►
From YouTube: Design Review Committee - 2/10/21
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
A
Hi
john
looks
like
you've
joined
us.
Are
you
need
to
be
able
to
share
your
screen.
D
C
Okay,
yeah
I'm
trying
to,
I
think
so,.
B
B
B
Okay,
so,
hopefully
my
presentation
is
showing
for
a
quick
recap.
We
are
looking
at
item
number
drh20-00539
located
at
bound
crossing.
This
was
for
the
construction
of
the
multi-tenant
building
at
bound
crossing
activity
center
at
the
corner
of
park
center
and
bound
this
project
was
approved
january
13th.
B
A
condition
was
added
for
a
future
work
session,
specifically
to
present
design
solutions,
including
for
the
blank
walls
the
elevation
facing
park
center,
as
well
as
to
modify
the
rendering
material
colors
for
the
blank
wall.
Treatments
on
the
southern
elevation
you
can
see
they
added
a
storefront
window
and
canopy
staff
is
satisfied.
Satisfied
with
this
change
thinks
it
meets
the
intent
of
our
conditions
for
the
western
elevation.
B
Then
there
were
there's
no
elevation
provided
for
park
center
with
the
renderings.
You
can
see
that
there
were
no
changes
made
as
part
of
the
conditions.
The
stucco
cannot
exceed
50
50
of
the
facade.
When
I
reviewed
the
project
it
did
exceed
50,
so
the
applicant
will
either
need
to
verify
that
the
stucco
is
actually
less
than
50
or
extend
an
additional
material
and
then
with
rendering
material
colors.
They
did
update
those
and,
as
you
can
see,
it
does
reflect
the
actual
selected
colors
a
lot
better.
B
So
in
general,
staff
is
recommending
that
an
additional
design
treatment
be
added
to
the
western
elevation
that
the
north
elevation
be
verified,
that
the
stucco
doesn't
exceed
that
50,
50
percent
or
the
masonry
veneer
may
be
extended
or
another
material
may
be
added,
but
the
south
elevation
condition
has
been
met
and
the
colors
are
appropriate
and
meet
the
intent
of
the
change,
and
I
believe
the
applicant
had
some
additional
elevations
to
discuss
potential
design
treatments
when
they're
able
to
present.
C
Okay,
can
you
hear
me
all
right?
Thank
you
yeah
I've.
I
I
would
like
to
address
the
western
elevation
if
I
may,
and
actually
the
southern
elevation
as
well.
Excuse
me
the
north
elevation
facing
park
center
and
so
I'll
share.
We
revised
that
a
little
bit
to
add.
C
You
know
I
think
the
elevation,
the
the
latest,
rendering
that
we
had
shown
on
that
western
elevation
was.
It
was
showing
more
stucco
than
was
going
to
be
allowed.
So
I
sent
some
updated
elevations
to
casey
and
that's
what
I'll
share
with
you
right
now.
C
C
I
do
think
we're
we're
right
at
about
50,
so
I
can
send
you
some
calculations
and
show
that
to
you,
if
we
needed
to,
we
can
increase
some
of
the
base
free
to
account
to
to
make
up
for
the
difference,
but
I
think
we're
right
there,
and
so
then,
on
the
west
elevation.
C
As
you
can
see
from
the
previous
version,
we've
we've
essentially
wrapped
the
entire
back
of
the
building
with
the
masonry,
and
then
it's
got
a
couple
of
precast
caps
in
it
one
down
lower
and
then
one
up
determination
of
the
masonry
where
it
needs
to
stucco.
F
C
And
one
of
the
things
I
would
propose
here
is
doing
some
sort
of
maybe
some
banding
or
not
necessarily
some
banding,
but
some
pattern
working
here
with
some
soldier
course.
Possibly
you
know
like
a
a
recessed
rectangle,
that's
going
to
mimic,
say
a
window
or
depression
of
some
sort.
But
but
I
would
propose
you
know
some
breaking
up
the
masonry
with
some.
C
Design
different
design
work
with
the
masonry
soldier,
of
course,
some
sort
of
pattern.
Something
like
that
so
and
with
that,
I
I'll
stand
for
any
questions.
E
Thank
you,
john.
Is
there
any
questions
for
the
applicant.
H
Mr
chairman,
yes,
tom
mr
day
with
regard
to
the
west
elevation
that
you
were
just
referring
to
and
the
possibility
of
doing
some
articulation
of
the
brick
patterning
or
patterning
on
that
section,
would
it
be
your
intent
that
that
patterning
would
carry
over
to
the
north
and
south
panels
that
are
similarly
done?
Or
would
it
just
be
isolated
to
that?
One
panel.
C
I
think
I
don't
know
I
I
think,
probably
here
as
well
tom
but
and
and
this
one
for
sure
I
just
don't
think,
there's
enough,
you
know
if,
if
you're
talking
about
these
ends,
I
don't
think
so,
but
I
would
consider
this
entire
section
in
here
available
for
some
sort
of
pattern.
Work
in
the
basement.
Okay,.
H
Pretty
good
and
then
one
more
question
john,
is
I've
noticed
that
you've
redesigned
the
parking
lot
area
to
accommodate
the
handicapped,
revised
handicapped
parking
location
as
well
as
the
trash
receptacle
area
has.
Have
you
reviewed
that
the
new
configuration
of
that
trash
area
with
the
city
of
boise
to
see
if
it
complies
with
their
requirements.
I
Thank
you.
I
just
wanted
to
address
the
issue
of
all
the
stucco.
I
I
think
the
stucco
makes
the
building
frankly
look
like
a
sort
of
a
cheap
part
of
a
strip
mall,
and
I
know
that's
what
we're
trying
to
avoid,
and
so
it
would
just
be
nice
to
see
more
of
the
masonry
on
the
front
inside
of
the
building,
and
you
know
I
I'm
not
as
concerned
about
the
back,
because
that's
where
people
are
parking,
I
also
don't
see
how
any
banding
or
pattern
work
in
the
masonry
in
the
back
is
gonna
solve
much.
