►
From YouTube: Shelter Better Task Force - Meeting #3
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
Jen
sends
her
best
and
has
still
been
intimately
involved
in
the
planning
of
today's
session,
including
the
homework
that
you
received,
the
handouts
that
you've
received
and
the
activities
that
we're
working
on
she
unfortunately
was
unable
to
attend
today
for
a
family
emergency.
So
we
on
behalf
of
the
city
and
our
path
home,
are
sending
our
best
wishes
to
jen
and
her
family
really
quickly
in
your
materials
that
you
received,
you
have
the
like.
Always
the
agenda
which
references
the
homework
that
was
assigned
before
today.
A
On
those
terms,
there
is
a
lot
that
we're
learning
about
how
this
system
for
homelessness
prevention,
diversion
and
solution
works,
and
so
we
wanted
to
make
sure
that
you
all
have
a
coherent
narrative
that
goes
with
a
coherent
glossary
with
that.
I
think
I'm
going
to
pass
it
to
courtney,
to
give
us
a
little
introduction
today,
just
to
cover
some
things
and
then
we'll
come
back
and
move
through
a
couple
of
activities
before
we
jump
online
with
our
facilitator,
who
is
joining
us
from
the
national
alliance
to
end
homelessness?
So
courtney.
B
Good
morning,
everybody
um
thanks
for
your
patience
as
we
continue
this
awkward
um
arrangement.
It
seems
real
silly
for
me
to
need
to
look
at
the
screen
to
see
who's
behind
me,
but
um
we're
doing
so
to
keep
everyone
as
safe
as
we
possibly
can.
So,
um
thanks
for
all
the
work,
you've
done
so
far
as
we
head
into
the
third
meeting,
I'd
just
like
to
review
the
charge
of
the
group.
B
And
then
in
week
six.
We
will
work
through
citing
a
shelter
in
boise
by
finalizing
the
list
of
potential
sites
that
we
will
cross-reference
with
the
feasibility
criteria,
which
is
that,
what's
on
the
wall
behind
me,
which
is
on
the
wall
behind
me
and
on
week,
seven
we'll
workshop
potential
sites
and
ultimately
land
on
a
decision
for
the
location
of
the
new
shelter
and
then
a
week.
A
make
final
edits
updates
to
the
report
as
we
prepare
to
present
this
information
to
both
the
mayor,
the
planning,
zoning
commission
and
the
boise
city
council.
B
um
So
with
that,
um
I
did
need
to
mention
that
um
council
president
elaine
clegg
has
a
conflict,
so
she
will
not
be
joining
us
today
and
again
at
any
time.
Between
this
meeting
and
the
next
meeting,
you
have
any
feedback
regarding
the
work,
the
focus
or
any
information
you
might
need
about
these
meetings.
Just
let
me
know
thanks
everybody.
A
A
So
for
this
week
one
of
the
components
that
we'd
like
to
finalize
is
our
partnership
statement
of
commitment.
This
partnership
statement
of
commitment
was
introduced
in
week.
One
we've
reviewed
it
a
couple
of
times
gotten
a
lot
of
feedback
and
made
adjustments,
and
last
time
when
we
asked
folks
to
name
kind
of
where
they're
at
with
this
presentation
for
us,
we
did
a
thumb
thing
which
is
like
that's
incredible.
I'm
all
the
way
there
too.
I
still
have
incredible
problems.
C
A
It
and
the
super
majority
of
people
were
up
here,
and
so
I
wanted
to
get
one
more
read
on
the
room
on.
Where
are
we
at
with
the
partnership
statement
of
commitment,
knowing
that
we
didn't
get
any
additional
feedback
on
changes
last
time?
So
if
you
could
quickly
kind
of
show
me
with
your
thumb,
where
you're
at
on
that.
A
A
A
The
first
is
the
our
path
home
staff,
which
is
myself
and
rachel,
are
actively
working
on
answering
every
single
question
that
you
provided
us,
including
some
comments
that
did
not
end
in
a
question
mark
which
was
not
the
activity,
but
we're
going
to
make
sure
that
we
include
responses
to
those
and
we're
going
to
provide
those
in
written
format.
We
are
taking
our
time
because
those
questions
are
incredibly
pointed,
and
we
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
giving
you
pointed
answers
back.
A
We
are
also
working
on
answers
to
those
questions
with
experts
and
partners
in
the
fields,
because
some
of
those
are
questions
are
related
to
ongoing
work
that
we're
doing
on
a
needs.
Analysis
for
the
shelter
and
some
of
those
are
questions
are
only
able
to
be
answered
by
partners
that
are
directly
involved
in
the
project
as
it
was
proposed
at
the
state
street
location.
So
that's
one
we're
working
on
getting
those
answers.
A
So
we
won't
do
that
in
this
time,
because
this
time
is
sacred
and,
as
you
can
see
me,
I
just
jumped
on
the
screen
for
the
presentation
but
30
minutes
after
today
and
if
you're
unable
to
make
it
today,
because
it
was
a
shift
in
our
schedule.
30
minutes
after
our
next
session
rachel-
and
I
will
be
here-
and
we
are
ready
to
have
a
conversation
with
you
to
elicit
more
feedback
from
you
so
to
get
warmed
up.
A
So
what
we've
done
here
is
outlined
objectives.
I
want
you
to
take
a
minute
read
through
these
things.
I
would
encourage
you
to
highlight
or
star
in
some
way
anything
that's
really
resonating
with
you
anything
that
you're
really
excited
about
put
question
marks
next
to
things
that
you
want
more
information
on
and
the
activity
where
we're
going
to
have
you
land
is.
I
want
folks
to
be
able
to
answer
what
week
are
you
most
looking
forward
to
or
have
you
most
enjoyed
so
looking
forward
and
looking
backward?
A
So,
looking
at
this
schedule,
looking
at
the
eight
weeks
which
week
are
you
most
concerned
about
and
what
are
your
concerns
related
to
that
week,
so
we're
gonna
have
about
four
minutes
to
do
this.
So
take
your
time
move
through
those
objectives,
again
starring
underlining
whatever
works
for
you
in
terms
of
indicating
points
of
interest,
points
of
confusion
and
then
on
at
the
end
landing
on
which
week
are
you
most
excited
about,
and
why
and
which
week
are
you
concerned
about
and
what
are
your
concerns.
A
C
A
D
E
F
uh
And
stephanie
day,
uh
I
am
also
really
excited
about
week,
four,
um
mostly
just
to
like
think
about
what
are
the
reasons
that
some
folks
have
not
felt
comfortable
in
a
shelter
and
how
could
we
actually
make
a
shelter
that
felt
comfortable
to
folks
that
currently
don't
feel
that
way
and
not
super
super
nervous
about
any
of
the
weeks,
but
I
think
probably
most
of
us
week.
Seven,
the
signing
conversation,
I
think,
is
going
to
be
the
most
interesting
just
because
I
think
there's
a
lot
of
emotion
involved
in
it.
A
Great
thanks
so
much
stephanie
and
jennifer.
So
we'll
move
on
to
that
second
question
which
stephanie
provided
us
a
good
bridge
towards
other
folks,
want
to
indicate
if
you'd
like
to
speak,
to
which
one
is
most
concerning
to
you
and
kind
of
letting
us
know
a
little
bit
about
the.
Why
there
so
again,
if
you'd
like
to
speak
to
this,
just
indicate
to
laura
and
she'd
be
happy
to
run
your
microphone.
G
Yeah,
this
is
b
black
wca.
I
would
agree
with
stephanie
I
think
week.
Seven
I'm
most
concerned
about
just
from
the
standpoint
of
I
think
the
lead
up
and
all
the
work
that's
done
ahead
of
that
is
really
good.
I'm
just
hoping
that
people
come
to
it
with
an
open
mind
and
that
people
aren't
stuck
with
a
fixed
decision
when
we
enter
that
discussion.
H
A
A
H
H
A
I
My
concern
is
that
I'm
serena
by
the
way
for
those
of
you
who
are
online.
um
My
concern
is
that
this
may
not
be
a
one-size-fits-all
kind
of
solution,
and
so
I'm
having
a
hard
time
breathing
going
forward
what
it's
going
to
look
like
for
the
people
that
don't
fit
into
this
one
box,
because
it's
an
ongoing
issue.
That's
where
my
concern
is
like
we
get
this.
