►
From YouTube: Boulder City Council Meeting 5-21-19
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Onto
the
May
21st
2019
Boulder,
City
Council
meeting,
you
will
notice
that
we
are.
Our
ranks
are
a
little
depleted
tonight,
so
I'm
the
assistant
mayor,
I,
Mayor,
Pro,
Tem
and
so
I'll
be
running.
The
meeting
until
Suzanne
Jones
gets
here,
which
should
be
around
9:00
and
9:30,
and
we
have
two
members
who
are
ill
this
evening.
So
with
that
council.
C
B
D
A
Okay,
so
we
continue
recruiting
for
our
boards
and
commissions.
We
did
do
some
interviews
tonight
and
have
filled
some
positions,
but
there
are
three
positions:
sorry,
three
boards
with
vacancies,
there's
the
boulder
Junction
access
district,
which
is
the
parking
Commission
piece
and
the
boulder
Junction
access
district,
which
is
the
travel,
demand,
management
piece
and
then
University,
Hill
commercial
area
management
Commission.
So
all
three
of
those
are
seeking
property
owners
or
residents
who
have
the
permission
of
our
property
owner
to
represent
them.
So
if
you're
interested,
we
would
love
to
have
you
apply?
A
You
can
apply
online
at
Boulder,
Colorado,
gov,
slash
boards
commissions,
so
sign
up
for
open
comment
is
now
closed
and
when
you
come
up
for
open
comment,
when
your
name
is
called,
please
do
not
speak
about
either
of
the
two
issues
that
we're
having
a
public
hearing
about
tonight.
The
two
issues,
our
ordinance
83
25,
which
is
approving
annual
budget
carryover
and
emergency
ordinance,
83
26,
to
adopt
rules
governing
scooters.
A
C
I
make
an
amendment
to
that
amendment.
I
think
we
maybe
should
wait
on
item
8d
on
the
appointment
of
forcing
Commission's
for
those
people
we
interviewed
tonight
in
light
of
the
fact
that
we're
a
little
short-handed
tonight,
I'd
like
to
get
my
colleagues
an
opportunity
weigh
in
so,
if
would
be
accepted
as
a
friendly
amendment
to
delete
8d
accepted.
C
So
it
is
long,
it's
pretty
hard
to
annoy
people
by
selling
ice
cream.
You
offer
them
a
lot
of
choices,
maybe
a
free
sample.
They
get
to
indulge
and
a
guilty
pleasure
with
family
and
friends.
It
doesn't
cost
you
much
that
was
Sean.
Maher
is
life.
He
operated
the
Ben
&
Jerry's
ice
cream
franchise
on
Pearl
Street
for
many
years.
He
was
doing
just
fine,
but
a
group
of
folks
asked
him
to
help
guide
other
small
businesses
and
to
lead
the
bolder
economic
council.
Then,
ten
years
ago,
Sean
was
asked
to
become
the
executive
director.
C
C
Visitors
to
the
Pearl
Street
Mall
had
to
compete
with
pan
handlers
and
skateboarders.
Whenever
a
store
or
restaurant
closed,
there
was
an
insistence
that
be
replaced
by
a
local
business.
Rents
went
up
and
up
people
claimed
that
there
was
no
downtown
parking
locals
complained
about
tourists.
It
was
a
lot
tougher
than
selling
ice
cream,
but
Sean
handled
the
job
well,
with
grace
ease
and
humor.
He
expanded
the
membership
of
downtown
Boulder
Inc,
especially
bringing
in
non
retail
members.
He
worked
hard
to
keep
rents
reasonable
and
urged
landlords
to
favor
local
businesses
or
national
chains.
C
He
made
sure
that
downtown
was
clean
and
safe,
developing
partnerships
with
the
city's
police
and
Parks
departments,
and
he
helped
downtown
grow,
supporting
the
efforts
to
add
more
than
300,000
square
feet
of
commercial
space
and
50
residential
units.
The
list
of
Sean's
accomplishments
as
the
head
of
downtown
Boulder
Inc,
would
fill
several
pages.
Here
are
just
a
few
things
that
Sean
did
during
his
10
years
as
the
organization's
leader
Sean
founded
the
taste
of
parole,
food
and
wine
event,
which
has
sold
out
every
year.
C
Sean
started
the
student
banner
program
so
that
art
created
by
young
people
can
be
seen
by
thousands.
Sean
brought
the
Ironman
and
USA
Pro
Cycling
Challenge
to
downtown
Boulder
Sean,
led
the
formation
of
the
college
town
summits
for
the
International
downtown
Association
and
brought
one
of
those
summits
to
Boulder
Sean
created
a
pop-up
art
gallery
at
the
former
stars
location
and
he
created
a
alley.
Art
program
that
we're
all
gonna
start
seeing
this
summer
as
more
Sean
replaced
the
aging
Tebow
train
with
a
new
electric
one
that
is
tremendously
popular
with
kids
and
their
parents.
C
Sean
started
the
downtown
Boulder
foundation,
a
non-profit
there
that
presents
festivals
concerts
and
parades
that
draw
more
than
a
quarter
million
people
to
downtown
every
year.
Sean
rebranded
his
organization
as
the
downtown
Boulder
partnership,
reflecting
the
relationship
between
downtown
and
the
rest
of
the
community
and
Sean
partnered
with
the
city
on
a
comprehensive
retail
study
which
City
Council
will
be
discussing
this
evening.
C
None
of
this
fully
describes
the
hundreds
of
hours
that
Sean
spent
every
year,
setting
up
concerts,
cleaning
the
streets
dealing
with
landlords
and
tenants,
helping
lost
tourists
and
advocating,
on
behalf
of
downtown
Boulder
partnerships
more
than
400
members.
He
is
Tyler
tireless
and
he's
always
smiling
after
a
decade
as
CEO
of
downtown
Boulder
partnership,
Sean
retired
from
the
organization
last
month
to
pursue
another
opportunity
here
in
Boulder,
but
Sean
leaves
behind
the
legacy
of
a
strong
team
in
a
strong
organization.
C
A
testament
to
that
is
the
fact
that
more
than
20
people
from
around
Boulder
and
across
the
country
applied
for
his
job
seeking
to
continue
the
good
work
that
Sean
started.
Downtown
will
miss
Sean,
but
he's
always
welcome
to
come
back
for
a
free
ice
cream,
and
so
the
City
Council
of
the
city
of
Boulder
Colorado
declares
May
21
2009
teen
as
Sean
Maher
day,
and
we
urge
all
members
of
our
community
to
wish
Sean
well.
F
I'm
gonna
keep
it
short.
I
know
you
have
a
long
meeting
tonight.
The
doubt
in
the
name
of
the
downtown
Boulder
partnership
says
it
all.
I
was
in
the
room
when
a
lot
of
those
things
happened,
but
I
didn't
do
them
alone.
Certainly
not.
We
have
a
wonderful
staff.
We
have
great
volunteers
and
board
members
and
the
business
community
partnered
with
our
amazing
city
staff,
as
well
as
our
City
Council.
Thank
you
all
for
your
service
and
your
support
of
downtown
Lisa
Mary.
We
didn't
always
agree.
We
often
did
not
agree,
but
we
worked
together.
F
G
Thank
You
councilmember,
Weaver,
hello,
everyone
I'm,
pretty
sure
everyone
remembers
me,
but
I
will
introduce
myself
again.
My
name
is
Sammy
Leon
Lawrence,
the
fourth
I
live
at
1926
Canyon,
Boulevard
apartment
number,
10,
Boulder,
Colorado,
803
Oh
too
many
of
the
comments
regarding
pending
charters
at
the
last
city
council
meeting
I
agree
with
I,
don't
like
it,
but
I
foresaw
it
and
agree
with
my
understanding
comes
from
a
previous
position
serving
as
a
youth
commissioner
in
Sacramento.
G
That
being
said,
at
the
same
time,
there
were
opinions
that
were
shared
at
this
council
that
insult
Mental,
Health
Awareness
Month
this
month
as
well
as
me
personally,
our
community,
the
original
drafted
Charter
requirements,
as
well
as
moral
conduct,
I
shouldn't,
have
had
to
seek
additional
healing,
after
being
assaulted
by
a
police
officer,
because
members
of
City
Council
ignored
or
doubted
my
earnestness
about
the
trauma.
I
experienced
your
lack
of
understanding
and
empathy
were
revealed
and
you
should
be
embarrassed
and
ashamed.
I.
G
Have
been
given
permission
by
Chris
Nelson,
the
CEO
of
attention
Holmes,
to
invite
all
of
you
to
trauma-informed
care
training,
because
it
seems
that
some
of
you
lack
empathy
for
others
in
dire
situations,
especially
you
marry
young.
You
hold
the
greatest
of
my
ire
as
a
woman
who
has
used
her
race
to
say,
as
she
was
a
unifier
of
this
community
I
feel
disenfranchised
by
you
specifically
calling
my
actions
dramatic
and
asinine.
My
bad
I
admit
stake
that
I
mistook
that
word,
but
that
was
wrong
specifically
for
you.
G
Likewise,
if
I
can
be
bold
for
a
second,
there
are
comments
about
public
and
from
information
that
has
not
made
public
yet
that
were
not
proper.
We
are
better
than
this
as
a
community,
and
all
of
you
are
better
than
this
on
this
area
and
thank
you
by
the
way
Sam
Weaver
for
staying
quiet,
because
you
showed
an
example,
besides
Aaron
Brackett
of
how
to
be
a
proper
city
council
member
in
this
community
that
we
deserve.
So
thank
you,
sir
Thank.
H
Good
evening
my
name
is
Kathleen
McCormick
I'm,
vice-chair
of
the
bolder
Arts
Commission
and
I
live
at
3:05
five
11th
Street
in
Boulder.
The
Boulder
Arts
Commission,
is
here
tonight
to
continue
efforts
to
coordinate
arts
funding
in
Boulder
with
the
City
Council.
First,
a
thank
you
for
providing
the
highest
level
ever
of
funding
for
arts
and
culture
in
Boulder.
Tonight
we
can
provide
information
on
the
2019
general
operating
support,
grants
that
have
been
awarded
to
small,
medium,
large
and
extra-large
organizations.
H
The
overwhelming
majority
so
far
have
proved
in
their
grant
applications
that
they
were
worthy
of
Arts
and
Culture
funding.
According
to
the
city's
cultural
plan
and
the
established
scoring
rubric
for
the
Arts
Grants
Program
45
out
of
47
organizations
met
the
funding
Thresh
threshold
established
by
the
Office
of
Arts
and
Culture.
This
means
that
the
overwhelming
majority
of
applicants
have
met
our
requirements
and
are
doing
a
beautiful
job,
forty-foot
I'm,
sorry
they're
doing
what
we've
asked
them
to
do
and
what
the
cultural
plan
recommends.
H
These
organizations
demonstrated
that
they've
provided
benefits
to
the
communities
such
as
excellent
educational
and
artistic
events,
free
performances,
employment
and
mentoring
for
artists.
Our
outreach
to
underrepresented
groups
and
significant
and
genuine
efforts
toward
equity
and
inclusion
in
2018,
the
Arts
Commission
decided
to
equitably
divide
up
the
general
operating
support
grants
based
upon
percentages
of
projected
applicants
applying
for
and
receiving
grants.
The
main
change
was
that
there
was
one
less
extra-large
GOS
grant
to
be
awarded.
These
funds
were
distributed
among
the
small
and
medium
organizations,
a
quick
summary.
H
H
However,
there
were
four
extra
large
organizations
that
were
unfunded
according
to
our
scoring
rubric
and
the
first
three
were
tied:
Colorado
Chautauqua,
Association,
thirty-two
point,
two:
five
par
Lando
School
for
the
Arts
thirty-two
point:
two:
five
Colorado
Music
Festival
and
Center
for
musical
arts.
Thirty-Two
point
two:
five
and
the
Museum
of
Boulder
@
31.5.
H
There
is
a
zero
part.
Sorry
there
is
a
point:
zero
four
percent
difference
between
being
funded
and
not
being
funded,
and
the
next
the
Museum
of
Boulder
score
was
only
0.75
away
from
being
funded.
These
are
infinitesimal,
differences
that
decide
gold,
silver
and
bronze
medals
in
the
Olympics.
We
can
provide
similar
outcomes
for
the
large
medium
and
small
arts
and
culture
organizations
tonight,
we'd
like
to
discuss
the
unfunded,
extra-large
arts
and
cultural
organizations
McCormick.
A
C
C
Thank
you,
we're
gonna
be
doing
the
budget
in
the
next
couple
months.
So
we'll
talk
about
talk
about
that.
Second,
can
you
remind
us
again,
I
know
separate
from
these
grants
that
you
made
last
night
or
this
week
when
is
the
the
timing
for
the
facilities
based
grants
that
we
authorized
for
this
year?
What,
when
you,
when
you
guys
guys,
accept
those
applications,
and
when
will
you
be
making
the
grants?
The.
H
I
Hi
everybody
I'm
coming
today
to
speak
on
behalf
of
Samuel
R
Lyon
Lawrence,
the
fourth
I,
don't
come
to
a
lot
of
City
Council
meetings
because
I'm
very
proud
to
live
in
Boulder.
It's
a
very
amazing
amazing
City.
It's
got
many
wondrous
things
to
offer.
I've
already
told
my
parents
who
travel
the
u.s.
I
I
I
I've
followed
you
guys
and
washed,
so
many
reviews
of
your
city
council
meetings
and
thought
that
you've
handled
so
many
issues
so
wondrously
and
with
so
much
tact
I'm
just
left
to
ask
where
that
tact
is
at
this
given
time
I'm
not
per
se
angry
anymore,
I've
quelled
that,
but
I
am
very
disappointed.
Thank
you
very
much
for
your
time.
City
Council
thank.
J
J
These
include
people
lining
up
in
16
degree,
weather
five
months
from
downtown
five
miles
from
downtown
to
see
if
they'll
get
a
bed
for
the
night
residents
being
kicked
out
into
the
cold
for
warnings
that
were
not
informed,
they
had
been
given
and
then
being
stranded
in
North
Boulder,
a
resident
being
kicked
out
for
rendering
emergency
aid
to
another
resident.
Who
was
having
a
seizure
and
that
while
staff
looked
on
and
of
course,
benjamin
harvey
being
kicked
out
and
then
freezing
to
death.
J
On
christmas
eve,
every
step
of
the
way
executive
director,
greg,
harms
and
shelter
management
have
refused
to
make
any
changes,
even
as
small
as
having
shelter
staff
wear
a
nametag.
So
residents
know
who
they're
interacting
with
we've
even
asked:
shelter
management
for
copies
of
their
training,
training
and
employee
manuals
as
a
matter
of
transparency,
and
we're
told
they
would
not
provide
them
because
they're
worried
those
materials
would
make
them
look
bad
their
words.
J
Not
mine
I
recently
met
a
man
who
lives
under
a
bridge
who
said
he
would
much
rather
stay
there
than
at
the
shelters.
His
friends
agreed
one
mentioning
that
he
was
kicked
out
of
path
to
home
because
he
came
down
with
pneumonia
and
was
not
able
to
ride
his
bike
to
the
shelter
every
night
while
he
recovered
we're
gonna,
see
justice
at
the
shelter
one
way
or
another,
but
having
the
support
of
city
council
will
make
this
process
a
lot
easier
for
everyone
involved.