I
I
I
think
I
don't
have
a
problem
with
the
blank
wall
because
of
the
large
sets
of
windows
on
either
side,
but
it
it
just
seems
like
decoration
just
to
have
decoration-
and
I
you
know,
I
think,
that's
a
problem
with
a
lot
of
architecture
today-
is
that
you
just
throw
some
molding
or
banding
or
something
on
there
to
make
it
look
like
you
did
something,
and
it
looks
like
it
was
an
add-on,
so
I'd
rather
see
either
nothing
different
or
something
entirely.
E
E
J
I
almost
feel
like
it
makes
it
look
like
more
of
a
blank
wall
with
the
change
and
the
single
color
there.
I
felt
like
some
of
the
recommendations
in
the
staff
report.
You
know
maybe
adding
a
couple
or
a
single
false
column
in
the
middle
of
that
kind
of
tan
wall
there.
Now
that's
all
masonry
just
created
more
of
a
pattern
than
would
be,
and
it
you
know
create
that
rhythm
of
you
know
some
columns,
whether
or
not
they're
false
columns
or
not
through
that
space.
J
I
think
that
would
probably
accomplish
a
little
bit
more
and
I
I
apologize.
I
wasn't
at
the
january
hearing,
but
to
me
I
I
don't
know
if
maybe
the
response
was
was
you
know
the
at
the
addition
of
that
masonry
in
the
back
was
to
try
to
reduce
the
facade
below
50
stucco
in
there.
J
I
think
maybe
a
combination
of
that
extension
of
the
the
masonry
and
and
the
bringing
back
kind
of
those
false
columns
that
were
in
that
elevation
on
that
side
before,
I
think,
accomplishes
what
we're
kind
of
looking
for
on
the
design.
I
definitely
agree
with
the
side
that
faces
park
center.
J
You
know
whether
that's
an
extension
of
that
masonry
or
something
else
just
to
dress
that
side
up.
I
I
realize
that
there's
a
fairly
large
landscape
buffer
in
there
but
yeah.
I
would
think
that
that
side
is
very
visible,
maybe
a
little
bit
more.
The
extension
of
that
masonry
and
that
other
ledge
that
you
have
above
on
this
on
the
west
wall
would
work
better
on
that
south
wall
too.
I
Yes,
mr
chair,
yes,
sorry,
the
more,
I
look
at
it
the
more
concerned.
I
am
that
it
really
looks
sort
of
like
a
generic
strip
mall,
and
I
think
I
I
finally
figured
out
why
I
think
that
it's
because
of
the
various
heights
on
the
single
building
is
it
and
because
of
the
because
of
the
the
moldings
or
the
around
the
tops
of
the
building?
Is
it
you
know?
Has
it
come
up?
I
B
Okay,
so
for
the
western
elevation,
the
intent
of
removing
the
blank
walls
is
to
activate
the
area
and
also
to
avoid
vandalism
encouraging
vandalism
by
having
those
blank
areas.
These
elevations
weren't
provided
to
staff
prior
to
the
meeting.
As
far
as
extending
the
masonry,
it
does
create
a
blank
wall
just
with
masonry,
so
the
intent
wasn't
necessarily
to
reduce
the
stucco
per
the
condition
of
approval.
It
is
an
interior
facing
elevation,
so
we
don't
have
that
50
percent
restriction,
so
it
could
be
succo.
B
We
don't
need
the
extension
of
the
masonry
there
as
far
as
the
height,
as
was
discussed
in
the
hearing,
the
varying
heights
do
kind
of
break
up
the
facade
in
the
front
facing
down.
As
you
can
see,
it
does
highlight
the
different
tenant
spaces
at
this
work
session.
We
are
specifically
talking
about
the
western
elevation
and
the
blank
walls,
the
park
center
elevation
and
then
the
rendering
colors,
which
I
think
no
one
has
issues
with.
L
Mr
chair,
yes
casey,
I
guess
or
and
john
if
you
put
some
type
of
trellis
treatment
back
there,
similar
to
what
you
have
at
the
northeast
elevation.
L
Smaller
version
of
that
would
that
resolve
the
issue
and
is
that
something
the
owner
would
consider
and
I'm
not
an
architect.
So
maybe
from
a
design
standpoint.
Maybe
it's
not
a
good
solution,
but
I'm
just
looking
at
the
entire
building
and
seeing
if
there's
another
element
from
a
different
elevation
that
can
go
back.
L
B
C
Yeah,
if
I,
if
I
may
speak
now,
I
I
think
you
know
that
that
that
idea
had
come
to
mind.
The
thing
I
need
to
be
careful
about
is
supporting
it
and
the
overhang
and
how
that
all
works.
Unfortunately,
the
the
back
of
the
building.
I
think
we've
got
a
seven
foot
sidewalk
back
there,
so
it's
it's
fairly
shallow.
C
What
I
would
propose-
and
I
think
I
I
think
the
owner
would
buy
into
it
is-
is
if
we
did
mimic
some
of
that
trellis
work
right
in
this
area,
and
then
we
applied
some
of
those
false
columns.
If
you
will,
like
you
see
here
in
the
front,
to
break
up
this
panel
a
little
bit
more,
I
think
that
those
two
options
would
be
agreeable
and
something
we
could
work
with.
H
J
J
J
And
site-specific
conditions
of
approval
contained
within
the
work
session
memo
for
the
hearing
dated
february
10
2021,
with
added
condition
of
providing
confirmation
that
the
northern
and
southern
facades
contain
less
than
50
of
stucco
and
that
an
additional
design
treatment
should
be
provided
along.
