►
From YouTube: Boulder City Council Meeting 10-5-21
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
D
C
C
As
usual,
you
can
find
information
on
getting
your
vaccine
at
http
colon,
slash,
slash,
www.aldercounty.org,.
C
B
Alicia
juni
is
here:
I
am
trying
to
promote
her
status
now.
C
Okay,
very
good,
and
then
we
have
one
item
to
amend
the
agenda
with
tonight.
That
is
to
add
item
8b,
which
is
the
discussion
on
council
meetings
for
the
remainder
of
this
council's
term,
considering
in-person
or
virtual
or
hybrid
attendance.
So
if
I
could
get
a
motion
to
him
in
the
agenda.
C
G
C
Very
good,
thank
you
for
that
and
brenda
had
mentioned
when
she
let
you
in
so
glad
we're
all.
Here
we
have
a
motion
and
a
second
does
anyone
object
to
adding
item
8b
great,
seeing
no
objections,
that's
unanimous
and
then
brenda.
I
will
turn
to
you.
I
think,
for
explanation
of
interpretation
for
item
1a
tonight.
B
Thank
you,
sam
and
juni.
My
apologies
that
I
left
you
waiting
while
I
was
juggling
other
buttons
and
I'm
so
glad
that
you're
here
with
us,
I'm
going
to
share
my
screen
quickly.
B
B
B
It
is
appreciated
if
you
do
not
interrupt
each
other
that
helps
our
interpreter
and
I'm
gonna
do
a
better
job
modeling
this
now,
if
you
speak
slowly
and
breathe
between
sentences
to
help
our
interpreter
stay
caught
up
to
what
you're
saying
so,
everyone
would
choose
your
language
now,
we'll
be
all
set.
Thank
you.
I
I
will
say
that
as
I've
come
to
this
community,
I
have
truly
appreciated
our
partnership
with
boulder
county
public
health
and
always
look
forward
to
lexi,
giving
a
brief
update
so
lexi.
The
floor
is
yours.
J
Thank
you
so
much
maria,
I
believe
my
slides
have
been
sent.
J
I
will
just
while
we're
setting
up
the
slides.
I
will
just
let
you
all
know
that
we
are
starting
to
have
some
good
news
in
this
space
that
I'll
tell
you
about
this
evening,
but
one
of
our
key
messages
this
evening
is
that
we're
not
out
of
the
woods
in
it.
Yet
we
still
have
some
work
to
do
and
a
little
more
tracking
and
some
stabilization.
J
We
are
going
to
see
kids
vaccinations
soon
and
we're
not
planning
on
on
moving
to
change
public
health
orders
in
the
immediate
future,
but
I
am
looking
forward
to
being
able
to
provide
some
additional
context
and
information,
so
folks
have
a
little
bit
more
of
a
sense
of
what
we're
watching
and
what
we
can
look
forward
to
if
we
continue
to
move
in
the
right
directions.
J
So,
just
as
a
reminder,
we
have
three
goals:
that
kind
of
center,
our
thinking
our
strategies,
our
partnerships
and
our
work
in
public
health.
The
first
is
to
prevent
severe
illness
and
death.
The
second
is
to
not
overwhelm
our
health
system,
because
this
is
this.
J
Health
system
serves
all
of
us
all
the
time,
not
just
folks
suffering
from
covid,
and
the
third
goal
is
really
around
safely
returning
to
normal
activities,
particularly
our
business
community,
our
schools,
keeping
kids
in
schools
and
also
really
supporting
our
community
to
begin
to
gather
again
in
fellowship
with
each
other
and
be
able
to
really
provide
those
kinds
of
supports
to
each
other.
That
being
able
to
be
in
person
and
see
your
friends
and
have
fun
together
really
allows.
J
So
with
that
said,
let's
go
to
the
next
slide.
I'll,
provide
you
with
an
update
on
cases
as
per
the
usual
next
slide.
J
So
this
graph
really
shows
you
kind
of
where
we've
come
from
the
beginning
of
the
pandemic
and,
as
you
can
see,
there
is
a
red
bar
that
signifies
high
transmission.
According
to
the
cdc
tracker,
which
is
the
way
that
we
kind
of
assess
how
urgent
the
situation
is,
it
replaced
the
colorado
dial
a
number
of
months
ago.
The
orange
line
signifies
substantial
transmission.
J
So
we
that
is
part
of
our
public
health
order
is
the
standard
that
we
are
following
is
tracking
that
above
the
orange
line
space
and
as
you
can
see,
we
were
way
above
it
back
in
last
winter,
but
this
surge
seems
to
have
peaked
a
couple
of
weeks
ago
at
around
200
cases,
per
hundred
thousand
we're
currently
at
about
127
cases
per
hundred
thousand.
J
It's
continued
to
kind
of
steadily
come
down
in
the
way
that
those
numbers
always
kind
of
bounce
around
a
little
bit.
But
you
can
see
a
pattern
here.
What
we
are
really
looking
for
is
to
see
if
the
cold
weather
as
it
sets
in,
is
going
to
change
that
trajectory
or
if
we
can
look
forward
to
continuing
declines
in
that
space.
J
If
so,
then
we
will
be
on
track
to
really
be
under
substantial
transmission,
probably
within
another
month
and
a
half
and
according
to
our
public
health
order.
J
If
we
were
able
to
sustain
under
substantial
transmission
for
three
weeks,
then
we
would
folks
wouldn't
be
required
to
mask
indoors
anymore,
so
that
just
gives
you
a
little
bit
of
a
sense
of
the
trajectory
that
we're
on,
but
I
have
to
present
this
good
news
with
some
caution
that
we
often
do
see
not
a
a
completely
smooth
decline
on
the
way
down
that
there
may
be
some
bumps
and
we
will
be
tracking
that
pretty
closely
next
slide.
Please.
J
So
this
is
a
slide
that
we've
begun,
presenting
pretty
regularly
lately
and
what's
important
about.
It
is
for
us
to
understand
the
context
not
just
of
boulder
county
but
of
what's
happening
around
us
in
boulder
county.
Our
rate
you'll
see
on
this
one.
Our
rate
is
137
per
hundred
thousand
in
the
previous
slide.
It
was
127
per
hundred
thousand,
and
I
want
to
clarify
that
in
public
health,
sometimes
we
have
to
take
data
from
different
sources
to
get
the
information
that
we
need
to
present
a
particular
idea.
J
The
previous
slide
was
based
on
our
bcph
data
drawn
on
october
4th.
So
yesterday
this
data
is
from
the
cdc
drawn
on
the
second,
so
it's
a
little
bit
different,
but
not
substantial
enough
of
a
difference
to
to
be
important.
What
is
important
about
this
slide
is
to
recognize
that
relatively
speaking,
boulder
county
is
doing
very
well,
even
though
all
of
us
are
in
high
transmission
in
our
general
area.
J
So
the
reason
this
is
important,
of
course,
is
because
we
have
you
know
lots
of
our
populations
live
close
to
county
lines.
Longmont
is
along
the
county
line
with
weld,
and
so
we
are
I'll
be
able
to
show
you
kind
of
some
of
the
impact
that
we
think
is
a
result
of
that
proximity.
J
Before
we
get
to
that,
I
just
wanted
to
present
the
age
trends
among
the
case
trends
among
different
age
groups.
We
feel
like
this
is
important
to
share
with
the
community
right
now,
particularly
because
we
do
have
a
school
masking
order
in
place
ages.
J
J
That's
our
zero
to
11
year
old
population,
which
is
our
kiddos
that
can't
get
vaccinated
yet
because
they're
not
eligible
and
that's
our
highest
case
rate
per
hundred
thousand
right
now
in
boulder
county
and
what's
important
to
note,
is
that
that
pattern
of
the
0
to
11
group
being
the
highest
cases
among
ages
within
a
county
is
typical
across
colorado
right
now,
and
the
rates
that
we're
seeing
are
actually
a
lot
lower
in
boulder
county
compared
to
other
counties.
J
So
our
kids
are
taking
it
pretty
hard
right
now,
they're
taking
the
most
cases,
we're
really
glad.
We
have
a
mask
order
in
place.
It's
doing
a
lot
of
good
protecting
them
and
we
can
see
that
when
we
look
at
other
counties
and
look
at
the
case
rates
among
that
group
of
kids
who
are
ineligible
to
be
vaccinated
at
this
point.
J
So
this
was
the
slide
that
we
do
have
some
concerns
about.
What
we're
seeing
is
a
very
disproportionate
number
of
cases
in
longbone
right
now,
so
longmont
and
boulder
each
have
about
a
third
of
the
county
population,
but
what
you
can
see
is
that
longmont
is
really
much
higher
in
case
races
rates.
Sorry,
and
we
believe
that
that
rate
is
likely
related
to
some
of
the
rates
that
we're
seeing
in
weld
county.
J
So
remember:
we're
at
about
137
per
hundred
thousand
wealth
county
is
about
299
per
100
000.,
so
we
think
that
that
is
partially
a
a
function
of
just
being
so
close
to
weld
county
and
anecdotally.
We
are
seeing
less.
We
are
hearing
reports
of
less
masking
and
longmont
than
we
are
in
boulder,
for
instance,
so
we
are
taking
a
look
at
what
can
we
do
to
support
that
community
to
have
a
little
bit
more
protection
next
slide.
J
J
So
these
are
some
updates
on
our
hospital
systems,
and
this
is
regional
information,
because
our
hospitals
really
work
in
a
regional
approach,
they're
not
specific
to
cities
or
even
counties
they
serve.
They
serve
populations
that
need
them,
and
so
that
often
includes
folks
from
across
different
counties.
The
north
central
region
is
our
region,
it
includes
wealth,
county
and
it
is.
We
are
currently
seeing
the
rate
of
staffed
icy
new
beds
that
are
available
at
nine
percent.
J
Only
nine
percent
of
our
icu
beds
are
staffed
and
available
right
now,
that's
down
from
13.
Last
week,
11
of
our
medical
and
surgical
beds
are
staffed
and
available
this
week
down
from
15
last
week
about
23
percent
of
our
hospitals
are
reporting
significant
staff
shortages,
so
not
just
shortages,
but
significant
staff
shortages.
J
Our
hospitals
are
continuing
to
take
patients
from
other
states,
although
we
understand
that
those
numbers
are
relatively
low,
possibly
even
in
the
single
digits,
and
that
our
hospitals
are
mainly
responding
to
patients
from
counties
with
very
high
pace
rates
right
now,
and
that
has
been
the
biggest
strain
on
them
as
well
as
a
lot
of
other
challenges
that
are,
you
know
normal
hospital
service
processes,
including
a
spike
in
rsv,
which
is
a
viral,
a
virus
that
is
affects
kids.
J
J
Next
slide,
and
so
this
is
a
repeat
of
the
data
that
you
saw
a
few
minutes
ago,
but
this
new
line
is
where
our
epidemiology
staff
stopped
being
able
to
give
the
full
case
investigation
and
contact
tracing
support
to
every
case.
That
comes
through
the
door
that
we
would
normally
like
to
provide
in
our
high
level
of
service.
J
And
we
move
to
a
triaged
approach
where
we
are
making
sure
that
positive
cases
with
the
most
potential
to
spread
disease,
to
create
an
outbreak
or
to
not
have
the
kind
of
support
that
they
need
to
isolate
and
quarantine
are
really
being
given
priority
and
that
we
are
making
sure
to
respond
to
everybody.
J
Who
is
positive,
at
least
with
some
outreach,
but
maybe
not
the
depth
that
we
would
normally
like
to
provide.
And
so
the
good
news
is.
We
are
almost
back
to
a
normal
non-surge
response
in
our
epidemiology
team.
So
we're
looking
forward
to
that.
J
So
we've
had
11
deaths
since
june
of
2021.
These
are
largely
older
folks
and
unvaccinated.
J
We
want
to
make
sure
to
emphasize
to
everybody
that
there
are
very
few
deaths
occurring
among
folks
who
have
been
fully
deaf
fully
vaccinated,
and
it
is
the
best
protection
that
someone
can
have
not
just
against
death,
but
against
outrageous
hospital
costs
and
family
impacts
and
job
impacts
and
all
kinds
of
things
that
can
really
interfere
with
your
ability
to
achieve
that
third
goal
of
safely
returning
to
normal
activities.
So
really,
please
encourage
people
to
continue
to
get
vaccinated.
J
I'll,
show
you
some
statistics
in
a
minute,
but
one
thing
that
we're
seeing
that
we're
concerned
about
is
that
the
rate
of
vaccinations
in
boulder
county
has
substantially
dropped
off
and
we're
not
vaccinating
at
the
rate
that
we
have
previously,
and
we
really
need
folks
who
have
not
gotten
vaccinated
yet
to
go
ahead
and
get
vaccinated.
Now.
Now
is
the
time
we
anticipate
that
in
the
next
few
weeks,
five
to
11
year
olds
are
going
to
be
eligible
for
vaccination.
J
J
J
Right
so
you'll
notice
that
we've
really
started
trying
to
communicate
to
folks
what
the
rate
among
our
total
population,
not
just
our
eligible
population,
but
our
total
population
across
the
county.
That's
been
fully
vaccinated
right,
because
what
we're
really
trying
to
help
communicate
in
terms
of
vaccination
rates
is
community
risk
and
to
accurately
reflect
community
risk.
We
need
to
take
the
whole
population
into
account,
not
just
the
eligible
folks,
and
we
need
to
know
who
actually
is
really
protected
and
not
just
those
who
have
started
down
the
path.
J
J
Please
talk
to
your
friends
and
your
family,
encourage
them
to
talk
to
their
doctors,
about
getting
vaccinated,
come,
and
you
know,
talk
to
the
public
health
department,
call
the
helpline
and
find
out
where
you
can
get
information
to
answer
your
questions,
because
we
want
to
answer
people's
questions
with
accurate
information
and
make
sure
that
they
are
making
a
fully
informed
decision
with
all
the
support
that
they
can
get.
J
That's
really
based.
In
reality-
and
that
gives
them
a
sense
of
confidence
about
the
decision
that
they're
making,
so
we
will
continue
at
boulder
county
public
health
to
to
offer
vaccination
clinics
for
folks
who
need
a
little
extra
support,
getting
there
to
offer
town
halls
on
what
the
what
the
facts
are
about,
the
vaccines
and
about
you
know.
We
hear
we
hear
some
really
concerning
stories,
sometimes
of
folks
saying
that.
J
Well,
the
vaccine
causes
myocarditis
in
kids
and
it's
really
important
to
supplement
that
kind
of
information
with
the
fact
that
myocarditis
is
more
commonly
found
among
people
who
contract
covid
than
as
a
side
effect
of
the
vaccine
and
when
it's
a
side
effect
of
the
vaccine.
J
And
those
are
the
kinds
of
pieces
of
misinformation
that
really
concern
us
that
make
us
fearful
that
there
are
still
too
many
folks
who
don't
know
the
real
facts
about
what
the
vaccine
risks
are
and
what
the
risks
of
contracting
covered
are.
So
we
really
encourage
people
to
please
take
this
opportunity
to
to
go
out
there
and
be
part
of
the
solution
and
look
around
and
see
how
many
folks
around
you
have
gotten
vaccinated
and
are
and
are
thriving
and
help
us
to
keep
our
community
thriving.
C
Thank
you
so
much
lexi
and
before
I
go
to
questions
I
would
like
to
add
one
quick
detail.
The
city
of
boulder
is
also
trying
to
support
the
delivery
of
vaccines
and
helping
people
get
vaccinated,
so
just
a
reminder
that
anyone
can
be
vaccinated
by
an
appointment
through
the
city
or
by
walking
up
to
the
boulder
main
library
every
sunday
from
noon
to
five
o'clock.
So
if
you
have
any
questions
about
that,
you
can
always
email,
just
the
simple
email
counsel
at
bouldercolorwriter.gov
with
a
question
we'll
make
sure
that
staff
gets
gets.
C
Your
question
answered
for
you
and
with
that
two
council
members
bob
and
jimmy
bob.
F
Thanks,
sam
lexi,
thanks
as
always
for
that
great
presentation
that
was
very
informative
for
not
only
us
but
for
the
rest
of
the
community
who's
watching.
I
have
two
kind
of
unrelated
questions.
Lexi
one
is
there's.
There
seems
to
be
a
persistent
gap
on
the
slide.
One
of
the
last
slides
you
showed
was
about
a
five
percent
gap.
Sometimes
it's
bigger
in
some
communities
between
people
who
have
gotten
one
copied
shot
and
people
have
gotten
fully
vaccinated.
F
J
So
it's
a
great
question
and
the
answer
is
actually
they
are
getting
the
second
shot,
but
what
you're
seeing
in
that
number
is
the
lag
time
between
the
first
and
second
shot.
So
what
we
watch
in
that
slide
is
to
make
sure
that
that
percent
of
folks
who
have
gotten
one
shot,
but
not
two
shots,
isn't
continuing
to
go
up.
If
it
were
continuing
to
go
up,
it
would
suggest
that
people
aren't
getting
the
second
shot,
but
if
it
stays
the
same
and
we're
continuing
to
vaccinate,
then
people
are
getting
their
second
shots.
J
It's
just
that
four
week
flag
time.
Sometimes
people
take
six
weeks,
not
a
problem,
but
that's
a
great
question.
J
F
Good
good
news,
unrelated
question
lexi,
what
later
this
evening
after
I
think,
signed
off
we're
going
to
have
a
council
discussion
about
possibly
getting
back
in
in
real
life
to
council
chambers,
and
so
the
pros
and
cons
of
that.
Do
you
have
any
advice
from
us?
You
know
we're
debating
about
whether
to
do
that
and
should
we
wear
a
mask
and,
and
you
know
it
should
require
people
to
be
vaccinated,
and
you
know
what
does
staff
do?
What
does
the
community
do?
J
Yeah
absolutely
and
we'd
be
happy
to
to
join
your
conversa,
not
tonight,
maybe,
but
to
have
a
conversation
about
what
would
be
most
supportive
for
you
and
what
would
kind
of
meet
your
needs.
