►
From YouTube: Boulder City Council Meeting 3-8-22
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
D
B
All
right
we
got
bob
here
so
that
gives
us
full
council.
I
understand
we
are
online
as
well.
So
let's
get
things
started.
Welcome
everyone
to
the
tuesday
march
8th,
welcome
everyone
to
the
tuesday
march,
8th
special
meeting
of
the
boulder
city,
council
and
alicia.
Should
we
call
the
roll
alicia.
E
B
Except
my
zoom
minimized
itself:
okay,
let's
go
with
the
slides
right,
covered,
19
testing
vaccinations,
so
testing
for
information
and
provider
locations
for
free
code,
19
testing,
please
go
to
www.boco.org
testing.
The
boulder
site
is
at
2445.
Stasio
drive
it's
open
seven
days
a
week
from
8
am
to
6
pm
and
for
vaccine
information
and
provider
locations.
You
can
go
to
www.voco.org
covet
vaccine.
B
Boards
and
commissions
well
annual
recruitment
is
closed
and
in
fact
we
are
talking
about
who
is
going
to
get
appointed
to
the
boards
tonight.
But
there
are
a
few
boards
that
did
not
get
an
adequate
number
of
applications,
so
these
are
still
open.
B
They
are
boulder
junction
access
district
parking,
as
well
as
the
travel
demand
management
board,
board
of
zoning
adjustment,
the
cannabis
licensing,
advisory
board,
the
design
advisory
board
and
the
university
hill
commercial
area
management.
Commission.
A
number
of
those
do
have
specific
requirements
for
residency
or
professions.
B
Final
announcement
for
tonight,
price,
couching,
colorado
law,
prohibits
charging
excessive
prices
for
certain
essential
products,
goods
or
services
during
a
disaster
period.
It
makes
clear
that
such
price
gouging
is
a
deceptive
trade
practice
under
the
colorado
consumer
protection
act.
So
if
you
witness
price
gouging
or
you
think
you
might
be
the
victim
of
price
gouging,
please
file
a
report
with
the
attorney
general's
office
at
800-222-4444.
E
F
D
E
G
B
B
So
we
have
item
two
items
that
we
would
like
to
add
item
one:
a
a
declaration
for
recognizing
arts
week
and
item
one
b
declaration
for
international
women's
day.
B
B
Seeing
no
objections,
the
agenda
is
duly
amended
and
with
that
amendment
we
can
launch
right
into
the
declaration
regarding
arts
week
and
I
believe
council
member
focus
will
be
reading
this.
H
Thank
you,
aaron
boulder
arts
week
is
going
into
its
ninth
straight
year
and
it
is
the
city's
only
large-scale
inclusive
celebration
of
our
communities,
artists
and
robust
arts
and
cultural
offerings.
Boulder's
boulder
arts
week
2022
will
feature
digital
and
in-person
offerings
as
artists
and
art
organizations
continue
to
adjust
to
the
pandemic.
H
It
also
generates
important
ancillary
spending
by
tourists
and
residents
at
local
restaurants,
bars.
Retailers
and
hotels,
arts
and
cultures
are
also
an
economic
engine
in
their
own
right.
According
to
the
national
endowment
for
the
arts,
the
arts
sector
contributes
16.3
billion
to
colorado's
economy
socially
and
economically.
The
arts
and
culture
sector
remain
at
significant
risk
from
the
covid19
cross
crisis.
H
Losses
have
been
staggering
due
to
restriction,
venue,
closures
and
widespread
event:
cancellations
in
the
denver
metro
region,
the
economic
impact
of
arts
and
culture.
Non-Profits
fell
49
in
2020
from
record
highs.
In
2019.,
employment
fell
by
almost
10
000
jobs
or
28.
This
is
the
equivalent
to
a
decade
of
growth
in
this
sector.
H
H
It
will
be
vital
to
boulder
as
we
come
together
again
after
prolonged
social
distancing
loss
and
polar
polarization.
The
arts
foster
beauty,
originality
and
vitality
to
the
benefit
of
all
of
connecting
all
members
of
the
boulder
community.
We,
the
city
council
of
the
city
of
boulder,
declare
march
25th
april,
2nd
2022
as
boulder
arts
week.
B
I
Thank
you
mayor
each
year,
international
women's
day
offers
an
opportunity
for
us
to
celebrate
the
many
social,
economic,
cultural
and
political
achievements
of
women.
Women
of
every
race,
class
ability,
sexuality,
age
and
ethnic
background
have,
and
continue
to
contribute
to
the
growth
and
strength
of
our
city,
state
country
and
the
world
in
countless
recorded
and
unrecorded
ways.
I
Despite
these
contributions,
the
role
of
women
in
our
past
and
present
continues
to
be
overlooked
and
undervalued,
particularly
for
women
of
color,
transgender
women
and
other
women
in
the
lgbt
community.
Disabled
women,
immigrant
women,
older
women,
lower
income,
women
and
women
without
a
formal
education,
women
and
girls
continue
to
lead
the
fight
against
voter
suppression,
the
abolitionist
movement,
the
labor
movement,
civil
rights
campaigns,
climate
activism,
gun
violence,
prevention,
advocacy
for
missing
and
murdered
indigenous
women,
the
struggle
for
transgender
rights
and
so
much
other
work
to
create
a
more
just
and
equitable
society.
For
all.
B
J
Thanks
so
much
mayor
and
so
happy
to
be
doing
it
on
international
women's
day.
Let
me
lift
that
up
all
the
time
right.
I
wanted
to
recognize
that
this.
J
For
the
first
time,
we
made
some
major
changes
to
the
long-standing
process
and
that
when
you
do
that,
that
can
have
its
own
growing
pains
but
we're
proud
of
the
results
of
our
improved
boarding
commission's
interview
process,
the
team
set
out
to
address
several
challenges
with
the
old
approach,
a
lack
of
individual
attention
for
applicants,
a
sort
of
repetitive
nature
of
group
interview
responses,
limitations
to
participate
when
interviews
took
place
all
on
one
evening
in
council
chambers,
one-way
questions
and
responses.
J
That
did
not
allow
applicants
to
ask
questions
to
learn
more
about
surveying
and
a
great
a
greater
variety
of
more
meaningful
interview.
Questions
thanks
to
the
exceptional
work
of
two
of
our
great
women
leaders
and
city
council,
council
members,
folkers
and
winer,
and
support
from
a
cross-departmental
staff
team
participation
by
all
of
council.
I'm
happy
to
share
that
early
feedback
indicates.
J
Not
the
city's
time
necessarily
and
anecdotal
feedback
during
the
week
of
interview,
showed
applicants
appreciation
for
getting
direct
attention
and
interest
during
their
interview
from
council
and
staff
members
we're
going
to
continue
to
strive
to
make
all
support
process
to
boards
and
commissions,
more
inclusive
and
supportive
of
our
city
goals,
and
look
forward
to
beginning
the
next
phase
of
conversation
with
you
in
late
april.
But
for
tonight's
appointments.
I
will
turn
the
meeting
over
to
another
phenomenal
woman
leader
elisha.
J
E
Thank
you
for
that
nuria
and
thank
you,
council
and
good
evening.
I
would
also
like
to
just
take
this
moment
to
introduce
my
support
team
with
me.
That'll
help
me
keep
track
of
everything
tonight
and
make
sure
we
document
accurately
your
wishes.
E
E
E
E
E
E
Next,
we
have
our
downtown
management
commission
seat.
Two
is
for
a
resident
to
be
appointed
for
a
five-year
term
through
march
31st,
2027
and
seat.
Three
is
appointing
a
member
to
an
unexpired
one-year
term
through
331
2023,
and
that
appointment
must
be
a
property
owner
or
a
representative
of
a
property
owner
in
the
downtown
management.
Commission,
I'm
sorry
the
downtown
management
area.
We
currently
have
jim
freeman,
who
meets
the
seat,
two
residency
requirements
and
justin
calvin
who
meets
the
seat
to
residency
requirement.
E
Next,
your
environmental
advisory
board
seat
two
is
to
appoint
resident
to
a
five-year
term
through
331-27
and
seat.
Five
is
appointing
a
resident
to
an
unexpired
three-year
term.
Through
331-2025,
we
have
applying
brooke
brockett
chloe,
constant
thomas
crane,
paul
coonan
jack
staccalo
duncan
gilchrist
amanda
groszek,
who
also
applied
to
tab.
E
Please
excuse
me
if
I
pronounced
any
of
those
names
wrong.
Next,
we
have
the
boulder
housing
authority.
We
have
see
three
seats
available
on
this
board.
We
have
seat
two,
which
is
appointing
a
residence
to
a
five
year
term
through
three
thirty
one.
Twenty
seven.
We
have
the
same
stipulations
for
seat
four
and
seat
six.
E
E
E
E
Open
space
boards
of
trustees
has
one
seat
open
to
appoint
a
residence
to
a
five-year
term
through
331-27
we
have
applying
john
carroll,
harold
halstein,
who
is
a
current
member
and
was
appointed
eight
to
2019,
and
he
is
currently
in
seat.
Two
ben
cadlick,
joel
cohen,
michael
nelson
kevin
rice,
ariel
show
spur
again
who
applied
to
tab,
brigger,
tomlin
and
andrew
trees,
mr
trees
applied
also
to
the
prat,
our
planning
board.
We
have
three
seats
available
seats.
Two
and
three
will
appoint
a
residence
to
a
five
year
term
through
three
thirty
one.
E
Twenty
seven
and
seat
five
appoints
a
resident
to
the
unexpired
two
year
term,
through
three
thirty
one
that
must
be
a
typo.
So
that
would
be
three
thirty
one.
Twenty
six.
We
will
correct
that
we
have
paul
cureplaying
mary
h,
cooper,
ellis
stephen
hennessy
lauren
kaplan,
mark
mcintyre,
who
is
currently
serving
on
tab
since
331-23.
E
H
E
E
E
Our
transportation
advisory
board
has
one
seat
open,
which
is
seat
two
and
that
will
be
to
appoint
a
resident
to
a
five-year
term
through
three
twenty
one.
Twenty-Seven,
we
have
a
rebecca
davies,
amanda
grossiac,
which
also
applied
to
eab
stephen
haydale
heather
house,
who
did
not
show
up
for
her
interview,
david
marchus,
gary
mcclellan,
mary
morrissey,
jamie
pledger,
megan
ricker,
ariel
slosper,
who
applied
to
osbt
tan
tom
souvenir,
who
applied
to
prabh
maria
trini
willerton
and
jonathan
woodard.
E
E
E
B
Appreciate
that
perfect,
okay,
so-
and
that
was
extremely
helpful
thanks
for
that
so
now
I
will
open
the
public
hearing
and
elisha.
Do
we
have
anyone
sign
up
for
that
public
hearing.
E
B
Interesting
well,
in
that
case,
I
will
close
the
public
hearing
and
bring
it
to
city
council
for
discussion.
So
I'll
make
a
few
points
and
guidelines
here.
One
is
to
note
about
recusals.
I
do
have
a
family
member
applying
to
the
environmental
advisory
board.
So
when
that
board
comes
up,
I
will
hand
the
virtual
gavel
over
to
mayor
pretend
friend
to
conduct
that
board
and
then
rachel.
I
will
turn
off
my
camera
and
turn
off.
My
screen
leave
the
room
rachel
field.
B
Just
text
me
when
that
board
is
done,
and
I
will
pop
back
in
again
and
take
it
from
there
and
then
tara
also
has
a
family
member
applying
to.
I
believe
it's
open
space
and
parks.
So
chair.
If
you
don't
mind,
when
we
get
to
those,
you
can
do
the
same
turn
off
the
camera,
leave
the
room
and
I'll
text
you
when
we
finish
those
boards
and
you
can
come
back
in
and
then
procedurally,
I
think
we're
going
to
work
our
way
through
board
by
board
alphabetically.
B
B
People
can
make
nominations
of
whoever
they
want
and
then
we'll
have
our
straw
poll
on
that
and
then
someone
will
be
selected
and
then
I'll
move
on
to
the
two-year
term
and
we'll
take
nominations
for
the
two-year
term
straw
poll
on
that
and
then
move
on
to
the
next
board.
Does
that
work
for
folks?
Does
anybody
have
any
complaints
about
that
or
concerns?
B
Okay,
very
good,
and
then
I'm
thinking
that
we
probably
want
to
have
those
slides
up
so
that
we
are
all
looking
at
the
the
full
information
and
then
what
I
would
ask
is
when
I
call
after
I
we
do
nominations
for
each
seat
and
I
call
for
a
straw
poll
that
you
do
the
raise
hand,
function
and
zoom
for
your
desired
candidate.
So
let's
try
to
be
pretty
efficient
about
that.
B
But
let's
say
in
this:
let's
say
that
that
barbara
bronco
were
nominated
and
would
have
beer
just
to
be
totally
random.
The
first
two
names,
so
I
would
say,
who's
for
barbara
bronk.
