►
From YouTube: Boulder City Council Meeting 10-06-22
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
A
A
A
A
B
B
B
It
has
been
a
very
long
time
since
we've
done
this
together
with
with
people
with
us,
we're
so
glad
that
you
could
join
us,
and
we
have
had
a
bit
of
a
tradition,
During
the
covid
period
of
starting
off
right
before
the
meeting
with
a
dad
joke,
and
we
want
to
just
continue
that
so
I'm
going
to
turn
to
council
member
Benjamin
to
kick
us
off
here.
D
A
B
B
E
B
That
so
we
will
go
into
a
couple
of
announcements
here,
so
covid-19
vaccinations
and
testing.
So
for
information
and
provider
locations
for
free
covid-19
testing
go
to
bocode.org
covid
testing
and
the
boulder
site
for
free
testing
is
at
2445.
Stazio
drive,
that's
open
seven
days
a
week
from
8
AM
to
6
p.m,
and
for
vaccine
information
and
provider
locations.
You
can
go
to
boco.org,
covid
vaccine
and,
as
I
said
already
welcome
back
to
public
participation,
participation
in
Chambers,
so
with
the
public
being
back
in
Chambers
starting
tonight.
B
We
want
to
remind
you
that
we
are
offering
the
public
to
participate
both
virtually
and
in
person.
So
you're
asked
to
indicate
on
open
comment
and
public
hearing
forms.
If
you
will
be
speaking
virtually
or
in
person.
In-Person
speakers
will
speak
first
and
then
virtual
speakers
will
follow.
All
speakers
are
listed
in
the
order
in
which
they
signed
up
now.
B
Speakers
do
have
the
option
to
change
their
location
preference
if
needed
by
contacting
the
city
clerk's
office
at
city,
clerk's
office
at
bouldercolorado.gov
prior
to
the
start
of
the
meeting,
and
with
that
I
can't
actually
gavel.
It
started
because
I
want
to
go.
I
will
call
this
meeting
to
order
and
if
we
could
do
roll
call,
please
Alicia.
C
B
Fantastic
and
Juni
has
informed
it
she'll
be
here
any
minute,
so
we
should
see
her
shortly.
Okay,
so
we're
going
to
get
started
with
a
couple
of
declarations.
The
first
declaration
is
indigenous
people's
day
declaration
to
be
presented
by
council
member
folkerts
and
take
it
away.
Lauren.
G
G
Indigenous
people
in
Boulder
respect
the
interdependence
of
all
humanity
and
living
things
and
celebrate
a
vast
and
Rich
living
tradition
through
ancestral
recognition
and
diversity
of
knowledge
and
perspectives,
including
sustainable
practices.
Indigenous
people
in
Boulder
have,
in
all
parts
of
America's,
endured
centuries
of
Cruelty
exploitation
and
genocide.
G
However,
those
men
stayed
after
gold
was
found
west
of
Boulder
in
January
1859.
Many
of
those
same
gold
Seekers
helped
found
the
boulder
Town
company
on
February
10
1859,
in
violation
of
the
1851
Fort
Laramie
treaty
in
August
of
1864.
Nearly
a
hundred
Boulder
County
residents
mobilized
into
company
D
of
the
third
Colorado
Cavalry
of
U.S
volunteers
at
Fort
Chambers,
this
company
of
a
hundred
men
trained
at
the
Fort
before
participating
in
the
Sand
Creek
Massacre
on
November
29
1864,
from
which
the
boulder
troops
enjoyed
a
hero's
welcome
upon
their
return.
G
G
This
work
is
Guided
by
the
city's
indigenous
people's
day
resolution.
The
city's
racial
Equity
plan
guidance
from
the
American
Indian
Tribal,
Nations
agreements,
the
city
shares
with
tribal
Nations,
the
open
space
and
Mountain
Parks
master
plan
and
engagement
with
indigenous
communities
and
Indigenous
organizations
in
Boulder.
G
We,
the
city
council
of
the
city
of
Boulder,
Colorado,
declare
October
10
2022
as
indigenous
peoples
day.
We
urge
all
community
members
to
begin
or
continue
the
process
of
listening
to
indigenous
peoples,
reflecting
on
the
indigenous
presence
in
the
Boulder
Valley
that
has
existed
since
time
immemorial
and
learning
about
the
violent
colonizations
of
indigenous
lands.
While
the
city
is
collaborating
with
tribal
Nations
on
several
ongoing
projects,
we
know
we
have
more
work
to
fulfill
the
indigenous
people's
day
resolution
and
help
support
indigenous
Nations
and
Indigenous
communities
and
organizations
in
Boulder.