J
J
We
launched
a
program
a
couple
of
weeks
ago
called
the
vaccine
verification
program
which
allows
agencies,
businesses
or
events
to
apply
to
be
able
to
go
maskless
if
they
require
vaccinations
and
that's
a
team
that
can
really
support
the
city
in
thinking
through
kind
of
what
kind
of
an
approach
would
best
meet
your
needs
for
being
able
to
meet
back
in
real
life,
irl
right,
that's
what
all
of
us
would
love
to
do,
and
I
think
that
those
conversations
are
going
to
be
coming
up
more
and
more
and
that's
terrific,
that's
part
of
our
you
know,
let's,
let's
safely
get
back
to
normal
and
we'd
love
to
have
that
conversation
with
you.
C
Thank
you
bob.
I
have
juni
and
mark
ginny.
G
Here
and
for
this
update
the
only
thing
I
did
not
hear
in
the
update-
and
I
wanted
to
hear
a
little
bit
more
about-
and
it
goes
back
to
the
mass
mandate
update,
meaning
that
what
is
the
time
frame
and.
G
J
Right
yeah,
so
I
think
that's
you
know
that's
what
we
all
want
and
what
we're
trying
to
get
back
to.
So
when
we
passed
that
public
health
order,
we
very
intentionally
designed
it
to
to
stay
in
place
to
be
kind
of
the
reference
for
people.
You
know
of
reference
to
understand.
When
do
we
need
to
mask?
When
do
we
not
need
to
mask,
and
so
what
we
built
into
the
public
health
order.
J
Was
that
any
time
we're
above
substantial
transmission
in
the
cdc
tractor,
and
we
have
that
information
on
our
website
every
day
that
that's
when
you
need
to
be
masking
when
you're
going
indoors
and
that's
what
the
expectation
is
the
way
out
of
being
of
having
to
mask
indoors
is
to
go
to
places
that
are
part
of
the
vaccination
vaccine
verification
program.
J
So
you
can
show
your
your
iphone
app,
that
has
your
vaccination
card
or
you
can
show
your
physical
card
and
be
allowed
to
enter
without
a
mass.
So
those
are
two
opportunities
now
I
think
what
you're
really
asking
is:
when
do
we?
When
do
we
project
that
we'll
be
out
of
substantial
transmission?
J
And
you
know
we
can,
we
can
make
educated
guesses,
but
the
reality
is
that
you
know
delta
caught
a
lot
of
us
on
our
heels
and
there
are
things
that
come
up
that
make
us
a
little
bit
nervous
about
getting
too
far
ahead
of
ourselves.
J
I
think
what
I
said
in
the
presentation
is
that
you
know
if
things
continue
to
go
well,
if
people
continue
to
mask
if
people
continue
to
stay
home
when
they're
symptomatic,
if
people
continue
to
not
send
their
children
to
school
when
they
are
having
symptoms
or
are
sick,
and
that
rate
continues
to
go
down
at
kind
of
the
same
rate.
G
L
Mark
just
two
quick
questions:
lexi
and
thank
you
for
the
presentation.
The
first
does
cold
weather
have
a
particular
impact
on
covid.
Does
it
make
it
better
worse.
J
Thank
you
for
the
question.
The
the
biggest
influence
of
cold
weather
is
that
people
tend
to
go
indoors
more
and
they
will
tend
to
be
more
crowded
up
against
each
other.
More
the
holidays
bring
parties
more
festivities
for
some
respiratory
viruses,
the
dryness
can
increase
spread,
but
that's
not
true
of
all
respiratory
viruses.
I
do
wish.
I
had
dr
robina
on
with
us
who
could
so
efficiently
answer
your
question.
J
What
we
are
hearing
is
that
there's
an
expectation
right
now
that
there
could
be
another
wave
because
of
winter
descending,
just
like
we
saw
last
year
and
we
haven't
seen
it
yet.
We
haven't
seen
the
signs
of
it
yet.
But
if
we
look
at
past
patterns
that
it's
it's
entirely
possible
that
we
could
see
a
wave
that
is
related
to
cold
weather,
that
we
just
aren't
seeing
quite
yet.
L
Thank
you
and
my
only
other
question
is
the
children
0-11.
J
It
would
be
we're
seeing
some
schools
that
are
more
lenient,
with
exemptions
for
mass
mandates
than
we
would
suggest,
and
those
are
the
places
where
we're
seeing
kids
with
more
cases
it's.
This
is
not
rocket
science.
I
I
would
love
to
say
that
you
know
I'm
I'm
brilliant
and
you
know
I
have
all
the
answers.
But
the
fact
is,
a
lot
of
us
have
the
answers.
A
Thanks
for
the
presentation
lexi,
I
know
that
the
state
has
free
at-home
testing
available,
like
that
you
can
mail
or
email
and
they
will
mail.
You
like
a
number
of
tests
per
month.
Is
that
something
that
we
are
educating
the
community
on
or
encouraging
people
to
do?
I
know
for
a
while
it
was
like
certain
occupations,
but
it
seems
maybe
more
open.
Now.
J
J
J
Every
household
should
have
them
in
their
house
stockpiled,
for
you
know
the
next
couple
years,
but
but
the
reality
is
they
can
be
a
little
bit
hard
to
get
your
hands
on
right
now.
The
challenge
from
a
public
health
agency
perspective
is
that
the
information
the
results
of
the
test
doesn't
go
into
our
database.
J
For
the
most
part,
people
don't
report
that
to
the
public
health
department,
if
they
test
positive
or
negative,
and
so
it
is
creating
some
interesting
challenges
with
being
confident
about
what
the
case
rates
we're
actually
experiencing
in
the
community
are
versus
what
we're
seeing
in
the
data,
but
absolutely
should
should
folks
get
a
hold
of
one
of
those
tests.
Yeah
absolutely
if
you're
starting
to
have
symptoms,
you
want
to
check
your
kid
real,
quick
before
you
send
them
off
to
school.
It's
a
great
thing
to
have
on
hand
provides
peace
of
mind.
C
All
right,
thank
you,
rachel
and
I
don't
see
any
more
questions
so
I'll.
Thank
you
again,
lexi.
So
much
for
being
here,
and
I
expect
we'll
see
you
next
month
as
well.
J
C
F
Thanks
ham,
if
we
were
in
real
life,
but
we
would
be
in
the
in
chambers,
and
I
would
be
standing
there
with
a
microphone
and
mary
ann
would
be
standing
right
next
to
me
with
her
big
old
smile.
So
we're
gonna
have
to
do
this
by
zoom.
It
won't
be
quite
as
good,
but
let
me
read
this
declaration.
F
Officer
of
the
boulder
convention
and
visitors
bureau
cvb,
reflecting
on
a
40-year
career
dedicated
to
hospitality
in
boulder's
tourism
industry.
Marianne
has
built
a
strong
legacy
of
leadership,
mentorship
development,
expertise,
organizational
strategy,
community
engagement
and
positive
stakeholder
relations.
F
Marianne
joined
the
cvb
in
august
of
2001
was
brought
into
the
city's
economic
vitality
discussions
under
then
city
manager,
frank
bruno,
the
downtown
boulder
marketing
committee
and
the
boulder
hotel
and
motel
association
at
that
time.
In
the
early
2000s,
the
city
and
the
cvb
had
studied
the
potential
conference
center
and
hotel
a
new
facility
designed
to
attract
high-profile
events
to
the
city,
which
is
now
under
pre-development
stages
at
the
university
of
colorado
campus.
F
During
her
time,
marianne
transfer
transformed
the
cvb
into
one
of
the
city's
most
effective
economic
vitality
contributors
and
improved
boulders
place
making
through
product
development
under
marianne's
leadership.
Community
members
have
benefited
more
than
one
million
dollars
in
funding
has
been
awarded
to
more
than
70
local
arts
and
cultural
organizations.
F
Marianne
served
on
the
boards
of
the
colorado
association
of
destination
marketing
organizations,
the
noble
arts
district,
the
editorial
board
of
bizwest,
the
downtown
boulder
business
improvement,
district
tourism
association
of
colorado
and
was
a
member
of
the
chautauqua
access
management.
Stakeholder
committee
in
2019
maryam
was
awarded
the
outstanding
individual
contribution
to
colorado
tourism
award
at
the
colorado
governor's
tourism
conference
and
she
was
awarded
the
boulder
chambers
celebration
of
leadership
president's
award
of
distinction
over
the
years.
F
Marion
has
brought
her
professional
insight
into
collaborations
with
city,
county
state
and
university
partners
and
has
been
a
valued
leader
in
colorado's
tourism
industry,
while
she
is
due
to
retire
in
a
couple
of
weeks.
Marianne's
work
in
boulder
has
left
an
indelible
mark
on
the
city's
economic
profile
and
collective
growth.
N
Well,
thank
you
all
thanks
bob
mayor
weaver
and
council
members.
This
is
such
a
great
honor
trying
to
get
through
this.
I
have
this
irish
heritage,
so
it's
very
humbling
to
hear
the
accolades
that
have
been
shared
since
my
announcement
of
my
retirement,
the
list
of
associations
and
organizations
that
I've
been
privileged
to
participate
in
sometimes
inserting
myself
to
these
conversations.
N
So
many
people
have
spent
hundreds
of
hours
and
not
all
of
those
are
an
hour
at
a
time
to
continue
to
improve
the
quality
of
life
for
our
boulder
residents.
On
these
initiatives,
some
of
these
initiatives
are
not
finished,
but
there's
very
capable
hands
to
carry
it
on
to
have
the
city,
council
and
the
city
staff.
N
Honor
me
with
this
recognition
is
so
appreciated,
but
I
would
be
remiss
if
I
did
not
recognize
the
amazing
people
that
I
get
to
work
with
at
the
boulder
convention
and
visitors
bureau,
the
board
of
directors
that
have
served
with
the
cbb
and
their
willingness
to
try
so
many
pilot.
N
So
it's
made
it
a
blast,
and
I
just
want
to
thank
you
for
everything
that
you
do
for
boulder,
and
this
is
such
an
honor.
Thank
you.
C
Thank
you.
Marianne.
Thank
you
bob
for
reading
that
we
are
so
grateful
for
the
work
that
you've
given
us
and
we
wish
you
a
wonderful,
wonderful
retirement.
I'm
sure
that
we
will
continue
to
see
you
around
the
community
even
after
you're,
not
leading
the
cbd,
and
with
that
there
you
go
exactly
perfect
and
with
that
aaron
I
see
you
have
your
hand
up.
K
It's
just
been
such
a
pleasure
working
together
over
the
last
six
years
that
I've
been
on
council
and
so
much
appreciate
the
partnership
that
that
you've
had
with
us
at
the
convention
of
visitors,
bureau
and-
and
I
know
the
organization
will
stay
in
good
hands,
but
we'll
miss
working
with
you
very
much.
Thank
you
for
everything.
You've
done.
O
Thanks
sam,
you
know,
I
wanted
to
start
out
by
sharing
something
which
is.
This
is
a
poster
that
I
got
at
the
first
indigenous
people's
day
in
2016
and
it's
signed
by
all
of
the
folks
that
participated
in
the
drafting
of
the
resolution
so
that
that
that
stays
with
me.
O
But
I
wanted
to
share
that
with
you
and
and
also
just
recall,
the
how
impactful
that
first
indigenous
people's
day
celebration
was
having
just
tons
and
tons
of
people
in
the
chambers
and
all
of
these
tribe
tribal
members
dressed
in
full
regalia
and
drumming
and
dancing,
and
it
was,
and
then
we
ate
native
american
food.
Afterwards
it
was
just.
It
was
awesome.
So
with
that,
I
will
read
the
the
resolution.
O
Indigenous
people's
day
declaration,
it's
a
declaration,
not
a
resolution.
Excuse
me
october
11
2021,
with
indigenous
people's
day
coming
on
monday
october
11th.
O
O
O
In
august
of
1864,
nearly
100
boulder
county
residents
mobilized
into
company
d
of
the
third
colorado
cavalry
of
u.s
volunteers
at
fort
chambers.
This
company
of
100
men,
reportedly
trained
at
the
fort
before
participating
in
the
sand
creek
massacre
on
november
20th,
29th
1864,
from
which
the
boulder
troops
enjoyed
a
hero's
welcome
upon
their
return.
O
This
work
is
guided
by
the
city's
indigenous
people's
day
resolution.
The
city's
racial
equity
plan,
consultations
with
american
indian
tribal
nations,
guidance
from
local
indigenous
community
members
and
the
broader
community
since
2016,
the
indigenous
people's
day
resolution
has
guided
the
city
in
hosting
sponsoring
and
organizing
community-wide
indigenous
peoples
day.
Events
reestablishing
annual
consultations
with
american
indian
tribal
nations,
who
have
historical
connections
to
the
boulder
valley.
Today,
the
city
of
boulder
currently
shares
agreements
with
13
tribal
nations,
collaborating
with
american
indian
tribal
nations
to
rename
settlers
park
to
people's
cross
to
the
people's
crossing.
O
C
C
Super
well,
I
will
just
take
a
moment
to
thank
you
again
for
reading
that
and
staff
for
helping
pull
that
all
together,
and
I
will
also
express
that
it
has
been
one
of
the
pleasures
of
my
time
serving
on
council
to
be
able
to
be
part
of
some
of
the
tribal
consultation
work
that
we've
had
and
the
visits
from
the
tribal
leadership
to
boulder.
C
So
I
agree
with
everything
that
was
in
that
declaration
that
this
is
a
work
in
progress
that
will
continue
forward
long
past
this
day
in
this
council,
and
I
really
appreciate
all
the
work
that
everyone
has
done
on
this,
especially
the
folks
from
the
tribal
nations
who
have
helped
us
understand
their
relationship
to
the
land.
Much
better.
C
Seeing
none.
Thank
you
so
much
mary
and
we'll
move
on
one
one
item.
That
is
the
end
of
our
interpretation
services
for
tonight.
So
thank
you
very
much
to
the
folks
providing
translation
into
spanish
and
that
will
end
and
everything
else
for
the
evening
will
be
in
english,
and
with
that
we
will
move
on
to
our
last
item.
At
the
beginning
of
the
meeting,
which
is
the
municipal
court,
quarterly
update,
presented
by
judge
linda
cook,.
P
Good
evening,
thank
you
for
having
me,
and
you
know,
brenda
or
whoever
is
setting
up
the
powerpoint
presentation
that
I
have
I
want
to
let
you
know
that
with
me
tonight
is
devon.
Kisik,
kelly,
she's,
the
deputy
court
administrator
and
she's
been
very,
very
involved
in
this
in
this
initiative
with
me,
and
so
I
and
I
could
not
be
doing
it
without
her,
and
so
I
really
appreciate
her
involvement
and
I
want
to
give
her
credit
for
the
the
work
that
she's
done
next
slide.
P
P
So
this
just
to
give
you
sort
of
a
sense,
you
can
see
that
we
were
just
one
of
seven
sites
nationally
that
was
granted
a
grant
for
the
2020
cycle
of
those
either
four
or
five
were
granted
new
implementation
grants
and
the
remainder
were
granted
continuation
grants,
but
nationally
there
are
28
community
courts
in
the
united
states
that
have
been
stood
up
through
this
process.
P
I
also
want
to
mention
that
one
of
the
challenges
of
being
awarded
a
grant
in
this
time
frame
was
the
fact
that
we
had
to
pivot
from
our
original
vision
for
this
project,
due
to
covid
occurring
between
the
time
that
we
well
early
in
the
time
that
we
applied
for
the
grant
and
then
on
the
time
that
the
grant
was
awarded.
So
our
what
we've
done
so
far
is
a
little
bit
different
from
the
vision
that
we
set
out
in
that
grant
next
slide.
P
So
here
are
our
primary
goals
for
the
community
court.
We
want
to
use
the
court
cases
that
we
have
for
this
population
as
an
opportunity
to
encourage
engagement
with
us,
and
the
goal
is
to
address
the
root
causes
of
homelessness,
rather
than
simply
having
people
cycle
back
and
forth
between
jail
and
the
streets,
which
is,
was
a
pretty
common
trend
prior
to
community
court
being
or
community
court.
P
Like
approaches
being
used
by
our
court,
we
started
using
those
approaches,
even
before
we
received
the
community
court
grant
with
some
success,
but
it's
helpful
to
have
the
additional
dollars.
Another
goal
is
to
collaborate
with
a
variety
of
service
providers.
P
P
So
these
are
the
types
of
cases
that
are
being
addressed
under
this
community
court
model
and
they
are
among
the
most
common
violations
we
see
with
the
unhoused
population
in
our
court
and
that
are
eligible
for
community
court
treatment.
I
want
to
make
it
really
clear
that
we
deal
with
low
level
quality
of
life
offenses.
P
We
do
not
handle
more
serious
violations
that
may
be
committed
by
this
population.
We
do
not
have
drug
violations
in
our
court
other
than
using
marijuana
in
public.
We
do
not
have
thefts.
We
do
not
have
burglaries,
so
those
kinds
of
more
serious
and
often
felony
level
cases
would
not
be
addressed
using
the
community
court
model.
Next
slide.
P
P
We
are
seeing
people
out
in
the
community
in
a
little
bit,
I'm
going
to
play
a
video
with
you
for
you,
where
you
can
see
that
in
action,
but
we
would
love
to
have
a
permanent
location,
at
least
some
of
the
time.
I
don't
think
we'll
ever
abandon
the
mobile
option,
because
it
has
proved
so
beneficial,
but
we
would
benefit
from
having
a
permanent
location
as
well.
P
We
are
using
this
the
citation
or
citations
that
people
receive
as
an
opportunity
for
engagement
and
frequently
people
are
earning
dismissal
of
their
charges
rather
than
entering
guilty
pleas
and
some
of
the
sanctions
that
we
impose
are
listed
there.
They
are
really
aimed
at
helping
to
resolve
a
person's
unhoused
status
and
or
connect
them
with
benefits.