What's
going
to
be
next.
J
J
I
see
nothing
with
achd
on
here
and
how
we
could
reduce
or
make
that
corridor
safer
um
and
secondly,
um
what
if
we
don't
find
a
one
site
solution
and
it
needs
to
be
multi-site.
Do
we
have
room
in
this
agenda
and
in
this
form,
to
make
that
part
of
a
solution?
This
seems
to
be
an
only
one,
slight
solution,
oriented
focus
and
what,
if
it's
a
multi-site
solution.
A
We
are
in
this
room
today
because
there
is
a
point
of
tension
and
it
is
the
job
and
the
charge
of
this
task
force
to
have
the
adequate
conversation
around
the
attention
that
exists
within
this
topic
and
land
on
a
recommendation
that
works
for
citing
emergency
shelter
that
works
with
the
city
of
boise's
homeless
system
response.
So
we
will
continue
to
push
you
all
to
name
more
clearly
and
adaptably.
A
What
are
the
concerns
that
we
have
to
make
sure
that
we
are
providing
an
agenda
and
a
facilitation
plan
that
helps
us
address
those
things
so
before
we
move
on?
There
are
two
more
things
I
just
wanted
to
in
addition
to
elaine
clegg
being
absent
today,
who
we
have
her
notetaker
stand
and
amanda
over
there
taking
detailed
notes.
We
also
have
for
katie
decker.
A
So
she's
been
joining
online
because
sales
has
particular
regulations
around
participation
of
four
in-person
events,
so
they're
only
able
to
join
remotely
and
starting
today
rebecca
is,
as
like,
an
attendee
or
a
panelist
in
the
webinar,
so
she'll
be
able
to
participate
and
weigh
in
directly
on
the
screen
so
she's
online.
If
she
unmutes
and
talks
at
any
point,
you'll
see
her
face
pop
up
nice
and
big
on
that
screen.
A
um
Two
more
things:
uh
father,
jesus
camacho
is
unable
to
attend
today
due
to
an
ongoing
health
issue
that
father
camacho
is
having
so
we're
in
conversations
about
how
we
can
best
support
him
and
jeanette
curtis
from
the
street
outreach
team
is
unavailable
today,
but
wasn't
able
to
send
a
replacement.
So
those
are
the
major
things
on
that
and
then
I
see
everyone
wearing
masks
which
is
great.
And
yes,
if
you
could,
when
you
do
speak
into
mike,
try
to
keep
your
mask
on
and
just
project
a
little
bit
harder.
A
Potentially,
I
know
it's
really
uncomfortable,
but
we're
trying
to
do
the
best
that
we
can
to
make
sure
that
everyone
is
safe.
So
with
that
we'll
move
it
to
our
next
agenda
item.
We
have
a
presentation
from
the
national
alliance
and
homelessness
and
I
will
not
do
too
much
purviewing
of
what
their
role
is
within
the
homeless
response
system
nationally.
But
we
are
super
excited
to
have
mia
joining
us.
A
A
Me
is
going
to
be
doing
the
presentation
from
here:
they'll
show
their
screen.
You
should
be
able
to
see
them
and
the
material
that
they're
presenting
at
the
same
time
and
then
at
different
points.
Mia
will
be
having
interactive
portions
and
when
she
has
those
interactive
portions,
both
laura
and
myself
will
be
mic
runners.
So
again,
just
continually
indicate
to
us
that
there's
something
that
you
want
to
say
and
then
we'll
also
have
index
cards
in
case
there's
a
point
where
mia
wants
us
to
solicit
written
questions
or
written
feedback
from
y'all.
B
C
Okay,
I
think
I
saw
a
thumb
up-
okay,
perfect
well,
good
morning
to
you
all,
I'm
so
happy
to
be
with
you
today,
so
happy
to
meet
casey
and
um
hear
more
about
what's
happening
in
the
city
of
boise
around
um
the
shelter
relocation.
um
So
I
wanted
to
just
quickly
introduce
myself.
My
name
is
tash
mia
or
mia
bryant.
um
I
am
a
senior
technical
assistant
specialist
at
the
national
alliance
in
homelessness,
which
is
based
in
washington
dc.
C
I'm
part
of
the
capacity
building
team
which
works
with
communities
throughout
the
country
to
further
their
efforts
in
homelessness,
whether
that's
in
rapid
housing,
emergency,
shelter,
diversion
you
name
it,
um
and
we
also
uh
support,
promote
um
and
train
on
best
practices
um
in
ending
homelessness
again
within
all
those
different
areas
that
I
discussed
on.
The
alliance
in
general
is
heavily
involved
in
policy
as
well
data
um
collection
and
analysis,
um
as
well
as
uh
providing
conferences
and
other
um
venues
and
platforms
to
um
further
the
work
of
ending
homelessness.
C
C
What
are
the
needs
in
your
community
and
how
can
your
decision
help
to
address
those
gaps
to
fill
those
gaps
so
that
you
can
end
homelessness
in
your
in
your
city
and,
ultimately
within
your
state,
um
because
it's
all
connected
the
work
that
you
guys
are
doing
here
is
it's
all
part
of
a
greater
um
effort
and
system
to
end
homelessness,
again
in
your
city,
in
your
state
and
honestly
throughout
the
country.
So
I'm
gonna
be
talking
about
um
really
the
role
of
emergency
shelter,
some
things
to
be
considering
so
that
again,
you
can
identify.
C
C
So
when
you're
thinking
about
homelessness,
consider
think
about
it
in
a
sense
of
it
being
a
public
health
crisis
and
something
that
needs
to
be
um
ended.
The
dress
now,
because
housing
is
just
as
important
as
food,
water,
warmth,
rest.
um
This
is
maslow's
hierarchy
of
needs,
I'm
sure
some
of
you
may
at
least
be
familiar
with
this
chart.
C
um
Housing
satisfies
a
basic
need
that
people
have
um
so
and
is
a
foundational
need
that
they
have
so
that
they're
able
to
accomplish
other
parts
of
their
needs,
which
include
self-esteem,
needs
belonging
and
loving
needs
and
self-actualization.
We
show
this
chart
because
oftentimes,
it
is
um
it's.
It's
thought
that
people
who
are
experiencing
homelessness
are
homeless
because
of
you
know
their
uh
sobriety
issues
or
because
of
their
mental
health
issues,
and
things
like
that.
C
So,
ultimately,
the
goal
is
to
house
people
as
quickly
as
pos
possible
and
divert
people
from
imminent
homelessness
wherever
possible.
So
if
we,
if
folks
do
have
to
enter
the
homeless
response
system,
having
a
system
that
is
coordinated
and
resourced
in
a
way
that
is
quickly
moving
people
through
that
system
and
into
permanent
housing
or
back
into
permanent
housing,
when
we
say
in
homelessness,
that
means
make
homelessness
rare
brief
and
one
time
it
doesn't
mean
that
people
will
never
become
homeless
again
in
their
lives.
C
You
know,
spend
at
least
one
night
um
unsheltered
or
in
this
in
the
homeless,
shelter
that
that
is
the
only
experience
that
they
have
we're,
making
that
um
we're
in
ensuring
that
that's
only
a
one-time
experience
and
people
aren't
returning
to
homelessness.
So
that's
what
we
mean
by
in
homelessness
and
that's,
ultimately,
the
main
major
goal
of
an
effective,
effective
homeless
response
system.
C
But
it
is
not
just
the
role
of
the
homeless
response
system
to
end
homelessness.
Ultimately,
it
takes
a
village.
So
what?
Whatever?
Your
role
is,
whether
you're
involved
in
health
care
mental
health,
child
care,
if
you're,
just
a
neighbor,
that's
concerned
whatever
your
role
is
define
what
your
role
is
in
ending
homelessness,
so
the
homeless
system's
role
is
to
ensure
that
interventions
are
scaled,
accessible
and
tailored.
C
Getting
people
housed
asap
is
important
as
soon
as
possible,
because
we
know
that
people
who
the
longer
folks
experience
homelessness
the
harder
it
is
to
get
them
out
of
homelessness.
So
we
want
to
ensure
that
people-
um
you
know
our
house
as
quickly
as
possible
and
then
making
those
necessary
and
appropriate
connections
to
keep
people
housed.
So
it's
not
the
homeless
response
system
to
provide
support
for
that
person
for
the
rest
of
their
life.
