►
From YouTube: City Council Evening Meeting - 9/1/2020
Description
Please visit the following link for information on how to testify during virtual public hearings:
https://www.cityofboise.org/departments/finance-and-administration/city-clerk/virtual-meetings/
A
A
B
B
B
All
righty
well,
hello,
everybody.
We've
got
a
nice
number
of
people
that
have
joined
us
in
person
and
I
know
that
there
are
others
online.
I
see
our
four
council
members
that
are
remote,
so
let's
go
ahead
and
we'll
call
this
meeting
to
order
and
first
we'll
have
a
moment
of
silence
as
the
invocation
and
then
the
pledge
of.
B
B
D
B
Without
objection
megan,
I'm
going
to
just
thank
you
first
off
for
your
willingness
to
serve.
You
join
a
great
commission.
I
really
enjoyed
the
conversation
that
we've
had
previously,
but
also
as
part
of
the
interview
process.
If
you
want
to
say
anything
because
you're
here
you're
welcome
to
jump
up
and
make
some
remarks
and
then
I'll
just
say
too,
you
can
both
leave
as
soon
as
you
would
like.
Unless
you
really
want
to.
E
G
Yeah
all
right,
I
was
trying
to
think
of
the
last
time
I've
been
in
here.
It
was
exactly
six
years
ago
I
was
joining
the
library
board,
and
that
was
my
first
role
in
a
city
position
and
since
then
I
have
gone
on
to
become
an
architect
so,
and
it
was
all
because
of
this
board
just
a
little
bit
about
myself.
I
am
a
current
graduate
student
at
the
university
of
idaho.
Here
I
am
working
on
licensure
as
an
architect
and
an
interior
designer.
G
B
And
well
thanks
megan,
I
love
that
you
brought
up
that
the
reason
you
decided
you
wanted
to
do
what
you're
doing,
but
also
be
involved
in
your
community,
is
that
you
were
a
high
school
commissioner
for
the
library.
I
remember
you
telling
me
that
at
one
point-
and
I
thought
that
was
great-
so
thanks
for
bringing
that
up,
yeah
thank.
G
H
B
B
I
J
Madam
mayor,
yes,
I
just
wanted
to
say
welcome
to
to
liz
both
council
member
sanchez
and
I
are
on
the
parks
and
rec
commission
as
well,
and
so
we're
excited
to
have
you
on
there
and
I
I
keep.
I
continue
to
be
excited
by
all
the
folks
from
the
non-profit
sector
who
are
getting
involved
in
the
city,
so
just
wanted
to
say
thank
you
for
the
work
at
the
goodman
society.
B
Wonderful
all
right!
Well,
thank
you
to
both
of
you
for
your
service
and
I'm
sure
I
hope,
but
I'm
sure
it
will
be
a
wonderful
experience
and
both
for
you
personally,
but
also,
of
course,
the
community
will
benefit
for
it
really
appreciate
it.
Next
up,
we
have
cup
20-14
and
cup
20-15
a
reconsideration
and
mediation
request.
K
K
As
you
know,
the
purpose
of
reconsideration
is
really
to
resolve
disputes
at
the
lowest
level
possible,
in
this
case,
probably
short
of
the
judicial
review
process.
The
idea
is
that
the
the
applicant
or
repellent
in
this
case
have
relevant
information
that
was
not
available
to
you
at
the
previous
hearing.
K
The
appellance
letter
was
included
in
your
packet
and
we
don't
necessarily
in
our
review,
see
anything
new.
It
really
appears
to
be
focused
on
the
same
issues
that
you
debated
at
that
previous
hearing.
That
being
said,
it
is
entirely
at
your
discretion.
If
you
choose
to
reconsider
this
evening,
we
would
then
advertise
for
a
future
public
hearing
on
the
matter.
The
appellant,
in
the
same
request,
has
also
asked
for
mediation
similar
to
reconsideration.
The
intent
is
to
try
and
resolve
issues
at
the
lowest
possible
level.
K
I
would
just
note
that
we
have
spoken
to
the
applicant
in
this
case
and
they've
indicated
no
interest
in
participating.
You
do
still
have
the
discretion
to
order
mediation
at
least
one
session.
I
just
wanted
you
to
be
aware
of
that
that
resistance,
because
it
probably
speaks
to
the
likelihood
of
of
success
and
mediation,
is
at
the
city's
city's
cost,
so
with
that,
the
decision
on
reconsideration
and
mediation
are
both
before
you
this
evening.
Thank
you.
D
Well,
madam
mayor,
I
would
I'd
be
interested
in
making
a
motion
here
all
right
sure.
D
Okay,
great,
you
know,
I've
looked
through
the
information
that
was
provided
to
us
and,
like
staff
said,
I
didn't
see
anything
new.
That
would
have
changed
at
least
my
my
decision,
and
so
I
would
move
that
we
denied
the
reconsideration
and
mediation
request.
Second,.
B
C
E
C
C
L
B
D
D
E
F
B
Our
covid19
reopening
plan
we've
got
kyle
here.
Kyle
patterson
is
here
to
walk
through
this,
but
just
to
tee
up
your
presentation.
What
what
we
hope
to
do
with
this
and
we've
got
some
of
the
we've
got
the
library
director
here
for
reopening.
In
case
we
have
questions
related
to
the
library.
B
B
Our
doors
offer
the
services
that
we
offer
as
a
city
to
our
residents
in
very
in
safe
ways
to
protect
our
staff
and
to
protect
the
community
in
doing
that,
but
so
that
we
are
available
for
residents
that
need
to
come
in
person,
and
so
staff
has
begun
working
on
those
the
proposals,
and
we
asked
them
to
do
a
couple
things
with
that.
And
that
is
to
come
to
this
recognizing
that
as
city
government,
we're
here
to
serve.
B
As
we
all
experience
like
the
need
to
change
the
way
we
offer
services
we'll
open
our
buildings,
offer
services
and
interact
with
the
public
in
safe
ways
as
we
manage
through
this
time.
While
we
wait
for
a
vaccine,
and
so
with
that,
I
appreciate
kyle's
been
working
with
all
the
departments
and
he'll
be
able
to
walk
us
through
on
what
they
propose.
M
If
you
think
back
to
march,
when
boise
received
its
first
confirmed
case
of
covet
19,
I'm
really
proud
of
the
way
the
city
moved
really
swiftly
to
find
new
and
different
ways
to
provide
services
safely.
Despite
covid,
one
of
the
big
strategies
there
was
shifting
from
in-person
to
digital
or
virtual
service
offerings.
M
Pds
is
one
great
example
of
that:
their
plan
review
and
permitting
services
had
all
been
almost
entirely
in
person
before
covet
19.
Within
a
couple
of
weeks,
they
switched
to
being
all
virtual
very
quickly,
big
thanks
to
our
id
it
department
for
that,
and
then,
where
we
offered
programs
through
parks
or
the
library,
we
looked
for
opportunities
to
offer
those
programs,
instead
of
in
person
virtually
and
had
a
lot
of
success
there
as
well,
and
then,
where
we
had
services
that
had
to
be
in
person,
we
found
creative
ways
to
offer
those
safely
as
well.
M
So
for
the
library
they
started,
offering
curbside
book
pickup,
so
customers
could
place
a
hold
on
an
item
online
and
then
come
and
pick
that
up
without
coming
into
contact
with
anybody.
And
then
I
really
love
the
work
that
the
parks
and
recreation
department
did
around
softball.
They
piloted
a
kind
of
truncated
league
this
summer
and
they
had
some
really
creative
and
cool,
but
still
very
strict
safety
protocols.
So
the
catcher
had
to
be
six
feet
away
from
the
batter.
M
The
empire
had
to
be
six
feet
away
from
the
catcher
and
the
batter.
I
don't
think
players
were
even
allowed
to
tag
base
runners,
so
it
was
a
different
game
of
softball
a
little
bit,
but
it
was
really
successful
and
it
just
showed
how
being
creative
and
innovative
and
our
approach
has
allowed
us
to
offer
those
programs
safely.
M
But
despite
that,
there
were
still
gaps
in
some
of
our
services
and
that's
what
we're
talking
about
today,
how
we're
trying
to
fill
those
gaps
and
much
has
really
changed
since
march
back
in
april
and
may
the
whole
state
was
aligned
around
the
state's
four-stage
reopening
plan
called
rebound
idaho
and
that's
really
shifted
now
locally
we're
somewhere
between
a
stage
two
and
a
stage.
Three
and
central
district
health
has
kind
of
shifted
away
from
stages
towards
more
targeted
policy
intervention.
M
So
they're
doing
things
like
saying
most
of
our
cases
are
coming
from
bars,
so
we're
going
to
put
restriction
on
bars
or
most
of
our
cases
are
coming
from
social
gatherings.
We're
going
to
put
restrictions
there.
That
creates
complications
for
our
organization's
reopening
plan
because
it
was
also
aligned
with
the
four
stages
and
now
that
we're
not
really
adhering
to
the
stages.
In
quite
the
same
way,
it
forces
us
to
rethink
that
plan.
M
We
also
know
a
whole
lot
more
about
the
virus
now
how
it
spreads.
What
are
those
risk
factors
how
we
can
do
things
safely
and
we've
had
the
opportunity
to
successfully
test
a
lot
of
those
safety
protocols,
so,
for
example,
parks
offered
play
camp
this
summer
at
eight
different
sites
to
1800
different
youth
and
because
they
had
really
strong
protocols
in
place.
None
of
the
participants
became
infected
with
covid19.
M
In
addition,
I
spoke
to
the
importance
of
those
virtual
services
earlier
and
those
are
definitely
necessary
and
the
preferred
mode
of
service
delivery
for
a
lot
of
our
customers,
but
it's
also
not
sufficient
right.
It's
really
important
that
we're
providing
in-person
service
options
well
as
well,
especially
for
those
folks
who
don't
have
access
to
technology.
M
So
before
I
get
into
the
specifics
of
the
reopening
plan,
I
want
to
highlight
a
few
of
the
safety
precautions
that
we'll
have
in
place,
because
I
think
those
are
really
critical
to
our
success
and
being
able
to
reopen
my
apologies
in
advance.
