►
From YouTube: 6-13-23 Board of Zoning Adjustment Meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
A
A
A
A
A
Devin
saunders,
cob:,
when
we
get
to
the
audio
to
the
public
participation
section
of
the
meeting,.
There
is
a
little
bar
at
the
bottom
of
the
screen
here
that
you'll
see,
and
when
we
get
to
the
public
participation,
you'll,
simply
click
the
raise
hand,
icon
right,
here,,
and
that
will
let
me
know.
and
the
rest
of
the
board
know
that
you're
interested
in
and
participating
in
the
public,
comment.
A
D
B
B
B
B
Jill
lester:,
if
the
first
vote
taken
on
a
motion
to
approve
or
deny
an
application
results
in
a
tie.
2
to
2.,
the
applicant
will
be
allowed
to
rehearing
a
tie
vote
on
any
subsequent
motion
to
approve
it
tonight.
so
result
in
defeat
of
the
motion
and
denial
of
the
application.,
a
vote
of
2
to
one
or
one
to
2
on
a
motion,.
She
on
all
respects
be
considered
a
tie.
B
E
E
E
E
Robbie
wyler,
cofb:
as
part
of
a
proposal
to
recognize
and
permit,,
and
approximately
72
square
foot
detached
son
of
structure
within
the
properties
front,
south
yard.
The
applicants
are
requesting
a
variance
to
the
front
yard
landscape,
set
that
standards
for
accessory
structures
in
the
ro.
one.
Zoning
district.
E
E
E
Robbie
wyler,
cofb:,
that
was
all
provided
within
the
application,
and
a
few
of
those
made
it
into
this
presentation..
But
for
the
most
part
the
proposal
has
remained
the
same,
and
the
presentation
has
remained
the
same.
so
with
that
there
are
still
for
written
support.
from
neighbors,
and
those
are
all
depicted
up
there
on
the
screen.
Right,
now,
and.
E
E
E
Robbie
wyler,
cofb:.
So
what
the
board
is
looking
at
today
is
a
setback
fairings
for
the
new
72
square
foot
on
a
structure,,
and
it
is
a
variance
to
the
front
south
yard,
as
mentioned,
and
that's
for
approximately
3
and
a
half
feet
from
the
subject:
structure,,
where
55
feet
is
required,
and
approximately
3
and
a
half
feet
exist.
Today.
E
Robbie
wyler,
cofb:
and
some
questions
were
brought
up
in
terms
of
what
the
usments
were
on
the
property,
and
there
are
2
active
easement
on
this
property,
one
along
the
east
property
line,
or
the
right
property
line
in
this
image,
and
that's
a
5
foot
access,
easement.
and
then
there's
also
a
10
foot
utility
easement
from
the
original.
E
Robbie
wyler,
cofb:
property,
line.
and
then
here
on
the
image
or
the
exhibit,,
you
can
see
that
kinda
green
shaded
area.
That
is
the
only
portion
of
the
property
that
is
buildable,
or
meets
all
setbacks,
and
is
outside
of
easement
for
an
accessory
structure,.
So
that
includes
the
55
foot
front,
yard,
the
3
foot
side
and
rear,
in
addition
to
the
10
foot
and
5
foot
easements.
That
cannot
be
built.
Within.
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
Robbie
wyler,
cofb:,
so
with
that
being
said,
staff
is
still
in
support
of
the
variance
set,
that
variance
request,,
as
has
been
presented
within
the
application
materials,,
including
the
additional
exhibits
and
visuals
that
were
provided
with
the
most
recent
round
of
materials..
We
feel
that,
given
the
topographic
and
site
constraints,,
including
the
setbacks
and
easements
that
are
in
place
for
the
web,
shaped
lot,
and
a
lot
that
is.
E
A
G
G
F
F
F
Ransom
beegles:,
my
firm,
has
worked
in
boulder
for
20
years
and
completed
over
a
hundred
residential
projects.,
so
we
certainly
understand,
the
importance
of
the
board
of
zoning
and
adjustments
process.
and
that's
why
I
want
to
provide
you
with
some
extensive
background
on
what
we're
proposing
here.
F
F
Ransom
beegles:,
you
can
sort
of
see..
The
the
shape
of
the
site
is
such
that
it's
kind
of
a
wedge,
and
the
traditional
front
yard,,
which
on
many
sites,
would
only
be
one
part
of
the
yard..
It
was
actually
both
the
southwest
and
south
parts
of
the
yard.,
so
alpine
avenue
runs
east,.
