►
From YouTube: Boulder City Council Meeting 2-18-20
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Make
Vogler
such
a
vibrant
and
evolving
community
by
creating
the
climate
mobilization
action
plan,
we
double
down
on
our
commitment
to
fight
the
global
climate
emergency
by
increasing
our
affordable
housing
goal
to
include
middle-income
families
and
by
beginning
construction
on
30
Pearl.
We
have
continued
our
mission
to
create
more
affordable
housing.
The
city's
first
neighborhood
Green
Street
on
13th
Street,
was
completed
as
part
of
the
low
stress,
walk
and
bike
Network
plan.
A
We
finalized
the
planned
acquisition
of
a
25
acre
conservation
easement
on
Long's
garden
in
North
Boulder,
one
of
the
last
working
agricultural
properties
in
the
city,
municipal
ordinance,
language,
was
updated
to
become
more
gender
inclusive.
In
addition,
our
main
library's
restrooms
underwent
major
renovations
to
be
inclusive
for
all
library
users.
We
closed
out
the
year
with
the
adoption
of
a
racial
equity
resolution
which
solidifies
our
commitment
to
becoming
more
welcoming
and
inclusive.
A
B
Has
an
important
role
to
play
in
welcoming,
supporting
and
serving
people
of
diverse
backgrounds
in
our
community
and
in
government
processes.
In
2018,
we
embarked
on
a
journey
with
the
government
Alliance
on
race
and
equity
to
understand
the
role
institutional
racism
has
played
in
perpetuating
current
racial
inequities
in
our
nation
and
here
in
Boulder,
the.
A
Creation
and
perpetuation
of
racial
inequities
is
embedded
into
government
at
all
levels,
focusing
on
promoting
equity,
so
that
everyone
is
valued,
respected
and
heard
offers
many
benefits.
The
city
of
Boulder
is
committed
to
leading
with
our
values,
changing
employee
perceptions
and
behaviors
first
and
then
expanding
beyond
the
city
organization
and
extending
the
impact
into
the
community.
A
The
adoption
of
the
city's
first
racial
equity
resolution,
solidifies
councils,
commitment
to
advance
racial
equity
and
opportunities
for
all
this
is
one
of
many
important
steps
that
we
will
take
as
we
work
to
make
our
community
one
that
feels
truly
safe,
welcoming
and
inclusive.
Speaking
on
behalf
of
council,
we
look
to
following
up
on
a
resolution
with
a
robust
racial
equity
work
plan
developed
in
collaboration
with
our
community.
This.
B
Commitment
extends
to
those
who
live
here
now
and
in
the
future,
as
well
as
to
those
who
called
Buller
home
long
before
we
arrived.
Native
Americans
have
a
deep
connection
to
the
boulder
area
that
we
respect
and
support
in
2019,
the
city
of
Boulder
resumed
government-to-government,
tribal
consultations
with
13
federally
recognized,
American
Indian
tribes
by
renewing
our
relationships
and
efforts
to
acknowledge
the
past
good
as
well
as
bad.
We
are
making
our
communities
stronger
with
an
equity
focus
in
mind.
B
The
Police
Department
released
its
first
full
year
of
data
on
police
officer
stops
of
community
members.
This
work
began
in
2016,
based
on
a
recommendation
from
consultant
Hillard
Hines,
which
recommended
we
track
police,
stop
data
to
better
understand
who
officers
interacted
with
and
to
identify
opportunities
to
ensure
equitable
treatment.
In
order
to
capture
this
important
data,
the
department
purchased
a
new
records
management
system
and
adopted
a
new
data
collection
process.
A
Council
engaged
in
a
community
listening
session
following
an
interaction
between
an
african-american
college
student
and
members
of
the
city's
police
department
after
the
student
was
approached
while
picking
up
trash
in
his
yard.
Personal
stories
were
shared
by
people
from
a
variety
of
races,
ethnicities,
as
well
as
perspectives
of
family
members
with
mixed-race
backgrounds.
This.
A
Capped
the
world's
hottest
decade
in
recorded
history.
We
know
why
and
had
the
power
to
do
something
about
it,
while
countries
from
the
world
met
at
the
United
Nations
climate
action
summit
to
discuss
climate
change,
the
city
of
Boulder
declared
a
climate
emergency.
This
resolution
acknowledges
the
existence
of
a
global
climate
emergency
and
recognizes
the
importance
of
local
action
to
protect
and
enhance
the
well-being
of
current
and
future
generations.
A
B
Our
pursuit
of
electric
utility
municipal
ization
as
a
path
toward
cleaner,
renewable
energy
sources
for
the
purpose
of
reducing
greenhouse
gas
emissions.
Other
benefits
we
are
seeking
through
managing
our
own
electric
utility,
are
a
more
resilient
local
electrical
grid
and
more
input
into
our
energy
system
operation
by
our
engaged
and
knowledgeable
community.
A
major
milestone
in
our
local
power
project,
which
was
four
years
in
the
making,
is
the
authorization
from
the
Colorado
Public
Utilities
Commission,
to
transfer
assets
necessary
for
the
creation
of
a
local
electric
utility
in
2020.
B
A
B
We
have
pursued
a
local
electric
utility
and
state
legislation
to
reduce
fossil
fuels.
We
also
have
made
substantial
changes
to
our
own
infrastructure.
Several
city
facilities
were
upgraded
to
be
more
environmentally
sound.
Upgrades
to
the
'but
a
so
water
treatment
plan
resulted
in
a
20%
improvement
in
filter
efficiencies,
reduced
chemical
usage
and
successful
ongoing
management
and
disposal
of
water
treatment.
Residuals
solar
panels
at
the
Bolar
reservoir
water
treatment
plant
now
bring
the
total
generation
at
the
site,
21.92
megawatts,
which
is
approximately
75%
of
the
total
electrical
use
at
the
facility.
A
The
past
year
we
conducted
dozens
of
projects
to
help
protect
and
restore
open
spaces,
high
quality
natural
areas
which
are
among
the
most
biologically
diverse
in
the
western
United
States.
We
planted
486
new
public
trees,
including
37
different
species,
improving
canopy
diversity
and
sustainability
to
continue
to
improve
our
innovative
public
land
legacy.
Open
space
and
mountain
parks
adopted
its
first
master
plan
shaped
from
community
input.
This
plan
will
guide
the
management
of
over
45,000
acres
of
open
space
over
the
next
decade
and
beyond
safety.
B
And
resilience
are
two
pillars
of
a
healthy
community
in
order
to
ensure
our
first
responders
safety
and
ability
to
effectively
serve
the
community
in
times
of
emergency.
They
need
a
clear
and
reliable
radio
system.
In
2017,
voters
approved
dedicating
a
portion
of
sales
tax
revenue
to
this
infrastructure
project.
In
2019
we
installed
a
portion
of
the
new
radio
system
infrastructure
that
will
allow
first
responders
to
be
able
to
better
communicate
with
one
another
during
emergencies.
A
Community
Safety
has
been,
and
continues
to
be,
a
high
priority
vision.
Zero
is
a
bold
goal
to
eliminate
all
serious
injury
and
fatal
traffic
crashes
involving
people
using
all
modes
of
travel.
Protecting
the
health
of
our
community
members
means
addressing
risky
behaviors
through
engineering,
education
enforcement
and
ongoing
evaluation
in
2019,
the
transportation
master
plan
was
updated
to
reflect
our
community's
vision
for
a
transportation
system
that
supports
the
city's
sustainability
and
resilience
goals.
This
plan
will
guide
the
city's
transportation
division,
core
services
and
investments
in
operations,
maintenance
and
capital
programs,
including
system
enhancements.
Our.
B
Three
for
three
parking
pilot
program
will
continue
throughout
2020,
making
weeknight
parking
downtown
more
affordable
in
any
of
our
five
downtown
city
parking
garages
after
3
p.m.
and
until
3
a.m.
Monday
through
Friday
for
only
$3
designed
to
meet
the
needs
of
our
service
workers,
who
may
not
be
well
served
by
public
transit.
The
pilot
program
allows
evening
and
night
workers
to
park
near
work,
affordably
and
easily
without
worrying
about
parking
meters,
time
limits
or
snow.
The.
A
City's
first
neighborhood
Green
Street
on
13th
Street,
was
completed
as
part
of
the
low
stress,
walk
and
bike
Network
plan.
The
city
installed
safety,
signage
and
paint
markings
to
improve
the
safety
and
comfort
of
people
walking
and
biking
in
this
corridor.
A
2020
council
priority
is
to
continue
thorough
reviews
of
design
and
construction
standards.
Looking
for
opportunities
to
integrate
safety
principles
more
deeply
into
how
we
design
our
sidewalks
streets
and
bike
facilities
living.
B
In
Boulder,
we
know
that
a
wildfire
is
not
a
matter
of
if
but
when.
That
is
why
Boulder
Fire
Rescue
implemented
a
comprehensive
program
to
assess
homes
located
in
areas
of
higher
risk
for
wildfires
near
the
urban
wildland
interface.
These
free
assessments
give
homeowners
recommendations
to
improve
their
ability
to
mitigate
risks
that
improve
resiliency
and
save
lives.
Approximately
50
of
these
assessments
have
been
completed.
In
addition,
600
curbside
assessments
were
conducted
that
helped
the
fire
department
pre
plan
in
the
event
of
an
emergency.
Looking.
A
At
our
long-term
community
sustainability,
we
continue
to
make
affordable
housing
a
key
priority.
In
2019
we
expanded
the
city's
affordable
housing
goal
from
10%
to
15%
of
all
residential
properties
as
permanently
affordable,
of
which
1,000
to
be
deed,
restricted,
middle-income
homes.
The
15%
goal
has
a
target
completion
date
by
2035.
A
Currently,
7.9
percent
of
homes
in
the
city
are
permanently
affordable.
Important
progress
was
made
on
development
projects
furthering
the
city's
commitment
to
creating
and
preserving
diverse
housing
options.
In
Boulder
we
added
37
permanently
affordable
homes
in
August
and
are
close
to
completing
an
additional
98
homes
in
December.
B
Ground
was
broken
at
30
Pearl,
our
newest,
affordable
housing.
Community.
This
project
is
a
collaborative
effort
between
Boulder
housing
partners
and
the
city
once
completed.
120,
affordable
homes
will
bring
1.3
million
dollars
in
annual
rent
relief
to
low-income
households.
This
project
represents
the
highest
percentage
of
permanently
affordable
housing
of
any
prior
developments
in
the
city.
A
manufactured.
A
Housing
strategy
was
formally
adopted
and
identifies
guiding
principles
and
a
prioritized
list
of
actions
by
the
city
park
residents
and
park
owners
to
further
Boulder
valley,
comprehensive
plan
policies.
We've
recognized
the
importance
of
manufactured
housing
as
an
option
for
many
households
and
encouraged
the
preservation
of
existing
mobile
home
parks
and
the
development
of
new
manufactured
home
parks,
including
increasing
opportunities
for
resident
owned
parks.
Not
to
be
forgotten,
is
the
final
approval
of
the
Alpine
balsam
area
plan,
which
reflects
many
community
values
and
strikes
a
balance
on
intensity
form
and
use
to
ensure
the
area
remains.
A
B
In
Boulder
should
have
the
opportunity
to
achieve
or
maintain
a
safe,
stable
home
in
our
community.
National
evidence
demonstrates
that
housing
opportunities
are
the
most
effective
way
to
reduce
the
impacts
of
homelessness
on
individuals
and
commune
through
coordinated
efforts
aligned
with
our
homelessness
strategy,
354
adults
exited
homelessness
last
year.
Coordinated
entry
is
the
first
stop
and
a
key
element
of
the
adult
homeless
service
system
included
in
the
goals
for
the
city
of
Boulder
homelessness
strategy.
B
Coordinated
entry
is
a
national
best
practice
and
has
been
implemented
countywide
with
standardized
procedures
all
homeless
adults
seeking
services
enter
through
a
limited
number
of
community
entry
points
where
they
are
assessed,
with
common
screening
tools
and
matched
with
appropriate
service
and
housing
paths.
We
continue
to
expand
the
pathways
to
permanent
housing
and
increase
access
to
programs
and
services
that
are
based
on
best
practice
and
data-driven
results
in
2019
through
year-round
and
severe
weather,
shelter
programs.
Seventy
three
thousand
three
hundred
and
eight
shelter
bed
nights
of
stay
were
provided
to
adult
individuals.
A
V
newsletters
to
mobile
apps,
we
worked
hard
to
introduce
new
and
convenient
ways
to
stay
informed
about
the
things
that
matter
most
to
you.
We
strengthened
relationships
with
community
partners
and
piloted
community
connectors
to
ensure
more
inclusive
engagement.
Breaking
down
barriers
to
public
participation,
especially
for
underrepresented
communities,
is
something
that
we
continue
to
strive
for
because
we
know
better
decisions
are
made
when
we
receive
input
from
our
entire
community.
Building.
On
the
success
of
chats
with
council,
the
city
hosted
four
walks
with
council
inviting
community
members
to
stroll
with
city
leaders
and
discuss
public
issues.
A
B
City
of
Boulder
was
named
USA
organization
of
the
year,
an
international
organization
of
the
Year
by
the
International
Association
of
public
participation,
I
a
p2.
These
prestigious
awards
recognize
the
value
of
the
city's
work
over
the
past
two
years
to
create
a
culture
of
more
meaningful
and
inclusive
engagement
in
Boulder.
These
awards
are
rooted
in
the
hard
work
of
staff
and
our
community
to
shape
a
new
culture
of
engagement,
and
especially
in
councils,
commitment
to
continual
improvement
in
this
area.
We
look
forward
to
building
on
this
successful
start
together.
Forbes.
A
Magazine
has
named
the
city
of
Boulder
among
the
best
employers
in
Colorado.
Our
willingness
to
assess
our
own
internal
operations
in
the
name
of
continuous
growth
and
improvement,
make
the
city
of
Boulder
a
great
place
to
work
in
2019.
We
renewed
our
focus
on
equity,
diversity
and
inclusion
in
recruitment
and
hiring.
While
our
work
is
far
from
over.
We
have
seen
positive
outcomes
at
the
police
department.
An
accelerated
and
improved
hiring
process
resulted
in
24
new
police
officers
being
hired
for
our
female
and
to
our
Latino
X.
Another.
B
Vision
we
have
been
working
hard
to
bring
to
life
is
the
desire
to
provide
a
world-class
community
telecommunications
infrastructure
in
Boulder
for
the
21st
century
and
beyond
broadband
connectivity
is
a
critical
infrastructure
service
for
the
quality
of
modern
life,
as
is
the
case
with
roads,
water,
sewer
and
electricity.
It
is
exciting
to
report
that
in
2019
the
fiber-optic
backbone
design
was
completed.
Construction
of
65
miles
of
fiber
is
expected
to
start
early
this
year.
This
asset
will
be
used
for
city
and
select
community
purposes
rather
than
provide
residential
and
commercial
services
in
the
short
term.
A
2019
Boulder
was
also
recognized
as
the
best
small
city
in
the
world,
best
arts
community
for
midsize
cities,
most
fitness
friendly
and
America's
best
bike
cities.
These
accolades
are
a
direct
result,
a
meaningful
and
impactful
accomplishments.
Over
the
past
12
months,
our
accomplishments
were
made
possible
because
of
the
support
from
the
boulder
community
in
2020.
We
will
continue
to
implement
the
multi-year
projects
already
underway
and
focus
on
the
city's
long-term
financial
sustainability,
finalizing
a
flood
mitigation
plan
in
South
Boulder,
balancing
housing
and
jobs,
growth
with
master
plans
to
ensure
we
have
adequate
infrastructure
capacity.
C
C
E
A
A
A
G
My
name
is
Vincent
Calvin
and
I'm,
one
of
many
Boulder
residents
that
cares
about
climate
change
and
especially
how
to
mitigate
it
as
quickly
and
effectively
as
possible
and
I
want
to
thank
everybody
on
the
City
Council
and
all
the
city,
employees
who
have
been
working
to
address
climate
change,
because
it
is
a
very
serious
issue,
as
we
all
know,
and
because
electricity
use
is
one
of
the
biggest
sources
of
greenhouse
gases.
I
support
the
many
measures
the
city
has
been
taking
to
lower
emissions
for
from
our
electricity
use
and
I
support.
G
The
city's
continued
work
on
municipal
ization
and
I
support
more
competition
for
electric
generation,
which
would
hopefully
enable
us
the
ability
to
more
quickly
lower
emissions
by
utilizing
the
many
thousands
of
megawatts
of
renewable
energy
potential.
There
is
here
in
Colorado,
that's
just
waiting
to
be
developed
there.
This
renewable
energy
is
cheaper,
cleaner
and
more
sustainable
than
the
vast
majority
of
the
electricity.
G
That's
currently
on
our
systems
and
Xcel
Energy
has
been
making
progress,
but
we
need
to
move
much
much
faster
than
they
are
willing
to
go
and
having
practiced
as
an
attorney
before
the
Colorado
Public.
Utilities
Commission
I
know
how
slow
and
expensive
that
process
is,
and
that's
all
the
more
reason
why
we
want
to
have
our
own
municipal
utility.
G
That
would
keep
us
out
of
that
process
and
enable
our
City
Council
to
drive
change
more
quickly,
as
well
as
keeping
more
of
our
money
here
and
not
patenting
Excel
shareholders,
pockets
and
I
believe
that
the
city
is
able
to
run
a
safe
carbon
free
and
resilient
electric
utility,
as
many
other
cities
do
across
the
country,
and
thank
you
again
for
everything
you're
doing
in
your
power
to
mitigate
climate
change
and
if
there's
anything
I
can
do
to
help.
Just.
Let
me
know
thanks.
H
My
name
is
Patrick
Murphy
I
live
in
Boulder.
This
is
the
continuation
of
the
24
articles
of
the
Muni
naughty
list,
article
13,
costly
legal
missteps
at
the
district
court
level
and
at
the
FERC
wasting
four
years,
Boulder
tried
to
go
to
condemnation
at
the
district
court
without
any
details
on
what
was
to
be
condemned.