C
Ultimately,
we
are
an
emergency
service,
an
emergency
intervention
and
resource
to
be
able
to
quickly
get
someone
to
housing,
and
then
we
make
those
community
connections
so
that
we
can
support
people
in
staying
house
or
the
community
can
support
people
in
being
able
to
stay
housed.
So
that
requires
those
warm
handoffs.
So
again,
when
I
say
define
your
role.
Look
at
that
bottom
box,
where
we
talk
about
community
partners,
service
partners
that
can
provide
some
of
those
stabilization
supports,
like
health
care,
mental
health,
child
support,
I'm
child
care,
I'm
sorry,
child
care,
transportation,
education,
etc.
C
It's
it
truly
takes
a
community
for
a
person
to
to
be
able
to
sustain
in
housing.
It's
not
the
homeless
response
system
to
fix
poverty
to
solve
poverty.
um
Ultimately,
we
want
to
provide
a
foundation
for
people
to
build
off
of
so
help
them
get
into
permanent
housing,
no
matter
what
they
may
look
like:
safe,
stable,
affordable
housing
so
that
they
can
start
that
foundation
and
then
they
can
build
off
of
that
once
they
get
into
permanent
housing,
we're
not
aiming
to
create
ideal
living
situations
for
people.
C
um
We
want
again
people
for
people
to
be
safe
and
to
have
something:
that's
sustainable
permanent
long-term,
but
it
may
not
be
ideal
at
first.
This
is
just
a
trampoline
or
um
kind
of
like
a
tr
uh
uh
opportunity
for
people
to
get
to
that
establish
that
foundation
so
that
they
can
build
off
of
and
then
also
we're
not
trying
to
fix
people.
So
we
do
know
that
there
are
people
who
um
you
know
that
have
various
different
barriers
and
circumstances
um
that
may
or
may
not
be
contributing
to
their
homelessness.
C
So
we
really
support
and
encourage
folks
to
use
the
collective
impact
model.
The
collective
impact
approach,
which
is
which
allows
for
there
to
be
a
common
agenda
so
ultimately
to
end
homelessness.
People
who
are
housed
are
not
homeless.
So,
if
your
um
concern
is
homelessness,
then
your
concern
should
be
housing
and
making
sure
that
people
are
getting
housed
as
quickly
as
possible,
and
that's
no
matter
what
um
system
or
um
interest
that
you
might
have
in
the
work
of
um
in
the
work
of
working
with
people
who
are
experiencing
homelessness
having
that
shared
measurement
system.
C
So
again,
when
we
say
ending
homelessness,
we're
talking
about
making
homelessness,
rare
brief
and
non-reoccurring.
So
having
that
shared
measurement
system,
that's
looking
at
our
people
returning
to
homelessness.
How
long
is
their
length
of
stay
when
they
are
experiencing
homelessness
when
they
are
entering
a
shelter
or
you
know,
engaging
in
different
aspects
of
the
homeless
response
system?
How
long
are
they
staying
there?
Are
they
returning?
Are
we
preventing
people
from
experiencing
homelessness?
We
want
to
make
sure
that
we
have
those
shared
measurements
and
also
monitoring
equitable
access
and
outcomes.
C
We
want
to
ensure
again
that
everyone
has
access
to
the
services
that
the
system
provides
and
we
want
to
ensure
that
they
have
equitable
outcomes
as
well.
We
want
to
see
those
consistent
and
equitable
returns
to
homelessness
or
exits
to
permanent
housing,
or
um
you
know
shorter
length
of
states
in
the
system
that
requires
mutually
reinforcing
and
equitable
activity.
So
what
are
some
ways
that
we
can
support
this
common
agenda,
this
common
goal
that
we
have
as
a
community,
so
that
might
include
things
like
helping
folks
to
navigate
the
housing
process.
C
C
How
as
a
community,
um
can
we
support
that
and
what
is
our
role
individually,
uh
tailoring
housing
stabilization
so
assuming
that
everyone
is
different
and
everyone
is
going
to
have
different
needs
so
that
they
can
stabilize
in
housing.
So
thinking
about
ways
we
can
individually
tailor
and
be
flexible
to
those
needs
so
that
we
can
accommodate
the
diverse
populations
that
we're
serving
and
also
thinking
about,
linkages
to
natural
and
community
supports.
C
So
again,
it's
not
the
homeless
response
system
to
be
there
forever,
but
to
be
that
springboard
to
be
that
um
you
know
kind
of
trampoline.
So
what
what
are
we
springing
them
to?
Like?
You
know,
thinking
about
permanent
housing.
How
can
we
ensure
that
people
have
the
resources,
the
um
connections,
so
they
can
sustain
in
housing,
long
term
and
again
uh
constantly
thinking?
What
is
my
role
in
that?
How
can
I
support
that?
And
how
can
this
task
force
support
that
as
well
continuous
communication,
so
to
create
this
uh
collective?
C
C
So
again,
it's
important
to
really
understand
the
role
of
effective
emergency
shelter
and
really
how
that
fix,
fits
into
ending
homelessness
so
that
you're
able
to
make
certain
decisions
that
affect
emergency
shelter
in
your
community.
They
must
be
informed
by
the
key
elements
of
emergency
shelter
which
are
housing
first,
safe
and
appropriate
diversion
lowberry
access,
immediate
and
low
bear
access,
housing,
focus,
rapid
exit
services
and
data
to
measure
performance.
C
C
However,
we
know
that
there
are
several
people
who
are
in
similar
circumstances
who
have
a
criminal
background
who
have
a
history
of
um
evictions
or
poor
credit
history
or
may
you
know
you
may
even
know
a
reg,
a
person,
who's
a
registered
sex
offender
but
is
not
homeless.
We
know
folks
who
have
experienced
some
of
these
same
barriers,
but
are
not
but
are
not
homeless,
um
and
so
considering
that
um
can
help
us
to
get
into
the
philosophy
of
housing
first
and
the
idea
that
everyone
is
ready
for
housing.
C
Now,
this
person
um
is
not
homeless
and
shouldn't.
Rem
continue
to
be
homeless
because
of
their
credit
history
because
of
their
eviction
they're
because
of
their
felony
and
all
these
different.
um
You
know
kind
of
barriers
that
oftentimes
we're
putting
in
in
front
of
people
to
resolve
before
they
can
get
access
to
housing
and
housing
interventions.
C
So
it
starts
with
understanding
and
and
the
understanding
the
housing
first
philosophy,
which
is
believing
that
everyone
is
ready
for
housing.
Now,
and
I
say
this
sounds
very-
uh
you
know
general
and
theoretical,
but
think
about
the
ways
that
this
can
translate
into
some
of
the
decisions
that
you're
making
so
thinking
about
where
this
shelter
can
be
thinking
about.
C
um
You
know
why
it's
important
for
it
to
be
in
certain
certain
places,
or
I've
heard
um
from
casey
and
um
in
in
the
team
that
prepared
me
just
thinking
about
you
know,
and
I
think
today
too,
I
think
someone
said
multi-site
you
know:
do
we
need
one
site.
We
need
multiple
multi,
multiple
sites
in
thinking
about.
You
know
the
decisions
that
you
need
to
make
consider
the
ways
that
housing
first
or
the
lack
of
the
belief
in
housing
first
can
influence
those
decisions.
C
What
makes
you
determine
whether
or
not
um
you
know
a
shelter,
the
the
brick
and
mortar
shelter
should
exist
in
a
certain
community
are.
Are
we
considering
that
um
you
know
we
are
concerned
about
folks
getting
sober
or
folks?
um
You
know
uh
accomplishing
certain
goals
before
they're
ready
to
be
served
by
the
homeless
response
system.
So
getting
back
to
the
philosophy,
understanding
that
homelessness
is
a
housing
problem.
It
is
not
a
problem
of
of
mental
health,
it
is
not
a
problem
of
addiction,
it
is
a
housing
problem,
but
housing
first
doesn't
mean
housing
only.
C
It
just
means
housing
fast,
like
quickly
getting
people
into
housing,
but
understanding
that
folks
may
need
services.
Oftentimes
people
don't
need
services.
They
truly
just
need
housing
and
self-resolve
in
a
lot
of
ways
once
they
are
out
of
fight
or
flight,
and
they
have
that
stable,
um
permanent
place
to
call
home
a
lot
of
times,
they're
able
to
self-resolve
some
of
the
other
issues
that
they
have
going
on
in
their
lives.
um
But
some
people
may
need
services.
