►
From YouTube: Boise City Council - Evening Session
Description
August 31, 2021
A
C
A
D
A
Next
up
under
special
business,
we
have
two
items:
first
off
the
appointment
of
jesus
hara
to
serve
as
the
director
of
the
office
of
police
accountability.
Jesus
is
with
us
today
welcome
we're
so
glad
that
you
were
able
to
make
it.
I
just
want
to
say
a
couple
things
before
I'm
putting
this
nomination
forward.
D
D
Second,
thank
you,
madam
mayor.
This
has
been
an
interesting
process.
I'm
the
one
on
the
council
who's
been
here
since
the
office
was.
The
ombudsman
saw
it
through
some
changes
to
the
office
of
police
oversight
and
now
this
new
office-
and
I
I
can't
tell
you
how
excited
I
am
that
we
found
jesus
to
be
the
director
of
this
office.
D
I
think
his
experience
his
life
background
is
the
way
he's
lived
his
life
and
come
to
us
as
someone
who
not
only
is
a
dedicated
public
servant,
but
also
someone
who
has
the
life
experience
to
understand
how
to
make
this
office
one
that
will
be,
I
think,
more
open,
more
transparent
and
serve
the
public
of
this
city.
So
well
in
this
time
when,
when
we
need
that
kind
of
service,
I'm
very
excited
about
this
nomination
and
excited
that
you
brought
it
forward
to
us.
Thank
you.
E
Madam
mayor,
I've
only
just
met
jesus
a
few
minutes
ago,
but
I'm
very
I'm
thrilled
that
you're
willing
to
take
on
this
role,
and
I
think
that
it
says
a
lot
from
our
short
conversation
about
the
process
that
we
went
through
in
determining
what
this
office
needed
to
look
like
to
best
serve
our
citizens.
So
that
really
means
a
lot
that
you
were
willing
to
do
that
that
we
have
a
structure,
that's
going
to
serve
our
citizens
in
a
fair
and
transparent
way.
F
G
I'm
really
thankful
that
you
have
applied
for
this
position
and
that
that
that
we
have
the
opportunity
to
to
vote
you
in
I'm
always
interested
in
when
people
decide
to
take
on
hard
positions
that
they
know
are
going
to
be
difficult,
and
why,
and
I
think,
a
lot
of
times
it's
because
it
matters
and
they
think
they
can
make
a
difference,
and
so
I
just
want
to
thank
you,
for
you
know
believing
that
you
can
make
a
difference
in
this
role.
Thank
you.
H
I
We
live
in
idaho,
where
people
who
look
like
you
and
I
very
rarely
get
to
sit
in
positions
of
leadership,
and
it's
not
a
small
thing,
because
not
only
do
we
have
before
us
the
tasks
that
we're
assigned
in
these
roles,
we
have
the
additional
some
days.
It's
a
burden
and
some
days
it's
an
honor
depends
on
the
day
when
we
get
to
be
role,
models
and
inspire
the
largest
minority
group
in
the
state,
and
that
is
the
latino
community.
I
A
A
J
J
It
didn't
look
very
good,
and
so
you
know
perspective
when
you
have
that
time
that
time
alone,
a
lot
of
things
go
through
your
head.
So
one
of
those
by
the
way
was
the
kind
of
press
release
that
you
guys
would
put
away
if,
if
I
didn't
make
it
through
so
that
just
tells
you
you
know
how
some
of
those
moments
can
go
so
anyway
thrilled
to
be
back
in
boise
thrilled
to
get
the
opportunity
to
represent
the
city
and
represent
our
community
members.
J
J
I
look
forward
to
seeing
you
guys
in
in
due
time
and
and
present
any
changes
to
the
ordinance
protocols
policies,
but
anyway,
I'm
just
happy
to
be
here,
and
I
can't
say
enough:
the
unwavering
support
that
the
city
has
has
offered
me
throughout
this
time
and
moving
forward.
I
know
many,
you
know,
stand
ready
to
help
and
ensure
success
in
this
office.
Thank
you.
C
A
Is
that
engagement
with
the
community
to
better
understand
from
the
community's
perspective,
how
it
is
that
they
need
to
know
how
to
find
you
and
then
how
it
is
that
they
want
and
need
to
feel
safe
to
come
forward
with
concerns,
and
that
process
will
begin
and
will
help
shape
those
policies
and
expectations
of
the
office.
And
we
look
forward
to
learning
from
the
community
in
partnership
with
the
office
and
the
community
engagement
division.
What
it
is
they're.
A
Looking
for
and
so
that
we
can
continue
to
maintain
the
trust
that
we
have
in
this
community
overall,
I'm
with
our
department
as
we
grow.
So
thank
you
for
being
here
and
I'm
going
to
take
one
more
liberty,
jesus,
you're
free.
This
is
not
about
you.
I
do.
I
had
hoped
to
be
able
to
share
with
council
before
we
started,
but
wasn't
able
to
on
the
topic
of
covid
the,
as
you
saw,
the
governor
had
a
press
release
today
where
he
is
calling
up
the
guard
and
sending
more
resources
to
hospitals
and
primary
health.
A
Urgent
care.
Primary
care
providers
have
has
informed
me
that
they
have
reached
capacity
and,
as
of
seven
o'clock
this
evening,
they
will
be
turning
away
patients.
I
mean
we
have
seen
throughout
this
crisis
that
our
wastewater
is
the
first
indicator
of
what's
about
to
happen,
primary
health
and
other
urgent
care
facilities,
follow
that
followed
by
impact
in
hospitals
and
we've
gotten
to
a
point
where
parts
of
our
community
and
our
hospitals
are
importantly,
are
in
crisis.
Our
health
care
workers
are
tired
and
they've
been
going
out
this
for
a
long
time.
A
They
need
our
support.
People
are
sick
and,
as
jesus
shared
with
us
tonight
are
very,
very
sick,
and
we
are
so
glad
that
he's
with
us
and
back
in
boise,
the
public
needs
to
understand.
I
want
to
thank
boise
school
district
for
requiring
mass
to
protect
our
children.
The
numbers
of
children,
the
positivity
rate,
is
over
20
percent.
A
The
numbers
of
children
being
tested
have
reached
the
hundreds
every
day
at
this
point
and
if
we
need
the
community
to
get
vaccinated
to
wear
your
masks
inside
as
we
are
in
city
hall
and
if
you're
outside
in
close
contact
with
people,
wear
your
masks
and
we've
got
to
do
it
outside
when
people
are
close
together
as
well,
I'm
to
try
to
get
a
handle
on
this
while
vaccinations
are
increasing,
which
we've
seen
I'm
increasing
the
last
couple
weeks.
The
zip
code,
vaccination
rate
for
boise
is
high.
A
There
are
some
areas
of
our
city
that
need
to
be
higher
and
I'm
imploring
you
to
do
that,
and
I
want
to
thank
the
zoo,
zoo
boise
in
the
parks
department
for
the
free
vaccination
clinic
that
I
believe
was
with
st
luke's
this
past
weekend.
We're
going
to
do
another
one
with
saint
owls
and
they
vaccinated
51
people,
which
was
a
record
for
one
of
these
clinics,
and
the
hospitals
want
to
come
back
and
do
more
and
thursday
night.
A
For
first
thursday,
here
at
city
hall,
on
the
plaza
there
will
be
a
vaccination
clinic
right
outside
starting
at
five
o'clock,
if
you're
downtown
I'm
visiting
stores
enjoying
our
restaurants.
If
you're
close
to
people
wear
your
masks
please
and
come
by
and
get
a
vaccination.
If
you
haven't
we're
happy
to
help
with
that,
and
with
that
I'll
move
us
on
to
the
interim
budget
changes
eric,
oh
you're,
here
great,
I
wasn't
sure
if
you
were
going
to
be
on
zoom.
K
Madame
members
of
the
council,
we
have
four
interim
budget
changes
for
your
consideration
this
evening.
The
first
one
is
for
amenities
at
franklin
park.
This
action
really
represents
an
advancement
of
funding
from
fiscal
year,
22
that
was
included
in
the
22
budget
into
fiscal
year,
21
to
facilitate
the
replacement
of
some
or
the
procurement
of
some
equipment.
This
action
also
includes
the
recognition
of
some
federal
funding
that
was
made
available.
K
K
The
third
action
before
you
is
for
the
acquisition
of
some
land
in
the
foothills.
It's
for
the
purchase
of
29
acres
adjacent
to
pierce
park
lane.
This
property
was
signaled
to
the
community.
That
would
be
purchasing
this
last
week
and
the
fourth
item
is
a
revenue
revenue,
neutral
item
at
the
boise
watershed,
realizing
some
grant
proceeds
for
some
for
the
expansion
of
climate
change
programming
happy
to
stand
for
any
questions
on
those.
E
D
E
E
No
offense
to
the
airport
at
all,
but
they
generally
take
care
of
themselves.
I
guess
that's
what
I'm
saying,
and
so
it's
really
neat
to
be
able
to
move
up
the
amenities
at
franklin
park,
which
I
think
that
the
neighborhood
has
really
been
looking
forward
to
for
a
long
time.
So
that's
really
great
and
it
was
wonderful
to
get
a
little
bit
of
federal
funding.