P
So
we
concentrate
a
lot
of
time
on
those
types
of
things
next
slide,
so
here's
some
of
our
key
accomplishments,
the
grant
effectively
began
october
1st,
and
by
january
we
began
our
mobile
court
sessions
twice
a
month.
We
are
conducting
them
outdoors
at
deacon's
closet
at
grace,
commons,
church,
deacon's
closet
is
actually
an
opportunity
for
people
to
go
and
obtain
clothing,
that's
been
donated,
and
so
it's
a
very
popular
service.
P
That's
attended
by
people
experiencing
homelessness
and
it
frequently
there
is
a
free
breakfast
that
goes
along
with
that.
In
february
of
2021,
we
first
used
transitional
housing
for
community
court
clients.
P
P
We
have
put
out
rfps
for
the
other
providers
or
we
have
an
agreement
with
a
local
hotel
for
the
transitional
housing,
but
we
reached
in
an
agreement
with
bts
for
substance
use
treatment
and
the
provider
that
they
selected
in
their
organization
to
provide
that
treatment
began
onboarding
in
july,
and
we
are
very
fortunate
to
have
somebody
who
previously
worked
with
this
population
through
bridge
house
and
so
that
gave
us
sort
of
a
leg
up
in
that
regard.
P
These
are
some
things
that
are
pending
implementation,
beginning
at
the
end
of
this
month,
we
will
add
two
more
pop-up
sessions
at
feet
forward,
which
is
a
community
outreach
sessions
at
central
park
which,
if
you
may
recall
the
forward
is,
was
a
non-profit
set
up
by
jen
livovich
somebody
with
lived
experience
and
who
went
to
fort
lyon
and
who's
now,
working
on
a
college
degree
and
has
been
very,
very
active
in
this
space.
P
So
that
will
give
us
four
mobile
sessions
a
month
once
per
week,
as
well
as
the
tuesday
general
offense
court
session
that
we
conduct
every
week
where
people
are
also
able
to
participate.
We
are
still
pending.
Implementation
of
court
funded
mental
health
services
that
are
going
to
be
funded
by
the
grant.
P
We
have
identified
a
provider,
but
we
have
not
yet
entered
into
a
contract,
as
I
mentioned
previously,
we're
still
looking
for
a
physical
site
where
we
can
have
that
connection
with
service
providers,
and
we
would
also
like
to
have
a
large
forum
for
coordinating
case
management
and
in
other
community
courts.
That's
typically
done
in
conjunction
with
community
court
sessions
held
in
a
space
where
the
service
providers
are
on
site
because
they
frequently
are
participating
in
that
large
case
coordination
forum,
so
it
all
connects
together.
P
P
P
Interestingly,
though,
some
things
became
much
easier
to
access,
so,
for
instance,
if
you
wanted
to
apply
for
replacement
social
security
card,
you
had
to
go
to
the
social
security
office
in
louisville,
and
now
it
can
all
be
done
online.
So
there
have
been
some
benefits
for
us
as
a
result
of
covet.
P
P
But
we
are,
all
of
these
grants
in
the
past
have
been
eligible
for
extensions
if
they
have
been,
if
they're
good
reason
for
it,
and
we've
been
advised
by
our
technical
assistance
advisor
the
center
for
court
innovation,
that
those
requests
for
extension
are
likely
to
be
viewed
very
favorably
this
time
around
and
in
fact
we
are
ahead
of
where
most
other
community
courts
are
in
their
implementation
process.
So
we
feel
pretty
good
about
that
next
slide,
please!
P
So
here's
some
early
data
that
have
been
has
been
reported
to
our
funders.
It
is
through
the
end
of
three
quarters.
We
did
just
finish
our
fourth
quarter,
but
that
data,
since
it
just
finished
last
week,
has
not
yet
been
collated,
but
you
can
see
we've
screened,
90
people
total
enrolled
quite
a
few
of
them.
P
The
people
that
we
did
not
enroll
were
people
who
generally
opted
instead
to
plead
guilty
and
have
a
suspended
fine,
which
is
what
is
typically
recommended
by
prosecutors
for
a
first
time,
low
level,
quality
of
life
violation
by
somebody
who's
unhoused,
the
number
of
court
cases
for
people
enrolled
total,
as
you
can
see,
is
268.
P
So
that's
quite
significant,
where
I
really
want
to
highlight,
though,
is
that
we've
assigned
tasks
or
sanctions
201
of
them
over
the
course
of
three
quarters
and
175
of
them
were
completed.
That's
87
completion
rate,
and
I
just
want
to
let
you
know
that
that's
stellar
for
any
population,
whether
it's
the
young
adults
that
we
see
with
minor
in
possession
violations
or
people
that
we
see
in
traffic
court
who
have
fines
or
traffic
school
imposed,
so
for
any
population
to
have
that
level
of
completion
is
phenomenal
and
for
it
to
be
among
our
house.
P
Unhoused
population
was
I'll.
Tell
you
completely
unanticipated
by
me.
The
number
of
people
not
completing
any
sanctions
or
tasks
out
of
that
79
people
enrolled
is
five
and
then
we've
had,
as
you
can
see,
a
very
high
number
of
cases
dismissed
or
pending
dismissal
or
who
receive
some
type
of
a
community
court
sentence.
The
reason
that
number
is
not
as
high
as
the
number
of
court
cases
enrolled
is
because
there
are
still
cases
out
there
that
are
pending
resolution.
P
A
discussion
of
this
type
is,
is
the
the
statistics
are
nice,
but
it's
also
helpful
to
hear
people's
stories,
and
I
just
want
to
tell
you
the
ones
the
story
of
one
person
that
we've
been
working
with
recently,
I'm
going
to
call
her
ashley
ashley
has
been
unhoused
in
boulder
for
a
very,
very,
very
long
time
and
she
went
to
fort
lyon
the
residential
drug
treatment
program
funded
by
the
state
the
first
time
around
a
number
of
years
ago,
as
is
not
uncommon,
ashley
found
staying,
sober
challenging.
P
She
has.
She
most
recently
got
out
of
fort
lyon,
for
what
I
believe
was
her
fourth
visit
she's.
Certainly
the
one
who's
been
there,
the
most
number
of
times.
If
anybody
we've
worked
with
in
boulder
county
and
it's
a
credit
to
her
reputation
down
there,
that
they
were
even
willing
to
take
her
back
that
many
times
she
has
been
in
boulder
and
housed
before
falling
off
the
wagon
and
going
back
to
fort
lyon.
But,
most
recently,
when
she
came
back
from
fort
lyon,
she
immediately
began
drinking
again.
P
P
She
had
not
lost
her
opportunity
for
a
housing
voucher
under
throughout
all
this
time,
which
was
amazing,
and
she
was
very
lucky
in
that
one
of
the
city
of
boulder
funded
vouchers
which
had
been
assigned
to
somebody
else
that
person
had
not
followed
through
on
the
necessary
steps
for
them
to
use
that
voucher.
So
ashley
rose
to
the
top
of
the
list
as
somebody
who
was
appropriate
for
that
housing
voucher.
So
she
is
now
housed
again.
P
She
is
approaching
30
days
sober
this
time
around.
She
has
connected
with
our
substance
use
treatment
provider
that
we've
that
we
have
funded
and
is
engaging
with
sessions
with
him
every
other
week,
although
she's
free
to
call
him
anytime
as
needed,
and
we
are
just
thrilled
to
report
that
kind
of
success.
But
I
I
mentioned
ashley's
case
mostly
because
I
want
people
to
understand
that
this
is
a
process
for
many
people.
P
This
slide
is
we're
going
to
play
the
the
first
community
court,
video
that
we've
that
we
developed
and
this
video
is
an
introductory
video
that
we
can
use
for
folks
like
for
council
for
the
general
public
for
the
the
population
that
we
would
like
to
engage
and
the
photo
that
you
see
as
a
background
to
this,
video
is
the
is
from
our
first
homeless
advisory
council
meeting.
R
P
We
got
the
idea
of
a
community
court
when
I
attended
the
2016
community
justice
summit,
which
was
hosted
by
the
center
for
court
innovation,
and
I
thought
it
would
be
a
great
vehicle
for
doing
a
better
job
of
dealing
with
the
types
of
low-level
cases
that
we
see
here
at
the
boulder
municipal
court.
My
goals
is
to
work
with
people
experiencing
homelessness,
who
are
charged
with
violations
that
reflect
their
unhoused
status.
P
We
want
to
understand
the
root
causes
of
homelessness
for
each
individual
and
then
to
use
our
court
navigators
in
the
police
department's
homeless
outreach
team
to
help
them
access
services
that
will
help
them
address
those
root
causes.
The
traditional
goal
of
a
regular
court
is
punishing
people.
No
amount
of
punishment
is
going
to
change
the
circumstances
for
someone
who
is
living
on
the
streets,
but
addressing
the
problems
that
got
them
there
can
for
the
individual
offender.
Success
means
using
their
citation
as
a
starting
point
for
engaging
them
with
services.
P
That
can
be
something
really
simple
like
helping
them
to
replace
their
state
id
or
it
can
be
very
complex
and
have
a
lot
of
steps
to
it
like
getting
ready
to
be
housed
for
the
unhoused
community
as
a
whole.
It
means
that
the
criminal
justice
system
and
the
social
services
systems
are
working
together
in
a
seamless
way.
If
we
can
address
the
issues
that
underlying
these
quality
of
life
violations,
then
we're
going
to
have
a
safer
community
one.
Q
So
we
have
opportunities
in
the
community
court
to
involve
people
in
a
variety
of
different
ways,
from
volunteering
to
be
mentors
bringing
a
sandwich
hygiene
products,
job
training
that
the
list
is
almost
endless.
We
would
like
to
have
a
variety
of
partners
join
the
community
court,
both
as
individuals
and
as
groups,
religious
groups,
civic
organizations
non-profits
just
about
anyone
can
be
involved
in
community
court.
R
As
a
prosecutor
for
community
court,
what
I'm
looking
for
in
terms
of
outcomes
is
whether
or
not
we're
helping
people
a
lot
of
the
individuals
who
get
charges
in
our
court
are
people
who
are
experiencing
homelessness.
The
root
cause
of
the
reason
why
people
are
getting
camping
tickets,
trespass
tickets,
open
container
tickets
is
because
they
don't
have
a
place
that
they
can
call
home,
and
so
are
we
actually
helping
people
move
towards
those
long-term
solutions
that
are
going
to
keep
them
out
of
the
criminal
justice
system
and
have
them
have
happier
healthier
longer
lives.
R
Defendants
should
participate
in
community
court
because
they
can
get
assistance.
They
can
get
help
from
people
who
are
trained
and
have
knowledge
of
local
resources.
They
can
get
help
with
things
like
moving
further
along
with
housing.
If
they
need
an
id,
do
they
need
a
social
security
card
or
a
birth
certificate?
R
Do
they
need
help
getting
connected
with
mental
health
resources
with
addiction
treatment?
A
lot
of
different,
really
good
things
can
happen
through
participation
in
community
court
a
lot
of
times.
Courts
are
not
really
associated
with
helping
people,
and
that's
really.
What
we're
focused
on
is
trying
to
help.
C
Thank
you
judge
cook,
so
much
for
that.
That
was
really
revealing
to
see
the
video
and
put
some
faces
and
some
actual
situations
that
we
could
see
rather
than
just
numbers,
so
much
appreciated,
and
this
pioneering
work
is
super
helpful
for
our
community.
So
I
want
to
thank
you
so
much
for
sharing
that
with
us
and
with
that
we've
got
two
hands
aaron
and
mary.
C
K
Anyway,
I
don't
have
a
question
but
judge
cook
that
was
incredibly
inspiring,
so
appreciative
of
you
doing
this
work
of
using
these
low-level
offenses
as
a
way
of
connecting
with
people
who
need
assistance
in
getting
them
to
a
better
position,
rather
than
taking
a
pee
with
approach,
so
really
appreciate
your
work
and
the
work
of
the
others
in
your
department
and
this
program
thanks
so
much.
Thank
you.
O
Thank
you,
sam
and
thank
you.
Judge
cook,
really
appreciated
that.
I
wanted
to
better
understand
how
people
know
to
show
up
at
community
court,
so
do
their
citations
say
show
up
at
you
know
feet
forward
on
thursday,
or
do
they
just
show
up
and
they're
recognized
or
how
does
that
work.
P
So
our
original
goal,
if
we
had
had
a
physical
location,
was
to
have
the
officers
summons
people
into
community
court
directly
that
didn't
pan
out,
at
least
not
yet
so
they
are
given
a
ticket
to
come
to
court
on
a
tuesday
and
if
they
come
to
court
on
a
tuesday
morning.
We
will
certainly
address
their
cases
at
that
time.
But
many
of
them
failed
to
appear
and
in
fact
with
covet
with
the
the
courts
being
shut
down
for
a
little
while
they
were,
they
become
even
less
likely
to
appear.
P
So
we
decided
we
needed
to
go
out
and
reach
people
where
they're
at
so
the
people
that
you
saw
in
that
video,
most
of
whom
face
people
who
were
court
participants
had
mostly
had
their
backs
to
you.
The
other
people
were
staff,
court
staff
or
the
prosecutor,
or
whatever
they're,
going
out
there
and
kind
of
drumming
up
business
and
they're
going
around
and
saying
to
people
at
deakin's
closet.
Hey.
P
Would
you
like
to
take
care
of
your
court
cases,
and
it
only
took
a
couple
of
times
for
people
to
know
that
that
would
be
there
and
for
word
to
spread,
and
so
people
do
show
up
there
and
they
often
come
up
to
them
now
and
say:
hey?
Can
I
take
care
of
court?
P
So
at
some
point
in
the
future
I
may
approach
the
county
court
about
whether
or
not
they
want
to
have
a
joint
initiative,
because
there
are
people
out
there
with
county
court
cases
who
would
love
to
resolve
their
cases.
But
that's
that-
and
you
know
they
also,
even
though
they
started
deakin's
closet.
P
So
we're
very
flexible
in
trying
to
engage
people.
O
Thank
you
for
that
that
that's
really
helpful,
and
then
you
talked
about
the
the
sanctions
being.
You
know
applying
for
services
and
getting
their
ids,
and
things
like
that.
Given
you
know
what
you
just
described
and
the
the
co-location
of
of
resources,
for
example
like
feet
forward,
is
it
has
it
occurred
that
a
person
goes
to
community
court
and
they're,
given
the
sanction
of
filling
out
some
form,
and
then
they
can
go
right
to
somebody
that
can
help
them.
P
Yes,
so
our
our
navigators
can
actually
assist
with
a
lot
of
these
sanctions
on
site
because,
for
instance,
applying
for
a
replacement
id
or
replacement
social
security
card
as
a
matter
of
just
going
online
and
working
through.
You
know
the
website.
So
yes
frequently
they
can
accomplish
their
task
on
that
specific
date.
And
then
that
is
recorded
in
our
court
records
management
system
by
the
navigator.
O
That's
great,
thank
you.
I
really
appreciate
how
you
are
using
the
court
system
to
help
people
and
not
punish
so
much
appreciate
it.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
A
I
want
to
reiterate
mary's
last
point.
I
I
just
want
to
thank
you
deeply
for
kind
of
working
to
empower
and
help
people
rather
than
taking
super
punitive
measures,
and
I'm
I'm
really
glad
that
I
feel
like
a
lot
of
time
on
council.
We're
sort
of
you
know
fussing
with
what
is
the
right
thing
to
do
and
you're
actually
in
there
doing
the
work
and
and
helping
people.
So
thank
you
for
that,
and
I
I
think,
must
have
been
about
a
year
ago
that
I
met
chris
reynolds
at
deakin's.
A
Closet
just
ran
into
him
there.
He
was
passing
out
flyers.
It
said
like,
if
you'd
like,
to
take
care
of
your
you
know
your
ticket.
We
can
set
up
a
time
so
that
must
have
been.
You
know
an
early
incarnation
of
this,
so
that
was
good
to
see
and
I
would
just
encourage
especially
returning
council
members,
if
you
haven't
seen
it
in
action,
is
pretty
cool
and
powerful
and
I
don't
know,
judge
cook
if
you
could
help
guide
us
to
where
we
might
be
able
to
come
and
see
this
some
days.
A
But
it
might
be
just
good
for
people
to
see
thanks.
P
Thank
you.
We
are
doing
it
at
deacon's
closet
on
the
first
and
third
thursdays
of
the
month,
and
so
that's
and
it
generally,
our
staff
shows
up
around
eight
o'clock
or
a
little
after
and
starts
strumming
up
business.
So
we
can
be
ready
to
go
online
they're
all
there
in
person,
I'm
the
only
one
who's
virtual,
but
we're
that's.
That's
the
best
place
to
to
observe
in
person.
C
C
Thanks
and
with
that,
we
are
finished
with
our
call
to
order
items
and
ready
to
move
to
open
comment
and
before
we
go
there
brenda.
I
think
you
would
be
ready
to
go
over
the
public
participation
guidelines
for
us.
B
C
B
B
B
No
participant
shall
make
threats
or
use
other
forms
of
intimidation
against
any
person,
obscenity,
racial
epithets
and
other
speech
and
behavior
that
disrupts
or
otherwise
impedes
the
ability
to
conduct
the
meeting
are
prohibited
and
participants
are
required
to
sign
up
to
speak
using
the
name
you're
commonly
known
as
and
we
need
to
display
your
whole
name
before
we
can
allow
you
to
speak
at
the
meeting.
Currently,
only
audio
testimony
is
permitted
online.
We
won't
be
allowing
video,
and
that
is
everything
for
for
participation,
guidelines
soon.
C
S
S
Our
restaurants
were
hit
hard
during
the
pandemic
and
allowing
restaurants
in
these
public
spaces
can
also
create
more
jobs
and
provide
greater
economic
impact.
Finally,
boulder
is
a
place,
is
a
fun
place
to
live
a
very
fun
place
to
live,
and
restaurants
will
only
add
to
that.
Let's
support
ideas
that
promote
fun,
community
and
opportunities
for
joy
and
boulder.
Thank
you.