Most
of
these
photos
are
taken
by
my
phone
and
I'm
a
horrible
photographer,
but
it
is
what
it
is.
M
So
this
these
pictures,
you're
seeing
are
city
hall
and
and
you're
looking
at
the
picture
of
the
left,
is
the
clerk
counter
on
the
front
desk
in
the
lobby
of
city
hall.
It's
hard
to
see,
but
there's
a
plastic
barrier
in
place
between
where
the
clerk
would
be
sitting
and
where
a
customer
would
be.
There
are
floor,
decals
to
make
sure
that
folks
are
staying
physically,
distanced,
there's
abundant
signage
throughout
our
facilities,
encouraging
folks
to
practice
physical
distancing
where
we
have
conference
rooms.
M
If,
for
some
reason
a
member
of
the
public
isn't
able
for
medical
condition
to
wear
a
mask,
then
we
will
offer
accommodations
for
that,
so
we
will
have
face
shields
available,
so
they
can
wear
that
instead,
obviously
there's
virtual
and
phone
services
that
we
can
offer
so
that
folks
can
adhere
to
that.
In
addition
to
those
pieces,
I
think
one
of
the
maybe
the
largest
safety
precaution
we
can
take
is
to
really
minimize
the
number
of
people
in
person
when
there's
not
crowds.
M
When
there
aren't
dense
groups
of
folks
we're
much
safer
and
there's
less
risk.
There
there's
a
few
ways
we're
going
about
that.
One
is
for
staff.
We
are
asking
them
to
telecommute,
where
possible,
through
december
31st,
so
that
we
can
limit
the
risk
for
those
staff
members
who
have
to
be
in
person
and
for
those
members
of
the
public
who
are
here
in
person
we're
still
encouraging
for
the
public
virtual
service
delivery
wherever
possible.
M
So
they
don't
have
to
come
down
to
city
hall
or
other
facilities,
and
then,
where
we're
offering
programs,
we
may
have
to
reduce
participation
in
those
a
little
bit.
So
we
can
do
it
safely.
So,
for
example,
an
art
program
for
parks
and
recreation
may
may
have
been
12
people
before
covet,
and
now
it
will
be
only
six
so
that
we're
not
having
too
many
people
in
a
room.
M
We
will
also
put
ambassadors
stationed
at
the
entrances
of
city
hall
and
our
libraries
and
those
folks
role
will
be
to
welcome
people
to
ask
them
to
wear
a
mask
to
meet
our
entry
into
city
hall,
to
make
sure
there's
not
too
many
people
in
one
space
and
to
answer
any
questions
and
we're
hoping
that
those
ambassadors
can
resolve
any
questions
folks
have
before
they
even
enter
the
facility
where
we're
providing
programs.
We're
going
to
provide
them
outdoors
wherever
we
can,
and
I
think
that's
one
of
library's
strategies
is
to
do
that
weather
permitting.
M
So
with
that,
I
want
to
share
a
few
highlights
about
what
services
will
be
expanding
in
this
new
plan
and
what
facilities
will
be
reopening
and-
and
just
a
note
before
I
start
on
that-
I'm
focused
largely
on
those
again
those
services
that
will
be
expanding
or
facilities
reopening,
there's
already
a
lot
of
services
that
we're
providing
now
and
I'm
not
going
to
get
into
detail
about
this.
Those.
This
is
really
about
talking
about
filling
those
gaps
that
still
exist,
so
city
hall
is
planned
to
reopen
on
september
8th,
which
is
a
week
from
today.
M
The
main
services
at
city
hall
include
the
clerk's
office
that
does
business
licensing
and
parking
services
currently
they're,
offering
those
services
virtually
and
by
appointment
for
fingerprinting
but
starting
september.
8Th.
All
of
that
will
be
allow
walk-ins
pds
will
allow
walk-ins
for
their
permitting
and
licensing
work,
and
then
utility
billing
will
also
allow
walk-ins
city
hall
west
the
front
office.
There
will
open
september
8th
the
watershed.
The
educational
facility
out
at
the
west
boise
water
renewal
facility
will
also
open
september
8th.
M
N
Madame
yes,
thank
you
mayor.
Thank
you
so
much
for
this
presentation.
This
is
great
information.
I
don't
know
what
the
protocol
is
now
when
people
visit
city
hall,
if
there's
a
sign
in,
do
we
have
anything
like
that
in
place.
M
Council
member
thanks
for
that
question.
It's
a
great
question.
It's
something
that
we've
definitely
discussed
right
now.
There
are
so
few
people
entering
city
hall
before
it
opens
that
hasn't
been
a
necessity.
We
have
a
record
of
anybody.
Who's
come
in
through
our
outlook,
scheduling
system
or
through
our
other
systems
of
records.
So
there
hasn't
been
a
need.
It
is
something
we're
discussing
for
opening
on
september,
8th
and
a
possibility
through
conversations
with
our
risk
and
safety
staff.
M
We
felt
like
that
probably
isn't
necessary,
because
the
the
contact
tracing
that
we
typically
do
is
only
if
you've
been
exposed
to
somebody
who
is
infected
for
15
minutes
at
a
given
time,
and
we
still
expect
there
will
be
so
few
folks
that
we
won't
need
to
do
that
at
some
of
our
other
facilities.
M
Go
ahead
so
now
we'll
talk
about
the
library-
and
this
slide
really
just
shows
the
services
that
they're
already
offering,
which
is
really
most
of
their
services.
They
have
the
curbside
pickup,
which
I
discussed
folks,
can
make
appointments
to
use
their
computers
in
person.
If
they
need
that
there
are
virtual
programs
being
offered,
you
can
get
a
contactless
library
card,
that's
a
mouthful
and
so
that
you
can
get
a
library
card
without
coming
in
person.
It's
not
mentioned
on
here,
but
they're,
also
using
the
downtown
library
as
a
cooling
library.
M
So
the
haze
auditorium
there
is
being
used
so
that
folks,
who
don't
have
access
to
air
conditioning
during
these
hot
days,
can
go
somewhere
and
stay
cool
and
rest
there,
really
the
only
things
that
aren't
being
provided
there
now
are
just
in-person
browsing
and
access
to
the
reference
desk
and
that's
what
really
we're
looking
about
looking
to
moving
forward
so
starting
september
28th.
Those
all
the
libraries
will
reopen
in
some
form
and
the
reason
why
we're
waiting
until
september
28th
is
because
this
will
mark
a
pretty
radical
departure
in
service
delivery
for
the
library.
M
And
then
the
afternoons
will
be
for
the
in-person
services
so
like
browsing
and
reference
desk,
and
things
like
that,
and
the
reason
why
they
have
to
split
that
up
is
each
of
those
services
requires
a
lot
of
staff
and
a
lot
of
space.
So
it's
just
not
possible
to
provide
them
at
the
same
time,
so
we're
splitting
those
up
for
parks
and
recreation
again
to
note
the
things
that
are
already
open,
so
many
services
and
facilities,
parks
and
playgrounds
trails
in
the
greenbelt
zoo,
boise.
Of
course,
only
the
outdoor
exhibits
are
also
open.
M
Now,
golf
courses,
outdoor
sports
courts,
like
basketball
and
volleyball
idaho
ice
world,
is
open
for
private
ice.
Rentals
fort
boise
community
center
is
open
in
a
limited
fashion,
just
for
fall
programs
and
then
five
community
base
or
school-based
community
centers
are
open
for
online
schooling.
M
Looking
forward,
I
know
parks
and
recreation
published
their
activity
guide
a
few
weeks
back.
Maybe
many
of
you
have
seen
that
there
will
be
a
lot
of
programs
offered.
This
activity
guide
is
shorter
than
it
has
been
in
the
past
and
that's
just
because
we
want
to
make
sure
we're
only
providing
programs
that
we
can
do
safely
and
in
some
cases,
as
I
mentioned
before,
the
participation
in
that
those
programs
will
be
lower
than
before,
so
that
we
can
maintain
safety.
M
Idaho
ice
world
will
be
open
for
drop-in
programs
and
some
learn
to
skate
classes
for
figure
skating
and
hockey
and,
as
I
mentioned
before,
that
will
be
with
sign
ins
for
contact
tracing
purposes
for
foothills
learning
center
and
the
boise
urban
garden
school.
Both
of
those
facilities
had
been
open
for
outdoor
program
delivery
in
the
past,
but
they
will
reopen
to
the
public
on
september,
8th
and
then
those
remaining
school-based
community
centers
will
reopen
when
the
schools
reopen.
M
So
that's
a
high-level
overview
of
what
that
reopening
plan
looks
like,
but
I'm
happy
to
stand
for
any
questions.
In
addition,
director,
christine
miller
of
the
library
is
here
in
council
chambers
and
doug
holloway,
the
director
of
parks
and
recreation
is
available.
I
believe
virtually
for
questions.
O
P
Yes,
madam
mayor
council,
member
woodings,
so
what
we're
looking
at
is
stick
time
and
figure
skating
drop
drop-in
opportunity,
utilizing
both
sheets
of
ice,
since
we
have
no
other
program
other
than
ice
rentals
for
our
hockey
teams
that
are
taking
place
now,
so
we
can
spread.
You
know
as
many
as
15
to
20
participants
out
on
both
sheets
of
ice.
We
don't
anticipate
seeing
that
many,
but
we
have
had
quite
a
few
inquiries
as
to
when
we'll
start
the
drop-in
services
so
again
we'll
require
a
sign-in
registration.
P
So
we
know
who's
in
the
facility
at
that
time
and
and
then
we'll
segregate
it
into
two
different
locations
on
both
sheets
of
ice
to
accommodate
both
the
figure
skaters
and
any
stick
time
hockey.
Players
that
may
want
to
use
that
time
for
ice
skating.
O
P
Yes,
madam
mayor
councilmember,
weddings,
absolutely
masks
are
required
for
entering
and
leaving
in
any
of
the
facilities.
If
you're
engaged
in
in
an
activity,
for
example,
on
the
ice
at
ice
world
you'll
be
able
to
take
your
mask
off
while
you're
participating
in
the
activity.
But
the
minute
you
come
off
the
ice,
the
mask
will
be
required.
P
We'll
have
we
have
placed
those
stickers
that
kyle
showed
earlier
at
city
hall.