J
The
shelter
is
a
necessary
service
for
all
Boulder
residents
and
it
needs
to
be
held
to
the
highest
regard.
We
wouldn't
let
a
hospital
treat
people
like
this.
Why
would
we
allow
it
for
our
own
house?
Neighbors
I
also
want
to
mention
that
the
only
reason
any
pittance
of
justice
was
seen
for
zayday
Atkinson,
the
man
who
asked
and
intimidated
by
Boulder
PD
for
picking
up
trash
all
black
was
because
someone
filmed
that
interaction.
The
Boulder
County
Democratic
socialists
of
America
and
safe
are
holding
a
film
and
police
training
on
Saturday
June
8th
at
noon.
J
K
Good
evening,
ladies
and
gentlemen,
my
name
is
Robin
Ryan.
Thank
you
for
the
opportunity
to
address
you
this
evening,
but
I'm
afraid.
That's
where
any
level
of
gratitude
is
going
to
cease.
I've
been
spending
the
bulk
of
my
nights
at
September,
1st
2017
as
a
bolder
shelter
for
the
homeless.
In
February
of
this
year,
I
met
with
their
operations
director
over
a
four-page
grievance
that
was
filed
the
following
Monday
he
took
to
the
airwaves
and
he
and
his
executive
director
insisted
they
should
not
be
subject
to
oversight
because
they
take
responsibility
for
people's
safety.
K
K
Those
are
taxpayer
funds,
they
insist,
they
are
privately
run,
but
they
are
publicly
funded
unless
it
is
your
intention
to
be
reflective
of
the
epic
failure
of
leadership
at
this
facility,
I'm
urging
you
to
withhold
all
future
funding
without
his
resignation,
I'm
asking
you
to
clean
house
anyone
who
approved
or
agreed
to
enforce
a
16
degree
weather
policy
should
not
be
delivering
these
kinds
of
services.
In
my
less
than
humble
opinion,
two
years
staff
management
board.
L
You
oh
hi,
Elizabeth
black
43,
14
or
13th
Street.
Here's
some
information
about
agriculture
in
Boulder
County
from
the
USDA.
It's
also
on
your
handout
way
back
in
1950
when
most
of
us
were
just
a
gleam.
In
our
daddy's
eye,
a
little
over
half
of
Boulder
County
was
farmland.
The
rest
of
the
county
was
covered
with
forests
and
small
towns.
Today,
less
than
a
quarter
of
Boulder
County
is
farmland,
a
59
percent
decline
in
agricultural
acreage
over
67
years
way.
L
L
Today,
only
6%
of
the
count
entire
county
is
irrigated
and
86
percent
decline
in
the
amount
of
irrigated
farmland
remaining
in
our
county
way.
Back
in
1950,
the
majority
of
all
farm
acreage
in
Boulder
County
was
irrigated
lands.
74
percent
of
all
farm
acreage
in
the
county
was
supplied
with
supplemental
water
to
go,
grow,
crops
and
past
your
livestock.
Today,
the
ratio
of
dryland
farmlands
is
almost
exactly
reversed.
Today,
only
25
percent
of
our
remaining
agricultural
lands
have
supplemental
irrigation
water.
L
This
has
huge
implications
for
our
farmers,
because
in
our
arid
West,
water
is
life
and
it
is
very
difficult
to
farm
without
it
without
irrigated
lands,
cash
crops
no
longer
grow
livestock,
carrying
capacity
shrink
and
profit
margin
Spanish.
This
is
why
our
farmers
and
ranchers
cherish
and
defend
our
remaining
rare
and
precious
irrigated
farmland.
Thank
you.
Thank.
M
The
same
goes
with
a
finding
of
no
racial
bias
which,
on
its
face,
leaves
us
surprised
as
a
community,
the
conclusion
of
Internal
Affairs
and
the
police
that
there
is
a
need
for
more
de-escalation
training
is
an
obvious
one,
but
without
objective
measures
and
policy,
training
could
very
well
be
meaningless.
We
want
to
know
how
officers
will
be
held
accountable
and
that
de-escalation
will
be
used
in
practice,
not
just
in
press
releases.
Recently,
members
of
council
defended
officer,
Lovett
eyes,
use
of
force
for
de-escalation
and
no
force
at
all
should
have
been
used.
M
Fifty-Year-Old
502
inch,
Michelle,
Rodriguez
and
disabled
Sammie
Lawrence
have
both
spoken
of
such
incidents
and
Rodriguez
was
recently
found
not
guilty
of
a
charge
of
obstruction
after
a
jury.
Viewed
the
video
of
Lola
ties
slamming
her
face
to
the
ground.
She
was
attempting
to
dial
911
one
and
complying
with
commands
when
Lola
ties
slapped
her
phone
out
of
her
hands,
I'm
bloody
to
her
face.
M
Despite
all
of
this,
we
hired
Lola
Tai
and
have
let
him
loose
against
the
boulder
community
to
our
detriment
and
danger,
and
now
the
city
is
being
sued.
Just
as
with
the
investigation
around
detaining
mr.
Atkinson,
it
is
clear,
with
officer
Lola
ties,
incidents
that
there
is
a
problem
with
our
standards
and
our
policies,
both
in
higher
and
overseeing
our
police
force,
the
community
demands
and
deserves
better.
Thank
you
thank.
N
Hi,
my
name
is
Catherine
Breen
I'm
here
on
behalf
of
Leslie
birch,
a
former
Boulder
County
resident,
her
sister
Suzanne
Wall
lived
on
Boulder
streets
for
four
years
until
she
died
of
pneumonia
and
organ
failure
in
Boulder,
Community
Hospital
in
October,
2014
Leslie
reached
out
to
me
and
other
activists
with
safe
Boulder,
with
the
idea
of
creating
a
memory
book
about
Suzanne's
life,
hoping
that
we
could
deliver
it
for
her
to
policymakers
in
the
city.
This
is
what
brings
me
here
today.
N
Here
are
some
excerpts
from
Leslie's
letter.
She
writes
my
intent
and
my
hope
is
to
remind
all
of
us
that
people
who
are
homeless
are
first
and
foremost
human
beings.
People
who
have
taken
or
been
forced
by
life
circumstances
to
travel
a
path
that
might
be
beyond
our
ability
to
understand
or
judge,
could
I
have
ever
foreseen
in
my
precious
beloved
sister
becoming
homeless.
N
When
you
look
at
these
photos,
could
you
I
have
imagined
enough
now
for
my
fog
of
grief,
to
begin
addressing
life
on
the
streets
for
my
sister
and
other
people
experiencing
homelessness
in
January,
I,
read
about
the
boulder
city
council?
Turning
down
the
proposal
to
keep
the
severe
weather,
shelter
open
all
winter,
my
visceral
reaction
to
that
news
alone
moved
me
to
tears.
N
She
goes
on
I,
urge
Boulder
City
Council,
to
expand
your
services
and
afford
affordable
housing
programs
to
alleviate
the
suffering
of
people
living
on
the
streets
and
to
help
prevent
more
families
from
having
to
endure
the
grief
of
losing
a
loved
one
to
the
rigors
of
homelessness
and
now
I
share
with
you
a
glimpse
of
my
beloved
sister,
most
sincerely
Leslie
birch.
Now
I'd
like
to
give
each
of
you
a
copy.
Please
read
her
full
cover
letter
along
with
the
booklet,
and
some
people
are
missing
if
I
give
all
of
these
to
you.
O
My
name
is
Patrick
Murphy
I
live
in
Boulder,
Muni
stranded
cost
slowly
part
three,
so
based
on
Boulder
being
3.8
percent
of
Excel,
the
120
million
selling
off
1%
of
excels
power
each
year
a
minus
B
would
be
year
one
eighty
eight
point:
four
million
year,
256
point
eight
million
year
three,
twenty
five
point:
three
million
total
one
hundred
and
seventy
point
five
million.
If
Boulder
can
find
a
buyer
of
one
percent
of
excels
total
for
three
years
in
a
row,
starting
with
one
percent
in
year.
O
O
Two
hundred
and
twenty
five
million
sounds
a
lot
better.
Now.
Doesn't
it
but
it'll
put
the
muni
in
the
red?
Well
past?
Twenty
thirty
three:
you
should
know
that
there
wasn't
even
a
place
to
put
stranded
costs
in
the
financial
spreadsheet
until
2018,
and
that
was
after
a
December,
2017
meeting
I
had
with
community
members,
Heather,
Bailey
and
Tom
car,
were
they
committed
to
putting
it
in
the
spreadsheet
it
took
them
a
year,
or
rather
eight
years
to
get
that
done.
The
muni
stranded
costs
low
lie,
needs
full
explanation,
not
excuses.
O
Claims
of
it's
too
complicated
are
pure
deceit
and
not
professional.
We
have
been
duped,
Mark
Twain
said
the
glory
which
is
built
upon
a
lie
soon
becomes
a
most
unpleasant
encumbrance.
How
easy
it
is
to
make
people
believe
a
lie
and
hard.
It
is
to
undo
that
work
again
and
I'll,
add
and
again
and
again.
P
Hello:
everyone
I'm
mark
Villarreal
I'm,
the
chair
of
the
bolar
Arts
Commission
and
I,
live
at
4140
Evans
Drive
I'm
gonna
pick
up
where
Kathleen
left
off,
so
she
kind
of
broke
down
this
or
large
or
extra
large
organizational
scoring
that
same
scoring
breakdown
and
that
same
sort
of
thin
margin
of
funding
or
being
unfunded
is
throughout
all
the
organizations
small
medium
large.
It
was
that's
close.
It
was
that
competitive
that
close
with
a
difference.
P
What
I
but
I'm
here
before
you
we're
all
here
before
you
tonight
to
recommend
that
funding
be
found
for
the
four
extra
large
organizations
that
did
not
get
a
score
from
us.
You
know
we
ran
out
of
funds
before
we
ran
out
of
organizations,
and
that
means
50,000
for
each
organization.
For
the
first
year
alone,
that's
$200,000,
it's
a
$50,000
grant
for
three
and
a
three-year
cycle,
so
we
feel
that
these
four
institutions-
they're
you
know
some
of
the
crown
jewels
of
our
cultural
scene-
deserve
to
be
funded.
P
One
thing
that
you
need
to
remember
is
that
parlando,
School
of
the
Arts
and
Colorado
Music,
Festival
and
Center
for
musical
arts
do
not
qualify
for
the
last
remaining
large
grant
in
our
program,
which
is
the
facilities
grant,
so
david
they're
left
out
in
the
cold
right
now.
The
other
two
organizations
have
a
shot.
Has
some
of
that
money.
P
In
the
past
here,
Arts
Commission
has
discussed
removing
the
Community
Grants
portion
of
our
grants
and
rolling
that
into
general
operating
support.
That
has
only
$80,000,
and
this
is
money
we're
talking
about
for
next
year.
What
we
have
in
our
grants
program
that
is
not
part
of
the
general
operating
support,
adds
up
to
one
hundred
and
seventy
three
thousand
dollars.
P
We
could
gut
that
and
put
it
all
in
the
general
operating
support
and
make
a
good
a
good
effort
to
fund
these
four
organizations
for
next
year,
but
that
will
eliminate
community
project
grants.
Arts
education
grants,
cultural
field
trips
or
title
one
school
children,
professional
development
grants
and
even
more.
Thank
you.
Q
Good
evening,
Council
lassic
lustrum
I
live
in
Boulder
and
I'm
here
to
thank
you
for
the
good
progress
you've
made
on
Energy
and
Climate
and
I
just
want
to
briefly
respond
to
Patrick.
He
threw
a
lot
of
numbers
up
about
stranded
cost
possibilities.
These
are
obviously
very
controversial
and
unknown.
There's
a
number
of
things
at
ways
that
we
can
both
mitigate
them,
but
either
way
we
know
that
excels
rates
are
going
up
and
we
know
the
cost
of
the
renewable
energy
we
want
to
buy
is
going
down.
Q
Q
Q
By
staff
and
by
council
staying
the
course
we
have
lots
of
programs.
We've
reduced
the
energy
usage
in
our
city
buildings
by
something
like
46%,
we
consulted
with
thousands
and
thousands
of
businesses
and
homes
we
have
worked
and
the
staff
has
worked,
and
the
council
has
stayed
the
course
incredibly
hard
to
do
that.
We've
separated
our
our
GNP,
which
is
going
up
dramatically
the
orange
line
from
our
greenhouse
gas
emissions,
which
are
going
down
significantly,
not
as
where
they
need
to
be
by
any
means.
Q
But
this
decoupling
of
economic
growth
and
greenhouse
gas
emissions
is
a
huge
accomplishment
and,
and
everybody
in
this
community
should
be
very
proud.
The
council's
that
came
before
you
again,
the
staff
who's
worked
so
hard.
This
is
really
a
big
deal
and
then
I'll
just
briefly
mention
for
those
that
don't
know
yet.
We
have
a
Carbon
Farming
project
to
get
carbon
out
of
the
atmosphere
and
into
the
soils
being
led
by
eco
cycle.
If
you
just
look
up
carbon
fiber
being
eco
cycle,
its
ton
of
fun.
Thank
you
so
very
much.
Let's
keep
going.
R
Though
James
Feeny
from
North
Boulder,
first
to
comment,
carbon
monoxide
monitors
cheap,
off-the-shelf
commodity
product
Oh
underutilized
when
carbon
monoxide
is
continuing
to
send
people
to
the
hospital
while
on
say
in
Boulder
in
Longmont,
hotels,
2012,
International,
Building,
Code
and
fire
code
requirements
for
carbon
monoxide
alarms,
adopted
by
reference,
do
apply
to
both
group
I
and
our
occupancy,
which
includes
hotels,
motels
and
apartments.
The
Boulder
hotel,
where
this
carbon
monoxide
poisoning
incident
occurred,
received
and
retained
sales
and
use
tax
license
without
complying
with
the
fire
code
requirements.
R
Second
I
have
a
question
for
city
manager.
Again
five
weeks
ago,
city
manager
suggested
both
that
the
dark
sky
ordinance
might
be
enforceable
and
also
suggested.
The
Bolar
city
ordinances
could
not
be
enforced
against
either
party
to
a
mobile
home
park.
Land
lease
that
legal
theories
struck
me
as
fanciful.
R
So
now,
after
an
additional
five
weeks
of
review,
has
city
manager
finally
compiled
supporting
documentation
for
this
legal
theory
of
non
enforceability
and
where
the
Boulder
Charter
imposes
a
duty
to
enforce
what
position
that
on
enforcement
or
non
enforcement
with
respect
to
boulders
dark
sky
ordinance.
In
effect,
now
for
four
and
a
half
years
has
city
manager
formulated.
S
Good
evening
Council,
my
name
is
Erica
Jos
I
live
at
195.
One
Vista
Drive
in
Boulder
I
wanted
to
start
off
by
thanking
you
so
much
for
the
bolstering
of
funding
this
year,
especially
with
the
facilities
grant
as
arts.
Commissioner,
it's
been
an
honor
to
work
with
these
organizations
and
I'm
going
to
expand
a
little
bit
on
why
the
funding
would
be
really
necessary
and
how
the
organizations
are
really
living
up
and
beyond
kind
of
our
request
to
ask
them
to
push
past
flowery
language,
around
inclusion
and
really
kind
of
strong
pipelines
to
Ward's
inclusion.