Everyone
who's
interested
raises
their
virtual
hand
would
register
it.
Then
you'd
lower
your
virtual
hand,
and
I
would
ask
for
votes
for
gwyneth
burak
and
I'm
happy
to
take
input.
I
see
alicia
and
rachel
have
their
hands
up.
E
E
Take
it
from
there,
if
you
don't
mind,
no,
that's
fine.
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
I
wasn't
missing
something
yeah
thanks.
A
I
just
wanted
to
make
the
point
that
the
first
year
we
did
this
on
zoom
and
we,
I
think
we
used
the
raised
hand,
function
function,
we
didn't
read
it
in
to
you
know,
read
it
out
for
members
of
the
public,
so
I
think
we
got
some
some
feedback
from
journalists
that
we
we
needed
to
take
our
time
and
make
sure
that
that
we
could
be
transparent,
because
members
of
the
public
can't
see
the
hand
raised
function
so
just
make
sure
we
build
that
in.
I.
B
Appreciate
that
and
rachel,
if
it's,
if
it's
okay,
what
I'll
do
is
I'll
record
the
number
of
people
for
each
candidate,
although
not
call
out
all
the
names
of
who
voted
if
that
works.
So
like,
let's
say,
barbara
got
three
votes,
I'd,
say:
okay,
that's
three
votes
for
barbara
now:
lower
your
hands
and
how
many
votes
for
what.
A
B
B
E
E
E
If
one
person
is
nominated
for
a
seat,
that
appointment
will
stand
and
there
are
no.
If
there
are
no
objections,
if
more
than
one
person
is
nominated
for
the
same
seat,
we
have
a
specific
process
for
narrowing
the
candidates
down
to
one
finalist.
A
vote
of
support
will
be
held
for
each
individual.
Nominated
candidates
must
receive
a
minimum
of
five
votes
to
be
declared
the
finalists
for
a
vacant
seat.
E
E
E
E
B
Thank
you
alicia.
I
appreciate
that
and
I'm
as
I'm
thinking
about
it,
I
can
actually
see
you
all
quite
well
through
the
videos,
so
it
might
be
easier
and
a
little
quicker
if
people
just
actually
physically
raise
a
hand.
So
I
think
I
can
see
that
just
fine
and
then
we
don't
have
to
hassle
with
the
raising
and
lowering
the
virtual
hands.
Is
that
all
right
with
people?
B
Okay,
great
so
then
we'll
just
need
to
make
sure
and
keep
your
video
on
and
raise.
Raise
your
hand,
keep
your
hand
up
until
I've
said
everyone's
name
for
a
candidate.
If
you
don't
mind
and
then
you
can
lower
your
physical
hand
all
right,
so
I
think
alicia.
I
believe
we
start
with
a
coin
flip
to
see
if
we're
going,
alphabetically
or
universe.
E
B
Okay,
we'll
we'll
trust
you
on
that
one
alicia,
usually
we
like
hold
it
up,
it
is,
but
I
I
know
your
your
integrity
is
without
challenge.
So
thank
you
for
that.
So
we'll
we'll
start,
that's
that'll
be
for
the
voting
by
the
way.
That's
not
we'll
take
nominations
for
whomever
people
want
to
nominate.
So,
but
when
we
start
the
voting,
the
straw
polls,
it
will
be
start
with
reverse
alphabetical.
B
B
B
F
B
I
you
know
people,
let
me
just
say
this:
we
could
spend
all
night
talking
about
the
different
candidates,
so
I
mean
people
can.
Certainly,
I
think
when
you
when
you
nominate,
I
think
you're
certainly
welcome
to
say
a
few
words
about
the
reason
why
you're
nominating
candidate
so
I'll
just
put
that
out.
There
feel
free,
as
you
nominate
to
say,
a
few
words,
but
it
is
optional.
We've
all
read
the
packets
we've
watched
the
interviews
and
we
know
the
amazing
qualities
that
these
folks
have
so
I'll
just
say.
B
B
Okay,
beverage
licensing
authority,
this
one-
it
is
a
little
tricky
because
it
is
required
by
our
code
that
one
of
the
appointments
be
someone
who
does
not
identify
as
male
and
currently,
I
think
if
we
appointed
michael
carr
and
noah
westby,
everyone
on
the
board
would
identify
as
male,
which
is
against
our
code.
So
hey
bob,
do
you
want
to
say
something
to
this.
B
Which
is
great
but
legit,
let's
just
say
that
that
lisa
is
essentially
guaranteed
a
seat,
and
so
just
wanna
make
sure
people
are
okay
with
that,
because
we
were
trying
to
hold
the
boards
open.
Until
we
had
a
number
of
there
was
a
multi.
There
were
multiple
options
for
every
board,
so
I
just
want
to
make
sure
everybody's
fine
with
that
map.
N
I
mean
I
mute
yeah,
so
I'm
glad
you
said
that
aaron
I
was
more
of
a.
It
was
a
question
about
process
just
because
we're
trying
not
to
have
one
person
for
one
seat,
and
so
I
didn't
know
if
we
wanted
to
agree
to
sort
of
broaden
out
the
field.
But
if
that's
not
the
case,
I
will
just
say
I'm
going
to
make
a
nomination
for
michael
carr
on
this
great.
H
Just
from
the
boards
and
committee
side,
you
know
we
did
talk
about
holding
open
any
seats
where
there
was
not
choice.
That
was
sort
of
a
specific
directive.
Council
gave
us
in
the
last
meeting,
and
this
would
be
the
only
seat
that
we
will
look
at
tonight
in
which
one
of
the
seats
does
not
really
have
a
choice.
M
Thanks,
we've
never
done
that
before
we
certainly
have
held
open
for
sometimes
we
hold
open
boards
when
we
have
the
same
number
of
applicants
as
seats.
Sometimes
we
just
think
the
applicant
is
just
better
than
a
can
of
peaches
and
we
go
ahead
and
point
that
person
anyway.
So
there's
no
rule
on
that.
I
think
there's
some
tradition
of
sometimes
keeping
open,
sometimes
keeping
it
not.
This
is
a
little
different
than
that.
M
This
is
a
situation
where
we
need
a
woman
to
fell
asleep
because
they're
all
guys
on
the
board
right
now
and
we
have
a
woman
who
is
qualified
to
serve
on
the
seat,
and
I
don't
think
I've
ever
seen
my
this
is
my
seventh
boarding
commission
process.
I
don't
think
we've
ever
declined,
appointing
a
person
because
of
their
gender.
That's
kind
of
a
weird
thing,
especially
when
that
person
has
the
gender
that
we
need.
So
I
I
stand
by
my
nomination
of
lisa
spaulding
she's
qualified
she's
actually
served
on
the
bla
many
many
years
ago.
M
M
A
It's
fair
point
bob
makes
you
know
I
I
do
think
we
want
to
be
consistent
with
what
we're
doing
so.
I
I
appreciate
bob
that
we
haven't
done
this
before
and
and
definitely
appreciate
like
it's
a
little
bit.
I
mean
I
I
think.
Maybe
we
need
to
just
go
back
and
and
re-look
at
our
rules
all
together
on
what
we're
requiring
in
in
seats
but
yeah.
We
are
changing
things
this
year.
E
A
A
Just
one
more,
I
guess
for
like
for
all
of
these
we're
holding
open-
and
maybe
this
is
just
one
where
we
just
don't
decide
what
to
do
with
this
board
tonight
and
and
come
back
to
it
overall
and
and
and
figure
it
out
in.
In
a
conversation
with
like
we
have
these
open
seats
or
non-competitive
seats.
I
guess
and-
and
I
don't
think
we
want
a
terribly
long
timeline,
because
that
just
doesn't
seem
fair
to
applicants
who
you
know
may
be.
A
B
G
Mayor
brockett
teresa
taylor,
tate
city
attorney,
the
code
does
require
gender
diversity
so
that
we
have
at
least
that
no
board
is
comprised
of
all
one
gender.
That's
the
only
requirement
here.
There
is
not
a
requirement
to
have
a
competitive
process,
necessarily
for
a
seat,
so
you
could.
You
could
appoint
with
only
one
applicant
if
that
was
the
wish
of
counsel.
That's
helpful.
B
All
right,
nicole,
tara
and
mark-
and
let's
try
to
figure
this
out
pretty
quick.
I
I
can
I
can
be
quick.
What
I'm
thinking
about
right
now
are
the
folks
who
applied
for
other
boards,
where
there
was
only
one
applicant
and
we
decided
to
not
kind
of
consider
them
and
discuss
them
and
think
about
them
right
now,
and
so
to
me,
this
feels
like
a
very
analogous
situation
and
if
one
of
those
folks
who
was
one
person
applying
to
a
board,
calls
me
tomorrow
and
says,
hey
nicole,
what
happened?
I
I'm
not
going
to
have
an
answer
for
them,
because
I
I
just
I
to
me
those
are
very
analogous
situations
and
I
think
we
we
need
to
decide
when
we
already
decided.
So
for
me,
this
feels
like
just
extending
the
decision
we
made
when
we
first
talked
about
it
and
and
just
holding.
I
B
K
I
do
want
to
say
for
the
other
seat
that
I
don't
feel
it's
fair
to
michael
or
noah
to
have
to
wait.
I
don't
I'm
hoping
that
we
can
do
at
least
that
seat,
no
matter
what
we
decide
on
the
other
one
since
they've
been
extremely
patient,
and
that
would
be
that
would
be.
I
don't
think
it
would
be
fair
to
keep
that
open.
Since
we
have
two
applicants,
I
think
we
should
go
ahead
with
that
scene.
K
I'm
gonna,
I'm
gonna,
wait
to
hear
from
the
rest
of
council
and
I'm
more
opinionated
about
the
first
thing.
Yeah.
L
Mark,
why
could
we
not
simply
go
through
the
applicants,
see
where
sentiment
of
council
lies
for
two
seats
and
lisa
may
or
may
not
be
among
those
two
applicants,
but
if
she's
not,
then
we
can
hold
that
seat
open.
She
might
well
be
on
a
competitive
basis.
A
selection
of
this
council
in
a
three-way
race
is
that
creating
an
impediment
that
we.
B
Let's
see
but
mark,
we
were
not
allowed
to
pick
both
of
the
men,
because
that
would
make
a
board
consisting
only
of
men,
so.
B
A
Meg
colloquy,
on
that
I
I
hear
what
you're
saying
mark
and
it
makes
it
makes
sense.
So
I
just
I
just
want
to
say
I
follow
it
and
you
know
we
did.
I
think
somebody
just
said
like
we
have
two
candidates
for
that,
like
we
actually
have
three
candidates
for
two
seats,
so
I
think
that's
correct.
We
have
a.
We
have
three
candidates
that
it
could
be
like.
A
It's
almost
like
we're,
pre,
saying:
lisa's
not
going
to
get
those
seats
which
isn't
at
all
fair
to
the
candidate
to
say
like
she
would
only
get
the
second
seat.
So
I
I
I
hear
you
mark,
and
I
agree
with
it
like
this
discussion-
is
only
relevant
if
she's
not
a
top
choice
for
either
of
those
two
seats.
B
I
I
I
guess
I
guess
so
I
just
and
the
second
one.
I
guess
you're
saying
that
we
would
consider
the
the
the
man
who
didn't
get
the
first
seat
as
well
as
lisa,
and
if
we
selected
the
man,
then
we
say
well,
but
we
can't
do
that
and
then
we
hold
it
open.
B
Interesting:
okay,
bob.
M
Yeah,
so
I
kind
of
lost
the
plot
here,
because
we
do
have
a
four-year
term
and
a
five-year
term,
and
I
I'm
not
sure
that
we
can
appoint
a
man
to
one
of
those
terms
without
mis
disrespecting
the
woman.
Whoever
that
is
would
be
appointed
because
I
don't
know
how
we
could
do
that.
I
mean,
if
you
want
all
the
candidates
to
be
nominated
for
a
four
five
year
term
and
a
four-year
term.
That's
fine!
M
But
I'm
just
commenting,
I
guess
on
on
tara's
point
of
just
appointing
the
man,
because
I
don't
demand
to
what,
before
your
term
or
the
five-year
term.
I
do
find
a
little
ironic
we're
having
this
discussion
moments
after
nicole
wrote
that
lovely
decoration
about
women
and
women
in
positions
of
power,
and
we
have
a
qualified
woman
who
would
provide
gender
diversity.
So
it's
a
little
puzzling
to
me
that
we're
grappling
with
this
one,
but
whatever
the
willow
council
is
I've
nominated
lisa.
You
all
can
vote
or
not
vote
as
you
wish.
B
All
right:
well,
this
is
clear's
mud,
so
I
think
our
options
are
to
proceed
tonight
or
to
hold
the
seat
open,
I
think,
is
basically
I
don't
know
about
vote
or
to
hold
the
board
seats
open.
I
don't
know
about
voting
for
a
man
that
can't
serve
like
that's,
I'm
not
sure
that
that's
a
path
we
can
take,
so
I
I
guess
I
would
what
I
would
suggest
would
be
a
a
straw
poll
for,
like
a
will
of
counsel
about
whether
we
want
to
hold
one
of
these
seats
open.
