►
From YouTube: Boulder City Council Meeting 9-9-21
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
They
are
obviously
available
and
free,
and
if
you
would
like
more
information
on
how
to
get
a
vaccine,
please
go
to
the
website.
Boco.Org
slash,
covid
vaccine
notify
sign
up
and
I
think
that's
actually
two
different
things.
I
think
that
is
the
one
to
get
notified
and
then
there's
also
a
way
to
get
the
vaccine
there
and
then,
with
that
announcement
being
done
alicia,
could
you
please
call
the
roll.
B
C
B
C
D
A
F
A
Second,
we
have
a
motion
and
a
second:
are
there
any
objections
to
amending
the
agenda
great,
seeing
none.
We
will
make
that
amendment
and
we
will
move
on
to
our
next
item,
which
is
the
declaration
for
the
2021
pollinator
appreciation
month,
and
that
is
going
to
come
from
our
beekeeper,
adam
swetlick,
adam.
D
D
The
550
native
bee
species,
butterflies,
hummingbirds,
beetles
flies
and
other
pollinators
of
boulder
maintain
the
health
and
beauty
of
our
grasslands.
Forests,
meadows
and
other
areas,
native
pollinators
and
honeybees
are
indispensable
partners
in
the
production
of
our
food
supply.
Pollinators
are
essential
for
the
diverse
and
thriving
ecosystems
that
support
all
life
around
the
world.
Insects
are
declining
precipitously,
including
critical
pollinators
from
habitat
loss,
pesticide
use
and
climate
change.
This
is
placing
our
food
security,
natural
environment
and
human
well-being
in
peril.
D
D
The
city
council
of
the
city
of
boulder
colorado
declares
september
2021
pollinator
appreciation
month
and
commits
to
taking
action
by
partnering,
with
boulder's
residents,
businesses
and
organizations
to
join
together
to
protect
pollinators
and
all
biodiversity
for
current
and
future
generations,
and,
as
always,
thank
you
to
taylor
ryman
for
putting
together
the
declaration.
I'm
just
here
to
read.
It.
G
And
our
committed
community
members
who
work
tirelessly
to
help
us
create
the
programs
and
and
the
gardens
that
are
just
necessary
to
change
things
and
support
biodiversity
and
and
and
have
natural
solutions
for
climate.
So
I'd
like
to
first
thank
the
the
bee
chicas,
who
have
for
the
last
seven
years.
G
So
festival
tonight
we
have
deborah
foy,
cynthia,
scott
and
deborah
and
teresa
beck,
we're
missing
tracy,
bella
humor
and,
in
addition
to
this
important
work,
we're
really
moving
into
a
direction
now
of
of
creating
habitat
throughout
the
city,
and
we
couldn't
do
that
without
people
who
are
just
taking
the
lead
and
working
themselves
day
and
night
to
make
this
happen.
G
You
know
we're
passionate
volunteers,
and
so
I
wanted
to
introduce
andre,
andrea,
montoya
who's,
the
director
of
the
gas
grove,
pollinator
pathway
project
and
who
is
responsible
for
putting
in
these
beautiful
gardens
and
our
city-owned
parks.
So
yeah,
I'm
gonna
be
happy
to
talk
to
andrea.
Now,.
H
Hi
there,
my
name's,
andrea
montoya,
thank
you
for
sponsoring
our
event
tonight
and
pollinator
appreciation
month.
I
am
the
director
of
the
goss
grove
pollinator
corridor
project.
These
are
the
volunteers
and
people
that
we
couldn't
do
this
project
without
I'd
also
like
to
thank
brella
abernathy
for
her
undying
commitment
to
this
project.
She
connects
people
across
the
city
and
the
community.
I'm
going
to
give
you
a
little
bit
of
history
about
who
we
are.
These
pocket
parks
were
first
built
in
the
city
of
boulder
because
they
were
traffic
diversion
islands.
H
In
addition
to
that,
we
have
lots
of
neighborhoods
around
here
that
have
yards
with
gardens
in
them
and
though
they
had
beautiful
gardens
with
plants,
none
of
it
was
really
connected.
It
was
more
like
we
were
individuals
with
yards
and
nothing
really
hung
together
about
three
or
four
years
ago.
I
started
to
take
real
notice
of
the
fact
that
climate
destruction
was
causing
a
tremendous
falloff
of
pollinator
habitat
and
pollinators
across
our
city
across
the
globe,
and
I
wanted
to
do
something
about
it,
so
it
was
kind
of
a
perfect
storm.
H
Here
we
had
neighbors
who
were
willing
to
plant
gardens.
We
had
pocket
parks
that
had
fallen
into
disarray.
We
had
a
community
of
people
that
needed
more
connecting
and
we
also
had
pollinators
that
needed
biodiverse
habitat.
So
we
sunk
our
heels
in.
We
got
out
our
shovels
and
we
committed
ourselves
to
turning
these
pocket
parks.
You
can
kind
of
see
them
in
the
background
into
real,
live
biodiverse,
habitat
full
of
native
plants
that
grow
around
here
around
this
area
and
can
serve
the
native
polis,
like
native
bees,.
A
A
Well
with
that,
I
guess
we
will
have
an
abrupt
end
to
our
celebration
with
rella,
but
I
want
to
say
thanks
to
adam
and
torella,
for
the
declaration
and
thanks
to
everyone,
who's
helping
support
our
pollinators
so
with
rachel.
F
D
A
A
J
I
don't,
I
think
we
can
go
right
into
it
unless
cheryl
has
something
to
add,
but
I
think
we've
you
know
we're
proud
of
what
we've
done
financially.
I
know
that
there
are
always
improvements
and
I
believe
that
our
cafers
kind
of
shows
everything
that
we're
doing
as
we
move
forward
as
strong
fiscal
accountability.
K
Thank
you.
I
think
ryan
needs
to
turn
my
video
back
on.
Oh
there,
it
is
okay,
all
right.
Thank
you
great
all
right.
Well,
thank
you
for
this
opportunity.
So
my
name
is
david
gross
and
I
serve
on
the
boulder
city
council
audit
subcommittee.
K
The
committee
consists
of
council
members,
swetlick
wallach,
yates
and
me,
and
it's
our
job,
to
assess
and
interpret
the
audit
of
the
city's
fiscal
year.
2020
financial
statements-
it's
not
the
job
of
this
committee
to
in
any
way
assess
the
city's
financial
position
or
to
assess
its
financial
activities,
just
the
quality
of
the
statements
and
the
audit
of
those
statements.
K
So
the
motion
on
the
consent
agenda
for
later
this
evening
is
to
approve
and
accept
the
city
of
boulder
annual,
comprehensive
financial
report
or
the
acfr,
and
also
the
audit
of
the
acfr,
so
note
that
this
is
the
sixth
year
that
clifton,
larson
and
allen.
Clifton
larson
allen
has
audited
the
city's
financial
statements
and
it's
best
practice
to
review
auditors
and
consider
a
change
after
five
years,
and
the
committee
did
this
last
fall
after
careful
consideration
of
several
firms
across
several
factors,
including
expertise,
compatibility
and
cost.
K
The
committee
unanimously
approved
to
renew
boulder's
relationship
with
clifton
larson
allen,
okay,
so
what
I'm
going
to
do
is
I'm
going
to
give
a
brief
description
of
the
four
part
process
that
led
us
to
this
point.
So
first
city
staff
records
all
financial
transactions.
K
Second,
the
staff
uses
this
information
to
prepare
the
financial
statements.
These
financial
statements
are
produced
for
each
of
the
city's
41
funds,
including
the
general
fund
and
the
open
space
and
the
transportation
and
municipal
property.
In
addition
to
a
combined
set
of
financial
statements,
there
are
three
main
financial
statements
that
are
produced
for
for
a
government
entity
like
this
so
kind
of
like
a
p
l
or
an
income
statement,
is
something
called
the
statement
of
revenue,
expenses
and
change
in
net
position.
K
K
So
like
a
balance
sheet,
the
city
also
produces
a
statement
of
net
position,
and
this
is
what
the
city
owns
its
assets
and
what
the
city
owes
its
liabilities
and
their
resulting
net
position.
If
this
were
a
business,
we'd
call
the
net
position
owner's
equity.
K
The
difference
between
this
year's
net
position
and
last
year's
net
position
is
the
change
in
that
position
that
we
saw
on
the
p
l
statement
above
the
third
financial
statement.
That's
produced
is
something
called
the
statement
of
cash
flows
and
the
statement
of
cash
flows
can
be
an
important
addition
to
the
other
two
financial
statements
to
address
the
to
assess
the
true
financial
health
of
an
entity.
K
K
The
city
does
not
have
a
lot
of
non-cash
transactions,
but
it
still
must
produce
this
statement
of
cash
flows.
So
these
three
types
of
statements
for
all
of
the
different
funds-
these
are
public.
They
can
be
used
by
anyone
to
understand
how
the
city
operates
and
answer
questions
about
the
city
from
where
does
the
city
receive
its
funds?
Where
does
the
city
spend
its
funds
and
how
stable
and
sustainable
financially
stable
and
sustainable?
Is
this
city?
K
But
these
and
other
questions
can
only
be
answered
if
the
city
is
accurately
recording
transactions
and
producing
the
financial
statements
correctly.
So
the
third
process
is
to
give
these
financial
statements
to
the
auditor.
In
addition,
the
auditor
works
with
the
city
staff
to
gain
an
understanding
of
the
process
used
to
record
the
transactions
and
prepare
the
financial
statements
and
it's
the
auditor's
job
to
ensure
that
the
recording
and
preparation
are
done
in
accordance
with
the
rules
set
by
the
government,
accounting
standards
board
or
gasby.
K
K
In
our
opinion,
the
financial
statements
fairly
in
all
material
respects
represent
the
true
financial
position
of
the
government
activities,
the
business
type
activities
each
major
fund
and
the
aggregate
remaining
fund
information
of
the
city
of
boulder.
This
is
the
best
possible
report
opinion
that
the
auditors
could
have
now.
There
was
one
something
called
a
my
uncorrected
misrepresentation.
K
It
sounds
a
lot
worse
than
it
is,
and
I'll
talk
about
that
in
a
minute.
So
the
auditors
look
for
deficiencies,
significant
deficiencies
and
material
weakness.
A
deficiency
is
a
flaw
in
the
design
of
a
process
that
might
allow
for
errors.
It
doesn't
mean
that
there
was
an
error,
but
if
they
find
something
like
this,
they
issue
a
comment
on
it.
So
in
2015
the
auditors
found
14
deficiencies
associated
with
I.t
processes.
The
city
worked
extremely
hard
to
address
these.
K
K
A
significant
deficiency
is
a
large
deficiency
or
a
combination
of
them
less
severe
than
a
material
weakness,
but
yet
important
enough
to
merit
attention
and
again
no
significant
deficiencies
and,
finally,
a
material
weakness
is
a
large
deficiency
or
combinations
such
that.
Not
only
did
this
happen,
but
there's
a
reasonable
probability
that
errors
occurred
and
again
no
material
weaknesses.
K
So,
to
recap:
legacy
deficiencies
for
2015
are
all
fixed
and
there's
no
new
ones,
no
significant
deficiencies,
no
material
weaknesses.
Now
there
was
one
misstatement
of
the
financial
statements
that
went
uncorrected
and
this
is
called
an
uncorrected
misstatement.
So
what
happened
was
boulder
county
did
224
thousand
dollars
worth
of
work
for
the
city
in
december
2020,
but
the
county
didn't
send
the
invoice
until
march
2021
after
the
books
were
closed.
The
city
paid
not.
K
No
available
entry
occurred,
so
the
2020
expenses,
which
is
what
we're
talking
about
now,
should
have
been
224
000
higher,
but
since
total
expenses
were
over
311
million,
this
represents
seven
one
hundredths
of
a
percent
of
expenses.
So
when
this
relatively
small
timing
issue
was
discovered
in
the
auditing
process,
it
was
deemed
correctly
to
have
no
material
impact
on
the
reported
financial
position
of
the
city
and
it's
going
to
be
included
next
year.
K
But
there
is
one
so
there
does
remain
one
uncorrected
misstatement
but
again
doesn't
have
a
a
real
impact,
so
overall
a
clean
opinion
and
for
the
31st
consecutive
year,
38
years
in
total,
the
city
was
awarded
the
certificate
of
achievement
for
excellence
in
financial
reporting
by
the
government
financial
government
finance
officers
association.
K
So
this
certifies
that
the
city
went
beyond
the
minimum
requirements
and
repaired
reports
that
evidence
the
spirit
of
transparency
and
full
disclosure.
Just
an
aside.
One
other
concern
the
this
fiscal
year
that
the
committee
had
was
internal
controls.
Internal
controls
are
the
process.
The
processes
make
it
more
difficult,
or
hopefully
impossible
for
people
to
engage
in
theft.
So,
for
example,
a
single
person
is
not
allowed
to
determine
the
amount
of
cash
to
be
collected,
collect
the
cash
and
then
deposit
it
in
the
bank.
K
Given
the
enormous
procedural
changes
necessitated
by
cobit
and
the
move
to
remote
work,
the
committee
was
concerned
that
these
changes
might
decrease
internal
controls,
but
both
the
city
and
the
city
staff
and
the
auditors
were
able
to
allay
these
concerns.
For
example,
there
weren't
a
lot
of
trash
cash
transactions
in
2020,
and
so
this
seems
like
it
was
dealt
with
well.
So
the
fourth
and
final
step
is
the
audit
committee
interprets
and
acts
on
any
recommendations
from
the
auditor
there
weren't
any.
K
The
audit
committee
then
makes
a
recommendation
to
the
full
council
on
whether
to
accept
the
annual
comprehensive
financial
report
and
the
audit
of
the
annual
comprehensive
financial
report,
and
it's
the
unanimous
recommendation
of
the
audit
committee
that
the
city
council,
the
city
council,
approve
and
accept
this
report
and
the
audit
of
this
report.
Thank
you.
A
Great,
thank
you
so
much
dave
and
before
we
go
to
council
questions
or
feedback,
would
you
mind
telling
us?
I
know
that
you
help
us
out
with
this,
but
you
have
a
day
job.
Would
you
mind
telling
us
the
expertise
that
you
bring
to
the
work
that
you
do
with
the
city.
K
Yeah,
I'm
a
teaching
professor
associate
teaching
professor
of
finance
at
cu.
I
have
been
teaching
graduate
and
undergraduate
finance
for
25
six
years
now
up
there
on
the
hill.
A
Oh
great,
we
so
appreciate
the
time
that
you
take
to
help
look
from
the
outside
and
make
sure
that
our
processes
are
stable,
looks
like
they're
getting
better
every
year,
which
is
great
and
to
get
that
certificate
of
high
regard
from
the
government.
Financial
officers
is
wonderful,
so
I
want
to
thank
you
and
thank
the
whole
committee.
L
Well,
I'd
just
like
to
echo
my
thanks
dave.
We
just
so
much
appreciate
your
service
to
the
city
and
bringing
your
expertise
to
bear
and
the
system
is
on
it
and
just
a
huge
kudos
to
the
financial
department
of
the
city,
and
you
know
the
audits
have
gotten
better
every
single
year
and
have
such
a
clean
report
and
it
just
it's
an
extraordinary
accomplishment,
so
very
appreciative
of
the
phenomenal
work
by
city
staff.
At
this.
E
Yeah
I
wanted
to
thank
dave,
so
thank
you,
dave
awesome
work
and
this
couldn't
happen
without
a
an
amazing
staff
behind
it.
So
I
wanted
to
thank
our
finance
staff
for
the
stellar
work
that
they
do
on
an
ongoing
basis.
So
thank
you.
M
Sorry
I
had
to
unmute.
I
also
want
to
thank
our
finance
staff.
They
were
at
the
committee
level.
They
were
very
very
forthcoming
and
the
information
they
produced
was
terrific,
and
I
want
to
thank
dave
as
well
for
his
terrific
expertise
and
helping
us
navigate
this
process.
I
actually
have
one
question,
starting
in
2022,
we're
going
to
be
subject
to
a
change
in
the
way
leases
are
recorded.
M
It's
called
the
you're,
probably
familiar
with
it.
I
am
not
gatsby
statement
87
and
it
was
apparently
significant
enough
that
our
auditors
had
a
large
section
of
boilerplate
warning
us
that
we
had
to
be
prepared,
for
that
is
there
anything
special
that
we
have
to
be
prepared
for?
Is
that
an
ordinary
course
of
business
adjustment
that
we
will
have
to
make.
N
Yeah,
so
thanks
mark
and
thanks
everyone
for
your
comments
and
feedback
tonight
and
dr
gross,
I
couldn't
have
explained
it
better
than
you
did
so.
Thank
you.
So
this
is
a
pretty
big
lift
for
the
entire
city.
In
that
you
know.
In
the
past,
we've
we've
just
had
to
record
our
major
capital
leases
and
now
we're
pretty
much
having
to
go
throughout
the
city
and
determine
all
the
leases
that
we
have
and
record
those.
So
it
certainly
is
something
that
we've
been
planning
for.
N
I
don't
I
don't
think
so,
but
I'm
going
to
defer
to
ann
penny
our
controller.
She
may
have
other
thoughts.
O
O
K
M
A
You
very
good
well
thank
you
again,
dr
gross,
and
to
our
entire
finance
team.
Thank
you
so
much
for
all
the
work
you
did
pulling
this
all
together.
It
is
a
great
accomplishment
and
I
have
to
say
dr
gross
you
you
get
so
excited
about
the
audit
work
and
the
accounting
that
you
must
make
a
great
professor.
So
thank
you
for
your
time
and
with
that
alicia,
I
think
we're
ready
to
move
to
open
common
is
that
correct.
A
A
P
Can
you
hear
me
now
we
can
hear
you,
I
got
it
delayed
on
mute.
I
wanted
to
talk
to
you
about
the
dining
outdoor
dining
on
pearl
street.
P
Now
the
pearl
open,
dining
went
in
place
without
any
it
was
kind
of
an
emergency
and
it
went
into
effect
without
any
study,
and
there
were
a
lot
of
unintended
consequences
and
if
you
drive
streets
in
our
neighborhood,
you
will
see
what
happened
was.
It
was
turned
into
a
big
parking
lot
with
no
space
for
neighbors.
Some
of
us
don't
even
have
driveways
or
parking
spaces,
and
nothing
seems
to
be
being
done
about
it,
and
we
now
hear
there
was
talk
about
a
three-year
extension.
P
P
Lots
of
open
parking
lots,
there's
lots
of
downtown
parking,
but
the
people
who
come
here
primarily
from
out
of
state
don't
want
to
pay
and
they
aren't
in
any
way
encumbered
by
the
threat
of
a
possible
ticket
they
just
leave.
So
I
think
we
need
to
really
take
into
consideration
this.
I
think
we
need
to
take
into
consideration
how
many
empty
tables
there
are
at
different
times
on
pearl
street.
Well,
our
blocks
are
never
unparked
and,
as
I
said,
you
have
a
lot
of
open
parking
options.
P
City
parking,
you
have
a
hospital
site
with
a
huge
empty
parking
lot.