S
Inclusive
work
in
the
city,
arts
and
cultural
and
cultural
organizations
are
blossoming
beyond
their
arts
and
culture
roles
in
Boulder.
In
addition
to
being
model
organizations
of
artistic
excellence
in
all
arts
modalities,
visual,
musical
dance,
theater,
historical
and
curatorial,
they
were
making
dynamic
strides
towards
inclusion
and
collaboration
with
non
arts
community
organizations
that
we
haven't
seen
before.
In
the
past
two
years,
we
have
witnessed
a
number
of
non
arts,
community
organizations
being
included
in
arts
and
culture
projects
and
meaningful
and
impactful
ways.
These
include
and
are
not
limited
to
the
community
foundation.
S
Boulder
Valley
School,
District,
right
relationship,
Boulder,
El,
Centro,
Amistad,
circle
of
care
out,
Boulder
and
black
lives
matter
5280.
The
Arts
Commission
has
demanded
this
from
our
cultural
and
artistic
organizations,
they're
all
rising
to
the
challenge.
Arts
organizations
doing
high-quality
critical
community
building
cannot
be
unseen
and
unsupported
by
the
city.
These
organizations
work
incredibly
hard
to
meet
the
standards
for
these
grants.
We
have
a
responsibility
to
ensure
they
are
merited
for
their
work,
so
they
can
continue
creating
genuine
genuine
avenues
of
engagement
for
boulders,
underserved
and
marginalized
communities.
S
We
had
some
conversations
with
some
organizations
after
the
last
grant
cycle
and
some
members
of,
especially
in
particular
in
the
small
grants
organizations
left
pretty
despondent.
It's
not
just
if
they
will
have
to
leave
Boulder
and
find
other
communities
to
do
their
work
in,
but
when
and
we
find
that
that's
a
critical
issue.
So
thank
you
again
for
all
of
your
service.
Thank.
T
Three
rows
are
on
there
talking
about
policing
tactics
and
sheltering
people
and
basically
making
sure
that
you
all
have
compassion
for
those
of
us
who
are
vulnerable
and
need
your
protection,
and
my
sense
is
that
people
don't
feel
that
you
are
showing
us
compassion
and
taking
care
of
business
in
the
way
that
needs
to
be
done
to
make
sure
that
your
constituents
are
safe
as
I'm
sure
you
all
know.
The
plan
for
flood
mitigation
for
South
Boulder
Creek
got
flushed
down
the
toilet
yesterday.
T
So
that's
the
lack
of
compassion
that
I'm
here
to
talk
about.
You
all
chose
this
single
plan
that
Cu
told
you
was
a
dead
end
that
everyone
in
harm's
way
told
you
it
was
a
dead
end
and
that
your
expert
advisory
board
Rabb
told
you
was
a
dead
end.
We
all
in
my
neighborhood,
pleaded
with
you
not
to
pick
variant
one,
because
that
would,
for
sure
mean
delays
and
delays
since
lives
are
in
danger,
is
something
that
we
were
so
eager
to
avoid,
and
that's
especially
true
because
we
had
three
other
viable
options.
T
T
Don't
know
what
your
end
goal
is,
but
common
sense
tells
me
it
cannot
be
to
protect
lives
as
quickly
as
possible,
because
if
that
had
been
your
goal,
you
wouldn't
have
gone
with
the
option
that
was
guaranteed
to
create
delays
where
at
nine
months
it's
probably
going
to
be
years.
So
I
would
ask
at
this
point.
What
are
you
planning
to
do?
T
U
Sigil
mountain
heights,
I
have
to
respectfully
disagree
with
Rachel
I
think
it's
really
disingenuous
for
Francis
to
now
say
this
and
bring
up
the
neighborhood
down
stream.
All
the
boulder
is
affected
by
overtopping
on
on
the
highway.
You
know
36,
and
sometimes
things
take
time
to
do
things
right
like
we
like
change
a
whole
alluvium
takes
time
now.
U
The
deconstruction
at
Alpine
balsam
is
like
something
that
really
needs
to
be
thought
out
very
carefully
and
the
reuse
value
of
the
embodied
energy.
The
full
lifecycle,
analysis
of
all
the
products
that
go
into
a
building
taking
each
nail
out
all
the
labor.
All
of
this
stuff
is
really
costly
and
so
I
say
thanks
twice,
we
probably
could
do
some
creative
architecture.
In
spite
of
what
Susanne
saying
that
it's
dark
and
everything
there
are
ways
to
do
things.
V
Good
evening,
Council
I'm,
Dianne,
Karl
and
I
live
in
Boulder,
South
Boulder
I'm
here
to
talk
about
the
FA
s
plan
westbound
jet
departures
over
Boulder
we've
sent
you
information
and
we
can
share
with
other
people
who
would
like
to
have
it.
But
the
short
story
is
that
FAA
in
about
2013
ramped
up
their
flights
over
Boulder,
they
changed
the
direction
of
the
Parcher
flight
path,
one
of
them
and
by
2017
everybody
was
noted,
noticing
major
noise
problems
in
South
Boulder.
V
It's
like
having
a
jet
freeway
overhead
when
they
turn
on
that
hitting
and
send
the
planes
over
us.
The
rock
faces
to
the
west
of
our
town
really
create
a
lot
of
extra
noise
reverberating
noise,
and
this
is
not
accounted
for
in
any
of
their
computer
simulated
noise
studies.
So
they
treat
us
like
we're
flat
ground
and
we're
not
and
a
lot
of
people
down
there
really
suffering.
From
this
extra
noise
we've
been
trying
to
work
with
the
FAA
me
for
a
couple
of
years.
V
A
group
of
people
have
continuously
worked
on
it
and
the
FAA
is
not
too
interested
in
listening,
but
just
recently
they
put
out
their
final
plan
for
what
they
wanted
to
do
for
the
jet
pathways
and
decided
and
graciously
to
move
the
one
we're
suffering
under
0.5
miles
to
the
south
of
the
city
limit
the
southern
city
limit,
which
really
does
not
solve
anything.
They
admit
that
it's
not
going
to
solve
the
problem,
so
we
are
hoping
that
you
will
help
us
get
them
to
adopt
a
complete
zimmer
noise
resolution.
V
This
would
adjust
the
departure
route
south
of
Rocky
Flats,
where
they
were
historically
in
the
deadline.
For
this
comment
is
June
6.
We
hope
you
will
take
supportive
action
before
that
date.
The
FAA
has
not
been
responsive
to
citizen
groups.
We
need
your
help
to
restore
some
peace
and
quiet
in
our
neighborhoods.
Thank
you.
Thank.
W
Good
evening
I'm
Lyndhurst
I
live
in
southeast
boulder
I've
been
sending
this
to
you
now
for
four
years,
so
I'm
hoping
that
maybe
some
of
you
will
reconsider
Alpine
balsam
as
a
homeless,
shelter.
Instead
of
offices
as
a
homeless,
shelter,
the
rooms
would
be
efficiency
apartments.
They
each
have
a
bed,
furniture,
TV,
closet,
dresser
sinks,
bathrooms
the
nurses
stations
can
be
converted
to
common
areas.
The
common
areas
can
have
a
small
kitchen.
The
extra
rooms
on
the
floor
can
be
a
library,
computer,
room
classrooms,
laundry
rooms,
exercise,
equipment.
W
Each
floor
can
be
separated
into
a
male
wing,
a
female
wing
couples
wing
family
wing.
You
could
have
a
limited
living
in
a
hospice
wing,
the
ER
could
become
a
doctor's
office
or
it
could
be
a
people's
clinic.
The
lobby
can
have
a
dentist
office
or
dental
aide.
You
could
have
your
gift
shop,
which
already?
Is
there
your
optician
glass
store
a
hearing?
Aids
store
pharmacy,
a
thrift
store
beauty
shop,
barber
shop,
coffee
shop,
bakery
flower
shop,
it's
endless.
The
main
lobby
can
be
open
to
the
public.
W
You
have
a
live,
a
records
room
downstairs
that
can
become
a
library.
You
have
a
cafe
already
there.
It
could
be
called
it
down
under.
It
could
all
be
open
to
the
public.
The
records
of
the
upper
floors,
elevators
and
stairs
could
be
accessible
only
by
a
keycard.
The
top
floor
would
be
reserved
for
teens
14
to
21
accessible
by
a
special
key
card
that
only
they
would
have
that
would
keep
them
safe
and
protected.
The
main
floor
has
a
lot
of
back
rooms
accessible
only
by
hallways.
These
could
be
used
as
classrooms.
W
You
get
a
valid
the
job,
training
and
HVAC
plumbing
electrical
computers,
landscaping,
social
media,
food
service,
accounting
secretarial.
They
could
get
their
diplomas,
not
GEDs,
they
could
apply
to
colleges
and
get
grants.
They
would
be
qualified
to
get
jobs
because
now
they
would
have
an
address.
Thank
you.
Thank
you
right.
Thank
you.
X
One
of
the
speakers
tonight
miss
Collette
was
talking
about
the
FAA
and
we
had
scheduled
that
later
this
evening,
but
I
can
address
it
now,
if
you'd.
Rather
so
there
was
a
public
meeting,
a
series
of
public
meetings
by
the
FAA
at
the
end
of
April
and
early
May.
Our
staff
attended
those
and
our
understanding
and
listening
to
the
comments
that
we're
receiving
from
our
residents.
The
last
time
that
the
FAA
asked
for
comments
was
in
2017
and
Mayor.
X
Suzanne
Jones
sent
a
letter
to
the
FAA,
which
perhaps
resulted
in
some
of
the
minor
changes
that
they're
making.
Now
the
deadline
for
current
comments
is
June
6th
and
we
are
working
with
Mayor
Jones
to
send
a
letter
on
behalf
of
our
community,
urging
the
FAA
to
make
further
changes
to
support
our
request
that
noise
be
reduced
in
self
older.
So
that
will
be
sent
out
on
time
and
we
urge
the
residents
to
send
letters
as
well.
Y
X
So
he
mr.
Feeny,
appeared
I
think
several
weeks
ago,
April
to
make
these
statements
and
the
the
answer
to
those
statements
is
that
apparently,
because
mobile
home
mobile
homes
are
located
in
parks
and
my
private
private
property
owners,
we
are
not
able
to
enforce
it.
I
checked
in
with
staff,
and
they
told
me
that
they
had
spoken
with
mr.
Feeny
before
and
that
there's
not
a
change
in
the
interpretation
of
the
ordinance.
X
X
Y
A
Z
Z
U
AA
Hi
Merry
Christmas
checking
around
planning
director
so
to
clarify
your
question
a
little
bit
the
question
of
the
construction.
That's
happening
on
the
site
now
versus
the
process
that
they're
going
through
to
obtain
their
rights.
Easement
now
is
that
what
you're
really
asking
uh-huh,
so
they
you're
correct
that
the
construction
is
underway
at
that
site
and
actually
the
second
item
in
this
revocable
is
related
to
the
bridge
on
the
site,
and
the
bridge
is
also
already
in
place.
So,
at
the
very
end
of
the
memo
we
talked
about,
the
matrix
of
options.
AA
AA
The
overall
design
that
master
site
design
was
approved
as
a
part
of
the
overall
site
review,
including
that
bridge
connection
and
then
the
ditch
and
the
Slough
that
runs
through
the
site.
It's
a
matter
of
just
making
sure
that
they
have
that
right,
revocable
lease
because
they're
crossing
a
city
easement
in
this
city
code.
It
talks
about
that.
If
you,
if
you're
gonna,
cross
the
city
easement
I'm,
you
need
to
be
able
to
have
a
revocable
lease
for
that
that
space.
Z
Okay,
so
let
me
see,
if
I
understand
this,
so
it
was
approved,
it's
night
review
and
the
bridges
were
there
at
site
review,
and
so
this
is
kind
of
like
doing
the
the
construction
work
and
the
permits
for
something
such
as
those
bridge
are
obtained
during
that
part
of
the
process
not
prior
to
site
review,
correct.
Okay,
thank
you.
E
B
A
C
X
So
the
next
item
on
the
agenda
is
Lynette
indicated
is
the
Supplemental
public
appropriation
which
we
always
called
the
first,
a
judgment
adjustment
to
base
I,
don't
know
Josie,
but
Gina
has
been
with
the
city
for
a
number
of
years
and
works
with
the
budget
department.
Our
Budget
Officer
Katy
was
not
able
to
be
here
this
evening,
so
Gina.
Let's
take
it
away.
AB
So
each
year's
council
has
the
opportunity
to
adjust
the
annual
budget,
so
we
usually
usually
these
requests
fall
under
one
of
these
four
categories:
they're
new
or
additional
revenues
received,
but
we're
not
budgeted.
There
are
projects
that
started
in
a
prior
year,
but
not
completed
also
grant
revenues.
AB
Okay,
how's
that
all
right
and
the
fourth,
the
last
category
here
are
additional
priority
needs
that
were
identified
since
the
annual
budget
process.
We
bring
forward
two
formal
supplemental
budgets
annually
in
May
and
November,
and
occasionally
we
have
a
need
for
an
off
cycle:
supplemental
for
special
things
like
tax
initiatives
that
were
approved,
but
not
budget.
The
revenues
and
expenses
were
budgeted
or
time-sensitive.
Large
item
needs
where
the
funding
needs
to
be
done
before
we
can
get
it
into
one
of
our
formal
supplementals.
AB
So
we
typically
have
two
types
of
carry
overs.
The
in
the
first
adjustment
to
base
typically
has
our.
We
have
to
time.
Sorry,
we
typically
have
two
types
of
budget
adjustments.
Carry
overs
and
supplementals
typically
carry
overs
are
in
the
first
adjustment
to
base
only,
and
these
are
usually
project,
often
for
capital
or
operating
projects
such
as
master
plans.
We
also
have
carryovers
for
grants
where
the
timing
of
the
awards
are
different
from
the
fiscal
year.
AB
Here
is
a
slide
that
has
our
previous
three
years,
plus
2019
of
our
first
adjustment
to
base
and
if
you'll
notice,
there's
a
big
variance
between
2016
and
2017
and
2018
and
2019
in
restricted
funds.
That's
due
largely
to
capital
project
carryover.
The
general
fund,
as
you
can
see
in
2016
and
17,
have
been
about
17
million
dollars.
AB
AB
So
this
slide
just
represents
a
few
of
the
types
of
adjustments
that
we
have
in
in
the
first
adjustment
who
pays
for
the
general
fund,
for
example,
of
that
12.2
million
in
carryover
in
the
general
fund.
There's
about
three
million
dollars
in
there
for
innovation,
technology
and
capital.
Carryover,
there's
also
nine
hundred
thousand
dollars,
for
this
got
carbon
to
pool
and
2.4
million
for
electric
utility
development
and
about
$600,000
for
substance,
abuse,
awareness
and
as
part
as
for
our
new
supplementals.
AB
That
total
was
about
16
million
dollars
and
of
that
I
already
mentioned
the
11.8
5
for
the
hospital
deconstruction.
There's
also
addressing
some
unfunded
needs
here
for
fire
station
3,
and
also
additional
for
the
fire
station
deficiencies
and
equity
compliance
and
the
fire's
fire
record
management
system
and
those
total
about
a
little
over
2
million
dollars.
