►
From YouTube: Design Review Committee - 7/8/2020
Description
Please visit the following link for information on how to testify during virtual public hearings:
https://www.cityofboise.org/departments/finance-and-administration/city-clerk/virtual-meetings/
A
A
C
C
F
H
H
H
F
I
H
J
F
And
welcome
to
the
July
8th
meeting
of
the
disease's
iron
review
committee.
There
are
a
few
things
to
start
out
with,
for
the
good
of
the
order
for
those
of
you
on
zoom'.
Everyone
from
the
public
entering
this
hearing
has
been
automatically
muted
and
cannot
speak
as
the
items
you're
interested
in
come
up
for
discussion.
You
will
be
called
upon
and
unmuted.
We
will
ask
if
you
have
slides
to
share
or
if
you
can
use
the
planners
slides
for
your
visuals.
If
you
have
your
own
slides,
you
will
be
promoted
to
panelists.
F
This
may
log
you
off
for
a
moment
and
log
you
back
in
and
then
you'll
have
the
capability
to
share
your
screen,
a
quick
overview
for
zoom.
The
capabilities
and
options
are
different,
depending
on
which
device
you're
using
if
you're
on
a
smart
form
phone
you'll
be
limited
to
only
speaking
and
sharing
your
camera.
If
you're
on
a
computer,
you
can
share
your
webcam
or
your
screen
when
called
upon
some
laptops
might
not
have
microphone
capabilities.
F
If
you
wish
to
speak
over
the
phone
but
watch
on
your
computer,
the
phone
number
for
this
hearing
is
listed
in
the
email
you
receive
and
registering
for
tonight's
hearing,
for
both
smart
phone
and
computer
participation.
There
are
controls
on
the
bottom
of
zoom
to
virtually
raise
your
hand
when
you
wish
to
speak
on
the
item
you're
interested
in
if
you're
attending
on
the
phone
with
no
visual
capabilities,
you
can
raise
your
hand
virtually
by
typing
starred.
9,
there's
also
a
chat
function
in
zoom.
F
F
F
After
that,
we
will
proceed
to
public
testimony,
starting
with
those
who
signed
up
on
the
electronic
signup
sheet
in
advance
and
then
anyone
else
who
raises
their
hand
virtually
each
member.
The
public
is
allowed
up
to
three
minutes.
For
testimony
we
will
provide
a
warning
and
then
stop
you
at
three
minutes.
We
are
strict
with
this
time
as
it
is
limited
in
code,
then
the
applicant
is
allowed
five
minutes
for
rebuttal,
after
which
the
hearing
will
be
closed
and
the
Commission
will
deliberate
and
render
a
decision.
F
Tonight's
agenda
and
proceedings
will
be
almost
the
same
as
in-person
hearings,
except
we
might
have
a
bit
of
a
delay
as
we
deal
with
this
new
technology.
Please
be
curious,
courteous
and
patient
with
us,
while
we
venture
through
this
virtual
format,
and
was
that
mr.
chair,
you
have
the
floor.
Thank.
G
You
Josh
appreciate
it
at
this
time,
I'd
like
to
call
the
July
8th,
2020
design,
review
committee
meeting
to
order.
We
are
the
citizen
volunteers
appointed
by
the
mayor
and
approved
by
speaker.
We
make
final
decisions
on
design
review
permits.
Any
decisions
made
tonight
may
be
appealed
to
the
Boise,
City
Planning
and
Zoning
Commission,
provided
that
the
appeal
is
filed
within
10
days
of
this
hearing.
In
order
to
file
an
appeal
you
must
have
given
written
or
oral
testimony
at
tonight's
meeting.
G
So
that's
why
it's
important
to
give
your
name
and
address
we
utilize
the
consent
agenda.
This
also
means
that
when
an
applicant
agrees
with
the
staff
court,
there's
no
public
opposition.
The
item
will
be
placed
on
the
consent
agenda.
All
items
that
are
placed
on
the
consent
agenda
are
approved
with
one
motion
without
further
public
comments
for
items
not
on
the
consent
of
will
hold
a
public
hearing
in
order
and
in
the
order
are
made,
you
know
with
staff
applicant
Neighborhood
Association
and
the
public
this
one.
G
B
J
B
G
Have
one
item
to
be
considered
for
tonight's
consent
agenda?
The
first
item
that
we
are
considering
for
tonight's
consent
agenda
is
DRH
20-0
zero
to
zero,
for
the
location
is
1270
70s,
Exchange
Street
for
the
construction
of
a
self
storage
facility
consisting
of
five
buildings
to
Elaine,
approximately
one
hundred
and
thirteen
thousand
seven
hundred
square
feet
and
the
Associated
site
improvements
an
m1.
The
zone
is
the
applicant
here
and
if
you
would
please
virtually
raise
your
hand.
G
I
N
O
P
G
Up
to
you,
the
first
time
could
be
here
tonight
no
amen.
The
first
item
to
be
here
tonight
will
be
a
key
item.
Number
four
I,
don't
know
before
he
RH
20
guess:
zero,
zero,
two
three
zero
location,
s12
451
west
overland
road,
is
to
construct
the
self-service
storage
facility
consisting
of
six
buildings.
Totaling
approximately
77,000
speaking
associated
site
improvements,
it
C
to
D
D.
So
this
time,
I
will
turn
it
over
to
staff.
There.
P
It's
on
the
south
side
of
Overland
Road
west
of
cloverdale
Road.
So
it's
the
outlined
property
here.
It
is
part
of
a
larger
multi-use
development
and
the
self
storage
east
received
a
conditional
use,
permit
approval
and
there
is
also
a
development
agreement
associated
with
the
approvals
for
the
overall
development.
P
So
you
can
see
this
is
the
parcel
we're
looking
at
here
this
project
and
then
these
other
parcels
will
be
developed
in
the
future
as
future
phases
we
do
have.
The
riding
bough
canal
runs
along
the
cells
of
this
property,
and
then
we
have
single-family
homes
across
the
canal,
and
then
we
have
a
city
of
Meridian
to
the
west.
So
there
are
six
buildings
that
make
up
the
self-service
storage
use.
Five
of
the
buildings
will
be
storage
and
then
the
sixth
building
will
have
office
and
storage.
P
And
we
took
here
from
some
neighbors
who
had
questions
about
the
project,
so
I
just
go
over
those
quickly.
We
heard
of
concerns
about
the
hours
and
the
construction
hours,
so
the
conditional
use
permit
did
limit
the
hours
of
operation
to
between
6:00
a.m.
and
10:00
p.m.
and
then
the
construction
activity
is
restricted
as
well
and
this
matches
the
conditional
use
permit
approval,
and
then
we
also
heard
concerns
about
lighting
and
screening.
P
So
the
development
agreement
requires
a
screen
wall
or
fence
in
areas
where
the
building
cannot
be
located
between
the
canal
and
the
areas
of
vehicle
use.
So
they'll
have
to
provide
a
six-foot-tall
screen
wall
or
fence
in
those
areas
to
block
headlights
and
traffic,
and
then
we
also
have
some
conditions
about
lighting
fixtures
and
how
those
have
to
be
downward-facing
full
cross
fixtures
and
will
require
the
lighting
plan.
G
D
H
G
I
G
Q
Please,
okay,
those
those
conditions
of
approval
that
were
went
over
earlier.
Those
are
my
questions.
I
don't
have
any
further
questions.
I
would
like
to
yield
my
time
to
any
mother
members
of
cloverdale
west
subdivision.
D
G
K
F
G
G
I
G
O
O
H
O
K
G
N
N
If
additional
screening
is
required,
as
you
come
off
the
street,
we
can
work
with
staff
to
negate
that
that's
the
only
place
I
see
where
you
could
have
a
problem
is
right.