You
have
an
alfalfa's
parking
lot,
that's
never
being
used,
and
I
can't
even
count
the
number
of
parking
lots,
probably
public
and
private
that
could
be
used
if
they
were
free,
people
would
use
them
and
if
there
was
on-site
traffic
monitoring,
which
the
npp
does
not
do
anyway.
Thank
you.
I
think
you
need
to
look
at
this.
A
Gary
next
up,
we
have
william
sales
and
patrick
murphy,
william.
R
And
we
do
not
have
william
or
patrick
here,
not
seeing
them
in
the
meeting
we
do
have
len
siegel,
who
is
interested
in
speaking
for
open
comment.
A
Okay,
well,
let's
bring
lynn
in
because
she's
only
signed
up
to
other
times
so
lynn.
You
have
two
minutes.
S
Yeah,
I
didn't
get
the
information
for
this
meeting
as
being
separate.
There
was
no
notification
that
you
have
to
have
a
certain
time
to
sign
up
for
open
comment
ahead
of
a
meeting.
That's
off
access
to
what
it
usually
is.
I
wanted
to
talk
to
you
about
cu
south.
One
of
the
things
that
I
found
out
today
is
that
the
if
there's
a
de-annexation.
S
There's
a
change
in
what
happens
with
the
dx
de-annexation
that
the
if
the
land
disposal
happens,
that
it
will
not
be
in
effect,
but
that
it
it
wasn't
in
effect
and
it
and
if
there's
a
de-annexation,
the
open
space
board
of
trustees
will
have
had
to
go
through
all
this
process
for
nothing
and
without
having
the
land
disposal
of
119
acres.
This
is
a
new
change.
S
It
was
brought
up
at
open
space
board
of
trustees
by
hal
holstein
last
night
at
8
50..
So
you
can
listen
to
his
review
of
that,
but
I
imagine
that
it's.
If
it's
d
annexed
because
c
dot
doesn't
approve
it
and
then
it's
vnx.
Well,
then
you
could
think
well
yeah.
If
it's
deanna's,
then
why
should
we
still
get
the
119
acres?
S
According
to
us,
it's
them.
This
wants
the
annexation.
So
I'm
kind
of
confused.
This
is
there's
so
many
moving
parts
to
this
annexation
and
it's
changing
all
the
time.
A
Lynn,
your
time
is
up.
Thank
you
for
your
comments,
they're
appreciated
and
you
can
send
the
rest
of
them
in
to
us
by
email,
if
you
would
like
ryan,
have
either
of
the
other
two
speakers
shown
up.
R
A
Have
not
okay,
very
good,
we
will
move
on
in
a
moment.
I
aaron,
I
see
your
hand,
I
was
going
to
turn
to
staff
and
council,
but
would
you
like
to
speak
before.
L
A
A
Super
very
good
and
bob,
I
see
you've
got
a
hand
up.
A
Some
thank
you.
Any
other
council
comments.
Questions
juni
did
you
have
the
were
you
going
to
recuse
from
3c
as
well.
A
Okay,
super
all
right
with
that.
Can
you
hear
me
just
barely
you
were
a
bit
choppy,
but
I
understood
that
you
were
going
to
recuse
yourself
as
well.
R
I'll
follow
up
with
judy
separately.
A
Okay,
super
well
with
that
council
word:
the
consent
agenda,
any
comments,
questions
or
we
take
a
motion
on
the
consent
agenda.
L
A
And
just
for
folks
who
are
listening,
the
item
that
bob
is
going
to
recuse
himself
from
3c
is
calling
a
special
meeting
on
september
14th,
which
will
be
for
the
public
hearing
of
the
cu
south
annexation,
which
is
why.
V
C
A
Very
good
and
juni:
well,
you
were
gone.
We
had
a
motion
and
a
second
for
the
consent
agenda,
so
I
believe
we're
ready
to
take
a
vote
on
that
is
that
correct
alicia
and
it's
a
roll
call.
A
U
I,
on
all
items
other
than
3c,
for
which
I'm
recusing
myself.
D
A
Super-
and
I
just
want
to
make
sure
I
I
believe
it
was
seven
to
one
sorry,
eight-
to
zero
for
all
of
the
items
and
seven
to
zero
for
three
c
correct.
B
B
To
partially
redevelop
a
portion
of
the
property
at
34.85
stanford
court
with
60
permanently
affordable
apartments
for
seniors
age,
55,
plus
in
one
new
building.
The
proposed
units
include
54
one-bedroom
units
and
six
two-bedroom
units.
The
original
sanctuary
building
is
proposed
to
be
landmarked
and
renovated
for
the
existing
child
care,
rainbow
child
care
center
on
the
lower
level
and
new
community
space
for
residents
on
the
upper
level.
The
proposal
includes
a
request
for
an
increase
in
maximum
allowable
building
height,
to
allow
a
height
of
45
feet,
10
inches
for
the
proposed
building.
Y
Thank
you
jacob
emily.
Would
you
mind
bringing
that
presentation
up
for
me.
Y
All
right
there
we
go
okay,
so
good
evening,
council.
The
purpose
of
tonight's
item
is
for
council
to
consider
whether
to
call
out
planning
board's
decision
on
the
site
review
application
that
alicia
described,
which
is
to
partially
develop
a
portion
of
the
property
at
3485
student
court,
which
was
formerly
the
site
of
the
mount
calvary
church,
and
this
presentation
would
just
be
a
brief
overview
of
the
site
review
proposal
and
the
planning
board
determination
next
slide.
Please.
Y
So,
just
to
provide
the
context,
the
nearly
five
acre
site
is
located
in
south
boulder
at
the
northernmost
terminus
of
stanford
court.
One
of
the
most
notable
aspects
of
the
site
is
the
topography
and
the
natural
slope
to
the
north
into
the
east.
The
site
is
relatively
level
at
that
source,
southwestern
quadrant
of
the
site,
which
is
where
the
redevelopment
post
the
site
contains
two
former
church
structures.
Y
Y
The
proposal
includes
three
requested
modifications
to
the
land
use
code.
The
first
is
a
hype
modification
to
permit
a
building
of
a
height
nearly
46
feet.
The
second
is
a
parking
reduction
to
allow
the
provision
of
59
vehicular
parking
spaces
where
83
spaces
are
required,
which
is
a
29.3
reduction
and,
lastly,
a
bike.
Parking
reduction
to
allow
the
provision
of
79
bicycle
parking
spaces
where
124
are
required
in
terms
of
parking.
Y
Y
The
first
is
that
the
design
of
the
building
incorporates
those
pitched
roofs
to
sort
of
support
that
architectural
compatibility
with
the
historic
structure
in
the
existing
neighborhood
and,
as
I
mentioned,
the
other
portion
would
be
because
of
the
topography
and
how
the
city
measures
height.
So
this
chart
just
sort
of
shows
you
the
two
different
components
of
the
height
modification.
Y
Because
of
the
height
modification,
the
the
final
decision
was
by
the
planning
board.
On
august
5th,
the
planning
board
held
a
public
hearing
and
approves
the
application
unanimously.
With
a
vote
of
5-0
and
at
the
hearing
the
board
discussed
whether
the
proposal
meets
the
site,
review
criteria
and
the
criteria
for
parking
reductions.
Y
Next
slide,
please,
in
terms
of
the
public
process,
formal
public
notification
was
provided
as
part
of
the
concept
plan
review
and
also
the
site
review.
Y
Neighborhood
comment
was
given
as
part
of
the
concept
plan,
and
the
applicant
has
worked
to
address
these
through
the
site
review
process
and
very
little
public
comment
was
received
by
staff
through
the
site
review.
Although
two
individuals
did
speak
in
support
at
the
planning
board,
hearing
and
outside
of
the
formal
process,
bhp
has
undergone
public
outreach
for
the
project
which
the
applicant
is
available
to
discuss,
if
desired
by
council
next
slide.
Y
Y
The
vacation
of
right-of-way
has
been
completed
and
the
designation
for
that
historic
sanctuary
is
on
track
to
go
to
the
landmarks
board
at
the
october
6th
meeting
dates,
which
would
then
go
to
council
within
100
days.
D
Thanks
sam,
I
know
some
of
the
main
concerns
about
this
area
were
the
access
from
table
mesa
and
especially
that
this
is
gonna
house
seniors
that
there
may
be
more
ambulance
traffic
that
has
to
be
sort
of
anticipated
was
anything
prepared
in
that
regard,
or
I
I
realized,
I
don't
think,
there's
any
additional
access
points
provided
in
this
plan,
but
I
wanted
to
see
if
that
was
taken
into
consideration.
Y
Well,
there
wasn't
a
traffic
study
done,
but
there
was
a
review
by
city
staff
to
ensure
that
there
was
safe
and
appropriate
access
across
the
site,
so
they
do
have
when
you're
entering
the
site.
There
is
a
sort
of
entry
plaza
where
an
ambulance
would
be
able
to
pull
in.
It's
also
been
reviewed
by
the
fire
marshal
to
ensure
that
an
emergency
vehicle
would
be
able
to
get
through
the
site.
D
Okay-
and
this
may
not
be
a
question
for
you
sloane,
but
are
there
any
anticipated
traffic
improvements
for
that
street
that
connects
to
table
mesa
just
since
it
is
a
pretty
highly
trafficked
area
and
it's
kind
of
a
mixture
of
people
going
a
little
fast
in
a
residential
neighborhood.
Y
Right
so
because
this
that
portion
of
roadway
is
is
not
part
of
this
property,
they
wouldn't
be
doing
improvements
there.
I
will
say
that
the
possibility
of
improvements
on
the
sort
of
public
side
was
evaluated
by
the
transportation
department
and
they
determined
that
that
wasn't
necessary
at
this
point,
but
it's
certainly
something
that
we
could
reevaluate
once
this
has
been
developed.
D
Okay
and
my
last
question
is
there
was
sort
of
a
community
park,
even
though
it
wasn't
an
officially
established
park
or
anything
on
the
west
side
of
this
property
are
community
members
still
gonna
have
access
to
that
or
does
this
plan
in
any
way
mitigate
that
function.
Q
Yeah
I
can.
I
can
take
that
one
sloane
good
evening,
members.
Y
O
Q
Ian
swallow
with
boulder
housing,
partners
and
adam.
I
think
what
you're
referring
to
there
is.
There
was
kind
of
a
historical,
not
historic,
but
historic,
for
the
property
community
gardens
over
on
that
west
side.
They've
gotten
pretty
overgrown
in
the
last
couple
years,
but
our
intent
we're
actually
moving
where
the
community
gardens
would
be
so
they'd
be
a
little
more
central
in
the
site,
and
then
we
would
look
to
make
a
portion
of
those
beds
would
be
available
for
the
community
just
because
they
would
potentially
be
losing
access
there.
Q
You'll
note.
If
you
look
closely
at
our
demolition
plans,
there's
there's
one
note
on
there
that
says
we'll
be
moving
the
dirt
from
those
gardens,
saving
that
that
kind
of
good
soil
and
moving
it
to
where
the
new
gardens
would
be.
So
I
think
we
we
think
that's
a
good
good
solution
and
and
one
that'll
serve
both
the
seniors
as
well
as
kind
of
the
broader
community
out
there.
D
Thanks
for
that
ian-
and
that
did
remind
me
one
more
thing-
is
there
any
plan
for
there's
sort
of
a
a
path
that
goes
to
the
north
on
that
property?
It's
you
know,
not
a
designated
path
in
any
way.
I
was
just
wondering
if
there's
any
plans
for
that,
if
it's
just
gonna
be
sort
of
shuttered
or
if,
if
you
have
any
idea.
Q
Yeah,
no,
I
think
it
is
certainly
not
going
to
be
shutter.
That
was
a
big
kind
of
focal
point
of
our
site
plan,
so
that
path
will
remain
it'll
get
slightly
reconfigured
so
that
it'll
bring
folks
up
from
the
bottom
of
the
hill
down
on
dover.
There
they'll
be
able
to
come
up
through
the
site,
walk
through
kind
of
the
entry
courtyard
and
still
be
able
to
cut
across
to
the
table,
mesa,
intersection
and
kind
of
that
shopping
center.
So
our
intent
is
that
that
stays,
that's
public.
Q
The
path
will
be
improved,
but
it's
not
going
to
be
it's
not
going
to
be
concrete,
it'll,
be
like
a
crusher
fine
path,
so
it'll
maintain
that
kind
of
natural
feel
out
there
and
we
would
just
yeah.
We
would
welcome
members
of
the
public
in
the
neighborhood
to
continue
using
that
once
the
site's
redeveloped.
A
Thanks
adam
next,
we
have
mark
and
rachel
mark.
M
M
We're
going
to
be
within
the
38
foot
limitation,
if
not
for
the
way
we
calculated
in
terms
of
25
feet
from
the
from
the
buildings
themselves,.
Y
So
in
this
district,
the
limitation
is
35
feet
and
even
if
you
were
measuring
from
grade
the
building
would
be
over
that
and
the
rationale
for
that
would
be.
They
could
design
a
building
with
flat
roofs
straight
across
to
meet
the
height
limitation,
but
in
order
to
meet
that
compatibility
with
the
historic
sanctuary
building
and
do
some
screening
of
the
mechanical
equipment,
and
they
would
still
be
over
height
limitation,
I'm
trying
to
do
the
calculation
of
where
they
would
be.
Do
you
know
off
the
top
of
your
head,
jv.
Z
Yeah,
thank
you,
everyone.
My
name
is
jb
jesus,
I'm
the
architect,
the
lead
architect
on
the
project,
and
I
I
don't
remember
the
exact
the
precise
numbers
sloane,
but
it
was
only
about
a
foot
to
between
12
and
18
inches
when
we
had
an
entirely
flat
roof
on
top
of
the
structure.
Z
We
did
add
the
slowproof
elements
actually
at
the
request
of
the
community,
to
have
slope
grooves
on
the
building
and
to
use
those
to
screen
our
mechanical
equipment
which
caused
them
to
count
towards
the
height
of
the
structure.
Whereas
if
it
had
been
a
standard
mechanical
screen
fence
on
the
roof,
it
would
not
have
been
considered
part.
M
Of
the
building
height,
so
essentially
a
good
portion
or
most
of
that
height
increase
that
you're
seeking
is
for
the
architectural
elements
and
screening.
That's
correct.
Okay,
and
my
last
question
is
on
the
parking
you
have
59
spots.
M
Q
Yeah,
I
can
answer
that
mark,
so
we
we
looked
pretty
closely
at
the
parking
out
here.
I
think
we
knew
that
was
a
big
concern
for
the
neighborhood
and
this
site
and
the
contacts
out
there
so
where
we
landed,
we
looked
at
a
number
of
our
other
senior
properties.
We
found
we
typically
see
about
0.6
cars
per
unit
at
our
senior
properties.
Q
So
for
the
residents
that's
about
36
spaces.
We
looked
at
the
child
care
use
their
staffing
needs
as
well
as
what
bhp
staffing
needs
might
be.
What
we
found
is
that
we
think
the
maximum
number
of
folks
at
a
peak
time
out
there
would
be
about
45
cars.
What
we
wanted
to
do
is
make
sure
you
know
that
if
that's
the
max,
we
provide
some
buffer
just
to
be
sure
we're
meeting
the
needs
out
there,
but
also
not
not
providing
too
much
parking
at
the
site.
So
we
can
still
have
those
gardens.
Q
We
have
some
really
nice
walking
paths
that
without
the
parking
reduction
really
would
have
been
possible.
So
I
think,
I
think,
we're
at
a
sweet
spot
with
the
59
spaces
to
to
meet
need,
but
also
make
sure
there's
enough,
but.
M
How
many
did
you
assume
for
the
for
the
residents
36.
Q
Q
Etc,
yeah,
that's
right
so,
and
you
know
I
think
we
would
probably
have
one
full-time
property
manager
who
was
on
the
site.
The
child
care.
Has
you
know,
depending
on
the
day,
between
four
and
seven
staff,
who
would
be
there
and
then
it's
primarily
a
drop-off
use
for
that
child
care?
It's
it's
a
pretty
locally
served
demographic,
so
you
do
have
folks
dropping
kids
off
in
cars,
but
you
also
have
a
lot
of
families
who
are
walking
or
biking
to
the
site.
So
I
think
we
feel
like
that'll
that'll
work
pretty
well
out
there.
Q
F
Q
Yeah,
I
can,
I
can
answer
it
as
well,
so
you
know,
I
think,
the
the
bike
parking
reduction
jumps
out
as
a
big
number,
but
I,
I
would
say,
we're
still
providing
quite
a
bit
of
bike
parking,
so
I
think
we
have
45
indoor
secured
bike
parking
spaces
for
the
residents,
as
well
as
several
kind
of
outdoor
bike
parking
areas.
The
the
reason
we
ended
up.
There
was
again
we
kind
of
looked
around
at
our
senior
properties
to
see
what
bike
ownership
looks
like
it's.
Q
It's
a
very
small
number.
It's
it's
not
typical
that
our
senior
residents
are
biking.
I
think
we
also
didn't
want
to
say
we
don't
we
don't
need
any.
I
think
we've
seen
you
know,
trends
in
e-bikes
increasing
and
I
think
that
will
only
continue
for
the
senior
population.
So
we
think
you
know
45
covered
spaces
in
the
building
is
a
good
number
that
that
will
meet
the
need
for
the
seniors.
Q
F
Q
So
if
we
needed
more,
I
you
know,
I
think
we
would
look
to
add
it
on
the
outside.
We
have
quite
a
bit
of
space
in
some
of
the
terraces
and
then
you
know.
The
other
point
that
I
would
I
would
just
mention
here
is
this
is
kind
of
these
are
formal
bike
parking
spaces?
What
we
see
oftentimes
is
people
prefer
to
keep
their
bikes
in
their
unit
rather
than
locking
them
up
in,
like
a
formal
bike
parking
place.
Q
So
you
know
our
one
bedroom
units
are
about
700
square
feet,
so
they're
quite
large,
so
I
I
think
you
would
see
someone
who
was
an
avid
cyclist
would
probably
keep
their
bike
in
their
unit
and
not
even
utilize
those
spaces,
but
I
do
think
we
would
have
a
room
on
the
site.
Should
three
four
or
five
years
down
the
road
we
say:
oh
everything's,
full
the
racks
are
full.
We
could
certainly
come
in
and
add
some
additional
parking
for
bikes.
A
All
right,
thank
you,
rachel
and
if
there's
no
other
comments,
I
just
want
to
say
thanks
to
bhp
for
bringing
this
forward.
Thank
you
so
much
for
reusing
that
sanctuary
building
we've
had
a
couple
successful
projects
in
the
last
handful
of
years
decade
or
so,
where
those
houses
of
worship
that
have
been
preserved
have
been
really
great
amenities
on
the
site.
So
I
think
this
is
a
fantastic
project,
and
you
know
the
height
is
a
minor
issue
in
some
sense,
but
it
does
definitely
100.
A
Affordable,
definitely
provides
a
community
benefit
for
that
little
extra
bit
of
height.
So
again,
thank
you
so
much
sloan
for
walking
us
through
this
and
ian
for
being
here
and
with
that
back
to
you,
alicia.
