►
From YouTube: Design Review Committee
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
All
right
so
for
tonight
we
have
six
items
on
the
agenda.
Number
one
is
a
two
building
commercial
development
on
Overland
Road.
We
would
recommend
that
for
the
consent
agenda,
I
have
number
two
is
a
industrial
building
on
Victory
view
way.
We
recommend
that
for
the
consent
agenda.
B
Number
three:
the
new
parking
garage
on
the
airport
property.
We
would
recommend
number
four
is
a
modification
of
a
previously
approved
multi-family
development.
We
would
also
recommend
that
for
the
consent
agenda
number
five
new
multi-family
building
on
Denton
recommending
that
for
the
consent
agenda,
may
have
some
public
in
attendance,
we're
not
sure
yet
so
just
kind
of
keep
a
close
eye
on
that
foreign
number,
six
on
Fairview
a
new
multi-family
building.
We
would
propose
that
for
the
consent
agenda
as
well.
B
B
Aguilar,
can
you
turn
your
microphone?
Sorry.
D
I
have
a
minor
concern
and
I
don't
know
if
I
need
to
maybe
recuse
myself
on
this,
but
with
regards
to
the
parking
garage
at
the
airport,
because
I
could
not
I'm
gonna
go
to
it
here,
see
it
clearly
on
this
middle
package,
and
this
could
be
totally
at
staff
level
because
that
you
kind
of
you
talk
about
it
in
your
conditions
of
approval
a
little
bit
but
I'm
just
concerned
about
pedestrian
access
from
the
FBO,
the
Jet
Center
area.
Okay,
to
that
garage,
I.
B
B
C
B
Good
good
point:
Mr
chairman:
there
are
the
minutes
from
last
time
that
we
weren't
quite
sure
what
to
do
with
and
our
recommendation
and
those
are
those
minutes
from
2018
that
were
just
never
approved
and
forwarded
to
council
as
required.
So
our
recommendation
is
that
the
motion
is
to
forward
those
minutes
to
council,
not
not
that
you
are
approving
them,
that
you
are
forwarding
them
to
council.
E
Josh
with
regard
to
the
the
minutes
in
the
agenda,
you
call
you
it
says
here:
there's
a
March
14th
minutes
in
the
packet.
This
is
the
design
review
committee
meeting
of
February
14th.
C
F
B
Okay,
with
no
further
concerns
we'll
get
started
here
in
about
10
minutes,
thanks
Josh.
B
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
C
All
right
good
evening,
at
this
time,
I'd
like
to
call
the
December
14th
2022
design,
Review
Committee,
to
order
Christina
Hugh.
Please
call
the
roll.
A
C
Absent,
thank
you
for
shorter
business
I'd
like
to
take
a
motion
for
the
October
12
2022
minutes.
You
could.
C
And
seconded,
thank
you
Mr
stead.
Can
you
please
call
the
roll.
A
Dybala
hi
routine,
absent
Marsh,
Aguilar,
aye,
Zuckerman
hi.
First
then.
C
Next,
we
have
a
couple
of
items
that
you're
looking
for
a
motion
to
forward
the
following
minutes
to
city
council:
these
are
from
March
14th,
2018
and
design.
Review
Committee
mean
it's
from
June
13
2018..
So
again,
looking
for
a
motion
to
forward
those
to
city
council
so
moved.
E
C
Next,
we'll
move
on
to
the
creation
of
our
consent
agenda
with
a
couple
items
up
for
consideration
on
the
consent
agenda.
The
first
is
item
number
one
item
number
one
is
drh,
22-00394
location
is
10,
100,
West
Overland,
it's
for
the
construction
of
two
new
single
story:
multi-tenant
commercial
buildings.
Totally
in
approximately
sixteen
thousand
six
hundred
square
feet
with
Associated
site
improvements
on
a
property
in
an
r2d
zone
is
the
applicant
present
today,
please
let
the
record
show
the
applicant
is
present.
Is
the
applicant
in
agreement
with
the
recommended
conditions
of
approval?
C
C
So
with
that,
we
will
have
this
moved
on
to
the
consent
agenda.
Next
item
to
be
considered
for
consent
agenda
is
item
number
two:
it's
drh-22-00414
locations,
2667
South,
Victory
view
way.
It's
for
the
construction
of
a
new,
approximately
33,
700
square
foot,
single
story,
industrial
building
with
Associated
site
improvements
on
a
in
an
M1
d-zone.
Excuse
me
is
the
applicant
present
tonight.
C
C
Do
you
would
we
like
to
hear
this
item?
Okay,
we'll
hear
this
item
for
tonight,
so
we
can
clarify
that
next
item
to
be
considered
for
our
consent.
Agenda's
item
number
four:
it's
Dr
h22-00411
location
is
17.