H
The
nice
judge
just
said:
go
away
and
deal
with
the
PUC
Boulder
tried
to
get
the
FERC
to
start
working
on
stranded
cost,
but
the
FERC
just
said:
go
back
to
the
PUC
and
come
back
later
as
an
attempt
to
cover
this
foolishness.
Boulder
lawyers
said
they
wanted
to
make
sure
the
stranded
cost
could
be
made
in
installments,
even
though
this
was
well
defined
in
order
888
from
1996,
we
lost
many
years
and
loss
of
legal
fees
trying
to
avoid
going
to
the
PUC
article
14,
numerous
costly
missteps
at
the
PUC.
H
H
Article
15
blaming
all
these
missteps
on
the
PC
in
Excel,
rather
than
poor,
Boulder
leadership
and
legal
decisions.
The
PUC
and
Excel
aren't
mean
they're.
Just
sane
and
not
bamboozled
by
Boulder
arrogance
and
ineptitude
time
has
demonstrated.
Self-Critical
review
is
not
a
Muni
characteristic.
Is
it
a
skill
you
possess
and
Boulder
can
learn
to
be
continued
with
article
16
through
24.
I
Okay,
quick
thing:
thank
you.
This
wasn't
a
part
of
my
original
speech,
but
I
want
to
say
thank
you
for
accommodating
me.
I
appreciate
it.
You
think
that
being
said,
accountability
it
starts
with
us.
Today's
City
Council
is
going
to
hear
about
a
proposed
ordinance
change
with
the
reasoning
that
the
requirement
is
problematic
in
the
terms
of
enforcement
for
officers.
I
entered
you
today,
my
opposition
to
this,
in
unison,
with
the
n-double-a-cp
on
the
grounds
that
removal
of
this
subsection
put
civilians
at
risk
and
as
well
as
infringes
on
our
First
Amendment
rights.
I
Furthermore,
impersonally
a
removal
of
the
subsection
will
go
against
councils
direct
to
goals
of
removing
opportunities
for
systemic
racism
and
discrimination
in
our
city.
This
ordinance,
when
utilized
properly,
provides
our
citizens
with
their
knowledge
that
we,
as
a
community,
seek
to
be
accountable
with
policing.
8-Feet
is
more
than
enough
space
for
an
officer
to
do
their
work,
while
at
the
same
time
ensuring
that
proper
care
is
taken
by
concerned
citizens
specifically
I
myself,
with
my
arms
raised
to
the
top
of
my
toes,
would
be
almost
eight
feet.
I
It
would
not
be
hard
to
specify
an
area
that
is
roughly
eight
feet
back
for
anyone
with
basic
reasoning,
skills.
The
ordinance
language
removal
would
further
empower
vagueness
of
law
and
allow
officers
to
potentially
harm
citizens
while
infringing
on
our
First
Amendment
rights.
2019
is
hot,
our
city.
Why
we
need
aspects
of
law
like
this
in
place.
Without
these
documentation,
we
as
a
city
would
not
be
growing
in
the
direction
we
are
going
now.
I
I
personally
find
the
foot
roll
amenable,
especially
because
I've
repeatedly
utilized
it
without
an
officer
even
addressing
me
about
the
ordinance
or,
if
they
did,
they
did
with
respect
and
care
/
acknowledgement
for
my
disabilities.
Well,
most
of
them
anyways
I
can
respect
for
the
witness
officers
conducting
business
when
they're
doing
it
properly.
Even
if
vocalize
my
mile
AG
of
agreement
with
documentation,
I
recommend
this
matter
be
tabled
until
the
task
force
is
fully
enforced
to
ensure
accountability.
Furthermore,
much
like
the
task
force
creation,
this
needs
to
be
a
community
involved
decision.
J
Good
evening
my
name
is
Patricia
Cardin
I
live
at
350,
Ponca,
Place
and
south
boulder
honorable
mayor
and
city
council
members
I'm
speaking
tonight
to
address
again
my
concern
for
the
safety
of
South
Boulder
residents,
who
continue
to
remain
vulnerable
to
flooding.
This
is
a
picture
of
the
sudden
flood
that
came
upon
us
at
our
residents,
after
which
garage
is
filled
with
water,
etc.
So
much
damage
was
done
and
life's
put
at
risk.
J
I
would
like
to
take
this
opportunity,
though,
to
personally
thank
the
PI,
the
City
Council
members
who,
in
their
goals
for
accomplishment
this
year,
included
resolution
of
this
long
safety
concern.
As
a
priority,
though,
it
seems
to
me
that
the
safety
of
South
was
older
residents,
and
the
resolution
of
this
issue
needs
to
be
uppermost
and
all
of
your
responsibilities
and
priorities.
I
also
appreciate
the
work
that
has
gone
into
the
preparation
of
the
188
pages
or
more
as
the
agenda
for
next
Tuesday
study
session
devoted
to
this
issue.
J
As
that
is
discussed,
I
request
serious
consideration
of
the
100-year
mitigation
design
mentioned
that
last
month's
update,
which,
as
I
understand,
will
allow
at
a
minimum
a
warning
of
rising
flood
waters,
enabling
residents
to
evacuate
and
also
on
the
paper
pages
for
next
week.
With
regard
to
the
consideration
of
the
proposed
land
swap
I
am
disappointed.
It
is
even
being
considered
as
for
many
reasons,
this
would
only
delay
the
resolution
for
many
more
years.
This
is
unconscionable.
I
would
venture
that
many
millions
of
dollars
have
already
been
spent
on
studying
this
issue.
Why
spend
more?
K
Hello,
my
name
is
Nolan
George
and
I'm
a
sophomore
at
cu-boulder.
My
reason
for
being
here
today
is
to
address
the
ongoing
crisis
of
climate
change.
Although
most
individuals
associate
climate
change
with
slow-moving
effects,
the
summertime
fires
in
California
and
Australia
that
caused
society,
hundreds
of
billions
of
dollars
speak
otherwise.
K
K
I'm
here
today
to
ask
you,
the
people
who
make
up
the
Boulder
City
Council
to
continue
to
fight
against
corporate
greed
in
the
fossil
fuel
industry.
A
sustainable
future
is
attainable
of
policy
makers
such
as
yourselves
continue
to
take
initiative
to
lead
the
change.
Climate
change
is
a
problem
we
cannot
afford
to
avoid
with
that
said,
I
would
like
to
thank
you
for
all
of
your
existing
contributions
toward
I'm
a
change
and
declaring
climate
change
as
an
emergency,
and
I
would
like
to
thank
you
for
your
time.
L
L
So
a
legal
non-conforming
use
is
the
use
of
land
or
a
structure
that
was
legally
established
according
to
the
applicants,
zoning
and
building
laws
of
the
time,
but
which
does
not
meet
current
zoning
and
building
standards
and
then
also
understand
the
origin
of
the
phrase
neighborhood
character,
which
came
to
mean
basically
excluding
undesirables
from
certain
neighborhoods
and
those
undesirables
were
immigrants
and
african-americans.
Prior
to
the
recent
election
plan,
Boulder
County
sent
out
a
tweet.
That
said,
we
prefer
a
horizontal
wall
of
green
space
to
surround
our
city.
L
L
There's
66
Lots
15
homes
violate
current
zoning
rules
and
that
doesn't
include
an
assessment
of
compatible
development
or
solar
Shadow
20-plus
are
non-conforming
single-family
lot
smaller
than
7,000
square
feet,
16
multi-family
homes,
a
variety
of
duplexes,
triplexes,
quad,
flexes
multiple
homes
on
one
lot
and
at
least
four
middle-income
duplexes
have
been
turned
into
single-family
homes
in
the
past
20
years.
So
I'd
like
to
ask:
is
this
really
a
single-family
neighborhood?
L
Why
do
we
have
rules
that
allow
middle-income
multi-family
housing
to
be
turned
into
single-family
McMansions,
but
not
the
other
way
around
how
come
the
city
is
not
inventoried
in
map
structures
that
do
not
conform
to
compatible
development
or
solar
shadow
ordinance?
How
does
it
make
sense
to
include
legal,
non-conforming
and
Adu
saturation
calculations
and
more
sense,
Thank
You
mr.
Veblen
sentence,
to
finish
to
add
density,
multifamily
and
neighborhoods
like
the
Vermont
subdivision,
when
it
was
originally
built?
Thank
you.
Mr.
Gale
ban.
M
Good
evening
counsel,
and
thank
you
for
this
opportunity
to
speak,
my
name
is
Laura
Tyler
I'm,
with
the
South
Boulder
Creek
Action,
Group
and
I've
been
advocating
for
flood
mitigation
at
South,
Boulder
Creek
since
2013,
and
this
evening,
we'd
like
to
welcome
the
new
councilmembers
Adam,
sweat
like
Rachael
friend.
You
need
Joseph
and
Mark
Wallach
yeah
thanks
for
joining
us
here
this
evening.
M
But
it
does
tell
the
story
so
in
September
2013,
my
husband
and
I
were
busy
removing
stuff
from
our
basement,
because
we
were
having
some
leakage
and
I
looked
out
the
window
and
took
a
break
and
the
water
was
down
at
the
curb
level
and
it
looked
you
know
a
little
scary
but
okay
and
then
maybe
10
or
15
minutes
later
after
having
a
quick
bite
to
eat,
we
looked
outside
and
saw
that
torrent
of
water,
essentially
south
Boulder,
Creek
rerouted
itself,
and
when
it
over
tops
us
36.
It
creates
a
flash
flood
situation.
M
That's
like
pouring
water
from
a
pitcher
into
a
bowl,
there's
no
place
for
that
water
to
go
except
to
fill
the
bowl,
and
my
house
is
not
even
at
the
lowest
part
of
the
street.
There
are
other
people
who
had
it
significantly
worse
than
we
did,
and
so
this
is
an
urgent
safety
issue.
There
is
flash
flooding
that
happens
in
that
neighborhood
and
I'm
here
today
to
urge
you
to
consider
at
minimum
protecting
us
from
the
100-year
flood
we're
looking
for
100-year
protection,
because
that
is
legally
significant.
M
N
Good
evening
my
name
is
Kathy
Joyner
I'm
from
Westminster
Colorado
I'd
like
to
request
again
that
you
view
the
south
boulder
creek
flood
mitigation
project
with
the
sense
of
urgency
that
is
warranted.
Please
move
with
decisive
and
clear
action
to
ensure
the
lives
and
safety
are
the
fundamental
concern
in
all
your
decision-making.
The
council
packet
for
the
upcoming
study
session
includes
some
I
poppin
cost
estimates
of
variant,
1
options.
N
That
said,
there
are
clear
distinctions
among
the
options
in
the
summary
tables,
particularly
tables
2,
through
5
related
to
levels
of
environmental
impact,
overall
cost
ease
of
permitting
overall
size
of
the
dam
and
impacts
to
wetlands
and
threatened
and
endangered
species.
Variant
1
100-year
design
appears
to
have
favorable
evaluations
on
many
of
these
points.
For
these
reasons,
and
for
the
extraordinary
difference
in
cost
compared
to
the
two
other
options,
this
option
appears
to
have
the
best
potential
to
move
forward
quickly.
N
Please
keep
in
mind
that
my
neighborhood
has
been
living
in
harm's
way
for
decades,
not
just
since
2013
we'd
like
to
know
that
there's
an
end
to
the
analysis
and
skyrocketing
costs,
particularly
with
500-year
designs
that
are
associated
with
the
numerous
iterations
of
this
plan.
Over
the
past
six
and
a
half
years.
We
support
all
levels
of
design
that
comply
with
city,
state
and
federal
standards.
N
All
of
the
three
variants
that
are
have
been
app
analyzed
do
so,
given
that
we
urge
you
to
choose
to
move
forward
with
a
design
that
will
be
the
fastest
route
to
safety
for
thousands
of
city
residents.
We've
all
heard
the
saying:
don't
let
the
perfect
get
in
the
way
of
the
good.
As
we
know,
there
is
no
perfect
and
while
we
look
for
it,
people
remain
in
harm's
way.
Thank
you
for
considering
these
critical
health
and
safety
issues
as
you
make
decisions
on
this
project
moving
forward.
Thank.
O
O
Because
I've
lived
there
for
20
years
and
I
was
involved
in
annexing
it.
Can
we
switch
to
the
next
one?
Oh
there
we
go
so
what
I
was
able
to
do?
There
is
to
actually
draw
a
somatic
schematically
how
people
live,
even
though
this
is
a
single
family,
zoned,
neighborhood
or
rezoning.
You
will
see
there.
What
I've
done
is
the
the
dark
squares
are
ones
that
actually
single
family
homes
lived
in
by
single
family.
Everyone
else
has
a
different
use,
so
there
may
be
squares
that
are
oops.
O
What
you
have
maybe
a
duplex,
or
maybe
you
have
a
need
you
or
you
simply
have
more
people
in
there
that
are
currently
allowed,
and
so,
if
I
ate
that
you
can
see
that
out
of
those
homes,
only
31
percent,
less
than
a
third
are
actually
single
family
homes
lived
in
by
a
single
family.
Everybody
else
lives
in
community
and
further.
O
If
we
put
this
in,
if
you
go
to
the
next
slide,
please,
if
we
now
look
at
that
of
all
the
residents,
you
will
see
again
that
that
now
only
a
quarter
of
the
residents
actually
live
in
so-called
single-family.
The
rest
in
others
and
among
those
most
surprising
to
me,
21
residents
in
our
little
neighborhood,
live
in
houses,
actually
don't
have
a
license
or
not
regulated
now.
I
think
it's
actually
a
positing
here
and
it
allows
for
quite
a
bit
of
more
room
in
Boulder
before
heaven.
P
So
national
nonprofit
map
light,
which
has
made
websites
for
the
League
of
Women
Voters
and
the
California
Secretary
of
State,
offered
Boulder
a
free
online
petitioning
system
for
initiatives
and
referenda.
The
city
turned
it
down,
but
we
didn't
know
the
justification.
Until
the
city
elections
working
group
met,
December,
18th.
P
Q
R
Hi
Elizabeth
black
43,
14
or
13th
Street
last
month,
I
discussed
how
tillage
is
hard
on
soil
health,
but
what
about
water?
What
does
extra
irrigation
water
due
to
soil,
health
and
soil?
Carbon
sequestration
I
divided
our
96
sample
sites
in
the
citizen,
science,
soil
health
project
into
the
same
three
tillage
intensity
groups
as
before
zero
tillage,
reduced
tillage
and
conventional
tillage
there
in
the
column
on
the
left,
then
I
divided
each
tillage
group
into
irrigated
or
dryland
sites,
depending
on
whether
they
got
extra
water
and
calculated
the
median
soil
health
score
for
each
subgroup.
R
If
you
compare
median
soil
health
scores
in
the
same
tillage
category,
the
medians
in
the
blue
column,
the
irrigated
sites
are
all
higher
than
the
medians
in
the
orange
column,
the
dry
land
sites,
so
supplemental
irrigation
water
boosts
soil,
health
scores
and
soil.
Carbon
sequestration
dry
land
sites
with
conventional
tillage
have
some
of
the
lowest
soil
health
scores.
These
include
dry
land,
small
grain
growers
who
plow
to
control
weeds
in
their
grain
fallow
grain
rotation
irrigated
sites
with
zero
tillage
have
some
of
the
highest
soil
health
scores.
R
These
include
irrigated
pastures,
hay
fields
and
orchards,
as
well
as
our
mountain
forests,
which
get
more
precipitation
than
the
plains.
Water
is
life.
We
can't
live
without
water
and
neither
can
soil
microbes.
Extra
water
grows
extra
microbes.
They
in
turn
boost
soil,
health
and
sequester.
Extra
carbon
boulders
AG
water
portfolio
is
an
incredibly
valuable
asset
in
the
fight
against
climate
change,
because
with
it
we
can
sequester
extra
carbon
in
our
soils
protecting
our
irrigated
AG
lands
and
our
mountain
forests
is
key
to
carbon
drawdown.
Thank
you.
Thank.
S
Thank
you
for
your
time
tonight
counsel.
My
name
is
Duncan
Gilchrist
I'm,
a
boulder
resident
master's
student
at
CU,
Denver
School
of
Public,
Affairs
and
I'm
on
the
board
of
an
organization
called
clean
energy
action
and
I'm
here
today,
just
to
reflect
positively
on
the
leadership
of
kiss
City,
Council
and
staff,
and
leading
the
transition
towards
a
low-carbon
economy,
in
particular,
I'd
like
to
voice
support
for
the
city's
efforts
to
prioritize
the
goal
of
democratization
over
energy.
S
It's
a
big
word
that
you
all
you
are
all
familiar
with
refers
to
localizing
decision-making
power
over
our
energy
system
and
I
think
this
is
super
important
and
if
we
were,
you
know
able
to
create
a
local
power
utility
we'd
be
able
to
have
a
say
in
decisions
like
how
our
electricity
revenue
is
reinvested
into
programs
to
further
support
the
transition
towards
renewables.
We
could
try
to
decrease
the
energy
burden
on
low-income
families.
S
We
could
promote
resilience
through
micro
grid
and
battery
storage
technology,
so
in
other
words,
you
know,
we'd
have
a
lot
more
local
decision-making
power
over
decisions
regarding
our
energy
system
compared
to
the
policy
pathway
of
sticking
with
Xcel
Energy,
where
the
decisions
of
our
energy
system
are
largely
determined
at
Public,
Utilities
Commission,
which
is
super
impenetrable
to
the
average
citizen.
So
I
appreciate
the
City,
Council's
and
city
staffs
evaluation
of
this
one
specific
pathway
to
decarbonization.
That
would
allow
us
more
decision-making
power
over
energy
system
and
that
pathway
is
the
initialization
effort.
T
Good
evening,
mr.
mayor
members
of
the
City
Council,
it's
been
a
while,
since
I've
addressed
you
I'm
Tim,
Johnson
I'm,
the
CEO
at
Frasier,
three-fifty
punkah
place
thanks.
I,
want
to
say,
thanks
to
all
the
city
departments,
for
our
13
building
permits
our
prairies
building
opened
on
January
6th,
we're
almost
done
with
all
of
our
building.
By
the
end
of
March,
we
will
have
a
population
on
our
campus
of
about
500
individuals.