G
B
Thank
you
so
much
Lauren
and
we
look
forward
to
celebrating
together
on
indigenous
people's
day
in
just
a
few
days,
do
we
have
anyone
here
to
receive
this
declaration.
A
B
Actually,
I
do
need
to
ask
for
a
motion
to
amend
the
agenda
here.
To
make
a
couple
of
changes.
We
need
to
remove
item
1C
the
Colorado
companies
to
watch
month
declaration
we're
going
to
do
that
in
a
few
weeks
and
also
to
remove
item
3F,
which
was
a
second
reading
of
ordinance
8547
about
policies
and
procedures
in
the
event
of
a
drought.
H
B
Motion,
second,
all
in
favor
all
right,
very
good,
so
the
motion
is
duly
agended,
duly
amended.
The
agenda
is
that
is
okay,
well,
Juni,
great
timing.
So
thanks
for
coming
on
in
and
we've
got
a
declaration
to
be
ready,
are
you
up
for
it.
B
I
I
I
The
aim
of
your
Veda
day
is
to
create
a
sense
of
awareness
in
today's
generation
and
promote
your
Vedic
principle
of
healing
in
society.
Your
Vedic
medicine,
also
known
as
your
verveda,
is
one
of
the
world's
oldest
holistic
whole
body
healing
systems.
It
was
developed
thousands
of
years
ago
and
what
is
today
India.
I
I
B
J
Microphone
who
here
has
heard
of
ayurveda
all
right,
nice
I
love
it
we're
in
Boulder.
J
So
yes,
appropriately
right
after
the
indigenous
people's
day
declaration
ayurveda
is
the
indigenous
medicine
from
the
South
Asian
continent,
India
Pakistan,
Afghanistan
Nepal.
This
this
whole
region
is
where
this
comes,
and
it
Bears
similarities
to
indigenous
medicine
practices
from
all
over
the
planet.
But
it
is
the
unique
geopolitical
history
of
this
region
that
lets
these
teachings.
J
This
whole
system
come
to
us
mostly
fully
formed
from
the
The
Vedas,
which
are
some
of
the
most
ancient
written
records
that
we
have
left
for
Humanity
and
so
Prema
and
I
are
representatives
of
kalarama,
which
is
the
Colorado
ayurvedic
Medical
Association,
and
we
are
one
of
the
most
active
and
engaged
collectives
in
the
country
when
it
comes
to
promoting
ayurveda
and
protecting
its
history
and
pushing
it
forward,
and
we
are
big
Believers
in
the
power
of
ayurveda
to
solve
many
of
the
health
crises
facing
our
nation
right
now.
J
What
are
the
epidemics?
We
have
obesity.
We
have
heart
disease,
we
have
inflammation.
These
are
lifestyle
conditions
that
modern
biomedicine
for
all
its
magic
and
miracles
and
life-saving
Technology.
Doesn't
know
how
to
deal
with
and
so
ayurveda
as
this
lifestyle
approach
to
health
and
healing
has
what
we
need
to
work
in
tandem
with
modern
biomedicine,
and
so
that's
what
we're
here
doing.
That's
what
we're
celebrating!
We
have
a
conference
in
Boulder
this
coming
weekend.
J
The
Colorado
ayurveda
conference
focused
on
Mental
Health,
one
of
the
precepts
of
ayurveda
is
that
there's
a
unbroken
Spectrum
from
the
subtle
Realms
of
the
psyche
into
the
physical
body
and
and
so
food
and
mood
are
intimately
interconnected.
So
so
our
conference
this
weekend
is
focused
on
on
ayurveda,
for
mental
health
and
Colorado.
B
Great
thanks
for
that,
so
we're
going
to
move
into
open
comments
now
and,
as
we
mentioned
before,
we're
going
to
have
the
in-person
speakers
speak
first,
followed
by
the
remote
speakers.
People
have
two
minutes
to
speak.
I'll
give
three
names
at
a
time.
So
if
you
all
can
kind
of
cue
down
here
so
that
you're
ready
to
come
to
the
mic,
when
it's
your
turn,
I
am
going
to
ask
Alicia
one
question:
I
did
hear
that
two
of
the
people
who
are
signed
up
for
open
comment
meant
to
sign
up
for
the
public
hearing.
C
B
The
names
I
got
were
Dan
creel
and
Nate
urandi.
K
Absolutely
we
will
go
ahead
and
have
those
pull
slides,
pulled
up
and
welcome
to
members
of
the
public
who
are
here
today.
We
appreciate
you
being
here:
I
want
to
share
that
the
city
has
created
with
community
members
a
vision
for
productive,
meaningful
and
inclusive
Civic
conversations.