Those
are
located
all
throughout
all
of
our
facilities
and
then
we'll
just
have
our
teams
working
as
ambassadors
visiting
with
folks
as
they
come
in
and
reminding
making
sure
people
have
their
masks
on
making
sure
they
know
where
all
of
our
sanitizing
stations
are
located.
And
then
you
know
making
sure
that
that
safe,
distancing
is
is
continued
to
be
observed,
while
they're
in
all
of
our
facilities,
obviously
not
just
ice
world.
Q
Madam
mayor,
yes
go
ahead.
Thank
you
not
a
question.
Just
a
note.
City
council
doesn't
get
very
many
drop-ins,
but
since
we
are
going
to
be
at
least
some
of
us
in
person
on
tuesdays,
and
we
have
a
second
staff
person,
who's
been
coming
in
on
fridays
and
completing
some
work
that
has
to
be
done
in
the
office.
Q
B
B
It'll
be
great
to
see
people
in
the
building,
and
it's
wonderful
to
see
all
of
you
tonight
and
to
have
more
staff
back
in
those
that
are
going
to
be
here.
I
thank
them
and
then,
of
course,
the
public
who
will
be
visiting
but
as
we've
experienced
throughout
this
different
things
happen
which
require
us
to
then
take
different
steps.
B
So
this
is,
I
appreciate
the
work
that
staff
has
done
to
put
this
together
and
we'll
be
moving
forward
with
this,
but
recognizing
if
we
have
outbreaks,
if,
as
we
learn
new
information
or
we
recognize
that
something's
working
or
isn't
working,
we're
bound
to
see
things
evolving
as
we
reopen
move
through
this
moment
and
try
to
keep
everybody
healthy
and
safe,
safe
and
healthy,
and
continue
to
provide
the
services
that
our
citizens
really
want
to
see.
N
Madam
mayor,
yes,
go
ahead,
just
just
to
clarify
and
for
the
benefit
of
the
public.
I
I
know
that
there
was
a
description
of
what
will
be
required
when
folks
enter
city
hall.
If
they
choose
to
do
business
that
way
or
need
to
do
business.
That
way
that
if
somebody
has
an
issue
with
wearing
a
mask
or
a
face
covering
that
there
may
perhaps
be
an
option
for
a.
I
don't
know
what
are
the?
N
What
are
these
called
the
shields
the
see-through
shields,
but
I
just
wanted
to
clarify:
do
people?
Is
it
required
that
people
wear
some
sort
of
face
covering
upon
entering
city
hall.
B
Yes,
that's
been
the
practice
we've
seen
with
every
city
council
meeting
the
people
that
come
are
masked
and
distanced.
We
appreciate
the
partnership
that
the
public
has
with
us
to
do
this
and
we
will
provide
accommodations
for
those
that
you
know,
for
reasons
known
to
them
from
a
health
perspective,
make
it
impossible
to
wear
a
mask,
and
that
includes
a
continuation
of
digital
and
by
phone
services
or
other
gear,
that
our
ambassadors
will
have
available.
H
B
And
next
we're
going
to
move
on
to
the
consent
agenda.
I
believe
that
there's
something
that
has
to
be
pulled
which
can
be
pulled
or
maybe
there's
a
council
member
that
needs
to
flag
something
tonight
not
polled
but
might
not
be
voting
on
something.
But
first
I'll,
say
all
items
with
an
asterisk
are
considered
to
be
routine
by
the
council
and
will
be
enacted
by
one
motion.
Q
Madam
mayor,
yes,
thank
you.
I
am
the
council
member
who
needs
to
recuse
from
one
of
the
items
tonight.
Resolution
372-20
involves
my
son
and
son-in-law
and
I
will
not
be
voting
on
that
resolution.
Thank
you.
E
L
B
E
L
C
C
Ord-29-20
and
ordnance
car20-0002
for
property,
located
at
8306
west
state
street
emitting
zoning
classifications
of
the
city
of
boise
city
to
change
the
classification
of
real
property,
particularly
described
in
section
one
of
this
ordinance
from
single-family
residential
large
lot,
r-1a
to
multi-family
residential
with
design
review.
R-3-D.
Setting
for
the
reason
statement
in
support
of
such
zone
change
and
providing
an
effective
date.
D
Madam
mayor,
yes,
I
believe
all
these
ordinances
are
relatively
straightforward
and
or
have
been
discussed
quite
well
in
the
past,
and
I
would
move
that
ordinance.
25
20,
26,
20,
27,
20,
28,
20
and
29
20
be
approved.
Second.
E
E
D
Interfering
with
the
immediate
consideration
of
ordinance
30-20
be
suspended
that
the
portion
of
idaho
code
50-902
requiring
an
ordinance
to
be
read
on
three
different
days
twice
by
title
and
once
in
full,
be
dispensed
with,
and
the
the
records
show
that
it
has
been
read
the
third
time
in
full.
Second,.
E
E
K
Thank
you,
madam
mayor
members
of
council.
This
project
is
essentially
identical
to
one
that
was
approved
in
2014
by
the
city,
but
has
un
unfortunately
expired.
It's
preliminary
and
final
plot
for
residential
subdivision.
That
includes
13
buildable
lots
on
about
4
acres
addressed
at
2311,
south
curtis
road
and
an
r2d
or
medium
density,
residential
with
design
review
zone
for
those
unfamiliar
with
the
area.
It's
basically
located
very
near
where
curtis
road
meets
interstate
84.
K
again,
the
project
includes
13
buildable
lots
all
accessed
from
a
new
public
street
that
will
connect
curtis
road
to
janine
street.
That
new
street
will
include
five
foot
detached
sidewalks
and
also
note
that
lost
seven
block
two
will
be
occupied
by
an
existing
home
on
the
property.
That
lot
will
also
allow
for
the
preservation
of
a
number
of
existing
trees
around
that
around
that
home.
Other
existing
trees
will
actually
be
preserved
on
on
the
block
one
down
in
the
very,
very
corner
there.
K
B
H
R
Yeah,
my
name
is
alex
mcdonald
in
agreement
with
the
staff
report
and
the
conditions
of
approval.
Thank
you.
D
E
E
K
Thank
you,
madam
mayor
members
of
council.
This
item
is
a
request
for
approval
of
a
preliminary
platt
of
a
residential
subdivision
that
includes
eight
buildable
lots
about
one
and
a
quarter:
acres
located
at
the
northwest
corner
of
hill
road
in
collister
in
an
r1c
or
single-family
residential
with
design
review
zone.
K
Each
lot
in
the
project
will
be
accessed
from
a
private
street
which
really,
in
this
case,
functions
very
similar
to
a
common
drive,
but
with
will
have
sidewalks
on
each
side.
I
think
you
see
looking
at
looking
at
the
project.
It's
a
good
design
and
given
the
lack
of
opportunity
for
future
connectivity
in
the
area
would
also
note
that
detached
sidewalk
with
trees
will
be
provided
on
collister
and
then
attached
sidewalk
on
hill
road,
which
will
allow
for
the
preservation
of
a
couple
existing
mature
trees.
K
K
The
pud
did
require
a
reduction
in
lot
width
and
setbacks.
The
lots
range
in
size
from
I
believe
about
3
600
square
feet
to
5200
square
feet
with
the
minimum
in
the
zone
typically
being
5000
square
feet.
The
applicant
has
also
asked
for
reduced
setbacks
of
three
feet:
interior
side
yards
as
opposed
to
the
five
feet-
that's
typically
required.
K
I
would
also
note
that
there
was
a
condition
of
approval
that
requires
the
applicant
to
explore
recycling
alternatives,
as
opposed
to
taking
that
existing
home
the
materials
directly
to
the
landfill,
as
you're
probably
aware
we're
starting
to
look
at
integrating
standards
like
that
into
our
into
our
codes,
and
in
this
case,
with
the
conditional
use
permit,
we
included
it
as
a
recommended
condition
and
the
applicant
has
agreed
to
it.
I
suppose
it's
a
really
good
way
to
start
testing
some
of
those.
Some
of
those
approaches
to
development-
I
believe
that
covers
things
this
evening.
K
F
Q
Thank
you,
cody
quick
question
about
the
sidewalk
on
hill
road.
As
I'm
reading
the
plaid
it
will
be
attached.
If
hill
road
is
widened
to
to
the
right
of
way
that
achd
has
requested,
will
it
will?
Will
that
happen
immediately?
My
understanding
is
that
that
it
wouldn't
and
that
there
might
be
some
room
at
least
to
have
a
little
bit
of
buffer
between
what
is
quite
a
busy
road
and
and
that
corner.
K
Madam
mayor
councilmember
clay,
I
don't
believe
the
plan
is
to
widen
hill
road
immediately,
and
so
there
will
be
will
be
a
buffer
that
includes
some
existing
shrubs,
but
then
also
two
near
the
west
corner
of
the
site.
Two
existing
conifer
trees
that
will
be
preserved
until
that
widening
occurs.
Q
Okay,
so
I'm
trying
to
understand
is
the
sidewalk
gonna
go
to
the
south
of
the
existing
trees,
but
I
I
believe
right
now
that
area
is
about.
I
don't
know
it
looks
on
the
map
like
12
or
14
feet
wide,
and
if
the
sidewalk's
only
5
foot
wide,
there
would
be
a
fair
amount
of
it.
That's
undeveloped.
H
B
Yeah
we'll
ask
the
applicant
if
to
take
a
run
at
that,
so
next
up
I've
got
the
applicant
listed
here.
Is
walter?
Is
a
herti?
B
T
B
Great,
if
you
state
your
name
address
and
then
it'd
be
great
to
answer
the
council
president's
question.
Let
us
know
if
you,
if
there's
anything
else
pertinent
to
the
application.
Q
Sure,
thank
you,
mr
archie.
I'm
trying
to
understand
where
exactly
the
sidewalk
on
hill
road
will
be
placed
and
given
where
the
current
pavement
ends,
whether
it
will
be
on
the
edge
of
that
or
whether
it
will
be
inset
from
that,
but
still
south
of
those
trees.
T
Yeah,
so
the
sidewalk
is
going
to
be
south
of
those
trees.