B
N
Yes,
I
guess
to
help
maybe
clarify
action
forward,
so
I
my
proposal
would
be
that
we
select
one
of
these
seats
because
we'll
be
handicapping
the
bla
until
we
fill
them
anyway
and
being
down
two
people.
I
think
on
a
on
already
a
short
board.
So
I
think
we
should
go
ahead
and
nominate
since
we've
got
two
men
for
technically
one
seat,
because
the
other
seat
has
to
be
reserved
for
for
someone
who's,
not
a
man.
N
So
so
I
think
we
go
ahead
and
nominate
the
one
seat
and
then
we
by
by
the
will,
decide
whether
to
leave
open
or
appoint
lisa
on
the
other.
But
I
think
we
bifurcate
the
one
seat
that
we
can
appoint
because
we
have
the
candidates
to
fill
it.
N
And
then
we
separate
a
separate
discussion
to
decide
whether
to
nominate
and
vote
on,
lisa
or
or
to
leave
that
particular
seat
open
with
the
very
narrow
requirements
that
it
be
specifically
for
gender
gender
diversity
for
this
board,
and
that
way
it
can
sort
of
narrow
the
scope
on
potential
candidates
versus
opening
both
up.
Then
we're
going
to
get
more
men,
more
women
and
others
coming
in,
and
then
that
sort
of
then
kind
of
muddies
the
water
again
and
maybe
isn't
fair
to
michael
and
noah.
Who
who
meet
that.
B
M
Ahead
and
then
I'm
going
to
yeah,
I'm
going
to
disagree
with
matt,
because
so
so
are
we
gonna
give
the
guy
a
five
year
seat
and
leave
the
junior
seat
the
four
year
seat
for
a
woman?
That
feels
really
really
weird
to
me.
So
I
I
think
I
find
aaron
with
with
having
a
vote
about
keeping
it
open
or
not
keeping
open,
but
I
think
it's
all
or
nothing.
I
think
it's
keep
both
seats
open
or
appoint
both
seats.
Tonight.
M
I
don't
think
we
can
say,
let's,
let's
give
the
guy
a
five-year
seat
and
leave
that
four-year
seat
for
for
some
woman.
That
doesn't
feel
very
nice
to
me
at
all.
So
I
think
it's
all
open
or
all
closed,
not
let's
appoint
the
guy's
seat
tonight,
because
I
don't
know
which
seats
the
guys
see.
Let's
get
to.
B
Pick:
okay,
I
got
rachel.
A
I
wonder
if
theresa
had
any
guidance
for
us
on
what
we
must
do.
You
know,
and
I
guess
I'm
a
little
confused
because
I
think
we're
in
this
position,
because
a
woman
resigned,
and
so
I
assume
this
board
is
operating
as
an
all
male
identifying
board
right
now,
and
so
does
that
mean
that
the
yeah
that
the
yeah
I
just
would
like
teresa's
input
if
possible,.
G
I'm
afraid
I
don't
have
any
sage
words
for
you
at
the
moment.
I
wish
I
wish
I
did
this.
Is
this
isn't
contemplated
under
the
boards
and
commissions
portion
of
our
code
and
and
so
unfortunately,
I
I
think
you
know
you
are
hashing
out
the
potential
options
and-
and
I
don't
have
any
legal
basis
to
say
that
you
have
to
proceed
one
way
or
another.
B
Here's
what
I'm
going
to
suggest,
I'm
going
to
suggest
that
we
we
appoint.
We
start
by
appointing
to
the
five-year
term,
which
could
be
any
of
the
three
applicants
and
then
we
have.
Then
we
have
a
seat
filled.
If
lisa
wins
that
seat,
then
we
can
proceed
to
the
second
seat
and
choose
between
the
two
men.
B
If
a
man
wins
the
seat,
I
will
ask
council
very
quickly
to
decide
if
we
want
to
grant
the
second
seat
to
lisa
spalding
or
if
we
want
to
hold
the
board's
recruiting
open
for
a
small
number
of
weeks
to
see
if
another
female
applicant
is
available,
will
would
that
work
for
folks.
B
Okay,
so
then,
let's,
let's
start
over
again
all
right.
So
lo,
if
you
can
lower
your
hands,
let's
take
nominations
for
the
five-year
term,
considering
all
three
candidates
bob.
K
B
Others,
okay!
So
let's
let's
vote,
we
have
michael
carr
and
lisa
spaulding.
We
go
in
alphabetical
order,
so
votes
for
michael
carr.
B
B
I
I
am
now
going
to
put
on
the
table
the
whether
people
would
like
to
appoint
lisa
without
just
by
acclimation
or
hold
the
board
open
for
a
few
more
weeks.
So
all
those
in
favor
of
moving
forward
with
the
appointment
tonight.
B
And
I've
got
three
bob
mark
and
tara,
and
so
folks
who'd
like
to
leave
it
open
for
a
few
weeks,
all
right.
So
I
got
the
looks
like
the
rest
of
us,
so
that's
majority
decision
there
so
we'll
hold
the
the
recruiting
open
for
a
few
weeks.
I
just
wanted
to
say
so:
lisa
about
lisa
she's,
an
extremely
qualified
candidate.
This
is
in
no
way
a
knock
on
her
abilities,
but
we
have.
B
We
didn't
just
give
it
to
you,
but
we
did
just
give
this
with
one
option
to
someone
else
for
so
we'll
do
this
for
a
handful
of
weeks
and
then,
if
we
get
another
applicant,
we'll
consider
them
and
if
we
don't,
then
I
think
at
that
point
we
say
thanks
so
much
lisa
and
the
suit
sawyers
are
people
who
are
alright
with
that.
F
Sorry
I
am
making
this
comment
right
now
right
in
the
middle,
I
receive
a
message
in
a
cauldron
or
meeting
from
len
sego.
She
mentioned
that
she
during
the
public
hearing
or
public
comment
period.
She
tried
to
raise
her
hands,
but
the
rey's
hand
button
wasn't
working,
so
she
could
not
have.
She
didn't
have
the
opportunity
to
speak-
and
I
said,
okay
I'll
just
relay
that
information
to.
B
Council-
let's
see,
I
don't
know
that
she
signed
up
ahead
of
time.
I
don't
see
her
in
the
meeting
elisha.
Do
we
have
any
options
for
allowing
lynn
to
testify
at
this
point.
B
A
Well,
just
I
think,
if
we're
gonna
open
up
the
meeting
to
people
who
didn't
sign
up
in
advance,
we'd
need
to
somehow
telegraph
that
to
anybody
else
who
might
want
to
also
speak
and
so
well.
I
would
love
to
give
lynn
the
opportunity
to
speak
to
this.
If
we
had
a
process
in
place,
I
don't
think
we
can.
I
I'm
just
leery
of
breaking
it
in
the
middle
of
a
meeting,
and
other
people
won't
have
that
opportunity.
B
B
B
A
Love
to
and
and
please
staff
do
feel
free
to
remind
me
to
text
aaron
when
we're
done.
So
I
don't
get
power
hungry
here
and
continue.
A
Right
thanks:
okay,
so
we're
on
environmental
advisory
board.
We
have
a
two
seats:
one's
seat,
number
two
resident
for
a
five
year
term
through
2020
through
march
2027,
second
seat,
five
unexpired
partial
three-year
term
through
2025..
A
So
we'll
start
with
the
five-year
seat.
Can
I
see
hands
for
who
would
like
to
make
a
nomination.
A
A
A
L
I
I
would
like
to
nominate
amanda,
and
I
also
just
want
to
take
the
opportunity
just
to
comment
only
how
excited
I
am
that
there
are
so
many
young
folks
who
have
applied
to
our
boards
this
time
around,
and
I
think
amanda
was
one
of
ours
for
me.
F
A
A
Okay,
tara,
you're.
I
M
Bob,
I
don't
have
an
additional
nominee.
These
are
great
nominees,
but
I
was
like
a
process
suggestion,
let's,
if,
if
the
nominations
are
closed,
let's
vote
on
these
for
the
five
year
term
and
then
without
don't
don't
highlight
their
names
and
then
whoever
doesn't
get
appointed
to
the
five-year
term.
Let's
consider
the
remaining
highlighted
people
for
the
three-year
term.
Obviously
we
can
reopen
nominations
briefly.
If
anyone
wants
to
add
a
name
for
the
three-year
term,
but
I
would
just
suggest
for
sake
of
speed,
we
can.
A
Great
okay,
so
that
makes
sense
to
me
and
any
objections
to
bob's
suggestion.
We'll
leave
these
nominations
up
for
round
two
great
okay:
elisha
are
we
are
we
at
a
coin
flip
moment
here.
A
Okay,
so
show
of
hands
for
votes
for
mr
ho.
A
Okay,
graham
hill
show
of
hands,
junie
kathleen
hancock.
A
Mark
wallach
one
amanda,
agroziak,
tara
and
nicole,
that's
two!
I
I'm
gonna
go
ahead
and
vote
for
amanda
as
well,
so
I
will
make
that
three
duncan
gilchrist.
A
A
Eric,
that's
a
that's
a
violation.
I
don't
know
if
you
have
to
turn
your
camera
off
or
like
I
get
to
ref
this
okay,
so
I
believe
that
was
one
vote
and
that
was
for
chloe
and
last
brook
rocket.
A
One
vote
junior-
and
this
is
your
one
vote
for
this
round-
not
a
second
vote
right.
E
E
A
Still
on
the
same
board,
great,
please
raise
your
hand
for
jimmy.
As
your
first
five-seat
round
vote
jimmy,
I
see
lauren
and
matt
show
of
hands
for
amanda
roziak.
A
A
I
think
if
you
didn't
vote
for
for
this,
if
you'd
like
to
go
back
and
vote,
if
there's
any
confusion
here,
which
I
will
take
full
blame
for,
if
there
is
like
how
did
I
get
up
for
this?
One
hearts
looked
very
easy:
okay,
so
how
many
votes
did
we
get
total
for
that
round?
Six.
E
A
They
got
the
two:
they
were
the
two
top
vote
getters
in
the
last
round.
Yes,
we
just
narrowed
our
votes
to
them
for
this
round.
So
would
anybody
who
didn't
vote
like
to
vote
for,
let's
just
re-vote
again
now
that
we
all
understand
votes
again
for
jimmy
howe?
A
So
now
we're
going
to
vote
on
the
remaining
candidates
for
the
second
seat
for
the
three-year
term.
The
people
who
are
in
highlight
I'm
starting
again
at
the
bottom,
I
believe
with
jimmy
howe.
So
would
you
like
to
everybody
will
get
one
vote
for
this
round
of
applicants
with
one
two,
three,
four
five
six
applicants
left
so
who
would
like
to
vote
for
jimmy?
G
Mayor
pro
tem
friend,
I
wonder
if
you
would
like
to
briefly
reopen
nominations.
I
sure
would.
A
Are
there
any
additional
nominations
before
we
vote
for
the
second
candidate
applicant?
Seeing
none
thank
you
theresa.
We
will
now
start
again
are
there
who
would
like
to
vote
for
jimmy
howe
in
round
two
for
seat
five?
I
see
matt
and
lauren
graham
hill.
A
Juni
kathleen
hancock
see
tara
bob
and
mark
duncan
gilchrist.
A
I
do
not
see
any
votes,
chloe,
constant.
A
A
I
think
jimmy
also
got
two.
I
think
we
have
a
chance.
That's
true!
You
were
right.
Thank
you,
okay.
Yes,
so
we
will
start
again
with
votes
for
jimmy
howe
for
the
seat
number
five.
A
I'm
not
seeing
any
hands
lauren,
okay,
kathleen
hancock.
A
A
A
Okay,
right,
okay,
but
so
we
take
jimmy
out,
then,
is
that
right,
elisha.
A
A
Great
okay,
a
show
of
hands
round
27.
Would
you
like
to
vote
for
kathleen
hancock
for
the
seat?
Number
five
for
eab?
I
see
three
hands:
tara,
bob
and
mark.
I
appreciate
the
consistency,
a
show
of
hands
for
brook
brockett
for
eabc5.
A
N
Awesome
well,
thank
you.
So
it
was
said
earlier
and
I
just
bears
repeating.
This
is
a
bounty
of
riches
and
I
think
the
the
smirks
on
some
of
our
faces
are
just
that
we're
debating
over
a
lot
of
really
good
candidates,
and-
and
so
I
just
want
to
recognize
that-
and
this
won't
be
the
end-
there's
a
lot
of
really
good
candidates
throughout
our
our
boards
and
commission
nominations.
So
this
might
play
out
similarly
a
few
times
later
tonight,
but
just
credit
to
all
the
candidates.
It
was
just
about.
N
It's
been
a
bounty
of
riches,
and
so
just
just
happy
to
go
through
that
lengthy
process
to
arrive,
but
we're
in
good
hands.
