►
From YouTube: Boise City Council - Work Session
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
C
Thank
you
and
first
up
Eric
is
with
us
to
go
over
some
interim
budget
changes.
D
Thank
you
very
much
Madam
mayor
members
of
council.
We
have
14
interim
budget
changes
for
your
consideration
this
afternoon.
The
majority
of
those
ibcs
are
in
the
Enterprise
funds
and
I'll
note
that
the
first
eight
of
them
are
all
related
to
airport
capital
projects
or
airport
projects.
D
D
These
bond
interest
expenses
were
not
budgeted
in
fiscal
year
23
giving
the
timing
given
the
timing
of
the
bond
issuances,
but
they
were
included
in
the
fiscal
year
24
proposed
budget.
D
D
The
fourth
airport
item
is
for
the
economy
parking
lot
improvements
project.
Additional
funding
is
needed
within
that
project
for
utility
and
design
related
costs,
as
well
as
to
relocate
the
existing
lateral
irrigation.
Ditch
funding
for
that
increase
would
also
come
from
the
taxi,
Lane
and
project.
Our
fifth
item
is
the
terminal
cooling
tower
relocation
project.
D
This
2.5
million
dollar
adjustment
would
cover
higher
than
budgeted
costs
for
the
equipment
associated
with
the
cooling
tower,
as
well
as
construction,
Administration
costs
and
a
certain
inspection
related
costs.
The
funding
for
this
project
would
come
from
the
tax,
taxiway
D
and
taxi
Lane
A3
relocation
projects,
both
of
which
have
available
budget.
D
The
sixth
airport
item
is
for
the
terminal
facility
upgrade
project.
An
increase
of
that
project
is
required
to
accommodate
higher
than
budgeted
costs
for
the
skylight
replacement
and
for
rotunda
art
support
funding
for
that
project
would
come
from
the
sky,
West
apron
construction
project,
which
was
canceled
and
has
available
funding.
D
The
next
item
is
for
the
ticket
Lobby
expansion-
this
375
thousand
dollar
increase,
would
is
required
for
design
work
primarily
related
to
tying
the
new
baggage
system
into
the
existing
package
system.
Funding
for
that
project
would
also
come
from
the
taxi
Lane
and
project
in
the
final
airport.
Related
project
is
for
the
utility
infrastructure
development
project.
D
D
This
increase
this
four
hundred
thousand
dollar
increase,
which
would
be
funded
by
development
impact
fees
in
the
North
River
Park
planning
area
would
address
higher
than
budgeted
costs
associated
with
building
out
the
park.
According
to
the
Park's
master
plan,
the
use
of
development
impact
fees
was
approved
by
the
development
impact,
the
advisory
committee
on
July
12th
of
this
year.
D
Our
10th
item
is
for
the
zoo,
necro
necropsy
building
for
thirty
seven
thousand
dollars.
That
project
is
in
need
of
additional
funding
due
to
higher
than
budgeted
costs.
An
expansion
of
that
building
is
required
in
order
to
maintain
the
zoo's
various
accreditations,
as
the
current
building
is
too
small
to
accommodate
larger
animals.
D
This
adjustment
would
transfer
undesignated
funds
from
the
housing
projects
and
special
activities
fund
to
support
administrative
costs
within
the
cdbg
and
home
funds.
Well
note
that
there
is
budget
Authority
available
within
those
funds,
but
Federal
reimbursement
limits
have
been
reached
and
there
is
not
sufficient
fund
balance
to
support
those
costs
absent
this
transfer.
D
Our
12th
item
is
an
advancement
of
funding
for
police
patrol
Vehicles.
We
had
allocated
1.7
million
dollars
as
part
of
the
fiscal
year
24
budget.
However,
the
due
to
the
timing
of
the
order
Bank
being
open,
the
order
bank
will
be
open
in
September.
We
need
to
advance
those
funds
into
the
current
fiscal
year.
D
A
subsequent
IBC
would
be
brought
forward
for
city
council
consideration
in
fiscal
year,
24
to
remove
the
fiscal
year
24
allocation,
similar
to
that
a
recommendation
to
advance
funding
for
the
Warm
Springs
historic
street
lights.
Project
is
recommended
advancing
those
funds
into
fiscal
year.
23
will
allow
for
more
of
that
work
to
be
completed
before
we
reach
the
winter
season.
D
A
subsequent
IBC
will
be
brought
forward
for
Council
consideration
to
remove
the
fy24
funding
after
the
approval
of
the
fy24
budget,
and
our
last
item
is
for
the
West
Boise
communications
center.
An
increase
to
that
project
is
needed
to
cover
higher
than
budgeted
labor
and
material
costs
associated
with
installing
power,
conduits
and
vaults,
as
well
as
to
prepare
the
facility
for
centralized
standby
power.
D
E
F
Ahead
and
start
okay,
so
I'm
here
today
to
bring
you
a
background
and
an
update
on
the
city's
work
to
reduce
fees
for
affordable
housing
development,
including
excuse
me
exclu,
including
an
ordinance
change
that
will
be
on
your
agenda
tonight
for
first
reading.
F
As
we've
said
before,
the
city
is
really
taking
in
all
of
the
above
approach
to
housing,
affordability
and
access,
including
setting
goals
for
construction
and
preservation
of
affordable
homes,
including
affordability,
incentives
in
our
zoning
code
and
piloting,
Innovative
approaches
related
to
adus
and
tiny
homes,
and
in
this
Spirit
we've
also
been
exploring
a
strategy
around
reducing
development
costs
for
affordable
homes
by
deferring
and
exempting
the
city's
fees
that
are
associated
with
development.
F
If
my
slides
are
up,
I
would
now
move
to
slide
two,
but
then
you'd
miss
the
beautiful
picture.
On
my
cover,
slide,
I'll
go
ahead
and
move.
F
Is
that
oh
she's
gone
okay,
I'll
just
keep
it
moving
in
the
interest
of
time.
So
in
terms
of
our
goals.
Here,
if
you
could
see
the
slide,
you
would
see
three
different
goals
outlined.
The
first
is
predictable
funding.
F
We
know
that
predictability
is
really
key
when
it
comes
to
affordable
housing,
development
and
what
I
mean
by
predictability
is
having
really
clear
criteria
around
the
types
of
projects
that
qualify
and
providing
those
making
them
available
on
the
developers
timeline,
not
through
a
predetermined
funding
round,
so
sometimes
affordable
housing
developers
will
call
this
over-the-counter,
meaning
that,
as
long
as
you
meet
the
criteria
in
terms
of
the
affordability
requirements
that
are
needed
and
any
other
requirements,
then
you
can
rely
on
being
able
to
access
this
incentive,
or
in
this
case
this
fee
waiver
or
exemption.
F
This
type
of
exemption
or
deferral
would
also
demonstrate
local
commitment
to
these
kinds
of
projects,
which
can
be
helpful
on
tax
credit
applications
or
other
types
of
funding
that
an
affordable
housing
project
may
be
applying
to
as
well.
The
second
goal
that's
outlined
in
the
slide
is
supporting
a
range
of
affordable
housing.
So
these
kinds
of
exemptions
and
waivers
can
be
used
for
multi
large
multi-family,
smaller
homeownership
projects,
as
well
as
a
range
of
incomes
targeted.
F
F
So
on
this
slide,
what
you
can't
see
is
a
beautiful
rendering
of
an
affordable
housing
project
with
nearly
100
units
which
is
set
to
break
ground
this
month
on
City
on
land
at
State
and
Arthur,
and
what
you'd
see
broken
out
are
the
city's
fees
that
we
charge
broken
into
three
categories:
impact
fees
which,
on
the
state
and
Arthur
project
which
again
you're
talking
about
up
in
around
100,
affordable
units.
Those
impact
fees
were
just
under
275
thousand
dollars
for
our
building
permit
and
development
fees.
That's
the
next
category.
F
F
So,
as
we
are
looking
at
what
at
those
fees
and
asking
a
question
around
no
problem
as
we're
looking
at
those
fees
and
asking
the
question
around,
is
there
something
we
can
do
to
address
this
seven
hundred
thousand
dollars
that
the
city
is
charging
on
fees
for
this
affordable
housing
development
that
that
very
much
you
know
meets
our
goals?
Around
affordability?
F
I
want
to
highlight
our
progress
on
the
strategy
so
far,
so
the
first
of
those
was
impact
fees
and,
as
you
know,
we
were
able
to
move
forward
a
short-term
impact.
Feed
deferral
option
through
internal
policy
change.
F
The
way
that
a
short-term
impact
fee
deferral
would
work
is
that
it's
paid
when
a
building
receives
it
certificate
of
occupancy,
rather
than
at
permit
issuance,
which
is
a
difference
of
usually
about
18
months
to
two
years.