I'm,
sorry,
170,
South,
28th
Street
to
modify
a
previously
approved
multifamily
project.
Increasing
the
unit
count
to
196
units
in
a
C5
d
zone
is
the
applicant
presence.
C
D
C
Thank
you
very
much.
Is
there
any?
Member
of
the
excuse
me
any
members
of
the
public
wishing
to
testify
in
opposition
to
this
item
tonight,
either
in
person
or
virtually
seeing
none
in
person
or
virtually
we'll
move?
This
item
to
our
consent
agenda
and
the
next
item
to
be
consider
is
item
number
five.
It's
drh22-00257
location
is
6160
West
Denton
streets
for
the
construction
of
a
new
five-story
multi-family
building
with
201
residential
units
and
structured
parking
in
a
property
in
an
l-o-d-d-a
zone
is
the
applicant
present
tonight.
C
Yes,
please
record
sure
the
applicant
is
present
and
are
you
in
agreement
with
the
terms
and
conditions
within
the
staff
report?
Yes,
besides,
the
record
show
that
the
applicant
is
in
agreements
any.
Is
there
any
member
of
the
public
wishing
to
testify
in
opposition
to
this
either
in
person
or
virtually
see?
None
in
person,
then
virtually
we'll
move
this
item
over
to
the
consent
agenda
as
well.
Final
item
to
be
considered
for
our
consent
agenda
is
item
number
six:
it's
drh
22-00409
locations,
2420
West,
Fairview,
Avenue,
it's
for
the
construction
of
a
new
six
story.
G
C
Is
that
the
record
show
the
applicant
is
present
in?
Are
you
in
agreement
with
the
terms
and
conditions
within
the
snap
report?
Yes,
is
the
direction
of
the
applicant
is
in
Agreements?
Are
there
any
members
of
the
public
wishing
to
testify
in
opposition
to
this
item,
either
in
person
or
virtually
seeing
none
in
person
virtually
Josh
see
none
these?
This
will
also
be
added
to
the
consent
agenda,
and
that
concludes
our
items
for
tonight's
consent.
Agenda
and
I
would
be
open
for
emotion,
Mr.
C
You
second
and
seconded,
thank
you,
Mr
stead.
We've
been
seconded
any
discussion
on
the
motion
at
this
point.
C
Thank
you
all
first
item
on
a
regular
to
be
heard
tonight
is.
C
J
J
J
The
staff
has
reviewed
analyzed
the
site,
design,
landscape,
designs
and
building
designs,
and
we
find
that
the
proposed
project
complies
with
the
city
code
findings.
Therefore,
we
don't
have
any
size
specific
conditions.
We
recommend
approval
of
drh-22-00414.
C
Thank
you
very
much.
Questions
for
staff
at
all
is
the
applicant
present.
Would
you
like
to
come
up
and
say
anything
at
this
point,
or
do
you
want
to
hear
with
public
Essa
questions?
Okay?
Well,
at
this
time,
we'll
open
it
up
to
the
public
for
questions
so
ma'am.
If
you'd
like
to
come
forward
and
state
your
name
and.
K
Candy
Walker
2576
South
Maple
Grove
Road,
so
this
building
is
on
the
east
side
of
us.
I
just
want
to
know
if
the
lighting
is
all
going
to
be
facing
Eastward
and
what
about
the
fencing
in
between
us
and
Them.
C
Okay,
any
other
questions.
Nope.
Okay,
thank
you.
Are
there
any
other
members
of
public
wishing
to
testify
on
this
item?
I,
don't
think,
there's
a
member
of
the
neighborhood
association
here
either
seen.
None
I
would
turn
it
over
for
the
applicant
for
and
if
you
would
please
just
state
your
name
and
address
for
the
record
West.
L
Steel,
steel
architecture,
P.O
box,
245,
Eagle
Idaho.
If
we
could
put
the
site
plan
up.
L
Yeah,
so
on
the
west
side
of
the
building
and
the
south
side
of
the
building,
so
there
will
be
no
pole
mounted
parking
lot
lights
proposed
with
the
application
only
building
mounted
lights,
with
a
downward
facing
light
fixture
with
cutoff
lenses.
So
that
light
will
not
leave
the
property
as
it's
intended
to
by
the
city
code.
L
We
have
one
at
grade
overhead
door
on
the
west
side
of
the
building,
one
overhead
at
grade
door
on
the
south
side
of
the
building,
and
there
would
be
a
light
mounted
above
those
doors
to
provide
access
and
at
dim
times
for
the
for
the
occupant.
But
that's
all
that
will
be
facing
the
South
and
and
West
sides.
L
L
So
where
are
we
at
here?
I,
don't
know
if
this
will
work
if
I
shoot
it
at
it,
does
it
work
or
just
advancing?