As
you
come
off
the
street
internally
between
all
the
buildings,
there's
really
not
much
of
a
concern
for
headlights
in
those
areas.
B
G
L
G
Alright,
thank
you
so
we're
moving
back
to
the
top
of
our
list.
Next
item
on
our
agenda
is
item
number
one
item
number
one
is
DRH:
20:
zero,
zero,
zero;
five
one
locations;
2502
West,
Banach,
Street;
it's
for
the
construction
of
a
five
unit;
three-story
multi-family,
residential
building,
the
three
detached
garage
buildings
and
associated
site
improvements
and
a
property
located
our
three
key
zone.
This
time,
I
turned
over
to
staff
for
their
reports.
R
Righty
so
again,
we're
talking
about
DRH
20,
zero,
zero,
zero.
Five
one
proposal
to
construct
the
five
multifamily
units
at
Banach
Street,
the
property
is
located
at
the
corner
of
Banach
and
25th,
though,
and
use
of
the
property
is
high
density
in
the
r3d
zone.
The
density
is
forty
three
point:
five
units
per
acre
and
an
approximately
0.28
acres.
The
property
would
be
permitted
to
construct
twelve
units.
The
maximum
height
is
45
feet.
R
R
This
project
had
some
redesigns,
which
I
think
are
important
to
go
over
to
understand
what
the
project
is
now
and
to
see
the
overall
progress
of
the
design.
So
originally
this
project
was
proposed
with
nine
units
and
required
a
Planned
Unit
development
to
move
forward.
It
was
then
reduced
to
seven
units
also
needing
a
PUD.
The
applicant
ended
up
withdrawing
the
planning
development
application,
as
well
as
a
variance
that
was
associated
with
the
designs
and
redesigned
the
project
once
again
into
a
five
unit
development.
R
R
Even
the
five
unit
development
has
gone
through
some
design
changes
on
the
left.
You
can
see
the
initial
proposal
after
discussions
with
the
applicant.
They
they
decided
to
redesign
in
a
way
that
addressed
some
of
the
public
comments
that
we
had
received.
They
opted
for
a
front
gable.
Design
that
reflects
the
pitched
roofs
in
the
neighborhood
from
posad
also
presents
itself
more
as
three
units
rather
than
five.
At
the
play
of
the
modulation.
The
materials
were
also
changed
from
stucco
to
lap
siding
for
a
more
residential
feel.
R
Some
of
the
comments
in
the
committee's
packet
were
submitted
before
a
June
23rd,
which
is
when
the
current
design
was
submitted.
All
members
of
the
public
who
had
provided
comments
before
that
date
were
directly
contacted
with
the
new
drawings,
so
everyone
should
be
aware
of
the
car
design
that
we
are
discussing
here.
We
see
the
up-to-date
site
plan
of
the
new
five
unit
development
proposed
on
site
during
the
latest
redesign.
R
R
The
landscape
plan
is
providing
the
required
type,
B
landscaping
buffer
between
the
development
and
the
property
to
the
west,
including
five
to
seduce
trees,
as
well
as
some
evergreen
plantings,
in-between
to
add
four,
more
some
screening
between
those
those
units.
We
had
received
comments
from
a
neighbor
that
the
proposed
honey,
locust
Street
trees
were
not
preferred
due
to
their
seed
pods.
While
we
believe
the
variety
selected
by
the
applicants
are
not
the
same,
that
would
have
those
seed
pods.
R
We
wanted
to
ensure
that
the
new
trees
will
not
cause
an
issue
for
the
neighborhood
and
a
different
species
will
be
chosen.
The
autumn
glory
maple
proposed
by
the
applicant
is
not
permitted
by
community
forestry,
so
the
final
selection
of
the
species
will
be
through
community
forestry
and
we'll
make
sure
that
it's
not
the
honey
locust.
R
There
will
be
tree
mitigation
in
the
form
of
paying
into
the
tree
fund
for
an
existing
desirable
tree
that
will
be
removed
rather
than
overcrowd
the
site
and
lead
to
potential
future
problems.
The
applicant
proposed
working
with
community
community
forestry
with
that
tree
fund.
The
details
of
the
tree
mitigation
plan
are
in
the
report
and
I
can
answer
any
questions.
R
Finally,
there
are
some
initial
comments
from
fire
that
they
may
need
additional
aerial
access
to
the
site.
We
are
still
working
with
fire
to
determine
their
needs,
but
appears
that
the
solution
will
be
reducing
the
number
of
street
trees
along
25th
by
other
one
or
two
community
forestry
has
already
agreed
and
due
to
it,
being
a
requirement
for
fire
safety.
Design
review
can
approve
to
reduce
the
number
of
street
trees.
R
The
applicant
has
agreed
to
conditions
of
the
staff
report,
except
one
condition:
EU
reads
that
all
windows
above
the
ground-floor
shall
incorporate
window
trim
of
at
least
four
inches
in
width
that
features
a
contrasting
color
per
the
design
of
you.
Guidelines
window
shall
either
have
the
four
inches
of
trim
or
be
recessed
a
minimum
of
2
inches.
We
find
that
the
trim
has
a
more
residential
feel
while
the
recess
is
a
bit
more
modern
as
such
to
work
with
the
public
comments
discussing
the
architectural
style,
we
did
opt
for
the
trim.
R
There
is
a
departure
option
for
the
window
standards.
However,
no
departure
was
directly
proposed
by
the
applicant
after
they
were
initially
notified
of
the
trim
requirement,
as
such
staff
is
remaining
conservative
and
our
recommendation,
but
the
committee
is
permitted
to
discuss
this
topic.
Another
strike
or
modify
the
condition.
R
We
have
a
number
of
people
who
have
signed
up
to
give
testimony
on
the
project
and,
as
I
mentioned,
we
had
a
number
of
written
comments
beforehand
which
are
all
attached
to
the
report.
Here
you
can
see
a
summary
of
the
main
written
comments
and
their
concerns.
The
main
concern
is
compatibility
with
the
neighborhood
staff,
believes
the
design
changes
present
a
more
residential
and
traditional
feel
that
complements
the
single-family
homes
in
the
area,
while
also
providing
a
balanced
for
the
allowed
inappropriate
density
concerns
about
density
and
Heights
have
also
been
provided.
R
As
noted,
the
r3
zone
allows
for
higher
density
and
increased
height
more
than
some
of
our
other
residential
zones.
The
project
is
actually
below
in
both
density
and
height
than
what
would
be
permitted
on
site.
There
are
also
concerns
over
parking.
The
multifamily
standards
allow
for
on-street
parking
immediately
adjacent
to
the
development
to
reduce
the
number
of
required
on-site
parking
required.
As
such,
the
site
is
actually
providing
more
on-site
parking
than
what
is
necessary.
With
the
5
adjacent
on
street
parking
spaces,
they
would
only
need
3
on-site
parking
spaces
and
they're
providing
5.
R
As
a
reminder,
parking
is
determined
by
the
Boise
City
zoning
code
and
is
not
within
the
design
review
committees
jurisdiction
to
modify.
Finally,
we
did
receive
comments
about
existing
trees.
Again,
the
tree
mitigation
plan
can
be
found
in
the
report.
Most
of
the
trees
on
site
now
are
not
desirable
and
would
either
interfere
with
or
be
damaged
by
construction
on
the
site.
R
Due
to
the
public
interest
on
the
project,
I
felt
an
important
to
highlight
the
limitations.
The
design
review
committee
/
the
Boise
City
zoning
code
for
everyone's
benefit.
The
committee
is
prohibited
from
requiring
reduction
in
density,
reduction
in
floor
area
ratio
or
other
general
bulk
regulations
outside
of
subcenter
Lots.
