►
From YouTube: Joint City of Boise/ACHD Meeting
Description
1:00 PM Thursday, April 7, 2022
A
B
Mayor
mclean,
I
will
also
acknowledge
quorum
for
the
eddy
county
highway
district.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
A
So,
just
before
we
kick
things
off,
we've
got
agenda,
probably
that
you've
got
in
front
of
you.
We've
got
four
things
on
the
agenda.
Several
of
us
have
things
starting
at
two
or
shortly
after
so
I'm
going
to
try
really
hard
to
keep
us
on
time.
A
I
just
want
to
acknowledge
yesterday
the
achd
commission
had
questions
of
valley,
regional
transit
with
regard
to
the
raise
grant,
and
it's
my
hope
that
in
the
next
week
we
can
be
helpful
in
answering
some
of
those
questions,
but
I
appreciate
the
level
of
excuse
me
the
letter
of
support
that
the
commission
had
already
proposed
to
provide-
and
you
know,
working
in
partnership
mary
and
I
have
been
really
focused
on
making
sure
our
agencies
are
working
in
partnership
and
we're
excited
to
hear
about
the
raise
grant
that
you're
putting
in
in
competition
with
our
raise
grant.
A
B
A
C
Thank
you
and
madam
mayor,
thank
you
again
for
the
host.
It's
always
great
to
see
you
and
be
part
of
this
tremendous
team
going
forward,
noting
the
time
I
will
go
quickly
for
those
that
would
like
a
copy
of
the
presentation
would
be
more
than
happy
to
send
it.
There
is
a
lot
in
here
and,
like
I
said,
we'll
go
quickly
through
it
stacy.
Thank
you
next
slide.
What
I
thought
I'd
do
is
give
you
an
oversight
of
where
we
are
and
where
we
may
be
going.
C
This
is
2021
expenditures
across
alaveda
county,
the
blue
is
revenue
collected.
The
red
is
expenditures
that
the
commission
has
directed
into
different
cities
in
ada
county.
As
you
can
see,
they
they've
done
a
very
good
job
on
balancing
all
those
dollars
across
the
county.
Next
slide,
please
for
2022,
that's
our
budget.
C
It
is.
We
are
doing
incredibly
well
on
executing
all
those
dollars
across
the
board
and,
of
course,
we'll
keep.
You
present
keep
you
briefed
on
where
we
are
next
slide,
please.
I
thought
I'd
share
with
you,
the
current
inventory
or
what
I
like
to
call
the
current
challenge.
You'll
know
a
common
theme
right
there
and
that's
and
growing
across
the
board.
That's
what
it
looks
like
for
ada
county
right
now
on
all
operations.
Next,
please.
C
C
To
share
with
you
what
we
see
on
a
daily
basis
for
the
last
since
2017
going
forward.
This
is
the
increase
in
development
applications
plan,
submittals
impact
fees,
you
name
it
across
the
board,
and
I
wanted
to
share
with
you
specifically
boise
on
the
growth
that
we're
seeing
in
all
areas
when
it
comes
down
to
impacts
into
ada
county
next,
please,
if
you'll,
look
at
this,
the
green
hashed
on
this
part
of
the
north
boise
is
what
we
already
know
is
entitled
and
such
you
can
see.
C
Next
slide,
please,
the
red
hatched
is
what
you're
seeing
in
the
south
again,
these
are
already
entitled
development
that
all
of
us
will
be
dealing
with
as
we
continue
to
move
forward
into
the
future
next
slide,
and
so
I
wanted
to
quickly
go
through
the
integrated
five-year
work
plan,
it's
composed
of
900
million
plus
in
dollars
for
529
total
projects
going
forward
and,
as
you
can
see
from
the
slide,
that's
what
we're
the
commission
has
through
all
of
our
partners.
C
C
Majority
of
these
dollars
are
put
into
capital
investment
programs
across
the
board
next
slide
and
as
we
break
it
down
a
little
bit,
more
community
programs
has
continued
to
grow
here
at
theater,
county
highway
district
and,
as
you
can
see,
that's
the
end
of
the
trail,
so
905
million
over
the
next
five
years.
That's
the
plan
and
that's
where
we're
allocating
those
dollars
in
those
categories.
Next
slide,
please!
C
So
by
program,
it's
always
good
to
have
a
big
bar
chart
or
a
circle,
and
such
that's
what
it
looks
like
when
it's
all
said
and
done
as
you
can
see,
a
majority
of
those
dollars
are
in
capital
investments
next
slide,
please
boise,
specific
and
again
I'll
run
through
these
quickly.
There
are
a
lot
of
programs
here
and,
if
you'd,
like
the
specifics,
I'm
more
than
happy
to
send
you
the
the
the
presentation,
but
just
for
northwest
boise
next.
C
D
D
C
C
C
C
Now
we
share
the
we're
sharing
these
all
the
specific
cities
for
their
specific
areas
and
such
so
everybody
knows
what
the
great
collaboration
has
produced
when
it
comes
down
to
all
of
your
staffs
and,
of
course,
all
of
you
in
putting
this
together.
So,
madam
mayor,
I
have
hit
my
mark
exactly.
You
said:
10
minutes
10
after
and
there
it
is.
A
Well,
thank
you
director.