So
the
middle
view
is
the
one
that
predominantly
faces
West
and
then
faces
South.
So
I
guess
actually
there's
five
proposed
lights
that
because
there
is
a
driveway
on
the
west
side
and
then
there's
just
the
one
over
the
overhead
door
on
the
west
side.
I
believe
excuse.
C
Me,
sir,
do
you
mind
just
yeah
I.
L
L
I
believe
the
the
intention
is
to
to
put
up
a
six
foot
high
chain
link
fence
on
the
property
line.
Potentially
they
Denise
hasn't
decided.
Yet,
if
that's
truly,
if
she's
going
to
go
through
with
that
or
not
so
I
she's
definitely
willing
to
talk
to
you
any
any
concerns
that
you
guys
have
so
I
had
a
meeting
with
her
earlier
this
week,
and
so
she
was
I,
know:
they've
been
out
of
town
a
little
bit
and
but
yeah
she's
more
than
more
than
willing
to
discuss
that
with
you
guys.
H
L
The
best
way
to
get
a
hold
of
her
events,
just
just
call
them
directly,
so
she's
been
traveling
they're
back
in
town
for
a
little
bit,
so
she's
she's
been
out.
L
F
Chair
I
just
wanted
to
add
the
point
of
clarification
too.
It
looks
like
on
the
landscape
plan.
There's
10
trees
along
that
Western
Property
boundary,
along
with
some
low
shrubs,
as
is
required
by
code,
so
I
feel
like
that
probably
helps
mitigate
a
little
bit
of
light
at
all,
as
well
as
helping
screen
visually
there
too.
So
just
for
the
Neighbors
benefit.
C
F
H
C
Next
item
is
item
number
three
drh22-00-338
3201,
West,
Airport,
Ray
and
I.
Think
there's
some
site
questions.
Caitlyn
I'll
turn
it
over
to
you
when
you're
ready.
H
Mr
chair,
if
I
could
interject
I
am
going
to
recuse
myself
just
due
to
some
similarities
of
name
attached
to
understand.
C
M
M
We
have
some
site
context
drawings,
showing
the
buildings
there.
Now
that
will
be
removed.
M
And
then
we
have
the
new
parking
facility
and
then
the
employee
parking
garage
to
the
north
is
also
under
construction.
Right
now,
I
believe
the
committee
wanted
to
discuss
site
connectivity
and
pedestrian
connections.
So
if
we
zoom
in
here
this
is
Rickenbacker
Street.
Here
it's
like
an
internal
drive
on
the
airport
property.
M
Believe
the
new
employee,
parking
garage,
I
think
there's
existing
sidewalk
here,
but
I
believe
they're
putting
in
a
detached
sidewalk
here
as
well,
and
then
staff
did
have
a
condition
of
approval
for
the
applicant
to
demonstrate
that
The
Pedestrian
connectivity
makes
sense
and
is
safe
in
this
area,
just
because
there's
a
lot
going
on,
so
we
would
just
ask
that
they
come
to
us
with
some
kind
of
plan
that
shows
how
they
anticipate
people
to
move
through
the
site
and
to
the
adjacent
sites.
C
D
N
Yes
ma'am
as
part
of
the
cup.
This
was
a
specific
issue.
The
planner
brought
up
and
we'd
addressed
and
discussed
with
them
and
same
similar
question,
and
so
what
we
are
talking
to
them
about
and
as
and
as
stated
tonight,
we'll
continue
to
develop
that,
but
based
on
the
function
of
this
facility,
there's
a
lot
of
vehicles
coming
and
going
on
the
south
side
of
Rickenbacker.
So
our
intent
on
phase
one
is
to
transition
that
traffic
at
Luke
across
to
the
existing
sidewalk
to
the
north
of
Rickenbacker.
N
Again,
you've
got
visiting
traffic
coming
and
going
there
and
then
also
during
phase
one
you'll
have
a
lot
more.
You'll
still
continue
to
have
the
vehicle
traffic
from
the
rental
car
agencies,
it'll
move
vehicles
to
and
from
that
site.
So
there'll
be
a
lot
of
vehicle
movement
there.
N
On
that
south
side-
and
we
can
continue
to
have
those
discussions
but
in
discussion
with
the
airport
as
the
owner
they've
they've,
stated,
they'd
want
us
to
maintain
that
safe
pedestrian
traffic
and
get
keep
that
flow
down
Rickenbacker
into
the
terminal
itself.
Thank.
D
G
C
C
No
with
that,
we'll
close
that
portion
of
the
public
portion
of
the
hearing
bring
back
to
the
committee
for
a
motion
and
discussion.
C
F
E
Thanks
yeah,
that
I
would
revise
the
design
review
number
to.