For
that
and
the
second
thing
that
was
really
exciting
was
that
stem
action
center
grant
for
climate
change,
education.
E
You
know
talking
to
kids.
I
think
that
there's
so
much
opportunity
there
to
make
sure
that
they're
getting
educated
in
the
ways
that
they
want
to
be
educated
about
climate
change
and
the
ways
that
they
can
have
impact.
So
it's
really
neat
that
we're
able
to
offer
that
programming
that
we
have
a
facility
in
which
we
can
do
so,
and
so
thank
you
and
thank
you
to
staff
everyone
who
made
it
work.
C
B
C
A
Thank
you.
Next
up,
we
have
the
consent
agenda.
Thanks
eric
have
a
good
evening.
All
items
with
an
asterisk
are
considered
to
be
routine
by
the
council
and
will
be
enacted
by
one
motion.
There
will
be
no
separate
discussion
on
these
items
unless
a
council,
member
or
citizen
so
requests,
in
which
case
the
item
will
be
removed
from
the
general
order
of
business
and
considered
in
its
normal
sequence.
D
D
B
An
ordinance
for
property
located
at
2605,
linda
vista
lane,
amending
zoning
classifications
of
the
city
of
boise
city
to
change
the
classification
of
real
property,
particularly
described
in
section
1
of
this
ordinance
and
adjacent
rights
of
way
from
r-1b
to
r-1c,
sending
forth
a
reason.
Statement
in
support
of
such
zone
change
and
provide
an
effective
date.
B
Ord-40-21
and
ordnance
car
20-000-19
or
profit
located
at
1522
west
state
street
on
many
zoning
classifications
of
the
city
of
boise
city
to
change
the
classification
of
real
property,
particularly
described
in
section
1
of
this
ordinance
and
adjacent
rights,
away
from
pcdb
pedestrian
commercial,
with
downtown
design
review
the
c-5d
central
business
district
with
downtown
design,
review
and
development
agreement.
Setting
forth
a
reason.
Statement
in
support
of
such
zone
change
and
provide
an
effective
date.
L
B
Yes,
all
in
favor
motion
carries
ord-30
an
ordinance
relating
to
the
water
renewal
system
of
the
city
of
boise
city,
ada,
county,
idaho,
providing
for
and
calling
the
special
election
at
which
there
shall
be
submitted
to
the
electors
qualified
to
vote
there.
On
the
question
of
issuing
the
city's
sewer
revenue
bonds
for
the
purpose
of
keeping
upfront
sewer
rates
increases
low
by
financing
the
cost
of
necessary
improvements
to
the
city's
water
renewal
system,
providing
details
in
connection
there
with
and
of
the
election
on
the
question
and
providing
the
effective
date
thereof.
I
L
C
A
C
A
Thank
you
and
now
we'll
move
on
to
new
business
and
first
up
we
have
subdivisions.
Welcome
cody.
This
is
sub.
21-33
is
the
applicant
here
in
the
building.
Oh
hello,
sir,
welcome
all
right,
and
then
we
don't
expect
the
west
bench
neighborhood
association
to
be
here.
Are
you
in
the
building
or
online?
If
you're
online?
Please
raise
your
hand
nobody's
signed
up
in
advance,
but
let
us
know
if
you're
here,
to
testify
on
this
and
with
that
cody
and
take
it
away.
M
Thank
you,
madam
mayor
members
of
council.
This
item
includes
a
preliminary
and
final
plat
for
a
subdivision
that
includes
six
buildable
and
one
common
lot.
The
1.7
acre
site
is
located
at
88.80
west
corey
lane
in
an
r1c
or
single
family
residential
zone
for
those
unfamiliar
with
the
site.
It's
located
just
northeast
of
the
maple
grove
and
north
view
intersection
in
west
boise.
M
The
commission
did
here
and
unanimously
recommended
approval
of
the
subdivision
on
august
9th
of
this
year.
It
was
actually
identical
to
a
subdivision
that
was
approved
in
may
of
2019.
unfortunate.
Unfortunately,
the
improvements,
although
installed
the
plot,
was
never
recorded
and
an
extension
never
requested
which
brings
us
back
to
you
this
evening
again,
the
subdivision
does
include
six
buildable
lots.
Each
each
shot
intended
for
a
detached
single
family
home.
Each
of
the
lots
meet
the
dimensional
standards
of
the
zone,
they'll
be
served
by
a
private
street
with
attached
sidewalk.
M
These
improvements
again
with
all
the
utilities,
have
been
installed
attached.
Sidewalk
has
also
been
installed
along
corey
lane.
There
seems
to
have
been
a
bit
of
a
misunderstanding
in
the
review
of
grading
permits
and
that
that
walkway
again
while
installed,
was
originally
required
to
be
a
detached
facility.
M
M
It
is
a
fairly
short
segment
of
roadway
with
low
traffic
volumes
and
then
also
almost
all
of
the
properties
along
this
segment
of
corey
lane
have
been
improved
with
identical
attached
sidewalks.
So
for
those
reasons,
the
commission
did
recommend
approval
of
the
subdivision,
the
preliminary
and
final
plot
and
the
waiver
to
allow
the
attached
sidewalk
to
remain.
Thank
you.
D
M
Madam
mayor
mayor,
councilmember
clay
there
there
are
not
common
lots
along
corey
lane
there,
but
it
is
set
up.
You
know
they
are
set
up
as
corner
lots.
So
you'll
have
a
sizable.
You
know
side
yard,
it's
the
southern
side
of
those
properties,
so
I
would
imagine
each
of
the
lots
would
would
want.
You
know
their
own
shade,
trees
on
that
private
landscape,
but
nothing
required
through
the
through
the
subdivision.
No.
D
So
I
bring
this
up
because
we
are
rewriting
our
zoning
code
and
there
is
an
opportunity
to
fix
this
even
on
private
lots.
I
think
those
that
front
sidewalks
we
should
look
and
see
if
there's
something
we
can
do
about
shading
the
sidewalk
adam
mayor,
one
other
question:
if
I
might,
as
I
look
at
this,
you
know:
opportunity
lost,
we
have
an
identical
or
pretty
close
to
identical
cul-de-sac
to
the
north,
no
pathway
connecting
those
while
a
roadway,
probably
wouldn't
be
appropriate.
A
pathway
would
sure
be
nice.
M
Madam
mayor
councilmember
clegg,
I
think
there
are
actually
several.
This
is
probably
a
poster
poster
child
for
where
we,
you
know
some
missed
opportunities
over
the
years
in
terms
of
connectivity
even
to
the
east,
we
have
an
almost
identical
situation
with
back-to-back
cul-de-sacs,
where
a
street
connection
might
not
have
made
sense,
but
certainly
a
micropath
at
a
minimum.
So
definitely
noted.
A
Great
thanks,
sir,
would
you
like
to
I
mean
you
can
come
up
and
testify
you
can,
let
us
know
you're
in
agreement
with
the
terms
and
conditions
of
the
staff
report.
If
you
are
all
right,
I'm
not
going
to
make
you
walk
all
the
way
up
here,
but
I
will
repeat
for
the
record
that
the
applicant
is
here
and
he
is
in
agreement
with
the
terms
and
conditions
of
the
staff
report.
B
A
M
M
M
M
While
the
agreement
caps,
the
density,
the
rezone,
will
allow
the
smaller
lots
and
setbacks
of
the
r1c
zone.
As
you
can
see
here,
the
property
does
about
r1c
zoning,
with
the
properties
to
the
east
and
then
to
the
west.
While
you
do
have
r1b
zoning
with
larger
setbacks
and
lots,
there
is
a
common
lot.
That's
about
35
feet
wide
for
the
farmer's
lateral
that
provides
a
good
transition
to
those
other
properties.
M
Moving
on
to
the
subdivision
again,
it
includes
18
buildable
lots
each
intended
to
support
detached
single-family
homes.
Those
lots
from
the
lots
range
in
size
from
just
over
5
000
to
a
little
over
7
000
square
feet
and
50
to
67
feet
wide.
Those
dimensions
are
consistent
with
the
standards
or
requirements
of
the
r1c
zone.
The
subdivision
includes
no
waivers
or
variances.
M
Access
to
the
subdivision
will
come
from
the
extension
of
surf
street,
a
public
right
public
roadway
along
with
the
travel
lanes.
It
does
include
the
extension
of
existing
attached
sidewalks,
while
the
street
will
not
access
overland
road
emergency
access
will
be
provided
in
that
location
and
that
emergency
access
will
also
allow
pedestrians
to
access
the
site
from
overland
along
overland
road.
A
condition
of
approval
does
require
the
installation
of
new
detached
sidewalks
to
replace
an
existing
attached
facility.
M
Finally,
in
terms
of
connectivity,
the
applicant,
through
conditions
of
approval,
was
required
to
provide
a
pedestrian
easement
along
the
canal.
As
you
saw
on
the
record,
there
was
some
back
and
forth
at
the
commission
on
this
and
a
subsequent
exchange
with
the
irrigation
district.
I
believe
we
have
that
all
worked
out.
Our
team
did
meet
with
the
irrigation
district
and
clarified
their
requirements
so
as
conditioned
while
they're
not
improving
a
pathway.
M
My
my
understanding
is
that
the
applicant
agrees
with
this
approach
and
condition.