I
appreciate
it
and
before
I
ask
brie
to
join
us
to
discuss
and
present
the
pathways
plan,
I
wanted
to
introduce
tim
keane
to
those
of
you
that
haven't
yet
met
him.
Tim's
our
new
planning
development
services
director.
I
know
you've
got
to
head
to
something
else.
I
wasn't
sure
if
you
wanted
to
say
a
couple
things
or
what
the
plan
was.
E
Well,
thank
you
mayor
nice
to
meet
everybody,
and
I
just
got
here
a
few
weeks
ago
and
came
from
atlanta,
georgia,
of
course,
and
spent
seven
years.
There
look
forward
to
working
with
you
and
in
boise
and
the
treasure
valley
on
in
a
growing
place,
dealing
with
mobility,
as
you
all
have
the
one
of
those
sets
of
responsibilities
that
no
no
city
yet
has
figured
out.
So
I'm
looking
forward
to
being
here
with
you
to
try
to
do
it
here
and
like
they
haven't
anywhere
else.
So
thank
you,
mayor.
F
Could
I
ask
bruce
just
one
quick
question
comment:
I
look
forward
to
seeing
the
powerpoint
that
you
just
shared,
because
I
would
like
to
look
at
some
of
those
details
on
that
first
slide.
When
you
showed
the
expenses
were,
though
in
revenues,
could
you
split
out
for
us
which
of
those
revenues
are
federal
and
which
ones
are
local
that
are
being
expended
in
the
various
places.
F
G
Thank
you,
madam
mayor.
Madam
president,
we're
here
today
to
present
an
update
on
our
pathways
master
plan,
which
we
were
before
you
with
last
spring,
at
least
to
the
commission
for
an
update,
as
we
were
kicking
off
our
spring
engagement.
So
now
we're
here
on
the
other
side,
and
we
have
an
overview
to
present
to
you
so
our
pathways
plan.
As
you
know,
the
goal
of
this
plan
is
to
develop
a
robust
system
of
off-street
walking
and
biking
pathways
to
connect
our
residents
without
relying
on
a
vehicle.
G
And
here
you'll
see
the
full
map
of
the
pathway
proposed
pathway
network.
Your
staff
was
incredibly
helpful
in
this
process.
We
were
able
to
overlay
your
regional
low
stress
network
to
show
the
full
picture
of
pathways
in
boise
and
the
impact
that
this
plan
has
when
paired,
with
the
work
that
you
all
do
at
the
district.
G
This
is
pulled
directly
from
our
plan
and
in
this
process
it
shows
how
we
identified
some
of
the
ways
our
two
agencies
might
expect
to
work
together,
for
example,
where
off-street
pathways
connect
to
the
on-street
network.
How
we
might
reflect
that
in
our
project
request
to
you
and
our
comments
on
projects,
things
like
that,
how
we
might
work
together
when
these
situations
arrive.
G
D
Thank
you,
bree
hello,
everyone
dave,
raider,
transportation,
planner,
so
we've
we
see
four
areas
or
categories
in
which
we
can
collaborate
with
achd
to
build
the
pathway
network,
and
one
of
these
areas
is
where
an
off-street
pathway,
intersects
an
on-street
or
achd
road
or
an
on-street
crossing,
there's
also
pathway
segments
that
are
critical
along
arterial,
roadways
and
areas.
We'd
like
to
see
the
low
stress
bike,
network,
expanded
or
augmented
and
areas
of
opportunity
and
unopened
right
away,
oops.
D
So
here's
an
example
of
where
we
could
supplement
the
low
stress
bike
network.
So
here
we're
looking
at
coal
road
and
on
the
left
side
of
the
screen
is
the
spalding
ranch
site
and
down
below
on
the
bottom
side.
You'll
see.
Kingston
kingston
is
currently
not
on
achd's
low
stress
bike
network,
but
adding
that
to
the
network
would
link
up
the
pathway
there.
You
on
the
south
side
of
the
screen.
A
D
Yeah
and
here
we
have
example
of
a
pathway
crossing
an
acht
road,
so
we're
looking
at
collister
drive
in
between,
I
guess
on
the
bottom
side
of
the
screen
screen
is
state
street
and
then
to
the
north.
You
have
bloom
street
and
there,
where
the
red
circle
is,
is
a
pathway
crossing.
So
another
area
of
collaboration
there.
D
D
And
here's
an
example
of
unopened
right-of-way,
so
you
have
the
boise
bike
park
on
the
top
of
the
screen
reserve
street
fort
boise,
all
on
the
top
side
of
the
screen
on
the
bottom.
You
have
mckinley
street
and
there
is
a
unopened
right
away
there
and
also
an
existing
pathway.
D
Next
to
the
fire
station
there
on
reserve
so
opportunity
there
to
enhance
the
network,
and
I
believe
achd
is
looking
at
this
connection
in
the
franklin
street
bikeway
and
something
we've
already
been
coordinating
with
acht
staff
on
so
next
steps
incorporate
on-street
elements
of
these
four
categories
into
our
five-year
work.
D
Plan
requests
prior
to
the
next
joint
meeting,
coordinate
on
achd's
policy
for
multi-use
pass
in
new
developments
and,
more
specifically,
I
think
development
policy
allows
for
a
five
foot
detached
or
seven
foot
attached
sidewalk,
but
trying
to
get
multi-use
paths
pathways
added
to
that
policy,
low
stress,
bikeway
additions
and
unopened
right
away.