C
Some
people
may
need
different
kinds
of
services,
different
amounts
of
services,
so
we
want
to
ensure
that
we're
scaling
that
and
ensuring
that
they
are
unique
to
each
individual
household
so
that
we're
tailoring
it
to
what
their
needs
are,
but
also
ensuring
that
the
service
participation
is
voluntary.
We're
not
forcing
people
to
do
anything,
we're
not
saying
that
they
have
to
become
sober,
they
have
to
get
employment,
they
have
to
do
anything
before
they
have
access
to
um
permanent
housing,
supports
and
resources.
C
So
again,
the
philosophy,
fist
philosophy
ship
includes
everyone's
ready
for
housing
now
homeless,
as
a
housing
problem,
but
also,
but
really
truly
believing
that
permanent
housing
is
a
right
to
which
all
are
entitled.
People
should
be
returned
to
or
stabilize
permanent
housing
as
quickly
as
uh
as
possible,
involuntary
voluntarily
connected
to
resources
necessary
to
sustain
that
housing.
C
Once
you
do
that
for
philosophical
shift
or
as
you're
doing
that
philosophical
shift
that
will
translate
into
your
practice.
So
when
I
say
practice
um
apply
that
to
whatever
your
role
is
you're,
I'm
not
necessarily
referring
just
to
shelter,
workers
or
shelter,
directors
or
folks
that
work
in
the
coc,
but
all
of
us
so
we're
thinking
of
that
collective
impact
model.
How
can
that
translate
into
housing?
C
First
translate
into
our
role
the
idea
that
it's
not
a
program,
but
it's
more
so
this
principle
that's
happening
across
the
shelter
across
the
system
across
the
decisions
that
we're
making.
So
it's
not
a
one-size-fits-all.
There
are
people
who
are
going
to
need
all
different
types
of
support
and
resources
and
that
housing
first
is
not
housing
only.
So
I
really
like
this
one
as
well,
because
I'm
thinking
about
when
you're
thinking
about
placement
of
a
shelter
think
about
the
resources
that
are
available
in
that
community
think
about
transportation.
C
C
C
Housing
first
also
advances
race
equity.
So
when
we
are
screening
out
for
people
who
have
evictions
or
have
criminal
records
or
unemployment
or
have
untreated
mental
health
disorders,
different
things
like
that,
we
are
disproportionately
affecting
people
of
color,
because
we
know
that
these
occurrences
happen
at
a
disparate
rate
for
um
people
of
color,
particularly
black
and
african
americans.
C
C
So
the
next
key
to
effective
emergency
shelter
is
safe
and
appropriate
diversion-
and
I
just
have
one
slide
on
this,
because
I
just
want
to
quickly
kind
of
um
just
stress
that
diversion
is
an
essential
part
to
making
homelessness.
Rare
so
remember
we
said
ending
homelessness,
making
is
making
it
rare,
brief
and
non-reoccurring
so
part
of
the
role
of
your
system,
the
role
of
your
shelter,
the
role
of
your
coordinated
entry
is
shifting
to
this
idea
of
doing
diversion
before
intake
before
you're
just
admitting
folks
into
shelter.
C
um
You
want
to
ensure
that
people
are
being
diverted
so
you're
thinking
about
um
you
know.
Does
this
person
have
any
other
connections
community
support
alternatives
to
shelter?
Do
they
have
family
and
friends
that
they
can
connect
with?
And
the
community
needs
to
be
able
to
support
that
again
in
indian
homelessness?
It's
also
making
it
rare.
C
So
how
can
the
community
support
efforts
to
divert
people
at
all
possible
um
within
the
shelter
that
looks
like
again
having
these
problem-solving
conversations
before
intake
having
resources
to
support
that
before
persons,
and
um
you
know
placed
into
a
place
into
a
shelter
um
shifting
from
this
idea
of
um
having
these
conversations
up
front
about
following
rules?
Is
a
person
able
to
enter
shelter?
What
are
they
eligible
for
eligibility,
determination,
screening,
assessment,
etc?
C
C
What
will
resolve
your
current
housing
crisis
and
brainstorming
and
having
these
problem
conversations
and
what
that
looks
like
operationally
is
being
able
to
have
perhaps
flexible
financial
assistance
to
assist
a
person
with
um
you
know
small
financial
needs
they
may
need
they
may
have
to
get
connected
back
to
permanent
housing
or
it
might
be.
Having
community
supports,
um
like
you
know,
food
resources,
mental
health
resources,
etc.
C
That
can
that
that
that
person
could
get
connected
to
so
that
they
can
remain
or
go
back
to
um
the
permanent
housing
uh
situations
that
they
were
in
before
or
establish
new
permanent
housing,
situ
um
outcomes
that
are
alternative
to
shelter.
So
again
I
mean
I'm
just
trying
to
keep
bringing
it
back
to
what
you
guys
are
doing
in
this
committee,
which
is
deciding
where
to
place
the
shelter.
So
if
you
know
that
um
diversion
is
an
important
kind
of
pre-step,
you
know
um
a
pre-determination
that
needs
to
happen
before
a
person
enters
shelter.
C
um
You
know
we
shouldn't
have
to
earn
necessarily
being
in
a
shelter
like
what
is
the
criteria
for
being
allowed
to
enter
a
shelter
we
shouldn't
be
trying
to
heal
or
fix
people
behaviors.
Ultimately,
we've
learned
time
and
time
again
that
that
doesn't
work
anyway.
That
just
keeps
people
out
of
the
shelter
um
that
keeps
people
unsheltered
on
the
streets
and
experiencing
literal
homelessness
um
unsheltered.
C
So
we
know
that
that
doesn't
work
anyway,
even
if
we
did
want
to
focus
that
it
doesn't
end
homelessness.
um
So
we
want
to
support
people
in
making
um
supporting
the
change
in
people
rather
than
trying
to
change
their
behavior.
So
when
folks,
um
you
know,
when
folks
are
ready
to
be
able
to
make
certain
changes
or
um
gain
access
to
certain
resources,
we're
ensuring
that
they
know
how
to
get
connected
to
resources
that
the
resources
are
available
to
them
um
and
that
they're
that
they
have
access
to
them.
C
So
that
doesn't
mean
oftentimes
people
hear
a
low
barrier
and
they
just
think
it's
going
to
be.
You
know
crazy.
They
think
it's
going
to
be
crazy,
that
there
aren't
going
to
be
any
rules
or
any
type
of
criteria.
Anything
like
that,
in
fact,
it
does
mean
having
expectations.
So
you
do
want
to
ensure
that
you're
providing
safe
shelter
for
folks
so
that
they
can
have
access
to
it.
C
um
You
know
uh
housing
situation
resource
for
you
that
this
is
a
uh
emergency
um
resource
intervention.
That's
here
to
get
you
into
permanent
housing
so
having
those
expectations
and
communicating
that
to
the
res
the
uh
guests
who
are
staying
there,
that
doesn't
mean
that
you
can
allow
that
you're,
allowing
people
to
act
in
ways
that
are
unsafe
to
themselves
or
others
at
all.
C
Having
those
safety
protocols
um
in
place,
ensuring
that
staff
are
chained,
trained
on
crisis
prevention
and
resilient
crisis
resolution,
ensuring
that
your
um
local
law
enforcement
and
emergency
mental
health
providers,
and
so
on
so
first
crisis
intervention
folks,
are
all
looped
in
and
part
of
this
system
of
support
for
those
who
are
experiencing
homelessness
in
your
community
or
who
might
have
crisises
within
the
shelter,
for
example,
doesn't
mean
that
you're
letting
anything
happen
or
letting
everyone.
In
again,
you
have
these
expectations.
C
You
do
have
these
safety
protocols,
but
again
you're,
not
presenting
barriers
to
folks,
just
simply
because
they're
inebriated,
for
example,
that's
a
common
one
that
we
see
very
often.
So
that's
why
I
keep
using
that
as
an
example,
um
and
it
doesn't
necessarily
mean
first,
come
first
serve
either.
That
is
ultimately
what
the
um
what
coordinated
access
is
trying
to
prevent.
That
is
not
first
come.
