►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
A
A
We
would
like
to
add
an
agenda
item
to
honor
a
staff
member
who's
retiring,
and
we
also
want
to
add
item
for
a
discussion
on
supporting
the
people's
resolution
concerning
needed,
federal
and
state
action
to
create
a
path
for
the
Colorado
residents,
Araceli
Vasquez
Ingrid
in
Colada
Latorre,
Rosa,
Sabido
and
Sandra
Lopez,
which
is
an
item
that
Mary
young
put
out
on
hotline.
So
can
I
have
a
motion
to
amend
the
agenda.
A
D
All
right,
hi,
everybody
so
tonight
we're
gonna,
be
honoring
kgn
you
and
their
40th
anniversary.
So
I'm
going
to
read
a
declaration.
The
boulder
community
broadcast
Association
incorporated
better
known
as
Kay
GNU
community
radio
began
transmitting
on
a
frequency
88.5
FM
on
May
22nd
1978,
that
is
older
than
I,
am.
D
During
these
40
years,
kay
GNU
community
radio
has
worked
diligently
to
fulfill
its
mission
to
stimulate,
educate
and
entertain
and
to
amplify
the
voices
and
issues
that
are
overlooked,
suppress
or
underrepresented
by
the
commercial
media
cagey.
A
new
community
radio
provides
our
community
with
access
to
critical
local
public
affairs
and
emergency
management,
information,
cagey,
new
community
radio,
broadcast
media
that
matters
and
music
that
inspires
fueled
by
volunteer
power
and
a
commitment
to
public
access
to
the
airwaves
cagey
new
community
radio.
D
Through
its
extensive
internship
and
youth
radio
training
labs
endeavours
to
train
the
next
generation
of
media
makers,
k,
GNU
community
radio
has
been
recognized
as
a
crucial
community
asset
for
the
contributions
Kay
GNU
makes
to
media
diversity,
arts
and
culture
in
Boulder.
The
City
Council
of
the
city
of
Boulder
Colorado
declares
May
22nd
Keiji
new
community
radio
day
and
encourages
all
residents
to
celebrate
the
importance
of
local,
independent
community
media
and
its
vital
role
in
the
democratic
process.
A
F
G
A
G
E
G
So
by
the
time
I
showed
up
I
just
needed
to
know.
You
know
which
end
of
the
mic
to
point
at
the
guy
in
which
end
of
the
plug
goes
into
the
wall,
and
we
had
a
show
and
the
first
month
that
we
were
on
the
air.
Our
show
came
on.
It
was
kind
of
humble
beginnings
for
many
of
us
who
didn't
really
have
radio
experience,
whatever
we
knew
about
audio,
let's
say
were
sound
or
music.
The
radio
thing
was
a
new
experience.
G
The
fact
that
the
community
came
forward
in
enough
depth
and
passion
it
helped
us
get
over
that
initial
hump.
There
were
some
deep
valleys
and
every
day
was
the
kind
of
a
is
this
station
could
have
survived
another
month.
Just
even
when
we
had
money
there
could
be
interpersonal
squabbles
again.
Nobody
knew
how
to
do.
We
were
building
it
a
day
at
a
time
as
it
came
along.
I
wasn't
one
of
the
inner
circle
by
any
means.
G
G
Shall
we
say
so
over
the
years
alena
have
we
had
a
thousand
volunteers?
Do
you
think
that
we
could
list
of
all
the
people
who
have
come
come
through
their
door?
More
five,
six
thousand
ronson
Wow
at
the
moment,
I
think
we're
around
300
and
at
any
one
moment
for
several
years
now
it's
been
about
that
so
spread
throughout
the
community,
all
ages,
all
backgrounds,
Keiji
and
you
continues
to
be
I,
think
a
wonderful
opportunity
for
members
of
the
community
and
we
perform
I
think
a
vital
service
during
the
flood.
I
think
you
all
remember.
G
People
were
tuning
into
us
because
we
had
the
best
information
we
hope
to
continue
doing
it,
to
expand
and
be
even
better
in
the
years
to
come,
but
people
just
like
you,
kept
us
going
and
helped
us
to
get
where
we
are
today.
Thank
you
all,
and
thanks
really
to
the
volunteers,
including
Roz,
who
has
put
the
committee
together
to
help
us
celebrate
this
40
year
anniversary.
A
A
Okay,
so
we
have
one
more
declaration
and
I
guess
I'm
supposed
to
stand
here
and
I
would
like
to
invite
Tracy
Winfrey
to
come
up,
so
we've
been
experiencing
a
little
turnover,
it
goes
with
being
a
big
city,
but
some
retirements
hurt
more
than
others,
and
this
one
hurts
a
little
bit.
Tracy
and
we're
gonna
be
really
sad
to
see
you
go,
and
we
have
a
long
resolution
to
to
talk
about
all
the
amazing
things
you've
done
for
the
city,
so.
A
Okay,
so
this
is
all
about
it
being
also
an
addition
to
KGA
new
day
it's
Tracy
Winfrey
day.
So
Tracy
began
her
illustrious
career
at
the
city
of
Boulder
in
1990.
As
a
plan
of
transportation
divisions
go
Boulder
office
in
seven
short
years,
she
was
asked
to
manage
the
programs
group
of
transportation
innovators
during
her
years
with
gold.
A
Boulder
Tracy
helped
develop
the
Eco
pass
and
CU
student
pass
and
to
launch
the
nationally
renowned,
boulder
community
transit
network,
including
the
city's
flagship
hopper
out,
plus
the
high-performing
skip,
jump
dash,
found
all
those
routes
and
many
more
that
continue
to
serve
the
community.
Today,
Tracy
was
again
promoted
in
2001
to
the
position
of
the
Director
of
Public
Works
for
transportation.
In
this
capacity
she
oversaw
the
implementation
and
maintenance
of
a
sustainable
local
transportation
system.
A
She
devoted
herself
to
building
regional
partnership
with
neighboring
communities
serving
as
chair
of
the
36
community
solutions
and
playing
a
key
role
in
the
creation
and
work
of
the
us,
36
mayors
and
commissioners
coalition.
The
capstone
achievement
of
this
of
these
regional
efforts
was
a
construction
of
the
multimodal
improvements
along
u.s.
36,
including
the
Flatiron
fire
bus,
rapid
transit
service
and
the
commuter
bike
way
now
considered
a
nationwide
model
for
multimodal
corridors,
which
is
very
true,
and
we
thank
you
every
day
that
we
do.
We
take
that
down
to
Denver.
A
Okay,
we
got
a
ways
to
go
here
so
Tracy
also
oversaw
the
development
of
the
for
transportation
master
plans,
including
one
in
2014,
which
was
honored
with
the
Gold
Award
by
the
Denver
Regional
Council
of
Governments.
In
addition,
she
collaborated
on
and
provided
inspiration
for
the
adoption
of
the
city's
transit
village
area
plan
now
known
as
Boulder
Junction,
which
is
a
vibrant
transit,
oriented,
walkable,
bikeable
mixed
use,
district
and
home
to
rdd's
newest
regional
transit
hub,
not
satisfied
with
her
well
established
reputation
as
a
local
and
regional
transportation.
A
Rockstar
Tracy
also
represented
Boulder,
with
distinction
at
national
and
international
conferences,
including
the
International
eco
mobility
Congress,
where
she
shared
boulders
transportation
story
with
cities
around
the
world.
While
returning
with
new
innovations
to
serve
our
community
in
May
of
2015,
she
she
began
her
second
career
just
when
she
thought
she
had
cemented
her
legacy.
Tracey
was
tapped
to
serve
as
director
of
open
space
and
mountain
parks.
During
this
time
she
helped
the
department
continue
the
massive
efforts
to
recover
from
the
2013
flood.
She
helped
launch
a
regional
round
table
of
land
managers
aged.
A
Land
acquisition
and
protecting
and
preserving
open
space
values
led
the
completion
of
the
agricultural
resources
management
plan,
the
North
Trail
study
area
plan
and
supported
a
successful
launch
of
the
first
master
planning
effort
for
all
the
states
in
mountain
parks,
not
to
miss
not
one
to
miss
out
on
the
joy.
The
outdoors
Tracey
took
the
opportunity
to
experience
the
big
picture
on
the
ground
and
it
recounts
a
day
that
you
had,
where
you
did
lots
of
things.
A
I'm
gonna
skip
ahead
throughout
her
career
Tracey,
dedicated
herself
to
public
service
and
made
significant
contributions
to
creating
boulders
walkable
lifestyle,
to
making
it
top
u.s.
bike-friendly
City
and
to
preserving
and
enhancing
the
communities
more
than
45,000
acres
of
open
space,
but
perhaps
more
important
to
those
who
worked
with
her
every
day.
She
worked
as
a
mentor
dedicating
to
encouraging
inspiring,
promoting
and
building
leadership
throughout
the
organization
feeling
best
only
when
others
received
the
credit
due
for
a
job.
Well
done
for
these
reasons
and
countless
others.
A
H
Right,
a
very
few
words
I
would
just
say
it
has
been
just
such
an
honor
such
a
privilege
to
work
in
service
of
this
community.
I
think
Boulder
demonstrates
time
and
time
again
that
change
happens
at
the
local
level
and
all
the
things
that
Suzanne
mentioned
and
all
the
other
things
that
the
city
works
on.
It's
taken
this
whole
community
to
make
meaningful
change
that
the
rest
of
the
world
watches
it's
an
honor
to
work
with
the
City
Council.
H
It
amazes
me
how
people
volunteer
their
time
night
after
night
day
after
day
weekend
after
weekend,
boards
and
commissions
volunteers
throughout
the
community
to
make
this
community
a
special
place,
whether
it's
volunteer,
Raptor
monitors
who
volunteered
with
us
for
30
years
or
the
very
first
neighborhood
group
that
got
together
to
create
the
neighborhood
eco
pass.
I
mean
wow.
That
is
change
happening
at
the
local
level.
H
So
it's
been
such
an
honor
such
a
privilege
to
be
able
to
work
with
this
leading-edge
city
to
achieve
many
things,
and
it
couldn't
be
done
without
the
people
here
and
the
caliber
of
staff
that
it's
inspiring
to
me
each
and
every
day
to
work.
Shoulder-To-Shoulder
with
people
who
they
devote
their
career
to
making
the
world
a
better
place,
making
their
community
a
better
place
being
in
service
of
something
bigger
than
themselves
and
I.
Just
count
myself
as
fortunate
to
have
had
this
career
and
fortunate
to
be
able
to
have
perhaps
another
career.
A
The
item
has
to
do
with
first
reading
of
our
accessory
dwelling
unit
ordinance
and
we're
not
going
to
discuss
it
tonight,
but
just
wanted
to
point
out
that
this
is
one
of
those
topics
where
it
would
be
really
helpful
for
people
to
get
out
first
reading,
questions
additional
research.
That
would
be
helpful
for
our
deliberations
that
are
coming
up
and
if
anybody
wanted
to
take
a
minute
to
mention
any
of
those
research
things
that
they
would
like.
This
would
be
a
good
time
to
quickly
do
that.
I
B
F
J
Have
a
few
questions
I'm
wondering
how
many
illegal
units
are
in
the
city
just
an
approximation,
since,
of
course
we
can't
know
all
of
those,
but
we
ought
to
be
able
to
do
some
sort
of
approximation
in
Mapleton
Hill
on
university
hill
in
Newlands,
in
martin
acres
areas
like
that,
I
think
that
even
an
approximation
neighbors
call
in
make
complaints
that
it
would
be
helpful
to
know
this
without
some
approximation
of
those
numbers.
I,
don't
know
how
we
can
move
forward
on
creating
new
units.
J
Additionally,
how
many
illegal
short-term,
rentals
I
think
I
read
on
in
our
packet
that
there
are
somewhere
around
400
of
them
that
showed
up
on
an
Airbnb
and
VRBO.
Yet
there
are
many
other
platforms
and
how
much
how
many
units
has
the
city
licensed
and
then,
if
we
can
enforce
these,
how
will
we
enforce
the
new
units,
as
the
staff
says?
J
So
I'm,
just
wondering
and
I'm
not
commenting,
but
just
these
questions
I
think
would
help
clarify
and
whether
or
not
this
is
experimental
rather
than
incremental,
and
will
illegal
units
be
grandfathered
and
what
will
that
do
to
saturation
limits,
and
how
do
we
address
equity
across
the
city?
With
all
of
these
questions
that
I've
just
asked.
A
K
Just
really
have
to
two
questions,
and
one
is:
how
are
we
going
to
address
the
diversity
of
our
various
neighborhoods?
It's
along
the
same
lines
as
Cindy
I.
Don't
think
we
can
move
forward,
one
size
move,
one
size
fits
all,
and
so
I'd
like
to
have
some
suggestions
for
how
we
start
working
in
neighborhoods
and
addressing
the
different
issues
associated
with
a
to
use
and
then
secondly,
but
I
think
very
important.
K
I
certainly
hope.
Affordability
is
a
major
component
of
all
of
these,
a
to
use,
if
not
most
of
them,
and
when
you
read
about
the
history
of
a
tea
use,
it's
clearly
been
there's
always
been
an
affordable
component
on
that
and
so
I
guess
I'm
just
wondering
how
are
we
going
to
keep
it
affordable
and
what
kind
of
guidelines
are
you
staff
going
to
come
forward?
I
would.
D
Second,
one
Cindy
and
Lisa
just
said
and
I
would
also
add
and
I'm,
not
quite
sure
how
stuff
is
going
to
answer
this,
but
having
a
mother
who's.
A
scientist
I
always
learned
that
when
you
do
an
experiment-
and
you
change
things-
you
change
one
thing
at
a
time
so
that
you
can
see
everything
else
is
a
constant
see
how
it
affects
the
others
that
are
constant
and
so
changing,
12
things,
some
of
which
I
understand
could
be
small.
D
So
maybe
change
three
things,
but
there's
one
really
big
thing
in
there:
I'm
kind
of
curious
how
we're
gonna
attract
this,
how
the
metrics
are
gonna
work
to
track,
12
changes
and
how
this
is
gonna,
almost
kind
of
be
like
a
downhill
effect.
So
that's
I
just
would
be
curious
how
staff
is
tracking
that
right.
C
So
various
questions
have
been
raised
about
affordability,
which
so
I'd
be
interested
to
hear
if
staff
could
look
into
whether
any
of
the
many
other
Adu
programs
across
the
country
include
an
affordability
component,
and
if
so,
what
that
looks
like
thank
you.
L
J
K
A
I
So
I'm
just
curious
how
many
people
are
currently
on
the
waiting
list
for
ad
use
due
to
the
concentration
limit,
so
presumably
the
concentration
limit
has
slowed
down
or
stopped,
certainly
to
use
I'm
just
curious.
How
many
that
is,
and
if
raising
it
to
20%,
as
has
been
discussed,
would
take
all
of
those
people
off
the
list.
A
K
A
Okay,
so
with
that
yeah,
obviously
it's
going
to
be
a
rich
conversation,
but
thought
that
would
be
helpful
to
kind
of
air
that
out
a
little
bit.
Okay,
so
with
that
could
I
have
a
motion
to
move
the
consent
agenda
any
more
discussion.
This
is
just
a
pass
this
forward
on.
First
reading,
okay
yeah,
you.