H
M
M
M
M
M
And
you'll
see
that
in
item
number
two
near
the
top
of
the
page
to
establish
a
year-round
resident
there
was.
It
was
not
a
top
20
pick.
There
was
no
stakeholder
or
public
or
staff
input
supporting
this.
The
next
item
down
just
talks
about
scheduling
special
events
during
non-peak
times,
also
not
supported
by
anyone
farther
down,
there's
a
section
that
talks
about
extending
hours
of
operation
for
certain
evening
events,
not
a
top
20
pic.
M
Basically,
there
was
slight
staff
input
on
that,
but
these
are
the
truthful
inputs
based
on
what
compared
to
what
parks
and
recs
is
telling.
You
there's
also
no
support
for
a
future
conference
center,
which
is
not
part
of
this.
This
is
what
the
public
input
shows.
Could
you
show
slide
3,
please
slide.
3
simply
shows
the
hours
of
the
reservoir.
You
can
see
seasonally
the
hours
shorten
as
the
days
become
shorter.
It
always
closes
at
dark.
That's
for
nature.
M
It's
not
a
profit
center,
but
privatizing
the
reservoir
in
this
public.
Private
partnership
takes
3.4
million
dollars
of
public
money
and
it
gives
that
ability
to
the
restaurant
owner
for
profit.
So
they're
very
happy
to
book
concerts
do
private
parties
and
special
events
after
hours
and
disturb
wildlife
and
the
nate
and
the
locals
that
live
there.
The
problem.
C
T
I
support
what
eric's
just
said,
and
you
know,
linda
cook
is
just
like:
that's
a
taxpayer,
wonder
the
sanctions
and
the
tasks
175
people
out
of
201.
Those
are
great
statistics.
T
She's
got
the
finger
on
the
pulse
of
boulder
and
chris
reynolds
too
they're
great
folks,
I'm
glad
to
see
that
as
far
as
the
outdoor
dining
on
the
mall
I'd
really
rather
not
support
excel
energy
pumping
their
their
those
propane
tanks
or
whatever
to
heat
up
these
enclosures.
T
What
you
need
to
do
what
I
said
last
year
is
heat
recovery,
ventilators
in
side,
the
restaurants
and
these
take
heat
and
and
store
it
so
that
it's
not
lost
in
tr
in
the
ventilation
and
you
can
put
in,
I
mean
uv
filters
or
whatever
filter
the
virus
and
people
in
the
restaurants.
Fine,
and
then
you
can
circulate
the
air
per
space.
T
The
other
thing
I
wanted
to
bring
up
was
2405,
spruce
and
folsom
25th
to
26th
and
spruce
to
pearl,
there's
more
condos
on
the
other
side
of
mike's
camera,
there's
more
condos
on
the
other
side
of
of
spruce
street
between
pine
and
there
need
to
be
services
that
should
be
left
as
services
for
all
of
that
housing.
That's
already
been
put
in
there
stop
already
with
all
this
development.
C
U
V
U
U
I've
presented
a
fast
and
efficient
carbon
reduction
plan
to
city
council
members
that
would
meet
with
me
mark
wallach
refused
to
meet
with
me
in
his
running
to
stay
on
council.
His
claims
to
listen
to
the
public
are
evidently
just
lip
service.
So
I'll
present
this
plan
in
increments,
so
mark
can
hear
them,
starting
with
wind
incentives,
slide
two
please,
with
an
average
of
75
percent
incentive
for
the
average
household
usage
of
480
kilowatt
hours,
the
cost
would
be
5.40
a
month
or
about
65
a
year.
U
There
are
about
42
000
residential
users,
so
2.72
million
would
cover
every
household
in
boulder.
I
need
that
slide
back.
Please,
business
uses
about
four
times
as
much
energy
as
residential,
so
a
50
incentive
for
each
business
would
be
about
fourteen
dollars
a
month
or
a
hundred
and
seventy
three
dollars
a
year.
Boulder
has
about
seven
thousand
three
hundred
and
fifty
businesses,
and
it
would
cost
about.
One
point
three
million
to
cover
them
all
with
wind
source
for
a
year
boulder
currently
collects
about
seven
million
dollars
a
year
in
carbon
taxes.
U
Four
million
dollars
of
those
carbon
taxes
would
make
all
of
boulder's
electricity
carbon
free.
Today,
all
these
win
numbers
should
be
reduced
by
30.
Since
excel
is
already
about
30
percent
renewables.
It
would
also
be
reduced
by
all
the
homes
and
businesses
in
boulder
that
are
already
solar.
As
excel
increased
renewables.
These
values
would
drop
to
zero
by
twenty
fifty
boulders
electric
usage
could
be
one
hundred
percent
renewables.
U
C
W
Good,
I'm
I
live
at
4867
valhalla
drive.
I
am
here
today
to
ask
you
a
basic
question:
are
you
users
or
stewards?
Have
you
seen
a
praying
mantis
be
born?
Have
you
heard
the
dying
breath
of
a
rabbit
being
eaten
by
a
coyote?
Have
you
watched
long
survival
conflicts
between
prairie,
dog
and
fox?
Have
you
encountered
a
rattlesnake
at
your
foot?
Have
you
had
hawks
land
four
feet
away
from
you
or
seen
a
northern
harrier
do
a
food
exchange?
W
W
These
activities
do
not
have
to
be
an
intrusion
if
done
in
the
right
place.
The
reservoir
has
become
a
family
recreation
center
and
wildlife
preserve
in
open
space.
It
is
not
the
right
place
for
an
after
dark
restaurant
and
party
center,
which
will
have
to
have
more
lighting
traffic
and
movement
during
the
recovery
time
for
wildlife.
W
One
study
by
the
national
park
service
says
that
this
activity
is
driving
the
wildlife
away.
Have
you
read
an
independent
environmental
study
at
the
reservoir?
Is
there
one?
The
city
of
boulder
is
powerful.
We
as
friends
and
neighbors
at
the
reservoir,
have
tried
our
best
to
communicate
to
many
deaf
ears.
What
our
concerns
are.
We
have
been
unjustly
vilified
by
the
city
with
unproven
accusations,
resolutions
and
newspaper
articles,
and
yet
we
have
continued
to
spend
endless
hours
trying
to
have
real
communication
with
you.
W
X
Hi,
my
name
is
jackson
maynard.
I
live
at
1430
18th
street
in
boulder,
I'm
speaking
in
favor,
of
allowing
more
restaurants
in
regional
parks,
and
I
encourage
the
city
council
to
support
this
effort.
I
go
past.
The
reservoir
on
my
bike
rides
and
it's
disappointing
to
see
how
hard
some
people
in
the
general
vicinity,
some
of
which
who
live
half
a
mile
or
more
away
from
the
reservoir,
are
willing
to
push
this
fake
news
on
people
coming
to
enjoy
the
space.
C
C
Super
any
questions,
comments,
discussion
of
the
consent,
agenda
or
emotion,.
L
Would
it
be
my
correct
understanding
that
the
appropriate
time
for
getting
into
issues
relating
to
diagonal
plaza
would
be
its
second
reading.
C
O
I
I
wanted
to
bring
up
the
hotline
that
I
sent
out
this
afternoon
regarding
the
policy.
O
It
is
policy
50,
f
and,
and
I
proposed
a
couple
of
options:
does
council
wish
to
discuss
the
options
or
I
can?
I
can
make
a
recommendation
on
on
on
an
option
if
you
like,
I,
I
will
proceed
as
council
police
pleases.
C
I
think
mary,
this
is
the
appropriate
time
for
this
to
be
brought
up.
That's
my
opinion,
just
because
this
is
the
last
time
that
we
will
touch
the
policy
statement
for
a
while.
So
I
think
now
is
an
appropriate
time
to
have
this
conversation
and
with
that
I'll
turn
to
other
council
members,
I've
got
aaron
and
then
rachel
aaron.
K
Mary,
I
appreciate
you
engaging
with
this
and
putting
out
some
alternatives,
because
I
believe
there
are
some
members
of
the
cannabis
business
community
they're
a
little
concerned
that,
with
this
policy,
we're
trying
to
put
them
out
of
business,
which
I
don't
think
is
anyone's
intention
right
says
this
is
about
limiting
high
potency
thc
product
access
by
youth.
K
You
know
it's
the
primary
intention
here,
so
I
appreciated
your
language
about
you,
know:
potential
changes
or
limits
that
were
supported
by
research
right
so
that
not
arbitrary
limits
but
but
ones
that
were
supported
by
scientific
research.
That
being
said,
I
thought
your
your
second
one
was.
The
second
version
was
a
little
preferable
to
me
that
had
language
about
exploring
the
creation
of
limits,
as
opposed
to
just
purely
supporting
limits.
I
think
you
know
exploring.
K
O
Thanks
aaron,
I
just
wanted
to
point
out
that
in
the
the
two
options,
one
of
the
things
that's
different
is.
O
A
I
just
say
I'm
comfortable
with
the
edits
and
probably
would
would
defer
to
carl's
preference
between
the
two.
V
I
do
like
councilmember
young's
wording
that
is
tied
to
the
legislation,
the
consensus
outcomes
of
the
systemic
review
of
scientific
research.
I
think
that's
an
accurate
way
and
helpful
way
to
describe
it,
so
I
think
that
second
one,
a
second
recommendation
that
was
sent
on
hotline,
would
work
just
fine.
O
Happy
to
all
right,
so
this
is
policy,
as
I
said,
52
f,
and
it
was
I'll
just
kind
of
refresh
the
the
people
listening
who
do
not
receive
the
hotline
posts.
This
was
a
policy
that
had
been
removed
and
then
council
inserted
it
back
in
because
of
the
bill
that
was
passed
in
the
state
legislature
during
2021.,
so
that
particular
bill.
O
So
so
it
got
reinserted
and
that
gave
some
members
of
the
cannabis
businesses
pause,
and
so
the
the
first
one
was
was
my
first
try
and
then
the
second
one
was
based
on
trying
to
address
the
concerns
of
the
businesses.
O
So
the
one
that
council
is
referring
to
the
preferred
version
reads
as
thc
levels
regulating
high
potency,
thc
marijuana
products,
eg
shatter
and
wax
so
as
to
protect
youth
by
exploring
the
creation
of
limits
on
its
and
production,
was
stricken
and
in
place
of
the
word
production
limits
on
its
potency
as
supported
by
consensus
outcomes
of
the
systematic
review
of
scientific
research,
messaging
and
marketing,
and
by
increasing
education
on
the
dangers
of
such
products
on
youth.
C
Thank
you,
mary,
and
with
that
I'm
going
to
zoom
us
out
one
more
notch
and
just
remind
everyone,
who's
watching
who
may
not
understand
we
are
in
the
consent
agenda.
We
have
dived
into
item
three
d,
which
is
our
policy
statement
which
is
used
to
guide
the
folks
that
lobby
for
us
at
the
state
house
and
that
the
federal
government
on
various
subjects
this
subject
is
about
regulation
of
thc
and
marijuana
and
mary
has
just
read
her
proposed
amendment
to
that
policy
statement.
I'll
just
weigh
in
here.
C
C
C
C
C
So
I'll
ask
right
now
nearby,
so
you
may
as
well
stay
on.
Does
anyone
have
any
objection
to
passing
the
full
consent
agenda.
C
E
I
Thanks
alicia
and
mayor
before
we
go
to
david
farnan
and
his
excellent
staff
over
at
the
boulder
public
library.
I'll
just
give
a
shout
out,
even
though
he
is
not
here
to
listen,
but
chris
meshech
has
been
working
hand
in
hand
with
david
and
supportive
as
part
of
cmo,
and
while
he
today
finds
himself
at
icma,
I
just
wanted
to
recognize
him
for
the
work
he's
been
doing,
but
david
you're
in
you
and
your
team
have
really
been
thoughtful
and
I'm
excited
to
have
you
share
with
council.
AA
Okay,
thank
you
very
much
nuria
good
evening,
mayor
and
members
of
council,
I'm
david
farnan
library
and
arts
director
I'm
joined
tonight
by
janet
michaels
senior
assistant
city
attorney
and
jennifer
ferris,
deputy
library,
director,
and
I
I
also
intend
to
mention
deputy
city
manager,
chris
master,
if
you've
been
instrumental
in
this
committee.
Emily
are
you
loading
the
slideshow.
AA
AA
So
the
staff
liaison
committee
after
council
voted
back
in
may
created
an
application
and
evaluation
criteria
for
putting
together
this
committee.
We
advertised
three
weeks
and
put
up
an
application
in
english
and
spanish,
received
37
applications.
12
members
were
selected
and
then
recommended
for
review
and
acceptance
by
the
city
manager
next
slide.
Please.
AA
AA
We
also
wanted
to
look
at
a
broad
representation,
a
mix
of
interests
on
support
and
or
not,
support
of
the
library,
district
experience,
evaluating
the
equity
impacts
and
those
impacts
of
taxation
and
other
skills
and
experience
that
might
enhance
their
group's
there
were
some
limitations
to
the
group
we
set
out
to
limit
the
committee
to
know
more
than
two
live:
older
library
foundation,
members
no
more
than
two
boulder
library,
current
builder
library,
commissioners,
and
no
more
than
two
of
the
boulder
library
champions
board
members.
AA
We
sought
representation
from
a
broad
spectrum
of
relationships
to
property
owners,
renters
business
owners
landlords,
as
well
as
a
broad
spectrum
of
non-white,
races
and
ethnicities.
We
hope
to
have
most
age
ranges
represented
and
most
incomes
represented
next
slide.
Please.
AA
So
the
library
district
advisory
committee
has
its
put
forward
to
you
tonight,
made
up
of
12
members
I'll
read
their
names:
alicia
seidel,
annette
doula,
kara,
schenkel
chip,
deborah
reed
fowler,
jane
sykes,
wilson,
joanna
rosenbloom,
johnny,
teeter,
kevin
miller,
michelle
denae,
garcia,
morrissey,
miho,
shida
and
peter
pollock
next
slide.
Please,
as
you
can
see
from
the
demographic
information
that
we're
presenting,
we
do
manage
to
hit
most
of
the
age
groups.
There
were
no
applicants
under
the
age
of
25.,
race
and
ethnicity.
AA
We
wound
up
getting
58
percent
of
the
of
the
participants
in
the
committee,
identify
as
white
42
percent
identify
as
some
race
or
ethnicity
other
than
white
next
slide.
Please,
the
housing
representation
again:
75
percent
homeowners,
25
renters
income
representation
is
broadly
across
the
board.
A
quarter
of
the
applicants
who
were
selected
indicated
they
would
prefer
not
to
say
what
their
income
was,
but
you
can
see
from
the
from
the
data
provided
to
you
roughly.
I
think
41
percent
estimate
their
income
to
be
at
100,
000
or
greater
next
slide.
Please.
AA
This
is
again
a
representation
of
perspectives
represented,
I
think
it's
covers.
The
group
covers
the
representation
of
the
overall
community
quite
well.
Fifty
percent
are
city
homeowners,
twenty-five
percent
of
county
homeowners.
We
do
have
adequate
representation
from
outside
of
the
city
area.
AA
Renters,
a
landlord
within
the
city,
a
landlord
within
the
county,
high
percentage
of
business
owners
on
the
commit
on
the
on
the
committee
83,
boulder
library
patrons
which,
if
you
aren't
aware,
but
I
am
that's
slightly
lower
than
what
the
average
number
of
people
in
the
vicinity-
households
that
do
have
library
cards,
two
boulder
library
champions,
one
member
of
the
boulder
library
foundation
and
one
current
library.
Commissioner,
next
slide.
Please.
AA
So
the
scope
of
the
committee,
as
you
well
know,
from
review
of
the
past
of
the
draft
iga
that
was
presented
to
you
back
in
may
by
city
attorney,
deputy
city
attorney
or
senior
deputy
city
attorney
david
gere,
is
to
determine
or
make
a
recommendation
around
library
district
boundaries,
the
services
that
the
library
district
would
provide
and
the
mill
levy
that
would
generate
the
amount
of
revenue
necessary
to
provide
those
services.
AA
AA
AA
Ask
for
council
consideration
of
a
resolution
and
hold
potentially
a
joint
city
council
board
of
county
commissioners
meeting
to
form
a
subcommittee
to
appoint
a
library
district
board
of
trustees,
and
at
that
time,
council
will
also
be
asked
to
review
consideration
of
the
iga
and
the
items
regarding
the
library
district
next
slide.
Please.
AA
So
the
questions
we
have
for
you
this
evening
and
I
and
jennifer
and
janet,
are
happy
to
engage
them
as
best
we
can
is.
Does
city
council
endorse
the
committee
members
appointed
by
the
city
manager?
Does
city
council
have
any
input
or
revisions
to
the
scope
and
proposed
timeline
for
the
committee's
work,
and
thank
you
very
much.
C
F
Thanks
sam
thanks
david
and
thanks
to
to
chris
for
working
with
your
team
to
pull
this
together,
I
thought
it
was
a
good
memo,
good
presentation.
I
have
four
questions
david
I'd
like
to
pose
to
you
and
they
all
relate
to
scope.
I'm
fine
with
the
the
appointees.
I
just
want
to
really
focus
on
scope
to
make
sure
that
the
product
that
council
gets
in
a
few
months
will
be
folsom
and
we
don't
have
to
send
the
committee
back
for
more
work.
F
My
first
question
is
in
item
two
on
scope.
In
the
memo
that
went
to
council,
there
was
appropriately
a
request
that
the
committee
evaluate
what
the
property
tax
or
the
mill
levy,
would
be
to
support
a
library
district.
So
that
part
I
got,
but
also
there
was
a
parenthetical
in
that
item.
That
said
that
the
committee
would
also
make
recommendations
on
property,
tax
relief
for
low
income
fact
families.
F
AA
Yeah,
that's
a
question
that
council
or
various
council
members
have
raised
multiple
times
in
the
course
of
the
last
three
years.
Where
we've
been
discussing
this
topic,
we
have.
AA
Tax
abatement
that
the
county
offers.
Obviously
it
is
the
prerogative
of
council
whether
or
not
they
wanted
to
set
up
some
form
of
fund
and
we're.