K
We
want
to
make
sure
that
this
Vision
supports
physical
and
emotional
safety
for
community
members
staff
Council,
as
well
as
democracy
for
folks
of
all
identities.
There's
more
information
available
on
this
website
and
we'll
move
to
the
next
slide.
Please
we
want
to
share
the
following
examples
of
rules
of
decorum
found
in
the
boulder
bias
code
and
other
guidelines
that
do
support
this
vision.
K
We
want
to
make
sure
that
these
are
upheld
during
this
meeting
any
remarks
and
testimony
shall
be
limited
to
matters
related
to
City
business.
No
participant
shall
make
threats
or
use
other
forms
of
intimidation
against
any
person,
obscenity,
racial
epiphats
and
other
speech
and
behavior
that
disrupts
or
otherwise
impedes
the
ability
to
conduct
the
meaning
are
prohibited.
K
And
then
we
appreciate
that
folks
have
signed
up
to
speak
using
the
name
they're
commonly
known
by
and
with
our
online
participants.
We
will
have
audio
testimony
only
so
we
welcome
folks
who
are
here
in
public
this
evening,
as
you
are
coming
up
to
the
podium.
Please
make
sure
that
you're
speaking
about
two
fingers
distance
from
the
microphone
to
make
sure
that
all
an
audience
and
in
zoom
and
our
council
members
are
able
to
hear
you.
Thank
you.
B
L
Good
evening,
I
would
like
to
begin
by
thanking
mayor
City,
Council,
Members
city
of
employees
in
the
city
of
Boulder,
for
this
opportunity
to
speak.
My
name
is
Glenn
brellinger
and,
along
with
my
partner,
Diane
Hastings,
we
own
braungardt
Aviation
the
maintenance
facility
at
Boulder
municipal
airport.
We
are
a
highly
risk
adverse
business
that
is
operated
there
for
over
30
years
in
compliance
with
all
city
regulations,
including
voluntary
noise,
pavement
processors.
L
We
have
willfully
contributed
to
the
community
in
several
many
ways,
but
most
of
all,
during
its
time
of
highest
needs,
Opening
Our
Hangar
to
help
the
Boulder
Hill
harmonic
Orchestra
have
a
2021
season
donated
our
time
and
space
in
2013,
the
First
Responders
for
the
boulder
flood
and
then
2020
again
opened
our
Hangar
doors
for
the
First
Responders
of
the
wildfires
that
threatened
our
city
in
our
history
of
operating
our
small
business.
Here
in
Boulder,
we
have
never
seen
the
current
conditions
of
Interest
or
intensity
from
the
council
or
Community
about
our
airport.
L
While
we
are
grateful
for
the
much
needed
positive
attention,
the
safety
risk
mitigation
and
communication
for
the
past
few
years
were
highly
Disturbed
of
the
impacts
to
our
business
through
actions
taken
by
the
city
towards
the
entire
airport
business
Community.
As
a
result
of
one
tenants,
disrespectful
actions
regarding
noise
abatement,
this
current
negative
and
restrictive
environment,
further
compounded
by
comments
about
closing
the
airport
is
significantly
impacting
our
business,
our
livelihood
and
our
employees.
L
B
N
A
M
It
is
on
the
recommendation
of
Dr
Harvey
Nichols
that
I
come
before
council.
With
my
questions
and
comments
concerning
the
Marshall
fire
I
believe
the
12
tribes
Community
deserves
full
presumption
of
innocence.
The
Marshall
fire
should
not
become
a
crucible
to
test
the
legitimacy
of
their
faith
or
our
procedural
Justice.
M
M
That's
mysterious
next
slide
on
Mother's
Day
1969,
a
plutonium
fire
at
the
same
facility
endangered
the
very
habitability
of
the
greater
Denver
region.
Releasing
thousands
of
pounds
of
fissile
material
into
the
environment.
Plutonium
is
pyrophoric,
pyrophoric
material
can
automatically
combust
under
many
conditions.
The
sudden
combustibility
of
the
Front
Range
is
a
more
is
more
urgent
than
cancer.
Next
slide
detectives
may
only
have
to
look
to
history
to
find
the
origin
of
the
Marshall
fire.
M
M
What
if
there
is
a
simple
answer
to
these
questions
in
2012,
Kristen
Iverson
writes
there
is
no
emergency
response
plan
to
protect
the
public
in
the
event
of
a
major
disaster
at
Rocky
Flats
next
slide
today.
That
still
holds
true.