There
are
also
additional
resources
for
marijuana,
licensing
and
compliance,
and
what
I
didn't
mention
before
was
that.
D
C
AB
AB
Z
There's
a
reference
to
I'll
read
the
paragraph
workload
related
to
marijuana.
Businesses
has
increased
substantially
over
the
past
five
years,
as
the
industry
has
changed
and
matured
without
additional
dedicated
resources
in
lieu
of
capping
marijuana
businesses.
The
working
group
is
requesting
the
following.
Additional
resources
and
I
was
curious
to
know
what
working
group
that
was
referring
to.
X
Z
AB
So
the
revenue
brings
an
approximate
leave.
The
marijuana
revenue
brings
it
approximately
four
million
dollars
to
the
general
fund
every
year,
and
so
that
amount
is
being
is
going
to
be
reclassified
as
ongoing
revenue
and
currently
with
our
expenditures.
We
have
about
two
million
dollars
that
we're
using
for
our
ongoing
needs
and
there's
about
two
million.
That's
going
to
be
available
for
ongoing
needs
for
future
use.
So.
X
Just
to
clarify
I'm
jeanna
said
I'm
going
to
say
it
a
different
way
in
the
past.
We
have
used
these
marijuana
revenues
as
one-time
revenues
because
of
the
position
that
the
federal
government
takes
with
regard
to
them.
But
we
now
believe
that
in
starting
in
2020,
not
that
sure,
but
in
2020
we
will
be
recommending
that
council
count
them
as
ongoing
revenues,
so
we're
already
taking
two
million
off
the
top.
For
so
doing,
the
marijuana
work
itself
and
the
additional
two
million
that
we'll
be
getting
will
be
using
for
general
fund
purposes
and.
X
Y
So
a
good
question
and
I
don't
know
if
this
is
the
right
place
to
ask
it.
I
can
wait
but
I
put
out
a
question
tonight
about
about
our
April
9th
study
session
and
we
looked
at
a
whole
bunch
of
other
options
or
other
things
that
we
were
interested
in
and
I
really
don't
see.
An
accounting
of
all
of
that
and
so
I'm
wondering
where
that
is
so.
X
We
didn't,
we
decided,
we
decided
not
to
sort
of
rehash
that
the
items
that
you
put
in
your
hotline
are
these
fire
station
deficiency
and
equity
compliance
are
in
this
first
adjustment
to
base
and
that's
I
thought
that
was
up
there,
but
I
guess
not
the
you.
Would
we
had
transportation,
core
maintenance
and
operations
again
in
the
first
adjustment
to
base,
then
in
the
2020
budget.
What
we
intend
to
bring
forward
is
the
municipal
building
east
door
entry
and
we
can't
do
it
now,
because
we're
still
finalizing
costs
on
that.
X
Y
This
report
I
mean
reading
this
tonight
was
really
somewhat
difficult.
I,
don't
think
it
was
really
well
put
out
there
in
terms
of
what
we're
approving-
and
you
know
we
went
from
April
9th
to
to
tonight
or
today's
memo,
and
it's
like
apples
and
oranges.
So
I'm,
just
you
know,
I
do
have
a
slide
from
the
April
9th
meeting.
AB
AB
X
So
we
discussed
on
april
9th
is
that
we
do
not
have
the
current
dollars
to
fund
all
of
these
items,
and
so
actually,
as
a
result
of
the
April
9th
discussion,
is
why
we
had
the
meeting
last
Thursday
to
talk
about
whether
or
not
we
were
going
to
be
moving
forward
with
Alpine
balsam
and
the
hospital
deconstruction,
particularly
because
we
know
that
the
total
cost
for
that
is
going
to
be
somewhere
between
11
million
and
16
million.
I
think
we
chose
the
larger
number
and
the
council
directed
us
to
move
forward
with
the
hospital
deconstruction.
X
X
Will
be
finding
money
for
that
see
what
other
ones
wage
increase
will
take
effect
in
2020
the
transportation,
core
maintenance
and
operations
we
funded
in
this
first
adjustment
to
base
the
library
master
plan
will
be
in
2020.
The
radio
services
will
be
in
2020,
so
almost
all
of
them
are
ones
that
we
are
going
to
take
care
of
either
this
year.
Next,
okay,.
Y
AB
So
some
examples
in
our
restricted
funds
of
budget
carryovers
are,
and
the
total
of
this
was
about
one
hundred
and
fifty
six
million
dollars
in
total
carryover
there's
about-
and
these
are
just
some
examples
of
items
that
are
in
there-
that
this
is
not
indicative
of
everything.
There's
eight
hundred
thousand
dollars
in
community
housing
assistant
programs,
there's
about
16
million
dollars
in
the
community,
cultural
and
safety
tax
and
8.1
million
of
that
is
bond
proceeds
for
fire
station
three.
How
much.
AB
Well,
total:
well,
I,
don't
have
total
CF,
you
know,
majority
of
the
hundred
and
fifty
six
million
dollars
is
CIP
and
a
large
portion
of
that
is
in
the
utilities.
Funds-
that's
64
million
dollars
between
all
of
those
funds,
there's
also
15
million
dollars
in
the
open
space
fund,
so
the
utility
fund.
Just
for
an
example,
the
wastewater
fund
has
32
million
dollars
alone
in
CIP,
carryover
for
very
sewer
replacements
and
rehabs
and
OSP.
The
15
million
dollar
carryover
includes
about
seven
and
a
half
million
for
current
and
future
acquisition
of
lands.
AB
So
moving
on
to
the
budget
supplemental
examples,
this
vision,
zero
implementation
is
also
part
of
that
transportation,
core
and
maintenance
operations,
and
that's
about
six
hundred
thousand
dollars
so
also
there's
additional
funding
for
the
scott
carpenter
pool
and
the
amount
of
1.5
million
climate
action
plan,
tax
programs
initiatives,
a
630
million
and
about
360,000
dollars
in
various
Parks
and
Rec
grants.
Six.
AB
E
Y
You
know.
This
is
not
a
really
good
way
to
move
forward
with
the
budget
and
in
presentations
and
in
the
materials
given
to
us.
It
needs
to
be
spelled
out
exactly
what
money
is
being
spent
for
the
council
to
know
and
for
the
public
to
be
aware
of,
and
doing
this
at
the
last
minute
doesn't
work.
Okay,.
AB
So
I
want
to
make
a
note
that
the
packet
actually
contained
two
copies
of
ordinance.
83
25,
one
with
the
hospital
T
construction
costs
and
one
without
and
staff
is
recommending
consideration
of
the
version
with
the
deconstruction
costs
in
it.
And
that's
the
end
of
the
presentation.
I
stand
for
any
further
questions.
AC
E
C
Y
A
C
Not
gonna
argue
with
Lisa,
but
I
do
want
to
just
state
for
the
record
that
when
we
met
last,
we
can
discuss
this
pretty
extensively.
The
the
net
result
was
we
already
construct
some
of
the
hospital
buildings,
but
not
all
of
them.
The
construction
will
involve
about
3/4
of
the
square
footage
of
the
buildings
in
existence.
The
other
quarter
will
be
preserved.
That
includes
the
Breton
building
the
parking
garage
and
the
pavilion
building
that
we
have
some
work
to
do
on
the
pavilion
and
the
cost
of
that.
Y
And
I
appreciate
that
I
I'm
talking
about
the
part
that
is
being
discussed,
I,
don't
see.
There's
been
no
discussion
about
reuse
of
the
basement
and
to
use
it
as
council
chambers,
underground
theater,
some
other
kind
of
creative
space,
there's
210
thousand
square
feet
of
rooms
that
I
think
could
be
repurposed,
and
so
anyway,
I
want
to
see
another
analysis
and
I'm
not
willing
to
move
forward
on
this
request.
C
B
C
A
AD
The
purpose
of
this
agenda
item
is
to
discuss
the
potential
emerging.
It's
an
emergency
ordinance
to
to
prohibit
the
city
manager
for
a
period
of
approximately
nine
months
to
from
issuing
business
licenses
to
commercial
electric
scooter,
businesses
scooter
companies,
it
would
not
prohibit
the
use
of
East
scooters
on
streets.
It
would
prohibit
the
use
of
these
scooters
on
sidewalks
multi-use
trails
and
on
open
space
to
be
clear.
Current
law
prohibits
that,
but
it's
to
get
to
that
point.
AD
Several
East
guta
companies
have
expressed
an
interest
in
operating
in
Boulder
we've
seen,
as
many
of
you
probably
seen
the
impact
of
these
scooters
around
the
country.
It
has
different
impacts
in
different
places,
they've
prevent
it
presented
safety,
environmental
and
particular
disability
challenges
because
they
tend
to
be
left
on
sidewalks.
A
scooters
could
provide
an
environmental
and
social
benefit.
I
can't
tell
you
how
this
is
going
to
come
out,
one
of
the
things
that
we
have
learned
over
the
last
few
years.
AD
The
community
engagement
before
making
major
decisions
is
incredibly
important
in
the
quality
of
those
decisions.
I
think
back
to
the
process
that
we
use
for
short-term
rentals,
and
many
of
you
may
recall
that
when
we
first
did
short-term
rentals,
the
plan
was
to
ban
them
because
the
hotel
industry
wanted
that
and
then
this
room
filled
up
with
a
bunch
of
people
who
were
doing
it
and
council
engaged
in
a
long
legislative
process.
AD
AD
Some
of
the
things
that
you
need
to
look
at
is
how
you
regulate
the
scooter
companies
there's
some
interesting
technology.
That's
out
there
that
we
don't
know
how
good
it
is
or
whether
it
works
that
well
I,
think
that
should
be
explored
where,
where
they're
allowed,
there
are
pros
and
cons
of
allowing
them
a
multi-use
paths
that
that
need
a
real
good
community
conversation
to
developed.
AD
Obviously,
open
space
is
a
completely
separate
question,
I'm,
not
suggesting
that
e
scooters
be
allowed
on
open
space,
but
it
certainly
should
be
part
of
the
conversation
and
then
some
raised
it
and
CAC.
One
of
the
questions
that
I
think
needs
to
be
addressed
is
what
about
other
potential
micro
mobility
options
like
electronic
skateboards,
which
we're
seeing
around
Boulder
with
some
frequency.
Now
we
don't
have
any
framework
for
regulating
them
and
we
don't
really
know
about
them.
So
the
plan
is
to
well
I,
actually
have
a
little
bit
of
data.
That's
really
fascinating.
AD
AD
But
you
can
see
that
the
number
of
dock
bites
has
gone
up
in
9%
from
2017,
so
we're
seeing
station
based
bikes
growing
as
a
micro
mobility
tool,
but
we're
also
seeing
around
the
country
and
a
significant
increase
in
the
use
of
shared
scooters.
Some
interesting
safety
information.
This
was
in
an
article
that
was
attached
to
there's
actually
a
study
that
was
that
was
linked
from
the
memo
they
did.
AD
The
Center
for
Disease
Control
did
a
study
in
Austin
Texas
from
September
5th
through
November
30th
2018,
and
they
found
that
during
that
period,
271
people
were
injured.
On
scooters,
half
of
them
had
hell
had
head
injuries.
That
would
have
been
preventable
by
wearing
a
helmet.
55
percent
were
injured
in
the
street
33
percent
on
sidewalks
33
percent
had
drink
alcohol
in
the
last
12
hours.
I'm
sure
that
shocks,
everybody
and
33
percent
were
injured
on
their
scooter.
AD
Ride
and
I
put
these
out
there
because
it
suggests
that
there
are
some
frameworks
for
potential
regulation
that
might
address
some
of
the
safety
problems.
If
that's
a
major
concern
for
council
I
think
understanding
this
data
better
and
understanding
what
our
community
expects
better
is
part
of
the
reason
for
doing
a
community
engagement
project,
and
so
the
motion
that
we
proposed
is
to
I.
Have
this?
Do
you
have
you
passed
these
emergency
ordinances,
as
provided
in
the
packet.
C
Question
is
probably
for
Kathleen
or
DK.
The
proposed
motion
talks
about
a
nine-month
process
and
I
agree
with
everything.
Tom
said
about
community-engaged
I
know,
that's
gonna
be
important.
We
would
have
to
get
tab
involved,
but
do
you
think
it
would
be
possible
to
do
this
in
a
shorter
period
of
time,
in
the
period
of
time
that
I'd
like
to
just
throw
out
there
would
be
before
this
council
adjourns
in
November
so
in
other
words,
make
the
moratorium
more
in
the
range
of
five
to
six
months?
C
AE
AE
So
that
is
part
of
the
recommendation
around
the
nine
months
is
just
making
sure
there's
enough
time
if
the,
if
the
desire
of
council
was
to
do
it
in
a
shorter
amount
of
time,
we
could
read
juggle
things
and
try
our
best
to
do
that.
The
concern
is
just
short,
changing
it
and
not
having
enough
time
to
get
all
of
the
stakeholders
involved
and
have
an
opportunity
to
do
the
full
robust
process
and
to
develop
the
regulations
that
takes
a
process
as
well.
AE
There's
a
lot
of
changing
information,
that's
going
on
around
the
country
in
terms
of
best
practice.
We
want
to
learn
from
that
and
apply
it
here.
So
it's
it's
having
the
time
to
do
a
well
thought
out
and
bust
process
so
and
there's
lots
of
things
happening
at
the
same,
at
the
same
time,
too,
with
the
transportation
master
plan
and
a
lot
of
the
other
projects
that
were
working
on.
So
it's
the
same
team
working
on
these
same
projects,
but
we
understand
the
importance
of
these
new
devices.
A
Y
So
we
got
a
couple
of
emails
from
two
of
our
tab:
transportation,
advisory
board
members,
and
they
both
stated
that
this
came
out
that
very
late
in
the
meeting
wasn't
on
the
agenda.
I
guess
and
it
was
somewhat
of
a
surprise
to
even
be
there
and
so
on
that
agenda
and
they
both
recommend
against
a
moratorium
and
to
get
tab
much
more
involved.
And
so
what
do
you
could
we
do?
That
I
mean
I.
Guess
I'm
wondering
why
tab
was
not
brought
into
the
process
earlier,
since
they
are
our
transportation
advisory
board.
Y
AE
So
there's
two
parts
to
that
all
and
I'll
answer
both
the
it
is
very
important
to
have
taps
involvement
in
engagement
in
this
topic
on
all
of
our
transportation
topics
so
and
there's
a
lot
of
items
on
tabs
agenda
as
well.
Initially,
this
item
was
scheduled
for
the
June
tab
meeting
as
a
full
agenda
item.
At
that
time.
This
item
tonight
was
scheduled
for
the
June
18th
council
meeting
because
of
the
state
the
passage
of
the
state
legislation
earlier
in
May.
AE
We
needed
to
accelerate
the
timeframe
of
this
in
order
to
be
able
to
act
quickly
and
bring
this
forward
to
unit
in
a
timely
manner.
So
at
the
May
tab,
meeting
I
did
provide
an
update
to
tab
under
matters
from
staff
and
I
shared
with
them.
The
memo
that
we
provided
for
councils,
so
all
of
this
became
very
accelerated
because
of
the
quick
action
that
was
taken
through
the
state
legislative
process.
So
we
certainly
do
not
want
to
leave
tab
out
of
the
process.
AE
We
welcome
their
input
and
their
guidance
and
all
of
the
work
that
we
do
and
we
want
to
continue
to
work
with
them
on
this.