A
A
B
A
Very
good
any
council
member
want
to
call
this
up
to
speak
to
it
great,
seeing
none.
I
don't
think,
there's
a
call
up
here,
alicia
and
we're
ready
for
the
next
item.
B
All
right,
sir,
thank
you
item.
Number
five
on
tonight's
agenda
is
our
public
hearings.
5A
is
the
introduction
first
reading
and
consideration
of
a
motion
to
order
published
by
title
only
ordinance,
8488,
approving
supplemental
appropriations
to
the
2021
budget,
including
appropriations
of
the
american
rescue
plan
act,
funds.
J
Yep
and
we've
got,
and
hopefully
I've
got
it
right.
This
time,
we've
got
two
great
presenters,
cara,
skinner
in
finance
and
then,
as
many
of
you
know,
mark
wolf
has
been
kind
of
our
project
lead
on
arpa
and,
while
he's
currently
in
community
vitality,
it
is
my
great
pleasure
to
say
that
he
will
be
joining
the
finance
team
as
of
september
20th,
as
our
new
senior
budget
manager
so
kudos
to
mark.
But
really
the
team
has
done
a
lot
of
good
work
on
this.
AA
Thank
you
very
much
so
good
evening
council,
we
reviewed
this
special
atv
request
at
the
august
24th
study
session.
So
our
presentation
this
evening
will
be
brief.
Next
slide,.
AA
AA
AA
AA
AA
And
then
last
the
airport
has
requested
an
eight
hundred
thousand
dollar
appropriation
from
fund
balance
for
a
time-sensitive
fuel
farm
project.
AA
AB
Thank
you
caro,
and
we
can
go
to
the
next
slide
good
evening
again,
council,
as
carl
mentioned,
we
covered
a
lot
of
this
on
august
24th,
so
I
will
just
briefly
go
through
a
few
of
these
slides,
which
outline
our
initial
recommended
allocation
of
our
local
relief
funds
through
arpa
next
slide.
Please,
this
slide
should
look
familiar
to
you.
AB
This
represents
the
city
of
boulder's
local
relief
funds
through
arpa
in
total
a
little
over
20
million
dollars
tonight,
we're
seeking
approval
of
appropriation
of
the
highlighted
portions,
that's
gap,
funding
for
limited
service
restorations
a
little
over
2
million
in
immediate
needs,
and
a
million
dollar
public
health
reserve
to
address
any
challenges
or
expenditures
that
arise
related
to
delta
variant
or
other
variants.
In
the
coming
months,
we
did
discuss
in
a
million
a
million
dollar
reserve
for
emerging
needs
based
on
council
feedback.
We
are
not
seeking
authorization
for
expenditure
this
evening.
AB
If
there
are
emerging
needs
that
arise
over
the
coming
months.
There
are
other
opportunities
through
adjustments,
subsequent
adjustments
to
base
that
we'll
be
back
and
seeking
approval
for
that
at
that
time.
What
we
are
not
talking
about
tonight
is
this:
the
large
green
area
or
the
remaining
dollars
for
transformative
investment,
which
we
are
pursuing
planning
for
in
the
coming
months,
in
the
areas
of
behavioral
mental
health,
small
business
support,
addressing
digital
divide
across
the
city
and
other
initiatives
that
address
some
of
our
most
pressing
challenges.
I
AB
Next
slide,
please,
we
are
seeking
to
apply
arpa
dollars
to
a
little
over
two
million
dollars
in
immediate
needs,
largest
being
addressing
the
the
digital
divide
at
several
bhp
sites
throughout
the
city,
additional
assistance
to
small
businesses
to
support
our
local
economic
recovery
in
several
areas,
including
expanded
and
pilot
programming
in
affordable
commercial
expansion
of
our
micro
loan
program
and
programming
to
encourage
safe
visitation
to
the
community.
AB
We
are
looking
at
a
program
to
assist
folks
with
utility
bills,
continuing
programming
that
we
funded
through
our
cvr
allocation
in
human
services
in
the
areas
of
food,
child
care
and
health
care
access.
And
lastly,
some
additional
dollars
to
support
services
through
hybrid
work
delivery
next
slide.
Please-
and
our
last
slide-
is
our
requested
motion
for
this
evening-
happy
to
take
any
questions.
Car
and
I
are
both
available
for
those.
Thank
you.
A
M
Of
the
appropriation
for
the
fuel
farm,
what
makes
it
imperative
that
we
do
it
now,
and
and
do
it
in
that
amount.
AC
So,
thank
you
very
much.
The
reason
why
it
is
imperative
that
we
do
this
quickly
is
because
we
have
been
given
some
notices
by
the
state
about
the
heel
form
and
the
practices
and
so
forth.
M
E
C
E
A
All
right,
so,
let's
we
have
a
motion
in
a
second,
but
we
will
suspend
discussion
while
we
go
to
the
public
hearing
and
if
the
public
hearing
changes
your
mind,
mirror
you
can
withdraw
your
motion.
So
with
that
give
me
a
second
and
I
will
pull
things
up.
Yes,
let's
go
to
the
public
hearing
and
we
have
two
folks
signed
up
for
the
public
hearing.
We
have
lynn
siegel
and
edward
smutney
and
because
we're
less
than
15
people
there'll
be
three
minutes
each.
So
when
you
are
up-
and
you
have
three
minutes.
S
Yeah
I'd
like
to
see
some
of
this
for
the
side
of
my
house,
which
is
melting.
It's
basically
made
of
particle
board
and
lousy
drainage
on
the
gutters
that
drained
into
the
house
and
just
decomposed.
S
The
siding
it'd
be
nice
to
have
some
shelter
at
my
place,
instead
of
like
the
siding
falling
off
to
the
tight
down
to
the
tie
back
then,
eventually
down
to
the
frame
and
and
into
my
house-
and
you
know-
it'd
be
nice
to
have
some
warmth
in
the
winter
and
some
cooling
in
the
summer.
I
have
an
air
conditioner,
but
I
won't
use
it.
Of
course,
sam.
S
You
know,
I'm
very
energy
efficient
and
it'd
be
nice
to
have
a
a
public
electric
utility
for
boulder
that
I
could
justify
getting
solar
panels
for
so
that
I
could
get
air-to-air
mini
splits.
So
I
can
keep
myself
warm
in
the
winter
and
cool
in
the
semper.
I'm
68
years
old
it'd
be
nice
to
have
a
little
bit
of
at
least
basic.
A
All
right,
thank
you,
lynn
and
I've
been
told
by
ryan
that
the
next
speaker
is
not
here.
So
with
that
we
will
bring
a
public
hearing
to
a
close
and
come
back
to
council.
We
have
a
motion
and
a
second
and
mary
did.
You
want
to
finish
speaking
to
your
motion.
E
I
just
wanted
to
comment
to
lynn
that
there
may
be
some
assistance
for
home
repair
available
and
so
would
encourage
her
to
look
into
that.
A
Super
all
right
with
that
we
have
a
motion
and
a
second
any
other
discussion.
A
A
Okay,
very
good,
so
we
will
go
opposite
that.
Does
anyone
want
to
vote
against
the
motion
great
seeing
none?
The
motion
passes
eight
to
zero.
B
A
W
Okay,
thank
you
nuria.
Thank
you,
mayor
members
of
council,
so
we
have
a
powerpoint
presentation.
If
that
could
be
started.
That
would
be
great.
W
Okay
next
slide,
please
all
right
so
for
purposes
of
this
item.
I'd
like
to
talk
about
the
proposed
changes
to
the
policy
statement
on
state,
regional
and
federal
issues.
Talk
about
the
policy
priorities
talk
about
generally,
more
generally
about
the
city's
legislative
advocacy
work.
W
W
So
this
is
something
that
most
of
you
know,
but
the
purpose
of
the
policy
statement
is
to
direct
the
I'm
sorry,
I'm
a
little
distracted,
I'm
getting
some
messages
and
I'm
having
a
hard
time.
If
you
give
me
one
second,
it
might
be
useful
to
turn
this
off,
because
they're
coming
on
fast
and
furious.
W
The
purpose
of
the
policy
statement
is
to
make
sure
that
the
city
officials
have
the
direction
they
need
to
respond
to
opportunities,
as
they're
presented
on
the
policy
sphere
in
the
on
the
regional
state
and
federal
level,
the
the
right
now
we
have
69
positions
that
have
been
proposed
for
you.
W
We
have
27
of
those
positions
that
have
some
changes,
that
I've
been
proposed
not
going
to
be
walking
through
all
of
those
because
they
were
reviewed
by
the
intergovernmental
affairs
committee.
So
your
committee
composed
of
mayor
weaver,
councilmember,
brockett
joseph
and
wallet
wallock,
so
they
made
some
recommendations
on
some
changes
and
those
changes
were
incorporated
into
attachment.
A
and
attachment
b
attachment
a
is
the
actual
changes
to
the
policy
statement.
Attachment
b
is
a
summary
of
those
changes.
W
W
Since
I'm
not
walking
through
the
changes,
I'd
like
to
at
least
kind
of
in
globally
explain
the
kinds
of
changes
that
occurred.
Primarily,
they
have
to
do
with
reflecting
a
change
in
circumstances,
because
legislation
or
other
policy
or
ages
agency
action
occurred.
At
least
18
of
the
policy
positions
are
changed
because
of
that.
W
The
second
category
is
because
there's
new
needs
that
we've
identified
in
opportunities,
so
there's
seven
changes
to
policy
positions
that
are
made
because
of
that
and
finally,
there's
two
positions
that
are
made:
there's
just
they're
just
changes
in
existing
positions
that
were
recommended
by
the
intergovernmental
affairs
committee
next
slide.
Please.
W
I'd
like
to
start
by
summarizing
some
requests
that
council
member
friend
made-
and
I
want
to
say
that
I
really
appreciate
her
reaching
out
to
me.
It's
always
useful
because,
as
you
can
see,
she
provided
some
concerns
and
I
actually
have
some
proposal
proposed
language,
so
we
don't
have
to
wordsmith
on
the
fly.
W
Our
first
concern
was
the
fact
that,
of
course,
we
know
the
supreme
court
is
reviewing
the
texas
law
on
abortion
rights
and
because
of
that,
there
may
very
well
be
a
need
for
our
own
state
act
to
make
sure
that
we
protect
women's
reproductive
freedoms.
W
W
W
Second
of
all,
their
position
number
33
has
to
do
with
protecting
governmental
immunity
to
clarify
that
it's
well
so
actually
back
up
so
council
member
fred
wanted
to
make
sure
that
that
position
was
not
interpreted
to
mean
that
we
were
against
that
that
we
were
supporting
rolling
back
qualified
immunity.
As
you
know,
that
was
established
in
the
the
major
law
enforcement
integrity
act
that
was
passed
in
in
1920.
W
So
the
proposed
change
to
the
language
that
I
am
making
to
clarify
that
we
are
not
proposing
to
roll
back
the
changes
that
the
state
made
on
qualified
immunity
is
written
there.
Again,
it's
the
red
language.
It's
qualifying
an
existing
statement
that
says
that
the
city
will
support
legislation
that
provides
immunity.
It
accepts
accepts,
established
state
law
on
a
qualified
immunity.
W
So
the
number
is
wrong
here,
but
a
third
request
that
council
member
friend
made
was
she
felt
that
the
position
number
39,
which
has
to
do
with
providing
minimum
requirements
that
local
governments
must
meet
to
combat
homelessness.
She
felt
that
there
was
some
language
that
created
some
equivocation,
and
so
the
language
is
right
there
right
below
it.
In
my
proposal
and
frankly,
it's
it's
it's
it's
merely
striking
the
word
some,
and
so
it
would
read.
Furthermore,
the
city
may
also
support
minimum
requirements
that
local
governments
must
meet
combat
homelessness.
W
The
reason
we
kept
the
word,
nay,
is
because
we
would
need
to
look
at
the
language
before
we're
gonna
allow
a
state
mandate
that
you
know
it
might
apply
to
us.
It
might
force
us
to
change
our
own
policy.
We
would,
of
course,.
W
You,
okay,
apologies
about
that,
so
her
last.
Her
last
question
was
about
a
position
number
50
which
is
regarding
thc.
W
So
this
has
to
do
with
the
concerns
that
we
have
about
the
impact
that
our
youth
with
some
high
potency
thc,
such
as
products
known
as
shatter
and
wax,
and
I
had
proposed
to
strike
this
language
because
there
was
a
legislation
that
was
introduced,
hb
21
1317
that
did
pass
that
did
address
issues
of
packaging
and
the
amounts
and
product
messaging
and
marketing.
W
So,
in
my
eagerness
to
remove
positions
where
their
legislation
has
passed,
I
did
propose
deleting
it,
but
the
council
member
friend
did
point
out
that
part
of
the
bill
did
charge
the
colorado
school
of
public
health
with
identifying
gaps
in
those
regulations.
So
there
might
be
additional
legislation,
that's
necessary.
W
So
what
I
am
proposing
in
response
to
her
concern
is
to
restore
position
50
to
read
as
as
it
exists,
and
that
is
written
there
in
red
next
slide.
Please.
W
We
also
received
I've
received
directly
an
email
response
from
laurel
herndon.
You
might
have
heard
from
before,
from
the
immigrant
legal
center
of
baltimore
county
she's
been
a
world
champion
of
immigrant
rights
and
a
great
partner
with
the
city
on
our
policy
advocacy.
W
W
Next
slide,
please,
and
the
final
request
that
I
saw
from
the
community-
you
all
received
emails
from
leslie
klusterm
and
from
duncan
gilchrist
from
350
colorado.
He
was
proposing
rejecting
rejecting
the
redactions
to
position
number
12
regarding
oil
and
gas.
W
So
his
concern,
as
was
leslie's
concern,
is
that
the
language
may
be
read
as
to
suggest
that
things
are
all
fine
and
dandy
at
the
colorado,
oil
and
gas
conservation
commission,
and
they
can
handle
the
rules
that
wasn't
the
intent.
The
intent
was
to
frankly,
recognize
that
a
lot
of
things
have
changed
since
we
drafted
the
initial
position
and
that
there
was
quite
a
bit
of
detail
there.
That
was
not
necessarily
accurate
because
of
the
changes
that
have
occurred
at
the
regulatory
level,
because
we
don't
have
any
subject
matters.
W
We
we
weren't,
able
to
have
somebody
on
our
staff
to
provide
us
a
kind
of
a
point-by-point
change
to
to
make
to
the
language.
So,
instead,
my
proposal
was
to
to
to
really
simplify
it
and
to
really
focus
on
this
new
issue,
which
is
the
the
fact
that
there's
going
to
be
greenhouse
gas
emission
regulations
that
are
imposed
on
the
oil
and
gas
sector.
W
One
one
point
that
was
brought
up
was
a
plain
out
mistake,
which
the
language
reads
refers
to
the
adoption
of
this
rule
on
greenhouse
gas
by
the
colorado,
oil
and
gas
conservation
commission,
the
codcc.
W
If
you
would
like
to
instead
go
along
the
approach
that
were
proposed
by
these
members
of
the
community,
we
can
certainly
restore
position
number
12
to
read,
as
it
was
originally
written.
The
danger
there
again
is
that
we're
not
quite
sure
that
it's
the
exact,
very
complex
rules
that
are
many
rules
that
are
that
have
been
adopted
or
underway.
We
don't
know
whether
they're
it's
still
accurate,
but
certainly
one
option
would
be
to
restore
the
language
that
was
originally
there
with
this
initial
additional
language
that
has
to
do
with
the
greenhouse
gas
emissions
standards.
W
So
what
I
want
to
focus
on
now
is
the
state
and
federal
policy
priorities
and,
as
a
reminder,
the
priorities
are
areas
where
the
city
anticipates
prioritizing.
Its
advocacy
efforts
I
underline
anticipates
because,
of
course,
things
change
and
we
are
not
able
to
set
the
agenda
and,
as
was
the
case
last
year,
there
was
many
bills
that
we
spent
a
lot
of
time
on
that
were
not
identified
as
council
priorities,
but
nonetheless,
we'd
like
to
be
proactive
and
that's
the
purpose
of
identifying
these
priorities.
W
They
they
do
address
legislative
and
non-legislative
matters.
The
third
bullet
here
does
describe
some
examples
of
council's
priorities
in
2021
that
were
successfully
met
so,
for
example,
the
the
removal
or
the
increase
of
the
120
cap
on
net
metered
residential
renewable
energy
generation
that
senator
fenberg
helped
us
achieve,
along
with
other,
very
important
elements
to
the
bill.
W
W
W
That's
been
placed
on
us
because
of
the
pandemic
because
of
the
king
super
shooting,
and
that
this
is
really
translated
into
an
increase
in
stress,
anxiety,
suicide,
ideation
and
the
other
things
that
are
described
here
and
they
are
requesting
that
we
engage
the
state
in
increasing
the
amount
of
resources
and
services
and
to
reduce
the
barriers
to
mental
and
behavioral
health
care.
I've
listed
there
are
a
few
examples
of
the
kind
of
support
that
we
would
ask
in
this
state.
Much
of
this
is
done
at
the
local
level.
W
It's
actually
primarily
something
that
the
county
and
non-profit
providers
are
the
lead.
However,
the
city
of
boulder,
as
you
know,
is
very
much
involved
in
either
just
financing
some
of
these
efforts,
or
actually,
in
the
case
of
the
crisis,
intervention
response
team.
It's
something
that
it's
a
program
that
we
have
ourselves.
W
W
So
we
we
are
hoping
to
meet
with
her,
actually
have
a
meeting
scheduled
with
her
and
the
rest
of
our
delegation,
so
that
our
police,
chief
and
our
housing
human
services
director
can
go
into
a
little
bit
more
detail
on
the
the
challenges
we
have
with
substance
abuse
and
and
explore
how
we
might
be
able
to
partner
with
the
state.
So
that's
what
this
first
priority
is
about
next
slide,
please.
W
The
second
priority
is
around
ranked
choice.
Voting
you
all
know
that
boulder
by
charter
is
now
required
to
elect
its
mayor
by
using
ranked
choice
voting
in
2023.
We
were
successful
this
last
session
in
passing
legislation
that
will
allow
just
that
the
coordination
of
irv
between
cities
and
counties.
W
However,
oh
actually
back
up
here,
the
secretary
of
state's
office,
needs
to
to
take
various
actions
to
make
that
happening,
including
some
minimum
system
requirements
and
specifications
for
voting
systems.
W
The
fiscal
note
for
doing
that
is
just
over
six
hundred
thousand
dollars
and
they
they
do
not
have
that
funding.
While
they've
received
the
authorization
to
do
this
through
21
1071,
they
have
not
received
the
funding,
so
that
is
our
policy.
Priority
number
two
is
to
make
sure
that
the
the
office
receives
the
funding
they
need.
W
W
The
third
priority
has
to
do
with
as
part
of
the
overall
effort
to
to
reduce
greenhouse
gases
gases
in
all
the
sectors
of
of
our
economy.
W
There
is
a.
There
has
been
a
proposed,
a
greenhouse
gas
pollution
standards
for
for
the
transportation
sector.