That
is
why
I'm
calling
on
city
council
to
commission
the
testing
of
Marshall
Mesa
and
the
surrounding
area
for
Alpha
emitting
particles,
so.
B
O
Evan
ravitz
North
Boulder
everything
here
looks
like
an
infomercial,
as
Mark
called
part
of
the
last
show
from
your
declarations
to
the
falsehood.
Every
meeting
that
the
city
has
engaged
with
Community
to
co-create
a
vision
for
participation
when
actually
Council
cut
our
participation
from
three
minutes
to
two
less
than
any
other
big
city
in
Colorado
in
2017.
O
mayor
mayor
Brockett
has
shown
his
insincerity
in
five
years.
He
told
council
at
least
four
times.
We
should
open
a
legal
camp
for
the
homeless,
like
Denver.
Has
eight
of
he's
had
a
majority
on
Council
to
make
it
happen,
but
has
renegged
Aaron's
betrayal
and
council's
acceptance
will
directly
result
in
more
deaths,
amputations
and
misery
this
winter,
as
you
cannot
prepare
for
the
cold
if
you're
being
evicted
every
few
days,
Nicole
asked
On
The
Hotline.
Why
persecute
the
homeless?
O
Because
that's
what
downtown,
Boulder
and
Governor
polis
want
a
downtown
Boulder
board
member
told
me
quote:
downtown
Boulder
runs
the
city
polis,
told
the
media.
He
was
happy
when
a
homeless
camp
near
his
Penthouse
was
swept
away
again.
Mayor
Brockett
is
looking
to
move
up
in
politics
and
wants
a
job
with
the
governor.
Like
former
Boulder
Mayors
will
tour
and
Sean
McGrath
and
county
commissioner
Elise
Jones
and
disgraced
City
I.T
director
Julia
Richmond
we're
just
there
stepping
still
Aaron
told
me.
We
lack
employees
to
open
a
camp.
Of
course.
O
P
My
name
is
Patrick
Murphy
2A
or
not
2A,
2B
or
not
2B.
Those
are
the
climate
action.
Questions
pair
of
no's
are
a
good
answer.
I'm
a
botanist,
clinicologist
and
I've
lived
in
Boulder
53
years,
unless
you're
dead,
you've
noticed
that
climate
has
changed
fast.
Why,
on
Earth
would
I
oppose
spending
Millions
on
climate
change,
I'm
opposed
because
it
isn't
being
spent
wisely
and
there's
no
reason
to
believe
that'll
change.
Remember
the
30
million
dollar
Muni
that
didn't
work.
The
new
climate,
inaction
leader
is
a
leftover
from
the
plan,
a
Muni.
P
What's
missing
from
the
plan.
B
climate
action
is
a
cost
benefit
analysis,
an
honest
external
audit
and
good
logic.
First,
money
Boulder
got
to
keep
all
the
leftover
money
when
the
muni
ended
most
of
that
money
doesn't
fully
end
until
2025..
The
muni
was
a
big
mistake
and
the
current
climate
in
action
has
gone
bad
again.
P
Next
comes
cost
benefit.
What's
the
percent
of
budget?
That's
employee,
paychecks
more
than
40
percent,
but
more
likely,
50
percent
or
more
since
they're,
hiring
more
people
exactly
how
much
carbon
is
being
reduced
by
hiring
18
or
more
people.
A
simple
cost
benefit
analysis
will
answer
that
in
a
way
that
all
the
mumbling
in
the
world
won't
change.
We
need
an
actual
cost
benefit
analysis,
not
a
long
list
of
the
good
things
they
intend
to
do
or
paper
plates
they
recycled,
keep.
F
P
Simple
audit,
the
true
cost
per
ton
of
carbon
reduction
fast
and
honestly
documented,
is
what
I
want
carbon
reduction.
No
Such
Thing
exists
in
2A
or
2B.
2A
has
a
long
list
of
good
intentions,
collaboration,
hot
air
and
zilly.
Excuse
me,
zillions
of
trivial
goals
that
fail.
The
cost
benefit
analysis,
as
if
an
honest
cost
benef
analysis
were
ever
done
next
time.
Boulder's
bad
logic.
Q
I
speak
today
against
the
dividing
up
of
the
job
of
governing
to
other
non-governmental
bodies
that
have
then
got
a
right
to
tax
or
pocketbook
like
for
the
Library
District
I.
Think
of
myself
as
a
library,
champ
Champion,
but
abhor
this
idea
of
undermining
representative
democracy
and
letting
a
non-governmental
agency
at
my
pocketbook.
How
can
I
vote
them
out
when
they're
not
elected?