The
western
elevations
as
discussed.
E
I
have
a
motion
and
a
second
any
discussion
on
that.
H
M
G
G
A
Opposed
thank
you.
All.
We
have
a
little
bit
of
housekeeping
before
the
regular
meeting.
Now
we
do
need
to
have
elections
for
chairman
and
vice
chairman,
I
did
speak
with
committee
member
marsh
since
he's
not
able
to
attend
tonight
and
he
is
perfectly
willing
to
continue
his
chairman,
but
would
love
to
give
somebody
else
the
opportunity
if
they
wanted
it
so
I'll,
open
the
floor
for.
E
L
J
I
agree,
I
think
mr
rodin's
doing
a
great
job
as
co-chairman
as
well.
H
I
would
move
that
the
nominations
be
closed
and
that
chairman
marsh
and
vice
chairman
rodin,
be
elected
for
the
next
term.
I
E
A
H
A
Yeah
in
the
council
chambers,
we
couldn't
hear
cody
at
all,
but
I
guess
he
spoke
to
the
group
as
a
whole.
So
but
I
think
if
we
went
back
and
watched
youtube,
we
would
be
able
to
hear
okay,
there's
no
problems.
J
G
E
When
we
start
the
meeting,
I
got
two
sets
of
kind
of
notes,
and
one
of
them
has
the
sort
of
diatribe
about
having
a
cassette
agenda
and
what
goes
on
a
consent,
agenda
and
appeal
periods,
and
all
that
and
the
other
one
just
left
that
out
and
started
right
into
the
meeting.
Do
you
want
me
to
to
re-read
that
at
the
beginning
of
the
meeting.
A
Yeah
the
one
that
starts
out.
We
are
citizen
volunteers
that
one
that
talks
about
the
consent
agenda
would
be
the
correct
one
to
read.
E
A
All
right,
mr
chairman,
if
everyone's
back,
I
think
we
can
go
ahead
and
get
started
very
well.
A
A
After
that,
we
proceed
to
public
testimony,
starting
with
those
who
signed
up
in
the
online
sign
up
sheet
in
advance
and
then
anyone
else
who
raises
their
hand
virtually
if
you
are
attending
through
your
telephone,
you
can
type
in
star
9.
To
raise
your
hand,
each
member
of
the
public
is
allowed
up
to
3
minutes
for
testimony.
E
E
Any
decisions
made
tonight
may
be
appealed
to
the
boise
city
planning
and
zoning
commission,
provided
the
appeal
is
within
10
days
of
this
hearing
in
order
to
file
an
appeal
you
must
have
given
written
or
oral
testimony
at
tonight's
meeting.
So
that's
why
it's
important
that
you
give
your
name
and
address
when
you
testify
tonight.
If
you
do,
we
utilize
a
consent
agenda.
This
means
that
if
the
applicant
agrees
with
the
staff
report
and
if
there
is
no
public
opposition,
the
item
will
be
placed
on
the
consent
agenda.
E
All
items
that
are
placed
on
the
consent
agenda
are
approved
with
one
motion.
Without
further
public
comment
for
items
not
on
the
consent
agenda,
we
will
hold
a
full
public
hearing
in
the
order
on
the
agenda
with
staff,
applicant
neighborhood
association
and
then
public
testimony.
Thank
you
all
for
virtually
attending
tonight.
E
I
would
like
to
call
the
february
10th
2021
design
review
committee
meeting
to
order
victoria.
Could
you
call
a
roll.
K
M
G
L
H
E
21-008,
that
is
a
location
of
2850
west
fletcher
street.
It's
number
six
on
our
agenda.
Is
there
any
member
of
the
audience
wishing
to
speak
to
this
item?
Who
cannot
make
it
to
a
future
date?
And
I
guess
I
should
ask
staff
when
we
are
deferring
that
to
or
do
you
have
a
time.
E
H
Mr
chairman,
yes,
move
for
deferral
of
drh.
L
E
E
E
E
K
Yes,
this
is
david
blodgett
with
rodin
architects.
E
E
H
I
would
move
that
the
consent
agenda
in
all
items
on
the
consent
agenda
be
approved,
subject
to
all
the
findings
and
conclusions
and
conditions
of
approval
upon
for
each
application,
and
that
would
include
the
late
correspondence
on
three
designated
items.
In
the
memo
provided
to
the
committee
on
february.
8Th
and
the
correspondence
provided
on.
L
E
I
have
a
motion
in
a
second
victoria.
Would
you
please
call
the
roll?
Mr
chairman
yeah?
Yes,
go
ahead,
dan.
J
My
firm
is
the
landscape
architect
on
item
number
two,
so
my
on
the
consent
agenda.
My
vote
will
not
include
a
vote
on
that
item.
E
And
victoria
before
I
ask
you
to
call
her
all
go
ahead
and
note
that
I'll
be
abstaining
on
my
vote
from
item
number
seven,
since
my
firm
is
the
applicant
so
victoria,
would
you
call
a
roll.
M
H
G
P
Thank
you,
mr
chairman.
This
project
was
deferred
at
the
january
hearing
and
the
committee
asked
for
some
additional
information
and
the
applicant
has
provided
that
additional
information,
including
the
metal
panel
system,
manufacturer
and
product.
They
are
proposing
the
warren
exposed
fastener
series
and
they
also
provided
the
profile
and
some
connection
details,
including
the
curb
detail.
P
E
O
Yes,
hi.
Can
you
hear
me
now?
Yes,
okay,
great
thanks,
mr
chairman
members
of
the
committee,
my
name
is
sean
kennedy
architect
with
gglo
1199
shoreline
drive
suite
290
boise
83702.
O
Thank
you
for
having
us
here.