West,
here,
and
tyler
road
runs
to
the
northwest
on
this
side.
Here.
F
Ransom
beegles:
that
ransom
beegles:,
the
question
of:
did
you
evaluate
the
by
right?
Considerations?
and
we
came
up
with
5
points
that
we
wanted
to
bring
up
in
detail,
and
we
kind
of
broke
those
out
and
their
existing
site
constraints
that
were
purchased
with
the
home
by
the
homeowners.
and
we
kind
of
broke
them
into
a
series
of
diagrams..
So
I'll
start
by
sharing..
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
Ransom
beegles:,
it's
it's
very
extreme..
The
high
point,
which
is
on
the
northern
edge,
sits
21
feet,
above.
right,
here,
adjacent
to
the
house.,
so
that's
only
40
feet
down,,
which
means
this
is
a
2
to
one
slope,,
which
is
extreme..
It's
far
above
the
slope
that
is
required
when
you
submit
with
the
city,
engineering,
department.
F
F
F
F
Ransom
beegles:,
so
it's
much
more
than
just
a
matter
of
taking
out
a
little
portion
of
wall
that
would
have
impact
that
would
go
down
all
of
the
walls
into
the
neighboring
properties..
These
2,
smaller
walls
are
on
property,
and
they're,
holding
back
that
grade
of
2
to
one
to
allow
slope
retention
to
occur.,
you
can
see
where
there's
not
retaining.,
it's
almost
impossible
to
grow
vegetation.
F
F
F
F
F
F
Ransom
beegles:
I'll
talk
about
it
in
a
little
bit..
Here
is
just
the
accessibility
not
only
for
foot
traffic,,
but
to
do
any
kind
of
a
construction
would
impact
this
structure
that
you
see,
here,,
which
is
tied
into
the
neighboring
property
on
1,965
alpine.
This
is
where
that
easement
encroaches,,
so
the
opposite
side,,
which
is
the
west
side,
has
a
21
foot
grade
change
over
40
feet.
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
Ransom
beegles:,
so
I
I
really
appreciate
the
opportunity
to
share
this
with
you..
We
wanted
to
dive
into
the
by
right
considerations
very
closely,
and
look
at
all
the
existing
conditions
of
the
site
before
we
came
back
and
presented
to
you..
So
I
want
to
thank
you
for
your
time
for
this,
and
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
H
F
H
H
B
A
B
D
Drew
eisenberg,,
boza:
yeah,
no.
thanks
a
lot
for
putting
this
together..
I
I
really
know
that
it
takes
a
long
time
to
put
this
all
together,
and
it's
really
probably
a
little
frustrating.
but
it.
you
know,.
This
does
live
past.
when
you
guys
own
the
property.,
and
so
it's
important
that
we
know
all
the
facts
and.
D
D
D
H
B
Jill
lester:
thank
you,
marine
nikki,
mccord,
boza:
nikki.
yes,.
Thank
you
for
this
additional
information..
I
think
this
information
helped
me
understand
more
what
was
going
on.
and
so.
because
of
this
presentation,
tonight,
and
the
additional
information,.
I
will
be
in
support
of
the
experience
as
well.
I
I
B
Jill
lester:
thank
you,,
everybody.,
I'm
probably
in
with
katie
on
this
one,,
but
I'm
very
familiar
with
this
area..
This
is
very,
not
quite
close
enough
to
keep
me
from
speaking
or
voting
on
it,,
but
it's
my
neighborhood.,
so
I
drive
by
this
area
all
the
time
that
I
was
by
there
yesterday
looking
at
the
site..
So
it
sounds
like
we're
in
good
shape
to
somebody.,
have
a
motion,
please.
B
B
B
B
C
E
E
E
Robbie
wyler,
cofb:
and
provided
within
the
application
materials.
there
were
several
neighbors
in
the
immediate
neighborhood
who
did
provide
written
support..
I
have
those
listed
there
on
the
left
hand,
side
of
the
screen,
and
then
the
stars.
Do
you
know
where
exactly
those
neighbors
are
located??
2
stars
were
off,,
my
mac.,
so
I
just
kinda
put
them
at
the
top.,
but
they
are
the
properties
immediately
to
the
north
of
the
map..
So
in
total,,
6
neighbors
did
provide
written
support
for
this.
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
Robbie
wyler,
cofb:
and
there's
not
a
whole
lot
of
zoning
information,,
because
this
is
a
parking
variance..
There's
no
modification
to
the
building,.