Q
This
non-democratic
way
to
run
our
town
I'll,
happily
join
hands
with
anyone
in
both
the
council
out
that
feels
unable
to
govern
within
the
bounds
of
democracy,
where
I
elect
those
who
taxed
me.
I
seem
to
remember
that
as
a
rallying
cry
during
our
revolutionary
history,
no
taxation
without
representation.
Q
It's
simply
irresponsible.
The
library
lives
within
a
bigger
context,
but
don't
cut
the
pie
up.
Isn't
there
a
biblical
story
about
this
with
a
child
in
dispute?
Isn't
there
a
child's
fairy
tale
about
the
goose
that
laid
the
golden
egg?
You
don't
cut
it
to
pieces
to
take
out
your
favorite
part,
you
kill
the
hole.
C
And
mayor,
if
I
may
just
ask
the
public
as
you
approach
the
mic
feel
free
to
adjust
your
microphone,
so
people
in
the
back
can
hear
you.
Thank
you.
R
R
I
live
in
a
BHP
complex,
my
80
year
old
mother
lives
in
the
apartment
next
door,
I'm
her
caregiver,
one
of
them
she's
lived
there
for
about
15
years.
I've
lived
there
for
about
two
two
and
a
half.
Over
the
last
several
months,
our
small
complex
of
just
a
few
dozen
Apartments
has
seen
a
rash
of
crime.
R
R
R
B
I
appreciate
everyone's
demonstration
of
support.
That
brings
us
to
a
past
piece
of
decorum
that
we
actually
need
to
add
back
into
our
descriptions
now
that
we're
in
person,
which
is
that
we
ask
for
people
in
so
that
everyone
feels
respected
and
appreciated
equally
to
not
make
applaud
or
say
yes
or
no
to
when
people
are
speaking.
But
if
you
want,
you
can
do
a
little
bit
of
jazz
hands,
but
we'd
ask
for
no
applause
or
booze
or
anything
like
that.
Thanks
so
much
everyone
now,
we've
got
Valerie
love,
Jonathan,
singer
and
Kathleen
gold.
S
Good
evening,
I'm
Jonathan,
singer
I'm
the
senior
policy
program
director
for
the
boulder
Chamber
of
Commerce,
and
it's
great
to
see
you
all
in
three
dimensions
and
I'm
glad
that
we
still
have
some
one-dimensional,
dad
jokes,
so
wow,
okay,
that
did
better
than
yours,
we're
gonna.
We're
gonna
have
to
team
up
on
this
later.
So
all
right.
So
so
the
reason
I'm
here
actually
has
to
do
with
the
September
one
meeting,
and
it
also
dovetails
perfectly
with
your
budget
meeting
as
well.
S
So
I
figured
I'd
take
a
little
bit
of
time
this
evening,
instead
of
a
lot
of
time
later
on
this
evening.
But
the
conversation
on
homelessness
is
something
that
the
boulder
chamber
has
been
paying
close
attention
to
and
really
seeks
to
be,
an
active
engaged
partner.
There's
a
common
denominator
that
you
see
on
the
issue
of
homelessness,
and
that
is
that
there's
an
extreme
desire
for
for
safety
and
stability,
whether
you're
a
person
experiencing
homelessness,
whether
you're,
a
business
owner.
S
S
What
I
did
notice
in
the
conversation
on
September
1
is
there
are
some
opportunities
at
the
state
level
that
and
at
the
regional
level
that
provide
some
of
the
solutions
that
will
get
us
to
some
of
these
answers,
with
hundreds
of
millions
of
dollars
coming
in
through
arpa
to
the
state
government
to
be
given
out
to
local
communities.
This
is
a
time
to
strike
where
the
iron
is
high
and,
while
we're
asking
for
the
city
council
to
act,
we're
also
operating
in
a
way
that
offers
our
assistance
as
well.
S
The
boulder
chamber
Works
closely
with
the
Northwest
chamber
Alliance,
which
includes
the
Boulder
County,
Latino
and
lgbtq
Chamber
of
Commerce,
as
well
as
the
towns
of
Louisville,
Lafayette,
Erie,
Superior
and
Broomfield,
and
we
seek
to
have
a
conversation
host
as
many
opportunity
host
as
many
voices
as
possible
and
come
up
with
those
Creative
Solutions
with
you
and
actives
and
active
engaged
partner.
So
with
that,
we
look
forward
to
the
conversation
tonight
and
just
know
that
we
will
be
there
to
work
with
you.
B
T
Yeah,
thank
you.
It
got
put
in
the
junk
folder
for
other
staff,
hi
Aloha.
My
name
is
Valerie
and
I'm
here
to
talk
for
the
children
there
you
go
welcome
to
Boulder.