It's
part
of
a
greater
effort
for
move
funding.
From
from,
I
guess
mobile
sources.
You
would
say
a
lot
of
the
reduction
will
occur
through
the
switch
to
electric
vehicles
over
time,
so
the
eight
metric
meter
ton
co2
equivalent,
is
what's
anticipated
through
that
through
that
transition
alone.
W
Five
of
them,
including
our
own,
dr
cog,
the
denver
regional
council
of
governments
approved
transportation
plans
and
that
basically
decides
where
state
and
federal
funding
goes
and
it
obviously
impacts
a
lot
of
things,
including
land
use,
and
so
this
proposed
standard
would
create
budgets
for
each
region
of
the
state
for
co2,
equivalent
emissions
budgets,
and
it
would
require
these
plans
to
comply
to
essentially
demonstrate
through
modeling
that
the
projects
that
are
being
added
to
the
plans,
cumulatively
collectively,
would
not
result
in
emissions
greater
than
the
emissions
budgets
that
are
being
provided
for
each
one
of
them.
W
You
know
such
as
transit
and
walking
and
biking,
and
things
like
that,
so
it
kind
of
intrudes
into
the
area,
or
I
should
say
it
does.
It
is
perceived
to
be
a
a
challenge
for
a
lot
of
communities
that
feel
like
they
should
be
able
to
make
these
decisions
on
their
own
and
not
have
the
the
state
and
federal
purse
you
know
preventing
them
from
making
decisions
on
how
to
grow
their
city
or
or
county.
W
However,
we
have
an
an
opportunity
to
really
make
a
difference:
the
city
of
boulder.
Of
course,
we
can
reach
out
to
cdot,
but
we
sit
on
many
different,
many
different
tables
where
these
decisions
are
going
to
be
considered,
including
starting
with
dr
cogg
councilmember
brockett
is
our
representative
there
and
they
will
be
taking
a
position
on
it.
Our
climate
coalition
will
be
taking
a
position
on
it
and
has
already
begun,
providing
some
comments.
W
The
metro
mayor's
caucus,
the
northwest
mayors
and
commissioners
coalition,
the
colorado
municipal
league,
so
this
is
really
an
example
of
our
policy
priorities
and
our
policy
statement.
Positions
in
general
are
not
just
having
this
city
try
to
go
straight
to
the
source,
but
working
with
our
various
partners
to
make
a
difference,
and
so
the
proposal
here
is
to
support
the
adoption
of
this
rule.
I
will
say
that
we
expect,
and
we
actually
would
like,
probably
to
see
quite
a
bit
of
an
evolution
and
revisions
in
the
rule.
W
So
what
we're
proposing
is
to
adopt
support
for
the
rule,
conceptually
in
terms
of
making
sure
that
emission
reductions
occur
tied
to
transportation
plans,
but
we
know
that
things
such
as
the
modeling
some
of
the
mechanics,
some
of
the
enforcement
mechanisms
waivers
that
may
be
issued.
Those
things
are
going
to
have
to
be
revisited
and
we'd
like
to
be
part
of
the
discussion.
W
So
this
fourth
policy
priority
has
to
do
with
building
energy
codes
so
again
different
sector
of
the
economy,
the
residential
commercial
and
industrial
sector.
They,
according
to
the
the
governor's
road
map
for
production
of
greenhouse
gases,
need
to
reduce
their
emissions
by
4.7
metric
million
tons
of
co2
equivalent
by
2030,
and
one
of
the
ways
that
is
being
proposed
and
actually
the
actual
roadmap
proposed
to
get
there
is
to
require
advanced
building
codes,
and
it
would
so
what
is
being
considered
now.
W
I
know
that
at
least
right
now,
one
high
level
official
in
the
government
is
considering
a
requirement
for
local
governments
to
adopt
such
advanced
codes
as
a
floor.
Local
governments
would
still
have
the
ability
to
to
have
a
higher
more
stringent
regulations
in
terms
of
building
energy
codes,
but
the
state
would
establish
a
floor.
W
We
believe
that
this
is
in
furtherance
of
the
city's
goals
to
promote
climate
goals,
specifically
increasing
energy
efficiency
and
the
beneficial
electrification
of
buildings.
We
think
that
local
government
support
will
be
critical.
There
will
be
quite
a
few
local
governments
that
I
imagine
will
be
animally
opposed
to
this.
In
fact,
that's
where
the
main
opposition
will
come
so
it'll
be
important
again
with
working
with
the
same
some
of
the
same
partners
I
mentioned
before
for
boulder.
W
If
council
agrees
to
take
a
position
in
support
of
this
proposal
that
we
expect
to
come
forward
next
slide,
please.
W
So
the
last,
the
fifth
and
last
priority
has
to
do
with
air
pollution,
something
that
I
know
we're
all
thinking
about,
and
it
was
actually
not
really
in
our
policy
statement.
So
the
intergovernmental
affairs
committee
and
climate
initiatives
department
brought
this
to
my
attention
and
so
there's
actually
been.
I
I
have
a
description
there,
how
it
essentially
threatens
public
health
and
everything
that
you
know.
W
I
guess
it's
worth
pointing
out
that
those
that
are
most
vulnerable
are,
and
by
that
I
mean
those
who
don't
have
the
option
to
go
into
an
air-conditioned
house
or
perhaps
even
to
go
into
any
house
are
particularly
vulnerable.
W
So
this
is
a
real
challenge,
both
in
terms
of
the
need
to
reduce
the
contributors
to
air
pollution.
So
I
I
would
you
know,
so
that's
one
position,
that's
the
position
number
40
that
we're
proposing
as
well
as
recognizing
that
we're
going
to
have
bad
air.
W
We
have
bad
air
right
now
and
while
we
have
it
as
part
of
a
climate
resilience
effort,
we
need
to
make
sure
that
we're
doing
everything
we
can
at
this
state
is
helping
us
do
what
we
can
to
to
build
resilience
to
help
our
community
to
know
when
you
know
as
much
as
the
best
we
can,
when
air
pollution
is
going
to
be
bad,
to
identify
resources
that
we
can
use
to
help
community
members
to
get
through
these
these
difficult
times
in
a
healthy
way.
W
Shifting
over
to
the
federal
policy
priorities,
the
first
one
has
to
do
with
congressionally
directed
spending
requests.
Now
there
were
another
way
of
saying
earmarking
it's
back
after
many
years.
The
federal
government
is
again
listing
recipients
in
appropriation
bills
of
funding,
and
it's
changed
from
how
it's
done
before
it
actually
has
a
greater
transparency.
W
It's
limited
to
who
can
get
it.
Local
governments
are
on
the
list
of
who
can
get
some
of
these
appropriations.
We
as
a
city.
This
is
something
council
that
we
haven't
spoken
with
council
about
this
year
or
even
last
year,
because
it
wasn't
a
thing,
but
earlier
this
year
opportunities
became
available
and
we
did
make
requests
for
expanding
our
crisis
intervention
response
team.
W
This
is
where
we
have
behavioral
professionals
going
to
places
where
police
are
called,
but
where
arresting
somebody
and
taking
the
to
the
jail
may
not
be
necessary,
may
not
be
the
best
for
the
community,
or
certainly
for
the
person
who
would
be
arrested.
W
So
the
proposal
that
we've
made
and
we've
actually
gotten
the
support
from
senator
hickenlooper
and
senator
bennett.
They
have
both
submitted
this
for
inclusion
in
the
appropriations
and
the
appropriate
appropriations
bill
is
for
245
000,
for
expansion
of
the
of
the
program
that
which
would
increase
the
number
of
trained
officers.
W
It
would
add
overtime
so
that
officers
could
be
dedicated
to
right
right.
Along
with
these
mental
and
behavioral
health
specialists
would
add
a
case
manager
and
perhaps,
most
importantly,
it
would
implement
a
formal
program
to
evaluate
what
works
so
that
when
we
seek
to
make
further
changes
and
expansions
we're
doing
so
in
a
very
scientific
way,
that
has
results
at
the
front
of
our
considerations.
W
So
this
request
really
has
to
do.
I
give
that
all
as
background,
but
this
federal
policy
party
number
one
is
essentially
saying:
let's
support
the
city
supporting
congressionally
directed
spending
requests
for
fiscal
year
2023,
so
those
requests
will
be
made
in
the
spring
or
actually
late
winter
of
2022,
so
we'll
have
to
start
identifying
those
this
fall.
W
W
The
second
request,
the
federal
policy
priority
request-
is
around
urban
forestry.
This
is
an
issue
that
you
probably
are
hearing
from
the
climate
initiatives
department.
You
probably
are
going
to
be
hearing
a
lot
more
from
from
them
on
this
very
topic
they
are
working
on
it.
Directing
kern
in
particular,
is
leading
an
effort
at
the
regional
and
at
the
national
level
to
to
encourage
funding
and
resources
to
to
to
to
plant
trees
and
to
create
urban
forests.
W
W
Interestingly,
it's
not
just
a
question
of
keeping
things
cool
and
by
the
way
I
just
read
that
it
it
can
reduce
the
temperature
of
an
urban
environment
by
about
10
degrees
when
you
have
the
appropriate
urban
forest.
So
if
you
just
have
cement,
you
could
very
likely
have
10
degrees
warmer,
so
definitely
enough
to
make
a
difference,
especially
for
those
who
are
getting
ill
or
even
and
dying
because
of
the
extreme
heat.
W
It
also
helps
prevent
cold,
but
our
buildings
don't
get
as
cold
when
there's
trees
along
the
side
of
it.
So,
oh
I
guess.
Finally,
it
would
allow
the
creation
of
many
jobs
where
they're
most
needed
to
actually
plant
these
trees
and
maintain
them
and
do
all
that
it
takes
to
have
a
proper
urban
force.
W
So
the
request
that
we
have
already
begun
to
communicate
and
actually
the
mayor
and
brett
and
I
have
met
with
congressman
august
on
this
very
issue-
is
to
provide
significant
new
funding
to
expand
urban
forestry
as
a
climate
mitigation,
resilience
and
equity-based
community
development
strategy
and
specifically
to
find
a
segment
of
that
money
to
be
used
for
research.
W
So
we
want
to
make
sure,
like
I
spoke
about
in
the
previous
priority-
is
that
we're
using
the
best
species
and
the
best
planting
techniques
and
with
the
investment
that
the
federal
government
is
likely
to
make,
and
we
do
expect
this
to
occur
in
one
of
the
two
infrastructure
bills
that
are
under
consideration.
Probably
the
reconciliation
package
is
that
some
research
be
done
and
that
some
research
should
be
done
in
colorado,
where
we
have
some
some
of
the
best
minds
on
this
issue
next
slide,
please.
W
The
third
proposal
is
a
brown
multi-modal
improvement
for
state
highway
119.
There
is
a
lot
of
traffic.
You
all
know
on
on
this
road,
specifically
the
portion
car
to
119
that
goes
between
boulder
and
longmont,
and
it's
expected
to
get
much
worse
and
just
like,
we
did
on
us
36
that
we're
working
on
a
proposal
to
to
add
a
managed
lane
that
would
be
used
for
hov
or
bus,
rapid
transit
and
a
quarter
wide
bikeway.
W
So
that
is
the
third
proposal
next
slide,
please.
W
So
this
priority
has
to
do
with
northwest
rail.
As
you
all
know,
of
course,
this
is
a
project
that
was
part
of
the
fast
tracks
measure
that
was
passed
in
2004.
W
rtd
has
not
delivered
on
it
there's
reasons
for
it,
but
at
this
point
up
until
now,
it's
been
looking
very,
very
unlikely
that
we
would
ever
get
it.
However,
there's
been
a
lot
of
hope.
I've
spoken
to
about
this
before
amtrak
is
promoting
their
front
range
passenger
rail
from
fort
collins
to
the
pueblo,
and
there
is
interest.
There
is
quite
a
bit
of
interest
in
using
the
northwest
rail
alignment
to
make
sure
that
that
front
range
passenger
rail
goes
through
boulder
and
longmont
before
it
gets
to
fort
collins.
W
Okay,
so
final
thoughts,
I
wanted
to
speak
to
you
a
little
bit
about
how
the
city
engages
in
advocacy.
So,
as
you
know,
we
do
our
best
to
make
sure
that
we
are
always
representing
what
the
city
council
wants.
We
are
never
doing
what
just
a
department
director
or
even
nuria-
certainly
not
myself,
wants.
We
want
to
make
sure
that
our
advocacy
efforts
are
reflective
of
council's
will.
W
So
this
is
an
effort
that
we're
always
striving
to
improve,
certainly
at
the
staff
level,
but
I
wanted
to
just
check
in
it's
kind
of
a
sensitive
issue.
This
is
more
about
council's
role.
This
is
something
I
spoke
about
with
the
intergovernmental
affairs
committee
and
they
agreed
that
it
should
be
brought
to
the
full
council.
W
Have
it
be
reflective
of
the
policy
statement,
positions
and
the
priorities,
and
if
there's
any
question
that
we
revise
that
policy
statement,
we
bring
it
back
to
council
or
we
don't
take
a
position
at
all,
which
is
always
a
possibility.
So
that's
my
request.
Take
it
for
what
you'd
like
it's
it's
it's
nothing
more
than
that
with
that.
I
wanted
to
turn
it
over
very
briefly
to
our
two
state
lobbyists
to
speak
briefly
about
what
to
expect
in
2022
at
the
state
house.
W
AD
Great
nice
to
see
you
all
thanks
for
letting
us
join.
You
briefly
will-
and
I
wanted
to
just
speak
very
quickly
about
what
to
expect
in
2022
and
I'm
going
to
open
by
saying
we
really
don't
know
exactly
what
to
expect
in
2022
it's
it's
early.
AD
Things
are
moving
around,
but
what
we
do
know
is
there
are
going
to
be
certain
themes
that
are
really
going
to
impact
what's
happening
at
the
legislature.
I
want
to
talk
about
a
couple
and
then
will's
going
to
talk
about
a
couple
as
well.
AD
I
think
just
as
a
reminder,
one
of
the
reasons
we
really
don't
know
what's
going
to
be
happening
is
because
every
legislator
gets
five
bills
and
every
bill
gets
a
vote
and
it's
something
that
we
always
say
to
our
clients
and
our
friends
and
anybody
who
works
in
politics,
because
it's
not
what
you
expect
right.
It's
different
than
ever,
almost
every
other
state
in
the
nation
is
different
than
congress.
A
legislator
introduces
a
bill
and
it
gets
a
hearing,
so
it
empowers
minority
voices
and
it
empowers
the
minority
voices
even
within
the
majority
caucus.
AD
So,
even
though
we
might
prognosticate
all
the
different
things
that
come
there'll
be
600
pieces
of
legislation
introduced,
so
it
will
be
a
lot.
The
other
thing
to
think
about,
as
we
go
into
the
session,
is
that
we
are
right
now
in
the
midst
of
a
major
redistricting
and
reapportionment
conversation.
AD
There
is,
there
are
likely
to
be
legislators
who
are
drawn
into
the
same
districts
when
we're
all
done,
and
some
of
those
legislators
will
announce
that
they
are
not
going
to
run
for
reelection.
So
there
will
be
a
whole
bunch,
potentially
a
whole
bunch.
It
could
be
two.
AD
It
could
be
10
of
legislators
who
are
lame
ducks
the
last
time
this
happened
10
years
ago,
in
the
midst
of
republican
control,
we
were
able
to
move
civil
unions
on
the
floor
of
the
state
house,
because
there
were
several
republican
legislators
who
didn't
have
any
were
were
not
afraid
to
vote
their
conscience
because
they
weren't
worried
about
their
constituents.
AD
AE
Yeah,
the
one
other
hello
everyone,
it's
nice
to
see,
all
all
of
you.
I
wish
that
we
were
there
in
person.
AE
The
other
big
dynamic
that
will
happen
this
year
is
that
we
are
projected
to
hit
our
tabor
spending
limits
for
the
first
time
in
a
long
time,
and
I
actually
was
having
lunch
with
a
member
of
the
jbc
earlier
this
week
and
we
were
talking
about
it.
AE
Obviously
we
will
have
multiple
budget
forecasts
and
could
have
some
change
between
now
and
the
time
the
budget
is
finalized
in
march
or
april,
but
it
could
be
a
billion
dollars
over
the
tabor
limit
and
that
will
very
much
be
in
and
of
itself
a
big
political
football
and
debate
about
exactly
what
form
the
tabor
rebates
take.
AE
It
will
also
shape
the
budgeting
process
itself
because,
even
though
there's
a
limit
now
on
what
the
state
can
actually
spend
and
some
requirements
to
send
money
back
to
voters,
you're
still
going
to
have
increases
in
caseloads
and
increases
in
all
kinds
of
needs
for
spending
from
the
state
government.
AE
So
it
will
be
a
very
defining
thing,
but
you
also
are
all
very
aware
of
the
large
amounts
of
federal
dollars
that
have
come
into
the
state
and
the
the
legislature
is
going
to
have
a
significant
say
in
the
spending
of
of
many
hundreds
of
millions
of
dollars,
and
there
currently
are
I'll
mention
three
significant
kind
of
interim
committee
processes
that
are
happening
right
now,
one
on
on
behavioral
health,
one
on
housing
and
then
a
whole
conversation
generally
about
economic
recovery.
AE
The
economic
recovery
committee
is
talking
about
a
pot
of
money,
that's
about
700
million
dollars
and
each
of
the
other
two
are
about
500
million.
It's
obviously
generally
all
one-time
money,
but
these
are
discussions
with
quantities
of
dollars
that
are
out
of
the
scope
of
normal
for
colorado.
I
think
for
many
of
you
who
have
been
involved
in
the
public
policy
debates
at
the
state
level.
You
know
that
we
end
up
fighting
in
bills
over
50
000
and
now
we're
having
big
public
debates
over
more
than
a
billion
dollars
going
into
this
year.
AE
So
I
think,
maybe
we'll
we'll
probably
stop
there.
It
will
obviously
be
a
very
busy
year
and-
and
we
look
forward
to
hopefully
representing
you
all
again
at
the
state,
capitol
on
a
whole
host
of
things
that
come.
W
So
that
is
the
end
of
our
presentation
and
I
guess
I
will
always
at
this
point
be
eager
to
answer
any
questions
that
you
have
and,
of
course,
to
defer
to
the
committee
members
who
have
actually
had
an
opportunity
to
hear
not
only
from
me
but
on
the
experts
on
many
of
these
topics.
We
met
last
last
week
and
we
had
people
who
really
knew
what
they
were
talking
about,
get
into
details
and
provide
powerpoint
presentations
of
their
own.
W
A
Cool,
so
thank
you
so
much
carl
and
adam
and
will,
as
always
great
to
see
you
guys.
It
is
unfortunate
we're
not
in
person,
but
at
least
you
didn't
have
to
make
the
trek
up
to
boulder
from
denver
so
upside
see
if
you
can
find
them.
So,
let's
start
with
questions
and
let's
save
most
comments
until
after
we
do
the
public
hearing,
it
will
be
short.
So,
let's
begin
any
questions
for
carl
or
our
lobbyists.