I
think
caitlyn
kind
of
covered
the
overall
context
or
content
of
the
additional
information
that
we
provided,
and
I
I'd
like
to
share
my
screen.
If
I
could.
O
You
so
I
I
won't
go
into
those
details
that
caitlyn
has
already
covered
unless
there's
something
specific
that
you'd
like
to
ask
for.
I
did
want
to
show
something,
though,
just
based
on
some
of
the
questions
that
we
had
going
back
and
forth
with
caitlin,
to
explain
the
mechanical,
the
the
revision
to
the
mechanical
screening
that
we've
provided
now.
O
Originally,
we
were
anticipating
that
the
mechanical
units
would
be
located
on
the
roof
after
some
additional
engineering
over
the
last
several
weeks
last
month.
We
realized
that,
in
order
to
meet
our
sustainability
requirements
and
the
types
of
mechanical
units
that
we
were
going
to
that
we'd
like
to
use,
they
really
were
not
going
to
be
able
to
use
them
on
the
roof
and
screen
them
effectively.
O
So
we've
actually
created
a
room,
an
area
for
the
mechanical
equipment
at
the
ground
floor
at
the
rear
that
space
right
there
is
enclosed
by
a
perforated
metal
panel
that
has
the
same
color
finish.
The
same
paint
finish
and
the
same
profile
as
the
metal
panels.
Above
it's
just
a
perforated
screen
to
allow
air
flow
through
the
system,
and
you
can
see
with
respect
to
caitlin's
comment
about
the
full
height.
O
You
can
see
that
it
runs
in
the
same
profile
and
it
just
corresponds
exactly
to
the
system
above,
and
this
would
be
the
view
from
right
around
the
corner,
the
and
then
again
from
the
back,
so
that
fully
screens
the
mechanical
equipment
and
the
distribution
is
on
the
inside
one.
Other
thing
that
I
wanted
to
note
is
on
the
roof
we
we
will
have.
This
is
the
elevator
overrun
area
right
here
that
that
needs
to
raise
up
just
a
little
bit
above
that
roof
and
there's
a
fan
unit
in
there.
O
We've
screened
that
fan
unit
with
a
a
wood
lattice
that
that
matches
the
same
materials
that
we're
using
on
the
elevation
on
the
facade
inserts
at
the
windows.
O
In
order
to
screen
that
fan
unit
in
there-
and
that's
all
I
wanted
to
show
in
addition
to
the
package
that
was
already
distributed
to
you,
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
other
questions,
though.
E
H
Mr
kennedy,
thank
you
for
your
your
package
and
the
detail
you
provided.
I
I
think
that
solved
a
lot
of
the
questions
that
I
had
on
how
you're
going
to
accomplish
some
things.
One
of
the
questions
I
had
was
with
regard
to
your
the
foundation
wall,
extensions
above
grade
that
vary
in
height.
I
assume
that
the
higher
wall
depicted
would
be
along
the
alley
side
and
the
lower
areas
would
would
be
in
the
other
elevations.
O
I
I
assume
that
you're
asking
about
this
wall
right
along
here.
If
you
can
see,
where
my
hand
is
yeah,
the
site
actually
does
have
a
slight
slope,
so
it
it
it.
The
height
of
that
wall
varies
a
little
bit
along
this
edge.
By
about
by
about
six
to
eight
inches,
I
believe,
and
that
that
sort
of
curve
wall
kind
of
goes
all
the
way
around.
We
we
chose
this
height.
We
initially
had
set
it
a
little
bit
lower.
O
H
O
H
Okay,
can
you
tell
me,
with
regard,
what's
your
you've
gone
to
so
much
detail
on
all
the
other
components
of
the
exterior?
What
finish
do
you
anticipate
on
that
wall?
Is
it
just
going
to
be
board
formed
or
or
out
of
the
form
concrete,
or
are
you
planning
any
kind
of
a
surface
treatment
on
that.
O
We
do
plan
to
do
it
as
an
architectural
finish,
with
a
paint
and
the
paint
with
a
paint
that
will
will
match
the
color.
The
siding
above
we
haven't
selected
an
actual
color,
but
I
expect
it
would
be
something
with
the
same
hue
and
and
tone,
but
maybe
a
slightly
lighter,
just
slightly
lighter
to
fit
into
the
color
scheme
of
the
rest
of
the
elevation.
H
Okay,
very
good.
Thank
you.
This
is
just
a
comment.
It's
not
a
not
not
really
a
question
on
the
the
wood
panels
that
are
going
to
be
an
accent
there.
H
H
O
I
I
I
I
will
say
I
I
agree
with
with
your
you
know
the
line
of
thought
that
you
have
there
and
we
can
take
that
into
consideration.
I
I
do
think
that,
while
you
know
our
consideration
here
was,
we
could
have
used
a
non-wood
material.
We
could
use
some
kind
of
composite
material
or
something
like
that.
That
would
never
really
change.
We
wanted
to
use
an
actual
real
wood
material,
and
you
know
so.
O
It
becomes
just
a
question
of
how
it's
maintained
over
the
long
term,
but
I
think
our
our
view
on
it
was
as
you
reference
since
the
building,
since
this
facade
is
on
the
north
side
sort
of
the
northeast
side.
Even
it
really
doesn't
get
a
lot
of
direct
sunlight
or
any,
and
we
weren't
expecting
that
it
would
that
it
would
truly
sort
of
fade,
but
but
we
could.
We
can
definitely
take
note
of
your
comment
and
think
about
that.
H
H
It
I
hope
that
your
design
team
has
also
considered
the
eventual
signage
that's
going
to
go
on
the
building
where
and
how
you're
going
to
handle
it.
I've
been
disappointed
in
a
lot
of
the
newer
buildings
that
we
see
in
the
downtown
area
seem
to
have
scatter
shot
signage,
going
from
floor
to
floor
to
floors.