F
Madam
here
quick
question,
thank
you.
It
seems
like
there's
one
more
category
that
we
ought
to
be
thinking
about
whether.
F
Sorry
yeah,
I
always
forget,
I
can't
turn
around.
It
seems
like
there's,
perhaps
one
more
category
we
ought
to
be
thinking
about
partnering
on,
and
that
is
where
a
multi-use
path
off-road,
but
parallel
to
the
road
can
take
the
place
of
what
is
really
hard
to
achieve
on-road
and
the
example
I
would
think
of
most
readily
is
the
glenwood
as
it
goes
down
the
hill
from
goddard
to
chinden.
F
It's
going
to
be
very,
very
difficult
to
get
anything
on
that
roadway,
especially
for
bikes,
but
there
is
an
opportunity
I
think,
to
get
a
pathway
up
the
hill
from
the
intersection
at
the
bottom,
along
the
hillside
to
the
west
of
fred
meyer.
There
there's
already
a
desire
trail
there
that
many
many
people
use
and
it
seems
like
a
perfect
opportunity
now.
Yes,
it's
a
multi-use
pathway,
yes,
it's
off-roadway,
but
it
replaces
a
facility
that
you
otherwise
might
want
to
try
to
build,
which
is
some
way
up
that
hill.
H
H
H
I
just
wanted
to
applaud
the
city
staff
for
their
work
and
the
leadership
of
the
city
council
and
the
mayor's
office
for
this,
and
I
think
those
examples
were
completely
spot-on.
In
addition
to
president
clegg's
additional
example
that
we
could
partner,
I
think
this
is
fabulous.
Thank
you.
I
I
have
a
question
about
the:
are
these
treated.
H
As
can
you
have
jim
use
the
microphone.
I
There
we
go,
the
question
is:
are
we
these
treated
as
park,
enhancements
and
so
eligible
for
impact
fees
that
you
charge
for
public
parks?
Is
this?
Is
this
incorporated
into
those
be
interesting
to
know.
G
Sure,
madam
mayor
commission,
council
member
commissioner
hanson,
I
don't
know
specifically
about
the
impact
fee
component,
but
we're
hoping
that
these
will
be
designed
as
context-sensitive
as
possible,
so
in
areas
where
they
go
through
a
park
they'll
match
whatever
that
park
landscape
is
if
it
makes
sense,
if
it's
next
to
a
roadway
for
it
to
be
concrete,
it
will
do
that,
but
we're
exploring
a
lot
of
funding
opportunities
that
could
change
that
as
well.
Right.
I
Yeah,
because
I
know
I
know
a
number
of
your
park
enhancements
are
paid
for
by
by
impact
fees.
Of
course,
our
system
doesn't
allow
us
to
use
this,
and
so
that's
a
big
difference,
but
I'd
I'd
like
to
see
us
working
closely
together
so
that
we
can
have
shared
funding
to
maximize
the
leveraging
of
that
funding.
I
It
just
doesn't
make
sense
that
we
keep
them
separate
the
I
would
encourage
you
also
to
reach
out
each
of
the
five
commissioners
are
very
involved
in
the
development
of
the
specific
projects
in
our
districts,
we're
very
tuned
in
to
where
the
connectivity
gaps
are
so
reaching
out
to
to
each
of
us
to
say:
where?
Is
it
you're
early
on
as
we
as
we
update
the
five-year
plan,
which
would
which
would
really
help
a
lot?
I
I
So
we
need
to
provide
that
that
same
sort
of
commitment
to
the
connectivity
of
pathways,
because
when
they're
connected,
then
people
use
them
when
they're
not
connected
it's
a
it's
a
pathway
to
nowhere.
I
J
Mary,
madam
president,
one
of
the
things
I
think
is
going
to
be
really
helpful
for
us
all
to
be
working
on
together.
Is
that
you
there
is
a
map,
that's
already
in
place
of
potential
pathways
that
are
identified
and
they're
really
kind
of
identified
in
two
different
ways.
One
is
here
are
high
feasibility
ones
that
we
think
are
some
of
our
lower
hanging,
fruit
and
other
ones
that
are
really
high
priority
ones,
and
some
of
the
high
priority
ones
are
really
ones
that
lack
other
infrastructure
or
other
real,
safe
places
to
go.
J
So
you
can
think
about
areas
in
south
boise
areas
close
to
some
of
our
major
roads.
Franklin
overland,
where
there
are
some
really
really
difficult
crossings,
and
because
you
are
in
districts-
and
you
have
folks
who
who
live
in
your
areas,
they
have
a
map
right
now
that
already
identifies
where
some
of
these
pathways
might
be,
and
so
it's
really
important.
J
So
that's
something
that
we're
really
excited
to
work
on
everyone
with
and
to
make
sure
that
we
are
trying
to
find
those
those
low
hanging
fruit,
but
not
forgetting
about
those
high
priority
areas
and
working
hard
to
build
those
long-term
projects
out
there.