J
K
M
Good
reason
is
that
the
council
asked
us
to
get
the
ATU
ordinance
to
the
council
before
their
retreat
and
their
schedule
is
so
busy
in
June
that
we
weren't
able
and
in
May
it's
been
busy
that
we
weren't
able
to
do
it
so
I'm
working
with
CAC.
We
agreed
that
we
would
have
second
reading
and
public
hearing
on
June
5th
and
in
order
to
back
that,
up
to
first
reading,
May
22nd
was
the
appropriate
night,
because
last
meeting,
when
you
ordinarily
would
have
had
it.
You
had
several
other
items
on
the
agenda.
Thank.
A
I
Just
gonna
make
a
comment
that
I
expect
that
this
may
take
more
than
one
additional
reading
as
we
work
through
the
other
issues.
So
I
think
it's
important
to
maybe
set
expectations
that
there
will
be
an
iterative
process
around
ad
use
kind
of
like
there
was
when
we
worked
through
the
coop
issues
that.
C
It
seeming
that
way,
it
did
to
me,
doesn't
feel
necessary,
but
understand
that
other
people
want
to
go
that
way.
I'll
just
throw
one
one.
One
quick
comment
just
to
remind
folks
how
high
I
don't
have
the
number
in
front
of
me,
but
how
high
a
percentage
of
support
there
was
for
a
to
use
in
our
statistically
valid
survey
of
the
community
for
the
comp
plan
process.
A
N
N
So
this
slide
shows
the
overall
timeline
for
the
South
Boulder
Creek
flood
mitigation
projects
I'll
be
stepping
you
through
this
timeline
at
a
very
high
level
and
then
we'll
focus
on
and
provide
a
greater
level
of
detail
for
the
public
process
for
the
current
and
next
phases
of
the
design
for
the
Phase
one
flood
mitigation
projects.
The
public
process
for
the
current
phase
carries
forward
and
builds
upon
past
studies,
community
input
and
decisions
made
at
each
stage
of
this
timeline.
N
N
The
master
plan
recommended
three
phases
for
flood
mitigation.
I
do
want
to
note
that
North
is
to
the
right
on
this
map.
So
that's
a
little
different
in
the
far
left
in
white
is
phase
one
regional
detention
at
u.s..
36,
which
is
the
project
we
are
currently
working
on,
designing
phase
one
select
was
selected
to
be
the
first
phase
because
of
the
large
down
Street
and
flood
benefits
by
reducing
the
risk
of
floodwaters,
overtopping
us
36
and
spilling
over
into
the
West
Valley.
The
master
plan
also
included
two
other
future
phases.
N
N
The
next
step
in
the
south
boulder
creek
flood
mitigation
project
was
the
Boulder
Valley
Comprehensive
Plan
Update,
as
I
mentioned
earlier,
the
South
Boulder
Creek
master
plan
identified
as
phase
one
reasonable
attention
at
u.s.
36
on
the
University
of
Colorado's
to
use
south
property
and
just
for
orientation.
This
map
north
is
because
the
see
South
property
is
not
owned
by
the
city.
In
order
to
put
flood
mitigation
project
at
this
location,
we
will
need
an
agreement
with
the
property
owner.
N
Ceo
stated
that
it
would
like
this
property
be
annexed
into
the
city
limits
and
with
annexation.
C.
You
will
agree
for
the
city
to
use
a
portion
of
the
property
for
flood
mitigation
because
of
this
during
the
Boulder
Valley
Comprehensive
Plan
Update
process.
The
future
see
you
suppose,
has
discussed
extensively
with
the
community.
This
input
ultimately
led
to
the
creation
of
Cu
South
guiding
principles
that
were
included
to
complement
the
future
land
use
designations
on
the
site.
N
The
Comprehensive
Plan
up
to
aid,
including
the
C's
South
guiding
principles,
were
approved
by
the
city's
Planning
Board
City
Council
Boulder
County
Planning
Commission,
and
the
Boulder
County
Board
of
County
Commissioners
in
July
of
2017.
These
new
land
use
designations
and
guiding
principles
were
intended
to
guide
the
future
agreement.
A
future
agreement
between
the
city
and
Cu
for
the
long
term
uses
on
the
site.
The
blue
area.
Labeled
public
on
this
map
is
where
future
development
by
Cu
could
take
place.
N
The
dark
green
area,
labeled
parks,
urban
and
other
at
the
top
is
the
area
envisioned
for
regional
flood
detention
and
the
boundaries
of
this
were
based
on
the
South
Boulder
Creek
master
plan
phase,
1
concept,
the
lighter
green
labeled,
open
space
other
corresponds
to
the
500-year
floodplain
and
envision
some
sort
of
open
space
and
no
enclosed
structural
development
by
CU
in
this
area.
In
the
future,
the
guiding
principles
clarify
expectations
for
each
of
the
land
use
designations
on
the
site.
Among
other
things,
the
guiding
principles
provide
direction
for
the
flood
mitigation
area.
N
This
includes
directions
to
evaluate
the
different
flood
events
during
the
design
process,
including
the
100-year,
500-year
and
long
duration.
Storm
events,
as
well
as
to
evaluate
the
possibility
of
removing
the
existing
CU
levee
on
this
map
is
that
faded,
white,
curved
line
kind
of
to
the
right
and
the
light
green.
N
This
will
allow
us
to
better
understand
the
location
of
the
project
on
the
site
and
the
way
it
might
affect
some
of
these
other
discussions
about
the
site.
So
just
as
a
reminder,
the
parks,
urban
other
land-use
that
is
shown
in
the
dashed
red
lines
up.
There
was
based
on
the
south
boulder
creek
master
plan
concept,
which
assumed
that
the
C
levee
would
remain
in
place
and
was
focused
on
mitigating
the
hundred
year
storm.
N
The
adopted
guiding
principles
are
asking
us
now
to
look
at
mitigating
the
possibility
of
mitigating
the
500
year
storm
as
well
as
look
at
the
potential
of
removing
the
C
levee.
So,
with
these
different
variations
being
explored,
this
could
change
the
shape
and
the
footprint
of
where
flood
mitigation,
project
and
inundation
area
might
happen
on
the
site.
N
N
Here's
a
high-level
timeline
for
the
phase
1
project,
we're
currently
in
the
concept
evaluation
phase
at
a
minimum.
Each
of
the
concepts
that
we're
considering
must
prevent
overtopping
of
us
36
during
a
hundred
year,
storm
and
again
a
hundred
year
storm.
It
has
one
percent
probability
of
occurring
in
a
given
year.
The
concept
must
also
be
permitted
by
the
regulatory
agencies
such
as
FEMA
EPA,
US,
Fish
and
Wildlife
Service,
as
well
as
the
acceptable
to
the
state
engineer's
office
and
CSI.
N
But
first
I
want
to
talk
about
the
interrelationship
of
the
project
engineering
schedules
shown
in
the
blue
bar
here
and
the
future
discussions
around
annexation
of
the
University
of
Colorado
Boulder
south
property,
as
I
mentioned
once.
We
know
which
concept
will
move
forward
into
preliminary
design.
We'll
have
a
better
idea
of
where
and
how
much
land
we'll
need
on
scene
yourself
for
flood
mitigation.
N
N
So
this
timeline
zooms
in
to
show
the
community
engagement
and
advisory
board
and
council
and
but
planned
for
the
concept
evaluation
phase
that
we're
currently
in
and
also
for
the
next
phase
of
preliminary
design.
Just
you
do
have
a
handout
of
this
in
front
of
you.
If
you
want
to
look
at
it
a
little
closer
in
more
detail
to
orient
you,
the
central
blue
bar
shows
the
flood
mitigation
project
phases.
An
estimated
timeline
for
those
above
the
bar
shows
completed
and
plans.
N
We
now
realize,
admittedly,
in
hindsight,
that
we
had
underestimated
the
level
of
interest
in
the
technical
details
of
this
project
by
some
community
members,
so
we
had
not
previously
planned
for
regular
community
updates
on
the
project
during
the
early
part
of
this
phase
of
the
project.
This
group
was
very
interested
in
understanding
the
details
and
the
status
of
the
consent
work
and
wanted
the
opportunity
to
provide
feedback
directly
to
the
project
team,
so
they
asked
to
meet
with
staff
and
consultants,
and
we
agreed
to
three
meetings
with
this
group.
N
N
The
design
concepts
are
evaluation
of
them
and
getting
feedback
before
we
present
this
information
to
OS,
BT
and
Rab,
ideally
at
a
joint
meeting
in
June.
Just
so,
you
know
that
June
date
is
still
tentative
if
we're
still
confirming
that
we
can
have
quorum
of
both
boards
at
that
meeting.
So
that
date
is
tentative
at
this
time.
N
Come
back
to
each
of
those
boards
separately
in
July
for
their
deliberations
and
recommendations
to
Council
os
BTE
will
be
looking
at
the
different
concepts
to
determine
if
they
could
be
acceptable
to
them.
As
a
property
owner
will
then
be
asking
web
to
make
a
recommendation
on
which
project
concept
to
move
forward
into
preliminary
design.
N
N
In
advance
of
the
meeting
and
we'll
relay
their
feedback
to
you
at
the
September
18th
study
session
during
preliminary
design
for
the
flood
mitigation
project,
staff
will
provide
regular
updates
to
web
and
the
community
on
the
progress
of
the
project
design
and
we'll
be
keeping
project
information
up
today
on
the
website
on
south
boulder
creek
comm.
We
have
learned
that
there
is
a
lot
of
interest
in
the
details
of
design
of
this
project
by
a
number
of
community
members,
not
just
as
an
ad-hoc
group.
N
So
we
are
now
planning
for
providing
regular
updates
where
the
community
can
learn
about
the
status
of
the
design,
ask
questions
and
provide
feedback
to
the
project
team
so
between
the
upcoming
board
and
council
meetings
regarding
the
design
concept,
selection,
future
annexation,
related
engagement,
lab
updates
and
other
flood
mitigation
project.
Progress
updates.
We
anticipate
roughly
monthly
touch
points
with
the
community
on
this
project,
probably
over
the
next
year.
So
if
that
concludes
my
update,
presentation,
I'm
happy
to
answer
questions.
K
Thank
you
for
that
presentation.
I
was
wondering
you
know
we're
in
the
concept
evaluation
phase,
and
you
talked
about
all
right,
Oh,
SPT
and
Rab
having
a
joint
meeting
and
then
giving
recommendations,
and
then
I
noticed
that
it's
going
to
Planning
Board
on
August,
2nd
and
whether
its
formal
or
informal.
Why
aren't
we
asking
for
planning
board
to
weigh
in
on
their
recommendations
so.
N
N
We
understand
planning
boards
interest
and
that's
why
we
wanted
to
provide
the
relationship
to
the
boulder
valley,
comp
plan,
cu
self
guiding
principles
so
that
they
can
understand
how
this
mitigation
project
relates
to
that
before
we
bring
it
to
you,
but
they
don't
have
a
specific
purview
over
the
engineering
of
this
project.
I.
K
Understand
that,
but
eventually
they'll
be
asked
to
recommend,
make
a
recommendation
on
enix
ation,
and
certainly
this
is
a
major
land
use
issue
in
terms
of
how
it's
going
to
be
zoned
and
stuff,
like
that.
So
I
guess
I'm
very
much
interested
in
hearing
from
the
Planning
Board
and
I,
like
the
sequencing,
the
OS
BT
and
the
rap,
but
I
think
it's
very
important
to
get
planning
board's
input
in
this,
whether
it
be
formal
or
informal
and.
N
K
N
And
so
again,
that's
during
the
preliminary
design
phase
of
the
flood
mitigation
projects
that
are
going
to
Planning
Board
is
really
around
the
annexation
issue
and
our
plans
for
Community
Engagement.
So,
yes,
we
have
not
set
a
date
yet
for
that,
but
we
do
anticipate
going
to
them,
particularly
around
the
annexation
process,
plans
and
community
engagement
plans.
Before
we
come
to
you
at
this
study
session,.
N
K
N
We
have
looked
at
about
15
different
options,
but
they
are
really
sort
of
sub
variations
of
three
main
concepts,
with
different
flood
events
and
with
and
without
the
Cu,
Levy,
etc,
etc,
and
so
we
are
bringing
evaluation
of
all
of
those
different
concept
variations
forward
to
the
boards
soon.
Thank
you.
C
C
My
understanding
is
that
so
on,
August
7th
we're
going
to
select
a
project
concept
right,
that's
up
to
us
at
that
point,
based
on
the
recommendations,
we're
getting
and
feedback
from
Planning
Board.
If
not,
are
not
a
recommendation,
then
the
September
18th
meeting,
that's
just
about
process.
Is
that
correct,
correct.
N
C
Great
call,
thank
you,
so
my
other
question
was
so
just
in
looking
at
this
timeline
over
the
next
year
and
a
half
or
so,
and
then
moving
into
the
next
phases.
Is
there
any
time
where
kind
of
the
planners
and
the
engineers
or
have
done
their
work
and
then
they're
sitting
around
waiting
a
few
months?
While
we
talk
about
stuff
or
is
it
kind
of
really
proceeding
kind
of
a
pace
as
they
finish
their
work?
We
make
decisions,
we.
N
Are
trying
to
sequence
the
preliminary
design
with
the
conversations
around
annexation?
The
reality
is,
as
we
go
out
to
the
public
and
hear
feedback
from
the
public
around
annexation.
We
don't
know
how
long
that
will
take.
We
are
aiming
to
align
those
so
that
when
we
are
done
with
the
preliminary
engineering,
we
will
be
ready
to
discuss
a
decision
around
annexation
with
you
all,
but
I
can't
make
those
promises
right
now,
simply
because
Community
Engagement
is
an
unknown
right.
C
And
we
want
to
be
true
to
that
process.
It
needs
to
be
a
genuine
process.
Absolutely
I,
just
I'll
just
invite
you.
Of
course
our
calendar
fills
up
fast
sometime,
so
please
do
reach
out
to
CAC
early.
You
know
when,
when
you're
seeing
what
needs
to
happen
when
it
needs
to
get
on
our
calendar
just
reach
out
dive,
I,
don't
know
if
I'll
still
be
on.
So
you
see
it
that
way,
but
whatever.
L
On
page
eight
of
the
slideshow,
you
have
kind
of
the
timeline
and
the
designs
one
year
final
design,
one
year
construction,
two
years,
but
given
that
we're
just
in
concept
evaluation
and
haven't
even
chosen
the
final
one
to
move
forward
with.
How
confident
are
you
that,
like
what,
if
we
choose,
do
you
think
my
question?
Is
the
designs
you're
gonna
bring
forward
to
us.
N
Preview,
which
will
be
rolling
out
to
others
soon
but
sort
of
preliminary
understanding
of
that
is
that
we
believe
that
all
the
different
concepts
that
we
are
bringing
forward
will
roughly
have
the
same
schedule.
I
know
that
was
important
to
the
community
and
when
we
asked
at
the
open
house
level
of
importance
of
different
criteria,
schedule
was
definitely
one
of
them,
and
so
we've
looked
at
that.
There
are
different
things
influencing
the
schedule
on
different
concepts,
but
it's
our
understanding
from
the
consultants
that
they're
all
roughly
about
the
same
so
again.
N
I
So
it's
gonna
be
something
that
I
think
we
will
need
to
make
sure
that
people
get
the
opportunity
to
become
educated
about,
and
the
next
meetings
that
we
have
with
Rab
and
OS
BT
and
planning
board
I
think
it's
important
that
all
of
those
bodies
get
a
chance
to
really
air
out,
including
Planning
Board,
because
the
decisions
they'll
be
making
afterwards
will
be
influenced
by
the
selections
that
are
made
of
the
specific
projects.
