►
From YouTube: Boulder City Council Study Session 6-11-19
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
Say
a
few
a
minute
or
two
of
opening
remarks
and
I'll
turn
it
over
to
Darren
and
team
to
move
us
into
the
depths
of
tonight's
study
session,
but
I
just
thought.
I
would
start
off
by
just
recognizing
the
fact
that
for
over
100
years,
the
city
of
Boulder
has
been
on
the
cutting
edge
of
community
land
preservation
efforts.
It's
got
a
reputation
that
not
only
spans
this.
The
Front
Range
in
the
state
but
kind
of
nationwide.
I,
of
course,
was
keeping
tabs
on
this
for
many
years
in
the
hinterlands
of
Northeast
Wisconsin.
B
In
many
ways,
if
other
than
the
land
itself
and
over
the
past,
18
months
or
so,
OSP
has
brought
this
same
level
of
partnership
in
the
same
level
of
collaborative
spirit
to
bear
in
the
development
of
our
departments.
First
master
plan,
and
so
we
are
gathered
here
tonight
actually
to
discuss
how
well
we
have
incorporated
the
engagement
we
receive.
B
We
have
received
to
date,
as
you
recall,
it
was
just
about
a
year
ago
or
so
that
we
all
sat
in
the
same
room
with
board
and
council
and
Department
staff,
in
which
we
incorporated
the
engagement
that
we
received
in
the
first
phase
of
our
master
planning
process
in
the
development
of
our
five
major
management
themes
or
what
we
have
now
called
our
focus
areas.
That
will
help
the
department
zero
in
what
we
ought
to
focus
on
over
the
next
ten
years.
B
So
tonight
what
we're
charged
to
do
is
to
we
would
like
a
staff
to
get
your
feedback
on
how
well
we
haven't
incorporated
community
engagement
that
we
receive
since
last
summer
in
identifying
the
specific
strategies
we
need
to
execute
in
order
to
carry
out
and
fulfill
those
five
focus
areas
as
well.
We
would
like
your
feedback
and
how
well
we
have
sorted
out
what
our
high
priorities
are
to
be
in
the
near
term.
B
So
we
really
look
forward
from
a
staff
perspective
having
this
discussion
tonight
to
getting
your
constructive
feedback
and
we'll
go
back
and
do
some
refinancing
and
come
back
to
you
with
a
an
even
better
plan,
the
next
time
we
do
meet
up.
So
as
we
head
into
the
homestretch,
with
the
hopes
that
the
council
will
be
considering
a
final
draft
plan
and
early
does
an
early
September
I
almost
said
December.
That
would
be
a
mistake.
I
just
want
to
acknowledge
the
amount
of
effort
that
has
gone
into
this
robust
public
engagement
process.
B
It
is,
it
is
truly
one
of
the
most
engaged
in
impressive
efforts
that
I
have
personally
been
involved
in
in
my
28
year:
land
and
water
conservation
career.
So
I
just
want
to
congratulate
all
of
us
for
the
amount
of
community
engagement
that
we've
done
so
far,
and
we
look
forward
to
a
few
more
months
of
that.
So
with
that
I'm
going
to
turn
it
over
to
osm
Pease
master
plan,
project
manager
and
senior
planner
Garen
Wigner.
To
take
us
from
here
thanks.
C
C
When
we
were
working
with
the
process
committee
on
designing
the
engagement
process,
I
think
we
were
envisioning
tonight,
because
I
think
this
is
the
opportunity
to
let
that
community
engagement
process
play
out
and
speak
for
itself
and
to
test
whether
or
not
that
that
worked
and
whether
we've
incorporated
the
engagement
well
enough.
And
while
we
had
more
than
10,000
public
comments,
we
also
held
seven
events
which
attracted
900
people.
C
We
engaged
with
1,400
more
than
1,400
people
in
underserved
communities
which
in
our
cases
meant
often
youth,
the
Latino
community.
Those
experiencing
disabilities
it's
more
than
numbers
and
it
really
has
been
a
meaningful
process
where
we've
asked
complex,
difficult
questions
of
our
community
members.
C
We've
engaged
our
staff
the
entire
process
before,
during
and
after
every
one
of
our
engagement
windows,
to
leverage
their
expertise
and
really
brought
to
bear
as
much
information
as
we
could
in
the
process
so
that
we
could
inform
discussion
and
bring
us
to
the
point
we
are
today
and
I
think
what
the
results
are.
Hopefully
you're
speaking
for
themselves,
but
I
know.
C
I
can
speak
for
staff
and
saying
that
it
has
felt
like
a
profound
process
because
it
felt
like
there
were
opportunities
and
moments
where
the
community
was
really
coming
together
and
we
were
identifying
shared
values
that
we
all
have
as
it
relates
to
responsible
recreation,
nature,
preservation,
working
landscapes,
I
think
we
all
were
able
to
see
a
common
language
emerge
and
we're
just
thrilled
to
have
been
able
to
start
the
process.
That
way
and
hopefully
continue
it
as
we
close
out
the
process.
C
So
I'm
gonna
give
it
just
a
brief
introduction
here
and
just
remind
us
zooming
back
out
what
those
engagement
windows
have
looked
like,
because
what
base
they
start
to
indicate
as
the
general
outline
for
the
draft
plan
and
I
want
to
point
out
that
there
are
copies.
I
know
some
of
you
requested
hard
copies,
and
so
those
are,
if
you
did
there
sitting
in
front
of
you.
Otherwise
there
are
copies
sitting
in
between
some
of
you
if
you
want
to
refer
to
that
throughout
the
night.
C
But
again
we
started
with
this
process
around
values
and
asked
questions
about
our
hopes
and
concerns
for
the
future
of
open
space
and
led
into
the
approval
of
the
focus
areas,
and
that
was
something
that
came
through
board
and
council
last
summer
and
moved
throughout
the
development
of
outcomes
which,
in
our
case,
is
a
set
of
aspirations.
Those
things
that
we
hope
to
achieve
to
help
us
advance
each
of
these
focus
areas
as
well
as
then
the
strategies
that
would
help
us
achieve
those
outcomes.
C
Our
most
recent
engagement
window
was
the
prioritization
of
those
strategies
and
then
were
tomorrow,
closing
out
our
fifth
engagement
window,
which
has
been
an
opportunity
to
release
the
draft
plan
to
the
community
and
start
to
ask
those
same
questions
we'll
explore
tonight.
In
other
words,
how
well
did
we
incorporate
engagement?
How
well
did
we
do
in
developing
the
draft
plan,
and
what
I'd
like
to
do
is
bring
some
of
the
findings
to
light
and
highlight
a
couple
of
these
engagement
windows
by
way
of
getting
us
accommodated
or
acqua
mated
to
what's
in
the
draft
plan.
C
I
know
it's
a
lot
to
get
through,
and
some
of
us
have
been
spending
more
time
with
it
than
others.
So,
by
way
of
highlighting
our
second
engagement
window,
just
to
remind
us
where
the
focus
areas
are
our
first
focus
area
that
council
approved
was
ecosystem,
health
and
resilience
and
as
we
think
about
the
the
what
that
is
what
what
that
really
means
to
us,
and
we
can
highlight
a
couple
of
one
one
community
quote
in
particular
that
emerged
and
I
are
in
the
engagement
window,
which
this
community
member
said
it's
a
very
unique
ecosystem.
C
With
some
of
the
greatest
diversity
on
our
continent.
I
can
go
a
thousand
miles
east
or
west,
and
not
find
that
diversity
of
plant
and
animal
life
and
so
I.
We
heard
so
many
comments
like
that
through
the
process
and
that
led
as
well
with
data
and
information
to
the
development
of
this
focus
area,
and
then
the
value
statement
in
and
of
itself
really
speaks
to
what
it's
about.
C
The
next
that
we'll
talk
about
tonight
is
agriculture
today
and
tomorrow,
and
the
value
statement
for
this
is
our
legacy
and
our
future
are
based
on
working
landscapes
that
are
in
harmony
with
nature.
Sometimes
that's
kind
of
all
you
need
to
say,
because
you
kind
of
feel
it.
You
hear
it
and
there's
a
lot
to
that
statement
in
the
case
of
asking
our
community
members.
How
important
that
particular
focus
area
is
for
the
future
of
OS
NP
49%
said
it
was
either
absolutely
essential
or
very
important.
C
Responsible
recreation,
stewardship
and
enjoyment
as
a
third
the
value
statement,
there
is
also
really
compelling
we
are
united
by
our
connection
to
and
our
enjoyment
of
nature
and
our
obligation
to
protect
it.
So
again
that
pulls
together
a
lot
of
conversations
around
what
nature
means
to
us
and
what
it
means
to
steward
it
together
and
in
the
case
of
our
community
members,
how
important
this
one
is
to
the
future
of
osm
P
90%,
so
it
was
either
absolutely
essential
or
very
important
to
the
future
of
osm
P
community
connection,
education
and
inclusion.
C
This
was
one
where
we
also
got
a
lot
of
great
help
from
City,
Council
and
board
a
year
ago,
when
we
were
looking
at
the
approval
of
this,
where
we
wanted
to
make
sure
that
education,
for
example,
was
central
in
the
development
of
this
focus
area
and
the
value
statement
for
this
is
together.
We
build
an
inclusive
community
of
stewards
and
seek
to
find
our
place
in
open
space.
So
we're
really
trying
to
pull
these
community
voices
through
as
we
continue
and
start
to
wrap
up.
C
How
we'll
achieve
those
outcomes
and
strategies-
and
this
is
where
we
talk
about
things
like
acquisition,
planning
for
and
in
certain
future,
as
it
relates
to
our
budget
situation,
updating
our
planning
framework
and
our
acquisitions
approach.
All
of
those
things
are
are
elements
that
again
help
us
achieve
the
other
focus
areas
and
71%
of
our
respondents
to
the
recent
survey
said
that
this
was
either
absolutely
essential
or
very
important
to
our
future,
and
so
by
way
of
highlighting
it.
C
Another
most-read
are
the
current
engagement
window
is,
is
the
one
that
we're
in
again
that
wraps
up
tomorrow
night
and
what
we've
heard
so
far
is
quite
honestly
gratitude.
We've
gotten
open
comments
that
have
said.
Thank
you
for
this
process.
We
have
appreciated
the
opportunity
to
participate
in
it,
and
certainly
we've
also
gotten
suggestions
that,
in
a
lot
of
ways
aligned
with
the
feedback
that
we've
gotten
today.
C
Some
of
those
are
an
effort
or
suggestion
to
integrate
strategies
across
focus
areas
and
to
think
about
the
ways
that
we,
when
we
get
into
implementation,
there
are
synergies
or
relationships
between
those
others
talk
about
advancing
certain
strategies
further
and
we'll
talk
about
some
of
that
tonight
and
hopefully
get
guidance
from
board
and
council
about
where
we
need
to
do
that
and
and
where
some
of
those
might
sit
better
and
implementation
level,
planning
and
programs
and
projects.
We
also
got
comments
around
either
narrowing
or
refining
priorities.
C
So
we
got
some
comments,
for
example,
that
we
have
too
many
priorities.
We
will
talk
later
tonight
about
that.
We
have
17
out
of
46
of
our
strategies,
initially
prioritized
with
input
from
the
staff
community
and
the
board,
and
some
said
you
know
narrow
that
even
further
and
think
about
the
things
that
you
can
really
achieve
in
the
near
term.
While
others
were
saying
that
we
should
explore
potential
refinements
to
those
so,
for
example,
placing
more
emphasis
on
tribal
relations
or
more
emphasis
on
soil
health
or
rapport
supporting
farmers
and
ranchers.
C
So
there
were
comments
there,
sort
of
to
tweak
the
content
of
the
play,
but
really
all
of
the
comments
we
felt
like
in
total
were
supportive
of
where
we've
come
and
where
we
are
to
date
and
as
we
think
about
going
forward.
We
have
set
out
at
the
beginning
of
this
process,
with
the
intention
of
hopefully
having
counsel
support
our
final
plan
in
September.
So
starting
and
finishing
the
plan
within
one
council
term,
and
so
with
tonight's
study
session.
C
We'll
kick
off
a
really
important
conversation
with
both
board
and
council,
and
then
we
do
have
a
hold
for
tomorrow
night
for
our
board
to
continue
any
of
the
conversations
that
we
can't
wrap
up
tonight,
similar
to
what
we
did
last
summer,
but
we'll
need
a
head
nod
of
support
from
Council
to
make
sure
that
we're
comfortable
with
the
topics
that
the
board
would
explore
tomorrow
night.
We
then
have
a
meeting
on
June
26
with
our
process
committee
and
I.
C
Do
I
want
to
take
a
moment,
as
I
often
do
to
just
thank
Erin,
Mary,
Tom
and
Curt,
because
that's
a
real
a
lot
of
extra
time
that
you've
spent
trying
to
guide
this
process,
and
it's
really
been
so
fruitful,
and
we
so
appreciate
the
guidance
that
we've
gotten
today
and
we've
set
up
that
meeting
as
an
opportunity
to
use
it
as
a
checkpoint
on
our
schedule.
We
recognize
that
tonight
and
tomorrow
night
something
may
emerge
where
there
might
be
potential
impacts
to
our
schedule.
C
D
So
thank
you
doing.
If
we
have
additional
comments
after
tonight,
can
we
send
them
to
you
and
you
could
just
send
them
as
they
are
to
the
trustees,
because
I
didn't
envision
tonight,
going
deep
into
weeds
but
to
have
kind
of
a
higher-level
discussion,
but
I
do
have
some
specifics
and
I
didn't
want
to
go
into
them
tonight.
So
our.
C
Hope
is
tonight
that
we
that
we
have
a
conversation
about
the
content
mm-hmm
the
things
that
we
need,
dialogue
around
with
board
and
council
that
we
addressed
those
tonight.
If
there
are
things
around
particular
phrasing
or
tweaks
or
editorial
or
those
sort
of
things,
then
we
would
welcome
comments
if
you
could
submit
them
by
June
16th
and
lots.
D
C
Again,
just
to
reiterate
the
focus
of
tonight,
I
know
there
are
a
lot
of
elements
to
the
plan.
We've
talked
about
them,
but
the
focus
tonight
is
we're
hoping
to
hear
your
feedback
on
the
strategies
themselves
and
how
we've
prioritized
those
strategies
and
again
those
the
the
detailed
plans,
programs
and
projects
that
would
help
us
implement
those
strategies.