B
K
K
K
The
master
stream
map
is
built
upon
several
studies
like
the
2012
south
meridian
transportation
network
analysis
and
the
2009
southwest
boise
transportation
plan,
as
well
as
in
conjunction
with
the
city's
adopted,
comprehensive
plans
and
updates.
This
ensures
that
the
massachusetts
amendment
and
updates
align
with
the
cities
and
counties
vision.
K
K
As
next
steps,
staff
will
continue
coordination
with
multiple
outreach
efforts
with
the
citizen
county,
following
with
additional
work
session
during
the
spring
and
summer
and
come
back
in
front
of
the
commission
for
adoption
consideration
with
this.
I
conclude
my
presentation
will
stand
for
any
questions.
J
Mr
president,
madam
president,
so
question,
and
and
maybe
this
is
for
staff-
or
maybe
it's
maybe
it's-
for
the
commission-
I'm
not
sure
so
when,
when
the
there's
initial
outreach
is
done
to
the
city
and
then
the
city
typically
follows
up
with
comments
or
a
letter
of
some
sort,
and
I
guess
my
question
is
what
what
happens
when
achd
receives
those
comments
and
how
are
those
compliments
integrated
into
that
plan?
K
Memory
clean
present
may
and
city
council.
So,
as
we
work
with
the
staff
members,
we
receive
the
request
and
we
do
an
internal
review
with
our
different
departments
within,
like
our
development
technical
services,
to
review
how
development
development
would
have
impacts
those
specific
requests.
K
But
at
the
same
time
after
we
do
a
specific
review,
those
reviews
we
we
go
back
to
the
city
review
with
them
our
findings,
and
then
we
determine
a
path
forward
just
to
whether
this
er,
this
request
would
need
to
take
a
different
direction
or
it
should
be,
should
need
further
study
to
make
sure
that
it
moved
forward
to
the
to
the
implementation
into
the
master
stream
map.
K
J
And
and
madame
president,
madam
mayor,
just
to
follow
up
there
so
just
to
make
sure
that
I'm
understanding
it
correctly,
we
reach
out
to
the
city.
The
city
provides
some
comments
and
some
feedback
staff
begins
working
together
to
kind
of
figure
out
how
this
might
be
implemented
where
it
might
be
integrated,
then
you
follow
back
up
with
the
city
and
then
eventually
it
goes
to
the
commission
on
whether
or
not
they
adopt
those
recommendations
from
the
two
different
staffs
that
I
kind
of
get
that
correct.
Correct
great.
Thank
you.
Okay,.
I
And
just
it's
perfect
timing,
because
the
city
has
already
provided
specific
requests
in
a
letter
we
received
on
march
17th,
I
was
hoping
maybe
edinson
would
go
over
those
requests,
but
perhaps
we
don't
have
enough
time,
but
my
assumption
and
it's
my
position
that
these
should
be
incorporated
into
the
master
street
map
because
they
reflect
the
city's
view
of
where
the
comprehensive
planning
process
is
going.
I
You're
more
familiar
with
development
patterns
and,
what's
in
the
in
the
works
than
the
the
transportation
agency
is
and
that
these
should
be
incorporated
into
them
and
it
it
should
shouldn't
take
a
huge
amount
of
effort
on
behalf
of
the
city
to
try
and
find
out
if
in
fact,
they
are
being
incorporated.
I
This
is
entirely
the
city's
responsibility
to
bring
these
to
us,
and
so
the
city
has
done
that
city
of
boise
has
I
I
don't
know
if
the
other
cities
have
done
this,
and
so
the
march
17th
letter,
as
you
know,
because
you
guys
signed
it
or
sent
it
should
be
incorporated
into
that
and
there's
one
thing
I
want
us
to
be
really
clear
at
the
master
street
map
is
really
really
critical
and
it's
and
it
does
have
a
lot
of
cost
consequences.
I
While
it's
not
a
guarantee
that
there's
this
is
going
to
be
the
design.
This
is
going
to
be
the
ultimate
configuration.
It
also
doesn't
say
that
that
development's
entitled
to
have
these,
but
what
happens
is
that
we
then
move
forward
in
acquiring
right
away,
and
that's
a
lot.
I
mean
that's
the
use
of
our
eminent
domain
power
to
take
private
property
in
order
to
anticipate
we
might
be
building
it
this
way,
because
the
master
street
map
has
given
us
that
indication
we
might
be
doing
this.
I
The
other
is
that
then
development
comes
to
rely
on
that,
even
though
it's
not
a
guarantee,
it's
not
an
entitlement.
Development
then
says
eventually
we're
going
to
have
this
configuration
of
these
roads,
and
so
they
start
spending
private
money
and
start
lining
up.
So
there
actually
is
a
significant
financial
consequence
to
putting
something
in
the
master
street
map
or
not
changing
something
when
something
has
in
fact
changed
within
the
city's
comprehensive
plan
or
their
vision.
B
Thank
you
edson.
I
know
you're
not
prepared
to
speak
to
that
letter
today
with
a
presentation,
but
if
we
could
get
a
follow-up
as
to
the
status
of
that
and
where
we
are
in
addressing
the
letter
that
we
did
receive
from
the
city
of
boise,
that
would
be
helpful
and
I'm
glad
that
the
point
was
brought
up
too,
that
there's
no,
as
these
changes
take
place,
rezoning,
etc.
