►
From YouTube: 2-6-23 Cannabis Licensing Advisory Board Meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
C
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
C
C
C
C
D
D
D
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
C
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
Rachel
freeman
(she/her):.
We
believe
that
allowing
cannabis,
social
consumption
businesses
is
a
step
backward
in
preventing
youth,,
smoking,
and
substance
use..
So
just
thank
you
so
much
for
your
consideration
of
this
important
issue,
and
engaging
the
community
and
making
the
best
decision
for
the
youth
and
boulder.
thanks.
So
much.
C
C
H
H
H
C
C
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
J
J
I
I
I
I
I
E
I
I
I
K
I
I
I
I
I
D
C
C
C
C
I
I
I
Suzaynn
schick,
toxicologist:,
I
don't
usually
name
businesses
when
I
publish.,
so
I'm
gonna
be
a
little
squarely
here,.
But
so
I
have
a
paper
that
pretty
much
describes
what
I
just
described
to
you
and
my
first
pay..
I
have
another
paper,,
my
first
paper,,
where
I
was
in
a
dispensary
that
didn't
allow
smoking
at
all,
and
it
was
all
vaping
and
dabbing.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
C
C
C
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
J
J
M
M
M
C
D
C
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
C
O
D
L
L
L
P
Jodi
radke:
okay,,
I
will
try
to
speak
loud,
and
I
will
try
to
be
brief,
as
I
recognize
and
honor
that
you
are
running
short
on
time..
My
name
is
jodie
redkey.,
I'm
the
regional
director
with
the
campaign
for
tobacco
free
kids..
I've
been
with
the
campaign
just
over
16
years,
and
I've
worked
in
the
field
of
tobacco
control
for
just
about
20
years..
P
P
P
D
D
C
A
A
A
A
A
C
Q
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
C
K
K
K
Q
Q
Clab,
stacy
green:
as
evan
is
saying,.
I'm
sure
it
could
be
a
really
colorful
discussion
if
we
had
the
time
to
do.,
you
know
more
back
and
forth,
type
debating
here.,
but
for
now
you
know,
taking
what
we
heard
at
face
value..
It
sounds
really
important,
and
it's
important,.
I
think,
that
all
of
us
here.
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Clab,
stacy
green:
there's
a
lot
of
other
points
to
consider,
and
our
job,.
I
think,
is,
you
know,
for
each
of
our
backgrounds
to
weigh
all
that
information,
and
then
make
you
know
our
vote.
The
way
we
want
to
vote,
and
that
all
will
go
to
city.
Council.-
you
know,
as
far
as
a
set
of
recommendations
from
all
of
us,
you
know,
and
all
of
our
voices
in
some
way
being
honored
there..
So
this
is
an
important
point.
We're
hearing
about
today,,
but
it's
one
line
item
on
the
spreadsheet,
so
to
speak.
Q
Clab,
stacy
green:,
it
is
maybe
a
more
heavily
weighted
one,,
but
it's
not
the
only
one,
and
like
I've
been
saying,
you
know,.
If
there
was
the
opportunity
to
get
and
dig
a
little
deeper,,
I'm
sure
there
would
be
some
questions..
I
think
brian
brought
up
an
important
point
about
relative
risk
in
terms
of
workers
exposures..
If
we
walk
through
restaurants
and
boulder
and
tested
the
you
know,
ppm
of
the
air
in
those
places.-
I
I
that's
actually
something.
I'm
sitting
and
thinking
like,
oh,.
That
would
be
really
interesting
to
do
just
here.
Q
About
the
gas
stoves
right?,
so
clab,,
stacy
green:,
I
I
think
that
it's
an
important
set
of
it..
You
know
data
we're
hearing
about
today.,
it's
something.
We
really
do
all
need
to
pay
attention
to,
because
it
is
real..
It
sounds
like
we
shouldn't
ignore
it,,
even
if
maybe
there's
questions
to
be
thrown
at
it.
and
at
the
same
time,.
I
think
it's
important
to
remember..
This
is
one
line.
Item.