Looking
at
that
now
I
mean
we're
investigating
now,
and
I
don't
I
know
janet
michaels
was
going
to
be
here
tonight.
I
don't
know,
I
think,
we're
just
in
the
beginning
phases
of
analyzing
what
that
might
be.
If
city
council
chose
to
set
up
a
fund
and
how
they
might
go
about
doing
that
if
there
was
some
form
of
rebate
for
low-income
families,
that's.
F
Fine,
we'll
just
stand
by
for
that
that
what
I
recommend
I'm
just
curious.
If
you
had
a
preliminary
view
on
that.
Okay,
that's
fine!
Second
question
is:
it
looks
like
there's
gonna,
be
some
robust
recommendations
on
community
engagement,
which
is
just
great
one
of
the
questions
I
have
is,
is
whether
that
might
might
include
a
recommendation
for
a
further
community
poll.
I
know
that
we
did
a
poll
of
the
community
and
see
the
2018
or
2017
by
the
time.
This
report
comes
out
from
the
advisory
committee
in
2022.
F
That
poll
will
be,
you
know
somewhere
three
or
four
years
old,
four
or
five
years
old,
and
I'm
wondering
if,
if
that
community
engagement
might
also
involve
a
springtime
poll
of
the
community
to
find
out
where
what
their
appetite
is
for
for
a
tax
increase.
AA
It
could
very
well
yeah,
I
so
the
the
first
poll
I
believe
and
jennifer
can
correct
me,
I
believe,
was
completed
in
2019.
AA
There
was
another
poll
with
a
not
as
comprehensive,
but
it
had
a
direct
question
which
I
think
was
good.
I
mean
the
interpretations
of
the
polls
were
quite
different,
but
in
fact
the
results
were
almost
identical,
so
I'm
not
sure
that
we
would
see
a
dramatic
change
in
that
poll
in
the
polling
numbers,
but
you
know
without
there
being
an
orchestrated
information
campaign
from
one
side
or
the
other.
It
seems
as
if
the
two
polls
separated
by
a
pandemic,
the
results
were
almost
identical.
F
Thanks
david,
we'll
stand
by
on
that
one
as
well.
I
know
that
in
the
recommended
the
recommended
scope
there
was
a
discussion
about
the
disposition
of
the
various
library
properties
and
that
could
be
obviously
a
conveyance
by
the
city
to
the
library
district.
It
could
be
a
lease
or
something
like
that,
but
I
could
also
see
a
circumstance
where
there
is
a
a
reversion
of
the
of
the
assets
back
to
the
city.
F
AA
You
know:
we've
discussed
that
in
the
past
internally
that
there
would
there
could
easily
be
a.
I
mean,
multiple
types
of
clauses,
and
I
mean
do
you
want
the
specifics
about
what
those
discussions
have
been,
but
I
mean.
F
I
don't
need
the
specifics.
I
just
I
guess
it's
more
of
a
recommendation
than
that
that
the
disposition
include
consideration
on
re-acquisition
under
whatever,
whatever
that
trigger
might
be.
AA
Something
that
we
have
discussed
internally.
Obviously
the
committee
hasn't
discussed
that
at
this
point-
and
I
don't
know
that
that
would
be
part
of
their
recommendations,
but
it
would
be
not
uncommon
for
if
the
buildings
were
either
deeded
or
leased
that
if
they
ceased
to
function
as
a
library,
they
would
revert
to
city
control
automatically.
F
Great
yeah
I'll
be
looking
for
that
in
the
recommendations
that'd
be
great
and
the
final,
I
guess
I'll
just
pose
this
as
a
request
rather
than
a
question.
It's
possible
that
on
whatever
cutover
date,
there
is,
if
there's
a
library
district
formed
and
it's
approved
by
the
voters,
that
there
could
be
some
unspent,
dedicated
funds
dedicated
to
library,
services
or
library,
infrastructure
or,
let's
say
north
boulder
library,
construction,
or
something
like
that.
I
assume
that
the
the
report
would
would
address
what
happens
to
those
dedicated,
but
yet
unspent
library,
funds.
AA
That
is,
that
is
correct
bob.
It
would-
and
I
I
believe,
the
city,
the
attorney
a
past
city
attorney-
has
made
a
you
know,
a
statement
on
what
happens
with
dedicated
funds.
We
would
likely
adhere
to
that
and
bring
back
whatever
recommendations.
There
were,
I,
you
know
truth
be
told.
I
don't
think
there's.
AA
But
there
might
there
might
be,
and
and
certainly
we
would
bring
back
a
recommendation
which
made
sure
it
was
consistent
with
city
of
boulder
legal
precedent.
AB
Thanks
sam
and
thanks
for
the
presentation,
david,
I
have
a
couple
questions.
Just
regarding
the
makeup
of
the
board.
I
noticed
that
it
is
on
the
wealthier
side
and
there
isn't
a
whole
lot
of
low
wage
earner
representation,
whether
that
be
fixed
income
or
just
low-income
people.
I
was
wondering
if
the
board
has
plans
on
addressing
issues
that
may
be
facing
people
who
have
fixed
incomes
or
low
wage
earners.
AA
That's
a
great
question
adam
and
in
fact,
multiple
of
the
applicants
who
were
selected
talked
about
the
impact
of
taxation
on
both
low-income
residents
and
small
business
owners.
So
I
believe
it
will
be.
You
know
it
is
I
and
I
I
won't
apologize.
AA
I
you
know
the
we
see
the
same
thing
year
after
year
in
applications
to
boards
and
commissions
there,
the
the
applicants
skew
heavily
towards
homeowners
people
who
are
over
55
years
of
age,
and
you
know
various
demographics,
and
actually
I
was
quite
impressed
actually
with
the
variety
of
applications
that
came
in
this
pool.
AA
I
think
a
little
over
a
third
of
the
applicants
identified
as
a
race
other
than
white
a
few
quite
a
quite
a
few
renters,
which
is
not
common
for
us
to
get
in
applications
for
boards
and
commissions.
This,
indeed
is
a
committee,
but
I'm,
but
I
was,
I
was
pleased
to
see
the
broad
representation
that
we
do
have
in
comparison
to
what
we
typically
see
in
terms
of
application,
supports
and
commissions,
and
I
can
assure
you
that
the
the
applicants
and
their
responses
did
discuss
the
impact
that
taxation
would
have
on
low
income.
Families.
AB
Yeah
and
I'm
certainly
not
disparaging
the
board
for
the
selection.
I
understand
what
it
is
to
recruit
a
board
in
this
county.
So
it's
it's
a
difficult
task
to
get.
You
know,
people
who
don't
have
the
time
or
resources
to
you
know
participate
in
a
voluntary
board.
It's
it's
a
tough
thing
to
do
so.
AB
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
the
board
is
having
them
in
mind
along
the
way
and
making
sure
that
you
know
not
only
from
the
taxation
standpoint
but
from
the
libraries
are
a
great
resource
for
people
who
are
low
wage
earners
who
are
on
fixed
incomes.
Sometimes
it's
their
only
resource
to
access
the
internet,
things
along
those
lines,
just
that
those
things
are
kept
in
mind
throughout
the
conversations.
AB
I
think
that's
super
important
that
we
keep
that
sort
of
towards
the
top
of
the
conversation.
That
was
really
the
main
question.
You
did
a
good
job
of
answering
it.
So
no.
O
Thanks
sam
just
one
question
david,
thank
you
for
all
the
work
that
you
and
everyone
who
worked
on
this
did,
and
I
usually
on
committees
like
this.
O
An
odd
number
of
people
are
appointed.
This
particular
committee
will
have
12
members
and
the
odd
number
of
people
appointed
is
so
that
you
don't
get
deadlocks
on
issues.
So
is
there
a
reason
why
it's
12
and
not
11
or
13.,.
AA
Well,
I
mean
the
I
appreciate
that.
Thank
you
very
much
mary.
I
mean
the
the
application
said,
6-12
and
again
being
frank.
We
had
more
significant,
I
would
say
nearly
all
of
the
applications
were
extraordinarily
qualified
and
would
have
been
acceptable
in
all
likelihood
to
be
on
this
committee.
It
was
very
difficult
to
narrow
it
down
to
the
number
that
we
did
and
we
wound
up
going
with
the
max
now.
The
draft
charter
for
this
committee.
AA
It's
a
short-term
committee
and
the
draft
charter-
is
that
we
would
work
towards
consensus
and,
in
fact,
what
what
we
are
working
for
is
consensus
on
recommendations
that
would
go
to
council
for
a
decision.
So
we
are
not
asking
this
committee
to
make
decisions.
We
are
looking
for
consensus
around
the
items
in
the
iga
and
my
anticipation
is
if
we
should
arrive
at
a
point
where
the
committee
is
deadlocked
or
gives
us
ambiguous
recommendations
for
which
way
they
would
go.
AA
We
would
simply
report
that
ambiguity
to
council
so
that,
in
the
end,
the
decisions,
what
decisions
we
will
need
to
make
will
fall
fault
accounts,
and
so
I
think,
if
there
is
ambiguity
around
a
certain
element
of
the
iga
or
anything,
you
know.
If
it
were
community
engagement,
we
might
be
able
to
incorporate
more
in
communication.
If
it's
around
a
particular
item
like
the
disposition
of
assets,
then
we
would
report
that
ambiguity
back
to
council
for
council
of
society.
A
Thanks
david
for
being
here
for
the
presentation,
I
just
wanted
to
answer
your
questions
directly.
I
support
the
committee
member
recommendations
and
do
not
have
any
other
feedback.
So
thanks
again,.
K
Thanks
rachel
aaron
I'll
give
feedback
as
well.
I
also
support
the
community
member
recommendations,
those
of
whom
are
that
are
being
appointed
that
I'm
familiar
with
are
all
very
capable
individuals
and
I'm
sure
the
rest
are
as
well,
and
then
I'm
really
looking
forward
to
seeing
this
timeline
play
out
over
the
next
year.
This
is
a
really
exciting
opportunity
for
our
library
and
our
community.
So
good
luck
to
you
and
the
new
committee,
and
I
look
forward
to
hearing
back
from
you
all
on
this
timetable.
L
Thank
you
so
much
just
a
couple
of
quick
questions
in
the
in
the
memo
the
staff
memo
there
was
a
draft
iga.
I
suppose
that's
I
assume,
that's
simply
illustrative
and
not
to
be
used
in
any
more
substantive
manner.
I
mean
it
made
reference
to
an
expansion
impact
fee
and-
and
there
were
other
provisions
of
that
sword,
am
I
correct
that
it's
it's
simply
an.
AA
Illustration,
it's
purely
illustrative
mark.
This
is
the
identical
document
that
we
brought
to
council
back
in
may,
when
there
had
been
questions,
though
several
months
prior
about
the
challenges
of
working
through
an
ita
deputy
city
attorney
gear
and
senior
assistant
city
attorney,
janet
michaels
just
drafted
an
iga,
so
they
drafted
an
iga
to
show
you
that
it
was
possible
to
do
it,
and
these
were
the
components
and
that
we
would
share
that
document.
Similarly
with
the
committee,
but
merely
as
a
guidepost
for
them
to
discuss
some
of
the
issues.
L
Fair
enough,
when
you
make
a
recommendation
to
the
city
in
terms
of
the
disposition
of
assets,
may
I
request
that
you
discuss
the
risk
factors
inherent
either
sell
or
lease.
Z
C
All
right,
thank
you,
mayor,
bye,
all
right.
Anyone
else
before
I
sum
up
great
scene
done
david.
Thank
you
for
that.
I
thought
your
answers
to
council
questions
were
excellent
and
I
also
support
the
individuals
that
have
volunteered
to
serve
on
this
committee
and
been
selected.
Thank
you
to
all
those
members
for
the
work
you're
about
to
do.
I
I
want
to
reiterate
how
important
I
think
it
is
that
some
of
the
disposition
details
be
brought
back
as
bob
and
mark
had
asked
about,
because
I
think
that's
a
key
question
here.
C
I
mean,
I
think
the
two
key
questions
to
me
are:
will
voters
support
the
revenue
stream
needed
for
the
district
and
then
how
will
we
manage
the
assets
which
have
been
accumulated
over
a
long
time
by
the
boulder
taxpayers?
So
I
think
you
know
equity
issues
around
that,
as
well
as
minimizing
risk
will
be
some
key
components,
but
I
won't
be
here
to
have
to
make
that
decision
and
I
wish
you
all
the
best
with
bringing
it
forward.
C
E
I
This
has
certainly
been
a
topic
of
lively
conversation
as
e-scooters
have
hit
the
town,
so
I'm
going
to
invite
david,
kemp
or
dk
as
he
goes
by
our
senior
transportation
plan.
AC
Thank
you.
Thank
you
very
much
well
good
evening,
mayor
and
members
of
city
council.
My
name
is
dave.
Kemp
senior
transportation
planner
with
the
transportation
mobility
department
and
joining
me
tonight
is
nico
probst,
director
of
government
relations
with
limey
scooters.
I
have
a
brief
presentation
for
you
this
evening
before
we
move
to
discussion.
AC
In
september,
2020
council
directed
staff
to
conduct
an
rfp
process
to
select
a
vendor
to
provide
shared
e-bikes
and
e-scooters
for
community
members
to
rent
for
for
short
trips
throughout
boulder
council,
also
requested
that
we
pilot
e-scooters
east
of
28th
street
in
order
to
learn
more
about
how
they
work,
staff
then
engage
in
a
collaborative
process
to
develop
the
scope
of
work
for
the
rfp
with
several
community
community
stakeholders.
Some
of
these
stakeholders
include
cu,
boulder,
boulder
county
members
of
the
transportation
advisory
board,
the
boulder
chamber
community
cycles
and
boulder
housing
partners.
AC
AC
AC
Additionally,
staff
from
the
boulder
bike
share
organization
were
hired
by
b
cycle
llc
in
august
to
operate
the
local
system.
Lime.
Lime
is
a
transportation
company
based
in
san
francisco.
It
operates
electric
scooters,
electric
bikes,
normal
pedal,
bikes
and
electric
mopeds,
car
sharing
systems
and
various
systems
around
the
world.
AC
AC
AC
As
we
move
forward
with
implementing
the
program,
there
are
several
strategic
items
on
the
table,
for
both
operators
b
cycle
will
continue
working
to
transition
the
fleet
to
fully
electric
assist
and
will
grow
the
fleet
to
nearly
500
e-bikes
by
2022
they'll
refurbish
the
existing
docking
stations
and
install
their
newest
modular
docking
station.
As
they
begin
to
expand
the
service
area.
AC
Lime
will
continue
operating
the
pilot
program
east
boulder
service
area.
They
are
ramping
up
their
education
efforts
to
their
customers
to
improve
safe
and
responsible
operations,
and
a
neat
safety
feature
that
they've
included
in
the
program
has
to
require
a
training
mode
training
ride
mode
for
first
time
users
in
the
training
mode.
These
skaters
only
go
about
eight
to
ten
miles
per
hour
to
help
folks
learn
how
the
e-scooter
handles
before
they're
able
to
ride
the
scooter
at
their
max
speed
of
15
miles
per
hour.
AC
And,
finally,
both
operators
are
required
to
participate
in
quarterly
and
annual
reviews,
as
the
program
gets
gets,
get
started
and,
of
course,
we're
looking
at
this
daily,
as
we
have
just
initiated
the
program.
AC
Before
the
start
of
the
program,
the
city
developed
a
comprehensive
web
page
to
provide
information
regarding
the
details
of
the
program
and
we
are
regularly
employing
the
city's
communication
channels,
including
social
media,
to
inform
and
engage
community
members
and
a
benefit
of
developing
the
program
with
several
community
partners
is
that
we
have
the
advantage
of
getting
the
word
out
through
our
partners.
Communicate
communication
channels
as
well.
AC
And
so
through
emails
phone
calls
and
inquire
both
reports.
We
are
hearing
about
we're
hearing
about
a
number
of
concerns,
specifically
regarding
the
e-scooter
pilot
program.
These
include
parking
issues
that
is
e-scooters
blocking,
sidewalks
and
or
multi-use
paths
unsafe,
running,
behaviors,
frustration
with
the
inability
to
travel
west
of
28th
street
and
also
a
general
appreciation
for
the
program
to
have
a
new
transportation
mode
available
to
community
members.
AC
And
so,
in
response
to
the
concerns
we're
hearing
and
we
are
implementing
a
number
of
action
items
to
optimize
operations,
one
of
the
immediate
day-to-day
items
includes,
following
up
on
reported
issues
within
two
hours
of
notification.
This
is
a
stipulation
in
our
agreement
with
lyme
we're
actively
working
on
educating
users
on
how
to
properly
operate
the
devices
through
both
the
city's
social
media
channels
and
through
lime
directly
to
their
customers
through
their
mobile
app.
AC
C
K
Okay,
thanks
for
that
information,
you
mentioned
the
the
two
hour
requirement
to
clean
up
any
issues
and
mention
that
something
that
you're
working
on.
How
is
that
being
tracked
and
monitored
to
make
sure
that
they're
meeting
those
performance
targets.
AC
Right
so
with
every
report
that
comes
in
it
comes
into
the
city
directly,
I
track
those
and
then
inform
lime
that
they
there
is
a
an
issue
to
respond
to,
and
so
we
have
an
ongoing
list
of.
Essentially,
you
know
all
the
different
reports
that
come
in
and
then
lime
can
also
receive
those
independently
and
they
too
keep
a
list
of
the
ones
that
they
get
directly.
K
So
that
was
about
them
getting
them,
but
then
how
about
the
whether
they're
able
to
resolve
them
within
that
two-hour
window.
AC
Yeah,
what
I've
found
thus
far
with
lime
is
that
they've
been
able
to
respond
to
that
actually
with
under
the
two-hour
window,
which
is
a
good
thing.
I
haven't
had
any
complaints
that
folks
are
not
having
the
issue
resolved
over
two
hours,
so
they
are
meeting
that
requirement
at
this
time.
