►
From YouTube: Historic Preservation Commission
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
C
So
on
tonight's
agenda
there
is
a
Time
extension
that
is
item
a
that
is
not
a
public
hearing.
It
does
require
emotion
and
action
by
the
commission,
but
you
won't
need
to
open
it
up
for
a
public
testimony
or
anything.
Okay
item
number
one:
we
are
anticipating
to
briefly
hear
that
one
okay
item
number
two:
we
are
anticipating
to
briefly
hear
as
well.
D
C
C
Yes,
yep
and
that's
March
27th,
we'll
be
the
next
one's
here;
okay,
so
pretty
straightforward.
So
if
you
have
any
questions
we'll
get
started
here
in
about
13
minutes
great.
Thank
you.
Thanks.
G
A
H
A
A
So
there's
an
edge
written
down
so
important,
more
Plex,
it's
the
little
house
behind
that
and
it
has
an
address
buttons.
A
A
C
Okay,
Madam
Madam
chair.
We
can
go
ahead
and
get
started
good
evening
and
welcome
to
the
Boise
City
Historic
preservation.
Commission,
public
hearing
a
few
things
to
start
out
with
for
tonight's
proceedings.
Everyone
from
the
public
entering
the
hearing
virtually
has
been
automatically
muted
and
cannot
speak.
As
the
item
you're
interested
in
comes
up
for
discussion,
you
will
be
called
upon
and
unmuted
there's
a
chat
function
in
Zoom.
This
is
not
part
of
the
public
record
and
should
only
be
used
if
there
is
technical
difficulties
that
arise.
C
After
that,
we
will
proceed
to
the
public
testimony,
starting
with
those
who
are
in
person
than
those
who
signed
up
on
the
sign
up
sheet
in
advance
and
then
anyone
else
who
raises
their
hand
either
in
person
or
virtually
if
you're
attending
through
your
telephone,
you
can
type
in
Star
9.
To
raise
your
hand,
each
member
of
the
public
is
allowed
up
to
three
minutes
for
Testimony.
C
E
You
Josh
we're
a
citizen
volunteer
appointed
by
the
mayor
and
approved
by
city
council.
We
make
final
decisions
on
certificate
of
appropriateness
applications.
Any
decisions
made
tonight
may
be
appealed
to
the
city
council,
provided
that
the
pl
is
filed
within
10
days
of
this
hearing.
In
order
to
file
an
appeal
you
must
have
given
written
or
oral
testimony
at
tonight's
meeting.
So
that's
why
it's
important
to
give
your
name
and
address
when
you
are
testifying
tonight,
we
utilize
a
consent
agenda.
E
This
means
that
the
applicant,
if
the
applicant
agrees
with
the
staff
report
and
if
there's
no
public
opposition,
the
item
will
be
placed
on
the
consent
consent
agenda.
All
items
that
are
placed
on
the
consent
agenda
are
approved
with
one
more
with
one
motion.
Without
further
public
comment
for
items
not
on
the
consent
agenda,
we'll
hold
a
Pub
full
public
meeting
Hearing
in
order
to
just
in
order
just
detailed
a
few
minutes
ago
with
staff,
applicant
neighborhood
association
and
then
the
public
testimony.
Thank
you
all
for
attending
tonight.
Will
the
clerk
please
call
the
roll.
E
You
we
do
not
have
any
items
for
the
consent
agenda
tonight,
however,
we
have
a
couple
of
items
that
we
need
motions
for
before
we
get
to
the
hearing.
The
first
is
item
a
drh21-00215
Amy
allgier
Architects,
asking
for
a
Time
extension
on
1808
North
11th
Street
request
for
a
two-year
time
extension
to
construct
a
new
single-family
residence
on
property
in
an
R-1
CH
single
family,
residential
with
historic
overlay.
Zone
do
I,
hear
a
motion.
D
E
Drh23-00021
email,
Guyer,
Architects,
1115,
North,
10th,
Street,
a
certificate
of
appropriateness
to
alter
the
character,
defining
facade
and
reconstruct
the
front
porch
of
an
existing
residence
on
property
in
an
r2hd,
medium
density,
residential
with
historic
overlay
zone.
Is
anybody
here
wishing
to
testify
on
this
tonight.
E
E
H
H
This
is
a
request
to
approve
of
approval,
to
construct
an
accessory
dwelling
unit
above
an
existing
attached
garage.