So
land-use
decisions
will
probably
follow
flood
mitigation
decisions
and
so
the
earlier
they
can
see
it
and
be
part
of
it.
N
On
that
note,
we
encourage
all
to
come,
see
the
public
open
house
on
the
7th
to
get
a
preview.
And
similarly,
that
is
why
we're
splitting
the
OSB,
T
rad
initial
presentation
of
information
and
then
the
follow
up
deliberations,
because
we
know
it
will
be
a
lot
to
digest.
And
we
want
everyone
to
have
the
opportunity
to
really
think
through
the
different
concepts.
O
A
C
F
P
All
he
thinks
that
it
was
very
helpful.
This
is
a
genuinely
a
question,
not
a
criticism.
I
see.
We
call
that
back
in
August
of
2015,
when
City
Council
moved
with
this
mitigation
plan,
there
was
discussion
that
the
berm
would
be
completed
around
2018
or
2019
I'm.
Remembering
correctly
looks
like
we're
now
looking
for
a
competition
of
around
2022,
which
is
about
three
or
four
years
later
than
was
originally
discussed
when
the
community
asks
you
that
question
just
so,
we
know
how
to
answer
that
question
as
well.
N
Not
around
during
that
time,
so
I
may
not
provide
the
best
answer
and
that
I
think
Jeff
Arthur
might
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
I
suspect
that
the
conversations
around
the
boulder
valley
comp
plan
and
see
yourself
the
kid
development
of
the
guiding
principles
put
the
engineering
of
the
flood
mitigation
project
on
hold.
While
we
had
those
community
conversations
around
the
future
of
CU
south
and
then
we
came
back
and
sort
of
restarted,
the
projects
fall
of
last
year.
After
this
you
South
guiding
principles
were
developed.
N
P
N
A
A
So
in
terms
of
the
public
process
you
know
recently
there
was
this
ad
hoc
group,
but
going
forward
it's
just
public
updates.
Anybody
can
come
here
and
update
and
give
your
opinion,
but
you
could
give
it
anyhow
and
it's
not
a
working
group
so
much
as
public
an
opportunity
for
the
public
to
make
sure
they're
tracking
the
details
is
that
accurate?
That
is.
N
Our
yes,
that
is
our
plan
to
do
that.
Certainly
regular
updates,
we're
needed,
depending
on
the
progress
of
the
project,
some
community
meeting
updates,
as
well
as
we're
having
engagement
around
annexation.
There
might
be
just
sort
of
a
tag-along
update
on
the
flood
mitigation
project
with
that,
so
we
want
to
kind
of
utilize
all
those
different
tools
as
we
move
forward.
Okay,.
A
So
I
guess
I'll
just
maybe
tie
this
up
by
saying
this
is
really
helpful.
I
think
it's
very
clear
to
the
public.
There's
lots
of
opportunities
for
people
to
to
engage,
to
learn
more
to
give
opinions
and
I
also
think
that
we
regularly
get
emails
and
conversations
with
people
that
are
very
concerned
that
we
keep
moving
forward
expeditiously.
A
F
Yeah
real
quickly,
this
resolution
was
afforded
to
me
by
a
immigration
activist,
Bob
Norris,
and
it's
the
product
of
about
five
months
of
discussion
and
meetings
with
different
folks,
such
as
immigrants,
rights
activists
and
attorneys
and
faith
communities,
and
it's
based
on
some
recommendations
that
were
put
together
by
some
folks
that
are
in
sanctuary
across
different
across
Colorado
and
and
I
just
wanted
to
bring
it
forward
to
Council.
So
that,
if
we
just
to
see,
if
council
would
want
to
sign
up
for
the
resolution
as
a
body,
we
can
each
sign
up
individually.
F
C
F
All
right,
I'll
read
the
whole
thing
concerning
needed,
federal
and
state
action
to
create
a
path
for
Colorado
residents,
Araceli
Velasquez,
Ingrid,
ANCA
da
de
la
Torre,
Rosa
Sabido
and
Sandra
Lopez,
whereas
Immigration
and
Customs
Enforcement
is
focusing
its
extensive
resources
on
the
state
of
Colorado,
with
the
second
highest
deportation
rate
in
the
country,
with
ice
detentions
and
arrests,
doubling
in
Colorado
and
Wyoming
in
fiscal
year.
2017,
whereas
Colorado
families,
businesses
and
local
communities
are
experiencing
crises
due
to
inaction
at
the
federal
level,
whereas
more
than
71,000
u.s.
F
citizen
children
whose
parents
are
undocumented
Coloradans
are
powerless
to
apply
for
relief,
whereas
the
bipartisan
Colorado
delegation
has
a
responsibility
to
work
towards
solution
and
to
recognize
the
contributions
of
these
four
women
to
their
communities.
Whereas
our
current
immigration
policies
by
the
path
to
legal
residency
for
for
Colorado
women,
who
represent
thousands
of
other
residents
of
the
state
of
Colorado,
whereas
our
four
women
have
complied
with
all
requested
of
them
by
our
immigration
system,
short
of
deportation
and
participated
to
the
fullest
extent
in
the
life
of
Colorado.
F
Fourteen
months,
her
previous
Liars
did
not
sufficiently
prepare
her
asylum
defense
ice
denied.
Her
stay
application
in
2017
and
current
law
does
not
allow
her
husband,
who
has
temporary
protective
status,
to
apply
for
her
or
a
justice
status,
and
current
law
does
not
allow
her
to
apply
through
her
minor
children.
As
Ingrid
in
Kalevala,
Thor
has
lived
in
Colorado.
More
than
half
her
life
arriving
at
age,
17
and
2001.
She
and
her
partner
Eliseo
are
raising
two
children
who
US
citizen
children,
Brian,
9
and
Annabelle.
F
Ingrid
is
a
well
known
leader
across
the
country
and
the
state
and
her
only
infection
has
been
to
work
to
sustain
herself
and
even
though
she
completed
our
restitution
and
rehabilitation
required
of
her
and
has
expressed
deep
remorse
for
the
impacts
of
our
loss.
Laws
on
the
person
impacted
her
deportation
continued
and
current
law
does
not
include
a
path
for
Ingrid
to
apply
for
status
there.
Her
minor
children
nor
her
citizen
and
it
is
inhumane
to
foot
further
Finnish
people
beyond
the
penalties
imposed
by
the
criminal
justice
system
and
a
1996
law.
F
IÃr
IRA
I,
don't
know
what
that
stands
for,
and
it
doesn't
say
the
power
of
discretion
from
immigration,
judges
to
consider
evidence
of
actual
personal
character,
closing
a
path
to
status
for
mother's
like
Ingrid
and
I.
Our
IRA
is
a
failed
and
inhumane
experience,
experiment
and
depriving
fairness
to
so
many
like
Ingrid
in
the
United
States
continuously
since
2001
Sanda
is
a
well-known
member
of
Roaring,
Fork,
Valley,
community
and
Colorado
living
here
with
her
husband
and
raising
her
their
three
u.s.
F
children
at
Le,
Toux
and
Edwin
13,
and
her
oldest
son
Alex,
who
is
attending
his
first
year
at
Mesa,
State
University
in
Grand,
Junction
studying
mechanics
and
Sanders
deportation
began
with
wrongful
arrests
when
one
of
her
young
kids,
dialed,
9-1-1
and
hung
up
all
charges
were
immediately
dropped.
Local
police
reported
sandra
to
ice
and
ice
refused
to
grant
her
last
day
of
deportation,
and
current
law
does
not
allow
senator
to
apply
through
her
minor
children
and
immigration.
F
Proceedings
continued
against
people
even
when
charges
are
dropped
or
they
are
found
innocent
and
there
is
no
path
to
status
for
long-term
residents
of
Colorado.
As
the
vast
majority
of
the
last
28
years
in
Colorado
with
her
citizens,
stepfather
and
mother,
Rosa
is
well
known,
and
a
fixture
in
southwest
Colorado
between
her
catering
business
and
as
pool
secretary
for
the
Catholic
Church
Rosa
is
the
main
support
for
her
aging
citizen
parents.
F
Salsa
complied
with
the
terms
of
ices
order
of
supervision
between
2008
and
2017,
and
received
stays
of
removal
between
2011
and
2017
this
year
without
explanation,
ice
tonight,
or
seventh
application
first
day
and
Rosa
has
been
the
beneficiary
of
her
mother's
immigration.
Petitions
since
2001,
but
client
law
has
delayed
her
mother's
application
for
by
17
years.
Ragosa
is
now
classified
in
the
family
based
preference
category
1
as
the
adult
unmarried
daughter
of
a
US
citizen
based
on
the
number
of
visas
set
by
Congress
for
each
immigrant
category
and
the
number
of
petitions
ahead
of
her.
F
A
F
By
taking
steps
to
value
the
tapestry
of
our
communities,
the
unity
of
our
families
and
our
humanity,
and
take
steps
such
as
below
to
create
a
pathway
to
citizenship
for
all
undocumented
people.
As
the
Colorado
delegation
worked
to
create
a
path
for
temporary
protective
status
and
I'll
just
shorten
those
maintain
a
commitment
to
human
rights
by
protecting
asylum
seekers,
restore
past
legal
permanent
residency
for
parents
of
us
children
by
repealing
the
iÃr
IRA
restore
past
a
citizenship.
F
By
giving
back
to
judges
the
discretion
to
consider
a
personal
character
by
repealing
a
IRA,
create
a
transparent
and
timely
path.
So
fulfilling
our
promise
to
families.
By
eliminating
quotas.
That
mean
decades
of
waiting
for
millions
of
parents
and
their
children
as
the
Colorado
Legislature
and
governor
to
uphold
our
Constitution
and
require
Immigration
and
Customs
Enforcement
to
show
a
judicial
warrant
in
Colorado
before
receiving
informant
information
about
or
detaining
people
allow
for.
F
Equal
access
to
the
justice
system
mean
to
serve
Colorado
residents
by
creating
a
bright
line
between
law
enforcement
and
ice,
including
becoming
Immigration
and
Customs.
Enforcement
and
probation
safeguard
Colorado
against
iÃr,
IRAs,
devastating
double
jeopardy
and
deportation
impacts
through
public
advocacy
and
mercy.
F
P
O
J
O
O
P
K
O
K
A
O
C
F
A
C
K
A
A
A
Q
It's
it's
my
pleasure
to
introduce
Karen
Ron
this
evening,
I'd
like
to
acknowledge
her
retirement
announcement
earlier
today.
It's
with
mixed
emotions,
of
course,
Karen's
22
years
of
amazing
service
and
significant
community
contributions
have
just
been
outstanding,
and
it's
been
my
pleasure
to
work
with
her
over
the
past
few
years.
We'll
have
an
opportunity
to
celebrate
Karen
more
during
the
month
of
June,
but
I
did
just
want
to
acknowledge
her
announcement
today,
Thank
You
Miriam
and
many
thanks
to
Karen
her
staff
team
for
tonight's
presentation,
as
well
as
the
Human
Relations
Commission.
Q
A
R
Counsel,
I'm
Karen,
Human,
Service
Services,
also
with
me
tonight
presenting
is
Carmen
at
Elana,
our
manager
of
community
relations
in
office
of
human
rights
and
our
human
relations
commissioner,
chair
Anna,
Kiel
manka
car
will
also
be
speaking.
We
also
have
in
the
audience
with
us
and
available
for
questions
the
rest
of
our
HRC
members,
art,
Fiegel,
Lauren,
Gifford,
Lindsey,
Loberg
and
Sharon
Simmons,
and
we
also
have
a
couple
of
our
youth
opportunities
advisory
board
members
here
to
answer
any
questions
about
vote,
16,
neighbor,
Martinez
and
dick
Sims.
R
So
we
have
a
full
complement
to
folks
here
to
answer
any
questions
so
we're
here
tonight
to
provide
an
update
on
the
HRC,
our
Human,
Relations,
Commission,
inclusive
and
welcoming,
and
also
to
ask
council
for
some
specific
feedback
on
legislative
initiatives
that
the
HRC
is
interested
in
pursuing.
So
we
have
about
a
presentation
and
then
we
can
have
followed
by
council
questions
and
discussion.
S
Tonight,
the
Human
Relations
Commission
is
really
happy
to
be
able
to
get
this
opportunity
to
present
to
you,
the
Human,
Relations
Commission.
So
just
so
people
know
we
have
a
goal
in
advising
the
city
on
improving
social
conditions
and
alleviating
social
problems
in
the
city
and
an
overall
goal
of
fostering
positive
relations
among
all
citizens
and
community
members.
S
Additionally,
we
assist
in
the
protection
of
human
rights
in
the
city.
In
doing
so,
we
we
make
legislative
and
policy
recommendations.
We
allocate
community
funding
for
cultural
and
social
issue,
events
such
as
indigenous
peoples
day
and
celebration
of
immigrant
Heritage
Month,
and
we
also
conduct
community
outreach
and
issues
of
importance
as
well
tonight.
In
this
welcome
and
inclusive
plan
it
presents'
to
the
top
is
that
the
Human
Relations
Commission
has
identified
that
we
would
like
to
work
on
for
2018
and
2019.
S
We
consider
the
public
feedback
and
multiple
community
engagement
processes
that
have
informed
both
the
plan
and
the
initiatives
earlier
tonight.
Just
to
give
you
an
idea
of
the
comprehensiveness
of
the
community
engagement,
we
and
the
staff
have
done
I
just
want
to
mention
both
the
Human
Services
and
homelessness
strategy
updates.
A
community
perceptions
assessment
which
began
in
2015,
was
initiated
by
the
council
and
completed
in
2017.
This
was
to
assess
to
conduct
a
broad
data
gathering
and
outreach
in
the
community
on
how
welcoming
inclusive
different
segments
of
the
population
feel
in
the
community.
S
After
that,
we
had
a
in
November
2017
at
a
community
perceptions
assessment,
open
house,
which
was
an
opportunity
again
for
the
community
to
give
feedback
on
this
study
and
to
present
solutions
and
ideas
of
what
they
would
like
the
Human
Relations
Commission
in
the
city
to
do
about
the
issues
that
came
up
in
the
study.
Additionally,
we
have
had
lots
of
public
feedback,
especially
since
the
2016
election
and
Human
Relations
Commission
meetings
and
we've
conducted
issues
on
immigration
as
well.
S
So
all
of
that
is
going
into
has
gone
into
developing
this
plan,
because
I
meant
to
you
tonight
and
we
put
those
legislative
initiatives
that
we
would
like.
Council
feedback
on
to
move
I
would
be
remiss
if
I
didn't
mention
in
listing
all
of
those
studies
and
all
the
community
engagement.
This
Commission
has
done
if
I
didn't
think
the
council
and
the
city
manager's
office
for
helping
us
plan,
those,
and
especially
all
members
of
the
Human
Relations
Commission,
between
2015
and
now
and
Kevin,
and
the
staff
for
changing
all
of
those
community
forums.
S
R
Thank
you
Nikhil,
so,
just
a
just
to
let
folks
know
that
the
work
plan
that's
being
presented
today
is
part
of
an
annual
work
plan
process
at
the
HRC
engages
in
and
each
year.
They
update
that
and,
as
Nikhil
mentioned,
this
particular
work
plan
incorporated
some
pretty
significant
community
feedback
from
different
community
engagement
processes,
including
the
community
perceptions
assessment.