Doing.
This
means
that
a
developer
can
avoid
putting
those
fees
on
their
construction
loan,
which
involves
accruing
interest
on
them
for
up
to
two
years
during
that
period
of
construction
and
to
instead
pay
the
fees
closer
in
time
to
when
they'll
be
moving
residents.
F
In
so
you're
still
talking
about
the
affordable
housing,
develop
developer,
paying
the
fees
and
paying
them
relatively
quickly,
but
it
does
reduce
some
of
that
upfront
cost
in
terms
of
the
building
permit
and
development
fees,
which
is
the
second
of
the
three
types
of
fees
in
that
image.
You
can't
see
the
change
there
will
allow
both
short-term
deferrals
and
exemptions
and
that's
included
in
this
year's
update
to
the
fee
schedule
which
is
on
your
second
reading
calendar
for
tonight.
So
that's
what
gives
the
ability
to
do
that
and
finally,
the
sewer
connection?
F
F
So
essentially,
what
we
have
tried
to
devise
here
is
a
two-tiered
system
that,
with
greater
incentives
associated
with
deeper
levels
of
affordability,
so
we've
got
two
categories
of
affordable
housing
projects.
One
is
projects
that
meet
the
zoning
codes:
affordability,
incentive
criteria
by
having
at
least
25
percent
of
their
units,
affordable
at
80
Ami
for
rental,
120
Ami
for
home
ownership.
So
what
we're
essentially
saying
is
look
if
you're
meeting
our
zoning
code,
affordability,
incentives.
F
We
can
also
offer
you
this
short-term
deferral
on
both
your
impact
fees
and
your
building
permit
and
development
fees
where
we
can
defer
them
for
two
years.
You
can
pay
them
at
certificate
of
occupancy,
and
it
it,
you
know,
addresses
a
little
bit
of
The
Upfront
pain.
The
second
tier
is
for
more
deeply
affordable
projects,
in
which
at
least
half
of
the
units
are
affordable
at
60,
Ami
or
below
for
rental,
or
a
hundred
percent
Ami
or
below
for
home
ownership.
F
Deferral
of
their
sewer
connection
fees,
which
we'll
get
into
now
So
currently
under
city
code,
restaurants
and
breweries,
are
already
already
have
the
ability
to
have
their
sewer
connection
fees
deferred.
So
this
would
just
add,
affordable
housing
as
an
allowable
category
and
would
also
include
a
repayment
structure.
That's
specific
to
the
financing
needs
of
those
projects.
F
Make
sense
and
that
they
have
used
in
other
jurisdictions
with
this
type
of
deferral.
It
also
would
only
apply
to
multi-family
projects,
whereas
the
other
exemptions
and
deferrals
we've
discussed
could
be
used
for
projects
of
any
size.
So
again,
apologies
for
the
technical
difficulties
on
my
end,
but
the
sewer
connection
fee
ordinance
is
on
your
first
reading
calendar
for
tonight
and
I'm
happy
to
stand
for
any
questions
you
might
have
related
to
it
or
the
other
feed
referrals
and
exemptions
that
we've
discussed.
E
First
of
all,
Nikki
great
job
explaining
the
complicated
thing
without
any
slight
assistance
you
did,
you
did
wonderful.
You
had
said
something
about
folks
being
eligible
for
an
exemption
and
I
was
wondering
if
you
could
maybe
just
kind
of
maybe
give
us
a
snapshot
of
what
that
process
would
look
like.
Is
it
somebody
who
meets
the
requirements
and
then
they
apply
for
something?
And
then
we
have
a
you
know
objective
way
of
saying:
yes,
no,
how
does
the
eligibility
work.
F
Mayor
council
president
Halliburton,
yes,
the
that's
exactly
how
it
would
work,
we
would
have
very
clear
criteria
spelled
out
in
policy,
and
this
is
something
we're
excited
about.
There
is
a
position
within
PDS
that
it's
Joe
Bruce
and
his
job
is
very
much
to
work
with
folks
who
are
trying
to
bring
affordable
housing
online
and
to
make
sure
they're.
Aware
of
these
are
the
incentives
that
are
out
there.
F
H
H
Not
a
question,
but
just
a
comment:
I
really
appreciate
the
continued
focus
on
trying
to
come
up
with
Creative
Solutions
to
ensure
that
we
have
affordable
housing.
We
know
the
market
forces
right
now.
Across
the
Nation,
but
here
in
in
Idaho
and
in
Boise
specifically,
are
really
putting
a
damper
on
our
ability
to
make
this
happen.
H
I
F
Madame
mayor
councilmember
Willett,
thank
you,
so
the
if
I
would
go
back
to
my
slide
that
broke
out
the
fees
but
I'll
say
them
verbally,
so
impact
fees
would
only
the
short-term
deferral
is
available
even
for
that
more
deeply
affordable
project,
so
they're
still
paying
the
I'm
going
to
round
them
all
to
200
000.
Just
for
that's
not
correct,
but
we're
gonna
use
it
for
purposes
of
illustration.
F
So
two
hundred
thousand
dollar
impact
fees
you're
still
paying
that
certificate
of
occupancy,
even
for
that
more
deeply
affordable
project
on
the
building
permanent
development
fees
to
really
get
into
the
weeds.
Here,
since
you
asked
the
question
on
our
building
permanent
and
development
fees,
that
project
would,
by
our
criteria,
qualify
for
an
exemption
of
their
specific,
typically
planning
and
development
services
portion
of
that
fees
which,
for
this
project
is
about
87
of
those
development
services
fees.
F
The
other
ones
are
like
very
weird:
Public
Works
fees
like
street
light
inspection
things
like
that,
so
they
would
have
about
87
of
that
200,
000
Exempted
and
then
on
the
sewer
connection
side.
They
would
that
additional,
essentially
200
000.
They
would
be
able
to
have
that
deferred
out
for
17
years,
at
which
point
the
full
amount
would
be
would
be
due.
I
And
mayor
follow
up,
thank
you
and
I
know.
This
is
really
hard
because
we're
we're
talking
numbers
without
having
the
the
benefit
of
actually
looking
at
them.
So
in
terms
of
doing
this,
I
think
it's
it's
a
great
idea,
because
it
just
incentivizes
folks.
How
are
we
as
a
city
going
to
make
up
for
the
Lost
Revenue
when
it
comes
to?
You
know
the
fees,
because
we
all
see
these
fees.
We
we
enact
these
fees
and
then
they
all
go
to
things
that
we
all
appreciate.
F
Absolutely
mayor,
council
member,
that's
something!
We've
had
a
lot
of
conversation
around
and
particularly
with
you
know,
impact
fees.
Of
course
you
want
to
have
the
parks,
police
and
everything
else
that
comes
with
that
neighborhood,
which
is
a
big
part
of
why
you
can
we're
just
looking
at
that
short-term
deferral
in
terms
of
in
terms
of
the
budget
impact
of
the
others
they're
only
as
I
said
available
for
those
more
deeply
affordable
projects
which,
in
looking
at
what
we
expect
to
be
coming
forward
at
that
level
of
affordability.
F
There
just
aren't
actually
that
many
of
them,
which
in
the
big
picture,
is
a
bad
thing
and
in
the
picture
of
our
the
city's
budget
and
these
fee
exemptions
is
like.
It
means
that
our
budget
office
had
a
level
love
comfort
with
saying
this
actually
isn't
very
many
projects
that
would
would
actually
qualify
under
these
more
restrictive
criteria
and
in
some
future
world
there
might
be
so
many
deeply
affordable
units
coming
online.
H
A
F
C
And
Nikki
just
to
follow
up
on
that
are
these
so
for
the
deeply
affordable
ones.
C
The
reason
that
you're
able
to
predict
how
many
we
might
have
is
that
also
because
I
mean
one
there
are
some
in
the
pipeline,
but
these
are
these:
the
projects
that
look
to
having
tax
credits
and
so
there's
a
limited
number
of
tax
credits
that
are
available
in
our
state
and
in
our
community,
and
that
gives
us
a
sense
of
how
many
projects
we
might
see
moving
forward
in
order
to
budget.
So
it's
not
we'd
like
to
see
more,
but
the
reality
is
with
the
capital
stack.
C
I
really
appreciate
the
work
on
this.
You
know
it
was
a
while
ago
we
said
be
as
creative
as
possible
and
come
up
with
some
solutions
and
Council
wanted
to
see
it
too,
and
you
and
the
team
have
done
that.
So,
thank
you
all
right.
Oh
we're
going
to
take
a
break
so
that
you
don't
have
to
try
to
describe
every
slide
that
you
likely
have
because
I
think
that
you
were
next.
C
C
So
next
up
we
have
what
we.
