►
From YouTube: Public Works Commission
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
And
I
will
start
things
off
with
a
quick
roll
call.
So
please,
let
me
know
if
you
are
present,
commissioner,.
A
A
A
B
A
D
Thank
you
very
much
So,
based
on
feedback
that
we
received
back
from
the
commission.
We
have
kind
of
revamped
our
approach,
and
this
is
our
kind
of
maiden
voyage
on
the
revamped
approach,
and
so
the
intent
is
based
on
the
feedback
that
you
all
have
given
us
is
that
we
want
to
focus
in
on
a
couple
of
specific
topics
at
the
beginning
of
the
fiscal
year,
because
we're
kind
of
in
the
middle
of
fiscal
year
we're
not
going
to
be
able
to
like
go
full
fully
over
to
the
new
approach.
Just
yet
so.
D
Kind
of
concept,
like
a
proof
of
concept
coming
in
October,
the
beginning
of
the
physical
Year,
we
will
have
a
workshop,
which
you
will
identify
a
couple
of
topics
that
you
want
to
do
some
deep
dive
on
deep
thoughts
on.
We
have
recommendations
we'll
have
we
have
some
thoughts
on
that
there
areas
where
we
could
use
some
help,
because
there's
going
to
be
some
pretty
big
policy
implications
of
some
of
the
work
and
so
I'll
give
you
an
example:
we're
going
to
start
working
on
a
strategic,
solid
Wasteland.
D
So
that's
our
our
trash
recycling
compost
Zoom
way
out
big
picture
where
we
want
those
programs
to
go
selling
a
kind
of
a
new
course
for
the
next
10
to
15
to
20
years.
That's
those
are
pretty
big
discussion
points.
There's
going
to
be
a
lot
of
public
interaction.
D
You
will
be
a
big
part
of
that
in
a
way
we'd
like
you
to
serve
as
almost
like
a
focus
group,
but
but
given
your
knowledge,
you're
going
to
have
well
you're,
going
to
be
a
little
bit
of
a
teeter,
focused
group
in
that,
if
you
have
a
formal
background
than
most
citizens
will
have.
So
that's
what
we'll
do
in
October.
This
today
is
the
Recycled
water
program,
another
topic
that
could
be
one
of
the
ones
we
want
to
cover
for
next
year.
But
again,
we'll
all
talk
about
that
and
you
all
inside.
D
Test
run
on
kind
of
the
New
Concept.
This
is
going
to
be
much
more
of
a
dialogue.
Much
less
us
talking
at
you.
We
do
have
some
size
up
front
to
kind
of
T
things
up.
You
saw
in
the
packet
that
you
received
a
lot
more
information
and
I'm
trying
to
give
you
some
stuff
really
to
chew
on.
You
may
have
a
lot
of
questions
based
on
the
fact
that,
maybe
not
so
much
we'll
we're
gonna,
see
we're
gonna
get
into
that.
D
D
The
two
of
them
are
really
kind
of
getting
this
up
and
running
Haley
from
the
making
sure
it's
aligned
to
the
utility
plan
and
our
larger
planning
document
and
Royce
really
getting
into
the
day-to-day
we're,
truly
starting
a
brand
new
program
and
new
facilities
of
everything
and
voices
doing
an
incredible
job
there.
It
is
there's
a
lot
of
moving
Parts
lots
of
swim
lanes
that
are
interacting
and
Roy
still
doing
a
great
job
on
that.
D
What
we
want
to
talk
through
today
is
we
have
some
policies,
a
couple
of
of
initial
policies,
that
we
want
to
bounce
off
and
get
your
perspectives
on
those
talk
about
some
of
the
community
engagement
pieces
and
are
there
anything
other
things
that
we
ought
to
be
considering
other
groups,
something
we've
missed
so.
B
Thank
you,
Steve
chair,
commissary,
Faulkner,
environmental
manager
in
public
works,
Bryce
and
I
are
going
to
take
team.
This
conversation
really
excited
that
it's
less
of
us
in
my
review,
so
I'm
looking
forward
to
just
all
of
that.
I
think
Steve
shared
this
really
my
intro
pointers.
Just
we
are
sort
of
anticipating
your
feedback
today,
really
vocal,
but
the
background
content
that
we
shared
was
was
useful
and
that
we
can
really
drive
and
dive
into
those
questions
and
drive
the
dialogue
today.
B
B
If
there
are
areas
you
want
to
I'll,
come
back
up
and
we'll
talk
about
our
two
policies:
highest
and
best
use
and
the
Good
Neighbor
policy
I'm
excited
about
that
conversation
and
we'll
close
out
with
where
we
are
in
the
car
stakeholder
engagement
and
the
pilot
tours
and
kind
of
just
where
we're
headed
next,
so
that
sort
of
format
sounds
good.
We
don't
have
much
in
the
way
of
content,
to
share
actively
today
really
just
framing
the
conversation,
and
maybe
so
you
can
kind
of
that
feedback
and
content
from
you.
This.
D
One
thing
on
that:
hey,
they
started
interesting.
You
know
just
be
thinking
as
we're
going
through
the
information
and
kind
of
how
setting
it
up
not
just
questions
about
the
Recycled
water
program,
but
maybe,
like
maybe
some
notes
on
like
yeah
this,
how
you
create
this
or
how
you
set
this
discussion
worked
well
or
maybe
next
time
you
could
do
this
thinking
about
the
structure
of
how
we're
going
about
this
game.
B
I
may
step
out
of
my
like
presenting
on
recycled
water
into
serving
a
bit
as
facilitator
with
Steve,
because
Colin's,
not
here
today,
so
I-
think
certainly
for
the
first
topic,
we're
here
to
answer
all
the
questions,
I
think
for
the
next
step.
I.
Obviously,
if
you
have
questions,
ask
them,
but
we'll
really
probably
be
trying
to
pull
more
and
more
information
out
of
you
and
some
of
the
pieces.
C
C
E
E
Started
in
2018
and
finished
up
in
was
2020,
but
you
know
the
whole
plan
and
it's
been
exciting
because
since
that
time
you
know
with
the
Recycled
water
program.
It's
really
getting
to
where
all
of
these
ideas
and
plans
and
things
that
we've
had
a
lot
of.
It's
really
starting
to
get
traction
and
we're
starting
to
get
some
movement
and
like
Steve.
E
E
Recycled
water
facility
up
and
running
I
like
to
say
January,
1st
2029,
which
I
think
everybody
laughs
at
me,
but
stress
goals,
stretch
goals
we
just
will
have
a
firm
day
of
January,
1st
2029
or.
C
E
2Nd,
since
that's
quality,
that's
the
goal-
and
you
know
at
this
time
I
think
you
know
we're
working
hard
to
make
that
happen.
E
To
keep
this
is
our
wide
goal
statement
we're
trying
to
keep
water
local,
protect
the
Boise
River.
You
know
part
of
this
is
groundwater
recharge,
so
we're
trying
to
put
water
back
into
the
bread
on
to
both
of
the
groundwater
Supply
and
then.
E
It's
like
planning
for
the
future.
You
know
it's
not
about
2024,
it's
about
from
24
to
below
right.
Where
is
Boise
at
in
2044,
you.
A
E
E
Current
priorities
for
the
Recycled
water
program,
as
we've
mentioned
before
the
advanced
water
treatment
pilot,
we
have
out
on
the
Micron
parking
lot,
so
the
pilot
is
up
and
running
for
the
last
six
weeks.
We
started
sampling
about
four
weeks
ago
or
just
now,
slowly
starting
getting
some
data
back.
So
it's.
A
E
From
you
know,
Public
Works
and
from
the
installation,
utility
maintenance
and
operations,
support
from
media
operation,
staff
commander
and
West
Boise,
and
just
a
big
group
effort
from
Public
Works
overall
environmental
division,
helping
with
sampling
and
getting
things
set
up
team
effort
to
get
the
pilot
up
and
running.
So
we
are
pushing
water
through
the
pilot.
Now
our
goal
is
to
run
40
40
hours
a
week,
40
hours
of
production.
So
we
start
on
Monday
and
we
end
on
Friday
afternoon
trying
to
put
you
know,
40
hours
of.
D
Water
through
the
fire,
the
team,
what
they've
been
doing
the
last
six
weeks
in
particular,
it's
like
it,
was
an
all
hands
on
deck
situation
and
to
see
all
these
people
come
together
from
across
the
utility
dropping
what
they
were
doing
here
to
come
support
the
the
pilot
and
all
the
sampling.
It
is
a
big
lunch
and
Royce
has
been
leading
the
team,
and
so
thank
you.
E
E
Steve
said
we
sampled
twice
a
week
so
right
now
it's
Tuesdays
and
Thursdays
and
Tuesday.
We
do
120
samples,
Thursday
we're
up
to
like
150.,
so
almost
300
different
samples
each
week
and
ship
off
to
the
cities,
water,
quality,
lab
and
then
after
different
contract
Labs
across
that
Nation.
So,
just
now.
E
E
One
that's
based
off
of
the
drinking
water
standards,
so
out
of
Idaho
Department
of
our
Environmental
Quality
drinking
water
standards.
There's
groundwater
rules,
which
has
I
think
there's
300
different
analytes
in
those
rules.
But
it's
you
know:
there's
nutrients,
so
phosphorus
ammonia,
there's
Metals,
Mercury
and
Lead,
really
any
metal
in
the
periodic
table,
we're
probably
close
to
sampling
four
there's
emerging
constituents.
Pfos
is
a
big
one.
We
have
a
whole
pfos
monitoring
plan
for
the
pilot.
C
E
Excited
because
we
have
some
new
Media
or
new
methods
that
are
kind
of
developing
from
removing
defaults.
So
that's
going
to
be
one
constituent
that
we,
you
know
hone
in
on
and
learn
a
lot
about.
There's
other
emerging
constituents
in
dmas,
one
more
diazon.
You
know,
there's
other
things,
there's
background
stuff
that
we
do.
We
do
super
lows
and
right
testosterone
throughout
it.
There's
all
sorts
of
different
things,
just
there's
almost
700
different
analytes
and
then
we'll
start
narrowing.