The
open
house
results
from
that
which
is
included
in
your
packets
public
comment
from
HRC
meetings
and
different
HRC
events.
So
a
lot
of
information
went
in
to
the
HRC
developing
their
work
plan.
R
So
I
just
want
to
mention
briefly,
because
this
was
a
pretty
important
part
of
the
community
engagement
process.
Was
the
city's
community
perception
assessment
that
was
published
in
2017.
It
was
conducted
by
the
the
National
Council
on
crime
and
delinquency,
and
it
was
really
to
get
feedback
from
the
public
and
the
community
on
how
they
perceive
and
experience
inclusiveness
in
our
community.
R
In
November
of
2017,
the
city
held
an
open
house
hosted
by
the
HRC
to
gather
feedback
on
the
specific
recommendations
and
potential
action
that
the
community
in
the
city
can
take.
I'm
gonna
turn
it
over
now.
The
comments
could
talk
a
little
more
specifically
about
the
recommendations
that
came
out
of
that
process
which
led
to
the
development
to
the
work
plan.
Oh.
R
T
Off
I'm,
sorry,
sorry,
which
brings
us
to
the
open
house,
it
was
an
opportunity
for
community
members
to
weigh
in
on
recommendations
made
in
the
community
perceptions
assessment
report.
So
there
are
four
stations
that
were
aligned
with
means
and
recommendations
that
were
identified
in
the
report.
These
included
policy
and
government
community
business
and
services,
individuals
and
interpersonal.
An
orientation
station
at
the
beginning
set
the
context
for
the
background
and
for
the
information.
And
then
we
had
an
exit
station
that
provided
an
opportunity
for
people
to
take
a
survey
which
prioritized
actions.
T
Participants
could
attend
an
area
of
interest
or
they
could
go
through
all
the
stations
that
night,
so
each
station
was
attended
by
city
staff
and
community
organizations
based
on
the
theme
stations
featured
specific
questions
for
the
public
to
react
to
and
an
opportunity
to
provide
an
open-ended
feedback
which
was
recorded
on
sticky
notes
and
poster
boards.
This
feedback
formed
the
basis
for
the
community
suggestions,
so
it
is
particularly
notable
about
comments
made
by
open
house.
Participants
is
the
extent
of
agreement
and
consistency.
T
Intentional
conversations
are
often
conversations
about
delicate
or
sensitive
issues,
and
we
had
a
number
of
these,
for
instance,
related
to
indigenous
peoples
day,
specifically
with
regards
to
history,
so
in
expanding
outreach
and
in
the
second
bullet,
it
has
to
do
with
making
an
app
to
interact
with
communities
on
terms
that
are
feasible
for
them.
That
involves
scheduling
events
when
people
are
not
working
providing
language
interpretation
and
childcare,
and
then
the
next
two
bullets
increase
representation
and
hire
diverse
staff.
T
Those
are
self-explanatory,
but
when
you
get
to
the
final
bullet,
it
has
the
words,
affordability
and
diversity
right
next
to
each
other.
The
issue
of
affordability
comes
up
frequently,
but
that's
not
within
the
purview
of
the
HRC,
but
it
is
a
present
in
the
minds
of
HRC
members
as
they
develop
their
work
plan
now,
because
the
HRC
work
plan
is
in
essence,
a
welcoming
and
inclusive
community
blueprint.
T
T
Above
all,
to
eliminate
the
likelihood
of
situations
such
as
those
in
news
stories
where
someone
calls
the
police,
because
a
person
they
come
into
contact
with
seems
different.
This
quality
of
being
insightful
into
each
other's
lives
and
cultures
is
sometimes
called
cultural
versatility.
So
the
bullets
on
this
site
can
be
summarized
as
efforts
to
foster
cultural
versatility.
T
So
the
HRC
is
interested
in
exploring
whether
boulders
law,
which
is
Boulder
of
ice
code,
title
5,
2,
3
D,
is
effective
in
providing
protections
from
fear,
intimidation,
harassment
and
physical
harm.
They
try
to
see
fills
that
it's
imperative
that
the
laws
that
prohibit
bias-motivated
hate
crimes
and
the
prosecution
of
these
crimes
can
be
evaluated
and
revised
more
effectively
to
address
the
needs
of
victims.
P
T
J
P
T
Yep,
so
the
next
is
a
policy
that
a
number
of
cities
around
the
country
have
implemented.
The
best
is
to
illustrate
the
best
way
to
illustrate
the
intent
of
non
citizen.
Voting
is
through
examples,
so
non
citizen
citizens
pay
local
sales
tax,
giving
them
the
giving
them
a
bill,
and
local
elections
amounts
to
giving
them
some
safe
and
how
their
taxes
are
used.
They
must
comply
with
laws.
The
can't
vote
to
consent,
non-citizens
also
serve
in
the
military.
T
So
here
the
intent
of
granting
non
citizen
voting
rights
is
to
enfranchise
people
who
have
a
direct
stack
stake
in
local
policies,
so
the
HRC
supports
either
a
citizen
lead
or
a
council
led
initiative
in
2019
and
the
third.
The
last
initiative
legislative
recommendation
is
of
local
initiative.
That
is
a
that
is
in
part,
a
national
movement
among
youth
to
effect
change.
T
It's
not
lost
on
our
youth
opportunity
advice.
You
brought
that
young
people
are
affected,
sometimes
disproportionately
so
bylaws
and
bylaws
and
policies
there
for
young
people
are
pressing
from
our
formal
role
in
shaping
these
laws
and
policies.
So,
like
non
citizen
voting,
the
HRC
supports
either
a
citizen
LED
or
a
community
or
a
council
that
initiative
in
2019.
R
A
P
I
have
a
few
questions
first
for
Tom,
so
the
laws
that
exist
now
as
adopt
in
2007
Tom
allows
first
of
all
finding
by
the
municipal
judge
that
there
was
a
race
or
a
crime
that
was
motivated
by
protected
class
as
I
correct.
Is
that
how
that
works?
Yes
and
the
judge
it
has
the
discretion
after
she
hears
or
the
evidence
to
add
an
additional
thousand
dollars
to
whatever
punishment
she
would
allow
that's
correct
and
so
I
guess
the
questions
to
HRC
or
maybe
the
staff.
P
P
O
P
R
So
so
I
think
we
don't
have
that
specific
recommendation,
because
I
think
the
looking
at
the
ordinance
is
much
broader
than
just
what
the
penalties
might
be
and
and
looking
at
how
effective
the
ordinance
has
been.
How
many
cases,
because
maybe
there's
some
substantive
changes
that
need
to
be
made
and.
R
T
We
checked
into
the
data
what's
happening,
is
a
lot
of
local
cases
are
charged
at
a
state
level
because
there
are
more
serious
charges,
so
it
would
take
some
looking
into
municipal
court
databases
to
see
exactly
that,
but
from
from
what
I
have
been
able
to
examine
there
are,
there
are
a
few.
There
aren't
very
many
at
a
municipal
level,
yeah.
P
And
Tom,
presumably
the
in
addition
to,
as
current
said,
the
the
Karen
said,
the
penalties.
Presumably
we
would
want
to
provide
judge
cook
or
a
municipal
court
with
some
guidance
has
two
protected
classes,
probably
pretty
well
defined,
but
what
it
is
that
we
would
expect
the
municipal
court
to
look
at
when
they're,
considering
enhanced
and
there
are
hints
punishments
or
sentences
whatever.
Those
might
be.
Is
that
right?
So
it's
kind
of
a
process
question
and
a
substantive
question
about
what
it
is
to
look
for
and
then
what
the
enhancement
of
these
would
be.
I.
A
Also
think
is
to
looking
at
and
seeing
whether
it's
an
effective
ordinance.
My
understanding
of
some
other
cities
have
tinkered
with
theirs
to
try
to
improve
them
and
I,
don't
know
I.
Think
Nikhil
m'as
may
be
poking
around
to
look
at
what
some
cities
have
been
doing.
That
might
strengthen
that
I.
Don't
know
if
you
wanted
to
weigh
in
on
this
question
either.
S
Eyes
of
national
what's
happening
nationally
with
the
lives
of
hate
and
incitement
of
hate,
we've
seen
an
uptick
of
paid
climbs
between
2016
and
now
so
some
communities.
You
know,
city
states
have
been
looking
at
updating
the
laws
and
strengthening
them,
so
those
components
would
be
since
this
mismatch
between
a
municipal
state
and
at
the
federal
level
on
what
protected
classes
they
have.
We
actually
have
a
pretty
good.
S
S
Specifically
something
I
found
that
might
be
helpful
to
the
local
municipal
ordinance.
Is
the
state
of
Florida
just
updated
the
bias-motivated
crimes
law
to
a
couple?
Mixed-Motive
hate
crimes.
So
this
is
an
issue
in
these
and
thinking
of
why
they
don't
get
charged
often
why
this
difficulty
putting
them
forth
in
the
courts
as
well.
So
let's
say
someone
gets
in
a
traffic
accident
and
they
get
out
exchange
information
and
one
of
the
motorists
is
black
and
all
of
a
sudden,
someone
shouting
racial
epithets
and
assaults
them.
They
win.
Those
cases
go
to
trial.
S
They
can
present
a
defense
saying
it
wasn't,
because
this
was
I
was
really
upset
about
the
traffic
accident.
Well,
confusing
that
and
the
way
defense
attorneys
can
use
that,
and
it
was
awful
assaults
and
these
charges
either
being
dropped
or
taken
to
trial,
because
the
DA's
know
they
can't
get
a
conviction,
one
of
them
failing
at
trial
police
not
having
the
probably
direction
to
charge
them
at
all.
Based
on
that
confusion,
so
in
updating
mixed
derivative
hate
crimes
in
Florida,
they
have
some
language.
They
used
to
do
that.
S
Additionally,
I
found
and
in
2002
in
Chicago
and
Illinois,
they
updated
the
law
to
couple
mixed.
They
added
something
to
decouple
mixed
matter
of
hate
crimes,
law
and
it's
something
we
could
do
if
we
just
added
a
subtle
but
important,
please
that
says
you
know,
regardless
of
the
existence
of
any
other,
motivating
factors
or
factors
after
we
list
the
protected
classes.
In
a
law
that
would
give
police,
NTAs
and
judges
instructions
as
well
and
how
to
enforce
the
law.
S
So
that's
one
example
and
then
also
just
I,
think
looking
at
you
know
things
like:
we
have
disabilities
update,
they
specified
what
disability
means,
because
previously
it
was
only
interpreted
as
mental
incapacity,
so
I
think
they
specified
physical
disability
as
well.
So
it's
good
to
take
a
look
at
this
law
after
the
decade
based
on
what's
going
on,
and
we
could
do
some
simple
patches
like
this.
That
I
think
would
really
make
an
impact
in
people's
lives
and
the
safety
of
the
community.
Thank.
T
Wanna,
just
if
I
may,
just
briefly,
to
give
a
little
more
of
what
Commissioner
makkac
are,
is
dead,
that,
although
there
is
a
majority
of
states
that
now
have
and
municipalities
to
have
biased
crime
laws
and
there's
widespread
support
for
them.
But
there's
also
widespread
question
regarding
some
of
the
effectiveness
of
sentence
enhancement
as
a
deterrent.
So,
in
addition
to
the
elements
that
were
described
by
commissioner
makkac,
are
it's
also
an
issue
of
looking
at
perhaps
trainings
and
understandings
of
of
different
protected
classes
and
cultural
versatility,
such
as
what
we
described
earlier.
A
T
S
Let
me
just
add
two
quick
points
to
that:
the
public
education
initiatives
in
following
local
bias-motivated
crimes,
locally
imported
I,
found
that
they
often
reach
out
to
anti-defamation
league
to
provide
classes
or
education
to
people
similar.
If
someone
gets
in
substance
abuse
issues,
they
provide
substance,
abuse
classes
as
women
of
conviction,
so
we
could
include
that
in
the
law
and
it's
often
already
being
done.
S
Secondly,
one
of
the
points
that
gets
made
is
that
you
know
so.
Many
states
have
adopted
this
law.
We
have
federal
laws,
we
have
municipal
laws
and
people
say
well
hate
crimes
of
gobbly.
They
may
have
reached
an
all-time
high
in
2016
in
news
articles
and
conversations
I've
had
with
da
standalone
ad
Michael
Dougherty
and
other
law
enforcement
officials,
it's
actually
by
enacting
the
laws
and
people
knowing
that
we
have
them.
S
It
encourages
victims
to
come
forward
and
feel
empowered
to
actually
speak
out
on
these
crimes
which
were
actually
on
to
avoid
it
and
it's
similar
to
having
laws
of
Ag
old
laws
and
sexual
assault
cases.
Actually,
it's
not
making
them
go
up.
Well,
it's
not
ineffective.
It's
actually
allowing
people
to
come
forward,
because
why
would
you
come
forward
and
say
you
you've
been
victim
of
a
crime
if
the
city
can't
do
anything
about
it,
but
so
that's
actually
why
there
has
been
an
uptick
in
data
showing
an
increase
in
hate
crimes.
I
I
think
this
is
a
good
idea.
Generally
I,
don't
see
the
downside
to
doing
a
review
it's
in
the
decade
and
so
that
certainly
had
enough
time
to
collect
information
and
see
what
the
numbers
look
like
and
I
think
you
know
if
this
HRC
is
motivating
itself
to
want
to
do
this
I
think
this
seems
like
one
good
big
chunk
of
a
work
plan,
so
I
would
definitely
support
going
forward
with
it.
A
K
O
E
O
K
T
It
was
first
enacted
by
City
Council
in
2007.
There
was
a
lot
of
coverage
of
it
and
in
the
in
the
daily
camera
and
other
publications
and
human
service.
That
certainly
did
a
lot
to
inform
the
public,
but,
as
you
know,
it's
11
years
old
and
I
think
it
needs
to
be
promoted
or
known
in
the
community.
So
I
would
I
would
answer
your
question
by
saying:
I,
don't
think
it's
very
well
known
in
the
community
that
it
exists.
K
T
L
Yeah
at
least
I
think
you're
exactly
right.
Maybe
if
we
do
move
forward
with
this,
we
could
publish
it
in
our
magazine
that
goes
out
to
all
citizens.
You
know
something
to
that.
We
could
do
to
help
get
the
word
out.
I
want
to
end
strong
support
for
this
I.
Think
members
of
protected
classes
have
been
victims
of
bias-motivated
crimes
for
centuries,
and
it's
well
time.
You
know
that
we
get
really
strict
on
this.
I
was
actually
contacted
by.
L
He
was
a
member
of
a
protected
class
and
the
lead-up
to
this
learning,
pretty
horrific
things
that
she's
both
been
through
and
witnessed.
You
know,
might
not
human,
but
my
brother
and
his
husband
have
been
chased
through
Subway's
friends
of
mine
have
witnessed
stuff
like
this
in
Boulder
and
so
I'm
happy
because
they're
taking
the
lead
and
I
guess,
just
a
staff
to
you
know,
move
forward
as
quickly
as
possible
with
implementation
and.
C
Agree
with
Jill
hate
and
bias
motivated
incidents
are
unfortunately
on
the
upswing
in
our
country
and
I.
Think
it's
important
that
we
make
it
clear
as
a
community
that
they're
completely
unacceptable
here
and
given
that
the
ordinance
is
ten
years
old.