C
That
is,
for
the
2020
process
that
I
just
described
in
terms
of
budget
approval
and
implementation
planning,
as
we
consult
with
the
board
and
then
Council
on
that
and
Anna
is
gonna
help
us
keep
on
track
before
we
get
into
that.
I
just
want
to
give
you
some
highlight
to
just
give
you
an
understanding,
get
you
more
grounded
and
what
we
really
mean.
So
by
way
of
example,
we
have
two
strategies
that
we've
just
pulled
out,
so
the
first
is
our
very
first
strategy
under
ecosystem
health
and
resilience
conserve
and
restore
boulders
natural
heritage.
C
So
you
will
see
a
short
phrase
like
this
in
the
front
of
every
strategy,
and
you
have
handouts
in
front
of
you
that
replicate
those
phrases
there's
also
a
poster
up
here.
That
will
be
referring
to
as
well
as
some
slides,
so
you'll
see
these
short
phrases
and
and
that's
a
way
of
summarizing
the
strategy,
but
behind
each
of
those
strategies
is
also
a
more
descriptive
sentence
about
what
it's
all
about.
So
this
is
the
purview.
These
are
the
places
where
we're
hoping
for
dialogue
tonight
how
we
describe
those
short
phrases.
C
What
those
sentences
you
know
what
the
content
behind
them
is.
If
we
have
substantive
changes,
let's
talk
about
those
tonight,
knowing
again
that
afterwards
we
get
more
details
as
we
put
together
the
implementation
plan.
So,
by
way
of
example,
for
this
particular
strategy,
this
would
guide
work
around
Creek
restoration,
for
example,
so
work
around
Boulder
Creek,
where
we're
looking
at
restoring
gravel
pits
and
looking
at
restoring
the
natural
flow
of
the
Creek
to
support
better
habitat
and
water
quality.
C
Another
example
is
under
agriculture
today
and
tomorrow,
so
you'll
start
to
see
these
little
handles
that
are
ATT.
Is
our
acronym
we're
bureaucrats,
so
we
speak
in
in
acronyms.
Forgive
us
this
one
is
around
enhanced
soil,
health
and
resilience
and
the
longer
sentence
around
this
is
talking
about
managing
agricultural
activities.
In
tilled
lands
native
grasslands
to
prevent
soil
erosion,
maintain
and
improve
soil,
health,
sequester,
carbon
and
protect
ecosystem
function.
So
again,
this
is
sort
of
the
purview
for
conversation.
E
Ok,
as
Darren
mentioned,
my
name
is
Anna
Leybourne,
I'm
with
design
workshop
the
consultants
behind
this
work,
and
I
was
mentioning
to
darren
that
this
when
it
was
brought
up
that
you
know
this
isn't
as
many
comments
on
a
draft
plan
as
what
we
expected.
We
had
so
many
comments
earlier
on.
I
said:
that's
exactly
what
you
want!
That's
the
goal.
You
want
this
sort
of
arc
of
building
interest
in
the
plan
from
folks
people
really
engaged
providing
input
showing
up
to
learn
more
about
the
plan
and
then,
as
a
draft
is
released.
E
People
saying
I
feel
heard
I
support
what's
going
on,
and
so
you
receive
hear
comments,
that's
ideal.
So
that's
kind
of
what
we're
looking
at
tonight
with
having
ended
that
period
of
having
public
comments
on
the
draft
plan
and
now
tonight
getting
to
engage
in
a
discussion
with
you
around.
Have
we
really
heard
it
right
and
are
there
any
tweaks
and
adjustments
that
will
make
it
a
plan
that
you
are
supporting
going
forward?
E
So
tonight's
staff
is
seeking
guidance
from
City,
Council
and
OSB
T
on
affirming
and
refining
the
strategies
says
Darren
just
explained
what
those
are
in
here
and
the
priorities
for
the
draft
master
plan.
We've
had
limited
touchpoints
at
this
point
at
this
time
with
council
so
tonight
I
might
call
on
council
a
little
bit
more
to
speak
to
the
items
in
this
plan,
but
we
want
that
discussion
and
that
engagement
tonight.
E
This
is
really
your
chance
to
have
it
all
together
in
one
room,
I'm
gonna
orientate
you
to
a
couple
of
things
that
you
have
with
you
to
work
with,
and
this
discussion
one
is
some
of
you
asked
for
maps
to
be
provided,
so
you
can
refer
to
the
lands
and
if
you
look
at
between
all
of
you,
there's
a
system
overview
document
that
you're
sharing
it
looks
big
with
a
pink
tab
in
it.
The
pink
tab
is
indicating
where
the
map
is
so
that
might
help
you
in
in
finding
your
way.
E
Secondly,
I
have
some
other
helpers
here.
Juliet
is
going
to
be
taking
detailed
notes,
the
whole
time
so
she's
in
the
back.
Doing
that
know
that
we're
getting
all
your
comments
and
noting
those
for
the
meeting
tomorrow
night,
as
well
as
for
the
future
and
in
addition,
Darrin,
is
going
to
be
shifting
over
to
help
take
some
notes
over
on
these
pads
over
here.
E
The
reason
for
that
is,
she
wants
to
make
note
of
any
agreements
about
substantive
changes
that
she
hears
and
make
note
of
those
up
here,
so
you
can
refer
to
them
and
secondly,
if
there
are
any
further
resolution
notes
that
she
needs
to
track
for
future
conversations,
she'll
make
it
up
there
and
also
kind
of
indicating
where
we're
at
in
the
agenda.
So
that's
the
help
I'll
have
with
some
of
these
things
to
move
through
it
tonight.
E
So,
overall,
we
have
until
9
o'clock
tonight
to
go
over
these
items
and
we're
going
to
be
discussing
these
which
strategies
are
on
target
in
the
draft
master
plan.
That's
the
the
key
one
for
this
evening
and
which
need
refinement,
well,
I'll,
speed
it
looking
at
priorities
and
what
support
you
might
need
going
forward
for
this
plan
and
in
limit
reviewing
some
of
the
items.
E
So
with
that,
I'll
give
a
little
bit
overview
of
how
we're
going
to
spend
our
time,
because
we
were
fortunate
that
nearly
all
of
you,
11
out
of
13
of
you,
responded
to
a
question
about
how
do
you
want
to
spend
your
time
this
evening?
So
that's
really
helpful
for
us.
We
know
know
from
that
that
you
particularly
want
to
spend
your
time
talking
about
ecosystem
health
and
resilience,
as
well
as
responsible
recreation,
stewardship
and
enjoyment,
we're
kind
of
ones
that
had
the
most
interest
in
discussion.
E
But
with
that
we
want
to
make
sure
there's
as
much
conversation
tonight
around
these
topics
as
a
group
rather
than
having
to
have
you
later,
provide
emails
that
you
wish
you
had
discussed
it
together.
So
that's
that's
the
goal
of
this
night
and
I'll
do
a
time
check
part
way
through
to
see
how
we're
doing
on
reaching
that
goal.
G
E
At
the
end,
oh,
it's
okay,
so
I
didn't
put
time
to
it,
but
we're
gonna
see
where
how
much
time
we
have
at
the
end
and
how
we're
doing,
but
we
thought
we'd
have
some
final
thoughts
kind
of
be
able
to
collect.
After
we
talk
about
priorities,
we
can
do
it
then
good
good
point
there
we
didn't
put
time
to
it.
You're,
correct
I'm,.
A
D
Don't
know
when
is
the
right
time,
but
I,
just
I
asked
Erin
and
I
do
have
a
question
about
how
its
presented
the
goals
and
then
the
strategies
to
achieve
the
goals,
and
they
don't
just
match
up
one
for
one,
but
it
takes
some
time
to
work
that
out
and
so
I
was
wondering
if
staff
or
if
you
guys,
had
thought
about
how
its
laid
out,
because
you
see
all
of
these
outcomes
or
goals
that
you
want,
and
it's
like.
Okay
and
some
of
the
comments
we've
gotten
have
been.
G
They
touch
each
other
somehow,
as
well
as
those
that
are
not
quite
in
harmony
that
compete
with
each
other
and
that
wouldn't
be
a
Venn
diagram.
I,
don't
know
what
that
would
be,
but
but
something
along
those
lines.
That
gives
you
an
idea
of
where
things
are
competing
with
each
other
and
that
could
help
with
the
prioritization
Darren.
C
Absolutely
and
just
to
briefly
answer
your
question:
Lisa,
we
had
worked
on
the
structure
of
the
document
and
when
we
were
looking
at
the
relationship
between
outcomes
and
strategies,
we
were
doing
exactly
what
Mary
did,
which
was
to
say
this
strategy
achieves
three
of
these
outcomes.
This
outcome
relates
to
four
of
these
strategies,
and
so
there
were
so
many
lines
this
way
in
that
that
they
don't.
There
are
multiple
relationships
between
them,
which
is
why
there's
not
one-to-one.
F
E
Anything
in
black
you
didn't
need
to
discuss
is
what
we
heard
from
11
out
of
13
of
you,
so
I'll
just
ask
as
we
move
through
each
of
these.
Would
you
confirm
these
are
not
once
you
wanted.
You
need
to
discuss,
because
in
fact
you
support
them
moving
for
the
final
plan
and
that
that's
something
you
want
to
see
in
the
final
plan.
So
we
can
do
that
now
and
you
can
take
a
look
at
these
two
that
are
in
the
screen
in
future
focus
areas.
There
are
more
that
you
didn't
need
to
discuss.
E
E
Also
bold
and
white
underlined
indicates
that
more
than
one
person
wanted
to
discuss
this,
so
we
will
begin
with
the
one
that
had
the
most
interest.
That
is
underlined
the
very
first
one,
but
before
we
do
that,
I
want
to
just
want
to
ask
number
five
and
eight
that
were
not
ones
that
people
indicated
they
they
need
to
discuss
tonight
is
that
is
that
true,
that
you
feel
that
this
is
one
that
you'd
like
to
see
in
the
neck
and
the
adoption
steps
just
supported
to
move
forward,
and
if
so
sorry
you
have
a
question.
D
When,
in
going
through
this
number,
eight
developing
a
learning
laboratory
approach,
I
wasn't
really
clear
how
you
would
do
that
so
in
the
National
Park
System,
which
you
come
from,
there
are
permits
that
you
apply
to
the
department
and
then
those
permits
are
evaluated
by
a
group
of
staff
and
maybe
some
outside
scientists.
And
then
you
know
somebody
comes
in
with
a
proposal
and
then
that
proposal
is
reviewed.
It
usually
doesn't
entail
any
exchange
of
money.
But
how
are
you
going
to
do
this
laboratory
approach
and
are
you
going
to
have
permits
and
how?
C
This
is
a
perfect
example
of
something
that
would
gather
more
detail
in
the
implementation
planning,
but
I
can
tell
you
that
we
do
have
a
funded
research
program,
and
so
it's
very
similar
to
what
you
just
described.
We're
also
looking
at
making
sure
that
we
describe
our
science
in
a
way.
That's
applied
search
so
that
we're
applying
that
in
a
piloted
way
to
land
management
practices
and
making
sure
that
we
use
that
data
and
in
an
adaptive
management
framework.
And
so
that's
the
really
that's
the
intent
and
import
behind
that
question,
and
certainly
so.
D
I
know
wondering
and
and
if
we'll
get
to
financial
sustainability,
but
that
does
take
time
it
does
take
staff.
It
does
require
resources
and
so
and
I'm
concerned
about
putting
on
a
new
thing
without
those
resources.
But
I
think
we
need
to
look
at
these
in
holistic
approach,
as
well
as
having
some
research
is
always
good.
So
I,
don't
we.
E
Want
to
make
sure
that
if
there's
something
you
need
clarification
on
in
order
to
support
it
moving
forward,
if
this
phrase
moving
forward
into
the
final
plan,
we
need
to
hear
that.
But
typically,
if
I
hear
a
lot
of
words
about
how
is
this
going
to
happen?
That's
gonna
be
my
indication
that
that
may
be
about
implementation,
and
so
then
we'll
say,
let's
come
back
to
the
strategies
and
talk
about.
E
Is
a
strategy
working
so
with
that
our
five
and
eight
do
those
items,
look
like
ones
you
need
to
anyone
else
need
to
discuss
or
a
raise
of
hands.
If
you
are
comfortable
with
this
one
did
these
two
being
supported
in
the
plan
or
the
plan
moving
forward
for
adoption,
okay,
great
and
then
we'll
start
with
number
one,
which
we
had
more
than
one
person
indicating
that
they
wanted
to
discuss
this
one
conserve
and
restore
boulders
natural
heritage.
So
that
was
in
one
of
our
examples.
E
H
Ahead
so-
and
this
is
on
page
32
of
the
underneath-
the
well
first
of
all
under
the
first
big
one-
ecosystem,
health
and
resilience.
This
goes
to
some
of
the
comments
that
we've
received
from
the
public
about
wanting
more
detail.
But
it
says
we
using
the
best
available
science.
We
protect
healthy
and
men,
those
how
we
have
impaired
and
the
question
is
in
protecting
healthy
ecosystems.
How
and
that
goes
more
to
details,
I
think
in
terms
of,
for
example,
under
strategies
conserve
and
restore
boulders
natural
heritage.
H
We
strive
to
maintain
and
enhance
a
network
of
healthy
resilient
habitats
to
native
for
native
plants
and
animals
large
connected
and
unfragmented
habitat
areas,
rather
than
smaller,
fragmented
ones,
etc.
Where
is
the
data
for
this?
I
would
like
to
see
data
and
the
plans
so
that
we
can
actually
see
where
these
are
the
large
unfragmented
habitat
areas.
How
many
there
are,
what
size
are
they
and
how
do
we
get
to?
H
One
of
the
persons
who
wrote
to
us
talked
about
no
net
loss
and
in
terms
of
if
something
happens
to
one
of
these,
so
that
a
chunk
gets
fragmented
off.
Someone
else
referred
to
open
space
being
lost,
not
by
a
large
act
but
by
a
thousand
acts,
but
by
a
thousand
cuts,
and
so
this
would
be
the
kind
of
thing
that
I
at
any
rate
and
I,
think
many
members
of
the
public
would
find
useful
data
and
so
that
we
can
follow
trends
over
time
and
it
becomes
apparent
rather
than
abstract.
G
E
One
element,
and
that
is
being
a
master
plan-
we're
gonna
have
it
for
a
long
time.