C
E
Pilot,
that's
one
of
the
priorities
now
so
we'll
run
that
for
the
next
12
months
we
have
two
operation
scenarios
six
months,
one
scenario
and
six
months
for
sex
well
seconds,
we'll
run
that
for
the
next
12
to
18
months.
So
that's
working
great.
E
D
E
Water
facility
we've
named
it
Jasper
of
the
previous
meeting
so
of
the
semi-precious
Stone,
so
we're
looking
for
a
site
for
Jasper,
so
we're
currently
doing
a
business
case.
Evaluation
on
I
think
there's
five
different
properties,
trying
to
figure
out
which
one
would
work
out:
best
based
off
of
cost
and
Logistics
the
pipelines
and
different
things
like
that.
So
that's
going
on
now,
which
is
a
big
big,
lift
to
figure
out
where
we're
going.
E
The
groundwater
recharge
site
so
part
of
the
the
project
here
is
you
know
what
are
you
the
highest
and
best
use?
So
what
are
we
going
to
do
with
water?
One
of
the
things
we're
going
to
do
is
groundwater
recharge.
So
where
are
we
going
to
put
the
water
in
the
ground?
So
we've
worked
to
try
to
find
locations
south
of
Boise
who
are
trying
to
find
free.
We
found
one
that
we
have
an
access
agreement
on
that
we're
currently
Drilling
two
different
Wells
800
feet
each.
E
So
that's
going
on
now,
so
we're
out
grilling
south
of
town
you're
headed
up
to
the
prison
or
that
way.
If
you
look
off
the
left,
bring
up
the
hill,
you
see
a
big
drill
rig.
That's
that's
we'll
be
out
there
for
the
next
three
weeks
on
that
site
and
then
we're
currently
negotiating
a
second
site
to
do
the
same
psychic
so
I
know
the
pilot
gets
a
lot
of
attention
or
more
attention
than
this
work
here.
But
there
is
a
ton
of
work
going
into
that
now.
D
E
To
learn
is
more
about
the
the
groundwater
south
of
Boise,
so
you
know
where
it's
at,
where
it's
flowing,
how
fast
it's
flowing.
We
have
a
whole
group
of
modelers
that
are
going
to
collect
data
and
they'll.
You
know
basically
hone
in
on
this
model
for
all
these
different
sites.
So
so
that
way
we
can
get
a
good
idea
if
you
know
when
we
put
water
back
in
the
ground
where
it's
going
to
go
now,
it's
going
to
react
with
the
background
geological
Hydro
geological
characteristics,
so
a
ton
of
work
going
on
with
that
too.
E
Engagement
with
pilot
tour,
so
you
know
we
about
12
months
ago
we
had
a
community
outreach
where
we
did
some.
We
met
with
different
groups,
the
libraries
and
did
different
Outreach
and
things
we're
just
now
coming
back
around
to
the
different
stakeholders
and
getting
everybody
scheduled
to
come
out
and
compiled
to
it
or
so.
Just
now,
we've
already
started
at.
E
Two
spin,
with
the
pilot
we
were
planning
to
get
out
there,
but
that's
it's
going
to
be
a
big
effort
to
getting
all
that
scheduled
to
be
giving
everybody.
A
D
Want
to
stop
here,
and
just
let's
just
talk
about
the
Recycled
water
program.
You've
heard
probably
not
three
three
or
four
presentations
and
Haley.
If
you
want
to
facilitate,
we
just
want
to
have
a
discussion,
big
picture
on
the
Recycled
water
program.
What's
your
perception
of
it
are
there
areas
that
are
clear?
Are
there
like?
Is
there
anything
that's
confusing
Etc?
So
who
do
you
want
to.
B
A
B
Maybe
off
track
because
I
agree
to
talk
about.
You
know
future
planning.
You
know
coming
from
a
drama
or
an
area
myself
and
what
happened
to
it,
so
you
don't
pay
for
it.
So
if
I'm,
if
I'm
off
base-
and
just
just
let
me
know
and
I'll
redirect,
but
so
talking
about
the
long
term
planning,
you
know
future
planning
climate
change.
Are
we
looking
at
any
kind
of
plans
for
storage
of
water
so
that
if
we
do
have
two
or
three
years
of
draft,
we
have
something
that
we
can
access?
B
Is
that
possible,
or
is
that
sort
of
future?
Not
what
we
do
right
now
chair,
commissioner
I?
Think
yes,
so
and
I
I
do
think.
When
we
get
to
the
highest
Investments
policy,
there
are
books
and
pieces
of
that,
so
certainly
as
we're
putting
the
water
into
the
ground
and
the
idea
there
is
in
a
groundwater
sort
of
reservoir.
If
you
will
I
think
to
be
answered,
it
would
be
when
howling
inside
saying
that
water
back,
but
certainly
the
intent
of
having
a
groundwater
recharge,
is
for
that
long
term.
Resilient
water
supply
here
so.
D
Their
drinking
water,
70
I,
think
75
is
brown,
water
and
so
thinking
long
term.
We
have
the
best
interest
to
make
sure
that
the
aquifers
that
that
water
is
being
pulled
from
are
healthy,
they're,
not
falling
so
part
of
what
the
approach
on
ground
recharges
is
to
think
about.
Okay,
it's
75
70
of
our
Drinking
Water
Supplies
groundwater.
D
B
Looking
specifically
in
the
South,
Coast,
Area
and
I
could
not
get.
It
could
be
open.
My
understanding,
I
guess
that
development
hasn't
really
happened
there,
because
we're
recharging
internet
South
policies,
they're
going
to
encourage
development
and
there's
that
and
they're
just
going
to
be
used
so
chair.
Commissioner
great
question
I
think
a
couple
pieces
on
the
location
in
the
South
part
of
it
has
to
do.
We
did
an
initial
sort
of
mapping
GIS
exercise
on
where
could
groundwater
recharge
be
possible?
So
before
we
go
put
a
drill
out
there?
B
Maybe
I,
don't
know
10
or
15
layers
of
what
is
necessary
for
groundwater
recharge
to
start
to
both
eliminate
our
focus
in
on
sites,
so
the
the
South
and
Southwest
being
sort
of
areas
where
it
is
reasonable
to
do
this
from
a
from
a
hydrogeology
standpoint
and
also
where
we
see
areas
of
following
aquifer
levels.
So,
while
we've
got
some
stability
in
the
aquifer
and
other
parts
of
the
valley,
the
southeast
has
a
groundwater
management
area
of
focus
for
water
use
kind
of
on
the
other
side
of
that
I
think.
D
A
really
good
question
and
part
of
what
we're
trying
to
align
is
through
the
modern
zoning
code.
The
intent
of
the
modern
zoning
code
is
to
try
to
increase
density
within
the
current
city.
Boundaries
said
another
way
we
don't
want
to
expand
out
into
the
bedroom.
The
the
wells,
the
drinking
water
wells
that
are
out
south
of
the
city
are
significant,
Wells
are
provided
so
even
though
we
would
be
augmenting
the
Opera,
that's
not
actually
going
to
promote
growth
out
there,
because,
through
our
modern
zoning
code,
we
hope
to
be
able
to
manage
that.
D
What
appeals
to
me
most
about
the
modern
zoning
code
is
it's
now
our
ability
to
say
maybe
in
the
past,
where
we
would
have
said.
No,
we
don't
want
that,
and
that
was
the
end
of
the
conversation
we
can
say.
No,
we
don't
want
that.
But
can
we
interest
you
in
this
infill
project
or
have
you
thought
about
this
area?
There's
a
bunch
of
open
acreage
here?
Could
we
work
to
have
you
fit
better
to
our
modern
zoning
kill
when
we
want
density?
D
A
C
A
My
understanding
and
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong
is
that
part
of
the
identification
of
the
potential
sites
to
explore
also
took
into
account
the
existing
industrial
presence
in
the
area.
So
it's
not
to
like
create
a
circumstance
where
we
would
have
to
duplicate
resources
or
make
it
slightly
more
inconvenient
for
existing
industrial
use.
D
Made
in
that
area,
yeah
sure
thank
you
for
bringing
us
to
that.
The
and
I
think
we're
going
to
get
into
the
hospital
issue.
So
I
don't
understand,
but
the
part
of
the
Recycled
water
program
is
in
its
industrial
recycled
water
program
to
start,
and
there
is
an
economic
development
for
this.
So
one
of
the
ideas
we
have
for
that
Southeast
Zone
industrial
area.
D
It's
one
thing
to
have
TurnKey
development,
it's
another,
the
potentially
a
green
TurnKey
development,
where
we
have
Green
Solutions
green
infrastructure.
So
if
you're
a
company
that
values
that
and
you
wanted
access
to
recycled
water,
we
could
say
come
to
this
part
of
Boise,
where
we
have
the
infrastructure
support
that
concept.
So
that
is
a
part
of
the
plan.
The
recharge
component
is
where
we
don't.
B
C
B
E
E
Location
or
it
could
be
two
different
locations
So,
currently
we're
just
looking.
You
know
around
the
airport
and
south
of
the
airport.
B
We're
doing
site
characterization
chair,
commissioner,
on
multiple
sites,
just
so
that
we
aren't
like
if
one
we
test,
but
we
analyze
and
it
doesn't
work.
A
Of
you
know
one
for
each
of
those.
The
current
offloading
of
water
I
think
we
had
a
number
of
mechanisms
in
the
in
the
existing
system
like
into
the
some
of
the
river.
A
A
B
B
B
Infiltration
basins
really
look
like,
so
we
would
pump
and
pipe
that
water
to
one
place
and
spread
it
out
in
sort
of
spreading
basins,
and
then
they
would
infiltrate
him.
So
we
would
look
for
one
place
to
do
nothing
if
it
can
be
co-located
with
the
facility
the
benefit
there
is
that
our
pipeline
monitor
than
if
we're
in
two
different
places
or
theirselves
in
the
desert.
We
have
to
move
that
water.
So
does
that
answer
your
question?
Okay,.
C
E
C
A
D
B
Okay,
I
hope
we
can
get
excited
today
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
policy.
I
know
that's
going
to
be
counterintuitive,
but
we're.