M
My
question
is
for
adam
and
will
in
one
section
of
our
policy
statement,
we
state
that
the
city
will
support
being
granted
the
authority
to
place
limits
on
the
rent
increases
that
can
be
imposed
on
pad
rents
in
manufactured
home
communities.
W
Actually,
councilmember
wallock.
I
know
you
addressed
that
to
will
and
adam,
but
I
I
just
had
a
meeting
with
a
newly
elected
representative
in
fort
collins,
who
is
looking
to
propose
a
bill
that
addresses
that
very,
very
issue.
So
I
do
know
that
there
is
another
coalition
that
would
like
to
just
repeal
the
prohibition
on
rent
control
more
generally
and
they
often
see
a
more
limited
repeal.
That
applies
just
to
the
manufactured
homing
manufactured
housing
industry
as
a
as
a
challenge
as
a
threat
for
that
matter,
so
yeah.
W
F
Mine's
for
carl
you
mentioned
the
the
subcommittee
talked
about
wanting
council
members
to
sort
of
collaborate
or
communicate
with
you
before
testifying
at
the
state.
If
I
heard
that
correctly,
I
guess
right
there
did.
I.
F
W
You
know
that
would
be
a
pretty
bad
idea.
If
I
was
trying
to
slap
the
wrist
of
any
council
member,
I
would
say
that
there
were
some
times
in
this
last
session,
where
there
were
different
messages
being
provided,
and
it
was
quite
understandable.
W
We
were
dealing
with
some
issues
that
were
at
the
heart
of
concerns
here
in
boulder
and
frankly,
we
hadn't
we
hadn't
spoken
about
this.
So
that's
why
I
think
it's
important
going
forward
to
have
that
conversation
have
the
agreement.
If,
if
you
guys
agree,
let's
decide
as
a
council
and
of
course
it
is
a,
it
would
just
be
a
strong
suggestion
at
most,
because
I
I
know
that
nobody
would
want
to
be
completely
bound
to
the
to
the
council
approved
position.
F
Got
it
and
then
I
guess
part
two
of
that
is:
does
that
apply
at
all
to
staff
as
well,
because
we
saw
some
of
that
last
year
as
well.
So
did
you
all
talk
about
that.
W
Yep
yep,
we
spoke
about
that
for
the
very
same
reasons.
I
think
that
some
of
these
issues
were
so
contentious
and
and
and
very
challenging
for
a
lot
of
our
leaders
in
the
organization.
We
spoke
about
the
importance.
In
fact,
we
just
had
a
meeting
with
our
leadership
team
last
week,
where
we've
reiterated
that
the
importance
of
keeping
it
uniform,
keeping
it
coordinated
so
something
that
we
will
strive
to
do
better.
E
Thanks
sam
carl
on
the
state
and
federal
priorities,
is
there
any
reason
why
homelessness
isn't
included
in
either
one
of
those
sets
of
priorities.
W
So
it's
not
yeah
it's
a
great
point,
because
that
is
one
of
the
most
important
issues
that
we're
wrestling
with
the
mental
behavioral
health
position
really
is
a
way
to
address
a
lot
of
that.
We
know
that
many
of
the
people
experiencing
housing
are
suffering
from
mental
and
behavior
health
issues,
so
that
was
our
thinking.
It
was
very
much
as
an
approach
to
address
and
support
our
homeless
population,
as
well
as
many
others
in
our
community.
E
So
so
I
I
was
wondering
if
that
was
the
case,
in
which
case
housing
is
part
of
the
solution
for
homelessness.
E
W
And
I
will
try
not
to
distract
myself
by
pulling
up
the
actual
policy
statement
right
now,
but
I
believe
we
have
as
one
example
of
a
support
that
we
like
to
get
from.
The
state
is
resources
for
permanent
or,
let's
just
say,
for
housing
for
people
in
terms
of
treatment
as
well
as
for
I
I
I'm
perhaps
speaking
beyond
what
I
know,
but
I
I
believe
that
our
position
does
address
the
need
for
housing
as
part
of
this
solution
and
if
it
doesn't
do
so
sufficiently,
we
can
certainly
add
more
to
it.
W
E
Thank
you
and
then
kind
of
similarly
along
those
lines.
Last
oh
gosh,
I
believe,
sometime
in
march
may
time
frame
council
approved
participation
in
the
mdhi
metro,
denver,
denver,
homeless
initiative,
and
that
was
not
included
in
the
list
of
partners
and
policy
agendas.
Is
there
any
reason
for
that.
W
No,
no,
not
at
all.
I
think,
we've
seen
that
as
part
of
the
metro
mayor's
caucus.
I
think
I
believe
it's
it's
a
project
of
the
metro,
mayor's
caucus
or
certainly
funding
is
because
I've
constantly
seen
the
request
for
the
annual
contributions
towards
that
going
through
the
metro,
mayor's
caucus.
So
so
so
that
was
my
that's
why
I
didn't
specifically
mention
it,
but
we
can
certainly
do
so
if
you
find
an
area
to
do
so,.
E
Okay,
great
and
then
my
next
question
has
to
do
with
the
section
in.
E
Section
13,
which
is
build
community
resilience,
and
would
it
be
possible
to
add
the
concepts
behind
resiliency
for
all.
It
was
a
project
that
resiliency
for
all
was
a
project
that
was
worked
on
by
one
of
our
new
county.
Commissioners.
Martha
lochemin
and
longman
has
incorporated
it
into
as
a
program
within
their
city,
and
I
was
just
wondering
if
we
might
be
able
to
incorporate
some
of
those
principles
within
this
section,
and
I
can
send
you
the
link
to
longmont's
page
on
that.
W
Yeah,
so
absolutely
great
suggestion,
so
one
thing
we
could
do,
for
example,
is
the
preface
propagatory
statement
or
sentence
before
the
actual
examples
of
the
kinds
of
things
we'd
like
to
see.
We
could
certainly
introduce
that
concept
there
or
include
reference
to
that
concept.
Thanks
for
bringing
that
to
my
attention-
and
please
do
send
that
to
me.
E
Okay,
we'll
do
and
then
my
next
question
in
the
policy
statement
number
28
that
talks
about
policies
that
address
and
begin
to
dismantle
institutional
and
systemic
racism.
Would
it
be
possible
to
add,
along
with
housing
and
wealth,
access
to
add
education
and
access
to
capital.
W
C
E
Access
in
there,
let
me
just
look
at
what
the
statement
says
again,
so
what
I
was
envisioning
was
include,
but
are
not
limited
to
health,
equity,
housing
and
wealth
access.
E
Sure
and
that's
all
I
have
and
carl
I'll
send
you
a
link
to
longmont's
resiliency
for
all
paige.
Thank
you.
A
A
Juni,
if
you
could
turn
your
video
off,
that
would
be
great,
and
I
I
believe
that
I
was
looking
at
the
document
mary
was
speaking
to,
I
actually
think
you're
correct.
We
removed
end
wealth
access
from
the
header
and
what
mary
was
talking
about,
adding
was
in
one
of
the
sentences,
and
it
was
specifically
about
education
and
access
to
capital.
C
No,
I
don't
know
that
that
was
my
only
comment.
That's
just
speaking
from
a
different
version
than
the
one
that
we
updated
during
our
reading.
That's
all.
Thank
you.
A
S
As
far
policy,
I
think
what
needs
to
be
done.
Most
is
wealth,
equity,
and
I
mean
it's
stating
the
obvious
just
like
oh
housing,
the
unhoused,
it's
like
duh
yeah,
but
but
it's
like,
where
is
the
money
coming
from
and
all
the
money?
That's
going
into
all
the
projects
that
you
as
the
council
are,
are
approving
every
day
like
at
3
11,
you
know
and
then
they
drop
their
affordable
housing
and
you
approve
them
because
of
their
affordable
housing
gone
poof
disappeared.
S
No,
there
has
to
be
something
in
this
situation
that
binds
people
to
their
promises
that
that
stops
the
excess
in
boulder.
You
know
I
just
watched
the
one
of
the
boards
this
week
at
hoshi
motors,
where
I
take
my
car
except
I
only
drive
my
car
once
a
year
now,
but
now
I
have
to
drive
my
car
way
out
to
east
boulder
because
they're
turning
that
whole
block
into
big
high-end
housing,
just
like
right,
a
block
away
at
mike's
camera.
You
know
folsom
now.
S
This
is
something
that
happens
in
boulder
coral,
but
it's
something
that
happens
everywhere
too.
I'm
sure,
because
the
more
that
the
that
the
high-end
housing
is
able
to
be
put
in
the
more
you're
digging
a
hole
of
lower
end
housing
demand
and
that's
just
the
way
it
goes
and
something's
got
to
be
done.
You
know
my
daughter
lives
in
controlled
rent
in
oakland,
but
and
I
can
see
the
controlled
rent
side
of
things,
but
there's
got
to
be
some
control
too.
S
When
city
council
is
approving
all
of
these
projects,
like
the
sky's,
the
limit
up
at
311
they're
going
to
charge
50
000
a
month
or
whatever
they
want
to
charge,
they
can
charge
anything.
You
know
the
biggest
billionaires
can
be
living
in
there
and
dragging
our
town
down.
Meantime
and
there's
got
to
be
something
in
your
advocacy,
coral
that
will
stop
this
excess
because
it's
bringing
the
whole
economy
down
and
along
with
covid.
S
That's
it
it's
like
curtains.
We
can't
have
an
equitable
situation
and,
of
course,
so
many
people
falling
off
into
the
homelessness
and
then
the
demand
for
drugs,
rehabilitation,
mental
and
everything
that
you've
brought
up.
It's
like
a
black
hole
and
it's
a
circular
process,
but
it
has
to
start
at
the
top.
Something
has
to
be
done
about
the
super
uber
wealthy
folks
that
are
pushing
things
like
you,
south.
A
Thank
you,
then,
and
it
appears
that
edward
smutney
is
not
with
us
ryan's
shaking
his
head
still,
so
with
that
we
will
bring
the
public
hearing
to
close
and
bring
it
back
to
council.
A
I
have
a
few
short
comments.
One
of
them
is
an
attempt
to
bring
us
to
a
resolution
on
one
of
the
items
so
the
one
on
oil
and
gas
carl,
I
was
thinking.
I
think
I
I
like
everything
that
you've
added
that
we've
added.
As
far
as
the
narrative
goes,
I
think
that's
super
helpful
and
informative.
A
I
would
like
to
see
a
few
of
the
sections
brought
back,
however,
and
so
I
appreciate
the
comment
that
we
got
from
the
public
on
that
and
I'm
pulling
up
the
attachment,
but
I
think
it's
the
first
three
there's
the
three
items
in
section
12
are:
are
that
were
stricken
that
I
would
propose
that
we
bring
back,
I'm
sorry
I'm
having
to
get
there
there
we
go
the
three
that
I
think
it
would
be
good
to
continue
carrying
forward
would
be
the
applicability
of
federal
laws,
section,
the
water
quality
section
and
the
air
quality
section,
and
I
get
your
point
that
you
made
and
agree
with
it
that
there
could
be
a
few
items
in
there
that
are
a
bit
dated
if
the
crgcc
has
made
some
progress
on
them,
like
with
setbacks,
but
I
think
the
general
direction
of
all
three
of
those
is
still
something
that
this
council
would
support.
A
I
think
removing
the
last
four
impact
mitigation,
orphan
wells
standing
before
crgcc
and
local
consent.
I
think
all
of
those
seem
very
dated
and
might
not
be
things
we
want
to
carry
forward,
but
I
think
the
air
quality
water
quality
and
the
federal
law's
applicability
to
try
and
bring
back
the
clean
water
act
and
the
safe
drinking
water
act
when
it
comes
to
oil
and
gas
would
be
things
that
this
council
could
support.
A
So
I
wanted
to
put
that
out
there
as
a
suggested
way
to
proceed
on
policy
12
and
then
the
only
other
thing
I
had
to
say
was:
I
I
think
the
urban
forestry
thing
is
fantastic.
You
will
hear
a
lot
about
direct
air
capture
when
people
talk,
tech,
solutions
to
the
climate
challenge
and
you'll,
hear
carbon
capture
and
sequestration,
I'm
extraordinarily
skeptical
of
direct
air
capture
as
being
scalable
enough
and
carbon
capture
and
sequestration
is
just
the
fossil
fuel
shell
game.
A
The
thing
which
will
do
the
most,
I
think,
going
forward
for
pulling
carbon
out
of
the
air
is
making
our
forest
healthy
everywhere
and
doing
so
in
our
urban
environment
has
all
the
advantages
that
carl
just
talked
about.
So
I
think
forestry
preservation
of
forest
and
urban
forestry
are
really
effectively
the
most
cost-effective
way
to
do
direct
air
capture
of
carbon
dioxide
and
sequester
it
for
long
periods
of
time.
So
I
really
want
to
advocate
for
keeping
that
urban
forestry
piece
front
and
center
as
part
of
the
work
we're
doing
at
the
federal
level.
A
So
that's
all
I've
got
and
I
see
we
got
one
another
hand
up.
Aaron.
L
Yeah
thanks
for
that,
sam,
if
I
can
sort
of
colloquy
with
you
on
the
oil
and
gas
one,
I
agree
with
keeping
those
points
in.
I
thought
that
was
a
good
one,
but
it
seemed
like
a
couple
of
the
other
ones
might
still
be
worth
having
as
well,
and
I'm
thinking
of
the
impact
mitigation
and
the
local
consent,
like
local
consent
say,
would
require
the
city
of
boulder
to
give
consent
before
a
well
could
be
drilled
on
open
space
land,
and
I
don't
think
we
have
that
power
right
now.
L
Great
thank
you,
so
I
think
that's
a
good
path
forward.
What
you
described
with
the
you
can
also
keep
those
two
forward
two
in
there
as
well.
They
want
to
say
that
mary,
I
appreciated
your
recommendations
in
the
questioning
period.
So
thanks
for
those
and
rachel,
I
appreciated
those
additional
items
that
you
brought
forward
as
well.
I
thought
those
were
all
really
good
ones.
There
was
one
I
wanted
to
comment
on
which
was
about
access
to
abortion,
which
I
think
does
deserve
a
place
in
our
legislative
agenda.
L
After
that,
appalling
texas
law
was
passed
recently
that
the
supreme
court
has
declined
to
intervene
on
so
far,
but
one
thing,
carl
in
terms
of
your
suggested
language,
it
calls
out
access
for
women
to
reproductive
care,
and
I
would
like
for
us
to
have
more
gender
inclusive
language
in
there,
because
there
are
folks
that
do
not
identify
as
women
that
may
need
access
to
abortion
care
as
well
so
probably
wouldn't
mind
rewarding
that,
so
that
it's
it's
inclusive
of
any
gender
and
person
any
gender
identity
that
might
need
access
to
abortion
care.
L
Other
than
that,
I'd
just
say
that
appreciate
all
the
amazing
work
that
will
and
adam
did
and
carl,
and
so
many
of
our
objectives
got
accomplished
in
the
last
session,
and
I've
never
seen
the
policy
gender
change
so
much
it's
because
wow,
a
huge
amount
got
accomplished
so
really
great
to
see
so
much
progress
on
our
priorities.
L
E
E
Was
not
muted,
but
I
was
not
looking
at
zoom.
I
was
looking
at
the
I
just
downloaded
the
latest
version
of
the
marked
up
policy
agenda
so
that
I
make
sure
I'm
looking
at
the
right
thing.
I
do
see
what
junie
is
saying
that
wealth
access
was
stricken
from
the
language
and
and
that's,
but
I
did
want
to
add
those
additional
ones
in
place
of
that.
E
I
can
see
why
wealth
access
would
be
stricken,
but
I
would
like
to
see
comma
access
to
capital,
so
the
I
went
over
and
looked
at
housing.
You
know
going
back
to
my
question
to
carl
regarding
homelessness
and
looking
at
the
housing
sections.
E
They
do
have
all
the
usual
litec
and
section
8
and
things
like
that
and
the
low-income
housing
tax
credit.
All
of
that
is
in
there,
which
I
suppose
would
cover
things
like
permanent
supportive
housing.
One
of
the
things
that
occurred
to
me
was
you
know.
Kurt
fernhofer
has
brought
up
numerous
times
the
need
for
housing
to
address
folks
that
have
been
addicted
to
methamphetamines
and
that
it's
very
difficult
to
find
housing
for
those
folks.
E
So
if
there
were
something
that
specifically
called
out
that
type
of
funding
for
that
type
of
housing,
I'm
not
sure
exactly
what
it
would
be
called
or
if
it's
covered
within
one
of
these
categories
that
are
listed
within
housing.
W
Thank
you
councilmember
young,
so
position
30,
which
has
to
do
with
increasing
mental
and
behavioral
health
and
also
substance
abuse
treatment.
It
certainly
can
be
improved
so
so
I
would
take
it
as
direction
from
you
to
make
sure
that
we
we
incorporate
something
that
has
to
do
with
the
the
housing
and
the
shelter
that's
necessary.
W
A
Okay,
so
I
guess
carl,
the
first
question
is:
do
you
have
a
coherent
set
of
amendments
so
that
if
we
propose,
if
somebody
moves
the
legislative
agenda
with
as
amended
are,
are
we
all
clear
on
what
those
amendments
are?
Do
you
want
to
call
them
out
for
us.
W
W
We
certainly
had
the
time
the
proposal
was
that
you
know
earlier
a
year
ago
we
talked
about
making
sure
that
this
is
approved
by
this
council,
so
that
we're
not
overwhelming
a
brand
new
council,
but
we
have
time
so
rather
than
me,
trying
to
review
everything
that
has
been
said.
That
would
be
my
my
proposal.
A
I
think
that's
a
great
proposal
is
that
you
bring
forward
all
the
edits
on
consent.
So
how
does
the
rest
of
council
feel
about
that
proposal?.
A
W
I
I
have
everything
that
I
need,
and
I
am
very
appreciative
of
your
time
and
and
for
the
input
that
I've
received
today.
Yes,
I
think
I
I
understand
the
changes
that
you'd
like
to
make
and
I
will
bring
them
back
to
you
at
a
date
that
has
yet
to
be
scheduled,
but
we
will
get
that
done.
A
A
I
will
say
thank
you
again
to
everyone
all
of
council
and
the
legislative
committee
and
the
intergovernmental
affairs
committee
for
working
through
all
of
this
and
to
carl,
especially.
This
is
a
huge
task
that
you
have
to
do
every
year.
We
all
have
lots
of
opinions
about
all
these
things
and
so
hurting
the
cats
to
getting
to
a
document
like
this.
That's
as
useful
as
it
is
is
super
helpful,
and
I
think
rachel
just
to
close
on
the
point
that
you
brought
up
about
how
we
manage
presenting
our
positions
going
forward.