Unless
it
can
be
shown,
the
project
specifically
harms
Public,
Safety
health
or
destruction
of
property
values.
If,
during
discussion,
the
committee
wishes
to
modify
any
of
the
aforementioned
elements,
I
ask
that
we
have
specific
findings
and
relations
to
those
harms
again.
R
G
I
Chairman,
yes,
I
did
have
one
question
regarding
the
15
foot
setback
off
of
the
west
property
line
in
looking
at
the
elevations
from
Bannock
the
it
appears
of
them
the
majority
of
the
mass
you
know
the
building
is
at
10
feet.
Can
you
casey
discuss
how
the
15
foot
setback
to
the
third
floor
is
being
met?
I
think
that'll
benefit
kind
of
the
discussion,
as
well
as
provide
some
more
information
for
the
public
that
has
provided
comment.
I
R
Chairman
committee
members,
so
the
third
floor
does
require
a
15
foot
setback
versus
the
10
feet
for
the
first
and
second
stories.
So
the
15
feet
is
the
actual
living
space,
as
well
as
the
rooftop
decks.
There
is
some
roofing
material,
that's
within
that
10-foot
just
because
you
have
to
do
that
with
architecture
to
be
able
to
have
that
sloped
roof
versus
the
flat
parapet,
design
that
was
previously
proposed.
However,
there
is
no
living
space
or
anything
that
we
would
review
through
that
15
foot
step
back
in
crouching.
Thank.
I
G
S
This
is
Blaine
Harvey.
Can
everyone
hear
me
yeah?
Thank
you.
It's
Blaine
Harvey
address
is
2
6
5,
0,
South,
Pine
Street,
Denver
Colorado,
we
are,
you
know,
excited
that
you
guys
are
hearing
this
tonight.
Thank
You
mr.
chairman
Thank,
You
committee.
We've
we've
definitely
been
through
quite
the
process
so
far
moving
through
the
PD
process.
Taking
public
comment
back
and
trying
to
find
a
balance
on
this
site
to
still
meet.
S
You
know
the
neighborhood
concerns,
while
also
building
a
project
under
the
approved
you
know,
planning
and
zoning
outlined
for
the
density,
I
think
we're
relatively
an
agreement
with
everything
in
the
report.
As
mentioned,
we
have
a
little
bit
of
concern
on
the
window.
Trim
I
think
would
just
like
to
ask
the
committee
that
we
could
just
work
with
staff
to
find
a
balance
there.
We
think
that
it
might
not
apply
to
every
condition
on
that
structure
and
that
we'd
like
to.
S
We
definitely
agree
with
providing
some
contrast
and
some
blocking
around
those
windows,
but
that
in
maybe
some
circumstances
it
would
not
even
not
really
benefit
the
project.
It
might
actually
hurt
the
project.
So
if,
if
that,
that
was
probably
how
we
like
to
see
that
addressed,
obviously
we
can
answer
some
questions
on
that.
I
have
two
examples:
just
to
show
you
from
a
rendering
perspective,
yeah,
secondarily
I,
think
on
the
report.
The
only
other
thing
that
we
might
want
to
bring
up
is
neighborhood
conformity.
S
S
You
know
a
stone's
throw
away
from
this
that
are
structures
of
at
least
two
stories,
and
we
do
have
pictures
of
that
on
site,
and
then
we
actually
went
through
the
entire
West
End
area
and
every
two-story
structure
in
the
neighborhood
and
potted.
Those
for
you
to
see
that
is
still
fits
within
a
conforming
use
within
the
general
broad
sense
of
the
neighborhood
so
happy
to
bring
that
up
and
show
it
to
you.
I
just
I
think
need
to
get
pushed
out
where
I
can
share
a
screen.
F
B
S
Structures
Jason
to
the
property.
This
property
is
directly
northeast
of
the
property.
It
is
a
as
you
can
see,
I'm
standing
at
our
property,
2502
Bannock,
looking
northeast,
you
can
tell
this-
is
a
two-story
structure
and
then
I've
walked
up
next
to
that
gray
vehicle
and
stood
directly
in
front
of
it
in
the
middle
of
the
street
and
took
in
the
additional
picture
just
to
show
with
the
dormer
there
is
living
space
up
there
and
being
used.
S
S
S
You
know
I,
think
that
it's
it's
important
to
note
that
anyone
along
all
Bannock
all
of
Idaho
has
the
right
to
build
this
structure
or
some
and
that's
the
intent
of
that
code
is
to
transition
from
c5
zoning
into
these
residential
areas,
and
without
this
it
really
could
limit.
You
know,
I
mean
it
doesn't
provide
that
transition,
and
we
think
that
we'll
we'll
see
more
of
this
continuing
to
develop
in
this
area
into
the
future.
S
I
know
previous
sites
on
the
Salvation
Army
site
had
some
density
and
zoning
and
Heights
I
know
that
did
not
make
it
through
a
PDF,
but
it
did
have
similar
proposed
heights
to
our
structure
and
it
is
located
not
you
know,
five
to
seven
blocks
away
as
far
as
under
multi-story
structures
in
the
West
End.
These
red
dots
represent
every
two-story
structure
in
the
West
End.
So
you
can
see
that
there
are
plenty
of
examples
of
that
and
then
for
non-residential
structures.
Those
yellow
dots
represent
non-residential
structures
in
the
West
End.
S
We
don't
we're,
obviously
a
residential
structure,
but
in
size
and
scale.
We
think
that
these
are
a
good
example
of
the
diversity
within
this
neighborhood.
It
is
not
predominantly
all
single-family,
one-story
homes
and
I
think
for
that
everything
else
to
the
port.
We
definitely
agree
with
and
I
guess
we'd
hand
it
back
over
to
mr.
chairman
yeah
thank.
G
S
So
as
far
as
windows
go,
we
did
two
two
options
here.
The
option
to
the
left
you
can
see
does
not
have
the
designated
four
inch
trim
that
we've
suggested,
and,
although
that
we
think
we
agree
with
some
of
the
the
four-inch
trim
around
the
windows,
to
give
a
little
bit
more
massing
and
blocking,
as
you
see
on
the
right,
we
just
think
that
sometimes,
that
condition
might
not
be
conducive
or
it
might
need
to
be
connected
as
a
whole
to
the
the
upper
storey
massing,
and
we
just.
G
B
G
G
All
right,
thank
you
very
much
and
at
this
point
we'll
turn
it
over
to
the
public.
Is
there
a
member
of
the
Neighborhood
Association
that
his
presence
and
if
so,
would
you
please
raise
your
hands?
I
do
have
a
raised
hand,
so
you
got
a
couple
of
raised
hands
but
with
the
Neighborhood
Association
one,
please
state
your
name
and
address
for
the
record.
I.
K
F
T
U
Right
yeah
I
was
just
hello
hearing
I'm,
saying
I'm
the
the
president,
but
Lauren
has
association.
Okay,.
T
T
T
Okay,
all
right
and
then
I
need
to
share
my
screen.
Okay,
let
me
oh
wait.
A
minute
hang
on
hang
on
folks,
okay,
I
lost
my
zoom
all
right.
This
may
not
be
pretty,
but
I'll
give
it
give
it
a
shot
here.
Let's
go
here,
he's
down.
Okay,
so
we're
gonna
talk
about
2502,
wes
panic,
as
I
said:
I
live
at
24:11
West,
Pleasanton
and
I
have
lived
here
for
30
years.
I
lived
in
this
house
in
my
house
in
this
neighborhood
and
I
picked
this
neighborhood
because
it
is
historic.