I
A
little
bit
emotional
because
for
those
of
us
in
the
lgbt
community,
this
is
a
big
deal,
and
I
just
wanted
to
recognize
that,
especially
on
international
women's
day
that
we
just
appointed
the
very
first
transgender
person
in
boulder's
history
to
one
of
our
boards
and
commissions,
and
I
just
want
to
know
that
moment.
Thank
you.
B
There
he
is
yes,
yes,
you
did.
I
was
trying
to
come
in
after
all
of
it,
but
all
right
well
just
clear
up
a
little
bit
so,
okay,
moving
on
boulder
housing
authority,
all
right,
we've
got
three
five-year
seats.
Here
we
have
six
people
who
are
qualified
to
serve
in
those
three
seats.
A
Rachel
I'll
nominate,
jill,
grano.
B
N
I'm
gonna
nominate
mary
faltinsky.
B
B
Okay
votes
for
mary
foltinski.
B
Let's
see,
I
got
lauren
and
matt
and
jeannie
jill
grano.
B
B
B
Matt
and
lauren:
that's
two
jill
grano
all
right
got
rachel
genie,
aaron,
okay,
three
julie,
schoenfeld,
bob
nicole
and
mark
and
bob
walker
tara.
So
we
got
one,
oh
okay.
B
A
Aaron
I
I
should
state
that
we
did
amend
the
rules
a
bit
for
the
last
round.
I
would
say-
and
we
just
left
everybody
who
was
highlighted
in
the
running
for
for
the
the
second
and
third
for.
B
So
I
have
I
I
have
my
opportunity
to
vote
for
my
subs
program,
great,
so
for
this
first
seat,
only
we've
still
got
mary
jill
and
julie
in
the
running.
So
let's
go
reverse
alphabetical
for
this
vote.
I
believe
so
julie,
schoenfeld
we've
got
mark
nicole
lauren
and
bob
junior
you're
right.
F
I'm
just
wondering
why
are
we
voting
on
mary
as
well,
when
she
only
got
two,
I
thought
it
would
be
between
julie
and
jill.
E
B
B
B
B
I
I
was
just
wondering
I
know
this
was
a
little
bit
out
of
order,
but
I
forgot
that,
with
our
nominations,
we
had
a
chance
to
say
a
couple
words
about
the
person
we
nominated
and
I
know
bob
nominated
julie,
but
I
was
wondering
if
I
might
say
a
couple
words
about
her:
go
for
it.
Okay,
so
one
of
the
things
that
has
really
impressed
me
about
julie
and
her
service
is
the
degree
to
what
she
has
really
pushed
for
racial
equity
and
equity
in
general.
I
The
way
that
she
has
kind
of
leaned
on
boulder
housing
partners
to
to
do
equity
training,
for
example,
for
the
foundation
to
do
to
appoint
residents
to
the
board.
I
think
you
know
she's
got.
She
worked
on
a
racial
equity
plan.
For
you
know
me,
this
is
somebody
who
has
just
been
a
consistent
voice
for
equity,
and
I
just
I
greatly
appreciate
that
about
julian
honestly.
Her
conversational
spanish
is
much
better
than
mine
and
you
know
I.
I
B
L
L
However,
for
this
round,
I'm
also
going
to
make
a
nomination
for
bob
walker,
who
is
an
affordable
housing
developer
and
probably
knows
more
about
affordable
housing
than
anyone
in
this
city
other
than
perhaps
the
executive
director
of
bhp
himself.
L
B
B
Okay,
so
in
other
words,
we
don't
need
to
re-nominate
the
people
already
we're
just
asking
for
additional
nominations.
I
misunderstood
okay,
great
so
in
other
words,
then
we've
still
got
mary
julian
james
or
bob
under
consideration
for
this
round.
So
now
the
question
I'm
asking
is:
does
anyone
want
to
add
someone
to
that
list
of
three
nominations?
B
K
I
don't,
but
I
do
want
to
say
one
thing:
if
that's
okay,
mayor
that,
can
somebody
tell
me
now
how
many,
what
is
our,
how
many
men
versus
women
we
have
or
how
does
the
genders
look,
so
we
can
be
relatively
fair.
I'm
just
curious
about
that.
B
B
And
so
yeah,
so
that's
where
we
are
matt.
You
comment.
N
N
People
that
bhp's
mission
is
driven
by
and
and
and
the
medical
work
as
a
nurse
that
mary
does
is
exactly
that
and
so
having
anot
another
window
into
the
very
residence
that
bhp
serves,
I
think,
is
really
valuable,
especially
when
we
think
about
the
resident's
needs,
rather
than
just
building
the
housing
itself,
but
how
to
meet
the
needs
where
they
are
with
the
residents.
And
I
think
that
perspective
is
something
that's
not
quite
there
and,
and
she
would
really
bring
that
and
elevate
that
on
this
board,.
B
K
B
Okay-
and
you
should
remind
me,
are
we
alphabetically
reverse
at
this
point.
E
B
Alphabetical:
okay,
mary
foltinsky.
B
We
got
rachel
genie,
matt,
julie,
schoenfeld,.
B
Bob
lauren
mark
nicole
and
tara,
so
that's
five
and
then
I'm
the
the
bob
walker
vote
over
here
and
so
julie
gets
the
second
seat.
B
All
right
so
now
we've
got
mary
voltinski
and
bob
walker
up,
and
does
anyone
make
want
to
make
any
additional
nominations
for
this?
Third
seed
and
terry
you've
got
your
hand
up.
B
Okay,
seeing
no
additional
nominations
we'll
go
in
alphabetical
order,
I
believe
again
so
mary
feltinski,
we
got
nicole
lauren
rachel
junie,
nicole
lauren,
rachel
genie,
so4.
B
Okay,
so
that
gives
the
three
seats
go
to
jill,
grano,
julie,
schoenfeld
and
bob
walker,
and
thanks
to
everyone
who
applied.
B
B
I
I
think
I
mentioned
earlier
how
thrilled
I
was
that
we've
had
so
many
younger
folks
applying
to
our
boards,
and
I
think
julianne
is
another
one
of
those
who's
given
a
lot
to
our
community
and
I'm
very,
very
ear
for
just
you
know
for
folks
to
have
more
opportunities
to
serve
here.
So
but
again,
I
think
this
is
the
board
where
we
have
a
wealth
of
riches.
I
M
I'd
like
to
nominate
richard,
also
known
as
dick
harris
dick
had
served
for
many
years
on
the
board
we
just
appointed
to
boulder
housing
partners
and
before
that
he
served
on
the
board
of
thistle.
He
probably
knows
as
much
about
housing
and
it's
just
about
anybody
in
town.
B
F
A
Thanks
jimmy
how.
B
All
right,
a
lot
of
nominations
here,
all
right:
some
great
applicants.
Okay,
so
seeing
no
more
nominations,
we
will
go
in
reverse
alphabetical
here.
So,
let's
start
with
julian
ramsey.
B
We
got
nicole
aaron,
matt,
lauren
and
rachel.
Okay,
that's
five!
But
let's
just
continue
here
quickly:
phillip
ogren
jimmy
howe
not
seen
any
dicaras.
B
B
B
Yeah
aaron
matt
and
lauren
jimmy
howe,
nicole,
rachel
too
jake
harris
bob
and
mark
two
and
matt
applebaum
genie
and
tara.
K
B
We
got
nine
nine
votes,
okay,
so
that
I
think
that
has
matt
apple
bomb
falling
off.
Thank
you,
matt
for
your
application,
your
service.
B
B
B
So
that
seat
goes
to
philip
o'green,
and
I
just
want
to
thank
everyone
who
applied
here.
We
again
we
had
a
real
wealth
of
issue
of
applicants
and
I
just
want
to
call
out
there's
some
folks,
matt
applebaum
and
richard
collins
and
dick
harris
have
all
been
in
service
in
our
community
for
for
many
years.
B
I
It
is
my
honor
to
nominate
carlos
feldes
for
this
seat.
Carlos
says
just
since
I
will
forget
to
say
a
few
words.
Otherwise.
I
appreciate
that
carlos
is
a
worker
in
our
community.
I
appreciate
that
he
requested
for
the
interview
to
be
done
in
spanish,
and
I
just
I
appreciate
his
leadership
within
our
community
and
I
think
he
would
be
a
wonderful
person
on
the
human
relations
commission.
B
N
Matt,
nicole
still
couldn't
have
done
a
better
nomination
for
carlos,
which
I
totally
agree
with,
but
but
I'd
like
to
move
to
my
second,
which
would
be
thicker,
I
just
absolutely
loved
the
interview
she
brought
and
I
think
her
perspective
is
going
to
be
fantastic.
Having
just
graduated
at
cu
and
her
current,
where
she
currently
works,
and
just
that
perspective
I
think,
is
going
to
be
very
valuable
for
hrc.
So
I
hope
she
gets
a
good
shot.
B
And
lauren.
H
And
I'd
like
to
nominate
selassie,
I
think
you
know
just
how
involved
he
is
with
so
many
different
organizations
in
our
community
and
the
focus
that
he
put
on
programming
and
and
activities
specifically
targeted
towards
our
underserved
sections
of
our
community.
I
think,
is
something
that
I've
heard
a
lot
of
desire
for
in
our
community.
F
B
Great
and
I'll,
just
I'll
echo,
the
the
great
words
people
said
about
other
people
and
then,
while
I'm
not
nominating
her,
I
just
want
to
recognize
liz
morasco's
deep
work
in
the
community
for
for
racial
equity.
So
thanks
to
her
for
everything
that
she's
done,
she
should
also
do
a
phenomenal
job.
B
Okay,
so
I
think
we're
alphabetical
this
time.
That
is
correct,
sir
all
right.
Let's
start
with
selassie
atiyasi
apologies
if
I
get
names,
mispronounced,
hands,
yeah,
lauren
and
juni
since
two
graham
hill.
B
All
right
we
got
aaron
nicole,
rachel
bob
matt,
so
that's
five
and
then
fakir
jacob
tara
engine
jenny.
I
think
you
already
voted
terran
mark
so
two,
okay,
carlos
wins
that
seat
and
I'll
just
note
the
historic
nature
of
his
first
ever
interview
in
spanish
and
and
really
applaud
him
for
applying
and
excited
to
be
putting
him
to
the
board.
B
Okay.
So
now
we
have
for
the
second
seat.
This
is
one
year
term.
We
have
nominated
chiassi,
graham
hill
and
jacob.
Does
anyone
want
to
add
any
nominations
to
those
three
and
junior
hand,
others
seeing
no
additional
nominations,
then
I
think
we
go
into
voting
here.
So
salasi
atiyasu.
B
And
I'm
the
only
one
looks
like
one
graham
hill
juni
for
one
kiriaka,
all
right:
tara,
nicole
lauren,
matt,
rachel.
Bob!
Congratulations
for
cure
very
exciting!
All
right!.
B
H
Well,
I
there
was
pans
were
going
up
slowly,
so
I
was
going
to
try
and
nominate
both
of
them.
I
just
can't
they're,
both
so
qualified
for
the
seat,
I'm
going
to
nominate
chelsea.
I
think
her
background
in
rehabilitating
structures
to
make
them
more
sustainable,
really
aligns
with
our
city's
goals.
N
That
chelsea
was
gonna,
be
my
nominee,
so
I'll
be
done
with
that.
Bob.
M
I'll
nominate,
myron,
gutman
and,
as
lauren
said,
just
really
well
qualified,
also
history,
professor
trained
in
archival
research
that
we
need
for
landmarking.
He
renovated
and
preserved
two
historic
houses
in
the
woodyear,
and
I
thought
he
has
answers
about
the
balance
between
his
direct
preservation,
environmental
responsibility,
we're
outstanding.
B
B
N
Yeah,
yes,
second,
second,
rachel
everyone's
gone,
the
same
track
here,
more
or
less.
So,
thanks
for
that,
rachel.
K
Tara,
I
have
a
question.
Am
I
on
mute,
no
good?
So
if
sylvia
is
really
the
only
candidate
right,
because
michael
carr
already
got
appointed
to
beverage
licensing,
am
I
wrong?
That's
correct,
yeah.
All.
K
B
A
Yeah
well,
I
got
I
mean
I
raised
my
hand
and
then
somebody
said
you
know
michael
got
appointed
and
that's
why
I
said
I
was
gonna
nominate
sylvia
because
I
got
confused
about
like.
Would
we
be
appointing
if
there's
only
one,
so
I
would
agree
that
this
is
not.
I
think
consistency
requires
us
to
hold
this
open
too.
B
So
I'll
just
ask
if
anyone
objects
to
us
also
opening
this
holding
this
board
open
for
a
few
weeks
to
see
if
we
get
an
additional
candidate
who
would
be
qualified
for
the
board
man
so.
N
I
so
I
don't
object,
I
just
I
just
to
put
it
out
there.
I
just
want
to
just
for
sylvia
like
she
knocked
this
out
of
the
park.