We
are
giving
some
of
the
property
on
the
south
side
to
accommodate
kind
of
where
the
street
is
on
hill
road
right
now,
hill,
road
kind
of
creeps
into
the
property
a
little
bit,
but
we
are
trying
to
keep
as
much
of
those
mature
trees
on
the
south
side
as
possible,
which
is
why
we
wanted
this
sidewalk
to
be
attached
to
hill
road.
Does
that
answer
your
question.
B
D
E
D
F
J
E
L
B
Next
up
we
have
two
public
hearings
tonight.
The
first
is
zoa
19-4.
Excuse
me-
and
this
is
the
city
of
boise
as
the
applicant
zach
hi,
and
then
nobody
has
signed
up
in
advance.
Is
anybody?
Sorry?
Is
anybody
here
tonight
to
testify
on
this
zoning
ordinance
change
great
all
right.
We've
got
one
person
here
in
person
and
if
anybody
is
on
zoom
hoping
to
testify
on
zoa
19-4,
will
you
please
raise
a
little
zoom
hand
so
that
we
can
get
you
teed
up?
U
Thank
you,
madam
mayor
and
council
members
for
the
record
zach
pietmeyer
transportation
planner
in
pds,
I'm
here
to
talk
about
a
proposed
zoning
ordinance
amendment
associated
with
accessible
parking
in
private
parking
lots
back
in
march
of
2019,
the
city's
accessible
parking
committee
initiated
a
discussion
about
modifying
boise
city
code
with
additional
design
requirements.
They
felt
would
improve
accessible
parking
in
private
parking
lots.
U
U
The
second
is
to
require
or
add
language
requiring
additional
signage
and
payment
markings
within
the
access
aisle
adjacent
to
those
stalls
indicating
that
that
parking
is
in
fact
not
allowed
there,
and
the
third
is
to
correct
an
error
in
the
van
accessible
to
standard
accessible
parking
stall
ratio.
Our
code
currently
says
the
ratio
should
be
one
to
eight.
U
Back
on
july,
13th
of
this
year,
boise
city
planning
and
zoning
commission
unanimously
approved
a
recommendation
of
approval
of
the
proposed
amendments
to
the
boise
city
council.
So
planning
and
development
services
recommends.
The
city
council
approve
the
proposed
modifications
to
chapter
110703
0.5
that
are
noted
within
the
staff
report
and
I'll
stand
for
any
questions,
and
I
would
like
to
note
that
the
chair
of
the
committee
is
also
here
in
person.
If
you
have
any
questions
for
him.
Q
Yes,
go
ahead,
zach,
just
a
quick
question
just
to
clarify
for
the
record
with
this
change.
If
eight,
if
six
stalls
are
required,
six
accessible
stalls,
at
least
one
of
those
will
have
to
be
van
accessible
if
less
than
that
are
required,
there
still
will
have
to
be
one
that's
been
accessible.
Is
that
correct.
Q
And
then,
secondly,
if
more
than
six
are
required
up
to
10,
there'd
have
to
be
or
up
to
12
there'd
have
to
be
two
that
were
been
accessible.
Q
Q
O
Mayor,
yes,
go
ahead,
I
just
want
to
thank
the
accessible
parking
committee.
I
know
that
this
has
been
a
lot
of
work
and
there's
still
a
lot
of
deficiencies
that
there's
that
folks
have
identified
within
our
built
environment
in
boise,
but
this
is
a
really
great
start
to
making
some
of
those
changes.
I
just
wanted
to
ask
zach
one
of
the
things
that's
come
up
in
our
committee,
because
I
serve
on
this
committee
as
well.
O
Is
there
have
been
some
examples
of
buildings
that
have
remodeled
and
changed
where
you
enter
the
building
and
then
the
outlay
of
their
parking
lot
has
not
changed
to
reflect
the
new
entrances,
I'm
wondering
where
we
are
on
that.
If
that
requires
an
ordinance
change
or
if
that's
just
something
that
we
change
within
our
building
department.
U
Madam
marion
council
member,
I
believe,
remodeling
or
redevelopment
of
sites
that
adjust
where
the
access
point
is
to
the
building
shouldn't
trigger
a
review
of
the
parking
facilities
associated
with
that
building.
U
N
I
just
wanted
to
ask
zach:
will
there
be
at
least
spanish
language
versions
of
this
as
well?
The
signage.
U
Madam
mayor
council,
member,
that's
a
great
question.
I
I'm
not
sure
if
that's
in
the
cards,
I
would
have
to
speak
with
our
design,
review
and
current
planning,
but
I
think
that's
something
we
can
definitely
investigate.
B
B
B
Hi,
mr
jones,
I've
got
a
couple
people
showing.
I
think
the
microphone
probably
needs
to
get
a
little
closer
to
your
mouth.
Maybe
okay!
Yes,
this
better.
V
Yes,
okay,
ken
jones,
I
reside
at
1159
e
kimberly
lane
in
boise
at
83712
and
current
chair
of
the
accessible
parking
committee.
I
just
want
to
take
this
opportunity
to
thank
the
mayor
and
the
city
council
for
continuing
the
work
of
this
committee.
We
still
have
a
lot
of
work
to
do.
We
appreciate
the
members
of
the
parking
control
that
come
to
our
meetings,
an
attorney
that
from
the
attorney's
office.
V
Also,
we
really
thank
zach
for
all
the
hard
work
that
he's
done
and
really
appreciate
councilwoman
wings
for
being
a
part
of
our
committee.
This
is
a
great
ordinance.
We've
got
a
lot
of
work
to
do
to
still
make
this
city
accessible
for
all
of
our
disabled
people
in
this
city.
Are
there
any
questions.
B
B
F
N
You
know
many
years
ago,
I
I
I
worked
with
the
idaho
school
for
the
blind
and
visually
impaired,
serving
as
a
translator
for
students
who
were
by
who
did
not
speak
english
and
needed
a
translator
as
they
received
cane
instruction,
and
it
was
at
that
time
that
I
finally
saw
all
the
obstacles
that
are
in
place
for
folks
who
are
living
with
disabilities
and
trying
to
navigate
a
mostly
able-bodied
world,
but
as
as
we
age,
many
of
us
are
starting
to
recognize
that
we
were
just
temporarily
able-bodied
and
by
the
end,
by
the
time
we
get
to
the
end
of
all
these
amendments
and
changes.
N
Eventually,
we
all
we're
going
to
need
these
accommodations,
and
so
I
just
appreciate
that
that
our
city
is
doing
this,
that
we
are
taking
into
consideration
everybody,
even
though
we
may
not
see
the
obstacles,
the
obstacles
are
there
for
some
of
us.
So
thank
you.
F
B
B
H
And
you
know.
D
J
Q
Yes,
go
ahead.
Thank
you.
I
just
want
to
recognize
the
committee
chair
who
came
tonight.
Thank
you
for
your
service.
I
really
want
to
recognize
as
well
council
member
woodings.
You
know
we
don't
get
paid
extra
to
do
the
extra
things
in
this
job
and
everyone
has
various
passions.
This
is
one
of
councilmember
woodings
and
it's
really
important
to
have
someone
on
this
committee
to
help
bring
these
things,
make
sure
that
these
things
get
brought
forward.
So
thank
you
for
your
service.
E
B
B
B
And-
and
I
asked
that
because
nobody's
signed
up
in
advance,
but
if
you're
on
zoom-
and
you
end
up
wanting
to
testify-
you
could
raise
your
hand
because
we
could
take
zoom
first.
So
if,
while
staff
and
the
applicant
are
doing
their
their
presentations,
if
you
are
on
zoom
wanting
to
testify,
raise
your
hand
and
we'll
start
with
the
zoom,
so
that
if
you
don't
want
to
stay
on
through
the
course
of
this
whole
thing,
you
don't
have
to
and
then
we'll
take,
I'm
testimony
here
publicly
and
then
for
each
of
you.
B
K
Thank
you,
madam
mayor
members
of
council.
This
item
includes
two
applications:
a
modification
to
a
development
agreement
to
allow
an
increased
building,
height
and
multi-family
residential
development,
and
then
an
appeal
of
the
planning
and
zoning
commission's
denial
of
a
conditional
use
permit
for
that
same
same
project.
K
The
applications
were
heard
by
the
commission
by
the
planning
commission
in
june
of
this
year.
The
commission
did
recommend
denial
of
the
changes
to
the
development
agreement
and
then
denied
the
conditional
use
permit.
I
want
to
recognize
for
a
lot
of
reasons.
This
is
actually
a
great
location
for
multi-family
residential
development.
K
It's
largely
compatible
with
the
mixes
mix
of
uses
in
the
area.
Unfortunately,
with
one
big
big
exception,
as
mentioned,
we
have
the
boise
airport
across
the
freeway
immediately
to
the
south,
the
denial
of
these
applications.
I
think
you
see
in
looking
at
the
record
really
going
to
boil
down
to
concern
with
compatibility
with
the
airport
included
in
your
packet.
Were
comments
from
the
airport
objecting
to
the
residential
use
in
this
location.
K
Their
their
property
again
is
only
about
260
feet
to
the
south.
As
you
can
see
from
this
illustration,
the
activity
with
the
taxiway
and
runway
are
quite
close
to
the
proposed
units.
The
commission's
decision
really
focused
on
two
areas.
First,
the
noise
level
present
would
make
it
unsuitable
for
residential
development
and
then
second,
it
could
jeopardize
the
long-term
viability
of
the
airport
and
future
operations.
K
K
The
commission's
denial
of
the
pud
was
obviously
appealed
and
the
applicant
included
five
grounds
they
contend.
The
decision
was
not
supported
by
the
evidence
in
the
record
that
it
was
arbitrary,
that
it
violated
state
code
that
it
exceeded
their
statutory
authority
and,
finally,
that
they
should
have
considered
conditions
to
address
concerns
rather
than
an
outright
denial
of
the
project.
K
I'll
keep
my
response
to
this
brief,
because
you'll
hear
from
the
applicant
this
evening.
I
would
also
note
that
there's
a
representative
from
the
airport
with
us
this
evening,
via
zoom
and
they're,
certainly
best
equipped
to
answer
some
of
the
very
specific
questions
on
airport
operations
and
concerns.