T
This
picture
of
the
of
the
house
at
2502
I
just
took
yesterday
as
a
matter
of
fact
and
the
so
it's
looking
a
little
rundown,
but
it's
still
a
beautiful
house,
and
there
is
a
lot
of
history
there
as
there
is
with
our
entire
neighborhood.
We've
had
two
surveys
now
over
the
history
of
our
neighborhood,
one
from
the
city
and
most
recently
from
the
State
Historical
Preservation
preservation
organization,
and
they
have
both
noted.
T
T
T
The
neighborhood
itself,
as
I
mentioned,
has
a
lot
of
history
here,
in
particular
about
those
properties
on
Idaho
and
Bannock
Street.
They
all
they
more
than
50%
of
those
properties,
contribute
to
the
historic
district
of
our
neighborhood,
which
I
think
is
very
important,
which
has
been
noted
in
blueprint
boise
that
you
know
guess
we
want
to
do
infill,
but
we
also
want
to
protect
the
history
of
our
neighborhoods,
so
I
think
that's
an
important
point
to
to
focus
on
and
also
in
blueprint.
T
There
is
the
talk
about
environment
is
one
of
the
principles,
preserving
the
history
and
and
the
historic
resources
of
the
city,
another
principle,
and
even
though
this
project
has
been
approved
and
the
house
is
going
to
be
demolished,
if
there's
anything,
we
can
do
to
salvage
any
part
of
the
house
or
any
of
the
structures
that
would
I.
Don't
know
if
this
committee
does
that,
but
that
would
be
something
to
at
least
entertain,
but
the
idea
that
mixed
use
or
infill
projects
occur
in
historic
neighborhoods.
T
They
should
still
respect
and
be
in
scale
with
the
resident
other
surrounding
buildings.
Yes,
there
are
two-story
structures.
There
are
two
storey
houses
in
this
neighborhood,
but
there
it
is
a
harmony.
There
is
a
compatibility
with
those
those
structures.
I
wanted
to
point
this
out.
This
is
new
construction
on
26/11
West
woodland.
There
was
a
small
house
here
that
was
demoed
and
this
is
the
new
house
that's
being
constructed.
So
this
is
a
two-story,
but
it
fits
it
fits
with
the
surrounding
houses.
T
It
makes
use
of
compatible
materials
with
with
other
homes
and
I
think
that's
important
and
then
the
other
new
construction
that
I
wanted
to
point
out.
This
is
a
new
house,
that's
going
in
at
23rd
and
Idaho.
This
was
a
bear
lot
and
this
is
the
home.
That's
being
built,
don't
know
what
the
finished
product
is.
T
With
these
five
units,
the
again
the
materials
should
be
compatible
with
the
existing
homes.
The
pictures
that
staff
showed
showed
that
most
of
them
are
single-story
very
traditional
looking
and
the
the
designs
that
Blaine
Harvey
showed,
while
they're
very
nice
they'd
not
compatible
with
the
designs
and
the
structures
and
the
materials
of
the
existing
homes
in
this
neighborhood.
That's
what
you
get
when
you
come
to
this
neighborhood.
T
You
want
the
history,
that's
why
you're
coming
here,
and
so
it's
important
to
restrict
to
respect
that
and
to
ensure
that
we
make
things
that
are
or
add
things
that
are
compatible.
What
I've
heard
from
Blaine
Harvey
and
his
architects
is
that
people
want
this
modern,
contemporary
design
but
where's
the
research
to
suggest
that
I
just
question
that
and
then
I
just
did
a
Google
search
myself
for
materials
and
design
new
designs
and
materials
that
make
buildings.
Look
like
they've
been
there
for
a
hundred
years.
There's
a
lot
of
things.
T
This
must
be
a
thing
because
there's
a
lot
of
articles
and
opportunities
to
do
that
there
was
the
neighborhood
input
we
still
have.
Ii
have
some
concerns
about
this
structure
and
how
it's
going
to
impact
the
residents
who
are
immediately
adjacent
next
door,
I
should
say
across
the
street
or
across
the
alley.
They
want
to
make
sure
that
it's
it's
like
I've,
been
saying
respectful
of
the
surroundings
and
not
something
so
contemporary
and
then
to
ensure
that
there's
privacy
with
the
second
and
third
storey
decks.
T
There's
concerns
that
people
will
lose
the
privacy
of
their
yards
and
because
they
will
have
people
eyeballs
looking
at
them.
So
that's
another
concern.
In
conclusion.
Anything
new
should
be
compatible
again
use
you
can
use
materials
and
design
to
make
a
new
structure,
look
and
feel
historic.
We
are
losing
part
his
part
of
the
history
of
our
neighborhood
and
we're
not
going
to
get
that
back.
So
you
know
the
institutional
design
yeah.
It
may
be
what
people
want
and
maybe
what's
all
over
downtown
Boise,
but
this
is
a
residential
neighborhood.
T
U
Presentation
no
I
signed
up
just
to
ensure
the
neighborhood
organization.
At
least
one
of
us
were
present.
Okay,.
G
V
It's
it's
Brian
Janaki
and
rest
25:16,
West
Banach
Street.
Thank
you.
I
just
have
a
couple
of
comments,
slash
questions,
I'll
start
by
saying:
I
I
live
not
adjacent
to
the
property,
but
one
house
removed
on
Bannock
Street
lived
there
since
2009
I
own
the
home,
and
my
my
question
in
regards
to
the
rooftop
deck
of
the
West
westernmost
unit
and
how
that
being
set
back
15
feet
will
be
enough
mitigation
and
perhaps
including
some
of
the
landscaping
that
I
haven't
been
made.
V
G
V
One
more
thing
is
in
regards
to
the
the
trees
and
the
tree
mitigation.
There
was
my
understanding
that
only
the
trees
on
the
actual
property
would
be
removed
and
I'd
see.
It
seems
that
and
I
could
be
wrong
here,
that
the
discussion
tonight
is
centering
on
more
than
that,
and
so
my
question
is:
will
the
trees
that
are
currently
there?
These
are
80
plus
year
old
sycamores
of
the
public
right
away
between
the
sidewalk
and
25th
Street
be
maintained,
preserved
or
are
they
planning
to
be
removed
as
well.
G
K
G
W
W
Just
isn't
there
just
isn't
any
three
story
around
here
and
as
much
as
we've
gone
back
and
forth
and
much
better
people
and
I
have
articulated
tonight.
But
the
real
point
is
that
the
third
story
changes
the
whole
look
and
feel
of
neighborhood,
and
while
they
have
gone
it
back
and
looked
at
it
and
the
dry,
the
driveway,
the
alley
kids
walk
down
there.
W
Maybe
they
never
get
to
you
again,
but
they
want
to,
and
we
want
to
make
sure-
and
we
want
to
preserve
this
neighborhood
so
that
they
can
my
sister's
owned,
that
big
ol
yellow
house
for
more
than
40
years,
and
it's
an
amazing
part
of
this
community
and
at
one
of
the
other
pictures
you
had
a
green
and
blue
house
on
the
other
corner.
My
niece
owns
that
we've
all
moved
here,
because
this
is
the
neighborhood.
This
is
family.
W
We
lost
one
of
the
members
of
the
neighborhood
just
recently,
and
150
people
in
the
middle
of
a
pandemic
came
together
because
we're
a
community
and
we
want
to
continue
to
be
a
community
if
we
can
and
a
house
that
doesn't
fit
with
that
community
is
going
to
change
it
tremendously.
I
think
that's
probably
all
I
can
say.