It's
gonna,
it's
the
planning
horizon
is
over
10
years,
and
so
sometimes
with
that
the
data
will
be
ever-changing
and
needs
to
be
updated.
So
we
need
to
refer
to
other
elements.
So
my
question
in
that
is:
are
you
looking
for
the
strategy
statement
itself
to
be
changed
in
some
way?
Are
you
looking
for
it
to
be
amended
with
data
points
amended.
H
H
H
For
example,
how
many
were
there
in
2007
and
how
many
were
there
in
2019
so
that
we
can
see
what's
happening
over
time,
which
goes
to
one
of
our
writers
wrote
and
talked
about
the
the
numbers
growing
25
percent
from
2005
4.7
million
visitors
to
6
point
2,
5
million
in
2017,
an
increase
of
25%,
so
that
we
can
see
where
we
are
now
and
then
moving
forward.
How
well
we're
actually
managing
what
it
is.
We're
striving
to
manage
we're.
I
I
I
mean
you
can't
get
all
I
mean
this
is
its
own
200
page
thing
right,
but
like
some
representative,
as
you're
as
you're,
preparing
a
final
plan
pulling
in
representative
data
from
the
system
overview
and
maybe
other
places
seems
like
it
would
be
really
helpful,
but
then
maybe
also
referencing.
It
say
like
hey
and
there's
a
whole
bunch
more
right
here
and
and
then
just
to
thought
just
your
point
about
tracking
things.
I
C
A
So
I
wanted
to
underscore
what
you
just
said,
which
is
because
this
is
going
to
come
up
again
and
again
again
under
every
one
of
these
strategies
is
this
is
general
and
how
do
we
link
it?
So
so,
yes,
we
need
to
tie
it
and
maybe
there's
the
citations
from
which
sections
are
relevant
in
this
document.
I
also
think
that
you
mentioned
somewhere
in
the
plan.
A
It
talks
about
80,
metrics
or
yeah
80
data
indicators
are
currently
measured
by
open
space
staff
and
it
could
be
that
those
relevant
to
various
areas
could
be
highlighted
inside
bars
or
something
or
anyhow
what
we'll
want
to
crosslink
these.
So
this
it
feels
more,
but
there's
more
comment
because
we
know
there's
content
backing
this
up,
but
it's
not
all
in
here.
It's
not
a
good
way
to
cross-reference,
but.
H
G
D
The
uses
so
I
know
when
we
started
this
permit
system.
We
weren't
gonna,
try
to
stop
people,
but
you
know
in
reading
this
master
plan,
it's
very
clear.
We
want
to
try
to
limit
off-trail
uses
and
we
want
to
repair
fragmentation
of
our
eco
eco
system.
So
when
I
look
at
this
particular
table
that
Cindy
pulled
out,
it's
like
none
of
these
are
for
research,
it
doesn't
seem
like
and
so
I
guess
I
would
like
to
know
like
national
park
permits.
D
A
Well,
I'm
gonna.
This
will
be
another
theme
which
is
yeah,
of
course,
duh.
Yes,
that's
very
important.
So
when
and
how
right
and
I
know
we're
gonna
just
say
up
that
keps!
That's
implementation,
that's
next
year,
but
know
that
that's
a
very
unsatisfying
answer,
okay,
so
I,
guess
and
I
think
that'll
come
up
again
is
come
on.
We
need
to
prioritize
it.
We
need
to
know
which
plans
are
likely
or
in
the
mix
or
you
know,
I'm
sure
the
Board
of
Trustees
have
thought
about.
You
know
what
we
know.
A
These
are
the
high-ticket
ones,
and
these
are
the
ones
who
are
probably
gonna
recommend
it
counsel
and
baby
yeah
I
think
you'll
meet
a
lot
less
resistance.
If
we
know
that
some
of
these
high
priority
ones
are
likely
to
end
up
on
the
work
plan
next
year
and
how
we're
gonna
bite
some
of
this
off
that
we
know
are
top
priorities
so
so.
B
We've
been
going
through
sort
of
as
at
a
staff
level
of
a
lumping
phase
in
a
splitting
phase
of
when
to
bring
things
together
and
when
you
bring
things
together,
they
tend
to
get
a
little
bit
diluted
as
opposed
to
plated,
and
this
is
one
where
we
have
had
that
discussion
of
whether
or
not
we
ought
to
split
these.
These
two
up
into
two
different
strategies,
because
conserving
boulders
natural
resources
is
a
sort
of
a
different
type
of
strategy
than
restoring.
So
the
conserving
side
is
good.
B
There
are
some
lands
that
are
in
very
good
condition
and
our
strategies
around
that
should
be
to
sustain
and
to
keep
that
integra
be
going
where
the
restoring
element
is
recognizing
that
there's
work
to
be
done
and
and
they're
high
quality,
but
there's
work
to
be
done
there
and
perhaps
there's
enough
interest
in
what
we're
hearing
tonight
is.
Instead
of
the
lumping
that
we
ended
up
is
is
maybe
we
should
split.
D
I
think
that
would
be
really
helpful
and
I
think
having
maps
would
be
really
helpful.
So
I
found
myself
in
reading
some
of
this
well
I'm,
not
on
the
open
space
board
of
trustees,
but
where
are
the
areas
that
need
to
be
restored?
What's
their
proximity,
what
kind
of
environment
are
they
in?
What
kind
of
restoration
are
we
talking
about
and
and
I
goes
all
the
way
through
the
plan,
so
I
think
maps
would
be
helpful
and
like
maps
where
the
different
species
are
I.
E
H
B
J
I
think
this
strategy
is
a
good
example
of
a
number
of
them
that
we're
going
to
have
to
deal
with
and
and
that's
a
concern
I
have
about
the
draft.
Now
it
doesn't
seem
to
have
substance
to
deal
with
the
really
hard
questions
or
issues
that
we're
going
to
have
to
confront,
and
this
is
a
good
one,
because
there
is
a
lot
there
are
a
lot
of
data
out
there.
So
it's
not
like
the
numbers.
Are
there
in
it.
This
is
a
question
we
keep
asking
the
community.
J
We've
asked
them
this
question,
probably
for
30
years,
and
it
keeps
coming
back.
You
know
the
highest
ranking,
you
know,
community
response,
and
so
from
my
perspective
is
like
let's
quit
asking
them
the
question
we
already.
We
know
let's
get
after
it
and
and
do
what
needs
to
be
done.
So
that
is
what
I'm
concerned
about
on
this
one
and
throughout
you
know,
the
strategies
is,
there's
got
to
be
a
context
for
people
to
understand
what
it
is
that
we
or
the
city
or
the
open
space
in
mountain
parks.
J
Department
is
proposing,
and
it
doesn't
have
to
be
so
specific
that
it's
you
know
it
becomes
trivial,
but
there
have
to.
There
has
to
be
some
things
in
there.
That
says,
for
example,
you
know
here's
here's,
you
know
what
we've
been
doing
will
continue,
or
here
are
some
things
that
we're
going
to
consider
and
then,
in
addition
to
that,
there
has
to
be
a
budgetary
number
attached
to
it.
People
have
to
understand
okay,
this
is
what
it's
going
to
take.
J
This
is
the
priority,
and
this
is
the
estimate
of
how
much
it's
going
to
cost
and
in
order
for
them
to
understand
you
know
the
importance
of
these
strategies
and
I
think
this
is
clearly
the
community's
number
one
recommendation
and
we
do
it
a
disservice
by
not
having
you
know
the
sufficient
substance
to
acknowledge
the
importance
of
this
particular
strategy.
I.
K
How
have
we
done
on
these
best
implementation
areas?
Have
we
succeeded-
and
you
know
that's
something
that
you
know
it's
kind
of
kind
of
the
bigger
perspective.
That
is
one
way
to
look
at
this
master
plan.
It's
setting
the
the
framework.
We
have
all
these
very
detailed
plans
and
operations
that
go
on
constantly
that
address
a
lot
of
this
issues.
That
are
a
thing,
sir.
So.
E
John
before
I
move
on
can
I
ask
with
that
that
was
brought
up.
Should
we
split
these
this
idea
conserve
and
restore?
Did
you
have
a
feeling
on
that?
So
we
can
then
come
back
to
folks
and
I.
Didn't
get
a
really
good
hand
signals
from
people
I
wasn't
really
clear
and
if
you
felt
strongly
about
that,
but
if
you
do
want
to
note
that
before
we
move
on
it.
A
Can
I
just
note
that
some
of
these
are
not
they're,
not
all
equal
like
under
restore.
You
have
reduce
on
designated
trails
control
invasive
weeds
I
mean
some
of
them
more
subsets
right,
so
they
kind
of
nest
better,
because
H
EHR
one
is
kind
of
like
the
thing
and
then
the
right
most
of
them
nest
in
some
ways.
So
anyhow,
that's
part
of
the.
I
I'm
gonna
find
separating
them.
That's
perfectly
all
right,
but
just
to
make
a
little
bit
of
a
larger
point,
I
mean
John
I.
Think
you
raised
an
excellent
point
and
and
I
think
we
have
some
understanding
of
that.
But
just
in
looking
through
the
the
first
few
sections
of
the
master
plan,
that's
not
really
clearly
articulated.
I
E
L
This
question
that
Dan
suggested
a
little
while
ago,
which
is
I,
think
the
reason
why
you're
not
getting
a
clear
hand
raising
on
that
question
is:
is
it
adding
substance
to
the
conserved
part
or
is
it
splitting
and
for
me,
I?
Don't
care
whether
they're,
combined
or
split
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
there's
more
than
five
lines
more
conserve,
okay,.
C
So
that
would
be
helpful
for
us
to
understand
tonight
and
recognizing
that
this
was
the
only
one
in
this
focus
area
that
was
underlined,
meaning
a
lot
of
people
wanted
to
talk
about
this,
so
we've
we've
spent
more
time
on
this
one
and
we'll
have
to
prioritize
our
time
on
the
others
accordingly,
but
but
just
to
make
sure
we
understand,
if
there
are
any
content,
changes,
whether
we
split
it
or
keep
them
together.
That
would
satisfy
council
and
board
it.
That
would
be
helpful
for
us
to
understand.
Is
there
anything
of
substance?
That's
missing
here.
A
That's
even
referenced
the
same
with
on
trail
requirements,
but
all
a
lot
of
the
other
ones
are
way
less
clear
about
what
happens,
certainly,
which,
which
ecosystems
we're
going
to
prior
prioritize
restoring
and
how
we're
going
to
aside
and
what
the
heck
does
that
mean
Sonia
again
if
it
means
implement
the
grasslands
plan
them
for
God's
sakes,
link
to
it
and
say
so.
You
know
that
kind
of
stuff
would
be
really
helpful
with.
H
You
and,
and
the
emphasis
I
think,
is
on
the
protection,
because
the
restoration
comes
after
what
we're
trying
to
protect,
gets
gets
trashed.
So
if
we
emphasize
protection
rather
than
coming
in
afterwards
and
cleaning
up
after
things
have
been
degraded
or
exploited
or
whatever
it's
kind
of
a
backwards
way
of
going
about
it.
Okay,
so
I
think
it's
just
it's
a
lot
of
that
is
emphasis
and.
D
I
have
a
question
about
so
you
have
reduced
human
disturbance
and
then
at
some
other
point,
I
think
it's
under
recreation,
its
connect
trails
and
it's
like
I
need
to
know
a
lot
more
about
that,
because
it
seems
to
be
contradictory
and
so
there's
different
things
in
in
these
five
areas
that,
in
and
of
themselves
being
in
there
are
somewhat
contradictory
to
other
parts.
So
yep.
C
So
we
you
know,
we
recognize
that
we
said
from
the
beginning.
We
weren't
going
to
be
able
to
make
site-specific
decisions
in
the
plan,
so
we're
not
saying
where
to
connect
the
trails
or
which
undesignated
trails
to
restore,
but
we
are
setting
ourselves
up
for
the
policy
conversations
and
the
the
framework
for
making
those
decisions
after
this.
So
that's
why
we
want
to
make
sure
tonight
that
we're
we're
setting
ourselves
up
strongly
for
that.
So
so.
H
One
of
the
things
that
Lisa's
talking
about
with
the
trails
is
that,
if
they
are
linked,
one
trail
over
here
is
linked
to
one
over
here.
Then
it's
increasing
fragmentation
of
the
area,
so
one
of
the
ways
to
protect
it
is
not
to
fragment
it.
So
it's
that
kind
of
which
is
a
broader
policy
issue
than
which
trails,
where.
M
You
said
something
that
sounds
like
a
policy
statement.
I
think
it's
on.
Thanks,
Cindy,
you
said
something
that
sound
like
a
policy
statement
regarding
these
large
habitat
blocks.
You
said
no
net
loss.
Now,
yes,
is
that
the
sort
of
thing
that
should
be
put
into
the
master
plan
it?
It's
not
a
location,
specific
statement,
it's
a
global
strategy
or
objective
from.
D
A
J
You're
asking
for
substance,
what
we're
suggesting
is
include
substance
in
the
description.
So
if
you
want
substantive
comments,
that's
when
it
needs
more
substance
and
and
I
think
you
know
that's
a
context
type
of
example,
and
we
I
think
provided
a
number
of
examples
that
you
could
incorporate.
Okay,.
C
E
I
E
And
looking
at
our
time,
I
want
to
move
kind
of
quickly
through
the
next
few
because
they
are
ones
that
we
heard
only
from
one
person
that
they
need
to
talk
about
too
three,
four,
six,
seven
and
nine
before
we
move
on
to
the
end
and
we've
already
exhausted
the
time
we've
set
aside
for
this
particular
focus
area.
So
I
want
to
kind
of
move
quickly
if
we
can,
through
discussion
of
what
refinement
or
clarification
folks
might
need
about
the
ones
that
are
white
on
this
page
so
reduce
under
the
name.
E
D
C
So
here's
one
way
we
can
also
do
this
just
to
prioritize
our
limited
time.
So
if
there
are
comments
or
thoughts,
that
counsel,
for
example,
would
like
to
put
out
there.
If
we
don't
have
time
to
talk
about
those
tonight,
then
we
can
start
to
assemble
the
list.
That
board
might
need
to
explore
more
tomorrow.
So
as
it
relates
to
these
others,
with
that
in
mind,
are
there
any
concepts
that
council
members
would
like
to
put
out
there
for
board
members
to
further
consider.