It
is
in
located
in
the
North
End
and
it
is
considered
a
non-contributing
building.
H
This
is
a
photo
of
the
existing
house.
This
house
was
built
in
the
1990s,
not
18
1990s.
So
it's
a
recent
construction
is,
is
the
garage
to
the
rear,
The
Proposal
is
to
add,
and
here
is
the
site
plan
just
to
give
you
a
general
sense
of
the
location
of
everything,
and
it
is,
the
application
is
said,
is
to
add
Adu.
So
here's
the
floor
plan
showing
what
it
will
look
like
and
here's
the
elevations
top
left,
showing
existing
a
sketch
form
below
it
of
the
proposed
and
then
detailed
elevation
drawings.
H
To
give
you
a
sense
of
its
appearance,
this
structure
is
going
to
be
one
and
a
half
stories
in
height
with
a
height
at
the
peak
of
26
feet.
10
existing
residents
is
two
stories
and
the
height
is
29.6.
Therefore,
the
height
difference
is
lower.
It's
two
feet:
eight
inches
below
the
height
of
the
primary
resonance.
It's
uses,
here's
today's
architectural
term.
It
uses
jerk
and
head
roofs
and
Dormers
to
mimic
the
existing
resonance
roof
forms
and
an
exterior
Stairway
to
the
second
floor.
H
It's
features
stucco
sighting,
so
it
is
congruous
with
a
house
is
built
and
the
garage
as
it
currently
exists.
Windows
will
be
appropriate.
Aluminum,
clad,
would
and
there's,
because
it's
just
sitting
upon
an
existing
building
on
a
site.
The
entire
lot
coverage
is
23
percent
and
will
remain.
Staff
recommends
approval.
K
K
E
Hearing
none
is
there,
anyone
is
there
anyone
representing
the
neighborhood
association
here
tonight.
If
you
would
like
to
step
up
state
your
name
and
address.
I
Yeah
hi
good
evening,
thank
you,
madam
chair
nice,
to
be
here
in
person
with
all
of
you
tonight,
Kate
Pennwood,
1116,
North,
12th
Street.
We
support
staff's
recommendation.
We
were
just
hoping
that
you
would
be
willing
to.
We
know
this
project
is
going
to
require
a
couple
of
variances.
We
were
just
hoping
that
you
might
add
those
to
the
conditions
of
approval.
I
E
All
right,
thank
you.
Any
questions
for
the
neighborhood
association
hearing.
None.
We
will
move
on
to
the
public
portion
I'm
going
to
move
to
the
sign
up
sheet.
I
have
a
Laura
Coulson
here
Laura.
Would
you
like
to
step
up
and
and
testify
because
I
thought
I.
E
Okay,
great
thank
you.
Is
there
anybody
who's,
not
on
the
sign
up
sheet
here
tonight?
That's
wishing
to
testify
please
step
up
to
the
microphone
state,
your
name
and
address,
and
you
have
three
minutes.
B
I'm
I'm,
here
to
testify,
because
I'm
highly
in
favor
of
this,
as
somebody
who
has
chronic
pain,
who
has
been
in
there,
who
has
known
a
lot
of
people
with
who
have
need
access,
including
some
people
that
that
I
know
pretty
well
I,
feel
like
it's
important
that
buildings
are
ADA,
Compliant
and
I
feel
like
in
order
to
make
sure
that
the
people
have
the
most
access
to
the
most
to
what
they
need
to
do
for
the
quality
of
life.
B
E
Great,
thank
you
so
much
Ian.
Is
there
anybody
else
here
wishing
to
testify
anybody
online?
No
all
right
hearing,
none
there!
You
can
step
back
up
and
give
your
rebuttal
wave
it
perfect.
Thank
you,
Beth
with
that,
we'll
close
the
hearing
and
render
a
decision
do
I,
hear
a
discussion
or
a
motion
on
this
item.
E
E
You,
commissioner,
Parks
clerk:
please
call
roll.
E
Thank
you.
Moving
on
to
item
number,
two
drh23-00005
can
read:
1514
West,
Franklin
Street
certificate
of
appropriateness
to
renovate
and
combine
two
existing
garages
to
create
an
accessory
dwelling
unit
and
a
property
on
a
r3hd
CD
multifamily
residential
with
historic
and
Conservation
District
overlay,
Zone
staff.
