►
From YouTube: Boulder City Council Meeting 9-22-22
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
A
A
A
A
B
A
C
Here
I
know:
Rachel's
checking
in
so
she'll
be
here
momentarily
all
right,
we'll
just
get
started
and
through
the
announcements
we'll
get
Rachel
in.
B
So
good
evening,
everybody
and.
C
Welcome
to
tonight
study
session
I'll,
wait
for
that
recording
yeah.
This
is
tonight's
study
session,
the
Boulder
City
Council,
I'm
council,
member
Matt
Benjamin,
and
thank
you
all
for
joining
us.
C
I
will
make
note
that
councilmember
Yates
will
not
be
joining
us
because
he
is
out
of
country,
and
so
we
miss
him
and
hope.
We'll
get
to
see
him
again
in
two
weeks,
when
we
reconvene
on
October
6th
on
tonight's
agenda,
we
have
really
just
two
items
to
go
through.
Our
first
item
will
be
to
cover
the
sort
of
preliminary
scoping
of
the
transit
area,
Village
plan,
otherwise
known
as
t-vap2
or
Boulder
Junction.
C
Two,
so
maybe
we'll
have
a
straw
poll
one
of
many
to
decide
what
the
actual
term
we'll
use
is
so
I'm
just
kidding.
Maybe
that
won't
be
the
case,
but
we'll
try
to
keep
it
simple
and
organized
in
terms
of
the
naming
and
then
an
update
on
the
projects
for
comprehensive
planning
and
and
then
we'll
sort
of
have
some
updates
on
budget
reallocation
for
the
library
funding.
C
C
After
announcements,
I
want
to
turn
over
to
Mayor
Brockett,
just
for
a
hot
second,
but
with
some
of
our
announcements
we
have
kova
19
testing
and
vaccinations
for
testing
for
information
and
provider
locations
and
for
free
Copa.
19
testing
go
to
www.vocode.org
covid
testing.
In
spite
of
what
President
Biden
said,
the
pandemic
is
not
over.
We
are
still
dealing
with
it
here
in
town
and
people
are
still
getting
it.
So,
let's
be
careful,
be
cautious,
be
safe
and
also
do
check
vaccination.
C
The
bivalent
booster
is
now
available,
so
if
people
are
interested
in
that
specific
Omicron
based
booster
do
check
local
pharmacies
for
information
about
that
or
do
talk
to
your
doctor.
But
there
are
some
restrictions
with
regards
to
That
vaccine
pertaining
to
when
you've
probably
had
other
boosters.
So
there
is
a
new
one
out
and
people
are
getting
them
and
so
for
vaccine
information
do
go
to
www.voco.org,
covet
vaccine
next
slide.
C
And
much
anticipated
return
to
council
chambers
we've
had
certainly
a
false
start
in
May
and
it
looks
like
we
are
doing
well
now
with
regards
to
council
and
staff
being
in
person
and
what
that
means
is
now
that
we've
got
our
legs
under
us.
Public
participation
in
Chambers
will
resume
at
the
October
6
regular
council
meeting
Council
and
staff
are
working
to
ensure
we
have
had
all
the
pieces
put
in
place
to
hold
hybrid
meetings
before
inviting
the
public
back
to
Chambers,
even
those
of
us
at
the
diocese
right
and
those
at
home.
C
I
recognize
there's
been
volume
and
other
Tech
issues.
So
it's
glad
that
we've
worked
some
of
those
Kinks
out
and
we're
ready
ready
to
welcome
the
public
back
in
and
with
the
public
being
invited
back
for
the
October
6
meeting,
which
is
in
two
weeks
as
a
writer.
Next
week
we
do
not
have
a
meeting.
We
want
to
remind
everyone
that
you
will
be
off.
C
Pardon
me
that
you
will
be
offering
the
public
to
participate
in
both
a
variety
virtual
and
in
person,
so
it
will
be
hybrid
in
that
sense,
and
you
will
be
asked
to
indicate
in
the
open
comment
and
public
hearings
forms
if
you
will
be
speaking
virtually
or
in
person
in
person.
Speakers
will
speak
first
and
virtual
speakers
will
follow.
All
speakers
will
be
listed
in
order
in
which
they
signed
up.
D
B
Thanks
Aaron,
now
that
we've
done
announcements,
we
can
kind
of
get
right
into
all
the
good
stuff,
but
before
we
get
into
our
work
items.
C
I
just
want
to
sort
of
outline.
You
know
how
this
meeting
will
be
conducted,
we're
going
to
review
the
staff,
presentations
and
sort
of
go
through
the
items
that
that
are
of
the
subject,
and
we
will
have
time
for
questions.
Ideally
we'll
save
questions
for
the
very
end.
C
Unless
staff
has
a
break
slide
within
their
presentation
where
they
are
asking
questions
so
we'll
take
lead
on
staff
in
terms
of
where
they
want
input,
and
so
let's
try
to
hold
back
questions
on
a
slide
by
side
basis
and
either
wait
for
those
breaks
or
wait
till
the
presentation
is
over,
and
then
we
will
sort
of
have
a
chance
to
ask
questions
and
certainly
have
that.
C
Council
discussion
that'll,
hopefully
give
guidance
to
staff
on
the
questions
they
have
asked
and
now
with
that
out
of
the
way
I'm
going
to
turn
it
over.
B
To
our
city
manager
and
Nuria
Rivera
vandamide,
and
to
introduce
the
first
item
area,
take
it
away
thanks.
E
Much
man
and
I'm
still
marveled
that
all
of
you
can
say
my
entire
name,
which
has
not
happened
in
my
previous
City,
so
yay
for
Boulder
I'm
not
going
to
take
up
a
whole
lot
of
time.
The
first
item
we
have
today
is
actually
on
a
project
that
well
preceded
my
coming
here
and
has
been
a
while
in
the
making
and
so
I
will
ask
Brad
Mueller
to
introduce
himself
and
take
the
home.
F
F
I
am
Brad
Mueller,
the
director
of
planning
and
development
services
good
evening
counselors.
We
are
very
excited
to
bring
forward
this
overview
of
Boulder
Junction
2
and
recognize
it
as
one
of
council's
priorities,
certainly
recognizing
and
building
on
the
success
of
what
is
now
built
out
mostly
built
out
Boulder
Junction
one
and
looking
it
forward
to
the
next
enhancements
in
the
city.
We'll
also
talk
a
little
bit
about
Council
other
work
program
items
within
planning
and
development
services.
F
So
we
essentially
have
this
presentation
divided
into
two
parts,
we'll
have
an
opportunity
to
stop
for
discussion
after
the
first
part,
I
would
like
to
introduce
Christopher
Johnson
right
now,
the
senior
manager
for
comprehensive
planning
who
will
start
the
presentation
and
then
we'll
have
a
little
bit
of
handoff
as
we
go
along.
So
thank
you.
G
Great
thank
you
Brad
good
evening,
council
members
and
we'll
wait
for
the
presentation
to
come
up
and
we'll
get
started.
Perfect
great
was
Brad.
As
Brad
mentioned,
my
name
is
Christopher
Johnson
I'm,
the
comprehensive
planning,
senior
manager
within
planning
and
development
services.
I
am
very
excited
to
be
here
this
evening.
G
It
is
my
first
study
session
with
city
council,
so
that's
exciting
and
also
we're
talking
about
a
really
exciting
project
as
well
and
I'm
excited
to
work
with
all
of
you
to
accomplish
your
identified
priorities
that
were
established
at
The
Retreat
earlier
this
year
and
and
really
ultimately
implement
the
Boulder
Valley
comprehensive
plans
for
all
the
work
that
we
do
within
our
comprehensive
planning.
Division
I
have
asked
a
number
of
several
other
comprehensive
planning
team
members
to
join
me
this
evening.
G
Just
in
case
there
are
questions
about
specific
projects
that
you
may
have
later
on
in
the
presentation
or
during
the
discussion
session.
Sarah
course
is
a
new
principal
Planner
on
the
team
and
she'll
be
the
lead
project
manager
for
what
we're
calling
Boulder
Junction
phase.
Two
she'll
cover
a
couple
of
slides
here,
a
little
bit
later
in
the
presentation.
Kathleen
King
is
here
as
well:
she's
an
other
principal
planner
that
many
of
you
know
and
is
the
lead
on
the
East
Boulder
sub-community
plan,
which
thankfully
will
be
back
in
front
of
you
at
that.
G
G
And
our
annual
Capital
Improvements
plan
work
that
we
do
I
also
wanted
to
introduce
quickly
Vivian
Castro
Wooldridge,
who
is
part
of
Brenda
writtenour's
team,
on
the
communications
and
engagement
side.
But
she
is
the
new
engagement
senior
project
manager
for
planning,
which
is
a
mouthful,
but
importantly,
she
is
focused
on
pnbs
and
will
ultimately
helped
create
and
execute
all
of
our
public
engagement
strategies.
G
So
we're
really
excited
that
Vivian
has
joined
the
team
just
a
couple
of
weeks
ago
and
is
getting
up
to
speed
very
quickly
and
also
Brad
is
here,
of
course,
and
he'll
be
on
hand
to
help
facilitate
the
conversation
regarding
some
of
our
future
work,
planning
and
priorities,
which
is
the
second
portion
of
this
presentation.
Next
slide.
Please.
G
So,
as
we
mentioned
this
evening,
we're
going
to
cover
two
primary
topics:
first,
we're
going
to
present
some
background
on
the
transit
Village
area
plan
and
then
describe
what
we
are
putting
forward
as
two
preliminary
options
for
a
scope
of
work
to
implement
phase
two
of
this
plan.
G
G
Second,
then,
we'll
move
into
an
update
on
many
other
planning
priorities
that
we're
balancing
across
the
department
and
really
this
is
intended
to
serve
as
an
introduction
to
a
more
in-depth
conversation
that
we
plan
to
have
with
all
of
you
about
our
priorities
and
Staffing,
scheduled
for
a
future
study
session
which
is
currently
on
the
calendar
for
November
10th,
so
hopefully,
tonight
is,
is
really
just
an
opportunity
to
tee
up
the
conversation
and
then
come
back
on
November
10th
with
some
more
details
next
slide.
G
So
before
I
move
on
I'm
just
going
to
really
quickly
run
through
the
three
questions
that
we
included
in
memo
to
all
of
you
and
that
we
have
for
you
tonight
to
help
us
guide
the
future
of
the
project.
The
first
is
related
to
the
proposed
land
uses
that
are
in
the
plan
currently
and
whether
or
not
those
should
be
updated
next
slide.
G
The
second
is
relevant
to
the
transportation
connections
plan
and
whether
or
not
some
amendments
are
updated
or
updates
should
also
be
considered
as
part
of
the
scope
of
work
and
then
the
third
item
next
slide
is
really
just
a
general
question
in
terms
of
additional
feedback
that
you
may
have
on
the
proposed
scope
in
the
schedule
for
for
phase
two
of
this
project.
G
So
I
hope
you
can
just
keep
those
questions
as
my
in
mind
as
we
as
we
move
through
the
presentation
and
certainly
bring
that
forward
as
part
of
your
feedback
during
the
discussion
portion
next
slide
so
phase
two
of
the
transit
Village
area
plan
was
identified
at
The
Retreat
as
one
of
the
top
priorities
by
city
council.
Earlier
this
year
we
have
been
able
to
add
some
important
staff
capacity
and
we're
definitely
rebuilding
our
comprehensive
planning
team
and
also
looking
forward
to
Future
positions
through
the
23
budget.
G
So,
in
terms
of
just
a
review
of
the
area
plan
itself,
it
was
adopted
back
in
2007,
really
established
a
vision
to
guide
development
within
this
area
of
Boulder
Junction.
As
you
would
expect.
Within
the
plan
itself,
there's
detailed
recommendations
on
future
land
uses
various
character,
districts,
Transportation
connections,
a
lot
of
information
around
Transportation.
H
H
G
Key
aspects
of
this
was
to
not
increase
significantly
the
amount
of
single
occupancy
vehicle
trips,
and
so
there
was
also
an
implementation
plan
that
was
created
after
the
adoption
of
the
original
plan.
That
really
outlines
more
specifically
what
needs
to
be
implemented,
particularly
in
terms
of
infrastructure
and
who
would
be
responsible
for
that,
how
it
moves
forward
and
when
next
slide
so
just
to
orient
everybody
and
give
everyone
a
quick.
G
You
know
frame
of
reference,
I'm
sure,
you're,
all
very
familiar
with
this
particular
area,
but
generally
the
plan
boundary
Falls
along
Belmont
Road
on
the
North
Foothills
Parkway
on
the
East,
the
railroad
and
the
North
Boulder
Farmers,
ditch
at
the
south
end
and
then
30th
Street
on
the
west.
You
can
see
that
there's
a
small
portion,
that's
west
of
30th,
Street
and
again
just
to
orient
yourself.
That's
actually
the
location
of
the
new
fire
station
number
three
that's
been
discussed
recently
next
slide.
H
H
G
Phase
two
is
generally
east
of
the
railroad
you'll
notice.
That
phase
two
also
included.
What
would
ultimately
became
known
more
recently
is
Phase
2A,
which
is
the
portion
that
is
west
of
30th
Street
and
the
implementation
of
the
land
use
changes
to
bring
that
into
and
up
to
date
within
the
Boulder
Valley
comprehensive
plan
land
use
map
that
all
occurred
during
this
most
recent
update,
which
occurred
back
in
early
2021,
so
really
the
focus
of
what
we
consider
to
be
phase.
G
Two
really
is
therefore
on
that
larger
portion
that
is
east
of
the
railroad
they're
shown
in
the
dashed
blue
boundary
on
the
right
hand,
side
next
slide.
G
The
the
original
Redevelopment
Horizon
for
phase
one
was
about
10
to
15
years,
we're
now
at
the
end
of
that
just
in
terms
of
time,
but
also
in
terms
of
the
actual
amount
of
Redevelopment
that
has
occurred
in
that
phase,
one
area
and
within
the
implementation
plan
there
are
there's
further
Direction
on
when
it
would
be
deemed
appropriate
to
move
forward
with
phase
two,
and
there
were
three
primary
sort
of
triggers
for
that.
G
G
Ultimately
we'll
be
working
with
a
consultant
to
do
a
market
study
to
confirm
that
and
then
third,
there
is
a
need
to
develop
a
plan
for
providing
the
infrastructure
improvements
within
the
phase
two
area,
so
that
again
is
going
to
be
something
worked
on
within
within
various
departments
to
strategize
and
scope
that
out
next
slide
we're
going
to
touch
on
each
of
those
three
really
quickly
with
a
couple
of
slides.
So
the
first
one,
if
you
recall,
was
substantial
completion
of
phase
one.
G
As
I
mentioned,
we
are
actually
already
in
the
process
of
completing
something
we're
going
to
be
determining
the
substantial
completion
report,
which
will
provide
more
information
about
the
Redevelopment,
that's
occurred
and
how
it
is
achieving
the
goals
of
the
plan.
There
are
a
few
major
takeaways
that
I
do
want
to
call
out
quickly
in
terms
of
the
overall
sort
of
planning
and
Regulatory
outcomes.
There
were
several
updates
that
have
occurred
and
occurred
quite
a
long
time
ago.
H
G
Of
course,
there
are
several
physical
built
outcomes
that
have
occurred
over
the
last
10
to
15
years
and
through
the
Redevelopment
of
this
area,
there's
been
approximately
1500
total
residential
units
that
have
been
constructed
over
300
of
those
is
permanently
affordable,
so
in
excess
of
20
close
to
25
percent,
new
hotel
restaurants,
shops
office
space,
the
preservation
of
the
historic
Depot
building
and
relocation
of
that
onto
this
site,
the
number
of
improved
bike
lanes
and
pedestrian
zones
and
public
spaces,
and
then,
of
course,
the
RTD
Regional
Transit
Hub
and
the
parking
structure
that's
associated
with
that
as
well.
G
The
next
question
is
to
think
about
the
demand
for
the
proposed
land
uses
within
within
phase
two,
so
I
want
to
take
some
time
to
just
examine
these
a
bit
closer,
and
certainly
we
can
get
into
some
questions
around
these
land
uses
as
part
of
the
discussion
section.
So
one
thing
I
want
to
note
quickly
is
that
the
description
or
the
naming
of
these
of
these
land
use
coordinate
categories
is
unfortunately,
not
aligned
with
the
Boulder
Valley
comprehensive
plan.