I
think
now
is
an
appropriate
time
to
look
into
how
we
can
tighten
it.
You
know
broaden
it,
and
so
thank
you
for
bringing
this
forward.
I
appreciate,
HRC,
too,
and
so
so.
R
A
T
Work
in
that
area,
yeah,
the
community
mediation
service,
does
work
in
the
area
of
restorative
justice
and,
as
we
move
forward
with
this,
we
will
certainly
make
sure
that
that
element
is
is
included.
I'm
I'm
unaware,
if
we
actually
do
restorative
justice
on
bias-motivated
incidents
that
have
come
our
way
through
Municipal
Court
I,
don't
believe
we
have,
but
we
certainly
can
promote
that
as
we
move
forward
and.
E
J
A
So
if
I
can
sum
up
what
I
think
I'm
hearing
is
yes
go
for
us.
Take
a
look
at
this
lawsuit.
If
we
can
enhance
and
strengthen
it,
I
think
I
heard
interest
in
sort
of
some
public
education
around
it
and
getting
folks
to
be
very
aware
of
it
and
then
also
reaching
out
I
would
include
V
BSD
and
the
county
as
well,
but
definitely
see
you
and
the
idea
of
restorative
justice
and
Nikhil
mentioned
the
anti-defamation
league
is
maybe
a
partner
in
providing
some
education
training
around
this.
S
Element
as
well
as
that's
come
up
and
in
some
of
my
studies
is
police.
Training
on
how
to
investigate
bias-motivated
crimes
is
key,
so
good
point
of
ship
with
DA's
office
and
knowing
the
law
and
what
they
need
and
then
having
adequate
police
training.
So
when
they
live
in
a
scene,
they
actually
recognize
something
as
a
potential
bias,
motivated
incident
and
investigated
as
such
to
get
the
best
evidence
possible.
S
K
T
It
did
it
looks
specifically
at
the
effort
to
remove
the
requirement
of
a
lector
to
be
on
boards
and
commissions
and
examined
that
as
to
why
it
and
the
question
to
you
is
to
support
either
a
citizen
letter,
community
or
council
that
initiative,
noting
that
the
time
when
elector
was
removed
from
the
Charter,
it
was
a
citizen.
Let
initiative
right.
K
E
F
F
I
S
We
discussed
this
will
in
favor
of
non
citizen
voting
so
of
the
what
but
the
how
has
been
the
question
and
so
initially
I
think
the
group
looking
at
having
a
council
initiated
ballot
initiative,
I
think
after
meeting
with
some
of
you,
it's
it's
facile,
ated
between
that
and
a
community
led
initiative.
So
it's
it's
kind
of
up
the
discussion
with
you
tonight
that
we'd
like
to
get
some
direction
on
that
I
do
know
that
we
also
have
whether
the
council,
and/or
citizen-led.
S
You
also
have
to
think
of
the
timing
in
the
elections
and
what
would
be
best
to
actually
get
something
like
this
pass,
because
I
don't
think
it
will
be
just
something
that
could
happen
easily.
So
he
wanted
to
happen
with
the
best
timing
between
2018,
2019
and
2020.
But,
looking
to
you
to
you
all
the
guidance
on
on
the
how
it
comes
about
yeah.
E
L
L
Their
argument
has
been
that
they
can
then
focus
that
Coalition
on
actually
getting
people
to
vote
for
it
rather
than
expending
volunteer
hours
and
time
and
money
and
just
getting
it
on
the
ballot.
But
you
know
I
will
defer
to
the
will
of
council
on
this.
This
has
just
been
conversations
that
I've
heard.
I
also
heard
a
pretty
clear
request
to
do
in
even
year.
A
P
Of
course
want
to
support
what
I'm
salmon
and
Mary
and
Lisa
said,
I.
Think
that
a
citizen's
initiative
for
all
the
reasons
you
said
in
coalition
building
I,
think
the
petition
has
to
be
in
by
June,
which
means
that
there's
been
a
lot
of
planning
that
happens
during
the
summer
and
fall
rather
than
just
dumping
this
on
the
ballot
in
September.
You
have
to
go
out
and
get
at
least
3,000
signatures.
Probably
more
so
you
already
have
3,000
voters.
People
are
already
moving
the
right
direction,
rather
than
just
having
the
nine
of
us.
P
You
know
you
guys,
look
more
votes,
bo9
one
other
thing,
though,
I
wanted
to
add
on
to
what
Sam
said
as
far
as
asking
HRC
and
the
staff
to
work
with,
whatever
groups
are
grassroots
developing.
This
is
please
please,
please
work
very
very
closely
with
the
City
Attorney's
Office,
because
we
have
seen
citizen's
initiative
come
forward
where
there's
a
disconnect
between
what
they
circulate
and
then
what
does
the
trick
and
I
would
really
really
urge
the
whatever
groups
are
leading
this
as
their
very
first
step
to
sit
down
with
the
city
attorney
and
work
out.
K
T
K
C
The
group
that
you're
speaking
of
is,
is
excited
to
work
on
this
and
and
and
wants
to
take
this
up,
which
is
wonderful,
but
without
there
that
I
mean
these
are
folks
who
are
residents
of
our
community
and
who
do
not
have
the
franchise
in
our
community
and
are
not
allowed
to
cast
votes,
and
so,
if,
if
the,
if
it
feels
like
too
much
work
or
for
people
who
are
trying
to
get
this
done,
I'd
like
us
to
consider
in
another
year,
potentially
referring
it.
If
that's
what
we
hear
from
members
of
the
community,
the.
C
A
So
I
guess
I'm,
fine,
I
think
there's
a
majority
that
feels
like
we
should
have
a
citizens
vote.
I
could
be
talked
into
referring
it.
I'll
be
honest.
This
is
the
year
of
Trump
and
I'm
happy
to
stick
up
for
disenfranchised
people
this
year
and
I.
Think
a
lot
of
people
are
pissed
off
about
things.
So
I
would
take
that
gamble.
A
That
said,
I
totally
agree
with
you
that
grassroots
movements
are
deeper
rooted
and
that's
a
better
way
to
go,
but
I
could
be
convinced
to
go
this
year
and
to
put
it
on
I'll,
just
okay
here.
That
is
that,
on
your
work
plan,
just
kidding
so
anyhow,
I'll
just
throw
that
out
there
that
we
could
buddy.
It
sounds
like
the
majority
of
council
wants
to
go,
slow
and
have
the
grassroots
do
it.
Next
year
the.
P
I
I
mean
it's
kind
of
strategy
as
to
whether
they'd
wanted
in
19
or
20
anyway,
I
mean
I.
Think
18
would
be
kind
of
a
heavy
lift
to
get
it
on
now.
20
is
a
presidential
year,
and
so
it
could
be
that
the
group
chooses
purposely
to
put
it
on
20
hi.
That's
completely
their
call,
but
yeah
I
agree
fundamentally
with
you,
but
I
really
do
think
that,
with
the
amount
of
time
there
is
until
19
that
would
be
really
well
served.
Building
support,
yeah.
A
A
Okay,
maybe
maybe
we
see
well
and
in
terms
of
the
role
of
the
HRC,
maybe
the
HRC
can
help
get
that
information
to
the
groups
that
are
working
outside
on't
know
if
HR
sees
just
wanted
us
to
weigh
in
and
you're
done
with
it
or
whether
you're
going
to
help
Shepherd
it
through.
But
I
agree
that
that's
important
information
for
groups.
K
For
the
16
year
old
is
that
where
you're
going
yep
so
for
16
and
17
year
olds,
I
think
they're,
fully
capable
and
able
to
vote
on
local
issues
and
I
see
a
synergy
between
what
we
just
talked
about
in
this
and
I
guess.
I
would
like
to
see
a
again
a
citizen-led,
it's
a
educational
thing,
coalition
building
and
but
anybody
who's
spoken
much
with
16
or
17
year.
Olds
knows
that
they're
as
capable
as
18
or
19
year
olds
and
speaking
about
political
issues
and
issues
of
the
day.
So
yeah.
U
I'm
Ava
I,
just
graduated
folder
high
and
I've,
been
working
on
this
campaign.
This
initiative
for
about
two
years
I
think
it's
really
important.
Just
because
I,
especially
with
all
of
the
things
going
on
in
parkland
I,
think
it's
an
important
movement
to
show
that
we
are,
as
you
were,
saying,
capable
of
voting
and
that
these
do
affect
us
and
we
need
a
voice
and
what's
happening
absolutely.
V
I'm
Nicholas
Simms
I'm,
a
junior
at
Fairview,
High,
School
and
I
also
think
this
is
really
important.
There
is
a
large
movement
in
Boulder
for
registration.
A
lot
of
people,
16
Seminoles,
are
registering
to
vote
pre-register,
so
when
they're
18
already
they
can
vote.
So
there
is
a
lot
of.
There
are
a
lot
of
people
who
are
very
excited
and
ready
to
vote.
So
I
think
this
is
a
great
movement,
expand
the
voting
rights,
16:17
rule
to
or
educated,
could.
U
So
the
nationwide
campaign,
a
lot
of
them-
have
been
little
grassroots
movements
in
San
Francisco.
It
was
much
like
this
campaign
where
it
started
through
their
Youth,
Advisory
Board
and
then
was
brought
into
a
coalition
for
voting
that
unfortunately
didn't
pass
to
last
year.
I
believe
so
that
was
a
little
bit
tricky
given
they
have
800,000
as
their
population
as
opposed
to
100,000,
so
they're
much
bigger
demographic
there.
U
I
Yes,
how
would
you
feel
about
writing
a
single
charter
amendment
that
combines
both
the
younger
voting
age
as
well
as
the
non
citizen
voting
it?
Would
that
be
something
you
would
be
willing
to
combine
together
and
to
so
I
was
just
curious.
I
was
asking
for
what
they
thoughts
were
about,
combining
the
efforts
or
doing
them
separately.
I
mean.
V
U
I
think
it
would
also
be
a
little
bit
difficult
to
combine
them
because
people
they
are
speaking
to
a
different
thing
in
16
and
17
year-olds
versus
non-citizens,
so
I
do
think
it
would
be.
My
personal
opinion
is
to
keep
them
separate.
We've
tried
to
reach
out
a
little
bit
to
the
non
citizen
voting.
We
haven't
had
much
communication
with
them
just
since
it's
been
a
little
hard
to
make
that
bridge,
but
I
do
think
they
have
their
similar
similarities,
but
they
need
to
stay
a
little
bit
separate.
U
S
S
You
have
to
think
of
like
the
cross
pollination
between
the
two.
So
one
is
I.
Think
implementation
with
the
office
of
elections
there's
some.
You
know
some
comment
could
be
some
common
shielded
costs
and
things
like
that,
because
one
of
the
cities
named
when
we
had
this
presented
to
the
Human
Relations
Commission
by
the
youth
opportunities
world
I
had
noticed
a
city
that
had
passed
about
16
project
was
able
to
easily
pass
a
non
citizen
vote
in
quadrant.
S
It
was
able
to
pass
it
and
easily
implement
it
because
they
had
done
a
lot
of
the
logistics
for
each
project.
So
I
think
that
console
lose.
What
does
something
to
consider?
But
you
know
you
don't
want
one
to
go
on
a
ballot
and
potentially
compete
well,
in
fact,
the
other
one
so
I
don't
know,
I
think
the
Commission
would
like
some
counsels
thoughts
on
if
they
went
to
the
ballot,
potentially
at
the
same
time
and
say
2019
2020
thoughts
on
that
and
just
thinking
strategically.
A
K
Hope
we
wouldn't
look
at
them
as
competing
with
each
other.
I
mean
we're
trying
to
help
people
who
are
disenfranchised
to
start
with
to
have
more
of
a
voice
and
to
make
their
voice
better
known
and
so
I
think
you
could
campaign
kind
of
on
that
theme.
You
know
let
let
people's
voices
be
heard,
no
matter
who
they
are
on
local
issues,
so
I
would
hope.
K
They're
not
competitive
against
each
other,
but
I
think
that
would
be
some
of
the
research
you
need
to
do
originally
in
in
getting
these
ballot
initiatives
written
up
and
meeting
with
the
City,
Attorney's
Office
and
and
doing
a
little
I,
don't
know
pre
polling,
but
you
you
need
to
find
out.
Is
there
prejudice
in
the
community
against
16
and
17
year
olds,
voting
on
local
issues?
I,
don't
know,
I
would
hope
so
I
mean
I
can
only
say
I'm,
okay
with
it,
but
that's
just
me
and
then
the
same
thing
about
non
residents.
K
S
J
J
P
16
rules
in
2013,
so
they've
had
five
years
of
experience
and
the
voter
turnout
among
16
to
17
year
olds
has
been
anywhere
between
6
and
20%,
higher
than
the
general
population
and
very
very
aggressive
voters,
and
perhaps
more
importantly,
we
all
know
that
18,
19
and
20
year
olds
are
really
bad
voters
in
those
cities
where
there's
been
16
17
year
old
voters
when
they
turned
18
and
19,
they
voted
a
much
higher
percentages.
So
they
got
in
the
habit
of
voting,
which,
I
think
is
a
good
thing.
C
No
I
think
I
think
this
is
great
Bob
thanks
for
making
this
points,
I
think
we
can
help
create
lifelong
voters
by
starting
people
at
an
early
age
and
I.
Think
people
at
16/17
are
mature
enough
to
vote
and
we
can
benefit
from
their
voices
in
the
municipal
elections,
so
I'm
similar
to
the
last
one
I'm
open
to
having
it
be
a
citizen
initiated
referendum.
But
if
that
doesn't
work
out
or
the
the
it's
having
a
hard
time,
getting
going.
A
A
K
A
U
C
A
great
point,
thank
you
for
bringing
that
up,
but
the
other
thing
that
we
have
not
talked
about
is
that
there
are
logistical
issues
with
both
of
these,
because
we
can
no
longer
have
the
County
Clerk
just
run
our
elections
with
the
same
set
of
electors
that
they
use
for
any
other
election.
So
that
would
be
an
important
part
of
both.
Of
these
things
is
to
work
out
the
practicalities
of
how
this
would
function
so.
A
A
A
F
I
just
wanted
to
make
a
comment
with
regards
to
the
some
of
the
findings
in
the
in
the
survey
that
was
done
and
the
feedback
from
the
community.
One
of
the
topics
that
was
that
came
up
from
the
community
was
to
have
courageous
conversations
and
I.
Just
I
wasn't
clear
about
how
that
fit
into
the
work
plan.
Is
that
part
of
what
you
would
look
for
in
the
proposals
that
come
forward
to
the
HRC?
How?
How
does
that
piece
of
it
work
into
the
work
plan.
T
I'm
sorry,
two
specific
areas:
one
is
within
forums
the
in
the
focus,
areas
of
forums
related
to
specific
issues,
and
the
other
is
through
giving
out
grants
through
the
human
relations
fund,
awarding
grants
to
community
groups
who
have
ideas
to
have
those
types
of
conversations,
because
certainly
they
are
the
experts
as
to
how
to
handle
those
or
specific
issues
that
they
want.
The
community
to
speak
about.
F
So
in
that
I
would
just
caution
on
that
to
have
community
those
courageous
conversations
before
laying
a
foundation
to
have
them.
I
think
that
there
has
to
be
some
sort
of
I'll.
Give
you
an
anecdotal
kind
of
example
of
why
you
need
to
lay
the
foundation
and
I
recently
heard
a
young
person
at
a
at
an
event
speak
about.