So
I
will
touch
on
things
at
a
high
level.
The
property
does
lie
as
mapped
within
the
airport
influence
areas
a
and
b
one.
That's
also
subject
to
the
faa's
noise
study
adopted
by
reference
in
the
comprehensive
plan.
K
There
is
a
bit
of
a
discrepancy
between
the
mapped
airport
influence
areas
shown
in
the
comprehensive
plan
and
the
most
current
data
available
as
it
relates
to
noise
levels.
The
mapping,
I
don't
believe
in
the
comprehensive
plan,
hasn't
been
updated
for
a
number
of
years.
However,
as
you
well
know,
ultimately,
the
comprehensive
plan
isn't
code.
It's
general
policy
guidance
and
the
science
here
says
that
the
noise
generated
from
the
airport
results
in
concerns
from
a
compatibility
perspective
and
it's
the
airport
and
the
planning
and
zoning
commission
that
relied
on
that
in
making
the
decisions.
K
Also,
the
comprehensive
plan
includes
a
number
of
policies
protecting
intended
to
protect
the
airport
from
incompatible
development.
K
So
before
I
move
before
I
move
on
or
wrap
up,
I
would
just
remind
you
that
residential
in
this
location
is
not
a
principally
permitted
use.
If
that
was
the
case,
we'd
probably
be
having
an
entirely
different
discussion
this
evening.
The
applicant
has
zoning
that
allows
office
use
and
that
use
is
even
further
restricted
by
a
development
agreement.
Again
we
acknowledge
there
are
countless
reasons,
probably
that
housing
makes
a
lot
of
sense
in
this
location
and
we
certainly
need
housing.
K
It's
a
nicely
designed
project
given
the
surroundings,
but
at
the
end
of
the
day,
it's
that
incompatibility
with
the
airport.
It's
really
just
a
tough
hurdle
to
clear,
so
it
is
for
that
reason
that
we
are
recommending
denial
of
both
modification
to
the
development
agreement
and
the
appeal
just
as
a
reminder.
We
should
provide
guidance
to
the
applicant
or
required
to
provide
guidance
to
the
applicant
as
to
ways
that
might
obtain
approval
in
our
mind,
in
this
case,
it's
probably
best
that
they
pursue
office
uses
originally
intended
or
other
compatible
uses
in
this
location.
K
I
finally
would
just
like
to
note
that
we
did
receive
some
written
correspondence
very,
very
late
in
the
day,
perhaps
yesterday
that
you
received
that
should
be
included
in
the
record
and
then
finally,
testimony
this
evening,
because
we
have
the
development
agreement,
modification
isn't
limited
to
to
parties
of
record.
Thank
you.
B
W
Madam
mayor
members
of
the
city
council,
cody
gave
a
great
introduction
to
the
project.
It's
a
great
project.
Could.
W
Apologize,
thank
you.
Josh
leonard
clark,
wardle
we're
at
250.
south
front
suite
310.
thanks
gave
a
great
introduction
to
this
project
and
I
appreciate
that
and
as
he
said,
there
are
a
lot
of
reasons
why
it's
a
great
project
at
this
location.
W
One
clarification.
The
development
agreement
modification-
and
I
even
got
it
wrong
here
on
this
slide-
is
to
increase
building
heights.
It's
not
to
include
multi-family
uses
as
I'll
mention
in
just
a
second.
The
development
agreement
contemplated
the
2000
development
agreement,
contemplated
those
multi-family
uses
or
conditionally
allowed
uses
in
this
area.
W
It's
to
increase
building
heights
to
change
the
circulation
throughout
the
project,
and
then
it
keeps
a
couple
of
the
elements
of
the
project
as
well.
Some
buffering
between
the
neighborhoods
and-
and
I
I
it
also
changes
elder
street
to
end
in
a
in
a
cul-de-sac.
W
W
This
was
constructed
by
the
applicant
biltmore
construction,
it's
owned
by
the
applicant,
and
it's
managed
on
the
applicant's
behalf
again
the
parcel.
W
I
want
to
do
a
quick
history
of
the
of
the
project
in
2000
this,
the
entire
8.7
acre
parcel
was
rezoned
from
r1c
to
limited
office,
with
a
design
review
and
a
development
agreement,
and
at
that
time
the
development
agreement
and
the
site
plan
that
went
with
it.
They
contemplated
the
development
of
three
office
buildings
and
surface
parking,
as
proposed.
They
would
step
down
and
hide
a
little
bit
as
they
got
closer
to
the
the
single
family
residential
neighborhood.
W
That
was
in
existence
at
that
time
as
well,
and
other
conditions
included
a
landscape
buffer
and
limiting
access
between
the
the
neighborhood
and
the
office
development
emergency.
Only
those
last
two
conditions
we
propose
would
remain
so
that
access
isn't
taken
through
the
regular
accesses
and
taken
through
that
neighborhood
and
that
there's
still
that
30-foot
buffer.
W
W
Again,
this
is
a
request
to
modify
the
site
plan.
That's
attached
to
the
development
agreement
to
allow
the
development
that
consists
of
84
units-
and
I
made
a
mistake
here:
it's
actually
not
4.33
acres,
it's
3.98
acres
of
the
8.66
acre
parcel
four
three-story
buildings,
all
of
them
less
than
38
feet
in
height,
30
foot,
wide
landscape,
buffer
emergency,
only
connection
remain
as
conditions
and
then
elder
street
room
ending
in
a
cul-de-sac.
W
The
proposed
project,
four
residential
buildings,
a
clubhouse
with
full
amenities,
a
pool,
a
jacuzzi,
a
workout
workout
area-
all
will
be
included.
As
you
can
see,
we've
marked
where
the
emergency
access
only
will
be
and
where
the
location
of
waihee
park
is-
and
it's
just
on
the
other
side
of
hawaii
park,
that
the
existing
multi-family
development
by
this
applicant
exists.
W
W
The
proposed
use
will
not
place
an
undue
burden
on
transportation
and
other
public
facilities
again
that
one's
that
one's
met.
City
staff
doesn't
dispute
that
the
site
being
large
enough
city
staff
doesn't
doesn't
dispute
that
and
then
proposed
use
if
it
complies
with
all
conditions
imposed,
will
not
adversely
affect
that's
met,
and
then
the
big
one
that
cody
mentioned
and
that's
that
the
proposed
use
is
in
compliance
with
a
comprehensive
plan.
W
The
last
one
is
especially
in
the
code
for
multi-family
buildings
and
they're
required
to
to
comply
with
the
design
standards
and
guidelines
really
quickly,
I'm
going
to
go
through
the
first,
the
first
few
location
compatible
to
other
uses
in
the
general
neighborhood
I-84
separates
the
project
from
the
airport.
Most
of
the
site
is
covered
by
by
sound
walls
protecting
it,
both
from
the
airport
and
from
the
from
from
the
the
highway.
W
It's
compatible
the
hotel
compatible
and
the
office
building
compatible,
and
then
the
public
park
compatible
as
far
as
not
placing
an
undue
burden
on
on
public
facilities.
It's
an
infield
project
and
it's
a
true
infill
project.
The
public
facilities
exist
through
this
site
and
and
services
are
already
in
place
as
far
as
transportation,
it'll
lessen
burden
on
transportation
facilities.
W
There
are
a
lot
of
employers
in
this
area,
but
not
very
much
housing
at
the
lower
end
of
the
affordable
spectrum.
This
would
provide
84
such
units.
W
Size
of
the
site,
not
in
dispute
and
then
not
adversely
affect
other
property
in
the
vicinity.
V
W
Is
a
one
of
the
ways
in
which
the
planning
and
zoning
commission
aired-
and
this
is
just
a
minor
error-
I
don't
even
know
that
this
light
raises
to
the
level
of
a
an
error
that
bears
reversal,
but
they
considered
it
that
it
would.
The
proposed
use
if
it
complies
with
all
conditions
imposed,
will
not
adversely
affect
the
use
of
other
property,
and
that's
not
what
the
code
says.
W
The
code
says
that
the
proposed
use,
if
it
complies
with
all
conditions
imposed,
will
not
adversely
affect
other
property,
slight
distinction,
but
but
meaningful
one
of
the
the
things
that
we
try
to
tell
my
my
youngest
is
the
words
matter.
It's
a
different
context
for
him,
and
it's
usually
that
what
he
says
matters
to
other
people.
In
this
case.
It's
the
that
the
code
matters
to
people
they're
trying
to
interpret
it.
W
The
proposed
use
is
in
compliance
with
a
comprehensive
plan.
The
reason
statement
that
was
provided
by
city
staff
on
behalf
of
the
planning
and
zoning
commission
included
the
following
statement.
You
can
read
it
there.
It's
does
not
support
residential
development
that
is
subject
to
these
levels
of
environmental
noise
impact.
That's
not
what
blue
blueprint
boise
actually
says,
though,
as
you
can
see
here,
blueprint
boise
among
several
a
few
dozen
ancillary
plans
adopts
both
the
boise
airport
noise
compatibility
program
and
the
master
plan
for
the
boise
airport
into
the
into
the
comprehensive
plan.
W
The
sound
contours
that
are
in
that
2004
those
2004
standards
are
the
only
adopted
sound
standards
that
govern
this
parcel,
and
I
can
tell
you,
from
those
maps
this
parcel
sits
outside
of
the
60
decibel
contour,
meaning
that
it's
lower
than
60..
W
As
you
heard,
and
from
staffing
probably
read
in
the
staff
report,
they
say
it's
that
they're
in
excess
of
65
and
that
may
very
well
be
true.
However,
the
standards
that
the
city
has
adopted
for
this
project
and
for
this
parcel
are
are
to
keep
it
below
60.
W
W
The
blueprint
boise,
the
goal
that
it
has
with
regard
to
noise,
is
to
ensure
that
all
development
within
the
airport
influence
area
complies
with
noise
standards
for
development,
as
outlined
in
chapter
three
of
this
comprehensive
plan.
That's
again
one
of
the
standards
and
recognizing
that
it's
not
a
a
code
standard
or
a
zoning
code.
It's
not
the
law.
One
of
the
the
criteria
for
approval
of
a
cup
is
that
it
being
consistent
with
the
goals
of
the
comprehensive
plan.