K
H
X
Actually
am
speaking
you
from
Texas
3,
408,
Pleasant
court
and
Flower
Mound
taxes,
uh-huh
I
own,
the
property
across
the
street
at
2501,
West
Bannock,
it
is
presently
least
I-
do
intend
at
some
point
in
living
there,
myself
I
submitted
a
written
opposition
to
the
building,
because
it's
I'm,
echoing
what
has
already
been
said,
but
I
think
that
property
is
going
to
stick
out
like
a
sore
thumb
in
our
neighborhood.
The
neighborhood
is
primarily
cottage
bungalow
style.
This
is
the
first
multi-unit
to
this
extent,
and
it
is
going
to
signify
a
change
in
this
neighborhood.
X
For
this
development
to
go
in.
What's
going
to
happen,
is
the
other
properties
will
be
bought
by
developers
with
further
multi
units
coming
in?
And
it's
going
to
change
that
block?
It's
not
going
to
be
immediate,
but
it's
going
to
happen,
and
this
is
where
it
will
start.
What
I
would
like
is
to
have
some
structure
put
in
there
that
matches
the
rest
of
that
block
so
that
it
has
its
st.
ambience
and
charm
that
is
preserved.
B
K
M
H
M
Banach
live
across
the
street
from
their
jacent
property.
That's
been
up
and
I
agree
with
totally
with
all
the
ones
that
agreed.
We
do
not
want
a
three-story
apartment
building
across.
We
want
something
that
fits
into
our
neighborhood,
my
husband's
mom
and
dad
built
the
house
that
we
live
in
and
we
just
need
to
preserve
this
neighborhood.
D
F
M
H
K
S
S
Definitely
pointed
out
some
neighborhood
characteristics,
but
I
just
like
to
remind
the
committee
that
at
this
time
there
is
no
historical
designation
at
all
for
this
portion
of
the
city
and
whether
an
application
or
survey
has
been
completed.
Nothing
currently
exists
as
far
as
the
other
comments
I
felt.
Most
of
those
were
zoning
issues,
not
design
review
or
design
committee
issues.
I
know:
Brian
brought
up
a
potential
for
screening
from
a
privacy
issue
on
the
neighbors
landscaping.
S
He
also
brought
up
the
sycamore
and
the
the
right
away
might
be
being
removed.
To
my
knowledge,
unless
fire
requires
that
in
no
way
we
want
to
move
that
tree,
that
tree
is
gorgeous
and
we
like
it
a
lot.
We
think
it's
a
great
aesthetic
to
the
site.
We
I
think
fire
has
gave
comment
that
they
might
require
a
treat
or
be
removed
on
Bannock
and
the
right
away
in
Bannack.
Presently
there
are
no
trees
there.
S
We
are
proposing
planning
three
new
trees
there,
but
if
fire
stipulates
that
we
can
only
do
two
we'll
just
pay
them
to
the
tree
fund
for
any
caliber
that
we
need
to
replace
to
the
lathe.
A
comment
about
access
and
walkability
I
think
that
the
alleys
are
meant
to
serve
vehicles.
Not
pedestrians.
I
would
employ
her
to
use
the
sidewalks
that
are
provided
and
I
know.
Scott
Shea
had
a
concern
on
the
cross
street.
He
made
a
comment
that
this
would
be
the
first
multi-unit
in
the
area.
S
I
Mr.
chairman,
yes,
I
I
just
wanted
to
make
a
couple
comments
specifically
about
the
neighborhood
I
could
understand
the
concern
about
the
massing
of
the
project
in
terms
of
what's
already
there
compared
to
what
is
being
proposed.
But
you
know
in
looking
at
the
design
of
this
building
or
these
homes,
they
are
below
the
allowed
height
in
r1c,
even
of
35
feet
or
really
any
residential
zone
of
35
feet
and,
as
was
stated
at
the
beginning,
we
can't
really
we're
not
looking
at
the
height
of
it.
I
It's
a
very
desirable
neighborhood
I've
looked
there
to
try
to
purchase
a
home
as
well
so
I,
just
I
think
that
additional
housing
in
this
area-
and
this
is
probably
adjusts
at
pnz-
also
it
encourages
additional
residents
that
want
to
become
members
of
this
community
and
members
of
this
neighborhood
to
live
in
that
space.
That's
I
think
the
landscaping.
Obviously
they're,
you
know
anything.
That's
removed
from
the
right-of-way
has
to
be
mitigated
for
substantially
I.
I
It
doesn't
appear
that
anything
in
the
conditions
of
approval
or
any
comment
from
any
of
the
other
agencies
would
require
the
removal
of
that
existing
sycamore
I
did
see
a
chat
from
Brian
that
talked
about.
I
can
only
see
one
sycamore,
that's
on
25th.
That
would
be
that's
between
the
alley
and
Bannock
and
based
on
the
applicants
discussion.
They
don't
intend
to
remove
that
and
I.
Don't
think
that
unless
it
was
required
by
fire,
it
sounds
like
it
would
be
removed.
I
So
I
I
think
that
I
commend
the
applicant
for
going
back
through
the
process
to
reduce
the
number
of
units.
I
think
that
that
shows
a
lot
of
effort
on
his
part
to
try
to
fit
in
as
well
as
modifying
the
design
to
provide
some
pitched
roofs
rather
than
a
very
modern
design
from
before,
with
the
flat
roofs
and
in
terms
of
the
design.
I
think
it
fits,
and
that's
kind
of
my
comments
on
that
right
now.
Okay,.
E
I,
concur:
I'm,
I,
didn't
think
that
the
original
plan
fit
in
very
well
with
the
neighborhood,
but
looking
at
the
pitch
rooms
and
seeing
that
it,
the
five-unit
building,
looks
like
it
really
only
has
three
units
makes
it
work
much
better
with
that.
Neighborhood
and
I
also
agree
that,
because
this
is
a
for
sale
project
it,
it
should
be
a
great
addition
to
the
neighborhood,
and
it's
not
you
know
it's
not
that
kind
of
condominium
building
where
people
have
to
go
down
the
elevator
into
a
lobby.
E
It
addresses
the
street
and
won't
bring
people
onto
the
sidewalk,
which
will
only
complement
the
energy
of
the
neighborhood
and
I
I.
Think
it's
one
of
those
things
that
is
jarring.
If
you've
lived
in
a
single-family
home
on
that
block
around
an
adjacent
block
and
that
you
know
within
a
year
or
two,
it
will
blend
right
into
the
rest
of
the
neighborhood
and
no
one
will
think
twice
about
it.
E
I
also
just
want
to
address
one
of
the
neighbors
said
about
looking
at
materials
and
designs
that
can
make
a
new
building
look
like
a
historic
building.
I
think
that's.
The
worst
thing
you
could
possibly
do
is
to
try
to
build
something
and
pretend
that
it's
a
hundred
years
old
or
pretend
that
it
that
it's
historic
that
rarely
works
well.
What
works
well
is
what
this
developer
is
proposing
to
use
design
elements
that
that
echo,
the
surrounding
buildings
and
the
pitched
roofs
really
accomplish
that
quite
well.
L
L
L
So
they're
going
to
be
invested
in
that
property
and
initially
hand
going
down
the
road,
so
I
think
they've
done
a
good
job
and
I
think
the
remaining
items
as
far
as
the
window
trim
working
through
the
landscape
and
the
screening
issues
that
will
continue
to
be
reviewed
by
staff
will
fine-tune
the
project
to
where,
as
was
indicated
over
time
it
will.
It
will
be
an
asset
to
the
neighborhood
that
initially
it
will
just
take
some
getting
used
to.
G
Thank
you.
Many
members
of
all-ivy
other
questions
from
discussion
looks
like
there's
pretty
good
consensus
for
support
for
this
I'd
certainly
entertain
a
motion
on
it
guests
question
for
mr.
Zavala.
There
was
any
concern
or
need
to
adjust
the
requirements
on
the
window
trim
or
gustan
viewed,
as
is
staff
report.