C
First
served,
but
it's
very
coordinated
in
the
way
where
those
with
with
um
the
highest
needs
are
being
being
able
to
be
prioritized
in
the
way
that
allows
their
needs
to
be
met,
um
and
it
doesn't
mean
forgetting
about
the
safety
of
clients
and
staff.
So
I
think
this
is
kind
of
stressed
throughout
this
slide,
where,
ultimately,
you
still
are
centering
the
safety
of
the
clients,
as
well
as
the
staff
that
are
um
in
your
in
your
shelter,
but
also
for
this
sake
in
your
community
as
well.
C
C
So
operationally
that
looks
like
screening
people
in
not
out
like
how
can
we
increase
our
access
to
this
service
to
as
many
people
as
possible?
That
is
our
goal,
not
screening
people
out
and
thinking
about
who
should
not
be
able
to
enter
shelter.
You
want
to
ensure
that
your
shelter
is
open.
24
7
that
you
people
don't
have
to
line
up
for
bed
each
night
or
leave
super
early
in
the
morning
with
no
place
to
go.
C
um
You
want
to
ensure
that
folks
are
not
drug
or
alcohol
testing
to
get
in
or
stay
in,
there's
no
criminal
background
checks
requiring
income
to
get
in
or
housing
readiness.
So
we
encounter
this
term
and
I
wish
I
could
just
eliminate
it
from
the
field
of
homelessness.
Honestly
and
I'm
sure
my
team
members
will
agree
with
this,
but
getting
rid
of
this
housing
readiness
that
folks
need
to
check
off
certain
boxes
before
they're
ready
for
housing.
C
That
directly
goes
against
the
housing
first
model,
and
we
know
that
that
doesn't
work
that
actually
extends
the
time
that
people
experience
homelessness.
If
you're
requiring
someone
to
engage
in
um
employment
or
get
a
job
before
they
can,
you
know
sign
a
lease
or
um
you
know
just
do
uh
certain
things
get
an
id
or
um
you
know,
engage
in
certain
types
of
services
before
they
can
access
housing.
We
know
that,
ultimately,
for
one
thing,
people
may
not
do
it
because
they're
being
forced
and
required
to
do
it.
C
So
for
one
the
success
rate
there
oftentimes
is
very
low
because
you're
forcing
people
to
do
it,
but
then
also
we
know
that
again
that
that
extends
the
length
of
time.
People
experience,
homelessness
and
oftentimes
people
just
disappear.
Folks
that
we're
working
with,
and
we
thought
we
were
getting.
C
If
their
pet
is
not
not
allowed
in
the
shelter
um
or
in
in
their
housing
um
they'll,
they
won't
engage,
they
won't
they'll
disappear,
oftentimes
and
you'll,
find
them
unsheltered
somewhere
and
not
willing
to
engage
with
um
resources
that
can
help
them
and
also
possessions.
um
Oftentimes.
You
see,
enchantments
being
cleared
or
folks
not
being
allowed
to
bring
their
possessions
into
a
shelter.
Don't
have
a
place
to
put
them.
C
um
Well
I'll
start
off
with
this,
but
staff
not
being
like
house
parents
or
behavior
monitors
or
program
monitors,
but
really
being
navigators
because
thinking
of
the
emergency
shelter
as
being
a
resource
with
navigators
who
are
partnering
with
clients
to
be
able
to
support
their
housing
success.
So
that
translates
into
way
ways
you
communicate
and
engage
with
um
folks
who
are
experiencing
homelessness,
but
it
also
requires
some
training
as
well.
C
So,
as
I
mentioned
before,
safe
shelter
is
ultimately,
um
safety
is
ultimately
a
pri
a
priority,
so
that
requires
conflict
resolution
trading
crisis,
de-escalation,
trauma-informed
care,
motivational
interviewing,
um
and
the
list
really
goes
on.
How
can
we
um
shift
our
thinking
and
shift
the
way
that
we
are
um
often
trained
to
engage
with
folks
to
this
new
model
that
is
being
able
to
support
wherever
people
are
meeting
people
where
they're
at
support
that
and
be
able
to
no
matter
what
the
barriers
folks
might
have
be
able
to
support
them
in
obtaining
permanent
housing.
C
So
the
philosophy
shifter
being
low
beer
is
that
shelf
shelter
is
life-saving.
It
is
a
life-saving
intervention
and
I
like
to
think
of
shelter
as
like
an
emergency
room
like
we
don't
want
to
keep
folks
in
the
in
the
hospital
in
the
emergency
room
for
a
long
period
of
time.
It's
meeting
those
immediate
needs
to
keep
people
alive
and
then
quickly
getting
them
connected
to
the
long
term.
Longer
term
perhaps
supports
that
they
need
sometimes
also
I
kind
of
got
tripped
up
there,
because
sometimes
it's
not
longer
term.
Sometimes
folks
just
need
that
emergency.
C
uh
You
know,
support
that
emergency
intervention
and
then
they're
fine
after
so
that's
also
having
that
kind
of
um
mentality
too,
that
we're
we're
going
to
be
flexible
because
folks
needs
are
going
to
differ.
um
Philosophy
shift
that
there
that
shelter
should
be
easy
to
access,
and
it
should
be
easiest
for
the
most
vulnerable
people.
So
folks
who
um
you
know
who
do
get
turned
away,
oftentimes
by
very
high
barrier
practices
and
what
that
looks
like
is
no
prerequisites
to
shelter.
C
I
compliance
in
compliance
and
rules.
The
rules
that
do
exist
should
only
pertain
to
safety.
Everything
else
is
more
so
about
the
expectations
that
folk
um
that
the
shelter
um
has
for
folks
who
are
um
guest
there-
and
I
say
all
of
this
because
ultimately
this
translates
into
okay.
So
how
do
we
do
that
like?
What
does
that
look
like?
C
C
I'm
thinking
that
we,
um
because
we
have
some
folks
who
are
on
zoom,
feel
free
to
enter
your
option
as
we
go
along
into
your
option
in
the
chat
and
for
those
who
are
in
person,
you
can
raise
your
hand
because
I
will
just
go
one
by
one.
You
can
raise
your
hand
if
you
think
you
um
want
to
choose
that
option.
So
we'll
do
the
first
one
as
an
example,
so
option
a
for
option
b:
option
a
is
10
p.m.
C
C
Okay,
I'm
seeing
most
folks
in
the
room,
raise
their
hand
for
b
and
I'm
seeing
mostly
b
in
the
chat.
Thank
you
guys
for
participating
so
quickly.
I'm
just
going
to
talk
about
curfew,
expectation,
so
just
something
to
consider
about
so
the
answer
is
b
um
b
creates
the
most
uh
access,
because
it
doesn't
restrict
the
time
that
people
can
enter
shelter.
um
One
thing
I
want
to
um
folks
to
consider
is
the
time
that
people
work,
um
considering
that
folks,
some
folks
may
work
overnight.
C
um
Some
folks
may
have
um
you
know
if
they
have
a
family,
they
may
have
to.
um
You
know
child
care
that
they
have
to
coordinate
with
oftentimes.
We
find
this
to
be
a
very
big
barrier
of
folks
being
able
to
access
shelter
also-
um
and
it's
in
especially
for
this
group,
who
is
thinking
about
placement
of
shots,
think
about
transportation
as
well.
What
time
does
um
public
transportation
run
to
and
from
the
shelter
is
there
public
transportation
that
runs
to
and
from
the
shelter?
Is
there
a
shuttle?
C
What
are
the
resources
that
exist
to
be
able
to
support
folks
getting
to
the
shelter?
Because
that's
something
you
want
to
think
about
if
you
do
have
a
curfew
like
who
does
this
limit?
If
we,
if
we
don't
have,
um
who
does
this
limit,
if
we
don't,
um
if
we
do
have
a
a
curfew?
um
Who
does
this
provide
access
to
or
creates
increased
access
to,
if
we
do
have
a
a
curfew
at
all?
C
um
Ultimately,
the
best
practice
is
to
not
have
a
curfew,
so
I
won't
say
that,
but
we
do
know
that
some
shelters
have
it
and
those
are
the
important
questions
they
should
be
asking
themselves
so
on
to
the
second
row.
Inebriated
guests
can
enter
shelter
as
option
a
and,
if
guest
is
presumed
to
be
under
the
influence,
I'll
just
put
ui
for
short,
but
if
guess
is
presumed
to
be
under
the
influence,
they
cannot
um
enter
shelter.