T
We
call
our
building
our
newest
residential
building,
the
prairies
building
and
for
your
information
it's
built
on
stilts,
because
we
are
still
in
the
high
hazard
floodplain
Fraser
spent.
While
we
were
doing
all
of
this
project,
2.1
million
dollars
of
our
own
money
to
build
a
flood
wall
around
our
campus
to
help
some
bring
some
measure
of
safety
to
the
residents
who
live
here.
Sadly,
the
residents
in
the
neighborhood
surrounding
Fraser
don't
have
that
same
security.
It
does
not
cover
the
meadows.
T
Neighborhood
I
wanted
to
share
the
sign
that
we
receive
from
the
city
with
the
requirement
that
we
post
it
now
at
the
completion
of
our
project,
at
our
thirteen
different
doors
on
their
property.
My
guess,
as
many
of
you
haven't
seen
this
sign
and
I'm
going
to
read
you
what
the
sign
says
it
says
notice.
This
property
is
in
an
area
subject
to
sudden
flooding
in
case
of
flood
emergency,
be
prepared
to
seek
high
ground
immediately
for
information.
Go
to.
U
Good
evening
Council
hi,
my
name
is
Chris
Allred
and
I'm
commenting
for
Rocky
Mountain
peace
and
justice
center
welcome
and
congratulations
to
the
new
council
members
also
to
reelected
council
members.
First
I
would
like
to
say
that
we
stand
in
solidarity
with
Evan
Ravitz
and
we
ask
that
the
council
please
make
sure
that
the
voter
approved
online
petition
system
is
implemented,
also
I'm
here
to
talk
about
Rocky
Flats,
the
former
nuclear
weapons
plant.
U
This
relates
to
the
Boulder
City
Council's
decision
of
whether
or
not
to
continue
participation
in
the
Rocky
Mountain
Greenway,
the
Rocky
Mountain
Greenway
is
a
mountain
bike.
Trail
proposed
to
traverse
radioactive
contaminated
ground
at
Rocky
Flats
in
2016,
Boulder
City
Council
authorized
$200,000
to
go
towards
a
federal
grant
for
this
project
and
that
funding
included
the
condition
of
soil
sampling
in
the
area.
This
was
along
with
six
other
local
governments.
U
We
have
learned
more
about
the
contamination
at
Rocky
Flats
through
this
sampling
in
recent
years
and
in
August
of
2019
there
was
a
record
high
reading
of
264
Pico
Curie's
per
gram
reading
of
plutonium.
There
are
many
other
radioactive
contaminants
at
Rocky
Flats,
including
uranium
americium,
beryllium
radioactive
lead.
Also,
dr.
Keller,
a
PhD
chemist,
published
a
study
in
September
regarding
hot
particles
of
plutonium
dioxide.
U
V
This
this
memo
is
very
complete.
It's
very
detailed
and
I
hope
you
all
read
it.
They
did
a
very
professional
job
in
all
the
aspects,
how
this
falls
into
the
historic
preservation,
ordinance
and
many
of
us.
My
neighbors
will
be
here
on
March
3rd
and
we
all
live
in
a
historic
neighborhood
with
historic
homes
that
were
built
by
professors
and
presidents
of
Cu,
and
this
is
an
important
issue
and
thanks
for
your
time
and
we'll
see
you
March
3rd
with
many
more
people.
Thank
you.
Thank.
F
All
right,
Elizabeth,
hahndorf,
4th
Street
Boulder
Colorado
for
since
the
70s
anyway,
well
I'm
part
of
the
Rocky
Flats
group
too,
and
I
I
was
going
to
speak
about
something
else.
But
I
find
this
view
way
more
important
and
I'm
asking
that
we
come
up
with
an
idea
to
collaborate
with
other
cities
to
put
warning
signs
and
historical
perspective
signs
around
the
Rocky
Flats
areas.
F
Newcomers
are
coming
here
on
bikes
and
they
don't
know
where
it
is.
There's
really,
no
definition.
It
doesn't
clear,
hazardous
warning
and
I.
Think
a
historical
perspective,
like
you
see
in
Yellowstone
about
the
Buffaloes
would
be
great
about.
This
is
a
site
where
you
know
nuclear
plant,
exploded,
etc,
etc.
I
have
some
relatives
that
came.
He
have
immigrated
here
and
they've
got
their
kids
and
they're
riding
all
over
asking
me.
Where
is
Rocky
Flats?
Some
people
think
it's
just
you
know
to
the
east
of
Broadway
well
or
whatever
93.
Well,
it's
not
it's
all.
F
F
People
should
be
given
and
notification
of
the
danger
and
the
current
signs
that
are,
there
now
just
say:
anti
Rocky
Flats
and
an
animal
refuge.
Well,
if
I
were
a
bicyclist
or
a
tourist,
I'd
want
to
be
on
that,
and
so
it's
it's
just
really
disrespective
and
I'm
hoping
we
can
put
this
together.
Thank
you.
Thank.
W
Yeah
and
and
that
$200,000
that
we
spent
you
know
that
was
contingent
upon
the
soil
analysis.
First
now,
if
you
Sam
come
to
April,
6
I
think
Michael
Kettering
is
going
to
give
a
presentation
that
you
would
find
quite
impressive.
It's
amazing
I
want
to
see
it
a
number
of
times
about
all
the
different
suspended
particles
and
their
decay
rates
and
a
lot
of
stuff
that
plutonium
is
not
stuff.
W
You
want
to
mess
with
now
what
I
wanted
to
bring
up
tonight
and
was
something
else,
but
I'm
gonna
be
gone
in
Sun
Valley
with
my
baby,
the
baby
that
says
no
skiing
in
Sun
Valley
next
week,
so
I
can't
be
here,
but
for
the
south
boulder
floodplain,
we
don't
need
see
you
any
bigger
here.
See
use
expansion
is
not
boulders.
Responsibility,
see
see
you
north
see.
W
You
south
see
you
in
the
middle,
see
you
in
Longmont,
that's
what
I
say,
see
you
there
SCE
and
Longmont
I
know
some
folks
there
that
really
would
like
the
campus
there.
So
condemnation
just
say
just
like
municipal
ization,
say
just
say:
condemnation.
This
land
was
had
very
shifty
ways
in
which
it
was
arrived
at.
In
the
first
place,
five
million
dollar
deal
with
the
Flatirons
gravel
company,
I,
don't
feel
terribly
sorry
for
you
see
you
and
I
love,
see
you
I'm
up
there.
Today,
I
was
at
the
Holocaust
laughs
that
I'm
taking
and
stuff.
W
So
what
I
wanted
to
also
say
is
I
want
a
new
climate,
integrated
services
department,
that's
heading
up
our
whole
city
and
has
all
the
other
departments,
transportation,
planning,
long
and
short
range
building
and
services,
development,
open
space
and
Joe
Cataloochee
and
Jonathan
Cohen
heading
this
dual
directorship.
We
need
somebody
watching
from
the
aerial
perspective
on
Boulder
on
how
how
we
design
the
rest
of
our
urban.
Thank
you
then
plan
to
the
very
end.
Michelle.
X
Just
yesterday,
I
learned
that
the
city
of
voter
is
trying
to
remove
citizen
protections
from
the
police
by
removing
the
ability
to
claim
self-defense
when
an
officer
uses
excessive
force,
as
well
as
we're
moving
the
eight
foot
to
film
law
allowing
Boulder
PD
to
dictate
how
far
away
you
need
to
stand
from
them
at
all
times.
I
want
y'all
to
know
that
on
my
person,
I
happen
to
have
some
some
documentation.
It's
footage.
X
Just
today,
I
spoke
with
your
head
detective
to
heal
you
of
your
Police
Department
I
also
learned
that
Pat
Wright
whiten
is
no
longer
in
your
complaints.
Department
in
your
ethics
department
gave
me
big
and
good
hope,
because
I
have
high
end
high
hopes
for
a
change
with
officer
McNiven
who
I
understand
is
now
there
and
I
was
referred
by
Trujillo
back
to
the
complaint
department
to
file.
My
formal
thing,
I've
already
won
in
the
court
of
law
in
front
of
a
pair
of
I,
mean
in
front
of
a
jury.
X
Six
of
my
peers
in
Boulder,
as
residents
I,
was
deemed
not
guilty
by
reason
of
self-defense.
It's
not
like
innocent
or
guilty
had
I
not
had
the
ability
to
have
access
and
there's
also
an
audio
recording
on
this
of
an
officer,
Lola
Tai
who's,
quite
high
on
the
controversy
list
who
another
one
of
our
very
prominent
citizens
spoke
earlier
tonight.
Mr.
samuel
is
defending
himself
from
also,
but
right
now,
I
need
a
lawyer.
I'm
on
my
civil
part,
I
was
told.
A
Y
I
will
respond
to
an
item,
that's
actually
on
the
consent:
calendar
891,
12
Street,
the
mark
known
as
the
Marfa
house.
So
there
has
been
a
change
today
in
the
direction,
so
the
property
owner
owner
John,
Kirkland
and
the
applicant
historic
Boulder
have
agreed
to
an
extension
of
the
100-day
period
for
the
City
Council
to
hold
a
public
hearing
to
an
additional
60
days,
which
would
extend
it
to
may
5th
for
a
second
hearing.
Y
What
this
extension
would
do
it's
intended
to
provide
time
for
the
applicant
to
get
feedback
on
the
proposed
exterior
changes
to
the
property
through
the
landmark
design
review
process
to
the
property
prior
to
the
designation
hearing.
So
just
wanted
to
provide
counsel
with
that
update
prior
to
the
consent.
Calendar,
okay,.
E
Z
I
can
respond
to
some
of
the
comments
about
the
changes
to
the
Criminal
Code.
If
you
prefer
me
to
do
it
now
or
I
could
do
it
later
would
go
ahead
now.
Okay,
so
I
think
there's
a
misunderstanding
of
the
changes
that
we're
making.
First
of
all,
no
defense
is
being
removed
at
all
the
same
defenses
that
were
there
before.
Are
there
now
the
section
that
that
people
have
talked
about
says
it's
not
a
defense
to
so
and
that's
that's
not
being
removed,
it's
being
rewarded
to
conform
to
state
law.
Z
The
essential
language
is
in
the
same.
We
do
recommend
removing
subsection
B.
Now
the
way
this
this
code
section
is
set
up
subsection,
a
parallel,
stable
law
with
different
words,
and
it
basically
says
that
to
prove
self
to
prove
obstruction.
We
have
to
show
that
someone
intentionally
interfered
with
the
operations
of
an
officer.
Subsection
B
is
a
session,
that's
unique
to
Boulder,
and
it
says
that
it's
a
criminal
offence
to
disobey
an
order
of
an
officer
to
step
back
8
feet.
It
doesn't
provide
any
protection.
Z
It
gives
us
the
ability
to
charge
that
what
we're
suggesting
is
that
we
removed
the
ability
to
charge
that
that
we
we
stopped.
We
we
don't
no
longer
allow
officers
to
issue
in
order
to
step
back
8
feet
and
make
failure
to
comply
obstruction.
You
know
the
only
obstruction
we
would
be
able
to
charge
would
be
under
subsection,
a
which
would
be
identical
to
state
law
and
which
would
require
proof
of
intentional
interference.
Z
So
our
view
is
that
this
is
more
protective
of
the
public
and
the
reason
and
I
I
apologize.
We
did
not
do
a
great
job
of
explaining
this
in
the
memo
and
I
will
improve
that
language
in
the
second
reading.
Memo
I
promise,
but
there
has
been
misunderstandings
and
ambiguity
and
clearly
by
some
of
the
discussion,
we've
heard
just
a
misunderstanding
of
what
that
section.
Does
it's
difficult
for
folks
to
understand
what
step
back
8
feet
means?
Z
What
8
feet
is
what
for
an
officer
in
the
middle
of
a
confrontation,
to
try
to
measure
off
8
feet
and
4
under
people
understand
that
if
they
step
there
are
9
feet
away,
they're!
Ok,
if
they're
8
feet
they're,
not
as
a
policy,
we
do
not
charge
people
for
filming.
We
do
not
interfere
with
people
observing
it's
only
when
people
interfere
with
the
actual
arrest
that
it
becomes
a
problem.
Z
So,
as
I
said,
I
think
we
can
do
a
better
job
of
explaining.
All
of
this.
You
may
recall
that
last
summer
there
was
of
some
news
about
a
case
where
a
woman
was
ordered
to
step
back,
didn't
an
officer
shoved
her
and
we
got
sued
she
in
her
complaint.
She
said
she
was
within
8.
She
was
no
no
closer
than
8
feet.
Z
We
were
able
to
demonstrate
that
she
was
within
2
feet
because
we
had
21
body
cameras
and
last
week
the
court
dismissed
that
complaint,
but
the
the
ambiguity
in
in
that
whole
thing
the
belief
by
her
lawyers
that
somehow
being
8
feet
out
was
a
defense
from
her
interfering.
Just
wasn't
true.
Under
our
code,
it
created
confusion
and
ambiguity
and
as
I
say,
because
it
was
an
alternative
charge
it
and
the
grounds
on
which
people
could
be
charged
and
we're
suggesting
removing
it.
G
E
I
was
gonna,
bring
this
up
in
her
consent,
but
since
we're
talking
about
it,
thanks
for
that
Tom,
so
I
for
second
reading,
if
I
could
ask
like
one
of
the
things
I've
was
missing
in
this
first
reading.
Memo
was
what
the
previous
language
was.
Yes,
I
mean
you
could
look
it
up
in
the
code
right,
but
if,
for
a
second
reading,
we
could
see
what
the
previous
language
was,
in
contrast
the
the
new
language,
and
then
it
really
explained
how
real
world
situations
would
be
handled
differently.
E
Based
on
these
changes,
and
so
I
know
that
one
of
the
things
that
people
are
concerned
about
is
that,
under
the
new
language,
potentially
someone
would
could
legally
be
asked
to
remove
themselves
to
a
distance
from
which
they
could
no
longer
see
what
was
occurring
right,
and
so
people
feel
that
by
stating
8
feet,
that
gives
you
some
ability
to
stay
close
enough
to
kind
of
keep
an
eye
on
things
right.
So
if
you
could
address
or
how
that
would
change
with
this
language,
and
maybe
if
there
any
alternatives
or
well.
Z
Everything,
if
counsel,
wanted
to
add
a
defense,
that
it's
you're
not
interfering
if
you're
8
feet
away,
that
would
that
would
actually
accomplish
what
people
want
seem
to
want
in
these
comments
which,
which
is
not
what
currently
okay,
it's
not
a
defense
to
be
standing
eight
feet
away,
although
be
hard
to
interfere
to
violate
subsection
a
if
you're
eight
feet
away.
Yes,.
Z
AA
Clarifying
questions
on
the
consent
agenda
as
we
roll
into
that
two
questions.
One
is
so
with
respect
to
item
I,
which
is
marpa
house.
What
I
think
you're
asking
us
to
do
is
is
to
set
it
up
on
first
reading
to
approve
it
on
first
reading,
so
it's
teed
up.
We
do.
You
were
just
letting
us
know
that
the
hearing
no
longer
will
be
March
3rd
it'll
be
sometime
later
on.
Is
that
right?
That's.
AA
Z
There's
an
obvious
choice
for
counsel
I
would
suggest
pass
both
great
thanks.
Yeah,
you
haven't
had
a
chance
to
discuss
it
great.
Thank
you
and
may
I
also
add
I'm.
Sorry,
honesty.
It
may
also
add,
with
respect
to
the
comments
about
online
petition
and
just
again
a
reminder
that
we'll
do
an
a
full
update
at
the
next
council
meeting
on
full
council
meeting
on
March
3rd
mm-hmm.
E
So
had
a
couple
more
on
consent,
so
just
on
back
to
item
K
house
had
a
question
about
the
parking
of
campers.
There
was
a
language
in
there
that
says
that
you
have
up
to
48
hours
of
active
where
you
were
doing
active
loading
or
unloading.
I
was
just
wondering
how
we
define
active
loading
and
unloading,
because
you
assume,
if
it's
there
48
hours
there
are
hours
in
the
middle
tonight
where
nobody's
doing
anything
right.
So
is
there
an
official
definition
of
sort
of
that.
E
The
part
of
the
change
is
to
add
emergency,
responders
and
volunteers
to
the
kind
of
protected
categories
and
the
emergency
responders
made
total
sense
to
me.
I
didn't
see
a
clear
definition
of
volunteer
okay
in
the
language,
so
I,
which
seemed
like
it
could
matter
without
how
high
a
bar
there
is
for
interfering
with
a
volunteer.
So
if
we
could
get
that.
E
AB
Z
Z
Z
Sam
kind
of
makes
it
ask
one
more
question
before
you,
so
you
may
recall
it.
The
retreat
bob
raised
the
question
about
parking
trailers
for
72
hours.
We
provided
in
there
an
alternative
so
right
now
anybody
can
park
for
as
long
as
they
they
need
if
they
get
a
right-of-way
permit
and
so
contractors
do
that.
So
we've
kind
of
expanded
that
language
a
little
bit
in
the
proposed
ordinance.
Z
We
did
provide
an
alternative
amendment
which
you
can
also
consider
a
second
reading,
or
you
can
do
that,
which
just
makes
it
legal
for
persons
who
are
working
at
a
reson
to
park
a
trailer
necessary
for
their
work
for
70
up
to
72
hours.
So
it
expands
that
I
think
it
addresses
the
concern
that
some
community
members
raised
to
Bob.
But
if
you
want
to
give
me
guidance
tonight
great,
if
not
we
what
you
want
to
leave
the
second
reading,
we
can
do
it
deal
with
it.
Then.
AA
AA
I'll
guess
I'll
state,
my
preference
I
know
the
alternative
would
be
a
permit.
It
just
seems
like
a
little
bit
of
work
for
them
a
landscaper
to
have
to
come
to
the
office
and
apply
for
a
permit
and
pay
whatever
fee
we
might
impose
and
so
on
so
forth,
site.
I
guess
I'd
suggests
a
72
hours
for
landscaping,
trailers,
which
is
consistent
with
our
rules
on
cars,
which
it
calls
to
be
in
the
same
place
for
72
hours,
yeah
I,
don't
know.
If
council
members
have
strong
feelings
on
that
I.