H
Well,
I
just
want
to
respond
to
Erin's
concern
about
the
no
net
loss
and
ask
that
maybe
that
would
be
something
that
we
would
ask
for
the
open
space
board
of
trustees
to
give
us
a
summation
of
that
not
necessarily
tonight,
but
they
could
send
that
to
us.
I
mean
I've
got
an
image
in
my
own
mind,
but
whether
or
not
given
the
time
constraints
now
is
the
time
to
discuss
it.
I,
don't
I,
don't
know
you.
A
H
E
N
This
may
be
my
only
comment,
but
on
reducing
undesignated
trails.
I
think
it's
absolutely
correct
to
say,
especially
in
sensitive
habitat
areas,
and
to
take
ecological
considerations
into
account,
but
I
think
we
also
need
to
say
and
considering
other
factors
such
as
the
destination
served
by
the
undesignated
trail.
We've
sort
of
you
know
in
the
example
as
well
something
that
just
goes
out:
somebody's
backyard
and
sure
there
are
lots
of
social
trails
that
serve
almost
no
redeeming
purpose
and
are
easy
calls.
N
But
it's
also
true
that
you
know
more
than
half
of
all
the
climbing
formations
on
open
space
aren't
served
by
a
designated
trail,
and
it
would
be
an
enormous
change
in
policy
to
say
well,
wait
a
minute.
You
need
to
have
a
designated
trail
to
go
to
those
destinations
and
most
of
them
the
only
reason
the
trail
isn't
designated
was
there
was
no
need
to
designate
it.
It
was
sort
of
working
reasonably
well
and
getting
people
to
where
they
wanted
to
go,
and
some
of
those
have
probably
been
in
existence
for
50
years.
M
B
That's
why,
typically,
when
we
make
calls
on
undesignated
trails,
it's
usually
done
through
a
public
process,
a
trail
study
areas
when
we'll
make
a
call
make
calls
on
designated
on
designated
trails,
because
of
of
that
topic
is
one
of
them.
So
it's
it's,
not
a
unilateral
one
staff
person
behind
closed
doors,
making
that
College,
usually
through
a
public
process
in
which
we
make
some
of
these
calls.
Okay,.
L
Yes,
I
have
a
question
for
counsel
on
nighttime
use.
It's
not
specifically
addressed
anywhere,
but
it
hasn't
been
called
out
by
previous
councils
and
when
I
look
at
EHR
4,
it
talks
about
light
pollution
and
noise
pollution.
It
doesn't
talk
about
nighttime
use
per
se
and
I'd
like
to
hear
from
counsel
about
whether
it
should
conceptually
include
nighttime
use.
D
C
Right
now
is,
if
you
remember
back
to
the
system
overview
report,
we
put
the
data
there
where
we've
looked
at
our
visitor
surveys
and
the
trends
over
time
and
in
the
last
decade
actually
nighttime
use
has
reduced
by
half,
so
we're
really
seeing
less
than
1%
of
our
visitation
happening
between
7:00
p.m.
and
7:00
a.m.
and
so
that's
why
staff
didn't
feel
like
the
trainer
sort
of
in
the
reverse
direction.
It
didn't
call
for
a
particular
action
at
this
time.
I'm.
Q
M
Think
one
reason
to
close
the
loop
is
that
the
system
overview
report
calls
out
the
overarching
issues
that
came
from
the
2005,
but
we
never
go
through
a
process
in
this
plan
to
say
we
don't
need
to
worry
about
that
one
anymore.
This
one's
already
been
addressed
and
I
I,
just
put
it
out
there
for
Council
again,
that
was
quite
a
while
ago,
but
it
is
sort
of
in
councils
documents
that
that
was
a
charge
to
open
space.
A
This
is
I'm
assuming
it's
an
issue,
but
I
guess
before
we
tackle
something,
especially
that
we
know
is
gonna,
be
controversial.
We
should
know
that
we
have
a
problem
to
solve
and
I
guess
I
would
ask
that
question
of
a
button
I
use,
because
we
know
we
have
other
problems
to
solve
that
our
top
priorities,
and
so,
if
not
use,
is
declining.
It's
not
a.
We
haven't
known,
we
don't
have
specific
species
were
worried
about
I,
say
interesting.
Question
put
it
on
the
parking
lot
for
future
things
to
consider.
A
D
And
I
would
also
add
to
that
we're
just
beginning
to
enforce
our
dark
skies
ordinance
on
July
31st.
That
goes
into
effect
and
it'll
be
interesting
to
see
what
that
does.
Having
dark
skies
in
the
city
of
Boulder-
and
you
know,
it'll
take
a
while
to
enforce,
but
that
should
have
a
phenomenal
impact
on
just
our
nighttime
wildlife
and
their
light
pollution.
And
things
like
that.
So
I
would
like
to
see
how
that
movie,
I'm
I'm
agreeing
with
Ann
and
I,
think
that
should
be
put
in
the
parking
lot.
D
H
The
other,
the
other
thing
is:
if
we're
starting
off
with
the
preserve
protect
conserve,
then
this
is
another
area
where
someone
wrote
in
to
us
and
said
this
is
the
time
when
the
species
get
to
rest.
So
in
terms,
I
wouldn't
use
this
to
try
and
bring
more
people
into
open
space,
particularly
if
they're,
if
they
have
their
canine
companions,
talk
about
harness
net
Hornets
nests,
but
to
just
give
the
everything
a
rest
out
there
and
if
it's
declining
I
think
that's
again
for
those
species
that
we're
trying
to
preserve
and
protect.
I
A
E
K
In
the
agricultural
resource
management
plan,
which
we
just
passed
two
years
ago
now
or
year-and-a-half
ago,
we
called
for
developing
areas
for
sort
of
diversified
vegetable
farming,
pastured
livestock
micro
dairies,
kind
of
that,
not
the
traditional
ranching,
and
we
in
that
plan
we
identified
I
think
nine
different
locations
where
we
would
start
to
try
to
do
that
in
those
opportunities
have
the
infrastructure
and
the
water
and
the
soils
that
were
conducive
to
those
and
make
them
available
and
I.
Think
we've
now
done
three
or
four
of
them:
we've
been
kind
of
doing
one
a
year.
K
A
A
If
we
do
that
and
then
I'll
note
that
the
county
does
seems
like
they're
doing
parallel,
things
and
I
know
there's
some
integration,
but
anyhow
the
less.
We
can
recreate
the
wheel
and
avoid
some
of
those
stumbles
that
we
make
or
they
make,
and
then
we
repeat
on
the
other
side,
I'll
just
I
think
that
that
would
really
I'm
sorry
I'm
being
long-winded,
making
sure
we
incorporate
that
better
going
forward.
I
think
will
serve
us
all,
however,
that
yes.
P
D
And
I
just
want
to
add
on
to
that
when
you
have
people
like
Jane
Goodall
saying
we
need
to
change
what
we're
doing
and
how
we're
eating
like
yesterday.
I
think
we
do
at
some
point
need
to
have
a
much
longer
discussion
about
agriculture
and
how
it
is,
and
are
we
going
to
stay
the
course
and
I
know
everybody
and
it's
in
this
document.
D
D
Yeah
but
there's
to
me,
there's
a
little
bit
of
conflict
between
support
the
success
of
ranchers
and
farmers
and
diversify
I.
Think
there's
a
huge
conflict
there
or
a
contradiction
so
I
agree
with
zan.
We
should
be
on
stuff
a
little
earlier
and
we're
I
think
we're
going
to
be,
but
I
think
also.
We
can't
be
continuing
to
be
cattle
ranchers
and
the
cattle
have
been
here
for
a
hundred
hundred
and
fifty
years
and
other
species
have
been
here
for
hundreds
of
thousands
of
years.
Okay,.
E
So
getting
back
on
target
with
our
goals
for
this
evening
of
talking
about
the
strategies
and
if
they're
on
target
the
ones
that
you
noted,
that
you
want
to
potentially
discuss,
refinement
or
clarification
or
in
white
here,
let's
go
to
the
ones
that
are
underlined
because
I
know
that
was
at
more
than
one
person
that
wanted
to
discuss
the
underlined
ones
so
number
seven
reduce
agricultural
impacts
from
Prairie
docks.
Let's
get
into
that
one.
There
are
a
couple
of
people
who
want
to
discuss
it
go,
go
ahead
and
get
started
well,.
P
H
D
Read
it
right,
like
any
other
science,
it's
controversial,
so
there's
not
one
there's,
not
one
answer
and
I
can
give
you
as
many
papers
that
say
the
contrary
of
the
paper
set.
We
have
gotten
so
anyway.
We
this
isn't
the
point
of
this
discussion
tonight.
It's
not
a
just
it's
not
at
this.
We
I
shouldn't
talked
about
this.
K
E
D
E
A
I
might
add,
and
well
soil
health
resilience
and
its
role
in
carbon
sequestration
and
I.
Guess
we
want
it
to
be
healthy
and
resilient.
We
also
wanted
to
help
us
address
climate
change.
So
in
some
ways
that
means
to
enhance
its
natural
role,
so
I
guess
I
might
tinker
with
that
or
mention
and
its
role
in
carbon
sequestration.
Since
it's
something
that
we
might
seeing.
E
C
This
one
is
trying
to
capture
a
couple
of
things.
We
look
at
the
scenic
quality
of
the
working
landscapes,
that's
important
to
the
fabric
of
the
Boulder
Valley,
as
well
as
the
recreational
components,
for
example
at
a
teller
farm
where,
where
we
have
the
opportunity
to
support
multiple
charter
purposes,
but.
A
K
C
A
Think
that,
in
that's
a
great
suggestion,
you
can
imagine
sidebars
for
each
one
of
these.
It
talks
about
current
trends,
relevant
existing
plans
or
sites
to
go
for
more
information
or
whatever
possible
future
action
items
that
kind
of
seed
some
things,
but
just
so
that
it's
really
accessible
to
people
for
I.
O
L
L
D
E
You're
pointing
out
some
items
that
in
the
very
introduction
about
the
draft,
the
note
to
the
readers
that
this
is
an
unformatted
version,
you're,
giving
us
a
lot
of
notes
about
what
would
be
helpful
when
we
are
formatting
it
and
bringing
it
together.
So
we
can
display
it
in
that
way.
I
could
says
you
know
that
this
is
a
Word
document,
knowing
that
there
would
be
refinements
and
edits
to
it
and
that
later
phase
we
can
display
things
differently
and
connect
ideas
together
in
a
different
way.
E
D
D
D
A
K
D
C
We'll
just
offer
that
you
know
our
current
estimate,
which
is
recognizably
outdated
to
sixty
to
seventy
million
dollars,
but
that's
a
process
that
we
recognize.
We
need
to
go
to
to
understand
the
current
value
and
the
county,
for
example,
is
undergoing
that
process
and
it's
a
very
slow,
methodical
process
to
go
through
that.
It's
it's
similar
to
the
real
estate
market,
where
think
chef,
but
yeah.
Thank
you.
Okay,.
E
I
think
we're
ready
to
move
on
to
responsible
recreation
stewardship.
So
with
this
one
there
are
a
number
of
items
there
that
are
black,
that
were
ones
that
you
didn't
bring
up,
that
you
need
to
discuss
that
you
would
support
moving
forward
into
the
plan.
The
final
plan
so
I
want
to
show
of
hands
if
all
the
ones
in
black
numbers
one
two,
four,
six
and
nine.
If
they
are
on
target,
so
I
can
get
a
show
of
hands.
If
all
of
those
you
believe
are
on
target
I
do.
E
Comment:
okay,
I'll,
come
back,
can
we
come
back?
Okay,
anyone
else
on
our
one,
two,
four,
six
and
nine:
are
these
all
on
target?
I
have
a
few
people
there,
so
there's,
okay,
so
I
know
who
to
call
on
who
needs
a
tough
discuss
woman's
in
black
okay.
So
that's
quite
a
few
of
you
all
right,
so
those
that
are
in
black.
There
were
a
couple
of
you
that
didn't
raise
your
hands
Erin.
You
might
have
wanted
a
clarification
on
one
of
them.
Well,.
I
I
just
want
to
make
a
comment
on
on
number
six,
which
was
the
improving
the
trail
connections.
Just
I,
don't
I,
don't
think
it
called
out
specifically
the
opportunity
for
regional
prioritizing
regional
connections.
It
mentions
regional
partnership
in
the
initial
language,
I,
don't
think
it
says
to
really
search
out
opportunities
for
regional
connections
and
I'll
make
the
point
that
doesn't
always
necessarily
involve
fragmentation,
I
think
about,
for
example,
the
Union
Pacific
Trail.
I
Now
the
RTD
trail
that
we
have
an
opportunity
to
do,
which
is
an
existing
right-of-way
used
to
have
a
railroad
on
it
still
has
tracks
what
would
make
a
great
regional
trail?
It's
in
the
plans,
so
I
just
love
to
see
a
little
bit
of
language
about
searching
for
those
those
bigger
regional
connections.
Right.
D
And
and
so
I
was
going
to
bring
that
up
as
well
and
we
have
the
Rocky
Mountain,
Greenway
and
I.
Don't
know
what
kind
of
I'll
have
to
get
with
the
you
and
and
see
where
we
are
with
the
Rocky,
Mountain
Greenway
and
going
north,
but
I
am
have
some
concerns
when
you
say
improve
trail
connections,
I'm
on
board
on
regional,
but
I'm
also
concerned
about
fragmentation.
So
I
would
like
to
know
what
that
means.
Improve
trail
connections,
because
it
could
mean
a
lot
of
things,
some
of
which
I'm
fine
with
and
some
I'm,
not.
J
I
have
a
question
on
the
number
one
on
support:
a
range
of
recreational
opportunities.
Actually,
in
the
draft
it
says
a
diverse
range
and
I
guess.
I
would
like
to
know
exactly
what
that
means,
because
I
think
the
Charter
spells
out
very
clearly
what
the
recreational
opportunities
are
and
I
think
we
open
up
a
can
of
worms
if
we
start
using
nomenclature
like
a
range
of
diverse
recreational
opportunities.
H
A
I
have
no
idea.
Okay,
I
think
what
we
mean
is
a
range
of
recreational
experiences.
I'm
hang
on
I'm
listening.
We
are.
We
know
that
it's
maybe
you
should
say,
support
a
range
of
passive
recreational
opportunities,
but
I
think
that's
everything
from
we
have
some
trails
that
are
accessible
to
wheelchairs.