L
Mr.
Chairman
I
I
would
I'll
get
the
ball
started
here.
I'll
make
a
motion
on
the
project
that
we
moved
to
approve
DRH,
20-0,
0,
5
1
is
recommended
and
the
findings
of
fact
and
conclusions
of
law
and
the
recommended
conditions
of
approval.
As
noted
in
the
project
report,
with
the
addition
of
one
sentence
to
item
one
in
a
site-specific
conditions
that
indicates
that
the
applicant
shall
review
possible
solutions
to
the
window
trim
with
staff
for
appropriate
approval
prior
to
the
submitted
for
building
permits.
E
G
I
I
know.
There's
a
wall
there
that
he
talked
about
will
provide
some
some
screening
but
I
think
that's
one
thing
that
could
go
a
long
way
and
work
and
I
did
in
looking
through
the
comments
from
the
neighbor
adjacent
to
the
West.
They
had
some
concern
about
a
couple
trees
that
are
in
their
yard,
so
just
to
to
work
closely
with
them
or
at
least
consult
with
them
about
where
some
of
those
plants
are
going
to
go,
so
that
it
doesn't
create
an
issue
in
the
future.
L
H
G
Thank
you
very
much
next
item
to
be
heard
tonight.
Side
number
two
Dr
h20
guess
your
0-105
location
is
11
for
for
Nine,
West,
Houston
Road
for
the
construction
of
a
15
unit,
three-story
multi-family
residential
with
associated
site
improvements
in
the
party
are
to
be
someone
at
this
point.
I'd
turn
it
over
to
Josh
and
staff
for
the
report.
F
Thank
You
mr.
chairman
members
of
the
Commission,
as
mentioned
the
applicant
has
applied
to
construct
a
15
unit,
multifamily
building
located
on
youstick
Road
at
the
southwest
corner
of
shamrock
Avenue.
This
project
received
a
PUD
approval
that
was
appealed
to
City
Council
and
was
ultimately,
the
appeal
was
denied
and
the
approval
was
of
the
Planning
Commission
was
upheld.
City
Council
did
add
two
conditions
to
that
approval.
F
One
was
in
regards
to
the
architecture
and
design
of
this
project
being
compatible
and
paying
homage
to
the
historic
youstick
town
site,
which
is
located
very
near
to
the
east
of
this
property,
and
then
the
inclusion
of
some
no
parking
on
shamrock
Avenue
to
address
some
parking
concerns
that
were
also
raised
during
the
approval
process.
So
the
applicant
submitted
site
plan
does
comply
with
that
approved
PUD
site
plan,
the
building
fronts
youstick
and
shamrock
at
the
corner
with
parking
and
drive
aisles
to
the
rear
into
the
west.
F
The
the
youstick
entrance
is
an
emergency,
only
access
which
will
have
bollards,
and
we
have
included
a
condition
of
approval
that
they
work
with
the
fire
department
to
identify
some
alternative
of
making
that
a
look
less
like
vehicular
entrance.
We
certainly
wouldn't
want
anyone
traveling
on
you,
stick
to
accidentally
enter
that
and
strike
the
ball
ERDs.
So
there
are
some
alternatives
that
could
be
used,
such
as
grass
Crete,
that
would
support
fire
vehicles
or
just
some
bright
painting
of
the
ballers
and
some
signage.
That
would
dissuade
people
from
from
doing
that.
F
There
is
also
an
irrigation
easement
on
the
west
and
south
boundaries
of
this
property.
The
applicant
has
worked
with
the
irrigation
company
to
stay
out
of
that
easement
provide
access
to
the
irrigation
company
for
maintenance
of
their
irrigation
facilities
and
has
located
the
drive
aisle
adjacent
to
that.
As
a
buffer.
From
this
project,
the
project
has
provided
the
amount
of
parking
required
by
ordinance
and
the
Planned
Unit
development
approval
is
required,
twenty
spaces
and
twenty
are
provided.
F
There
is
a
21st
parking
space
on
the
submitted
site
plan
and
we
have
included
a
condition
of
approval
that
that
be
removed.
So
there
is
a
guest
space
identified
on
the
west
side
of
that
drive
aisle
on
the
west
side
of
the
building,
with
no
vehicular
access
to
youstick
road.
That
could
be
very
problematic
for
a
vehicle
to
get
out
of
without
making
a
multi-point
turn
and
interfering
with
other
vehicles.
Since
it
is
not
needed
to
meet
the
quantity
requirements
of
parking,
we
have
included
a
condition
of
approval
of
that
be
removed.
F
The
applicant
has
provided
landscaping
along
youstick
road
in
compliance
with
design
review
requirements
in
terms
of
street
trees,
some
shrub
beds
and
some
lawn
areas.
There
is
an
existing
landscaped
planter
strip
between
the
sidewalk
and
you
stick
road
that
was
installed
as
part
of
a
beautification
project
on
usik
Road
a
few
years
ago.
That
will
remain
unchanged
and
the
applicant
has
proposed
a
bus
stop
along
youstick
Road,
as
requested
by
Valley
Regional
Transit
and
the
comprehensive
planning
division.
This
project
is
on
a
future
transit
route.
F
Youstick
is
identified
as
a
future
transit
route
in
Valley,
Regional
Transit
split
was
granted
additional
density
during
that
PD
process
to
get
to
the
15
unit.
Building
that
you
see
today
in
terms
of
building
design,
the
applicant
did
propose
a
project
with
low
sloped
roofs
which
do
pay
some
homage
and
and
come
and
kind
of
play
off
of
that
existing
music
town
site
a
little
bit.
F
You
have
the
decorative
corbels
along
the
roof
facing
youstick
Avenue
or
used
to
grow
it
I'm,
sorry
and
then
incorporating
some
high
quality
materials
along
the
base
of
the
building,
the
cultured
stone,
the
patio
areas
and
metal
railings
facing
music
Road
with
individual
entries
to
all
of
the
units,
all
things
that
the
design
review
guidelines
promote
and
that
they
are
looking
for
the
I
believe
the
applicant
is
in
agreement
with
the
conditions
that
we've
placed
on
the
project
tonight.
There.
F
Of
areas
of
discussion
that
I
anticipate
one
would
be
the
colors
selected.
There
are
there's,
perhaps
some
disagreement
in
terms
of
of
neighborhood
consensus
about.
If
the
proposed
colors
are
appropriate
and
compatible
with
the
surrounding
neighborhood,
you
know
we
would
generally
defer
to
the
surrounding
area.
This
is
certainly
not
a
color
scheme
that
is
uncharacteristic
of
a
building
of
this
type,
but
perhaps
there
are
some
some
tones
and
a
color
palette
that
could
better
fit
with
those
surrounding
properties
and
I
believe
some
neighbors
tonight
will
comment
to
that.
Specifically.
F
Additionally,
an
area
of
concern
is
what
material
is
proposed
for
those
railings
on
the
balconies
and
patios.
They
were
not
detailed
in
the
application.
We
did
include
a
condition
of
approval
that
that
material
be
specified
and
I
believe
that
they,
the
neighborhood,
feel
strongly.
That
should
be
an
opaque
material
to
kind
of
keep
it
from
being
on
site
in
terms
of
people's
belongings
being
stored
on
these
patios,
which
which,
as
we
know,
can
can
certainly
happen
on
the
east
and
west
ends
of
the
building.
F
We
did
require
some
changes
that
the
applicant
is
in
in
aware
of
an
in
support
of.
We
felt
that
some
additional
design
interest
could
be
provided
on
those
elevations
while
providing
privacy
for
those
adjacent
properties
to
the
east
and
west.