Z
D
D
E
I
just
have
a
couple
of
questions
for
staff
I'm,
not
to
call
it
up
I'm,
so
Karl's
hogging.
To
maybe
ask
you
questions
about
things
that
happen
long
before
you
got
here
with
me.
I
see
carrot
there
as
well.
So
it's
my
fundamental
question
is:
why
is
the?
Why
are
we
stopping
in
a
sumac
like
you're,
because
Crestview
is
just
to
the
north
of
there
right,
yeah
and
I
know
that
the
you
know:
I
live
in
this
part
of
town.
I
know
the
character
changes
a
fair
amount
north
of
violet.
E
AC
AD
Good
evening,
Garrett
Slater
principal
transportation
engineer,
and
so
the
the
reason
that
the
scope
of
the
project
goes
from
Norwood
to
sumac.
It
was
a
strong
desire
from
area
residents
around
Crestview
to
improve
the
potential
pedestrian
facilities
to
the
crossing,
a
sumac
to
get
access
better
access
to
Crestview
Elementary.
AD
A
secondary
reason
was
that
we
pursued
additional
grant
funding
through
the
Colorado
Department
of
Transportation,
safe
routes
to
school
program
that
had
limited
amounts
of
funding,
and
so
we
had
to
bracket
put
brackets
around
a
project
that
we
thought
would
fit
within
the
budget
context
available
within
that
grant
program.
And
so
then
the
an
additional
tertiary
reason
would
be
that
we
were
aware
that
the
utilities
the
department
was
interested
in
carrying
forward
for
Mile
Canyon
improvement
projects
underneath
19th
Street,
and
that
is
in
fact
a
project.
AD
E
Yeah
thanks
for
that
answers
today.
Do
we
know
I
know
that
that
underpass
under
19th
Street
is
coming
eventually.
So
will
that
also
include
then
street
side
treatments
to
bring
it
into
will
have
exactly
the
same
kinds
of
treatments
that
you're,
including
south
of
sumac?
Yes,
it
will
it's
great
to
hear
so
then
the
request
that
I
would
make
is
I
mean
you
really
do
have
a
block
gap
there
and
I
know
any
number
of
kids
that
are
traveling
south
on
19th
Street,
to
get
to
Crestview
and
also
to
centennial
late.
E
AD
We
can
certainly
put
that
project
into
the
prioritization
effort
that
we
go
through
every
year
for
sidewalks
of
missing
links.
One
of
their
key
reasons,
this
19th
Street
project
came
to
the
top
of
a
project
we
want
to
implement
is
because,
for
a
number
of
years,
through
our
missing
link
sidewalk
program,
it
was
the
number
one
project
we
wanted
to
get
to
work
on,
and
so
every
years
we
go
through
the
privatization.
AD
E
That
and
I
guess
you
know
there
would
be
a
pretty
big
opportunity
when
the
underpass
is
going
in
and
there
are
other
improvements
being
constructed
like
if
you
were
able
to
find
the
funding
to
do
that.
One
extra
block
at
that
time
it
seemed
like
there'd,
be
a
big
synergy
there.
So
I
just
you
know,
really
put
that
request
out
there
to
see.
E
AD
So
I
understand
the
frustration
at
taking
the
length
of
time
that
it
does
to
get
a
project
to
this
point.
There
are
two
very
obvious
explanations
that
I
can
provide
to
us.
Some
of
that,
and
one
is
that
the
initial
grant
award
we
received
from
the
state
was
a
whopping
$75,000
which,
on
a
1.5
million
dollar
project,
didn't
go
very
far,
but
they
said
be
patient,
wait
another
year
and
we'll
have
more
and
they
did
and
they
said
and
I
still
wasn't
quite
enough,
and
so
they
said
wait
one
more
year
and
we'll
have
more.
AD
So
we
waited
for
the
grant
funding
to
build
up
over
a
two
to
three
year
time
span,
and
then
we
once
we
realized,
we
had
enough
funding
for
the
project
to
actually
advance.
Then
we
began
work
on
the
planning
and
the
Public
Engagement
effort,
and
we
thought
that
we
had
a
design
that
was
going
to
work
in
terms
of
the
floodplain
permitting,
and
then
we
were
surprised
to
learn
that
we
we
didn't,
have
a
design
that
was
fully
compliant
with
the
floodplain.
Because
of
all
that
happened
in
2013.
AD
One
of
the
top
priorities
of
this
project
is
making
sure
that
we
don't
make
things
worse
if
anything
we'd
like
to
try
to
make
them
better,
and
so
we've
spent
a
lot
of
time
really
studying
the
flood
issue
over
the
last
year
to
make
sure
that
we've
got
a
solution.
That's
going
to
work
for
the
projects
as
well
as
adjacent
residents
and
stakeholders.
That
makes
a
lot
of
sense.
Q
Welcome
to
the
pain
of
floods,
delaying
things
I
had
a
question
I'm,
not
sure
who
it's
for,
but
we're
looking
at
alternative
four
as
the
preferred
option,
and
it
talks
about
a
painted
buffer
and
I
just
wanted
to
figure
out.
Is
that
really
just
paint
or
is
it
a
buffer
that
is
painted?
Is
there
like
a
physical
separation
so.
AD
Q
AD
One
of
the
additional
challenges
is
that
because
a
significant
portion
of
19th
Street
resides
in
the
Wunderland
Creek
floodplain,
no
matter
what
we
do
in
terms
of
bicycle
infrastructure
and
in
the
Wunderland
Creek
plain,
but
we
wondered
Creek
floodplain
that
will
need
to
be
a
standard
bike
lane,
because
pushing
it
out
to
accommodate
buffered
or
protected
facilities
would
not
be
something
we
could
get
permitted
within
our
floodplain
regulations.
R
AE
So
you're,
anticipating
a
three
million
dollar
expenditure
from
transportation
funds.
To
do
this
correct
I
will
tell
you
one
disappointment:
I
act,
I
read
this
I
read
the
memo
and
I
went
back
to
the
earlier
memo
and
I
saw
unless
I
was
miss.
Reading
and
I
saw
one
line
articulating
what
the
costs
are.
Gonna
be
I
generally
like
to
know
a
little
more.
E
AC
About
the
protected
bike
lanes,
we
can
follow
up
on
that.
There's
more
history
there
than
we
can
give
you
in
the
15
minutes
be
happy
to
that
concert.
Wallach.
We
will
follow
up.
We
have
more
detailed
estimates.
If
you
have
insomnia,
we
can
provide
you
spreadsheets
fo,
and
we
have
to
report
those
it's
our
job
to
be
transparent
about
the
cost
of
these
projects.
One
of
the
things
that
we'll
do
moving
ahead
and
we
get
the
sharper
pencil
is
get
more
detail
on
those.
A
AF
AF
So
in
doing
a
little
bit
of
research
and
understanding
a
little
bit
more
of
the
history,
the
medium
density
overlay
zone
actually
was
created
back
in
1995,
and
this
is
the
map
that
showed
all
of
the
different
geographic
areas.
So
all
of
the
solid
black
areas
on
the
map
are
the
areas
that
we
created
this
medium
density
overlay
zone
for,
and
it
was
in
response,
after
a
development
moratorium
in
some
of
these
areas
to
respond
to
really
changes
in
neighborhood
characteristics
that
were
resulting
in
undesired
outcomes.
AF
You'll
see
there's
several
areas
on
the
map
here
circled
in
red,
then,
following
that
the
city
undertook
a
comprehensive
rezoning
process
in
1997
and
weary
zoned.
Those
geographic
areas
to
a
new
zoning
district
and
the
medium
density
overlay
zone
was
removed
from
those
areas.
So
the
result
of
that
now
is.
There
are
four
areas
in
the
city
that
still
have
this
medium
density
overlay
zone
and
what
an
overlay
zone
is
is.
It
is
an
additional
set
of
regulations
that
overlay
on
top
of
the
existing
base,
zoning
district
that
add
additional
regulations
or
have
additional
restrictions.
AF
So
we
have
other
overlay
zones
in
the
city
like
our
floodplain
regulations
or
right
now
we
have
an
overlay
zone
in
the
area
of
the
opportunity
zone.
The
medium
density
overlay
zone,
essentially
the
the
simplified
version
of
what
it
does
is
it
restricts
any
new
construction
on
any
lot
within
the
overlay
zone
to
a
single-family
residential
structure,
even
if
the
underlying
zoning
allows
for
a
multi-family
residential
structure.
AF
So
the
request
and
the
NADA
five
that
council
gave
was
to
explore
removing
the
overlay
zone
on
University
Hill,
and
so
this
stretches
from
baseline
on
the
South
Aurora
on
the
north
17th
Street
to
19th
Street.
So
that's
the
geographic
area.
It
has
medium
density
residential
to
zoning
as
the
underlying
zoning
I'm
in
the
area,
but
then
has
the
overlay
zone
on
top
of
it,
so
we
dug
into
understanding.
Well
what
would
it
mean
if
we
were
to
remove
this
overlay
zone
from
this
area?
AF
What
would
be
the
outcome
or
result,
and
so
what
we
began
doing
is
looking
at
well,
how
many
properties
are
in
this
area?
There's
a
hundred
and
thirty-two
properties
within
this
geographic
area
and
right
now,
there's
208
housing
units
on
those
properties.
So
a
lot
of
the
properties
are
already
a
multi-family
residential.
AF
The
reason
that
this
project
started
was
spurred
by
the
property
that
has
the
star
on
it,
which
is
a
large
parcel
that
had
a
duplex
on
it
that
burned
down.
Based
on
the
existing
zoning,
you
could
build
a
triplex
there
with
this
overlay
zone.
You
can
only
build
a
single-family
home,
the
Lots
large
enough
that
you
could
subdivide
it
into
two
Lots
and
build
two
single-family
homes.
What
the
property
owner
was
expecting
to
be
able
to
do
is
build
a
triplex,
which
is
what
the
underlying
zoning
rm2
would
allow.
AF
So
then
the
next
question
is
well
how
many
dwelling
units
are
on
each
of
those
properties
and
how
many
are
left
that
could
potentially
have
additional
development,
and
the
answer
to
that
question
for
four
properties
could
have
additional
development
for
a
total
of
six
additional
dwelling
units.
When
we
presented
this
item
to
the
Planning
Board,
one
of
the
things
they
pointed
out
is
we
said
six
additional
units
based
on
what's
out
there
today.
You
could
actually
build
two
units
on
that
large
parcel
on
18th
Street
756.
AF
So
it's
really
only
the
potential
is
really
only
about
four
dwelling
units.
We
represented
the
information
as
the
as
exists
on
the
ground
today.
So
if
we
look
at
the
detail
of
that,
you
can
see
the
starting
on
the
left-hand
side
of
the
screen
that
the
756
18th
Street
property,
currently
there's
zero
dwelling
units,
there's
the
potential
right
now
that
you
could
build
if
we
remove
the
irregular
could
build
3
or
+1
based
on
the
existing
zoning
and
then
there's
another
property
on
17th,
Street
and
19th
Street.
AF
That
has
one
dwelling
unit
that
theoretically
they
could
add
one
more
based
on
the
zoning
and
then
one
that
is
currently
a
duplex
where
you
could
add
one
additional
unit,
whether
those
units
would
actually
get
constructed.
There's
a
whole
lot
more
detail
that
a
property
owner
would
need
to
go
through,
so
whether
these
units
are
actually
constructed
or
not
would
require
a
bunch
more
analysis.
AF
We
presented
this
item
to
the
Planning
Board
and
the
Planning
Board
recommended
6
to
1,
to
approve
elimination
of
the
medium
density
overlay
zone
for
University
Hill,
and
so
the
staff
recommendation
is
for
council
to
approve
ordinance.
83
80
adopting
this
change
and
we're
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
AE
Couple
of
questions
actually
in
1995,
the
rationale
in
the
statute
for
imposing
the
zone
was
that
development
has
been
very
disruptive
of
the
think.
Character
of
the
of
the
areas
has
failed
to
preserve
certain
historic
structures
has
led
to
many
inappropriate
structures
being
erected,
and
us
has
negatively
affected
the
value
of
adjoining
properties
of
those
considerations
as
a
drove
you
that
they
have
all
been
met.
AE
AE
AF
Actually,
it's
pretty
uncommon
that
we
bring
forward
zoning
changes
every
once
in
a
while.
It
does
happen
in
this
case.
It
was
a
request
from
that
property
owner
to
council
to
look
at
this
overlay
zone
and
whether
it
was
still
necessary
or
not,
and
at
the
time
that
the
not
a
five
discussion
happened
with
council.
AF
There
was
also
a
lot
of
conversation
about
the
mix
of
housing
units
that
we
want
in
the
community,
and
that
was
part
of
what,
when
we
did
our
analysis
in
looking
at
balancing
both
a
desire
for
preservation
of
neighborhood
character,
as
well
as
recognition
of
wanting
a
mixture
of
housing
unit
types
in
the
city.
That
was
part
of
our
rationale
of
why
we
recommended,
in
this
case
elimination
of
of
this
overlay
zone
and
will.
AF
AF
A
E
AG
We've
been
working
on
trying
to
use
land
use
to
solve
some
of
the
multiple
issues
we
have
on
the
hill.
In
January,
the
University
Hill
neighborhood
associations,
executive
committee
presented
Planning
Board
with
a
proposal
to
amend
the
medium-density
overlay
zone
in
a
way
that
would
offer
the
owner
of
seven
five
six
18th
Street
the
ability
to
build
a
triplex,
but
would
require
that
the
extra
unit
he
wants
to
build
be
permanently
affordable.
AG
The
proliferation
of
expensive
student
Reynolds
has
seriously
affected
diversity
on
the
hill
faculty
and
staff
can
no
longer
afford
to
rent
or
buy
on
the
hill
and
graduate
students
trying
to
support
families
on
a
teaching
or
research
assistants.
Salary
have
been
shut
out
of
a
neighborhood
that
could
offer
them
two
excellent
public
schools
for
their
children
and
the
ability
to
walk
to
campus.
AG
Although
undergraduates
with
need-based
financial
aid
deserve
till
two
with
it
to
live
within,
walking
distance
of
their
classes,
libraries
and
labs
exorbitant
rents
forced
many
of
them
to
commute
long
hours
by
bus
or
car.
As
a
result,
this
prime
location
is
filled
primarily
with
students
who
can
afford
$1400
a
month
for
a
bedroom
and
are
often
more
interested
in
partying
than
studying.
We
believe
the
city's
planning
process
can
be
used
to
address
equity
issues
for
faculty
staff
and
students
and
to
make
the
hill
more
environmentally,
socially
and
financially
sustainable.
AG
Several
members
of
the
Planning
Board
were
very
frustrated
by
the
fact
that
the
overlay
ordinance
was
passed
25
years
ago
with
the
intention
that
it
be
lifted
once
new
residential
guidelines
were
introduced,
but
the
guidelines
for
this
area
were
never
developed.
We
have
different
issues
now
than
in
those
blocks
than
we
had
when
it
was
more
families.
Now
it's
student
rentals,
and
these
will
never
be
sold
these
the
units
that
the
the
developer
already
said.
He
we
its
student
rentals.
AG
So
if
you
left
what
we
would
really
like
our
design
guidelines
that
would
help
to
control
this.
This
whole
area
is
just
ripe
for
redevelopment.
Everyone
in
all
of
the
landlord's
are
going
for
high-end,
really
expensive
student
housing,
because
that's
what
they
can
make
the
most
money
on.
It's
completely
disrupting
any
kind
of
balance
in
the
neighborhood,
and
if
you
lift
the
overlay
zone
with
nothing
in
place
to
ensure
the
redevelopment
is
not
designed
piecemeal.
AG
With
no
thought
for
the
particular
problems
associated
with
dense
student
housing
or
for
social
and
economic
diversity
on
the
hill,
you
will
contribute
directly
to
the
current
degradation
of
our
neighborhood
and
I
would
caution
you
I
know
the
Planning.
Board
was
really
like.
Oh
my
god,
this
is
so
few
units.
Let's
just
not
worry
about
it,
but
the
real
question
is
what
happens
when
all
these
things
are
tore
down
so
and
redeveloped?
Thank
you.
W
W
The
impact
of
see
you
long
ago
over
and
their
benefit
to
the
city
of
Boulder
we
need
to
put
on
the
brakes.
That's
what's
going
to
lower
housing
costs
in
Boulder,
and
if
people
can't
deal
with
it
here,
they
go
out
and
build
another
model
community
with
a
blue
line
around
it,
because
we
don't
grow
too
big
for
our
carrying
capacity
in
Boulder.
AH
Good
evening
Tim
Hellman,
1429,
North
Street
I've,
come
to
learn
then
I
actually
reside
in
an
area
that's
affected
by
an
overlay
zone
and
I've
done
a
little
bit
of
homework
and
trying
to
catch
up
on
it
and
I
hadn't
realized
that
city
staff
was
so
actively
pursuing
and
kind
of
reviewing
every
assessment
of
areas
that
are
currently
within
the
overlay
zone
and
it
food-for-thought
for
you
all
I'm
in
an
area.
That's
not
under
consideration
with
this
by
understanding
housing
shortages
and
needs.
AH
We
have
particularly
around
areas
where
we
have
an
opportunity
to
get
folks
to
do
alternative
modes
shouldn't
be
alternative
anymore,
but
walk
and
bike
to
get
places.
You
saw
there's
only
a
couple
areas
left
in
Boulder
that
are
impacted
by
these
overlay
zones.
We've
only
talking
about
a
couple
of
residences
remaining
that
haven't
already
gone
from
a
single-family
dwelling
unit
to
something
else.
AH
So
assuming
you
wanted
to
make
housing
available
to
others
in
a
a
unit
that
would
be
less
than
the
neighboring
single-family
home.
This
overlay
zone
is
restricting
our
ability
to
before
provide
housing
to
cut
our
residents
that
could
be
residing
in
areas
where
they
could
be
walking
biking
the
whole
redevelopment
around
the
hospital.
These
other
overlay
zones
along
Broadway,
it'll,
come
up
again.
I
would
save.
Consider
removing
the
overlay,
sighs
I,
think
it's
a
good
idea
for
the
neighborhoods.
So
thanks
a
lot
for
his
time.