Going
forward
and
having
in-depth
conversations
and
public
hearings
with
them
and
also
co-hosting
public
events
with
tab.
So
we've
talked
about
the
importance
of
having
opportunities
for
community
members
to
try
scooters,
there's
people
who
never
tried
one,
and
so
how
do
we
create
a
place
to
do
that?
And
how
do
we
co-host
that
with
tab,
so
I
think
there's
a
lot
of
opportunities
to
work
together
and.
AD
Answer
the
we
were
involved
in
the
state
process.
This
was
mostly
pushed
by
Denver
to
address
some
concerns
that
they
had
so
CML
was
actually
supporting
it.
We
tried
to
get
a
later
implementation
date
to
give
us
more
time.
We
didn't
get
that
what
we
basically
couldn't
oppose
it,
because
one
of
our
colleagues
was
supporting
it
in
CML.
AD
Cml
was
supporting
it,
so
we
had.
We
had
that
and
it
was
passed
on
May,
9th
without
an
effective
date,
and
generally
legislation
like
this
has
some
date,
like
usually
July
1st.
So
that's
what
we
were
anticipating
when
was
passed
without
effective
date.
It
becomes
effective
the
day,
the
governor
signs
it
and
he
hasn't
signed
it
yet.
So
we
original
plan
and,
as
Kathleen
said,
was
to
bring
this
to
Council
in
June,
have
a
thorough
process
before
tab.
AD
E
AD
E
AD
I
think
that's
right!
That's
what
I've
heard
congestion
I
know
there
was
never.
There
was
a
plan
to
bring
tab
in
we
kind
of
got
a
little
sidetracked,
as
we
often
are
by
the
legislature
and
again
this
past
May
9th
and
we're
here
May
21st
before
you.
So
there
wasn't
a
lot
of
time
between
that
day,
the.
E
Other
thing
I'd
like
to
say
about
tab
is
that
when
we
first
talked
about
this
sometime
in
the
past
right
in
terms
of
the
the
scooters
and
I
can't
remember
when
that
was,
but
there
has
been
some
notification
to
the
city
and
to
the
boards
that
this
is
something
that
the
council
has
been
interested
in,
at
least
in
terms
of
regulation,
if
not
trying
to
get
something
scheduled,
so
it
shouldn't
I.
Don't
think
it
should
be
a
complete
surprise
because
it
has
come
before
us
before
so.
A
I'll
call
myself
I
had
a
conversation
with
the
bird
representative
and
spoke
to
them
about
what
they've
seen
in
other
communities-
and
it
was
pretty
thought-provoking
things
Denver
has
done,
is
I
believed
that
they
have
contracted
to
allow
a
handful
of
companies
to
scooters
in
and
they've
capped
the
number
per
company.
So
there's
an
RFP
process,
and
then
you
know
they
selected
the
more
what
they
perceive
to
be
the
more
responsible
operators
and
then
they've
been
gradually
increasing.
AE
A
Is
that
correct?
That's
right!
That's
correct!
Okay,
and
so
it's
part
of
the
public
outreach
here.
It
seems
that
anything
that
qualifies
as
micro,
mobility
and
I
know
we're
worried
about
a
particular
business
model
here
that
is
kind
of
becoming
very
popular,
and
we
want
to
get
the
regulatory
structure
in
place.
Z
A
AD
AE
Z
And
in
that
video
they
talked
about,
one
of
the
things
talked
about
many
things,
but
one
of
the
things
that
talked
about
was
the
the
life
and
that
dispose
of
the
disposable
feature.
I
guess
of
these
scooters,
so
I
was
wondering
if,
as
part
of
the
outreach
and
how
this
gets,
this
ordinance
gets
pulled
together.
There's
been
any
consideration
of
including
it
within
the
framework
of
the
zero
waste
right.
AE
I
think
that's
a
really
important
component
of
this
and
information
that
we
do
need
to
consider
as
part
of
this
DK
has
done
the
research
again
through
with
the
City
and
County
of
Denver,
as
well
as
their
research
sources
around
approximately
30
day,
lifecycle
of
a
scooter,
and
so
it
is
concerning
from
the
durability
and
the
zero
waste
approach.
So
appreciate
that
suggestion.
Y
Would
hope
in
this?
Whatever
we
end
up
doing
that
we
do
look
at
these
other
components.
Skateboards
I
mean
people
are
skateboarding
all
over
the
place,
all
they're
kind
of
micro,
mobility
options
and
the
zero
waste
thing
is
really
important
and,
as
I
understand
it
right
now,
these
a
scooters
are
designed
for
like
four
hours
a
day,
not
24/7
and
use,
and
so
I'm
wondering
what
kind
of
leverage
we
could
use
to
require
more.
AE
Y
AE
So
there's
and
there's
a
lot
of
different
business
models
out
there
and
that's
why
we
we
spent
the
time
to
develop
our
ductless
bike,
share,
permit
program
so
that
we
would
incentivize
the
quality
bikes
that
are
there
and
that
are
built
for
the
long
term
versus
there
are
ductless
bike
shares
that
are
very
similar
in
terms
of
lesser
quality
and
don't
have
that
durability
there.
So
that
was
again
part
of
how
we
approached
it
for
those
other
items.
But
those
are
all
things
we
need
to
look
at
as
part
of
this
work.
No,
that's.
AC
AC
Some
of
our
transportation
master
plan
goals
we
are
far
behind
on
our
goal:
to
reduce
greenhouse
gas
emissions
from
the
transportation
sector
are
going
to
reduce
vehicle
miles
traveled
from
cars
and
our
goal
to
reduce
single
occupancy
vehicle
use.
We
need
to
do
more
to
reduce
our
climate
impacts,
get
people
out
of
their
cars
and
the
process
make
our
community
healthy
and
more
walkable.
Electric
scooters
first
came
to
market
in
late
2017
and
quickly
proved
themselves
to
be
a
viable,
clean
transportation.
Alternative
to
car
travel,
particularly
for
trips
of
five
miles
or
less.
AC
These
shared
scooters
have
had
a
faster
rise
than
bike
share.
Car
share
and
ride
share
by
far
it's
a
cheap
and
easy
way
to
get
around
and
which
is
less
than
$3
100
cities
that
have
scooters
and,
according
to
a
populist
report
from
2018
70
percent
of
the
public
support
these
scooters
in
their
cities,
solutions
scooters
fill
in
the
gaps,
they
replace
short
distance
car
trips
and
they
provide
first
last
mile
solutions
for
potential
transit
riders,
I
have
friends
and
colleagues
that
come
to
Boulder
and
fire
up
their
bird
scooter.
AC
App
I
look
around
for
a
scooter
that
this
technology
is
already
prevalent
in
other
cities.
It's
an
expected
amenity,
especially
in
a
place
like
Boulder.
Two
months
ago,
the
Fort
Collins
City
Council
approved
an
ordinance
to
allow
electric
scooters
in
their
city.
So
the
question
is:
why
is
Boulder
so
far
behind?
This
is
a
position
ourselves
to
be
a
late
adopter
three
years
behind
the
curve.
I
am
frustrated
because
we
should
have
put
together
a
plan
last
summer
and
now
we're
saying
we
need
to
wait
until
next
summer
to
introduce
scooters.
AC
AC
D
AC
AF
The
numbers
are
staggering:
as
Tom
noted
last
year,
in
the
US
alone,
we
just
saw
40
million
trips
happen,
so
we
know
it's
coming,
it's
happening
everywhere
and
it's
as
a
new
form
of
micro
mobility.
As
long
as
it's
managed
appropriately
planned,
it
can
be
a
valuable
tool
for
addressing
our
first
final
mile
challenge
as
the
young
man
who
just
went
before
me
noted.
So
we
appreciate
the
boulder
transportation
departments
desire
to
innovate
and
we
encourage
the
coordination
between
the
operators
in
the
city
in
order
to
get
it
right.
AF
But
let's
get
there
quickly,
as
councilmember
Yates,
just
noted
as
councilmember
Brocket
noted
on
the
hotline
today,
let's
move
forward
you'll
a
shin,
a
small
pilot,
rather
than
imposing
a
lengthy
moratorium,
we're
ready
to
support
a
pilot
at
the
boulder
chamber.
We
want
to
explore
these
opportunities
with
our
businesses.
We
look
forward
to
collaborating
around
those
efforts
and
with
the
city
and
other
interested
party,
and
we
want
to
just
try
something:
let's
try.
AF
10
scooters
maybe
20
place
like
Boulder
Junction
or
Flatirons
Business
Park,
where
folks
just
need
to
get
to
some
kind
of
food
options.
Let's
see
what
they
do,
let's
see
how
they're
used
and
overall
we
look
forward
to
to
partnering
on
this.
We
look
forward
to
continuing
the
conversation
about
scooters
and
other
multimodal
options,
because
at
the
chamber
we
want
to
fully
explore
the
possibilities
to
improve
the
mobility
for
our
workforce
and
residents
as
soon
as
possible.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
Yes,.
A
E
AF
I
think
the
memo
that
you
gotten
the
approach
that
the
the
staff
is
taking,
it's
pretty
good.
You
know,
let's
look
at
the
best
practices,
let's
look
at
what's
being
modeled
in
other
cities,
you
know,
didn't
get
it
right
right
away.
City
numbers
had
this
and
I
think
you
know
it
took
them
a
little
bit
to
catch
up
to
now,
where
it's
at.
AF
We
can
get
there
pretty
quickly,
but
I
think
it's
going
to
be
that
focused
and
that
initiative
to
see
what's
worked,
what
hasn't
working
diligently
with
the
operators
to
make
sure
that
they
come
with
a
responsible
business
practices
and
and
figure
out
ideas
and
options,
like
the
gentleman
before
me
mentioned
on
how
we
can
try
something,
but
we
don't
have
to
go.
You
know
crazy.
Let's
just
try
something
small,
like
I
said
just
a
few
and
and
see
what
they
do
and
see
how
they
operate.
Thank
you.
Thanks.
Y
Y
AG
AG
Y
AG
You
know
they've
done
a
lot
of
the
same
stuff
that
we're
proposing
to
some
extent
we're
looking
at
a
more
extensive
public
engagement
process
that
really
that's
the
issues
and
concerns
with
all
of
our
stakeholders
in
the
community,
mobility
for
all
the
local
Coordinating
Council,
the
downtown
Chamber.
AG
Well,
so
that
when
we
do
introduce
a
new
program,
the
community
is
excited
for
it,
and
we've
got
a
good
set
of
regulations
that
were
ready
to
move
forward
with,
and
so
getting
people
on
these
scooters
firsthand
and
all
different
types
of
the
season,
whether
it's
summer
and
fall
or
winter
I,
think
it's
important
for
them
to
see
what
this
is
like
year-round
and
so.
Bringing
this
pilot
program
through
the
fall
and
into
the
winter
is
a
great
opportunity
to
see
how
these
things
really
work
and
those
different
times
of
the
year.
So.
AG
Yeah-
and
there
are
a
lot
of
opportunities,
I
think
to
to
work
with
the
e-scooter
companies-
we're
not
a
we're,
not
against
e
scooters.
We
see
this
as
a
new
form
of
transportation,
it's
fun,
but
there
are
some
considerations
that
we
need
to
really
take
a
look
at.
There
are
safety
issues,
there
are
right-of-way
concerns
and
but
I
think
there's
some
ways
in
which
we
can
really
apply.
AG
Some
innovative
public
engagement
process
he's,
like
Andrea,
had
mentioned
doing
a
small
pilot
program
with
a
business
park
and
seeing
how
that
works,
seeing
how
the
geofencing
technology
works
and
in
really
taking
kind
of
a
more
of
a
long
term
with
focus
groups,
in
addition
to
public
demonstration
events
to
to
really
get
a
handle
and
help
the
community
really
understand
the
impact
good
or
bad
associated
with
e-scooter
use.
So.
AG
What
we
do
is
so,
for
example,
if
we
were
to
choose
a
business
park
and
we
had
say
we
launched
20
to
30
scooters
within
this
business
park
alone.
We
can
geofence
that
area
and
see
how
well
that
particular
technology
works
and
how
it's
being
used
within
the
business
park
itself
and
and
get
a
better
understanding
of
how
it
had
actually
functions.
So.
A
Z
Yeah
I
I
really
appreciated
the
suggestions
that
came
up
during
the
public
hearing
from
mr.
Romer,
in
particular
the
surcharge
to
consider
but
surcharge
for
that
could
be
used
for
public
transit,
also,
a
small
pilot
that
was
suggested
by
Andrea
to
in
particular
at
like
55th
and
Arapaho
to
see
if
it
is
used
for
those
kinds
of
trips,
because,
according
to
the
data
in
the
memo,
those
38
0.5
million
trips
were
done
Friday
afternoon
through
Sunday
evening.
So
they
were
not
getting
used
for
last
mile
or
any
kind
of
commuting
purpose.
Z
And
in
addition,
if
we
could
take
a
look
at
what
happens
after
the
useful
life
of
the
scooter,
what
would
do
these
scooter
companies
do
with
them
and
maybe
examine
what
make
that
part
of
a
potential
RFP
look
at?
How
do
you
dispose
of
them?
And
what
are
you
doing
to
improve
the
life
and
I
think?
That's
all
I
have
great.
E
One
of
the
things
that
I
wanted
to
mention
is
that
I
think
in
terms
of
placing
this
moratorium.
While
we
work
out
the
regulatory
issues
and
hear
from
the
public
has
the
benefit
of
seeing
what
other
communities
have
done
at
San
Francisco,
for
example,
used
the
same
kind
of
model
that
Fort
Collins
is
and
and
ended
up
having
two
smaller
companies
for
its
pilot
programs.
Not
bird,
not
lift,
not
lime.
E
So,
interestingly
enough,
it's
not
until
one
goes
through
the
process
and
can
look
at
the
what
it
is
that
the
community
wants
and
put
the
adequate
regulatory
pieces
in
place
before
we're
just
sort
of
swarmed,
with
these
scooters
I
think
is,
is
a
responsible
way
to
go
in
terms
of
just
trying
to
look
and
see
what
others
have
learned.
For
example,
there
there's
now
a
company,
and
maybe
it
is
bird-
that's
going
docked
so
that
they're
doing
a
long-term
rental.
E
A
AG
And
there's
actually
two
different
things:
okay,
the
the
demonstration
events
would
be
more
of
a
supervised
tour.
If
you
will,
you
know,
including
different
East
gouta
companies,
to
try
out
the
different
types
of
scooters.
They
have
look
at
their
technology,
the
interface
with
the
mobile
phone
and
take
people
for
a
ride
around
the
community
on
these
East
scooters
and
then
the
pilot
program,
which
is
also
part
of
the
public
engagement
program.
Excuse
me,
the
public
engagement
process
would
be
more
contained
versus
having
it
wide
and
for
the
entire
community.
So.
AG
So
I
think
what
we
could
do
is
both
concurrently,
okay
yeah.
We
can
get
the
more
longer-term
understanding
of
how
this
would
work
in
a
say,
a
business
park
like
Flatirons.
Well,
at
the
same
time,
we've
got
several
demonstration
events
throughout
the
course
of
the
year
to
give
people
the
opportunity
to
try
these
out
for
free
first
hand
to
see
how
they
really
work
on
our
streets.
So.