C
And
I'm
going
to
colloquy
on
that
briefly
dk.
Are
you
having
any
concerns
with
the
b
cycle
around
being
left
in
the
wrong
places
or
so
on,
and
do
they
have
a
similar
requirement,
as
lyme
does.
AC
They
do
and
we're
not
having
the
same
type
of
reported
issues
as
we
are
with
wine
and
it's
primarily
because
it's
a
docked
versus
the
dockless
system.
AC
Yes,
in
some
cases,
the
the
user
of
the
scooter
has
to
park
it
correctly
and
take
a
snapshot
of
it
and
then
send
it
back.
We
do
have
no
ride
zones
in
certain
areas
where
they
can't
ride
or
can't
park,
but,
generally
speaking,
they
are
able
to
park
the
device
in
most
locations.
A
Hey
sam
hi
dk,
thanks
for
the
presentation
and
overview,
I
have
a
couple
kind
of
safety
related
questions,
so
wondering
how
we
picked
the
hours
of
operation-
and
maybe
we
already
heard
about
that.
But
I
was
thinking
that
we
were
going
to
sort
of
avoid
dark
and
drinking
hours
and
so
11
p.m
seems
maybe
late
for
that
target.
So
just
wondering
how
we
arrived
at
11.
AC
You
know
we
did.
We
went
back
and
forth
with
with
actually
cu
boulder
and
determining
that
thinking
about
college
age,
students
and
potentially
using
devices.
You
know
during
that
time
and
they
were
comfortable
with
the
11
o'clock
time
frame
and
we
had
initially
pitched
10.
So
11
o'clock
was
a
compromise
and
so
far
we
haven't
seen
any
issues
with
that
time
frame.
At
this
point,.
A
I
don't
think
I've
seen
anyone
riding
with
a
helmet,
so
I
do
have
concerns
about
you
know
I
guess
heightened
safety
concerns.
I
thought
at
some
point.
There
was
going
to
be
a
some
targeted
outreach
or
efforts
at
helmets
and
that
whatever
that
was
conceived
as
it
must
not
be
working.
A
So
another
question
is
there
like?
Sometimes
I
see
people
writing
on
on
sidewalks
that
don't
look
like
they
would
be
great
to
write
on
as
opposed
to
you
know,
multi-use
paths.
A
Is
there
any
way
to
not
have
people
ride
on
on
like
areas
that
wouldn't
be
safe
like
where
there
are
broken
sidewalks
or
things
like
that,
because
I
think
that
is
sometimes
what
causes
accidents
and-
and
did
we
look
at
all
at
if
geofencing
is
the
right
word
geofencing
off
certain
certain
areas
that
are
maybe
under
construction
or
just
not
safe,.
AC
Yes,
so
to
address
the
first
statement
about
the
helmet
use
helmets
are
encouraged.
We
haven't
required
that
as
part
of
a
law
that
information
is
available
on
our
website,
we've
done
a
lot
of
social
media
outreach.
Lyme
also
does
that
through
their
through
their
mobile
app,
and
actually
you
can
get
a
free
helmet
through
lime.
AC
If
you
request
one
and
then
in
terms
of
where
to
ride
the
devices
so
technically,
the
e-scooters
are
not
allowed
to
be
ridden
on
sidewalks
unless
there
is
no
adjacent
bike
facility
in
this,
in
the
travel
lane
or
in
the
street
jason
street,
and
so
it
is
possible.
The
thing
about
geofencing
is
that
it's
a
little
broader,
it's
not
surgical
per
se,
but
it's
it's
a
little
bit
broader.
AC
So
if
you
were
to
say
geofence
a
particular
street
and
say
you
can't
ride
on
the
sidewalk
well,
then
you're
likely
geo-fencing
off
that
adjacent
bike.
Lane
too,
and
that's
kind
of
where
the
technology
is
with
that
right
now.
But
it
is
possible
for
geo-fencing
that
we
can
cordon
off
larger
swaths
of
land
to
prevent
those
e-scooters
from
being
ridden.
So,
for
example,
is
belmont
bike
park.
AC
A
Interesting,
okay
and
then
you
talked
about
like
eight,
you
know
eight
to
ten
miles,
an
hour
sort
of
the
the
training
speed,
and
I
would
guess
that
a
crash
at
eight
to
ten
miles
an
hour
is
safer
than
a
crash
at
15
miles
an
hour.
So
one
question
is
how
like
how
far
are
people
going?
How
many
miles
is
an
average
trip
if
you
know-
and
that
would
be
something
you
could
get
to
us
later-
if
that's
more
convenient.
AC
Yeah
no
trips
average
scooter
trips
are
about
a
mile
a
little
over
a
mile.
At
this
point
and
then
e-bike
trips
are
a
little
bit
longer.
A
AC
Actually
15
is
a
pretty
conservative
speed
limit
for
the
scooters
okay,
so
you
know
any
going
any
slower
than
that.
I
think
you
start
to
lose
the
ability
to
get
to
your
destination
more
conveniently,
and
so
we
don't
see
a
problem
right
now
with
15
miles
per
hour,
but
we
are
monitoring
the
program
and
if
we
do
experience
any
issues
crashes
with
you
know
speed
as
a
result
of
the
crash,
then
we
can
definitely
look
at
lowering
those
the
speed
limit.
A
A
AC
That's
to
help
you
get
more
familiar
with
device
and
then
once
you
get
a
handle
on
it,
then
you
know
you
can
pretty
easily
go
15
miles
per
hour,
but
it's
it.
You
know
not
pushing
the
20
mile
an
hour.
Speed
limit
is,
is
a
is
a
good
thing
and
I
think
we've
we've
arrived
right
now
at
a
pretty
safe
speed,
and
it's
also
important
to
note
that
the
speed
limit
on
the
multi-use
path
system
is
also
15
miles
per
hour.
A
Yeah
and
is
is
15
the
the
standard
like
in
other
cities
that
I
would
have
used
the
the
scooters.
A
All
right-
and
then
you
mentioned
the
two
hour
turnaround
time.
Pardon
the
dog
scratching
next
to
me
is:
is
that
like
does
are
complaints
coming
in
around
that
for
people
leaving
the
scooters
mid
mid
sidewalk?
Is
that
what
we're
trying
to
accomplish
within
those
two
hours.
AC
AC
A
AC
A
Okay,
two
hours
seems
like
a
long
time
to
have
a
scooter
blocking
the
whole
sidewalk
is
my
concern
there.
I
understand
it's
good
that
it's
coming
in
under
the
two
hours,
but
I
guess
my
feedback
would
be
one
hour
would
be
better
than
two
in
that
situation.
30
minutes
would
be
better
than
both
all
right.
Thanks.
That's
all
my
questions.
AB
Thanks,
sam
and
yeah,
thanks
for
the
update
dk,
it's
been
interesting
to
watch
this
out
in
the
world
going
on
in
real
time.
I
definitely
want
to
you
know,
congratulate
the
the
bike
introduction
that
seems
to
have
gone
really
well
and
seems
to
only
continue
to
go
well,
so
that's
really
cool.
I
had
similar
concerns
as
rachel
she
covered
most
of
them.
AB
I
also
was
just
wondering
you
know,
is
everything
subject
to
the
lowest
common
denominator
of
human
when
it
comes
to
leaving
things
in
the
worst
places
possible
sounds
like
that's
sort
of
the
case,
which
is
unfortunate
and
seems
to
be
unavoidable,
with
non-docked
situation.
AB
At
least
I
haven't
seen
it
solved
in
any
other
city
that
has
non-doc
scooters.
So
my
my
main
question
was
I've
been
seeing
a
whole
lot
of
scooters
in
places
that
I
just
didn't
expect
they
would
end
up
so
like
just
in
front
of
houses
in
single
family
neighborhoods,
and
my
question
was:
have
you
seen
through
aggregate
data
where
most
of
the
trips
are
going
and
are
a
lot
of
them
ending
up
in
sort
of
those
one-off,
weird
places
like
I've
been
seeing
throughout
the
neighborhoods.
AC
Yeah,
it
does
happen
it.
You
know,
people
will
take
those
to
their
destinations
and
that,
I
guess
that's.
One
of
the
benefits
of
a
dockless
system
is
that
you
can
really
get
from
point
a
to
point
b
directly
to
your
destination
and
that
they
are
being
used
by
by
folks
all
throughout
the
entire
east
boulder
area
and
and
so
for
those
scooters
that
are
stagnant
or
sitting
out.
AC
AB
AB
Does
that
mean
that
there's
an
unmet
need
to
some
degree
that
you
know
just
existed
before,
or
is
this
sort
of
a
weird
fluke
that
we
just
didn't
anticipate.
AC
No
certainly,
I
think
that
you
know
folks
are
looking
for
different
ways
to
get
around,
and
you
know
if
you
can
get
this
device
as
close
as
you
can
to
your
destination
or
pick
it
up
as
close
as
you
can
from
your
or
from
your
origin,
then
it's
it's.
What
we
expect
in
a
program
to
have
that
device
be
convenient
and
to
get
them
where
they
need
to
be.
AB
AC
AC
We
can
create
no
parking
zones
anywhere,
we'd
like
and
then
require
folks
to
park
in
that
corral,
and
but
that
would
be
sort
of
a
hybrid
between
the
dockless
and
the
dock
system,
and
so
that
would
be
a
next
step
for
us
is
to
move
to
that
hybrid
system.
And
then,
if
we
can't
fix
some
of
the
more
egregious
behavior-
and
we
can
come
to
a
point
where
we
can
generally
get
folks
to
park
these
devices
responsibly,
then
that
might
work.
If
not,
then
it
may
be
that
a
doc
system
is
most
appropriate
for
boulder.
AB
And
I
know
you
had
a
quarterly
update
system.
Is
there
sort
of
going
to
be
another
check-in
for
recommendation?
Do
you
have
a
time
anticipated
for
that.
AC
For
with
city
council,
yeah
yeah
we'll
come
back
whenever
you'd
like
adam
okay,
however,
we
we
will
be
coming
back
at
the
end
of
the
for
sure.
At
the
end
of
the
the
one
year
evaluate
pilot
evaluation
program,
so.
AB
AB
Will
have
their
I'm.
C
Thank
you
adam
thanks,
adam
mark
and
then
junie
mark.
L
I
think
we
should
bring
adam
back
as
a
special
guest
for
that
presentation.
There.
You
go
thanks,
dk,
just
a
couple
questions
in
the
memo.
It
said
that
we've
had
13
445
trips
and
and
zero
accidents
that
that
seems
to
be
inconsistent
with
the
earlier
data.
We
had
that
raised
issues
about
the
safety
of
e-scooters.
What
has
changed.
AC
You
know
that's
a
really
good
question.
You
know
I
I
still
think
we're
under
that
threshold,
so
I
don't
want
to
speak
too
soon
to
say
that
you
know
we've
solved
all
the
you
know,
answers
at
this
point,
but
I
think
one
of
the
benefits
of
waiting
to
implement
this
program
is
that
a
lot
of
folks
have
learned
how
to
use
them
in
different
cities
and
so
we're
getting.
I
mean
students
are
a.
You
know,
huge
demographic
that
are
using
this.
This
you
know
the
e-scooters
to
get
around
and
so
they've
they've
been
experienced.
AC
You
know
by
them
now
and
they've
been
able
to
use
them.
I
think
that's
one
part
of
it.
I
think
the
training
ride
mode
definitely
helps
a
lot
and
then
the
technology
mark
has
gotten
better
the
wheels
the
diameter
the
wheels
have
gotten
larger.
The
devices
come
with
shocks
in
the
front
they're
more
durable
devices
than
they
were
when
we
were
talking
about
this
two
years
ago,
when
we
were
really
concerned
about
you
know,
can
this
thing
hold
up
and
is
it
a
safe?
You
know
device
and,
and
so
the
technology's
gotten
better.
AC
I
think
people
have
gotten
more
accustomed
to
using
them
and,
frankly,
we've
I
mean,
generally
speaking,
we've
got
great
facilities
in
boulder.
We've
got
an
excellent
network
of
multi-use
paths
of
bike
lanes
and
whatnot.
So
I
think
those
are
all
contributing
factors
to
to
what
we've
experienced
so
far.
But
again
I
don't
want
to
jinx
the
program,
there's
a
lot
more
to
find
out
over
the
course
of
this
year.
So
but
preliminarily,
that's
what
I
believe.
Okay.
L
Now,
speaking
of
of
evolution
of
data
way
back
when
we
were
first
looking
at
this,
the
e-scooters
had
a
half-life
of
about
28
days
of
my
recollection.
That's
right!
I
remember
that
yeah
and
do
we
have
any
data
as
to
what
it
looks
like
now.
AC
You're
right
so
now
we're
learning
that
the
devices
are
coming
in
around
a
couple
years
and
so
and
really
in
you
know,
the
companies
are
motivated
by
quality
of
the
product,
because,
if
they're
losing
these
devices
losing
these
scooters
on
a
monthly
basis,
then
they're
losing
their
overall
profit
and
so
they've
been
really
driven
and
the
technology
has
gotten
better
and
so
looking
at
the
robustness
of
the
device
now
compared
to
when
we
were
talking
about
this
a
couple
years
ago.
L
My
last
comment
is:
is
pretty
much
of
a
shout
out
for
rachel's
suggestion
that
you
might
want
to
consider
imposing
some
financial
consequences
on
people
who
improperly
leave
their
e-scooters.
L
In
the
public
thoroughfare
and
if
they're
they're
supposed
to
take
pictures,
are
they
not
where
they
left
it
they
are.
They
are.
I
think
that
would
would
probably
solve
the
problem
of
somebody
else
coming
in
and
moving
it,
because
they'll
have
taken
a
picture
and
would
be
not
responsible
for
that.
But
I
think
there's
something
to
be
said,
for
you
know
imposing
a
financial
consequence
if
somebody
is
just
leaving
the
e-scooter
on
somebody's
lawn
or
on
a
bike
path.
AC
Yeah,
I
think
we're
gonna
try
the
carrot
first,
and-
and
you
know
this
is
this-
is
the
pilot
program.
This
is
very
new
to
the
community,
we're
all
learning
about
this,
and
I
think
we
really
need
to
intensify
the
education
about
how
these
things
are
operated
from.
You
know
from
a
user
like
when
they're
on
right
when
you're
actually
operating
the
device
on
the
street
and
when
you're
parking
it
and
help
folks
understand
the
context
of
why
it's
important
to
park
the
device.
AC
The
way
you
should-
and
so
I
we've
got
more
work
to
do,
and
but
I
think
that
learning
curve
there
is
a
learning
curve
to
this.
L
C
G
G
You
know
the
sidewalks
and
even
I
have
a
hard
time
walking
past
them
myself
and
I
can
imagine,
for
you
know,
people
with
mobility
issues,
and
you
know
if
someone
is
in
a
wheelchair,
it's
very
hard
for
them
to
get
by.
So
I'm
wondering
what's
the
pickup
process
for
these
lime,
green
scooters
that
are
littering
the
sidewalks.
AC
So,
what's
the
pickup
process,
what's
the
the
rebalancing
is
what
we
call
it,
and
and
and
so
if
we
find
that
there
are
a
number
of
divide,
e-scooters
that
are
located
at
a
particular
point
and
some
of
them
are
not
being
used
and
lime
will
routinely
pick
up
those
devices
and
bring
them
back
to
their
initial
deployment
zones.
So
the
idea
is
that
we
don't
have
all
of
our
scooters
concentrated
in
one
location.
AC
But
then
we
can,
you
know
every
couple
days
or
so
redistribute
those
things
so
that
they
can
be
used
by
folks
to
do
more
trips.
And
so,
when
there's
a
problem-
and
it's
reported
and
and
that's
really
one
of
the
elements
of
the
program-
that's
challenging
too-
is
to
encourage
people
to
report
a
scooter.
That's
been
misparked
because
that's
the
the
most
efficient
way
for
for
lyme
to
then
get
that
report
and
then
go
out
and
then
get
to
it
and
fix
the
fix
the
problem
and
then
rebalance
it
where
it
needs
to
be.
G
Yeah,
I
think,
from
what
I
hear
from
you
tonight,
I
think,
seeing
all
these
scooters,
I
was
one
of
the
supporters
of
the
you
know,
bringing
scooters
to
boulder
and
and
honestly,
I
don't
find
the
sight
of
all
these
scooters
littering
the
ground
and
the
sidewalks
and
making
it
hard
for
people
to
walk
by
appealing.
G
I
think,
that's
a
disservice
to
people
who
are
you
who
are
mobili,
who
have
mobility
issues,
and
you
mentioned
earlier
something
about
some
type
of
a
docking
station
to
ensure
that
these
things
are
not
just
on
the
ground
and
impeding
people's
access
to
the
walkway.
Because
you
know
we
can't
have
community
members
being
in
conflict
with
cars,
because
these
scooters
are
on
the
sidewalk
and
there's
nowhere
to
walk.
So
I
think
that's
something
that
we
definitely
need
to
work
on
as
a
community.
G
But
there's
another
question.
I
wanted
to
ask
you
about
I'm
looking
at
the
memo.
I
think,
what's
missing,
or
at
least
something
I
didn't
see,
was
the
age
group
who
use
these
scooters
and
I'm
thinking
for
lime.
Since
it's
in
east
boulder-
and
I
know
where
is
the
cu
campus
and
I'm
wondering
if
it's
mostly
young
college
students
who
are
using
them
as
opposed
to
older
people,
so
I
didn't
really
get
a
sense
of
the
demographic
of
who's.
Using
these
scooters.
AC
I
can
help
with
that.
We
well,
I
should
say:
lime
in
advance
of
this
meeting
did
conduct
a
survey
to
their
users.
Now
the
program
is
very
new,
and
so
the
response
rate
was
very
low.
However,
what
I'm
finding
what
we
found
is
that
the
average
age
of
a
line
writer
I'm
reading
from
the
report
is
age
of
30.