Good
luck.
Thank.
E
You
don't
mind
if
I
star
in
this,
because
I
brought
this
forward
last
year
for
the
knot
of
five,
and
you
know
it
was
prompted
by
this
specific
situation
on
this
one
parcel
where
there's
a
duplex
that
had
burned
down
and
the
owner
thought
well.
I
could
put
up
another
duplex
in
place
of
it.
Oh
actually
there's
room
for
triplex
and
then
came
forward
to
the
city
after
getting
quite
far
into
the
process
and
was
told.
Actually
you
can't
build
a
multi-family
camp
housing
here
because
of
the
overlay
zone
and
just
for
a
city.
E
That's
in
a
crisis
with
a
lack
of
housing.
It
seemed
to
me
unfortunate
that
we
would
instead
require
this
person
to
build
one
or
two
very
large
expensive
homes,
rather
than
triplex,
which
could
provide
some
additional
housing
at
a
lower
price
point.
And
then,
when
Chris
and
his
team
did
the
analysis,
the
effects
in
the
larger
area
were
very
minimal
might
have
a
little
bit
of
additional
change
over
the
long
term
with
those
couple
three
additional
parcels
but
which
you
know
could
result
in
some
other
positive
outcomes.
AE
AF
A
great
question
that
I
don't
have
the
numbers
off
the
top
of
my
head.
I
might
need
to
go
and
look
again.
The
way
we
we
calculate
density
on
Lots
in
the
rm2
zoning
district
is
first,
you
have
to
have
at
least
a
minimum
lot
size
and
then
for
every
3,500
square
feet
of
lot
area.
You
can
have
one
dwelling
unit,
and
so
that's
where,
for
this
parcel
they
get
to
the
three
in
terms
of
what's
that
late
in
terms
of
square
footage
based
on
setback,
solar
and
all
of
that
I.
AE
AI
Following
up
on
Aaron's
point
I
just
like
to
remind
everyone
that
we
don't
have
housing
problem,
we
have
in
affordable
housing
problem,
there's
plenty
of
homes
in
Boulder
that
are
underutilized
in
many
ways
and
I
like
to
keep
that
in
mind.
Whenever
we're
having
these
density
conversations,
because
density
doesn't
always
equal
affordability
in
this
instance,
I
would
love
if
the
developer
in
their
heart
of
hearts
decided
that
one
of
these
units
should
be
permanently
affordable
and
proved
that
development
isn't
necessarily
about
maximizing
the
amount
of
income
you
can
have,
but
actually
contributing
something.
A
Q
But
if
we
don't
remove
the
overlay,
there's
there's
no
reason
for
the
developer
to
make
it
affordable,
single-family,
home
or
duplex
right,
so
we're
not
removing
affordability.
As
far
as
I
can
tell,
and
it's
possible
that
there
could
be
some
I
mean
we
have
the
chance
of
affordability
with
the
triplex
or
paying
into
our
inclusionary
zoning
fund.
AA
Respond
to
Adams
my
first
of
all,
head
of
my
hundred
percent
agree
with
you
having
just
come
off
of
three
years
on
the
Boulder
housing
partners
board.
One
of
the
things
I
learned
is
it's
helpful.
To
have
kind
of
a
critical
mass
of
units
to
manage
for
affordable
housing
is
really
difficult
to
have
like
one
unit
of
affordable
housing,
because
you
have
all
sorts
of
requirements
as
far
as
income,
qualifications
and
reports,
and
so
on
and
so
forth
and
and
while
I
agree
with
you
hundred
percent
and
I
would
love
it.
AA
If
this
developer
did
build
one
of
those
units,
or
maybe
all
three
of
them
as
firmly
affordable,
I
think
there's
also
a
practical
challenge
with
somebody
who
doesn't
otherwise
manage
affordable
units
to
manage
one
affordable
unit
because
of
all
the
requirements
I
just
want
to
throw
that
out.
There
is
just
a
practical
frustration
that
I
share
with
you.
AE
AE
E
I
just
totally
respect
being
voting
knowing
it,
but
just
a
point
that
without
this
we
get
no
increased
affordability
either.
Instead,
we
get,
if
you
were
larger
units
that
are
more
expensive.
So
while
you
don't
get
necessarily
permanently
affordable
housing
with
this
change,
you
do
get
smaller
units
at
lower
price
points.
Quick.
AF
If,
based
on
the
parcel
size,
the
property
owner
could
subdivide
the
parcel
and
be
single
from
homes,
whether
an
ad
you
could
go
there
I'd
need
to
look
into
the
details
based
on
the
ATU
regulations,
but
right
now
you
could
build
either
two
detached
single-family
homes,
or
if
we
remove
this,
then
it
would
be
as
as
Erin
described,
one
structure
with
three
units
in
it
as
a
drive
once
the
ad.
You
would
be.
A
Overlay
zones
are
really
kind
of
mediocre
policy,
generally
speaking,
you'd
rather
have
the
underlying
zone
and
be
what
determines
what
you
can
build,
and
so
I'm
gonna
vote
to
lift
this
just
because
I'm
not
a
huge
fan
of
overlay
zones,
and
it
has
a
relatively
minor
impact
but
positive.
So
that's
where
I'm
gonna
be.
AF
As
a
part
of
this
analysis,
the
the
direction
from
Council
was
just
to
focus
on
this
area
and
University
Hill.
But
if
you
look
at
those
other
geographic
areas,
there's
an
area
in
Grand,
View,
Terrace,
much
of
which
is
now
owned
by
the
University
and
then
the
other
big
area,
as
we
heard
in
testimony
tonight,
is
around
community
Plaza,
an
ideal
Market
area.
So
that
is
something
that
we
could
look
at
as
a
part
of
the
work
plan
in
the
future.
If
counsel
gave
us
that
direction.
G
AJ
I
was
Sam
on
the
overlay
zones
as
policy,
and
this
is
just
removing
part
of
an
overlay
zone
and
I
think
that
if
we
want
it
to
I
didn't
know
that
there
was
an
overlay
zone
right
behind
my
house.
My
house
might
even
be
included,
I,
don't
know,
but
I
live
behind
Tim.
So
that
would
be
something
I
think
consider
when
we
start
looking
at
the
sub
community
plans
is
to
address
overlay
zones
as
we
go
through
that
process
and
it's
four
units
here.
A
lot
of
the
other
properties
already
have
the
maximum.
AI
So
that's
a
major
issue
in
its
own
right
and
even
though
I
don't
like
the
concept
I'd
much
prefer
that
we
get
some
sort
of
money
for
the
affordable
housing
program
out
of
this
instead
of
C,
probably
larger,
probably
less
affordable
units
made
out
of
this
and
again,
this
is
the
difference
between
a
bad
choice
and
a
worse
choice.
It's
really
not
a
whole
lot
to
work
with
in
terms
of
really
getting
towards
our
goals,
so
I'm
a
little
upset.
A
D
L
D
D
AA
E
AK
AK
K
AK
Y
Chief,
so
tonight's
action
is
to
accept
the
fire
master
plan
and
adopt
the
proposed
amendment
to
the
Boulder
Valley
comprehensive
plan,
boulder
fire
rescue
master
plan.
Summary,
that's
a
lot
of
words
and
I
wanted
to
read
those
out
loud,
because
I'm
gonna
give
a
little
bit
of
background
of
master
planning
and
what
the
action
is
tonight.
So
the
picture
that
you
see
on
the
screen
is
the
sustainability
and
resilience
framework.
Y
So
this
guides
the
Boulder
Valley
comprehensive
plan
and,
as
you
see
in
the
middle,
is
Department
or
strategic
master
plan.
So
really
we
are
focusing
on
that
red
highlighted
box
in
the
middle
of
this
diagram
tonight.
So
what
do
master
plans
do
or
what's
the
purpose
of
a
master
plan
it's
to
establish
the
vision
for
future
service
delivery
within
that
department
or
service
area,
and
it
really
acts
as
a
bridge
between
the
comp
plan
and
the
master
plan.
Y
So
it's
a
another
layer
down
and
starts
to
drill
into
more
specifics,
and
we
have
this
framework
in
place
so
that
there's
a
common
language
across
the
city
when
we
are
adopting
these
master
plans
and
the
master
plan
process
is
incredibly
important
for
capital
planning
and
also
I
want
to
say
also
for
operational
budget
purposes,
which
chief
Colorado
will
talk
a
little
bit
about
tonight.
But
the
action
tonight
is
just
the
acceptance
of
this
plan.
Okay
next
slide.
Thank
you.
Y
So,
a
bit
of
background,
the
city
actually
has
what's
called
a
city
plans
and
project
handbook.
The
planning
department
right
now
is
in
the
process
of
updating
that
handbook,
based
on
council
discussion
and
discussion
of
the
financial
strategy
committee
of
how
do
we
really
look
at
master
plans
in
the
in
the
future
and
tie
them
closer
to
the
budget
process
next
slide?
Y
So
that
brings
us
up
to
four
total
updates
and
the
next
year,
half
a
year
and
a
half
or
so,
and
so
that's
why
I
just
want
to
ground
once
again
that
tonight's
action
is
acceptance
of
the
master
plan.
We
will
have
after
acceptance
of
the
master
plan.
Then
we
start
to
go
to
work
of.
How
do
we
incorporate
the
master
plans
within
budget
conversations?
Y
AJ
One
question
regarding
I
was
going
back
and
just
now
in
looking
at
the
open
space
master
plan
and
the
transportation
master
plans
and
within
those
plans
there
are
costs
associated
with
some
of
them
priorities.
I
did
notice
that
this
one
was
different
in
that
it
was
a
very
different
approach
in
terms
of
what
the
priorities
were
and
how
they
were
outlined.
So
I
just
had
a
question
about
how.
AJ
Y
That's
part
of
part
of
the
reason
of
updating
our
handbook
so
that
we
do
have
consistency
across
master
plans.
I'd
actually
like
the
chief
to
touch
on
the
work
that
the
department's
been
doing
looking
at
their
budget
establishing
metrics,
which
has
really
set
them
up
over
the
last
two
years
to
really
have
a
master
plan
that
drills
into
the
metrics.
As
you
had
outlined,
marry
I'll.
AA
AA
So
I
just
want
to
be
clear
that
by
accepting
this
master
plan
or
any
master
plan,
we're
not
adopting
or
committing
ourselves
financially
to
the
things
that
might
be
contemplated
in
that
plan,
it's
it's
a
plan
and
it
certainly
provides
a
roadmap
for
Loic
could
spend
money
on,
and
maybe
internally
prioritization
x'
within
that
department,
but
we're
not
committing
to
spend
money
on
anything
in
particular
that
might
be
called
out
in
the
plan.
That's.
Y
AE
I'm,
actually,
a
little
troubled
by
the
the
process
that
were
engaged
in
I.
Think
when
we
accept
these
master
plans,
we're
creating
a
degree
of
expectation
in
the
community
what
we
can
and
want
to
provide
and
I'm,
not
sure
that
they
that
those
expectations
are
consistent
with
what
we
are
capable
of
providing
I
love,
this
master
plan.
There
is
nothing
in
this
master
plan.
I
don't
want
to
do.
A
So
in
here,
as
well
and
say,
I
get
a
little
confused
by
this
as
well,
because
we're
adopting
goals
but
we're
not
talking
about
how
we're
gonna
get
there.
And
so
you
know,
I,
look
on
page
452,
physically,
constraining
the
action
and
the
vision,
and
we
compare
yourself
to
pure
departments
right,
which
I
think
is
a
very
important
thing
to
do.
It's
benchmarking
yeah
two
thumbs
up
for
that.
But
when
we
look-
and
we
say-
oh
yes,
we
want
to
get
to
the
ALS
Department
with
transport
and
I.
A
Think
that's
the
right
place
to
land
I'm
not
to
get
ahead
of
ourselves.
But
how
do
we
fund
it
and
so
I
guess
I'm
a
little
confused
about
what
the
function
of
the
master
plan
is
versus
the
function
of
budgeting?
And
so
what
would
ask
staff
is?
Are
we
supposed
to
pick
physically
constrain
action
or
vision
when
we
adopt
the
plan
because
I
think
that's
where
we
often
maybe
get
confused?
Is
you
know
if
we
don't
pick
one
of
those,
then
everyone
might
hope
that
we
get
to
the
vision
level,
and
that
would
be
fine.
A
You
know
I
want
us
to
get
there
just
like
mark,
but
I
need
to
know
how
this
intersects
with
the
budgeting
process.
So
we
can
leave
that,
for
you
know
the
physical
working
group
to
tell
us
how
we
should
look
at
our
master
planning
process,
but
I
think
that's
a
real.
You
know
to
Mark's
point
if
we're
setting
expectations
that
we're
not
going
to
meet
or
we're
setting
expectations
that
we're
not
going
to
be
able
to
budget
for
I
think
we're
setting
ourselves
up
for
disappointment.
AA
And
for
those
of
you
who
worked
so
hard
on
this
great
fire
master
plan
realize
that
this
is
a
culmination
of
frustration.
That's
build
up
over
years
has
nothing
to
do
with
this
great
plan.
You
guys
put
together
as
you
the
fact
that
we're
kind
of
struggling
with
what
a
master
plan
he
is,
and
it
should
be
so
nothing
to
do
with
this
great
plan.
Timing.
Y
Q
That's
level
three
versus
one
or
something
like
that.
I
would
like
this
to
be
a
place
where
we
achieve
vision
and
so
I
guess
I'm
I
would
want
to
vote
for
that,
because
I
think
health
and
safety
is
our
top
priority,
and
so
I
don't
understand
what
we're
supposed
to
do
tonight.
If
we
have
to
wait
and
and
stack
everything
up
against
the
others,
the
other
priorities
and
master
plans
and
vision
levels,
it's.
AK
My
jump
in
so
as
I
go
through
the
plan.
We're
just
gonna
pick
highlights
I'll,
throw
in
it
right
now
as
we're
going
through.
What
we're
really
asking
you
to
adopt
are
the
actual
goals
themselves,
because
then,
every
five
year
interval
we
check
in
to
see
whether
we've
been
able
to
hit
the
mark
or
not
whether
it's
fiscally
constrained
action
or
vision.
AK
Those
three
gives
us
the
give
us
the
options
down
the
line
of
how
to
implement
and
get
to
some
of
those
goals,
but
we're
really
asking
to
look
carefully
at
the
goals
that
we've
developed,
whether
you
think
we're
on
the
right
track,
whether
you
think
our
approach
was
right
and
we
can
adjust
dates,
we
can
adjust
percentages.
Those
are
all
part
of
the
actual
goal
itself
if
we're
not
able
to
actually
give
funding
in
any
given
year.
For
that
particular
thing.
AK
So,
if
you'll
just
bear
with
me
up
I'll
take
us
through
the
process
and
then
we
can
and
then
talk
a
little
bit
about
you
know.
Well
what?
If
we
don't
get
the
funding,
what
happens
so
I?
Don't
know
if
you
wanted
to
add
to
that
Tanya
or
not,
but
no
thanks.
Okay,
so
before
I
get
into
the
actual
master
plan.
AK
I
did
want
to
thank
all
of
you
for
your
feedback
last
month
and
you'll
see
that
we
can
corporate
some
of
that
and
you
just
it
was
in
the
memo
and
we've
adjusted
our
own
master
plan
as
a
result
of
Planning
Board
input
to
soar.
Thankful
for
that
I
also
wanted
to
thank
the
members
of
the
team
who
worked
on
this
really
hard
of
the
last
couple
years.
Members
of
the
public
who
took
their
time
out
to
contribute
to
the
whole
master
plan
process.
AK
AK
AK
We
need
to
be
thinking
about
people,
the
people
we
serve
and
the
people
that
do
the
survey
and
make
sure
that
we
do
it
in
a
way
that's
safe
and
to
the
best
of
our
ability
and
I
think
that
the
goals
that
we
put
together
do
take
that
customer
centric
approach
as
you'll
see
here
in
a
minute
just
a
little
overview
of
the
department.
We
have
124
authorized
FTEs
they're,
not
all
firefighters,
you
can
see
the
breakdown
there.
We
have
97
firefighter
emergency
medical
technicians,
8,
wildland,
responders,
full-time
and
8
community
Risk
Reduction
staff.
AK
Those
are
people
that
do
on
the
right-hand
side
of
all
the
services
provided
there
are
they're
the
folks
that
do
all
the
stuff
to
keep
911
calls
from
happening.
So
code
enforcement
education,
things
like
that.
We
have
seven
fire
stations
that
are
around
town
and
a
wildland
facility
as
well
I'm
out
at
the
res.
AK
So,
as
Tanya
alluded
to
what
we've
been
really
really
working
hard
to
do,
and
this
both
predates
the
master
plan
and
right
during
the
master
plan
development
processes,
we
organized
our
department
completely
differently
than
we
have
in
the
past.
By
program
we
assign
program
managers,
we've
been
working
on
data
so
that
we
can
tie
performance
measures
to
actual
dollars
and
the
idea
was
we
wanted
our
program
managers
to
start
tell
kind
of
what
counsel
wants
on
the
macroscale.
AK
If
we
don't
fund
this,
what
doesn't
get
done,
what
percentage
doesn't
get
reached,
and
so,
at
each
program
level,
we've
asked
our
program
managers
to
do
that,
so
the
department
is
reorganized,
and
now
we
can
actually
entertain
an
individual
program
requests
based
on
that
idea.
That
ties
in
well
with
our
different
areas
of
focus
in
our
master
plan.
Let
me
talk
about
the
process,
real,
quick.
AK
AK
We
got
that
accepted,
I
think
earlier
2013
five
years
in
we
actually
began,
so
we
might
have
begun
a
little
bit
late
on
our
update
for
the
master
plan,
but
we
realized
that
we
will
achieve
a
lot
of
stuff
from
the
old
master
plan,
and
so
when
we
started
this
process,
we
agreed
to
be
part
of
the
city's
engagement
process
as
well.
That's
a
we
piloted
that
as
well
as
did
a
lot
of
well.
AK
So
that's
a
little
bit
of
the
process.
Here's!
What
we've
done
since
we
met
with
you
in
December,
we
took
your
feedback,
put
it
in
the
master
plan
draft.