A
A
If
it's
a
council
position,
we
say
it's
a
council
position,
here's
where
you
can
find
it
in
the
legislative
agenda
and
here's
what
we're
saying
me
on
behalf
of
council
and
if
you
aren't
sure,
if
any
council
member
is
not
sure
or
it's
different
than
what's
in
the
legislative
agenda,
that
we
just
call
it
out
as
our
own
opinion,
and
we
can
still
testify
as
a
council
member
on
any
subject
and
say
anything
we
want,
but
just
to
be
careful
not
to
represent
it
as
a
city
position,
and
I
think
that
is
the
main
distinction
is
if
it's
in
the
legislative
agenda
and
we're
speaking
on
behalf
of
the
city,
especially
if
carl
knows
that
we're
speaking
intentionally
on
behalf
of
the
city,
then
we
represent
it
as
a
city
position.
F
Just
I
would
make
a
pitch
for
it's
also
super
helpful
like
as
someone
who
testified
a
lot
before
getting
on
council
as
well
to
to
be
a
council
member.
I
always
checked
in
with
carl,
and
he
gave
really
good
data
and
and
facts,
and
it
was
helpful
so,
if
anybody's
reluctant
to
do
that,
I
would
say
set
your
mind
at
ease
like
it's.
It's
it's
great
to
to
converse
with
carl
and
your
testimony
will
be
even
better.
A
Okay,
super
all
right.
Well
with
that
thanks,
everyone
adam
will
enjoy
the
rest
of
your
evening
and
see
you
soon
hopefully,
and
we
will
move
on
to
the
next
item
and
then
alicia.
What
do
we
have
next.
B
N
F
J
Much
sam,
I
know
this
is
one
that
we
have
received
a
lot
of
input
both
from
you
and
from
community
and
from
our
business
partners
as
well,
and
I
just
want
to
be
a
vet-
is
going
to
give
us
a
quick
little
presentation
on
the
outcome
of
a
lot
of
those
meetings
and
know
that
we
have
additional
staff
who
have
really
been
thoughtful
about.
What
do
we
need
to
do
right
now,
amidst
this
growing
pandemic?
J
And
then
what
do
we
need
to
do
in
the
long
term
as
we
continue
to
consider?
What
is
the
continuation
or
the
long-term
efforts
on
outdoor
dining?
So
with
that
and
with
great
thoughts
thanks
to
a
vet
who
tried
to
hurt
the
cats?
Speaking
of
that
sam
on
our
side
on
the
topic,
I'll,
send
it
over
to
a
vet.
AF
AF
During
the
last
covet
briefing,
council
asked
to
get
a
little
bit
of
a
deeper
dive
on
where
we
are
with
the
boulder
business
recovery
program,
especially
as
the
pandemic
effects
linger.
As
a
reminder,
this
slide
will
look
familiar,
it's
an
overview
of
what
emergency
order
2020-16
and
thanks
sandra
who
reminded
me
that
this
has
been
amended.
So
many
times
is
another
number
associated
with
it,
which
is
2020-18,
and
it
has
been
amended
five
times
since
being
in
place.
AF
Basically,
what
all
of
these
things
allow
us
to
do
to
aid
community
safety
and
business
viability,
and
I
won't
go
through
all
of
the
different
components
here,
but
it
includes
all
the
efforts
that
allow
for
outdoor
dining
and
they
really
are
quite
different,
as
we
transverse
the
city,
including
everything
from
city,
facilitated
closures,
to
a
lot
of
appreciation
of
all
the
landlords
who
are
letting
people
bump
out
in
front
of
their
businesses
to
some
additional
infrastructure,
signage,
curbside,
pop-ups
and
the
like
next
slide.
AF
So
you
asked
for
a
little
bit
of
information
of
how's
it
going
and
we
can
say
that,
obviously
the
program
has
been
well
received
by
the
community.
AF
We
estimate
expenses
right
now
and
I
want
to
say
these
are
extremely
conservative
and
best
guesses,
because
things
are
quite
complicated
and
in
lots
of
different
budgets
but
direct
expenses
of
around
fifty
two
thousand
dollars,
and
if
we
looked
at
the
revenue
impact.
Currently
it's
about
two
hundred
and
fourteen
thousand
dollars
that
number
we've
massaged
a
little
bit,
because
that
number
includes
a
figure
that
would
have
been
on-street
revenue
parking
revenue
that
went
to
the
general
fund.
AF
We
basically
took
that
number
time
the
number
of
spaces
that
are
being
used
and
divided
by
three
in
appreciation
of
the
fact
that
we
know
there's
been
lower
visitation
over
the
last
18
months.
This
does
not
include
impacts
or
any
loss
revenue
other
than
patio
leasing
on
the
mall
itself,
where
people
are
bumping
out
or
in
some
of
the
alleys
where
we
are
not
currently
charging
for
any
of
that
curbside
use.
AF
We
also
know
there's
been
lingering
public
health
and
safety
concerns
that
continue
to
evolve
with
the
pandemic,
but
there's
been
some
really
improved.
Industry-Wide
revenue
performance
there's
no
direct
link,
which
we
pointed
out
in
the
memo
to
particular
restaurants
or
to
how
that
revenue
is
derived.
But,
as
you
can
see
by
the
graph
provided
it's
nice
to
see
the
figure
going
up
and
some
degree
of
recovery
in
our
really
hurting
restaurant
industry,
we
did
have
some
key
learnings
and
I'm
tremendously
simplifying
that
into
these
four
bullets.
AF
I
think
you
heard
earlier
one
of
our
public
comment,
which
basically
said
the
surrounding
neighborhood
has
some
considerations
that
weren't
a
little
greater
focus,
and
this
was
all
laid
out
in
the
memo
things
from
noise
to
spillover
impacts
of
traffic
and
the
light.
AF
Not
just
for
people
in
cars,
but
certainly
for
folks
who
are
walking
or
living
with
disabilities
for
the
rerouting
of
the
hop
which
has
caused
some
some
rollover
issues
in
the
light,
and
finally,
I
wanted
to
point
out
one
of
the
big
learnings
is
everybody
across
the
country
has
a
different
model
and
even
within
our
state,
different
cities
are
exploring
different
ways
to
do
this.
Licensure
use
of
the
right-of-way
all
up
for
grabs
and
being
considered
a
new
next
slide.
AF
I
wanted
to
kind
of
provide
a
little
bit
more
context
for
the
numbers
here
again
extremely
conservative,
but
we
know
that
the
expenses
come
from
infrastructure
and
temporary
art,
so
we
did
a
lot
of
signage
around
town
to
be,
and
especially
in
the
closure
areas
to
wash
hands
and
to
remind
people
to
socially
distance
staff.
Time
is
conservatively
estimated
at
around
37
000,
and
this
is
based
on
an
average
three
years
ago
of
an
average
hourly
wage.
AF
This
is
not
indicative
of
a
particular
department's
actual
hours,
but
this
is
everything
from
time
and
permitting
administration
inspection
licensure,
and
we
are
not
actually
counting
all
the
meetings
primarily
called
by
me.
So
I
apologize
to
everybody
on
team
revenue,
so
we
got
a
cdoc
brand
and
that's
awesome
several,
which
allowed
for
temporary
closures.
This
is
only
a
portion
of
that
award
that
helped
with
some
of
the
signage
and
the
retention
of
some
artists,
to
help
us
bring
people's
attention
and
make
it
a
little
nicer.
AF
In
the
closure
areas
there
was
89
000
worth
of
waived
fees
about
4,
400
of
which
are
alcohol
related
and
the
majority
of
which
are
in
other
permitting
waived
fees,
and
the
majority
of
this
is
for
the
106
on
street
repurposed
parking
spaces.
Just
to
give
you
some
context,
we
actually
went
out
and
counted
the
parking
spaces,
and
there
are,
if
you
don't
take
this-
the
garages
or
the
ones
at
the
muni
lot
and
the
like.
AF
We
have
962,
I
believe
parking
spaces
in
the
cajun
district
and
about
106
are
currently
being
used
for
this
program,
and
then
we
divided
that
number
by
one-third
so
and
again
trying
to
be
fair
and
recognizing
that
there
has
been
low
visitation
over
the
18
months.
We're
estimating
conservatively
around
132
000
in
the
normal
year,
kj
on
street,
for
a
general
fund
generates
about
500
000.
So
we
should
keep
that
in
mind
for
a
going
forward.
Consideration
next
slide.
AF
AF
AF
We're
it's
been
a
long
time
since
we
talked
to
the
property
owners
and
we
just
want
to
make
sure
that
there
is
authorization
to
use
the
frontage
of
their
property
that
way
and
certainly
want
people
to
attest
that
they
have
continued
to
have
the
city
as
named
insured
on
their
insurance
policies
and
we're
at
this
point
recommending
through
april
1st
2022
continued
waiver
of
city
fees,
not
state
fees,
but
city
fees
through
this
expansion
period.
Next
slide.
AF
So
what
af?
What
about
the
post
pandemic?
Like?
Can,
we
all
say,
post
pandemic?
That
would
be
awesome
to
envision
downtown
boulder,
has
reached
out
to
us
on
august
2nd
and
wants
to
explore
post-pandemic
downtown
outdoor
dining
program
which
balances
the
needs
and
interests
of
the
businesses,
property
owners
and
city
in
supporting
access,
safety,
vibrancy
and
the
achievement
of
all
of
our
community
goals.
So
we
have
a
lot
of
work
to
do,
but
I'm
pleased
to
say
that
that
work
has
already
begun
and
they
have
a
working
committee.
AF
AF
There
are
different
possibilities:
around
participation,
cost
sharing
models
that,
I
think,
is
really
a
lot
for
dbp
to
discuss
with
their
members
and
the
participating
businesses.
And,
of
course,
we
want
to
remind
people
of
the
other
existing
options
that
are
already
available
to
them
through
other
city
offerings
next
slide.
AF
This
is
a
very
aggressive
timeline
that
we
have
proposed.
That
was
in
your
memo
and
if
this
evening
we
gain
support
from
council
to
keep
moving
forward,
we'll
do
our
very
best
to
stick
to
this
timeline
and
to
keep
you
and
the
community
posted
for
when
we'd
be
able
to
launch
a
program
as
early
as
spring
of
2022
next
slide,
and
so
we
only
have
two
questions
for
council.
U
Thanks
sam
thanks
a
bit,
that's
very,
very
helpful.
I
had
four
kind
of
questions
I'll
try
to
do
them
quickly.
First,
I
just
was
trying
to
understand
the
math
on
the
loss
of
parking
revenue.
U
I
know
that
you
cut
it
by
a
third,
in
other
words,
the
maximum
potential
revenue,
and
then
you
cut
it
by
a
third.
Some
of
that
presumably
accounted
for.
I
think
you
said
the
fact
that
fewer
people
might
be
coming
downtown
was
another
factor
in
reducing
that
the
fact
that
some
people
are
still
paying
for
parking
they're
just
paying
for
parking
someplace
else.
In
other
words,
we
didn't
lose
all
that
revenue.
Somebody,
you
know,
went
down
the
street
or
went
into
a
garage,
and
they
still
paid
for
parking.
Is
that
right.
AF
That
can
prove
that
all
the
folks
that
were
parking
on
that
street
are
parking
for,
let's
say
in
a
garage
or
in
a
surface
parking
lot
in
many
instances,
it's
very
hard
to
kind
of
correlate
at
this
point
where
those
people
park,
I
would
say
we
are
seeing
some
return,
a
visitation
to
the
garages,
but
it
is
challenging
and
people
do
continue
to
want
to
search
for
free
parking.
U
Yeah
yeah
well,
it
sounds
like
it's
kind
of
a
swag,
a
swag.
So
so
that's
that's
fine.
I
know
you.
Your
one-third
was
just
an
estimate.
Second
question
of
four,
the
extension.
I
was
just
kind
of
curious
about
why
it's
five
months,
as
opposed
to
six
months,
because
it
currently
the
program
ends
on
october,
31
and
six
months
would
take
us
to
the
end
of
october
or
assuming
the
end
of
april,
which
is
proposing
the
beginning
of
april.
What
why
why
five
months
as
opposed
to
six.
AF
I
believe
we
had
some
conversation
with
our
colleagues
about
changes
in
weather
and
coming
back
to
look
at
infrastructure
and
required
infrastructure
and
we'd.
Always
part
of
this
is
also
we'd,
always
been
in
conversations
with
dbp
about
that
time
frame.
But
I
would
welcome,
if
there's
a
strong
opinion
from
one
of
my
colleagues,
you
know
otherwise
we're
listening
for
council's
thoughts
on
that.
U
I
I
just
knew
that
there
were
some
discussions
earlier
this
year,
maybe
even
late
last
year
about
180-day
rule
in
six
months
was
most
that
you
wanted
to
extend
and
so
on
and
so
forth.
So
I
was
kind
of
expecting
a
six
month
extension.
I
was
just
curious
what
the
what
the
driver
behind
five
months
sounds
like
it's
weather.
Is
that
what
you're
saying.
AF
It's
a
part
of
it.
There
was
also
at
the
beginning
of
this
and
continues
to
be-
and
I
appreciate
sandra
and
her
colleagues
in
the
city,
attorney's
office
and
michonne,
there's
a
little
challenge
that
we
have
understanding
of
what
is
allowed
under
the
alcohol
licensure
in
terms
of
timing.
So
some
of
the
timing
recommendations
were
initially
based
on
that
as
well.
I
think
we
still
have
a
lot
of
work
to
do
in
this
area
right
now,
we're
really
still
shooting
for
april
first,
but
welcome
any
other
thoughts.
That's.
U
Fine
third
question
is:
do
we
have
to
take
any
action?
In
other
words,
if,
if
most
or
all,
council
members
are
kind
of
nodding,
their
heads
and
saying
that
they
support
the
staff
recommendations?
Is
that
good
enough
for
you
and
the
city
manager,
or
do
we
have
to
take
a
vote
at
some
point
in
time
on
this.
AF
We
would
typically
bring
some
question
or
a
motion
to
counsel
on
consent
to
approve
the
city
manager's
authorization
in
that
agreement.
But
I'm
not
aware
that's.
T
T
T
U
Fourth
and
final
question
about
is:
could
somebody
put
that
the
second
to
last
slide
up
the
one
with
the
timeline?
I
didn't
quite
track
that
one
by
pretty
quickly.
U
AF
And
part
of
that,
thank
you
for
that,
and
we
could
certainly
come
back
with
the
additional
update
right
now.
We
have
ourselves
in
april
looking
for
that
approval,
we're
letting
you
know
where
we
stand
in
implementing
against
that
spring
timeline.
I
don't,
I
don't
believe,
there's
another
action
at
that
point,
but
frankly,
there's
been
so
much
change
during
this
covert
period.
We
also
want
to
remain
somewhat
fluid
in
that.
Do
you
have
a
suggestion
in
that
regard?
Well,
I.
U
Guess
what
I
wouldn't
want
to
do
is
I
wouldn't
want
to
wake
up
on.
You
know
the
morning
of
april
first
and
say:
oh
my
gosh.
We
needed
to
take
an
action
back
in
february
or
march
and
we
didn't
and
now
you
know
the
trucks
are
out
there,
we're
removing
the
jersey
blocks
and
people
having
to
clear
away
picnic
tables.
So
I
guess
I'd
put
a
marker
out
there
and
say
you
know:
let's
come
back
to
council
in
in
february
and
say
this
is
what's
going
to
happen
april,
1.
U
or
at
least
ask
the
question:
what's
going
to
happen
april
1.,
I
wouldn't.
I
wouldn't
want
just
there
to
be
an
ip
in
april,
because
that's
the
things
expired
by
that.
So
that's
I
guess
that's
what
I
would
say
is.
I
appreciate
the
fact
we're
having
this
conversation
on
september,
9th
against
an
october
31
deadline.
That's
great!
I
would
suggest
we
do
the
same
thing
in
february
against
april
one
deadline:
okay,.
A
Great,
thank
you
bob
next
we've
got
rachel
and
aaron
rachel.
F
Thanks
yvette
for
the
information
to
answer,
question
number
one:
I'm
I'm
generally
very
supportive.
A
couple
questions:
did
the
emergency
orders
apply
only
to
downtown
or
were
those
city
wide?
Those
were
city,
one
okay,
because
obviously
we're
just
looking
at
downtown
for
this.
So
I
was
wondering-
and
maybe
I'm
just
misremembering
but
like
if
we're
looking
at
garage
doors
and
alleys
and
and
maintaining
some
of
what
we've
had
and
you
know
the
hill
has
has
benefited
and
it's
not
in
the
map.
Like
what
happens?
AF
The
portion
of
the
presentation
that
relates
to
emergency
orders
would
continue
to
be
city-wide.
It's
only
the
portion
that
would
be
post-pandemic
that
we're
currently
talking
to
downtown,
because
that's
where
the
majority
of
the
feedback
and
issues
have
been
coming
from.
Nevertheless,
I
have
been
in
contact
with
a
couple
of
business
operators
on
the
hill,
and
I
can
certainly
reach
out
to
the
hill
boulder
if
they're
interested
in
exploring
similar
idea.
F
So
I
think
I'd
be
supportive
of
that.
I
just
remember
a
couple
years
ago
we
talked
about
like
the
hill
wanting
to
activate
alleys,
and
so
when
they
saw
allies
and-
and
I
assume
garage
dooring,
I've,
I'm
embarrassed
to
admit
but
like
does,
that
is
that,
like
with
the
restaurants,
have
the
garage
door
that
goes
up
and
and
it
converts
okay
yeah
like,
is
that
not
legal
in
the
city
right
now.
AF
But
there's
a
regular
city
process
for
that
there
wouldn't
need
to
be
any
emergency
order
and
you
don't
need
to
wait
till
february
to
start
that
process.
Of
course,
I
don't
want
to
speak
for
jacob
and
his
team
and
their
workload,
but
those
things
are
possible
to
look
at
even
now.
F
A
Pardon
me
all
right,
aaron.
L
Yeah,
so
that
thanks
so
much
for
the
presentation
and
for
coming
back
to
us
quickly,
I
really
appreciate
your
responsiveness
and
you
and
your
your
team
bringing
this
back
so
thanks
and
to
answer
your
question,
I'm
very
supportive
of
the
direction
you're
going
in
thanks
very
much
for
doing
this.
I
think
it's
a
great
idea
and
just
to
to
bob's
comments
around
timing.
I
would
certainly
support
six
months
instead
of
five
months.
You
know
april,
as
they
say,
is
the
cruelest
month
right.
L
It
can
be
very
variable
in
terms
of
its
climate,
its
temperature.
We
often
get
snowfalls
and
such
so
and
anyway,
so
we
won't
quite
be
to
spring,
and
the
other
thing
is.
That
is
that
I
wouldn't
want
to
see
this
go
away
before
we
had
instituted
the
new
program,
so
you
know
you've.
You
said
it's
an
aggressive
timeline.
I
appreciate
you
doing
that
so,
hopefully,
it'll
work
out
on
that
timeline,
but
I'd
hate
to
see
this
disappear.
L
30
days
before
we
got
a
new
program
in
place.
So
I
agree
with
bob
as
well
to
to
bring
this
back
to
us.
You
know
for
a
check-in,
maybe
in
the
february
time
frame-
something
like
that.
So
we
can
see
how
the
new
program
is
coming
along
in
its
development,
which
I
do
also
support
very
much
and
see
how
the
timing
is
working
out
so
that
we
can
make
sure
and
adjust
the
current
approach
and
tie
it
neatly
into
whatever
the
new
approach
ends
up
be.