W
In
this
case,
chapter
three
of
the
comprehensive
plan
outlines
those
airport
influence
areas
and
prescribes
mitigation
that
needs
to
be
performed
by
these
by
the
applicant
in
order
to
comply.
This
proposed
development
does
comply
with
those
noise
mitigation
standards
in
the
60
65
contour
they're
required
to
provide
a
sound
level
reduction
of
25
decibels.
W
As
you'll
hear
from
from
kevin
amar
one
of
the
the
principles
of
biltmore
construction,
they
do
that
they
they
far
exceed
that
that's
in
airport
influence
area,
a
in
airport
influence
area
b.
It's
a
little
bit
more
restrictive.
It's
a
more
of
a
sound
level
reduction
required,
it's
30
decibels.
Why
is
that
important?
It's
important
because
airport
influence
area
a
this
is
the
overlay
of
the
airport
influence
area
with
the
project
down
here
at
the
bottom.
This
little
piece
right
here
is
the
only
piece
of
the
project.
W
W
F
C
B
B
B
F
X
Thank
you
I'll
move
it
down
a
little
bit,
I'm
teresa
cirelli
and
I'm
at
3811,
west
normandy
drive
in
boise
83705
and
we
did
submit
comments.
They
came
in
late,
they
were
included
in
the
packet.
X
We
met
as
a
neighborhood
association
with
several
of
the
long-term
residents
in
the
area,
and
we
had
a
really
good
conversation.
We
were
very
concerned
about
the
noise
levels
that
are
not
being
considered
by
the
applicant
because
they
were
from
the
recent
airport
noise
study
from
2017
and
we
agree.
They
have
not
been
adopted
by
the
city,
and
so
we
do
want
to
have
those
considered,
because
the
traffic
at
the
airport
has
significantly
changed
since
2010
in
2004.
X
we
live
there.
We
hear
the
noise
on
a
daily
basis,
I'm
an
air
force
brat,
so
I'm
used
to
being
around
the
airplane.
So
I
don't
complain
about
them,
but
I
am,
I
do
enjoy
being
around
there
and
the
other
long-term
residents
they
enjoy.
It
also
we're
concerned
about
new
residents
coming
in
and
the
complaints
that
will
be
issued
because
we
do
have
that
in
the
neighborhood.
Also,
the
newer
pm
people
that
move
in
do
complain.
X
So
we
want
you
to
really
take
consideration
of
the
recent
noise
study
that
was
done
when
the
f-35
planes
were
considered
and-
and
the
change
was
indicated
by
what
cody
had
presented
the
the
mapping
does
change
the
65
decimals.
I
think
to
70.
X
Decimals
is
shown
on
that
map,
and
so
we
would
encourage
you
to
to
consider
that
and
and
the
changes
of
the
traffic
there,
the
boise
air
terminal
whenever
they
testified
at
the
june
1st
hearing,
they
mentioned
that
they
would
be
the
grant
money
that
they
received
for
updates
of
the
airport
would
become
in
jeopardy
from
the
federal
funding
and
so
we'd
like
to
have
that
taken
into
consideration.
For
last
year
alone.
X
There
was
some
mention
about
the
the
roading
the
elder
street
in
the
original
packet
from
june
1st.
From
that
hearing,
the
the
fire
chief
did
indicate
that
the
road
is
not
wide
enough
on
elder
street
entering
into
this.
X
This
proposed
property,
and
that
would
require
parking
on
both
sides
of
elder
street
to
be
closed
and
that
would
affect
parking
for
people
that
use
the
public
park
right
there
and
there's
tennis
courts
right
there
and
a
lot
of
handicapped
people
will
come
and
utilize
that
park
right
now,
there's
only
18
parking
stalls
at
the
park,
one
handicap
parking
spot,
so
a
lot
of
them
have
to
use
the
street
elder
street.
X
X
So
that's
our
considerations
that
we'd
like
for
you
guys
to
think
about.
Is
these
areas,
the
noise,
the
airport
funding
that
they
would
lose
from
federal
grants
and
then
also
the
the
handicap
changes
that
would
affect
the
parking
and
that's
all
I
have
to
say
all
right.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
Madame.
D
Yes,
ask
the
hillcrest
teresa.
I
appreciate
your
testimony.
I
had
a
question
you,
you
had
referenced
the
f35
study
and
I
of
course
remember
that
study
and
looking
at
that
map.
But
I
don't
remember
the
specifics
when
you
said
it,
it
went
to
65
and
what
did
you
say
exactly
that
it
shows
that
it's
higher
now.
X
On
the
map
that
cody
presented
from
the
city,
he
shows
on
there
that
it's
between
it's
either
70
or
75,
to
65
in
the
whole
property
area
of
where
these
apartments
would
be
placed.
S
B
So
before
we
move
into
public
testimony
here
in
the
building
just
want
to
see
if
anybody
has
raised
their
hand
on
zoom,
no
matter
all
right
great,
so
I
don't
have
anybody
listed
here,
so
I'm
going
to
propose
that
come
up
one
by
one
and
just
give
us
your
am.
Do
you
want
to
go
with
the
interesting
mask?
I
Y
Good
evening,
mayor
council
members,
my
name
is
kevin
amar
with
biltmore
company.
My
address
is
1580
west
cayuse
creek
drive
in
meridian,
happy
to
be
here
before
you
this
evening
to
present
oahe
park
apartment
or
elder
street
apartments.
Y
I
will
go
through
briefly
why
we
like
this
location
in
this
project
and
the
number
one
reason
that
we
get
why
people
live
in
the
current
owyhee
park.
Apartments,
the
ones
that
we
just
built,
is
proximity
to
work.
There
is
a
woeful
lack
of
available
housing
in
this
immediate
area,
but
there
is
an
immense.
Y
Requirement,
I
guess,
for
employment,
there's
many
office
buildings
there
there's
that.
Obviously
we
know
about
the
airport
and
we'll
discuss
that
a
little
bit
and
there's
a
lot
of
other
employment
in
this
area.
What
generates
is
increased
traffic
to
this
area
every
morning
and
every
evening
and
people
don't
have
an
opportunity
to
live
here
and
that's
why
we
looked
in
certain
areas
of
the
city
to
try
to
identify
viable,
long-term,
good
solutions
to
provide
apartments.
Y
This
project
will
consist
of
84
units,
there'll
be
54,
2,
bedroom,
2
bath
units
they'll
be
31,
one
bedroom
one
bath
unit,
but
it's
also
fully
amenitized.
It's
not
something
that
is
currently
even
available
in
the
area
and
when
I
say
fully
amenitized
I
mean
it
has
a
pool
clubhouse,
it
has
weight
room,
it
has
a
common
area,
it
has
onsite
leasing.
So
this
is
a
high
quality
project
and
taylor's
here,
and
she
can
talk
about
talk
about
some
of
those
things
that
she
experiences
as
she
is
managing
the
as
she's
managing
the
project.
Y
I
was
surprised
this
evening
and
and
concerned
with
the
inconsistency
that
the
standards
are
applied
from
project
to
project.
We
just
saw
a
project
that
was
unanimously
approved
by
the
city
of
boise
that
is
currently
in
the
b1
zone
and
currently
experiences
higher
levels
of
decibels
than
this
project
and
staff
supported.
It.
Council
unanimously
approved
it,
and
it's
called
joyful
subdivision.
Y
Y
The
rest
of
this
project
is
in
the
a
zone,
and
so,
as
I
look
at
the
standards
that
I'm
being
held
to
and
the
project
that
this
is
being
held
to
they're,
not
standards
that
are
adopted
and
they're,
honestly,
not
even
standards
that
are
uniformly
spread
across
the
other
properties
in
this
area,
as
we
saw
tonight,
staff
supported
the
project
that
was
just
at
the
end
of
this,
and
that
project
already
exceeds
65
decibels
in
the
2004
study.
So
we
know
we
have
a
good
project.
We
know
this
is
in
demand.
Y
Z
Gonna
take
it
off
now,
but
my
name
is
taylor
granger.
I
live
at
11715
king
street
number
107
in
boise,
idaho
83713.
As
kevin
mentioned.
I
currently
manage
the
owyhee
park
apartment,
which
is
which
is
the
complex,
45
or
450
feet
away
from
the
proposed
project.
The
current
complex
owyhee
park
apartments
has
I've,
never
received
any
complaints
from
our
tenants
and
I've
been
there.
Since
completion
of
construction
for
from
the
airport
in
ours
we
haven't
ever
received
a
tenant
call
for
that.
Z
The
current
units
at
owahi
park
have
been
in
high
demand
due
to
proximity,
to
work
location
just
in
general
to
the
boise
area
and
then
the
modern
floor
plans
and
modern
finishes
that
biltmore
provides
in
that
area.
There
are
some
rental
units,
but
not
many,
and
they
are
more
run
down.
Z
We've
been
over
95
occupied
since
completion
of
the
project
and
we're
currently
at
100
occupancy,
and
that's
just
due
to
the
length
of
stay
that
tenants
are
increasing
to
stay
with
us
due
to
many
reasons,
but
one
being
the
lack
of
homes
in
the
boise
area.
People
are
needing
places
to
stay
while
they
try
and
find
other
areas
to
live
in
or
just
make
these
units
their
homes.
Z
B
Anyone
else
are
all
of
you
working
for
the
applicant
or
some
of
you,
members
of
the
public,
come
on
up.
Typically
the
team
working
for
the
applicant.
We
expect
out
of
respect
for
council's
time
that
you
give
your
presentation
all
as
one
so,
if
they're
members
of
the
public
I'd
like
to
make
sure
we
hear
from
them
now.
S
Madam
mayor
city,
council
welcome,
my
name
is
rob
cirelli,
3811
normandy
drive,
boise,
idaho,
I've
been
living
in
this
residence
for
over
30
years.
I've
seen
a
lot
of
development
come
and
go
the
apartments
that
they
put
in
on
that
she
was
just
referencing.
It
on
pasadena
have
significantly
increased
the
traffic
in
the
area
because
they
don't
have
enough
parking
stalls.
S
She
also
stated
and
biltmore
stated
at
the
last
testimony
with
planning
and
zoning
that
they
had
a
waiting
list
for
the
apartments
we
personally
called
the
apartments.