C
C
Okay,
so
if
we,
I
know,
we
do
have
a
microphone
in
the
room,
and
so
I
I
kind
of
explained
the
first
one,
but
I'm
curious
as
to
um
for
folks
who
answered
um
option
a.
Why
is
that
essential?
Why
is
that
important
um
to
create
access
or
increase
access
to
folks
into
the
shelter
anyone
who
wants
to
volunteer
um
or
folks
who
are
online?
C
K
C
Absolutely
jody,
and
one
thing
that
you
um
you
know
that
was
mentioned
in
your
comment-
is
the
safety
aspect
of
it.
You
know
being
able
to
have.
um
You
know,
be
able
to
assist
that
person
if
they
do
need
help
having
eyes
on
them.
Having
people
who
are
around
them
is
absolutely
a
safety
issue.
This
could
be
a
safety
concern
for
the
person
themselves,
but
also
for
the
community.
You
know
thinking
about
someone
who's,
intoxicated
who
may
not
be
able
to
make
um
the
most
effective
or
safe
decisions.
C
um
It's
better
for
people,
someone
to
you
know
be
able
to
be
there
in
case
something
does
happen
um
and
oftentimes
we
find
um
you
know
when
we
do
receive
pushback
on
what
we
call
wet
shelter,
so
shelters
who
do
allow
folks,
who
are
inevitable
to
enter
um
a
lot
of
times.
The
pushback
is
about.
What's
gonna
happen,
if
you
know
um
they're
dangerous
or
anything.
Well,
guess
what
the
same
rules
apply
to
folks
who
are
not
initiated
at
any
time.
C
Someone
who
is
not
inebriated
can
become
agitated
and
do
something
you
know
certified
or
argument
or
whatever
the
case
is
so
in
that
same
way,
you
provide.
You
follow
the
same
protocol.
You
would
for
anyone
who's
presenting
any
type
of
safety.
um
You
know
concern
or
anything
like
that
and
oftentimes.
C
We
find
too
we've
heard
from
a
lot
of
shelters
um
too
that
and
in
my
work,
I've
seen
a
lot
of
shelters
too,
but
oftentimes
people
are
who
are
who
come
in
intoxicated
who
are
inebriated
oftentimes
just
go
to
sleep,
so
that's
also
too
just
checking
our
own
kind
of
biases
about
people
um
who
struggle
with
addiction
too.
Oftentimes
people
are
not
they
don't
um
we
don't
find
it.
It's
often
that
they
do
pose
a
threat.
um
You
know
safety,
risk
or
safety
threat
to
anyone.
C
Oftentimes
people
just
go
to
go
to
sleep
and
just
use
that
use
a
shelter
for
that.
um
Okay,
so
the
third
one,
shelter
guests
with
active
addiction,
must
engage
in
services
to
gain
access
to
permanent
housing
support.
If
you
think
it's
option
a
that,
creates
the
most
access
raise
your
hand
or
enter
into
the.
C
C
Okay
and
option
b
is
shelter
guests
with
addiction
will
engage
in
permanent
housing
planning
from
day
one
and
voluntary
get
connected
to
services
during
after
the
housing
process.
So
raise
your
hand
for
b
or
put
that
in
the
chat
all
right.
It
acts
exactly
and
it's
option
b
and
does
anyone
want
to
just
talk
about
um
this
option
why
they
chose
b
again,
you
can
either
raise
your
hand
to
speak
or
if
you
want
to
unmute
on
the
um
zoom,
feel
free.
L
This
is
sarah,
um
I'm
just
thinking
about
the
trauma
and
challenge
of
trying
to
access
services
and
get
clean
when
you're
in
the
crisis
of
homelessness
and
how
the
stability
of
shelter
and
support
in
finding
home
can
actually
improve
and
possibly
increase.
The
likelihood
that
someone
has
the
capacity
to
begin
to
engage
in
that,
rather
than
the
other
way
around.
C
An
addiction
concern
um
or
I'm
sorry,
um
struggling
with
your
sobriety.
That
does
put
you
in
a
very
vulnerable
place
where
having
access
to
shelter
can
provide
some
of
that
um
sense
of
safety
and
sense
of
control.
um
Oftentimes.
We
do
see
that
once
folks
can
get
out
of
that
fight
or
flight,
um
and
they
do
have
a
roof
over
their
head,
even
if
it's
temporary
so
again
we're
thinking
of
shelter
as
that
temporary
roof
over
someone's
head.
C
C
Okay,
so
we'll
move
on
to
the-
um
and
I
do
see
that
they
are
uh
sequester
some
questions
in
the
q,
a
that
were
about
different
aspects
of
what
we
discussed.
I
do
have
a
portion
at
the
end,
um
a
segment
at
the
end
for
us
to
do
q
a
so
the
next.
The
last
example
that
I
have
um
is
that
guests
must
have
and
show
identification
to
access
shelter.
C
C
Okay
and
if
you
think
it's
option
b
where
any
guests
can
um
enter
regardless
of
their
id
status,
raise
your
hand
or
enter
in
the
chat
all
right.
So
most
people
are
saying
be
and
that's
absolutely
right.
um
Some
communities
have
expressed
concern
with
that
like
how
can
we
ensure
that
people
are
who
they
say?
They
are,
or
things
like
that,
but
often
possessions
when
they
are
experiencing
homelessness,
whether
it's
because
of
fire,
because
they
were
robbed
just
because
it's
hard
to
keep
track
of
everything.
C
There
are
encampment
sweeps,
so
many
things
can
happen
when
a
person
is
experiencing
homelessness.
um
That
oftentimes
folks
do
not
have
any
identification
at
all,
and
so
we
want
to
ensure
that
again
we're
creating
the
most
access
to
folks
who
need
it,
who
are
the
most
vulnerable
like
those
who
don't
have
identification.
C
C
Okay,
so
I'm
gonna
um
just
quickly
go
over
kind
of
what
the
um
last
areas
of
the
effective
keys
are,
which
is
how
like
housing,
rapid
exit
to
housing.
We
want
to
ensure
that,
ultimately,
our
our
our
time,
that's
spent
with
folks
in
shelter,
is
aimed
at
um
getting
them
into
permanent
housing.
So
housing
planning
must
happen
from
day
one.
Those
conversations
should
happen
even
before
a
person
into
shelter.
C
Again,
when
I'm
referencing
diversion
that
problem
solving
conversation
happens
before
and
then
it's
translated
into
um
the
conversations
that
are
having
within
the
shelter
so
having
that
housing
plan
happening
from
day
one.
The
person
that
is
um
experience
you
know
that
is
experiencing
homelessness,
leads
that
housing
plan
and
that
again,
there
are
no
prerequisites
to
housing.
What
that
look,
what
housing
looks
like
within
your
community
might
be
different
based
on
the
person,
but
also
based
on
the
availability.
C
So
I
was
prepped
to
understand
that
there
is
a
lack
of
affordable
housing
in
your
city.
There
is
an
issue
with
um
you
know,
folks,
having
access
to
affordable
housing,
which
is
common
with
communities
across
the
country,
so
that
requires
creative
solutions
and
again,
as
you're
thinking
about
where
to
place
this
shelter.
C
There
are
some
kind
of
considerations
that
you
might
want
to
have
about
um
things
like
shared
housing,
so
shared
housing
is
something
that
many
of
us
do
have
done
in
our
lives
and
are
probably
doing
right
now,
if
you're
sharing
um
any
type
of
housing
with
another
adult,
you
are
doing
shared
housing,
and
so
this
oftentimes
is
a
foreign.
It
seems
like
a
foreign
concept.
Sometimes
when
we're
working
with
people
who
are
experiencing
homelessness,
you
know
folks
shouldn't
have
their
own.
C
You
know
this
thinking
that
folks
should
have
their
own
apartment,
that
they
should
be
able
to
pay
it
on
their
own.
When
oftentimes
many
of
us
are
sharing
housing
and
are
sharing
the
cost,
and
so
how
can
we
support
and
facilitate
that
to
so
that
people
have
access
to
affordable
housing
within
our
communities?
So
it
could.
This
could
look
like
a
person
that
you're
working
a
shelter
guest
um
living
with
a
family
member,
a
friend
and
doing
shared
housing
that
way
each
having
separate
leases.
C
This
could
be
um
a
part
two
people
within
a
shelter
leasing
up
to
um
you
know
getting
an
apartment
together,
each
individually
having
a
lease.