Finally,
I
would
briefly
mention
that
the
existing
farmhouse
and
I
believe
five
trees
will
be
removed
with
the
project.
However,
all
of
the
trees
along
the
existing
lateral
will
be
retained
and
22
new
trees
will
be
provided
in
common
areas.
M
M
M
Madam
mayor
council,
member
clay,
we
certainly,
we
certainly
could,
through
the
through
the
development
agreement,
that
that
certainly
could
be
a
requirement
it
would.
It
would
end
you
know
at
overland
clearly
and
then
to
the
south,
would
would
dead,
end
or
sure
could
somehow
maybe
tie
back
into
the
oh
to
the
public
street
system.
There
it'd
be,
I
guess,
temporarily,
for
an
un
certain
amount
of
time
be
somewhat
of
a
loop
within
the
project,
but
we
certainly
could
require
that
this
evening.
D
Thank
you
and
then
second
question
and
all
assets
of
the
applicant.
You
can
tell
me
it
looks
to
me
like
at
least
some
of
those
trees
around
the
farmhouse
would
well
serve
whatever
house
gets
built.
Houses
get
built
on
those
two
lots
and
I'm
curious
why
the
need
to
remove
those
trees.
None
of
them
seem
to
be
in
the
roadway.
M
Madame
mayor
councilmember,
craig
you're
right,
it
could
be
by
the
time
we
place
a
a
home
on
this
property.
It's
going
to
be
certainly
close
to
the
drip
line,
if
not
the
trunk
of
those
trees
I'd,
let
the
applicant,
I
suppose,
speak
to
that
it
could
be
that
they
be
retained
until
construction
of
that
home
and
an
attempt
to
be
made
to
save
them.
D
D
N
Good
to
see
you
good
to
see
you
thank
you,
madam
mayor
members
of
the
council,
I'm
becky
mckay,
with
engineering
solutions,
business
address,
1029,
north
rosario
and
meridian.
I'm
here
representing
the
applicant
sterling
land
development
on
this
particular
piece
of
property.
As
staff
indicated,
this
property
is
4.17
acres.
It's
an
infill
parcel,
it's
very
small.
N
N
The
the
biggest
concern
was
their
fence
along
our
eastern
boundary
is
very
dilapidated
and
some
of
the
the
posts
have
been
compromised
and
they
asked
if
we
would
remove
their
fence
and
install
a
new
fence,
and
we
told
them
that,
obviously,
with
the
consent
of
their
hoa
and
all
of
the
adjoining
neighbors,
we
would
be
glad
to
coordinate
with
them.
Remove
that
fence
and
install
a
new
fence
along
that
common
eastern
boundary
that
seemed
to
to
please
most
of
the
people.
Their
other
concern
was
traffic.
N
As
far
as
we
are
required
to
connect
to
surf
street,
which
is
a
stub
street
ada
county
highway
district
indicated
that
overland
road
is
a
mobility
corridor
that
they
would
not
allow
us
to
have
any
access
due
to
the
fact
that
it's
currently
five
lanes
anticipated
to
be
seven
lanes
in
2036,
and
so
they
said,
you
know,
our
policy
manual
dictates
that
you
shall
take
access
at
the
lesser
designated
street,
which
happens
to
be
surf
street.
The
stub
there
on
our
south
east
boundary,
the
fire
department,
was
concerned
about
the
cul-de-sac
length.
N
N
N
Blueprint
boise
encourages
obviously
infill
this
council,
madam
mayor,
has
indicated
we
need
to.
We
need
to
go
out
there
as
a
planning
community
and
develop
these
infill
parcels
that
have
existing
sewer
and
water
facilities.
Existing
stub
streets
are
long
mobility,
corridors
which
have
public
transportation.
N
N
N
N
If
you
look
down
overland
road,
there's
vertical,
curb
and
attached
sidewalk
all
along
that
south
side
of
overland
road.
As
far
as
you
can
see,
staff
had
indicated
that
they
wanted
us
to
detach
the
sidewalk
go
in
tear
out
that
that
five-foot
walk
that
vertical
curb
because
it's
a
monopore,
I
can't
leave
it.
It's
got
to
be
jackhammered
out.
N
N
We
have
to
match
that
center
line
elevation
for
overland
road
to
be
in
compliance
with
ada
county
highway,
district's
policy
manual,
and
so
I'm
going
to
have
to
connect
on
the
east
side
to
that
attached,
walk
we're
going
to
have
to
fill
and
then
detach
the
walk
and
then
swing
it
back
and
then
make
it
and
then
l
it
back
into
the
attached
walk
and
it
just
seemed
very
cumbersome,
very
expensive
for
for
338
feet.
We
do
have
a
35
foot
landscape
buffer,
that's
proposed!
N
We
also
have
a
common
lot
there,
so
we'll
be
treeing
it
councilman
clegg
mentioned.
You
know
can't
can't
you
install
trees
along
the
attached
walk
to
create
shade
we're
doing
that.
I've
had
my
engineer
working
all
day
on
that
detached
walk.
We
all
also
have
the
complexity
of
there's
an
existing
irrigation,
pipe
and
boxes
and
there's
existing
transmission
poles
all
along
there
right
at
the
back
of
that
existing
walk.
So
we
have
a
lot
of
conflicts
and
we
just
don't
have
a
lot
of
room
to
make
the
transition.
N
One
of
the
things
that
concerns
me
is
affordability,
these
infill
projects
as
price,
the
more
requirements
that
are
piled
on
them,
the
higher
the
va,
the
price
of
the
lots,
the
higher
the
price
of
the
homes-
and
I
know
that
we're
struggling
to
provide
housing
for
local
residents
that
is
affordable
on
bigger
projects.
Obviously
it
makes
sense.
We
have
the
latitude
ada
county
highway.
Districts
are
also
requiring
that
we
dedicate
22
additional
fees
so
that
sidewalk
is
going
to
be
set
way
back,
we're
going
to
have
22
feet
of
additional
right-of-way.
N
We've
also,
if
you
look
at
our
our
site
plan,
we
do
have
like
a
tot
lot
up
in
the
the
northwest
corner
and
we
also
have
a
tot
lot
down
there
kind
of
in
the
southeast
corner
talk
to
my
client.
They
want
to
put
some
play
equipment
or
something
in
there.
You
know
there
we
want
to
have
some
use
there.
We
have
the
farmer's
lateral
that
runs
all
along
our
west
boundary
and
along
our
south
boundary.
The
farmer's
lateral
has
a
40-foot
easement
west
of
centerline
and
a
20-foot
easement
east
of
centerline.
N
N
N
N
A
D
Madam
here
well,
thank
you,
becky,
it's
good
to
see
you
so
a
couple
of
questions
without
looking
and
I'm
trying
to
pull
up
the
gis.
So
I
apologize,
I
can't
see
it.
I
do
see
on
just
our
lotting
map
that
it
looks
like
there's
an
easement
also
on
the
north
side
of
this
creek
in
the
coronado
subdivision
and
the
one
that's
on
south
campbell.
D
Regardless
without
knowing
that
it
doesn't
look
like
on
your
site
plan
that
you
have
any
plans
to
connect
to
that
easement
on
the
eastern
boundary
south
of
surf
street,
so
at
very
least,
I
would
ask
that
a
connection
to
that
easement
be
allowed,
be
put
in
on
the
very
east
side
of
your
property
south
of
surf.
Have
you
thought
about
that?.
N
N
D
D
On
the
other
hand,
the
idea
that
you're
supposed
to
provide
you
know
this
extra
20
or
30
feet
so
that
they
can
have
an
80
foot
right
away
to
widen.
The
road
makes
it
sort
of
problematic,
because
you
don't
know
where
the
curb
and
gutter
is
supposed
to
go
and
all
of
those
things
and
it
might
change
in
the
future.
D
One
of
the
things
I
guess
we
might
be
able
to
explore.
This
is
a
preliminary
plan,
so
you
know
you
can
explore
things
and
come
back
recognizing
that
the
utility
poles
are
there.
The
reason
for
the
attached
sidewalk
is
how
uncomfortable
it
is
to
walk
along
overland
today
at
35
miles
an
hour
two
feet
from
the
traffic,
and
so
one
of
the
things
that
we
might
be
able
to
explore.
D
N
D
And
then,
finally,
I
guess
thank
you
for
coming
back
with
a
plan
to
preserve
whatever
trees
you
can
and
I
would
like
to
explore
actually
getting
a
pathway
on
that
easement
again,
not
knowing
what
the
gis
map
looks
like
and
where
the
trees
are.
I
don't
know
what
that
looks
like,
but
before
preliminary
plat,
I
would
like
to
explore
that,
even
if
it's
just
a
graveled
surface,
which
is
what
it
is
on
the
south
side
today
at
least
it
would
be
recreation
for
the
folks
who
live
there.
D
N
It's
not,
I
guess,
napa
meridian's
position
was
that
under
that
2001
agreement
that
the
city
has
to
negotiate
with
the
district
to
designate
any
additional
or
new
paths-
and
they
said
the
farmer's
lateral
was
not
listed
as
one
of
those
designated
paths.
And
then,
if
you
go
south,
you
guys
own
property,
as
I
showed
you
in
blue
and
feast
simple,
that
was
supposed
to
be
the
pathway
which
has
never
been
built,
but
you
can't
get
to
it.