She
grew
up
in
Boulder,
Boulder
native
here
all
their
lives
and
commented
on
driving
up
and
down
Arapaho
Avenue,
and
not
until
that
day,
knowing
why
it
was
named.
F
Arapaho
Avenue
and
you
know-
and
you
can't
talk
about
the
right
relationship.
If
you
don't
have
that
kind
of
foundation,
the
historical
foundation
so
I
would
I
would
just
caution
on
the
grant
the
granting
process
and
making
sure
that
before
you
have
those
courageous
conversations
that
the
foundation
has
been
laid
and
I.
Also,
you
know
I
heard
it
was
at
2018-19
work
plan.
It's
really
more
like
a
twenty
eighteen,
thirty
eighteen
work
plan,
it's
it's
not
something
that
happens
overnight
and
then
just
prepare
for
that
long
road.
So
yeah
I
just
wanted
to
comment
on.
F
T
S
So
I'm
proud
to
say
that
the
Commission
has
had,
especially
in
2018
many
discussions
about
that
and
what
we
can
do
better
and
figuring
out
the
expectations
that
we
have
for
community
groups
that
come
to
us,
proposing
these
kinds
of
educational
initiatives
and
we'll
definitely
stay
on
it.
But
thank
you
for
bringing
up
that
point
really
significant.
S
Q
W
All
right,
can
you
hear
me
now:
yeah
helps
to
have
the
microphone.
So
thank
you
all
for
your
time
this
evening
and
for
your
feedback
on
the
30th
and
Colorado
quarter.
Study
recommended
options.
The
question
posed
for
your
feedback
is
up
on
this
first
slide
and
we'll
return
to
it
at
the
end
of
the
presentation.
Information
on
this
item
begins
on
page
57
of
this
evenings
packet
and
again
I'm
Noreen
Walsh
I'm.
The
project
manager
for
this
study
I
also
wanted
to
acknowledge
and
thank
team
members
bill.
W
W
W
We
have
a
renewed
vision
for
transit
plans
and
those
plans
have
additional
services,
and
so
the
roadway
designs
need
to
reflect
that,
and
we
also
have
the
boulder
Junction
area
to
the
north
of
30th
Street.
We
have
CU
williams,
village
housing
and
the
CU
East
Campus
Center,
that's
continuing
to
develop
according
to
their
visions
and
plans,
and
so
these
roadway
quarter
designs
really
need
to
reflect
those
plans
and
visions.
W
I
also
want
to
mention
justif,
isn't
clear
from
this
map
30th
Street
and
where
we
were
looking
for
this
study.
The
boundaries
are
from
baseline
to
Pearl.
That
section
of
30th
has
between
18,000
and
23,000
vehicles.
Today,
today,
each
day
as
well
as
transit
service,
riders,
bicyclists
and
pedestrians,
the
limits
for
the
Colorado
corridor
goes
from
foothills
all
the
way
east.
Through
the
Cu
campus
on
Colorado
Avenue
down
18th
Street
and
out
Euclid
to
meet
at
Broadway.
It.
W
W
We've
worked
at
each
point
along
the
way
with
the
community
and
we've
developed
an
engagement
plan
that
represented
the
decision
framework
that
came
out
of
the
public
participation
working
group.
We
at
each
step
in
the
way
kind
of
sat
with
a
community
to
listen
to
what
their
ideas
were,
that
helped
kind
of
feed
each
product
along
the
way.
So
we
began
by
hearing
what
their
issues
priorities
needs
were
for
each
of
these
quarters
that
helped
to
feed
the
vision,
goals
and
objectives.
It
also
helped
to
feed
the
range
of
quarter
options.
W
So
in
your
packet
you
probably
saw
there
were
five
corridor
options
for
xxx
Colorado
and
then
that
Cu
section
they
were
including
various
combination
of
roadway
elements.
Some
were
within
the
public
right
away
somewhere
without
some
had
for
general
purpose
lanes
or
to
general
purpose
lanes,
bus
and
right
turning
lanes,
we
had
multi-use
paths
on
Street
off
street
bicycles.
There
are
all
these
different
combinations
to
again
see
how
we
could
get
at
addressing
those
issues
and
ideas
and
fulfill
the
vision
of
the
study.
W
We
then
kind
of
talk
through
and
got
to
refining
those
options
and
evaluating
them
against
our
goals
and
objectives
to
get
to
where
we
are
to
here
today
with
two
recommended
design
options.
So
the
intention
was
to
work
with
the
community
each
point
of
the
way
and
ask
questions
that
help
to
shape
that
next
work
product
and
with
this
final,
one
being
the
recommended
options,
we
had
a
number
of
tools
that
we
use
for
community
engagement
from
meetings
to
online
questionnaires,
to
a
community
working
group
to
go
to
your
place
for
a
meeting.
W
We
make
presentation
at
hey,
Joey's
at
Chamber,
hosted
events
and
so
forth.
So
this
next
slide
is
just
to
give
a
shout
out
also
to
our
community
working
group
member,
so
16
members
of
the
community
were
selected
to
represent
a
broad
spectrum
of
viewpoints
and
perspectives.
They
were
using
different
modes.
They
sometimes
lived
or
worked
along
the
corridors,
or
sometimes
they
lived
or
worked
outside
the
corridors,
but
they
came
in,
and
so
they
were
all
using
these
for
a
variety
of
purposes
and
it
helped
to
you
know,
really
understand
all
the
different
needs.
W
These
corridors
met.
So
again,
thank
you
to
the
community
working
group.
They
listened
to
make
sure
that
each
point
along
the
way
when
we
got
to
a
different
work
product,
that
the
public
feedback
was
helping
to
shape
that
so
I
want
to
do
is
just
go
over
the
recommended
options
and
then
go
through
the
process
by
which
we
got
to
that.
So
for
30th,
Street
baseline
up
to
Colorado,
the
recommended
option
is
option.
5A
you'll,
see
that
includes
for
general
purpose,
lanes,
protected
bicycle
lanes
and
sidewalks
a
little
further
north
of
Colorado.
W
We're
recommending
option
three.
That
includes
for
general
purpose
lanes.
The
bike
lanes
and
sidewalks
would
also
allow
space
for
trees,
either
we're
helping
to
maintain
the
valuable
trees
that
are
there
today
or
providing
spaces
to
plant
more
trees.
If
you
can
think
about
some
of
the
properties
that
would
be
working
with
to
make
the
sure
that
we
could
fit
this
type
of
option
in
it,
see
you
on
the
east
side
from
Colorado
going
up
to
Marine,
Street
and
then
Scott
carpenter
Park
on
the
west
side.
It's.
W
K
Can
I
just
add
on
today
so
I
think
Aaron's
point
is
good
and
I
had
a
similar
question
and
the
and
I
think
it's
great
to
really
number
one
preserve
the
trees
that
we
have,
but
just
from
an
urban
design
perspective.
It
seems
like
you
know,
if
you
have
the
trees
next
to
the
road
and
the
bikes
outside
on
the
outside
of
the
trees.
That
also
could
help
in
traffic
calming
you
know,
making
the
roads
look,
mm-hmm,
more
narrow
and
it's
just
an
amenity.
U
W
To
clarify
that
for
sure,
so
for
Colorado,
the
recommended
option
in
the
western
section
from
Folsom
to
30th
Street
is
option
1.
This
includes
two
general
purpose
lanes:
bus
and
right-turning
vehicles,
Ayn's
protected
bicycle
lanes
and
sidewalks.
We
also
will
try
to
fit
in
landscaping,
but
we'll
have
to
work
with
the
adjacent
property
owners
to
see
if
we
can
get
an
additional
space
for
that.
K
But
those
are
somewhat
dangerous
places
for
bicyclists
and
especially
I
mean
I,
like
that.
We
have
a
five
but
Lane.
But
if
there's
a
way
and
I
don't
know,
you've
got
some
engineers
back
there.
But
if
there's
a
way
you
could
just
do
the
pan
so
that
that
part
is
concrete.
I
mean
there
must
be
a
reason
why
you
do
this
L
shape
that
comes
out,
but
does
it
have
to
be
a
foot
and
a
half
into
into
the
lane?
So
I
guess
my
question
is:
is
there
a
way
to
make
that
and
narrower?
W
We
can
keep
that
in
mind.
Word
is
coming
actually
onto
the
street
again.
The
good
news
with
this
option,
as
well
as
the
previous
options
for
30th
Street,
is
the
bicycle
lane
as
a
protected
bicycle
lane
is
raised,
so
it's
at
the
same
level
as
the
sidewalk,
so
I
don't
think
we're
running
into
the
issue,
but
I'll
double
check:
okay,
big
incredibie.
I
So
one
of
the
things
that
when
we
were
reconfiguring
Folsom,
one
of
the
things
that
reared
its
head
was
the
hardscaping
right
and
so
the
president's
I'm
thinking
about
28
coming
to
make
a
left
turn
onto
Colorado,
and
so
have
you
given
some
thought
or
done
any
traffic
studies
to
look
at.
What's
gonna
happen
when
that
becomes
a
single
left
lane,
because
right
now
that's
a
double
left
lane,
and
so
it's
got
a
certain
bay
length
and
I
would
just
wanted
to
raise.
W
Left
turn
yes,
and
we
did
look
at
this
information,
so
you'll
see
a
little
bit
further
down
line
we've
kind
of
jumped
into
what
the
recommended
options
were
and
I
was
going
to
build
up
to
kind
of
how
we
got
that
point,
but
in
particular
for
Colorado
we,
you
know
we
did
it
for
both
30th
Street
and
Colorado
to
look
at
what
are
the
travel
times.
You
know
what?
W
W
So
keep
in
mind,
so
this
is
Colorado
from
Folsom
to
30th,
Street
Colorado
and
the
recommended
option
from
30th
to
Foothill
is
the
same
option
that
option
one.
So
it
has
the
same:
configuration
of
facilities
to
general
purpose,
lanes,
bus
and
right
turning
lane,
as
well
as
protected
bicycle
lanes
and
sidewalks.
But
if
you
recall
the
Colorado
east
of
30th
Street
has
the
woman
ditch
in
the
center,
so
it
just
wanted
to
make
sure
you
guys
know
that
we're
still
keeping
that
I
just
have
the
same
transportation
facilities
as
the
previous
option.
W
For
the
CU
section,
we
went
from
five
options
down
to
two
options,
and
these
are
being
forwarded
to
see
you
they'll.
Take
it
into
further
consideration
during
their
transportation,
Master
Plan
Update,
that's
happening
this
fall.
These
options
have
transit
lanes,
bicycle
lanes
as
well
as
sidewalks.
They
do
not
permit
vehicles
except
for
emergency
response
and
delivery
vehicles.
If
you're
in
that
change.
That
is
a
change.
Although
today
there
is
a
restriction
on
private
vehicle
use
within
those
streets
during
the
daytime.
I
think
it's
like
eight
to
five,
but
it
would
be
a
full-time
thing.
Yes,.
C
Just
point
this
out:
I
did
reach
out
to
see
you
and
ask
them
about
their
thoughts
on
this
question,
about
removing
the
private
vehicles
entirely,
and
they
said
that
that
is
their
intention
and
to
keep
in
mind.
This
is
west
of
Folsom
right
where
there's
the
gate
there
currently,
but
maybe
you
can
drive
in
a
little
bit,
but
it
is
their
intention
with
their
master
plan
to
remove
private
vehicles
from
us.
It's
not
our
concept,
really
I
mean
I'm
sure
you
guys
worked
on
too,
but
it's
not
just
our
concept
is
the.
K
C
W
For
bringing
that
up,
they
were
are
part
of
our
project.
Staff
team
you'll,
probably
hear
a
little
bit
more
from
our
tab
chair
on
their
most
recent
letter
of
support.
But
yes
thanks
for
bringing
that
up.
So
how
did
we
get
there?
So
there
wasn't
any
clear,
easy
choice.
There
wasn't
one
option
that
performed
best
for
our
vision,
goals
and
objectives
that
didn't
have
maybe
major
considerations
like
a
pretty
wide
cross
section
or
a
large
funding
cost.
So
we
kind
of
needed
to
look
at
both
what
the
community
preference
were
and
when
they
were
expressed.
W
We
asked
that
question
back
in
February,
then
we
needed
to
go
back
to
our
technical
evaluations
and
see
how
these
options
were
performing
for
our
four
goal
areas
and
all
those
objectives
in
there
and
so
I'm
going
to
walk
you
through
this
for
30th
Street.
So
at
the
point
where
we
were
asking
what
option
your
preferred
and
why
we
had
two
ways
to
collect
that
information,
we
had
a
community
meeting
and
an
online
questionnaire.
We
advertised
all
our
meetings
through
a
mailing
that
went
out
to
9,000
different
addresses
in
the
surrounding
area.
W
We
also
had
our
email
group.
We
had
digital
communications
and
social
media
promotion,
but
we
had
a
lot
of
groups
in
the
community
that
helped
to
get
the
word
out
like
Boulder
neighborhood
Alliance
community
cycles,
Chamber
of
Commerce,
even
the
University
of
Colorado,
would
always
take
our
invitations
and
put
it
out
through
their
community
as
well.
So
in
person,
that's
on
the
left-hand
side
here,
you'll
see
that
the
most
preferred
option
was
option
5
a
followed
by
option.
3,
then,
to
the
reasons
for
these
preferred
options
were
the
bike
treatments,
the
walking
and
the
safety.
W
If
you
look
online
and
what
input
we
were
hearing
in
terms
of
what
was
the
preferred
option,
it
was
existing
conditions
followed
by
option
5
a
and
4
reasons
for
those
preferred
conditions.
Online
were
maintaining
reliable,
vehicular
travel
time,
safety,
cost
and
bike
treatments,
and
where
we
did
have
people
who
preferred
other
options
and
different
sets
of
improvements.
We
did
always
hear
that
not
impacting
adjacent
properties,
keeping
it
lower
cost
staying
within
that
right
away
was
still
very
important
to
people
who
wanted
maybe
a
different
cross
section
of
improvement.
K
W
Yeah,
so
when
we
were
talking
through
the
cost,
it
was
kind
of
a
relative
cost
based
on
kind
of
an
estimate
to
get
the
improvements
made,
but
also,
if
again,
it
was
a
wider
cross-section.
What
those
property
impacts
would
be
in
the
cost
to
obtain
easements
or
property,
so
we're
keeping
those
in
mind
you'll
see
on
the
next
matrix
on
the
next
slide.
It
was
kind
of
a
relative
figure.
W
So
this
was
our
evaluation
matrix
when
we
got
to
the
point
of
evaluating
every
option
against
the
goals
and
objectives,
and
so
the
goals
and
objectives
are
along
the
left
hand,
side,
and
this
first
column
to
the
left
was,
if
you
look
at
what
the
existing
configuration
of
the
corridor
is
with
roadway
lanes
and
their
bicycle
and
pedestrian
facilities,
how
would
that
meet
all
the
goals
and
objectives
of
our
study?
And
so,
if
you
look
at
that
today
and
into
the
future,
it's
really
not
meeting
most
of
the
objectives.
W
In
fact,
it's
kind
of
a
worse
condition,
and
so
that
idea
of
keeping
with
existing
conditions
wasn't
really
gonna
meet
our
studies,
goals
and
objectives.