We
have
some
that
are
wide,
so
you
can
take
your
old
family
and
then
dog
on
it
and
not
you
know
when
people
can
pass,
you
have
others
that
are
rugged
and
go
to
Wilder
places
that
few
people
use
that's
a
range
of
experiences.
A
We're
gonna
have
some
places
where
kids
can
get
close
to
the
water
and
play
and
yeah
I.
Think
that
that's
what
this
means
and
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
but
we,
if
need
be,
we
can
say
passive
recreational
experience,
but
it's
experiences.
They
don't
all
have
to
be
eight-foot-wide
multi-use
trails.
What
what.
H
I,
wouldn't
want
to
do
I
think
is
put
the
expectation
out
there,
whether
it's
an
experience
or
a
opportunity
that
it's
open
to
beyond
those
that
are
spelled
out
as
passive,
except
for
those
that
are
noted
in
the
Charter,
so
that
we
don't
build
in
an
expectation
that
someone
wants
to
play
whatever.
Well.
D
I
would
add
the
word
passive,
but
I
would
also
state,
as
defined
in
the
Charter
under
Section
blah
blah
blah.
So
just
take
it
right
to
the
Charter
and
that's
something
I
kind
of
noticed
in
this.
The
master
plan
is
that
it
doesn't
refer
back
to
the
Charter
too
much
and
I
think
they
should
be
pretty
much
married.
The
Charter
sets
out
what
we
can
do
and
the
master
plan
comes
from
that
Charter
yep.
C
Q
G
I
Married
you
I
would
offer
a
note
of
caution
in
terms
of
saying
uses
in
the
Charter
that
just
look
at
the
Charter
language.
It
says
land
for
passive
recreational
use
such
as
hiking,
photography
or
nature
studies
and,
if
specifically
designated
bicycling,
horseback,
riding
or
fishing
so
has
a
such
as
it
doesn't
have
a
limited
to
I
mean
it
doesn't
call
it
bird-watching,
it
doesn't
call
out
running
it,
doesn't
call
it
there's
a
whole
kinds
of
things
that
people
do
on
open.
Space
I
think
are
perfectly
fine
that
are
not
mentioned
specifically
in
the
Charter
side.
G
E
So,
going
back
to
you've
now
had
some
clarifying
items
around
the
items
that
are
black
here,
that
we
didn't
think
we
needed
to
discuss,
but
we
did
so
I
want
to
see
just
a
show
of
hands
of.
Are
these
items
that,
after
that
clarification,
the
notes
that
Darren's
taken
here?
Would
you
feel
comfortable
and
saying
that
these
are
support
enough
to
move
forward
into
the
plan,
for
that
you'll
see
before
adoption
later?
Can
I
see
a
show
of
hands
if
these
are
ones
that
you'd
like
to
see.
D
E
O
D
C
Think,
just
by
way
of
a
little
bit
more
context
of
the
the
actual
strategy
language
behind
the
handle.
It
talks
about
the
fact,
for
example,
that
we
own
and
a
set
of
historic
facilities
in
the
mountain
parks,
for
example,
and
so
that's
sort
of
at
a
policy
level
and
intention
to
continue
to
provide
those
because
they're
part
of
our
cultural
history
as
well
as
well
as
looking
at
the
accessibility
of
the
facilities,
knowing
that
there
might
be
some
retrofits
to
increase
the
universal
accessibility,
for
example.
C
So,
looking
at
the
ways
that
the
our
existing
infrastructure
can
can
continue
to
be
welcoming
and
inspiring-
and
this
is
you
know-
I-
would
offer
Mary
Ann
Austin
a
strategy
where
we
do
talk
about
some
that
stewardship,
because
it's
a
way
to
also
the
inspiring
part
is
where
we
talk
about
the
intention
to
elevate
opportunities
to
learn
about
the
surrounding
landscape.
Through
that
visitor
infrastructure.
A
A
The
better
people
stay
on
them,
so
I,
guess
and
I
think
you
call
that
out
there
and
trail
and
I
guess
number
four,
but
I
highlighted
three
just
to
underscore
that
I
think
that
we're
about
quality
experiences
and
I
think
that
builds
better
stewards
and
better
behavior,
so
I
guess
I,
think
they're
self
reinforcing
and
it's
part
of
I
think
our
we're
getting
better
at
it.
I'll
just
put
it
that
way
and.
G
A
We
could
even
say
inspiring
visitor
amenities
and
stewardship
opportunities,
I
think
yeah.
Well,
you
get
at
it
under
education,
I
think
everybody
that
records
and
enjoys
open
space
lands
should
also
come
away
feeling
inspired
to
volunteered
out
to
give
back
and
I
think
that
virtuous
cycle
is
something
we
really
want
to
hold
up
this
plan.
O
J
I
would
suggest,
especially
in
this
context,
if
it's
going
to
be
cultural
resources,
we
we
spell
that
out
or
include
that,
in
whatever
additional
information
we
provide
and
I
would
recommend,
especially
in
this
context,
to
replace
amenities
with
services
and
delete
inspiring.
So
we
just
provide
welcoming
you
know,
visitor
services
or
something
I'm,
not
sure
that
we
need
to
necessarily
be
inspired
by
these
things.
A
B
A
there's
a
much
larger
paragraph
underneath
this
handle
that
kind
of
hints
to
what
we
are
talking
about
and
again
in
terms
of
what
amenities
would
be
at
a
trailhead,
for
instance,
again
that
those
tend
to
be
conversations.
We
have
through
trail
study
plans
we
do
get
into
the
level
of
should
there
be
an
outhouse
at
this
drill
that
or
not
and
again,
that
is
on
the
ground
planning.
That's
always
part
of
our
public
process
for
what
should
be
on
there.
But
as
far
as
what
we
mean
by
amenities,
there
is.
J
Just
think
using
the
word,
amenity
basically
means
that
then,
if,
if
it's
not,
then
is
where
these
services
or
places
are
not
that
it's
not
amenable
and
from
my
perspective,
it's
similar
where
Lisa
said
it's.
Basically,
a
minimum
minimization
of
a
number
of
these
things
provides
the
experience
actually,
and
so
it
just
seems
prejudicial
to
use
the
term
amenities.
And
when
you
compare
that
with
whether
or
not
does
that
mean
that
it's
not
non
amenable
I
think.
C
What
I
hear
you
saying
David
that
would
look
to
the
rest
of
the
group
to
see
if
you
agree
that
it
sounds
like
the
concept
that,
in
response
to
link
landscape
character
or
the
entire
DEQ's
perience,
that
we're
thoughtful
about
the
surrounding
natural
resources
that
we
incorporate
that
concept
into
here,
maybe
more
clearly
in
order
to
get
to
what
you're
talking
about
would
that
satisfy
at
the
group?
Yes,
okay,.
E
Great
I
think,
then
we
should
move
on
to
item
five,
since
there
was
a
little
bit
of
a
hint
of
this
one
needing
discussion
of
reducing
the
trail
maintenance
backlog.
There
was
one
person
that
wanted
to
bring
this
one
up
for
discussion
or
clarification.
Did
we
hit
on
it
already?
Okay,
then,
the
one
that
had
a
little
more
interest
with
seven
manage,
increasing
visitation.
D
So
some
of
them
aren't
things
that
are
won
it
and
others,
but
we
need
to
collaborate
and
discuss
more
how
we
can
come
to
a
common
understanding
and
help
manage
some
of
this
visitation
a
little
more.
So
maybe
people
aren't
coming
from
such
far
distances
and
it's
fine
if
they
do
come.
But
it's
it's
a
really
a
regional
issue,
absolutely.
B
In
our
mind,
right
now
of
things
that
we're
doing
currently
and
you'll
see,
regional
partnerships
is
number
one,
I
mean
there's
probably
four
different
regional
groups
that
are
found
now
formed
and
up
and
running,
with
visitation,
being
sort
of
the
central
theme
of
it's
one
of
those
things
as
we're
so
glad
that
people
are
connecting
to
our
open
space
systems.
It's
good
that
they're
loved
the
land
that
they
realize
the
value
of
these
habitats.
However,
you
know
how
can
we-
and
you
know,
maintain
that
love
of
limb
without
obviously
just
join?
B
What
people
are
here
to
enjoy
so
doing
things
regionally
is,
is
going
to
be
key,
and-
and
that's
that's
really-
the
thrust
behind
this
number
one
and
like
I,
said,
there's
four
different
partnerships
that
are
already
forming
on
the
Front
Range
that
deal
with
that
regional
partnership.
In
that
regard,
I.
G
Just
wanted
to
make
a
quick
comment
right
and
this
isn't
really
master
plan.
This
is
more
tactic
tactical,
the
in
coincidentally
there's
the
Leave
No
Trace
right
of
both
at
Chautauqua
access
management,
the
shuttle
and
the
parking.
The
shuttle
currently
has
these
docent
type
of
people
riding
on
them,
and
that
seems
like
a
perfect
opportunity
to
impart
Leave,
No,
Trace
kind
of
information,
and
currently
it's
all
about
what
restaurants
you
so
I.
E
E
H
I
think
it's
great
that
we're
working
with
other
people
and
everything
but
I've
wondered
under
this.
Have
you
defined
carrying
capacity
I
mean
is,
are
those?
Are
there
numbers
that
you're
looking
at
even
in
in
ballpark
terms,
or
do
you
just
keep
letting
everyone
come
everyone
come?
Does
the
gates
stay
open?
So
those
are
they're
hard
questions.
B
That's
right,
Cindy,
and
then
we
made
a
list
of
you
know
where.
What's
what
are
some
lifts
that
we
can
do
in
the
near
term
right
around
this
subject
matter-
and
we
came,
you
know
some
of
these
have
been
identified
already.
We
need
to
evaluate
and
update
the
visitor
use
management
plan,
expanding
presence
on
our
system
to
encourage
and
regulatory
sort
of
compliance
continue
addressing
undos
any
trails.
The
voice
and
site
program
is
up
for
evaluation.
The
commercial
use
permit
needs
to
be
freshly
evaluated,
the
temporal
management
of
our
system.
B
O
H
Q
I
think,
in
response
to
that,
just
to
emphasize
what
Dan
said,
there
is
immediate
actions
we
can
take
in
certain
locations
and
a
specific
policy
guidance
of
God
and
then
there's
also
like
a
system-wide
look
to
look
at
things
like
thresholds,
etc.
So
we're
thinking
wondering
if
it'd
be
a
good
idea,
so
to
lay
out
those
steps.
What
are
the
near
terms,
actions
we
can
take
for
this
strategy
and
then
what
are
the
longer-term
strategies
we
take?
So
we're
looking
at
the
bigger
picture,
while
we're
also
taking
care
of
some
mediate,
immediate
issues.
H
H
Maybe
these
findings
suggest
the
need
to
monitor
conditions
over
time,
especially
where
congestion
issues
are
emerging.
Early
detection
can
support
early
action.
Well,
that's
true.
It's
really
I'd
like
to
see
you
jump
on
it,
a
little
more
just
with
the
with
the
with
the
words
as
well
as
with
the
actions
you.
L
This
is
one
of
those
kinds
of
places
where
I
really
want
to
see
the
data
displayed
on
a
graph.
In
the
first
paragraph
of
our
RFC
seven,
the
the
data-
that's
repeated
a
couple
of
times
in
the
plan
is
that
there
was
a
34%
increase
in
the
last.
Is
it
10
years
13
and
and
if
you
keep
that
rate
up
in
another
10
years,
we'll
have
another
30-some
percent
increase
in
another
10
years,
we'll
have
another
30
percent,
some
percent
increase,
so
we
can't
just
develop
a
toolkit.
We've
really
got
to
come
to
grips
with.
L
As
Cindy
said.
What
are
the
numbers?
Is
there
a
limit,
or
are
we
going
to
have
a
graph
like,
like
in
the
transportation
master
plan,
that
projects
this
continuing
line,
or
are
we
going
to
try
to
bend
the
curve,
and
that
to
me
is
the
kind
of
policy
issue
that
council
needs
to
decide
so
that
we
can
put
that
in
the
plan
now.
A
So
it
I'll
just
add
that
I
think
these
two
things
where
you
talked
about
your
stuff.
We
already
have
underway
here's
some
additional
stuff
that
this
is
like
lucky
place
and
you
got
to
have
it
in
there.
Cuz
I
think
a
lot
of
people
thought
this
was
what
the
plan
was
gonna
be
about.
This
issue
was
gonna,
be
a
major
I
meant
just
because
it's
such
the
big
issue,
so
I
think
getting
to
this
level
of
clarity
around
stuff
would
be
very
helpful
because
it's
on
everybody's
mind.
E
Okay,
I'm
not
seeing
I
gotta
call
this
one
then
I
think
thank
you.
So
there
was
one
more
that
one
person
wanted
to
discuss
before
we
move
on
to
the
last
of
the
focus
areas,
so
that
was
thank
you
for
pulling
it
up
for
you
and
improve
fee-based
recreation
programs.
Any
discussion
items
around
this
one
before
we
move
on.
H
H
Wait
a
minute:
that's
the
amount
to
hike
on
the
at
mountain
lions,
lair
people
are
meeting
at
over
it
on
93
and
the
parking
lot
over
there
where
go
into
Eldo,
so
people
are
meeting
there
to
carpool
into
here,
and
so
I
was
just
concerned
about
I
thought.
This
is
again
goes
to
the
this
being
an
issue
of
the
Front
Range,
but
also
groups.
H
Someone
sent
me
a
photograph
of
a
van
that
was
from
one
of
our
local
large.
It
was,
it's
actually
I,
think
probably
all
of
the
west
coast,
if
not
more,
firms
that
is
in
to
the
industrial
recreation
could
be
termed
that,
and
so
how
much
about?
When
did
we
start
monetizing
open
space
use?
How
much
do
we
permit
and
where's
the
data
for
that?
J
Know
this
whole
thing
was
confusing
to
me
because
I
wasn't
sure
whether
a
fee
base
recreation
programs
were
sponsored
by
the
open
space,
mountain
parks
department
or
whether
those
were
actually
private
programs
that
charged
participants
and
then
they
used
open
space.
So
I
think
there
should
be
more
clarity
on
this
particular
strategy.
Okay,
it's
a
good
point.
Dave.