I
can't
get
to
it.
D
O
Hi
marissa
keith
3279
south
cloverdale,
president
of
the
southwest
data
county
alliance,
neighborhood
association,
I'm
really
just
here
observing
tonight.
I
don't
have
really
much
comment
other
than
to
say.
I
appreciate
the
pedestrian
and
the
connectivity
aspects
of
this
project.
So
that's
all.
I
have.
A
A
M
Madam
mayor
councilmember
clay,
I
think
I
think,
where
there's
some
uncertainty
around
it,
it
would
be.
My
suggestion
would
would
be
that
we
bring
back
kind
of
an
analysis
of
each
of
those
topics
at
the
final
plat
stage
and
then
address
it.
Then,
if,
if
you
know
you're
you're
confident
and
with
certainty
want
those
as
conditions,
I
would
suggest
they
be
included
in
the
development
agreement
now,
but
recognizing
there's,
you
know
perhaps
some
give
and
take
probably
between
the
preliminary
and
final
plot.
D
So
if
we
chose
to
do
that
tonight,
the
direction
would
be
to
explore
those
bring
back
a
development
agreement
with
those
added
conditions
for
approval.
After
I
mean
it,
because
we'd
approve
the
rezone
tonight.
If
we
went
that
direction
but
not
approve
the
development
agreement,
as
for
it
to
be
brought
back.
M
Madam
mayor
councilmember
clay,
we
could
certainly
bring
the
development
agreement
back
along
with
a
final
plot
or
approve
it
with
the
development
agreement
this
evening,
just
as
written
and
we'll
just
address
it
through
the
through
the
subdivision,
the
the
zoning
will
be
in
place
and
then,
instead
of
the
final
plot
being
on
consent,
we
report
back
on
these
couple
of
things
and
address
it.
There.
G
M
Madam
mayor
councilmember,
halliburton,
it
does
get,
it
does
get
tricky
back
there
behind
those.
Oh
two
or
three
lots
at
the
end
of
end
of
coronado,
there's
common,
there's
canal
easement.
There
I
mean
it
would.
We
would
have
the
opportunity
to
continue
to
work
with
the
canal
company
with
the
irrigation
district,
to
get
that
and
then
similarly
on
the
property
further
to
the
I
guess,
further
to
the
east,
so
while
it
would
be
challenging,
it
wouldn't
be
necessarily
impossible
to
get
that
connection
in
the
future.
C
A
G
F
M
M
G
And
I
guess
the
reason
I
ask
these
questions
is
just
to
I
want
to
see
pathways
along
the
canal
as
much
as
anybody.
I
think
that
other
council
members
know
that,
but
with
uncertainty
of
where
it's
going
to
be,
and
what's
going
to
happen,
what
the
kind
of
surface
area
is
going
to
look
like
it
would
be
nice
to
have
that
detailed
a
little
bit
further
before
something
was
added.
I
guess
on
to
this
particular
agreement.
M
Madam
mayor
council,
member
hallie
burton,
I
would
suggest
that
at
a
minimum
we
want
that
easement
I
mean
there's
always
a
chance,
we'll
work
things
out
and
then
between
preliminary
and
final
plat
we
could
bring
back
some
some
further
analysis
on
just
how
it
might
connect.
And
what
interim
I
mean
councilmember
craig
mentioned.
Perhaps
a
gravel
surface
is
an
interim
step,
so
we
can
certainly
report
back
on
that
at
the
final
plat
stage.
Okay,.
D
D
I
don't
know
if
it
connects.
I
don't
know
if
it's
an
easement,
I
don't
know
if
it's
common
lot,
but
it
does
look
like
there
is
an
opportunity
there
and
council
member
halliburton
to
the
east
and
south
and
is
a
connection
to
fi
the
five
mile
creek
trail.
So
it
really
could
provide
potentially
provide
really
great
connectivity
in
this
pretty
disconnected
cul-de-sac
world
of
neighborhood
that
otherwise
doesn't
have
much,
and
so
that
that
was
my
thinking
in
and
trying
to
get
as
far
as
we
could
with
it
now.
D
P
Mayor,
yes,
I
just
know
that
I
I
do
agree
based
on
everything
that
you'd
said
about
what
we
need
to
work
out,
that
it
makes
sense
to
approve
this
and
then
sort
the
rest
out
later
with
the
development
agreement
in
the
final
plot,
rather
than
hashing
it
out
now,
because
it
doesn't
seem
like
we
actually
know
everything
we
need
to
know
to
make
that
decision.
So
I
very
much
support
your
potion.
L
A
A
We
have
welcome
kevin
kevin
holmes,
presenting
for
planning
development
services,
then
the
appellant
david
de
haas,
the
applicant
jody
knop,
and
then
we
will
have
the
public
I'll
call
on
people.
One
person
sign
up
in
advance,
melissa
regan
is
mostly
here
or
on
zoom,
on
zoom,
okay,
great,
so
we'll
get
to
melissa
first
and
then
I'll
see.
Who
else
is
here
good.
Q
Q
Q
Following
the
commission's
decision,
the
appellant
submitted
an
appeal
application
with
the
grounds
that
you
see
here.
No
other
supporting
memorandum
were
submitted
so
I'll,
just
very
briefly
go
over
the
city's
responses
to
these,
so
the
first
two
items
were
in
fact
submitted
with
the
original
application
and
deemed
to
be
sufficient
for
the
required
review.
Q
The
second
two
items
are
quite
simply
not
required
as
part
of
a
cup
application,
the
specifics
of
electrical
equipment
would
be
reviewed
under
a
related
building
or
electrical
permit,
and
that
last
item
there
is
not
a
requirement
of
any
planning
application
that
I'm
aware
of.
So
as
this
is
the
case,
the
planning
team
cannot
find
any
place
where
the
commission
aired
in
their
decision
to
approve
the
conditional
use
permit.
Therefore,
we
are
recommending
that
the
appeal
be
denied
and
the
original
approval
be
upheld.
Thanks.
A
R
A
R
All
right,
my
name
is
david
dehaas,
1016,
south
vista
boise,
idaho
job
one
for
this
city
council
is
protect
public
safety.
That
is
your
duty
as
residents,
we
have
the
right
to
the
quiet
enjoyment
of
our
streets
and
our
homes.
This
means
preserving
our
public
safety,
our
privacy
and
our
property
values.
R
Denying
this
wireless
facility
application
should
be
an
easy
decision
for
you
tonight.
By
citing
your
local
code,
you
can
deny
the
application,
because
the
applicant
has
provided
no
appropriate
or
substantial
evidence
of
a
significant
gap
in
carrier-specific
telecommunications
service,
as
the
applicant
must
do
for
the
2005
ninth
circuit
ruling
in
metro,
pcs
versus
san
francisco.
This
u.s
federal
court
of
appeals
ruling
requires
the
applicant
to
measure
the
existing
carrier's
specific
signal,
strength
levels
and
to
prove
the
signal
level
is
not
sufficient
for
outdoor
telecommunication
service.
R
In
order
to
establish
the
need
for
any
additional
wireless
facility.
The
applicant
has
simply
not
done
so.
The
propagation
map
the
app
can
provide
is
merely
a
color
drawing
akin
to
a
comic
strip.
The
analysis
lacks
any
substantial
evidence
to
prove
a
significant
gap
in
coverage
or
even
the
power
inputs
and
outputs
to
make
any
such
determination.
R
The
council
and
I
can
simply
decide
this
lack
of
substantial
evidence
as
the
basis
of
your
decision
to
deny
this
application
easily
win
any
potential
future
court
challenge.
Please
explain
in
the
year
since
we
first
met
that
the
city
has
failed
to
equip
the
department
with
a
neutral
raf
professional
to
evaluate
such
applications.
R
R
This
case
about
the
fcc's
attempt
to
avoid
court
mandated
environmental
review
to
establish
the
adequacy
of
the
existing
fcc
microwave
radiation
guideline.
The
fcc
got
caught
again
in
the
ruling.
The
judges
wrote
the
following:
we
grant
the
petitions
in
part
and
we
remanded
the
commission.
The
commission
failed
to
provide
a
reasoned
explanation
for
its
determination.
This
guidelines
adequately
protect
against
the
harmful
effects
of
exposure
to
radiation.
R
Radio
frequency
radiation
with
all
of
these
shenanigans
they've
been
certainly
perpetuated
by
the
fcc.
On
behalf
of
the
wireless
interview,
it's
no
wonder
that
there
is
not
one
insurance
company
that
will
provide
insurance
and
get
the
health
claims
for
injury,
illness
or
death
in
response
to
the
substance
back
in
law
that
I'm
entering
into
the
public
record
tonight,
I
am
requesting
that
you
do.
R
P
I
just
want
it's
not
really
a
question,
it's
just
a
comment.
I
want
to
note
that
the
address
the
gentleman
gave
has
been
mailing
to
my
home
voluminous
information
about
5g,
which
I
interpret
to
be
harassing
an
attempt
to
intimidate.
I
don't
appreciate
it.
I
don't
think
it's
necessary.
It
doesn't
influence
what
I'm
going
to
do
in
this
decision
or
in
this
meeting,
but
it's
not
necessary.