C
AD
C
So
I'll
just
make
my
statement
now.
I
would
given
what
DK
and
Kathleen
have
laid
out
as
far
as
a
demonstration
events
and
pilots
and
all
the
great
comments
from
the
community
and
I.
Like
your
add
on
Sam,
that
we
need
to
investigate
more
than
just
electro
scooters.
I
would
be
in
favor
of
a
moratorium.
I
thought
I'd.
Never
would
say
that
out
loud.
This
may
be
the
first
forever
I
would
be
in
favor
moratorium
just
so
that
we
are
thoughtful
and
methodical
about
the
process
sounds
like
we've
got
a
quick
plan.
C
There's
gonna
be
comprehensive,
however,
I
would
like
to
make
it
as
short
as
possible.
I
we
can
always
extend
a
moratorium.
I
mean
we
can
pick
an
arbitrary
date
and
then
we
get
to
that
data,
and
we
just
haven't
quite
done
our
work.
We
can
always
extend
oratorio
I'm
afraid
if
we
have
a
long
word
for
EM
we're
gonna
fill
this
space
right.
C
We're
we're
gonna
get
the
work
done,
the
time
that
we
give
ourselves
so
I'd
like
to
shorten
that
up,
and
it's
unfair
to
the
next
council
to
dump
this
on
them
in
november/december,
so
I'm
gonna
throw
out.
There
is
October
15th,
which
is
the
last,
be
scheduled.
Regular
council
meeting
of
this
council
there's
a
fifth
Tuesday
in
October
or
October
29th,
which
we
may
or
may
not
have
a
council
meeting
for
and
then
we're
to
the
election.
So
I'd
like
to
propose
that
we
do
pass
a
moratorium.
Given
all
the
great
work.
C
Z
What
happens
is
a
lot
of
people
feel
like
they
weren't
included
because
they're
gone
over
the
summer,
so
I
think
that
that
kind
of
timeline
presents
that
kind
of
issue
with
yeah,
so
I
I
guess
like
I,
wouldn't
be
able
to
support
that.
For
that
reason,
yeah
so
I
would
support
the
recommended
moratorium.
So
I.
A
A
So
I'm
gonna
support
the
full
length
of
the
moratorium,
but
I'm
going
to
say
to
staff
if
there's
any
way
that
you
could
get
this
done
by
fall,
that
would
be
fantastic
so
that
we
could
then,
because,
hopefully,
the
pilots
will
teach
us
enough
about
how
these
are
used,
that
we
can
decide.
You
know,
if
we're
good,
to
go
ahead
with
an
RFP
or,
however,
we
want
to
handle
it.
A
So
I'm
gonna
support
the
the
full
duration
with
the
understanding
that
the
goal
is
to
make
all
of
these
micro
mobility
options,
legal
and,
in
my
mind,
treated
as
similarly
to
bikes
as
possible,
because
I
don't
see
why
we
as
long
as
they're,
limited
to
15
miles
an
hour
I'm,
not
quite
sure
why
we
wouldn't
want
them
on
creak.
That's
like
my
a
bike
can
go
on
the
creek
path,
and
so
why
wouldn't
we
want
the
scooter
to
be
allowed
to
do
the
creek
path
as
well,
or
maybe
it's
a
limited
set
of
paths.
AG
The
technologies
is
actually
come
a
long
way
since
the
advent
of
these
scooters
and
today
you
can
regulate
the
speed
of
a
nice
scooter
through
a
geofencing
okay,
so,
for
example,
multi-use
paths
and
the
15
miles
per
hour.
If
we
felt
that
there
is
a
more
appropriate
speed
for
a
multi-use
path
that
can
be
adjusted
to
fit,
that
need,
could.
Y
Y
I,
like
going
I,
agree
with
Bob
I
think
we
need
to
accelerate
this,
as
maybe
I
shouldn't
use
the
term
accelerate,
but
that
I
would
like
to
get
this
in
into
our
options
of
transportation
as
quickly
as
possible.
I
think
the
summer
is
a
great
time
to
be
trying
this
out,
because
the
weather
is
warm
and
I
would
think
in
and
and
I
think
it's
mr.
firmer
pointed
out,
the
students
are
pretty
much
gone,
so
we
have
kind
of
less
stress.
Y
We
do
have
people
who
come
and
visit,
but
it's
little
mellower
and
I
would
think
in
summertime.
That
would
be
at
least
a
good
time
to
start
trying
a
scooter.
Your
skills
on
that,
instead
of
in
the
middle
of
winter
I,
am
concerned
with
the
waste
issue
and
would
want
to
prioritize
those
companies
that
really
make
durable,
long-lasting
type.
Ii
scooters
I'm
also
curious
in
terms
of
where
they're
charging
further
II
and
I
don't
want
it
to
be.
It
needs
to
be
a
renewable
source
and
coal,
or
something
else
and.
Y
Guess
if
we
could
use
different
term
terminology,
I
would
prefer
to
just
start
it
as
a
phased
in
program
where
we're
doing
pilots,
where
we're
doing
demonstrations
where
we're
doing
community
outreach
getting
people's
input,
doing
it
in
really
small
allotments
and
then
phase
two
would
be
ramping
it
up
and
I
would
prefer
not
to
use
the
term
moratorium.
So.
E
We
ready
for
a
motion
I
move
that
we
adopt
on
first
reading,
published
by
title
only
and
by
emergency
ordinance,
83
26,
the
providing
time
for
the
city
to
adopt
regulations
governing
commercial
electric
scooter
companies
by
prohibiting
the
city
manager
from
issuing
any
business
license
to
a
commercial
electric
scooter
company
until
February,
4th
2020
and
setting
forth
related
details.
Second,.
C
I'm
gonna
support
the
motion.
Like
least
I'd,
rather
have
it
be
done
sooner
and
I
think
we've
told
staff
we'd
like
it
done
sooner,
I,
guess
heavens,
when
it
happens,
I'm
just
worried
a
little
bit
about
the
headline
here,
because
I
think
the
headline
says
yes,
scooters,
ban
from
Boulder
and
tough
labor,
and
just
to
be
really
really
really
clear
to
the
press.
That
happens
to
be
in
the
room.
The
only
thing
we're
we're
not
banning
these
critters,
that's
gonna
be
allowed
by
state
law
on
to
these
city
streets.
C
You
know
a
few
weeks
is
the
governor
signs.
The
bill
thing
that
we're
banning
I'll
use
that
word
or
instructing
the
city
manager
not
to
do
is
issue
business
licenses
relating
to
scooters.
That's
the
only
thing
we're
doing
commercial
scooters,
yeah
business
license
to
commercial
scooter
companies
Oh
somebody
shows
up
Tom
with
a
scooter
of
their
own.
After
the
governor
signs
the
bill,
they
can
write
it
on
the
street
right.
Okay,.
Y
AD
Know
what
the
police
departments
plan
is
for
enforcement.
They'd
have
to
put
it
in
there
and
force
my
priorities
and
they
have
lots
of
I'm.
Sorry,
the
police
department
would
have
to
put
it
in
there
among
their
enforcement
priorities,
and
we've
talked
about
how
you
would
do
that,
but
I'm
not
sure
how
much
they'll
do
the
enforcement
and.
AD
A
I'm
gonna
call
myself
I
very
much.
This
is
really
a
policy
pause.
I'm
excited
to
see
scooter
companies
coming
to
Boulder
I.
Think
it's
gonna
be
a
good
thing
in
the
long
run.
I
also
think
that
we
need
to
be
really
intentional
and
I
think
earlier
on
in
this
process,
make
sure
that
we
legalized
pretty
much
everything
wherever
we
want
it,
legal
because
you
know
there
are
privately
owned.
Mobility
devices
that
aren't
technically
able
to
use
bike
lanes
or
use
our
multi-use
paths
and
I.
A
Think
that
that's
something
we
should
correct
as
a
first
part
of
this
process,
not
necessarily
wait
all
the
way
to
the
end.
Now.
Business
practices
is
a
different
thing
right
and
so
do
the
Dhokla
scooters
get
put
where's
the
geofencing
done.
You
know
all
that
stuff,
but
I
could
imagine
an
early
phase
where
we
just
address
the
fact
that
we
have
illegal
skateboards
running
around,
which
I
think
should
be
legal
if
people
want
to
use
them
for
mobility.
A
E
Just
like
to
thank
as
well
the
transportation
staff
for
the
comprehensive
nature
of
looking
at
this
and
the
information
that's
been
brought
forward
already.
I
think
it's
been
really
helpful.
There's
lots
out
there
and
I
think
the
more
each
of
us
who's
interested
in
moving.
This
forward
looks
at
what
has
been
done
around
the
country
and
the
world.
For
that
matter.
A
A
A
B
A
A
Z
AD
AH
Good
evening,
can
you
hear
me
so
we're
here
to
provide
an
update
on
the
work
by
the
marijuana
advisory
panel
and
there
are
six
items
that
they
provided
recommendations
on
and
tonight
I'm
going
to
be,
focusing
mainly
on
the
formation
of
a
city
marijuana
board,
but
I'll
also
be
touching
lightly
on
some
of
the
other
topics.
So
the
map
is
recommending
formation
of
a
city,
marijuana
board
and
I
will
go
into
more
detail
on
the
specifics
of
what
that
looks.
AH
In
the
first
two
years
of
that
program,
2238
adults
and
youth
were
served
and
participating.
Subcontractors
met
75%
of
the
targets
set
for
their
program
outcome
measures.
The
map
recommended
the
city
worked
to
amplify.
The
state
of
Colorado
is
good
to
know,
campaign
encourage
safe
storage
and
mitigate
concerns
over
impaired
drivers.
AH
Okay,
so
staff
is
seeking
council
direction
on
the
following.
First
and
foremost,
Maps
recommendation
to
form
a
new
city
board,
Maps
recommendation
regarding
the
structure
and
responsibilities
of
that
board
and
maps
recommendation
on
the
ongoing
work
regarding
the
penalty
schedule
in
transfers
by
meeting
for
an
additional
one
to
two
meetings.
AH
With
respect
to
the
city
board,
the
the
Matt
foreign
formed
a
subgroup
that
met
twice
in
April
for
over
two
hours
each
time,
and
during
that
time
they
were
provided
with
the
code
and
charters
and
a
lot
of
information
on
how
other
city
boards
operate.
In
addition
to
that,
we
had
to
be
LA,
members
come
and
speak
and
I
have
them
provide
information
on
how
the
beverage
licensing
authority
works
and
provide
some
input
and
opportunity
for
them
to
ask
questions.
AH
So
it's
pretty
well
established
so
the
way
that
the
BL
a
is
now
it's
80%,
roughly
licensing
with
about
20%
policy.
With
this
potential
board,
the
opposite
would
be
true.
In
the
beginning,
but
in
particular,
probably
80%
policy
with
whenyou
percent
licensing,
they
have
also
recommended
a
phased
in
approach,
which
would
mean
that
in
the
beginning,
they
would
focus
their
work
on
policy
work
and
advisory
in
nature,
and
they
would
work
towards
phasing
in
the
licensed
licensing
ass
of
their
role
with
that
happening.
AH
No
sooner
than
six
months
and
no
greater
than
two
years
later
and
the
thought
behind
that
was
that
they
feel
they
felt
like.
There
were
a
lot
of
policy
issues
that
really
needed
to
be
addressed
more
quickly,
and
it
would
also
give
them
an
opportunity
to
kind
of
get
ramped
up
on
the
licensing
aspect
and
learning
the
quasi-judicial
nature
of
that
aspect,
which
can
be
challenging.
AH
They
came
up
with
a
charter
which
is
pretty
self-explanatory
here,
but
the
the
Charter
reads
to
promote
the
boulders.
Excuse
me
to
promote
the
boulder
communities,
interests
and
values
in
the
local
regulation
of
marijuana,
while
considering
the
downstream
consequences
of
such
regulations
on
the
community
and
on
public
health
and
safety,
while
supporting
economic
development
and
congruence
between
local
ordinances
and
state
laws.
AH
With
respect
to
its
role
in
policy,
the
map
has
recommended
that
the
board,
if
council,
decided
that
a
new
board
should
be
formed,
that
the
board
would
address
some
remaining
outstanding
work
from
map.
They
had
previously
provided
a
letter
to
Council
in
December
of
2017
that
had
a
list
of
items
that
they
would
have
liked
to
had
addressed
some
of
them
being
title:
9
changes,
marijuana,
social
clubs,
etc.
AH
In
addition
to
that,
one
of
the
items
that
they
addressed
was
questions
of
jurisdictional
parity
and
also
topics
initiated
by
council,
the
board
itself,
city
staff
and
also
the
public
and
in
terms
of
the
public.
The
thought
was
that
obviously
there
would
be
an
opportunity
for
public
comment
with
the
board,
but
also
there's
already
in
place
a
mechanism
where
the
public
can
provide
input,
comments
and
suggestions
through
the
suggestion.
Suggestion
comment
form
through
the
licensing
department.
AH
That
would
kind
of
raise
a
red
flag.
Then
those
items
would
be
brought
forward
to
the
board
for
consideration
rather
than
being
addressed
administratively.
So
that's
something
that
the
new
board
could
come
up
with
a
criteria
for
we
provided
a
sample
in
the
packet
I.
Believe
it's
attachment
D.
So
you
can
see
what
that
looks
like,
but
all
the
licensing
duties
would
continue
to
be
handled
by
the
city
staff
until
the
board
formally
determines
otherwise.
AH
With
respect
to
the
makeup
of
the
board
members,
the
map
recommended
seven
members
at
least
twenty-one
years
old.
It
was
a
lot
of
discussion
about
this.
Our
code
allows
for
anybody
over
eighteen,
but
they
felt
in
the
end
that
it
was
important
or
there
to
be
someone
who's
of
legal
age
to
be
able
to
participate
or
use
the
substance.
AH
The
panel
decided
to
leave
that
within
the
council's
discretion.
Essentially,
what
they
recommended
would
is
that
the
ex
officio
positions
would
be
available
for
anyone
who
is
a
non-resident
from
the
cat
candidate
pool
who
would
otherwise
qualify
under
the
qualifications,
but
would
be
prohibited
because
they're
a
non-resident.
AH
In
terms
of
the
qualifications,
they
came
up
with
a
list
of
recommendations,
they're
not
requirements,
but
simply
suggestions
on
what
they
would
kind
of
what
they
would
like
to
have
in
terms
of
qualifications,
representation
of
the
community
at
large
diversity,
reflection
of
the
community
values,
involvement
in
the
education
community,
involvement
in
the
public
or
mental
health,
community's
involvement
in
a
marijuana
business,
knowledge
of
marijuana
laws
and
regulations
and
involvement
in
other
types
of
businesses.
Other
than
marijuana.
AH
The
options
are
either
that
it
be
policy
only
which
would
just
be
advisory
or
the
combination
of
policy
and
licensing
which
the
map
is
recommending.
Whether
or
not
you
agree
that
the
phase-in
of
the
dist
excuse
me,
the
judicial
role
of
Licensing
is
appropriate.
Whether
there
should
be
five
or
seven
members.
Map
is
recommending
seven
and
whether
or
not
the
membership
seats
are
designated
or
at
large.
C
I'll
start
off
and
I
guess
your
first
two
bullets,
I
guess
up
I've,
always
been
uncomfortable
that
our
BL,
a
or
beverage
Licensing
Authority,
engages
in
the.