So
we
looked
at
some
of
those
other
options
that
were
listed
as
preferred
options,
and
you
can
see
at
the
bottom
here
that
options
two
through
four
are
better
meeting
or
even
best
meeting
our
goals
and
objectives,
but
they
have
very
wide
cross
sections
and
had
a
greater
cost.
So
that
was
that
major
consideration
trade-off
that
wasn't
gonna
be
necessarily
reflecting
that
balance.
W
And
so
then,
if
you
look
at
option
5,
which
is
all
the
way
to
the
right,
you
see
that
it
is
better
meeting
the
objectives
for
transportation,
but
it's
a
lower
cost
and
it's
within
that
right-of-way,
and
so
we
really
felt
like
that.
5A
was
that
good
balance
of
improving
things
and
meeting
our
goals
and
objectives,
but
also
reflecting
that
input
from
the
community,
keeping
it
within
the
right-of-way,
keeping
the
lower
cost,
maintaining
that
vehicular
travel
time
again,
I
mentioned
earlier.
W
We're
gonna
try
to
get
to
that
option,
3
because
it
does
better
meet
many
of
the
objectives,
particularly
in
our
sustainability
goal
area
and
that
quarter,
identity
having
good
urban
design,
landscaping
and
spaces
like
that,
so
where
we
can
get
that
fitting
in
we'll
go
after
that.
So
when
we
got
to
the
plan
layout-
and
that
was
our
meeting
in
early
May,
we
and
these
plan
layouts
around
the
walls.
W
I,
don't
know
if
you
guys
got
a
chance
to
see
him,
but
we
took
the
cross
sections
and
laid
them
out,
and
so
what
you're
seeing
here
then
is.
With
this
slide,
we
started
to
get
into
ideas
for
crossing
treatments
and
ideas
of
intersection
treatments,
so
these
are
ways
to
say:
what
can
you
do
when
folks
are
crossing
and
making
turning
movements?
How
can
you
kind
of
keep
those
movements?
Separate
I
can
even
reduce
the
conflicts
and
we've
got
feedback
on
that.
We're
not
saying
that
this
particular
crossing
treatment
is
exactly
happening
at
that
location.
W
For
sure
we
were
just
trying
to
give
some
ideas
to
get
feedback
so
that
when
we
do
go
into
further
preliminary
engineering,
we
kind
of
get
a
sense
of
where
we
need
to
be
with
the
crossing
treatments
and
intersection
designs
and
then
you'll
move
into
that
even
further,
along
as
you
get
into
more
detailed
design.
So.
W
I
think
we
want
your
feedback
is
on
these
recommended
options:
option
5a
option:
3
are
those
the
recommended
options,
kind
of
best
balancing
our
goals
and
objectives
and
the
community
feedback
we're
not
necessarily
asking
for
you
to
pick
I
think
we
have
a
proposed
recommended
option
again
supposed
to
be
that
balance
right.
W
C
W
Thank
you,
yeah
thanks
for
clarifying
sorry
all
right.
So
in
terms
of
what
we
heard
for
Colorado
Avenue
again
for
the
western
section
Folsom
to
30th
Street
at
the
community
meeting,
the
most
preferred
option
was
option:
one
followed
by
option
five.
Then
two
top
reasons
were
the
bike:
treatments,
transit
safety
and
cost
for
Colorado
Avenue.
At
the
online
feedback
point
we
heard
existing
conditions
was
the
most
preferred
option
by
options.
Five
and
two
top
reasons
were
the
vehicular
travel
time.
Transit
safety
and
cost
did.
A
W
We
did
notice
that
you
know
people
do
tend
to
let
folks
know
within
their
organizations
that
there's
these
opportunities
to
participate
and
I
did
mention
before
that.
We
had
community
organizations
getting
the
word
out
whether
it
was
Boulder
neighborhood
alliance
or
community
cycles
Chamber
of
Commerce.
There
are
numerous
organizations
that
help
to
get
that
word
out,
and
so
that
may
have
been
why
the
difference.
W
W
K
W
W
K
D
W
So
we
had
an
hour
meeting
in
February
over
a
hundred
people
at
that
meeting
and
then
the
online
questionnaires.
You
know
it
ranged
from
section
some
people
wanted
to
participate
and
give
us
feedback
on
all
four
sections,
and
so
that
would
be
anywhere
between
a
hundred
and
three
hundred
responses
to
that.
So.
W
Thank
you
yeah.
So
let's
just
take
a
quick
look
at
the
East
section.
Really.
What
I
wanted
to
point
out
here
is
that
the
options
that
were
most
preferred
at
the
meeting
for
the
East
section
is
the
same
as
the
West
right.
It's
options.
One
then
followed
by
five
two
and
then
online
same
thing.
The
most
preferred
option
again
was
existing,
followed
by
options
five
and
two
and
the
same
preferred
reasons
for
those
options.
W
So
when
you
look
at
the
evaluation
matrix
again
for
that
existing
conditions,
we're
really
not
reaching
any
of
our
goals
and
objectives,
this
existing
configuration
of
facilities
is
really
a
worse
condition
in
the
future.
When
you
look
at
that
option
in
two
and
five,
because
again,
you
were
pointing
out
that
you
know
that
seemed
to
be
similar
from
both
online
in
the
community.
The
thing
is:
is
that
those
are
wider
cross-sections,
and
so
they
are
going
to
cost
more.
W
Or
obtain
an
easement?
Yes
exactly
so,
when
you
look
at
option
1,
you
see
that
it's
actually
better
and
best
performing
for
most
of
the
objectives,
except
for
that
maintain
vehicular
travel
time,
and
so
that
was
both
an
objective
in
our
study
and
our
goals.
But
it
also
was
an
important
reason
and
why
people
were
expressing
a
preference
for
a
certain
option.
W
So
when
we
looked
at
potentially
laying
this
one
out
as
the
recommended
option,
we
needed
to
see
if
there
was
possibility
to
be
able
to
meet
that
objective
and
and
respond
to
that
community
feedback.
So,
just
again,
keeping
in
mind
the
volumes
in
the
eastern
section
or
9,000,
they
grow
a
little
bit,
go
up
to
16,000
and
go
back
down
to
11,000
vehicles
when
we
went
into
the
plan
layout,
which
I
think
is
over
on
this
side.
W
Here
we
looked
at
what
are
some
more
detailed
improvements
that
we
could
do
that
can
maintain
that
vehicular
travel
time
and
so
in
this
28th
in
Colorado.
You
see
that
there's
a
double
left
turn
and
that
allows
that
westbound
travel
movement
to
turn
southbound.
It
also
results
in
some
storage
space.
There
that
allows
that,
through
lane
to
remain
moving
as
well
as
the
bus
and
right
turning
lane,
the
intersection
improvement
at
Colorado
and
Regent
also
helps
to
have
that
movement
come
out
of
Regent
staying
a
dedicated
lane
to
turn
southbound
on
28th
Street.
W
So,
with
this
option
and
in
a
more
detailed
plan
layout
view,
we
found
that
we
could
make
those
modal
improvements,
but
also
maintain
the
vehicular
travel
times
and
I'll
show
you
in
this
next
slide
what
our
traffic
modeling
software
showed
us.
So
if
you
take
a
second
and
look
at
this
top
row,
this
gives
you
the
travel
times
for
eastbound
and
westbound
today,
they're
4
minutes
in
each
direction.
W
W
So
remember
when
we
looked
at
it
as
just
a
straight
cross-section,
we
hadn't
made
those
additional
ideas
of
improvements
up
a
double
left
turn,
and
so,
when
you
evaluated
that-
and
we
ran
it
through
our
traffic
modeling
software-
that
bottom
row-
you
see
here
that
was
the
anticipated
travel
times.
Eastbound
would
be
five
minutes.
Westbound
would
be
17
minutes
so
actually
by
having
that
same
cross
section,
but
doing
some
more
further
detailed
plan
layout
and
proposed
improvements
at
those
intersections.
We
were
able
to
actually
get
those
travel
times
down
to
what
they
are
today.
Can.
K
C
W
X
K
C
X
There's
at
that
point
where
the
cursor
is
there's
currently
two
three
lanes
and
that
would
change
to
a
single
general-purpose
through
Lane
and
a
bat
lane,
bus
and
right
turn
as
you
pass
through
the
intersection.
There's
still
two
lanes,
but
one
of
them
is
a
trap
lane
that
traps
into
that
left
turn
onto
southbound
region.
Okay
got
it!
W
So
we
wanted
to
go
through
kind
of
what
the
bus
and
right
turning
lanes
help
to
support
in
terms
of
the
planned
service
and
the
ridership.
So
this
table
here
is
giving
you
a
sense
of
the
number
of
buses
today
in
the
PM
peak
hour
on
Colorado,
so
about
46
buses,
starting
with
service
changes.
This
August
and
anticipated
service
changes
for
the
next
five
years.
There
should
be
up
to
80
buses
and
the
PM
peak
on
Colorado,
so
you
have
additional
service.
That's
gonna
be
happening
fairly
soon
with
that.
W
We
also
did
a
ridership
analysis
that
shows
that
there
is
an
anticipated
ridership
increase
of
anywhere
from
52
percent
up
to
69
percent,
again
related
to
that
additional
server,
that's
already
being
planned
to
take
half
a
plan
to
happen
with
the
bus
and
right
turning
lanes.
We
anticipate
another
nineteen
to
twenty
percent
ridership
increase,
so
these
bus
and
right
turning
lanes
are
helping
with
meeting
the
additional
service
changes
that
are
happening,
but
also
that
ridership,
that's
gonna
be
so,
and
ridership
is.
W
W
Yes,
that's
true!
Yes,
any
more
questions
on
this
slide
before
I
go
okay,
great
I'm,
going
to
go
to
this
one.
So
we
also
then
looked
at
what
are
the
transit
travel
times
and
so
again,
if
you
look
at
the
top
of
this
table
today
in
the
eastbound
direction,
it
takes
about
seven
minutes
to
go
from
Folsom
to
foothills
in
the
eastbound
direction.
Westbound
is
eight
minutes.
The
travel
times
in
the
future
without
a
project
are
anticipated
to
increase
to
eight
minutes
in
the
eastbound
direction.
W
Ten
minutes
in
the
westbound
direction,
with
this
option
one
and
the
mentioned
of
the
intersection
designs
that
we
just
went
over,
we're
just
being
that
we're
actually
able
to
keep
that
westbound
travel
time
to
what
is
existing
today
and
kind
of
meet
that
travel
time.
That's
anticipated
in
the
eastbound
in
the
future.
The
last
row
stand.
W
Someone
had
asked
that
earlier
this
last
row
talks
about
what
the
anticipated
travel
times
were
with
just
the
option,
one
when
it
was
just
a
cross-section
before
we
did
some
of
those
intersection
designs
and
changes,
so
community
feedback
that
we've
heard
so
far.
We
had
her
meeting
in
early
May
and
we
received
you
know
for
the
recommended
options
when
we
asked
and
what
are
the
things
you
liking.
Most
people
are
liking
for
5a,
the
bike
facilities,
designs
for
safety
and
the
auto
facilities
in
the
section
north
that
3a,
where
we'd
have
more
landscaping.
W
You
see
that
they
like
similar
features,
but
they
also
like
that
ability
to
have
natural
features
and
they
like
that
walking
environment
for
Colorado
Avenue.
They,
like
those
bicycle
transit
and
pedestrian
facilities
for
the
recommended
option
that
we
have
I
want
to
hand
this
over
to
Jennifer
Nicole.
She
is
our
transportation
advisory
board
chair.
They
were
also
considering
these
recommended
options
and
she's
just
going
to
share
her
input
with
you
now.
Y
Hello
there
so
I
think
knowing
did
an
amazing
job
of
kind
of
laying
out
a
very
long
and
very
involved
process,
but
I
just
wanted
to
kind
of
reiterate
the
the.
Why,
in
terms
of
both
the
current
needs
for
this
specifically
around
safety
and
the
fact
that
this
is
a
very
high
collision
area
and
then
for
the
future
and
the
fact
that
we
need
to
plan
for
what's
going
to
change
in
these
corridors
and
the
fact
that
the
growth
is
already
happening
and
the
activity
centers
are
evolving.
Y
So
tab
really
wanted
to
commend
the
transportation
staff
on
how
they
handled
the
process
of
engaging
the
community,
because
I
think
they
really
took
the
findings
from
the
public
participation
working
group
to
heart
and
they
really
provided
numerous
and
various
forums
for
people
to
be
heard
and
I
think
the
takeaway
is
they?
Actually,
we
all
listened
as
well.
So
I
think
that
that
that
was
really
impressive.
We
heard
from
numerous
members
of
the
actual
community
working
group
they
said.
Not
only
were
they
really
pleased
with
the
process.
Y
So
in
terms
of
the
what
of
what
were
Tabb
voted
unanimously
to
in
support
of
the
recommendations-
and
we
appreciated
that-
you
know
that
staff
was
able
to
really
think
through
creatively
and
combine
options,
especially
with
the
way
they
were
able
to
look
at
the
cost
factors
for
options,
5a
and
options,
3
and
figure
out
that
you
know
along
different
sections
of
that
30th
Street
corridor.
They
could
evolve
the
options
and
really
adapt
to
what
was
necessary
and
what
was
actually
feasible.
Based
on
the
right
away
on.
We
wanted
to
state
that
you
know.
Y
We
know
that
there
are
crashes,
and
we
know
that
you
know
there
is
a
vision,
zero
problem
on
30th
Street,
we're
hearing
from
people
that
that
regularly
bike
and
walk
and
say
that
they
just
avoid
30th
Street
altogether,
because
it's
they
just
don't
feel
safe,
and
so
we,
you
know
tab,
has
raised
this
in
our
last
meeting
and
wants
to
work
with
staff
to
identify
what
near
term
solutions.
Can
we
come
up
with
that.
Y
We
appreciate
that
this
is
a
longer-term
vision
for
this
corridor
that
could
take
up
to
20
years
and
we
fully
support
that.
But
we
also
know
that
there
are
media
safety
concerns
and
so
really
looking
for
support
from
council
as
well,
especially
in
lieu
of
declining
sales
tax
revenues
that
support
transportation
initiatives.
What
what
can
we
do
to
fund
changes
in
this
corridor
in
the
near
term?.
W
Thanks
Jennifer
I
just
want
to
go
to
one
more
slide,
so
you
guys
can
see
what
some
of
the
steps
are.
So,
following
your
feedback
today,
we'd
like
to
take
the
design
options
into
preliminary
engineering
so
that
we
can
actually
have
a
cost
estimation
for
the
improvements
for
both
quarters
and
we'd
like
to
develop
an
implementation
plan
of
phasing
these
improvements
in
overtime,
and
we
can
look
to
you
know
Jennifer's
comment
as
well
on
kind
of
short-term
near-term
things
as
well
conceptual
design
plan.
W
So
we'd
like
to
come
back
with
that
to
you
all
in
early
2019
for
City
Council
acceptance,
so
that
when
development
projects
come
in
for
review,
they
can
address
and
respond
to
these
designs
for
these
quarters.
So
with
that,
we're
back
to
the
question
at
hand
are
the
recommended
options
for
xxx
and
Colorado
the
best
balance
of
the
studies,
goals,
objectives
and
community
feedback
Thanks
before.
A
Z
Clarify
so
our
intent
is
we'll
take
the
design,
the
next
step
really
developed.