Can
we
have
the
report
please
thank
you.
H
I'm
trying
to
get
it
to
come
up
to
the
full
screen
there
we
go
just
got
to
let
something
Slide
Away,
all
right
I.
This
is
a
request
to
add
a
rare
addition
to
the
house,
remove
a
trail
list
which
you'll
see
in
a
moment
at
the
front
and
out
of
owning
over
the
front
door
as
well
as
renovating
and
combining
to
existing
garages
to
create
an
accessory
dwelling
unit.
This
is
in
Hay,
Street,
historic
district
and
it
is
a
contributing
building.
H
Here's
a
site
plan
to
give
you
an
idea
of
its
location.
This
is
a
these.
Are
the
two
most
important
elevation
photos
to
look
at.
That's
the
rear
elevation,
where
the
addition
will
be
added
and
the
front
elevation
where
the
extant
Trail
us
and
mini
trailers
over
the
door
will
be
removed
and
replaced
with
an
improved
design.
H
This
is
the
two
existing
garages
with
air
space
in
between
and
some
sort
of,
Hal
trusses,
connecting
the
two
together
and
here's
a
site
plan
of
the
existing,
showing
the
separation
of
those
two
garages
and
the
deck
that
will
be
removed
and
replaced
with
the
rear
Edition,
as
well
as
showing
the
trellis
at
the
front.
H
The
proposed
plans
are
here
to
give
you
an
idea
of,
what's
going
to
happen
on
the
lower
and
upper
floor
and
a
general
idea
of
the
site
here
are
the
elevations
showing
the
addition
and
the
garage
with
the
Jason
80.
That's
integrating
the
two
garages
that
are
integrating
together
to
be
a
garage
and
an
adjacent
Adu.
H
H
It's
going
to
be
clad
with
Gordon
Batten,
which
is
a
material
as
seen
on
the
garage
and
typically
seen
in
the
historic
district,
especially
used
to
differentiate
new
construction
from
old
and
the
roof
height
will
be
the
same
as
the
peak
of
the
primary
resonance.
H
As
far
as
the
Adu
goes,
since
the
proposed
height
is
going
to
be
one
story
at
13,
feet,
6
and
the
existing
resonance
is
a
one
and
a
half
story.
As
stated
before
is
24..
This
is
substantially
lower,
so
there's
no
negative
impact
on
the
height
of
that
it's
using
the
existing
design
of
the
garage.
The
board
and
Baton
has
also
seen
on
the
Edition
and
it's
below
a
thousand
square
feet
and
22
in
height,
so
it
does
comply
with
the
full
setback.
Requirements
with
that
staff
recommends
approval.
E
Thank
you
Richard.
Do
we
have
any
questions
for
staff
before
we
move
on
to
the
applicant
all
right
hearing,
none
if
we
is
applicant
present
tonight,
you'd
like
to
step
up
and
state
your
name
and
address.
M
Evening
Madam,
chair
Commissioners,
my
name
is
Ken
Reed
I
live
at
2415,
Compass,
Drive,
Boise,
Idaho,
I.
Think
if
you
read
through
the
letter
of
intent
that
this
house
that
was
converted
into
interest
something
interesting
as
far
as
a
modern
Loft
kind
of
lacked
some
privacy
on
the
indoor
spaces,
there
was
just
basically
a
loft
upstairs
and
so
my
client
desired.
To
create
a
bathroom
I
mean
a
bedroom
off
the
bathroom
in
the
back.
M
I
did
that
by,
as
as
Richard
said,
different
using
differentiating
materials
and
I
talked
to
Josh
and
Richard
when
I
began.
This
project
and
I
I
did
recognize
that
if
we
did
any
addition
of
an
Adu
in
the
house,
we
would
probably
go
over
the
35
percent.
But
I
did
an
analysis
on
the
Block
and
more
than
half
the
properties
are
over
35
percent.
M
The
adjacent
property
to
the
East
is
in
the
high
40s
across
the
street
is
a
five-story
apartment,
complex,
which
has
almost
100
lot
coverage,
but
we're
hoping
to
create
a
a
space
on
the
back
and
make
it
feel
like
a
courtyard
in
the
back.