D
B
B
Why
policy
why
an
entire
area
of
work
around
this
is
so
that
we
don't
get
five
six
seven
years
down
the
road
and
sort
of
wonder
why
we
made
a
decision
or
get
asked
what
about
this
there's
another
thing
you
can
put
the
water
here,
but
putting
in
some
of
that
thought
now
to
what
do
we
really
want?
It
sounds
like
a
lot
of
water
and
then,
at
the
same
time,
that's
really
maybe
not
a
huge
amount.
B
We
want
to
do
the
right
thing
with
the
water,
and
that
was
really
the
beginning
of
the
highest
and
best
use
policy
policy.
So
what
what
is
the
best
way
for
us
to
put
this
highly
treated,
Advanced
treated
water
to
good
use,
and
so
the
sort
of
simplest
way
that
we've
written
this
out
is
that
we
want
to
establish
an
approach
for
prioritizing
where
the
water
is
used
based
on
a
variety
of
areas.
So
we
will
talk
today.
B
We
want
to
hear
from
you
all
on
Community
Values
Market
signals
so
what's
happening,
who
needs
the
water
and
how
is
that
changing
over
time
and
and
risk
management?
And
that
could
be
all
sorts
of
things.
We've
talked
about
wanted.
An
industrial
user
is
our
key
end
use
and
they
don't
need
the
water
for
two
weeks.
That's
a
risk
and
we
need
a
place
water.
B
The
other
way,
I
said
is
this:
that
we
allow
drinking
water
to
feed
purposes
and
that
if
we
can
use
this
recycled
water
in
a
way
to
offset
this
is
where
drinking
water
is
being
used
for
non-drinking
water
purposes.
That's
a
high-end
best
use
for
us
that
we
offset
surface
water
to
enhance
the
Boise
River.
So
if
there
are
places
where
we
can
keep
more
water
in
the
Boise
River
and
use
recyclable
water
for
another
way,
that
could
be
a
priority:
the
cost
effectiveness
of
treatment
and
distributions.
B
B
And
then
can
we
use
the
Water
Board
of
the
things
we
want
to
use
it
for,
and
will
the
community
accept
that
set
and
find
more
plain
language,
I
guess
so
I'm
going
to
just
start
with
our
questions,
I
think,
because
that
I'm
hopeful
that
the
level
of
detail
that
was
provided
in
this
house
was
certainly
much
more
than
we've
shared
here
in
the
real
kind
of
bare
bones
of
what
went
using
the
policy
but
I
think
kind
of
first
off.
B
A
What
questions
and
feedback
from
the
commission
I
think
I'll
kick
off.
I,
have
a
question
about
cost-effectiveness
and
risk
management
and
how
you
might
tease
out
short-term
versus
long-term
in
those
considerations
is
what
might
be
a
short-term
cost.
Saving
could
be
a
postponement,
some
greater
costs
down
the
road
or
what
you
might
do
to
manage.
An
immediate
risk
may
have
other
unintended
circumstances,
so
I'm
wondering
how
that
is
teased
out
in
these
or
how
that
might
be
teased
out
on
its
own
and.
B
B
This
would
be
we're
testing
five
treatment
processes
and
the
idea
to
be
around
the
pilot
is
understand
which
combination
of
them
are
all
going
on
in
one
order
producing
the
type
of
water
quality
there.
They,
of
course,
each
come
with
a
capital
pricing
and
operations
and
maintenance,
price
tag,
and
so
I
think
for
part
of
the
cost
Effectiveness
is.
Does
it
does
that
change,
depending
on
where
the
water
still
from
where
you
all
are
sitting?
And
how
do
we
is
that
a
place
for
us
to
ask
about
potential
difference.
C
A
And
I
was
also
thinking
that,
along
the
lines
of
just
capital
investment
itself,
if
there
are
materials
that
are
designed
to
meet
all
of
the
anticipated
changes
to
say
a
regulatory
environment
for
the
next
decade.
But
there
are
things
in
the
works
that
in
15
years
it
could
be
a
very
different
environment
and
you
don't
have
the
capital
investment
to
necessarily
keep
up
without
adding
to
it.
Is
it
worth
The
Upfront
investment
of
a
the
higher.
D
Quality,
so
I
would
chair
one
of
the
things
we
look
at
is
and
where
these
prioritization
factors
come
in
is
they
will
help
plan
for
us
the
risk
associated
with
that
actual
scenario?
So.
C
D
Run
scenarios
that
let's
look
at
capital
o
m
and
then
give
us
like
a
30-year
Net
Present
Value
number,
but
then
we'll
also
have
a
risk
cost
column.
So
there's
going
to
be
a
probability
of
what
you
just
described,
that
there's
going
to
be
I,
don't
know
some
pfos,
plus
that
we
don't
know
right.
If
that's
going
to
come
out
in
15
years,
we'll
test
in
the
business
case.
Evaluation
there'll
be
risks
that
we
try
to
account
for
and
quantify
not
just
like
I'll
give
it
a
10
on
a
scale
of
110..
D
D
Factors
that
Haley's
talking
about
help
us
frame
the
risk
that
we'll
want
to
quantify
so
that
we
are
making
decisions
not
just
on
capital
M,
but
also
on
the
risk
cost
of
certain
things
happening
that
could
influence
significantly
investigated,
we're
not
going
to
fund
that
risk
column.
It's
really
going
to
be
a
differentiator
to
say,
hey
this.
This
one
is
the
least
cost
from
a
capital
M
standpoint,
but
man
there's
a
whole
lot
of
risk
out
there.
That
makes
us
nervous.
A
B
Service
Community
impact
I'm
sure
that
those
types
of
risks
are
absolutely
being
captured
in
the
business
case
evaluation
so
that
we're
getting
and
that's
where
Steve's
talking
about
customers
who
may
not
get
the
absolute
number
right
about
understanding
how
something
might
ship
on
gratitude
of
risky
you
get
it
it's!
What
we
want
connections
I
think
some
of
those
same
pieces
will
show
up
in
our
Good
Neighbor
policy
as
well,
which
is
a
little
bit
different
from
how.
B
A
A
lens
that
might
have
gotten
in
the
way
of
reading
this,
for
me
is
this-
is
more
of
a
like
a
procurement
and
operations,
oriented
policy
versus
more
of
a
something
that
we
you
know
published
on
on
public
Outreach
materials
like
this
is.
B
Up
here
so
so
I
mean
it.
So
we
want
that
certainly
intended
to
be
captured
here
in
the
statement
around
Community
Values
and
maybe
then,
as
you
were
reading
that
as
we're
talking
here,
what's
missing
in
the
conversation
factors
that
should
be
in
here,
this
is
we're
talking
about
where
and
how
the
water
is.
It
seems
like
sure
what
you're
sharing
there,
who
would
want
to.
A
Have
happier
yeah
so
the
offsets
make
sense
of
the
authority
and
Community
acceptance
makes
sense.
Just
from
the
lay
perspective
to
me,
the
cost-effectiveness
and
risk
management
seemed
a
little
more
technical,
so
just
the
late
versus
interpretation
of
it
I
think
was.
A
B
B
Yeah,
thank
you.
Thank
you.
This
is
really
helpful.
So
on
point
number
one
yeah:
can
we
bring
these
back
up?
Thank
you.
So
I
felt
very
strongly
with
that.
You
know
that
I
agreed
at
that
first
point
because
there's.
C
B
Many
instances
when
we're
just
using
water
for
the
hose
or
whatever
that's
totally
good
drinking
water.
Everyone
knows
this
I'm,
not
telling
you
guys
anything
as
experts
that
you
don't
already
know,
but
I
think
that's
really
important,
because
I
hear
recycled
water
and
get
a
little
nervous
like
I,
don't
know
if
I
want
to
drink
it
right
like
as
a
user
I,
don't
know
I'm
glad
to
hear
we
have
a
million
tests
and
you
guys
are.
B
Surface
water
Point
number
two
I.
B
Bit
nervous
about
that
one,
because
I
wasn't
sure
how
you
know
my
concern.
There
would
be
more
how
aquifer
levels
are
impacted
with
like
Wells
particular
clearly,
where
I
live
in
northwest
Boise,
South,
Southeast,
Southwest
Boise,
and
just
to
make
sure
that,
like
you
talk
about
Community
acceptance
right
that
all
types
of
water
users
are
recognized,
you
know
so
like
well,
water
users.
Maybe
we.
C
B
Use
a
lot
of
water
right,
but
if
our
aquifer
and
our
water
levels
aren't
like,
we
don't
have
all
the
water
seeping
for
lack
of
a
better
word.
You
guys
tell
me,
as
the
engineers
play
you
know
every
year
like
our
later
and
later,
that
we
can
use
our
well
because
the
ground
water
is
higher
right,
it's
not
as
deep
and
so
I
just
think.
We
have
to
be
conscientious
of
all
types
of
water
users
as
we
move
through
this.
D
D
In
the
coming
decades
so
really
appreciate
that,
because
we
kind
of
zoom
in
on
this
particular
project
that
we're
working
on,
but
this
is
the
policies
that
we're
presenting
for
the
Recycled
water
program
long
term.
So
so
that's
a
really
interesting
point
of
bringing
up
that
it.
It
may
not
be
in
the
Southeast
20
years
from
now.
Maybe
we're
going
to
put
a
facility
in
Northwest
I,
don't
know
yeah
there's,
maybe
some
tie-ins
there
to
other
parts
of
the
community
that
I'm
thinking
about
current
interest
well
and
absolutely
yeah.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
B
This
is
fabulous,
but
I
just
want
to
make
sure
like
that.
The
community
at
large
is,
is
you
know,
impacted
and
I
also
really
liked
what
Ellie
said
about
not
only
the
yeah
financial
side
of
sustainability,
but
also
the
environmental
side.
I
think
that's
obviously
goes
without
saying
that
that's
important
I
know
that
this
is
all
on
your
mind,
but
this
is
my
feedback.
B
B
Even
just
hearing
interpretation
of
it
is
very
helpful
about
it
part
of
the
intent.