Reach
out
to
us,
there's
no
time
constraint
or
specific
period
of
time
that
you
can
only
submit
something
to
us.
So
this
is
ongoing.
B
F
Thank
you.
Thanks
for
the
presentation
and
just
a
little
bit
of
follow-up
on
the
conversation,
I
appreciate
that
you
will
get
back
to
us,
but
I
I
guess
I
would
note
that
the
process
right
now
is
pretty
reactive
and
that
there's
nothing
in
it
that
triggers
any
kind
of
a
comprehensive
review.
When
this
was
first
developed.
It
was
developed
in
concurrent
with
the
livable
streets.
Design
guide.
F
You've
recently
made
at
least
one
change
that
is
pretty
significant
to
that,
and
that
is
no
more
on-street
bike
lanes
on
very
big
arterials,
but
off-street
multi-use
paths,
so
it
it
seems
to
me
that
there
might
be
a
time
when
we'd
have
a
little
more
comprehensive
process
where
we'd
look
not
just
at
the
master
street
map,
but
also
at
the
livable
streets,
design,
guide
and
see
if
those
things
are
keeping
up
with
the
development
pattern
that
we're
seeing
today,
especially
as
we
begin
to
work
through
our
new
zoning
code
and
our
desire
to
create
more
mixed-use
activity,
centers,
many
of
which
are
on
arterial
roadways,
is
that
livable
streets,
design
guide
and
the
accompanying
master
streets
map.
F
In
keeping
with
the
zoning
changes
that
we're
proposing.
I
don't
know
what
that
process
is.
I
know
it's
a,
but
it's
a
bigger
process
than
asking
us
to
produce
something
for
you
that
then
you
react
to,
or
vice
versa.
I
think
it's
a
more
collaborative
process
of
some
kind
and
would
propose
that
that
we
think
about
that
because
of
all
of
the
changes
that
have
occurred
in
the
last
10
years,
since
it
was
first
produced.
F
In
addition,
I
guess
I
look
forward
to
seeing
the
the
response
to
our
letter.
I
guess
and-
and
it
would
be
good
to
make
sure
that
as
we
partner
on
these
things,
that
the
partnership
does
have
a
good
two-way
communication
channel
and
if
we
send
something
we
get
something
back
and
vice
versa.
If
you
send
us
something,
we
make
sure
and
get
you
something
back.
So
we
all
know
what
the
answer
is
to
the
questions
we've
been
asking
each
other.
F
B
You
thank
you,
council,
president
clegg,
timely
and
very
very
good
suggestions,
so
we
can
certainly
follow
up
on
that
and
do
something
going
forward.
Take
a
look
at
that
edinson
all
right!
Madam
president,.
L
I
just
have
one
thought
to
tag
on
to
that.
So
last
night
we
had
one
of
our
zoning
code
rewrite
outreach
meetings
with
the
north
end,
neighborhood
association
and
easton
neighborhood
association,
and
this
very
topic
came
up.
Somebody
asked
you
know
how
how
is
achd
collaborating
with
the
city
as
you
move
forward
in
this
zoning
code
rewrite
and
how
do
those
two
things
interact,
and
so
I
think
that
much
like
what
council
president
clegg
was
saying.
L
You
know
us
us,
making
a
zoning
code,
a
new
zoning
code
and
then
having
a
chd
react
to
that
might
not
be
as
productive
as
having
a
chd
at
the
table
with
our
staff
as
we're
working
through
that
zoning
code
update,
and
so
I
guess
I
would
just
encourage
that-
encourage
greater
collaboration,
because
transportation
is
so
much
of
what
we're
trying
to
build
into
the
zoning
code
and
making
sure
that
people
can
get
around
in
multiple
ways,
not
just
by
cars,
so
that
we
can
reduce
congestion
in
our
city.
L
And
so
I
would
just
really
ask
for
ask
for
that
to
happen.
I'm
not
totally
sure
how
that
happens,
but
if
we
can
just
keep
it
all
top
of
mind.
Yes,
absolutely.
B
J
Then,
president,
madame,
if
there's
not
another
question,
I
might
have
one
more,
but
I've
already
asked
one.
So
I
don't
know
if
anyone
else
all
right,
so
I
guess
just
to
kind
of
be
a
little
bit
more
clear
on
the
process.
So
we
submit
comments
or
requests
for
the
for
the
update
on
the
master
street
map
and
our
staff
works
on
taking
those
into
account.
I'm
going
to
assume
that
sometimes
maybe
the
commission
doesn't
adopt
all
of
those
updates,
maybe
that's
a
wrong
assumption,
but
maybe
that's
happened
before
so.
J
I
guess
my
question
is
so
when
we
send
comments
or
requests
and
an
example
might
be
like.
In
the
last
one,
we've
asked
to
reclassify
a
couple:
neighborhood
residential
arterials
in
south
boise.
If
the
commission
decides
that
they
don't
want
to
update
those
or
if
staff
decides
that
they
don't
want
to
update
those.
Does
that
come
back
to
council
for
a
conversation
between
council
members
and
commissioners
or
does
it
if
it's
not
the
will
of
staff
and
if
it's
not
the
will
of
the
commission,
does
that
potentially
not
get
adopted
without
there
being
another
conversation.