P
We
have
a
public
forum
and
a
public
place
to
have
these
conversations,
we're
in
it
now,
and
I
speaking
on
behalf
of
myself
and,
I
suspect,
all
other
elected
officials.
I
would
appreciate
if
you
respected
my
privacy,
just
as
you've
asked
the
city
respect
the
privacy
of
its
residents
in
your
presentation
today.
S
S
S
On
march
29th
verizon
wireless
submitted
their
cup
application
on
june,
8th
boise
planning
and
development
issued
their
project
report
recommending
approval
with
conditions.
The
public
hearing
was
held
on
june
14th,
where
the
planning
and
zoning
commission
unanimous
unanimously
voted
to
approve
the
application.
S
An
appeal
was
filed
with
the
city
council
on
june
24th
of
the
planning
and
zoning
commission's
approval
of
the
wireless
communication
facility
application.
The
foregrounds
of
appeal
with
no
additional
support
supporting
documents
were
improper
propagation
study
map
is
not
a
study.
Failure
to
have
an
engineer,
approved,
signed
plans
for
power
and
pull
no
specific
specifications
as
to
power
and
equipment.
No
proof
of
liability
insurance
for
health
effects
signed
by
the
applicant
or
end
user.
Verizon
melissa
will
address
these
more
in
depth.
In
a
few
minutes,
I'd
like
to
cover
the
necessity
of
this
site.
S
S
U
Good
evening
this
is
melissa
reagan
on
behalf
of
verizon
wireless,
I'm
an
attorney
at
sherman
howard
in
denver,
colorado,
633,
17th
street
suite,
3000.
and
I'll
be
quick
here
in
the
interest
of
time
jody.
If
you
wouldn't
mind
just
going
to
the
next,
just
as
mr
holmes
presented
his
presentation
and
verizon
agrees
with
everything
in
mr
holm's
presentation
and
the
staff
recommendation
that
the
appeal
be
denied,
in
particular
as
the
piece
you
know.
U
U
Additionally,
the
appellant
argued
that
we
have
not
demonstrated
any
significant
gap
in
coverage.
These
maps
have
shown
that,
but
in
addition
to
that,
under
the
september,
2018
fcc
order,
the
fcc
actually
stated
and
changed
the
requirement
as
to
what
constitutes
an
effective
prohibition,
prohibition
and
if
it
is
that,
if
they
are,
we
are
materially
limited
or
inhibited
in
the
ability
to
provide
wireless
service
that
that's
the
standard.
U
It
has
not
and
did
not
overturn
the
existing
federal
telecommunications
statute
or
the
existing
fcc
regulations
with
respect
to
rf
admissions.
Those
are
still
the
valid
law
and
the
regulations
of
the
city
council
is
required
to
follow.
So
under
the
current
federal
telecommunications
statute,
local
jurisdictions
can't
deny
applications
for
wireless
facilities
if
they
comply
with
the
rf
admission
standards.
That's
set
by
the
fcc
wireless
providers.
Verizon
wireless
will
not
receive
a
license
for
its
facility
from
the
fcc
unless
it
meets
these
current
existing
regulations
and
standards
which
verizon's
facility
will
do
so.
U
What
the
order
did
in
fact
was
it
evaluated
the
fcc's
2019
order
regarding
fcc
regulations
and
asked
simply
that
the
fcc
provide
more
reasoned
explanation
for
its
determination
that
the
current
fcc
guidelines
are
adequate
with
respect
to
rf
exposure,
and
it's
just
remanded
the
fcc
to
provide
that
further
reasoning.
It
did
not
issue
any
moratoriums,
it's
not
required
to
redo
its
regulations
or
anything,
and
so
until
that
remand
is
complete,
the
existing
rules
and
regulations
remain
in
place
and
they
cover
wireless
facilities.
U
A
A
V
Perfect
hank
allen,
687
west
rush
court
eagle,
idaho,
thank
you
for
allowing
me
to
speak
this
evening,
armrests
requesting
city
council
members
to
vote.
Yes
in
favor
of
this
appeal
to
deny
the
cell
tower
conditional
use
permit
application.
This
tower
is
simply
not
needed.
There
is
no
significant
gap
in
coverage
and
I'm
here
to
tell
you
that
non-ionizing
rf
radiation
from
cell
towers
pose
a
significant
risk
to
human
health
and
life
safety.
V
Despite
what
the
fcc
says
and
the
attorneys
tell
you,
I'd
like
to
share
my
personal
struggles
that
are
ongoing
right
now
and
over
the
past
four
months.
Regarding
a
cell
tower
in
eagle
idaho,
on
april
15th
of
2021
verizon
switched
on
a
macro
tower
cell
tower
600
yards
from
my
house
here
in
eagle.
Within
a
week
of
the
tower
being
switched
on,
I
was
admitted
to
the
er
with
my
heart
in
aphid,
for
those
of
you,
who've
never
been
an
afib.
V
My
heart
felt
like
it
was
jumping
out
of
my
chest,
and
my
heart
rate
was
at
174
beats
per
minute.
The
er
was
very,
very
concerned
with
this
and
admitted
me
immediately
with
my
wife
in
tears.
This
was
scary,
to
say
the
least
for
myself
and
my
family
saintly,
st
luke's
used
their
paddles
to
cardiovert
my
heart
back
into
a
normal
sinus
rhythm.
V
V
I
said
I
subsequently
reached
out
to
my
neighbors
hearing
eagle
via
next
door,
with
a
brief
description
of
my
symptoms,
afib
and
other
environmental
conditions,
not
relating
to
the
cell
tower,
just
just
in
general
talk
about
my
my
symptoms
that
were
going
on.
20
neighbors
responded
within
my
small
community,
all
complaining
of
the
same
symptoms
and
all
waiting
to
see
a
cardiologist
because
of
heart,
palpitations
and
aphid
symptoms.
V
V
By
the
end
of
june,
the
tree
canopies
between
my
house
and
the
cell
tower
started
filling
in
which
also
which
provide
coverage
and
reduce
the
the
radiation
levels.
At
my
house,
I
also
spent
thousands
of
dollars
painting
my
house
with
a
very
expensive
rf
blocking
paint
to
screen,
and
I
screened
my
windows,
all
reducing
the
rf
radiation
levels
in
my
house.
Okay,
I'll
go
real
quick
here.
W
W
W
Cities
across
the
u.s
are
creating
their
own
municipally
owned
fiber
optic
networks,
which
are
far
safer,
faster,
more
secure
from
from
cyber
attacks
and
a
yi
and
yield
a
rich
revenue
source
for
local
governments.
This
could
be
a
rich
revenue
source
for
boise,
I'm
calling
in
from
my
cabin
in
lowman,
where
I
have
4g
and
5g
via
wired,
fiber
optics
to
the
premises
service.
W
In
the
june
14th
hearing
on
this
conditional
use,
permit
hank
allen's
presentation
included
a
list
of
existing
wired
broadband
providers
with
the
coverage
map.
The
majority
of
those
providers
had
97
to
100
percent
coverage
in
boise.
The
city
of
boise
would
be
prudent
to
invest
in
wired
infrastructure
for
high-speed
internet,
not
wireless.
W
A
R
R
R
Furthermore,
this
the
fcc
has
been
told
you
need
to
come
out
and
come
back
and
prove
do
the
neva
reviews,
which
there's
not
been
one
neighborhood
you've
done
in
this
city
on
any
of
these
towers
and
then
and
they
need
to
prove
that
they
need
to
prove
that
this
is
safe
from
harm
you've
already
heard
from
one
person,
I've
got
numerous
other
people
who
have
called
me
and
stated
they're
having
headaches.
They
can't
sleep
at
night.
Their
kids
are
having
attention
deficit
disorders,
oh
after
the
towers
went
up.
R
R
You
do
that.
You
don't
do
this
for
buildings.
You
don't
allow
buildings
to
go
up
without
proven
safety.
You
look
at
the
strength
of
the
steel
that
goes
in
the
building.
You
look
at
all
the
data.
That's
going
to
go
into
and
prove
that
these
buildings
are
actually
going
to
stand
up,
but
you're
not
doing
that
for
wireless
facilities.
I
can't
understand
why
you're
not
we're
significant
risk.
This
is
not.
This
is
bigger
than
kobe.
Look.
You
can't
as
a
homeowner.
R
If
this
tower
is
with
20
feet
from
my
home,
I
can't
turn
it
on
and
you
want
to
make
everyone
do
what
hank's
done
to
spend
thousands
of
dollars
to
wrap
their
home
and
basically
create
a
faraday
cage
around
their
home
to
protect
this
coming
into
their
home
24
hours
a
day.
That
is
not.
You
know
we're
guaranteed
on
the
constitution
to
have
privacy
and
the
protection
for
private
property
rights.
R
These
towers
go
against
all
that
it's
time
for
for
the
boys
to
just
take
a
pause.
We
know-
and
you
guys
have
admitted
testimony
in
the
past-
that
your
staff
is
unclear
about
what
a
propagation
study
is.
This
was
not
a
proper
propagation
study.
There
needs
to
be
specifications
just
like
you
would
have
in
a
building.
There's
been
no
specifications,
they
didn't
do
a
drives
test.
