
feel
is
a
very
important
part
of
any
project
but
post
the
them
coming
forward
at
planning
and
zoning.
O
I
john
price-
and
I
went
in
that
with
the
association
there's
a
55
and
older
community
to
the
south
of
that
of
this
development,
and
we
met
with
them
and
had
about
an
hour-long
conversation
that
addressed
their
concerns
and
I
think,
by
the
end
of
it,
I
think
just
you
know
talking
it
through
and
incorporating
what
they
needed
and
listening
to
their
concerns
alleviated
a
lot
of
anxiety
and
I
think
people
are
afraid
of
what
they
don't
know
and
when
they
sat
down
and
could
talk
to
me
about
it.
O
We
even
went
as
far
as
addressing
that
there
are
some
of
their
amenities
they
were
concerned
would
be
used
by
the
you
know,
tenants
and
we
said,
and
the
parking
on
the
street
and
just
you
know,
general
policing
things,
and
we
said
you
know
we'd
be
happy
to
incorporate
it
in
our
lease.
We
also
met
with
the
hospital
next
door.
Their
major
concern
was
parking,
and
I
said
you
know
we
can.
O
We
can
address
that
and
we'll
put
it
in
their
lease
and
we'll
educate
them
from
the
very
beginning
that
you
know
that
they're
you
know
the
neighborhood
is
not
welcoming
them
parking
on
their
on
their
on
their
property.
So
we
there's
a
common
road
that
I
would
also
need
to
address
with
the
hospital
adjacent
and
we're
going
to
put
an
agreement
together
to
work
that
out.
So
I
think
once
we
had
an
opportunity
to
go
through
the
meetings
and
talk
to
the
neighbors,
I
think
we've
gone
a
long
way
to
alleviate
their
concerns.
P
O
So
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions
and
we're
pretty.
You
know,
engaged
in
this
project
and
we
want
to
work
with
the
neighborhood
and
the
city
to
make
it
a
successful
project.
I
feel
like
housing
is
a
need,
it's
a
brilliant
location
for
apartments.
It's
got
great
adjacency
to
the
freeway,
to
services,
to
schools
and
employment.
It's
and
if
the
light
rail
ever
comes
through
it's
right
across
from
that,
and
it
will
have
beautiful
views
of
the
mountains,
which
is
always
mine.
I,
like
that
part
too,.
B
So,
thank
you.
Thank
you
appreciate
your
work
with
the
neighbors
too.
Are
there
any
questions
for
the
applicant.
B
B
Right,
well,
we
are
back
already
marianne.
Is
there
anything
that
you
would
like
to
add
to
what
you
said,
or
it
sounds
like
you're
in
agreement
with
the
terms
and
conditions
of
the
staff
report,
and
there
were
questions
that
we
had
for
you
all
right
great.
Thank
you.
Thanks
for
joining
us,
I'm
going
to
go
ahead
and
close.
The
public
hearing.
E
Madam
mayor,
yes,
I
guess
it
just
applied
the
applicant
for
working
with
this
neighborhood,
because
clearly
there
were
a
lot
of
concerns
at
the
planning
and
zoning
level
and
they
appear
to
have
been
met
with
that.
I
would
move
approval
of
car
21-1
rezone
from
r2d
to
r3d.
H
Mayor,
yes,
I
just
want
to
talk
on
to
what
the
council
president
said.
This
is
a
fantastic
place
for
multi-family
residential,
it's
close
to
schools,
it's
close
to
workplaces.
This
is
a
corridor
that
can
handle
increased
traffic.
You
have
the
safety
aspect
of
it
being
right
by
a
fire
station.
I
just
applaud
the
applicant
for
having
so
so
much
thought
put
into
this
development
and
you're
right.
We
need
housing
very
badly.
So
thank
you
for
bringing
us
some.
D
B
A
Thank
you,
madam
mayor
members
of
council.
This
last
item
is
a
request
to
rezone
a
roughly
one
acre
site
from
r1
a
s
or
single
family
residential
with
the
sycamore
overlay
to
r1csda
or
single
family,
residential
still
with
the
sycamore
overlay
and
a
development
agreement.
That
was
a
lot
a
lot
to
babble
on
about
this.
The
site
is
request,
is
located
at
the
northwest
corner
of
taft
and
hawthorne
just
off
of
state
street.
A
As
indicated
in
your
packet,
the
purpose
of
the
rezone
is
simply
to
adjust
the
property
line.
The
two
between
two
oddly
configured
parcels,
the
result
will
be
two
regularly
regularly
shaped
buildable
parcels,
the
north
northern
parcel
as
it
exists
today,
is
smaller
than
the
minimum
allowed
in
either
the
r1a
or
r1b
zones.
A
Thus,
the
request
for
r1c
zoning,
the
rezone
2
r1c,
will
allow
the
property
to
be
divided,
as
you
can
see
on
the
screen,
as
you
can
see
in
the
record,
there
were
were
concerns
in
fact
expressed
at
the
commission
hearing,
specifically
with
an
allowance
for
increased
density.
Now
the
r1c
zone
would
typically
allow
up
to
eight
units
per
acre
where
the
existing
zone
does
only
allow
two
to
address
this
concern.
A
We
directed
the
applicant
or
encourage
the
applicant
to
include
a
development
agreement
with
the
rezone
that
agreement
will
cap
the
density
of
the
property
at
4.8
units
an
acre
or
that
allowed
in
our
r1b
zone.