She
did
great,
but
I
do
want
for
consistency.
We
do
need
to
move
forward,
but
I
want
to
make
sure
she's
acknowledged
for
having
a
tremendous
candidate
and
a
phenomenal
interview.
B
I'll
second,
that
I
mean,
as
I
said
before,
with
lisa
spaulding,
you
know
sylvia
is
eminently
qualified
and
had
a
fantastic
interview,
and
this
is
in
no
way
saying
that
she's
not
suitable
for
the
board,
but
just
that
we're
looking
to
make
sure
that
we
have
at
least
two
candidates
for
every
seat.
B
Okay,
open
space
board
of
trustees,
we've
got
one
seat
available,
it's
a
five
year
term
and
we
have
nine
people.
Let's
see
we
got
to
get
tara
out
of
here.
Tara.
Did
you
already
leave
that
looks
like
a
yes,
okay,
all
right,
tara's
recused
on
this
one.
We
have
nine
qualified
applicants,
so
I
think
we
can
dive
in
and
start
taking
nominations.
B
N
I'd
like
to
nominate
john
carroll
for
this
role
and
and
just
to
say
a
few
words
john,
is
an
incredibly
mild-mannered
even
keeled
person.
I
would
look
at
him
as
very
much.
A
steady
rudder
never
gets
too
high,
never
gets
too
low,
and
you
know
he
brings
welcomed
needed
diversity
to
this
board.
The
fact
that
he
got
married
on
open
space
is
is
a
great
plus
and-
and
I
think
the
other
part
is
you
know
in
his
application.
N
He
didn't
shy
away
from
bringing
up
the
elephant
in
the
room,
which
is
cu
south
and
I
think
that's
an
acknowledgement
of
exactly
the
issues
that
we
have
and
not
shying
away
from
that
and
really
conveyed
a
clear
equity
lens
in
talking
about
marginalized
communities
regarding
access
and
also
you
know,
leaning
into
the
discussion
discussions
we
have
about
fort
chambers,
so
he
just
has
a
very
clear
understanding
of
the
issues
facing
open
space
and,
I
think,
would
just
be
an
absolutely
tremendous
candidate
for
this
board
and-
and
I
I
highly
recommend
thanks.
L
Mark
yeah,
I'm
going
to
nominate
hal
holstein
I've
known
him
for
a
while
worked
with
him.
I
think
he
is
excellent
at
what
he
does.
It
is
very
customary
when
somebody
fills
a
short
term
to
grant
that
person
a
full
term,
and
he
in
fact
has
served
as
the
the
chair
of
osbt
and
I'm
not
sure,
there's
a
very
compelling
reason
not
to
allow
him
to
continue
in
that
role.
H
I'd
like
to
nominate
bridger
tomlin,
I
think
that
their
experience
with
so
many
areas,
different
types
of
open
space
around
our
community
was
just
fantastic.
B
It's
not
seeing
any
so
I
think
you
know
alicia.
If
we
skip
a
board,
then
I
think
we
just
go
back
to
alphabetical.
That
is
correct.
Sir
great
okay
votes
for
john
carroll:
let's
see
I've
got
aaron
nicole,
matt,
rachel
bob
all
right.
So
that's
five
hal
halstein
just
finished
this
out,
yeah
mark
and
richard
tomlin.
B
Okay,
so
that's
six
there
and
then
one
each
for
hal
hall's
team,
richard
tomlin,
okay,
so
john
carroll
gets
that
seat.
I
just
wanted
to
say
note
of
thanks
to
hal
holstein,
for
his
service.
He's
done
an
able
job
on
the
board
these
last
few
years
and
really
appreciate
the
work
that
he's
put
in.
M
I'd
like
to
nominate
mary
cooper
ellis
I'll,
save
my
words
now
mary
serves
on
the
uni
hill
executive
committee.
She
has
a
reputation
for
objectivity
and
fairness.
M
She
has
a
master's
degree
in
both
urban
planning
and
architectural
landscaping,
and
I
think
one
of
the
things
that
playing
board
is
great
is
they
are
suffered
from
is
we've
lost
all
of
our
professionals?
We
don't
have
any
architects
or
design
professionals
or
even
real
estate
lawyers
on
this
board,
and
we
used
to
have
lots
of
them,
and
so
I
think
that
mary
brings
that,
as
a
matter
of
fact,
she
used
to
serve
on
the
equivalent
of
the
planning
board
in
crested
butte.
M
I
I
I
think
that
her
skills
as
a
mediator
I
mean
this
is
kind
of
literally
what
she
does
with
her
with
her
time
during
the
day,
is
you
know,
working
with
groups
of
people
helping
to
build
consensus,
trying
to
get
to
the
heart
of
issues,
and
you
know
really
moving
communities
forward
on
their
goals,
and
I
think
these
are
exactly
the
qualities
that
our
city
could
benefit
from
right.
Now,
thanks
tara,
oh
may
I.
I
So
one
more
thing:
this
is
not
a
nomination
and
because
this
particular
person
is
going
to
be
studying
abroad
this
next
year
and
noted
that
they
would
not
have
reliable
internet
connectivity.
But
I
did
want
to
note-
and
thank
ariana
proctor
for
applying.
I
I
just
invest
at
cu-
is
one
of
my
favorite
programs
in
terms
of
turning
out
highly
qualified
community
leaders,
and
so
I
really
see
ariana
as
being
an
up
and
coming
leader
in
our
community.
I
I
think
that
she
would
bring
all
kinds
of
perspectives
that
this
board
has
never
had
before,
and
I
I
just
would
really
love
to
encourage
ariana,
please
when
you,
when
you
return
to
boulder,
please
consider
applying
again,
because
I
was
just
absolutely
thrilled
by
your
application
in
your
interview.
I
B
H
I'd
like
to
nominate
ml,
you
know,
as
was
mentioned
by
bob,
I
think
I
was
really
excited
to
see
architects
applying,
I
think
ml.
Her
focus
also
on
you
know,
alternative
and
smaller
kinds
of
housing.
I
think
really
aligns
well
with
our
work
plan
and
what
we
have
laid
out
ahead
of
us.
A
I
would
love
to
nominate
mark
mcintyre
he's
he's,
got
a
breadth
of
experience
and
expertise
that
I
won't
go
into,
but
I
think
that
we
have
struggled
over
my
years
on
council
to
to
really
build
in
and
just
create
a
framework
for
ensuring
that
our
planning
decisions
have
transportation
community
members
eyes
on
them.
So
mark
will
just
like
build
that
into
tab,
and
I
think
it's
also
important,
as
you
know,
whoever
we
appoint
to
the
five
year
seats
this
time,
we'll
we'll
participate
in
the
in
the
comp
plan.
A
Discussions
and-
and
I
think
it's
important-
that
we
have
voices
who
are
sort
of
interconnecting
our
issues
and
and
who,
who
are
able
to
to
kind
of
work
through
those
hard
discussions
with
with
strong
voices.
So
I
think
mark
would
be
good
at
those
two
things.
Thanks.
M
N
I
can
say
I
can
say
more
than
the
two
words
for
tim
from
tara.
On
kurt
no
yeah,
I
mean
kurt
has
been
very
active
in
our
community
for
a
lot
of
years
and
in
many
ways
outside
of
maybe
some
of
our
planning
staff.
N
He
could
probably
recite
title
ix
back
to
us,
and
so
you
know,
I
just
think
kurt
brings
a
ton
of
knowledge
and
and
similar
to
mark
does
bring
some
crossover
understanding
of
the
transportation
needs
and
really
trying
to
bridge
that
gap,
and
then
so
until
we
more
formalize
like
rachel,
said
more
of
a
greater
integration
between
transportation
and
planning
having
two
people
that
come
at
it.
From
that
point
of
view,
I
think
is
going
to
be
very,
very
useful
and
very
handy
for
us
going
forward
in
the
next
few
years.
K
Words
thanks
matt
for
that
he
is
so
dedicated
to
this
community
kurt
is,
and
he
is
also
dedicated
to
the
planning
board.
I
know
that
he
goes
on
a
regular
basis
to
I
guess
most
or
all
of
the
meetings,
and
that
is
dedication.
B
Yes,
yes,
yeah.
My
as
I
say
my
only
problem
here
is
only
having
three
three
people
to
only
being
able
to
approach
three
people.
This
is
a
challenge
great
great
folks.
Here,
okay,
I
think
we're
reverse
alphabetical.
So
for
the
first
five
year
term,
let's
start
with
ml
robles,
okay
nuts
see
we
got
one
from
mark.
B
B
B
Okay,
see
none,
let's
go
for
start
over
again
with
ml
robles.
I
And
I'm
sorry
aaron.
I
was
just
wondering
if
this
is
an
opportunity
where,
rather
than
nominating,
I
could
make
a
comment
about
somebody
that
I
did
not
nominate
the
first
time
is
that
appropriate
or
not?
Okay?
I
just
wanted
to
say
that
I
I'm
not
going
to
echo
the
comments
about
ml
being
a
practitioner.
B
All
right.
We
got
nicole
aaron
mark
lauren
rachel.
That
is
five.
Let's
finish
it
out:
kirk
morback,
tara,
it's
one
mark,
mcintyre
genie
and
matt,
and
then
mary
ellis,
that's
fun.
B
B
Okay,
that's
our
last
one:
let's
go
with
kurt
nordbach.
B
And
mark
mcintyre
yeah
aaron,
nicole
lauren,
matt,
rachel
and
mary
alice
mark
that
gets
us
to
nine,
so
mark
mcintyre
gets
the
two-year
term
like
with
five
votes
rachel.
Did
you
want
to
offer
comment.
A
I
did
congratulations
to
those
who
were
elected.
This
was
a
really,
I
think,
a
lot
of
us
liked.
A
lot
of
these
people
and
and
especially
sort
of
you
know
the
yeah
anyways
I
wanted
to
suggest
specifically
for
for
people
who
were
not
appointed
that
that
we
do
have
openings
on
like
bozo,
which
has
which,
which
requires
some
some
expertise
and
knowledge,
and
it
would
be
great
if
you
all
considered
applying
to
that
board
and-
and
I
really
appreciate
it-
and
this
was
just
hard.
So
thanks.
M
I'm
gonna
make
a
suggestion,
which
is
probably
a
little
premature,
but
since
mark
mcintyre
still
has
a
year
left
on
tab
and
presumably
would
be
resigning
from
that,
as
we've
pointed
to
planning
board,
and
since
we
have
such
wonderful
candidates
as
we'll
see
in
a
few
minutes
on
tab,
I'd
like
to
suggest
that
we,
at
least
provisionally,
subject
to
mark's
resignation,
appoint
a
additional
person
to
tab
that
way.
Since
we
have
great
applications.
Applicants.
I
believe
we'll
see
in
a
second
that
we
fill
all
those
spots,
including
mark's
spot.
B
Great
point
bob,
let's
just
nail
that
down
once
we
get
to
tab
a
great
point
and
I'll
just
echo
that
this
was
this
is
really
tough
one,
where
I
would
have
loved
to
appoint
more
people
and
echo
rachel's
encouragement
of
applying
to
one
of
the
other
boards.
That's
still
open,
because
we
could
certainly
use
your
expertise
in
other
areas.
B
All
right,
so
we've
got
two
terms
here.
We
got
a
five
year
term
and
a
three
year
term.
We've
got
lots
of
qualified
applicants,
we've
got
12
people
here
and
we
will
start
with
the
five
year
term.
Rachel.
A
Well,
I
believe
that
is
an
old
hand,
but
I
will
go
ahead
and
it
would
be
my
honor
to
nominate
anita
spears.
M
You
like
mice,
to
be
my
honor
to
nominate
sonny
vanderstarr.
B
I
Thank
you
I,
while
I'm
looking
this
up
in
my
spreadsheet,
I
just
want
to
add
a
note
about
anita
I
just
I
I
really
she
would
have
been
my
my
nomination
if
rachel
didn't
beat
me
to
it,
and
I
just
greatly
appreciate
the
diverse
experiences
that
she
would
bring
to
parks
and
rec
advisory
board,
as
well
as
just
her
her
wonderful
application
and
interview,
which
I
appreciate
it
very
much.
I
I
would
like
to
nominate
neil
henderson.
I
greatly
appreciated
sort
of
his
talk
about
practitioner
right
practitioner
in
sort
of
the
recreation
center
world.
As
being
a
fitness
instructor.
I
thought
that
was
a
really
unique
perspective.
So
thank
you.
B
H
B
D
B
B
Tom's
souvenir
mark
for
one
anita,
anita
spears,
that's
aaron,
nicole
lauren,
matt
rachel,
so
that's
five
carrie
tanner
not
seeing
any
and
sunny
vanderstar
bob.
B
I
think
I
didn't
get
a
vote
from
somebody.
Maybe
junie
did
you
record
a
vote?
Are
you
up
for
sunny
all
right?
Sorry,
okay,
got
it
so
two
percent
all
right.
Well,
we
had
anita
across
the
five
lines.