There
was
no
means,
but
tablets
whatsoever.
R
I
don't
think
so.
It's
not
the
kind
of
city
that
I
want
to
live
in.
Other
cities
have
been
far
more
open.
Eagle,
idaho
has
changed
their
tone.
Mountain
homeless
says
we're
wired
as
wired
fiber
optics
to
the
premise
which
is
faster
and
more
superior.
This
technology
is
only
for
broadband
and
it's
slower
than
dsl.
R
Why
would
we
submit
ourselves
as
a
city
to
having
our
bees
killed
to
having
our
children
harm
to
having
people
like
hank
go
into
afib?
Why
would
we
do
that?
Why
would
we
do
that
without
taking
the
time
and
taking
a
pause
and
say
hey,
let's
put
a
moratorium
on
this
right
now
and
let's
take
a
step
back
and
let's
look
at
the
data.
Let's
get
our
hands
around
this,
rather
than
just
going
at
warp
speed
just
to
put
these
in
because
we've
got
this
agreement,
it's
time
to
take
a
pause,
and
I
encourage
you.
R
This
is
one
of
the
biggest
decisions
I
believe
you'll
make
in
the
history
of
your
time
served
on
this
council.
This
is
not
going
away.
It's
generalities,
there's
going
to
be
more
people
injured,
more
people
hurt
from
this
technology.
This
is
not
david's
opinion.
This
is
fact
there's
over
twenty
thousand
studies.
I've
interviewed
theodore
schroder
from
environmental
health
trust.
I've
interviewed
these
people
who
been
doing
this
for
20
some
years.
The
data
is
there
you're
not
going
to
find
it
on
google,
it's
barry,
but
the
data
is
there.
That
shows
there's
significant
harm.
R
We
know
because
of
our
activities
throughout
the
country
with
other
people,
we
have
deltas
in
other
cities,
people
have
died
from
cancer
and,
if
you're,
if
you're,
in
a
apartment
complex
in
this
town,
which
is
30
feet
off
the
ground,
it's
shooting
right
there
into
your
bedroom
window
and
those
people
have
ended
up
with
cancer.
They've
ended
up
with
ovarian
cancer
brain
cancer.
R
A
C
D
Okay,
go
ahead.
Thank
you.
This
is
an
appeal
of
a
decision
by
the
planning
and
zoning
commission,
the
standards
of
an
appeal,
or
that
we
need
to
find
an
error
that
the
planning
and
zoning
commission
has
made
in
their
approval
of
this
conditional
use.
Permit.
As
I
listened
to
the
testimony,
I
did
not
hear
anyone
suggest
that
there
was
an
error
in
that
decision.
Q
P
P
I
mean
we
have
many
jobs
here,
but
one
is
to
follow
the
law
and
the
law
preempts
us
from
basing
decisions
in
anything
other
than
a
very
in
this
context.
In
the
wireless
communication
context,
anything
other
than
a
very
limited
and
narrow
set
of
essentially
form
and
zoning
rules,
and
the
reason
for
that
is
big
and
complicated,
but
basically
it's
a
national
technology.
It's
national
communications
infrastructure
and
our
country
is
going
to
make
a
national
decision
about
that.
The
decision
will
come
from
the
fcc,
its
guidance
as
interpreted
by
court
rulings.
P
The
law
that
we
have
to
follow
now
says
we
can
regulate
certain
aspects
of
the
form
and
certain
aspects
of
the
zoning
of
these
towers,
but
there's
other
stuff
other
information
we're
not
allowed
to
consider.
So
we
have
to
follow
the
law.
When
I
look
at
what
the
planning
and
zoning
commission
did
here-
and
I
look
at
the
assignments
of
error,
the
first
is
that
a
propagation
study
was
was
not
submitted
according
to
the
appellant
and
there's
a
disagreement.
P
I
think
about
what
counts
as
a
propagation
study,
but
we
know
from
our
code
and
from
our
prior
appeals.
The
study
should
include
the
location
of
existing
facilities
in
the
coverage
area
and
some
radio
frequency
modeling.
That
shows
why
the
tower
is
needed.
The
applicant
here
did
submit
those
things.
It
submitted
a
map
that
showed
both
of
those
things,
and
I
guess
I
would
point
out
that
the
purpose
of
the
propagation
study
is
to
show
that
the
tower
is
really
necessary.
P
It's
not
relevant
to
the
presence
of
the
study,
but
it's
noteworthy
that
the
applicant
wants
to
put
a
tower
in
there
they're
in
a
business,
and
they
wouldn't
want
to
be
doing
that
unless
they
had
users
unless
it
was
necessary.
So
I
don't
see
an
error
in
the
planning
and
zoning
commission's
conclusion
that
a
propagation
study
was
submitted.
P
Another
requirement
for
these
submittals
that
was
called
out
as
an
error
was
lack
of
sufficient
engineering
documents.
What
our
code
requires
is
a
stamp
report
from
a
structural
engineer.
That's
what
the
applicant
submitted
as
to
the
rest
of
the
errors
for
these
types
of
cu
applications.
Our
city
doesn't
even
require
proof
of
liability
insurance.
So
the
planning
and
zoning
commission's
conclusion
that
the
absence
of
those
of
those
things
was
not
a
problem
is
correct.
L
A
Thanks,
I'm
going
to
go
ahead
and
have
us
move
into
this
one
and
if,
if
it
gets
dragged
out
we'll
take
a
break,
but
I
think
we
ought
to
just
keep
going
through.
So
we're
going
to
pick
up
a
cr
21-15
welcome,
celine
celine
will
present
for
the
city
and
then
john
wardle
for
the
applicant
brighton
development.
Centennial
is
the
neighborhood
association.
A
B
X
Mayor
council
members
before
you
this
evening
is
a
request
to
reason:
6.47
acres
from
t1d
technological
industrial,
with
design
review
to
our
3d
multi-family
residential,
with
design
review.
The
site
is
located
near
the
intersection
of
de
meyer
and
cloverdale,
which
is
near
chinden
boulevard
home
to
one
of
our
four
designated
regional
activity.
Centers
in
blueprint
boise
the
site
is
located
within
the
boise
research
center,
which
is
home
to
the
west
ymca
hubble
creek
park
and
various
office
uses.
X
The
land
designation
is
mixed
use
which
allows
for
host
of
zoning
districts,
including
the
requested
r3.
The
t1
zone
is
not
frequently
used
throughout
boise,
as
it
was
always
intended
for
larger
warehouse
and
tech
and
office
type
uses,
since
the
site
is
mostly
undeveloped.
The
request
to
r3
would
provide
a
much
needed
mix
of
housing
to
a
predominantly
detached
single
family
area
located
so
closely
to
businesses,
schools
parks
and
transit
lines.
X
The
request
r3
would
facilitate
a
residential
project
on
site.
What
you
see
before
you
is
a
concept
for
110
attached
town
homes
with
surface
parking.
There
is
no
associated
development
agreement
with
the
rezone
request,
so
this
plan
is
merely
a
concept
of
what
could
be
developed
here.
You'll
see
in
the
record.
X
The
commission
was
initially
concerned
that
there
wasn't
a
da
to
leon
but
eventually
agreed
that
a
future
residential
use
for
the
site
met
the
rezone
approval
criteria
in
boise
city
code
plus
they
were
reassured
once
again
because
any
project
proposed
would
require
additional
public
hearing
process
no
matter.
The
density
proposed
you'll
see
on
the
screen
the
different
next
steps
required
of
the
development
of
the
site.
X
You'll
see
from
the
record
in
the
end,
the
public
comments
were
mixed
with
support
and
opposition.
The
main
concerns
were
capacity
for
nearby
parks
and
roadways.
No
public
agencies
have
commented
in
opposition
and
in
fact,
achd's
review
says:
there's
ample
capacity
on
both
the
meyer
and
ash
creek
streets
and
cloverdale
has
recently
been
widened.
X
Other
concerns
were
regarding
the
mix
of
density
or
the
nature
of
the
high
density
for
the
site,
along
with
the
predictability
of
development
for
the
area.
It's
true,
the
site
was
envisioned
for
office
uses.
Excuse
me
office
uses,
but
the
things
have
changed
in
boise
over
the
past
30
years
since
the
research
center's
inception
and
the
site
has
not
redeveloped
successfully
within
the
t1
zone.
This
is
a
prime
location
for
additional
housing
at
a
different
price
point
within
an
area
with
many
services
and
amenities.
Y
Y
This
is
a
request
where
he
zones
6.47
acres
within
the
boise
research
center
shown
in
the
middle
of
the
exhibit.
Here.
The
the
aerial
you'll
see
a
red
boundary,
and
this
is
where
the
the
area
that
we're
asking
to
rezone
it's
within
the
square
mile,
with
bounded
by
chin
to
the
north
eel
road
to
the
west,
mcmillan
to
the
south
and
cloverdale.
Y
Y
Y
As
you
can
see
from
the
comp
plan,
the
comprehensive
plan
table
for
general
mixed
use,
which
is
highlighted
there
in
pink
and
as
you
scroll
through
there
most
every
land
use
or
zoning
designation,
is
a
potential
use
zone
that
could
occur
in
general.
Mixed
use.
I've
also
highlighted
the
r3,
which
is
with
the
check
mark
there.