We
went
back
and
and
took
a
look
at
our
ten-year
master
plan
financial
analysis,
so
we
did
get
very
granular
depending
on
which
version
of
plan
we
we
went
with
for
the
full
ten
years.
So
if
you
did,
if
we
did
action
for
all
of
our
goals,
here's
what
it
looked
like
if
we
did
then
particularly
ALS,
was
what
we
were
actually
looking
at.
AK
If
we
did
ALS
in
this
manner
and
action,
we
would
spend
the
money
this
way.
We
would
add
people
this
way
and
it
really
is
a
10-year
process,
no
matter
which
way
we
look
if
it
was
the
vision
version
of
ALS,
it
was
a
ten
year
process
to
get
all
the
way
up
to
what
we
thought
we
could
get
to,
and
all
of
that
required
some
of
the
infrastructure
stuff
we'll
be
talking
about,
and
the
last
thing
was
we.
AK
We
also
also
got
recommendations
from
the
Planning
Board
to
make
a
couple
of
minor
changes
to
the
to
the
document
as
well,
particularly
in
one
area,
and
that
was
in
the
workforce
area.
So
so
those
are
the
things
we've
done
since
December.
Here's
the
plan
itself-
and
this
is
really
what
we're
asking
you
to
look
at
and
accept,
but
all
we
did
was
pull
up
in
each
of
these
areas
to
representative
result
measures
the
rest
of
them
are
in
the
document,
but
we
we're
focusing
the
first
two
on
our
core
areas
of
operation.
AK
AK
That's
a
big
part
of
what
we
do
believe
it
or
not,
and
the
third
area
really
is
necessary
to
accomplish
the
first
two,
and
that
is,
if
we
don't
have
the
equipment
of
the
facilities,
we
have
the
best
trained
people,
I,
think
world,
certainly
United
States,
but
probably
in
the
world.
They
work
really
hard.
They
truly
are
good
at
what
they
do,
but
if
they
don't
have
the
equipment
in
the
facilities,
they're
gonna
be
constrained.
AK
So
that's
a
big
part
of
the
plan
as
well
and
then
the
last
part
is
actually
maintaining
those
workforce,
skills
and
the
professionalism
of
our
workforce
as
well
as
its
diversity.
So
so
those
are
the
big
areas
drilling
down
specifically
and
here's.
What
I
mean
by
people
focused
the
idea
around
y'all
has
is
responsible
about
what
does
someone
calling
9-1-1?
What
should
they
expect
from
their
fire
department?
Where
do
their
tax
dollars?
What
does
it
mean?
What
does
it
mean
for
me?
God
forbid.
AK
Can
we
get
even
higher
it?
We
will
need
to
work
on
that
in
every
way
we
can,
and
the
same
would
go
true
for
the
second
goal,
which
is
about
actual
response
times
so
right
now
we're
in
the
ten
minute
and
forty
six
second
mark
for
advanced
life.
Support
I
will
talk
about
what
advanced
life
support
really
means,
certainly
for
the
sake
of
the
public.
So
they
understand
the
difference
between
what
we're
doing
today
and
this,
but
that
number
can
be
brought
down
in
various
ways,
depending
on
level
of
funding
and
resources
allocated.
AK
If
that
makes
any
sense,
the
bottom
line
is
what
does
the
customer
get
when
they
call
9-1-1,
and
that
was
what
the
planning
team
decided
was
an
important
metric
for
us
to
be
looking
at.
The
second
area
of
focus
is
about
making
our
community
more
resilient,
more
hardened
to
the
risks
that
we
face
here.
The
fact
is,
you
know:
we're
a
wildfire
community
and
I
I'm,
pretty
proud
of
what
the
planning
team
came
up
with
here.
60%
of
the
homes
in
the
wildland
urban
interface
will
have
received
a
wildfire
assessment.
AK
That's
a
big
step
towards
making
us
more
resilient,
more
resistant
to
the
effects
of
wildfire.
We
can't
we're
not
going
to
be
immune
to
it,
but
we
can
certainly
with
our
private
partners
as
well
as
open
space,
which
you
already
work
with
help
make
ourselves
more
more
resistant
to
those
threats.
So
the
planning
team
came
up
with
this
and
I
think
that's
an
expectation
our
customers
would
want
from
from
their
fire
department,
help
me
help
myself
and
and
and
then
let
me
do
whatever
I
need
to
do
the
third
area
around
facilities.
AK
Truthfully
they
do
not
support
the
list
of
services
that
we
deliver
today,
regardless
of
changes
in
service
levels
and
I'm.
Gonna
highlight
a
couple
in
particular
that
really
really
needs
some
attention
and
TLC,
but
we
have
goals
around
making
sure
that
we're
able
to
deliver
our
services
for
the
long
term
in
facilities
that
support
that,
as
well
as
help
the
city,
because
these
are
city
facilities
and
they're
accessed
by
the
public.
So
people
come
in
all
the
time
car
seat
checks,
fire
stations
are
often
used
to
teach
classes.
AK
In
many
many
places
there
are
even
clinics
in
some
areas.
Ours
don't
have
that
size,
they're,
not
a
DA
compliant.
They
lack
a
lot
of
those
amenities
and,
of
course,
all
the
city's
climate
energy
goals
are.
Unfortunately,
our
stations
are
the
worst
offenders,
probably
of
all
city
stock,
so
having
those
improve
would
be
great
from
a
bigger
macro
scale
as
well.
AK
The
last
part,
the
last
area
of
focus,
we're
asking
you
to
approve,
is
around
the
workforce
itself
and
the
well
taken
care
of
workforce
will
take
good
care
of
our
citizens
and
and
in
a
diverse
workforce.
That
looks
more
like
the
community
always
will
be
the
kind
of
service
provider
we
want
to
have,
and
so
you'll
see
that
we
have,
and
we
just
pulled
these
two
goals.
One
of
them
is
about
increasing
the
number
of
female
firefighters,
which
is
a
which
is
a
challenge
for
the
fire
service
in
general
across
the
country.
AK
That's
an
aggressive
goal.
You
see
up
there,
so
those
of
you
who
know
the
fire
service
they're
single
digits
all
over
the
place,
we're
single
digits
as
well,
but
in
ten
years
to
get
to
that
level,
would
be
an
accomplishment
for
for
our
department
to
be
able
to
do
that,
and
the
other
piece
is
definitely
customer
centric,
and
that
is
we
want
the
people
we
serve.
AK
We
want
to
be
able
to
ask
them
how
well
were
you
served
that
doesn't
a
lot
of
investment
in
dollars
to
find
out
what
the
community
thinks
when
they've
called
911
when
they're
treated?
So
these
are?
These
are
the
areas
of
focus.
These
are
the
things
that
we're
asking
you
to
support
along
with
the
sub
goals
of
each
area
and
that's
the
key
piece.
It's
really
about
service
levels
and
what
we
would
like
to
see
four
for
Boulder
now
I'll
drill
down
into
the
specifics.
AJ
AK
Was
so
so
they
asked
us,
why
did
we
focus
on
female
firefighters?
Why
just
that
demographic?
What
about
race,
especially
with
all
the
work
that
we're
doing
in
the
city
and
it
turns
out
they
were
actually
pretty
good
as
a
department
on
the
the
breakdown
of
our
demographic,
racially
I,
don't
use
the
phrase
we're
better
than
the
community,
we're
definitely
more
diverse,
I
guess
you
can
say
from
that
perspective
in
the
community,
so
what
we
ended
up
doing
was
focusing
here
on
female
firefighters,
because
that's
the
real
challenge
in
the
fire
service
in
general.
AK
Their
comment
was
because
we
gave
them
the
numbers
and
I
forget
the
breakdown
like
we
can
give
those
to
you.
Actually,
they
said
you
should
actually
celebrate
in
the
document
that
you
do
well
here
and
that's
why
you're
focusing
on
this.
It
wasn't
clear
why
female
you
seem
like
you're
taking
your
eye
off
the
needle
in
this
critical
area.
That
could
be
true.
So
their
comment
was.
You
need
to
really
really
highlight
how
you're
doing
well
here.
So
you
chose
to
focus
here,
so
that
was
our
oversight.
Thank.
AJ
AK
So
drilling
down
just
the
specifics
around
stations
in
particular,
so
that
third
area
we're
getting
pretty
desperate
station
two
in
station
four:
are
they
I?
Don't
know
they
don't
look
too
bad
in
the
picture,
but
you
can't
get
a
sense
of
size
and
nothing
to
do
with
the
size
of
the
trucks
which
has
been
said
before
it
has
everything
to
do
with
the
number
of
services
that
we
provide
and
believe
it
or
not.
AK
AK
If
you
visit
the
station
or
our
folks
are
pretty
creative
and
they've
done,
some
good
work
with
what
we
have,
but
they
do
lack
a
lot
of
critical
things
that
you
need
in
critical
infrastructure
and
unfortunately,
we
have
not
we've
been
in
the
CIP
for
a
long
time,
but
in
but
the
funding
sources
have
never
been
defined.
So
what
we're
really
asking
to
do
here
is
a
commitment
so
that
we
can
jump
on
an
opportunity
to
build
new
stations
for
these.
AK
We
wouldn't
be
able
to
achieve
any
of
our
advanced
level
goals
regarding
advanced
life,
support
or
otherwise,
without
doing
something
with
our
infrastructure.
One
certainly
needs
to
happen,
but
this
needs
to
happen
regardless
of
what
we
choose
to
do
in
the
long
term.
Because
of
the
way
we
serve
the
public
today
we're
all
hazards,
these
don't
really
support
all
hazards.
A
good
example
is
that
station
for
the
one
on
the
right
is
south
Boulder.
We
know
our
wildland
interface
challenge
over
there.
AK
I
couldn't
put
a
wildland
truck,
even
a
small
one
in
there,
along
with
the
big
one
in
there,
even
if
they
could
jump
trucks
to
go
to
a
wildland
incident,
so
the
space
just
isn't
there
for
for
us
to
be
nimble
as
a
workforce,
but
they
that
fits
three
firefighters
because
it's
housed,
so
it
doesn't
even
work
well
from
from
a
fire
station
perspective.
It
worked
as
a
temporary
location
60
years
ago
when
they
built
it,
which
is
what
they
were
told.
AK
So,
that's
that
let
me
switch
over
to
advanced
life
support
and
for
the
sake
of
really
more
the
public
and
than
anything
else,
there
is
a
difference
in
levels
of
response.
When
you
call
911
you
get
usually
get
both
depending
on
the
nature
of
the
call.
We
call
it
basic
life
support.
We
call
it
advanced
life
support.
The
fundamental
difference
between
the
two
is
that
advanced
life
support
responders
can
bring
life-saving
drugs
to
the
scene.
They
can
do
invasive
things
that
basic
life
support
responders.
AK
Cannot
it
the
simpler
version
of
advanced
life
support
is
like
a
step
down
version
of
the
ER.
The
docs
are
going
to
kill
me,
but
it's
the
step-down
version
of
the
emergency
room
coming
to
your
house
or
business
without
the
doctor
without
the
nurse,
but
with
delegates
who
are
pretty
highly
trained,
I'll
show
you
what
we
do
today,
so
you
can
see
what
what
we
give
in
Boulder
we
give
both
today.
Als
is
part
of
our
service
delivery.
So
I
want
to
be
clear
about
that.
AK
AK
AK
I
will
say
that
so
with
minimal
fiscally
constrained
environment,
we've
already
added
skills
to
our
emergency
medical
technicians
that
many
places
don't
do
outside
of
Colorado
more
than
anything,
and
that
is
they
can
start
intravenous
therapy
that
cannot
push
drugs
like
like
the
paramedics
can,
but
they
can
do
that
and
they
can
do
some
advanced
airway
techniques
so
that
our
responders
can
do.
But
we
get
basic
life
support
from
our
firefighters
and
then
ambulances
around
the
city
provide
the
advanced
life
support
and
that's
where
the
ten
minutes
plus
comes
in
when
the
ambulance
gets
there.
AK
AK
What
we
did
put
in
here
we
did
want
to
make
clear,
is
cardiac
arrest.
Survival
times
are
not
just
a
function
of
how
many
responders
you
have
in
the
community
if
we
teach
compression
CPR
to
bystanders,
if
we
have
more
advanced,
if
we
have
more
defibrillators
throughout
town,
those
are
the
devices
that
shocked
the
art.
If
those
are
available,
then
we
have
a
multitude
of
responders.
AK
Besides
the
fire
department
in
AMR
that
can
help
us
start
moving
the
needle
upwards-
and
my
point
is:
is
that,
even
by
adopting
those
goals,
there
are
still
ways
to
achieve
higher
levels
of
survival
rates,
with
smaller
levels
of
investment.
If
we
invest,
say
twenty
thousand
dollars
on
the
education
side
on
make
sure
we
have
defibrillators
around
town,
making
sure
more
people
know
compression
CPR,
if
that
makes
any
sense,
so
I'm
hoping
to
help
with
the
funding
question
here
by
saying
it's
adopting
the
measure
and
then
in
any
given
year.
AK
AK
In
short,
all
we're
really
saying
here
is
that
we
would
raise
the
level
of
our
eight
basic
life
support
units
to
advance
life
support,
so
we
would
have
paramedics
on
the
fire
trucks
they
would
have
all
of
the
gear
they
would
need,
and
then
it
doesn't
matter
for
fire
truck
cuts
to
your
house
first
or
a
name.
This
gets
to
your
house.
First,
you
are
going
to
have
an
als
responder
at
your
place
fairly
quickly.
You
can
see
there
is
a
cost
to
that,
because
I'd
be
raising
the
level
of
training
for
our
responders.
AK
We
would
be
adding
the
equipment
and
we
would
have
to
light
response
vehicles
in
the
system
added
so
that
those
responders
can
nimbly
get
to
different
calls
in
the
field.
That's
that
model
under
action.
That's
still
a
five
to
ten
year
plan
to
make
that
happen.
If
we
followed
that
route,
all
the
way
through
the
final
version
under
vision
in
the
master
plan
suggests
this.
If
we
want
to
lower
our
ALS
response
times,
then
we
take
all
of
it
in
that.
AK
Is
we
take
the
ambulances,
so
we
start
doing
patient
transport
as
well,
and
what
this
does,
what
both
the
action
and
the
vision?
Well,
what
the
vision
version
does
for
us
is
something
over
and
above
what
our
current
model.
That
is,
and
then
is,
if
you
have
EMT
paramedics
on
every
truck
in
the
city
and
there
are
12
or
13
of
them
now,
I
have
responders
that
can
respond
to
any
type
of
emergency
right
now.
AK
A
So
thank
you
for
putting
that
up.
I
have
a
question
so
on
page
four
49mm
is
total
annual
and
incremental
cost.
So
I
think
this
is
one
of
the
things
that
we
asked
you
for.
Yes,
when
we
saw
you
last
and
so
we've
got
the
action,
ALS
cost
and
then
the
vision,
ALS
cost
and
so
I'd
ask
you
to
describe
those
two
so.
A
AK
AL
Lower
acuity
medical
calls
in
the
Vision
Plan,
that
is
the
full
five
ambulance
model
and
there
so
and
that
that
would
be
in
in
addition
to
having
paramedics
on
all
of
the
engines
as
well,
and
that's
in
there
are
some
other
all
their
differences,
but
those
are
the
primary
ones.
I.
A
E
And
just
ask:
can
you
go
back
a
slide
or
two
where
it
mentions
the
cost,
the
the
vision-
one?
Oh
right
there,
so
you
have
here.
The
full
rollout
requires
an
additional
five
point:
four
five
million
in
annual
operating
costs.
So
but
the
the
chart
there
in
terms
of
total
annual
and
incremental
costs,
has
by
the
time
we
get
out
to
2030.
It
says
the
annual
incremental
additional
cost
is
2.1
million.
So
you
definitely
maybe
you
could
speak
to
that
just
as
ensue
that
those
are
very
different
numbers.
Absolutely.
AL
AL
AL
E
AL
E
AL
AL
E
E
It
give
us
a
good
sense
of
it,
but
I
think
maybe
the
point
that
I'm
getting
from
this
is
that
that
there's
some
significant
additional
costs
over
five
or
six
or
seven
years
as
you
create
the
services
correct,
but
once
you
get
to
full
implementation,
the
additional
amount
each
year
is
essentially
it's
that
it
right
is
well
I'm,
not
sure
over.
What
we.
AK
If
we
didn't,
this
is
over
our
baseline
of
fiscally
constraints.
So
we
didn't
do
anything.
Change
didn't
do
anything
with
ALS
and
didn't
do
any
of
the
implementation
that
that
chart
that
you're
looking
out
calls
for.
Then
we
wouldn't
be
looking
at
an
additional
five
point:
four
or
five
million
and
annual
operating
cost
right,
but.
E
AJ
AK
Great
question:
it
actually
works
out
to
be.
If
we
did
it.
Let's
just
say
our
long-term
goal
was
to
be
something
like
the
vision
either
way.
It
looks
more
like
the
action
upfront
as
we
raise
the
level
of
the
firefighters
and
and
the
the
fire
response
units
up
to
ALS
status.
So
that
gets
us
eight
units
over
time.
We
would
realize
the
action
long
before
we'd
ever
get
to
the
vision
and
the
vision
piece
would
be
simply.
AK
Okay,
now
we're
gonna,
add
a
couple
of
extra
12
action
calls
for
adding
a
couple
of
extra
light
rescue
units
with
paramedics
on
them,
but
then
over
time,
bringing
in
the
patient
transport
piece.
That's
the
vision
version
of
it.
So
once
you
do
the
patient
transport,
then
you
collect
all
the
patient
care
revenue
and
we
don't
pay
a
subsidy
to
the
third
party
like
we
do
today.
So
I
hope
that
makes
sense
you
you
wouldn't
bump
up
and
down.
You
would
probably
do
action
first
and
then
get
up
to
vision.
So.
AJ
A
Ma'am
just
to
follow
on
to
that
is
the
main
difference.
The
transport
piece
so
I
mean
in
any
case,
all
of
the
firefighters
who
are
gonna
show
up,
are
going
to
be
paramedic
trained
and
are
either
division
or
the
action.