What
we're
doing
here
is
it
looks
like
Dennis
is
presenting
Dennis
mazzaros
is
that
you
both
are
okay
and
Chris
Chris
Roth
from
St
Luke's
also,
and
we've
asked
St
Luke's
to
come
in
and
present
the
master
plan
that
this
Council
and
Community
weighed
over
many
many
months
and
maybe
years
quite
a
while
ago,
and
with
covid
and
other
things
that
have
happened.
C
You
know
there
have
been
some
slight
delays
in
the
steps
the
hospital
expected
to
take,
and
so
we
asked
that
now
that
they're
ready
to
take
the
steps
that
they
come
back
to
us
to
review
the
overarching,
a
master
plan
that
was
approved
by
the
city
and
then
we'll
have
some
specific
conversations
about
pieces
that
were
approved
and
agreed
to
as
part
of
this
the
seat
was
it
the
cup
back
in
the
day?
Was
it
a
cup?
C
No,
it
was
the
adoption
of
blueprint,
Boise,
okay
and
so
the
different
pieces
that
were
agreed
to
at
that
point.
We're
going
to
review
it
all
because
it's
moving
forward
starting
today
there
will
be
steps
that
will
be
taken
that
were
expected
to
happen.
But
it's
just
been
so
long
since
the
council
has
had
this
conversation,
it's
going
up.
J
About
that,
okay,
Madame
mayor
council
members
good
afternoon,
I'm
Chris
Roth
I
serve
as
president
CEO
of
St
Luke's
Health
System.
J
It's
been
a
number
of
years,
but
since
I've
been
before
this
group
and
on
behalf
of
my
team
and
and
our
organization
really
looking
forward
to
providing
you
an
update
today
on
the
comprehensive
master
plan
related
to
the
the
development
and
investment
in
our
Boise
hospital
and
related
structures,
as
well
as,
ultimately
to
Grant
the
boy,
the
city
of
Boise
easement
through
the
Bannock
Corridor,
that
will
provide
Public
Access
on
an
ongoing
basis.
J
The
granting
of
the
easement
is
in
I,
wouldn't
I,
don't
want
to
say
It's
the
final
step,
but
it's
it's
a
critical
step
in
the
next
phase
of
what
will
be
a
1.2
to
1.4
billion
dollar
investment
in
our
downtown
Boise
Hospital.
Those
of
you
that
recall
discussions
eight
years
ago.
That
number
was
a
lot
smaller,
but
inflation
and
time
and
and
all
of
those
things.
But
there's,
as
you
will
see,
there's
been
a
tremendous
amount
of
work
over
the
past
few
years
and
there's
a
lot
of
work
ahead.
J
So
we're
looking
forward
to
this
dialogue
and
we'll
be
here
to
answer
any
questions.
This
is
a
very
complex
project,
lots
of
moving
parts
and
pieces
we'll
do
our
best
to
stay
pretty
high
level
and
and
not
overwhelm
you
with
the
details,
but
we're
here
standing
by
to
provide
you
any
information
that
you
need
relative
to
the
agenda
today,
I'm
going
to
turn
it
over
here.
In
just
a
moment,
you'll
first
hear
from
Dennis
massaros
Dennis
is
one
of
our
vice
presidents,
who
oversees
all
operations
in
Boise,
Mountain,
Home
and
McCall.
J
He
really
is
an
expert
in
this
project
and
we'll
go
over
the
scope.
What
we've
done
today
and
more
importantly,
what's
ahead,
then
you'll
hear
from
Kristen
Losi
from
Tool
as
she'll,
introduce
herself
and
and
her
team
Tool's
been
involved,
working
with
St
Luke's
in
the
city
really,
and
the
neighborhood
associations
around
the
design
of
the
Bannock
Corridor
and
the
testing
and
and
lots
of
information
to
share
there
and
lots
of
input
we
received
from
the
committee
and
then
finally
you'll
hear
from
from
Jordan
Heller
Jordan
is
Deputy
council
at
St
Luke's.
J
She
also
importantly,
oversees
all
of
our
real
estate
portfolio
and
holdings.
I
do
want
to
acknowledge
that
Jordan's
stepping
in
on
behalf
of
Joanne
Butler,
who
sadly
passed
away
a
couple
days
ago
recently
Joanne
would
want
us
to
be
here
to
talk
about
this
project.
I
know
many
of
you
have
worked
with
Joanne
I.
Think
arguably
she's.
The
best
land
use
attorney
in
the
state
of
Idaho
will
miss
her,
but
we're
we're
here
in
spirit
with
Joanne,
so
with
that
with
Joanna,
Mike
and
family,
and
with
that
I'll
turn
it
over
to
Dennis.
K
L
K
L
Hey
the
the
goals
that
I
have
in
terms
of
walking
through
the
master
facility
plan
is
ensuring
that
the
mayor
and
the
council
have
an
understanding
of
the.
Why
why
we're
embarking
in
this
journey?
Secondly,
review
the
scope
they're
tied
to
guiding
principles,
specifically
reducing
patient
friction
through
an
integrated
design,
improving
clinical
efficiency
workflows
ever
more
important
with
the
labor
issues
that
we're
having
protect
a
Community
Asset,
very
specifically,
looking
at
some
of
the
services
that
are
unique
to
this
campus
neurosciences
Heart
and
Vascular
cancer
and
the
children's
hospital.
L
But
I
do
want
to
provide
with
an
overview
of
what
we're
talking
about.
There's
a
lot
of
activity
down
between
between
Bannock
and
Jefferson
and
first
and
Avenue
B,
so
I'll
walk
through
the
campus
just
for
an
orientation
better
awesome.
L
So
what
you
see
in
front
of
you
and
I'll
I'll
just
start
with
the
legend
you'll
see
that
the
work
that
was
completed
after
the
city
approved
the
master
facility
plan
back
in
2015
and
to
date
the
spend
has
been
about
260
million
and
then
you'll
see
in
green.
The
work
that
is,
that
is
in
progress
that
will
be
completed
about
2029
and
that's
at
a
spend
of
1.2
billion
dollars
and
up
at
the
top
at
12
o'clock,
you'll
see
the
existing
Tower.
L
That's
been
cobbled
together
since
1927
through
2001
10
stories
to
the
right
of
that
is
the
South
Tower.
So
those
are
the
buildings
that
are
right
on
the
Bannock
Corridor
we
opened
the
Bannock
Corridor
in
2019
for
multi-use
and
Kristen
will
be
talking
a
little
bit
about
the
the
function
of
that.
We
put
the
cycle
track
around
the
campus
in
2019,
opened
shipping
and
receiving
in
2021
Central
utility
plant
in
the
parking
structure
with
1100.
L
Additional
space
was
also
opened
in
21
and
then
I'm
just
going
to
go
to
the
the
8
o'clock
area
right
now
and
you
can
see
in
terms
of
Avenue
B,
the
additional
roundabout
that
was
added
relative
to
some
of
the
infrastructure
that
we
had
to
put
in
place
and
then
also
in
2019.
The
children's
Pavilion
with
the
important
connector
that
moves
patients
and
clinicians
across
Avenue
B
into
the
into
the
hospital
back
at
the
bottom
of
the
page.
L
You'll
see
the
medical
office
building,
which
is
at
first
and
Jefferson
six
stories
to
be
completed
in
2029,
the
bridge
over
first
read
2029
an
important
connector
again
from
parking
to
the
to
the
mop,
the
medical
office
Plaza
and
then,
if
needed,
into
the
main
hospital,
the
main
entrance
will
shift
from
Bannock
to
First
and
state,
and
then
the
new
North
Tower
completed
in
2029
Nine
Stories
lower
than
the
existing
Tower
by
about
3
feet.
So
that's
the
orientation
of
the
overall
master
plan
upon
completion
I'll
go
to
the
next
slide.
L
Just
for
some
macro
context.
It's
important
to
share
the
St
Luke's
health
system
is
the
Idaho's
largest
private
employer
with
over
15
000
employees.
We
provide
Care
at
Hospitals
and
Clinics
throughout
Idaho
in
Eastern
Idaho
Oregon.
The
medical
center
downtown
is
the
tertiary
referral
Hospital,
the
only
children's
hospital
within
the
state
of
Idaho.
We
have
400
beds,
113
children's
beds
and
our
beds
have
become
often
full
annually.
We
admit
over
21
000
patients,
including
2
000,
pediatric
admissions
from
all
areas
of
Idaho
and
beyond
for
cancer,
Services,
cardiac
services
and
Trauma
care.
L
The
Boise
Hospital
employs
over
3
600
community
members
at
an
average
wage
that
is
60
percent
higher
than
the
state's
average
wage
next
slide.
Please
now
talking
about
demand
for
care.