Q
Q
Q
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
C
C
C
E
E
C
C
C
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
C
Clab,
tom
kunstman
(he/him):,
I'd
like
to
hear
from
you
clab,
brian
keegan
(he/him):,
2
people
that
have
not,
said
bunch
up,,
including
the
wait
before
we
go
off..
I
understand
that
I
just
want
to
be
it..
It's
really
explicit
about
what
we're
about
to
do
here..
So
if
we
want
to
move
forward,,
we
got
5
proposed
motions.
here..
We
can
sort
of
have
a
q.
a.
for
each
of
these
motions
or
discussion
reach
of
those,,
but
I
don't
want
to
engage
in
an
open
end
of
discussion.
E
C
C
C
R
C
F
F
S
C
S
F
S
F
E
E
F
F
F
F
K
K
K
C
C
Clab,
tom
kunstman
(he/him):
yeah,,
if,
if
clab,
tom,
kunstman
(he/him):,
I
mean
23,,
we
take
care
of
that.
Just
I
mean
we
don't
have
to
to
the
the
differences.
Is
that
you
wouldn't
have
to
to
read
like
vote
on
re-voting
right
like
there's
a
process
for
reconsideration,,
and
this
isn't
a
reconsideration.
The
language
changed
from
one
memo..
The
city
came
out
with.
S
Clab,
kate
thomson
(she/her):
to
this
document.
It
changed
somewhere
in
between
there.
The
meeting
minutes
say
something
different
than
what's
in
this
motion,,
and
this
was
a
summary
of
the
motion..
We
didn't
go
back
through
every
single
meeting
to
make
sure
we
had
the
exact
language
in
somewhere
in
between.
there.
It
changed.
S
Clab,
kate,
thomson
(she/her):
from
the
day
that
that
the
the
the
vote
was
made
until
now,,
and
we
don't
know
when
that
happened.
and
so
again,
clarification
means
that
we
just
talk
about
it..
A
reconsideration
means
that
the
prevailing
has
to
to
say
that
we
have
to
vote
on
it,
and
then
we
vote
on
it..
So
there
are
very
2
different
things.
When
you
talk
about
talking
about
14
versus
talking
about
23.
J
K
K
K
K
K
C
E
E
C
K
C
C
E
J
J
J
J
E
Clab,
brian
keegan
(he/him):,
I'll
just
add,,
just
as
as
a
the
help
facilitate..
If
there
are
people
who
are
on
the
fence
about
this,,
or
it
would
be
some
clarity
or
some
discussion
with
benefit
them,
making
up
their
mind..
I
think
I
want
to
prioritize
hearing
from
folks
whose
minds
are
not
made
up.,
so
we
kind
of
discuss
around
those
issues
that
are
pertinent
to
this
motion..
So.
E
C
C
Clab,
tom
kunstman,
(he/him):
and
I'll
just
quote
the
clab,
tom
kunstman
(he/him):.
The
bottom
line
actually
is
the
top
line,,
but
it
is
the
bottom
line..
A
new
study
from
the
researchers
at
university
of
california,,
san
san
francisco,
or
ucsf.
shows
that
you,
don't,
have
smoke
cannabis
to
produce
dangerous
levels
of
particulate
matter
and
hailing
and
heated
cannabis
pro
produces
levels
of
dangerous,
particulate
manner.
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
E
Clab,
brian
keegan
(he/him):,
so
as
this
motion
is
written,,
I
respect
and
could
support
the
intent..
But
the
sort
of
the
actual
length
itself
includes
the
for
phrase,,
like
marijuana,
concentrates,,
which
is
something
that,
like
robin,.
I
think
we
should
go.
Low,
go
slow
on
with
starting
off
of
hospitality.
and
so.
E
E
K
K
K
C
O
O
Cob,
sandra
llanes:,
with
the
first
motion.
now
it
cob,
sandra
llanes:
seconded,,
and
it
now
needs
to
be
cob,
sandra
llanes:
voted
on
as
to
whether
you
want
to
reconsider
the
motion..
Does
that
make
sense?,
and
then
you
can
have,
if,
if
it
passes.,
if
that
motion
passes,,
then
you
can
have
the
substantive
discussion
about
this
new
motion.