There
are
so
many
creative
ways
that
this
could
look
like
um
an
elderly
uh
person.
That's
experiencing
homelessness,
partnering
up,
uh
I
say
partnering
up,
but
um
getting
being
housed
with
a
small
family.
You
know
this
could
look
a
lot
of
different
ways
and
it's
our
role
to
you
know,
provide
those
opportunities
and
support
that
kind
of
creative
um
access
to
affordable
housing.
C
It
could
also
look
like
temporary
housing
with
long-term
permanent
housing
plans.
So
it
could
look
like
you
know.
You
can
stay
with
this
person
for
a
family
member
for
two
months,
and
then
you
know
you
have
you
have
a
plan
in
place
to
get
your
own
housing
or
to
double
up,
or
you
know,
do
a
shared
housing
situation
with
another
person
or
another
um
family
household,
um
affordable
dwelling
units,
thinking
about
accessibility
and
access
to
affordable
dwelling
units
within
your
community
and
also
studio.
Excuse
me
studio
apartment
with
that.
You
want
to
be
thinking
of.
C
C
We
want
sure
that
we're
um
diversifying
our
approach
so
again,
just
remember
remembering
that
um
folks
may
not
need
any
type
of
services.
Folks
may
need
different
types
of
services
or
different
amounts
of
services,
oftentimes
our
perception
of
home.
You
know
people
who
are
homeless
need.
All
of
these
things
is
often
based
in
bias.
um
We
have
this
certain
bias
about
a
person
experiencing
homelessness
and
we
think
that
they
need
all
of
these
expensive
in.
C
Some
people
might
consider
services
to
be
faith-based
related
services
or
um
holistic
services,
um
so
having
that
flexibility
and
allowing
people
who
are
who
we're
working
with
to
lead
that
way,
but
also
as
a
community
supporting
that
as
well
in
um
connecting
for
being
able
to
connect
folks
to
those
resources
or
identify
the
resources
that
exist
in
those
community
community
in
our
community.
So
how
can
we
create
those
warm
handoffs?
C
So
these
are
some
questions
that
you
want
to
ask
yourself
as
you're
thinking
about
the
decisions
that
you
all
had
to
make.
How
do
we
right-size
our
shelter?
How
what
is
the
right
size-
and
that
starts
with
your
community-
needs
identifying
identifying
and
acknowledging?
What
are
your
community
needs?
What
are
the
gaps?
Your
data
can
help
you
to
make
those
decisions.
So
thinking
about,
how
can
you
improve
your
data?
What's
missing,
what
do
you
need?
C
How
do
people
experience
homelessness
in
our
community?
What
do
they
feel
the
needs?
Are
you
know,
folks
who
have
gone
through
the
system
who
are
currently
involved
in
various
interventions
in
the
system?
You
know:
how
do
they
experience
homelessness?
What
are
the
needs
that
they've
identified
exists
within
your
community
because
that
can
help
to
right-size
yourself
shelter
and
make
certain
decisions
about
how
to
effectively
end
homelessness
in
your
community?
C
um
One
thing
I
like
these
little
prompts
that
I
use
to
you
know
um
kind
of
filter
your
decision
making
through
so
does
x,
decision
increase
or
decrease
access.
So
I
spent
a
lot
of
time
talking
about
housing.
First,
talking
about
low
barrier,
talking
about
um
being
housing,
focusing
you
know
the
shelter
as
a
short-term
intervention.
C
So
you
want
to
ask
yourselves
well
with
this
decision
that
we're
thinking
about
making?
How
does
this
increase
or
decrease
access?
Does
it
affect
access
think
about
how
we
are
perpetuating
racism
or
eliminating
racial
disparities?
How
does
this
decision
or
does
excuse
me?
Does
this
decision
perpetuate
racism
or
eliminate
racism
in
our
community?
You
know
really
filtering
your
decisions
through
that
type
of
lens
does
x
decision
align
with
the
housing
first
philosophy.
C
So
are
we
putting
barriers
in
front
of
people
um
you
know
before
they
can
access
certain
types,
and
you
know
life-saving
interventions
like
shelter.
If
we
decide
to
place
the
shelter
in
this
community,
you
know
what
does
that
mean
like?
Are
we
putting
a
barrier
in
front
of
people?
Will
they
have
access
to
the
type
of
resources
that
they
need
um
and
again
working
with
those
who
are
experiencing
homelessness?
To
answer
some
of
those
questions
and
looking
at
your
hmis,
your
quantitative
type
of
data,
so
that
you
can
answer
some
of
those
questions
as
well?
C
What
community
connections
are
needed
to
getting
people
housed?
I
mean
uh
get
and
keep
people
housed
so
again.
Looking
at
your
data,
qualitative
and
quantitative,
do
we
have
training
needs,
so
we
are
going
to
be
low
beer.
If
we're
not
going
to
have
um
you
know
a
curfew
or
we're
not
going
to
require
folks
to
be
sober
to
get
into
you
know,
and
so
on
so
forth,
are
there
training
needs?
Are
there
training
needs
for
staff?
Are
there
training
needs
for
various
community?
C
um
You
know
partners
and
folks
who
will
exist
in
these
communities.
Do
we
need
to
have
messaging
campaigns
where
we
talk
about?
You
know
what
the
role
of
emergency
shelter
is.
What
this
means
for
a
community
if
a
shelter
is
putting
put
in
to
a
certain
community,
are
there
training
needs
and
messaging?
That
needs
to
happen
around
that
again.
Thinking
about
law
enforcement,
um
any
crisis
intervention
um
providers
that
you
might
have
in
the
community
are
there
ways
that
we
can.
um
You
know,
train
them
on
engaging
with
folks
who
are
experiencing
homelessness.
C
Anything
like
that,
so
so
many
questions
that
you
can
run
down
the
rabbit
hole
with
training
needs
and
then,
lastly,
another
question
is:
how
does
x
decision
impact
our
efforts
to
end
homelessness
equitably
so
centering
equity
in
the
work
that
you
all
are
doing
you
know:
will
this
create
a
disparate
outcome?
If
we
put
a
if
we
place
the
shelter
in
this
place,
you
know.
Will
folks
of
you
know?
Will
this
limit
folks
of
color
from
having
access
to
this
resource?
Will
this
limit
or
um
decrease
access
for
people
who
are
lgbtq?
C
um
You
know
what
you
know,
and
so
on
so
for
thinking
about
populations
who
are
um
often
discriminated
against,
who
often
lack
access
to
you,
know,
resources
and
services,
and
thinking
about
how
your
decision
might
have
an
impact
on
that.
In
again
working
with
these
communities,
um
you
know
sub
communities
to
make
some
of
these
decisions
and
oftentimes,
I
will
say
the
proof,
is
in
the
pudding
oftentimes.
When
you
do
look
at
your
data,
um
you
will
have
some.
You
will
see
certain
trends.
You
will
be
able
to
make
certain.
C
K
A
Folks,
if
you
want
to
ask
a
question
to
mia
on
the
scope
of
the
role
of
emergency
shelter-
or
I
know
that
there
are
a
lot
of
questions
from
this
group-
explicitly
about
low
barrier,
shelters
and
housing
first
oriented
shelters.
This
is
your
opportunity
to
place
the
work
that
we're
doing
here
in
boise
in
the
national
context
for
best
practices
across
systems
in
the
united
states.
So
I
want
to
encourage
us
to
prioritize
questions
from
this
task
force
that
has
an
explicit
charge
when
it
comes
to
citing
shelter
and
push
you
all
to
ask
questions.
C
A
J
So
looking
at
this,
all
of
this
is
coming
from
the
perspective
of
limiting
homelessness,
which
is
absolutely
something
that
we
all
agree
and
want
to
do.
But
none
of
this
is
coming
from
the
perspective
of
the
surrounding
communities
in
which
these
shelters
may
be
located.
Is
there
any
data
or
studies
or
anything
you
can
talk
about
and
pertaining
to
that
aspect
or
that
perspective
for
the
community?
J
J
Sorry,
maybe
this
is
all
about
you,
know,
homelessness
and
and
ending
and
housing
first
models
and
that's
all
excellent.
We
can
all
absolutely
get
behind
all
of
those
things,
but
within
the
communities
that
these
are
situated
in.