Idaho
is
one
of
the
fastest
growing
states
in
the
country.
Within
our
communities
of
service,
the
population
is
growing
fast
by
2034.
18
growth
is
expected.
The
population
is
also
aging
faster,
37
growth
in
the
60
plus
population,
the
high
utilizers
of
healthcare
services.
It's
a
data
point,
but
I
think
we
can
all
relate
to
it.
L
Relative
to
our
personal
experiences,
commute
times
reservations
and
the
costs
were
incurring
now
concurrent
with
the
population
growth.
We're
also
seeing
a
demand
for
tertiary
or
subspecialty
care.
Those
services
are
unique
to
the
Boise
campuses,
neurosciences,
thoracic
surgery,
vascular,
Gynecology
and
oncology
services,
in
addition
to
Pediatric,
Orthopedics
and
general
surgery.
They
have
each
increased
by
over
20
percent
now
within
the
community.
Many
of
these
services
are
not
duplicated
at
other
hospitals,
so
the
Boise
Hospital's
expertise
is
a
core
competency
for
these
Services.
It
draws
patients
from
a
very
broad
geographic
area.
L
Next
slide,
please,
if
you
were
not
aware,
Idaho
ranks
the
lowest
relative
to
beds
per
capita
in
the
country,
we're
actually,
sixth
lowest
in.
In
summary,
we
have
a
bed
shortage,
there's
not
enough
beds
for
the
population
in
this
town.
What
you
see
also
is
a
heat
map
that
up
there
that
is
up
there
and
that's
a
Boise
heat
map
and
just
to
simplify
it.
L
Red
is
not
good
or
red
indicates
that
our
beds
are
full
in
2022,
our
occupancy
rate
exceeded
82
percent,
the
bed
Target
for
planning
the
need
for
additional
beds
at
75,
so
we're
already
short
the
beds
that
we
need
to
service
the
community
members.
L
If,
by
28
we
don't
add
additional
beds,
we'll
be
running
at
92
percent
and
we'll
see
more
patients
needing
to
travel
out
of
town
or
even
out
of
state
for
healthcare
services,
so
we
are
at
a
point
where
it's
critical
to
add
capacity
on
our
campus
next
slide.
Please
a
lot
of
detail
here,
but
I'm
going
to
summarize
it
with
a
brief
orientation.
You
can
see
in
the
the
middle
of
the
slide
where
the,
where
the
roundabout
is
for
reserve
and
going
up
Avenue
B
you'll,
see
right
beneath.
L
That
is
where
we
have
an
empty
lot,
where
we
took
down
the
old
Central
utility
plan,
in
addition
to
HR
buildings
that
were
there
and
then
you'll
see
a
patchwork
there
of
different
colors,
and
that
reflects
the
campus
and
the
campus
efforts
to
the
system.
Efforts
to
increase
capacity
on
that
on
the
structure
from
2021
I'm,
sorry
from
1921
through
2001.
L
we're
at
a
point
where
we
have
aging
infrastructure
where
it
prohibits
growth
in
place.
We
have
operating
rooms
that
are
below
grade
often
flood.
We
have
ORS
that
are
landlocked
operating
rooms
that
are
landlocked.
We
cannot
accommodate
the
growth
that
we're
seeing.
We
have
inadequate
ceiling
Heights
within
those
operating
rooms,
so
we
can't
accommodate
increased
technology
such
as
robotics
for
a
minimally
invasive
surgery,
and
we
have
inpatient
rooms
that
are
not
able
to
fit
needed
equipment
such
as
overhead
lifts
for
our
staff
safety.
L
L
We
completed
our
first
phase
of
the
master
facility
plan
and
that's
up
there
in
the
red,
the
orange,
the
blue
and
the
green,
and
that
is
the
new
Central
utility
plant
with
updated
generators,
heating
ventilation,
air
conditioning
systems,
electrical
power
and
critical
environmental
stewardship
takeaways.
We
reduce
our
utility,
spend
in
electricity
by
21
per
square
foot
gas
by
26
percent
and
Sewer
by
31
percent.
L
L
So
what
you
see
here
is
a
completed
campus
shaped
by
years
of
planning
and
investment
and
and
just
in
terms
of
the
view
you
have,
you
can
see
in
terms
of
First
Street,
State,
Street
and
coming
around
Fort.
If
you
make
that
left
turn
design,
principles
protect,
Community,
Access
to
care,
ensure
patient
continuity,
reduce
friction
and
clinical
efficiency.
We
accomplished
this
through
an
integrated
design
that
connects
Physician
Offices
to
diagnostic
ancillary,
Services,
procedural
and
inpatient
care
during
our
design
sessions.
L
It
was
a
critical
physician
asked
to
ensure
that
there
was
access
that
was
horizontally
connecting
patients
and
Care
teams.
The
bridge
connects.
The
bridge
connects
the
existing
Tower
to
the
new
tower
similar
to
what
we
see
in
Pediatrics.
This
response
to
the
community
need
by
adding
80
additional
beds.
It
also
adds
additional
surgical
capacity
with
seven
additional
ORS
and
two
additional
procedural
areas
next
slide,
please
so
our
next
steps
into
in
terms
of
moving
forward.
L
You
know
I'll
just
pause
and
say
this
has
been
an
extremely
busy
year,
with
dozens
of
clinical
teams
engaged
in
design
the
size
of
the
rooms,
the
location
of
the
equipment
we
mocked
up
and
did
walk
throughs
of
patient
rooms
and
operating
rooms
to
ensure
that
we
had
it
right
that
was
in
advance
of
working
through
our
construction
documents.
L
L
There
we're
looking
at
a
move
of
the
ambulance
entrance
again
establishing
a
construction
yard
for
the
activity
and
then
North
Wing
reinforcements
we're
going
to
preserve
a
1971s
building
and
in
order
to
connect
the
two
towers,
we've
got
to
drop
about
70
foot
pylons
through
that
top
of
the
building
into
our
infrastructure
and
then
we'll
look
at
24
in
terms
of
being
The,
Big
Dig,
the
mass
excavation
starts
and
then
in
25
you'll
start
to
start
to
see
the
skeleton
the
building
rise.
L
H
Thank
you
really
detailed
presentation.
I
just
want
to
make
sure
I
understood
that
if,
with
this
new
build
and
talking
about
the
numbers
of
what
we're
seeing
with
the
growth
in
Boise,
how
close
will
we
be
in
terms
of
the
number
of
beds
to
meet
the
demand?
Will
we
be
at
that
75
percent
level,
or
will
we
be
higher
than
that?
It's.
L
A
great
question:
you
know
our
planning
Horizon
was
2034,
so
that
is
one
challenge
that
we
have
we're
bumping
up
closer
to
the
planning
Horizon
than
we
thought
we
would.
We
have
three
shelled
floors
so
we'll
be
able
to
add
additional
beds
if
demand
is
there,
but
I
think
it's
important
also
to
share
that.
This
is
an
end
strategy.
L
E
Batman,
first
of
all,
I
I
want
to
say
sorry
to
your
entire
team.
I
heard
the
news
about
Joanne
earlier
today
and
it's
heartbreaking,
I'm
sure,
you're,
all
hurting
and
I
do
appreciate
you
all
being
here
and
continuing
to
move
forward.
E
L
Madame
mayor
council,
president
Halliburton,
we
anticipate
using
Jefferson
and
our
current
area
in
order
to
do
that
dig.
So
we
do
not
anticipate
closing.
We
will
have
to
close
first
for
parts
of
the
time
when
we're
doing
some
of
the
construction
over
that,
but
but
we
are
not
planning
on
closing
State.
Okay.
Thank
you.
Yes,
sir.
M
All
right,
can
you
hear
me
all
right?
Yes,
all
right,
Madame,
mayor
and
council
members,
I
am
pleased
to
be
here
with
you
to
share
the
results
of
the
Bandit
Corridor
testing,
and
this
is
what
I'm
going
to
cut
next
slide.
Please.
This
is
what
I'm
going
to
cover
I'm
going
to
do
a
quick
introduction,
talk
about
shared
Street
design
and
the
testing
summary
and
results
next.
C
M
All
right,
thank
you
so
tool
design
is
a
national
firm
specializing
in
the
design
of
streets
for
bicycles
and
pedestrians
and
as
an
urban
designer.
These
are
the
kind
of
projects
that
I
specialize
in
ones
that
have
a
big
focus
on
the
user
experience,
so
projects
that
Mary
civil
engineering
with
Place
making
I'm
also
the
co-author
of
the
original
design
guidance
for
shared
streets.
This
image
on
the
right
is
the
fhwa
guide
for
accessible
shared
streets.