C
Q
Clab,
stacy
green:
we're
really
like
reconsidering.
and
now,,
considering
the
new
motion,,
so
we
had
once
talked
about,,
maybe
just
somebody,,
maybe
from
city
staff,
putting
up
on
their
screen
that
text.
So
we
could
actually
all
be
really
clear,.
You
know.
here's!
What
we're
talking!
About.,
here's,
what
we're
voting!
On.
Q
O
O
Cob,
sandra
llanes:,
if
you
do
decide
that
you
want
to,,
then
you
would
consider
you
would
move
on
to
the
next
part,,
which
is
actually
the
consideration
of
what
that
motion
would
be..
So
it.
it.,
it's
like
it's
starting
over
fresh
at
that
point..
But
right
now
we
haven't
even
gotten
past
the
first
hurdle.
Q
C
O
C
F
D
O
C
K
O
Cob,
sandra
llanes:,
that's
right.,
I'm
sorry.,
yes,,
that's
correct.!
That's
a
good
distinction.!
Yes,
we.,
we're
just
in
that
first
space..
So
once
we
get,,
if
we're,
if
we'
to
get
to
the
second
phase,,
then
yes,
you
wouldn't
be
able
to
be
involved,,
but
in
the
I
voluntarily
reach
back
to
my
second
of
brian's
motion.
brian,.
What
was
your
motion?
exactly.
E
E
C
F
C
C
C
E
C
K
Q
O
C
C
K
F
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
Q
Q
Clab,
stacy
green:,
but
one
of
the
things
at
least,
I've
been
arguing,,
I
think,
evan,.
I've
heard
you
argue
as
well
in
favor
of
the
hospitality
establishments
is
that
it
would
kind
of
remove
it
from
the
streets,
where,
like
right
now,.
If
I
walk
down
pearl
street,,
I
can't
not
smell
pot
like
it's
impossible,
and
it's
it's
actually
kind
of
ridiculous.
and
so
for
me,.
One
of
the
things
I
like
about
the
idea
of
these
establishments
is
that
maybe,
of
course
it's
maybe
that
could
somehow
be.
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
K
K
K
Clab,
evan
anderson::
I
could
stand
there
and
smoke
it
here.
it
clab,
evan
anderson:.
It
will
be
perceptible
to
those
in
entering
the
bookstore
to
the
north..
It
will
be
perceptible
to
those
standing
on
pearl
street,
and
it
will
be
perceptible
to
those
standing
at
the
door
of
the
bookstore,
and
maybe
even
at
the
old
tom's
tavern
restaurant,,
whatever
that
may
be
today..
I
can't
remember.
K
K
K
F
Clab,
alana
malone:
around
clab,
alana
malone:,
was
a
neighborhood
clab,,
alana
malone:
needs
and
desires
survey,,
and
I
think
that
is
a
great
opportunity
for
neighboring
businesses
to
weigh
in
on
how
something
like
this
could
potentially
impact
them,
and
knowing
cannabis,
licenses
and
boulder,.
I
am
confident
they
would
be.
E
K
Clab,
evan
anderson:,
you
had.
now,,
if
you
recall,,
when
I
brought
this
up
originally
clab,
evan
anderson:
kind
of
just
running
through
this
in
my
head,
clab,
evan
anderson:,
there
is
clab,
evan
anderson:,
so
so
what
I
just
listed
as
the
the
prohibitions
I
see
in
my
head
kind
of
as
this
progresses
where
this
to
pass
tonight,
and
it
progress
to
city.
Council.-
how
do
we
make
this
align
with
tobacco
consumption?
Regulations?.
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
R
E
K
K
R
Clab,
allison
bayley
she/her:.
I
think
I
mean
with
that
clarification
that
covers
some
of
the
pieces.
I
was
concerned
about,
and
also
to
reorate
on
this
point
about
the
needs
and
desires
of
the
neighborhood..
I
think
that
is
an
a
really
important
piece,
and
some
of
the
concerns
will
be
addressed
by
that
and
that
outdoor.