If
you,
if
you
divide
the
task
of
the
VLA
and
then
also
this
proposed
marijuana
board
into
three
buckets.
You
have
policy
which
is
advice
you
have
licensing
and
then
you
have
enforcement
right
and
I've
always
been
uncomfortable
that
our
be
la
does
enforcement.
C
We
hear
a
lot
of
complaints
from
from
community
members
that
the
BL
a
as
long
as
good
as
they
are
and
doesn't
have
the
training,
the
judicial
training
that
may
be
required
to
make
determinations,
accept
evidence.
You
hear
witnesses
and
so
and
so
forth,
and
it's
my
understanding
that
in
a
significant
number
of
communities
around
the
country
and
around
Colorado
that
lysis
places
and
suspensions
and
other
administrative
excuse
me
and
other
judicial
determinations
relating
to
penalties
and
enforcement
tend
to
be
handled
by
municipal
judges.
That
wasn't
my
understand.
Correct
I,.
AH
C
C
Think
that
also
allows
us
to
broaden
the
scope
or
the
membership
of
the
board,
because
if
we
have
people
in
the
industry,
policing
people
in
the
industry,
that's
going
to
put
them
in
a
conflicted
situation
if
I'm
a
if
I'm
a
grow
operation
or
a
retail
operation
and
another
retail
operation
has
been
accused
of
a
violation.
I
have
an
incentive,
you
know
and
I,
don't
know
which
that
incentive,
which
way
that
incentive
goes.
But
it's
it's
an
incentive
that
I
don't
think
we
want
as
part
of
our
enforcement
process.
C
I
think
we
want
a
non-biased
a
party,
and
so
you'd
almost
have
to
have
an
organization
that
consists
of
people
or
not
in
the
industry,
which
I
think
then
deprives
us
of
industry
experts
from
a
policy
standpoint.
So
I
would
very
much
like
to
not
repeat
the
mistake
that
I
think
we
have
on
VLA
and
I.
Don't
want
this
board
involved
in
in
enforcement.
I
think
it'd
be
interesting.
C
Discussion
on
that
middle
bucket
about
licensing
and
I'd
like
to
have
a
little
bit
more
of
an
exploration
as
this
process
goes
through
and
hear
from
the
staff,
whether
they
felt
the
demarcation
between
staff,
administration
of
Licensing
and
the
board.
Licensing
is
the
right
place,
but
I
see
this
was
largely
a
policy
board
and
I
guess
that's
what
kind
of
where
I'm
at
in
those
first
two
questions.
A
AH
But
I
think
that
they
tried
to
address
that
with
the
phasing
in
strategy,
and
you
know
I
think
that
there
was
also
some
discussion
about
enforcement
as
well
and
I.
Do
know
that,
from
the
perspective
of
the
PLA
members
that
spoke
to
the
subgroup,
they
shared
that
it
was
beneficial
to
them
to
be
able
to
not
only
hear
from
applicants
on
new
applications
and
renewals
and
so
forth,
but
also
to
hear
the
enforcement
details,
because
it
gave
them
a
better
picture
of
what
was
going
on
in
the
community.
AH
AH
Y
Well,
I'm,
just
gonna
answer,
questions
and
I
guess:
I
would
like
to
see
a
combination
of
policy
and
licensing
and
I'd
like
I,
actually
liked
the
phasing
in
overtime
I,
don't
understand
a
lot
of
the
enforcement
issues
with
PLA,
but
I
think
this.
The
map
deliberately
said
they
wouldn't
even
start
licensing
until
like
early
is
six
months
and
not
until
like
no
later
than
two
two
years.
Something
like
that.
So
I
think
it
gives
them
a
little
ability
for
time
to
get
their
feet
wet
and
understand
and
I
think
right
now.
Y
The
phase
facing
in
I
I
would
keep
it
right
now
at
an
advisory
for
point
and
let
our
administrative
staff
continue
with
their
their
job
of
licensing
and
stuff
and
I
would
encourage
our
staff
and
I'm
sure
they
have
a
lot
of
interaction
right
now
with
map,
but
I
would
encourage
them
to
have
sessions
with
map
and
talk
about
some
of
the
challenges
that
they've
come
across
in
licensing
and
surprises
during
once.
The
mat
board
is
is
seated.
Y
Y
C
Something
q
just
I
just
want
to
definitional
because
we're
kind
of
throwing
around
the
words,
licensing
and
enforcement,
almost
a
little
interchangeably
and
I
guess
I-
want
to
throw
out
a
definition
of
license.
You
need
tell
me
if
it's
wrong
or
not
I,
guess
I
considered
licensing
as
granting
new
licenses
and
approving
transfers
of
licenses
and
enforcement.
I
would
consider
is
taking
away
a
license
or
otherwise
imposing
penalties.
C
AH
Fair
I
mean
I,
think,
there's
probably
a
lot
more
licensing
involved
than
just
the
ones
that
you
mentioned,
there's
a
lot
of
different
things
that
can
require
an
application
or
administrative
review,
but
I
think
that's
a
fair
statement
and
also
just
to
to
share
with
you
with
respect
to
the
enforcement.
The
way
that
it
currently
is
right
now,
decisions
on
violations
and
penalty
are
decided
by
the
licensing
clerk
and
then
there's
an
opportunity
for
appeal
to
the
Municipal
Court
and
then
there's
an
additional
appeal
review
to
district
court.
AH
Yes,
so
judicial
licensing
would
be
really
any
time,
there's
a
new
application
that
requires
public
input,
so
the
way
that
the
PLA
does
it
every
time
that
there
are,
you
know,
new
license.
Applications,
transfers,
renewals,
there's
an
opportunity
for
a
public
comment,
and
so
it
becomes
more
of
a
mini
hearing,
trial
kind
of
thing
where
you
know
the
applicant
provides
information
presents
their
case.
If
there's
anyone
there
in
opposition,
they
have
an
opportunity
and
then
the
public
as
well,
and
then
there's
deliberations
by
the
board.
I'm.
C
Sorry
I
believe
with
the
point,
but
I
wanna
make
it
real
clear
here
so
I.
So
that's
fine
that
I
get
that
that's
not
a
firm
dove
licensee,
neither
the
granting
of
a
license
or
or
maybe
the
transfer
license,
there's
a
public
hearing
that
makes
it
qua
judicial,
but
the
PLA
is
involved
in
enforcement
and
penalties.
Is
that
correct?
Yes,.
AH
C
C
C
AH
Y
Just
just
back
to
I
think
to
phase
in
the
light
licensing
or
enforcement
I
think
is
a
wise
thing,
because
I
knew
that
the
Medical
Marijuana
is
going
to
cease
in
2019,
and
we
have
something
like
85
pages
of
code.
With
respect
to
marijuana
and
I
think
you
know,
half
of
it
might
be
related
to
medical
marijuana
and
half
of
it
may
be
related
to
recreational,
and
it's
just
it's
I,
don't
think
it
will
be
as
easy
as
just
wiping
out
the
medical
marijuana
code
and
saying.
Okay.
Y
Now
we
have
the
recreational
marijuana
code
because
we'll
still
have
medicinal
marijuana
and
we'll
still
have,
as
you
mentioned,
people
18
or
under
21,
who
would
have
access
to
medical
marijuana,
so
I
think
a
time
to
really
consider
those
policies
and
the
changes
of
those
policies
and
the
changes
in
those
code
would
be
very
important.
So.
Z
So
in
the
memo
it
said
that
that
creating
board
is
going
to
require
increasing
marijuana
application
fees,
subsidization
from
the
general
fund
of
marijuana
licensing
or
relying
on
marijuana
tax
revenue.
Is
there
any
reason
why
we
wouldn't
just
rely
on
the
marijuana
tax
revenue,
since
it
is
gonna?
We
heard
earlier
tonight
that
it's
going
to
become
ongoing?
Z
AD
That's
a
policy
choice
for
Council
there's
something
in
our
code;
I'm.
Sorry,
it's
a
policy
choice
for
council
there's
something
in
our
code
that
says
that
marijuana
should
be
basically
subsidies
cover
expenses
should
be
covered
by
fees
like
we
have
self-sustaining
for
other
parts
of
the
government,
but
there's
no
reason
why
council
couldn't
decide
to
use
marijuana
tax
funds
for
those
things
and.
AD
Z
And-
and
so
there
was
another
one
mention
of
a
necessary
FTE
for
the
City
Attorney's
Office,
and
so
my
question
is
earlier
tonight
also
in
the
adjustment
to
base.
There
was
a
set
of
staff
that
was
recommended
by
the
work
that
internal
working
group
that
Jane
mentioned,
and
so
how
does
that
relate
to
this
staff
that
is
described
here
so.
AD
I
believe
that
in
Shawn
can
correct
it.
That's
for
the
current
work
to
bring
the
staff
up
to
speed
for
what
we're
currently
doing.
The
budget
proposal
would
be
based
on
additional
work
that
might
be
necessary
if
we
have
a
quasi-judicial
board
so
for
the
City
Attorney's
Office,
we
decided
not
to
ask
for
anything
until
we
see
this
I
think
we
can
handle
our
current
workload.
AD
If,
if
you
have
a
board,
it
would
be
nice
to
have
an
attorney
who
specializes
in
marijuana
does
pretty
much
only
that
who's
funded
at
a
marijuana
tax
funds,
but
that
that's
a
budget
discussion
that
were
proposed
as
part
of
the
budget
process,
and
it
will
depend
in
part
on
how
this
board
is
structured.
Okay,.
Z
Thank
you
see,
I,
have
any
additional
questions
and
I
guess
I'll
go
through
the
questions
as
well.
Yes,
on
the
policy
and
licensing
combo
and
then
I
like
the
phasing
in
as
well
the
seven
members
and
then
the
membership,
membership
designated
or
at-large
I.
Think
there's
more
than
seven
members
on
the
on
the
map.
Right
now,
yes,
so
to
have
that
same
kind
of
representation
with
seven
members
would
be
difficult.
Z
So
it
seems
to
me
that,
like
we
might
want
to
desert
designate-
and
this
is
a
question
to
my
colleagues-
to
designate
some
of
the
seats
and
have
some
of
them
be
at
large
and
and
have
some
like
you
have
to
have
some
knowledge
of
marijuana
laws
and
policy
would
might
be
one
that
is
designated
and
haven't
thought
this
through,
but
some
combination
of
designated
and
at-large
to
ensure
that
you
always
have
some
fundamental
basic
knowledge
within
the
board.
I.
E
A
Myself,
I
generally
agree
with
the
combo,
a
policy,
licensing
and
enforcement
just
to
be
clear.
All
under
this
board,
I
might
call
if
the
marijuana
licensing
authorities
for
parallelism
with
the
PLA
I
agree
with
my
colleagues
that
phasing
it
in
is
a
good
idea,
so
leaving
that
to
the
discretion
of
the
board
as
to
what
the
pace
of
that
should
be
I.
Think
seven
members
is
what
I
would
lean
towards
for
more
diversity.
A
If,
if
our
goal,
in
fact
is
to
treat
marijuana
like
alcohol,
as
we
have
said
kind
of
from
the
get-go,
then
I
think
in
the
long
run,
having
the
board
members
of
both
the
PLA
and
the
MLA.
If
that's
what
it
is,
look
at
how
penalties
are
handled
and
trying
to
make
them
parallel
between
marijuana
and
alcohol,
I
think.
C
C
With
exception
of
liquor,
I
would
appreciate
it
when
this
comes
back.
If
the
staff
could
do
a
bit
of
some
benchmarking
and
some
analysis
about
what
other
cities
are
doing,
certainly
with
alcohol,
because
there's
a
long
history
there,
so
we
would
be
pretty
easy
to
track
down
whatever
these
two
non
alcohol
is
it?
Is
it
a
residence
board,
that's
in
doing
enforcement,
or
is
it
staff
or
a
judge,
and
to
the
extent
that
there
are
cities
that
have
ventured
into
enforcement?
C
E
I'd
like
to
follow
up
I,
wasn't
thinking
clearly
when
I
was
talking
about
the
quasi
judicial
role.
I
think
makes
a
good
argument
about
keeping
this
before
the
municipal
judge,
particularly
because
of
the
possibility
of
conflicts,
and
it
just
makes
it
cleaner.
So
I
would
like
to
see
that
followed
up
as
well.
Y
AD
AD
You're,
the
only
one
who
is
here,
but
we
took
a
look
at
this
back
in
2013
and
most
of
the
communities
in
this
area.
Longmont
Greeley,
Fort,
Collins,
a
lot
of
Springs
Denver
have
a
hearing
officer,
that's
who
they
miss
Porter,
independently
appointed
okay.
Just
reading
my
memo
I
actually
referred
to
the
magnet
Carter
in
there.
So
it's
actually
a
great
literature.
AE
Y
E
A
Z
AH
All
right
here
we
go
all
right
with
respect
to
the
penalty
schedule
and
transfers
map
is
looking
for
direction
on
whether
they
can
have
an
additional
one
or
two
meetings
to
continue
to
address
this
issue.
We
had
a
smaller
subgroup
meet
on
Friday
and
we
did
a
lot
of
good
work
and
that
information
or
recommendation
will
go
back
to
the
bigger
group
on
June,
26th,
I,
believe
and
so
yeah,
that's
kind
of
where
it
is
now
where
so
the
the
topics
are.
AH
AH
AH
A
Y
Oh
I
I
think
map
should
continue
and
I
would
give
them
two
additional
meetings
for
discussions
and
future
recommendations
on
the
penalty
schedule
and
transfers.
I
think
part
of
the
problem
I've
heard
is
that
they,
you
know,
the
meetings
are
X
amount
of
time,
and
sometimes
there
are
some
more
topics
that
they
would
like.
They're.
Y
Y
AH
A
Okay,
I
support
one
or
two
meetings,
yeah,
so
continuing
just
so
that
we
can
flush
it
out
and
if
you
wouldn't
mind
getting
some
clarity
from
them
on,
are
they
comfortable
doing
enforcement
because
I
think
it's?
It's
really.
You
know
when
this
comes
back
to
council
I
think
we
want
to
make
a
firm
decision
on
whether
we
do
a
boa
type
group
or
not.
AH
Z
I
have
just
some
questions
regarding
the
new
legislation.
Actually,
it's
more
like
comments,
it's
my
understanding
that
some
of
them
actually
do
create
some,
perhaps
not
conflicts,
but
attention
that
must
be
given
to
them.
For
example,
the
HB
19
1230
the
hospitality
establishments,
which
creates
a
new
license,
so
that
has
to
be
addressed.
Z
The
marijuana
delivery
is
an
endorsement
to
a
license,
so
that
might
need
some
attention.
So
there's
several
of
them
like
this
and
I'm
wondering
if
one
of
the
things
whether
it
would
be
first
order
of
business
for
the
new
board,
to
take
a
look
at
all
of
these
and
look
at
which
ones
do
indeed
or
do
not
affect
our
ordinances
and
then
prioritize
them.
That
seems
like
a
first
order
of
business,
because
some
of
these
will
be
on
a
timeline.
C
Other
thing,
I
would
say,
is
I'm
yes
on
this
I
think.
Maybe
we
had
to
do
it
all
over
again.
We
probably
would
do
things
a
little
differently
with
respect
to
the
housing
board.