D
I'm,
assuming
that
I
know
like
High
Plains,
that
High
Plains
used
to
be
called
Doughty
draw
anyway,
we
get
a
lot
of
people
who
come
in
with
horses
or
with
bikes
to
start
off
from
there
and
they're,
not
from
Boulder
and
I
know.
We've
tried
to
do
permitting
of
those
and
I
just
don't
know
how
well
we're
doing
I
have
no
information
on
that
and
I
assume
we
are
keeping
our
fees
up-to-date
are.
D
H
O
D
Yeah
and
if
my
recollection
is
right,
we
started
those
and
maybe
time
you
can
remember
like
it's
somewhere
with
the
visitor
master
plan
back
in
two
thousand
five.
Something
like
that
and
my
understand
when
standing
was
when
those
were
brought
in,
that
we
would
keep
kind
of
track
of
those
uses
and
adjust
those
fees
over
time.
So
that's
like
14
years
ago,
yeah.
R
So
we
did
yeah,
we
did
implement
it
back
in
2006,
right
after
the
visitor
master
plan
and
so
and
then
we
also
came
back
to
City
Council
back
in
2013,
because
that
was
one
of
the
first
issues
out
of
the
overarching
issues
that
we
took
a
look
at.
So
we
looked
at
both
the
parking
fee
and
the
commercial
right,
and
so
we
checked
in
on.
Where
are
we
with
the
fee
amounts
for
those,
the
application
of
them
for
the
parking
fee?
R
R
That
point
I
think
in
2013
we
thought
the
fees
were
amenable
for
the
types
of
activities
were
occurring
and
just
to
give
some
kind
of
a
little
more
detail
is
of
the
320
commercial
use
permits
we
had
for
last
year.
Mm-Hmm
250
of
those
were
photography.
So
by
far
the
most
common
type
of
permit
is
just
the
individual
who's
doing
portrait,
photography
etc
in
our
system,
and
so
the
kind
of
the
others
are
it's
down
in
the
teens
that
we're
talking
about
the
climbing
the
the
nature
camps
that
are
getting
the
permits.
R
E
J
O
E
Move
into
the
next
set
we
allocated
about
20
minutes
for
this
one,
because
we
have
a
number
of
them
that
you
already
said:
you're
you're,
you're
cool
with
you,
don't
need
to
discuss
further,
so
that
is
numbers
one
two,
three,
four,
six,
seven
and
nine
so
show
of
hands
if
these
are
all
on
targets,
the
ones
that
are
black
on
the
screen
all
on
target.
Okay,
we
can
come
back
for
comments,
but
on
target
I
think
I
saw
is
that's
all
hands,
I!
Believe,
okay,
no,
you
didn't
put
yours
up.
Okay
and
Aaron
has
clarification.
E
I
Here,
just
on
the
number
six,
the
welcoming,
diverse
backgrounds
and
abilities,
which
I
think
is
just
really
important-
that
we
that
we
make
a
lot
of
efforts
to
reaching
out
to
people
who
don't
tend
to
get
on
open
space
as
much,
which
is
one
of
the
things
that
I
know
that
other
places
have
done
with
a
lot
of
success,
is
to
make
particular
efforts
to
get
underserved
youth
onto
their
open
space
systems
in
their
natural
areas
and
I.
Didn't
see
that
really
called
out
specifically
here.
E
Q
A
Is
I
know
we're
working
a
lot
on
diversity,
hiring
a
diversity
of
Rangers
from
different
backgrounds.
I
think
also
facilitates
that
divert
the
welcoming
piece,
because
you
see
people
of
all
backgrounds,
and
that
makes
it
more
likely
you'll
see
somebody
that
looks
like
you
and
then
the
other.
Just
the
other
notion
of
you
know
like
how
the
ski
areas
like,
if
you're
in
the
fifth
grade
every,
but
he
goes
free
to
kind
of
introduce
everybody
to
skiing
in
Colorado.
Everybody
knows
I
mean
I,
just
kind
of
wonder.
Q
Yes,
we
have,
for
example,
the
e
movement,
where
we
collaborate
with
our
partners
on
how
we
do
environmental
education
and
what
are
the
gaps
we
notice
is
in
certain
age
groups
between
three
and
six
between
twelve
and
fifteen,
so
we're
trying
to
recognize
those
gaps
because
then
you
lose
the
continuum
of
someone
engaging
at
my
you
know
understand
all
of
nature,
then
wanting
to
stewardship
volunteer
as
well
as
enjoy
it.
So
we
recognize
we
can
do
better
at
that,
but
we
have
got
some
foundation
work
in
place.
I
just.
Q
D
And
I
would
suggest
you
partner
with
Parks
and
Rec,
to
do
a
bunch
of
that
because
the
back
to
my
comment,
this
is
open
space
and
different
from
Parks
and
Rec
and
I
think
there's
activities
that
are
totally
suitable,
that
we
could
partner
with
Parks
and
Rec.
On
my
my
last
comment
and
we're
on
the
CCE
I-9
preserve
and
interpret
what
is
boulders
cultural
heritage.
Is
that,
like,
since
white
guys
got
here
or
are
we
including
Native
Americans,.
K
D
A
Talked
about
that
actually
at
the
Native
American
consultation.
The
idea
of
there
were
a
lot
of
tribes
presidents,
but
the
idea
of
interpret
having
many
of
the
tribes
be
able
to
tell
their
story
in
various
locations
and
how
I
do
that.
Given
the
diversity
of
tribes-
and
you
know
it
was
a
very
the
beginning
of
it-
I
think
of
a
very
rich
conversation
about
how
we
might
do
that
and.
D
I
would
just
add
to
that:
it's
not
just
open
spaces
responsibility,
because
there
were
native
people
all
over
the
city
of
Boulder,
and
so
we
have
very
old
grounds
really
close
to
here.
That
isn't
that
aren't
on
open
space
and
I
want
to
be
very
cautious
of
just
because
different
people
inhabited
Boulder.
At
one
point
we
don't
go
to
one
department
to
make
them
pay
for
all
of
it,
and
so
it
needs
to
be
distributed
amongst
the
city.
E
Want
to
redirect
this
conversation
I
think
it's
a
really
good.
One
and
I
appreciate
the
topic,
but
I
do
want
to
note
that
we
had
hoped
at
this
time,
I'd
be
transitioning
into
talking
about
prioritization
and
the
funding
piece
of
this
so
I.
One
of
the
respect
that
there
are
two
that
we
want
to
discuss.
There
was
an
interest
in
number,
five,
enhanced
signs
and
communication.
One
person
wanted
to
discuss
that
and
then
a
couple
more
than
one
was
interested
in
number
eight.
So
anything
for
five
before
we
move
into
the
prioritization.
E
I
I
It
is
one
thing
it
felt
like
the
language
in
the
main
paragraphs
was
more
about
honoring,
the
historical
connections,
the
past
connections
and
and
I'd
love
to
see
something
a
little
bit
more
about
the
current
relationship
and
how
making
invitations
to
tribes
to
be
here
to
revisit
to
spend
time
here
and
be
with
us,
and
things
like
that
and
and
possibly
designating
specific
lens.
Whatever
you
do.
Do
that
that's
kind
of
an
implementation
bit,
but
I
just
would
like
to
see
some
some
language
about
the
current.
J
J
There's
a
MoU
between
13
indigenous
tribes
in
the
city
of
Boulder.
You
know
with
the
open
space,
Department
and
I
think
that
this
that
should
be
recognized
as
as
providing
some
guidance
in
this
particular
section,
because
there
is
a
quote
history
of
working
with
some
of
the
indigenous
peoples
over
the
past,
probably
almost
20
years
and.
E
C
C
C
So
we
will
devote
some
time
in
here
in
a
little
bit
for
you
to
contemplate
these
strategies
themselves.
But
what
we
also
want
to
talk
about
is
how
we
have
developed
a
set
of
priorities
around
our
strategies
themselves
and
so
to
do
that
in
accordance
with
citywide
master
planning
frameworks.
We
have
developed
three
scenarios
where
we
look
at
the
our
current
level
of
funding,
as
it
relates
to
the
expected
sales
tax
explorations,
and
that
does
account
to
amount
to
about
19
million
dollars
a
year
where
our
budget
is
constricting.
C
We
do
we
have
been
planning
for
that
for
years.
Our
second
scenario
is
the
restoration
of
some
are
all
of
the
sales
text
funding
to
think
about
what
that
might
look
like,
and
the
third
scenario
is
what
more
typically
is
called
the
Vision
Plan,
where
we
look
at
additional
and
diversified
funding
above
2018
levels.
So
that's
sort
of
the
general
construct
that
we
have
established
in
our
draft
master
plan
and
as
it
relates
to
how
we
align
our
strategies
across
the
first
four
focus
areas
to
those
three
funding
scenarios.
C
And
so
what
we
have
up
here
is
just
the
one
data
piece
from
a
recent
survey
for
the
master
plan,
where
we
saw
a
strong
percentage
of
our
respondents
supporting
the
improvement
of
ecosystem
health
of
our
existing
lands,
as
it
relates
to
acquisition
of
new
lands
for
conservation.
So
this
is
to
say
that
we,
you
know
we're
still
hearing
from
our
community.
The
acquisition
is
something
that
we
should
be
in
the
business
of
doing
but
relative
to
conservation
of
our
existing
lands.
C
Let's
place
emphasis
on
that,
and
so
that's
helped
sort
of
characterize
the
general
prioritization
process
that
we've
gone
through
and
what's
resulting,
and
so
where
we've
ended
up,
is
with
a
set
of
strategies
17
out
of
our
46,
that
we're
calling
right
now
are
high-priority
strategies
and
what
what
we
mean
by
that
is
those
are
the
ones
that,
especially
in
the
near
term,
out
of
the
gate
starting
implementation
after
council
approves
this.
Those
are
the
ones
that
we
would
accelerate
your
emphasis
emphasized.
C
C
So
that's
kind
of
the
general
construct
that
we've
worked
with
in
terms
of
how
do
we
take
this
broad
set
of
aspirations
and
strategies
for
the
next
decade
and
one
of
those
down
into
what
we
hope
becomes
a
reasonable,
feasible
number
of
things
to
emphasize?
First,
when
we
talk
to
you
tonight
about
any
refinements,
you
might
have
keep
in
mind
that
we
did
hear
some
comments
from
the
community
that
we
might
consider
narrowing
it
down
even
further.
You
know,
as
we
think
about
our
staff
work
plans.
C
I,
think,
that's
something
that
we
could
understand
as
well,
just
to
keep
things
feasible
and
reasonable,
and
to
give
you
an
understanding
of
again
how
we
might
scale
the
work
if
additional
funding
might
become
available,
as
it
relates
to
some
of
our
heart
our
high
priority
strategies,
we
might
look
to
get
more
of
a
good
thing.
In
other
words,
for
example,
we
might
be
able
to
restore
more
miles
of
creeks.
We
could
further
reduce
the
trail
maintenance
backlog.
We
could
further
expand
our
soil
health
initiatives
and
we'd
look
to
grow
the
Junior
Ranger
program.
C
All
of
these
things
are
just
examples
of
some
of
the
program's
projects
that
would
stem
from
the
high
priority
strategies,
as
we've
defined
them
now,
but
they're.
There
examples
to
just
give
an
understanding
of
what
it
might
look
like
where
we
scale
our
work
to
the
available
funding,
whether
that's
in
our
current
fiscally
constrained
scenario
or
otherwise.
C
So
that
was
a
brief
presentation
just
to
kind
of
give
you
some
context
and
I'm
going
to
turn
it
back
over
to
Anna
to
talk
about
the
actual
strategies.
First,
as
it
relates
to
the
financial
sustainability
focus
area,
and
then
we
invite
your
comments
on
how
you
might
want
to
adjust
to
refine
the
priorities
themselves,
but
I
would
also
open
up
for
any
questions
you
might
have
before
we
get
into
the
discussion.
D
So
I
appreciate
the
comments
on.
We
should
take
care
of
what
we
own
and
we
should
manage
that
very
well,
and
that
should
be
a
high
priority.
But
I
would
hope
that
our
acquisitions,
when
there's
key
acquisitions
that
come
up
that
are
maybe
a
small
piece
of
land
in
the
middle
of
all
open
space.
And
you
don't
want
to
see
that
develop
that
that
would
be
a
priority.
D
It
affects
the
other
priorities
on
open
space
and
then
one
thing
we
didn't
talk
about
before
we
got
into
this,
but
it
came
up
through
the
discussion
was
more
boots
on
the
ground
and
that
came
up
under
several
headings
and
so
I
I
want
to
make
sure
that's
in
there.
Somehow,
with
this
financial
sustainability
and.
B
Just
one
comment
about
the
acquisitions
is
I
think
what
what
this
master
plan
will
allow
us
to
do
as
we
look
at
acquisitions
does
not
say
acquisitions
off
the
table,
but
prioritize
those
acquisitions
that
may
help
further
enhancement
and
improvement
of
our
management
of
our
system.
So,
instead
of
growing
out,
you
know
it
does
as
acquisition
help
to
achieve
a
management
goal.
B
I
could
think
of
a
few
in
Holdings
that
we've
a
that
were
able
to
achieve
over
the
last
couple
of
years
that
had
severe
invasive
problems
and
we
were
unable
to
control
the
invasives
in
our
own
lands,
because
we
didn't
have
control
of
that
particular
processor.
So,
through
acquisition
we
actually
it
was
almost
a
management
tool
rather
than
a
traditional
acquisition.
So
this
will
allow
us
to
look
at
our
acquisition
program
in
light
of
managing
the
system.
D
D
And
I
didn't
answer
your
question.
So
I
was
supposed
to
I,
don't
follow
instructions
well
and
so
I
didn't
go
through
the
1
2
3,
so
you
don't
have
I
just
said,
but
I
would
have
underlined
that
and
I've
written
two
emails.
Hotlines
about
open
space,
tax
and
I
will
also
say
that
there
probably
would
have
been
at
least
a
third
underline
and
I
think
we
probably
all
underlined
or
did
your
answers
differently.
So
it's
not
ie.
D
I
E
E
Target
I'm:
seeing
did
you
okay
for
those
of
you
that
didn't
raise
your
hand,
were
there
any
items
and
numbers
five
through
ten
that
you
needed
some
clarification
or
wanted
to
discuss.
Okay,
then
I'm
gonna,
assume
that
we're
okay
with
those
underlined
ones
were
ones
that
more
than
one
person
wanted
to
discuss.
Oh
sorry,
did
you
have
yeah.