G
There
are
five
different
land
use
categories
in
the
phase
two
area
that
you
see
highlighted
and
bold
in
the
legend
primarily
we're
talking
about
high
density,
residential
2,
industrial,
mixed
use,
Office
industrial
and
then
there
is
a
portion
of
Greenway
and
open
space
along
Goose
Creek
there
towards
the
center
of
the
phase
next
slide.
G
So
the
high
density
residential
2
land
use
is,
you
can
see
there
is
on
the
north
side
of
Goose
Creek.
It
is
proposed
to
allow
for
stacked
flats
and
Lofts,
potentially
up
to
two
to
five
stories
in
height,
approximately
25,
to
50
dwelling
units
per
acre
and
primarily
would
be
it
containing
underground
or
structured
parking.
So
not
a
lot
of
surface
parking
in
this
particular
situation.
You
can
see
you
know
in
the
photographs,
from
the
plan
sort
of
the
character
of
what
that
might
look
like,
but
relatively
higher
density
in
terms
of
residential
uses.
G
And
just
to
give
you
a
bit
of
understanding
of
what's
there
today,
the
area
is
currently
characterized
by
a
comprehensive
plan.
Land
use,
designation
of
light
industrial
and
has
industrial,
General
zoning
that
applies
to
it,
and
you
can
see
that
really.
It
exhibits
generally
one
to
two
story:
Office
Buildings
and
light
industrial
type,
buildings
Etc.
So
implementing
the
recommendations
within
the
area
plan
as
currently
written,
would
be
a
pretty
significant
change
from
what
is
there
today
and
certainly
would
introduce
the
potential
for
many
more
residential
uses.
G
G
And,
as
proposed
would
allow
Light
and
Service
Industrial
some
small
technical
offices
with
potentially
live
work
units,
or
some
residential
mixed
in
vertically
or
horizontally
within
buildings.
Overall,
it
anticipates,
you
know,
generally
sort
of
lower
scale,
one
to
three
story:
buildings,
a
floor
area,
ratio
of
about
0.8
to
1.3,
and
here
it
could
be
structured
or
potentially
surface
parking
in
this
condition
next
slide.
G
So
the
implementation
of
the
proposed
land
use
here
in
terms
of
that
industrial
excuse,
one
would
allow
structures
that
are
relatively
similar
to
what
is
there
today.
There
certainly
could
be
some
additional
height
and
density
introduced
into
this
particular
area.
It
would
also
allow
for
much
greater
flexibility
for
residential
uses
than
the
current
land
use
and
Zoning.
That
applies
to
this
particular
area.
But
overall,
the
sort
of
built
character
wouldn't
be
wouldn't
be
modified
too
dramatically.
Next
slide.
G
The
industrial
mix
use
two
Zone
district
is
a
little
bit
different
and
you,
this
area
is
located
near
Pearl,
Parkway
and
Foothills
Parkway
there
to
the
southern
end
in
the
railroad.
This
allows
for
a
much
greater
intensity
than
the
industrial
mixed
use.
One
area
that
we
just
talked
about,
so
it
envisions
a
strong
mix
of
residential
and
office
and
Industrial
in
up
to
three
to
four
story:
buildings,
a
much
higher,
far
of
1.5
to
2.0
and
primarily
structured
parking
next
slide.
G
So,
currently,
this
area,
if
you're
familiar
with
it,
is
primarily
kind
of
some
large
format,
light
industrial
and
Warehouse
type
structures,
one
just
there's
a
few
one
to
two
story:
Office
Buildings
in
Those
portions
that
are
north
of
Goose
Creek
and
some
other
similar
uses.
So
the
proposed
land
use.
That's
in
the
transit
Village
area
plan
would
certainly
allow
for
much
greater
intensity
of
uses
and.
G
Height
and
again
allow
for
much
greater
flexibility
for
residential
than
what
exists
today
under
the
current
land
use
and
Zoning,
which
is
fairly
restrictive,
next
slide
and
then
finally,
I
want
to
touch
on
the
office
industrial
land
use.
So
this
is
the
essentially
the
the
northern
third
of
this
entire
phase,
two
area,
a
pretty
large
area
up
the
north.
It
incur
really
encourages
an
intensification
of
the
existing
office
or
industrial
areas.
G
H
G
Similar
to
what's
there
today
next
slide,
so
you
can
see
in
the
images
on
the
right
pretty
traditional
Office
Park
layout,
with
some
large
surface
parking
areas
generally
one
to
two
story:
Office
Buildings,
and
these
are
in
various
states
of
agent
conditions.
Some
have
been
built
or
renovated
relatively
recently,
others
have
not.
G
The
proposed
land
use
here
within
the
transit
Village
area
plan
essentially
maintains
the
status
quo,
aside
from
perhaps
some
intensification
of
those
uses,
but
it
does
not
anticipate
the
incorporation
of
residential
in
to
this
large
portion
on
the
North
End
of
phase.
Two
I
want
to
note
here
too
that
certainly
given
the
recent
experience
that
our
team
has
had
within
the
East
Boulder
sub-community
planning
effort
and
really
the
desire
to
create
more
mixed-use
type
of
industrial
areas.
G
This
is
certainly
an
area
that
staff
is
curious
about
and
whether
this
particular
land
use
recommendation
May
warrant
some
further
evaluation
and
discussion
as
part
of
this
phase,
two
project
next
slide
so
finally
coordinated
with
the
proposed
land
uses.
The
area
plan
includes
a
detailed
connections
plan
that
identifies
a
number
of
different
improvements
within
the
phase
two
area.
The
city
would
be
responsible
for
some
of
these
improvements,
but
it's
definitely
expected
that
private
Redevelopment
will
contribute
to
and
Implement
many
of
these
as
part
of
individual
projects.
G
A
lot
of
these
are
adjacent
to
Foothills,
Parkway
or
along
Goose
Creek,
and
also
in
the
proximity
of
a
potential
future
rail
station.
So
I've
identified
the
location
of
that
rail
station
there,
with
the
blue,
dashed
Circle
sort
of
in
the
northern
portion
and
western
side
of
phase
two.
That's
another
area,
I
think
in
terms
of
what
the
future
holds
potentially
for
that
rail
station
and
how
those
connections
are
working
is
another
area
that
staff
is
interested
in
digging
into
a
bit
further.
G
So
with
that
I'm
actually
going
to
pass
the
presentation
off
to
Sarah
course
at
this
point,
who
will
discuss
some
of
the
considerations
that
we've
been
weighing
as
a
team
that
led
ultimately
to
these
two
preliminary
options
for
a
scope
of
work
for
phase
two.
I
Okay,
so
Christopher
just
gave
a
brief
overview
of
some
of
the
topic
areas
as
well
as
recommendations
from
the
plan
and
that
will
guide
us
as
we
continue
into
our
work
for
phase
two.
So
when
we
began
to
develop
the
scope
of
work
as
well
as
engagement
strategy
for
phase
two,
there
were
several
different
considerations
that
we
felt
that
we
should
accommodate
into
our
thinking.
I
So
the
first
set
of
considerations
were
about
policy
related
considerations,
so
such
as
the
relevance
of
the
plan
recommendations
15
years
later
and
the
alignment
of
proposed
land
uses
to
the
community's
current
needs.
I
So,
with
these
considerations
in
mind,
we
developed
two
preliminary
scope
options
which
I'll
present
next,
but
first
I'd
like
to
say
that
at
this
time
we
feel
we
need
input
from
you
on
these
options
to
help
guide
those
most
the
most
appropriate
directions
for
the
scope
of
work
and
that
we
wanted
to
receive
initial
input
from
Council.
First,
as
this
is
identified
as
the
city
council
priority
project
and
your
feedback
will
have
a
significant
influence
on
the
overall
trajectory
of
the
project,
then
we'll
consult
planning
board
and
the
transportation
Advisory
Board.
I
I
It
would
require
the
equivalent
of
one
and
a
half
full-time
pmds
staff.
Members
and
I'd
like
to
note
that
this
is
existing
staff
and
we're
not
necessarily
active
asking
for
additional
staff,
and
we
also
know
that
other
departments
would
contribute
staff
throughout
the
duration
of
the
project
as
well.
I
In
terms
of
community
engagement
for
this
option,
it
would
be
more
at
the
inform
and
consult
and
of
the
engagement
spectrum,
and
this
is
because
the
assumption
is
that
major
policy
decisions
have
already
been
made
and
are
currently
documented
in
the
plan
and
then
also
as
part
of
Engagement.
We
would
utilize
the
racial
equity
instruments
and
we'd
also
consult
boards
and
commissions.
So
as
a
quick
summary
of
option,
A,
this
option
would
focus
primarily
on
plant
implementation
rather
than
new
recommendations.
You
can
go
to
the
next
slide,
all
right.
I
So
in
contrast,
the
second
option:
option
b
considers
what
the
scope
and
schedule
would
be
if
the
2007
land
use
and
transportation
recommendations
are
re-evaluated
and
if
they
are
re-evaluated,
it
would
then
also
require
adoption
of
a
plan.
Amendment
option
b
would
then
introduce
additional
tasks,
tasks
to
a
3A
and
4A
which
are
in
the
blue
text,
and
these
tasks
would
include,
investigating
new
land
use,
Mobility
alternatives,
reaching
preferred
land
use
and
Mobility
connection
recommendations
and
then
bringing
a
plan
Amendment
through
the
adoption
process
with
planning
board
and
city
council.
I
I
Additional
staff
would
also
need
to
be
assigned
to
the
project
to
support
the
expanded
scope,
which
means
this
option
might
require
the
equivalent
of
about
two
and
a
half
full-time
pnds
staff.
Members
and
public
engagement
was
also
expand
and
it
would
expand
to
consult
and
involve
the
community
in
potential
policy
changes
that
we
consider
again
similar
to
option
A.
We
would
utilize
the
racial
Equity
instrument
and
we
also
consult
boards
and
commissions.
I
In
summary,
you
know
we
recognize
that
this
approach
places
more
demands
on
staff
and
also
lengthens
the
total
time
needed
to
complete
the
project.
However,
this
option
could
result
in
updated
policy
recommendations
that
are
better
aligned
with
the
community's
goals
and
needs
now,
as
well
as
into
the
future.
I
Currently,
staff
is
leaning
towards
option
b,
and
this
is
partly
because
the
original
assumptions
around
Transit,
as
well
as
the
community
needs,
have
evolved
since
2007.
they're,
substantially
more
residents
in
the
areas
such
as
the
new
residents
that
live
in
the
phase
one
area,
and
we
also
have
the
new
racial
equity
and
racial
equity
instruments,
as
well
as
other
community
engagement
tools
to
reach
and
respond
to
groups
who
may
not
have
participated
or
been
involved
in
the
previous
planning
process.
I
G
G
So
really,
as
we
mentioned
at
the
start
of
the
presentation,
really
are
key
questions
for
you
or
whether
we
should
explore
updates
to
the
current
proposed
land
uses
and
transportation
connections,
as
would
be
accommodated
by
option
b.
That
was
just
described
earlier,
and
certainly,
if
Council
has
any
additional
overall
feedback
on
the
scope
and
the
schedules
presented
this
evening.
We
we
welcome
all
of
that
and
look
forward
to
the
discussion.
C
Well,
thank
you
Brad.
Thank
you,
Sarah.
Thank
you.
Christopher
for
the
presentation,
I'll,
sort
of
open
up
for
Council
questions
and
some
feedback.
I
will
just
make
a
quick
observation
to
simplify.
If
we
can
put
those
questions
back
up,
we
might
perhaps
consider
just
combining
question
one
and
two
to
option
a
option
b.
Thinking
even
in
the
presentation,
they
seem
to
combine
scope
of
work
about
proposed
land
uses
and
transportation
together.
So
maybe
just
just
for
throwing
it
out
there.
C
We
might
want
to
just
combine
question
one
or
two
as
an
A
or
B
solution,
rather
than
parsing
them
out
between
land
use
and
transportation.
But
when
we
get
to
answering
those
questions,
just
might
be
a
little
easier
and
simplify
it.
That
way
so
I
see
a
hand
up,
Nicole
go
for
it.
J
Thank
you
and
thanks
Steph.
This
was
a
wonderful
presentation.
You
laid
everything
out
really
clearly
and
just
appreciate
it.
My
first
question:
it's
really
just
purely
a
question.
I
was
wondering
if
someone
could
remind
us
of
what
those
different
levels
of
Engagement
are
I
know,
there's
a
wheel
and
it
has
different
words
on
it,
sort
of
showing
what
is
involved
with
the
different
engagement
stages.
J
J
G
I
can,
if
you
give
me
two
moments
to
find
the
Spectrum
okay,
so
the
boulders
engagement
Spectrum
generally
has
four
categories,
beginning
with
inform,
consult,
involve
and
collaborate.
So
our
thinking
is
that
under
option
A,
you
know
really
a
lot
of
those
major
policy
decisions
have
been
made,
they're
documented
in
the
plan.
We
really
are
ultimately
just
focused
on
implementing.
H
G
Current
proposed
recommendations,
so
we
would
inform
and
consult
members
of
the
public,
and
certainly
you
know
local
stakeholders,
Property
Owners,
folks,
folks
of
that
nature,
if
we
moved
into
option
two
that
of
course
broadens
the
level
of
Engagement,
we
would
shift
slightly
towards
the
consult
and
involve
end
of
the
spectrum,
because
we
believe
there
would
need
to
be
some
additional
conversation,
particularly
as
Sarah
mentioned,
there's
a
number
of
people
that
actually
live
in
this
area
now
and
would
want
to
gather
their
feedback
and
input
into
any
updates
or
amendments
to
those
proposed.
J
C
Well,
let's
see
I
mean
if
we
have
a
slew
of
questions
or
clarifying.
Let's
maybe
go
through
that,
and
then
we
can
answer
the
questions
in
one
fail
swoop.
But
if
there
aren't
too
many
bites
at
the
Apple,
then
I
would
turn
it
right
back
to
you.
Nicole
Aaron
go
for
it.
D
You
know,
thanks
for
the
informative
presentation,
I
appreciate
that
from
all
of
you,
and
so
my
question
is
sort
of
in
terms
of
whether
there
might
be
slightly
a
different
option
on
the
table.
So
I
get
that
so
the
we
need
to
look
at
this
area
comprehensively
from
an
infrastructure
and
standpoint
like
about
what
what
are
the
roads
and
paths
and
the
utility
infrastructure
and
flood
mediation
Etc
that
are
necessary
to
serve
this
whole
area.
D
But
it
does
feel
to
me,
like
it,
has
some
distinct
sections
to
it
like
that
area,
north
of
Deuce
Creek,
which
is,
is
a
developed
with
a
more
recent
buildings.
I'd
say
with
with
with
more
life
left
in
them.
You
know,
whereas,
like
south
of
Goose
Creek,
it
tends
to
be
older,
smaller
buildings
that
might
be
more
ripe
for
redevelopment
and
and
then
south
of
pearl
Parkway
is
a
different
character
from
north
of
pearl
Parkway
kind
of
as
it
seems
to
me.
D
So
what
I
was
wondering
is
that
you
know
in
the
in
the
first
phase
of
Boulder
Junction
each
there
were
different
sectors
in
there
and
each
of
them
had
really
finely
grained
character.
D
Sketches
and
studies
and
different
zoning
different
Lane
uses
Etc
would
it
be
possible
to
kind
of
do
the
overall
look
at
the
whole,
this
whole
area,
but
then
like
have
a
phased
approach
on
either
one,
maybe
two
or
three
different
phases,
and
what
I
think
about
is
maybe
working
from
the
south
to
the
north,
because
the
northern
section
to
me
seems
like
it's
less
ripe
for
for
change,
I
think
still
worthy
of
being
looked
at,
but
but
the
areas
that
I
think
are
more
Viper
to
the
South.
So
is
there?
D
Is
there
any
possibility
for
breaking
it
up
a
little
bit
and
part
of
my
motivation?
There
would
be
to
see
if
there's
something
that
we
could
get
100
complete
in
a
shorter
time
frame
than
what
we're
looking
at
in
your
proposed
time
frames.
So
that's
my
question
to
you.
H
G
H
G
Entire
area
comprehensively,
certainly
as
it
as
it
comes
to
some
of
the
infrastructure
improvements,
there's
going
to
be
a
lot
of
you
know,
really
integrated
and
interconnected
things
that
you
know
you
do
want.