AF
And
I
do
they're,
I
don't
know
that
they're
on
or
I'm
sure
they're
listening
tonight,
but
I
I
cannot
also
speak
for
the
workload
at
downtown
boulder
partnership.
I
know
we're
all
crazy
busy
and
there's
ambassadors
and
lots
of
things,
so
I
also
want
to
respect
their
resources
and
the
ability
to
address
some
of
this,
but
we'll
certainly
convey
that.
Thank
you.
L
M
Yeah
just
to
clarify
you
bet:
is
there
a
state
requirement
that
limits
the
licensing
to
april
1.
T
So
I
I'll
try
and
speak
about
this
and
michonne.
If
you're
here
come,
you
can
feel
free
to
correct
me
if
I
say
anything,
that's
incorrect,
but
so
the
state
imposed
a
communal
outdoor,
dining
regulation
during
the
pandemic
that
allowed
for
expedited
temporary
modifications
of
licensing
premises
and
that
was
going
to
expire.
It
is
going
to
expire
on
october
31st,
but
there
was
a
house
bill
that
was
introduced
to
basically
continue
the
communal
outdoor
dining
but
make
it
permanent.
T
However,
it's
not
on
an
expedited
basis,
so
they
have
to
follow
all
of
the
time
frames
and
time
timelines
associated
with
a
regular
temporary
modification,
which
I
generally-
and
this
is
where
I
I'm
not
sure
about
the
details
and
sean
is
30
days-
advanced
notice.
There's
a
10-day
posting
requirement,
there's
an
ability
for
it
to
go
in
front
of
the
bla,
the
beverage
licensing
authority
instead
of
being
adminis
process
administratively,
so
the
the
time
frame
is
much
longer.
T
So
that's
part
of
the
issue
is
that
they
would.
It
would
require
extensive
time
to
to
apply
for
that,
permit
that
more
permanent
outdoor
dining
permit
and-
and
I
don't
know
what
the
length
of
the
this
must
have
been-
something
that
you
yvette
you
and
michonne
spoke
about.
T
But
there
is
a
certain
length
in
which
they
have
to
renew,
and
it
may
be
such
that
it's
five
months
and
I'm
not
familiar
with
that,
because
I'd
have
to
look
it
up,
but
I'm
sure
that
if
michonne
is
available,
she
can
address
that.
AG
Yes,
the
we
checked
with
the
agent
in
charge
of
the
state
liquor
enforcement
division
and
what
they
said
is
that,
on
october,
31st
temporary
modification
standard
temporary
modifications
are
going
back
in
place
before
during
covet.
There
was
expediting
and
fee
waivers
that
happened
on
a
state
level,
that's
going
away
on
october
31st,
so
the
requirements
for
reapplication
for
temporary
modifications
is
that
liquor
licensees
need
to
file
at
least
30
days
prior
to
the
first
event
date.
AG
They
need
to
pay
the
state
fees,
even
if
the
city
waives
the
50
fee,
they
still
need
to
pay
the
state
fees
and
the
state
will
not
be
expediting
those
applications.
AG
In
addition,
the
requirements
in
the
state
liquor
code
revert
to
10-day
posting
and
if,
as
a
result
of
the
10-day
posting,
there's
negative
comment,
then
we
need
to
send
it
before
the
beverage
licensing
authority
for
a
hearing
for
that
temporary
modification.
So
all
of
all
of
those
sort
of
sort
of
individual
steps
were
all
expedited
during
coven
and
they
won't
be
after
october
31st.
AG
AG
AG
I
guess
I
don't
foresee
that
I
don't
perceive
that.
AF
I
don't
either-
and
I
think
part
of
the
challenge
with
this
is
when
the
state's
prior
process
ends
and
then,
when
you
start
again,
there's
unclear
guidance
at
this
point,
and
I
appreciate
sandra's
colleagues
who
are
helping
us
look
into
this.
So
at
this
point,
we're
going
based
on
our
prior
understanding
and
in
every
hope
that
the
pandemic
doesn't
continue
to
linger
in
this
way.
Okay,
thank
you
appreciate
it.
I
also,
and
I
sean
is
the
expert,
but
I
also
want
to
point
out
it.
AG
Yeah,
in
addition
to
that,
I
would
just
note
that
the
beverage
licensing
authority
has
talked
about
communica
communal
consumption
areas
and
common
consumption
areas
twice
once
in
hearing
and
also
at
their
retreat,
so
they're
open
to
hearing
those
voices
and
doing
that
work
thus
far
they're
and
it
seems
like
that's
changing
that
there
will
be
some
community
impetus
from
a
group
of
liquor
licensees
which
is
interested
in.
You
know,
proceeding
with
that.
So.
U
So
I
guess
I
didn't
hear
anything
from
that
that
this
dialogue
was
initiated
by
mark
to
indicate
that
there's
a
there's,
a
liquor,
license
reason
for
an
april
1
date,
and
so
I
I
joined
aaron
urging
that
to
be
april
30th
as
a
matter
of
fact,
the
memo
referred
both
to,
I
think
it
used
the
word
through
april
and
then
later
it
referred
april
1.
So
I
guess
I
would
agree
with
with
aaron.
Let's
give
staff
and
the
downtown
boulder
partnership
adequate
time
to
do
this.
U
If
there's
no
compelling
reason
under
the
state
law
liquor
law
to
pick
april
1,
then
let's
make
this
april
30th.
That's
that's
a
clean
six
months
from
our
current
october
31
cutoff,
and
I
want
to
also
agree
with
rachel.
I
know
that
the
the
temporary
extension
of
five
or
six
months,
temporary
extension
will
be
city
wide.
U
I
do
agree
that
there
are
certain
parts
of
town,
particularly
on
the
hill,
partly
on
the
event
street,
on
the
hill
that
I
think
could
benefit
from
whatever
the
staff
and
downtown
boulder
partnership
comes
up
with
downtown.
So
I
would
hope
that,
as
we
think
about
places
like
the
hill,
particularly
the
event
street,
we
we
think
about
doing
whatever
we
do
downtown
there
and
I'm
not
talking
about
parklets
here
and
there
around
town,
I'm
talking
about
a
long-term
street
closure
like
we're
talking
about
in
west
pearl.
U
E
Thanks
sam
yeah,
I
just
wanted
thank
you,
vet
for
all
the
work
that
you've
done
so
rapidly
and
responsibly
and
and
to
say
that
I
support
the
direction
that
you're
going
with
the
the
revisions
that
my
other
colleagues
have
suggested
with
respect
to
six
months.
I
just
have
a
general
question
about.
E
You
know
we're
talking
about
the
first
item
being
all
of
citywide
and
have
there
been
a
any
businesses
that
wanted
to
participate,
but
couldn't,
for
whatever
reason,
have
you
seen
any
of
that,
or
has
everybody
that
wanted
to
participate
been
able
to?
Not
that
we're
aware?
Okay,
that's
wonderful!
Thank
you!
That's
all!
I
have.
D
Thanks
sam
and
thanks
yvette,
I
will
also
say
yes
to
both
your
questions
and
with
a
particular
emphasis
on
the
check-in.
Just
because
we'll
have
a
new
council
and
want
to
make
sure
they
know
what's
going
on
and
the
businesses
are
out
ahead
of
it
as
well
and
also
to
extending
to
the
hill.
I
think
from
what
I've
heard
from
a
couple
owners
up.
There,
they've
really
enjoyed
the
the
ability
to
have
some
additional
flexibility,
so
that
may
be
part
of
the
ongoing
lifeline.
A
F
A
Record
great
well,
I
wasn't
gonna
do
a
straw
poll
only
because
it
seems
like
we
have
such
consistency
in
our
response.
I
appreciate
you
a
vet
for
herding
cats.
This
is
more
cat
hurting
than
usual,
and
so
not
only
us,
but
all
of
the
other
folks
involved,
but
it's
very
important
work.
So
much
appreciated,
and
I
agree
yes
on
both
items.
I
would
like
to
see
the
six
months
so
end
of
april.
A
For
the
first
part
I
think,
looking
ahead
and
doing
something
permanent
around
this
will
create
kind
of
a
progress
towards
that
european
ideal
of
space
that
can
be
reconfigured
for
different
parts
of
the
day,
public
space,
it's
very
dynamic
and
is
used
for
lots
of
things,
including
dining.
So
I'm
enthusiastic
about
all
this
and
moving
forward
with
it.
A
The
only
copy
up
that
I
have
is,
let's,
please
do
take
a
systematic
look
at
access
and
you
know
the
the
change
traffic
patterns
when
we
have
these
outdoor
dining
areas
and
so
on,
because
as
I
go
back
and
forth
between
1911
on
pearl,
you
know
part
of
it's
really
easy
to
move
around
in
no
matter
what
mode
you're
you're
moving
in
that's
non-auto,
but
towards
each
end.
The
center
parts
are
completely
closed
down.
A
A
So
I
would
just
ask
that
we,
especially
as
we
look
towards
making
this
permanent,
that
we
make
sure
that
we're
equitable,
so
the
restaurants
are
treated
equitably
and
that
we
make
sure
that
access
is
a
big
part
of
it,
because
the
mall
works
great
because,
generally
speaking,
there's
a
lot
of
room
for
pedestrians
to
walk
back
and
forth
on.
But
even
the
mall
at
a
few
places
has
gotten
a
bit
more
congested
than
usual
with
the
outdoor
dining.
So
that's
my
only
caveat
is
it
does
create
it?
A
It
just
needs
to
be
equal
and
there
need
to
be
rules,
and
the
rules
need
to
be.
You
know
applied
equally
to
all
people
who
want
to
use
that
public
space
and
with
that
I'll
turn
to
mary
and
then
aaron.
E
Yeah
thanks,
I
did
want
to
bring
up
one
additional
thing
with
respect
to
safety,
and
I
know
I
want
to
thank
you
for
bringing
up
the
ada
requirements,
but
I
have
a
question
about
the
at
the
intersection
of
pearl
and
ninth
on
the
east
side.
There,
where
the
crosswalk
the
the
concrete
barriers,
the
jersey
barriers,
are
to
the
east
of
the
crosswalk
to
to
leave
the
crosswalk
outside
of
the
the
common
area
for
the
restaurants.
E
E
And
and
if
there
is
any
consideration
to
be
given
to
that
particular
intersection
to
make
it.
E
AF
It
is
not
designated
for
drop-off
and
pickup,
but
I
would
always
defer
to
our
transportation
and
mobility
team
in
terms
of
guidance
with
with
our
planning
department
on
safety
and
any
amendments
that
have
to
be
made.
Thanks.
For
that
note,
mary
and
we'll
make
sure
that
we
take
a
look
at
that.
E
Yeah,
I'm
not
sure
that
it's
being
used
but
for
drop
off
and
pick
up,
but
I
could
see
how
it
could
be
and,
as
somebody
is
pulling
back
out
into
traffic,
they
may
be
completely
unaware
of
the
fact
that
there
is
a
stop
light
there
and
and
not
be
looking
out
for
that.
So
just
wanted
to
make
sure
that
we
address
that.
Thank
you.
A
And
I'll
just
colloquy
on
what
mary
said
and
then
I'll
get
to
aaron.
I've
noticed
a
couple
times:
people
transportation
network
companies
with
vehicles
that
are
stopping
on
broadway
to
pick
people
up
on
the
pearl
street
mall.
I've
seen
happen
in
both
directions
on
broadway,
where
uber
or
lyft
or
other
driver
stops
dead
in
the
middle
of
broadway
at
the
mall
and
people
load
and
unload
into
the
car,
and
I've
seen
it
more
and
more
so
married
similar
to
your
point
about
what's
happening
on
9th
street.
A
But
I
don't
know
what
we
need
to
do
about
that,
but
it
is
becoming,
I
think,
an
increasing
problem.
I've
been
seeing
more
of
it
and
you
know
the
night
street
is
a
good
example
of
that.
I'm
not
sure
what
can
be
done
about
it
exactly,
but
I
think
it's
a
problem
in
more
places.
It's
not
such
a
big
deal
on
13th
and
14th,
because
traffic
is
really
slow
and
there's
lots
of
stops.
But
on
broadway
and
ninth,
it's
a
different
animal
aaron.
L
I
just
wanted
to
add
in
some
support
for
what
you
were
saying
about
the
the
obstructing
the
entire
street
close
tonight
on
pearl.
Just
I
do
recommend
that
we
leave
a
core
door
open
that
we
require
folks
to
leave.
You
know
three
feet
or
something
in
between
the
the
different
on-street
amenities,
because
you
should
be
able
to
walk
through
here.
AF
I
think
so,
and
I
again
want
to
express
much
thanks
to
all
the
cats
that
are
here
this
evening
and
all
the
cats
at
home.
I
appreciate
partnership
and
I
look
forward
to
working
with
you
in
these
next
few
weeks.
L
Thank
you.
Thank
you
very
much
for
talking
with
cats.
B
J
B
All
right
well,
thank
you,
miss
nuria
for
both
the
introduction
and
the
compliment.
Yes,
council.
In
accordance
with
section
our
charter,
section,
41
and
I'll,
read
it
just
for
clarity
prior
to
an
election
being
set
on
the
initiative
petition
within
10
days
after
the
date
of
final
action
on
such
measure
by
the
council,
the
committee
petitioner
cell
certified
to
the
city
clerk
the
requirement
of
submission
of
the
measure
to
the
voters.
B
The
certification
by
the
committee
of
petitioners
must
be
unanimously
a
unanimous
vote
of
the
members
of
the
committee
legally
competent
to
act
at
such
time
upon
receipt
of
that
certificate.
The
city
clerk
shall
certify
the
fact
to
the
council
at
its
next
meeting,
and
such
measures
shall
be
submitted
by
the
council
to
the
voters
of
the
electors
of
the
electors
in
november.
B
So
with
that
being
said,
the
final
action
for
all
three
initiative
petitions
was
in
august
on
the
17th
at
the
regular
meeting.
So
I
worked
with
the
city
attorney's
office
and
we
sent
out
emails
to
all
the
committees
and
every
member
because
they
have
to
again
vote
unanimously
to
proceed
with
the
measure
to
be
placed
on
the
ballot
and
we
got
confirmation
from
each
of
those
committees
unanimously.
B
So
with
this
particular
I
say
from
what
I
understand
is
a
record
year
of
initiative
petitions.
This
is
our
last
step
before
the
election
to
move
the
petitions
forward
and
with
me
reading
the
item
into
the
record
that
certification
and
that
particular
requirement
was
met.
B
All
right,
sir.
Thank
you
all
all
right.
Our
next
item
is
item
eight
on
this
agenda
matters
from
the
mayor
and
members
of
council.
Eight
a
is
the
discussion
regarding
timing
of
ordinance
8485,
the
2020
midterm,
update
to
the
bvcp,
which
is
scheduled
for
first
reading
on
september
21st
and
second
reading
on
october
5th.
A
Super
thank
you,
alicia,
and
so
I
brought
this
forward
to
council
because
mark
had
brought
up
that.
He
wasn't
sure
that
it
was
appropriate
for
this
council
to
take
these
rezoning
actions
and
maybe
to
go
to
the
next
council.
I
I
didn't
necessarily
agree
but
wanted
to
give
mark
a
chance
to
speak
to
the
full
council
because,
as
it
is
scheduled
currently,
we
will
take
the
final
actions
to
complete
the
2020
comp
plan
update
as
it's
scheduled
and
mark.
Did
you
want
to
speak
to
your
thoughts
on
that.
M
Sure
I
just
you
know,
we
actually
have
something
of
great
consequence
that
we're
going
to
be
addressing
on
the
14th
and
21st,
and
it
seemed
to
me
that
the
rezoning
actions
require
a
little
more
consideration
than
we're
going
to
be
giving
it
in
that
short
time
period
immediately
following
what's
going
to
be
a
very
difficult
and
contentious
process
of
decision
making
on
cu
south
and
I'm
not
convinced
that
we
can't
take
a
look
at
it
before
this
council
expires.
M
But
I
thought
doing
it
hard
on
the
heels
of
the
decision-making
process
for
cu
south
was
was
simply
rushing
it
too
much,
and
you
know
if
we
pushed
it
back
a
couple
weeks.
I'd
feel
a
little
more
comfortable
about
it.
A
Okay,
rachel
and
then
mary.
F
Then
I
just
want
to
make
sure
I
understand
what
we're
talking
about.
Is
this
sort
of
the
the
end
point
of
a
process
that
we
dug
into?
I
want
to
say
last
summer,
in
part.
A
F
I
guess
I
will
say
I
I
thought
that
we
analyzed
this
pretty
critically
previously,
and
this
was
more
of
a
just
like
putting
the
period
on
it
than
then
a
maybe
a
little
less
discussion.
So
maybe
I
don't
understand
what
we're
talking
about
and
would
appreciate
clarification
if
this
is
not
an
extension
and
just
a
completion
of
something.
A
I'll
I'll
just
weigh
in
briefly
rachel
that
I
think
it
is
just
a
completing
of
other
work
that
we've
done,
but
sandra
or
others.
If
you'd
like
to
jump
in
and
and
answer
rachel's
question,
I
think
that
might
be
appropriate
at
this
time.
X
It's
correct
that
this
is
the
completion
of
previous
actions.
All
of
the
items
that
are
engaged
here
were
presented
to
you
in
detail
during
the
adoption
of
the
midterm
comp
plan
update
in
december
2020..
AE
X
M
Okay,
so
that's
I'm
not
suggesting
that
a
new
council
do
this
de
novo
and
and
start
from
scratch,
I'm
suggesting
that
we
just
have
a
little
more
time
after,
what's
likely
to
be
a
very
contentious
couple
of
meetings
to
do
whatever
final
analysis
or
review
that
we
wish
to
do,
and
it
may
be
that
we
don't
wish
to
do
anything.
M
I
just
know
that
for
me
I
would
like
to
take
a
look
at
the
materials
one
more
time,
having
not
looked
at
them
for
nine
or
ten
months
and
astonishingly,
they
are
not
all
engraved
on
my
memory,
so
it
was
more
of
a
procedural
request
than
a
than
a
suggestion
that
we
kicked
this
over
to
the
new
council.
F
Can
I
can
I
wrap
up
my
so
understanding.
F
Thank
you
mark,
I'm
supportive.
It
sounds
like
we
could
maybe
move
it
then
to
october
5th,
so
we're
not
digesting
it
on
the
same
night
as
the
sea
south.
I
don't
know
why
you
think
that's
going
to
be
contentious,
but
so
that
we
don't
do
it
that
night
and
do
it
maybe
the
fifth
and
then
the
16th
or
yes,
that's
really
all.
I.
M
E
So
I
I
would
support
just
moving
it
to
october
5th
and
then
october,
whatever
seven
days
or
14
days
is
after
that
I
just
want
to
say
that
you
know
what
jason,
what
jacob
said
about
it
being
pro
forma,
believe
it
or
not.
This
is
like
my
third
comp
plan
update
that
I've
been
through,
and
it
is
very,
very
pro
forma
process
where
you're,
basically
implementing
whatever
changes
were
made
or
recommended
through
the
it
it
it
trickles
down
through
all
the
documents
in
the
city
and
so
the
the
change.