B
Do
they
have
potential
to
serve
an
open-space
charter
purpose
if
they
don't?
What
are
some
options
for
us
in
that
regards?
So
that's
the
primary
action
that
could
be
so
that
could
help
achieve
that
strategy.
There
may
be
other
ones
down
the
road
over
the
next
10
years.
We
may
want
to
look
at
land
management
portfolio
that
Boulder
County,
Open
Space
has
and
that
we
have
and
perhaps
there's
a
few
lands
that
make
sense
to
be
under
a
different
regime.
We
have
some
very
northern
properties
that
are
surrounded
by
Boulder
County
Open
Space.
Vice
versa.
A
It's
just
I
underscore
the
things
I
think
were
the
key
issues
and
I,
don't
think
we
have
at
least
a
public
isn't
well
aware
of
all
the
costs
that
go
into
managing
and
when
we
let
some
of
those
taxes
expire
based
on
including
advise
of
open
space
staff.
I
think
we
underestimated
what
it
would
cost
to
manage
the
system,
especially
in
the
face
of
climate
change.
A
H
D
A
S
Yes
and
while
Darren
shuffles,
the
deck
I
had
a
kind
of
an
overriding
question
about
prioritization.
That
I
think
is
important
in
helping
us
develop.
That
list,
which
is
what
is
the
life
cycle
of
a
high
priority
status
when
would
high
priority
status
sunset
under
what
conditions
is
it
as
simple,
as
in
the
next
revision
of
the
master
plan,
which
happens
in
next
year's,
then
we
evaluate
if
this
is
still
high
priority
or
not
high
priority.
Do
we
meet
certain
metrics
and
then
it
is
satisfied.
S
H
C
Are
we
still
on
track
with
these
particular
priorities
or
have
we
made
substantial
progress
towards
those?
Have
the
sand
shifted,
in
which
case
you
might
need
to
revisit
those
priorities,
but
right
now
the
way
we're
looking
at
them
as
we're
talking
about
them
in
the
near
term.
We're
looking
at
being
able
to
predict
our
CIP,
for
example,
in
our
operating
dollars
over
the
next
three
to
six
years,
and
so
we
want
to
give
it
some
life
in
terms
of
again.
The
next
few
years,
at
least,
is
how
we've
anticipated
the
near
term.
Does
that
help?
B
Priorities
may
shift
as
changing
conditions
over
the
ten
years
shift,
so
what
we're
envisioning
for
at
least
probably
the
next
three
years,
what
we
land
on
as
a
high-priority,
probably
will
remain
a
high
priority
for
the
first
three
years,
but
through
annual
visits
of
our
annual
work
plan,
we
may
shift
those
throughout
the
ten
years.
Data.
H
C
Okay,
so
the
ask
right
now,
as
we
talked
about
earlier,
is
whether
or
not
you
would
suggest
any
refinements
to
the
way
these
have
been
prioritized
to
date
and
so
to
understand
what
you're?
Looking
at
from
afar
understanding
that
you
know
it
may
be
difficult
to
see.
You
also
have
handouts
in
front
of
you
that
have
the
same
information
as
up
here.
So
what
you're
looking
at
is
those
that
have
an
asterisk
and
that
are
in
bold
are
the
ones
that
have
been
prioritized
to
date.
C
E
D
Tom
Isaacson
at
the
beginning,
we
were
on
reduce
undesignated
trails,
I
get
a
point
for
mountain
climbers
and
you
don't
really
want
those
designated
necessarily
rock
climbers.
So
are
we
going
to
distinguish
between
undesignated
and
social
trails?
I
mean
social
trails
we
should
and
I.
Then
how
do
you
define
them,
but
it
seems
to
me
the
social
trails
out.
Your
back
door
should
definitely
be
reduced
and.
C
B
Instance,
we
have
a
number
of
undesignated
trails
through
adopted
and
approved
PSAs,
and
what
this
would
tell
us
to
do
is
devote
more
resources
in
order
to
carrying
out
that
was
planning.
Those
planning
guidance
make
it
a
priority,
spend
more
your
time
and
resources
in
order
to
carry
out
those
parts
of
those
past
plans.
Oh
that's.
O
I
So
I
get
that
17
as
a
fair
amount,
but
I
want
to
make
a
pitch
for
a
couple
more
and
before
I
before
I
have
to
give
some
up
I
know
well
before
I.
Do
that,
though,
we
might
consider
a
couple
of
Tears,
you
know
where
I
mean
there
are
really
all
17
like
super
equally
high
priority
or
or
do
we
have
a
top-10
tier
and
a
second
ten
tier,
so
I'll
leave
that
for
y'all
time
all
over,
but
regardless
I'm
gonna
make
it
I'm
gonna
make
a
pitch
for
a
couple.
I
H
T
Cindy
and
I
spoke
about
this
yesterday.
It
was
me
and
the
decline
is
very
slight
and
and
the
Transportation
Department
is
monitoring
it
and
we
will
make
adjustments
after
we
learn
more
data
through
the
rest
of
the
summer,
but
we
were
just
noting
that
when
it's
a
new
thing
people
flocked
to
it
and
now
they
figured
out
maybe
how
to
do
things
differently,
so
we're
monitoring
it
and
it
still
is
hugely
successful.
So
I
didn't
want
my
earlier
comment
in
a
conversation
with
Sydney
to
be
read
as
it's
not
successful.
It's
very,
very
successful.
We're.
H
C
I,
what
I
have
done,
Aaron
and
in
the
case
of
you're
promoting
this
was
I've
added
an
asterisk.
So
what
we
need
to
get
to
tonight,
hopefully,
is
a
level
of
consensus
where
we
can
live
with
what
we
end
up
with
so
I've
put
it
there.
If
we
end
up
adding
it
great
again,
the
the
ask
is
that
we
try
and
manage
the
number
so
I
know
that
you
had
some
other
promotions
to
offer.
Okay,.
I
The
other
one
was
the
the
agriculture
number
for
diversified
agricultural
operations,
and
this
is
another
one.
Where
we've
had
some
momentum.
You
know
you
had
a
plan
recently,
an
agricultural
plan
that
designated
nine
possible
areas
for
diversified
agriculture
operations-
we've
done
two
or
three
seems
like
it
would
be
good
to
continue.
Moving
on
that,
so
I
mean
if
you
can
tell
me
that
you're
gonna
keep
developing
the
new
ones
without
it
being
a
high-priority
strategy.
Then
that's
fine,
but
I.
Just
I
don't
want
to
see
that
momentum
lost
either.
I
K
D
I
have
one
comment
and
I
don't
know
about
channeling
Sam,
but
I
agree
with
them
on
this,
and
it
has
to
do
with
water,
and
it
is
plan
for
the
future
of
water
and
I.
Don't
know
what's
involved
in
that,
if
that's
in
the
egg
plant
or
what
but
water
is
certainly
in
these
next
few
decades
going
to
be
come
even
more
a
scarce
resource,
and
so
we
need
to
be
ahead
of
the
curve
and
understand
what
we're
doing
so
did.
G
Would
over
another
one
but
I
guess
for
me
one
of
the
things
that
I
don't
have
a
full
picture
to
be
able
to
say
this
end
take
this
out,
because
these
don't
exist
by
themselves.
They
touch
on
a
whole
bunch
of
other
ones.
So
it
seems
to
me
before
in
order
to
be
able
to
say
which
one
is
high
as
priority
to
me.
G
G
A
C
There
are
some
we
set
at
the
beginning.
Some
strategies
go
further
than
others
in
the
case
of
water.
We
don't
have
a
true
water
resources
plan.
We
talked
about
it
a
little
in
Ag.
We
talked
about
it
a
little
in
the
grassland
plan.
We
talked
about
a
little
in
the
forest
plan,
but
we
don't
have
one
where
we
look
at
it
holistically
as
a
system
in
and
of
itself.
So
this
one
is
talking
about
the
planning
process
and
identifying.
C
Just
just
reminder
those
that
aren't
prioritized
again.
We
still
intend
to
make
progress
towards
it's
just
a
more
gradual
effort.
So
what
might
that
look
like?
Is
that
if,
for
example,
this
weren't
a
high
priority
that
we
might
not
be
able
to
start
that
planning
process
in
the
next
three
years,
because
something
around
maybe
updating
the
VMP
or
up
you
know,
addressing
visitation
from
a
planning
perspective
is
is
determined
to
be
more
of
an
immediate
priority.
C
K
C
So
it
was
a
process
of
initially
asking
staff.
We
mean
the
the
rhythm
where
we
first
engaged
with
our
700
experts.
Then
we
took
that
out
to
the
community
at
a
community
workshop,
for
example,
and
other
venues
where
we
asked
for
any
refinements.
Based
on
that,
then
we
we
took
that
to
the
Board
of
Trustees
in
April
and
had
a
study
session
around
that
and
did
some
additional
refinements.
So
it's
a
reflection
of
all
three
employees.
D
D
D
B
B
A
Can
I
ask
a
question:
is
it
near
okay?
So
back
then
you
say
near-term
priorities
other
and
then
you
use
the
word
high
priority
strategies.
Is
it
the
same
thing?
Is
it
just
we're
starting
with
these
strategies,
so
it's
really
near
term
strategies
and
longer
term
strategies,
or
is
it
just
a
time
component.
C
I
think
that's
an
important
way
to
at
least
initially
talk
about
it.
Some
of
these
might
take
a
number
of
years
so,
for
example,
reducing
the
trail
maintenance
backlog.
Well,
we're
gonna
be
in
that
business
for
a
long
long
time,
so
we
might,
on
an
annual
basis,
say
yep
still
a
priority,
yep
still
a
priority.
Others
might
you
know
again,
we
might
evolve
past
them,
so
it
would
only
really
be
for
the
next
few
years,
but
to
start.
C
A
Be
more
helpful,
then
yep
put
the
timing
in
it
Karen
what.
F
B
A
I
I
Think,
for
example,
is
something
that
I
would
want
to
make
sure
we're
doing
immediately
and
and
placing
a
high
priority
on
it,
but
also
some
things
that
you
like,
welcoming,
diverse
backgrounds
and
abilities
doesn't
have
to
cost
a
whole
lot
but
I
think
God.
We
really
need
to
work
really
hard
on
that
in
our
community,
so
you
know,
wouldn't
necessarily
just
put
those
two.
N
E
Oh
and
we
had
to
move
the
screen,
but
the
things
that
are
on
this
back
part
is
what
we're
saying
about
high
priority
strategies:
they're
ones,
to
accelerate
or
emphasize
first,
whereas
the
other
strategies,
they're
ones,
that
are
more
gradual
progress
or
accelerate
or
emphasize
later,
which
addition
with
additional
funding.
So
that's
how
we've
kind
of
categorized
what
is
high
priority,
and,
what's
other
so.
C
One
of
the
things
that
we've
also
tried
to
do
in
working
with
the
board
and
others
that
we
want
to
make
sure
that
there
is
distribution
across
the
focus
areas
because
in
and
of
themselves
Council
said
at
the
very
beginning.
We
ought
to
be
focusing
on
these
things
so
as
it
relates
to
these.
For,
for
example,
let's
go
through
those.
What
I
heard
is
confirmation
that
reducing
the
trail,
maintenance
backlog
and
increasing
visitation
I
saw
lots
of
head
nods.
Those
have
been
previously
prioritized.
C
D
C
So
again,
understanding
we'll
keep
doing
the
work.
It's
just
a
matter
of
emphasis.
Yep
do
those
feel
like
them
too,
if
we
had
to
pick
two
or
those
the
most
important?
Yes,
okay,
what
about
under
community
connection
education
and
inclusion?
So
what
Spri
what's
prioritized
right
now
is
enhanced
signs
and
communications,
welcome,
diverse
backgrounds
and
abilities,
connect
youth
to
nature
and
consult
and
collaborate
with
federally
recognized,
Native
American
Nations
and
help
support
indigenous
people.
C
D
S
C
You
and
yeah,
so
we
have
done
a
number
of
micro
engagements.
Some
of
those
have
been,
for
example,
around
people
experiencing
disabilities,
the
Latino
community,
youth
we've
heard
from
all
of
those
communities
as
well
as
others,
the
opportunities
to
improve
the
the
way
we
can
convey
simple
graphic
messages.
So
we
just
met,
for
example,
with
the
Latino
members
Latino
community
the
other
day,
and
they
said
we
sure
hope
you
can
act
on
that
soon,
even
if
it's
just
simple
graphics
or
Spanish
translation.
Q
A
D
I
A
A
D
I
Is
but
I
have
to
say
I
have
to
say
when
you
say
that
certain
things
are
high
priorities,
it's
it's
going
to
send
a
message
to
the
community,
and
so,
even
though
we
may
know
that
hey
there,
this
is
operating
on
so
like
the
diversify
of
Agriculture
I
can
let
that
one
go
it's
operating
in
some
time.
Well,
that's
fine,
but
but
but
I
think
the
community
doesn't
necessarily
know
that
and
we
we
certainly
got
some
public
outreach
for
people
saying
this
is
really
important.
C
A
Clarify
five
is
updating
grassland
management
plan
right?
Okay.
Why
don't
we
just
say
that?
Because
because
because,
as
it's
written,
it's
an
approach-
and
it's
like
you-
don't
have
to
prioritize
the
approach-
you
just
do
it,
but
that's
not
what
that
means.
Because
I
was
gonna,
say:
hey,
we
don't
have
to
do
that
because
we're
already
doing
it
and
then
I
read
what
it
really
means.
It's
code
for
updating
the
plan
for
the
prairie-dog
working
group
and
right
so
it's
time
to
say
that
that's.
A
D
C
A
K
A
B
If
it's
a
high
priority,
how
it
probably
would
be
done,
if
so,
during
our
budget
process,
we
all
staff
get
together
and
they
throw
in
what
CIP
projects
do
you
want
to
do
this
year
and
we
start
with
a
list
of
a
hundred
and
we
Whittle
those
down
and
we
Whittle
them
down
and
we
Whittle
them
down.
This
is
going
to
provide
us
guidance
that
we're
four
on
the
fence.
So
if
we're
deciding
between
two
projects
of
who
we're
gonna
scale
up,
one
versus
the
other,
this
type
of
guidance
will
help
us
make
that
decision.
G
Add
the
question
so
I
reduce
human
disturbance.