There,
too,
is
that,
as
we
potentially
shift
more
and
more
recycled
water
over
time
that
that
also
doesn't
have
a
negative
Boise,
River
but
I
think
maybe
expanding
into
the
Boise
reverse
role
in
sort
of
that
interconnection
with
groundwater.
Community
part
of
that,
but
is
that
a
piece
of
this
surface
water
is
making
sure
that
we
are
protecting
the
voice
River?
It's
uses
that
we're
not
ending
up
pulling
more
water
out
that
could
be
used.
E
B
B
Number
four
I
also
agreed
with
that
and
just
kind
of
thought
that,
depending
on
how
all
your
tests
pan
out
and
what
the
water
it
can
actually
be
used
for,
you
know
once
we
know
that
then
we'll
be
able
to
Pivot
back
to
like
number
three
and
figure
out.
Okay,
that's
going
to
be
the
end.
Use
right,
like
I!
Think
you
probably
don't
really
know
until
you
see
how
your
pilot
goes
and
that's
more
of
a
question,
slash
the
think
statement.
So
that
is
my
other
point
of
feedback.
B
Used
in
a
lot
of
other
Advanced
treatment,
Pilots
to
recycled
water
will
prove
out
and
be
able
to
produce
a
high
quality
water
that
we
could
use
for
abroad.
Array
of
things
I
think
that,
and
so
you
probably
saw
that
in
the
memo
where
it's
like,
as
we
did
an
initial
screening
of
this,
it
looks
like
if
we
get
that
quality
that
we
expect
based
on
these
treatment
technologies
that
go
into
groundwater,
recharge
and
Industrial.
Videos
will
be
the
highest
and
best
uses
to
sort
of
name.
B
B
B
A
great
it's
a
great
time
to
get
all
the
practicality
you
know
like
I,
have
a
hospital
which
has
one
source
of
water,
but
you.
B
B
You're
right?
That's
probably
that's
why
we
don't
see
sort
of
residential
and
irrigation
here
as
one
of
the
Priority
Solutions,
that
infrastructure
cost
and
even
the
timing
as
we
look
at
the
timing
of
fees
for
something
like
your
Asian,
applying
that
as
far
as
like
with
industrial
reuse,
being
in
that
Industrial
Area
out
in
the
Southeast,
that's
anticipated
right
see
that
that
could
be
potentially
a
pretty
now
say
whether
it's
voluntarily
we
have
this
water
or
it
becomes
part
of
building
things
in
that
industrial
area
that
the
Recycled
water
is
a
source.
B
We
definitely
anticipate
that
being
part
of
the
process
and
then
I
would
I
mean
I,
think
it
depends
on
who
the
user
is.
Five
million
gallons
are
or
not
very
much,
but
that's
why
we
have
the
groundwater
recharge
kind
of
kind
of
back
up
that
that's
there's
always
a
place
for
it
to
come,
and
so
it's
really
within
the
framework
within
this
Industrial
Area
we're
making
some
good
motions
and
going
to
like.
D
C
D
Like
sorry,
that
is
like
a
part
of
what
we've
talked
about
I'm
trying
to
say
it
really
is
a
mass
balance
right
for
our
community.
There's
x,
amount
of
water
being
used
x,
amount
of
water
that
we
treat
and
put
in
the
Boise
River.
What
we
heard
from
the
community
is
they
wanted
us
to
start
keeping
that
water
level
so
from
a
writ
large.
D
What
we're
using
and
what
we're
putting
in
the
river
will
be
less
because
we're
going
to
take
a
little
bit
of
that
and
reuse
it
so
for
the
community
we're
at
large
it's
a
benefit
now.
Will
you
get
it
at
your
house
as
they
benefit?
No,
but
is
it?
Is
it
a
benefit
for
the
broader
community
and
the
long-term
water
supply?
And
we
argue
yes
right.
So
there
is
a
little
bit
of
a
abstraction.
Is
not
the
right
word,
but
it's
like
it's
not
a
direct
benefit
to
you,
but
it
is
a
community
benefit.
A
It's
less
bringing
the
recycled
water
to
your
home,
but
making
sure
that
your
drinking
water
isn't
going
to
or
can
I
go
to
these
other
places
so
that
we
have
that
for
us.
B
Other
I
have
more
questions.
A
Any
other
before
we
hear
more
questions.
B
B
C
E
And
one
of
the
things
that
that
occurs
to
me
is
I
really
wanted
to
prioritize.
E
That's
probably
not
going
to
work,
but
it
was
something
I
would
brush.
The
department
could
be
thinking
about
how
to
communicate
this
and
I'm.
Thinking
of,
like
some
kind
of
you
know
more
graphical
way
of
showing
these
because
they're
they're
just
to
Kentucky
I
guess
some
parts
of
them
are
I
think
most
people
can
get
their
head
around
presentation
on
the
first
one
and
kind
of
like
that
makes
sense.
You
know
what
I
mean
and
I
just
think.
E
You
think
it's
really
difficult,
I'm
thinking
a
lot
about
it
publicly,
not
really
understanding
and
a
lot
of
the
anxieties
with
reuse
or
recycled
water,
especially
industrial
recycling,
water
generator
the
charge
and
be
in
our
drinking
water
or
potentially,
those
are
the
fear.
Their
fears
that
are
going
to
come
out
real,
strong,
being
able
to
understand
and
to
solve
a
lot
and
the
advanced
pilot
will
actually
be
data
and
surely
they're
expected
so
I
just
think.
It's
really
difficult.
B
I
like
this,
where
I
can
turn
to
watch
the
backfield
as
if
you've
not
read
what
we've
already
produced
in
the
context
of
like
this,
is
we
can
get
behind
not
using
drinking
water
for
laundry
water
purposes?
What
just
in
your
own
words?
What
comes
out?
That's
something
we
need
to
be
prioritizing
around
using
this
recycle
I
heard
like
public
health
protection
as
a
just
simplifying
kind
of
what
you
just.
C
B
When
I
talked
about
it
with,
they,
don't
even
want
to
talk
about
the
second
water.
They
want
to
talk
about.
What's
education,
clients.
C
B
B
More
about
forward
security,
I'm
really
trying
to
be
diplomatic.
C
B
Now
I'll
tell
you
what
I
heard,
though,
with
like
water
supply
security.
So
if
it's
not
that,
can
you
help
me
someone.
C
B
Or
something
or
doing
something
that
would
be
the
limit
to
the
process
or
program.
B
I
actually
thought
about
that
too.
Are
we
doing
yeah
so
I
also
thought
about
that,
like
it
sounds
kind
of
crazy,
but
like
an
incident
response
plan
right
to
how
you're
going
to
respond,
so
that
immediately
can
answer
the
number
two
right,
then
you're
always
going
to
be
updating
things
when
there's
an
incident
like.
So
how
do
you
respond
to
the
right,
whether
it's
a
Cyber
attack
on
the
equipment
or
an
actual,
like
you
know,
bad
stuff
dropped
in
the
water
and
mixed
in,
but
I?
B
B
B
B
The
water
quality
intense
painted
standards,
I
think
the
answer
is
yes,
but
I
think
it's
complicated.
B
Said
sacred
that
always
seems
to
have
that
as
a
party,
so
if
it
passed
that
they
all
are
important,
it's
really
hard
see.
Basketball
dialogue
would
ride
for
your
help.
A
That's
what
I'm
hearing
on
the
security
note
is
sort
of
two
things.
One
people
only
want
three
things
in
their
water
and
that's
H
and
up,
and
the
other
is
just
as
a
physical
utility
site.
I
think
we've
all
seen
headlines,
that
utilities
have
been
targeted
for
security
threats
and
so
making
sure
that
the
actual
physical
infrastructure,
the
buildings
that
people
the
operation
itself
is
secure,
am.
D
I
was
going
to
mention
chair,
the
I
know
what
you
meant
when
you
said
HHO,
but.
D
D
And
it's
going
to
be
really
really
really
expensive.
Do
we
need
to
pick
it
that
way,
I'm
not
saying
saying
anything
get
on
there.
That's
part
of
the
pilot
I'm,
trying
to
understand
the
results
and
what
kind
of
data
sets
come
out.
That's
a
really
important
point
that
you're
bringing
up
and
that
we're
gonna
have
to
educate
the
public
on
some
of
the
it's
not
just
HHO.
C
B
I
mean
because
this
is
focused
on
an
industrial
chair,
an
industrial
recycled
water
program
will
be,
you
know,
targeting
Industries
or
commercial
users
in
that
area.
In
this
case
we
know
my
parents
that
anchor
tenant
in
this
beautiful
water
of
strip
mall,
because
they're
a
water
loser
and
we're
in
their
in
their
parking
lot
or
the
partner
pilot
consumers,
but
certainly
we
can
have
have
some
level
of
authority
on
if
you
want
a
particular
industry
into
this,
or
we
want
to
go
to
our
existing
facility,
for
example,
we're
not
anticipating
like
food
and
beverage.
B
The
water
quality
makeup
of
the
food
Peppers
water
may
not
be.
What
we're
looking
for
right
now
in
this
industrial
recycled
water
facility
could
be
something
you
can
consider
into
the
future.
I
think
if
I
make
sure
I'm
going
to
answer,
maybe
not
the
question.
You
asked
that
that
might
be
a
setup
set.
A
couple
of
the
key
pieces
that
we're
considering,
who
has
better
for
the
program
is
so
the
boundary
conditions
around
what
can
be
sent
to
us
so
part
of
the
pilot
testing
is
understanding
sort
of
what
we
can
do
and
what
not?
B
What
we
can't
do,
but
maybe
what
we
aren't
going
to
do
and
then
that
pushes
Upstream
to
the
discharger
that
they
are
required
to
do
some
level
of
treatment.
We
have
a
person
operating
band
for
that,
and
much
of
the
analysis
of
the
pilot
will
also
be
around
the
instrumentation
and
controls
and
understanding
what
a
real-time
data
can
we
use
that
we
know
is
an
indicator
that
the
equipment
is
functioning
and
if
the
equipment
is
functioning,
then
we
know
that
we're
removing
these.
B
You
know
constituents
because
we've
done
this
pilot
testing,
so
I
think
part
of
the.