The
cost
estimates
come
up
with
some
phasing
options
for
implementation
and
then
we'll
be
programming
that
into
the
CIP
so
from
the
city
project
perspective
we'll
be
moving
forward
with
a
project
but
norine
was
mentioning
is
that
at
the
same
time,
what
we'll
be
doing
is
we'll
actually
be
developing
the
plan
and
actually
adopting
that
plan.
So,
as
development
proposals
come
in,
let's
say
somebody
to
redevelops
and
on
30th
Street,
then
their
project
would
need
to
basically
comply
with
the
plan.
Z
A
Z
So
need
to
do
is
take
design
the
next
level,
so
we
really
understand
the
cost
and
then
I
think
what
you've
heard
tonight
is
is
trying
to
come
up
with
phased
approach,
to
be
able
to
implement
the
most
important
aspects
of
the
project
first,
and
so
we'll
be
doing
that
and
then,
where
you'll
see
this
next
is
in
the
CIP
provides
in
the
CIP
process,
you'll.
Actually,
what
we've
have
in
the
budget
that
we're
currently
developing
for
2019?
We
have
a
line
item
in
there.
A
Z
Sorry,
so
to
figure
out
what
the
total
cost
is
and
that
what
we
have
is
capacity
within
our
CA
RP
of
about
three
million
dollars
a
year
to
do
these
types
of
projects.
Give
you
an
idea
of
range
of
time
that
has
taken
us
to
do.
For
instance,
28th
Street.
We
adopted
that
in
2000
and
we'll
be
finishing
it
in
2019,
and
so
we
hope
to
not
have
that
type
of
timeline.
But
that
gives
you
an
idea
of
a
really
long.
Z
Project
quarter
definitely
takes
a
number
of
years
at
those
kind
of
three
million
dollar
chunks,
and
then
the
other
thing
that
we
really
are
going
to
need
to
sort
out
is,
at
the
same
time
we'll
be
submitting
for
projects
through
the
Denver
Regional
Council
of
Governments
transportation
improvements
program
in
what
we're
as
Erin
I,
think
it's
described
for
you,
the
that
process
is
largely
undefined
right
now
and
we're
kind
of
making
the
plane
as
we're
going
down
the
runway.
And
so
we
hope
that
that
will
also
give
us
some
additional
money.
C
C
One
of
the
questions
last
part
I
want
to
make
is
that
we
have
chosen
more
or
less
the
cheaper
of
the
options
here
right.
So
in
terms
of
we're
thinking
about
like
how
soon
could
we
do
this
of
all
the
options
we
were
considering,
this
will
probably
get
done
the
fastest.
The
approach
that
we're
taking
is
that
a
fair
statement.
It.
I
W
W
I
D
W
I
So
for
the
CIP:
what's
the
thinking
on
how
to
incorporate
this
into
the
CIP
so
will
it
be
like
I
know
that
we
look
at
it
each
budget
cycle?
It's
probably
not
going
to
be
far
enough
along
for
the
19
budget
cycle,
but
would
the
plan
be
for
us
to
start
looking
at
possible
30th
Street
projects
in
the
20
budget?
Yes,.
W
K
I
have
a
question
so
somewhere
I
got
lost
and
I'm
trying
to
figure
out
which
options
are
being
recommended
for
which
portions
sure.
So,
if
I
go
through
your
handout,
the
PowerPoint
xxx
recommended
option
baseline
to
Colorado
is
option.
5A,
Yeah
right;
okay,
it's
so
it
just
goes
and
then
xxx
from
baseline
north
of
Colorado
they're.
The
same.
K
Have
a
couple
things
one:
it
would
be
really
nice
to
make
the
bicycling
as
safe
as
possible,
so
I
like
the
separated
grade
bicycle
lanes.
So
if
there's
anything,
you
could
do
to
get
started
on
this
ASAP
start
at
baseline
mm-hm
and
get
the
bikes
out
of
the
streets
and
get
them
up
on
two
separated.
I,
don't
know
how
much
that
costs,
but
that
would
be
really
really
important
and
I
think
would
improve
safety
and
I.
K
Don't
know
if
you
could
add
a
little
bit
of
sidewalk
there
so
that
you
know
pedestrians
don't
feel
like
there
might
be
being
run
down
by
bicyclists,
but
that
there's
ample
room
for
pedestrians
to
feel
safe
and
bicycling,
and
so
I
think
I'm.
Okay,
with
everything
else,
I
I'd
like
to
see
as
many
trees
as
possible
trees
make
everything
better.
K
Consideration
of
a
traffic
circle
here
there
you
know
I,
don't
know
xxx
in
Colorado.
From
my
perspective
as
a
bicyclist
and
a
writer
and
even
a
driver
in
there
I
hate
that
intersection
and
I'm
glad
you
guys
are
trying
to
fix
it.
It
really
needs
a
lot
of
help
and
then
the
last
thing
you
know
buddy's
brought
it
up
here
is
speed
limit,
but
speed
kills
and
I
know.
K
We
don't
want
to
slow
down
the
cars
very
much,
but
everybody
needs
to
coexist
some
and
if
you're
gonna
have
all
these
multi
modes
out
there,
maybe
having
a
little
bit
slower
speed
limit
might
help.
So
when
you
post
a
speed
limit
of
35
people
are
going
4045,
so
I
guess
I
would
like
some
consideration
of
what
would
happen
if
you
move
the
speed
limits
down
to
30,
just
to
get
them
to
go
35
saying.
K
C
I
had
a
couple
additional
questions,
so
one
of
them
is
about
that
cross
section
in
Colorado
between
xxx
and
foothills.
That
has
the
the
woman
ditch
in
the
middle.
So
is
it
at
all
possible
to
be
a
little
flexible
with
the
width
of
that
central
area
like
or
there
you
have
a
60
foot
width
recommend
it
there
and
is
that
60
feet,
because
there's
like
big
trees
right
on
the
edge
I.
F
C
So
just
put
the
thought
out
there
that
I
mean
if
there
are
big
trees
right
on
the
edge.
Well,
you
don't
want
to
cut
down
the
trees
but
like
if
we
could
get.
For
example,
we
could
get
a
little
bit
of
buffer
between
the
protected
bike
lane
and
the
travel
lane
in
the
bus
lane.
You
know
if
we
get
two
or
three
feet
there.
It
would
allow
for
a
little
more
physical
separation
that
wouldn't
really
fundamentally
impact
that
that
central
median
area
that
seems
worth
exploring.
C
W
When
we
were
looking
at
the
extents
for
the
30th
street
quarter,
we
were
looking
at
what
the
big
activity
centers
are
and
the
areas
of
change
and
so
Boulder
junction
at
the
north
and
C
Williams
village
on
the
south.
We
do
have
the
transit
village
area
plan.
That's
looking
area,
I
think
it
was
already
from
Pearl
to
Valmont.
So
we
thought
that
that
area
south
of
Pearl
down
to
baseline
was
them
remind.
C
Incorporates
these
similar
principles
is
gonna
come
out
of
like
a
little
similar
to
you,
yeah
I
just
can
put
this
out
there's
a
big.
This
is
a
bigger
deal,
but,
like
I,
remember
the
the
first
time
I
biked
on
thirty
throughs,
like
one
but
not
long
after
I
moved
here
it
was
with
my
son
in
a
bike
trailer
behind
behind
me,
biking
south
from
iris,
on
33
it
was
terrifying
and
I
got
it.
I
felt
like
I
was
taking
his
life
in
my
hands
and
I
got
off
of
it
as
quickly
as
I.
C
Could
that
bike
lane
is
inadequate
all
the
way
north
I
mean
really
inadequate,
and
so
I
I
would
really
like.
Obviously,
we've
got
like
a
10
or
20
year
set
of
things
to
do
here,
but
I
don't
want
to
forget
about
that
section
of
30th
Street.
So
hopefully
we
can
have
a
you
know.
Maybe
in
the
next
phase
we
can
evaluate
those
as
well,
but
you
know
if
we
can
just
keep
that
in
mind
as
we
move
through
this
process.
K
Because
we,
when
we
talked
about
the
Folsom
corridor
and
trying
to
get
people
to
go
under
bike,
north-south
I
thought
it
was
kind
of
ironic,
because
the
longest
street
we
have
and
Boulder
going
north
south
is
30th
Street
and
so
I
fully
support,
Aaron's
comments
on
take
it
all
the
way
to
diagonal
and
I,
don't
know
what
it
takes,
but
the
bike
lane
you're
really
skinny
up
there
and
and
the
cat
that
curved
thing
comes
way
out
into
the
middle
of
the
bike
lane.
And
so
you
really
have
maybe
three
feet
mm-hmm.
K
A
W
Think
we're
gonna
know
some
more
information
of
that.
Once
we
get
through
preliminary
engineering
and
the
cost
estimation
I
think
we
need
to
get
a
little
better
understanding
of
some
of
the
aspects
of
the
to
make
kind
of
this
design
option
happen.
I
think
we'll
be
able
to
understand
how
much
that
cost,
maybe
per
section-
and
that
may
be
right
now
and
also
and.
A
We're
not
talking
about
intersections,
but
if
there's
also
that
piece
to
try
to
make
them
safer,
so
I
guess
I'll,
just
put
it
out
there
there's
a
lot
of
us
that
would
like
to
have
you
come
back
to
us
and
say:
okay,
yeah,
here's
what
its
gonna
look
like,
but
it
in
the
meantime,
here's
the
priority
things
we
are
going
to
do
starting
next
year.
So.
X
The
only
thing
I
would
add
to
that
conversation
is
that
there
are
two
projects
that
are
scheduled,
both
of
which
we
expect
to
make
the
quarters
be
much
safer.
The
first
is
the
underpass
that
will
go
underneath
30th
in
Colorado,
and
we
expect
that
that
will
a
lot
that
will
remove
a
lot
of
conflicts
in
that
intersection
and
then
the
second
is
the
the
drawing
that
Narine
had
shown
that
entire
cross-section
route
of
Colorado
through
region
and
into
20th
Street,
not
including
the
intersection
of
20th
in
Colorado,
but
from
that
intersection
West.
X
We
actually
have
federal
safety
money
to
build
a
project
in
that
area,
we're
gonna
and
which
you
I'm
not
sure,
if
you
can
quite
see
it,
but
we're
actually
building
experimenting
with
a
protected
intersection
at
that
location,
and
so
we
hope
to
get
information
about
just
how
safe
that
treatment
is
and
whether
that's
the
right
treatment
that
we
should
then
take
and
use
in
other
intersections
in
the
corridor.
Those
are
both
things
that
are
funded
and
will
be
constructed
in.
W
C
So
I
can
finish
up
my
comments
here.
People
don't
mind
so
well
and
just
I'll
just
say
one
more
time,
just
that
the
intersections
will
be
important,
so
whatever
we
can
do
to
so
much
of
pedestrian
bike
safety
happens
at
the
intersection
so
and
it
will
get
to
that
eventually
and
I
guess.
My
only
other
real
comment
is
something
I
was
saying
earlier,
which
is
that
well,
first
of
all,
let
me
just
say:
I
think
you've
done
fantastic
work
here.
The
public
outreach
was
top
notch
and
the
winnowing
down
some
blending.
You
just
kudos.
C
So
thank
you
for
all
that
and
I
look
forward
to
these
changes.
They're
gonna
really
help
with
safety
through
that
corridor
in
usability
in
a
lot
of
ways,
but
so
the
one
the
one
detail,
other
detailed
common,
is
that
I'm
really
happy
to
see
the
protected
bike
lanes
and
I.
Think
having
them
raised
will
make
a
big
difference,
but
in
most
of
the
places,
the
way
that
you
haven't
proposed
they're
separated
vertically,
which
helps
a
lot
but
there's
very
little.
C
C
But
if
there
are
opportunities,
if
there's
a
block
or
two
where
it
really
works
to
put
the
landscaping
next
to
the
vehicles
and
the
bikes
interior
to
that,
so
that
you
have
that
physical
separation
for
the
bikes
and
the
past
reans
I
think
that
would
be
really
helpful
and
where
that's
not
possible,
you
know
if
you,
if
there's
just
a
room
to
get
another
foot
or
two
in
and
I,
don't
want
to
say
the
B
word.
But
you
know
not
necessarily
bollards,
but
some.
C
J
J
A
I
I
just
wanted
to
say
also,
this
is
pretty
nicely
teed
up,
but
it
is
a
corridor
that
absolutely
we
need
to
be
looking
at.
There's
no
question
that
I
find
that
their
district
court
or
to
be
one
of
the
scariest
on
the
bike,
and
so
because
there's
so
much
population
that
circulates
in
there
I
think
we're
doing
the
right
thing
by
prioritizing
it
this
highly
so
kudos
for
that
I
want
to
just
pick
up
on
what
Cindy
was
saying
and
say:
I,
don't
know
exactly
where
all
the
red
light
cameras
are
in
town.
I
I
know
that
there's
a
lot
on
28th,
but
the
the
point
being
that
those
have
been
shown
to
be
effective
at
reducing
crashes
at
intersections.
So
that's
another
type
of
solution
that
we
can
deploy
at
intersections
to
get
people
to
think
twice
about
running
through
the
yellow
light,
and
so
I
mean
our
traffic
department.
You
can
say
more
about
that
because
you
guys
have
all
the
numbers
on
it,
but
I
do
think
that
as
we
do
this
improvement
in
safety,
we
want
to
also
look
at
that
I
wouldn't
mind.
I
The
speed
limit
dropping
five
miles
an
hour,
because
it's
well
established
that
the
speed
differential
is
what
does
the
damage
and
different
modes
when
there's
a
crash.
So
all
that
said,
I
think
the
process
that
you
put
together
seems
like
it's
worked
out
pretty
nicely
and
it
seems
like
you've,
got
a
broad
cross-section
of
people
who
have
come
together
on
some
options
and
I
think
it
makes
sense
to
leave
four
lanes
on
xxx
for
now,
because
it's
a
major
major
arterial,
but
to
reconfigure
Colorado
I
think,
except
for
the
one
section
between
28
and
region.
A
F
So
I
just
want
to
echo
what
the
great
work
that
you've
done.
The
compliments
that
have
been
given
thank
you
and
I
wanted
to
just
touch
on
what
Aaron
said
and
Lisa
about
30th
Street
from
from
Perl
to
the
diagonal
and
whatever
you
can
do
there,
even
if
it's
just
restriping
or
something
because
it
is
it
could
it
has
the
potential
to
be
a
good
north-south
connection,
but
it
isn't
right
now
and
that's
all
I
had
so
so.
A
X
X
X
A
I,
just
am
I
agree.
That's
what's
been
said.
I
really
appreciate,
I
think
how
you've
taken
the
public
participation,
working
group,
input
to
heart
and
really
fashion,
take
a
good
process
and
I
look
forward.
I
think
we
all
do
what
comes
out
and
how
we
can
help
support
and
move
it
forward
quickly,
but
I
think
people
are
very,
very
interested
in
figuring
out
how
to
before
was
protected
bike
lanes
in
a
way
that
serves
all
the
modes
travel
time.
So
thank
you
for
that
anything.
P
Just
a
communication
suggestion
you
might
remember
that
when
the
survey
was
out
there
online
I'm
one
of
the
options-
I,
don't
think,
was
an
option.
We
were
super
serious
about,
but
just
to
be
thorough
loans.
The
options
was
to
narrow
some
of
the
30th
Street
from
four
lanes
to
two
lanes,
and
we
all
got
dozens
of
emails
from
people
saying,
oh,
my
god,
I
can't
believe
you're
thinking
about
doing
that.