So
anita
spears
gets
the
five-year
term.
Congratulations!
Anita,
and
now
we
will
do
the
three-year
term.
We've
got
neil
henderson
tom,
souvenir,
carrie,
tanner
and
sonny
vanderstarr
nominated.
Does
anyone
want
to
add
any
additional
nominations
to
that
list?
B
Not
seeing
any
so
we
can
start
in
on
the
voting.
Neil
henderson,
I
got
nicole
for
one
tom
souvenir
mark
for
one
carrie
tanner.
B
B
G
Yes,
thank
you
mayor,
while
efficiency
would
would
counsel
to
a
point
for
what
we
know
as
an
upcoming
vacancy,
we
don't
currently
have
a
vacancy,
so
we
can
only
appoint
for
the
vacancies
that
we
have.
B
Thank
you
for
clarifying
that,
so
I
guess
we
will
be
appointing
to
one
seat
tonight
and
then
what
I
would
say
is
you
know
we
can
open
this
board.
Well,
we'll
see
I
mean
the
one
when
I
think
we'll
look
to
our
boards
and
commissions
subcommittee
for
a
recommendation
here
that
when
and
if
mark
resigns
from
the
board
and
creates
an
opening
on
how
to
proceed,
whether
we
just
take
the
many
other
applications
that
we
had
or
add
additional
to
them.
L
Yeah,
I
just
wanted
to
ask
a
question
of
teresa
you're,
saying
it's
not
possible
to
we're,
not
appointing
somebody.
If
we,
if
we
try
to
fill
a
mark
mcintyre's
thing,
can
we
not
take
the
will
of
counsel
as
to
where
we
would
be
if,
in
fact,
that
seat
opens
it's
not
a
formal,
it's
not
official,
and
we
can
confirm
it
on
consent.
Presumably,
if
and
when
it
becomes
official.
G
Sure,
members
of
council,
certainly
you
could
express
your
will
here-
you
you
could
perhaps
even
go
so
far
as
to
say
who
you
would
nominate
if
you
had
a
second
nomination.
G
B
G
I
I
would
note
just
one
other
point:
if
you,
if
you
don't
mind
mayor
that
the
vacancy
will
be
different
in
kind
in
that
it
won't
be
a
full
five-year
term,
and
so
certainly
I
wonder
about
whether
there
might
be
additional
applicants
if
there
was
a
different
term.
N
G
Yeah
you
know
my
concern
here
is
that
we
didn't
open
up
nominations
for
that
specific
seat,
or
rather
we
didn't
open
up
vacancies
for
that
specific
seat,
and
so
it's
certainly
possible
that
there
are
community
members
who
are
interested
in
a
truncated
term
and
they've
not
yet
had
the
opportunity
to
apply
okay.
M
I'm
going
to
respectfully
disagree
with
our
lawyer,
which
is
dangerous,
because
people
don't
apply
for
a
particular
seat.
They
don't
apply
for
a
five
year
seat
or
a
one
year
seat.
So
no
one
knew
what
term
that
they
were
getting
and
that
we've
seen
that
throughout
the
evening,
and
so
I
don't
think
that
there
would
be
someone
to
say
well,
gosh
darn,
I
would
have
applied
to
tab
now.
I'm
going
to
it
just
doesn't
make
a
whole
lot
of
sense
to
me
and
we're
not
voting
tonight.
M
L
Mark
yeah,
I
you
know
somebody
called
up
mark
right
now:
he'd
probably
resign
on
the
spot,
and
you
know
further
to
what
matt
was
saying.
I
I
you
know
it's
just
trying
to
minimize
the
the
process
a
little
bit
and
getting
an
indication
of
where
we're
going
to
go
with
his
seat
when
it
becomes
available
sometime
between
10
minutes
from
now
and
tomorrow,
at
10
o'clock,
he's
obviously
going
to
take
the
planning
position,
so
I
I
would
vote
for
a
a
smoother
process.
L
G
E
B
Thanks
for
clarifying
the
alicia,
so
I
I
sorry
I
would
suggest
that
we
go
ahead
and
straw
straw
poll
for
both
the
five
year
and
the
one
year
term
and
assuming
mark's
official
resignation
comes
through
before
next
week
to
just
go
ahead
and
do
this
because
we
do
have
a
great
deal
of
applicants
who
are
quite
qualified
so,
and
I
thought
bob
made
a
good
point
about
people
applying
to
a
seed
rather
than
a
term
most
likely
rachel.
Did
you
want
to
add
to
that?
Well,.
A
Just
it
seems
like
sometimes
in
the
past
we've
had
you
know,
openings
and
we've
just
said
like:
let's
just
go
back
to
the
people
who
already
applied
and
invite
them
like
you
know,
ask
them
if
they're
still
interested
right
so
like
that
we
could
just
sort
of
commit
to
that.
Now,
right,
like
we
will
go
back
to
this
pool
of
applicants
and
say
hey,
you
know,
you
know,
were
you
still
willing
to
be
considered
and
especially
the
person
that
straw
polls
is
as
the
person
would
like?
B
We
we
have
in
the
past,
not
reopened
applications
when
a
board
opening
came
pretty
quickly
and
we
had
had
additional
applications
applicants
in
the
past.
So
we
do
have
precedent
for
that.
Okay,
so
I'm
going
to
go
ahead
and
take
the
straw
poll
on
both
seats.
It
seems
like
that's
the
will
of
council.
B
I've
been
seeing
a
fair
amount
of
nodding,
heads
and,
and
then
we'll
just
check
in
with
our
our
lawyers
about
how
to
approach
it
for
consent
next
week,
all
right
so
five
year
term
and
I've
lost
the
threat
on
alphabetical
versus
well.
First,
let's
take
nominations.
We've
got
a
lot
of
great
applicants
here.
Mark.
L
Yeah,
I
was
one
of
the
two
members
of
the
council
who
was
sitting
in
on
these
interviews,
and
one
individual
really
just
stood
out
tremendously
to
me
and
it
was
megan
richard.
She
worked
for
a
global
mobility
company
via
she's
got
an
extraordinary
background
in
the
field.
She's
worked
with
underserved
communities
as
a
transit
advocate,
and
I
I
just
there
were
many
many
good
candidates
here,
but
I
just
want
her
to
be
sort
of
a
head
and
shoulders
above
everyone.
Thank
you.
L
B
N
Thanks
aaron
and
mark
thanks
for
your
nomination
to
megan,
I
absolutely
I
love
her
her
nomination
as
well,
but
I
do
want
to
nominate
rebecca
davies.
You
know
as
much.
I
thought
she
was
the
really
an
amazing
candidate,
but
furthermore,
I
think
that
it's
about
just
she
had
just
a
clear
understanding
both
in
what
she
wrote
in
her
interview
of
the
issues
and
a
path
forward,
really
for
us
to
truly
achieve
vision,
zero
which
we're
going
to
be
talking
about
later
tonight.
N
So
I
think
she
knows
the
the
issue
of
the
hour
and
what
we
need
to
do
and
really
understanding
that
safety
is
a
limiting
barrier
for
more
people
using
alternative
modes
of
mobility
in
our
community,
so
so
really
liked
and
thought
that
rebecca
was
just
really
strong.
So
I
think
she's
gonna
be
a
tremendous
candidate.
N
A
I
was
actually
going
to
nominate
rebecca
as
well.
I
will
instead
nominate
or
additionally
nominate
maria
trini
willerton,
but
I
just
want
to
mention
about
rebecca
that
I
appreciated
that
that
she
lives
in
southeast
boulder
and
when
we
just
rolled
out
the
the
can
core
arterial
network.
If
you
look
at
that
map,
southeast
boulder
is
not
not
well
covered
there
and
there's
also
a
dearth
of
representation
from
current
tab
membership.
I
think
everyone's
north
of
pearl
and-
and
I
don't
know
west
of
28th-
maybe
but
it
it's
a.
A
F
B
H
H
They
not
only
understand
a
youth
perspective,
but
also
because
of
that
they're
changing
need
and
understanding
sort
of
a
role
of
being
more
dependent
on
public
transit.
I
think
that
they
will
represent
a
diverse
set,
a
more
diverse
set
of
needs
beyond
their
own.
M
Thanks
bob
yeah,
I
just
want
to
see
a
few
more
great
candidates
nominee.
I
want
to
say
a
few
more
words
by
trini
willerton.
She
was
the
founder
and
is
the
head
of.
It
could
be
me,
which
is
a
survivor's
organization
of
people
who
have
been
on
non-motorized
vehicles,
particularly
bikes.
Who've,
been
hit
by
cars
and
have
survived
and
trini
is
a
survivor.
I
think
was
four
years
ago
that
she
was
in
her
accident.
M
I
can't
think
of
anyone
better
to
serve
on
a
transportation
advisory
board
and
figure
out
how
to
make
our
roads
safer
for
walkers
and
bikers
and
someone
who
has
already
suffered
that
consequence
and,
as
somebody
mentioned
we're
going
to
talk
about
that
later
tonight
in
vision,
zero,
and
I
can't
think
of
anybody
better
to
lead
our
vision,
zero
effort
than
someone
who
barely
survived
a
traffic
accident
herself.
B
B
B
So,
let's
start
with
trini
willerton.
B
Okay,
rebecca
gets
the
five
year
term
with
five
votes,
and
so
I'm
not
now
going
to
take
a
straw
poll
for
the
potential
opening.
It's
it's
not
terribly
potential.
I
did
get
an
official
communication
from
tab
member
mark
mcintyre
with
an
official
resignation,
so
it
does
seem
like
that
that
position
is
opening
up.
So
but
let's
start,
let's
just
call
it
a
straw
poll
and
then
we'll
we'll
figure
out
exactly
how
to
proceed
forward
for
the
one
year
term.
B
Seeing
none,
let's
start
with
trini
willerton
again
nicole
aaron,
rachel
bob,
that's
for
ariel
shawsburg
lauren
for
one.
B
B
Okay,
so
trini
has
the
five
votes
in
the
straw
poll
for
the
potentially
new
open
seat
here.
B
Okay,
well,
congratulations,
rebecca
and
provisionally
trini
and
thanks
everyone
else.
There
really
were
such
good
applications.
I
could
have
voted
for
at
least
seven
of
those
people
easily
we
got
nicole.
Did
you
want
to
make
a
comment
before
I
talk
about
this
board.
I
I
did
want
to
make
a
comment.
I
just
wanted
to
remind
folks
that
I
think
elisha
put
up
like
six
boards
at
the
very
beginning
that
still
need
applicants
and
we've
discovered
a
couple
more
tonight.
So
I
just
I
really
want
to
encourage
people
that
that,
at
least
for
me,
a
lot
of
folks
are
left
that
I
would
still
love
to
see
on
board.
So
I
hope
those
of
you
who
are
interested
might
consider
applying
to
another
board
absolutely.
B
B
A
Well,
just
making
sure
I
just
it's:
okay,
that's
that
they're
in
reverse.
Order
of
time
like
I
was,
I
was
wanting
to
vote
for
barbara
for
the
five-year
seat,
even
though
the
top
one's
the
shorter
term,
but
I
assume
we
were
voting
for
the
five-year
seat,
we're.
B
Voting
for
the
five-year
term-
yes,
yes,
this
is
voting
for
the
five-year
term,
so
that
looks
like
it
was
nine
votes
there.
So
amy
brown
gets
the
five-year
term
all
right,
so
we've
got
one
more
term
four-year
term
we
have
steve
maxwell
nominated.
Would
anyone
like
to
add
any
additional
nominations.
B
Okay,
that's
it
well!
I
want
to
thank
everybody
that
was
a
little
challenging.
I
don't
remember
ever
having
that
many
process
questions
come
up
in
a
boards
and
commission's
nomination.
So
thanks
for
waiting
through
all
of
those
with
us
appreciate
all
of
your
your
votes
and
your
comments.
Bob.
M
Yeah
I
I
wanna
follow
on
the
comments
that
nuria
made
earlier
at
the
very
beginning
of
the
session,
and
I
think
both
nuria
and
then
council
last
week
acknowledged
the
great
work
of
of
staff,
particularly
alicia
and
john
and
pam
and
taylor
for
all
the
hard
work.
But
I
want
to
acknowledge
the
committee,
which
was
tara
and
lauren.
M
I
know
this
was
so
so
hard
and
so
time
consuming
way
way
more
than
ever
before,
but
I
think
you
guys
came
up
with
a
really
great
process,
certainly
some
some
things
we
can
improve
on
next
year.
But
you
know
having
this
is
my
seventh
time
doing
borders
and
commissions
on
a
scale
of
one
to
ten.
This
is
a
nine
and
all
the
others
were
twos
and
three.
So
you
guys
just
really
rocked
on
this
one.
M
You
made
this
so
much
better
and
I
think
it
was
much
more
meaningful
for
the
applicants
where
they
could
spend
quality
time
with
council
members
and
have
some
exchange
and
back
and
forth,
and
so
I
really
appreciate
lauren
and
tara.