M
M
We're
also
going
to
take
the
trellis
off
the
front
which
I
think
is
dated
from
the
70s,
and
my
client
said
that
was
an
architect's
office
back
in
the
70s,
so
that
trellis
will
come
off
and
something
that
looks
I
sent
Richard
a
couple
pictures
of
what
we
would
like
to
build,
which
is
basically
The,
Identical,
awning,
sort
of
construction
on
the
ice
houses
that
are
on
the
opposite,
Street,
and
so
that
would
kind
of
hopefully
tie
these
historic
buildings
together
as
a
as
a
cohesive
design
and
style.
J
Mad
and
chair
I
do
have
a
question
and
Ken
I'm,
not
sure
if
this
is
better
for
you
or
for
Richard
I
guess
I'll
ask
both
of
you
if
you
were
to
remove
that
two
percent
block
coverage
to
bring
it
to
that
35
percent.
What
kind
of
footprint
are
we
looking
at
I.
M
Did
a
calculation
commissioner
Montero
the
the
distance
I'd
have
to
only
be
able
to
add
I'd
have
to
make
a
choice.
I
think
we
would
have
to
either
eliminate
the
Adu
and
do
that
addition
on
the
back
or
the
addition
on
the
back
could
only
extend
about
six
feet
so
that
really
doesn't
make
a
bedroom
upstairs
or
any
kind
of
living
space
downstairs.
So
there
is
a
yeah
there's
a
dilemma
there
that
I
can't
really
do
both.
E
E
None
is
there,
anyone
representing
the
neighborhood
association
here
can
comfort
and
state
your
name
and.
I
Address
oh
very
tall,
thank
you.
Kate
Henwood,
1116,
North,
12th,
Street
appreciate
the
applicant
and
commissioner
Monto
bringing
up
the
lot
coverage
issue.
We
just
wanted
to
acknowledge
it
too.
Typically,
we
feel
really
strongly
about
respecting
that
35
limit,
but
I
guess
would
say
I
also
don't
love
the
our
neighbors
are
doing
it.
I
So
we
want
to
do
it
too,
but
in
this
instance
I
would
say
we're
more
receptive
to
it,
giving
it
that
it
is
given
that
it
is
a
more
dense
kind
of
transitional
part
of
the
neighborhood,
so
just
wanted
to
acknowledge
it
and
make
sure
that
it
was
on
everyone's
radar
that
it
does
exceed
that
35.
Thank.
E
You
thank
you.
Is
there
anyone
here,
I,
don't
have
anybody
signed
up?
Is
there
anybody
here
willing
wishing
to
testify
on
this
project
looks
like
nobody
in
person
anyone
online?
No
all
right.
We
have
time
for
the
rebuttal
by
the
applicant
if
you'd
like
to
step
forward
again
and
state
your
name
and
address.
M
Yes,
commissioner,
Kenneth
Reed,
2415,
Compass,
Drive,
yeah
I
did
talk
with
Josh
and
Richard
at
the
very
beginning
of
this
commission,
when
I
was
working
with
the
client
and
I
and
I
told
him
that
we'd
probably
have
if
we
did
go
over,
he
said
yeah.
We
could
consider
it
because
it
is
a
different
Zone.
It's
half
a
block
away
from
Albertsons,
it's
in
a
very
dense
area.
There's
commercial
buildings
on
either
end
of
the
block
and
higher
density
everywhere.
So
I
would
agree.
M
I
wouldn't
want
to
go
over
35
if
we
were
in
a
very
residential
area
of
the
north
end
or
the
East
End,
where
you've
got
nothing
but
houses.
But
this
is
a
very
transitional
place
in
Boise
and
so
I
think
it's
really
not
discernible
that
it's
two
percent
over
the
addition
is
completely
on
the
back
of
the
property
and
and
I
stand
for
any
other
questions.
Great.
E
Thank
you
any
questions
for
Ken
before
he
sits
down
all
right
hearing.
None.
We
will
close
the
hearing
and
render
a
decision
do.
I
have
a
motion
or
any
discussion
on
this
project.
J
Manager,
I
guess
I'll
start
with
my
thoughts
and
I.
Think
I
would
like
to
make
a
motion,
but
I'll
share
my
thoughts.
First.
First
of
all,
I
think
this
is
a
very
well
planned
design
and
I
applaud
Mr
Reed
for
his
work.
J
The
reason
I
asked
about
that
two
percent
law
coverage
is
because
typically
I
am
very
majesticular,
for
that.