But
the
big
difference
is
that
you're
transporting
yes,
yes,
sir
okay,
and
so
that
has
an
implication
of
personnel
as
well
as
equipment.
Yes,
okay.
Thank
you.
A
A
AK
AK
W
A
first
person,
first
name
person
and
so
I
would
be
happy
to
support
whatever
Michael
thinks
is
most
efficient
and
dollar-wise
for
the
city
of
Boulder
I
understand
from
the
past
explanations
that
fire
truck
always
has
to
come.
That's
really
unfortunate,
I
believe
a
lot
in
like
community
pleasing
except
community.
You
live
to
support
sweet,
but
what
I
don't
support
is
311
Mapleton
being
built
on
the
urban
wildlife
interface
and
causing
more
demand
for
for
these
services,
and
I've
heard
you
say
in
fact,
I
was
reviewing
a
tape.
W
Last
night
and
I
heard
you
say
that
this
actual
thing
causes
you
know
having
higher
risk
development
like
this
and
Gilbert
white
would
turn
in
his
grave
and
it's
the
same
thing
with
fire
as
it
is
with
water.
You
don't
build
in
the
floodplain,
you
don't
build
on
the
fire
zone,
so
I
say
no
to
everything
until
you
reduce
the
hemorrhaging,
but
that's
what
I
have
to
say
every
single
time.
I
come
up
here.
AE
AK
There's
an
elaborate
there's,
the
boulder
inflation
factor
on
construction
in
general,
but
fire
stations
also
by
design
the
the
weight
of
the
trucks
in
the
bays
in
particular,
require
the
highest
high
compression
concrete,
but
all
the
sports
spaces
as
well.
The
positive
pressure
you
need
built
into
keeping
bad
stuff
out
of
the
living
spaces.
AK
Unless
we
can
jump
on,
you
know
a
public-private
partnership
or
some
other
opportunity
that
comes
up,
which
is
why
we've
said:
if,
if
we
have
a
funding
source
or
some
sort
of
commitment
to
go
there,
then
there
is
an
opportunity
to
jump
on
something
like
that
sooner
rather
than
later,
and
then
we
can
make
longer-term
plans
from
there.
Okay,
thanks.
AI
AI
So
I
think
we've
said
this
enough
time,
so
the
most
striking
thing
on
there
is
page
450
that
is
a
comparison
of
other
surrounding
cities
and
as
as
per
always,
we
pride
ourselves
on
how
great
we
are
and
being
able
to
save
our
citizens
lives
probably
be
towards
the
top
of
that
list.
So
when
we
are
looking
at
the
budgeting
process,
I
think
it's
really
important
that
for
all
the
things
that
we
love
and
want
saving
our
citizens
lives
gravitates
towards
the
top
of
that
list.
AI
Unfortunately
it
wasn't
so
maybe
you
know
in
the
next
iteration
we
might
consider
her
name
change,
name
change
for
the
department
yeah,
because
I'd
love
to
see
more
public
participation
surrounding
topics-
that's
important,
also
I,
think
you'd
hit
the
nail
on
the
head.
I
would
love
to
see
a
public-private
partnership,
someone
donating
towards
a
new
fire
station,
one
or
more
more.
You
know
wealthy
community
members
or
community
businesses.
That
would
really
be
helpful
at
this
point,
even
if
it
means
we
have
Google
on
the
side
of
our
fire
engines
on
down.
A
Q
C
AJ
To
Adams
point
I
think
that
was
one
of
the
community
benefit
options
to
look
at
things
that
we
need
within
our
city
that
could
be
provided.
So
it's
an
option
out
there
I
believe
I
wanted
to
ask
a
question
of
the
chief
about.
There
was
a
comment
in
the
memo
about
this
being
a
living
document,
and
is
that
how
is
that
different
from
other
master
plans?
I.
AK
Can't
speak
to
the
other
master
plans,
but
I
can
say
the
intent
of
the
living
document
piece
as
we
set
the
targets
and
we're
constantly
checking
through
our
programs,
whether
we're
hitting
the
targets
coming
close
to
them.
They're
supposed
to
be
stretch,
goals
as
they
are,
and
then
we're
supposed
to
generate
conversation
both
internally
and
then
periodically
to
you
all
as
to
how
we're
doing
and
whether
we're
making
the
target
or
whether
we
should
adjust
the
targets
down
or
up.
That's
what
really
we
mean
by
living
document.
AJ
I
thought
that
was
a
real
interesting
point
in
the
in
the
memo.
I
agree
with
what
what
Adam
said
with
respect
to
this
is
one
of
the
most
important
things
that,
if
not
the
most
important
along
with
police,
that
a
city
is
responsible
to
its
citizens,
for
so
I
jokingly
said
earlier
that
this
is,
you
know.
Timing
is
everything,
however,
I
do
think
that
we
need
to
be
patient
with
ourselves
and
make
sure
that
we're
considering
the
whole
big
picture
with
the
financial
strategy
and
see
what
comes
of
that,
but
I
think
this.
AJ
This
is
a
very,
very
different
master
plan
and
I
thought
it
was
unlike
not
not
to
diminish
other
master
plans,
but
this
one
had
just
some
real,
realistic
performance
measures
to
it
that
tied
them
to
dollars
it
wasn't
it
wasn't.
You
know
well,
to
achieve
this
master
plan.
We're
gonna
need
a
hundred
million
dollars
of
operating,
so
it
you
know
it
wasn't
that
kind
of
thing.
AJ
So
I
really
appreciated
that
one
comment
that
I
would
just
like
to
make
in
general
about
the
defensible
space
and
that
particulars
that
there
are
well
I
hope
that
we
work
in
partnership
with
like
ready
to
work
or
maybe
even
attention,
homes
to
come
up
with
social
enterprise
kinds
of
approaches
to
to
create
helping
citizens
create
their
defensible
spaces.
But
I
thought
this
was
a
great
master
plan
and
I
think
it's
just
the
way
it
was
laid
out
in
terms
of
having
all
of
these
achievable
performance
measures
was
very
I.
AJ
E
Like
what
Mary
said,
I
thought
y'all
did
an
extraordinary
job,
that
it
was
the
the
details
and
the
metrics
and
then
all
the
different
goals
and
how
they
were
connected
to
funding
and
timelines
incredibly
specific
and
also
laid
out
a
pathway
for
achieving
those
which
I
thought
was
was
really
impressive
and
and
like
Mary
said
you
know,
we
were
talking
about
earlier.
A
lot
of
master
plans
start
out
with
a
vision
plan
that
says:
if
money
were
no
object,
you
know,
if
you
could,
spend
it
three
billion
dollars.
E
What
would
you
do
and
then
we
get
these
approved
them
people
like
well?
How
do
we
find
the
three
billion
dollars
to
realize
it?
I
mean,
while
your
vision
plan
is
not
cheap,
it's
also
not
sky-high
and
completely
unattainable,
and
also
ties
into
really
important
outcomes
and
goals.
That
would
be
very
desirable
for
the
community.
So
I'll
just
answer
your
question
here
that
I
absolutely
accept
those
goals
within
the
master
plan
and
well
I
agree
with
Mary.
E
We
can't
we
can't
budget
on
the
Dyess
tonight
as
part
of
adopting
a
master
plan
that
we
do
need
to
look
at
all
the
different
pieces
through
the
financial
strategy,
but
I
would
hope
that
we
would
prioritize
these
goals
highly
because
the
safety
and
survival
and
health
of
our
citizens
needs
to
be
right
at
the
very
top
of
our
priority
list.
So
thank
you.
A
Alright
I'll
be
happy
to
jump
in
here.
I
thought
this
was
an
excellent
master
plan
and
I
think
the
areas
of
focus
were
the
right
areas
to
focus
and
to
what
Mary
said
you
know
having
measurable
achievable
at
least
you
know
metrics,
by
which
we
look
at
you
know
the
way
that
the
fire
response
serves.
Our
community
was
very
thoughtful
and
so
I
thought
this
was
a
very
good
break
down.
Your
four
areas
of
focus,
I
mean
I'm,
just
gonna
come
out
and
say:
I
I.
A
Think
members
of
our
community
would
be
very
disappointed
if
they
saw
where
we
were
relative
to
our
peer
cities
and
I.
Think
that's
a
very
important.
We
don't
want
to
jump
to
conclusions
about
where
we
want
to
go
with
the
budget
process.
I
agree
with
that
Mary,
but
I
also
do
think.
As
you
said,
this
is
a
truly
important
service
and
you
know
there's
no
alternatives.
There's
us
and
AMR
who
are
providing
the
life
support
in
this
community
and
I.
A
But
do
you
think
you
know
we
can
have
a
discussion
whether
when
we
get
to
budgeting,
we
want
to
do
action
or
vision.
Ultimately,
I
think
we
want
to
end
up
at
the
vision
plan.
I
think
we
want
to
do
our
own
transport
I.
Think
there's
lots
of
good
reasons
for
that,
but
we
don't
have
to
start
there
necessarily
and
so
Mary
you.
A
You
talked
about
a
transition,
and
maybe
when
we
get
to
the
budget
discussion,
we
can
talk
about
what
that
looks
like,
but
I
think
you
know
we're
one
of
the
more
educated
communities
in
Colorado
and
I.
Think
people
who
were
looking
at
the
level
of
service
for
life
support
would
would
not
be
very
happy
with
where
we
are.
AA
I'll
make
an
observation
of
an
opportunity
that
will
be
in
front
of
us
in
about
a
year.
The
community
culture
or
safety
tax,
which
was
originated
in
2014
for
three
years
and
then
was
renewed
in
by
the
voters
in
2017
for
four
years,
would
sunset
absent
a
new
vote
in
2021
and
I'm
sure
this
is
a
discussion.
AA
We
will
be
happening
having
either
late
this
year
or
early
next
year
about
whether
we
want
to
ask
the
voters
to
continue
the
community
culture
safety
tax,
which
is
a
0.3
sales
tax
and,
if
so,
for
what
purpose
and
for
how
long?
If
we
maintain
it
at
0.3,
I
think
it
generates
about
10
million
dollars
a
year
at
0.3.
If
I'm,
remembering
correctly,
you
don't
have
to
confirm
that
I'm.
Just
remembering
that
roughly
and
of
course,
there's
any
number
of
things
we
typically
because
these
taxes
have
been
real
to
a
short
term.
AA
I
think
we
typically
want
to
fund
capital
things
with
them,
as
opposed
to
ongoing
operating.
But
when
we
have
that
discussion
and
probably
start
to
have
discussion
in
less
than
a
year,
we
can
talk
about
what
10
million
dollars
a
year,
of
course
at
least
stretch
it
out
long
enough.
We
can
bond
against
it.
So
10
years
gives
you
a
hundred
billion
dollar
bonding
capacity,
the
interest,
whether
things
like
the
capital
outlay
for
EMS
or
fire
stations,
number
four
or
two
might
be
on
that
list.
AA
A
Anyone
else
so
I
guess
in
answer
to
these
questions.
We
should
probably
get
some
consensus,
so
I
think
we're
all
happy
with
the
goals.
Did
I
hear
pretty
good
agreement
with
the
goals
and
my
opinion
is
that
you
didn't
adequately
address
what
we
asked
you
to
I
mean
you've
got
metrics,
you've
got
costs
and
you've
got
a
rollout
plan,
so
Tanya
I
would
turn
to
you
and
say.
A
Y
Q
AI
A
Y
Y
The
first
section
of
of
the
green
sheet
is
the
2020
2021
major
priorities.
So
these
were
the
priorities
that
council
previously
had
discussed
at
the
study
session
prior
to
the
retreat,
and
we
had
said
yes,
the
direction
from
Council.
Yes,
move
forward
with
these
priorities
into
the
next
two
years,
based
on
discussion
at
CAC,
there
was
a
suggestion
that
we
actually
reframe
the
priorities
and
create
clear
council
actions,
and
so
this
was
staffs
attempt
to
take
what
were
the
major
priorities
and
develop
key
actions
around
them.
Y
So
I'll
just
walk
through
each
of
those
council
actions
and
how
they
related
to
the
priorities
to
ensure
that
we
haven't
missed
anything
or
Mis,
misunderstood
councils
direction,
so
the
first
one
is
adopt
racial
equity
plan.
So
this
ties
with
the
advancing
racial
equity,
but
the
action
before
clear
action
before
council
is
racial
equity
plan
at
CAC.
Mayor
Weaver
had
raised
well
what
about
bias
and
microaggression
training
bias
and
microaggression
training
will
be
part
of
the
plan,
so
it
still
rolled
into
that
item
boulder
electric
utility
development.
Y
We
didn't
make
a
change
to
that
because
that's
project
specific,
adopt
climate
mobilization
plan,
so
that
was
what
used
to
be
the
climate
mobilization
plan,
but
really
the
action
before
council
is
to
adopt
it,
adopt
a
stew,
community
benefits
and
site
review
criteria.
Oh
I
apologize.
We
have
a
spelling
error.
The
next
one
East
Boulder
sub
Community
Plan,
launched
the
financial
strategy
committee.
So
this
was
previously
financial
strategy,
Study
Committee,
but
we're
saying
we're
actually
launching
that
so
there's
the
action
so.
Y
A
Y
For
that
clarity
evaluate
so
the
next
one
is
actually
the
longest
action
item,
and
this
was
what
used
to
be
homelessness.
So
what
we
have
that
listed
as
evaluate
complementary
approaches
to
the
homeless
strategy
that
further
housing
diversion
and
supportive
services,
okay,
implement
middle-income
down
payment
program
and
adopt
ordinances
related
to
manufactured
housing
strategy.
So
those
were
the
two
key
actions
relative
to
housing:
implement
police
oversight.
Y
So
that's
the
action
of
updating
the
ordinance
hiring
the
auditor
monitor
and
seating
the
Oversight
Committee,
no
change
to
see
you
South
annexation,
South,
Boulder,
Creek
flood
mitigation
and
then
adopt
phase
to
abuse,
tables
and
standard
revisions
and
then
under
vision,
zero,
there's
a
lot
of
actions
that
staff
are
taking
under
vision,
zero.
But
as
we
looked
at
council
specific
actions,
it
was
the
residential
speed
limit
review,
what's
commonly
also
referred
to
as
20
as
plenty,
so
that
coming
to
councils.
Y
AA
Q
A
E
I
guess
I
have
a
little
bit
of
trouble
with
the
premise
here
that
in
terms
of
turning
them
all
into
action
items
because
I
think
for
some
of
them
going
to
specific,
then
takes
away
from
the
larger
effort
that
we
want
to
be
accomplishing.
It's
like,
for
example,
vision.
Zero
to
me,
I
think,
is
a
broad-based
effort
that
we
want
to
be
moving
forward
on
all
fronts,
and
generally
we
are,
but
to
just
say.
Residential
spent
review,
then,
is
what
we
should
be
doing.
Other
actions
on
vision,
zero
as
well.
E
Similarly
like
with
the
advancing
racial
equity,
that's
a
broad-based
initiative
and
one
piece
of
it
is
adopting
the
racial
equity
plan.
Another
piece
would
be
implementing
the
racial
equity
plan,
but
I
think
we're
doing
other
things
as
well,
so
I
actually
I,
think
kind
of
Rachel's
point
about
like
well.
How
do
we
word
this
yu-sau
thing
to
get
it
just
right,
I
mean
some
of
these
things.
We
don't
know
exactly
what
we
want
to
do
on
it,
but
we
know
it's
an
important
priority
so
and
then
it's
also
really
long.
E
AA
Way
so
let
me
just
offer
a
country
of
you.
It
is
long
I'm,
a
little
troubled
by
non-action
words
for
a
couple
of
reasons.
Number
one
I
don't
know
like
what
housing
means.
I,
don't
know
when
we've
done
housing,
I,
don't
think
we'll
ever
do
housing
and
the
second
is-
and
that
begs
what
we
have
omitted
for
example:
does
that
mean
that
transportation
is
not
a
priority?
Does
that
mean
parks
is
I
mean
you
know
when
when
when
everything's
a
priority,
nothing
is
right.
AA
So
I
think
that
we
need
to
I
think
the
purpose
of
this
is
to
outline
for
ourselves
and
staff
and
the
community
the
things
that
we
hope
to
accomplish,
and
if
we're
not
specific
about
that,
then
I
guess
we
would
just
at
the
end
of
your
pet
ourselves
in
the
back
and
said
we
did
some
housing
and
I,
don't
know
what
that
what
the
goal
was.
So
some
of
these
are
really
clearly
have
goals,
kind
of
implied
in
them,
like
east
boulder,
sub
community
I.
AA
Think
the
implication
is
we
adopt
the
plan,
others
like
housing
or
vision,
zero,
don't
really
call
for
an
action
there
ongoing
things
that
go
on
forever,
never
never,
and
then
they
would
beg
the
question.
Why
don't
we
have
lots
of
other
things
that
go
on
and
on
forever,
so
whether
these
are
the
right
worse
or
not,
I
don't
know,
but
I
would
I
would
suggest
that
we
have
a
checklist
that
we
can
work
off
of
by
the
way.
A
AJ
Tonya
was
the
the
thinking
as
you
came
up
with
these
proposed
key
actions
was
to
because
this
is
what
we
have
on
our
CAC
agendas
and
then
at
the
top
of
our
purple
sheets.
That
we
get
so
was
the
idea
to
leave
the
major
priorities
and
then
add
key
council
actions.
Was
that
and
I
guess,
maybe
more
to
Bob
and
Sam,
or
it
was
that
the
thinking
to
eliminate
the
major
priorities
and
replace
them
with
the
key
council
elections.
So.
A
A
AJ
I,
what
I'm
hearing
is
that
that
people
want
to
keep
keep
it
high
level,
as
well
as
having
some
specific
actions
so
that
at
the
end
of
this
council
term
we
say
hey.
We
did
all
of
these
things,
but
we
kept
our
eye
on
the
bigger
ball
up
here
and
all
of
that
there's
still
more
work
to
do
within
all
of
these,
and
is
that
kind
of
would
that
be
yeah.
AA
AJ
No
I
know
I,
think
I,
think
being
able
to
check
stuff
off
because
you're
not
gonna,
check
off
housing
and
homelessness
right,
so
so,
I
think
that
having
a
list
of
things
that
we
can
check
off
is
is
a
good
achievable
metric
that
we
can.