You
can
see
that
it
is
shown
that
would
be
in
allowed
use
within
general
mixed
comprehensive
plan.
Y
We
are
requesting
the
r3
designation,
which
isn't
allowed
use
on
the
mixed
use,
designation,
the
comprehensive
plan-
and
it's
also
a
designation
which
is
found
in
this
area
previously
zoned
and
has
been
developed.
I
just
want
to
go
into
a
couple
small
items
here
and
then
I'll
stand
for
any
questions
that
you
have.
Y
I
want
to
go
over
just
kind
of
general,
very
quickly,
information
about
the
project
circulation
for
the
project,
because
I
know
that
traffic
and
transportation
is
always
a
question
that
comes
up
and
also
system
capacity,
while
not
required.
We
did
want
to
provide
a
very
clear
direction
of
what
we
intended
to
do
with
the
property
from
a
development
perspective.
Y
Y
Currently,
when
the
boise
research
center
was
developed,
demeyer
was
not
opened,
meaning
there
was
no
access
from
brc
to
demayer.
That
was
a
condition
of
approval
that
there
not
be
any
vehicular
access
between
existing
demire
and
the
boise
research
center.
Just
to
be
clear,
we
are
not
proposing
any
access
to
demire.
We
have
access
on
ash
creek.
We
can
get
to
meeker
out
to
explore
then
to
cloverdale
and
also
discovery
and
up
to
chindin.
The
red
dots
represent
and
show
you
where
their
existing
stop
lights
at
those
intersections.
Y
However,
there
are
deficiencies
with
the
mire
de
meyer.
Currently
is
only
improved
on
the
south
side,
there's
no
curb
and
gutter
on
the
north
side,
there's
no
sidewalk
pedestrian
access
or
anything
like
that.
It
is
a
collector,
but
it
doesn't
really
function
like
one
with
the
needed
access
for
pedestrians,
so
we
are
proposing,
as
shown
here
in
purple.
We
are
actually
going
to
build
the
curb
gutter,
sidewalk
storm
drainage
on
the
north
side
of
de
meyer,
we're
going
to
so
that
that
roadway
can
be
complete
one
of
the
things
with
a
residential
collector.
Y
Y
Additionally,
we
will
be
installing
a
solid
fence
around
the
property
on
the
south,
east
and
west.
There
are
areas
in
the
berm
that
exist
right
now,
which
has
very
mature
landscaping
that
have
some
gaps
in
them.
I've
highlighted
those
yellow
areas
where
we
would
be
replacing
that
landscaping
and
enhancing
it
as
well
as
landscaping
throughout
the
project.
Y
Y
Y
A
couple
of
our
couple
other
highlights
to
note
here
is
public
safety
is
close
by
we're
within
1.3
miles
of
fire
station.
There's
public
schools
nearby
in
this
square
mile.
We
have
two
elementary
schools.
We
have
a
high
school,
we
also
have
a
junior
high
and
there
are
there's
more
than
enough
capacity
in
joplin
elementary,
where
the.
Y
Y
To
my
as
it
relates
to
meyer,
we
are
not
going
to
add
any
trips
to
the
meyer,
we're
not
accessing
it.
We're
not
poking
a
road.
Through
there
there
will
be
no
vehicles
onto
meyer.
We
will,
however,
be
improving
to
meyer,
so
we
have
a
road,
a
collector
that
will
function
the
way
it
should
and
we
will
maintain
and
enhance
the
existing
buffer
and
demire.
D
C
D
Yes,
well,
it's
good
to
see
you.
It's
been
a
while
welcome,
so
my
question
for
you
on
the
staff
report
we
got.
It
shows
actually
two
pathway
connections
to
the
meyer.
I
was
unclear
on
what
you
showed
us
if
those
were
going
to
still
be
there.
I
appreciate
that
you
want
to
protect
the
meyer
from
vehicle
access,
but
protecting
it
from
pedestrian
access
means
that
whoever
lives
here
will
not
be
able
to
visit
anyone
to
the
south.
Y
Y
We
were
specifically
asked
to
not
provide
any
other
access
points
through
there
by
the
neighbors
when
we
met
with
them
in
the
neighborhood
meetings.
But
we
do
have
an
opportunity
down
here
where
you
had
the
access
down
to
hubble
creek
to
provide
another
access
into
the
site
and
minimize
the
the
openings
along
the
meyer.
So
you
were.
Y
Madam
mayor
council,
member
clegg,
the
the
concerns
from
the
neighbors
were
that
it
would
invite
people
and
we
we
explained
this
right,
but
that
it
would
invite
people
to
park
on
the
meyer
in
the
neighborhoods
and
walk
in
and
so
by.
Maintaining
the
existing
pedestrian
access
has
exist.
Now
there
will
be
no
parking
allowed
on
demeyer.
D
Y
Y
C
G
C
Y
It
was
a
request
there.
There
was
currently
there
exists,
a
chain
link
fence
along
that
entire
property.
It
sits
on
the
boundary
it
sits
kind
of
on
the
downslope
side
of
it.
There
was
a
request
that
it
be
there,
be
some
privacy
created
by
that.
So
we
have
proposed
to
replace
that
chain
link
fence
with
a
solid
fence
so
that
that
privacy
could
be
could
occur.
G
X
Madam
mayor
council,
member
hallie
burton
these
are
just
neighborhood
requests
within
you
know
the
pre-application
neighborhood
meeting
process.
It's
certainly
not
a
requirement
in
code,
and
nor
would
we
normally
encourage
that
kind
of
cutoff
between
neighborhoods
or
residential
uses
from
one
another.
G
Y
Neighborhood,
madam
mayor,
can
I
just
make
one
comment
related
to
that
council
member
hallie
burton
it's
a
good
question
for
sure.
It's
not
uncommon,
however,
throughout
the
city
of
boise,
where
we
have
arterials
and
collector
roads
that
we
would
have
enhanced
landscaping,
birming
and
fencing
this,
although
de
meyer
feels
like
just
a
local
street,
it
is
designated
as
a
collector.
It
does
carry
some
traffic.
Y
I'm
not.
I
hear
what
you're
saying
with
access
or
fencing
through.
I
we
did
show
some
originally,
as
you
can
see,
there's
clearly
some
opportunities
where
the
sidewalk
is
coming
to
the
south
in
internally
and
there
be
maybe
some
opportunity,
some
limited
opportunities
to
create
some
some
access
through.
I
just
wanted
to
communicate
to
you
the
request
that
came
up
through
the
neighborhood
meeting
process.
G
Thank
you
and
madame
arigatus,
just
following
up
with
that
one
more
time
real
quickly.
I
really
appreciate
the
extra
effort
that
you've
gone
with
accommodating
the
neighborhood.
I
think
that
the
the
no
parking
songs
signs
along
the
sidewalk
does
a
good
job
at
encouraging
people
to
not
park
along
there,
which,
I
think
is
their
biggest
fear.
D
Just
follow
up
on
that
on
the
policy
side,
our
policy
is
that
there
be
an
access
point,
every
350
to
no
more
than
500
feet,
and
that
would
mean
at
least
two
more
access
points
more
likely
three
to
four
in
this
space.
If
that
policy
is
followed,
when
the
application
is
brought
forward
for
the
actual
design.
A
C
Z
This
matters,
because
this
there's
a
proposed
development
for
approximately
a
twenty
thousand
square
foot
commercial
building.
The
property
is
currently
under
contract
for
the
buyer,
that's
going
to
build
that
building
and
they
will
not
be
able
to
build
that
and
that
sale
will
not
be
able
to
go
through.
Z
In
addition
to
just
the
decrease
to
my
clients,
the
value
of
that
parcel,
I
think
it's
important
to
look
at
what
the
requirement
is
for
a
rezone
on
a
couple
of
things.
The
future
land
use
designation
of
mixed
use
does
not
mandate
of
a
rezone
to
a
residential
use.
Here
the
council
still
has
to
see
whether
the
proposed
rezone
is
in
accordance
with
comprehensive
plan.
Z
Z
The
other
side
of
the
other
aspect
that
I
feel
is
within
the
comprehensive
plan
is
that
when
you
look
at
the
west
bench
goal
ccn3,
which
is
to
support
the
retention
of
regionally
significant
uses,
that's
not
limited
to
the
subgoal,
which
is
the
hewlett-packard
industrial
area,
the
boise
tech
park
or
the
boise
research
center
is
a
significant
established
use
and
you're
going
to
prohibit
the
future
development
of
that
existing
use.
By
allowing
residential
in
this
situation,.
P
Question
about
the
setback
and
and
the
building
that's
under
contract.
Now,
do
you
know
off
the
top
of
your
head?
What
the
setback
difference
is
and
how
I'm
just
trying
to
get
a
grip
on
whether
it's
so
unmanageable
that
it
like
really
destroys
the
current
economic
prospects
for
the
property
or
whether
it's
something
that
we
might
be
able
to
work
with
you
on
to
help
you
out.
Z
D
X
Yes,
madam
mayor
council,
member
clegg
and
councilman
beijing,
the
the
t1
zone
next
to
when
adjacent
to
residential
uses
or
districts
has
a
100-foot
setback
and
so
for
the
parcel
that
the
previous
person
was
talking
about
you.