H
The
tenants
want
to
get
their
name
publicized
out
into
the
public,
and
this
building
is
really
nice
and
I'd
hate
to
date
to
see
the
one
last
element
on
it:
kind
of
take
away
from
all
the
work
that
you've
done.
O
Thank
you
for
saying
all
of
that.
Yes,
that
that
is
something
that
we
have
thought
some
about,
especially
as
the
project
has
progressed.
The
tenants
are
not
completely.
O
Confirmed
yet,
but
we
do
have
some
thoughts
about
how
signage
would
be
very
much
integrated
into
the
the
canopy
and
into
the
the
the
the
wall
panel
next
to
the
door
and
and
have
it
be
a
very
integrated
element,
as
opposed
to
just
sort
of
a
a
random
backlit
box
or
something
we
fully
intend
it
to
be
something
that
is
relatively
modest
in
scale
and
very
much
in
the
language
of
the
architecture.
E
Thank
you,
mr
kennedy.
Is
there
any
member
of
the
public
that
would
like
to
testify
on
this
application.
E
I
can
say
from
my
perspective,
it
looks
like
they've
addressed
everything
pretty
handily
and
it
continues
to
look
like
a
pretty
smart
piece
of
architecture,
and
I
I
don't
have
any
problem
with
it
with
any
of
the
solutions
that
they've
suggested.
At
this
point.
E
H
I
I
Yes,
mr
chairman,
yes,
I
agree
with
what
you
said
previously.
I
think
this
is
a
beautiful
building
and
all
of
our
concerns
expressed
at
the
previous
meeting
have
been
addressed.
H
G
E
Thank
you.
The
next
item,
up
for
to
be
heard,
is.
P
P
And
we
do,
we
do
have
a
number
of
trees
that
need
to
be
removed
to
allow
for
the
building
to
be
placed
where
it
is
and
it
sounds
like
the
applicant
is
going
to
do
what
they
can
to
see
if
they
can
save
some
of
those
trees,
but
with
the
building
layout
approved
by
current
planning.
There's
not
really
too
much
shifting
of
the
building
itself.
P
We
can
do
at
this
point,
but
they
are
going
to
work
with
forestry
too,
to
look
at
this
street
tree
mitigation
calculations
and
see
what
they
can
do
to
save
save
any
of
the
trees
on
site
that
they
can.
P
And
then
the
development
agreement,
I
think
the
two
items
that
probably
pertain
the
most
to
us
is
the
landscaping.
So
it
says,
open
areas
within
the
site
will
be
landscaped
with
plants
and
trees.
Consistent
with
the
city
of
boise,
30th
street
master
plan,
including
street
planters,
the
developer
shall
consider
participating
with
ccdc
to
install
silva
cells
on
27th
street
and
stuart
avenue
adjacent
to
the
site.
Dense
deciduous
plants
shall
be
planted
to
screen
the
parking
areas
and
efforts
shall
be
made
by
the
developer
to
retain
as
many
mature
existing
trees
as
possible.
P
P
P
The
roof
form
will
be
both
gabled
and
flat
and
will
not
exceed
a
height
limit
of
35
feet.
Exterior
fenestration
at
the
ground
level
will
be
modern,
retail,
including
historic
elements
or
residential
and
scale
above
the
ground
floor
fenestration
will
be
residential
in
scale.
The
building
facade
will
have
horizontal
and
vertical
recesses
and
offsets.
P
P
So
I
think
we
have
another
couple
renderings
here,
but
I
think
it
does
show
that
they
have
the
residential
scale
fenestration
on
the
upper
floors.
They
have
both
gabled
and
flat
roofs
and
they
have
some
kind
of
historic
elements
in
their
storefront,
while
also
having
a
modern
look.
So
I
think
they've
met
the
development
agreement.
Requirements
pretty
well
and
I
think
they
are
in
they're
in
agreeance
with
all
the
recommended
conditions
of
approval.
P
But
we
might
have
a
couple
members
of
the
public
wanting
to
speak
on
this
one.
So
I
think
I
think
steve
might
be
there
from
the
applicant
team
and
I
think
he
might
be
in
person.
E
Thank
you
caitlin.
I
will
is
the
applicant
present
somewhere,
I'm
here
at
city
hall.
Thank
you
I'll
turn
it
over
to
you.
If
you'll
say
your
name
and
address
for
the
record.
D
This
is
steve
trout
with
trot
architects,
we're
at
2504
west
kootenay
here.
D
Mr
chairman
and
community
members,
thanks
for
taking
your
time
to
review
this
exciting
project
that
we
have
going
down
on
27th
and
stuart
caitlin
kind
of
mentioned
the
process
of
getting
here,
but
if
I
can
elaborate
just
a
little
bit
more
in
2018,
we
started
with
a
different
owner
than
we
have
right
now,
which
is
mike
prentiss.
Who
is
also
with
me?
If
you
have
any
questions
concerning
that
side,
we
initially
proposed
a
whole
different
building
than
you
see
now,
and
the
neighborhood
did
not
like
it.
I'll.
D
So
that's
where
the
historical
overtones
are
coming
in,
but
yet
some
of
the
modernism
on
the
top
anyway.
So
this
this
has
been
well
vetted
by
the
neighborhood
as
we
went
through
it.
I
feel
caitlin
mentioned
the
existing
trees.
We
will
be
trying
to
save
a
few
trees.
We
found
a
few
trees
that
got
missed
in
our
initial
planning,
some
pines
on
the
northern
end
of
the
property
that
I
think
we
can
save
and
there
might
be
one
or
two
in
the
alley
that
we
can
save.