So
next
slide.
T
T
But
we
were
very
wrong.
My
children
live
in
fear
every
day
they
go
to
Boulder
high
school
they're
terrified,
my
daughter
is
suicidal.
Children
are
killing
themselves
at
Boulder,
High
they're
afraid
to
go.
Have
lunch
in
the
park,
they're
afraid
to
walk
by
the
creek?
What
are
you
guys
doing
about
it?.
T
We
owe
them
better
in
New
York
they
had
the
broken
windows
Theory,
which
helped
clean
up
New
York
and
helped
prevent
more
deaths,
visible
signs
of
disorder
and
misbehavior
encourage
further
disorder
and
misbehavior
Boulder
is
a
magnet
for
drugs
and
violence.
You
just
saw
it
on
Saturday
night
next
slide.
Thank
you.
T
T
T
Do
we
need
a
shooting,
like
this
past
weekend
in
order
for
you
to
take
Serious
action,
one
more
slide,
because
this
is
the
slide
that
I'm
going
to
start
putting
on
social
media
and
I'm
going
to
make
flyers
of
it,
and
it's
going
to
be
awesome
next,
one
overdose
death
enough
is
enough.
One
more
there
you
go
welcome
to
Boulder,
free
camping,
free
bikes
and
shopping
carts,
no
jail
time,
hey
and
guess
what
lots
of
drugs
and
needles.
U
Her
just
turned
eight-year-old
offered
to
drop
the
books
off
in
the
drop-off
box,
got
out
of
the
car
approached
the
front
doors
of
the
library
well
and
I
was
going
to
go
around
to
drop
off.
The
box
was
approached
by
a
woman
who
had
been
sitting
on
the
bench
she
yelled
at
him.
Hey
little
boy
come
with
me.
U
U
I'm,
assuming
the
woman
was
homeless,
I
volunteered
at
the
Boulder
homeless,
shelter
for
a
couple
years,
but
the
woman
then
approached
another
woman
and
child
another
man
and
child
who
took
his
son's
skateboard
and
was
going
to
hit
the
woman
and
then
approached
a
handicapped
woman
getting
out
of
her
car
now.
I
know
you
guys
are
trying
to
work
on
this.
I
lived
here
in
the
70s
and
over
the
last
10
years,
I've
come
back
and
forth
from
Ohio.
You
guys
know
the
problem.
U
I
know
you're
trying
to
work
on
it,
but
little
children
should
not
be
afraid
to
come
downtown
to
the
library
you
need
to
get
it
fixed,
I
called
Gene
Patton
out
at
the
Boulder
Police
Department
today
that
had
a
Personnel,
she
said:
you're
down,
30
officers
get
some
officers
down
there,
man
they
should
be
down
there
in
front
of
that
place.
Full
time.
I
encourage
the
public
to
report
these
incidents
to
do
police
reports.
I
also
encourage
you
to
pay
your
police
officers
more.
You
know
they
put
their
lives
on
the
line.
U
V
Thank
you
so
much
members
of
the
council,
I'm
Tony
Sarge
I'm,
grateful
to
be
here
speaking
with
you
tonight
before
your
discussion
later
this
evening
about
eliminating
local
taxes
on
necessary
Health
products
such
as
diapers
and
menstrual
products
for
the
city
of
Boulder.
V
As
a
parent
of
a
sweet
18
month
old,
we
spend
about
eight
eighty
dollars
a
month
on
diapers
as
a
household
with
two
women
who
get
their
periods.
We
spend
about
25
dollars
a
month
on
tampons
and
other
supplies.
V
We
are
lucky
enough
to
be
able
to
shop
at
Big
retail
stores
or
even
get
subscription
Services,
which
saves
our
family
money
and
keeps
these
costs
as
low
as
possible.
Not
all
families
have
this
option,
though.
New
data
from
the
Colorado
women's
health
and
hygiene
access
service
conducted
this
summer
told
us
that
57
percent
of
coloradans,
with
young
children
struggle
to
afford
diapers,
57
and
47
of
people
currently
menstruating
are
experiencing
menstrual
hygiene
product
poverty.
V
E
Good
evening,
thank
you
very
much
for
letting
me
have
the
time
to
talk
to
you
and
everyone
in
the
audience.
I'm
speaking
on
behalf
of
the
Arts
and
funding
for
the
Arts
I
want
to
thank
Boulder,
Arts,
commission
I
want
to
thank
BCAA
and
other
the
community
center.
Everybody
who
supports
the
Arts
in
Boulder
and
I
know
you
all
do,
and
so
I'd
like
that
continued
and
hopefully
improved
I,
run
a
underserved
music
education
program
that
we
teach
for
free.