Is
there
any
data
about
the
impacts
of
these
of
shelters
within
those
specific
communities
before
and
after
shelter,
location
or
anything
like
that?
That
we'll
be
able
to
look
at.
C
um
So
that
data
that
data
should
re
should
exist
within
your
um
within
your
community,
so
um
communities
do
have
to
collect
this
data.
They
do
have
to
understand
what
their
length
to
stay
is
within
their
shelters.
They
do
have
to
understand
where
they
are
in
terms
of
equity,
returns
to
homelessness
and
so
on
so
forth,
and
that's
very
common
with
other
programs
as
well
um
with
enormous
response
system,
so
that
ex
that
data
does
exist
and
that's
something
that
can
be
um
collected
from
your
local
continuum
of
care.
C
um
So,
if
you
are,
you
know,
as
I
kind
of
um
like
really
emphasize
within
my
presentation,
about
looking
at
the
data-
um
that's
something
that
the
tax
force
should
be
um
should
be
looking
at
and
considering,
because
that
data
does
exist.
It
has
to
be
reported
to
hud
to
the
um
housing
urban
development,
so
um
that
data
does
exist,
and
I
will
say
too,
I
think
oftentimes.
I
get
this
question
to
like
okay.
Well,
how
does
this
like
apply
to
us?
C
Like
you
know,
you're
speaking
philosophically
you're
talking
about
housing
first,
I
think
ultimately,
because
I
think
it's
also
ultimately
related
because,
if
you're
working
on
um
you
know
placing
this
shelter
ultimately
is
with
the
goal
of
ending
homelessness,
you
can
put
the
shelter
wherever
you
want.
You
know
like
it
could
really
be
wherever
you
guys
want,
but
the
questions
you
have
to
ask
yourself
is:
how
is
this
going
to
advance
our
efforts
in
homelessness?
C
If
you
want
it
to
be
effective,
if
you
want
the
shelter
to
have
meaning
and
for
the
placement
to
have
meaning
and
so
consider,
housing
first,
you
know,
consider
low
barrier,
consider
you
know
diversion
and
all
the
things
that
I
talked
about
in
making
this
decision
it's
ultimately
never
my
job
or
any
person
who
considers
you
know
calls
themselves.
A
national
expert
is
never
um
you
know
their
job
to
tell
folks
what
to
do
is
ultimately
to
help
folks
to
make
the
decisions
that
they
need
to
make
in
considering
what
the
best
practices
are.
C
So
keep.
Keeping
these
um
ideas
in
mind
are
essential
when
you
are
making
these
decisions,
but
ultimately
the
decision
is
up
to
you
to
to
this
task
force
um
and
I'm
I
just
implored
and
encourage
you
all
to
you
know
utilize.
Some
of
these
uh
philosophies
that
I
discussed
today
in
your
decision
making,
as
that
will
um
influence
whether
or
not
it
has
a
negative
or
positive
impact
on
ending
homelessness
and
community.
A
Thanks
for
that
answer
me-
and
I
think
that's
helping
address
like
the
spectrum
of
philosophy
and
approach-
and
I
think
behind
the
question
was
also
something
we're
hearing
from
community
leaders.
Is
the
approach
to
ending
homelessness?
Is
one
thing:
how
is
it
going
to
impact
my
neighborhood,
and
so
I
think
the
question
behind
that
was
as
national
alliance
to
end
homelessness.
C
That
needs
to
be
done
so
that
people
can
gain
access
to
those
supports
that
can
help
inform
can
be
part
of
what
informs
your
decision
making
on
where
this
um
this
uh
shelter
is
is
placed.
um
You
know,
thinking
about.
uh
You
know
whether
it's
uh
faith-based
resources,
food
resources,
um
affordable
housing,
think
about
transportation.
C
You
know,
do
folks,
have
um
you
know
access
to
their
doctors?
Thinking
about
you
know,
thinking
about
uh
mental
health,
supports
that
folks
have
so
I
think
those
are
the
types
of
things
you
kind
of
want
to
research
and
know
about
these
different
sites.
You
know
how
will
folks
have
access
to
um
supports
and
services
if
they're
placed
here
and
one
one
thing
I'll
say
is
one
misconception?
Is
that
folks
who
are
experiencing
homelessness?
Don't
work?
C
Many
people
do
work.
So
that's
another,
that's
another.
uh
You
know
thing
to
consider
about
the
placement
of
this
site
is,
you
know,
do
folks
have
the
transportation
that
they
need
to
get
to
and
from
the
shelter
to
their
employment
or,
like
I
said,
to
their
um
doctors
or
daycare
centers
or
whatever
the
resources
that
they
need
to
be
able
to
even
sustain
where
they
are
now
and,
of
course,
that
will
contribute
to
their
permanent
housing
as
well.
C
A
Perfect
and
thank
you
so
much
mia
we're
going
to
wrap
for
time,
um
but
I
really
appreciate
everything
that
mia
brought
to
the
table.
We
are
at
12
31,
so
I
just
want
to
make
sure
we're
respecting
folks
time.
We
do
have
some
uh
hours
with
mia
after
today's
session.
So
what
we
can
do
is
again
since
jenna's
out
I'll,
be
your
contact.
You
can
send
emails
to
me
directly
if
there
are
things
that
you're
curious
about
from
the
presentation
today
or
as
it
relates
to
low
barrier,
housing.
First
oriented
shelters.
A
If
you
send
me
those
questions,
we
can
work
with
mia
to
come
back
with,
in
addition
to
those
case
studies
about
community
impact.
What
are
the
other
things
that
we
can
work
to
provide
answers
from
mia
directly
that
come
from
your
concerns
or
questions
about
the
role
of
emergency
shelter?
So
mia?
Thank
you
so
much
for
coming
today
and
um
really
appreciate
it
and
we'll
be
following
up
over
email.
You
can
jump.
C
Awesome
thank
you
for
having
me
and
I
wish
I
could
see
your
your
guys's
faces.
I
see
like
the
back
of
your
head,
but
I'm
looking
forward
to
the
hearing
about
the
work
that
you
do
and
um
you
know
being
able
to
support
it.
As
casey
said,
we
do
have
a
couple
more
uh
technical
assistance
hours.
So
looking
forward
to
supporting
that,
and
also
just
on
the
back
and
hearing
about
the
wonderful
work
that
you
guys
do.
A
So
just
some
housekeeping
as
we're
jumping
off
for
the
day.
One
reiterating,
if
you
have
questions
about
the
role
of
emergency
shelter
as
it
relates
to
anything
that
was
discussed
today
or
explicitly
and
specifically
on
low
barrier
housing.
First
oriented
shelters,
send
those
questions
to
me.
We
will
send
them
directly
to
mia
who
will
be
responsive
to
those
questions,
and
I
know
that
you
have
them
because
you
put
them
on
the
feasibility
criteria,
so
please
engage
with
that
process.
A
Second,
is
we're
continuing
to
collect
locations
from
you?
All
we've
received
a
couple
of
different
locations.
We
are
moving
through
our
process
of
the
city
of
boise
internally
and
determining
which
sites
are
opportunities
for
citing
shelter.
We
are
also
meeting
with
a
brokerage
firm
this
week
to
go
through
a
scan
of
available
listings
that
are
currently
on
the
market,
and
then
we've
received
some
recommendations
from
you.
A
Also,
if
you
have
those
again
because
jen
is
out
within
a
family
emergency,
please
send
those
to
me
and
we'll
make
sure
that
those
are
added
to
that
make
sure
you
come
up
and
sign
the
partner
statement
of
commitment
before
you
leave
and
for
the
folks
who
are
unable
to
attend
in
person.
If
you
could
send
through
chat
that
you
want
to
add
your
name
to
the
signature,
we'll
do
it
for
you
here
and
then
next
week
we
are
going
to
be
going
through
the
theme
of
sheltered
and
unsheltered
homelessness
in
boise.
A
So
you
can
expect
as
normal,
to
receive
today
kind
of
a
high-level
summary
of
what
we
did
and
on
wednesday
you'll
receive
the
homework
and
reading
for
what
we're
going
to
be
doing
together
the
next
time.
So
any
questions
that
I
can
resolve
for
clarity
about.
What's
coming
next
great
reminder,
we
will
be
here
today
afterwards
to
do
the
feasibility
just
open
conversation,
and
thank
you
all
so
much
for
coming
back
again
this
week.