My
third
piece
of
that,
though,
is
also
that
the
around
policy
or
permitting
but
the
levels
of
I
don't
know
if
control
is
the
right
word
with
our
industrial
dischargers
to
say:
you're,
okay,
here
you're,
not
okay
here,
but
here's
what
we're
going
to
do
about
it.
You're,
really
not
okay,
here
so
I-
think
there's
a
piece
of
that
that
changes
a
bit
when
our
water
is
water.
B
B
B
A
That's
that's!
That's
the
time
between
these
messages
that
the
whole
I
think
it
was
the
offset
another
way
of
saying
that
belief,
person
way
of
saying
that
is:
keep
industrial
water
out
of
your
drinking
water
like
make
sure
that
they're
separate.
That's
why
the
Recycled
water
program
does
right.
B
B
D
C
B
Another
thing
that
popped
up
in
my
head,
that
I
feel
like
would
be
a
concern
from
community
members,
is
like
I:
don't
want
to
pay
that
much
money
for
cleaning
water,
that
I
don't
get
access
to
and
so
showing
how
this
is
a
community
benefit
by
having
this
closely
system,
and
it
does
impact
you
just
not
directly
like
we
were
talking
about
earlier.
C
B
C
B
I
think
maybe
those
connections
for
our
community
members
is
going
to
Halt
them,
create
that
buy-in
sure,
I'm
sure
Morgan
if
I
make
that
that's
exactly
it
that
we
have
to
add
capacity
to
our
system.
There's
lots
of
ways.
We
can
do
that
and
doing
it.
This
way,
the
sort
of
incremental
costs
increase
that
exists
also
produces
this
local
resilient
water
supply
that
you
can
use
them.
We
need
to
be
continuing
to
lead
with
that
message.
Yeah.
It's
not
lost
in
what
we're
doing.
D
I
apologize
to
Abby,
we
have
a
new
Communications
manager
for
water,
animal
services,
Abby
Hayden.
She
joined
the
city.
You've
been
here
for
about
two
things.
C
D
She's
already
jumping
with
both
feet,
she
was
out
at
the
pilot
she
was
out
of
the
well-site
she's
already
available.
Sorry
and
it's
like
she's.
This
is
really
good
for
all
of
us
to
hear,
but
in
particular
to
Abby,
because
she's
going
to
be
helping
on
all
of
the
messaging
around
all
of
this
right.
It's
complicated
and
I
really
appreciate,
like
we've
got
to
spoil
some
of
this
down,
it's
it's
still.
We
think
it's
like.
Oh,
we
blow
it
down.
It's
like.
C
B
C
B
Please
just
you
know
we
did
you
write
in
the
memo
that
we
did
have
an
initial
screening
where
we
went
through
these
prioritization
factors
and
coming
out
of
that,
we,
you
know
what
shook
out
was
initially
that
industrial
abuse
and
groundwater
recharge
will
be
the
highest
and
best
uses
of
this
Advanced
treated
water.
To
me,
sort
of
these
factors
and
just
wanted
to
get
any
reactions
from
you
all
does
that
sort
of
pass
an
initially
like
yeah?
B
B
I
mean
I'm
happy
to
share.
Is
that
useful,
I
don't
know
if
I'll
get
them
all
so
certainly
irrigation
of
multiple.
You
know
Fridays
whether
it's
kind
of
large
landscape,
irrigation
agricultural
irrigation,
irrigation
canals.
You
know
any
of
those
three
sort
of
abuses
that.
D
Help
us,
of
course,
their
own
risks
and
benefits
the
groundwater,
recharge
industrial
abuse
I
feel
like
I'm
listing
some
things.
There's.
D
We
did
not
in
part
because
the
community
told
us
very
clear
that
they
were
not
ready,
so
that
became
an
option
that
we
took
off
the
table.
What
could
be
Revisited
there's
a
anyways
talking
about
market
conditions,
we're
going
to
be
tracking
and
completing
water
costs,
and
there
is
a
camera
with
a
memory,
but
there's
a
break
point
where
it's
like.
Okay,
this
actually
might
start
to
make
sense
to
treat
it
to
a
drinking
water
standard
but
Kimberly.
C
D
We
had
considered
kind
of
someone
tangential,
but
farming
we
we
already
do
we're
already
having
fun,
but
it's
like
more
active
like
like
we
are
the
ones
creating
local
produce
and-
and
that
was
one
of
the
initial
things
we
looked
at
and
we
heard
from
The
Advisory
Group.
It's
like
that's,
not
your
core
business,
like
that's.
B
Sort
of
differentiating
the
advisory
of
information,
kind
of
narrow,
the
scope
of
reuse
and
juices
and
work
I
think
those
are
the
key
ones
there
may
be
some.
There
was
some
Nuance
between
like
pre-industrial
use
for
directly
producing
the
thing
like
we're
going
to
use
this
water
to
make
a
widget
or
we're
going
to
use
this
water
for
computing
power.
B
Water,
and
this
is
there
a
difference
there
as
well
of
that
change,
kind
of
the
reactions
how
the
how
the
water
gets
used
so
I
think
to
give
the
full
context,
is
I've,
been
through
all
of
those
I'm
missing
one
in
a
car
and
I
can't
remember,
but
I
think
it
was
just
a
sub
topic
of
the
others,
but
again
got
to
Industrial
reuse,
really
direct
Connection.
In
that
obvious
drinking
water
is
used
whether
to
produce
the
widget
or
use
this
cooling
tower
water
shift
that
to
recycled
water.
There's
a
very
nuclear
connection.
B
Drinking
water
use
for
not
drinking
purposes,
which
is
a
big
reason.
Why?
That
one
of
those
to
one
of
the
top
two
groundwater
recharge
really
comes
with
a
benefit
of
being
at
a
point,
65
and
use
that
we
really
do
need
for
any
of
those
sort
of
possible
down
periods
or
lower
use
periods
from
another
user.
B
E
Security
person
I
think
of
two
like
to
me,
like
the
irrigation
to
me.
There's
there's
like
a
purple
pipe
that
goes
back
to
Boise,
where
you
provide
recycled
water,
to
say
your
house
to
irrigate
your
lawn
or
there's.
You
know
discharge
into
a
canal,
water
in
a
canal
that
goes,
you
know
throughout
Boise
or
the
Treasure
Valley.
It's
kind
of
introduce.
B
I,
like
sticking
with
industrial
for
now,
some
of
those
scenarios
I'm,
like
you
I'm
a
little
anxious
and
I-
think
the
public
would
also
be
anxious
safety
of
that
because
then
you're
like
this
wasn't
your
example
exactly
but
like
yeah
up
and
out
into
the
fields,
but
that
just
seeps
in
and
gets
into
the
water
table
and
then
becomes
I
mean
it's
all
connected
right.
It's
all
just
some
other
nature
right.
You
can't
totally
isolate
the
water
in
your
closed
loop
system,
but
I
think
I
agree
with
the
industrial
abuse
line.
A
Any
other
questions,
maybe
just
a
contact
piece.
E
E
D
We're
just
going
to
get
it
off
the
ground
yeah.
Our
commitment
is
all
new
capacity
outside
of
some
improve
minor
improvements,
we're
making
with
Boise
and
Landry,
to
just
kind
of
maximize
the
existing
capacities,
all
that
incapacity
for
the
utility
plan
we're
committed
to
recycle
the
department.
So
that's
the
commitment
we
made
that's
the
policy
decision
the
Council
made-
and
this
is
that,
so
we
do
need
five
MGD
of
capacity
by
2029.
That's
this
part
we're
going
to
continue
to
grow
as
a
city
all
that
new
growth
we'll
be.
B
And
I
think
chair
and
commissioner
Morris
Commissioners
in
general,
I
think
they're
thinking
about
some
of
that.
As
we
go
out
to
the
pilot,
we
come
back
to
you
all
this
data.
What
information
is
necessary
to
use
some
of
those
concerns?
I
am
confident
that
we're
going
to
have
the
data
and
be
able
to
show
that
winnowing
it
down
to
something
that
is
digestible.
Abby
has
worked
out
for
her
and
that
we
can
really
share
that
in
a
meaningful
way.
I
think
we'll
really
became
have
we
done
it
to
not.
B
Then,
to
the
speed's
point
on
that
picture:
growth-
certainly
right
now,
it's
interesting
to
hear
some
of
the
concerns.
Certainly
around
the
industrial
water.
I
would
say
that
other
side
of
that
is
that
we
know
we
don't
have
any
Terry
waste
in
this
water,
and
so
we've
eliminated
an
entire
Suite
of
emerging
constituents
and
personal
care
products
and
pharmaceuticals.
B
Are
we
we
this
work
that
we're
doing
the
site
characterization
in
the
groundwater?
Drilling
is
all
so
that
we
need
to
become
a
very
good
picture
of
what's
Happening.
A
On
sort
of
that
note,
I
do
think
that
this
fits
what
these
factors
maybe
a
little
sanding
around
the
rough
edges,
but
it's
a
bit
where
we're
at
and
where
we're
headed,
based
on
what
we
know
now
and
I
think
the
three
areas
that
would
make
us
revisit
that
are
catastrophe,
obviously
Innovation
and
then
just
Community
guidance.
C
B
B
A
So,
just
making
sure
that
we
have
time
together
to
have
a
Good
Neighbor
policy.
Maybe
we,
if
there's
some
standing
around
the
rough
edges
for
those
bringing
back
for
another
quick
speed
round.
D
Facilitation
Jobs
super
well
there
this
year
and
so
and
then
chair
I,
think
what
you
know,
depending
on
where
we
land
in
October
you
can
see.
This
is
a
big
lift
in
here.
So
I
think
we're
going
to
recommend
that
this
be
one
of
the
topics
that
we
cover,
but
it
certainly
it's
up
to
you,
but
we'll
we'll
probably
be
talking
about
a
lot.
B
C
B
Let's
talk
about
the
benefits,
really
a
fun
and
different
one
I
think
again
in
the
context,
that's
really
easy
to
zoom
in
on
a
facility
we're
going
to
build.
We
talked
about
Jasper,
but
also
asking
for
folks
to
zoom
out
and
consider
recycled
water
feature
down
the
road.