I,
don't
think
we
provided
them
with
sufficient
guidance
when
we
launched
them
a
year
or
a
year
and
a
half
ago
and
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
we
don't
make
the
same
mistake
here.
AH
AI
Thank
you.
This
is
a
midpoint
update
on
the
citywide
retail
study.
We
were
last
before
council
in
July
getting
input
on
a
scope
of
work
for
the
project.
Since
then,
considerable
work
has
been
completed
by
members
of
the
community
working
with
our
nonprofit
economic
vitality
partners
and
an
interdepartmental
staff
team
to
examine
the
bolder
retail
environment
and
whether
bolder
residents,
workers
and
students
are
able
to
meet
their
needs
for
basic
goods
and
services
within
Boulder
tonight.
We'll
review
the
purpose
of
the
study
where
we
are
within
the
four
study
phases
and
next
steps.
AI
We
will
focus
on
what
is
known
at
this
point,
which
includes
basic
data
on
the
boulder
retail
environment,
who
we
were
able
to
reach
with
our
community
engagement
efforts
and
some
preliminary
themes
from
those
responses.
We'll
come
back
this
July,
with
a
more
complete
analysis
of
the
study,
findings
and
recommendations
for
next
steps,
as
we
develop
a
citywide
retail
strategy,
I'm
going
to
run
through
the
slides
fairly
quickly
and
then
we'll
follow
with
questions
for
Council,
given
the
late
hour,
try
not
to
take
too
so
first.
AI
The
study
follows
last
year's
downtown
retail
vibrancy
study
by
looking
more
broadly
at
the
retail
environment
in
Boulder
and
assessing
whether
it
meets
the
community's
core
values,
such
as
sense
of
place,
welcoming,
inclusive
and
diverse,
sustainable
and
environmental
stewardship.
The
study
will
ultimately
inform
a
citywide
retail
strategy
to
help
us
achieve
the
comprehensive
plan
goals
of
a
more
vibrant
retail
environment,
as
well
as
supporting
maintaining
affordable
retail
space.
AI
With
the
data
collection
phase
now
complete,
we
are
at
the
midpoint
of
the
study.
The
work
so
far
has
included
hiring
a
consult
through
a
competitive
bidding
process
to
assist
with
survey,
design,
analysis
and
recommendations.
We
worked
with
our
nonprofit
community
partners
to
develop
an
engagement
plan
and
collected
more
than
1,000
responses
to
three
questionnaires:
one
for
shoppers,
one
for
retailers
and
exit
interviews
with
retail
operators
that
have
closed
or
relocated
from
bolder
within
the
last
two
years.
We
are
currently
analyzing
the
questionnaire
responses
and
evaluating
these.
AI
The
study
looked
at
the
bolder
retail
environment,
both
citywide
and
within
what
the
consultant
identified
as
ten
primary
nodes
of
retail
activity.
The
entire
retail
environment
is
6.6
million
square
feet,
which
generates
2.9
billion
in
retail
sales
in
2018.
Both
the
total
total
square
footage
and
sales
are
higher
than
any
of
folders
neighboring
communities
and
more
detail
on
these
comparisons
is
provided
in
the
agenda
packet.
AI
The
shopper
and
retailer
questionnaires
and
exit
interviews
were
designed
to
reflect
the
community
values
that
make
up
the
framework
for
the
study.
In
the
analysis
phase,
we
were
able
to
determine
if
some
responses
are
more
common
in
certain
areas
of
Boulder
or
among
certain
Boulder
demographics,
and
how
our
retail
performance
compares
to
our
neighboring
communities
in
pure
communities
nationwide.
The
survey
also
looked
at
how
people
access
retail
areas
both
to
work
and
to
shop
and
what
characteristics
of
a
retail
district
are
important
to
them.
AI
We
asked
about
how
shopping
behavior
is
changing
if
at
all
and
whether
they
are
buying
more
goods
online
remaining
within
Boulder
or
looking
outside
the
community.
The
staff
team
on
the
project
includes
a
member
of
the
city's
engagement
team.
They
assisted
with
strategies
for
reaching
community
members
from
a
broad
variety
of
backgrounds,
postcards
and
mailers,
with
survey
links
were
sent
in
both
English
and
Spanish.
We
conducted
in
outreach
at
various
public
events
at
Boulder,
housing
partners
and
at
the
emergency
family
assistance.
AI
Association
surveys
were
conducted
door-to-door
using
the
community
connector
program
and
we
reached
out
to
bilingual
school-aged
families
using
the
families
and
educators
together
program.
We
also
conducted
in
person
visits
to
more
than
100
retailers
across
the
city
and
worked
with
the
Small
Business
Development
Center,
to
conduct
confidential
in
person
exit
interviews.
AI
The
goal
was
to
reach
a
broad
geographic
and
demographic
diversity
of
responses
over
the
next
few
slides
will
illustrate
the
reach
of
the
community
engagement
effort.
All
of
the
graphics
are
available
in
the
agenda
packet,
which
is
posted
online
for
a
more
readable
format.
This
presentation
provides
a
quick
overview
of
the
information.
That's
been
gathered,
the
geographic
distribution
of
responses
from
resident
shoppers
worker
shoppers
and
retail
retailers
reflected
fairly
closely
where
the
residents
workers
and
retail
activity
were
taking
place.
The
demographic
distribution
of
responses
was
more
varied.
AI
Respondents
were
from
a
wider
diversity
of
age
groups
and
income
levels.
However,
respondents
had
less
diversity
and
their
self-identified
ethnic
groups
and
genders
how
the
response
rates
match
up
to
bolder.
Demographics
overall
will
be
examined
in
the
analysis.
Phase
and
statistical
findings
may
be
weighted
accordingly.
AI
AI
We
had
a
higher
rate
of
responses
among
restaurants
in
the
exit
interview
outreach,
although
these
also
were
primarily
were
smaller
sized
businesses
and
more
than
a
third
had
been
in
Boulder
for
more
than
21
years.
At
this
stage,
the
comprehensive
analysis
of
the
survey
data
is
not
yet
complete.
However,
staff
has
reviewed
more
than
800
open-ended
responses
to
the
surveys
and
highlighted
the
comments
that
appeared
more
frequently.
AI
The
shopper
survey
responses,
for
example,
included
multiple
requests
for
a
greater
diversity
of
retail,
including,
more
general
merchandise,
option,
options
and
location
specific
needs,
such
as
grocery
stores
in
certain
areas
across
the
city.
Some
respondents
reported
shopping
more
frequently
outside
of
folders.
Since
the
introduction
of
the
sugary
beverage
and
bag
fees,
respondents
frequently
said
they
felt
the
need
to
go
outside
Boulder
to
access,
affordable
goods
at
stores
such
as
Costco
and
Walmart.
AI
Current
retailers
responded
that
they
located
in
Boulder
because
of
the
beauty
of
the
location
and
because
of
the
relatively
affluent
customer
base.
They
also
liked
that
the
city
offered
a
mix
of
resident
student
and
tourist
customers.
Some
found
it
challenging,
however,
to
adequately
park
their
customers
and
employees
and
to
navigate
the
city's
zoning
and
permitting
processes.
Some
also
said
they
would
like
support
for
workforce
housing
and
for
reducing
potential
negative
impacts
from
people
who
are
homeless,
locating
outside
their
stores.
AI
Comments
from
businesses
who
closed
their
Boulder
locations
were
fairly
similar
to
those
still
in
operation.
More
of
these
respondents
cited
issues
that
arose
from
not
owning
their
building,
such
as
rising
rents,
building
maintenance
issues
and
pass-through
costs.
Some
of
the
clothes
retailers
also
cited
a
perceived
negative
impact
from
marijuana
based
businesses,
as
mentioned
earlier
in
the
study
we
are
at
the
midpoint
when
the
analysis
and
final
report
are
ready
in
July.
We
will
return
with
next
steps
for
developing
the
citywide
retail
strategy.
AI
AI
C
You
into
things
that
was
helpful.
That's
in
shortly.
Do
you
anticipate
that
the
final
report
or
the
recommendations
later
on,
will
have
things
that
are
actionable
by
the
City
Council?
In
other
words,
do
you
maybe
if
the
answers-
don't
no
that's
ok,
an
answer
to,
but
do
you
anticipate
that
you're
gonna
ask
us
to
do
certain
things
relating
to
taxes
or
land
use
or
zoning
or
things
like
that?
In
other
words,
is
this
informational
and
then
we're
you
know
we're
all?
C
AI
D
AI
D
Y
A
Y
C
I
echo
that
one
number
that
jumped
out
of
me
was
the
fact
that
the
average,
the
retail
sale
per
capita
in
the
city
was
$27,000.
In
other
words,
you
take
all
the
money
that
people
spend
in
the
city
divided
by
the
number
of
buildings.
It
was
twenty
seven
thousand
dollars
per
capita
yeah.
If
you
do
the
math
on
that,
our
our
cease
share
of
the
sales
tax
is
a
almost
four
percent
as
like
3.8
percent,
or
some
like
that.
So
that's
roughly
roughly
I
guess
what
the
point
I'm
trying
to
get
to
is.
C
Our
budget
is
about
three
thousand
dollars
per
capita:
okay,
three
thousand
dollars.
If
you
take
the
our
overall
budget
of
three
hundred
and
some-odd
million
divided
by
one
hundred
eight
thousand
people,
it's
roughly
three
thousand
dollars
per
capita
that
we
spend
on
everything
that
includes
our
utilities.
By
the
way
too,
you
can
do
just
the
retail
portion
of
that
the
sales
tax
on
the
retail
portion
of
that
will
so,
which
is
probably
taxable
that's
one
thousand
dollars
worth.
My
point,
is:
is
one
third
of
our
budget
comes
from
retail
sales?
C
One
third
of
our
overall
budget
comes
from
retail
sales,
so
we
can
guess
I
couldn't
say
is
that's
why
I
asked
the
question
about?
Are
we
alleged
because
we
could
really
screw
that
up
right?
We
could
do
like
something
that
inadvertently
causes
that
to
go
down
because
we're
way
higher
than
a
lot
of
our
cities
and
the
Front
Range
on
a
per
capita
basis
sales.
And
so,
while
you
know
it,
you
know,
money
is
not
the
be-all
end-all
of
city
government.
C
We
have
to
keep
in
mind
that
city
government
is
funded
and
all
the
wonderful
things
we
have
as
far
as
our
parks
and
our
paths
and
our
open
space
and
so
on
and
so
forth,
is
a
big
big
portion
of
that
is
funded
by
retail,
and
we
we
need
to
be
very
intentional
about
what
we
do
to
that.
Do
we
want
to
grow
it.
C
Y
AJ
Y
E
In
terms
of
following
up
on
Bob's
question
about
actionable
items,
one
of
the
things
we
did
earlier
today
was
interview
for
an
applicant
for
the
Bureau
board
and
diagonal
Plaza
was
mentioned
again.
So
perhaps
in
terms
of
retail
the
things
that
people
say
who
live
here
that
they
want
didn't
word
that
they
go
out
of
town
for
possibly
there
might
be
some
options
that
we
would
be
able
to
look
at
in
terms
of
expanding
those
kinds
of
needs
in
some
of
the
we're
vacant.
B
A
A
Z
So
yeah
I'll
take
that
one
since
Erin's,
not
here
so
one
of
the
things
that
was
in
the
Charter
for
the
the
task
force
was
representation
and
I.
Think
all
of
us
on
the
subcommittee
one
at
Latino
representation,
and
we
thought
that
we
had
that.
We
made
some
assumptions
and,
as
it
turned
out,
we
didn't
so
Aaron
and
I
spoke
on
Sunday
and
we
proposed
that
we
reopened
the
applications
for
one
week
and
and
asked
council
to
authorize
the
subcommittee
to
appoint
that
person.
Z
C
AD
X
X
I-S
I
am
the
one
or
my
office
is
the
one
that
needs
to
reopen
it
by
providing
a
press
release
by
sending
an
email
to
all
the
people
that
already
applied
but
didn't
get
selected
by
gathering
all
the
materials
so
I.
When
do
you
want
the
materials
gathered
and
when
can
you
meet
in
order
to
review
them
so
that
the
folks
can
show
up
at
the
first
meeting.
Z
We
didn't
quite
establish
the
timeline,
so
thank
you
for
asking
that
it
is
a
tight
timeline
and,
if
it
needs
to,
if
that
thirteenth
person
needs
to
miss
that
first
meeting,
which
is
highly
likely.
That
would
happen
anyway,
because
it
would
be
very,
very
short,
notice,
you're,
really
short
notice
for
so
so
what
is
your
suggestion
in
terms
of
you
know,
reopening
it
and
can
how
much
of
the
previous
materials
can
you
use
so.
Z
C
C
Z
C
I
guess
I
personally
I
would
be
happy
to
delegate
to
you
and
Aaron
the
decision
to
appoint
the
thirteenth
person.
If
the
two
of
you
want
to
open
it
up
and
see
where
else
applies,
that's
fine,
but
I
would
also
be
fine.
If
you
and
Aaron
are
happy
with
Latino
gentlemen
that
applied
that
you
advocated
for
I
trust
your
judgment
and
errands
and
I'd
be
perfectly
happy
to
delegate
that
decision.
To
the
two
of
you,
that's
my
view.
C
A
I'm,
okay,
with
that
I
mean
I,
also
feel
like
in
the
interest
of
transparency
and
cooperation
that
you
should.
Let
the
other
three
members
of
the
committee
know
what
you're
up
to
and
no
council
has
said
as
far
as
you
know
that
you
and
Aaron
can
make
that
appointment,
but
it
sure
seems
like
they
should
at
least
be
informed
of.
Z
A
Z
Also
me
so
last
week,
I
received
an
email
from
Nicole
melaku,
who
is
the
executive
director
of
the
Colorado
immigrant
rights
coalition,
and
in
it
she
wrote
that
a
partner
organization
had
notified
her
that
there
have
been
asylees
that
have
been
getting
bused
from
El
Paso
to
Colorado,
and
she
was
looking
for
communities
in
Colorado
could
house
these
asylees
who
basically
getting
bust
and
waiting
to
be
placed
with
their
families
while
their
applications
are
processed.
So
it's
a
72-hour
need
for
housing
for
these
individuals
and
I.
Z
Z
D
Z
Yeah,
so
that's
the
latest
that
I
have
and
and
since
it's
only
20
I'll
get
more
information
on
that,
and
perhaps
we
can
put
it
out
to
community
members
who
might
be
interested
in
helping
and
I
would
suspect
that
and
I
would
put
it
out
to
the
community
I'm
sure
people
are
watching
at
10
o'clock
right
now
and
put
it
up
to
the
community
and
ask
perhaps
ask
the
daily
camera
to
put
this
front
and
center.
So
the
contact
person
and
I'll
just
go
ahead
and
say
this.
A
Well,
good
thanks
for
bringing
this
up
and
we
can
use
our
networks
to
support
these
folks
when
they
get
in
our
community.
So
Jane.
You
are
detached
on
the
last
item
on
the
agenda,
which
is
the
FAA,
so
we're
gonna
have
the
mayor
sign?
Yes,
a
letter
requesting
the
flight
paths
to
be
moved
even
further,
south
yep,
great
perfect,
and
then
any
discussion
items
or
debrief
from
this
meeting?
No
thanks!
It's
the
smallest
council
meeting
I
can
remember
this.