M
So
this
is
just
a
quick
slide
to
show
that
there
has
been
a
long
history
of
third-party
input
on
this
project
and
I
put
mou
here,
but
really
what
I
meant
was
the
letter
agreement
from
2016.,
so
I'm
not
going
to
go
into
this
I
just
want
to
demonstrate
that
there
have
been
numerous
organizations
and
firms
that
have
been
involved
in
the
project
over
time.
Next
slide.
M
M
After
that
letter
agreement
we
built
consensus
about
how
Bennett
could
look
and
function
following
that
I
worked
on
the
concept
design
with
the
community
with
the
council.
We
I
was
involved
in
the
council
resolution
tool.
Design
did
the
30
design
of
the
corridor.
We
turned
it
over
to
the
land
group
who
did
the
final
design
and
construction,
and
then
we
began
the
testing,
and
that
was
a
multi-year
effort.
M
So,
throughout
that
whole
process
there
has
been
engagement
all
along
and
we've
been
working
with
the
community
and
the
council
and
the
mayor
next
slide.
M
So
in
2017
we
did
seven
listening
sessions
with
the
community,
as
well
as
a
big,
intensive
design
charette,
and
this
is
just
a
quick
slide
to
show
you
who
was
involved
in
the
process.
Many
people
have
had
input
from
from
way
back
in
2017,
so
this
includes
electeds
City
staff,
advocacy
groups
and
Community
groups,
both
neighborhood
and
Citywide
next
slide.
M
M
So
this
is
a
very
wonky
slide
and
I'm
not
going
to
go
into
detail
and
because,
for
the
sake
of
time,
but
I
just
want
to
emphasize
that
streets
are
really
designed
to
balance
mobility
and
access.
So
on
this
on
this
chart,
street
that
is
really
about.
Mobility
is
a
freeway.
It's
just
getting
people
from
A
to
B
and
streets
that
are
really
about
access,
maybe
the
street
that
you
live
on.
It's
mostly
just
homes,
and
it's
really
just
for
people
who
need
to
get
to
those
spots.
M
So
with
that
Mobility
versus
accessibility
or
excuse
me,
access
lens
I
want
to
walk
you
through
some
of
the
corridor
context.
First,
looking
at
Transportation,
so
there
are
high
Comfort
bikeways
on
parallel
streets
on
all
the
surrounding
on
all
the
and
on
Parallel
routes
to
Bannock
and
all
the
surrounding
streets,
and
this
is
a
clip
of
the
achd
bike
map
and
you
can
see
in
blue
and
green
those
High
Comfort
streets
for
cars
manic
really
functions
like
an
alley.
There
are
actually
no
destinations
for
cars
on
that.
M
Corridor
people
do
use
it
to
go
back
and
forth
between
the
parking
areas
and
and
as
in
other
ways,
but
it's
not
a
major
Street.
There
are
other
streets
surrounding
that
are
much
faster
and
easier,
and
more
on
that
Mobility
Mobility
spectrum
and
really
the
street
has
limited
connectivity
to
the
east.
It
kind
of
dead
ends
just
past
Avenue
B
at
the
cemetery.
So
it's
not
a
huge
through
Street
next
slide,
so
in
terms
of
access
and
land
use.
M
There
are
a
lot
of
pedestrian
activity,
generators,
that's
the
transportation
term
for
destinations,
and
you
can
see
from
this
diagram.
We
did
with
our
on
our
observations.
The
green
line
shows
where
people
walk.
The
thing
about
this
Corridor
is
that
none
of
the
building
entries
align.
M
So
you
can
see
that
people
do
travel
back
and
forth,
but
they're
also
going
back
and
forth
in
this
way,
and
that
way
and
it
was
really
difficult
to
identify
any
single
Crossing
mixing
Zone,
so
we
let
it
be
organic
and-
and
that
is
in
keeping
with
how
shared
streets
are
designed
and
intended
to
work.
I.
Think
it's
really
important
to
recognize,
too,
that
this
is
a
really
unique
setting
with
a
with
vulnerable
users.
M
That's
what
we
call
people
walking
and
biking,
but
that
term
is
really
even
more
appropriate
here,
given
the
context
with
the
hospital
and
finally,
the
corridor
has
historic,
had
historically
provided
open
space
and
Gathering
areas
for
both
the
hospital
and
the
community,
and
that
was
a
really
valued
function
next
slide.
M
So,
for
the
reasons
I
just
walked
you
through
we
chose
a
shared
Street
design,
they're
called
pedestrian
priority
streets.
They
go
by
different
names
and
I
pulled
a
few
coats
from
some
design
guidance
here
to
emphasize
that
these
are
really
streets
with
high
pedestrian
volumes,
low
vehicle
volumes
and,
if
and
you're
able
to
either
reduce
those
volumes
or
discourage
those
to
emphasize
The
Pedestrian
priority
and
they're
really
a
response
to
making
the
street
more
friendly
for
people,
biking
and
walking.
M
I,
don't
recall,
but
I
can,
if
that,
if
that
admission
to
you
yes
next
slide,
so
this
is
a
screen
grab
from
that
shared,
accessible,
shared
Street
document.
That
I
mentioned
that
we
worked
on
shared
streets
really
work
by
removing
all
the
segregation
between
the
modes
as
it
call
it's
called,
so
whether
that's
curbs,
whether
that's
curbs
that
create
sidewalks
striping,
everything
is
all
on
one
plane,
you
remove
signs,
you
remove
traffic
control
and
that
forces
people
to
interact
to
make
eye
contact
and
to
interact
with
everyone.
M
So
we'll
move
on
to
the
testing
summary
and
results
next
slide.
So
the
council
resolution
asked
us
to
measure
four
things:
the
existence,
location
and
severity
of
the
conflicts
between
all
Corridor
users,
the
speed
and
safety
of
bicyclists.
M
So
we
know
that
data
does
not
tell
the
whole
story,
so
we
designed
a
testing
methodology
that
included
the
typical
tools
of
transportation,
engineering,
so
speed
volume,
speed
and
volume,
data
for
cars
and
bikes
and
incident
reports,
collision
and
collision
reports.
We
also
use
qualitative
data,
so
we
went
out
and
observed
the
corridor.
We
use
a
video
to
to
see
what
was
going
on,
but
again
even
qualitative
data
doesn't
tell
the
whole
story,
so
we
knew
that
public
input
would
be
quite
critical
and
we
developed
some
common
cards
that
we
used.
M
I'll
talk
about
those
in
a
moment
and
a
survey.
So
with
these
three
things
that
gave
us
a
picture
of
how
the
corridor
is
functioning
next
slide,
so
we
had
planned
six
observational
visits
that
were
intended
to
be
within
a
year
and
then
the
sixth
one
at
the
one
year
mark
some
things
happened
between
2019
and
now,
but
we
were
able
to
go
out
and
be
there
in
differing
weathering
conditions,
different
activity
levels.
M
M
So
we
did
a
lot
of
different
kinds
of
of
visits
in
different
conditions.
We
also
worked
with
the
city
and
Compass
to
to
employ
count
data,
and
then
I
mentioned
the
comment
cards.
We
had
those
on
the
corridor.
While
we
were
out
there
observing,
we
had
them
available
on
the
corridor
for
at
other
times
they
were
in
the
hospital
we
collected,
those
compiled
that
data
and
analyzed
it,
and
then
the
city
of
Boise
hosted
an
online
survey
survey
and
I
believe
Ina
also
hosted
one
next
slide
all
right.
M
So
let
me
catch
up
with
my
notes.
What
did
we
learn?
So
we
learned
that?
Yes,
pedestrians
are
the
major
user
at
eight,
almost
eighty
percent.
At
times
there
could
be
thousands
of
people
using
the
corridor
in
one
day,
there's
a
steady
trickle
and
then
there
are
big
surges
as
shift
changes.
Drivers
are
about
17
of
the
the
travel,
the
users,
so
that's
about
500
cars
a
day
and
bikes
are
at
four
percent
about
50
users
a
day
next
slide.
M
So
we
looked
at
Travel
both
along
the
corridor
and
across
the
corridor
and
I've
summarized
our
points
here.
You
can
see
that
most
drivers
do
move
really
slowly
in
the
corridor
and
yield
to
other
users
that
may
shift
over
time
as
people
become
more
con
comfortable
using
the
quarter
and
understand
how
it
works.
Better
bikes
volumes
are
low,
speeds
are
not
a
concern,
they
seem
to
work
quite
well
in
the
corridor
and
we
do
know
that
while
speeding
is
not
super
prevalent,
speeding
is
always
an
issue
on
any
Street.
M
There
are
always
going
to
be
those
outliers
who
go
80
80
miles
an
hour
down
the
street.
That's
not.