How
do
we
do
this?
This
may,
you
know
eventually
expand
into
all.
B
Because
it
works
but
really
looking
at
first
like
what
does
it
mean
to
be
a
good
neighbor?
It's
not
only
do
no
harm
technology.
We
also
do
some
good
I,
think
that's
really
important,
and
that
really
resonated
with
our.
B
And
then
who's
a
neighbor
and
we
we
talked
about
that.
You
know
there's,
there's
concentric
circles
of
who
may
be
that
impacted,
influenced
connected
to
our
future
facilities
and
activities,
but
that
anyone
who
has
a
direct
impact
from
the
construction
and
ongoing
operations
at
our
facility
now
that's
I,
think
leaves
enough
flexibility
for
us
to
kind
of
respond
to
that
and
I
think
again
seeking
feedback
here.
This
is
an
answer,
but
that's
where
we've
started
too
many
nights.
So
here,
as
we
started
talking
about
what
what
impacts?
B
Could
we
be
looking
at
as
we're
looking
at
Future
facilities
and
who
and
again
what
does
it
mean
to
be
a
good
neighbor?
We
categorize
them,
similarly
to
other
work
that
we've
done
in
the
climate:
space,
social,
environmental
and
economic.
This
is
not
necessarily
an
exhaustive
list,
but
a
starting
point
from
which
we
can
look
at
our
types
of
activities.
So
are
we
going
to
have
a
facility?
That's
viewed
from
people?
Is
it
only
from
commercial
activity
or
is
it
from
a
neighborhood?
B
How
does
that
change
whether
it
means
to
be
a
good
neighbor,
so
kind
of
taking
all
of
these
pieces
into
consideration
eventually,
when
we
start
to
seek
feedback
on
what
it
is
that
we're
doing
so
again?
I,
don't
have
a
project
here
today
to
say
here's
how
we're
implementing
it,
but
you
can
imagine
as
we
go
forward
and
we
do
have
a
site
and
we're
talking
about
what
that
site.
The
look
feel
touch
tastes
impact
to
the
community.
How
can
we
we're
good
with
that
and
do
goodbye?
B
So
when
we
I'll
go
back
to
that
list
in
a
minute,
but
anything
else
that
you
all
would
expect
when
you
think
of
an
industrial
Advanced
water
treatment
facility
that
could
potentially
be
near
your
work
or
the
person
is
going
to
be
in
a
Zone
area
for
its
purpose.
But
what
would
you?
What
would
your
expectations
be
of
a
good
neighbor
around
the
you
know,
potential.
A
Impacts
that
you
would
have
been
here,
I'm
going
to
kick
things
off
with
just
a
general
note.
Reading
through
this
there
was
a
piece
that
was
missing.
That
was
only
present
in
in
this
presentation,
which
was
a
lot
of
this
is
just
to
minimize
negative
social,
economic
and
environmental
impacts.
But
there
is
no
reference
to
maximizing
the
positive
and
I
think
calling
that
up
explicitly.
There's
a
lot
of
opportunity
specifically
to
invest
in
assets.
That
neighbors
would
find
pleasing
useful
and
investments
in
their
in
their
neighborhood,
so
Commissioners.
What.
C
Other
I
mean
I,
do
have
nice
words.
Thank
you,
Mr,
chair,
well,
I
guess,
I
need
to
know
more
of
all
of
the.
E
B
The
point
it
could
actually
be
Community,
Asset,
yeah
I-
think
maybe
to
allow
for
that
sort
of
dialogue.
I
would
say
if
it
is
infiltration
based
in
a
bond
that
does
have
the
potential
to
look
like
a
park.
I
think
on
here,
I
think
building
wise
was
not
anticipating
open
sort
of
clarifiers
and
Mary
who
basins
like
we
have
at
our
other
facilities,
but
then
potentially
the
entire
ly
the
treatment.
B
So
we're
talking
about
things
and
that
potential
co-location
of
the
infiltration
responsibilities.
C
B
A
facility
but
more
of
its
way,
maybe
in
the
construction,
but
you
know
as
as
this.
This
is
getting
set
up.
Connections
with
schools
or
university.
D
C
B
B
Just
make
it
an
engagement,
Center
or
a
community
center
will
help
also
dispel
any
apprehensions
towards
the
facility
as
well
so
making
it
like
an.
B
B
Of
money
in
it
I
think,
would
it
really
end
anymore,
a
lot
of
more
buy-in
and
a
lot
more
excitement
for
that
potential
growth
in
that
area
and
the
neighbors
above
it.
A
I
do
think
that
these
these
ideas
are
informed
by
making
a
lot
of
sense
for
projects
like
Planet
Street
here
for
the
new
site
it
might,
we
might
not
have
residential
neighbors,
necessarily
so
another
way
of
looking
at
that
is
our
neighbors
in
a
site
like
that
might
be
industrial
users,
as
well
as
the
natural
landscape
around
us,
so
that
I
think
would
be
a
very
different
way
of
maintaining
good
neighborhood
with
you
know
the
wildlife
there,
with
the
the
plant
life
there
to
make
sure
that
it
is
uninterrupted
or
interrupted
to
the
minimal
extent.
B
Based
sort
of
contextually,
where
it's
at
I
hear
that
but
I
also
think
of
this
space,
where
it
is
out
of
the
way
for
many
residential
folks
and
it's
very
disconnected.
But
people
will
come
out
here
to
be
able
to
show
their
kids
the
facility
and
learn
enough
to
Watershed.
So
I
think,
even
if
the
site
is
very
remote
and
for
industrially
based
having
that
as
an
education
center
or
even
like
10
minutes,
just
really
enhances
people's
understanding
and
wants
to
engage
with
it.
D
Sure
just
follow
commission
Morgan,
so
maybe
what
I'm
hearing
you
say
is
like
do
you
think
it
would
be
a
transcription
would
help
on
transparency,
yeah,
you're.
C
D
Look
come
on
now.
We've
got
this
educational
Garden.
We've
got
this
and
by
the
way,
if
you
want
to
take
a
look
around,
we
can
give
tours
Etc,
but
there's
it's
not
a.
We
are
going
to
be
Ironically
in
a
building
right
and
it's
going
to
be
just
like
what
is
that
walk
over
there?
Well,
that's
the
Recycled
water
like.
B
B
Okay,
I
think
that's
got
our
questions
here.
Oh
no
I
have
one
because
the
unfun
question
so
part
of
this
Good
Neighbor
policy
and
I,
appreciate
and
share
how
we
have
it
friend
us
sort
of
how
we're
going
to
potentially
invest
in
mitigation
strategies
or
benefits.
I
think
that's
when
that
come
out.
Interestingly,
we
did
separate
these
calls.
I
can
sort
of
hear
our
team
now
thinking
about
it,
because
we
separated
the
community
co-benefits
from
The
Good
Neighbor.
B
The
potentially
I
missed
that
completely
here
that
the
community
co-benefits
could
be
a
much
wider
netcast
than
the
Good
Neighbor,
which
is
our
much
tighter
sort
of
area
and
so
I
think
if
that
changes
anyone's
thoughts
on
those
previous
pieces,
but
recognizing
we
have
captured
all
of
your
thoughts
on
community
co-benefits
and
we'll
include
that
as
we
move
that
other
piece
forward.
This
is
really
in
a
lot
of
ways
focused
on
that
Mitigation
Of,
as
well
as
I,
think
there
is
a
an
investment
in
that
group.
B
That's
it
but
I
guess
none
of
this
really
comes
without
a
trade-off.
So
is
there
other
thoughts
that
you
have
or
recommendations
on
approach,
to
sort
of
how
we
invest
in
being
a
good
neighbor
and
some
of
these
things
that
it
might
be
mitigations
of
some
of
these
potential
impacts
with
kind
of
our
overall?
B
You
know
your
program
across
this
is
I'm,
just
really
curious
in
your
thoughts
in
our
overall
for
every
second
one
of
the
water
and
kind
of
reactions
to
you
know
the
trade-off
for
the
or
the
necessity
of
investing
in
some
of
these
Good
Neighbor
mitigation
pieces.
A
If
I
could
ask
a
clarifying
question
on
this,
so
not
having
too
much
context
on
what
some
of
the
Big
Ticket
items
might
be
on
this
list.
That
would
be
that
had
a
significant
enough
impact
on
the
overall
budget
and
operational
budget
to
be
a
point
of
contention.
What
might
examples
of
those
be,
or
is
it
truly
just
the
volume
of
time.
B
Share
a
great
question:
I,
don't
know
that
I
have
a
good
I,
think
that
could
be
both
I
think.
Maybe
it
could
even
be
the
potential
for
eign.
B
You
know,
let's
just
take
that
culturally
relevant
flora
and
fauna
or
other
otherwise
just
kind
of
plants
and
animals
out
there
could
a
change
be
the
actual
site
of
the
building
is
moved
in
One,
Direction
or
another
to
protect
a
particular
area
and
that
changes
the
pipeline
costs
because
we've
moved
it.
This
way,
a
made-up
scenario.
A
C
A
Cost
change
kind
of
the
trade-off
of
that
for,
in
my
perspective
and
I'll
open
it
up
to
the
commission.
My
perspective
is
almost
sort
of
a
sniff
test
that
is
really
really
contextual,
because
I
think
there's
a
difference
between
you
know
paying
a
little
bit
more
for
lighting
that
is
downward
facing
so
you're,
not
interrupting
the
wildlife
versus
building
some
palatial
water
renewal
facility.
That
is
like
an
architectural
Masterpiece
and
something
like
that.
So
I
think
there's
a
sweet
spot
in
the
middle
that
we
can
find.
B
D
On
one
of
the
reasons
why
we're
hoping
that
we
can
get
this
here
and
we
haven't
started
working
through
the
settlements
and
we
have
some
pretty
big
decisions
to
make
on
whether
this
is
going
to
be
a
separate
utility
or
it's
like
a
water
utility,
or
is
it
going
to
be
just
part
of
water,
renewal,
Services,
just
part
of
water,
rural
Services,
that's
brought
into
the
rating
and
that
the
users
of
the
Recycling
wire,
then
just
paying
additional
premium
to
get
access
to
the
water?