Those
are
single-family
residential
uses,
so
some
additional
windows
in
the
these
areas
of
stucco
that
you
see
on
that
East
and
West
elevation.
F
Those
are
master
bedrooms
on
those
floors,
some
high
windows
that
would
still
allow
a
placement
of
a
bed
against
that
wall,
because
that
can
be
certainly
problematic
if
there
are
no
walls
without
a
window,
but
some
high
windows
that
would
provide
some
additional
design
interest
and
allows
more
light
into
those
units
the
applicant
is,
is
in
support
of
that
requirement
and
also
it's
difficult
to
see
on
the
elevations.
But
this
central
mass
that
has
the
existing
windows
on
the
plans
that
were
submitted
has
some
relief
of
about
of
less
than
a
foot.
F
Certainly
I
think
it's
between
six
and
nine
inches.
We
did
place
the
condition
of
approval
that
that
be
increased
to
three
feet:
minimum
it
will
give
that
east
and
west
wall
plane,
certainly
a
much
less
flat.
Appearance
provide
some
additional
modulation,
some
shadow
lines
and
really
kind
of
reduce
the
overwhelming
sense
of
a
large
flat
wall
facing
those
east
and
west
properties.
F
E
Thank
you.
What's
not
clear
to
me
is
how
the
slanted
roof
lines
echo
anything
about
the
original
youstick
site.
To
me,
that's
that's
one
of
those
like
almost
modern
semi
contemporary
designs,
that
people
think
this
is
gonna,
look
really
sleek
and
then
to
me
looks
jumbled.
But
it's
supposed
to
echo
something
and
I.
Don't
I,
don't
see
what
it
actually
echoes.
F
H
F
You
stick
to
the
east,
you,
you
know
it's
pretty
difficult
to
draw
parallels
between
that
and
a
three-story
residential
building,
so
I
think
the
intent
was
to
kind
of
pull
some
elements
from
those
buildings,
some
general
building
forms
when
viewed
from
youstick
Avenue.
Certainly
this
you
know
if
we
truly
mimic
those
youstick
townsite
buildings,
this
would
be
a
white
brick
box.
You
know
and
I
don't
think
anybody
would
want
to
see
that,
but
what
they
did,
the
applicant
and
and
I'll.
F
G
Z
Can
you
hear
me?
Yes,
okay,
thank
you.
I
know.
We
appreciate
everybody
tonight
and
mr.
commissioner,
mr.
chairman
and
commissioner
permissions
we
are
in
in
in
agreeance
with
the
staff
report.
We
have
had
a
couple
meetings
with
the
neighbors
to
go
over
a
few
design
elements
I
believe
they
also
had
a
meeting
with
Josh
last
week.
I
understand
they
had
a
couple
of
concerns.
Really
today,
one
being
railings
I
can
answer
that
question.
This
is
going
to
be
black
aluminum.
Z
It
is
going
to
be
an
opaque
or
a
film,
the
glass
panel,
and
that
was
to
allow
people
to
not
see
on
to
the
patio.
So
we
had
left
that
off.
We
apologize
for
that,
but
it
is
an
opaque
or
a
frosted
glass
railing
on
there
and
then,
as
far
as
the
colors
go
I
heard,
that
will
be
another
point
of
discussion.
We
are
okay.
With
you
know,
kind
of
working
with
staff
in
modifying
our
colors
were
not
married
to
anything
per
se.
Z
Z
Z
B
L
Z
Z
It'll
also
tell
you
that
we
also
will
have
a
mechanical
well
on
top
of
some
of
those
taller
units.
There
is
a
it's
hard
to
point
here,
but
there
there
is
the
cut
there's
of
some
storage
rooms
here,
there's
also
a
fire
riser
room
there
and
there's
a
Connor
you'll
thanks
Josh,
there's
a
comm
room
up
there.
E
Z
Z
H
G
Y
We
were
dismayed
as
a
Neighborhood
Association
and
as
a
neighborhood
that
this
project
was
even
allowed
to
go
forward.
We
have
you,
can
go
back
and
look
at
our
testimonies
because
we
were
very
prepared.
We
had
videotapes
and
the
transportation
issues
that
are
going
to
arise
from
this.
Shamrock
is
not
a
through
Street.
In
fact,
it's
a
by
sits
a
sitting
designated
bicycle
path
that
goes
to
Redwood
Park.
It's
part
of
the
bicycle
network
for
the
City
of
Boise.
It's
a
pedestrian,
walking
path
for
people
to
go
to
Redwood
Park
to
walk
their
dogs.
Y
There
is
a
walkway
over
you
stick
through
to
shamrock
the
only
outlet
from
these.
The
units
in
this
apartment
building
is
shamrock,
which
I
just
explained
is
not
real
appropriate
for
the
area.
So
we'll
have
15
units
how
many
cars
a
day
will
you
have
going
out?
There
is
no
way
to
go
west
on
you.
Stick
from
this
apartment
complex.
You
would
have
to
go
east
on
you,
stick
to
get
out
of
the
complex
and
go
around
and
turn
around.
Y
If
you
worked
in
Meridian
or
you
were
going
to
the
village
or
going
anyplace
towards
evil
Road,
so
it
would
add-
and
there
is
a
median
on
you-
stick
road
that
would
block
people
from
being
able
to
turn
to
go
around
west
and
make
a
u-turn
just
some
interesting
little
points.
We
brought
up
that
were
kind
of
ignored,
but
then
we
also
understand
that
and
we're
not
opposed
to
development
on
this
property
at
all-
and
we
explained
this
to
city
council
and
to
Planning
and
Zoning
it's
just.
Y
We
have
to
take
a
look
at
appropriate
development
for
the
the
property
there.
It's
a
very
small
I
think
it's
one
acre
or
maybe
less
it's
the
size
of
the
lot
and
they're.
Putting
this.
You
know
she's
building
there
that
is
not
compatible
at
all
with
the
neighborhood.
Now
all
that
being
said,
it
was
approved
and
in
spite
of
our
opposition
and
all
the
homework
that
we
did
and
how
many
neighbors
that
will
be
impacted.
Who
came
out
to
talk
about
this
project
and
our
opposition
to
the
project
it
was
approved.
Y
So
there's
that
saying
you
can't
fight
city
hall,
unfortunately-
and
we
said
okay-
we'll
go
with
it-
they
thank
you.
The
lane
Clegg
she
allowed
for
us
to
have
some
input
into
the
design.
This
was
not
the
original
design
of
the
building.
The
original
design
literally
look
like
a
BSU
dorm
from
the
60s.
So
this
is
an
improvement,
but
we
did
ask
for
gabled
roofs
because
of
the
height
requirements.
Y
We
were
not
able
to
have
gable
groups,
Oh,
miss
Ackerman
I,
your
comments
and
your
observations
and
looking
at
this
building,
because
they're
very
similar
to
what
mine
are.
Is
it
appropriate
for
a
historical
area?
You
know
what
we've
been
doing
with
new
stick
town
site
in
the
past
four
years
is
we
have
been
trying.
We
have
a
beautification
project
and
we've
been
trying
to
restore
the
historical
symbolism
of
that
area.
I,
don't
know
if
you
know,
but
you
stick
was
incorporated
as
a
town
in
1907,
the
inner
urban
trolley
ran
right
down.
Y
Y
Additionally,
in
Redwood
Park,
the
city
has
put
$60,000
together
to
do
a
historical,
interpretive
display
of
the
youstick
town
site,
they're,
several
myself
and
several
of
their
neighbors,
who
have
put
a
thousand
hours
of
volunteer
time
into
this
project.
We
have
not
hoped
to
have
a
an
apartment
complex
and
it
is
an
apartment.