B
No
council,
member
hallie
burton
no
absolutely
there
would
be
a
follow-on
dialogue
before
something
like
that
would
take
place,
and
I
think
edinson
touched
on
that
that
it's
a
collaborative
process,
so
you
submit
staff,
takes
a
look
at
it.
They
meet
with
your
staff,
look
at
the
projects,
the
path
forward
and
then
there's
there's
an
agreement
there,
so
that
you
would
definitely
be
part
of
that
part
of
that
process.
Perfect.
J
B
I
Want
to
clarify
my
experience
in
the
past
is
that
hasn't
been
as
explicit
as
what
we're
trying
to
make
clear
now
is
that,
yes,
that
has
to
be
part
of
the
process
and
council
member
clegg
pointed
out
specifically.
If
we
want
you
know,
we
don't
aren't
too
sure
about
a
specific
area,
but
we
want
to
have
a
process
to
be
to
drill
down.
I
I
I
think
that
we
owe
the
city
a
commitment
to
say
we
will
engage
in
that
process
and
we
will
engage
in
that
process
before
we
update
where
we
move
forward
on
spending
any
more
money
at
that
area,
because
I
think
that's
really
critical
and
I'd
like
to
see
that
being
done
in
the
next
nine
months
or
a
year
so
that
we
can.
We
can
make
it
clear,
because
that
is
your
request
rather
than
just
to
sort
of
leave.
I
It
so
you,
the
letter
the
city
has
proposed
is
a
is
a
broader
process
with
southwest
boise
and
then
a
series
of
very
specific
requests.
That
probably
don't
need
a
complex
process.
It's
just
these.
These
would
be
to
make
it
more
consistent
with
our
master
with
our
comprehensive
plan.
So
I
appreciated
your
comment
because
I
think
in
the
past
it
hasn't
been
that
clear
and
deliberate.
There
is
an
expectation
that
it
will
come
to
the
commission
and
that
it
will
come
to
the
council
before
final
decisions
are
made.
Yeah.
G
J
B
M
Madam
mayor
president
may
ryan
head
planning
manager
at
achd.
I
am
the
liaison
to
the
city
and
it's
always
a
pleasure
to
see
your
faces
in
particular,
to
have
seen
him
in
person
again
recently.
M
I
thought
it
would
was
better
today,
though,
to
introduce
the
real
expert
who's,
the
guy
behind
all
the
money
and
all
the
grant,
writing,
and
so
tom
firsch,
for
my
team
will
be
making
this
presentation.
N
N
N
N
The
five
million
dollar
mill
threshold
well
exceeded
funds
needed
to
plan
and
design
any
single
achd
project.
That's
an
integrated
five-year
work
plan
and
something
else
new
this
year
was
the
identification
of
historically
disadvantaged
communities.
N
To
meet
the
administration's
justice,
40
goal
of
delivering
40
of
overall
federal
investment
in
climate
and
clean
energy
to
disadvantaged
communities.
The
federal
highway
administration
developed
a
map
to
identify
such
communities
using
census,
data
and
omb
analysis.
The
criteria
used
are
transportation,
access,
health,
environmental,
economic
resilience
and
social
projects
within
historically
disadvantaged
communities
are
favored
and
may
qualify
for
a
hundred
percent
federal
funding.
N
So,
as
you
can
see
on
this
map
at
the
the
top
portion
is
garden
city
and
it
is
separated
from
the
other
two
by
the
bench.
N
N
So
these
three
communities
have
physical
barriers
that
separate
them
from
each
other
and
restrict
access
to
other
parts
of
the
boise
area
and
garden
city
area
and
then
they've
also
been
identified
as
historically
disadvantaged
by
the
criteria
that
was
mentioned
earlier.
N
N
Ray's
applications
are
due
on
april
14th.
We
are
finalizing
the
application
this
week
with
the
goal
of
submitting
the
application
on
april
12th.
That's
our
goal.
I
will
it's
interesting
to
note
earlier
conversation.
Councilwoman
clegg
mentioned
the
desire
path
on
glenwood,
and
that
is
the
picture.
The
the
second
one
from
the
left
is
a
cyclist
ascending
to
the
top
of
the
bench
there
on
glenwood
and
mountain
view,
and
I
will
stand
for
questions.
F
Thank
you,
madam
president.
Thank
you
tom
good,
to
see
the
presentation
of
this
I've
been
hearing
about
it,
but
had
not
seen
some
of
the
details.
So
I
guess
you
know
it
is
where
it
is
and
we
support
it
and
we
want
it
to
go
forward.
I
wonder
if
there
are
ways
to
partner
in
the
future,
if
you're
successful
in
extending
some
of
these
and
if
you're
not
successful
in
building
another
grant,
that
might
include
some
other
things.
F
So
the
the
two
things
specifically
that
I
saw
that
I'd
heard
about
but
didn't
know
if
we're
going
to
be
in
the
grant,
are
a
crossing
of
chindin
at
43rd.
I
think
I
saw
one
at
38th
and
one
at
50th,
but
not
at
43rd,
and
I
thought
that
there
was
some
discussion
of
that.
F
The
other
is,
I
think
you
know
that
we
have
approached
compass
in
the
past
about
a
pedestrian
crossing
of
the
connector
somewhere
between
liberty
and
alaba.