I
was
on
the
commission
when
we
decided
to
go
up
to
35
from
30,
and
we
did
it
to
allow
for
these.
You
know
two
percent
here,
three
percent
there,
one
percent
here,
but
that
the
expectation
that
that
continues
to
increase
is
not
a
precedent.
J
I
want
to
see
happen,
however,
going
through
staff's
recommended
site
requirements
and
conditions
and
seeing
that
staff
is
okay
with
this
two
percent,
given
the
zone
and
the
location
of
the
site,
I
would
be
okay
with
that
two
percent
increase,
given
that
also
it's
on
the
back
of
the
site.
E
You
with
that
we'll
be
moving
to
item
number
three
on
the
agenda:
drh22-00432
Mike
Maxfield.
This
was
deferred
from
the
January
30th
meeting.
It's
1112
North,
22nd
Street
certificate
of
appropriateness
to
construct
a
second
story,
Edition
on
an
existing
non-contributing
single
story,
residence
and
a
second
story
Edition
on
an
existing
single
story,
detached
garage
on
property
in
an
R-1
CH
single
family,
residential
with
historic
overlay,
Zone
staff.
Can
we
please
have
the
report.
H
H
Yay
technology
boom:
this
is
a
request
to
approve
to
construct
a
second
story.
Addition
on
an
existing
single
story,
detached
garage,
it's
in
the
expanded
north
end
and
it's
a
non-contributing
structure.
Here's
the
map
to
give
a
idea
of
its
location.
H
This
is
existing
home
this
as
a
as
we
know,
this
is
something
that
came
in
in
the
previous
months
commission
and
was
deferred,
and
they
have
come
in
with
a
Adu
on
the
garage
portion
now
and
they
will
continue
to
work
with
staff
to
flesh
out
an
addition
to
their
primary
resonance
at
a
future
date.
So
all
we're
considering
now
at
this
meeting
is
the
Adu
over
the
garage.
H
Here's
an
idea
of
the
rear
elevation
of
the
house,
multiple
photographs
of
the
existing
garage
on
adjacent
properties,
to
give
a
sense
of
the
space.
Where
is
it
located
and
here's
the
site
plan
now
just
showing
the
outlines
as
they
exist
as
it's
an
addition
on
top
of
an
existing
building?
H
Here's
a
defor
plan.
I'm,
sorry
I,
keep
using
the
word
a
to
you.
This
is
to
be
used
as
an
office
space.
It
is
not
an
Adu
over
a
garage
I've
been
saying
that
to
too
many
times
so
these
are.
This
is
the
plan
showing
the
office
spaces
that
will
be
above,
and
here
are
the
elevations
showing
how
the
office
above
the
garage
will
look.
H
It
is
pretty
much
the
same
as
it
was
in
previous
iterations,
although
the
drawing
kind
of
shows
a
vertical
line
indicating
that
the
rough
material
is
a
metal,
it
will
be.
You
know,
a
single
appearance
asphalt
triple.
H
This
will
be
two
stories
in
high
with
a
pink
at
19.9.
The
existing
resonance
is
got
a
height
currently
of
22
feet
to
the
peak.
So
therefore
it
is
under
it
uses
utilizes
existing
of
Designing,
the
garage
to
a
rather
large
degree,
and
the
structure
is
below
a
thousand
square
feet
and
under
22
in
height,
so
awful
setback
requirements
are
met
with
that
we
recommend
approval
for
this
garage
over
an
existing
I
mean
this
office
over
an
existing
garage.
E
L
Mike
Maxfield
1112
North
22nd
Street
Boise,
so
hopefully
this
one
will
be
slightly
shorter
than
the
last
as
I
think
everyone,
but
one
Committee
Member
was
present.
We
didn't
originally
go
into
this
wanting
to
do
just
the
garage
at
this
time.
L
You
know
we
originally
submitted
this
back
in
November
I
think
we
went
through
at
the
last
meeting
how
my
wife's
office
is
in
the
living
room
mine's
in
the
basement,
it's
kind
of
especially
after
kind
of
waiting
since
November
kind
of
getting
desperate
to
get
that
fixed,
so
we're
trying
to
get
that
done
this
year.
We
are
still
working
on
something
that
will
be
viable
for
us
for
the
main
house.
L
I
think.
That's
basically
it
about
the
garage.