What
you've
done
to
this
process-
and
I
think
it's
something
we
can
build
on
for
future
years-.
A
Echo
all
that
and
would
just
add
that
I
think
tonight
itself
went
smoothly
as
well.
So
thank
you
to
staff
for
that
and
also
aaron.
I
thought
you
did
a
really
good
job
like
this
has
never
been
sort
of
as
painless
and
and
efficient,
so
good
job
to
to
everyone
who
was
nominating
and
to
you
for
shepard
shepherding
that.
B
Appreciate
that
thanks,
rachel
elisha.
B
N
N
I
just
my
hat's
off
to
you
guys.
You
did
a
great
job,
so
so
thanks
for
really
knocking
it
out
and
just
sets
us
up
for
for
great
success.
Success
down
the
road.
So
thank
you
well,.
B
F
Thank
you.
I
just
want
to
say
this
was
an
interesting
experience.
I
did
feel
that
the
interviews
were
much
more
personal
than
the
one
we've
had
with.
You
know
the
panel
of
nine.
So
you
know
that
part.
I
find
very
exciting
and
I
felt
a
little
bit
more
ownership
because
I
had
to
sit
there.
I
had
to
just
have
this
one-on-one
conversation
through
zoom,
so
all
in
all
I'd
say
that
was
an
interesting
experience.
Is
it
better
than
the
year
before?
F
I'm
not
so
sure
I
think
you
know,
I'd
be
happy
to
you
know,
get
an
overall
perspective
from
staff,
whether
you
know
the
number
of
applicants
have
improved
whether
zoom
has
really
improved
the
process
when
it
comes
to
accessibility
and
equity.
But
you
know,
I
think,
all
of
us
put
a
lot
of
work.
I
spent
hours
hours
listening
to
these
videos
and
I
know
a
lot
of
my
colleagues
have
as
well
and
staff
as
well
put
in
a
lot
of
work
night
that
we
spent
together.
F
K
We
can't
forget
pam.
She
was
incredible,
I
would
say
she
was
awesome,
but
probably
matt
would
tell
me
to
use
a
different
word.
Remember
the
last
time
I
said
they
were
awesome
matt
anyway.
I
do
want
to
say
that
it
was
an
incredible
experience.
First
of
all
lauren
and
I
got
to
know
each
other
and
we
had
a
really
good
time.
So
thanks
lauren,
but
I
think
what
I
will
say
is
the
hardest
part
about.
It
was
that
you
get
to
know
people
really
well
when
you're
interviewing
them
and
also
watching
them.
K
So
for
me
it
made
the
pain
of
not
picking
those
that
I
now
love.
It's
really
intense.
I
want
to
go
out
to
coffee
with
people,
so
you're
going
to
see
me
reaching
out
to
people
a
lot
of
the
people
who
who
applied
and
again
I
just
want
to
know
that
it
was
incredible
meeting
you
all.
Everybody
was
special
and
I
wish
we
could
have
voted
for
way
more
people
we
would
have
done
and
it
made
it
a
lot
harder.
I
think
in
that
way,
but
also
a
really
special
experience.
I
Echo
everything
everyone
else
has
said
and
just
really
give
a
shout
out
to
our
community
for
stepping
up
for
taking
the
time
to
apply
for
these
boards,
especially
with
a
new
process.
It
was
just
such
a
joy
to
meet
every
one
of
you
through
either
your
recordings
or
those
new
interviews,
and
I
wanted
to
just
give
a
special
shout
out
to
all
the
gen
z
folks
who
stood
up
the
younger
millennials
as
well
just
for
really
getting
involved.
I
I
certainly
was
not
even
thinking
about
that
when
I
was
your
age
and
we
we
need
you
desperately.
Clearly,
we
need
all
hands
on
deck
for
the
times
that
we're
in
and
so
just
from
the
bottom
of
my
heart.
Thank
you
to
everybody.
Who's
stepped
up
and
tried
something
new
for
this
cycle.
I
just
so
grateful
to
be
in
community
with
all
of
you.
H
I
just
wanted
to
say
thank
you
both
to
applicants
council
to
staff
for
sort
of
going
with
us
on
this
experiment.
I
think
that
we've
certainly
learned
a
lot.
There's
things
that
worked
really
well
things
that
can
be
improved
on
and
we
look
forward
to
taking
what
what
has
worked
and
making
it
better
for
the
next
time
around
thanks.
B
All
right,
well
so
I'll
just
I
just
have
to
add
my
own
thanks.
You
know,
first
of
all
to
the
community
members
who
applied
such
an
abundance
of
talent
and
creativity
in
our
community
and
I'm
really
excited
to
get
the
people
that
we
appointed
tonight
on
board
and
really
disappointed
about
a
lot
of
the
people
that
we
didn't,
appoint
and,
like
tara
said,
there's
like
a
there's,
a
real
sadness
mixed
with
the
excitement
of
the
new
folks,
because
there
are
so
many
talented
people
that
we
didn't
have
spaces
for.
So
I
hope
a
lot.
B
Many
of
you
will
apply
again
next
year
in
a
future
year
and
and
just
the
the
enormous
thank
you
to
city
staff
working
on
this
process
like
this.
This
was
a
very
heavy
lift
that
was
put
upon
you.
You
know
alicia
john
morse,
pam
davis,
you
know
taylor,
you
know
you
all
worked
so
hard
and
you
brought
this
process
to
a
successful
end
point
and
and
then
tara
and
lauren.
B
I
know
how
many
hours
that
you
put
in
on
this,
so
a
huge
kudos
and
thank
you
and
I'm
sure,
we'll
we'll
take
some
lessons
learned
and
make
a
few
tweaks.
But
we
got
here
and
and
now
we're
done
and
congratulations
everyone
so
yay
and
I
think
we
can.
We
can
move
on
and
wrap
up
now.
If
that's
all
right
and
I'll
just
say,
I
found
the
last
two
and
a
half
hours
to
be
exhausting.
So
maybe
we
can
take
a
10
minute
break
before
we
hit
the
the
last
item
great.
D
D
D
D
D
C
Item
started:
thank
you
very
much
I'll
make
this
very
brief.
I
know
that
council
has
been
having
a
great
interest
in
both
division
and
the
20
is
plenty
report,
and
with
that
I
will
turn
it
over
to
devon
joslin.
Our
principal
traffic
engineer
very
much.
O
O
All
right
well
good
evening,
mayor
brockett
and
members
of
council.
My
name
is
devin
joslin
and
I'm
the
principal
traffic
engineer
for
the
city
of
boulder,
and
I'm
pleased
to
be
here
tonight
to
present
an
update
on
the
safe
streets
report
and
20
is
plenty
and
I'll
reiterate
that
20
is
plenty
was
a
council
priority
that
was
implemented
in
2020..
O
So
there
are
four
main
things
that
I'd
like
to
talk
about
tonight.
The
first
is
to
present
key
findings
from
both
the
safe
streets
report
and
the
evaluation
of
20
is
plenty.
The
next
thing
is
to
show
how
this
work
relates
to
the
core
arterial
network
and
highlight
projects
that
are
already
underway
on
arterials.
O
O
O
F
O
But
what
we
found
is
that,
despite
the
results
of
the
evaluation,
local
streets
continue
to
generally
not
exhibit
speed
related
crash
patterns,
as
was
shown
in
our
safe
streets
report
and
the
key
findings
support
that
the
methods
to
reduce
speed
that
were
proposed
within
the
evaluation
should
be
balanced
against
other
priorities
and
implemented
over
time
as
part
of
a
comprehensive
vision.
Zero
strategy-
and
this
is
something
that
the
vision,
zero
action
plan
will
aim
to
address.
O
I
wanted
to
highlight
on
this
slide
the
relationship
between
where
crashes
are
occurring
within
the
city
as
compared
to
the
coral
arterial
network,
and
what
is
evident
again
is
that
not
only
are
most
severe
crashes
occurring
on
arterials
but
crashes
in
general,
even
those
resulting
in
property
damage
only
tend
to
occur
more
frequently
on
arterials,
and
you
can
see
the
correlation
there
between
the
map
of
total
crashes
within
the
city
for
the
period
that
was
analyzed
within
the
safe
streets
report
to
the
core
arterial
network.
On
the
right
hand,
side
of
the
slide.
O
O
The
13
projects
identified
in
the
core
arterial
network
six
are
already
underway,
five
of
which
will
start
construction
in
the
next
year
or
two
and
those
that
will
start.
Construction
are
28th
street
30th
street
vertically
separated
bike
lanes,
iris
and
15th
28th
in
colorado,
the
east,
arapahoe
multi-use
path
and
the
gun
barrel.
Belmont
multi-use
path
and
our
key
focus
areas
within
the
core
arterial
network
are
pedestrian
and
bicycle
facility
enhancements,
as
well
as
traffic
signal
system
upgrades.
O
O
We
want
the
vision,
zero
action
plan
to
use
a
data
driven
approach
to
recommend
proven
safety,
countermeasures
that
both
complement
and
enhance
the
core
arterial
network
and
address
clear
crash
patterns
that
emerge
and
we
plan
to
implement
proven
safety.
Countermeasures
that
address
both
reactive,
that
is
to
say,
address
crash
patterns
that
we've
identified
through
the
data
analysis,
as
well
as
proactive
that
try
to
get
out
in
front
of
crashes
occurring
by
identifying
systemic
or
risk
factors
along
our
streets
and
aim
to
address
them
before
crashes
occur.
O
So,
in
terms
of
next
steps,
there
are
four
that
you
can
see
listed
here,
really
we'd
like
to
wrap
up
work
and
finalize
the
safe
streets
report
as
well
as
the
evaluation
of
20
is
plenty.
O
O
B
Thanks
steven
that
was
both
very
informative
and
succinct.
I
appreciate
that.
So,
let's
start
off
with
see,
if
you
have
any
questions
for
staff
from
council
members.
N
And
I
was
kind
of
I
was
kind
of
waiting
to
see
who
else
was
going
to
jump
in,
so
I
finally
as
well,
I
guess
I'll
break
the
ice
for
one.
Thank
you,
staff
erica
devon.
I
think
that
report
is
really
great
in
the
sense
that
it
sets
a
really
important
baseline
for
us
and
really
sort
of
tracks
a
lot
of
these
important
trends
from
which
we
can
evaluate
our
successes
going
forward,
especially
as
we
have
some
clear
goals
and
outcomes
that
we
want
to
achieve
so.
N
First,
that's
just
really
good
stuff
and
and
thanks
for
already
wrapping
in
which
is
really
recent,
with
the
can
and
wrapping
in
a
lot
of
that
in
how
folds
division,
zero
and
the
safe
streets,
I
think
the
ability
to
sort
of
adapt
pretty
quickly,
given
we
just
sort
of
made
that
change
at
our
retreat.
You
know
within
two
months
again
credit
to
the
department
and
and
working
with
tab
to
make
those
adaptations.
So
first,
just
thank
you
for
that.
N
I
do
have
a
question
with
the
route
and
it
wasn't
mentioned
in
your
proposal,
but
it
is
in
the
safe
streets
report
it.
It's
pertaining
to,
you
know,
photo
and
enforcement
program.
I
know
that
was
a
part
of
it
and
I
was
just
curious
because
we
have
such
good
metrics
on
everything
else.
We're
doing.
I
was
wondering
if
we
had
any
data
showing
like
you
know,
is
it
reducing
running
red
lights?
N
You
know,
you
know,
is
it
creating?
Are
we
having
the
positive
benefits
that
investing
in
that
infrastructure
is
designed
to
achieve
and
then
really
there's
a
budgetary
question
that
are,
we,
you
know,
are
we
necessarily
raising
the
funds
from
it
to
cover
the
cost
of
doing
it,
and
so
I'm
just
sort
of
curious
about
where
that
photo
enforcement
is
in
terms
of
achieving
the
outcomes
that
they're
designed
to
to
propagate.
O
Sure
so,
in
terms
of
photo
red
light
enforcement,
we
have
found
that
that
is
a
very
effective
program.
At
reducing
red
light
running
crashes,
we
have
about
11
photo
radar
cameras
throughout
the
city,
and
I
don't
have
the
numbers
at
the
tip
of
my
fingertips,
but
I
know
it
has
been
effective
at
reducing
crashes
and
we
could
certainly
get
back
to
you
with
more
exact
information
on
that
in
terms
of
the
photo
radar
van
enforcement.
O
Again,
I
don't
necessarily
have
numbers
on
that
that
we
can
directly
attribute
to
crash
reduction.
What
I
will
say
is
that,
in
terms
of
20
is
plenty.
What
we
did
find
is
that,
following
the
change
to
20
miles
an
hour,
we
did
see
for
the
sites
that
we
evaluated
an
increase
in
the
violation
rate
per
hour
on
the
streets
where
the
photo
radar
van
was
deployed.
I
I
just
had
a
few
questions
and
I
I
love
the
study
and
I
loved
having
statistics
and
tests
and
things
there
that
that
was
wonderful.