We
don't
know
those
are
questions.
D
They
need
to
be
grappling
so
I,
don't
know
if
I'm
answering
your
question.
A
A
D
If
it's
within
one
percent
or
a
half
a
percent
of
the
overall
costs,
we
don't
we're
not
going
to
have
a
big
issue
or
maybe
less
I,
don't
know
that's
kind
of
what
we
want
to
test
that.
So
maybe
it's
where
we
kind
of
start
coming
back
to
you
like,
as
we're
going
through
the
the
some
of
the
major
upfront
design
decisions
not
into
the
minutia,
because
that's
going
to
be,
that
would
be
brutally
painful
for
you.
D
B
A
Are
these
are
definitely
pieces
that
I
would
like
to
see
in
any
proposal
having
demonstrated
consideration
for,
at
the
very
least,
the
top
tier
in
the
50,
to
these
three
kind
of
things
sure.
B
That's
I
mean
that's
exactly
it
like.
We
have
not
missed
the
market.
We
should
include
these
there's,
probably
some
kind
of
bracketing
of
what
don't
go.
All
the
way
over
here,
I
think
that
the
fact
really
helps.
I
have
one
last
question:
it's
completely
topic,
but
when
I
think
about
other
and
many
people
don't
care
as
much
about
other
groups
because
they're
not
as
sexy
as
some
of
the
other
stuff
but
I.
Think
of
like
the
library
project
and
how
I've
said
sorry,
I.
B
Got
steps
that
our
local
library
was
going
to
be
designed
by
people
team
and
obviously
this
is
a
very
specialized
here.
We
need
people,
those
specialized
skills
but
I,
think
in
terms
of
community
engagement
and
getting
people's
mind,
ensuring
that
we
have
as
much
political
involvement
as
possible
in
the
facility
will.
B
C
E
C
I
think
that
chair,
commissioner.
B
Watch
other
policy
that
will
bring
back
that
ties
in
some
of
what
I
think
commissioner
McLean
shared
as
a
climate
economy
policy,
as
well
so
kind
of
getting
into
the
economic
activity
side
of
this,
how
we,
how
we
get
this
broader
College
of
clearance
use,
so
that'll
be
coming
as
well.
Okay,
we
answer
these
Bryce
I.
Think.
E
So
I
just
wanted
to
touch
on
the
Advanced
marketing
compilence,
so,
like
I
mentioned
before,
really
kicking
things
up
now,
moving
into
fall
with
various
stakeholders
and
community
and
eventually
you
know
the
list
goes
on
and
on
we've
had
a
been
pretty
busy
today.
I
did
three
tours.
E
E
You
know
talk
about
the
purifying
water
that
we're
creating
pure
water,
the
technology
that
we
have
there
and
the
work
that
they're
doing
urge
you
to
create
the
community
about
recycled
water
and
fit
for
purpose,
so,
whether
it's
ground
recharge
it
just
reuse,
different
technologies
that
we
need
at
home.
What
technologies
need
or
don't
need
and
then
just
answer,
questions
and
concerns,
and
we
find
that
it
would
bring
people
out
to
the
pilot.
It's
a
great
opportunity
to
talk
about
a
lot
of
different
things:
Public
Works,
Boise
environments,
Community
water
in
general.
E
A
lot
of
questions
around
us.
It's
been
really
good
to
engage
with
the
stakeholders
in
the
community.
So
far.
Just
you
know,
we've
had
voices,
City,
Boise
staff,
Sydney,
Meridian,
Wastewater,
Department
of
environment
quality,
Idaho
Department
of
Water
Resources.
Obviously,
Micron
National
associate
clean
water
agencies
at
a
conference,
and
you
know
different
watercraft
engineering
firms
that
are
coming
out
itself.
A
E
A
E
Over
there
chair
commission
I
mean
it
is
inside
baseball.
C
E
D
A
couple
of
Tours
and
we've
had
people
ask
about
so
we'll
talk
about
pfos
and
show
them
kind
of
where
it's
getting
removed,
and
then
they
they'll
Almost
Pretty
consistently
it's
like.
Where
does
it
go
from
there
where's
the
pfas
end
up
it's
a
great
question
and
we
talk
about
the
the
gack
and
kind
of
how
that
process
works.
So
they're
kind
of
like
it's
one
thing
to
to
demonstrate
hey
this.
Is
your
living
really
hard
stuff
to
ruin?
It's
like
okay?
Well,
then,
where
is
it
it
is?
D
It
has
to
go
somewhere
right,
so
those
kind
of
questions
have
been
coming
up
when
I've
been
on
tours,
which
I
found
was
kind
of
interesting.
A
D
B
B
And
we
have
I
mean
the
tour
broken
up
into
kind
of
the
groundwater
recharge
card.
Of
course,
we
can't
show
that
in
the
same
way,
I
see
more
of
a
conversation
about
what
that
is,
and
what
we're
you
know,
I
think
a
lot
of
questions
there
that
are
really
just
it's
not
a
super,
well
understood,
kind
of
thing,
the
groundwater
and
the
aquifer,
and
so
that's
been
a
really
great
place
for
dialogue
and
questions
about.
A
Well,
just
the
sort
of
the
general
like,
like
the
form
and
function
of
those
questions,
I
think
that
the
the
end
product
of
those
technical
questions
like
having
that
answer
and
offering
it
thumb,
prompted
to
people
who
do
have
a
slave
person.
Safety
concerns
will
sort
of
assuage
a
lot
of
that
and
that
really
help
to
to
show
that
we
know
what
we're
doing.
E
E
C
A
Cool
so
then
I
I
just
have
three
groups
of
folks
and
then
I'll
I'll.
Let
the
rest
of
the
commission
talk
but
for
missing
key
groups
once
on
the
list,
but
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
it's
prioritized
at
make
sure
that
the
price,
the
local
tribes
in
the
area
are
invited
to
give
it
to
her
to
see
the
impact
that
that's
having
and
then
agricultural
communities,
local
farmers,
agricultural
associations,
even
USDA
FDA.
D
A
There,
the
treatment
that
process
is
there
for
for
potential
endings
and
then
I
sure
the
Venn
diagram
for
a
lot
of
these
folks
is
certainly
Folks
at
USGS
and
make
the
turn
to
their
lived
in
Oregon.
B
B
B
A
E
You
chair,
my
grad,
might
have
a
good
sense
in
the
associations
that
they
could
bring
in
that
are
the
same
business,
but
the
Idaho
Association
of
conference
industry,
yeah.
E
A
B
C
A
D
B
Many
meetings,
if
I've
been
to
I,
have
not
actually
presented
interesting
admin
support
services
manager,
but
many
of
you
know
me
as
also
commission
support
so
kind
of
different
to
be
on
this
side.
We'll
see
how
this
goes
so,
the
role
update.
B
We
have
a
recap
of
the
recommendations,
we've
all
seen
in
your
pockets,
that
suggested
quarterly
meeting
Cadence
and
with
an
annual
meeting
which
would
be
for
kind
of
setting
those
topics
and
a
little
bit
of
a
social
networking
and
kind
of
get
together
opportunity
for
you
all
around
more
of
a
focus
on
those
long-term
strategic
topics
that
could
build
from
meeting
to
meeting
and
maybe
fewer
topics
so
that
they
have
an
opportunity
to
build
and
dive
deeper
during
the
meetings
and
having
you
all
provide
that
more
Roundtable
discussion
to
provide
that
strategic,
long-term
information
that
we're
that
we're
all
seeking
the
redesigned
meeting
structure.
B
So
there
would
be
the
the
four
main
meetings
with
the
additional
fifth
one.
That
would
be
that
kind
of
annual
setting
I'll
be
exciting
for
the
year
and
then
we
are
still
moving
toward
that
new
Cadence
and
we
were
working
very
hard
to
get.
You
the
materials
early
or
this
time
we
are
still
working
very
hard
to
make
that
happen
going
forward.
B
We
have
it
all
calendared
out
and
we
do
strive
to
get
you
things
in
advance
so
that
you
can
review
the
packets
and
have
time
to
digest
do
the
homework
as
requested.
So
anyway.
That
is
definitely
another
goal
that
we
are
working
to
achieve
and
then
regular
business
items
would
still
be
included
in
the
meetings
as
needed.
So
obviously
November,
for
example,
is
the
annual
elections
that
we
have
to
have
or
any
other
things
that
come
up.
That's
just
kind
of
run.
The
business
type
items.
B
So
today
we
wanted
to
get
some
feedback
on
this
updated
structure
kind
of
how
it
went
today
and
the
meeting
format
that
we
did
today
or
if
you
have
any
suggestions
for
changes
on
that
or
the
depth
of
the
topic
that
we
were
able
to
dive
into
today
and
just
we'll
kind
of
capture.
Some
notes
on
your
feedback.
A
Dimensions
any
Topline
feedback
on
the
overall
structure.
B
It
was
I
think
the
perfect
step
content
to
review
the
lawyers.
It
wasn't
too
long.
It
wasn't
boring,
it
was
engaging.
B
It
was
to
the
point
and
got
you
the
information
that
I
needed
and
asked
the
questions
were
beautiful
to
help
me
engage
in
like
oh,
when
I
go
back
and
look
at
the
information
I
want
to
think
through
this
thing
and
recognize
the
questions
that
I
have
and
answer
your
questions
and
come
with
thoughtful
responses
to
so
I
thought
it
was
a
beautiful
way
to
like
get
neat
readied
for
coming
to
the
meeting
today,
and
it
made
me
just
feel
really
excited
to
like
dive
into
the
topics
a
little
bit
more
deeply.
B
A
C
Discussion
for
a
while
so
I
think
it's
is
it
just
a
much
better
learning
way
to
learn
I
felt
like
we
learned
some.
E
Things
together,
which
in
just
a
few
previous
meetings
at
the
end
I
thought
that
it
was
more
of
a
solitary
experience,
so
I
think
it
really
works.