R
C
K
K
K
K
C
K
K
D
F
K
O
O
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
Q
Clab,
stacy
green:,
it's
called
like
first
past
metabolism.,
so
bypasses
like
you're,
saying
the
stomach,
and
in
test
install.,
that's
all
very
true,
and
what
you
said
about
it
being
more
hydrophilic,.
I
think,
is
also
true,,
but
it's
not
the
glands..
It's
just
there's
like
a
bunch
of
blood
vessels
and
the
tissue
under
the
tongue
that
absorbs
it.
Differently.
Q
Q
Q
C
C
C
C
Clab,
stacy
green:,
or
at
least
you're,
advocating
for
that.,
but
but
it's
not
just
the
half-life
thing.
Right,
like
the
concern
is
more
like
you
take
it,
and
it
may
not
hit
you
for
a
long
time,
and
then
your
consumer
may
be
using
more
before
they
know.
They've
been
affected
right
by
their
prior
goes.
Q
Q
Clab,
stacy
green:
they're,
going
to
eat
like
in
the
case
like
haven't,,
set
up
a
gummy
where
it
it
could
be
a
long
time..
This
should
affect
somebody
sooner,
where
they
then
be
in
a
position
to
judge
their
level
of
intoxication
sooner
than
later,
which,.
Even
from
my
standpoint,
is
more
of
the
concern
than
the
half
life
piece.
Q
K
K
K
K
Clab,
evan
anderson:,
barely
functional
at
all.,
clab,,
evan
anderson:.
I
use
anecdotal
answers,
to,
or
anecdotal
stories
to
explain
this.,
but
there
are
many
people
in
the
cannabis
industry,
and
many
people
in
the
consumer
world
of
cannabis
that
I've
encountered
many,
many
times
in
the
last
14
years
that
can
eat
a
1,000
milligrams
of
an
edible,
and
never
ever
get
high.
K
K
K
K
J
K
K
K
K
K
K
C
C
C
K
K
K
K
C
K
K
E
C
Q
Q
C
C
Clab,
stacy
green:,
that's
right.,
no,
like
cannabis,
tinctures.
and
the
other
thought,.
I
don't
know
anything
about.,
but
I'm
sitting
here
wondering
as
we're
talking
about
it,
because
I
haven't
before
is
if
you're,
bypassing
the
liver
right
theoretically
with
sibling.
well,.
Maybe
that's
of
some
benefit.
if
the
patron
is
also
drinking,.
So
I
don't
know
that
would
be
something.
A
E
T
T
T
E
E
D
K
E
F
T
D
E
C
E
C
J
Clab,
robin
noble:,
all
right.,
I'm
not
trying
to
take
anyone's
time,
because
you
guys
know
how
I'm
gonna
vote
on
this.,
but
I
am
trying
to
be
persuasive
with
some
of
you
who
might
vote
against
the
motion,.
I
think
at
10
am
opening
for
consumption.
Lounges
is
a
reasonable
regulation..
I
also
think
that
stopping
consumption
at
10,
pm.
and
remaining
open
until
12
am.
is
a
reasonable
regulation
that
would
help
to
mitigate
impacts
of.
E
S
C
K
Clab,
evan
anderson:
with
alcohol,
businesses.
clab,,
evan
anderson:.
I
think
this
is
a
wise
choice,
and
clab,
evan
anderson:.
We
allow
our
dispensaries
to
be
open
at
7.
am.
I
think,
8,
am.
or
8
am..
I
think
8
am.
for
consumption
lounge..
This
is
reasonable..
I
don't
think
we
all
want
whole
bunch
of
potheads
running
around
the
streets
at
8
30
in
the
morning,
smoking
weed
on
the
street
when
they're
standing
outside
of
a
dispensary
or
a
hospitality
license.
F
F
E
E
E
E
T
E
E
E
T
T
K
K
K
C
P
Q
Q
S
E
Clab,
evan
anderson:
all
right
things
along,,
I
see,
for
a
proposed
motion.
24
member
anderson
is
contracted..
We
have.
We
have
approved
outdoor
consumption
thereby..
I
am
not
interested
in
fighting
about
cfm.
indoor
air
quality..
You
are
never
going
to
make
indoor
air
quality
match
out,
or
air
quality.