It's
they're,
rentals
they're,
not
places
that
people
are
going
to
purchase
our
own
they're,
rentals
and
right
down
the
street
on
the
north
side
of
Houston.
K
E
Thank
you,
I
just
want
to
make
it
clear
to
miss
Herman
and
anyone
else
from
the
neighborhood.
What
our
purview
is
as
Design
Review,
that
we
we
don't
get
to
decide
things
about
traffic
flow
and
zoning,
and
so
wow.
Those
are
compelling
arguments.
It's
not
up
to
us
to
decide.
You
know
whether
it's
appropriate
to
have
a
building
this
size
on
a
street
that
leads
to
a
park
or
where
a
left
turn
can't
be
made
so
I.
E
Y
Understand,
there's
that
thing
you
can
do
about
that
and
I
get
that,
and
thank
you
for
that.
All
that
being
said
so
I
have
a
couple
things
and
I
heard
Jeff
and
we
did
meet
with
Jeff
and
had
great
meetings
with
him.
It's
very
cooperative
with
the
neighborhood,
the
porches
I
did
send
a
picture
of
an
apartment,
complex
up
the
street
in
Meridian,
actually
with
an
idea
for
some
opaque,
railings,
Jeff
or
Josh.
Do
you
have
that
available
that
you
can
put
up
you.
Y
C
Y
You
go
so
you
can
see
they
have
the
okay,
k--,
railings
and
then
the
metal.
I
guess
it's
an
ornamental
railing
on
that
which
would
definitely
what
we're
dealing
with
with
the
townhouses
down
the
street
is
that
the
porches
their
front
porches,
but
right
up
to
you,
stick
road
and
people
are
putting
their
barbecuers
and
they're
very.
Very
small.
Porches
and
people
are
putting
their
barbecuers
and
their
lawn
chairs,
and
you
know
right
out
on
their
porches,
which
it
would
be
nice.
Y
Yeah,
the
landscaping
on
you
stay
in
landscaping.
Barrier
was
installed
by
the
Houston
beautification
project
and
there
are
no
trees
on
the
south
side,
and
basically,
that
is
because
of
the
bank
and
the
mercantil
which
take
up
a
great
part
of
the
area
there
and
they're
being
used
as
businesses.
They
were
at
the
time
at
least,
and
they
couldn't
put
trees
in
there.
Y
So
we
would
like
them
to
put
in
our
landscaping
barrier
to
put
some
trees
in
that
would
match
some
landscaping
that
our
neighborhood
reinvestment
grant
gave
us
the
money
to
put
in
on
the
north
side
of
you
stick
what
we've
got
there
is
green
ash,
eastern
red
buds
or
hackin
berries,
impact
berries,
rather
so
I
would
appreciate
if
some
trees
were
put
in
there
and
that
would
offer
more
of
a
barrier
I
think
for
neighbors
not
to
have
that
apartment
building,
just
right
out
on
the
street
kind
of
right.
In
your
face
on
you,
stick.
G
G
Z
Dia
kind
of
give
the
Commission
a
little
bit
of
background.
We
did
try
and
do
gabled
roofs
again.
Our
height
limit
restricted
that
basically,
it
would
have
had
to
go
back
through
the
whole
process,
all
over
again
to
get
a
height
restriction,
height,
variance,
past
I.
Believe
our
landscaping
I'm
going
to
answer
her
landscaping
question.
Z
Since
that
landscape
plan
is
up
I
believe
we
do
have
about
six
or
seven
trees
along
you.
Stick
I
am
questioning
on
where,
where
she
was
suggesting,
we
put
the
youstick
Town
Center
trees.
If
it's
in
what
they
already
did.
It
sounds
like
it
supposed
to
be
in
front
of
the
bank.
I'm,
really
not
entirely
sure
where
that
was
supposed
to
be
a
thank
it
a
little
bit
of
clarification
there,
but
we
do
have
you
know
six
or
seven
trees.
There
is
quite
a
few
at
the
corner
as
well
and
then
three
right
along
shamrock.
Z
So
we
are,
we
are
pretty
heavily
landscape,
it
isn't
just
you
know,
a
big
building
right
on
the
street
and
then
thank
you
for
the
picture
of
the
porches.
Like
I
said
earlier,
we
are
proposing
to
do
opaque
porches.
So
we
cannot
see
through
those
as
well
as
to
help
to
help
block
what
what
residents
are.
What
tenants
would
put
on
those
porches
I
mean
I'll
stand
for
any
questions.
Thank.
I
I
It
appears
that,
along
with
those
townhomes
and
kind
of
smaller
homes
that
are
down
on
Wildwood-
and
you
stick,
there's
also
an
apartment
complex,
just
the
east
of
that
and
looking
at
some
of
their
facade
treatments
and
color
palette,
as
well
as
some
of
that
stone
veneer.
That's
on
there
that
this
project,
their
palette,
matches
that
pretty
well.
There
are
some
blues
and
almost
looks
like
the
exact
same
stone
color
that
they're
using
on
the
lower
portion
of
their
buildings
and
so
I
kind
of
feel
that
it
does
mimic
some
stuff.
That's
in
the
vicinity.
I
Those
do
have
more
gabled
roofs,
but
there's
also
some
taller
sort
of
towers
on
the
corners
of
the
entry
into
that
apartment,
complex
and
then
additionally,
I
think,
based
on
my
experience
with
landscaping.
I
think
that
the
reason
that
they're
I'm
going
to
take
a
guess
at
what
the
Neighborhood
Association
representative
was
discussing
about
trees
along
youstick
I
think
that
she
was
meaning
in
the
planter
strip,
that's
between
the
sidewalk
and
the
road,
because
that
appears
to
be
what
has
happened
in
terms
of
treatment
on
the
north
side
of
youstick.
I
But
there
is
a
major
Idaho
power
transmission
line
that
runs
on
the
south
side
of
youstick
that
it
appears
prohibit
street
trees
within
there
at
least
again,
based
on
my
experience
with
Idaho
power.
When
it
comes
to
planting
trees,
you
have
to
maintain
a
specific
setback
from
that
power
line,
and
it
looks
like
they're
addressing
the
as
mr.
likes
discussed
some
tree
locations
within
the
site
because
they
can't
put
them
in
that
planner
strip
because
of
that
restriction.
For
my
toe
power
in
general,
I
think
that
the
project
is
attractive.
I
We
kind
of
touched
on
it
on
the
last
agenda
item
that
you
know
at
first,
it's
kind
of
hard
seeing
something
new
come
into
a
more
historic
area,
but
as
it
grows
over
time,
I
think
it
becomes
part
of
the
fabric
of
that
community
too.
So
I
I
kind
of
I,
like
the
project
I,
think
it
does
do
a
good
job
at
addressing
some
of
the
existing
community
that
it
that
surrounds
it.
G
It
kind
of
contributes
to
pushing
the
mass
of
the
building
and
those
same
materials
all
out
to
the
face
of
the
building
so
in-cabin
that
material
change
with
the
semi
opaque
is
actually
a
better
solution
than
continuing
one
of
the
other
building
materials
and
kind
of
making
that
the
depth
of
the
building
just
a
little
more
shallow.
So
it's
my
my
two
cents.
G
L
Mr.
chairman,
yes,
I,
would
move
to
approve
DRH
20
zero,
zero
one
zero
five,
as
recommended
in
the
findings
of
fact,
in
the
conditions
of
law
and
the
recommended
conditions
of
approval,
noted
in
the
project
report
with
the
modification
of
item,
one
H
in
the
site,
specific
conditions
to
read,
submit
details
that
demonstrate
the
locations
of
all
mechanical
units
and
electrical
gas
meters
to
demonstrate
that
they
are
adequately
screened
to
D
our
staff
for
prove
it.