We
haven't
encountered
that,
but
there
have
been
some
higher
speeds,
but
they
do
seem
to
be
kind
of
edging
up
over
time
and
that's
a
concern
and
I.
Think.
A
really
important
point
is
that
when
you're
walking
along
the
corridor,
a
car
passing
you
at
12
miles
an
hour
that
can
feel
really
fast
because
you're
right
there
with
the
car,
there's
no
separation.
So.
M
Mirror
that's
a
great
question:
through
traffic
yeah
we
did
not.
We
did
not
do
what
they
call
An
Origin
and
destination
study
to
know
who
the
users
were.
They
did
appear
to
be
mostly
regular,
regular
folks
in
cars,
very
few
delivery
vehicles,
so,
okay,
yeah
thanks
slide
foreign,
so
pedestrians,
traveling
and,
along
and
across
the
corridor.
This
has
been
an
evolution
despite
there
being
other
shared
streets
in
in
Boise.
M
They
all
are
they
all
look
and
feel
a
little
different
and
operate
a
little
different,
so
people
at
first
were
quite
confused
and
didn't
know
that
they
needed
to
yield
cars.
So
there
was
a
lot
of
confusion,
a
lot
of
lack
of
com
of
caution
over
time.
People
have
gotten
the
hang
of
it
and
they
look
out
for
cars
more,
but
I
think
there
remains
some
discomfort
with
that
disorganized
movement
and
that's
kind
of
how
it's
supposed
to
work.
M
Strangely
enough,
the
agree
is
on
the
left
and
the
disagree
is
on
the
right
kind
of
backwards
to
most
most
surveys,
but
the
top.
The
top
image
shows
that
when
we
started
out,
we
asked
people
was
the
corridor
attractive,
welcoming
easy
to
travel,
comfortable,
safe.
Most
people
were
mostly
in
the
neutral
zone
to
maybe
a
little
bit
just
in
a
disagreement,
and
two
years
later,
that's
really
shifted
toward
the
agree.
There's
there
are
people
still
on
the
fence
about
the
safety,
but
we're
definitely
above
the
neutral
zone.
M
So
next
slide,
just
a
few
quotes
from
people.
I
tried
to
pick
A
random
assortment,
but
ones
that
kind
of
demonstrate
that
people
really
are
concerned
about
cars
in
the
corridor.
They
they
are
not
many
people
are
not
comfortable
with
it
I'm
concerned
about
their
safety,
but
a
lot
of
people
do
appreciate
the
corridor,
especially
the
Gathering
spaces.
E
I
guess
just
a
question
about
that
last
quote
and
then
the
corresponding
slide
I
think
in
front
of
it
are
most
of
the
safety
concerns
due
to
pedestrians
concerned
about
the
vehicles.
Does
that
seem
to
be?
You
know
a
through
Point
Madam.
N
You,
madam
Madam
mayor
I,
have
a
question
about
what
is
the
history
here
about?
Why
we
allow
cars
there
could
I
be
brought
up
to
speed
on
that.
M
Madam
mayor
council
member,
that
is
a
long
history
that
I
I
I'm,
not
sure
I
can
answer
that.
There
was
a
lot
of
I'm.
C
Happy
to
say
a
couple
things
too,
when
this
was
decided.
So
there
was
a
lot
of
discussion
about
the
impact
that
the
closure
of
Jefferson
would
have
on
through
traffic,
and
so,
as
the
council
looked
at
and
the
mayor
at
the
time
looked
at
options
and
we
knew
that
at
some
point.
C
Jefferson
would
be
closed,
but
Bannock
could
be
open.
We
asked
them
to
do
a
study
that
looked
at
all
uses
to
see
if
it
would
work
for
a
shared
street
with
cars,
people
on
foot
people
on
bikes
as
an
alternative
for
people
that
you
know
had
historically
taken
Jefferson
to
get
from
one
side
of
the
East
End
into
downtown.
And
so
that's
why
you're
here?
M
Thank
you,
madam
mayor,
all
right.
So
wrapping
up
here's
how
our
testing
shows
the
corridor
performs
in
response
to
the
council
resolution.
So
in
terms
of
user
conflicts,
none
have
been
reported
that
may
shift
over
time
as
Vehicles
grow
more
comfortable
with
the
corridor
or
maybe
traffic
patterns
change
right
now
it's
not
a
concern.
Bicyclist
speeds
and
operations,
not
a
concern.
They
seem
to
be
meshing
well,
with
all
users
conflicts
at
the
parking
garage
at
the
access
points.
That
is
a
concern.
The
way
the
corridor
is
laid
out.
M
People
drivers
enter
the
corridor
right
as
people
right
right
where
people
exit
and
enter
the
parking
garage.
So
as
people
are
transitioning
from
the
regular
Street
to
the
shared
Street
they
meet,
you
know
at
at
a
shift
change
a
surge
of
pedestrians
coming
out,
but
again
so
far,
no
no
conflicts,
but
people
need
to
continue
to
be
aware
and
as
Vehicles
you
know
if
vehicle
speeds
increase
over
time.
M
That
could
be
an
issue,
but
it
hasn't
been
so
much
right
now
and
then
in
terms
of
the
adequacy
of
the
mixing
zones.
We
did
not
actually
design
mixing
zones
because
it
was
too
hard
to
organize
people
into
one
space,
but
it
does
seem
to
be
working
all
right
and
we
do
notice
that
people
walk
where
there's
available
space.
So
if
there's
nobody
on
the
corridor,
pedestrians
will
spread
out.
M
If
there
are
other
users
like
a
car
bicyclists,
pedestrians
tend
to
move
aside
so
really,
and
that's
kind
of
true
for
the
as
people
are
moving
across
the
corridor
during
the
shift
changes
when
there
are
lots
of
people,
people
just
March
right
through
at
other
times,
they're,
more
aware
and
and
slow
and
and
observance
next
slide.
M
So
in
our
final
analysis,
the
shared
street
is
working
as
intended.
Tool.
Designs
position
is
that
the
land
use
context
here
is
is
very
unique:
it's
a
really
access
oriented,
Street
and
the
primary
users.
Users
of
this
Corridor
are
also
very
unique,
being
a
hospital
setting,
and
it's
we
feel
really
strongly
that
the
corridor
should
be
safe
for
those
primary
users.
The
pedestrians
St
Luke's
position
is
that
cars
can
remain
and
we
are
okay
with
that.
M
E
Yes,
I
think
I
have
three
questions
for
you,
so
first
Jefferson's
not
closed
yet
do
we
think
that
that
has
anything
to
do
with
the
lower
percentage
of
bicyclists
going
through
and
that
that
might
change
when
Jefferson
actually
closes
when
we're
looking
at
that
kind
of
breakdown
on
percentages.
M
Madam
Madam
mayor
council
president,
and
we
did
a
simulation
as
I
mentioned,
of
of
Jefferson
being
closed
and
did
not
notice
a
huge
difference
that
could
be
the
case
or
yeah,
but
as
I
as
I
mentioned
before
there.
The
the
cycle
tracks,
as
well
as
the
streets
really
provide
a
more
direct,
fast
route,
and
this
is
really
just
a
half
a
block.
So
yeah.
E
Perfect.
Thank
you
second
question.
So
maybe
it's
anecdotal
one
of
the
things
that
I've
heard
from
from
people
riding
bikes,
it's
it's
the
Crossing
on
Broadway
or
Avenue
B.
It
kind
of
makes
it
a
little
weird
where
you're
like
boom,
like
a
really
sharp
90
degree,
turn
and
like
if
you're
a
little
kid.
Maybe
you
can
do
it,
but
that
that
may
be.
You
know
one
of
the
issues
as
well.
Did
you
get
any
response?
You
know
when
doing
surveys
and
checking
in
with
folks
if
that
was
an
issue
that
people
brought
up.
M
Madam,
mayor
council
president,
do
you
do
you
mean
where
Bannock
and
and
Avenue
be
intersect?
Yes,.
B
M
Island,
yes,
that's
a
tough
spot
in
an
ideal
world
that
design
would
look
different,
but
we
did
not
it.
We
we
were
involved
in.
We
did
the
design
for
that
little
segment
of
the
cycle
track
between
Avenue,
a
and
Avenue
B,
but
that
that
segment
was
not
part
of
our
observations
and
we
did
not,
to
my
knowledge,
get
any
comments
about
about
that.
Intersection.
Yeah.
E
Thank
you,
I'm
interested
in
looking
into
that
because,
as
achd
as
their
Bannock
study
that
actually
creates
you
know
a
pathway
from
Bannock
all
the
way
over
to
like
17th
Street,
almost
all
the
way
over
to
the
penitentiary.
You
know
there
may
be
some
some
changes
there
and
I
guess
my
last
question.