D
D
D
We're
also
working
on
this
project
as
a
night
sky
project,
so
all
of
that
we're
trying
to
be
very
friendly
to
the
neighborhood
same
with
the
trash
we've
heard
comments
about
trash
being
could
be
an
issue
of
picking
that
up
we've
oversized
the
trash
enclosures
just
slightly
so
we
can
put
more
dumpsters
in
there,
so
we
can
have
less
collection
times,
so
the
noise
that
the
collection
we'll
make
we'll
be
we're
trying
to
mitigate
that
to
our
neighbors
and
and
to
our
our
clients
there.
D
At
the
thing
there
was
a
comment
I
think
caitlin
made
about
the
trees
on
27th
being
ash,
we're
going
to
actually
be
changing
those
to
an
emerald
sunshine.
Elm
is
what
we're
proposing
today,
which
is
different
caitlin
that
I
would
I
told
you
earlier,
the
silva
cells
I
wanted
to.
Let
you
know
that
we
are
in
conversation
with
ccdc
to
put
those
silver
cells
in
so
per
our
development
agreement.
D
In
our
conversations
with
the
neighborhood
one
of
our
neighbors
mentioned
that
it
would
be
nice
to
have
some
public
art
on
the
corner
of
stuart
and
27th.
We
have
a
large
plaza
there,
and
so
we've
launched
off
again
talking
to
ccdc
and
arts
and
history
department
to
see
if
we
can
get
some
art
put
in
on
that
corner,
it'd
be
an
excellent
piece.
A
vertical
piece
would
be
really
nice
there
and
then
finally,
just
to
mention
there's
also
been
conversation
in
the
neighborhood
about
preserving
or
moving
the
existing
housing.
D
We
have
a
couple
interesting
parties
so
anyway,
that's
an
ongoing
event
for
the
ones
that
we
can't
move,
we're,
also
exploring
salvage,
so
we're
checking
out
different
salvage
availabilities
to
get
them
those
materials
recycled
and
out
of
the
landfill
and
not
fill
the
landfill.
So
it's
just
a
little
background
and
other
than
that.
Caitlin
presented
it
well.
So.
E
R
Yeah
hi,
can
you
all
hear
me
okay
here
I
am.
I
can
see
me
all
right,
I'm
supposed
to
give
my
name
and
address
first
right.
R
All
right,
thank
you.
My
name
is
marcia
franklin
and
I
live
at
2521
west
stewart
avenue
in
boise.
That's
a
block
from
the
development
and
I've
lived
in
the
neighborhood
for
almost
28
years,
so
I
am
going
to
try
and
share
screen
which
I've
never
done
before.
If
you
can
bear
with
me.
Hopefully
this
will
work
and
we
can
do
that
there.
It
is.
Can
you
all
see
that
is
that
is
that
seeable
yeah?
Okay,
great
so
I'm
gonna
start
my
testimony.
R
I'm
gonna
just
speak
specifically
to
the
design
of
element
of
the
landscaping
and
go
into
more
detail
on
the
tree
issue.
This
property
is
really
unique
for
any
neighborhood
and
that
it's
a
small
glade
and
woods
and
here's
a
look
from
above.
As
you
can
see,
it
really
stands
out
in
the
neighborhood
and
that's
because
more
than
40
trees
provide
a
canopy
of
shade
and
habitat,
and
here's
a
closer
look
at
that.
R
The
canopy
includes
large
oak
and
walnut
trees,
as
well
as
some
really
gorgeous
specimens
of
evergreens.
I
did
take
a
little
video
of
some
of
them.
I
wish
the
deciduous
trees
were
fully
leafed
out,
but
if
you
walked
by
in
a
few
months,
you'd
see
just
how
lush
the
canopy
is.
All
these
trees
will
be
cut
down
and
replaced
with
very
small
trees
and
grates.
R
R
Now
I
don't
want
to
stop
this
development,
but
I
am
here
because
I
really
believe
that
we
can
and
we
must
save
some
of
the
mature
trees
on
this
property.
The
blueprint
boise
plan
clearly
prioritizes
the
environment,
including
a
healthy
urban
forest
goal.
Es
6.2
calls
for
preserving
healthy
specimens
of
mature
species
and
the
health
and
survival
of
all
intermediate
intermediate-aged
trees,
removing
38
trees,
many
of
them
healthy
intermediate
and
mature
specimens
is
not
in
alignment
with
blueprint
boise.
R
In
addition,
boise's
tree
ordinance
clearly
states
that
the
city
will
maintain
the
maximum
amount
of
canopy
coverage
and
preserve
and
enhance
the
city,
environmental,
economic
and
social
character
with
mature
trees.
The
removal
of
38
trees
does
not
seem
to
be
in
compliance
with
boise's
tree
ordinance.
We
have
city-wide
climate
change
and
tree
planting
initiatives.
The
removal
of
38
trees
and
the
construction
of
a
large
parking
lot
that
will
add
to
our
heat
map
is
not
in
keeping
with
these
initiatives.
In
my
view
now
the
current
developer,
as
you
know,
has
told
neighbors.
R
He
would
like
to
save
some
of
the
trees,
which
is
great,
and
we
have
an
enlightened
architect
and
landscape
firm
involved.
I've
walked
the
perimeter
many
times
and
believe
that
there
are
healthy,
mature
trees
that
can
be
saved
in
the
future
parking
lot
area.
We
actually
have
a
great
example
of
how
to
do
that.
R
Just
a
block
away
at
another
complex,
also
designed
by
mr
trout,
the
davis
street
apartments
not
only
have
mature
trees
surrounding
them,
but
there's
also
a
large
tree
in
the
middle
of
the
parking
lot
that
provides
shade
a
gathering
space
and
a
respite
for
the
eye.
Here's
how
that
looks
from
above
you
know.