You
do
one
thing
at
the
south
in
terms
of
infrastructure
or
flood
mitigation,
that's
going
to
have
a
Cascade
of
effects
of
other
utilities
and
infrastructure
to
the
north.
So
we
certainly
would
want
to
approach
that
holistically.
G
In
terms
of
the
you
know,
some
of
the
regulatory
functions
of
amending
the
land
use
the
Boulder,
Valley,
comprehensive
plan,
land
use
map
or
introducing
new
zoning.
Those
are
the
types
of
things
that,
from
an
implementation
standpoint
could
absolutely
happen.
I
think
in
a
more
phased
approach,
where
you
know
it's
an
area
needs
needs
or
deserves
some
additional
conversation
around
a
proposed
land
use,
for
example
those
changes
and
the
you
know.
G
Those
ordinances
could
ultimately
occur
at
a
later
time,
but
I
do
think
there
could
be
some
some
opportunities
to
look
at
a
few
of
these
areas
that
have
perhaps
have
recommendations
that
feel
feel
right
and-
and
you
know,
really
are
consistent
with
our
current
Community
goals
and
we
could
certainly
look
at
moving
forward
on
some
of
those
land
use
and
Zoning
changes
more
quickly.
H
G
Some
of
those
particular
areas
and
I
think
hearing
your
feedback
tonight
is
certainly
going
to
help
us
move
forward
and
and
sort
of
sharpen
our
pencils
as
we
as
we
move
back
in
and
really
refine
the
scope
of
work
and
the
schedule.
Those
are
the
things
that
we
can
come
back
to
you
here
later
before
the
end
of
the
year,
with
with
more
details
on
that.
D
K
Thanks
Matt,
so
my
first
question
has
to
do
with
I've
heard
about
maybe
a
culvert
going
in
under
sort
of
the
railroad
in
order
to
alleviate
some
flood
issues
and
I
was
just
wondering
how
this
does
picking
a
timeline.
You
know
the
option
A
or
option
b
have
any
impact
on
how
quickly
those
kinds
of
utility
things
might
move
forward.
C
I
think
we
would
see
if
Joe
tadiucci
is
on
perhaps
after
that,
unless
Brad
can
take
a
bite
at
that
apple.
F
Brad
yeah
Joe's
not,
but
but
we
have
talked
a
little
bit
about
that
so
just
to
make
sure
I
followed
your
question.
Lauren
just
wondering,
were
you
wondering
about
how
the
mapping
would
play.
A
K
Well,
I
guess
my
question
is:
is
that
I
mean
it
seems
like
that
update
to
help
provide
some
I
mean
I'm?
Assuming
that
that's
to
help
reduce
our
you
know
the
area?
That's
in
100
year
flood
zone
and
the
danger
that's
there.
So
is
that
moving
that
forward,
dependent
at
all
on
the
rate
at
which
we
move
the
rest
of
this
forward,
or
is
that
kind
of
going
to
run
on
its
own
track
and.
F
K
F
Not
my
understanding
is
that
the
boulder
Slough
has
already
undergone
the
mapping
phase
and
that
the
next
one
is
mitigation
planning.
F
I
think
there's
some
Independence
between
the
two,
but
we
can
certainly
take
that
question
back
and
get
back
to
you
in
more
detail
about
it.
We'll
talk
about
this
a
little
bit
more
as
we
go
on,
but
we
also
have
a
plan.
November
10th
work
session
with
Council,
and
that
would
be
a
opportunity
where
we
could
lay
out
all
the
various
elements
in
a
more
detailed
plan.
So
I
could
Envision
us
bringing
that.
Then
too.
C
L
K
I
mean
I
guess
the
question
is
some
of
those.
Is
that
a
utility
Improvement
that
depends
on
this
plan
moving
forward
or
is
it
you
know
unrelated,
but
work,
that's
happening
nearby
on
its
own
already,
okay,
thanks.
C
Sort
of
a
gorilla
in
the
room-
it
was
not
literally
in
our
room,
but
that's
the
railroad
and
so
that's
a
whole
nother.
You
know
beast
of
the
whole
thing,
but
you
know
what
what
I
gathered
from
what
you
know
I.
Obviously
what
Brad
said
was
right,
but
one
thing
I
I
did
pick
up
on
is
from
Joe
that
they're
just
starting
their
work,
planning
items
and
remember
when
we
just
passed
the
storm
water
and
Flood
Master
Plan.
C
So
so
I
think
there
are
some
considerations
that
utilities
would
take
into
account
based
on
any
any
acceleration
or
priority
in
terms
of
whether
it's
industrial
or
more
housing
in
that
space,
because
that
would
change
how
it's
prioritized
on
the
rubric
that
we
just
passed
with
the
with
the
master
plan.
So
they
are
kind
of
connected
in
how
they
would
then
prioritize
and
then
move
forward
and
certainly
work
with
Brad
and
his
team
on
that
process.
K
Thank
you
and
then
my
other
question
was
to
me.
It
seems
like
the
option
b
feels
like
it
actually
does
include
quite
a
bit
more
than
option
A
and
I
guess
you're
planning
on
adding
more
Staffing
to
accomplish
it
faster,
but
to
me
I
was
surprised
that
there
is
only
the
six
to
nine
month.
Difference
between
the
two.
Do
you
think,
do
you
feel
confident
in
that
assessment.
G
We
do
you
know.
Certainly
this
is
a
first
pass
at.
G
You
know,
really
kind
of
laying
out
a
general
scope
of
work
and
what
we
anticipate
needing
I
think
the
key
for
us
during
you
know,
as
we
were
thinking
about
option
b,
is
being
strategic
about
what
what
types
of
things
were
reopening
within
the
plan.
Like
what
questions
are
we
asking?
We
certainly
are
not
taking
the
approach
or
wouldn't
propose
the
approach
of
scrapping
everything.
That's
there
and
starting
over.
We
have
a
really
great
Baseline
to
work
from.
G
We
have
some
excellent
outcomes
from
phase
one
that
we
can
really
lean
on
and
learn
from.
So
I
think
we
would
be
pretty.
We
would
attempt
to
be
pretty
surgical,
I
think
about
the
about
the
land,
use
or
connections,
recommendations
that
we
want
to
revisit,
rather
than
you
know,
really
revisiting
the
whole
thing
so
I
think
that's
partly
how
we
think
we
could.
You
know,
extend
or
expand
the
the
scope
of
the
project
and
still
maintain
a
relatively
you.
B
M
L
Just
one
understand:
if
we
sorry
if
this
is
duplicative
of
what
somebody
else
already
asked,
but
if
we
go
to
option
b
here,
does
that
have
a
ripple
effect
on
other
Council
priorities
such
as
occupancy,
say
or
adus.
H
F
I
can
start
with
that
one
we're
going
to
talk
about
that
a
little
more
contextually
in
the
second
half
of
this,
but
the
short
answer
is
no.
This.
This
already
has
been
on
a
track
before
those
others
and
the
key
staff
that
are
involved
with
that
we
haven't
had
quite
the
same
impacts,
the
kind
of
questioning
around
Staffing
on
the
mid
to
longer
end
of
the
overall
project.
F
We
may
be
able
to
get
some
efficiencies
with
Consultants.
Certainly
the
idea
of
respect
and
support
this
evening
or
the
question
of
of
facing
some
of
the
finer
grain
elements.
F
But
this
is
a
is
relatively
independent
of
the
others.
Do
you
have
anything
else,
Dan
Christopher,
that,
based
on
our
conversations,
no.
G
Work,
we,
you
know
two,
two
different
groups
of
folks
and
and
I
think
we'd
be
able
to
I,
don't
think
that
any
expansion
of
the
Boulder
Junction
work.
What
happened
effect
on
those
on
those
code
updates
thanks.
L
Sure,
and,
and
just
want
to
expand
that
my
question,
maybe
would
it
have
an
impact
on
anything
like
would
I
hear
a
lot
as
a
council
member?
Well,
we
have
you
know
we
have
a
limited
amount
that
we
can
do
with
the
the
staff
that
we
have,
which
I
understand
so
I
just
want
to
understand.
If
we,
if
we
do,
you
know,
broaden
this
to
the
bigger
option
b
timeline.
Is
that
going
to
impact
anything
else?
We
might
want
to
do
or
be
doing.
F
Sure
I
appreciate
that
question
in
in
kind
of
very
basic
terms,
the
Boulder
Junction
2
is
handled
by
comprehensive
planning
staff,
that's
where
we
are
most
fully
ramped
up
and
this
being
a
fairly
discreet
project
over
multiple
months,
wouldn't
get
impacted
by
some
of
the
other
kind
of
code
changes
and
other
priority
projects.
F
The
other
big
one
and
we'll
touch
on
this
is
the
area
three
research,
where
the
question
of
resources
comes
into
play
relative
to
some
of
these
planning
projects,
as
opposed
to
code
update
projects,
does
in
kind
of
relate
to
the
longer
time
frame,
and
for
that
we
already
in
the
budget
you'll
see
a
request
for
an
additional
planner
for
comprehensive
planning
that
would
support
this
timeline
either
of
these
two
timelines,
as
we've
represented
them,
as
well
as
a
request
for
some
Consulting
dollars.
C
And
yeah
so
I,
just
to
maybe
button
that
that
up
clear
I
totally
understand
that
you
know
the
code.
Work
is
a
different
team
than
the
comprehensive
planning,
but
maybe
more
specifically,
you
know
if,
given
the
request
for
Staffing,
if
we
were
to
delay
or
sort
of
jettison
the
area,
three
from
sort
of
our
current
timeline
of
work
plan
would
would
that
free
up
resources
to
shorten
the
timeline
of
option
b.
F
Yeah
I'll,
let
Christopher
kind
of
kick
me
under
the
table
if
he
disagrees
but
I
think
the
answer
is,
it
would
provide
some
efficiency.
So
if
we
were
looking
at
that
gen
chart
again
it
would
it
would
compress,
but
there
are
certain
elements
of
this
planning
process
that
are
sequential,
so
there's
there's
kind
of
a
limit
to
how
much
of
that
we
would
be
able
to
do.
G
Yeah
I,
don't
I,
don't
know
if
I
can
Venture
a
guess
in
terms
of
specific
timelines,
but
you're
exactly
right.
I
do
think
we,
you
know,
obviously
having
staff
you
know
generally.
The
entirety
of
the
team
focused
on
this
project
would
certainly
help
to
accelerate
certain
aspects.
I
think
one
area
that
we
run
into
in
terms
of
these
planning
projects
that
option
b
is
you
know
in
terms
of
having
to
move
forward
with
the
planned
Amendment.
G
Something
we
can't
avoid
is
is
just
the
the
process
it
takes
to
run
through
our
boards
and
commissions
and
city
council
to
ultimately
get
approval
of
that
before
we
could
move
forward
with
land
use,
updates
and
Zoning
updates,
and
things
like
that.
So
that's
that's
kind
of
a
it's
kind
of
a
given.
You
know
that
that's
going
to
take
time
to
work
through
that
entire
process,
but
certainly
the
engagement
piece,
the
development
of
Alternatives
and
valuation
of
those
Alternatives.
A
C
C
Perhaps
we
can
Circle
back
to
this
question
and
maybe
raise
that
to
everyone
on
Council
as
if
there's
perhaps
a
a
preference
or
desire
on
whether
or
not
they
want
to
lean
towards
moving
area
three
to
gain
some
efficiencies
or
if
we
want
to
table
that
decision
for
another
time,
but
we
might
Circle
back
to
that
in
the
later
part
of
this
conversation
just
to
just
to
maybe
give
staff
a
little
bit
more
clarity
as
to
where
council
is
on
that
particular
issue.
If
that's
all
right
with
you,
Brad
yep,
okay,.
M
M
It
is
because
you
do
want
to
update
what
needs
to
be
updated.
F
Yeah
fundamentally,
the
recognition
that
15
years
have
passed-
and
you
know
life
in
the
world-
has
changed.
Then
a
secondary
and
very
important
consideration
too,
that
there
are
residents
now
where
there
hadn't
been
before
so
there's
a
voice
and
voices
there.
That
could
only
be
predicted
in
the
past,
but
are
known
now
and
then
we
do
have
some
more
robot.
F
Excuse
me
robust
tools
available
now,
such
as
the
racial
Equity
tool
and
such
we
would
use
those
in
both
cases,
but
using
that
in
conjunction
with
the
Outreach
tools
and
Outreach
teams
that
have
been
developed
since
then,
Community
connectors
and
those
types
of
opportunities.
B
D
Right
well,
if
I,
if
people
don't
mind
with
me,
starting
with
a
little
bit
of
background
information
here
so
I,
don't
know
how
many
of
you
have
talked
to
about
this.
But
I
went
to
a
little
three-day
mayor's
Institute
of
City
design
conference
several
months
ago
and
I
brought
this
project
forward
to
for
people
to
look
at
and
discuss
and
I
have
not
gotten.
D
But
I
did
not
so
I'm
just
going
to
offer
just
a
few
high-level
things,
things
that
I
heard
from
on
that,
and
then
I'll
offer
my
own
comments
after
that,
the
the
people
that
so
there
there
were
some
design
professionals
there
and
some
some
other
Mayors
from
other
jurisdictions,
and
they
noted
what
a
fantastic
opportunity
this
was
for
the
city
is,
is
one
of
you
know
a
few
redevelopable
areas
you
know
kind
of
left
in
town
and
and
and
thought
that,
given
our
current
housing
prices
and
the
needs
in
our
community
me
that
it
made
sense
to
focus
on
housing
as
the
driving
kind
of
use
in
this
area.
D
But
just
maybe
something
to
think
about
is
a
potential
importance
of
place
making
here
that
if
it
has
a
strong
individual
identity
that
it
could
help
draw
people
in
and
make
it
a
kind
of
a
crown
jewel
of
Boulder
and
and
not
just
an
area
that
has
a
few
apartment
buildings,
so
I
think
those
are
the
top
level
thoughts.
I
got
from
that
which
I
thought
all
raised,
pretty
good
points
and
then
I'll
turn.
D
Then
personally,
so
I
I'm
gonna
go
with
the
option
b
fundamentally
here,
because
I
think
the
the
land
uses
do
you
need
some
updating
and,
in
particular
I
think
they
need
to
focus
much
more
carefully
on
housing.
You
know,
I
think
the
you
know.
We
know
how
much
of
a
need
we
have
for
housing
in
this
in
our
community
and
so
I'd
really
like
to
see
the
land
uses
updated
to
reflect
that
and
so
I
think
we
do
need
a
bit
of
a
heavier
lift
in
that
area.
D
On
the
transportation
side,
I'll
say
in
looking
at
it,
I
don't
immediately
have
anything
where
I
say:
oh
well,
that's
really
out
of
date.
You
should
really
do
something
else
instead,
so
but
of
course,
I
think
we
should
have
tab,
look
at
it
right
to
say
see
if
they
think
that
it's
up
to
date
or
would
need
revisions
and
or
maybe
some
of
it
if
we
change
the
land
uses
that
might
trigger
some
reevaluation
to
Transportation
connections.
My
guess
is
not
that
much,
but
you
know
we
certainly
want
to
hear
from
tab.
D
D
You
know
that
when,
when
pencils
turn
over
there's,
inevitably
some
number
of
months
of
delay
as
folks
shift
priorities
and
things
like
that-
and
it's
also
really
great
to
have
a
group
of
people,
so
your
project
at
least
partially
to
to
fruition
so
I'm
gonna,
I'm
gonna,
put
in
a
plug
for
some
kind
of
phasing
for
the
detailed
land
use
and
Zoning
changes
going
from
south
to
North
and
and
see.
D
If
I
ask
you
all,
if
you
feel
like
it's
possible,
maybe
to
get
through
the
infrastructure
piece,
and
then
you
know
a
first
phase
that
we
could
finish
out
by
you
know
the
next
fall
kind
of
time
frame.
So
you
know
maybe
you'll
come
back
to
us
and
tell
me
that's
totally
impossible
and
if
so,
that's
the
way
it
is
but
I'd
just
love
to
hear
from
you.
If
you
do
think
that
might
be
possible
with
that
kind
of
approach.
D
And
what
was
our
third
question
that
was:
oh
was
further
updates,
which
I've
already
given
you.
So
those
are.
Those
are
my
thoughts.
I'm
really
excited
to
be
getting
going
on
this
and
I
do
think
it.
It
can
turn
out
to
be
well
I'll
just
make
this
another
comment.
Let's,
let's
make
sure
this
is
a
special
unique
place
in
the
city
of
Boulder
right.