There
was
two
vacancies
as
of
september
1..
They
had
two
vacancies.
I
believe
last
month,
biltmore
also
testified
at
the
planning
and
zoning
that
they
have
a
written
thing
for
their
residents
about
the
noise
ordinance.
S
It
was
stated
that
they've
never
had
a
complaint,
but
whoever
I
don't
know
if
she
was
unaware
of
it.
I
can't
verify
for
a
fact,
but
there
was
no
written
paperwork,
that
of
the
noise
in
the
area.
S
E
S
It's
an
older
neighborhood,
it's
noisy
because
of
the
airport.
He
also
from
biltmore
testified
that
there
is
a
sound
wall.
There
is
no
sound
wall
on
the
freeway.
The
sound
wall
dead
ends
at
st
andrews.
There
is
no
sound
wall
that
continues
past
where
the
commercial
residential
was
supposed
to
take
place.
S
The
other
thing
that
is
not
being
mentioned
is
achd,
did
not
see
a
problem
with
the
traffic
but
passes
why
he
does
not
have
a
stop
sign
elder
does
that
they
want
to
build
their
property
on
people,
don't
stop,
because
why
he
travels
east
and
west,
the
other
travels
north
and
south.
They
think
they
have
the
right
of
way.
F
B
All
right,
one
more
check
on
zoom,
nope,
okay,
any
quest
there's
nobody
else
here
to
testify
any
questions
for.
Q
And
mayor,
I
have
a
couple
of
questions
cody
and
I
and
I
believe,
rebecca's
here
too.
So
if,
if
either
one
of
them
wants
to
comment,
the
first
question.
B
Building
is
rebecca
on
zoom,
oh
hi
rebecca.
I
didn't
realize
that
great
thank.
Q
You
yeah
so
the
first
question
the
applicant
seemed
to
indicate
there
was
another
project
that
was
approved.
That
would
have
been
in
the
noise
contours
if
we
were
taking
the
new
ones.
But
as
I
look
at
the
map,
if
it's
the
project
on
the
end
of
curtis,
it
is
not
in
those
noise
contours.
Can
you
clarify
what
you
what
what
that
might
have
been
about.
B
I
K
K
Madam
mayor
there's
actually
a
larger
and
let's
see
if
I
can.
K
Well,
I
guess,
madam
mayor
councilmember
clegg,
as
I
look
for
that.
What
I
would
say-
and
I
mentioned
this
in
my
introductory
comments-
that
other
project
had
has
residential
zoning
in
place.
That
subdivision
is
an
allowed
use
in
the
zone.
Airport
did
comment
on
that
application
and
and
didn't
didn't
object
or
raise
a
concern
with
the
change
in
the
in
the
noise
levels.
This
item
here
is
a
conditional
use
permit
where
the
bar
is
certainly
higher.
The
residential
use
isn't
an
outright
allowed
use
of
this
location.
Q
Thank
you
and
then
rebecca
or
cody,
either
one
recognizing
that
the
2004
maps
are
the
ones
that
are
referenced
in
our
adoption.
Q
Q
Can
you
tell
me
whether
or
not
that
applies
in
this
particular
case.
K
Madam
mayor
count,
council
member
council
member
clay
in
the
front
of
blueprint
boise
it
does
reference
this
whole
long
list
of
of
plans
by
reference.
K
The
goal
there's
goals
and
policies
related
to
the
to
the
airport,
one
of
which
policy
cc
6.1
airport
compatibility,
says
the
airport
master
plan
is
adopted
by
reference,
as
amended
from
our
perspective,
that
that
kind
of
recognizes
those
situations
that
the
airport's
going
to
evolve,
expand
change
and
we
don't
want
to
run
afoul
of
you
know
as
as
different
dates
and
different
plans
change.
I
would
note
also
that
next
next
month
or
this
month
september
1st,
we
are
updating
a
number
of
those
dates
in
in
the
comprehensive
plan,
but
certainly
not
changing
this.
D
Yeah
dakoti
or
rebecca,
can
you
just
speak
to
sound
walls
sounds
like
there
may
only
be
a
portion
here,
but
does
that
have
an
impact
on
this
type
of
development's
approval.
K
Madam
mayor
councilmember
thompson,
not
as
it
relates
to
the
airport.
From
our
perspective
I
mean
that's
that's
mitigation
from
noise
along
the
interstate,
I
believe
somebody
spoke
and
indicated
it
doesn't
run
the
entire
length
of
the
site
that
that's
probably
true
from
staff's
perspective.
It
wouldn't
change
our
our
recommendation
in
terms
of
compatibility
with
the
airport.
L
L
I
have
a
question
for
rebecca
huff
the
airport
director
director
and
the
question
is
it's
about
the
staff
report,
which
explains
that
the
airport
improvement
program
is
a
significant
source
of
funding
for
airport
operations
and
references
that,
as
you
know,
part
of
the
evidence
that
supports
the
pnz's
decision.
Here.
I
just
wonder:
if
rebecca
could
elaborate,
it
wasn't.
It
wasn't
quite
clear
to
me
the
connection
between
funding
from
the
airport
improved
program
and
this
particular
development.
L
AA
Thank
you,
madam
mayor
and
council
member
badgen.
I
hope
that
you
can
all
hear
me
adequately.
So
that's
a
great
question
and
the
way
that
the
funding
ties
in
with
this
requirement
is
that
as
a
condition
of
receiving
federal
funding
through
the
faa,
we
agree
to
certain
grant
assurances.
For
example,
we
agree
not
to
discriminate
against
people.
We
agree
that
we'll
be
open
to
the
public.
One
of
the
things
that
we
agree
to
is
that
we
will
ensure
proper
zoning
around
the
airport
to
protect
the
assets
that
the
faa
is
investing
in.
O
Mayor,
yes,
go
ahead,
I
have
a
question
for
cody
around
the
residential
densities
that
typically
are
part
of
the
airport
zone
of
impact
cody.
You
probably
know
more
history
and
why
many
of
the
residential
zones
around
the
airport
are
limited
to
certain
densities?
Can
you
speak
to
that?
A
little
bit.
K
Madam
mayor
councilmember,
councilmember
woodings
yeah,
really,
as
in
the
most
immediate
vicinity
of
the
airport,
you
generally
have
have
zones
that
simply
don't
allow
residential
use
altogether,
as
you
radiate
out.
Further
radiate
further
from
the
airport
residential
becomes
allowed,
but
it's
limited
in
density
simply
to
minimize
the
number
of
folks
that
are
exposed
to
that
noise
and
and
complaints
and
compound
compatibility
concerns
with
the
airport,
probably
most
notable.
I
believe
it's
b1
that
limits
a
density
to
three
units
per
acre.
That
was
that
was
actually
the
density
cap
that
was
on
that
project.
K
We
heard
earlier
this
evening
and
then
beyond
that
the
next
overlay
zones
require
sound
attenuation,
but
don't
cap
density
and
then
you're
far
enough
away.
There
are
no
standards.
O
Great
thank
you.
I
just
want
to
add
that
it's
also
my
understanding
that
some
of
those
density
caps
were
put
in
place
to
avoid
high
density
housing
being
placed
in
airport
areas
of
impact,
so
that
it
would
not
create
adverse
health
impacts
on
lower
income
communities,
and
so
I
just
wanted
to
bring
that
up
so
that
we
can
keep
that
in
mind
for
this
application.
F
Q
There's
been
a
lot
of
talk
tonight
about
noise,
just
being
a
something,
that's
bothersome
that
people
complain
about,
but
in
fact
cody
as
a
planner.
I
believe
there
are
there's
plenty
of
evidence
that
consistent
noise
in
a
residential
area
can
actually
can
actually
impact
health
and
well-being
and
that
it's
one
of
the
things
that
is
taken
into
account
when
there
are
environmental
justice
decisions
to
be
made
about
where
to
place.
Certain
things
is:
am
I
correct
on
that.
B
All
right,
I'm
going
to
close
the
nope,
I'm
not
the
applicant
is
allowed
or
the
appellant
is
allowed
to
rebuttal.
W
I'll
try
to
be
quicker.
This
is
josh
leonard
again
for
the
applicant,
madam
mayor
members
of
the
council,
I'll
try
to
be
quicker
than
the
five
minutes.
W
I
first
thing
I
wanted
to
address,
though,
was
the
the
fact
that,
in
order
to
be
to
allow
due
process
to
an
applicant
the
decisions
of
the
city
council,
particularly
when
it
impacts
something
as
serious
as
property,
rights
has
to
be
based
on
adopted
standards
or
they
are
per
se
arbitrary
and
capricious.
W
Although
this,
the
city
council
does
have
discretion
more
discretion
on
a
cup
than
when
it's
allowed
as
a
matter
of
right,
there
are
still
criteria
when
we
went
through
several
of
those,
as
did
cody
earlier,
and
those
are
the
adopted
standards.
The
the
this
other
standard.
That's
that's
important.
There
is
the
fact
that
those
2004
noise
contours
are
the
ones
that
the
city
has
identified
in
the
comprehensive
plan,
as
as
being
that,
applicants
are
required
to
comply
with.
In
this
case,
we
do
as
to
the
federal
money.
W
W
We
made
this
argument
at
planning
and
zoning,
but
and
to
the
extent
that
there's
a
violation
of
that
grant
assurance
it's
not
based
on
any
one
application.
It's
based
on
the
the
prior
failure
to
update
those
standards
and
update
the
airport
influence
area,
the
airport
influence
area.
Most
of
this
project
is
an
area
of
area
of
airport
influence
or
airport
influence
area,
a
which
doesn't
have
a
restriction
on
density
all,
but
about
one-fifth
or
excuse
me
less
than
that.
W
W
I'd
also
like
to
to
to
really
quickly
talk
about
another
decision
that
the
city
council
made
back.
W
I
guess
it's
been
a
couple
of
years
now,
but
the
syringa
valley,
development,
13
acres
of
that
parse
of
that
property
was
in
airport
influence
area
b,
not
b1,
but
b,
which
it
severely
restricts
residential
residential
uses,
and
yet
it
got
a
rezone
and
and
are
currently
building
and
selling
homes
down
there.