If
you're
going
to
improve
the
connection
on
alibaba,
it
seems
like
it
would
be
hooves
to
think
about.
Is
that
the
right
place
to
connect
over
the
connector,
and
is
that
a
future
project?
F
If
folks
can
get
down
the
hill
from
the
west
bench
and
get
across
china
relatively
near
veterans,
memorial
parkway,
I
know,
there's
also
potentially
another
pedestrian
bridge
there.
They
can
access
the
things
on
state
street
and
vice
versa.
Folks
can
get
across
the
connector
without
having
to
use
a
car.
They
can
access
the
jobs
at
the
mall
area
at
the
hospital
and
all
of
those
those
jobs,
I
think,
are
really
important
ones
for
for
folks
to
be
able
to
access.
F
So
my
only
comment
is
great
project
really
appreciate
you
taking
the
ball
and
running
with
it
on
the
equity
end
of
it,
and
I
think
hopefully
this
is
just
the
beginning
of
of
what
we
could
do
in
this
area.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
N
I
just
wanted
to
inform
councilwoman
clegg
that
the
43rd
crossing
is
currently
funded
with
tap
funds,
we're
in
the
process
of
designing
it.
So
it
didn't
show
up
on
this
map
because
it'll
be
hopefully
completed
by
then.
B
Very
good,
thank
you,
councilmember
woody
thank.
L
You,
madam
president,
madam
mayor,
thank
you
tom.
If
this
seems
like
it
just
feels
like
there's
so
much
federal
funding
out
there,
I'm
really
glad
to
see
the
achd
is
working
to
take
advantage
of
some
of
it
as
well.
L
I
saw
on
your
list
of
folks
who
had
offered
letters
of
support
the
central
foothills
neighborhood
association,
which
I
thought
was
an
interesting
neighborhood
association
for
this,
and
it
brought
up
the
question:
have
you
been
able
to
reach
out
to
the
neighborhood
associations
where
these
projects
are
are
located
like
the
central
bench
and
winstead
park,
and
maybe
some
others.
N
Madam
president,
madam
mayor
councilwoman
woodings,
yes,
we
with
city
staff
was
very
helpful
to
help
us
reach
out
and
connect,
and
it
was
it
was.
It
was
kind
of
interesting
who
who
was
interested
in
responding.
We,
we
could
probably
do
in
the
future
a
more
aggressive
approach
to
getting
in
contact,
but
it
was
a
matter
of
the
amount
of
time
the
the
short
turnaround
time.
L
B
L
B
Absolutely
madam
chair,
yes,
councilmember
sanchez.
O
Thank
you
so
much.
I
I
just
want
to
thank
you
so
much
for
focusing
on
on
communities
that
are
really
vulnerable
when
it
comes
to
making
use
of
of
transportation
that
that
really
requires
them
to
put
their
bodies
at
risk,
and
it's
not
a
choice.
It's
not
a
lifestyle
choice.
It's
it's
a
necessity
and
you
know
poor
people
can't
afford
to
have
accidents,
and
it
really
swells
my
heart
to
think
of
of
folks
making
a
concerted
effort
to
make
sure
that
their
needs
are
met.
O
They
don't
have
lobbyist
groups
to
advocate
for
them
and
so
just
very
deeply
from
the
bottom
of
my
heart.
I
thank
you
for
working
in
in
service
to
them.
H
Thank
you.
I
just
want
to
do
one
point
of
clarification.
Mayor
mclean
opened
up
with
stating
that
this
was
in
competition
with
vrt
and
boise
the
city
of
boise's
application
for
state
street,
and
I
just
want
to
clarify
that
this
is
a
tom
mentioned
this,
but
this
is
a
planning
grant
versus
the
vrt
state
street.
H
One
is
design
and
implementation,
so
they're
different
buckets
of
funding,
which
we
were
really
intentional
about
making
sure
that
we
weren't
in
competition
with
each
other,
and
we
brought
as
much
federal
dollars
into
our
shared
communities.
A
Madam
president,
I
actually
was
going
to
jump
in
and
correct
myself
because
brie
clarified
as
well
that
this
is
a
planning
grant,
and
so
I
think
that
there's
great
opportunity
to
continue
the
conversation,
even
if
it's
submitted
this
way,
if
there
are
different
connections
or
things
that
we
could
do
together
to
complement
each
other.
Given
that
this
is
in
its
planning
stages
rather
than
a
capital
request
and
then
prepare
for
the
capital
request.
That
might
include
a
little
bit
more
and
we.
A
We
are
supportive
of
this
because,
as
it's
been
noted,
I
mean
I
want
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
traffic
congestion
and
different
ways
of
getting
to
work
to
support
economic
development.
But
in
this
one
in
particular
appreciate
that
the
agency
saw
opportunity
with
this
federal
grant
program.
That
is
targeting
at-risk
neighborhoods
and
we've
got
lots
of
them
here
too,
and
we've
seen
debate
discussion
as
to
whether
or
not
targeting
like
that
is
appropriate.
A
That
creates
economic
opportunity
for
our
residents.
And
it's
for
that
reason
that
we're
really
happy
to
support
this.