You
know,
since
there
were
no
negative
feedback
items
about
the
garage
and
Nina
hopefully
pointed
out
that
it
was
below
the
site
of
the
main
house
which
I
wasn't
aware
of
at
the
time
we'd
like
to
go
forward
with
this
I
did
have
one
comment
just
to
make
respectfully
and
I.
Actually,
don't
really
think
this
applies
so
much
to
our
future
projects,
but
as
a
neighbor
in
the
North
End,
when
I
rock
around
and
see
new
construction.
L
It's
it's
just
kind
of
sad
there's,
so
many
nice
houses
and
four
non-contributing
structures,
at
least
it
is
so
easy
and
I'll
emphasize
easy
and
cheaper
to
tear
it
down
and
that's
throughout
so
many
people
take
and
I
was
really
disappointed
in
what
we
felt
wasn't
a
I
know
there's
a
lot
of
speaking
to
it,
but
in
constructing
something
for
someone
in
our
situation
where
they
need
more
space
and
they're
trying
really
hard
to
keep
the
existing
facade
so
that
when
someone
walks
by
it
looks
like
the
existing
house,
I
hope
you
guys
can
find
a
way
to
prioritize
those
types
of
projects
in
the
future.
L
It's
just
sad
to
see
new
construction
and
I
think
you
know
we're
kind
of
feeling,
like
our
hands
are
tied
with
some
of
that.
You
know
ending
up
with
a
solution
that
might
not
look
the
same,
which
sucks
as
far
as
I'm
concerned
and
then,
of
course,
we
talked
in
detail
about
the
alternative,
energy
and
efficiency
things.
I
think
the
city
has
a
lot
to
figure
out
for
what
to
do
there.
L
J
Not
sure
not
so
much
question
more
a
comment.
Thank
you.
So
much
Mr
Maxfield
for
your
willingness
to
come
back.
I
know
that
I
felt
really
strongly
at
the
last
hearing
about
making
sure
that
we
get
this
right
because
I
think
keeping
neighbors
like
you
in
the
neighborhood
who
want
to
put
the
time
energy
and
effort
into
keeping
their
house
as
close
to
what
it
was,
is
exactly
how
we
preserve
our
districts
as
opposed
to
you
know
so
many
non-contributing
houses
that
we
lose
every
single
month.
J
So
I
just
very
much
appreciate
you
and
your
wife's
energy
and
effort
to
be
here
tonight
and
that's
not
really
a
question
but
I
just
felt
called
to
say
it.
So
thank
you.
E
Any
questions
or
other
comments,
thank
you
for
being
here.
Thank
you
for
coming
back
hope
to
see
your
your
project
again,
all
right.
Anybody
here
in
the
audience,
I
don't
have
anybody
signed
up,
but
is
there
any
members
of
the
public
wishing
to
testify?
Oh
I'm,
sorry,
is
there
a
a?
Where
are
we?
Is
there
a
neighborhood
association
representative
here
that
would
like
to
testify?
Thank
you
step
up
and
your.
I
Name
and
address
Kate
Henwood,
1116,
North,
12th
Street,
just
one
to
say
that
we're
happy
to
be
able
to
support
staff's
recommendation
for
this
project
and
happy
that
this
family
can
move
forward
with
at
least
one
part
of
their
project
now
and
hopefully
can
move
forward
with
the
rest
of
it
before
too
long,
and
then
in
a
comment
that
should
surprise
no
one.
We
would
recommend
permeable
Paving
and
down
Shield
lighting,
especially
because
there
will
be
a
new
Hardscape
for
this
project.
So
that's
it
thanks.
Thank.
E
You
all
right
now,
I,
don't
have
anybody
signed
up
on
my
sheet?
Is
there
anybody
in
the
audience
wishing
to
testify
on
this
on
behalf
of
this
project,
anybody
online
all
right
applicant?
If
you'd
like
to
come
up
and
speak
again,
you
can
no
okay,
but
that
will
close
the
hearing
and
we
will
make
a
decision.
Do
I
hear
any
motions
or
discussion.
F
I
can
make
a
motion
for
approval,
so
I
moved
to
approved.
C
Chair,
just
sorry
could
could
we
do
the
minutes
I
think
we
missed
the
minutes.
E
Of
the
beginning
meeting
excellent:
yes,
let's
do
the
minutes
on.