C
Thanks
thanks,
Aaron
I
still
had
a
couple
questions
I
know
Aaron
got
into
answering,
which.
C
I'll
get
him
I'll
get
done.
No,
that's
fine!
Lauren
did
you
have
more
questions,
or
were
you
going
to
jump
on
to
answering
SAS
questions
for
a
ladder
awesome?
Well
then,
I'll
I'll
I'll
go
to
you
next
Once
I
ask
stuff
a
little
about
my
my
upfront
questions
and
we'll
jump
into
that,
probably
for
everyone
else.
Unless
someone
has
some
free
questions
so
question
couple,
questions
I
have
is
certainly
in
kind
of
where
Aaron's
comments
were
about
really
being
intentional
about
housing
and
and
thinking
about
that
sort
of
IMU.
C
One
and
two
that
currently
exists
and-
and
thinking
about
you
know,
is
there
any
restriction
in
really
moving
that
towards
an
area
that
I
think
a
lot
of
us
were
pretty
happy
with
with
the
East
Boulder
subcommunity
plan.
Was
that
sort
of
mu3tod
you
know,
I
mean
being
so
close
to
the
Boulder
Junction
itself,
you
know,
Transit
oriented
development
seems
Seems,
really
ripe
in
certain
parts
of
that
area
in
proximity
and
so
I
didn't
know.
C
You
know
in
those
revisions
is
that
kind
of
where
you're
thinking
in
into
building
that
kind
of
continuity,
with
what
we
have
in
East,
Boulder,
sub-community
and
and
bridging
that
Gap
and
so
I
sort
of
wanted
to
ask
about
that
in
in
one
pence
and
then
I
have
a
question
about
office
and
Industrial
after
that.
So
and
I'll
start
with
the
IMU
one
and
two
question.
G
Sure
yeah
thanks
for
that
question.
Admittedly,
we
haven't
gotten
into
a
ton
of
you
know,
detail
on
on
what
changes
we
might
think
about,
or
what
alternative
land
use
is
we
might
put
forward,
but
certainly
you
know,
I
do
think
that
there
is
a
lot
of
value
in
the
work
that
was
done
just
over.
You
know
more
recently,
over
three
years
in
East
boulder
around
that
station
area,
master
Planet,
55th
and
Arapahoe,
which
is
visionary
and
based
on
future
Transit.
G
But
we
have
an
opportunity
here
where
Transit
already
exists
and
hopefully,
RTD
is
able,
to
you
know,
bring
service
back
to
this
location
as
soon
as
possible,
so
I
I,
you
know,
certainly
that
is.
That
is
a
point
that
we
would
look
to.
You
know
immediately
as
one
of
our
first
options
to
evaluate
and
think
about
how
we
might
make
some
adjustments
and
certainly
there's
some
some
benefit
to
I.
G
That
we
might
look
at
here
and
also
the
fact
that
we
already
have
form-based
code
in
place.
We
might
need
to
modify
it
and
update
it,
but
we
already
have
a
lot
of
that
of
that
structure
already
in
place
and
the
general
Improvement
districts
already
exist
on
the
other
other
side
of
the
track.
So
we
can
look
at
whether
or
not
simple
expansion
of
that
makes
sense,
as
opposed
to
trying
to
set
up
and
establish
a
new
District.
So
I
do
think,
there's
a
lot
of
opportunities
both
within
the
existing.
C
I
I
appreciate
that
I
mean
it
sort
of
generally
answered
my
other
question
just
in
terms
of
how
much
we're
going
to
leverage
that
work
that
was
just
sort
of
across
Foothills,
so
so
I
I
appreciate
that
I
think
that
that's
good
Synergy
and
leverages
work
that
you
already
know
has
a
lot
of
support,
certainly
from
us
and
the
community
at
large.
C
So
I
appreciate
that
oh
I'm
gonna
move
over
to
Lauren,
so
she
can
answer
staff
questions
and
then
hopefully
everyone
can
chime
in
on
their
responses
and
then
we
can
hopefully
synthesize
what
we're
going
to
give
guidance
to
staff
on
and
keep
the
ball
rolling.
So
I
see
Lauren
then
I
see
Nicole
foreign.
K
Thanks
Matt
and
thank
you
staff
for
the
presentation
and
for
your
thinking
on
this
and
bringing
forth
multiple
options.
I
think
I
am
also
leaning
towards
more
of
an
option
too.
You
know
so
much
has
changed
since
2007
and
I
think
that
it
would.
These
plans
represent
really
quite
a
long
frame
for
development.
This
is
something
that
we're
going
to
be
implementing
for
the
next
15
years,
and
so
we
don't
want
to
be
implementing.
K
You
know
30
year
olds,
thinking
in
15
years,
so
I
think
it
is
really
important
for
us
to
take
advantage
of
some
of
the
really
smart
choices
that
went
into
the
East
Boulder
sub-community
plan,
like
Matt,
was
talking
about
the
transit-oriented
districts
sort
of
around
the
transit
hubs.
The
I
also
really
appreciated
how
that
plan
had
housing
specifically
tried
to
take
any
area
that
had
sort
of
green
space
and
rapid
and
housing
I
think
that
something
like
that
could
be
appropriate
here
as
well,
and
as
you
mentioned,
we
have
more
residents
living
nearby.
K
That
should
have
a
say
in
how
this
area
gets
developed
as
well.
As
you
know,
new
tools
like
a
racial
Equity
tool
that
I
would
really
like
to
see
play
a
bigger
role
in
how
we're
thinking
about
these
very
important
decisions.
K
K
Reduce
our
climate
impact.
So
what
are
the
sort
of
you
know
if
we
were
going
to
look
at
this
just
through
a
climate
lens?
What
kind
of
zoning
would
we
pick
for
these
areas
based
on
that,
and
so
I
would
really
like
to
see
EAB
also
involved
in
this,
as
we
move
forward
with
looking
at
what
this
new
zone,
or
you
know
what
modifications
we
might
make.
K
And
then
in
term
I
guess,
like
Aaron
I'm,
a
little
bit
less
sure
about
the
transit
plan
and
if
that
still
makes
sense,
I
would
really
be
interested
to
see
how
tab
feels
about
it
and
if
they
think
that
it
means
significant
updates
or
not.
B
Thank
you
thanks,
Lauren
I
see
Nicole,
then
Tara.
J
For
all
the
reasons,
every
bit
already
stated,
the
one
thing
I
will
just
bring
that
comes
out
of
our
Dr
Cog
meeting
last
night
and
approving
the
greenhouse
gas
mitigation
reduction
plan.
There
is
that
they're
going
to
be
offering
technical
assistance
and
things
as
well
for
communities
that
are
interested
in
trying
to
build
more
housing
along
Transit,
High,
Transit
areas
and
corridors,
and
so
that
it
sounds
like
it's
just
going
to
be
available
to
communities
that
wish
to
use
it.
J
M
Down
the
mute
buttons
good
for
me,
okay,
let
me
just
get
my
notes.
M
M
What
is
great
I,
don't
want
to
be
a
negative
now
you
know,
but
when
I
was
reading,
the
the
TV
app
plan
has
a
lot
of
pages
that
we
had
to
read
a
lot
of.
It
was
words
like
vibrant
and
Community
Center,
and
some
of
the
areas
are
not
vibrant,
nor
are
they
community
centers.
So
some
of
the
year.
C
N
Thanks
I
am
also
going
to
be
supportive
of
option
b,
I'm
less
concerned
with
how
long
it
takes,
although
you
know
doing
it,
expeditiously
is
better
but
I'm
more
concerned
with
getting
it
right.
I
I
think
Tara's
initial
comments
before
she
became
garbled
were
correct.
One
of
the
things
we
ought
to
be
looking
at
is:
where
are
the
successors,
successes
and
failures
in
TV1
and,
let's
not
repeat
the
mistakes
and
let's
emphasize
the
things
that
that
are
good
and
that
have
worked
well.
N
I
would
much
prefer
that
that
we
do
option
b
and
really
look
at
this
with
new
eyes
and
with
current
understandings
of
Transportation
of
the
kinds
of
housing
we
want
kinds
of
housing.
We
need
Etc,
so
I'm,
I'm,
very
supportive
of
that
I
I,
would
I
would
not
abandon
the
urban
Services
study
for
area
three.
N
This
is
a
part,
these
Parcels
of
land,
if
the
next
could
provide
a
significant
opportunity,
not
just
for
housing
but
for
affordable
and
potentially
middle
income.
Housing
either
through
Community
benefit
agreements,
if
we
Annex
private
properties
and
at
our
own
discretion,
if
we
own
the
properties
so
I
would
I
would
not
walk
away
from
that
under
any
circumstances,
because
I
think
there's
we're
not
going
to
run
out
of
Need
for
housing
before.
N
If
we
could
do
tivap
2
tomorrow,
we'd
still
need
more
housing,
so
I
think
the
area
three
well.
The
planning
Reserve
is
is
an
important
asset
and
we
ought
to
be
moving
forward
and
looking
at
that
as
well.
Thanks.
O
All
right,
thank
you
Tara.
This
is
great.
I
am
in
full
support
of
the
comment
made
by
Mark
about
area.
Three
I
was
the
strong
proponent
of
the
study
being
done
because
of
the
very
reason
mentioned
by
Mark,
which
is
affordable,
housing
and
Workforce
housing,
which
is
something
that
is
greatly
needed
in
the
community.
O
But
I
was
looking
at
to
answer
the
question.
I
agree:
option
b,
because
even
looking
at
some
of
the
the
processes,
it
seems,
option
b
offers
a
little
bit
more,
which
I
welcome
and
I.
When
I
was
looking
at
the
slide
as
well
and
I
thought
Lauren
was
going
to
mention
that,
because
she's
the
architect
in
the
room
about
you,
know
our
architecture
and
the
importance
of
ensuring
that
there
is
some
level
of
beauty
in
the
way
that
we
do.
O
This
work,
also
on
page
25,
I,
welcome
the
additional
multi-use
path
and
pedestrian
connection
I
think
that's
very
important.
You
also
mentioned
the
racial
Equity
tool,
especially
in
this
type
of
project.
Sometimes
it's
hard
to
find
okay.
How
do
we
ensure
that
we
bring
Equity
into
the
work
into
this
type
of
work?
Sometimes
we
don't
see
it
because
it
feels
so
concrete,
but
I
really
appreciate
that
as
well.
O
I
appreciate
the
comment
that
you
made
actually
Tara,
you
are
gonna,
say
something
about
being
Community,
centered
and
I
and
I
think
that
was
great
as
well.
That
is
very
important
and
also
there
was
a
comment
about
actually
in
one
of
the
slides
about
tailored
Community
engagement.
That's
very
important,
because
it's
not
enough
to
just
do
community
engagement,
it's
more
important
that
we
ensure
that
it
is
tailored
to
the
community.
M
O
M
Right
you
sound
great,
so
I'm
not
gonna,
well,
I'll,
just
repeat
a
few
things:
yes,
I'm
Beauty!
Yes,
this
is
the
opportunity
really.
This
is
a
great
opportunity,
make
something
beautiful
to
make
something
that
really
is
a
community
center,
so
going
back
to
looking
at
what
is
not
a
community
center
and
what
is
a
community
center
in
the
current
in
the
current
tv
app
and
the
current
Boulder
Junction
would
be
a
really
good
idea.
M
I
want
to
say
that
to
me
listening
to
the
community
that
lives
there
and
the
community
connectors
is
probably
one
of
the
most
important
things,
because
when
you're
far
away
from
it,
we
don't
live
there.
Let's
say
there
are
certain
things
that
we
don't
know.
We
don't
know
well,
we
do
know
because
people
write
to
us
for
sure,
but
it
will
be
best
to
hear
from
them
before
we
make
any.
M
What
I
would
call
of
the
same
mistakes,
I'm
not
saying
we're
making
mistakes,
but
it
will
be
good
to
know
if
we
are
making.
If
we
have
made
mistakes
to
not
do
them
over
again,
so
everything
else,
everybody
else
said
great
things
and
I,
don't
need
to
repeat
them.
So
I'm
going
to
go
with
door
number
two.
B
C
L
Missed
it
you'll,
never
I'll,
never
be
able
to
supportive
of
as
well
and
to
Tara's
point
about
engagement.
I
do
think
that
people
who
live
at
Boulder
Junction
now
are
probably
in
a
good
position
to
give
us
important
feedback
and
I
think
we
have
two
boards
and
I,
don't
remember
if
that
was
specifically
built
in,
but
you
know,
along
with
planning
and
tab.
L
I
would
think
those
two
boards
should
have
a
lot
of
good
input
as
as
we're
looking
at
what
what
has
and
hasn't
worked
and
as
I
recall,
it's
hard
to
fill
those
boards.
So
that's
one
thing:
that's
not
working
I
mean
something
about
the
process
already
isn't
great.
So
so,
let's
include
them
and
figure
out.
Maybe
how
we
can
do
some
of
that
better.
B
Thanks
Rachel
Aaron
go
ahead
and
add
your.
D
Great
Just
one
thought
I
forgot
to
include
was
just
in
terms
of
efficiencies
that
we
have
just
gone
through:
the
East
polishable
Community
planning
process
and
that
area
of
town
was
very
similar
to
this
area
of
town
and
so
I
think,
rather
than
Reinventing
all
of
the
wheels
I
think
we
could
borrow
some
of
those
ideas.
So
obviously
we
want
to
do
the
community
outreach
and
the
things
that
folks
have
said
about
Outreach
to
nearby
neighbors
and
the
community.
D
Connectors
are
really
important
in
applying
the
racial
Equity
tools,
so
not
to
pre-determine
anything,
but
if,
once
as
we
get
that
feedback,
if
we
look
at
some
of
the
tools
or
some
of
the
methods
that
we
applied
to
these
Fuller
subcommunity
plan,
we
could
maybe
use
some
pre-existing
work
that
we've
done
to
get
a
great
outcome
here.
That
also
is
a
little
bit
more
efficient.
I
just
want
to
throw
that
idea
out
there
as
well.
C
B
C
So
you
know
before
I
answer
the
well.
Let's
see
I
can
answer
the
question
and
I'll
look
to
clarify
from
from
Brad
and
maybe
Christopher
and
Sarah
on
on
a
point
that
sort
of
seemed
to
be
brought
up
by
some
of
my
colleagues.
So
I
I
mean
I'll.
Just
make
this
sort
of
unanimous.
C
We
we
all
as
soon
as
we
set
a
plan
we
own
we
deal
with
obsolescence,
oh
pretty
quickly
with
how
things
change
so
modernizing
it
as
much
as
possible
and
if
we
could
somehow
just
prognosticate
the
future
15
years
from
now
and
make
a
plan
for
that.
Wouldn't
life
be
great,
we'd
have
flying
cars,
and-
and
you
know
all
those
things
already,
but
but
so
I
think
that
option
b
is
the
way
to
go.
C
I
did
want
to
clarify
and
ask
Brad
a
question,
and
maybe
that
helps
clarify
Mark
and
juni's
concerns
about
area.
Three
is:
is
there
a
critical
path
from
which
studying
area
three
has
to
be
done
by
in
order
to
be
incorporated
into
the
next
round
of
the
Boulder
Valley
comp
plan?
I'm
just
wondering
do
we
have
a?
C
Are
we
already
at
that
point
where
if
we
don't
start
it
now
we
miss
that
window
or
do
we
have
some
grace
period
that
we
we
can
work
with
with
regards
to
delaying
it,
but
not
missing
that
important
window,
which
is
really
the
whole
point
of
the
urban
study,
is
to
have
it
ready
for
the
comp
plan
conversation
so
I'm
just
wondering
timing-wise.
Do
we
have
something
to
work
with
there?
Are
we
already
sort
of
you
know
borrowed
for
time.
F
Yeah
Matt,
that's
an
excellent
question
and
I'm
afraid.
I
simply
don't
know
the
answer.
Maybe
Christopher
or
we've
got
some
other
staff
who
can
I
I
will
offer
up
that.
F
You
know
this
is
the
basic
tension
of
comprehensive
planning,
which
is
the
not
urgent
but
important,
and
so
our
instincts
as
planners
are
too
want
to
move
all
things
forward.
All
the
time
because
we
know
this
Day
of
Reckoning
so
to
speak,
will
come
on
all
all
things
long-range
planning,
but
there
is
and
obviously
must
be,
a
prioritization.