Okay,
it
seems
to
me
that
under
reduce
human
disturbance,
you
would
have
extended
on
trail
I
think
we
had
this
conversation
already
to
extend
on
trail
requirements,
reduce
and
designated
trails
and
control
invasive
species.
So
why
don't
we
just
take
those
out
and
leave
reduce
humans
disturbance
and
you
could
still
but.
L
G
F
B
I
C
D
C
Right
and
what
about?
Let's
move
on
to
agriculture?
What
what?
What
just
as
a
reminder,
what
will
have
the
opportunity
is
to
further
the
conversation
with
the
board
tomorrow
night,
if
council
feels
that's
appropriate
and
then
you'll
see
this
again
in
the
next
iteration
that
a
draft
plan,
so
under
agriculture
right
now,
what's
been
prioritized
is
the
maintaining
infrastructure
for
Ag
and
water.
Reducing
agriculture
impacts
from
prairie
dogs
and
soil,
health
and
Rosalee
resilience.
D
And
I
would
support
that
as
well.
I
think
we
need
to
start
looking
at
that
and
that's
part
of
one
in
maintaining
infrastructure
for
agriculture.
Maybe
we
and
maybe
maintain,
should
not
be
the
word
but
reconsider,
or
something
like
that,
so
that
somehow
I
would
like
to
see
four
included
in
one
weight.
A
O
O
C
And
it
provides
us
additional
clarity
and
especially
in
our
fiscally
constrained
environment.
So
again,
the
goal
of
this
is
to.
Hopefully,
we've
arrived
at
a
place
of
being
able
to
live
with
what
we
have
right
now,
knowing
that
when
we
reproduce
this
in
the
next
version
of
the
draft
plan,
it'll
be
the
next
opportunity
for
the
board
and
Planning
Board
to
look
at
it.
C
Council
will
have
another
opportunity,
but
let's
let's
talk
about
what
we've
done
so
far,
just
to
reiterate
so
for
recreation
in
terms
of
the
two
that
are
right
now
feeling
like
the
most
important,
we
have
reducing
the
trail,
maintenance
backlog
and
managing
increasing
visitation.
We
also
had
the
suggestion
to
elevate
encouraging
multimodal
access
to
trail
heads
and
the
others
still
felt
important.
We
didn't
hear
any
suggestions
to
demote
anything,
but
we
did
develop
sort
of
a
tearing,
as
it
relates
to
the
two
most
important.
Oh
I,.
A
A
C
Sorry,
it's
still
an
important
one,
so
Walter
will
come
back
with
this
tiered
approach
as
we
talked
about
okay,
so
it
helps
us
develop
some
sense
of
timing
and
emphasis.
So
as
it
relates
to
CCC
I
can
community
connection
education
and
inclusion.
We
heard
the
the
way
to
combine
five
and
six
as
it
relates
to
prayer.
That
prioritizing
is
to
look
at
enhancing
signs
and
communications
in
light
of
welcoming
diverse
backgrounds
and
abilities
that
felt
important
and
wanting
to
maintain
the
others
as
important
for
right
now
as
well.
C
Yep,
okay,
so
under
HR,
talked
about
number
one
being
of
primary
importance,
which
reflects
our
community
input
today
as
well.
The
others
still
feel
important
with
the
congestion
that
human
disturbance,
perhaps
is
a
little
less
important
question
about
controlling
invasive
species.
Perhaps
that's
something
that's
in
the
second
or
third
tier,
but
still
important.
These
are
still
things
that
we
would
make
gradual
progress
towards
I.
C
Under
agriculture,
the
two
most
primary
ones
we've
identified
are
diversifying
agriculture
operations
and
enhancing
soil
health
and
resilience.
The
others
that
are
still
remaining
important
in
that
second
tier
are
maintaining
infrastructure
for
Ag
and
water,
and
reducing
conflict
between
agriculture
and
prairie
dogs
and
potentially
planning
for
the
future
of
water.
Look.
C
P
C
H
A
C
All
right
so
I
know
this
has
been
a
long
night.
We've
worked
for
three
hours
and
it's
going
to
help
wrap
us
up,
but
I
just
want
to
reiterate
what
this
means
for
us
tonight
and
what
Anna's
gonna
help
us
summarize
is
what
conversation
might
need
to
be
tomorrow,
night
with
the
board.
So
just
by
way
of
wrapping
up
for
right
now
we
have
we've
developed
at
least
some
ideas
that
we
can
live
with
for
now,
I,
with
an
understanding,
as
it
relates
to
priorities
that
staff
needs
to
turn
back
through
this.
C
D
H
H
A
C
F
C
O
H
I
A
C
C
A
Conservationists,
I
I
think
the
division
focusing
on
whatever
you
said,
preserve,
protect,
conserve
and
also
restoring
that
they're
both
really
important
concept.
Therefore
it
could
be
separated,
I
think
that's
legit.
We
talked
a
lot
about
that.
I.
Think
tackling
fragmentation
is
the
substance
of
it
and
I
wouldn't
go
there
now,
isn't
that?
That's
why
it's
a
strategy
is
because
you're
going
to
have
a
planning
process
around.
What
thank
you.
F
E
F
E
So
we're
at
nine
o'clock-
and
we
were
hoping
to
be
wrapped
up
by
now,
but
I
do
want
to
respect
that.
This
is
our
chance
to
hear
from
counsel
so
that
tomorrow
night,
you
can
have
it.
So
we
want
to
extend
15
minutes
if
that
would
be
alright
to
look
at
any
other
questions
or
reflections
that
you
want
to
bring
to
this.
So
if
there's
anything
that
you
want
to
move
to
and
one
to
hear
supports
for
moving
forward
or
any
other
reflections
you've
had
at
the
overall,
there
was
a
question
at
the
beginning
of.
E
G
Next
week
this
week
at
CAC,
you
were
talking
about
all
these
strategies
and
then
funding
was
at
the
end,
and
it
just
seems
like
where
you
are
with
funding
kind
of
sheds,
the
light
on
how
you
prioritize
and
so
I
think
that
funding
should
move
from
the.
From
the
last
thing
that's
presented
in
the
master
plan.
To
the
first
thing
that's
presented,
that's.
A
Advocate
by
the
time
you
get
to
the
end,
you're
like
holy
moly,
we
need
more
money
right,
but
that's
how
you
start
it's
when
you
look
at
all
the
priorities.
It
leads
to
that
conclusion.
That's
how
I
read
it
is
you're
totally
convinced
by
the
by
the
end
of
all
the
things
you
want
to
spend
money
on.
So
to
me,
it
builds
that
way.
A
G
G
Instead
of
adding
more
stuff,
we
may
want
to
take
away
stuff.
I
mean
it's
it's
it's.
How
people
operate?
Well,
I,
don't
know,
but
maybe
most
people
don't
operate
this
way
on
a
personal
basis,
but
you
know
you
only
have
so
much
of
a
budget
when
you
go
to
the
grocery
store
and
sometimes
you
don't
buy
the
Belgian
chocolate,
so
I
think.
H
Summary
on
page
3,
I
think,
is
a
good
one
in
terms
of
introducing
what
it
is
that
is
trying
to
be
obtained
here,
what
it
is
we're
trying
to
preserve
and
protect,
but
the
funding
coming
up
early.
You
know
this
is
in
this
is
in
jeopardy
to
be
able
to
accomplish
these
kinds
of
things
which
includes
like
these
ecosystem
services
of
clean
air,
clean
water,
local
foods.
If
we
don't
have
funding
to
do
it
do
something
like
that
mix
it
up,
but
without
going
into
the
whole
thing
of
the
funding.
P
So
couldn't
we
just
do
it
like
a
study
paper
I
mean
remember
back
in
high
school
you'd
present
your
thesis
you'd
make
your
points
to
it
and
then
you'd
reiterate
and
make
it
ask
for
what
you
were
trying
to
basically
prove
your
thesis.
So
if
we
eat
basically
made
a
statement
about
the
monetary
needs
in
the
beginning
proved
our
point
and
then
at
the
end
reiterated
it
at
least
you'd
hit
it
on
both
sides.
Depending
on
how
you
think
about
things,
maybe
you
did
tack
it
from
both
ends.
I
I.
J
Part
of
the
response,
because
you've
got
to
put
in
context,
then
what
the
estimated
costs
of
priorities
are
in
order
to
understand
what
the
relationship
is
between
the
amount
of
money
that
you
have
in
what
it's
going
to
cost
there
was
going
to
take
to
accomplish
whatever
it
is,
and
so
I
I
do
think
that
we
still
need
numbers
budget
dollars
estimated
associated
with
with
the
strategies
in
order
to
be
able
to
figure
out
okay.
What's
the
relationship
between
you
know
these
budget
scenarios
and
the
costs
of
accomplishing
whatever
it
is.
D
So
I
was
gonna,
propose
something
similar
to
Mira
pies,
but
I
would
also
say
that
in
2013,
before
the
floods
and
due
to
hit
the
fan,
we
decided
to
significantly
reduce
what
was
the
open
space
funding
and
that
wasn't
the
best
of
decisions
and
so
I
think
somehow
there
needs
to
be
I,
don't
know
how
you
do
it,
but
there
needs
to
be
an
explanation
that
we've
and
we
talked
about
it
in
terms
of
what
we
own
and
what
it's
going
to
cost
to
take
care
of
it.
In
terms
of
you
know,
climate
change
visitor.
A
Adaptive
management,
that's
what
we're
doing
I
do
think,
and
maybe
this
is
self-serving,
but
since
you
all
have
to
go
silent,
if
we
put
it
on
the
ballot
relatively
soon
thereafter,
I
would
suggest
making
that
the
case
for
what
it
costs
as
much
as
we
can
in
here,
so
that
there
can
be
a
robust
public
consideration
of
that
in
context
before
you
guys
can't
talk
about
it.
I.
E
Like
how
the
way
you
all
show
support
to
move
forward
is
talking
about
the
money
side
of
it,
and
but
if
there
are
other
statements
of
support
or
consideration
and
how
you're
feeling
about,
can
you
live
with?
What's
in
this
plan
that
we
discussed
tonight,
this
is
a
last
before
we
move
on
to
others
discussing
it.
So.
G
Just
one
thing
I
was
going
to
say
to
the
to
the
book.
Ending
the
financial
pieces
of
it
is
perhaps
as
part
of
the
end
book
and
Tamara
buys
point
is
that's
where
you
introduce
the
the
maintain
the
the
middle
and
then
the
vision
so
tee
it
up
that
way
and
I
keep
looking
for
the
determine
the
cost
understanding.
Oh
there,
it
is
it's
an
under
financial,
understand,
total
cost
of
system
management,
and
that's
one
of
the
things
that
is
not
it's.
G
B
Would
say:
Mary
we're
we're
well
underway
of
that
and
we're
understanding
some
costs.
We
did
a
big
presentation
last
fall
on
trail
maintenance,
backlog
in
which
we've
done
in
yeoman's
work,
and
we
now
do
understand
what
the
total
cost
of
system
a
maintenance
and
of
that
program
area
is
and
we're
going
program
by
program
and
we're
assembling.
All
of
that
there's
still
work
to
be.
B
H
That's
a
good
starter
again
putting
numbers
on
things
like
this
and
and
letting
people
realize,
but
this
is
also.
This
is
deferred
maintenance
right
and
it's
also
degradation-
that's
happening
more
rapidly
than
one
can
keep
up
with
it
now.
So
it
has
all
of
the
elements
that
we've
been
discussing
tonight
and
I
would
just
like
to
thank
everyone
for
their
hard
work
in
putting
all
of
this
together
and
bringing
it
to
us
in
such
completed
form
I.
Think
it's
really
talk
about
yeoman's
work,
the.
O
I
Couple
things
the
they
didn't
fit
under
anything
else
on
page
20,
I
believe
it
is,
you
have
the
Charter
purposes,
and
you
summarized
them
I
was
just
thinking
might
be
nice
to
include
the
actual
language.
You
know
the
Charter
purposes
are
like
the
constitution
of
the
open
space
system
and
they're
really
not
very
long.
So
it
seemed
worth.
You
know,
spending
another
third
of
a
page
on
putting
the
actual
language
in
there
and
then
my
other
one
was
just
about
how
planning
is
going
to
work
going
forward.
I
B
Definitely
couldn't
make
a
really
good
reference
to
that,
the
specifics
of
it.
What
we
have
discussed
with
the
board
is
the
specifics
of
the
exact
changes.
That
is
something
that
we're
going
to
have
consultation
with
our
board,
starting
to
follow
more
of
the
winter
of
of
this
year,
but
we
certainly
could
allude
to
what
what
we're
thinking
of.
C
A
A
The
other
thing
I
guess
I
would
just
under.
So
thank
you
that
wasn't
quick,
but
the
other
thing
is
I
would
start
where
I
begin,
which
is
everybody's
gonna,
want
to
know.
What's
next
so
I,
when
you
present,
this
I
would
have
I
would
explain
to
people
the
things
that
are
already
underway
for
the
next
two
years
and
then,
where
the
implementation
discussions
I.
Think
because
generically
saying
we're
gonna
decide
later
what
the
you
know.
A
Q
G
I
If
I
can
add
in
also
as
a
member
of
the
process
subcommittee
Mary,
thank
you
for
all
of
your
work
as
well
as
Tom
and
Curt,
and
but
just
how
thorough
that
was.
There
was
very
high
quality
engagement
and
it
got
out
to
many
people
in
ways
that
were
both
quick
but
also
deep,
and
also
the
my
crane
engaged
like
the
members
of
Latino
community
youth
have
hit
people
that
I,
don't
think.
I
A
When
we
talk
about
taking
these
processes
or
the
lessons
learned
and
then
handing
them
to
other
departments
and
so
I
guess
I
know
we
look
to
Jane,
but
I
guess:
cannon
under
store,
then
you
know
we're
doing
the
transformation,
Matt
transportation
master
plan.
There's
other
plans
coming
up
where
we
should
build
upon
what
was
successful
and.
D
Not
just
say
I
was
on
that
18-month
process
of
how
to
do
better.
Communication
and
I
want
to
thank
Jane
for
supporting
that,
and
there
were
I
think
15
people
in
our
group
plus
other
people
who
put
that
together
so
I'm
very
happy
to
hear
that
it's
worked
so
well
and
it
will
be
a
tough
act
to
follow.
But
at
least
now
we
have
a
map
which
I
like
of
how
to
do
it
so
and
I
want
to
just
thank
everybody
for
your
work
on
this.
It's
not
been
easy.