A
A
I
feel
like
I
got
a
lot
more
out
of
it,
and
I
was
able
to
give
a
lot
more
and
I
hope
that
the
feeling
is
mutual
on
the
north
side
of
the
table
that
our
that
style
and
our
input
was
was
also
rewarding
and
I
do
know
that
it
may
have
been
a
little
Clumsy,
but
that
some
abstractions
as
our
first
Deep
dive,
but
I,
think
that
we
would
may
have
a
little
more
robust,
different
kind
of
conversation.
B
Okay,
perfect,
so
we
kind
of
touched
on
this
a
little
bit,
but
in
regards
to
the
prep
materials,
it
sounds
like
that.
You
all
found
those
helpful
to
useful,
but.
B
Any
additional
information
on
the
length
or
the
detail
of
the
questions
and
prompts
how
they
were
helpful.
Maybe
but
I
need
to
be
back
on
any
part
of
that
or
anything
we
could
do
differently
chart
tweet
for
next
time,
then
we
are
interested
to
share
I
guess
there
was
one
like
there
were,
maybe
one
or
two
questions
that
were
just
very
Germany,
so
just
lay
cursing
that
one
up.
D
Yeah
sure,
and
one
of
the
things
we
were
concerned
about
is
we're
developing
those
we
didn't
want
the
questions
to
be
leading
like
we
didn't
want
you
to
be
like
do.
D
Like
we
were
steering
you
somewhere,
so
maybe
some
feedback
on
like
did
you
and
it's
okay,
if
you
felt
like
yeah,
you
were
kind
of
could
say
you
were
fishing
for
an
answer
or
not.
We
don't
that's
not
going
to
be
helpful.
We'll
give
you
questions
and
you're
like
I,
can
see
what
they're
up
to
here
or
something
feedback
on
the
questions
they
feel
like.
They
were
potatoes.
A
In
my
view,
that
for
the
level
of
that
distraction,
they
were
like
as
as
good
as
they
could
be.
I
think
that
the
challenge
there
might
be,
but
because
it's
more
nitty-gritty
trying
to
keep
that
same
level
of
open-endedness
to
the
team
good
discussion
as
we
as
we
do
get
into
the
numbers
and
data,
but
overall
I
thought
I
think
it
was
good.
I
will
also
say
that
moving
forward
I
know
how
heavy
lift
it
can
be
to
send
out
materials
for
a
meeting
that
is
happening
into
the
future.
A
When
we
are
go,
go
trying
to
run
a
city,
so
I
I,
I
myself
will
be
very
open
to
if
75
of
the
material
is
generally
correct.
That's
an
A
plus
so
rate
yourself
on
a
curve.
C
C
B
It
was
great
I'm
just
excited
to
see
how
it
evolves
too.
Right
like
this,
is
only
like
getting
our
toes
wet
so,
but
I've
learned
more
today
than
like
it.
Maybe
several
meetings
and
it's
more
engaging
to
be
in
person
and
have
regarded
here
too.
So
that's
partly
on
me
like
when
I've
had
to
be
a
virtual
attendee,
but
overall
it's
great.
So
thanks
for
your
work
is
that
husband
have
you
left
together
for
lunch,
but
she
was
really
involved
too.
So
was
that
Jennifer
sitting
back
there
earlier.
C
B
B
Appreciate
it
very
much
and
I,
don't
think
that
any
of
the
questions
were
maybe
I
mean
what.
C
B
C
B
We
will
work
to
find
the
time
that
might
work
for
you
all
for
this
work,
if
I'm
not
promising
that
out
and
so
we'll
see,
maybe
that
we
have
to
have
a
couple
of
times
that
you
fit
on
another
tour
speaking
logistically
a
little
easier
I
will
look
into
that.
My
tour
extraordinaire
here
and
we'll
also
incorporate
some
of
that
social
time
into
the
future
of
manual
meeting,
so
we're
working
story.
C
B
I
think
so
I
just
would
reacticulate
that
it
feels
more
personable
and
like
it's
not
so
high
in
the
sky,
we
got
like
a
dropped
in
the
air
dropped
into
the
information,
and
then
we
know
we're
not
going
to
see
it
for
a
couple
months.
So,
like
only
have
like
a
light
touch
with
it,
this
spell
really
a
lot
more
intimate
so
like
we
were
able
to
just
be
able
to
speak
or
to
it
based
on
our
various
experiences,
so
it
just
felt.
B
The
previous
meetings
structured
that
we
so
really
appreciate
it
sure
yeah
I
think
this
kind
of,
in
your
view,
all
and
anticipating
the
development
and
sort
of
evolution
of
this
I
think
from
my
scene
and
if
recycled
water
is
a
topic
that
moves
forward,
the
ability
to
sort
of
pick
up
where
we
left
off
here
with
like
a
remember,
we
talked
about
this,
but
not
having
to
sort
of
restart
and
come
back.
It's
like
we
can
pick
up
where
we
were
here.
Remember
we
talked
about
those.
You
know:
categories
of
Good,
Neighbor
impacts.
B
Let's
talk
about
it,
you
know
what's
happening
next.
I
think
that
too,
from
our
side
is
going
to
be
sort
of
building
on
what
you
gave
today.
It
allows
us
to
sort
of
accelerate
the
next
step.
We
need
as
well,
which
I'm
really
excited
about
and
I.
Think
there's
some
more
of
your
comments
there,
sort
of
that's
that's!
What
resonated
for
me
is
I.
Think
from
our
student
is
part
of
the
benefit.
I
think
that
was
going
to
be
the
case.
D
So
we'll
be
able
to
tee
up
topics,
you
know,
maybe
in
October
we're
going
to
do
start.
Pre-Design
I,
don't
know,
but
whatever
it's
going
to
be
like,
we
can
start
to
tee
that
up
for
you
like,
okay,
now
that
we're
going
to
start
freezing,
so
we're
going
to
start
asking
some
of
these
trade-off
questions.
A
C
A
B
Terry
I
guess
like
a
question:
when
would
this
Cadence
start
with?
Does
this
Kate
and
start
this
month
and
then
we'll
meet
again
like
Steps,
yes
Commissioners?
So
we
have
this
July
meeting,
we've
canceled
the
August
and
September
meetings,
and
so
our
next
meeting
will
be
November.
Is
that
correct,
Okay.
B
B
B
Then
share
another
question:
what
will
happen
to
the
subcommittee
structure
that
we
started
and
I
don't
think
it's
as
useful
now,
but
wanted
to
just
check
in
check
in
with
that.
D
Chair,
that's
a
good
question.
We've
been
talking
internally,
we
wanted
to
see
how
this
one
went
yeah.
This
is
for
those
who
haven't
been
on
a
second
video.
This
is
very
much
how
the
celebrities
go.
It's
very
conversational,
it's
very
much
like
back
and
forth
this.
C
D
Like
it
could
be
replaced
in
the
subcommittees,
but
maybe
we'll
talk
with
sugar
back
and
have
an
conversation
about
kind
of
how
you
move
that
forward.
I
will
add
and
I'd
mention
to
we've
hired
our
Public
Works,
our
Public
Works
Arts
work
here
and
she's
going
to
be
great.
First
of
all,
because
she's
got
a
really
interesting
background,
so
we're
gonna,
we're
gonna,
start
picking
up
the
pace
on
our
the
arts,
master
plan
and
implementation
of
that
which
will
be
we're
going
to
start
our
pay
processes
pieces.
D
You
know
commissioning
and
I
know
you
all
have
expressed
it.
It
was
probably
the
particularly
expressed
interest
about
having
being
part
of
that
problem.
I've
shared
that
with
the
Arts
staff
and
we're
trying
to
figure
out
how
to
integrate
that
into
decision
making
around
how
we're
particularly
develop
the
master
plan.
So
stay
tuned
on
that
we.
D
B
Okay,
so
next
step
is
going
to
incorporate
any
feedback
from
today
and
then
we'll
refine
any
of
our
agenda,
packets
or
content
packets
that
we
need
to
based
on
feedback
and
then
tours.
We
will
do
that.
We're
gonna
help
find
out
tours
of
their
cycle.
Pottery.
D
C
A
So
just
the
final
note
on
this
discussion.
A
One
piece
that
we
weren't
able
to
get
feedback
on
today
and
that's
the
homework,
the
the
follow-up,
not
the
preparation,
so
I
would
offer
just
a
challenge
to
my
fellow
Commissioners
between
now
and
our
October
meeting.
If,
sometime
by
you
know
mid
late
September,
you
can
reach
out
to
your
networks,
have
conversations
since
our
October
meeting
is
our
sort
of
topic
setting
a
discussion.
A
I
think
that
would
be
useful
feedback
to
have
prior
to
that
discussion.
What
sort
of
top
of
Mind
among
our
networks,
among
our
our
colleagues
family
friends,
to
inform
that
discussion.
So
if
you
could
take
either
personal
notes
or
if
there's
anything
that
comes
up
consistently
or
it's
really
high
profile
that
you
think
to
be,
the
commission
would
benefit
from.
You
can
send
me
an
email
with
a
with
an
overview
and
I'll
try
and
consolidate
all
of
that
and
communicate
that.
A
Right
so
any
any
topic,
part
of
the
Earth
under
the
jurisdiction
of
Public
Works
yeah.
D
Yeah
and
chair:
we
can,
you
know
if
you
have
questions
on
the
modern
zoning
code,
for
example.
Those
are
other
things
that
we
can
throw
in
at
the
end
of
a
meeting.
It's
like
a
assured
water
supply
or
something
that's.
It
could
barely
be
significant
change,
but
since
we
can
give
you
an
update
on
it,
just
a
little
bit
quick
hitter
topics
at
the
end
of
the
week.
A
And
do
keep
an
eye
out
for
engagement
opportunities.
I
know
there
are
different
programs
that
are
being
run
by
the
city
and
our
partners
related
to
the
work
that
we
do
and
there's
always
fun
to
talk
there
that
we've
seen
how
things
are
going.
They
work
when
the
boats
who
are
engaging
in
this
kind
of
work
so
definitely
keep
an
eye
out
there
and
with
that,
is
there
any
other
business
to
come
before
the
commission
today
hearing
none,
then
I
would
entertain
a
motion
to
adjourn.