W
I'd
also
like
to
point
out,
we
made
this
argument
also
at
at
planning
and
zoning
that
we,
the
construction
methods
and
materials
used
in
constructing
these
apartments,
achieve
a
much
greater
sound
reduction
than
is
required
in
either
of
those
area
or
excuse
me
airport
impact
areas.
W
We
can
provide
additional
information
if
the
mayor
and
council
would
like
that,
instead
of,
if
the,
if
the
motion
it
ends
up
being
to
deny
this
project,
allow
we'd
ask
that
that
you
allow
us
to
present
a
couple
of
of
proposed
mitigation
or
items
and
proposed
mitigation
in
addition
to
reducing
the
the
sound
using
those
construction,
materials
and
methods
we'd.
W
W
We
offered
to
include
that
as
a
condition
of
of
approval
that
we
would
include
on
all
of
the
lease
forms
for
all
the
properties
all
of
the
units
there
that
that
it
is
in
an
airport
impact
area
and
that
it
is
subject
to
it
to
increase
noise
and
include
those
noise
levels.
We'd
also
record
a
document
against
the
the
property
in
case
future
purchasers
of
the
property
so
that
they
don't
they're,
not
unaware
of
the
the
sound
issues
that
the
property
has
all
in
all.
W
What
I'd
like
to
point
out
is
that
this
includes
84
units
of
housing
at
the
affordable
end
of
the
spectrum
mentioned
a
couple
of
times
that
that
that's
the
case
and
that
this
is
some.
This
is
housing
stock
that
the
city
desperately
needs.
L
F
L
One
quick
question
that
sir,
you
heard
from
the
airport
director
and
from
city
staff
that
the
comprehensive
plan
adopt
a
2004
study
as
amended
and
that
it
has
been
amended
since
2004,
and
I
guess
I
was
expecting
to
hear
you
respond
to
that
in
your
rebuttal.
But
you
didn't
so.
I
wanted
to
give
you
a
chance
sure.
A
I
my
response
to
that
and
I
appreciate
madam
mayor
councilmember
pageant.
I.
W
As
amended
to
me
is
in
past
tense,
it's
that
it
is,
as
it
was
amended
up
to
that
date.
I
don't
know
that
the
city
council
can
approve
something
blindly
going
forward,
as
it's
amended
outside
of
their
outside
of
their
purview
would
be
as
as,
though
they
were
amending
an
ordinance
by
saying
it's
as
it
as
it
comes
to
us
from
some
other
entity.
I
don't
think
that's
appropriate.
E
D
Is
there
a
situation
that
you
could
foresee
where,
given
the
restraints
the
challenges
of
building
residential
in
this
area
due
to
the
close
proximity
of
the
airport,
do
you
do
you
see
a
situation
where
residential
could
be
approved
in
this
area?
I
know
that's
a
bit
hypothetical
and
puts
you
in
a
bit
of
a
top
hard
spot.
I
would
like
your
thoughts.
K
Madam
mayor
councilmember
thompson,
as
I
acknowledged
earlier,
I
think
there
are
probably
a
million
reasons
for
that
residential
makes
sense.
Here.
Everything
is
in
place
that
we
want
residential
here
park
services,
transit
everything
from
a
planning
staff
perspective,
though
we
would,
we
would
fall
on
the
experts
at
the
airport
and
we'd
be
hard-pressed
to
recommend
approval
of
a
project
if
they're
opposed.
D
D
B
Q
Yes,
thank
you,
I'm
willing
to
make
that
motion
and
I
believe,
we'll
need
to
start
with
the
modification
of
the
cu
because
it
or
the
development
agreement,
because
it
is
associated
with
the
original
rezone,
and
with
that
I
would
deny
car
20-3
biltmore
company,
36,
35
west
elder
modification
to
a
development
agreement.
Q
Second,
thank
you,
madam
mayor.
I
would
like
to
speak
to
this
and
then
with
my
second
motion.
I'll
speak
to
the
broader
issues
on
the
pud,
in
this
case
they're
asking
for
an
increase
in
the
height
limit
and
to
include
multi-family
residential
uses
when
the
rezone
was
approved.
This
development
agreement
was
approved
in
part
to
preserve
compatibility
with
the
existing
neighborhood
and
part
of
that
compatibility
was
the
height
of
the
buildings
that
were
going
to
be
allowed
and
so
to
increase.
Q
D
I
I'll
be
supporting
the
motion.
I
you
know
if
I
could
pick
this
property
up
and
put
it
in.
You
know
somewhere
else
in
boise,
I
I
would
do
it
in
a
heartbeat,
it's
outstanding
development
and
really
at
the
day.
I
know
we're
speaking
specifically
to
the
the
excuse
me.
D
I
can't
find
it
on
my
page,
but
we're
not
speaking
to
the
appeal
is
what
my
point
is,
but
it's
it's
an
absolutely
outstanding
project
and,
with
the
exception
of
where
it
is
located
due
to
the
constraints
of
sound
I'd,
certainly
be
supporting
it.
I
think
in
particular,
this
developer
is
second
to
none
in
our
city
and
I,
but
I
can't
support
the
change
in
the
current
use,
for
that.
N
Thank
you.
I'd
like
to
thank
council
president
pro
tem
woodings
for
bringing
up
how
folks
who
come
from
low-income
communities
are
often
put
in
situations
where
their
health
needs
are
not
taken
into
consideration,
and
I
feel
like
there
is
no
denying
that
every
single
one
of
us
who
serves
the
city
puts
a
priority
on
ensuring
that
there
is
housing
for
folks
which
isn't
a
premium
right
now,
and
given
that
it's
still
so
important
to
advocate
for
those
among
us
who
are
the
most
vulnerable
there
is
this
thing
called
intersectionality.
N
N
People
who
may
become
hearing
impaired
because
of
where
they
live,
especially
children,
who
have
no
choice
in
where
they
live.
I
absolutely
think
that
it
would
be
great
to
have
more
housing,
but
there's
just
too
much
danger
for
folks
who
might
have
to
live
there.
L
F
L
F
Q
F
Q
Go
ahead,
thank
you.
You
know
some
council
members
have
already
commented
on
this,
so
I'll
try
not
to
repeat,
but
I
think
it's
worth
noting
that
the
argument
that
the
planning
and
zoning
committee
commission
aired
in
this
was
based
on
the
fact
that
this
in
fact
was
compatible
because
the
date
listed
on
the
adopted
zoning
noise
map
for
the
airport
is
2004..
Q
Those
new
amendments
would
apply
to
those
plans
in
the
blueprint
boise
and
in
fact
this
noise
map
was
amended
by
the
city
council
in
2017,
with
a
an
approval
of
a
new
noise
map.
With
that
new
noise
map,
there's
clear
evidence
that
this
particular
development
is
not
compatible.
It's
in
a
zone
that
does
not
allow
multi-family
at
this
kind
of
a
density.
Q
Because
of
that,
there's
evidence
that
this
would
adversely
affect
not
the
use
of
the
airport
but
actually
affect
the
airport
property,
because
it
would
likely,
in
the
future
not
be
able
to
continue
to
be
an
airport
and
that's
what
that
property
is
zoned
for
today.
Q
I
think
the
planning
and
zoning
commission
did
a
great
job
in
identifying
those
two
things,
perhaps
not
in
the
same
specificity
in
terms
of
the
map,
but
in
identifying
that
that
was
the
correct
thing.
I
think
an
additional
piece
was
referenced
by
councilmember
sanchez
and
also
by
council
member
woodings,
and
that
is
the
notion
that
one
could
mitigate
this
by
requiring
people
who
can't
afford
to
live
anywhere
else
to
sign
away
their
right
to
complain.
Q
If
living
there
becomes
a
burden,
I
think
that
that's
an
incorrect
way
to
mitigate
such
a
burden
and
so
for
those
things.
For
that
reason,
I
believe,
in
addition
to
the
reasons
listed
by
the
planning
and
zoning
commission,
this
particular
development
is
also
incompatible
with
our
comprehensive
plan
and,
finally,
just
a
note.
The
syringa
valley
development
was
in
fact
approved
with
a
small
portion
in
the
b
influence
area
of
the
airport
and
that
small
portion
was
prohibited
from
being
developed
as
anything
but
the
field
for
the
schools.
Q
So
in
fact
that
was
mitigated
in
a
way
that
was
deemed
appropriate
the
rest
of
the
residential
development.
There
is
not
within
those
influence
areas
so
anyway,
for
those
reasons
I
bring
forward
this
motion
to
deny
the
appeal.
O
I
want
to
echo
everything
that
council
president
cling
has
just
said
in
my
time
on
council
we've
approved
many
residences
within
the
area
of
impact
of
the
airport
and
those
have
all
been
single
family
residences,
for
the
reasons
that
we've
already
discussed,
because
we
know
that
living
somewhere
where
there's
noise
has
adverse
health
impacts,
and
we
don't
do
multi-family
residential
in
those
areas,
because
we
don't
want
to
force
people
to
make
those
kinds
of
decisions.
O
And
so,
while
I
applaud
the
applicant,
for
you
know
wanting
to
provide
a
much
needed
type
of
housing
and
some
affordability
that
we
desperately
need.
O
L
L
Generally,
I'm
I'm
going
to
be
voting
with
the
council
president
for
most
of
the
reasons
that
she
outlined.
The
two
that
I
want
to
highlight
for
the
applicant
appellant
are
first,
I
guess
it's
maybe
three.
First,
I
don't
think
it
was
an
error
for
the
planning
and
zoning
commission
to
rely
on
the
best
available
present
evidence
about
the
sound
in
the
area
adjacent
to
the
airport,
and
I
understand
your
interpretation
of
the
amendment,
the
2004
study
and
amendments,
but
I
don't
agree
with
that
interpretation.
L
L
But
given
that,
I
think
the
findings
are
substantiated
on
other
grounds,
it's
kind
of
an
irrelevant
error
and
I
think
it's
actually
harmless
in
the
sense
that
although
the
pnc
decision
referenced
the
use
of
the
property,
it's
clear,
they
did
consider
the
adverse
impact
to
the
property
itself
by
considering
potential
loss
of
grant
funding
to
the
airport.
So
for
those.