Maybe
this
is
for
you
or
maybe
from
some
from
someone
from
St
Luke's.
Is
there
any
benefit
from
for
St
Luke's
having
vehicles
actually
drive
through
I
mean?
Is
there
like
a
nice
aspect
of
like?
M
Mayor
council
president
I
think
that
as
I
as
I
said
before,
there
aren't
any
destinations
on
the
corridor
and
it
would
be
easy
for
it
is
easy
for
cars
to
drop
off
like
closer
to
the
entries
on
either
end.
So
there's
there's
not
a
reason.
It
does
provide
convenience.
You
know
you
can
cut
through,
but
again
it's
not
fast
you're
having
to
negotiate
with
other
users,
so
it
might
be.
You
know
like.
M
E
Guess
one
of
the
reasons
why
I
asked
that
is
you're
talking
about
a
shared
Street
design
and
that
sort
of
uncomfortableness
or
unpredictability
like
sort
of
like
that's
a
feature
of
the
design.
You
know
it
causes
people
to
kind
of
slow
down
and
pay
attention,
and
then
just
you
know,
the
counterbalance
to
that
is,
like
sure
would
be
nice
if
people
didn't
feel
uncomfortable
and
didn't
have
to.
You
know
worry
about
a
vehicle
going
through
and
so
I
guess.
Just
in
my
head,
you
know
as
I'm
thinking
about.
E
Is
there
a
functional
purpose
for
vehicles
driving
through
there
for
St
Luke's
in
somebody
being
able
to
drop
off
where,
if
that
wasn't
available,
that
would
be
a
large
issue
for
St
Luke's.
C
David
come
on
up
for
Dan,
we
I
need
you
in
the
mics.
We
can
just
get.
L
It
for
the
record
council
president
Holly
Burton,
there's
really
no
no
needed
use
for
vehicle
traffic,
there's
other
ways
and
and
I
guess,
because
a
patient
taking
my
kid
to
the
emergency
department,
I
I,
would
defuse
panic.
I
use,
Avenue,
B
and
come
that
way.
So
there's
no
there's
no
drop-off
area
there
most
of
the
pedestrian
activity.
You
see,
you
have
individuals
that
are
going
from
a
hospital
into
the
south
tower
for
meetings
where
you
have
patients
that
are
going
into
a
cell
tower
for
Clinic
appointments.
L
You
don't
typically
see
patient
drop
off
because
it's
not
a
convenient
location.
Typically,
patients
will
use
the
parking
garage.
You
don't
typically
see
your
GrubHub
staff
often
use
the
emergency
area
for
the
GrubHub
and
the
the
deliveries.
So
in
an
Ideal
World
there
there
wouldn't
be
those
cars.
It
would
be
just
a
mixing
area
for
cyclists
and
pedestrians.
I.
E
N
You,
madam
mayor,
can
I
just
make
a
comment.
I
didn't
know.
This
was
a
contentious
issue
in
the
past
and
I
didn't
know
the
city
had
anything
to
do
with
it
right
in
the
kind
of
the
corner
there
before
you
go
to
the
hospital
off
to
the
left
is
the
Pediatric
cancer
treatment.
My
son
gets
treatments
there
every
other
month
and
last
treatment.
N
My
wife
and
I
were
holding
his
hand,
walking
and
a
car
came
out
right
in
front
of
us
right
before
we
were
getting
ready
to
go
in
and
it
was
surprising
to
me
because
I
didn't
know
we
let
cars
through
there
and
I
didn't
expect
a
car
to
come
from
there
and
I
imagine
there
are
other
families
that
feel
the
same
way,
I
think
about
all
the
times
that
I
go
to
the
hospital.
It's
usually
for
his
treatments
when
he's
hospitalized
or
when
my
wife
had
a
baby.
N
Those
are
times
when
I'm
I'm
not
going
to
be
looking
for
cars.
So
I,
don't
know
the
history
of
this
business
as
well
as
others
I'm.
Just
speaking
from
personal
experience,
I
don't
want
to
see
cars
there.
So
don't
know
what
that
will
take,
but
just
want
to
share
that.
N
A
C
You
I
mean
it's
it's
crazy,
to
think
that
this
has
now
been
five
years
since
you
started
the
study
and
given
all
that
we
have
all
gone
through.
It
makes
sense,
of
course,
but
it's
great
to
have
you
back
and
to
see
this
and
really
appreciate
all
the
attention
that
you
you
and
your
firm
put
into
this
as
well
as
St
Luke's
put
into
this.
Thank
you.
G
Thank
you,
madam
mayor
and
Council
I
appreciate
the
chance
to
be
in
front
of
you
today
to
speak
about
the
easement
itself
and
I'll
provide
some
context
for
that
easement
to
hold
on
to
the
information
that
Dennis
and
Kristen
and
Chris
shared
as
well.
G
The
easement,
as
we've
discussed,
is
to
allow
public
movement
through
Bannock,
which
runs
in
front
of
what
is
currently
the
front
door
of
St
Luke's
Boise
Hospital,
and
this
follows
a
plan
that
we
set
back
in
2015
through
a
public
process.
I
want
to
take
a
moment
just
to
situate
Us
in
that
Master
Plan,
the
mat,
the
2015
master
plan
contemplates
four
phases
of
construction
for
this
investment
in
our
community.
The
first
phase
is
the
children's
hospital
or
children's
Pavilion,
as
we
call
it.
G
Next
is
the
central
plan
and
shipping
and
receiving
really
the
infrastructure
to
power
this
new,
more
modern
hospital.
The
third
phase
is
the
the
hospital
and
the
renderings
that
Dennis
shared
the
the
new
more
modern
facility
and
the
that
North
Tower
and
then.
Finally,
the
fourth
phase
is
Renovations
of
our
existing
facility
So.
Within
the
context
of
this
plan
that
we
set
in
2015
the
plan
itself
contemplates
that
to
move
from
phase
two
to
phase
three
is
in
order
to
build
over
Jefferson
in
Exchange.
G
G
The
quarter
may
be
also
designed
to
allow
automobile
access,
if
deemed
appropriate
by
the
city
of
Boise.
So
that's
certainly
a
decision
that
we've
reached
through
years
of
public
engagement
and
process
that
will
speak
a
little
bit
about
and
something
that
St
Luke
certainly
wants
to
defer
to
our
agreements
and
the
plan
that
we've
laid
out
together
next
slide.
G
Please
so
just
to
recap
that
plan
and
those
agreements,
the
2015
master
plan,
really
lays
out
this
concept
of
a
shared
space
mobility
and
the
concept
that
St
Luke's
will
grant
an
easement
and
that
St,
Luke's
and
City
staff
will
together
propose
this
easement
to
the
city,
and
we
are
grateful
for
the
chance
to
have
worked
together
with
City
South
to
make
that
proposed.
Easement
that
we
are
submitting
today,
this
plan
is
then
reiterated
in
our
2016
letter
agreement,
which
further
outlines
the
aspects
of
the
easement.
G
The
the
shared
space
itself
was
developed
through
those
series
of
multiple
public
meetings,
public
input,
Community
input,
input
of
experts
to
to
develop
and
Design
This
shared
space
throughout
that
2017-2019
period
and
then
subjected
to
a
documented
testing
protocol
reviewed
through
the
public
process
as
well
that
the
city
approved
in
2019.
G
Then
it
was
applied
and
so
for
this
period
and
and
we've
had
the
chance
to
test
this
for
an
even
longer
period
than
we
initially
intended,
but
appreciate
as
as
Kristen
laid
out
the
work.
That
tool
has
done
to
apply
those
rigorous
testing
protocols
to
the
corridor
to
assess
its
use
and
have
taken
the
input
that
that
tool
design
has
shared
with
St
Luke's
about
how
the
corridor
could
be
improved,
particularly
given
the
multimodal
use
of
transport.
G
So
that's
all
gone
into
the
easement
that
we're
presenting
today
and
that
it
incorporates
that
that
feedback
and
that
and
follows
that
plan
next
slide.
Please.
G
The
easement
that
we're
presenting
today
is
in
response
to
again
the
plan,
as
adopted
in
Council
resolution.
A
city's
resolution
2
8
4
19,
which
contemplated
that
St
Luke's
and
the
city
staff
would
propose
to
Mayor
and
Council
and
easement,
and
the
final
configuration
for
the
corridor
and
the
location
of
this
28-foot
wide.
G
Easement
I
want
to
note
that
we
are
making
some
changes
in
light
of
the
feedback
from
tool
that
there
had
not
been
the
posted
speed
limit
in
the
service
of
encouraging
all
users
to
be
aware
of
other
users
and
for
no
one
user
to
have
priority
over
another.