F
At
the
same
time,
I
would
suspect
this
will
be
the
greater
part
of
our
conversation
in
November
a
little
bit
on
the
second
half,
but
certainly
it's
a
retreat
as
well
so
but
to
the
mechanical
question
of
its
a
relationship
to
the
Boulder
Valley,
comprehensive,
Plano
deferred
others
on
staff.
Here.
G
Yeah
I'm
happy
to
chime
in
on
that
a
bit
I
mean
the
so.
The
next
major
update
for
the
comprehensive
plan
is
scheduled
for
2025,
which
you
know,
of
course,
will
be
upon
us
before.
We
know
it,
but
the
completion
of
that
Baseline
Urban
Services
study
in
order
to
inform
those
conversations
and
be
referenced
within
the
document.
G
You
know
really
we
have
until
until
that
date,
so
it
could
be
completed
next
year.
It
could
be
completed
in
24
before
we
get
into
that
2025
major
update
and
even
though
I
am
new
to
the
city.
G
You
know
what
I
have
seen
in
terms
of
those
major
updates
to
the
comprehensive
plan
is
that
they
often
tend
to
not
occur
actually
right
on
schedule
on
2025,
so
that
could
you
know
conceivably
even
extend
into
26.,
hopefully
not
if,
if
I
have
anything
to
do
with
it,
but
you
know
certainly
that
that
could
happen.
C
I
I
appreciate
that
that
adds
a
little
bit
of
context
to
it.
I
guess
what
I'm
hearing
is
that
we
we
we
we
do
have
a
little
bit
of
time
is
what
I'm
kind
of
hearing,
maybe
not
exactly
known
and
maybe
there's
greater
context
in
November
as
to
what
that
might
look
like
and
then
maybe
what
I?
G
Yeah
generally,
from
a
you
know,
from
a
workload
standpoint
and
certainly
the
creation
of
new
materials.
Yes,
most
of
that,
most
of
that
is
really
front
loaded
in
terms
of
engaging
the
community
listening
to
people
creating
Alternatives
and
refining
those.
You
know
ultimately
landing
on
a
preferred
option.
G
H
G
Any
ordinances
that
would
actually
change
the
code
or
change
zoning.
You
know
you
know
type
of
thing
so
within
that
20
within
our
current,
you
know
window
of
the
22
to
24
months
that
we
were
anticipating
for
phase
two
or
for
option
b.
G
That
does
include,
or
attempts
to
try
to
incorporate
some
of
those
additional
implementation
steps.
So
it's
not
necessarily
just
to
get
to
a
plan
amendment
in
24
months.
We
think
we
might
be
able
to.
Actually
you
know
do
some
of
those
other
code
updates
and
implementation
steps
as
well
within
that
time
frame.
C
All
right
that
that's
helpful
context
and
I
just
wanted
to
then
Circle
Tech
to
Mark
and
Juni
with
concerns
about
area
three,
you
know
if
there
was
a
desire
to
gain
those
efficiencies,
because
I
definitely
want
to
make
sure
that
whatever
we
do
with
Area
3
is
incorporated.
The
compound
we
probably
all
share
that
intention,
but
would
would
you
be
amenable
if
we
delayed
the
start
of
the
area
three
to
gain
efficiencies,
knowing
that
by
still
starting
it?
C
You
know
nine
months
from
now
a
year
we
still
get
it
done
in
time
for
it
to
be
ultimately
incorporated
into
the
comp
plan
is:
is
that
because
I'm
trying
to
see,
can
we
have
our
cake
and
eat
it?
It's
more
or
less
what
I'm
kind
of
asking
and
I
think
what
I'm
hearing
from
Brad
and
Christopher
is?
We
probably
can
with
regards
to
this
and
so
Mark
Juni,
since
you
had
those
concerns,
I
just
want
to
Circle
back
knowing
that
now.
N
No,
it
it
really
doesn't
matter,
I,
look
at
the
area
3
as
a
greater
opportunity
for
affordable
and
middle
income
housing
than
TV2,
which
is
basically
going
to
be
market
rate
housing
in
whatever
configuration
we
permit
with
either
cash
and
Lou,
or
you
know,
25,
affordable
area
three,
as
I
said,
to
the
extent
that
that
there
are
properties
out
there
that
the
city
owns.
We
have
full
discretion
as
to
what
we
want
to
do
with
it
and
with
respect
to
properties
we
don't
own.
N
C
All
right,
I
appreciate
you
clarifying
Tara,
I,
see
your
hand
up,
and
then
you
can
maybe
button
this
up.
Yeah.
M
Quick
question:
when
we
had
we
had
our
tours
to
the
east
Boulder
sub
community
plan
areas
that
really
helped
me
I'm,
a
very
visual
person
and
to
be
able
to
see
it
made
a
big
difference
and
I'm
wondering
if,
before
the
November
meeting,
can
we
have
another
tour,
I'd
love
to
go
see
extensively.
M
What
areas,
even
even
looking
at
TV
app
one
even
looking
at
the
areas
that
are
that
did
and
didn't
work
and
then
going
to
the
next
section
and
checking
that
out
and
I
think
visualizing
will
really
help.
At
least
me.
C
Wonderful
I
think
that's
a
great
idea,
Tara
thanks
for
bringing
that
up.
We
all
love
our
field
trips,
preferably
when
the
weather's
nice.
That
would
be
nice.
C
So,
let's,
let's
see
if
we
can
wrap
this
up
and
then
you
know
and
make
sure
if
there's
any
clarifying
from
from
staff,
but
it
looks
pretty
it's
well.
It
looks
like
unanimously.
We
want
to
move
with
option
b,
so
I
think
that's
really
clear
guidance
for
staff.
With
regards
to
those
first
two
questions
and
then
sort
of
one
that
that's
and
then
there's
a
you
know.
C
One
comment
that
I
think
kind
of
got
also
repeated,
or
at
least
got
got
tacked
on
to
was
one
that
was
really
kind
of
initiated
by
by
Aaron,
which
was
really
looking
first.
You
know
obviously
looking
at
the
whole
area
but
sort
of
quickly,
starting
to
think
about
in
implementation,
breaking
this
up
into
phases
and
and
sort
of
thinking
about
it
from
a
south
to
North
perspective.
C
But
as
we
look
at
those
things
being
really
intentional,
with
housing
and
really
leaning
into
to
that
aspect
and
intentionality
seemed
to
be
a
theme
as
well
as
we
move
forward
and
I
think
staff.
Certainly
you
guys
have
nodded
your
heads
yeah
that
you're
leaning
that
too,
but
I
think
it's
just
to
be
clear
that
that
was
I.
C
Is
there
even
though
we
chose
B?
Is
there
interest
in
gaining
any
efficiency
with
regards
to
area
three?
You
know
we
heard
from
Mark
and
Judy
that
they're
not
interested
in
that,
but
I
did
want
to
hear
from
everybody
else,
because
that
might
be
indication
for
staff
in
terms
of
how
they
want
to
think
of
things
in
preparation
for
November
and
so
I
would
just
maybe
quickly
just
sort
of
throw
out
just
a
quick
straw
poll.
C
C
A
D
C
And
I
think
we
heard
that
you
go
ahead.
Lauren.
K
Yeah
and
I
just
wanted
to
add
to
that.
I
I
think
that
there
might
be
other
reasons
like
other
priorities,
that
might
that
I
might
choose
to
put
in
front
of
area
three,
but
in
general,
I
think
that
I
trust
staff
to
balance
their
schedule.
I
mean
I.
Think
that
largely
we
all
agree
that
we
want
to
make
sure
that
this
is
done
for
the
comprehensive
plan,
and
it
is
a
super
important.
You
know
as
Mark
said
area
for
us
to
look
at
so
I.
K
Don't
you
know
I,
don't
want
to
jeopardize
it,
but
I
also
don't
want
to
micromanage
how
things
are
lined
up
in
your
on
the
planning
and
development
services.
Schedule.
K
I
also
just
wanted
to
mention
that
I
I'm
not
sure
that
the
south
to
North
I
would
need
to
look
at
that
in
more
detail
before
I
would
feel
comfortable,
saying
like
that
is
a
plan
that
I
solidly
agree
with
and
support
I
trust
staff
to
if
there
are
way
pieces
that
it
makes
sense
to
bring
forth
more
quickly
for
the
phase
two
I'm
open
to
that.
But
for
me
it's
not
having
it
done
right
and
with
the
strong
engagement
is
my
priority.
C
So
I
think
we're
clear
on
option
three
going
forward.
Any
last
comments
before
we
move
on
all
right,
I
think
we're
all
good
thanks
for
staff's
presentation,
thanks
for
clarifying
A
lot
of
our
questions
and
just
a
last
check
in
with
Brad
Sarah
and
Christopher,
do
you
think
you've
got
what
you
needed
from
us
to
move
forward,
not
just
on
Boulder
Junction
too,
but
certainly
preparation
for
the
November
10th
meeting?
C
C
Awesome,
thank
you
well
just
to
recognize.
Also.
This
is
Sarah's
first
meeting
in
front
of
council
as
as
a
new
person,
so
great
job,
Sarah,
nice
work
and
KJ
as
well.
We
haven't
seen
you
so
thank
you.
You
guys,
you
guys
did
great
awesome.
Well,
thank
you.
So
much
and
thanks
for
everyone's
comments,
link
that
buttons
up
our
conversation
on
Boulder,
Junction
and
Nuria.
Do
you
want
to
turn
it
back
to
you
for
our
transition
to
our
next
subject?
Well,.
E
F
Yes
and
I
will
qualify
that
this
is
much
more
informational
at
this
point,
it
is
really
kind
of
a
preparatory
discussion
leading
up
to
the
November
10th
work
session-
that's
planned,
so
this
is
just
giving
a
broader
picture
because
we
are
comprehensive
planners
of
the
of
the
broader
landscape
planning
projects,
so
take
it
away.
Christopher.
G
G
This
really
is
intended
to
be
informational
and
really
set
the
stage
for
that
November
10th
meeting,
where
we
can
get
into
much
more
details
and
and
decision
making
about
a
number
of
things
really
across
our
department.
G
So
we're
going
to
begin
just
by
providing
a
reminder
of
the
five
Council
priorities
that
involve
our
department
directly
and
then
we're
going
to
hide
just
a
few
other
ongoing
and
unscheduled
items
that
are
on
the
radar
and
sort
of
circling
within
the
department
next
slide.
Please.
G
L
G
H
E
G
Implementation
projects
that
are
continuing
to
come
out
of
the
subcommunity
plan,
a
number
of
zoning
studies,
some
creation
of
form-based
code
infrastructure
planning
Etc.
That
would
be
that
we
will
continue
to
be
moving
forward
with
and
implementing
that
plan,
as
hopefully,
it
leads
to
toward
adoption
on
October
6th.
We
also,
if
you
recall,
committed
to
creating
a
Civic
area
historic
district.
This
was
an
outcome
of
the
decision
not
to
expand
the
landmark
boundary
of
the
band
shell
and
really
the
importance
of
looking
at
this
area
holistically
rather
than
on
that
piecemeal
basis.
H
G
In
particular,
a
lot
of
that
Civic
area
work
is
really
falling
into
the
context
of
a
number
of
other
projects
that
are
focused
on
downtown
currently
and
whether
they
be
led
by.
H
G
Departments
or
or
others
things
like
the
Downtown
Vision.
G
Ongoing,
certainly
the
recent
conversations
around
the
future
of
West,
Pearl
and
Mobility
study
in
that
particular
area,
and
also
thinking
about
connectivity
to
the
CU,
Boulder
campus
and
improving.
You
know
improving
those
connections
between
campus
and
downtown,
particularly
as
it
relates
to
a
new
hotel
conference
center.
That
is,
that
is,
you
know,
set
to
begin
here
fairly
soon.
We
recognize
that
you
know.
Not
only
is
there
just
a
tremendous
amount
of
attention
being
focused
on
downtown
right
now,
but
also
there's
a
there's.
G
A
Time
component
of
all
these
items
and
the
fact
that
they're
all
sort
of
aligning
in
terms
of
their
timing
is
is
somewhat
unusual,
and
we
see
that
presented.
You
know
really
is
a
tremendous
opportunity
for
a
lot
of
cross-disciplinary
collaboration
not
only
within
within
our
city
departments,
but
with
our
stakeholders
and
Community
leaders
as
well.
So.
A
G
Offering
a
chance
to
think
comprehensively
about
all
of
these
components
together
next
slide
and
then
finally,
I
I
would
be
remiss
if
I
didn't
remind
you
about
all
the
ongoing
annual
and
daily
work
that
you
know
our
department
is,
is
responsible
for
that's
our
annual
Capital
Improvements
plan,
our
department
Master
plans
that
fall
under
fall
under
our
wing.
You
know
all
manner
of
applications
and
permits
and
development
cases,
particularly
our
historic
preservation
and
our
development
review
teams,
and
then
thinking
ahead
towards
you
know,
perhaps
the
next
sub
community
plan.
G
What
does
that
look
like
and
where
is
that
located
thinking
about
already
some
of
the
initial
pre-work
for
that
major
update
of
the
comprehensive
plan
in
2025?
So
really
the
goal
here
is
just
to
Simply.
You
know
not
to
just
present
to
you
and
say
we're
busy,
because
I
think
you
know
that,
but
it's
really
just
to
provide.
H
G
Reminder
and
overview
of
all
the
items
that
we
are
thinking
about
and
attempting
to
balance
and
consider,
as
we
start
thinking
about
our
work
planning
for
next
year
and
really
hoping
that
we
can
continue
to
make
a
lot
of
progress
on
the
council
priority
projects.
You
know
within
the
context
of
all
these
other
things
happening,
so
we've
got
one
more
slide
and
I.
Think
Brad
is
going
to
close
that
out
and
then
we'll
move
into
the
next
discussion
section.
F
Yeah,
thank
you
Christopher
and,
as
Christopher
has
mentioned,
and
I've
alluded
to
and
others,
we
will
be
coming
back
to
you
in
about
six
weeks
or
more
with
details
and
thoughts
on
how
we
can
really
strategically
balance
these
and
honor
and
recognize
the
priorities
for
Council
and
priorities.
These
prioritize,
these
various
work
items
I,
want
to
relay
that.
We
have
had
success
in
filling
some
very
important
Staffing
positions,
both
within
comprehensive
Planning
and
Development
review.
F
Some
of
those
were
just
on
the
cusp
of
as
well,
but
it
certainly
did
result
in
delays,
even
even
while
we've
been
fairly
successful
in
getting
those
staffed
up
and
but
onboarding
those
folks
and
getting
people
familiar.
In
the
meantime,
though,
we
do
continue
to
make
good
progress
on
important
efforts
like
finalizing
the
land,
use,
table,
updates
and
refining
the
scope
of
work
for
Boulder
Junction
by
the
end
of
the
year,
which
again
will
be
part
of
what
we
bring
forward
in
November
as
well,
and.
F
2023,
we
look
forward
to
finalizing
the
priorities
with
you
at
the
council
Retreat
and
we
would
anticipate
initiating
the
Adu
code
update
work
during
that
period
and
completing
the
update
to
the
site
review
criteria
that
you've
seen
earlier
and
formally
starting
Boulder
Junction
too,
as
we've
talked
about
tonight
and
then
the
other
items
that
we've
itemized
this
evening
being
part
of
that
broader
discussion
in
the
next
six
weeks
here
so
I
believe
that
concludes
our
presentation.
Map
Advanced
to
the
last
slide
and
any
last
thoughts
that
Council
has
on
this.
Under
your
picture,.
C
Thanks
Brad
thanks
Christopher
anyone
got
any
comments
or
feedback
on
on
this.
Before
we
move
on.
C
Going
once
going
twice
all
right,
I'll
just
add
one
I
I
would
I'd
love
to
see
us
since
we've
been
talking
a
lot
about
comprehensive
planning,
I'd
like
to
see
as
much
of
an
acceleration
on
getting
the
Adu
stuff
done,
because
it's
pretty
I
think
as
we
identified
it
at
the
retreat
was
really
just
a
couple:
targeted
code
changes
and
because
we've
not
long
ago
already
went
through
a
lot
of
community
input
on
adus
I
think
we
can
I
think
we
can
knock
that
out
much
faster
than
than
maybe
otherwise.
C
We
could
think
if
we
just
lay
out
what
three
we
want
and
get
to
code
I
think
we
could
turn
that
around
pretty
quickly.
So
I
just
would
hope
that
we
can
find
some
ways
to
to
do
that.