G
G
AC
Yes,
so
yeah
there
is
an
equity
requirement
as
part
of
our
agreement,
with
both
b
cycle
and
lime
and
and
so
and
what's
really
interesting
is
the
technology
with
these
scooters
and
the
geo
and
the
the
gps
data
that
we're
able
to
obtain.
It
really
helps
us
with
our
planning
purposes
and
we
can
and
we
can
cordon
off
or
demarcate
through
gps
areas
in
the
city
that
we
consider
underserved,
neighborhoods,
traditionally
underserved,
neighborhoods
and
and
so
we're
able
to
pull
from
that
data.
AC
How
many
rides
are
originating
in
that
underserved
neighborhood
zone,
and
so-
and
we
did
include
this
in
the
memo
and
I'm
really
glad
you
asked
the
question,
but
from
august
18th
through
october
3rd,
there
were
about
a
little
over
1600
trips
that
originated
from
these
underserved
neighborhoods
in
ways
in
which
we're
we're
getting
out
the
information.
AC
The
outreach,
the
number
of
ways
in
which
we're
doing
that
we're
coordinating
closely
with
boulder
housing
partners
and
then
also
with
boulder
county's
mobility
for
all
program
and
that,
as
a
matter
of
fact,
we've
got
a
presentation
next
week
to
talk
with
them
about
how
we
can
co-promote
the
program
to
more
of
those
to
more
to
more
community
members.
A
Last
time
the
dog
was
scratching
to
get
out
and
now
there's
a
cat
howling.
I
can't
wait
to
get
back
to
chambers,
so
please
bear
with
elmer
here.
So
I
guess
I
just
wanted
to
follow
up
dk
since
my
questions-
and
you
know
in
reflecting
and
then
hearing
later
comments
and
questions
were
probably
all
in
the
the
more
negative
category.
I
just
wanted
to
say
that
I
am
a
fan
of
the
scooters
I
I
was
an
advocate
of
them.
A
I
think
that
they
are
a
great
first
and
last
mile
and
I
really
want
them
to
succeed.
A
So
my
questions
are
in
the
spirit
of
like
how
do
we
make
sure
that
we
are
preventing
accidents
and-
and
you
know,
don't
come
back
for
a
next
update
and
and
have
things
you
know
going
south
so
just
wanted
to
say
that
and
also
there's
been
some
mentions
of
docked
versus
dockless,
and
so
I
just
wanted
to
get
it
on
the
record
that
I
actually
really
like
the
dockless
and
I've
appreciated
that
and
especially
cities
that
I
have
visited.
A
A
So
I
understand
that
there
are
growing
pains
and
that
the
you
know
the
sight
of
them
isn't
isn't
normal
right
now,
and
you
know
we're
used
to
seeing
cars
everywhere,
but
we're
not
used
to
seeing
these
scooters
all
over
town.
So
just
wanted
to
add
that
I
I
remain
a
fan
of
us
doing
this
and
I
appreciate
all
the
work
that
that
you
have
done
to
to
make
this
successful
so
far
and
really
appreciate
it.
So
thank
you.
C
Thanks
rachel,
okay,
any
other
council
input
feedback
I'll
just
keep
mine
briefly,
thanks
dk
for
the
great
report
out.
It
is
very
thorough
and
gives
us
a
good
picture
of
what's
going
on
for
me,
I
think
this
is
a
great
pilot,
we're
learning
what
we
need
to
learn.
I'm
super
excited
about
the
direction
b
cycles
going
and
having
track
backing.
That
is
going
to
be
a
great
thing.
I
think,
for
the
city
and
having
500
e-bikes
out
and
about
in
our
town
is
going
to
be
wonderful.
C
I
think
that's
going
to
be
a
really
good
thing.
I
share
junie's
concern
with
the
scooters
around
on
sidewalks.
I
think
that
is
the
single
biggest
downside
to
them.
Generally
speaking,
I
agree
with
rachel
that
doctors
is
nice
and
convenient
for
folks,
but
the
litter
problem
has
to
go
away,
and
so
I
you
know
you
can't
have
people
impeded
from
being
able
to
make
progress,
walking
and
forced
out
into
a
bike
lane
or
a
roadway,
because
there's
scooters
on
the
sidewalk.
C
So
I
would
say
that
for
this
to
be
successful,
I
won't
be
on
the
council
that
will
evaluate
the
pilot,
but
I
would
say
that
that
will
be
a
premier
concern
at
the
top
of
the
list
for
people
and
so
thinking
about
that
now
might
be
helpful
and
I
guess
the
the
only
other
thing
is
the
safety
concern.
I
think.
That's
you
know
a
15
mile.
An
hour.
Speed
limit
is
a
very
strong
start
on
addressing
safety
concerns
and
I,
like
the
the
training
ride
idea
as
well.
C
So
I
think
this
is
a
very
successful
pilot
and
I
think
the
b
cycle
is
just
going
to
build
on
its
previous
success
and
hopefully
we
can
work
to
expand
the
areas
that
the
scooters
can
go
in.
If
we
can
get
the
litter
problem
under
control,
I
could
see
if
we
can
figure
out
a
good
way
to
get
them
around
campus,
the
main
campus
and
connect
to
the
other
campuses.
That
might
be
a
great
way
to
reduce
autos.
So
anyway,
this
has
been
great.
Did
you
get
what
you
needed
from
us?
AC
E
C
Well,
thank
you
for
turning
that
over
to
us.
This
is
a
step
that
we
often
take
around
about
election
time
when
we
have
referred
items
on
the
ballot
to
speak
to
bob,
I
wanted
to
turn
to
you
briefly.
You
brought
this
up
for
discussion.
That
council
did
you
want
to
tee
this
up
or
give
any
context
to
it?.
F
Sure
I'm
happy
to
I,
as
you
said,
sam.
This
is
something
we
typically
do
in
october
and
just
provide
for
whatever
it's
worth
our
opinion
and
guidance
to
the
community
on
ballot
measures.
I
would
hope
that
at
a
minimum,
this
council
would
pass
resolutions
endorsing
the
five
ballot
measures
that
we
put
on
the
ballot,
which
is
items
2i,
2j,
2k,
2l
and
2
m.
F
Since
I
think
we
voted
on
those
unanimously
or
close
to
universally,
I
would
hope
that
we
would
encourage
the
community
to
vote
yes
on
those
I'm
not
necessarily
advocating
for
council
to
take
a
position
one
way
or
another,
on
the
three
petitioned
ballot
measures
we
can't
if
people
wanted
to,
I
suppose,
but
I
would
hope
that
we
could
at
least
come
out
out
loud
and
say
those
five
ballot
measures
that
we
put
on.
Please
vote
yes
on
them.
F
I
think
there
was
a
discussion
from
the
city
attorney's
office
about
whether
this
would
be
a
declaration
or
resolution,
and
I
think,
there's
a
distinction
between
the
two
and
maybe
some
process
around
resolution.
We
could
talk
about
that
a
little
bit
later,
but
I
guess
I'd
just
like
to
hear
from
council
members
at
a
minimum.
Would
they
support
endorsing
so
to
speak
or
encouraging
community
members
about
yes
on
the
five
ballot
measures
that
we
put
on.
L
K
Yes,
absolutely
bob
thanks
for
bringing
that
forward.
I
think
we
should
support
those
fives.
I
appreciate
it
and
then
I
wonder
if
we
could
just
have
a
like
a
straw
poll
on
positions
on
300
and
302.
We
don't
want
to
spend
all
night
talking
over
all
the
pros
and
cons,
but
maybe
we
could
just
test
the
waters
on
council's
willingness
to
have
a
position
on
those
measures.
O
A
I
agree
with
all
that's
been
said
before.
I
think
that
my
guess
is
this
council
is
going
to
be
pretty
split
on
300,
but
on
302.
I
would
be
curious
to
talk
about
that
because
I
think
eight
out
of
nine
of
us
have
have
personally
supported
the
no
campaign,
so
I
don't
know
if
if
they
have
to
be
unanimous
votes
or
how
that
the
history
or
how
that
usually
works
out,
so
I'd
be
curious
to
learn
more.
C
Well
I'll
just
weigh
in
I
agree
that
I
think
we
should
do
the
five
that
we
put
forward.
I
think
that's
super
clear,
my
recollection
of
the
history
and
mary
and
others
can
add
to
this.
Was
we
generally
only
support
things
that
have
a
preponderance
like
a
super
majority
of
support,
but
generally
we've
stayed
away
from
things
that
are
closely
split
and
only
gone
towards
things
that
have
a
really
strong
support
on
council.
So
my
shorthand
is,
I
agree
with
you
about
300.
C
F
Yeah
sam,
I,
if
we're
gonna,
take
a
straw
poll
on
302
and
then
ultimately
vote
next
week.
I
do
need
to
ask
a
question
of
sandra
whether
junie
and
I
need
to
recuse
ourselves
on
that
straw
poll
tonight
and
that
vote
next
week.
Y
F
Sure-
and
so
I
might
suggest
that
that's
fine
sorry
to
put
you
on
the
spot,
I
might
suggest
that
for
purpose,
if
we
are
going
to
take
a
stroll
pull
on
302,
might
I
suggest
that
judy
and
I
just
not
vote
one
way
or
the
other
on
that,
and
then
you
could.
Let
us
know
that
it's
not
really
a
vote.
I
would
not
straw
poll
at
all
and
then
you
can.
Let
us
know
before
next
week's
vote.
Z
So
if
we
vote
on
302
and
obviously
I'll
be
voting,
no
or
I'll
be
opposing
the
rest
of
council,
so
what
the
endorsement
goes
out
and
says,
council
supports
this,
except
for
one
council
member
I
mean
I'm
not
really
comfortable.
Having
council
said
it
saying
out
there
to
the
public.
The
council
supports
us
when
one
member
strongly
does
not.
C
Well,
I
mean
we
often
have
split
votes.
I
think
we
could
adopt
whatever
we
wanted.
Depending
on
how
that
came
out
for
me,
I
I'm
most
interested
in
supporting
the
five
that
we
put
on
I'm
happy
to
do
will
of
counsel
on
the
others,
and
I
I
guess
I
would
say
it's
also
going
to
be
willow
council
how
we
represent
that
out.
C
So
you
know
if
we
have
a
super
majority
supporting
something
I
think
it's
fair
to
say
that
council
supports
it,
but
I'm
not
necessarily
going
to
lobby
that
we
should
take
a
position
on
the
300,
301
and
302
items.
That's
just
my
thinking
and
with
that
I've
got
juni
and
aaron
junior.
G
I
was
going
to
say
I
do
support
the
five
that
we
put
on
and
maybe
because
of
mirabai's
concern,
maybe
for
the
season
initiated
ballots.
Maybe
we
should
ask
the
account
entire
council
do
a
struggle
if
they
want
to
give
their
opinion
or
do
a
straw
poll
on
each
one
of
them,
because
I
think
me
and
bob
really
for
302.
G
We
don't
know
whether
we
should
say
anything
or
not.
On
that
one,
and
I
think
mayor
by
smearby's,
concern
is
actually
valid,
so
maybe
asking
taking
a
stroll
to
find
out
if
the
entire
council
is
interested
in
supporting
citizen-initiated
ballot
measures
after
you've
done
with
the
ones
that
are
brought
forward
by
city
council
itself.
C
K
Yeah
thanks
for
that
jenny,
I
think
the
points
about
making
sure
that
it's
measures
that
are
strongly
supported
by
super
majority
councils
or
reasonable
ones.
So
my
guess
is
that
well
clearly,
300
from
our
many
conversations
on
the
topic
doesn't
have
that
right
on
one
way
or
the
other.
My
guess
is:
301
probably
doesn't
have
that
either.
So
I
I
would
sort
of
retreat
this
to
say,
recommending
a
position,
a
a
no
position
on
the
302
ballot
measure
and
then
same.
K
L
Yeah,
I
think
I
think
I
would
want
to
restrict
it
to
the
five
ballot
measures
that
we
initiated.
You
know
if
a
I
want
to
be
sensitive
to
mirabei's
position
b.
If
we
use
that
super
majority
to
say
that
we
are
in
support
of
or
against
302,
and
then
it
appears
that
we
are
taking
a
different
position
with
the
other
two,
because
we
don't
have
a
supermajority
and
I
just
think
it
gets
messy.
I
think
those
those
initiatives,
a
lot
of
sinkers
swim
on
their
own.
L
They
were
not
initiated
by
this
council
and
it's
sort
of
above
our
pay
grade
to
be
making
that
endorsement
or
decision.
So
I
would
restrict
us
to
the
ones
that
are
our
responsibility
and
just
let
it
go.
Let
the
community
vote
on
the
others-
and
you
know
have
done
with
it
thanks
for
watching
and
I'll
say
that
in
the
context
of
someone
who
is
not
supportive
of
302.
C
A
I
I
appreciate
mark
and
mary's
point
there.
I
would
say
that
three
is
to
me
qualitatively
different,
because
it's
it's
an
action
that
council
took
to
annex
and
it
really
would
tie
our
hands
on
a
health
and
safety
issue
that
I
think
that
the
majority
the
super
majority
of
council
actually
cares
about.
So
I
think
it's
it's
a
different
question
than
the
fur
or
bedrooms
questions
and
it
would
be
appropriate
since
we
just
annexed
and
and
people's
lives
would
be
in
harm's
way.
F
Even
though
I'm
not
going
to
participate
in
any
straw
poll
relating
to
302,
I
would
I
will
say
that
I
agree
with
with
mary
and
mark
that
it's
cleaner
for
us
simply
to
endorse
the
ballot
measures
that
we
put
on
the
ballot
and
leave
it
to
the
voters
to
decide
on
the
citizen-initiated
petitions.
C
Super
all
right
great,
I
think
I've
got
a
sense
of
counsel
here's
my
proposal
feel
free
to
object.
I
would
take
a
straw
poll
that
says:
do
we
want
to
support
the
five
that
we
put
forward
and
so
we'll
deal
with
that
as
one
lot,
because
I
haven't
heard
any
distinction
between
them
and
then
I
think
I
would
pose
the
question
to
council.
C
Do
you
want
to
take
a
position
on
any
of
the
citizen
initiated
ballot
items?
If
that
vote
is
a
majority?
Does
then
we'll
go
through
them
one
at
a
time,
and
I
would
suggest
them
looking
for
a
super
majority
in
order
to
take
a
position
one
way
or
another
on
any
of
the
citizen
initiated
items.
So
does
that
make
sense?
One
vote
on
the
five
we
referred
one
vote
on
whether
we
want
to
take
positions
on
citizen
initiated
and
then
we
go
from
there
great.
C
I
am
seeing
no
objections
to
that
and
some
nodding
heads
and
thumbs.
So,
let's
begin
oops,
okay,
sorry,
my
computer's
throwing
something
up
here.
Let's
begin
with
a
straw
ball
on
the
five
in
initiative
ballot
initiatives
that
we
referred
to
the
ballot.
Does
anyone
have
an
objection
to
a
resolution
of
support
for
a
yes
position
on
all
those
five
items?
C
Great,
I
think
that's
super
clean,
so
we
have
unanimous
support
for
council
adopting
a
position
of
we
support
a
yes
vote
on
the
five
referred
council
referred
ballot
items.
So
that's
clean
and
done
and
we'll
come
back
to
talk
about
resolution
versus
declaration
in
a
moment,
then,
let's
shift
gears
I'll
do
this
by
a
show
of
hands.
Literally
put
your
hand
up.
C
If
you
want
to
who
would
like
counsel
to
adopt
a
position
on
citizen
initiated
items,
I
see
rachel,
I
see
aaron,
and
that
is
all
I
see
so
I
think
that's
pretty
clear
as
well,
so
I
think
council
sandra
would
like
to
adopt
a
position
of
support
on
the
five
that
we've
referred.
I
know
that
we
can
do
a
declaration
pretty
easily.
Can
you
remind
us
what
we
need
to
do
to
get
a
resolution
adopted?
Can
we
bring
that
forward
on
consent
next
week.
Y
Yeah,
thank
you
sam.
I
appreciate
that.
So
there
was
some
discussion
on
whether
or
not
we
could
do
a
declaration
versus
a
resolution,
and
I
just
wanted
to
let
you
know
that
the
fair
campaign
practices
act
specifically
or
explicitly
says
that
it
allows
resolutions,
and
so
my
recommendation
would
not
would
be
not
to
use
a
declaration,
but
rather
a
resolution
and
and
then
I
just
wanted
to
share
that.
Y
C
C
C
Very
good-
and
this
item
has
come
up
several
times,
as
we
all
know
we're
coming
to
the
end
of
this
council's
term,
and
it
would
be
great
to
get
back
together
in
person
for
a
meeting
or
two.
Certainly,
the
transition
meeting
between
councils
will
need
to
be
in
person
in
some
way
likely.
So
this
is
kind
of
an
open
item
for
us
to
discuss
as
we
will,
I'm
gonna
turn
to
nuria
and
and
see
nuria.
I
Sure,
thank
you,
sam
and
I'll
say
a
couple
things.
One
is
in
terms
of
technology.
I
believe
we're
in
a
good
place
to
go
for
hybrid
meetings,
we're
gonna
hold
a
dry
run
next
week
and
we
should
be
able
to
confirm
that,
but
we,
you
know
we
had
been
ready
and
trying
to
gear
up
for
july
that
got
pushed
back,
obviously
because
of
the
pandemic
and
some
technical
issues
we
had,
but
those
have
been
resolved.
Well,
the
technical
issues
have
been
resolved
covet
has
not
right.
So
you
know
I
I
will
say
this.
I
Other
thing
is
that
we
have,
as
of
we,
are
being
very
cautious
with
covid.
We
have.
Not
only
did
we
institute
a
universal
mass
mandate
recently,
but
we
also
then
have
gotten
the
county's
universal
mass
mandate,
and
that
remains
in
place
for
the
foreseeable
future.
So
it
depends
a
little
bit
on
timing.
We
are
working
with
lexi
to
see
what
does
that
look
like
for
us,
and
we
wanted
to
make
sure
that
if
we
came
together
with
universal
masking
what
that
could
look
like.