Anything
very
helpful
for
me,
just
in
thinking
about
you,
know,
ways
to
interpret
the
data
and
you
know
the
conclusions
from
the
report.
I
So
thank
you
for
that,
and
I
just
had
a
couple
of
questions
about
the
data
one
of
them
was,
and
maybe
this
is
just
I
think,
it's
a
question
but
having
severe
crashes
as
just
sort
of
a
total
number
and
then
having
the
total
crashes.
I
As
a
total
number,
I'm
wondering
if
the
data
can
be
presented
in
terms
of
percentage
of
total
crashes
that
are
severe,
because
for
me
it's
that
it's
that
difference
and
how
those
two
are
are
showing
up.
That
is
quite
concerning
right,
so
our
total
crashes
are
going
down,
but
our
severe
crashes
are
staying
steady,
which
means
that
they're
likely
making
up
a
bigger
number
of
the
total
and
and
that
you
know
for
me.
I
I
think
just
helps
me
grasp
why
some
of
the
proposals
that
are
you
know
there
in
terms
of
focusing
on
some
of
the
arterial
straights
are,
is
so
essential
right,
because
we
really
do
need
to
decrease
these
severe
crashes.
I
So
I
think
that
was
a
question
just
if
the
data
could
be
presented
that
way
as
well,
and
I
apologize
if
I
missed
it
and
it
was
in
there
and
then
the
other
question
that
I
had
was
just
whether
whether
any
sort
of
insights
about
why
the
arterials
versus
the
local
straights
are
kind
of
increasing
crashes,
and
I
think
you
know
you
went
into
this
a
little
bit
in
the
report
in
terms
of
sort
of
narrower
streets
and
things
like
that
kind
of
naturally
reducing
speeds.
I
But
I
wondered
if
it
gives
a
volume
of
traffic.
Is
it
speed?
Is
that
if
you
have
any,
if
you
could
shed
any
light
on
that
and
then
my
last
question
was
just
about
an
interaction
in
terms
of
the
severe
crashes
that
are
happening:
kind
of
by
location
right
on
local
streets
versus
arterials?
I
Is
there
an
age
interaction
there
at
all?
Or
do
we
have
data
to
know
that,
based
on
who
is
the
victim
of
the
crash
and
the
reason
I'm
asking
this
question
is
because
I
do
hear
from
parents
who
are
living
in
some
of
these
neighborhoods
that
they
are
concerned
about
people
speeding
on
those
streets
and
that
the
risk
it
poses
to
their
child,
and
I
was
wondering
if
we
had
any
data,
they
could
speak
to
that,
not
to
say
that
it
is
a.
I
mean
it's.
I
It
is
tragic
and
awful
when
anybody
is
involved
in
a
crash,
so
I
just
want
to
express
I'm
not
I'm
not
saying
that
anybody
matters
more
or
less.
This
is
just
a
question
particularly
to
inform
the
folks
who
may
be
concerned
about
focusing
on
these
arterial
straights,
where
a
lot
of
the
crashes
are
happening.
O
Yeah,
thank
you
for
those
questions
to
your
first
one.
I
would
say
what
we
did
in
terms
of
representing
severe
crashes
that
you
probably
saw
in
the
report
and
it's
how
we
identified
our
areas
of
concern
was
we
did
pull
out
those
crash
types
where
the
severe
crashes
represented
a
significant
percent
of
the
total
crashes
relative
to
that
crash
type.
So,
in
terms
of
cyclists,
for
example,
we
saw
that
a
lot
more
crashes
involving
cyclists
result
in
severe
outcomes
compared
to
the
total
number
of
crashes.
O
So
we
did
present
the
data
in
that
way.
But
I
hear
you
in
terms
of
what
you're
saying
as
far
as
understanding
how
the
severe
crashes
have
changed
in
relation
to
the
overall
total.
So
that
is
something
we
can
take
a
closer
look
at
to
your
second
question,
I
would
say
that
the
arterial
roadways
certainly
are
our
busier
roadways
that
do
have
higher
speeds
and,
of
course,
also
have
higher
just
a
higher
number
of
lanes
right.
O
So,
there's
a
lot
more
opportunity
for
conflict
and
interaction
between
modes
at
those
locations,
and
we
also
found
within
the
report
that
it's
our
signalized
intersections
as
well,
where
most
of
the
conflicts
occur
and
crashes
are
happening.
So
those
are
going
to
be
some
of
our
areas
that
we
emphasize
moving
forward
in
the
vision,
zero
action
plan
to
try
to
identify
the
best
ways
to
mitigate
crashes
that
are
occurring
in
those
areas
and
then
to
your
third
point.
O
We
did
a
you
know,
a
fairly
detailed
look
at
age
ranges
in
the
report
that
you
probably
saw,
although
I
don't
think
we
did.
The
exact
analysis
that
you're
referring
to
to
try
to
correlate
crashes
that
are
occurring
on
local
streets
attributed
to
speeding
looking
at
the
age
of
the
victims
of
those
crashes,
so
that
that
is
not
something
that
I
don't
believe
we
have
done.
But
it
is
something
that
we
could
do
with
the
data
that's
available
to
us
from
the
crash
records
we
have.
O
What
I
will
say,
though,
that
you
probably
also
saw
within
the
report
is
the
the
trend
that
older
drivers
have
been
involved
in
more
crashes
recently
within
the
city
and
then
as
well.
There's
some
pretty
obvious
trends
in
terms
of
impaired
driving
and
it's
pretty
evident,
who
is
often
most
at
fault
in
those
crashes
involving
impaired
drivers
and
there's
ways
to
certainly
develop
education
campaigns
that
can
target
those
specific
audiences
as
a
way
to
try
to
change
those
behaviors.
I
I
Those
are
the
folks
that
you
know
people
are
thinking
of
are
little
kids
and
things,
and
I
just
I'm
wondering
if
there's
any
kind
of
reassurance
for
the
parents
that
we're
not
we're
not
ignoring
anything
they're,
really
just
trying
to
focus
on
where
the
spots
are
in
our
community
that
are
creating
the
most
risk
to
everybody.
O
H
Thanks
so
I
thought
the
packet
graphically
everything's
beautiful,
thank
you
that
so
many
so
much
good
data
in
there
moving
forward.
I
would
love
to
know
you
mentioned
about
preventative
measures.
I
think
I've
asked
this
before,
but
is
it
possible
to
have
our
red
light
cameras
or
speed
cameras,
look
at
intersections
and
do.
O
My
understanding
is
that
that
would
require
a
separate
camera
camera
system.
Beyond
our
photo
red
light
camera
system,
it
would
be
a
more
robust
camera
system
with
the
analytics
you're
talking
about
built
into
it.
I
would
say
that
we
are
working
toward
that.
We
are
working
extensively
throughout
the
city
to
upgrade
our
fiber
backbone,
which
will
allow,
for
you
know
better
data,
transmission
and
reception
from
those
types
of
devices
that
may
be
put
out
in
the
future.
O
I
think
we're
probably
taking
more
of
a
wait
and
see
approach
with
that,
I
would
say-
and
it
is
something
that
is
being
discussed
and
talked
about
as
part
of
a
broader
smart
city
project-
that's
going
on
within
the
city
as
well
looking
to
develop
a
framework
for
how
the
city
strategically
deploys
those
types
of
devices
throughout
the
city
to
make
sure
that
everything
we
do
deploy
is
cross
talking
appropriately
across
our
network.
O
On
top
of
each
other
to
identify
areas
within
the
city
where
crashes
may
be
most
likely
to
occur,
and
it
may
involve
things
like
you
know:
where
are
we
seeing
our
people,
our
impaired
crashes,
or
where
do
we
have
bike
lanes
that
are
directly
next
to
traffic
and
they
maybe
don't
have
a
buffer
next
with
them,
and
some
of
them
may
just
be?
Where
do
we
have
roads
that
have
spew
limits
above
35
miles
per
hour,
for
example?
O
N
Yeah,
I
mean
it's
kind
of
a
turn
of
a
general
planning
question,
which
is
you
know
looking
at
at
the
can
and
all
those
pieces
acknowledging
that
they
do
require
a
long
runway
to
get
done
and
also
you
know,
carry
a
significant
expense
when
you
look
at
sort
of
all
of
them
packaged
together.
You
know
my
question
is:
is
there
anything
you
need
at
least
from
council,
to
maximize
the
ability
to
get
funds,
but
be
it
dr
cog
or
safe
street
grants?
N
Is
it
staffing?
Is
it
capital
funds
for
matching
opportunities?
I'm
just
sort
of
generally
asking?
Are
we
at?
Are
we
in
the
best
position
possible
to
take
full
advantage
of
the
resources
that
are
coming
down
the
pipeline
to
to
make
the
most
use
of
these
plans
and
more
or
less
expedite
a
lot
of
this
stuff,
so
that
we
can
turn
those
numbers
that
that
might
be
either
static
or
or
go
in
a
different
direction
in
a
more
positive
direction
as
quickly
as
possible?.
C
I
could
answer
that
just
briefly.
I
think
that
inside
in
terms
of
the
department
itself,
we
try
to
keep
within
our
budget
and
certainly
whenever
we
have
an
additional
ask
and
so
forth.
We
do
that
in
the
context
of
the
budget.
You
know
going
forward
and
I
think
that
we
really
have
tried
to
work
together
with
tab
and
with
the
community
and
the
council,
both
in
the
past
and
certainly
going
forward
to
be
able
to
address
those
issues.
C
I
think
that
you
know
in
terms
of
what
devin
was
saying
that
we
are
just
getting.
We
know:
we've
just
gotten
this
information
back,
we've
just
gotten
the
can
and
so
we're
trying
to
find
ways
to
be
able
to
use
our
resources
to
leverage
that
first-
and
I
just
want
to
say
thank
you
so
much
for
your
invitation
to
ask
but
we'll
ask,
within
the
context
of
the
budget
overall,
that's
coming
forward.
So
thank
you.
J
I'll
just
add
to
that
matt,
and
I
appreciate
the
question
because
I
I
just
appreciate
eric
and
her
team
so
much,
but
certainly
as
we
do
think,
of
funds
that
are
coming
down
the
pike,
whether
that's
the
federal
transportation
or
infrastructure
package
or
other
potential
arpa
opportunities
or
things
will
certainly
be
involving
and
putting
that
there
is
a
process
in
place
for
departments
to
think
through
that,
and
so
please
know
that
we
will
be
leveraging
every
last
dollar.
We
have
to
make
them
stretch.
J
B
All
right,
thanks
for
all
that,
so
those
are
the
questions
I'm
seeing.
So
we
had
three
questions
for
us,
so
the
first
is
what
feedback
does
council
have
regarding
the
safe
streets
report.
B
I
B
B
It
was
informative,
you
know
again
appreciate
the
data-driven
approach,
so
we've
learned
about
what
effects
it
had
and
again
it's
I
think
everything
keeps
directing
us
in
towards
making
our
core
arterial
network
safer
right,
like
that,
that's
where
the
injuries
happen
and
that's
where
the
the
major
investments
need
to
be
made.
So
this
is
a
piece
of
it.
I
thought
matt
and
nicole.
N
Yeah,
I
mean,
I
think
the
question
is:
is
hearing
about
oregon
and
washington
and
that
they've
had
sort
of
similar
results.
As
we
have
had.
My
question
is:
is
there
a
timing
issue?
I
mean
we're
still
pretty
fresh
into
making
that
adaptation
and
there's
some
of
this
just
habituation
and
and
habit
forming
that
needs
to
take
time
in
order
to
sink
in
and
have
some
of
those
communities
done
this
for
long
enough
that
maybe
habituation
isn't
it,
and
it
needs
to
be
more
prescriptive
solutions
to
drive
that
change.
O
So
I
think
what
we
found
in
terms
of
those
pure
cities
is
that
they
had
done
their
evaluations.
I
would
say,
within
a
fairly
similar
timeline
timeline
to
us
doing
ours.
They
didn't
wait,
you
know
years
after
doing
it,
it
was
within
one
or
two
years.
I
would
say
of
doing
the
change
that
they
had
also
done
their
evaluation.
O
But
I
think
similar
to
our
study.
They,
the
belief
throughout
the
industry,
is
that
it
really
is
the
street
design
that
drives
speeds,
as
opposed
to
just
the
posting
of
signs
or
changing
of
the
default
speed
limit.
B
I
This
is
a
little
nerdy,
but
I
just
wanted
to
say
how
much
I
appreciated
that
there
was
a
line
about
how
the
photo
radar
may
have
influenced
the
kind
of
had
that
interaction
effect
right
with
the
the
signs,
and
I
just
I
just
wanted
to
commend
you
for
kind
of
going
down
that
path,
and
you
know
looking
into
that
as
a
possible
explanation.
I
It
was.
It
was
very
pleasantly
surprising
to
me
to
to
kind
of
read
that
level
of
detail
in
this
report,
so
just
truly
outstanding
work.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
B
B
O
B
Okay,
anything
else.