No
expansion
of
building
coverage,,
solar
access,
side,
yard.,
well,,
articulation,,
bulk
plan,,
none
of
that's
being
modified
or
impacted
because
of
the
parking
variance,,
and
it
is
an
existing
driveway,
as
mentioned.
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
B
E
E
E
I
Katie
crane,
boza:
type
of
this
variance
request
that
I've
seen
since
I've
been
on
the
board..
You
know
I
was
in
reading
the
application.
I
was,.
I
was,
you
know,.
Just
a
s,
swayed
a
little
bit
that
there
isn't
a
whole
lot
of
extra
resources
to
sort
of
build
an
extra
structure.
for
a
bedroom..
How
is
it?
is
there
any
like?
Is
that
taken
to
into
account
at
all.
I
J
B
B
E
E
D
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
Jill
lester::
this
is
a
property
that
probably
that
garage
doesn't
get
used.
it's
typically.
Those
garages
are
too
narrow,
and
people
put
their
things
in
on
one
side
and
the
other
side.
they
just
can't
get
a
door
open..
So
that's
one
of
the
reasons
we
have
a
lot
of
cars
down
in
south
boulder.,
in
addition
to
the
fact
that
there's
lots
of
people
living
down
there.,
it's
just
the
fact..
The
garages
aren't
useful.
B
A
B
K
K
K
E
E
E
E
Robbie
wyler,
cofb:
and
we
do
allow
people
to
park
in
a
driveway
within
a
front
yard
setback,
if
it
specifically
leads
to
conforming
off
street
parking
like
within
a
garage..
So
we
do
allow
people
that
in
essentially
we
don't
care
if
you
park
in
front
of
your
garage
as
long
as
that
garage
is
in
use..
E
Robbie
wyler,
cofb:
and
if
the
parking
was
placed
to
the
north
of
the
property
out
of
the
front
yard,
set
back,,
there
would
be
no
need
for
a
variance,
and
they
could
then
convert
that.
But
that
doesn't
seem
to
be
a
a
preferred
approach
is
to
move
the
driveway
and
the
parking,.
And
we
understand
that
we
respect
that.
E
E
E
B
I
I
I
I
E
E
D
D
E
B
B
B
A
L
L
B
L
L
L
L
L
B
B
C
C
B
B
B
L
L
B
A
A
B
Jill
lester:
must
be
time
for
a
new
chair.
yeah..
Can
you
put
video
on
margaret
and
lewis,
please.
just
for
it,,
you
applicant.,
you
may
chat
your
video
off
if
you're,
finding
it's
trouble,
maintaining
the
signal
that
happens
with
zoom.
so
stay
on
as
long
as
you
want
to,
or
turn
your
video
off.,
but
stay
with
us,
please.
M
E
E
E
Robbie
wyler,
cofb:
h,,
one
robbie,
wyler,,
cofb:
c
and
d,;
that's
actually
h,
one
c
and
d,
and
there's
also
an
h
5..
That's
a
different
section
of
the
code..
That's
additional
review
criteria
that
the
board
has
to
find
a
request
meets
in
order
to
approve
it..
So
h.
one
j..
This
did
not
qualify
for,
because
that's
past
conversions.,
so
this
application
has
to.
E
M
N
Margaret
&
lewis:
and
we
still
all
have
driveways,
which,
of
course,.
We
are
going
to
use
to
park
our
car
on
the
driveway..
I
was
confused
about
the
the
piece
about
you:
have
a
driveway
leading
to
a
garage,,
but
are
you
not
supposed
to
use
your
driveway
at
all.?
If
you
have
a
garage,,
can
you
not
park
a
car
on
a
driveway??
If
you
have
a
garage,
or.
M
Jill
lester:
thank
you.
did
you?.
Did
you
get
enough
time
to
answer?
because,
say,
what??
You
wanted
to
say,
okay,
yeah,
thank
you..
We
appreciate
your,
you're,
taking
the
time
to
join
the
meeting
and
give
us
some
feedback..
I
think
we
can
address
that
response.,
but
I
I
think
one
thing
I
like
to
say:
is,.
You
have
to
remember
that
the
codes
are
written
at
a
time.
Certain.
B
B
B
I
I
I
I
I
I
B
J
J
Erin
poe,
cao:
that?,
just
as
the
financial
situation
has
been
taken
into
account
by
pass
boards
in
a
criteria
d
about
hardship,.
It
also
has
been
taken
into
account
bypass
boards
for
what
it
reasonably
be
developed,
means,
and
if
the
cost
for
developing
is
so
high
to
do
it
in
in
conformity.