I
see
Aaron's
hand
up,
go
ahead.
Aaron.
C
Yeah
Aaron,
it
was
on
the
a
couple
slides
earlier.
It
was
on
that
just
maybe
not
at
the
final
slide,
but.
C
B
C
Enough,
so
are
any
other
thoughts
comments
feedback
before
we
head
to
November,
12th
or
number
November
10th
meeting.
C
All
right,
well,
that
was
that
was
fast
appreciate
it
Again
Brad
Christopher
Sarah.
Thank
you.
So
much
I
really
appreciate
you
guys
working
through
this.
We
look
forward
to
seeing
you
again
in
just
a
handful
of
weeks
and
going
through
those
next
little
pieces,
as
we
start
to
knock
out
the
rest
of
these
Retreat
priorities
and
look
forward
to
hearing
some
more
updates
on
that
going
forward.
So
thank
you
appreciate
it
all.
H
E
Thank
you
so
much
Matt,
and
so
tonight
we're
gonna
come
to
you
and
talk
on
our
second
topic
about
discussing
not
a
new
topic
and
really
at
the
request
of
you
all
in
Council,
we've
been
discussing
Library
funding
and
governance
for
years
now,
and
certainly
we
all
know
that
there's
a
ballot
item,
that's
considering
creating
a
Library
District
in
the
near
future.
E
If
the
district
is
passed
by
voters,
there
are
a
series
of
actions
and
steps
that
we
need
that
will
need
to
occur
and,
while
tonight
isn't
really
about
discussing
all
of
those
items,
I
just
wanted
you
to
know
that
staff
is
really
ready
and
we'll
be
prepared
to
bring
the
council
comprehensive
outline
of
that
information
in
November
should
that
ballot
item
indeed
pass.
The
conversation
tonight
is
about
the
potential
reallocation
of
the
funds
that
are
currently
used
to
provide
Library
services.
E
This
is
the
beginning
of
that
conversation
that,
if
the
library
district
is
passed
by,
voters
in
the
fall
will
continue
into
2023.
tonight,
we'll
be
seeking
initial
Council
thoughts
on
the
subject,
and
so
we'll
appreciate
all
the
feedback
that
you
can
give
us.
Additionally,
we
know
when
we
want
to
clarify
some
of
the
information
about
the
property
tax
portion
of
the
library,
funding
and
I
know
that
staff
will
be
talking
about
that
as
well.
So
with
that
I'll
introduce
Cara
Skinner
who,
along
with
Mark,
Wolfe
and
Teresa
Tate,
will
be
presenting
this
item.
Cara.
P
Again
area
and
I
believe
Michael
taught
the
presentation
great.
Thank
you.
Nuria
Cara
skin,
on
Chief,
Financial,
Officer
and
I
think
we
can
move
right
on
to
the
next
slide.
P
Thank
you
Mark.
So,
as
Nuria
mentioned,
we
are
here
this
evening
as
Council
requested
the
discussion
on
the
process,
the
timing
and
priority
making
for
the
reallocation
of
the
budget
that
we
do
believe
would
be
available
beginning
in
2024.
Should
voters
approve
the
library
district
in
November,
so
our
presentation
agenda,
as
you
see
here,
items
two
through
five
relate
to
that
scheduled
discussion
and
Mark
wolf.
Our
senior
budget
manager
will
take
us
through
that
portion
of
the
presentation.
P
However,
as
Maria
mentioned
before
we
get
to
that
scheduled
conversation,
we
do
want
to
take
a
few
minutes
to
clarify
with
Council
and
the
community
the
impact
of
the
city's
ballot
issue
to
see
and
the
library
Mill
Levy.
So
for
that
conversation
I
will
welcome
our
City
attorney
Teresa
Taylor
Tate
for
the
clarification.
Q
Thank
you
so
much
so
as
council
is
aware,
but
we
want
to
make
the
public
aware
as
well
following
the
publication
of
the
staff
memo
for
tonight's
discussion.
Questions
arose
about
the
impact
of
repealing
certain
provisions
of
City
Charter
related
to
the
library,
specifically
under
ballot
item,
to
see
and
with
respect
to
the
council's
intent
of
the
ballot
question
and
the
ballot
title.
Q
So
these
questions
prompted
further
discussion,
research
and
ultimately
consultation
with
an
outside
expert
in
elections
law
after
one-on-one
conversations
with
each
council
member,
it's
clear
that
the
super
majority
of
council
intended
that
ballot
question
2C
if
passed,
would
repeal
the
tax
and
taxing
authority
of
the
.333
mill
Levy.
Q
Q
And
I'll
turn
it
back
over
to
Cara
and
Mark
to
discuss
the
mechanism
for
doing
that.
P
Thank
you
Teresa.
So,
as
Teresa
indicated,
if
both
measures
pass
both
the
library
district
ballot
issue
and
the
City
ballot
issue,
2C
staff
will
then
bring
to
council
for
Council
consideration
an
emergency
ordinance
to
revise
the
2022
Mill
of
the
ordinance
which
you
will
be
considering
and
approving
in
October
to
reduce
the
total
City
to
Mill
Levy
by
that
.33
Mills.
P
So,
as
you
know,
we
always
present
the
middle
of
the
ordinance
and
the
budget
without
anticipating
a
certain
result
of
the
November
election.
So
the
mill
Levy
that
you
will
develop
the
ordinance
you'll
be
considering
in
October,
does
not
presume
those
ballot
measures
pass.
So
if
they
do
pass,
we
will
bring
something
to
you
at
the
meeting
following
the
election
in
November,
and
it
will
need
to
be
passed
on
emergency
ordinance
to
reduce
the
mill
Levy
by
that
.333.
R
All
right
good
evening,
Council
Mark,
wolf
senior
budget
manager,
so
I'll
now
take
you
through
a
few
slides
related
to
the
current
Library
budget,
the
amount
available
for
reallocation
upon
District
creation
and
the
proposed
process.
R
Starting
here.
This
slide
has
a
few
parts
beginning
with
the
2023
recommended
Library
budget
you'll
notice,
here
that
the
recommended
budget
includes
appropriation
of
the
library
fund,
which
includes
the
0.33
Mill
lebby.
R
The
city
would
continue
to
operate
the
library
as
a
city
service
through
2023,
and
then
the
city
would
likely
be
repaid
by
the
library
district
subject
to
Future
negotiation
for
the
total
cost
of
operating
the
library
that
repayment
could
begin
as
early
as
2024
and
again,
details
related
to
such
would
be
worked
out
through
an
intergovernmental
agreement
negotiated
between
the
city
and
the
district.
If
the
district
passes
in
November.
R
R
and
then
additional
what
we're,
calling
direct
general
fund
savings
again:
a
range
of
a
half
a
million
to
a
million
dollars,
so
the
the
number
that
we're
targeting
this
evening
and
planning
ahead
for
that
potential
reallocation
is
that
9.75
to
10.75
million
dollars.
I
also
know
that
that
includes
the
North
Boulder
operating
expenses.
Again,
that
is
expected
to
open
late
in
2023..
R
I
also
want
to
acknowledge
that
these
numbers
that
9.75
to
10.75
are
differ
from
what
was
contained
in
the
staff
memo
and
again
that
difference
is
the
revenue
from
the
0.33
Mill.
Levy
is
no
longer
included
as
we're
anticipating
that
would
be
repealed
if
the
district
were
to
pass.
R
All
right,
one
more
number
side:
this
side
is
to
emphasize
the
amount
that
is
estimated
to
be
available
for
reallocation.
Again,
that's
in
the
first
column
on
the
left
here.
R
This
amount
includes
all
direct
costs
to
operating
the
system.
So
that's
all
Staffing
what
you
would
see
represented
within
the
library
budget
within
within
your
budget
package.
It
does
not
include
such
indirect
costs
that
would
not
result
in
those
direct
cost
savings.
So
parts
of
other
positions
that
support
the
library
is
a
good
example
of
that
and
it
does
not
include
other
foundational
or
Grant
support
that
are
that's
represented
within
the
library
fund.
R
It's
part
of
the
total
budget,
but
wouldn't
be
cash
savings
that
the
city
could
could
spend
if
available
after
the
district
was
created.
So
that's
how
you
start
to
get
a
different
number
from
what
is
available
for
reallocation
versus
what
is
the
true
full
cost
of
the
to
the
city
of
operating
the
library.
So
that's
in
the
middle
column,
so
that
includes
annualizing
certain
maintenance
costs.
It
includes
all
administrative
overhead
costs,
so
you
imagine
all
of
the
other
finance
and
City
attorney.
R
Support
that
the
library
would
receive
does
receive
an
addition
of
many
other
departments,
so
that
total
cost
is
is
much
bigger
than
the
cash
that
is
available
for
reallocation.
There
are
probably
some
other
savings,
as
we've
talked
about,
mostly
in
efficiencies
and
being
able
to
allocate
staff
time
elsewhere,
but
in
terms
of
cash
that
we're
anticipating
to
be
available
again,
that's
in
the
left
column
and
then.
R
All
right
so
now,
I'll
start
talking
about
our
recommended
approach
to
looking
at
the
potential
reallocation
and
priority
prioritizing
our
needs.
So
we
have
begun
the
process
and
we
do
this
on
a
regular
basis,
looking
across
departments
and
inventorying,
our
needs
from
a
work
planning
standpoint
from
a
budget
standpoint,
but
also
if
there
are
opportunities
such
as
this,
we
want
to
have
a
good
sense
of
what
what
is
missing
in
terms
of
the
funding
fixture
going
forward.
So
we
have
started
that
process
with
our
departments.
R
We
are
discussing
that
a
potential
process
now
and
what
we're
suggesting
is
that
we
work
through
council's
financial
strategy
committee
on
a
prioritization
of
those
needs
for
Council
review
sometime
over
the
winter,
to
help
inform
the
budget
process
for
2024.
and
again
because
those
dollars,
the
soonest
that
those
dollars
would
be
available
would
be
for
reallocation
within
the
2024
budget.
We
think
it's
prudent
to
look
at
that
budget
process,
which
would
include
include
all
of
our
needs
and
all
of
our
funding
sources.
R
R
So
what
do
we
mean
by
all
of
this?
Core
operational
needs
again
might
be
pretty
straightforward,
but
essentially
these
are
the
critical
Investments
to
maintain
our
existing
service
levels
and
lack
of
funding
would
implicate
some
type
of
service
reduction.
So
these
are
things
like
facility
maintenance,
snow,
plowing,
median
maintenance,
sidewalk
repairs,
software
replacement,
maintenance
of
our
fiber
system,
Parks
maintenance
Etc.
This
would
also
include
Investments
continued
investments
in
our
city
staff.
We've
highlighted
this
through
the
2023
process
and
again,
we'll
likely
need
those
continued
Investments
to
stay
competitive
as
a
workplace.
R
Program
service
enhancements
aligned
with
with
established
policy,
so
essentially,
these
are
investments
to
existing
programs
or
services
that
are
aligned
with
existing
policies
existing
policies.
The
easiest
is
to
think
about
accepted,
Department
Master
plans.
A
couple
examples
are
continued
implementation,
so
areas
that
we've
already
made
Investments
such
as
advanced
life,
support
services,
emergency
medical
services
within
our
fire
department,
our
vision,
zero
goals
within
transportation.
Again
we
have
made
some
Investments
there,
but
likely
more
to
come
new
Investments
align
with
established
policy.
R
So
in
this
area
we
may
have
a
policy,
that's
been
accepted
or
adopted
by
Council,
and
we
have
not
yet
begun
to
make
progress
within
a
goal
area.
So
one
example
could
be
the
facilities
master
plan.
So
certainly
that
plan
calls
for
the
build
out
of
the
Alpine
Balsam
campus,
that's
on
the
capital
side,
but
if
there's
a
significant
City
investment
on
that
site
in
pursuit
of
our
goals,
there's
likely
some
Debt
Service
associated
with
that.
So
that
would
be
an
ongoing
expense.
R
A
new
investment
in
in
alignment
with
a
within
a
accepted
master
plan,
another
maybe
some
of
our
additional
climate
action
goals
and
programming
associated
with
meeting
our
climate
action
goals.
We
know
that
there
is
the
ballot
initiative
in
November,
but
that
will
not
cover
all
of
our
needs
in
terms
of
meeting
our
climate
calls
from
a
programming
perspective,
newer,
expanded
Investments
to
meet
emergency
community
community
needs,
so
sometimes
there
are
Community
needs
that
come
up.
R
That
may
not
be
specifically
called
out
in
an
existing
plan,
but
nonetheless
are
something
that
we
need
to
address
in
a
short
period
of
time.
So
example
of
this
is
the
funding
that
we
have
proposed
in
the
23
budget
to
to
start
a
day.
Services
Center,
our
behavioral
health
program
is
another.
We
also
have
several
programs
that
are
identified
with
arpa
funding.
These
are
all
one-time
uses
of
funds
that
implicate
ongoing
services
or
ongoing
need
so
again
with
a
really
interesting
opportunity
to
look
at
ongoing
costs
again.
R
R
We
were
asked
to
put
together
some
thought
around
this.
We
could
look
at
certain
rebate
programs
targeted
at
certain
community
members
that
could
be
a
property
or
sales
tax
rebate.
In
some
way.
We
could
also
look
at
an
overall
reduction
in
the
sales
tax
rate
or
property
tax
credit
for
a
certain
period
of
time
again,
we'd
want
to
use
caution
and
be
thoughtful
about
how
we
use
those
mechanisms,
but
that
certainly
is
within
the
council's
purview
and
then
just
for
your
reference.
R
One
mill
is
equivalent
today
around
4.2
million
dollars
and
0.1
percent
sales
tax
is
equivalent
to
about
four
and
a
half
million.
R
And
this
slide
you
have
seen
two
weeks
ago,
so
I
won't
get
too
far
into
it,
but
these
are
the
types
of
pieces
of
information
that
we'll
be
refining.
This
is
not
a
comprehensive
list,
but
gives
you
an
idea
of
scale.
The
number
is
Big.
The
number
is
likely
to
be
bigger
as
we
complete
our
inventory,
so
that
really
does
necessitate
some
type
of
prioritization
with
Council
to
determine
how
we
may
use
this
money
and
then
also
structure,
our
future
budgets.
R
All
right,
so,
as
we
build
out,
this
list
of
unfunded
needs
broader
than
the
last
slide.
What
does
this
prioritization
exercise?
Look
like
what
we're
suggesting
again
is
to
work
through
a
council's
financial
strategy
committee.
On
the
specifics,
however,
a
prioritization
is
likely
to
include
looking
at
alignment
with
our
sustainability,
equity
and
resilience
goals.
R
Other
considerations
for
prioritization
could
be
ongoing
versus
one
time,
reflecting
that
opportunity
to
look
at
ongoing,
addressing
ongoing
costs
and
then
some
type
of
weighing
of
the
different
categories
that
we've
presented
at
least
getting
a
sense
of
where
we
should
be
focusing
our
our
efforts.
R
So
that
concludes
a
very
brief
presentation,
but
essentially
we're
trying
to
tee
up
Council
to
get
some
reaction
on
that
on
that
process
and
also
hear
some
early
thoughts
as
to
whether
or
not
you
all
have
some
ideas
for
emphasis
on
those
categories,
or
at
least,
would
like
to
help
Focus.
Some
of
our
inventory
and
gathering
information
for
future
Council
consideration
prioritization
hand
it
back
to
you
Matt.
C
Thanks
Mark
Cara,
thank
you
for
this
presentation
and
thanks
for
clarifying,
certainly
the
item
2C
on
our
ballot.
That's
really
helpful
for
outside
Council,
and
also
the
community
I
appreciate
that
certainly
going
to
open
it
up
to.
Why
don't
we
just
start
with
sort
of
the
you
know,
the
that
first
question
about
sort
of
process
and
reallocation?
C
I
will
sort
of
just
remind
everybody
that
we
we
will
be
making
the
2020
four
budget.
It
is
this
body
that
will
do
that,
and
so
the
reallocation
of
these
funds
should
the
library
district
get
passed.
It
will
be
up
to
us
to
decide
that
in
in
a
formal
sense,
when
we
start
our
budget
process
next
year,
and
so
there's
no
passing
the
buck,
there's
no
making
decisions
on
others
and
so
I
think
it's
important
to
know
that
that
this
is
good
planning
for
decisions.