E
We
teach
seven
different
instruments
and
we
teach
the
underserved
youth
of
Boulder,
we've
been
doing
it
since
2015
and
it
has
been
funded
by
the
city
and
our
private
donations
of
our
company.
We
see
this
as
a
tremendous
thing
to
help
lift
up
the
underserved
Youth
and
make
them
a
part
of
the
community
instead
of
being
pushed
aside
and
not
being
helped
in
any
such
way,
and
please
remember
that
the
Arts
are
what
make
boulders
special.
E
Yes,
we
have
the
beautiful
foothills
and
that's
great
and
we
have
a
beautiful
town
and
we
have
problems
like
every
other
town
in
the
country,
but
the
Arts
are
what
make
us
special
and
so
we'd
like
to
make
sure
that
you
vote
for
that
that
you
help
with
any
way
that
you
can
and
know
that
all
of
us
who
are
artists
and
do
what
we
can
to
help
the
community
we'll
make
it
better.
Thank
you
for
your
time.
Thank
you.
Mom.
B
W
You
also
have
an
opportunity
to
give
Bolder
families
a
break
tonight,
a
tax
break
two
months
ago,
a
law
with
strong
bipartisan
support
went
into
effect,
exempting
essential
hygiene
items
like
diapers
incontinence
products
and
menstrual
products
from
Colorado
sales
tax.
Several
cities
have
already
followed
suit.
We're
very
pleased
that
Boulder
City
Council
is
taking
this
issue
up
for
discussion
tonight.
W
Removing
sales
tax
on
these
essential
items
would
lower
the
effective
cost
of
diapers
tampons
and
pads.
Often,
these
topics
are
deemed
too
embarrassing
or
inappropriate
for
public
conversation.
Thank
you
for
normalizing
the
conversation,
babies,
women
and
girls.
Other
people
who
menstruate
and
elderly
people
require
these
products
to
go
about
their
daily
life
with
dignity.
W
These
sales
tax
fall
disproportionately
on
people
who
can
least
afford
them,
including
women,
struggling
young
families
and
older
adults
on
fixed
incomes.
If
you
wonder,
if
small
changes
can
make
a
difference
for
needy
families,
just
think
of
how
many
times
in
the
grocery
store
the
mother
or
elderly
couple
ahead
of
you
in
the
line
ask
the
cashier
to
put
something
back,
because
they're
total
exceeded
their
funds
that
day
Boulder
doesn't
have
to
figure
this
out,
how
to
do
it.
On
their
own.
W
Today,
the
women's
Foundation
of
Colorado
launched
a
tool
kit
for
communities
to
join
their
don't
tax
dignity
campaign.
They
want
to
spread
the
good
work.
That's
been
done
at
our
legislature
to
municipalities
around
the
state.
We
encourage
you
to
follow
the
lead
of
bipartisan
legislators
and
municipalities
throughout
the
country
and
Colorado
and
exempt
essential
hygiene
products
from
sales
tax.
Thank.
H
Thank
you,
yeah
I
would
really
like
to
see
the
slideshow
and
I
don't
buy
that
it's
because
security
that
I
can't
see
the
slides,
because
I'm
virtual
I'm,
not
vaxxed
I,
don't
want
to
be
in
spaces
when
I
don't
have
to
be
and
I.
Don't
think
this
is
fair
now.
What
I
want
to
talk
to
you
about
tonight
is
about
the
landmarks
board
and
the
landmarks
design
Review
Committee.
H
The
landmarks
design
review
committee
meetings
are
not
recorded
at
all,
so
everything
in
them
happens
under
the
radar.
I
saw
two
situations
going
on
there.
One
was
for
some
windows
that
some
woman,
that's
a
historic
preservationist.
That's
done.
19
historic
preservations
wanted
in
the
little
Russia
section,
Floral
Park.
To
add
some
windows,
thirty
thousand
dollars
very
expensive
windows
and
she
was
cut
off
by
the
landmarks
board.
H
Well,
the
there's
two
board
members
that
meet
for
the
ldrc
she
was
cut
off.
She
spoke
some
about
her
windows,
but
when
she
tried
to
speak
a
little
more,
she
was
cut
off
now.
Sometimes
it's
excusable,
because
if
it's
going
to
go
to
the
landmarks
board
anyway,
then
they
have
to
stop
the
person
from
bringing
it
up
at
the
time.
H
Instead,
I
don't
feel
she
got
enough
time
to
argue
for
her
windows
and
she
got
passed
to
the
landmarks
board.