I
would
also
urge
that
permeable
concrete
be
used
for
this
parking
lot
to
prevent
runoff
on
and
mayor
mclean
has
made
this
a
priority,
so
in
some
I'll
just
stop
the
share.
R
I
would
like
to
see
the
permit
for
this
development
be
conditioned
on
saving
some
of
the
mature
trees,
not
just
a
suggestion,
and
that
the
final
design
review
decision
be
deferred
until
the
city,
forester
and
the
landscape
firm
have
re-examined
opportunities
to
do
that.
This
is
really
a
chance
to
benefit
the
property,
the
environment
and
future
generations,
and
we
really
have
the
knowledge
and
creativity
to
do
this,
and
I
feel
we
have
the
obligation
to
as
well.
Thank
you.
N
Thank
you
very
much,
mr
chairman
committee
members.
Can
you
hear
me
okay.
N
N
I
also
serve
on
the
boar
as
a
board
member
on
the
west
end
neighborhood
association,
I
love
living
in
the
city
of
trees
and
every
time
I
am
hiking
in
the
foothills,
I'm
grateful
for
that
mature
tree
canopy.
That
covers
much
of
our
city.
One
of
the
main
reasons
we
live
here
in
the
west
end
is
for
these
mature
trees
that
we're
discussing
in
today's
hearing.
N
N
I
recognize
the
intent
from
the
developer
to
do
the
best
that
they
can
related
to
these
trees
on
site,
but
I
would
be
remissed
if
I
didn't
comment
for
the
public
record
here
to
allow
a
development
to
occur
in
the
city
of
trees,
that
plans
to
completely
destroy
a
lush,
mature
canopy
and
replace
it
with
a
parking
lot
just
seems
out
of
character
for
our
city.
I
would
strongly
urge
the
committee
to
encourage
the
preservation
of
these
mature
trees.
N
My
window
looks
out
at
this
property.
That's
planned
for
development
all
year
round.
I
look
and
enjoy
this.
This
wooded
area
that
currently
occupies
this
space.
I
watched
squirrels
playing
birds,
nesting,
I've,
seen
baby
raccoons
grow
up
in
these
trees
and
to
tear
those
down
in
may
time
frame
would
completely
disrupt
a
significant
amount
of
wildlife.
N
In
addition,
I
am
conscious
of
some
of
the
other
concerns
that
we've
expressed
to
the
developer,
and
I
know
they've
made
comment
about
the
lighting
in
the
parking
lot.
That's
going
to
feed
over
across
the
alley
into
our
homes,
the
privacy
of
a
three-story
apartment
that
will
look
into
our
backyards,
and
I
think
that
this
preservation
of
a
tree
of
these
mature
trees
will
provide
that
natural
screen
and
desired
privacy
from
those
new
neighbors
from
us.
E
I
Can
we
hear
from?
Is
this
an
appropriate
time
to
hear
from
either
caitlyn
or
from
the
applicant
about
you
know
their
reaction
to
their
request
to
save
some
of
the
trees
and
you
know,
what's
been
tried
and
what's
possible.
E
J
E
Yeah
good
point:
josh:
is
there
anybody
else.
D
Thank
you,
steve
trout,
here
again
I'll
pick
off
the
first
one
easy
for
miss
franklin's
comment
on
permeable
pavers.
We
are
intending
to
use
permeable
pavers
in
this
project,
which
will
cut
down
a
little
bit
on
the
heat
load
coming
from
the
you
know,
the
typical
black
asphalt
because
they
come
in
a
little
different
color
concerning
the
trees,
I'm
not
a
landscape
person.
D
So
I
depend
on
other
people
to
inform
me
of
this,
but
our
goal
is
to
save
as
many
trees
as
we
can
we're
having
a
big
meeting
there
coming
this
wednesday
with
the
civil
engineer,
landscape,
architect
and
myself
and
the
owner
to
review
it.
One
more
time
in
the
previous
submittals,
we
had
a
different
landscape
firm
said
that
that
probably
we
couldn't
not
even
probably
we
couldn't
save
them
because
of
the
depth
and
location
of
those
trees.
D
There's
a
drainage
swell
where
most
of
those
really
nice
trees
are
located
or
some
of
them
that
will
have
to
be
filled
in
so
we
can
get
a
parking
lot
out
of
it.
Unfortunately,
but
I
don't
I-
I
totally
agree
with
mr
tesla
and
miss
franklin
on
trying
to
preserve
the
trees.
We
just
don't
have
a
good
way
of
doing
that
and
getting
the
density
of
the
project
that
the
property
requires.
D
Some
there
are
some
trees
that
hit
our
planters.
Pretty
good.
We've
moved
planters
around
trying
to
get
them
we're
going
to
try
some
more
to
do
that,
but
again
it's
more
the
elevation
than
the
location
that
is
causing
us
a
problem
here.
E
J
Mr
sample
not
so
much
a
question
necessarily
as
just
a
comment.
I
guess
I'm
really
glad
to
hear
that
you
are
working
with
the
landscape,
architect
and
the
owner,
and
I
would
definitely
encourage,
if
at
all
possible,
getting
in
touch
with
someone
down
at
the
city,
forestry
department,
they're,
always
willing
to
come
out
and
evaluate
trees.
They're,
not.
I
don't
believe
they
charge
anything
for
that
service
up
front,
just
to
see
what
their
recommendations
would
be
because
they
are
working
around
these
trees
within
this
urban
environment
on
a
daily
basis.
J
So
they
can
really
provide
some
insight.
So
I
would
encourage
that.
I'm
sure
that
caitlyn
or
anyone
else
on
the
staff
could
get
you
in
touch
with
them,
but
it
is
good
to
see
that
definitely
like
to
see
trees
being
saved
in
the
city
of
trees.