C
We,
as
a
body
will
ultimately
make
and
and
also
in
terms
of
timing,
that
this
is
exactly
when
other
all
most
departments
are
already
starting
to
think
roughly
about
what
buckets
they're
looking
to
put
money
into
in
preparation
for
that.
So
the
timing
of
this
conversation,
even
though
it
coincides
with
a
ballot
measure,
is
actually
really
appropriate
with
regards
to
where
other
departments
are
doing
that
planning
and
so
I
think
just
sort
of
working
from
that
Foundation.
C
We
can
sort
of
March
forward
once
we
answer
that
first
question
I
know
as
wheels
are
turning
I
do
want
to
sort
of
point
out
that
let's
try
not
to
get
into
dollars
and
cents
and
and
Hyper
specifics
of
programs
I
think.
Let's
talk
about
buckets
and
more
or
less
because
I
think
the
the
details
will
come
later
and
I
think
you
know.
C
Certainly
the
budget
team
and
marking
care
of
demonstrated
certainly
is
what
we
saw
with
the
last
budget,
they're
pretty
good
at
hearing
what
our
priorities
are
and
and
finding
those
investment
points
around
that
so
I
think
they
do
a
pretty
good
job.
If
we
can
highlight
those
buckets
so
about
that
out
of
the
way,
I'll
turn
it
back
to
help
me
answering
that
process
of
number
one,
the
question
number
one
and
I
see
Nicole's
hand
up
so
go
for
it.
J
I
just
had
a
pre-question
before
getting
there
just
a
point
of
clarification,
so
we're
really
just
talking
about
reallocating
kind
of
some
of
what
it
currently
costs
us
to
run
the
library.
J
So,
if
I'm
understanding
correctly
when
we're
estimating
the
savings
that
we'll
actually
realize
in
terms
of
what
we
can
reallocate
to
other
purposes,
we're
not
really
looking
at
the
total
cost
of
running
and
maintaining
the
library,
so
the
operating
cost
that
we're
looking
at
that
comes
from
the
general
fund
is
excluding
building
maintenance,
for
example,
Capital
maintenance
improvements,
things
like
that
is
that
am
I
understanding
that
correctly
I
just
want
to
make
sure
I
wrap
my
head
around
this.
The
right
way.
R
That
that's
correct
it
there.
There
is
some
Building
Maintenance
that
we've
built
into
those
those
direct
cash
savings.
If
you
will,
that
would
be
available
for
reallocation,
there's
a
there's,
a
larger
bucket
that
includes
future
larger
maintenance
projects
that
are
not
built
in
into
that
that
we
plan
for
and
also
kind
of
General
administrative
overhead,
which
is
more
indirect.
That's
not
not
represented
in
the
in
the
cost
savings
that
would
be
available
for
reallocation.
Okay,.
J
So
thank
you
for
clarifying
I,
just
I
think
it's
really
important
for
us,
especially
as
we're
talking
about
it
in
front
of
the
community
to
help
everybody
recognize
that
that
nine
or
ten
million
dollars,
that's
not
the
entire
cost
of
the
library
that
there's
there's
more
there.
J
And
can
you
put
those
questions
back
up,
I'm
happy
to
answer
them
now?
Unless
other
people
have
clarifying
questions,
they
want
to
get
to
First.
C
Well,
yeah
I
think
Nicole
we're
we're
going
to
just
answer
that
first
question.
So
thanks
for
priming
the
question
up
there
yeah
just
in
terms
of
just
questions
about
the
process,
let's
just
sort
of
start
there
and
then
we
can
dive
into
the
buckets
because
obviously
I
think
that's
where
the
meat
on
the
bone
is
here
in
this
conversation.
But
if
we
can
knock
out
the
first
one
which
may
inform
the
second
let's
go
ahead
and
do
that
Aaron
Aaron
I
see
your
hand
go
for
it.
D
D
I
just
want
to
make
sure
I
understand
this
correctly,
that
there
will
be
things
where
we
there
will
be
areas
in
terms
of
staff
time
where
we
will
not
be
saving
money
because
we're
not
going
to
lay
off
staff
that
have
helped
out
the
library
but
the
but
the,
but
those
staff
will
have
additional
capacity
to
work
on
other
City
projects.
So
do
I
understand
that
correctly.
D
That's
correct
mayor
great,
so
that
that
part
of
that
differential
between
the
the
10
and
the
like,
the
16
or
so
million
the
10
million
that
we're
talking
of
savings
we're
talking
about
reallocating
in
the
16
million
to
run
the
library
center
stamp
part
of
his
we'll
have
additional
capacity
to
work
on
other
things,
that's
good
to
understand
because,
of
course,
we're
always
we're
struggling
with
the
lack
of
capacity
across
the
board,
so
that
that'll
be
really
helpful.
D
I
think
the
other
one
was
I
know
back
when
we
were
talking
about
either
doing
an
IGA
before
the
ballot
measure.
You
know
this
is
a
number
of
months
ago.
You
know
we
there
were.
We
were
talking
about
whether
we
would
be
leasing
the
buildings
to
the
district
or
transferring
ownership
of
the
Bill
of
the
buildings
to
the
district
and
as
under
as
I
recall,
we
had
a
majority
of
us.
D
R
Yeah,
that's
a
good
question.
I
I
can
just
speak
to
the
the
portion
of
looking
at
the
difference
between
what's
available
for
reallocation
versus
estimating
the
total
cost
of
providing
the
library.
The
total
cost
includes
us
owning
the
buildings,
because
that's
the
total
cost
to
the
to
the
city
today
in
terms
of
anticipating
reallocation
it
it
doesn't
anticipate
the
terms
of
the
IGA,
so
I
think
we'd
have
to
wait
to
see
exactly
what
the
structure
that
was
before
costing
out.
D
Okay,
that's
helpful
to
understand,
and,
of
course
this
this
body
will
have
have
to
approve
any
such
thing.
So
if
we
were
assuming
we're
going
in
this
direction,
then
we're
in
good
shape.
Okay,
thanks
for
answering
that
that's
all
I
had.
N
Aaron
can
I
call
a
queen
for
a
second,
if
I
recall
those
conversations
I,
don't
think
it
had
a
financial
impact
one
way
or
the
other.
We
were
either
going
to
transfer
phenomenal
consideration
or
we're
going
to
lease
phenomenal
consideration.
N
R
K
R
I
can
tell
you
is
that
the
the
estimated
amount
includes
an
average
of
the
amount
of
building
maintenance
that
we
have
done
over
the
last
few
years
and
I
think
that
number
is
around
500
000
and
then
we
anticipated
some
direct
cash
savings
above
that
for
those
other
administrative
costs.
R
So
it's
the
library
budget
as
it
stands
today,
plus
some
Building
Maintenance
and
some
other
what
we
would
consider
cash
savings
beyond
that,
like
the
the
future
anticipated
expenses,
the
major
maintenance,
those
are
not
built
in
as
cash
savings
at
this
moment
and
then
to
your
point
there
there,
the
IGA
could
influence
some
of
that,
but
we
obviously
don't
know
any
of
that
today.
J
Oh,
this
sounds
maybe
another
clarification,
not
necessarily
unprocess
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
I
understood
correctly
we're
not
including
in
thinking
about
this
reallocation,
funding
available
the
0.33
Mills
that
currently
goes
toward
the
library,
because
what
we
are
expecting
based
on
Teresa's
conversations
with
all
of
us
is
that
there
was
a
super
majority
of
us
that
are
interested
in
releasing
repealing
that
property
tax.
Should
this
District
measure
pass,
so
you
get
that
did
I
get
that
right.
That's.
R
J
Thank
you
to
Teresa
for
figuring
this
out,
I
apologize
for
not
having
looked
at
this
closely
enough
when
we
were
looking
at
the
ballot
measures
to
kind
of
pull
out
that
that
detail
so
I.
Just
thank
you
Teresa
for
finding
a
way
to
reflect
what
it
was.
We
were
hoping
for.
Q
You
are
almost
welcome
and
I
think
you
know
we
all.
We
all
learned
a
lesson
about
communication
and
making
sure
we
have
robust
conversations
around
issues
that
are
important
and
and
very
happy
to
to
try
to
help
lend
some
some
clarity
to
this
issue
and
reflect
council's
intent
and
will.
N
Just
one
question
for
Mark
the
9
to
10
million
dollars
using
those
rough
figures
that
is
not
net
of
the
1.8
million
dollars
that
we're
going
to
lose
with
the
repeal
of
the
the
0.333
Mill
Levy
correct.
R
N
R
At
and
the
tax
itself
in
2024
is
anticipated
to
be
1.5
million.
Okay,
thank
you.
C
C
Well,
outside
of
any
other
questions
about
process,
I
think
we
might
move
to
sort
of
just
discussing
a
little
bit
about.
You
know
the
areas
and
the
categories
that
Council
would
like
to
prioritize.
With
this
rough
to
ten
I
know
we
keep
saying
9
to
10,
I,
think
for
Simplicity
and
math
just
call
it
10,
it's
a
nice
divisible
number,
but
we
don't
need
to
split
hairs,
but
we're
not
going
to
get
into
dollars
and
cents,
but
just
in
sort
of
you're
thinking
base
certainly
is
certainly.
C
Those
are
unfunded
needs
just
sort
of
thinking
in
your
head
because
saying
you
want
to
do
an
unfunded
need,
that's
20
million
dollars
and
all
we're
talking
about
is
10
there's
futility
in
that,
but
nonetheless
we
could
take
a
bite
out
of
it.
So
anyone
want
to
take
a
quick
crack
at
where
they
see
some
of
these
priorities
and
core
needs,
and
so
you
want
to
go
for
it.
N
N
As
my
colleague
Bob
Yates,
pointed
out
in
his
hotline
post,
everything
we're
discussing
tonight
is
both
contingent
and
remote.
We
have
no
understanding
of
what
economic
conditions
will
be
like
what
sales
tax
revenue
is
going
to
be
generated
and
what
other
necessities
are
going
to
arise.
N
You
know
the
council
voted
for
a
library
district,
and
you
know
that
was
a
clear
majority
and
nothing
nothing
exceptional
about
that,
and
most
of
my
colleagues
are
strong
supporters
of
the
district
and
their
individual
capacity
and
that's
great.
But
what
council
is
doing
tonight
is
basically
producing
an
Infamous
infomercial
in
support
of
the
district
and
all
of
the
benefits
that
can
arise
from
the
district
and
and
frankly,
I
think
doing
so
is
a
little
bit
beneath
us
on
the
role
we
ought
to
play
as
a
governing
body.
N
N
So
to
me,
all
of
this
is
frankly
and
I
don't
mean
to
be
harsh,
but
it's
a
form
of
performance,
art
and,
as
I
said
it
it.
This
is
not
an
appropriate
role
for
us
to
be
playing.
Thank.
A
C
Thanks
for
your
comments,
Mark
I
might
just
take
a
take
an
ad
here
that,
if,
if,
if
we
were
basing
decisions
on
the
uncertainty
of
budget
and
what
was
going
on,
we
would
never
pass
any
budget
at
any
point,
because
we
would
only
pass
a
budget
based
on
that
moment
in
time.
So
there
has
to
be
planning
based
on
conditions,
and
this
is
part
of
that
I
I
am
concerned
about
sort
of
a
nihilistic
perspective
that
that
this
is
sort
of
Showmanship.
C
This
is
largely
a
product
of
having
to
dispel
copious
misconceptions
that
have
been
spread
about
this
issue,
and
it's
important
for
us
to
do.
That
is
in
fact
incumbent
upon
this
body
to
dispel
and
somewhat
be
Arbiters
of
Truth,
so
that
the
community
has
a
fair
place
from
which
to
judge
a
lot
of
these
things
and
and
because
of
those
misconceptions.
This
is
one
of
those
where
people
want
to
know
exactly
what
this
money
is
and
where
and
how
it's
going
to
go
and
I.
Think
it's
important
for
us
to
do.
C
That
departments
are
doing
that
throughout
our
city
already
in
preparation
for
2024
and
we're
talking
about
two
percent
of
our
budget
with
this.
So
it's
important
for
us
to
at
least
be
thinking
about
those
bucket
buckets
intentionally,
so
that
the
community
has
confidence
that
this
money
doesn't
just
get
just
folded
into
The
Ether
that
there's
intent
with
these
savings
to
meet
Community
needs
and
I.
C
Think
that's
a
fair
thing
for
us
to
give
the
community,
as
they
evaluate
the
merits
of
a
library
district
and
what
this
city
is
going
to
do
in
terms
of
fulfilling
the
commitments
that
it
has
both
with
tax
rule
leaf
with
the
3.33
Mills.
And
what
we're
trying
to
do
here
with
the
roughly
10
million
dollars
so
I
see
Nicole's
handout.
Let's
turn
to
Nicole.
N
Matt
before
you
go,
one
comment:
please
yeah,
given
the
well
stated
and
perfectly
appropriate
by
the
way
views
of
most
of
this
Council
on
this
issue.
I
am
hard-pressed
to
see
us
as
the
Arbiters
of
Truth.
N
C
I
I
I
appreciate
that
perspective
Mark,
but
numbers
don't
lie
so
so
we
we
will
work
within
the
facts
of
that
have
been
presented
to
us
Nicole,
please
go
for
it.
J
Thank
you
and
thanks
everybody
for
coming
so
far,
and
thanks
Jeff
for
the
presentation,
I
I
just
wanted
to
say
you
know,
I
think
with
I,
haven't
been
shy
about
the
fact
that
I,
you
know,
support
forming
a
Library
District
at
all
and
I
really
feel
like
voters
as
part
of
the
decision
making
want
to
have
some
insight
into
what
it
is.
We're
thinking
about
here.
I
think
this
idea
of
planning
ahead
is
Central
to
our
role
as
a
governing
body.
J
I
see
our
primary
duties
as
council
members
as
being
protecting
our
community's
safety
and
protecting
our
finances,
making
sure
we
have
enough
money
to
run
so
I
see
this
kind
of
as
a
a
financial
planning,
type
of
exercise
and
I.
Think
it's
an
important
one
for
us
to
be
thinking
about,
because,
as
Matt
said,
it
is
it
this
isn't.
It's
we're
not
just
talking
about
a
thousand
dollars
here.
J
This
is
a
fairly
large
component
of
our
of
our
general
fund
and,
and
you
know,
I
think,
there's
a
lot
that
we
do
where
we're
referring
to
work.
That's
going
to
be
done
by
Future
councils
just
tonight
in
our
discussion
of
TV
phase,
two
that
I
think
is
now
Boulder
Junction
phase
two
there's
a
different
word.
We
were
using
for
it,
but
we
were
talking
about
work
that
would
be
done
in
2024.
That's
beyond
this
Council
as
well,
so
I
think
it's
it.
J
With
that
said,
to
answer
question
two:
what
I'm
looking
for
is
is
really
thinking
about
more
of
the
new
and
expanded
Investments
to
meet
emerging
community
needs.
That
is
that
that
is
what
I
would
really
love
to
know
more
about
and
when
I
think
about
what
this,
what
the
function
of
the
libraries
are
in
our
community.
It's
really
social
infrastructure.
It
is
a
free
space
that
has
resources
that
are
available
to
anybody
in
our
community.
It
is
a
place
for
us
to
come
together
as
communities
and
connect.
There
are
meeting
rooms
spaces
we
can
use.
J
There's
art,
that's
displayed
throughout
the
Library
resources,
available,
training
opportunities.
All
of
these
things
that
build
community
and
connection,
which
is
something
that
we
desperately
need
as
we
Face
the
climate
crisis
and
as
we
move
forward
as
a
community.
So
what
I
would
really
love
to
know
more
about
and
to
emphasize,
for
consideration
of
these
funds
was
something
that
fills
a
similar
purpose,
something
that's
capturing
Community
social
infrastructure,
Gathering
spaces
for
our
community
to
to
move
move
forward.
J
C
Thank
you,
Nicole
Juni
thentera.
Thank.
O
You
Matt
I
welcome
the
comments
made
by
Nicole.
Thank
you
for
them
and
I
just
wanted
to
add.
For
me
just
to
answer
the
question.
O
I
would
say:
I,
don't
fully
understand
the
new
and
expanding
investment
to
meet
emerging
Community
needs.
That's
that's
a
mouthful
in
itself,
but
I
think
what
I
want
to
say
is
that
I
hope
that
we'll
put
that
we'll
use
that
money
in
a
way
that
is
Equitable,
for
instance,
I've
had
community
members
who
said
in
a
place
like
Boulder,
where
we
talk
a
lot
of
equity
and
inclusion,
yet
we
don't
really
have
a
cultural
center,
so
maybe
that
is
something
we
can
think
about
as
a
community.