E
The
zoning
changes
are
basically
implementing
what
we've
already
approved.
So
it's
quite
pro
forma
everything
has
already
been
vetted,
and
maybe,
if
I
recall
correctly,
maybe
the
most
controversial
of
those
zoning
changes
is
likely
3303
broadway
and
we
have
already
been
through
a
lot
of
process
on
that
particular
one.
So
I'm
okay
with
moving
it
out,
and
but
it
is
just
a
similar
to
what
we
did
a
couple
weeks
ago
with
putting
all
of
the
petitions
on
the
ballot.
It's
just.
M
A
Great
and-
and
I
I
agree-
I
didn't
want
to
kick
it
too
far
down
the
road,
but
it
would
be
pretty
easy
for
us
to
put
first
reading
on
the
fifth
and
then
second
reading
on
the
19th
and
then
do
the
hearing
on
the
19th
right
now.
A
The
19th
is
a
three
and
a
half
hour
meeting,
so
it
will
go
a
little
longer
so
council,
if
you
nod
yes
to
mark's
suggestion,
we
may
have
a
slightly
longer
meeting
on
october
19th,
but
it
may
be
the
last
long
meeting
this
council
has
so
maybe
you
want
to
savor
it
bob.
U
I
I'm
fine
with
a
slight
extension
as
well.
I
was
going
to
make
a
slightly
different
calendaring
suggestion.
The
the
the
28th
is
a
special
meeting
and
it's
a
light
meeting
right
now.
Returning
the
12th
of
october
into
a
from
a
study
session
to
a
special
meeting,
that's
also
a
light
meeting,
so
I
might
suggest
the
28th
and
the
12th
would
be
better
than
the
5th
and
the
19th,
which
are
both
heavy
meetings.
T
Yeah,
I
just
wanted
to
mention
that
alicia
had
noted
that
there
are
four
public
hearings
scheduled
for
the
19th
already.
I
I'm
just
now
looking
at
it
myself,
so
I
I
think
that
we
just
need
to
be
careful
about
that
and
then
the
fact
that
we
just
need
to
make
sure
that
there's
enough
time
in
between
first
and
second
reading
as
well.
A
And
that's
great
and
thank
you
for
for
that
input
and
a
good
juni
next,
but
as
nuria
has
mentioned,
we
could
take
this
back
to
cac
with
this
input.
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
all
of
council
had
the
chance
to
to
weigh
in,
and
we
can
finalize
it,
but
I
think
bob
may
has
made
a
good
suggestion.
Junie.
A
All
right,
thank
you,
juni,
so
with
that,
I
will
suggest
that
cac
takes
us
up
with
the
input.
That's
why
I
brought
it
here
was
to
get
this
kind
of
input,
and
I
think
we
have
enough
to
go
on
at
this
point
and
bob's
on
cac.
I
am
and
juni
is
so
we'll
take
this
and
we
will
bring
you'll,
see
it
in
the
cdac
minutes
and
if
you
don't
like
it,
let
us
know
all
right,
so
I
think
we're
done
with
that
one
alicia.
A
E
Right
so
so,
sam
and
I
are
in
the
current
evaluation
committee
and
as
one
of
the
the
things
that
we
were
hoping
to
accomplish
prior
to
coved
hitting
was
to
realign
the
three
council
employee
evaluation
schedules
to
intuit,
bring
them
into
alignment
with
the
rest
of
the
city
employees,
and
in
order
to
do
that,
I
think
we
need
to
start
sooner
than
later,
and
that
should
probably
go
to
a
new
evaluation
committee,
because
the
conclusion
of
that
process
will
likely
not
happen
within
this
council.
E
So
we
need
to
take
a
couple
of
volunteers
and
maybe
we
put
it
out
there
and
you
all
think
about
it,
but
it's
pretty
narrowed
down
as
to
who
can
be
on
the
evaluation
committee,
since
there
will
be
assuredly
only
four
council
members
returning
perhaps
mark
will
too
but
but
for
sure
four.
E
So
one
of
you,
four
two
of
you,
two
views
gotta
do
this
so
think
about
that
and
if
you
wanna
volunteer,
maybe
we
set
another
time
to
do
the
actual
appointment
unless
you
already
know
already
what,
if
you
want
to
do
this.
A
So
mary,
if
I
could
just
ask
for
clarification,
we
have
one
of
our
employees
to
do
the
evaluation
for
this
chair.
That's
judge
cook
and
we
mary
and
I
have
been
kind
of
focused
on
the
city
manager
search
and
then
the
city
attorney
search
part
of
it,
and
so
I
dropped
the
ball
on
us
moving
through
that
evaluation.
A
Normally
it
would
be
coming
to
council
about
now
to
complete,
and
so
the
thinking
on
this
was
since
we
need
to
do
this.
It
might
make
sense
to
appoint
two
new
members
who
will
be
on
the
evaluation
committee
who
need
to
be
experienced.
Members
of
the
council
have
them
work
with
mary
and
I
to
do
that
evaluation
and
then
those
two
council
members
continue
with
the
work
that's
going
to
have
to
happen
with
the
realignment
of
schedules
and
into
the
next
council.
So
that's
the
subject.
Did
I
get
that
right?
Mary.
E
So
I
I
the
way
I
see
it
is
yes
you're,
correct
judge
cook
needs
to
have
a
review,
but
the
suggestion
from
jen
was
to
take
this
opportunity
to
align
it
with
the
other
city
employees
since
we're
getting
a
new
city
attorney
and-
and
we
have
a
new
city
manager-
well,
not
so
new
anymore,
but
in
any
case
yes,
we
need
to
do
the
evaluation
for
judge
cook
and
the
realignment
of
the
process
so
and
for
that
it
really
takes.
E
E
A
All
I
meant
by
that
was
hand
off
whatever
we
needed
to
hand
off
as
far
as
like
the
knowledge
of
how
it
worked,
jen
can
take
care
of
most
of
it.
I
agree.
I
just
thought
you
and
I
might
want
to
do
a
handoff
of
some
kind
to
the
new
folks.
I
see
some
hands
here.
Let
me
make
sure
I
get
him
in
the
right
order.
F
Well,
I
think
that's
an
old
universe
hand,
but
I
will
ask
a
question:
to
sum
up:
can
somebody
describe
the
amount
of
time
that
goes
into
this?
In
you
know,
for
the
four
of
us
who
I
mean,
I
do
appreciate
sam's
notion
of
passing
the
baton
and
educating
people
before
you
both
leave,
so
that's
probably
would
be
appreciated
by
whoever
takes
this
on.
I
would
be
curious
to
know
a
little
bit
more
about
what
it
is
to
take
this
job
on.
A
So
I
can
speak
briefly
to
that.
My
experience.
I've
been
on
it
three
cycles
now
and
this
last
one
was
totally
unusual.
So
really
two
cycles
and
it
gets
started
in
well
the
old
time
table.
It
will
be
a
new
timetable,
but
in
the
old
timetable,
start
sometime
at
the
beginning
of
summer,
we'd
start
having
our
meetings
and
we
would
meet
with
the
consultant
and
figure
out
what
process
we
were
going
to
use.
Obviously,
there's
been
a
pass
process,
we'd
see
if
we
wanted
to
make
any
updates.
A
So
during
that
six
week
period
we
might
meet
three
or
four
times
to
set
up
the
process
and
then
the
the
staff
then
goes
out
to
the
peer
review.
So
it's
usually
been
a
360
review
and
so
the
hr
staff
would
handle
getting
the
reviews
out
and
so
on.
A
So
from
a
council
member
perspective,
there
was
a
quiet
period
that
lasted
about
six
weeks,
and
then
it
was
time
for
council
members
to
get
their
review
and
that's
where
the
herding
cats
comes
in,
because
council
members
me
included
are
notoriously
bad
at
actually
doing
their
reviews
and
so
then,
from
late
summer
into
fall.
There's
a
there's,
another
half
dozen
meetings
which
are
with
the
subcommittee
and
chasing
down
the
reviews
and
then
collating
the
review
data
and
then
getting
it
back
to
council
members.
A
So
we
have
council
members
fill
out
the
same
surveys
that
the
peers
did
of
the
the
three
employees,
and
then
we
would
get
all
that
information
back
out
to
council
get
council's
feedback
on
what
we
wanted
to
do
as
far
as
raise
levels
and
so
on,
goes
and
then
hand
that
off
at
a
meeting.
So
it's
about
six
months
worth
of
work
and
it
comes
in
two
bursts
and
for
a
little
while
it
might
take
four
hours
a
week
for
three
weeks
at
both
of
those
times.
So
that's
the
way.
A
F
Okay,
I'll
I'll
wait,
till
aaron
goes
and
then
chime
in
with
a
purposeful
hand,.
L
So
yeah,
I
think
it's
fun
to
to
move
forward
with
this
right
now.
I
would
just
consider
these
interim
appointments
so
that
in
the
january
you
know
when
we
appoint
the
new
council
to
all
the
different
committees
that
just
wouldn't
treat
these
folks
as
incumbents,
but
say
you
know
who
wants
to
do
it
this
year?.
A
Yeah,
I'm
totally
fine
with
that.
My
very
strong
recommendation
is
that
the
experienced
council
people
doing
this
because
it
takes
it,
takes
a
little
bit
of
extra
work
and
having
some
cultural
background.
As
far
as
how
things
have
gone
in
the
past,
through
your
own
experience
of
it
would
be
helpful,
I
think,
but
the
new
council
can
appoint
whoever
they
want
sure.
L
F
Rachel,
I'm
back
with
an
intentional
hand
now,
which
is
bob,
and
I
are
doing
the
attorney
recruitment
right
now
and
it
might
be
easy
for
us
to
just
continue
with
jen
in
this
transition
as
interims
and
sort
of
carry
on.
So
I
would
just
propose
that
maybe
it
makes
sense
for
me
and
bob
to
do
this
at
least
on
an
interim,
and
I
don't
see
aaron
or
judy
or
bob
real,
like
you
know,
not
touching
their
nose
so
I'll
make
that
for
purple.
U
Yeah,
I'm
I'm
willing
to
do
that,
but
I
do
agree
with
aaron
that
I
do
think
we
need
to
out
of
fairness,
bringing
this
back
to
the
new
council.
I
do
concur
with
you,
sam
that
some
experience
is
necessary,
but
mark,
for
example,
may
very
well
wish
to
do
it
and
we
don't
know
for
sure
that
he'll
be
re-elected,
so
I
think
I'm
happy
to
to
be
appointed
along
with
rachel
and
then
we'll
visit
with
our
new
colleagues
in
mark
in
in
january
and
see
what
they
want
to
do
long
term.
F
A
V
A
Juni,
you
just
went
on
mute,
so
we
just
lost.
V
Yeah,
I'm
not
sure
what
happened
but,
as
I
was
saying,
is
that
I
think
appointing
bob
and
rachel
right
now
would
actually
what's
the
word.
It
would
stop
the
new
council
from
throwing
their
name
in
in
the
hat.
V
As
you
know,
people
who
could
do
it
so
I
I
don't
agree
with
appointing
bob
and
rachel
at
this
moment.
I
think
we
should.
V
A
A
If
she
wanted
it,
I'm
happy
to
wait,
I
suppose
mary
and
I
could
do
it,
but
it
would
be
the
least
hand-off
council
to
council
that
we've
done
before,
because
the
reason
I
came
on
was
because
lisa
morsell
was
going
off
and
I
could
spend
a
year
working
with
lisa
to
learn
kind
of
what
the
process
looked
like
from
the
inside,
and
then
we
brought
mary
and
when
lisa
was
off
and
we've
had
the
coveted
disruption.
So
I
so
will
a
council.
A
I
I
I
think
mary
and
I
will
do
as
you
as
the
remainder
choose.
We
can
certainly
execute
this
and
then
just
leave.
If
that's
the
preference
mark.
M
M
Who
are
prepared
to
do
it?
Who
can
be
taught
a
little
bit,
how
to
do
it?
And
if
that's
not
the
will
of
the
new
council
that
that's
up
to
them,
but
I
I
think,
having
some
degree
of
continuity
is
an
important
thing.
M
It
doesn't
preclude
someone
else
in
january
from
from
sticking
their
hand
up
and
saying
I'd
like
to
serve
and
that
decision
can
be
made
at
the
time,
but
simply
having
you
guys
just
disappear
in
the
first
week
of
november
and
having
nobody
on
council
who
has
any
preparation
in
this
area.
I
I
don't
think
it's
a
good
thing.
I
I
would
be
supportive
of
of
your
suggestions,
sam.
F
Just
for
the
record,
this
is
not
something
I'm
dying
to
do
so
offering
to
do
it
to
be
helpful,
but
I
I
don't
see
it
as
much
about
myself
as
making
sure
that
staff
has
the
council
resource
to
get
in
place,
whatever
we
need
in
place
for
what
sounds
like.
Maybe
I
don't
want
to.
F
I
don't
sound
critical,
but
almost
overdue
evaluation,
so
you
know
just
making
sure
that
we
have
the
the
path
for
the
staff
needs
so
happy
to
do
or
not
do
whatever
is
best
for
the
city
to
to
function
and
definitely
happy
to
to
stand
back.
If
somebody
new
to
council
would
like
to
do
this.
A
L
Juni,
I
totally
agree
with
your
your
fundamental
point
there
that
if
new
council
members
are
interested
in
doing
this,
they
should
absolutely
have
the
right
to
step
up
and
we
should
be
very
willing
to
appoint
them.
So
the
the
one
thing
I
I
feel
about
why
I'm
willing
to
move
forward
now
is
because
we've,
let
judge
cook's
evaluation
go
too
long.
So
I
would
like
to
see
that
move
forward
sooner
rather
than
later,
which
also
should
be
really
easy,
because
judgehook
is
amazing.
L
So
you
know
I
think,
it'll
be
a
relatively
straightforward
process,
but
but
junior
to
your
point,
I
I
certainly
I
pledge,
as
somebody
who'll
still
be
around
in
a
few
months
from
the
new
council-
comes
on
to
to
not
give
kind
of
incumbency
to
bob
and
rachel
and
to
100.
Consider
new
council
members.
If
they're
interested
in
participating
in
the
sport
committee.
A
Okay
junie,
would
you
like
to
follow
up
any
further.
V
Well,
I
hear
the
rest
of
my
colleagues
and
their
comments
about
you
know
going
forward
with
the
appointment.
I
still
would
not
agree
with
it,
but
it
is
again
the
majority
wants
it
it's
going
forward,
but
I
still
disagree
and
from
what
I
heard
from
you
earlier,
the
work
doesn't
have
happened
until
sometime
in
the
summer,
so
appointing
these
new
new,
these
two
enter
and
people
actually
to
me.
E
So,
just
to
clarify
the
the
summer
process
was
the
old
process
and
the
whole
idea
is
to
align
because
there's
two
new
employees
and
as
aaron
pointed
out
we've,
let
judge
cook's
evaluation
go
far
too
long.
E
It's
an
opportunity
to
perform
judge
cook's
evaluation
now
and
take
the
opportunity
that
we
have
two
new
employees
to
align
it
with
the
january
time
frame
as
opposed
to
waiting
until
summer.
So
the
old
method
was
out
of
step
with
the
rest
of
the
city
employees
by
six
months,
and
so
the
idea
here
is
to
align
it
to
be
in
january
with
everybody
else,
so
it
wouldn't
be
waiting
until
summer.
It
needs
to
start
happening
now,
so
that
it's
aligned
by
january
2022.
A
And
I'll
just
say
one
further
thing
with
that:
it
is
quite
possible
that
mary
and
I
could
train
trains.
A
loose
word
just
share
what
we've
learned
so
far
with
the
two
new
council,
people
who
get
appointed
and
if
one
of
them
wants
to
stay
on
and
a
new
person
wants
to
join
them
from
you
know,
newly
elected.
A
That
would
be
another
way
to
pass
some
of
the
kind
of
how
it's
gone
in
the
past
and
things
to
watch
out
for
just
because
mary
and
I
could
have
done
that
with
the
two
interim
appointments
and
then,
if
one
of
them
wanted
to
continue,
there
would
at
least
be
some
continuity
and
mary's
exactly
right.
This
is
going
to
come
up
if
we
try
and
do
this
schedule
alignment
it's
going
to
come
up
for
the
new
council
right
around
the
time
of
the
retreat.
A
So
it's
going
to
be
a
super
topical
thing,
and
so
it
sounds
like
the
will
of
council
is
to
move
forward
with
some
interim.
A
I
think
that's
smart
and
rachel
and
bob
have
kind
of
been
pushed
forward
and
if
the
rest
of
council
is
good
with
that,
I
think
it
would
make
sense
for
them
to
do
it
for
us
to
have
a
meeting
publicly
noticed,
if
need
be,
where
mary
and
I
spend
some
time
just
saying
what
we've
seen
or
we
can
do,
it
informally,
whatever
makes
the
most
sense,
but
the
idea
is
just
to
make
sure
that
we
can
pass
some
lessons
learned
to
the
new
folks.
So
I
will
this
is
sandra.
A
T
Right
I'd
have
to
look
and
see.
I
I'm
not
sure
about
that.
A
I
I
think
to
be
complete:
why
don't
we
just
take
a
vote
so
we'll
go
ahead
and
do
this
with
the
show
of
hands
if
that
works
for
everyone,
we
can
have
a
motion.
Somebody
can
make
a
motion
to
appoint
bob
and
rachel.
As
interim
members
of
the
employee
evaluation
committee,
aaron.
A
A
Okay,
mark.
A
Okay,
so
so
that's
perfect,
I
think
we
have
the
willow
council
on
that
and
sandra.
If
we
need
to,
we
can
figure
out
if
we
need
to
bring
a
consent
thing
forward.
We
can
handle
that
at
cac.
A
It
seems
like
we
have
acclimation
for
rachel
and
bob
noting
that
juni
has
an
objection
to
it
and
we'll
proceed
with
that,
and
if
we
need
to
we'll
bring
it
back
on
consent.
A
F
I
am,
I
wanted
to
speak
to
that.
Actually
anyhow
yeah
aaron,
it's
not
tonight,
but
I
did
want
to
flag.
I
think
people
will
be
getting
an
email
for
calendar
holds
and
to
please
pay
attention
to
that,
because
we're
in
such
a
tight
turnaround
and
we
will
need
to
have
calendars
held
like.
Is
it
two
and
a
half
weeks
out
bob
it's
four
weeks.
I
don't
know
sometime
in
the
next
month.
People
will
need
like
a
half
day
held.
So
please
please
check
your
inbox
for
that.
A
It's
a
great
reminder-
and
we
will
put
with
the
city
attorney
work-
that
the
council
needs
to
do
to
tee,
that
up
at
the
next
cac
and
the
request
has
been
for
the
14th
and
the
21st
to
touch
this.
So,
okay,
anything
else,
all
right
with
that.
Our
meeting
is
adjourned
at
9
35
pm.
Everyone
have
a
good
rest
of
the
week
and
see
you
on
tuesday
next
week.