In
the
same
way
that
we've
made
supporting
the
vrt
raise
grant
a
top
priority
for
the
city,
because
we
have
to
create
ways
for
people
within
our
road
networks
to
get
to
work,
that
don't
have
cars
and
in
doing
that,
we're
also
lessening
the
congestion
of
those
that
do
get
to
work
by
cars.
And
so,
as
we
look
at
all
of
these
things,
how
we
work
together
for
us.
A
It
really
is
in
that
opportunity
lens
of
how
can
we
create
a
system
that
recognizes
our
region
is
growing?
There
are
infrastructure
needs
that
includes
ways
to
get
fewer
people
on
the
roads,
get
them
safely
to
work
in
different
ways
to
lighten
up
the
pressure
on
those
that
do
use
the
roads
for
their
cars,
and
so
it's
for
those
reasons
that
vrt's
raise
grant
remains
a
priority
and
that
we
want
to
keep
working
with
you
from
a
planning
perspective
to
be
supportive
of
your
grant.
Requests
as
well.
I
Thank
you.
We
appreciate
it.
Thank
you
and
president
yeah
just
I
want
to
just
give
a
huge
amount
of
credit
to
commissioner
pickering,
because
in
the
process
of
identifying
this,
I
think
it
was
her
leadership
more
than
any
who
really
understood
the
demographics
of
the
neighborhood
she
represented.
I
If
it's
not
surprising-
and
she
said
we
can
do
this,
we
ought
to
do
this
and
it
was
her
leadership
that
pushed
the
agency
and
the
rest
of
the
commission
to
look
at
this,
and
because
achc
doesn't
look
at
equity
and
demographics,
the
kind
of
things
the
city
does.
When
we
decide
where
we're
going
to
put
put
projects,
we
don't
measure
those
we.
You
know.
I
We
predominantly
measure
how
cars
move,
that's
our
predominant
measurement
and
it
should
come
as
no
surprise
when
you
look
at
the
map
that
the
neighborhoods
that
qualify
are
along
two
state
highways
chindin
and
the
connector,
and
that's
something
that
should
also
be
a
lesson
to
us
that
that
the
way
in
which
we
build
transportation,
infrastructure,
big,
huge
transportation
infrastructure,
can
have
a
very
devastating
impact
on
neighborhoods
cut
them
off,
make
it
very
difficult
to
cross.
I
There's
a
picture,
I
think
it's
the
the
right
picture
right
now.
People
can't
cross
on
emerald
over
the
over
the
connector,
it
cuts
neighborhoods
off
and
when
that
happens,
we
don't
get
investment
in
those
neighborhoods,
and
so
they
have
further
and
further
away
to
go
to
schools
and
to
shops
and
to
other
things.
So
I
think
it's
really
important
that
we
not
then
create
other
places
by
building
huge
transportation,
huge
highways
huge
without
understanding
exactly
what
the
implications
are.
I
The
long-term
implications
are
for
private
investments
in
those
neighborhoods
and
that
we
preserve
the
ability
for
future
generations
to
keep
re
reinvesting
in
those
and
and
and
not
cut
them
off.
So
I
think
it's
really
important.
I
just
and
I
really
appreciated
early.
You
know
we
were
up
against
the
deadline,
but
commissioner
pickering
was
the
one
that
really
to
my
impression,
lit
the
fire
that
got
this
going
and
and
deserves
the
credit.
J
Thank
you,
madam
mayor.
Madam
president,
I
can
be
really
quick.
I
just
want
to
commend
both
the
staff
commissioners
and
the
leadership
over
at
achd
for
this
grant
application.
It's
a
great
application.
There's
some
specific
things
like
connecting
you
stick
through
garden
city
to
the
green
belt,
where
you're
working
in
multiple
jurisdictions
and
those
types
of
connections
are
just
awesome
to
see,
and
I
think
that
really
helps
us
build
those
partnerships
going
forward.
J
There's
also
some
really
cool
spots
on
there
that
are
going
to
be
a
great
overlay
with
the
pathways
master
plan.
There
was
a
connection
on
irving
that
goes
right
over
the
top
of
one
of
the
pathways
that
we
had
identified
or
right
next
to,
I
should
say,
are
intersex
one
of
those
pathways,
and
so
it's
gonna
be
really
really
exciting.
J
A
That
was
the
the
last
time
we
were
just
a
couple
minutes
over.
I
just
wanted
before
we
break
are
there?
Is
there
any
questions
from
staff
in
terms
of
next
steps
follow-ups
and
it's
fine?
If
the
answer
is
no,
I
just
want
to
do
this
now.
If
there
is
madam.
C
Mayor,
if
I
could
very
quickly
to
commissioner
excuse
me
councilman's
clay
question
95
of
the
jurisdictional
revenue
is
local.
5
was
federal,
we'll
have
specific
numbers
for
you
next
week.
B
Adjourned
all
right,
and
thank
you
very
much
to
you,
mayor,
mclean
and
and
the
boise
city
council
for
having
us
and
staff
from
what
the
city
of
boise
and
achd
for
your
presentations
today
we've
enjoyed
it.
It
was
nice
to
be
here
in
person
and
see
everybody
not
just
up
on
a
screen.
So
thank
you
all
very
much,
and
with
that
I
will
call
the
meeting
adjournment
for
the
achd
site.
Thank
you.