O
How
do
we
spend
that
money
to
bring
forward
that
Equity?
Maybe
this
is
where
we
should
use
the
equity
tool
and
say
what
is
it
we
don't
have
and
how
we
can
better
use.
This
fund
I
saw
also
tax
relief
and
rebate
consideration.
There
are
elderly
people
in
our
community
and
some
people
mention.
How
can
we
use
that
money
to
give
some
of
it
back
to
community
members
and
form
of
tax
rebate?
O
That's
something
again
when
we're
talking
about
Equity
that
could
help
us
leverage
how
we
use
those
funds
as
far
as
cooperational
needs
not
so
much
because
I
feel
like
these
needs
are
always
there,
but
this
is
an
opportunity
to
maybe
what's
the
word
level,
the
playing
field
use
that
money
in
a
way
that
make
people
feel
like
they
are.
We
are
bringing
the
community
in
together
and
I
know.
O
Maria
has
been
working
really
hard
since
he's
been
here
since
I've
been
on
the
council
to
ensure
that
we
have
that
sense
of
community,
where
you
know
we
bring
more
people
into
the
process
and
I
hope.
That's
what
we'll
be
able
to
do
with
this
money
to
look
into
some
of
these
issues
that
we've
not
been
able
to
implement
and
put
action
behind
in
the
form
of
equity
and
inclusion.
Thank
you,
foreign.
M
So
it's
a
it's
a
commercial
of
sorts
but
I'm
not
going
to
go
down
that
route,
because,
frankly,
what
I
do
like
is
that
we
have
a
ballot
measure
and
we
can
all
decide
and
that's
the
Fairway,
so
I'm
gonna
say
that
I
like
what
Juni
said,
because
what
I'm
most
worried
about
with
the
library
district
by
far
is
the
fact
that
a
lot
of
people
who
bought
homes
when
they
were
way
when
they
were
a
couple
hundred
thousand
dollars,
maybe
even
like
fifty
thousand
dollars
back
in
the
day,
and
now
these
homes
are
so
expensive
and
people.
M
M
I
have
to
say,
and
one
of
the
reasons
is,
is
because
when
it
comes
to
you
know,
taxes
you're,
paying
your
taxes
and
then
you're
riding
your
bike
and
you're
the
roads
are
falling
apart
and
you
just
broke
your
time.
You
know
you
just
you're
tired
is
broke
or
whatever
I
feel
like
core
operational
needs
are
what
a
city
is
supposed
to
do
right
now
we
have
a
big
backlog
of
those
things.
M
They
don't
care
about
them
until
they
just
broke
their
tire
but
and
then
all
of
a
sudden,
they
do
so
that's
important
to
me
and
lastly,
I
want
to
talk
about
parks
for
a
second.
Can
you
hear
me.
M
No
I
can't
even
find
my
zoom
is
my
zombie
good
computer
day,
so
that's
good,
so
Parks
remember
last.
Was
it
last
week
when
we
were
talking
about
storm
water
and
how
they
picked
a
Visionary
funding.
Well,
Parks
is
right
now
under
what
is
called
fiscally
constrained
funding,
and
that
means
they
have
no
money
and
why
that
is
so
important
to
me
if
we're
gonna,
if
this
does
pass,
is
because
their
parts
get
so
many
letters.
M
People
are
having
a
hard
time,
affording
the
the
cost
of
the
community
centers
and
they're
having
there's
not
a
like
there's,
not
enough
maintenance,
there's
not
enough
pool
time.
There
are
so
many
things.
People
want
to
see
in
parks
and
they
are
under
a
lot
of
stress
right
now.
Parks
is
a
great
Parks,
does
a
great
job
when
it
comes
to
equity,
they
offer
so
many
discounts
or
people
that
are
marginalized
or
in
need,
and
so
it
is
super
important
that
we
fund
our
parks
to
better
levels
than
fiscally
constrained.
M
I
think
we
should
get
it
up
to
at
least
we're
doing
a
pretty
good
job
funding
whatever
that
is,
but
right
now
it's
we
get
so
many
letters,
it's
such
a
low.
So
that's
why
I
would
like
to
see
more
of
our
money
if
we
did
have
that
and
if
this
did
pass
going
to
parks,
that's
it.
D
Great
thanks,
Matt,
well
just
to
start
about
why
we're
having
this
conversation
I
think
it's
specifically
in
response
to
community
requests
that
people's
I've
heard
from
a
number
many
community
members
about
hey
what
what
will
the
money
get
spent
on
if
the
These
funds
are
freed
up
and
so
I
think
this
is
being
responsive
to
some
Desires
in
the
community
rather
rather
than
in
for
infomercial
purposes.
That's
certainly
not
my
intention
so
to
to
that
point.
D
I'll
just
offer
a
few
thoughts
that
and
just
note
that
that
the
amounts
that
we're
talking
here
about
10
million
dollars
a
year
is
about
what
we've
gotten
from
arpa
funding
from
for
two
years
is
about
10
million
a
year,
so
it's
and
which
we've
we're
able
to
do
some
really
helpful
things
for
our
community
with
that
money
right.
So
this
this
provides
a
similar
opportunity,
but
out
into
perpetuity
so
I
I
thought
what
Nicole
said
about
social
infrastructure
was
was
really
good.
D
So
it's
a
great
point:
I
I
liked
what
Genie
said
about
you
know,
certainly
applying
an
equity
lens
and
I
think
going
out
and
talking
to
people
in
the
community
that
are
that
are
missing
some
of
those
you
know:
Gathering
opportunities
or
service
opportunities
and
and
finding
out
what
they,
what
they
need
right
so
I
think
that's
not
predetermining
every
dollar
for
sure,
but
thinking
about
who
we're
talking
to
as
we're
developing
a
spending
program
but
and
then
I
also
I
also
noticed,
like
the
the
the
behavioral
health
response
emergency
response
program
that
we're
standing
up
this
next
year,
that
that's
being
done
with
one-time
funding
so
I.
D
If
that
goes
as
well
as
I'm
expecting
and
hoping
that
it
does
we're
going
to
need
ongoing
funding
for
that,
and
that
that
would
be
a
real
opportunity
here.
Something
else
that
I've
had
my
eye
on
throughout.
My
almost
my
entire
time
on
Council
is,
you
know,
we're
moving
towards
bringing
Advanced
life
support
services
in-house
in
the
fire
department
and
that's
about
paying
EMTs,
better
and
providing
better
service
to
our
community
and
making
our
emergency
response
and
our
firefighters
kind
of
more
effective
and
also
giving
them
a
better
working
environment.
D
So
I
would
definitely
prioritize
that
for
some
of
this
funding,
because
every
single
person
in
the
in
the
community,
if
something
if,
if
they're
in
in
crisis,
you
know
like
a
medical
crisis,
having
that
response
come
faster
and
higher
quality
is
a
benefit
to
each
and
every
member
of
our
community.
And
then
the
last
thing
I'll
just
say
is
that
either
that
this
well,
the
tax
increase
would
be
a
you
know,
relatively
modest
one.
At
about
four
percent
of
property
taxes.
D
It
is
going
to
fall
harder
on
some
people
than
on
others,
and
so
I
think
developing
some
kind
of
a
rebate
program,
not
across
the
board,
but
with
criteria.
You
know,
income
based
or
or
hardship-based
criteria
for
individuals
and
small
businesses.
D
C
Thanks
Aaron
I
appreciate
that
some
some
thoughtful
comments
there,
oh
I,
just
saw
Rachel
dropped.
Did
you
intend
to
go.
L
L
For
honoring
my
my
faux
hand,
so
this
is
a
little
bit
tricky
for
me.
You
know
I
I
laughed
at
Mark's
use
of
the
word
infomercial
it
hit
my
Funny
Bone.
Thank
you
for
that
and
I.
Don't
want
this
to
feel
like
an
infomercial
of
just
like
what
what
my
sort
of
pet
projects
or
desires
are
for
funding
and
so
I'm
a
little
bit
loathed
to
weigh
in
on
like
what
what
are
my
favorite
uses
of
of
10
million
bonus
dollars.
L
So
I
think
what
I
feel
is
that
it
it's
probably
going
to
be
best
for
Nuria
to
say:
here's
where
we
have
the
highest
need
for
10
million
dollars,
given
Council
priorities
as
they
stand
in
November
of
2022
and
going
forward
so
I'm
not
going
to
be
able
to
to
weigh
in
much
much
deeper
than
that
because
it's
we
have
a
over
500
million
dollar
budget,
and
this
is
in
in
some
senses
a
drop
in
the
bucket
and
and
I
feel,
like
staff
is
going
to
be
better
able
to
tell
us
whether
we
need
it
for
EMS
versus
flood
mitigation
versus
homelessness
services
or
anything
else
that
we're
looking
at
so
I.
K
Thank
you,
I.
K
One
of
the
comments
Mark
Brockett
brought
up
is
about
this
being
performative
and
I
just
wanted
to
it
caught
me
thinking,
because
I'm
sure
you
could
make
that
argument,
but
you
can
also
make
that
argument
about
a
lot
of
things
that
go
on
I
mean
to
a
certain
extent,
being
an
elected
official
being
on
Channel
8.
There
is
a
performative
nature
to
all
of
this,
that
we
do
and
I
I
get
the
criticism,
but
I.
Don't
think
that
this
is.
K
That's
just
part
of
part
of
our
job,
so
with
that
being
said,
I
like
Nicole
really
strongly
would
support
this.
K
A
sizable
allocation
of
these
funds
being
spent
on
social,
social
infrastructure
projects
like
Parks
I,
think
that,
but
there
there
could
be
other
options
there
and
then
sort
of
my
second
tier
would
be
life
safety.
Things
like
Aaron
brought
up
the
advanced,
Life,
Safety
support
and
also
Vision
zero
things.
I
think
that
you
know
those
are
making
sure
that
people
in
our
community
are
safe
is
really
there's
few
things
more
important
that
we
do.
K
I
do
I,
have
an
issue
with
using
general
fund
dollars
which
are
largely
sales
tax,
based
which
are
regressive
tax
to
give
property
tax
credits,
which
would
mostly
go
towards
people
who
own
property
within
our
community
I.
Think
that
there's
an
inherent
Equity
issue
there
it
there
might
be
ways
to
overcome
that
with
really
smart
high
end,
targeting
of
who
those
funds
go
to,
but
I'm
going
to
be
fairly
skeptical.
C
No
I
for
one
I
appreciate
the
thoughtfulness
from
from
the
comments
that
have
come
before
you
know.
Certainly,
I
I
I
see
social
infrastructure
as
an
absolute
need.
I
think
that
that's
a
high
priority
in
our
community.
It's
an
increasing
need
in
our
community.
So
you
know,
arpa
is,
is
finite
in
nature,
and
we've
been
largely
using
a
finite
source
of
money
to
prop
up
our
increasing
needs
of
social
infrastructure.
C
So
the
fact
that
we
could
supplement
what
was
finite
in
terms
of
arpa
with
money
that
can
sort
of
hang
out
in
perpetuity,
I
I
think
is
a
generational
opportunity,
given
the
social
infrastructure
needs
that
are
presented
in
front
of
our
community
right
now
and
will
continue
to
be
the
case.
So
I
appreciate
Nicole's
comments
on
that
and
those
that
have
backed
that
up.
I
I
think
that's
spot
on.
You
know
the
other.
The
other
interesting
part
is
I.
Do
appreciate
where
Aaron
was
going
with
ALS
Advanced
life
support.
I.
C
Think
that's
a
huge
thing
with
regards
to
community
safety.
Right
I
mean
one
of
the
first
things
we
take
are
pledge
to
as
council
members
is
health
and
safety
of
our
community,
so
I'm
hard
to
ignore
that
as
an
important
investment,
you
know,
I
I
think
you
know
the
rebate.
Conversation
is
tricky.
I
I
tend
to
align
with
where
Lauren
is
I,
think
that's
tricky
to
take
sales
tax
and
give
a
property
tax
rebate.
C
But
but
I
do
think
in
terms
of
you
know:
groups
that
are
hit
hard
by
the
library
districts
funding
is,
is
the
business
community,
and
so
I
I'd
like
to
see
us
think
about
some,
some
small
business,
Tax,
Grants
and
small
business
support,
because
you
know
it
isn't
an
it
still,
isn't
easy
for
them
and
they're
still
recovering
and
so
I
think
if
we
can
certainly
give
them
a
leg
up
and
give
them
some
support
to
soften
the
landing
a
little
bit.
I
think
that
would
go
a
long
way.
C
It'd
be
quite
important
for
us
to
do.
I
didn't
really
see
where
that
fit
into
sort
of
those
main
categories,
and-
and
since
that
is
gone,
I'll
just
remind
in
case
people
didn't
see
it.
Mark
was
kind
enough
to
put
those
questions
in
the
chat.
So
if
you
want
to
refer
back
to
those
query
areas,
they're
sitting
in
the
chat
you
know-
and
the
other
part
is
certainly
you
know
some
of
our
climate
work.
C
I
know,
we've
got
a
climate
attacks,
but
in
some
ways
there
isn't
enough
money
to
deal
with
the
immense
impacts
of
climate
change,
and
so
certainly
I'm
thinking
how
to
help
climate
initiatives
about
whether
it
be
ebike
program
or
Wildlife
or
Wildfire
resiliency.
So
those
are
some
of
the
things
that
for
me
seem,
and
they
aren't
just
pet
projects.
C
These
are
things
that
have
been
overwhelmingly
shouted
at
us
by
the
community
and
so
in
many
ways
we're
just
reflecting
the
community
needs
back
to
this
10
million
dollars
to
try
to
find
ways
to
to
make
sure
we
meet
those
needs
sooner
rather
than
later.
So
those
are
my
thoughts
on
it.
Does
anyone
else
have
anything
else
before
we
move
on
I,
don't
see
any
hands.
So
let
me
ask
Mark
and
Cara.
You
know,
based
on
sort
of
what
you've
been
hearing.
C
Do
you
feel,
like
you've,
you've
heard
some
Consolidated
thoughts
that
that
inform
you
in
terms
of
where
the
thoughts
are
on
on
this,
roughly
10
million
dollars
and
what
departments
you
know
you
you
are
worth
reaching
out
to
in
terms
of
of
how
to
think
about
allocating
this
money?
Should
it
be
freed
up
after
the
November
election.
R
Yes,
I
think
so
we
certainly
have
a
couple
specifics
that
will
do
some
sharpening
of
our
pencil
on
and
try
to
bring
back
some
more
specific
numbers
and
then
again
we'll
be
working
closely
with
FSC
on
what
that
prioritization
process
looks
like
and
Target
coming
back
for
more
robust
conversation
in
the
winter.
If
the
district
passes.
C
Wonderful,
thank
you
Mark.
Thank
you.
I
really
appreciate
it
and
thank
you
Teresa
for
helping
us
navigate
the
the
0.33
Mill
and
and
providing
just
real
clarity
about
what
2C
is
and
then
also
the
commitment
that
staff
and
Council
will
make
in
terms
of
emergency
ordinance
right
immediately
on
the
heels
of
the
election
results
in
that
sort
of
I.
Think
November,
13th,
meeting
I
think
is
the
one
that
I
think
I
said
or
something
like
that.
B
Q
And
absolutely
our
pleasure-
and
we
appreciate
you
all
sticking
with
us
as
we
reasoned
through
this.
C
Well,
thanks
again
and
and
as
always,
you
know,
navigating
all
that
is
Nuria
I
know
she's
been
quiet
tonight,
but
thanks
to
Nuria
for
helping
navigate
all
of
those
pieces
in
this
conversation.
So
thank
you
for
that.
E
C
Pleasure
all
right:
well,
we
are
at
8
35
anything
else
on
the
table.
Don't
think
so
it's
not
a
regular
meeting.
So
we
don't
have
matters
going
once
going
twice
all
right!
C
C
Anyways.
Thank
you
all.
So
much
have
a
great
week
and
then
also
yeah
we're
not
meeting
next
week.
So
we
have
sort
of
a
week
off
in
terms
of
meetings
and
then
we'll
be
back
in
person
all
the
way
around
October
6th
Council
staff
and
the
community
look
forward
to
seeing
everybody
in
two
weeks
in
person
so
have
fun,
enjoy.