They
would
have
residential
uses
in
districts
on
three
sides
of
that
parcel.
So
you'd
have
a
hundred
foot
setback
on
east,
west
and
south.
D
C
E
P
So
the
main
point
is
that
that
space
is
used
to
set
buildings
apart,
and
I
wonder
if
there's
any
time
that
you
can
think
of
that
we
have
required
the
functional
equivalent
of
a
setback
by
asking
a
applicant
to
either
grant
an
easement
that
may
be
used
for
the
setback
purpose
or
to
commit
to
not
developing,
in
this
case,
30
to
40
feet
of
the
east
edge
of
the
property.
Or
you
know
some
other
mechanism
to
accomplish
the
purpose
of
the
setback,
which
is
the
physical
separation.
X
Yeah,
madam
mayor
council,
member
of
agent,
this
I
mean
it
would
be
a
variance
process
is
what
you're
talking
about.
We
can
certainly
ask
for
a
greater
setback
on
the
western
side
for
this
property,
but
there
would
still
be
that
setback
requirement
for
the
western
property,
and
so
you
know,
I
think
it's
important
to
know
this.
X
This
plan
or
this
site
image
doesn't
show
the
parcel
lines,
but
we've
got
the
pathway
to
hubble
creek
park
to
the
east
or
excuse
me
west,
and
then
the
open
right-of-way,
that's
not
developed,
but
acts
as
a
path
to
the
south.
You
know
with
the
variance
process
if
a
future
person
or
future
developer
would
want
to
develop
the
site.
X
C
X
Madam
mayor
councilmember
thompson,
you
know,
I
suppose,
if
they
had
applied
for
an
application
yesterday
and
this
zone
had
not
been
in
place,
then
it
would
have
been
a
lesser
setback,
but
once
this
rezone
is
approved
and
effective,
then
we
have
to
base
it
off
of
that
hundred
foot
setback
past
that
it
would.
It
would
be
some
sort
of
request
process
to
ask
for
that
variance
and
setback.
D
It
appears
to
me
that
there
are
buildings
built
within
less
than
100
feet
of
various
lines
that
end
up
in
the
park,
whether
they
be
a
roadway
edge
or
something
was
the
research
part
built
with
just
as
one
big
lot
and
that
didn't
matter
I
mean
it
it.
It
appears
to
me,
as
I
look
at
these,
that
there
are
other
places
where
the
hundred
feet
doesn't
apply
and
if
it's
a
hundred
feet
all
around
in
a
t1,
I'm
just
curious.
How
that
how
that
worked
out.
X
Madam
mayor
council,
member
claire
I'd
have
to
look
at
the
specifics,
of
course,
but
the
100
foot
setback
is
only
adjacent
to
residential,
but
the
boise
research
center
and
hubble
creek
subdivision
as
a
whole
was
you
know,
a
big
master
use
kind
of
planned
unit
development?
If
you
will,
you
know
over
30
years
ago,
in
the
sense
that
you
know
they
did
probably
account
accommodate
for
reduced
internal
setbacks
for
the
various
uses
that
they
had
planned
for.
A
T
T
We
think
this
is
an
excellent
reuse
of
an
existing
surface
parking
lot
to
the
setback
question
and
I
I've
gone
through
this
multiple
buildings,
multiple
planning,
directors,
multiple
everything,
the
the
way
that
the
planning
department
and
and
and
believe
me.
This
has
come
back
on
application
after
application,
the
setback
issue.
T
T
So
if
that
satisfies
the
council,
we're
willing
to
put
that
on
the
record
you
know
otherwise,
I
just
you
know
I
think
it's
been
noted-
the
job
to
resident,
in
balance,
probably
the
mix
of
the
housing
imbalance.
I
was
in
a
meeting
last
week
with
the
waffed
executive
team,
including
their
ceo
out
of
seattle.
T
They
purchased
the
building
right
across
the
street
to
the
north.
They
have
a
hundred
thousand
square
feet
with
a
major
employment
center
there.
They
definitely
want
places
for
their
people
to
live
where
they
can
walk
to
work.
So
we
think
this
is
an
excellent
reuse
of
this
property.
I
think
it's
much
needed
and
I
don't
know
that
I'd
need
to
say
anything
more
than
that
I'll
stand
for
any
questions.
T
D
D
C
A
D
C
A
D
D
D
Very
much
support
the
change
in
use
recognizing
that
there
needs
to
be
access
to
the
neighborhood
to
the
south,
even
though
it
won't
be
vehicular
access
and
that
the
council
recognizes
the
potential
challenges
this
creates
for
the
lot
to
the
west
and
recognize
the
applicant's
willingness
to
work
with
that
landowner
and
support
any
variances.
That
may
be
needed
to
allow
development
of
that
lot
appropriately.
G
Just
about
anytime,
you
can
get
rid
of
a
massive
surface
parking
lot.
That's
probably
a
good
thing
for
the
city
when
you
can
do
it,
while
incorporating
all
this
housing
and
some
additional
pedestrian
bicycle
access.
I
think
that
that's
great
as
well,
and
so
I
think
that
there's
a
huge,
huge
victory
there
looking
at
a
better
use
for
this
property,
and
then
I
think
I
just
finally
would
note,
I
think,
in
the
in
the
spirit
of
our
mayor's
vision
of
creating
a
city
for
everyone.
G
Building
walls
between
us
isn't
necessarily
the
best
way
to
do
it
and
making
sure
that
neighborhoods
are
connected
to
each
other.
The
kids
can
go
from
their
backyard
to
another
neighbor's
backyard
and
play
and
that
one
neighborhood
isn't
truly
separated
from
the
other.
To
me,
that's
that's
really
part
of
that
vision.
So
I
appreciate
council
president
klig,
including
the
policy
statement
of
trying
to
create
those
access
points
from
one
area
to
another.
Thank
you.
P
Adam
a
couple
of
thoughts
I'll
be
supporting
the
motion
as
amended,
because
that
was
one
of
my
primary
concerns.
You
know
that
part
of
the
basis
for
the
rezone
is
that
it's
adjacent
to
residential
other
residential
property,
and
then,
of
course,
if
you
wall
it
all
off
and
make
it
completely
separate,
it's
not
really
very
adjacent
anymore.
So
I
also
strongly
feel
that
opening
it
up
is
the
right
thing
to
do.
P
P
P
What
I
would
love
to
be
able
to
tell
mr
spiker's
clients
is
we're
going
to
get
it
worked
out.
Don't
worry
because
I
know
that
you
have
a
contract,
you
probably
have
lenders,
you
have
all
kinds
of
underwriters
who
are
going
to
see
this
and
freak
out
and
do
underwritery
things
and
that's
very
stressful.
P
I
can't,
unfortunately,
it's
against
the
rules
for
me
or
anybody
to
make
a
promise
about
what
a
future
council
will
do,
but
based
on
everything
we've
heard
and
on
how
cooperative
and
helpful
the
applicant
has
been
both
to
the
neighborhood
and
to
us.
I
feel
like
this
is
going
to
be
able
to
work
out.
I
wish
I
could
give
you
something
more
definitive
than
that,
but
that's
that's
what
we
can
do
so
I'll
be
voting
to
support
the
motion
signaling.
P
H
Madam
mayor,
just
one
note
that
I
100
agree
support
the
motion.
I
agree
with
what
council
member
holly
burton
said.
I
think
the
signs
will
work
on
their
own
in
keeping
the
parking
off
that
street
and
and
having
those
pathway.
Connectivity
is
extremely
important
for
kids
and
adults
and
pets,
and
so
I'll
be
supporting
that
going
forward
as
well
and
thanks
a
lot
david.
Another
outstanding
job
on
a
remarkable
development.
I
I
I
think
right
now,
where
I
think
like
at
43
and
something
as
seemingly
innocent
and
innocuous
as
a
fence.
Actually
isn't
so
it's
a
visual
reminder
of
us
and
them,
and
there
is
no
them
there's
just
us.
So
I
really
appreciate
my
colleagues
for
pointing
that
out
and
wanting
to
remove
some
of
those
barriers
that
keep
us
separated
from
each
other,
so
I'll
be
supporting
the
motion
as
well.
E
E
I
think
that
one
thing
that
the
adjacent
neighbors
might
not
realize
yet
is
that
by
not
having
a
fence
there,
it
also
adds
to
their
walkability
in
their
neighborhood
they're
a
tremendous
employment
opportunities
in
the
adjacent
area.
They
maybe
then
wouldn't
have
to
go
all
the
way
around
the
end,
either
end
of
this
development
to
reach
them.
So
I
look
forward
to
seeing
this
built
out
see
the
workforce
housing
that
is
likely
to
result
and
see
a
lot
more
walkability
for
this
neighborhood,
which
I
think
is
really
neat.
So
thanks.
A
Well,
I
won't
be
voting,
but
I
just
want
to
say
thank
you
for
working
it
out.
I
encourage
you
to
come
back
soon
come
back
sooner
than
later,
and
while
the
council's
thoughts
on
this
are
fresh
and
agree
with
council
member
woodings,
pointing
out
that
you
know
just
as
we're
looking
at
our
surface
parking
lots
as
a
city
and
where
we
have
tool
sheds
and
different
things
for
housing
and
to
see
others
doing.