J
I
appreciate
the
comments
that
from
mr
testa
and
miss
franklin
earlier
too,
as
a
landscape
architect
to
save
as
many
trees
as
we
can
is
great.
Obviously,
sometimes
some
have
to
come
out
and
they're
mitigated
for
so
we're,
hopefully
replacing
them
over
time,
if
not
increasing
the
the
canopy
over
time.
With
the
addition
of
trees
through
these
projects,
also
but
yeah-
that's
kind
of
my
comment
so,
but
thank
you.
D
We're
familiar
with
that
process
so
we'll
be
bringing
them
on
too.
I
just
didn't
mention
that.
H
This
is
more
of
a
comment
than
a
question
in
looking
at
the
drawings
that
were
provided
to
us
on
sheet
l1,
which
is
the
landscape
plan
or
portion
of
the
landscape
plan
showing
the
new.
But
it
also
shows
the
existing
or
the
apparent
locations
of
the
existing
trees
and.
D
H
H
I
count
rough
count
here
was
approximately
23
trees,
or
so,
as
indicated
on
this
plan
here,
with
about
half
that
number
being
off
the
building
footprint,
but
within
the
site
itself
that
mr
trout
has
indicated
they're
going
to
try
to
work
with
in
terms
of
perhaps
moving
some
of
the
parking
landscape
around.
But
I
I.
E
Okay,
thank
you,
mr
trout.
Anybody
else
from
the
public
out
there
that
wants
to
testify
or
have
a
comment,
josh.
A
Mr
chairman,
there
is
one
more.
Q
Thank
you.
I
just
had
a
quick
question.
E
Lauren,
if
I
could
interrupt
you
for
a
second,
if
you
could
give
us
your
name
and
address
for
the
record,
I
would
appreciate
it.
Thank.
Q
Q
E
Point
seeing
none
I'll
close
the
public
portion
of
the
meeting
and
open
it
up
to
the
staff
for
discussion.
So
any.
I
Mr
chairman,
yes
now
I
recognize
that
a
lot
of
us
choose
to
live
in
these
older
neighborhoods
because
somewhat
because
of
the
beautiful
old
trees
and
that
replacing
them
with
more
trees
that
are
smaller,
doesn't
necessarily
do
their
job.
But
on
the
other
hand,
we
aren't
planning
and
zoning,
and
we
don't
dictate
whether
it's
appropriate
to
build
a
three-story
building
on
this
privately
owned
lot.
That
is
zoned
for
building.
It's
not
zoned,
as
you
know,
a
nature
preserve
so
as
much
as
I
would
love
to
see
the
applicant
save
as
many
trees
as
possible.
I
I
feel
like
it
is
not
our
job
to
stop
them
from
building
what
I
think
is
a
built,
a
good-looking
building
that
fits
in
very
well
with
the
neighborhood
and
allows
a
lot
of
density
without
being
overpowering
and
is
and
creates
a
really
good
pedestrian
environment
for
27th
street.
I
You
know,
I
I
don't
feel
like
it's
our
role
to
try
to
stop
that
in
order
to
save
the
trees.
So
I
I
would
like
to
keep
it.
As
you
know,
we
make
a
request
that
the
applicant
goes
and
meets
on
february
17th
with
anybody
who's
interested
in
the
area
and
keeps
in
mind
that
you
know
beautiful
trees
are
impossible
to
replace,
but
I
don't
think
that
we
can
put
further
limitations
on
it.
I
don't
think
that's
within
our.
J
Yeah,
I
totally
agree
with
that
as
well.
I
mean,
I
think,
that
it's
nice
to
see
that
the
applicant
and
the
architect
are
working
as
much
as
possible
to
help
save
these
trees
yeah
the
kind
of
the
nature
of
development.
Some
of
these
things
are
going
to
have
to
change
and
grading
to
to
get
things
flat
enough
for
parking
and
everything
else
that's
required
for
these
projects
requires
the
removal
of
some
trees.
J
So
I
and
I
yeah-
I
think
that
as
much
as
they
can
try
to
do
that,
I
I
don't
think
that
we
can
hold
up
a
project
because
of
that
at
this
level,
but
you
know
to
encourage
just
to
keep
encouraging.
That
is
all
we
need
to.
We
should
be
doing.
H
Thanks,
I
would
concur
with
the
the
previous
comments
and
also
want
to
note
that,
beyond
the
the
meeting
that
will
take
place
here
in
a
few
days
that
one
of
the
requirements
of
the
site,
specific
conditions,
is
that
the
trees
within
the
parking
lot
will
be
a
three
inch
caliper
at
the
time
of
planting,
which
is
a
larger
tree
size
than
we
would
normally
expect
to
see
in
in
these
locations.
H
So
I
think
their
their
applicant
and
the
design
team
are
are
sensitive
to
what
they're
doing
and
trying
to
do
as
good
a
job
as.
E
I
Mr
chairman
yeah,
do
we
know
if
that
meeting
was
dictated
by
planning
and
zoning
or
any
other
authority,
or
is
that
just
at
the
will
of
the
developer.
P
Mr
chairman
and
committee
members,
I
believe
that
was
just
the
applicant
meeting
out
on
the
site.
I
don't
think
there
was
any
requirement
for
a
meeting.
J
J
I
think
it
probably
wouldn't
work
out
too
well
for
them
if
they
don't
hold
that
meeting.
So
I
don't
think
we
need
to
put
that
as
a
condition
of
approval,
and
because
of
that,
I
I
am
going
to
move
to
approve
drh
21-000,
as
recommended
in
the
findings
of
fact,
conclusions
of
law
and
the
recommended
conditions
of
approval
noted
in
the
project
report.
L
H
E
Thank
you
and
that's
our
last
item
for
on
the
agenda,
so
I
can
conclude
this
meeting.
Thank
you
very
much.