Whereas.
J
H
H
H
H
H
H
B
D
D
K
K
Nikki
mccord,
boza:
when
ordinances
and
laws
are
written.
they're
written
at
that
particular
time,,
and
I
think
we
are..
We
all
know
that
our
modern
cars
do
not
fit
into
these
substandard
garages,,
and
so
I
don't
agree
with
staff
that
the
garage
can
be
reasonably
used
as
a
garage..
Knowing
the
information
that
we
now
have
about
the
size
of
vehicles.
K
K
K
K
B
Drew
eisenberg,
boza:
yeah,,
I
did.
just
to
add
on
to
a
reasonable
size,
just
for
feedback
for
council,.
You
know
about..
How
do
we
fix
things??
You
know
a
9
by
19.
Spot
inside
a
garage
is
not
wide
enough
for
a
for
a
modern,
car,
right..
So
as
a
potential
solution,,
if
you
made
it,,
maybe
1010
and
a
half
feet
wide,,
you
guys
even
that's
tight
for
a
garage.
D
B
Jill
lester:
yeah.
well,.
We
we
we
an
opportunity
every
year
to
write
a
letter
to
city
council.-
sometimes
they
listen
to,
and
sometimes
they
don't,
and
or
they
read
it
and
move
on,
or
it
doesn't
fit
what
they
have
to
do.,
but
you
know,
obviously,.
This
is
a
concern..
I
think
some
of
the
things
that
happen
for
us
is,.
How
often
do
we
see
it
come
up?.
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
Jill
lester:
and
design
it
according
to
code,
and
build
it
according
to
code..
But
I'm
looking
forward
to
the
motion
that
complies
with
the
regulations,
and
allows
us
to
grant
this
family.
What
is
a
solution
to
their
dilemma,
and
somebody
that
already
is
in
existence
in
many,
many
homes
in
that
neighborhood.
B
B
J
K
B
B
E
J
B
B
E
E
H
E
O
O
Lisa
houde,,
cob:
and
robbie,
and
I
just
wanted
to
circle
back,,
because
now
city
council
has
adopted
those
regulations..
So
I
just
have
a
very
brief
presentation,
just
a
couple
of
slides
to
go
over
the
changes.,
so
you're
aware
of
them.
and
what
changes
you
might
expect
to
see
with
variances
that
come
to
you..
So
I
will
share
my
screen.
O
Lisa
houde,
cob:
alright.
lisa
houde,
cob:,
so
we
have
our
eightyu
update
project..
This
is
one
of
the
city
council's
priorities
for
the
last
2
years,
and
they
adopted
ordinance
8,571
on
may.
Fourth
of
this
year
may
remember,.
We
talked
through
each
of
these
changes
back
in
february,,
but
they
were
adopted
within
that
ordinance..
So
we
have.
the
city
has
eliminated
the
saturation
limit
for
accessory
dwelling
units
that
limited
the
number
of
within
a
certain
radius.
In
a
few
of
the
zoning
districts
in
the
city.
O
Lisa
houde,
cob:,
but
we've
also
modified
the
size
limits
for
a
to
use.
I'll.
Go
into
that
in
a
little
more
detail.
in
the
next
slide..
We
did
a
number
of
changes
that
clarified
and
simplified
the
80
regulations,
and
then
we'll
also
be
improving
the
approval
process
and
making
things
more
streamlined.
O
Lisa
houde,
cob:
the
ordinance,.
Although
it's
been
passed.,
so
it's
passed
in
may.,
it
doesn't
go
into
effect
until
september
first.,
so
we're
still
working
under
the
old
80
regulations
until
that
point,
and
then,,
as
at
at
september.
first,.
Any
building
permits
that
come
in,,
we'll
use
the
new
process
and
new
regulations
for
a
to
use.
O
Lisa
houde,
cob:
as
the
board,
you
review
floor
area
variances
for
a
to
use.,
so
I
thought,
you'd
be
most
interested
in
the
adopted
code.
Changes
related
to
the
size
limits..
So
the
first
thing
was
that
we
have
removed
the
unique
eightyu
floor
area
measurement
definition..
There
was
just
a
different
way
of
measuring
a
to
use..
We
talked
about
that
last
time..
Now
we
will
use
for
area
the
same
for
a
definition
for
a
to
use
like
we
do
for
every
other
building
in
the
city.
O
O
Lisa
houde,
cob:,
but
for
the
attached
lisa
houde,,
cob:
it,.
It
went
from
a
third
of
the
principal
unit
to
a
half
of
the
principal
unit,
or
1,000
square
feet,.