K
K
E
C
D
K
C
C
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
C
C
O
O
O
J
J
J
J
J
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
T
T
T
K
K
K
Clab,
brian
keegan
(he/him):,
you
guys.
are
you?
by
saying,
all
right,.
Let's
take
the
the
same
arguments.
Evan
can
be
made
about
you,
looking
out
strictly
for
the
the
interest
of
the
industry
where
others
on
this
board
are
looking
at
what
we
consider
to
be
the
interest
of
the
community.
there's
a
difference
of
opinion.
Here.
T
T
F
F
Alanamalone:
back
during
concentrates
into
these
establishments.
We
are
a
policy
board..
We
are
determining
what
is
going
to
go
in
the
front
door
through
the
regulated
system
into
these
establishments.,
and
just
because
we
are
the
cannabis
industry,
representative
speaking,
doesn't
mean,
we're
talking
about
doing
something
illegal,
like
back,
during.,
please
be
mindful
of
the
language
that
you
use.
K
K
K
K
K
E
E
E
Clab,
evan
anderson:
right,,
so
I
just
maybe
we'll
check
in
with
evan
like
evan..
If
you
want
to
proceed
with
motion
25,,
then
we
need
to
start
with
the
reconsideration
of
motion.
5.
to
be
honest,
brian,.
I
don't
believe
that
if
sandra
weighed
in
right
here,,
I'm
even
allowed
to
present
this,
because
what
I'm
offering
right
now.
K
K
C
C
J
J
K
K
C
A
A
O
O
C
C
A
O
O
C
C
C
C
E
F
C
S
K
K
J
J
K
K
K
S
S
J
K
K
E
E
E
C
J
E
O
O
O
O
O
O
Cob,
sandra
llanes:,
if
you
are
in
the
circumstance
where
you
have
to
bring
it
up
during
the
meeting.,
then
what
I
ask
the
board
to
do
is
to
set
aside,,
maybe
hit
pause
on
the
matter.
that's
being
considered
until
the
attorney
has
an
opportunity
to
come
back
with
that
legal
analysis.
Regarding
that
issue.
K
O
O
O
C
C
O
O
C
F
O
F
O
O
O
K
K
K
K
D
C
C
E
E
C
C
C
E
C
S
S
S
O
O
O
F
F
F
D
D
D
O
O
S
S
C
E
E
E
E
C
C
A
D
D
D
D
D
A
A
Cob,
kristen
changaris:
just
wanted
to
let
you
know
that
staff
is
looking
into
the
different
options
that
we
might
have
for
hybrid
meetings
going
forward..
It
does
look
like.
we'll
have
a
few
different
conference
rooms
available
at
the
city
that
could
facilitate
a
hybrid
meeting..
If
that's
something
that
board
would
be
interested
in.
K
K
K
K
A
Cob,
kristen
changaris:,
no
problem.,
just
long.
story,
short,
we're
looking
into
our
options..
The
board
will
have
an
opportunity
to
vote
on
what
format
works
best
for
you..
Once
we
finish
up
with
the
recruitment
process.,
then
we
have
the
new
member
seated..
We
want
to
give
them
an
opportunity
to
participate
in
that
conversation
as
well,
so
more
to
come
on
that.,
but
I
just
wanted
to
give
a
quick
update.
D
D
C
E
C
C
J
Clab,
robin
noble:
well,
yeah,,
I
mean,-
I
saw
that
twin
study,
too,
and
thanks
for
including
it,
brian..
I
think
that
everybody
would
be
interested
to
read
that.
it's
interesting
for
sure,,
but
I
did
want
to
make
a
comment
on
the
materials
that
were
included
in
the
packet
that
over
the
cd.
phg.
reports
on
cannabis,
attributed
health
outcomes
in
colorado.
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
Q
Q
Clab,
stacy
green:
useful
for
everyone
here
to
look
over,
so
that
hopefully
it
will
make
it
to
the
next
reading
packet..
But
it
includes
a
lot
of
similar.
there's
some
overlap,,
but
there's
also
a
lot
of
other
interesting
data.
That's
been
collected
on
cannabis
and
colorado.,
so
just
more
to
read
for
next
time.