I
Perhaps
if
we
distance,
if
folks
could
take
that
off,
while
they
were
speaking
or
what
that
looked
like,
so
we
will
continue
to
work
with
the
county
and,
as
lexi
offered,
to
provide
some
recommendations
of
our
own,
we
will
make
sure
to
bring
those
to
council.
But
at
the
moment,
if
you
were
to
come
in,
we
were,
we
still
have
universal
masking
in
place.
I
I'll
also
say
that
we
certainly
and
appreciated
the
vaccination
verification
program
that
lexi
mentioned.
We
had
thought
about
it.
We
have,
as
you
all
know,
as
of
yesterday
informed
staff,
that
we
are
requiring
vaccinations
for
all
staff.
As
of
december
1st,
it
is
one
of
the
reasons
we
chose
not
to
necessarily
go
in
this
direction,
because
we
were
going
to
switch
gears
and
simply
require
proof
of
vaccination
and
or
do
medical
or
religious
accommodations
as
needed.
I
So
that
will
take
that
will
go
into
effect
on
december
1st,
which
will
be
after
the
transition
happens,
and
then
the
only
other
thing
that
I'll
add-
and
I
want
to
honor
staff
who
has
brought
this
forward-
is
certainly
we
can
come
back
as
you
as
you
will,
and
we
will
take
precautions
as
needed
and
certainly
will
heed
the
recommendations
by
boulder
county.
But
we
have
several
staff
who
particularly
our
com
staff,
who
would
be
supporting
those
meetings.
I
C
That
was
a
ticketing
policy,
but
performers
could
take
a
mask
off
when
they
were
performing,
and
I
was
allowed
and
encouraged
to
take
a
mask
off
when
I
was
speaking
so
I
think
one
option
if
we
do
have
some
or
all
of
us
in
person
would
be
that
we're
masked
most
of
the
time.
But
perhaps
when
we're
speaking,
we
can
unmask
for
clarity,
and
with
that
I
see
rachel.
A
Yeah,
just
one
question
nuria
so
for
I
imagine
that
many
or
a
high
percentage
of
the
people
that
we
would
be
looking
at
bringing
into
in
real
life
meetings
will
be
vaccinated,
and
I
understand
the
proof's
not
due
till
december
1st.
But
could
there
be
a
requirement
that
people
who
would
have
to
go
at
least
to
these
meetings
would
have
to
either
give
proof
of
vaccination
or
a
recent
test?
I
So
again,
we
will
look
at
that
as
we
move
forward.
We
we
actually
are
really
proud
of
the
high
vaccination
rate
we
have
across
all
our
staff
and,
as
we
were
coming
in,
were
thinking
about
coming
in.
We
knew
that
that
that
most,
if
not
all
the
staff
that
would
be
in
council
chambers
were
vaccinated,
so
we
will
take
appropriate
steps
as
that's
necessary,
including
some
additional
requirements.
I
think
our
concern
is,
you
know
just
heating
again
the
the
what
we're
learning
from
our
public
health
partners
is
even
if
you're
vaccinated.
I
There
are
breakthrough
cases
that
we're
concerned
about.
So
certainly
we
can
make
arrangements
and
try
to
do
that
unless
we
find
that
we
have
somebody
who
needs
specialized,
who
is
using
specialized
equipment
as
we're,
recording
and
so
forth.
But
I
think
we
can
certainly
take
that
on
the
back
of
the
house
and
make
sure
we
have
some
some
of
those
safety
protocols
in
place
and
we
would
be
happy
to
let
you
know
what
the
what
those
were
and.
A
I
asked
lexi
about
the
the
binax
instant
or,
I
think,
they're
15-minute
tests
from
the
state
of
colorado
and
I
think
that
organizations
can
buy
those
too
like
given
the
low
number
of
people
that
we're
talking
about
and
the
fact
that
some
staff
members
have
young
children
who
can't
be
vaccinated.
Yet
could
we
all
just
take
tests,
as
you
know,
on
top
of
being
vaccinated
on
the
nights
that
we
need
to
meet.
I
Yep,
we
could
certainly
absolutely
consider
that
as
we
move
forward.
I
know
the
city
has
been
thinking
about
that
and
offering
folks
to
make
sure
we
have
just
shared
that
with
our
leadership
team,
we
will
be
communicating
that
out
staff
as
well.
I
I
just
myself
ordered
some
of
those
tests
from
the
from
the
state,
so
I
think
that
all
of
those
considerations
will
bring
forward
and
it
will
depend
just
on
when
you
want
to
come
in
and
what
the
current
safety
precautions
where
we
are,
if
we're
still
in
high
transmission
and
hopefully
we're
down
a
bit,
but
considering
your
transition
rate,
I
mean
your
transition
date
and
lexi's
comment
today
about
waiting
three
weeks.
After
lowering
from
that
rate,
it
will
not
hit,
I
believe,
we're
still
going
to
be
in
high
transmission.
F
Yeah,
I
think
I'd
like
to
maybe
separate
this
discussion
between
whether
council
comes
back
and
then
how
nuria
manages
their
staff,
because
it
sounds
like
because
we've
got
this
hybrid
system.
Nuria
can
have
different
people
in
different
places,
so
I
don't
want
to
get
into
micromanaging
what
staff
members
are
in.
What
room
I
wanted
to
talk
about.
The
nine
of
us
and,
as
as
sam
said,
cu
seems
to
have
made
an
arrangement
where
people
who
are
speaking
or
performing
can
take
their
masks
off.
F
I
think
many
of
us
have
been
in
restaurants
where
you
sit
down
and
you
take
your
mask
off
and
so
there's.
Obviously
there
there's
obviously
masks
and
then
exceptions
to
mass,
and
I
would
hope
that
the
nine
of
us
could
could
consider
the
possibility
of
being
in
chambers
at
least
one
one
last
time
and
allowing
over
speaking
to
take
their
mask
off.
Maybe
perhaps
the
rest
of
us
should
be
masked,
we'll
we'll
defer
to
lexi
on
that.
F
I
want
to
let
nuria
manage
her
staff
and
how
who
gets
tested
and
who's
vaccinated
and
who's
wearing
masks
and
who's
in
the
room
and
who's
son's
in
the
room.
That's
not
really
for
us
to
say
so.
F
I'm
going
to
throw
out
a
proposal
which
people
can
agree
or
disagree
with
I'd
like
to
propose
that
this
council
convene
in
person
on
its
last
meeting,
which
is
november
9th,
which
is
a
little
bit
more
than
a
month
from
now,
and
that
the
new
council
is
which
is
sworn
in
on
on
the
morning
of
november
16th
and
then
convenes
later
that
evening
also
meet
in
person
and
one
of
their
agenda
items
at
night
can
be.
F
Do
we
want
to
keep
meeting
in
person
because
it'll
be
four
or
five,
I
hope
for
new
council
members
and
they
may
have
a
different
position
than
than
we
do
and
we
don't
want
to
impose
our
our
values
on
them.
F
So
I
I
like
to
throw
a
straw
man
out
there
that
we
meet
in
person
on
the
ninth
that
we
ask
the
new
council
to
meet
in
person
on
the
16th
nuria
can
manage
her
staff
and
we'll
take
advice
from
lexi
on
how
we
master
don't
mask
and
and
and
just
go
from.
Then
let
the
new
council
decide
what
they
want
to
do
after
the
16th.
K
K
So
I
think
giving
it
a
solid
month
is
a
good
idea
that
meeting
on
the
ninth
is
only
scheduled
to
be
like
an
hour
and
a
half
long
right,
so
that
that
mitigates
your
your
risk
levels
there
and
then,
if
we
had
on
the
16th,
you
could
start
with
the
new
council
with
an
option
for
people
to
participate
remotely
if
they're
not
comfortable
with
participating
in
person.
In
case
you
know,
anybody
here
on
the
current
council
or
in
the
new
council
feels
like
that,
doesn't
feel
safe
to
them.
K
They
could
exercise
that
option
and
then
we
can
see
where
we
go
from
there,
both
on
the
how
the
transmission
levels
are
doing,
how
the
vaccination
levels
are
doing
and
make
a
decision
at
that
point
for
going
forward,
and
I
would
like
us
to
explore
that
idea
that
the
the
county
was
talking
about
about
the
exemption
that
you
can
apply
for,
if,
if
everyone
is
vaccinated,
because
because
that
my
hope
is
that
that
would
be
our
situation
when
you
do
meet
in
person
again,
is
that
everyone
in
the
room
is
vaccinated.
K
Ideally,
that
would
be
a
requirement
at
least
at
the
beginning,
and
because
we
do
have
the
hybrid
option
right,
so
people
can
participate
remotely
if
they
are
not
vaccinated
for
some
reason,
and
then
we
could
get
that
potentially
that
dispensation
from
the
county.
So
that
could
be
a
good
thing
to
have
on
the
table
as
well.
Thanks.
L
I
I
don't
want
us
to
underestimate
the
discomfort
of
a
five
or
five
and
a
half
hour
meeting
with
masks
on
you
know
if
you're
just
to
express
my
own
preference.
I
would
rather
come
back
in
person
when
we
can
sit
and
actually
look
at
each
other
and
talk
to
each
other.
L
I
have
no
problem
with
an
hour
and
a
half
meeting
on
on
the
ninth
and
you
know,
obviously,
if,
if
I'm
going
forward
on
the
16th,
but
I
think
it'll
be
a
fairly
unpleasant
experience
to
be
going
to
11
o'clock
at
night,
you
know
and
having
to
wear
a
mask
for
all.
But
you
know
the
five
or
seven
minutes
that
you're
actually
giving
commentary.
G
I
was
going
to
see
the
same
thing
as
mark.
I
find
it
very
difficult
as
well
to
be
in
chambers
and
again,
we've
talked
about
this
before,
but
we're
having
the
same
discussion
again.
G
That
will
community
members
be
in
attendance,
because
if
community
members
are
not
in
attendance,
then
to
me
being
in
chambers,
I
just
don't
see
the
purpose
except
for
being
in
that
chair,
but
there's
something
that
was
mentioned
earlier
is
a
hybrid
system,
because
I'm
not
comfortable
with
just
going
in
chambers.
Knowing
there
is
a
delta
variant
and
there
are
two
cases
and
we
don't
know
exactly
where
the
numbers
are
going
as
of
right
now.
G
C
C
I
believe
there
there
may
even
have
been
historically
some
of
the
newly
elected
council
members
in
the
room
for
the
speeches
by
the
folks
who
might
want
to
be
the
next
mayor.
They,
I
think
in
the
past
have
wanted
to
hear
that
so
the
ninth
I'm
still
keeping
my
eye
on
this
part
of
cac
as
to
whether
we
want
to
transition
that
to
a
real
meeting,
there
may
be
business
that
we
want
to
tie
up
or
complete.
C
So
the
ninth
currently
is
the
study
session,
and
that
is
the
night
that
I
think
bob
was
proposing
that
we
do
in
person
or
hybrid
and
as
far
as
your
point
about
hybrid
with
council
members,
I
would
turn
to
nuria,
because
I
think
that's
a
really
important
question.
Nuria
will
we
have
the
ability
to
have
say
we
had
a
subset?
Seven
council
members
in
chambers,
but
two
wanted
to
come
in
via
a
hybrid
link.
Is
that
something
we
can
support.
I
Yes,
I
know
that
we
have
been
planning
for
hybrid
meetings
for
council
members
to
the
other
question
about
the
public.
We
would
not
advise
the
public.
We
are
not
planning
for
the
public
to
come
in
yet
particularly
with
being
in
high
transmission,
but
we
have
been
planning
for
the
body
to
come
in
hybridly.
So
that
would
be
something
that
we
could
offer.
C
Okay,
super
so
junior
I'll
come
back
to
you.
I
think
there
are
answers
to
all
the
questions
you
put
out
there.
Is
there
anything
else
you
wanted
to
follow
up
with.
G
O
I
have
a
question
november.
9Th
is
a
little
over
a
month
away,
and
so
how
late
or
how
close
to
that
date
can
we
make
the
decision?
O
Because
you
know
things
could
change
and
I
would
like
to
be
in
person
if
nothing
else,
because
it
would
be
basically
my
final
meeting
and
there's
just
some
sentimental
value.
I
guess
and
and
so
how
much
time
do
we
have
to
decide.
C
Well
I'll
turn
to
nuria
after
I
I
give
you
my
thoughts,
but
since
it's
two
weeks
between
our
last
october
meeting
and
that
november
9th
meeting,
it
would
seem
to
me
like
we
have
all
the
way
until
the
last
meeting
in
october,
because
that
gives
staff
two
weeks
to
prepare.
But
nuria
does
that
sound,
accurate
or.
I
I
I
do.
I
will
say
that
for
me
mostly
it's
your
comfort
right
and
where
we're,
I
think,
we're
ready,
we'll
do
the
dry
run
in
terms
of
technology
and
the
ability
to
move
forward.
I
believe
that
we're
there
it's,
whether
it's
how
much
more
information
you
need
from
perhaps
our
public
health
authority
and
we
meet
and
talk
to
the
county
at
least
weekly
and
probably
several
times
a
week.
So
we
can
bring
you
the
latest
information.
I
C
A
A
I'm
I'm
not
wanting
us
to
micromanage
nuria
with
regard
to
staff,
but
I
think
we
have
to
manage
ourselves
a
bit
and
so
that's
why
I'm
suggesting
that
we
could
commit
to
testing
and
then
her
staff
would
not
be
in
harm's
way
because
one
of
us
is
coming
in
there
carrying
delta.
So
I
don't
know
if,
if
nuria
can
demand
that
we
get
vaccinated
or
get
tested,
but
I
think
it
would
be
helpful
if
we
all
just
may
be
committed
to
that,
and
then
you
know,
I
I
think
for
two
meetings
for
sure.
A
A
But
even
if
not
my
dad
is
a
retired
surgeon,
and
he
continually
reminds
me
when
I
complain
about
wearing
masks
that,
like
he
had
to
stand
up
10
hours
a
day,
often
in
stressful
situations
wearing
a
mask,
and
so
I
I
should
not
complain.
You
know
when
I'm
doing
it
sitting
down
so
we'll
try
and
carry
that
spirit
forward
and
wear
the
mask
if
we
need
to.
But
I
think
it
would
be
great
to
see
you
all
those
that
are
that
are
exiting
one
last
time
in
chamber.
C
Ask
a
clarifying
question:
rachel.
You
put
all
the
thoughts
out
around
either
vaccination
or
testing,
but
if
there's
council
members
who
want
to
do
this
hybrid,
I
assume
that
you're
only
talking
about
the
ones
who
will
be
there
in
person
correct.
A
That
is
correct
and
I
you
know
it
was
a.
It
just
occurred
to
me
that
we
could
be
vaccinated
and
still
test
like
we
have
these
15-minute
tests
now
that
are
free
and
available
that
we
can
either
order
on
our
own,
or
I
think
the
city
could
order.
A
You
know
to
have
available
and
if
we
all
test
you
know
and
then
in
15
minutes
before
we
go
in
or
whatever
then
there's
some
extra
level
of
security
that
we're
not
putting
anyone
else
at
risk
and
obviously
other
other
organizations
are
just
you
know,
working
in
real
life
a
lot.
So
we're
probably
doing
a
lot
of
of
heightened
consideration
here,
but
I
think
that
that
there
are
also
some
some
situations
where
people
do
just
test.
You
know
weekly,
so
we
could
do
that.
G
Well,
I
just
have
a
question
for
rachel:
I've
never
done
the
testing
and
I'm
wondering
what
does
that
entail?
Is
it
the
nasal?
It's.
A
A
it's
a
fair
question:
you
don't
want
the
brain
stab
right,
so
it
is
a
nasal
test,
but
it's
not
like
the
the
like
that
hits
your
brain
version
of
it.
So
it's
it's
one
that
like
because
we
we
have
some
my
husband
qualified
as
a
as
a
physician
for
it.
You
know
a
while
ago.
So
it's
it's
just
that,
like
you
know
not
into
the
far
recesses,
but
it's
a
nasal
thing
that
you
then
it's
very
easy
to.
A
You
know
you
put
like
six
drops
in
a
in
a
I
don't
know.
Is
anybody
else?
Can
anybody
else
help
me
with
this?
Unlike
a
little
piece
of
cardboard,
and
then
you
slide
the
nasal
thing
under
it
and
you
just
close
it
for
15
minutes.
It's
it's
a
bit
like
a
home
pregnancy
test.
If
I,
if
that's
not
offensive
to
say
easy
to
read
easy
to
to
take.
C
So
I
I
think
what
I'm
hearing
is
consensus
around
bob's
idea,
which
is
that
we
plan
on
being
in
person
on
the
ninth
and
on
the
16th.
C
We
ask
the
next
council
to
please
be
in
person
on
the
16th,
but
that
that
is
a
strong
encouragement
to
council
members,
but
not
a
requirement
because
we'll
set
up
hybrids,
so
any
council
members
who
choose
to
can
attend
via
hybrid.
So
I
think
that's
a
consensus.
I've
got
and
the
good
news
is,
if
we
say
that's
a
consensus
tonight,
we
can
change
our
mind
for
three
weeks
before
we're
really
committing
ourselves.
So
does
anyone
disagree
with
that
summary?
C
Okay,
very
good,
with
adam.
AB
Yeah
real
quick
before
we
move
down
from
that
I
I
did
have
a
request
for
the
last
study
session,
which
is
the
ninth
I
believe
correct.
Currently,
I
know
juni
is
on
the
calendar
as
leading
it,
but
I
was
wondering
if,
since
it's
my
last
possible
study
session,
if
she
wouldn't
mind
me
leading
that
one,
especially
because
there's
a
chance,
she
may
be
a
major
part
of
that
meeting.
So.
C
I
I
will
take
that
to
cac
adam
and
juni
is
on
cac,
so
she
can
weigh
in
on
that
at
cse,
and
I
think
that
would
be
fine.
The
only
fly
in
the
ointment
could
be
if
we
turn
it
into
a
meeting.
AB
Search
case
yeah,
so
you're
you're.
It
then.