Whichever
is
less,
so,
that
provides
some
more
flexibility.
for
houses
with
attached
units
for
the
detest
or
the
separate
structure..
It's
been
increased
from
550
square
feet
to
800
square
feet..
O
O
O
O
Lisa
houde,
cob:,
so
the
difference
for
you
all
is
that
if
you
see
a
variance
for
floor
area
for
80,,
you
we're
starting
at
that
bigger
number
now..
So,
rather
than
something
that
was
600
square
feet
and
a
detached
unit
needing
to
come
to
you
for
a
variance..
You'd
only
be
seeing
things
that
are
over
800
square
feet.
if
they're,
not
affordable,
or
half
of
the
principal
unit,.
That
kind
of,
if
they're
meeting
those.
O
Lisa
houde,
cob:
right
hand
columns..
So
that's
really
the
biggest
impact
that
would
affect
your
board
and
what
we're
working
on
now
over
the
summer
are
all
of
the
process
improvements..
So
we're
working
on
updating
all
of
the
handouts
and
videos
related
to
the
edu
approval,
process.
and
then
because
we
are
moving
from
a
2
step
review
to
a
one
step
review
where
the
80
you
is
reviewed
during
the
building
permit.
O
O
Lisa
houde,
cob:,
so
that's
kind
of
an
overview.
not..
There
were
no
major
changes
to
the
ordinance
from
the
proposal
that
you
all
saw
in
february.,
so
it
kind
of
went
through
the
process
and
was
recommended
for
approval
by
have
and
planning
board
and
city
council,.
And
now
it's
been
adopted
as
an
ordinance,.
So
I'm
happy
to
take
any
questions,.
If
you
have
any.
B
O
Lisa
houde,
cob:,
so
yeah,.
So
if
if
people
would
like
to
remove
the
affordable
designation
like
their
7,,
they
were
approved
as
affordable.
and
now
they'd
like
to
be
market
rate..
They
have
to
go
back
through
the
approval
process
because
we
have
to
update
the
legal
documents
and
things
like
that.
but
they'd
be
reviewed
under
the
new
standards..
So
if
they
choose
to
do
that,,
they
can
do
that.
B
Jill
lester:
and
whoever
else
they
need?
or
do
they
just
resubmit
with
it?
I
mean,
is
it
I?.
I
I'm
suggesting
that
there'
be
a
simplified
process.,
but
please,
yeah,
yeah,.
It
would
be
essentially
a
change
of
use,
building,
permit
application,
which
you
can..
They
could
use
the
plans
that
they
had
used
last
time.,
and
it's
really
just
to
update
kind
of
the
paperwork.
for
that..
So
and
then
there
wouldn't
be
a
major
scope
of
work,
obviously,
to
create
a
fee.
O
O
B
B
Jill
lester:
there's
something
I
mentioned
to
you
is
like,.
How
do
you
control
tenant?
use??
How
do
you
encourage
a
tenant
to
be
efficient
about
their
utility
usage?
or
what
about
credits
for
solar
panels??
I
don't
know
if
these
things
have
been
considered,,
but
I'm
just
curious
whether
it
it
only
applies
to
the
affordable,
units,
or
if
it
applies
to
all
of
them.
O
Lisa
houde,
cob:
yeah.,
so
the
utilities
question
didn't
really
come
up
as
a
major
point
of
discussion..
One
thing
that
is
that
we
have
talked
about
is
a
major
differentiator
between
having
an
edu
and
having
another
dwelling
unit
technically
separate
utilities.,
and
so
the
city
is
pretty
strict
about
the
80..
You
cannot
have
separate
utilities.
O
Lisa
houde,
cob:,
and
so
that
isn't
something
that
changed.,
but
certainly
the
conversation
for
a
to
use,
I
think,
is
continually
going
to
be
ongoing.
and
again
many
incremental
changes
over
time,.
So
that
could
be
something
for
the
next
round
of
conversations.
and
as
we
see
more
and
more
a
to
use.
come
about..
It
might
be
something
that
we
need
to
address.
Next.
B
B
B
I
B
Jill
lester:
applications.,
so
jill
lester:,
yeah,,
so
we'll
just.
I'll
just
make
sure
we've
got
something
updated
before
I
leave
town,
so
that
it's
a
little
more.
there's
some
typos
in
there.,
and
so
it's,
I
think,
there's
a
word
appliance
instead
of
applicant,
and
I
always
have
to
be
careful
not
to
say
appliance.