You
know,
to
keep
in
keeping
with
the
mess
the
fire
master
plan,
but
and
then
on
see
the
Cu
South
Rachel's
point
about
having
some
sort
of
action
in
2021.
A
So
help
me,
if
you
don't
mind
so,
there's
a
30%
design,
completion
right,
that's
like
the
next
thing
we're
supposed
to
get
to,
which
is
when
we
can
then
apply
to
the
federal
agencies
right
and
so
it
seems
like
if
we're
trying
to
check
off
things.
You
know
on
our
pathway
to
success
and
see
yourself
the
next
action
item
into
30%
design
completion,
because
that's
what
allows
us
to
apply
to
Barbara
Corps
of
Engineers
is
that
right.
Yes,.
D
A
Y
A
AJ
E
So
if
I
get,
that
sounds
great
good,
but
maybe
if
we
have
both
and
I
think
they
they
serve
complementary
purposes
right.
So
in
maybe
the
the
the
first
area
I
mean
we
can
still
call
it
major
priorities.
We
could
call
it
focus
areas
you
because
it
doesn't
like
homelessness,
isn't
an
action,
but
it
is
a
focus
area
right
and
then
so.
If
these
are
focus
areas,
we
don't
need
active
language,
but
then
having
key
council
actions.
I
like
that
point
Bob
about
well.
What
are
we?
E
A
One
of
the
things
that's
missing
here
for
me
is
microphone
mobility
definition.
So
one
of
the
things
that
I'm
concerned
with
is
where
these
skateboards
go.
Where
the
scooters
go,
you
know
kind
of
that
whole
cluster
of
micro
mobility
and
we
have
clear
rules
for
bikes,
I
think,
but
we
don't
have
clear
rules
for
other.
You
know
one
wheels
but
I
think
if
we
got
those,
then
we
could
talk
about
during
the
pilot
program.
AA
AA
It
is
transportation,
right,
I,
think
we're
gonna
spend
a
lot
of
time
on
transportation
and
quickly
funding
around
it,
and
so
I
don't
know
if
transportation
becomes
one
more
thing
on
the
top
and
then
adding
the
the
item
that
Sam
just
mentioned,
or
maybe
transportation,
is
in
lieu
of
vision.
Zero,
since
we're
gonna
have
some
action
items
down
below
so
I
don't
have
a
strong
feeling
on
that
one.
Q
So
one
thing
that
I
struggle
with
is
like
people
come
to
office
hours
and
ask
for
how
do
I
get
involved
with
the
homeless
strategy
that
we're
looking
at
or
where
are
we
with
the
East
Boulder
sub
community
plan?
Things
like
that
so
I'm
wondering
if
we
could
do
a
third
layer
as
well,
so
we've
got
the
priorities,
actions
and
then
kind
of.
Where
are
we
because
they
don't
come?
Q
You
know
it'll
be
months
between
you
know
when
we
talk
to
the
fire
department
and
then
they
come
back
and
and
I
know
things
are
happening,
but
I
don't
know
what
I
don't
know
if
they're
at
boards
I
don't
know
like
on
homelessness.
I
understand,
there's
going
to
be
a
joint
meeting
between
AB
and
HRC,
but
that
doesn't
like
I
couldn't
go
somewhere
and
just
find
that
and
tee
that
up
for
community
members.
A
So
as
long
as
we're
diving
down
into
each
of
these
evaluate
complementary
approaches
to
the
homeless
strategy,
that's
just
much
so
I,
don't
know
how
we
can
make
that
more
concise.
But
you
know
we
want
to
work
on
the
homeless
strategy,
but
I'm
not
sure.
We
need
to
call
out
everything
that
we're
hoping
to
do
there
so.
AI
Y
We'll
work
on
that
because,
given
this
conversation
tonight,
we
will
be
doing
some
updates
on
the
council
action
guide.
The
council
action
guide
has
historically
been
I'll,
call
it
a
static
document
and
there
has
been
I'll
say
frustration
expressed
that
it
hasn't
always
linked
directly
to
project
pages,
where
you
can
get
some
of
the
resources
that
you
were
asking
for
Rachel,
so
we'll
work
on
it
and
we
can
follow
up
and
share
that
information
with
its
council.
What
the
next
steps
could
be.
AI
AA
Y
I
maybe
repeat
a
full
summary
of
what
I
believe
I've
heard
okay,
so
what
I've
heard
is
changed
the
title
of
the
first
section
from
major
priorities
to
focus
areas.
This
would
be
the
section
that
would
be
listed
on
the
CAC
agenda,
so
would
be
the
guiding
kind
of
force
as
we
scheduled
vision.
Zero
would
be
vision,
zero,
slash
transportation
to
accommodate
both.
Maybe.
Y
Under
the
key
council
actions
summary,
we
will
be
striking,
but
not
losing
the
meaning
under
the
homelessness
strategy,
so
taking
out
that
further
housing
diversion
and
supportive
services,
we
will
create
the
burbs
around
Cu,
South
annexation
and
south
Boulder
Creek
flood
mitigation
that
reflect
where
we're
at
with
the
projects
looking
at
30
percent
completion,
etc.
Some
some
of
the
action
words
around
those
two
projects
and
separating.
A
Y
AA
You
know
last
point:
Tonya
I
know
in
a
perfect
world,
wherever
this
resides
I,
don't
know
where
it's
gonna
sit
and
for
us
to
refer
back
to
these
would
all
be
clickable
actions
right,
they'd
all
be
clickable,
and
we
just
click
on
it.
Take
us
right
to
the
in
our
magic
we're
all
in
our
wonderful
world,
our
visionary
world,
these
all
be
clickable
to
a
project
web
page
right,
ideal.
Y
AA
AA
That's
fine,
whatever
the
most
public
place
we
can
put
that
put
it
out
at
and
and
the
other
request
I
would
then
make
would
be.
Then,
when
an
item
is
completed,
we
should
celebrate
that
by
putting
a
little
completed
or
some
sort
indicate
and
having
a
party
and
having
a
party
and
I
was
only
half
kidding
about
the
fire
master
plan.
That'd
be
a
good
accomplishment,
said
dick
right
off.
AA
Y
So
that
transitions
right
into
the
next
steps,
so
there
was
also
further
information
just
on
the
retreat
conversation
on
projects
and
process
that
was
included
in
the
memo.
I
won't
spend
any
time
to
review
that
information,
but
happy
to
take
any
questions
from
Council.
So
the
next
steps
in
this
process
is
going
to
be
what's
new,
this
year
is
actually
out
loud
mid-year
check-in.
Previously,
there
was,
through
an
IP
council,
received
a
mid-year
check-in
which
was
really
a
narrative
of
where
we
were
with
council
priorities
or
focus
areas.
Y
This
year
at
the
retreat
Council
decided
to
actually
have
the
check-in.
We
have
scheduled
that
for
the
July
14th
study
session,
the
council
retreat
subcommittee
its
staff
recommendation
that
the
sub
community
meet
to
help
design
design
and
shape
that
mid-year
conversation
with
staff.
I
will
note
that
we
have
Heather
Bergman,
scheduled
to
help
facilitate
that
conversation
happy
to
take
any
questions.
A
Z
Z
Z
Those
in
gory
detail
in
the
memo,
but
I,
don't
I
could
I
have
them
all
here,
but
I
don't
intend
to
go
over
them
in
any
detail
here.
If
you
have
any
questions,
I'm
happy
to
answer
them,
some
of
them
were
recommended
by
the
clerk's
office.
Some
were
just
obvious,
like
a
piece
I
missed
when
we
changed
the
way
of
nominating
the
mayor
that
I
should
have
taken
out
two
years
ago.
So
these
are
the
the
substantive
changes,
the
working
agreements.
This
is
the
staff
proposed.
Z
There
was
a
provision
in
there
that
allowed
the
mayor
to
adjust
the
speaker's
time.
The
speaking
time
is
detailed,
pretty
carefully
in
the
were
in
in
the
rules,
so
I
thought
having
that
in
the
working
agreement
made
no
sense
and
no
mayor
that
I
know
has
ever
adjusted
a
speaking
time
for
a
speaker
and
I'm
doing
it,
for
an
interval
speaker
would
probably
violate
the
First
Amendment
and
then
the
the
the
one
that
council
member
friend
suggested
was
limit
the
prohibition
against
electronic
communications
to
quasi
just
lyrics,
and
that
has
been
made.
Q
Z
The
summary
sessions
study
session
yeah
the
way
I
write
like
it's
kind
of
soft.
It
says
it
shall
be
rotated
generally
based
on
the
who's
serving
on
the
CAC.
Then
it
should
also
include
the
Mayor
Pro
Tem
and
the
mayor
and
that
it
can
be
adjusted.
So
it
gives
you
the
flexibility
to
do
it.
Whichever
way
is
appropriate
for
a
particular
meeting,
but.
Q
AI
Maybe
it
wasn't
on
there,
maybe
you
were
just
talking
about
it,
but
I.
Remember
we
had
an
issue
at
the
beginning
of
our
term,
with
the
choosing
of
the
mayor
and
the
mayor
pro-tem,
and
putting
the
proper
rules
in
place
to
tell
the
new
council
members
exactly
when
that's
gonna
happen.
How
that
procedure
occurs.
Is
that
anything
that
needs
to
go
in
here
is
that
something
we
can
do
outside
of
this?
It's.
Z
Something
that
we
should
do
and
and
I
think
we
kind
of
did
do
in
the
orientation.
We
just
didn't
make
it
clear
enough
and
we
basically
gave
you
a
fire
hose
to
drink
from,
and
so
council
orientation
is
now
only
two
council
elections
old.
So
it's
a
it's
an
evolving
process
that
we
as
a
staff,
are
trying
to
do
better
and
I
promise
you
we
will
do
better
about
that
next
time.
Okay,
thank.
A
AA
Two
other
things
that
I
think
we've
talked
about,
maybe
either
at
the
retreat
or
since
the
retreat
and
I
don't
know
where
they
go
well,
one
of
one
of
them,
I
think,
is
just
direction
to
the
Charter
Committee.
So
the
two
things
were
very
suggestion
at
the
retreat
about
allowing
non-resident
board
and
Commission
appointments
that
probably
doesn't
go
anywhere
here.
I
just
wanted
to
bring
that
up.
AA
Of
course,
if
that
was
the
will
of
council
to
explore
that,
then
I
think
that
becomes
instruction
to
the
Charter
committee,
because
I
would
charter
change
at
an
election
and
the
other
one
I
think
we
talked
about
is
possibly
changing
CAC
meeting
times,
so
that
probably
doesn't
go
and
rules
either
I.
Just.
Z
Want
to
raise
it,
what
the
rules
say
right
now
is
that
CAC
meetings
are
generally
held
on
Monday
mornings
in
the
manager's
office
and
they
have
been
held
in
the
matters
office
for
many
years
and
they're,
not
there
they're
held
on
Monday
mornings,
so
I
took
that
language
out
and
said
they'll
be
scheduled
by
council.
So
it
gives
you
the
flexibility
to
to
choose
whatever
time
cuz.
It
wasn't
clear
to
me
what
you're
gonna
choose,
because
I
think
there's
a
survey
going
out
right
now
about
that
issue.
So
you
could
just
decide
what
to
schedule.
AA
AA
Z
AE
E
Aaron
I've
got
the
nerve,
we've
actually
been
coming
under
time
and
we
may
do
it
again
tonight.
You
know
so
if
you
go
forward
since
we're
due
being
so
efficient
Tom,
it
looked
to
me
that
there
were
at
least
a
couple
changes
missing
in
the
redline
version
from
that
we're
in
the
summary,
like
the
electronic
communications.
I,
don't
see
that
actual
change
in
attachment
the
working
agreements
in
the
working
group,
but
there's
an
attachment,
B,
okay,
but
there
is
an
on
page
20
of
that.
There
is
an
item.
E
E
AJ
Z
Z
AA
Z
D
Z
Basically
the
difference
between
what
both
hemp
and
marijuana
or
forms
of
cannabis
marijuana
has
THC
and
hemp
does
not
with
the
growth
of
the
interest
in
CBD,
oil,
which
is
contained
in
both
products,
can
be
attacked
from
both
products.
A
lot
of
people
are
producing
hemp.
In
fact,
as
you'll
see
in
the
memo,
there
are
more
hemp
producers
now
in
Boulder
than
marijuana
producers.
Z
Hemp
has
the
same
issues
for
the
community
that
marijuana
does
in
terms
of
safety.
It
has
the
same
odor
complaints.
It
has
the
same
risk
of
fire,
the
extraction
methods
that
are
used
to
extract
the
oil.
You
involve
butane
and
other
chemicals.
We've
had
several
explosions.
The
fire
department
is
particularly
concerned
about
finding
some
way
to
regulate
hemp,
so
the
I've
listed
the
the
there's
also
the
security
issue.
Z
One
of
the
the
challenges
we've
always
had
with
marijuana
that
we
now
have
with
hemp
is
dumpster,
diving
and
break-ins,
because
people
believe
that
it
that
it
can
be
used
for
the
discarded
can
be
used.
So
we
we
have
pretty
strict
rules
about
how
you
describe
discards.
Yes,
disappointed
people,
you
could
have
how
you
just
discard
marijuana
when
it's
not
being
processed.
We
don't
have
any
such
rules
for
hemp,
there's
also
a
question
of
equity
to
operate
a
marijuana
business.
It
takes
a
bunch
of
money
and
you
have
to
comply
with
some
pretty
strict
rules.
Z
You
don't
have
to
do
that
with
respect
to
hemp
and
they're,
now
all
competing
against
each
other
for
the
CBD
oil
business.
So,
in
terms
of
fairness,
the
staff
would
would
like
to
an
out
of
five
for
us
to
go
ahead
and
explore
basically
duplicating
our
marijuana,
licensing
and
regulatory
system
in
the
hemp
area
and
we'd.
Z
Presenting
a
balanced
approach
to
regulation
has
been
incredibly
helpful
for
all
of
us,
and
particularly
council,
but
staff
as
well
so
I
would
recommend
that
so
that
that's
where
we
are
we're
only
asking
for
an
out
of
five
to
go
ahead
and
develop
the
ordinance
we
originally
put
this
on
for
a
study
session.
The
CSE
did
not
believe
that
it
was
well
did
when
you
had
time
to
consider
considering
some
of
the
sub
study
sessions
you've
had
to
deal
with
in
recent
times,
and
we
did
not
want
to
delay
this
any
further.
AA
Z
AA
AJ
AJ
Z
E
It's
a
tough,
it's
a
tough
one
to
deal
with
I
guess,
I'm
a
little
concerned
a
couple
things
here:
one
is
it
I
mean
we
just
got
through
our
work
plan
and
I've
I
thought
heard
what
we
talked
about
with
the
retreat
was
to
not
had
substantial
items
to
the
work
plan.
Midway
some
I'm
I'm
a
little
concerned
about
the
workload
there,
but,
but
also
just
that
I
mean
it
certainly
I
hear
about
the
life
safety
issues
which
I
think
would
want
to
do
something
about,
and
the
odor
question
seems
like
an
important
one.
E
But
I
don't
know
that,
given
that
hemp
is
not
a
drug
in
the
way
that
marijuana
is
I,
don't
know
that
that
we
would
want
to
just
duplicate
the
marijuana
regulations
for
hemp
cultivation,
so
I
guess
I'm
a
little
concerned
about
the
direction.
This
is
going.
Some
little
little
nervous
about
giving
you
not
a
five
to
go
to
develop
something
complicated
and
then
bring
it
back
for
something
I'm,
not
sure
that
is
the
exact
right
way
to
go.
Okay,.
AJ
Z
I,
don't
know
the
for
us
I
think
we've
got
most
of
the
work
done.
So
we
kind
of
know
what
we've
done
from
marijuana.
We've
got
a
lot
of
experience.
The
question
is
for
counsel
and
Aaron
makes
a
great
point
you're,
adding
something
to
your
work
plan.
That's
probably
going
to
get
some
public
interest,
at
least
from
the
hemp
industry,
and
so
you
will
have
to
have
a
public
hearing
and
you'll
have
to
make
some
tough
calls
well.
E
G
Z
Q
Z
Okay
may
I
respond
just
briefly,
I
think
that
what
you're
doing
is
telling
staff
to
go
ahead
and
work
work
on
it.
Your
time
is
controlled
by
CAC.
So
if
something
came
up,
you
could
just
put
this
off
and
address
it.
So
it's
not
necessarily
committing
to
council
passing
any
things
you
haven't
seen
anything
yet
it's
it's
basically
authorizing
us
to
work
on
it,
but
it
is
a
valid
point.
Of
course,.
Z
I
think
it
goes
a
little
bit
beyond
that.
I
think
that
there's
also
this
equity
issue
of
between
the
marijuana
and
they
have
businesses
and
the
feeling
of
some
marijuana
businesses
that
they've
invested
heavily
in
the
community
that
they're
heavily
regulated
that
they're
doing
it
right
and
there's
a
bunch
of
their
competitors
who
don't
have
any
of
those
requirements.
Gotcha,
okay,.
A
And
I'll
just
remind
us
that
this
has
been
something
that
Tom
has
been
asking
for
for
I,
don't
know
four
or
five
months
now,
so
it
it
may
be
new
to
new
council
members.
But
it's
been
something
he's
been
trying
to
get
on
our
agenda
for
a
while,
so
and
to
Mary's
point
you
know,
hip
is
not
marijuana,
but
it's
certain
points
in
its
processing.
It
can
have
THC
concentrations
which
are
similar,
so
I
mean
I.
Think
that's
one
of
the
the
challenges
that
we
have
with
him
and
it's
processing
is.
A
A
AJ
A
AI
Yeah
I'm
also
on
board
just
for
that
reason.
I
think
CAC
does
20%
of
the
work
in
setting
up
the
agenda
and
we
do
80%
of
the
work
of
making
sure
that
we're
moving
things
along
so
so
far.
It's
proven
that
we've
done
pretty
well
so
I'm,
okay,
adding
a
little
bit
of
work.
That
staff
is
willing
to
do
if
we
FCA
see
is
the
barrier
to
when
it
happens.
For
us,
okay,.