I
recognize
this
does
get
a
bit
confusing,
but
there
are
a
few
things.
A
few
things
at
play
here.
The
sycamore
neighborhood
plan
suggests
suggest
an
increase
in
density
along
tap
is
appropriate
and
specifically
references
four
units
per
acre,
as
you
can
see
in
this
old
map.
A
A
A
The
three
units
on
this
corner
is
actually
very
similar
to
the
arrangement
that
exists
across
hawthorne
street
to
the
east.
We
do
have
a
mixed
use
plan
unit
development
with
the
church
and
two
small
houses
that
was
recently
approved
to
the
west,
and
then
north
of
this
property
is
a
multi-family
residential
development.
A
A
It's
certainly
in
a
transitional
location
on
a
corner
lot
with
the
collector
roadway,
that's
also
less
than
one-quarter
mile
from
state
street
corridor
to
the
south.
We
do
recognize
the
concerns
and
acknowledge
the
maximum
density
of
the
r1c
zone
might
not
be
appropriate
in
this
location,
but
we
believe
that
has
been
addressed
with
the
included
development
agreement.
A
M
Gotta
marry
cody,
you
might
not
know
the
answer
to
this
question,
it's
kind
of
a
weird
one,
and
it's
just
that
it's
it's
kind
of
a
funny
lot
shape
existing
right.
Now,
I'm
curious,
if
you
know
any
history,
if
there
was
something
different
on
it,
that
caused
it
to
be
shaped
like
that
in
the
first
place,
if.
A
Not
that's
fine,
madam
mayor
councilman,
councilmember
haliburton.
I
wonder
I
wondered
the
same
thing
and
you'll
know.
I
don't
know
the
answer
to
that.
I
do
know
that
the
property
right
across
hawthorne
to
the
east
is
arranged
much
the
same
way.
However,
it
it
actually
already
has
three
units
on
on
the
oddly
configured
parcels
yep.
That's
it.
E
And
yeah
so
cody
just
to
be
clear
for
the
record
by
doing
a
rezone
with
a
development
agreement,
we're
actually
easing
the
burden
regulatory
burden
on
this
property
of
the
things
they'd
have
to
do
in
order
to
develop
that
third
lot
easier
than
zoning
to
r
b
and
then
having
to
do
a
pud
or
variance
is.
B
Q
Thank
you,
madam
mayor.
I
can't
address
the
question
that
came
up
before
for
cody
on
on
why
the
odd
configuration.
Q
Yes,
back
in
the
day,
I
think
back
in
the
40s,
the
the
lot
was
originally
square
shaped
and
the
owners
sold
off
a
portion
for
the
house
that
was
built
on
taft
and
I
think
the
same
thing
did
happen
across
the
street
as
as
cody
said
and
other
than
that.
I
really
don't
have
anything
to
add.
I
thought
he
did
a
very
nice
job
presenting.
E
Madame
yes,
good
to
see
you
dave
to
see
lane
clegg.
E
So
I
I
don't
have
a
big
question.
I
just
wanted
wanted
to
say
hello
because
we
see
so
few
people
anymore,
but
also,
but
my
question
is
this:
you
have
a
church
to
the
west
and
it
has
two
small
houses
on
it.
Are
those
houses
actually
occupied
or
or
does
the
church
leave
them
empty?
I
was
just
curious.
Q
There's
a
counseling
center
that
that
has
been
active
that
the
church
uses.
So
that's
that's
what
the
houses
are
used
for.
B
All
right,
if
there
are
no
additional
questions
or
or
hellos
for
dave,
we
all
say
hello,
I'll,
go
ahead
and
see.
If
call
is
callister
with
us,
I'm
not
sure
that
kate
would
be,
but
is
somebody
else.
B
Right,
so
this
is
the
chance
just
one
last
chance
for
folks,
if
you're
online
wanting
to
testify
on
this
go
ahead
and
raise
your
hand.
B
So,
just
to
confirm:
there's
nobody
here
to
testify
on
this
item.
I
don't
want
to
mess
up
my
last
hearing
and,
have
you
say,
okay
great,
we
have
one
person
in
the
room,
so
I
just
want
to
make
sure
she
wasn't
here
for
this
with
that.
If
there
aren't
any
further
questions
for
dave,
I
don't
imagine
there's
more
that
you
want
to
say
if
okay
I'll
go
ahead
and
close
the
hearing
is
that
all
right.
G
B
B
D
B
If
there's
nothing
further
to
come
before
council
adam
mayor,
I
move
we
adjourn.
Second,
we
have
a
second
motion,
a
second
all
in
favor
all
right
opposed.
We
are
adjourned
and
I
will
say
also
echo
cody-
that
it's
really
nice
to
have.
We
had
two
council
members,
unfortunately,
that
had
to
be
absent
so
that
we
could
have
the
other
four
all
in
at
once
is
lovely
to
have
everybody
in
one
spot.
L
Madam
mayor,
I
know
the
meeting
is
adjourned.
It
came
to
my
attention
earlier
this
week,
maybe
last
week
that
one
person
who
comes
to
every
council
meeting
and
has
the
entire
time
I've
been
a
counsel
person
is
leaving
us
to
go
back
to
michigan
and
that's
haley
harding.
So
I
just
wanted
to
wish
her
the
best
of
luck
in
her
future
endeavors
and
her
travels
and
to
invite
her
to
continue
to
tune
in
to
boise
city
council
meetings.
Any
time
because
we'll
be
here.