But
we
did
understand
the
feedback
from
tool
that,
notwithstanding
their
their
preference
or
I,
guess,
question
to
say:
there's
not
necessarily
a
reason
for
there
to
be
cars
in
the
corridor.
G
But
but
if
the
city
determines
that
that's
appropriate
and
and
if
we
decide
to
proceed
with
that,
here
are
the
ways
that
that
can
be
done
safely.
And
so
we've
taken
that
feedback
from
tool
to
add
posted
speed
limits
to
keep
those
speeds
lower
and
also
to
increase
the
signage
for
awareness
that
this
is
a
shared
space.
For
all
users-
and
those
have
not
not
all-
of
those
improvements
were
present
during
all
of
the
testing.
G
G
The
easement
itself
runs
across
approximately
two
block
span
of
Bannock
and
it's
depicted
here.
It's
28
feet
wide
for
the
length
of
those
two
blocks
and
then
for
the
portion.
That's
between
First
Street,
well,
the
the
whole
easement
runs
from
First
Street
to
Avenue
B,
but
for
the
portion
between
First
Street
and
what
was
previously
Avenue
a
that's
where
the
shared
space
is
and
that's
a
10
foot
wide
portion
specifically
documented
in
the
easement
to
designate
that
as
shared
use.
G
This
easement
provides
that
and
preserves
that
access
and
perpetuity
under
this
easement,
but
St
Luke's
maintains
responsibility
for
maintaining
the
area
paying
for
snow
removal
and
maintenance
and
so
forth.
Then
the
Eastman
also
requires
St
Luke's
to
do
that
with
materials
that
are
in
keeping
with
the
documented
configuration
in
this
easement
and
with
of
like
materials
as
as
good
quality
materials.
So
it
really
preserves
that
space
and
I
think
the
intent
that
Rose
from
the
public
process
in
this
document.
G
The
next
slide,
please,
the
easement
also
contains
this
rendering
or
incorporates
this
rendering
that
shows
the
various
aspects
of
design
meant
to
accommodate
this
multimodal
use
and
also
make
a
really
I
think
a
beautiful
space
for
our
community
and
the
many
types
of
visitors
who
who
come
to
the
hospital.
G
This
easement
as
we've
discussed.
It's
it's
the
next
step
in
St,
Luke's
investment
in
modernizing
our
hospital
and
really
investing
in
this
connected
facility
for
the
benefit,
our
community
and
and
that's
what
we
are
together
with
City
staff
presenting
to
council
today
and
and
Madam
mayor
with
that.
I'd
stand
for
any
questions.
G
C
E
It's
going
to
give
everyone
else
a
chance
to
go
first,
so
I
do
I,
do
have
some
questions
for
you.
So
with
this
with
these
proposed
Corridor
improvements,
is
there
a
significant
cost,
that's
being
invested
into
this,
or
is
it
sort
of
maintaining
what
it
is
right
about
now,
with
the
addition
I
think
it
sounds
like
of
some
signs,
or
is
there
actually
a
fair
amount
of
construction?
That's
going
on
to
get
it
to
this
proposed
easement
design,
St.
G
Luke's
has
invested
significant
dollars
in
achieving
the
corridor
that
is
there
today.
It's
built
and
so
there'll
be
ongoing
maintenance
to
to
maintain
that
space
and
its
condition,
but
the
investment
to
build.
It
has
already
been.
E
Has
already
been
made
so
I
think,
there's
and
so
other
than
maybe
some
additions
to
some
science
or
some
slight
traffic.
Calming
measures
to
I
think
reduce
the
speeds,
there's
not
an
additional
large
amount
of
investment
other
than
just
the
maintenance
of
the
space.
That's
correct
great.
Thank
you.
Thank.
H
You
madamir
thank
you
Jordan.
Do
you
have
a
sense
of
what
the
signs
my
percentage
might
look
like
I?
Think
to
our
prior
comments.
Maybe
I
still
concerns
around
safety.
Is
it
signage
that
will
kind
of
dampen
the
amount
of
traffic
or
drivers
that
we'll
go
through,
or
is
it
really
more
about
awareness
to
pedestrians
that
there
might
be
drivers
going
through
I'm
just
curious?
What
that
might
look
like.
G
Thank
you
Madame
mayor
and
council
member
Andy
Keith,
the
the
signage
that
we
have
right
now
includes
photographic
or
sort
of
stick
figure:
renderings
of
bicycle
cars,
pedestrian
wheelchair
users
on
a
sign.
That's
posted
both
on
both
sides
of
the
shared
use
portion
of
that
Corridor.
G
So
on
First
Street
and
on
the
Avenue,
a
side
and
in
light
of
the
feedback
today,
I
think
there's
an
opportunity
to
consider
more
places
for
signage,
given
that
there
there
isn't
just
one
or
two
entrances
and
the
and
the
signs
really
are
directed
to
cars
right
now,
but
I
think
there's
an
opportunity
to
consider
additional
ways
of
awareness.
The
intent
is
not
to
discourage
any
particular
mode
of
Transit
per
se,
although
I
do
think
any
any
user
for
the
space
is.
B
So
you're
going
to
give
the
easement
and
then
there's
going
to
be
I,
assume
more
conversations
about
how
the
space
is
used.
I
guess
what
I'm
asking
is
the
lurking
in
the
room
right
now
is
this?
Should
cars
be
their
question
and
I
I?
Guess
I,
don't
understand?
Does
it
matter
right
now,
you're
going
to
give
us
the
easement
and
then
I
assume
the
city
in
the
future
could
make
some
decisions
about
who's
going
to
be
there
so
that
it's
obviously
an
issue.
B
G
Madam
mayor
council
president
pro
tem
budget
that
you're
correct,
so
we
can
move
forward
with
the
easement
as
drafted
the
easement
contemplates
that
the
parties,
through
the
appropriate
process,
can
evaluate
the
corridor
and
if
that's
a
decision,
certainly
based
on
input
from
the
city,
we
can
certainly
evaluate
that,
but
we
would
ask
to
move
forward
with
the
easement
so
that
we
can
continue
that
construction
on
our
Hospital.
Thank
you.
G
C
You'd
prefer
to
have
it
move
forward
as
written
and
then
the
city
to
evaluate
once
with
you
as
we're
in
the
process,
Movement
Like
Beyond
tonight.
E
Mary
I
may
might
just
make
one
comment
here:
one
I
appreciate
your
willingness
to
explore,
leaving
leaving
the
corridor
open
to
to
traffic
and
you
working
with
the
East
End
neighborhood
association,
all
the
parties
involved
to
explore
all
options
and
see
what's
going
to
work
for
folks
right
now,
achd
is
in
the
middle
of
doing
the
Bannock
Street
neighborhood
concept,
and
it
actually
extends
from
27th
Street,
like
all
the
way
down
almost
to
old
penitentiary,
Road
and
they're,
taking
input
on
it
right
now,
all
the
way
until
the
end
I,
think
of
2023
with
plans
on
what
that
whole
Corridor
is
going
to
look
like,
and
so
you
know
my
you
know.
E
Personal
opinion
is
now
is
a
good
time
to
to
proceed
as
planned
with
the
easement,
but
for
staff
to
be
evaluating
as
this
larger
Banning
Street
neighborhood
concept
has
explored.
How
that
might
change
that
street
in
the
future,
and
hopefully
St
Luke's,
you
know,
is
there
and
I
think
it's
outlined
in
the
East
meant
to
be
a
partner
in
making
sure
that
that
works,
but
if
there's
no
reason
to
make
a
decision,
that's
different.
Now,
if
there's
a
larger
plan,
that's
happening
and
those
should
really
be
part,
I.
B
Agree
completely,
I
would
just
add
that,
as
staff
is
preparing
things,
the
the
marching
voters
would
be
persuading
me
why
cars
should
be
there.
We
can
have
that
conversation
later,
but
I'm,
not.
You
know.
We
talk
about
this.
All
the
time
like
these
mixed
pedestrian.
The
numbers
just
don't
support
a
need
for
vehicles
to
be
moving
through
that
place,
but
you
can
see
how
much
work
has
gone
into
this
I
know.
There
are
stakeholders
who
are
not
here
in
the
room.
C
Thank
you
very
much.
Thank
you,
I
think!
That's!
That's
it
I
want
to
thank
you
all
for
coming
in
and
great
review
of
Where
we've
been
appreciate.
All
the
work
that's
gone
into
the
development
of
the
won
the
corridor
as
it
is
and
as
it's
been
the
last
several
years
and
then
the
easement
agreements
that
you
worked
on
with
staff,
really
appreciate
it,
and
then
it's
good
to
see
you
all
here
tonight,
thanks
for
being
here
and
with
that
we'll
go
ahead
and
recess
until
six
o'clock
thanks
everybody.