So
she's
going
to
be
cold
until
December,
trying
to
get
Windows
and.
B
X
Good
evening
councilors
this
is
Ryan
Welsh
based
in
Boulder
I
assume
you
can
hear
me.
Yes,
yes,
awesome.
First
of
all,
I'd
like
to
just
express
my
condolences
to
the
counselor
who
lost
a
family
member
this
past
week,
I'm
also
sorry
for
the
unwarranted
vitriol
you've
had
directed
towards
you,
especially
during
a
tough
time.
That's
not
fair!
X
In
the
time
of
climate
crisis,
when
we
should
have
an
entire
downtown
core
of
car
free
community
spaces,
like
other
cities
in
the
world,
we
failed
to
keep
two
extra
blocks.
You
might
think
we
can
Club
a
Mac
from
Community
Vitality
in
the
spring,
but
we
shouldn't
even
have
to
fight
for
just
two
blocks.
These
should
be
permanent
spaces
for
people,
along
with
20,
more
giving
Community,
vitality's,
clear
disinterest,
Community
spaces
and
Community
input.
X
You
might
have
guessed
that
I'm
also
concerned
about
a
Broadway
multi-use
path.
One
of
the
few
north-south
baltaze
paths
said
everyone
aged
880
can
currently
use
with
relative
safety.
You
know
CU
plans
to
run
their
new
conference
Center's
traffic
directly
over
this
protected
path.
Will
the
city
and
Council
sit
back
and
let
it
happen,
I
hope
not
and
I
hope
this
is
a
place.
X
Y
Thank
you
all
right,
good
evening
hear
about
some
concerns
about
potential
habitat,
Factory
you're,
going
to
hear
more
about
later.
The
story
keeps
changing
and
communication
has
been
very
poor.
A
month
ago,
the
planning
board
was
told
about
eight
houses
a
year
with
a
few
more
possible
after
a
learning
process.
Y
September
12th
letter
from
Jay
sugnet
said
50
to
80
a
year
up
more
than
10
times
or
10
times.
Meeting
last
week's
handout
said
12
to
15
a
year
with
options
to
increase
capacity
to
50
a
year.
Does
this
mean
24-hour
operation
heard
a
while
ago
that
doors
would
be
away
from
close
neighbors
heard
recently
from
habitat
drive-through
doors
south
to
North
finally
see
drawings?
Last
week,
with
several
garage
doors
facing
close
Neighbors
on
the
east
Net
Zero
Energy
is
not
noise
zero.
There
is
resistance
to
hiring
an
acoustic,
sound
engineer.
Y
I,
don't
know
why
thermal
insulation
is
not
the
same
as
noise
insulation,
nail
guns
and
backup.
Beeps
are
much
more
piercing
than
background
traffic.
It
will
not
be
easy
to
fix
if
not
designed
with
sound
requirements
in
mind,
perhaps
impossible
to
fix,
with
all
the
doors
facing
the
neighborhood
and
less
recently
changed.
No
hours
or
noise
restrictions
are
in
the
written
agreement.
Y
Given
all
the
changes
should
there
be
a
do-over
with
the
planning
board
seems
like
there's
been
a
bait
and
switch.
We
understand
that
once
the
annexation
is
done,
all
controlled
by
the
city
is
lost.
It
seems
there
should
be
several
written
restrictions
in
the
agreement
about
the
hours
eight
to
four
a.m:
Tuesday
Saturday
meeting
all
the
County
residential
noise
requirements
that
are
tighter
than
the
city
and
limits
during
the
construction
of
the
factory.
Y
We
heard
all
the
construction
noise
from
the
new
kitchen
facility,
that's
further
away
than
the
factory
and
would
still
be
hearing,
and
we
still
hear
the
not
operational
noise.
It
does
not
seem
right
that
a
school
district
will
be
changed
to
an
industrial
park
right
next
to
a
presidential,
neighborhood
Charles.
B
B
Thanks
for
clarifying
right,
so
that
brings
our
public
hearing
a
public
hearing.
Our
open
comment
to
an
end,
so
I
will
turn
to
staff
to
see
if
we
have
any
responses.
Z
Thank
you
so
much
mayor
and
a
I
want
to
just
appreciate,
as
this
is
my
first
meeting
with
the
public.
It's
just
so
good
to
be
here
in
person
with
everyone,
and
just
so
appreciate
that
appreciate
everyone
who
shared
their
comments.
I
did
want
to
talk
about
two
things
and
I
I
want
to
say,
because
I
want
to
address.
Z
I
know
that
we've
been
thinking
about
the
violent
incident
that
happened
on
the
hill
I
just
want
to
say
that
we
take
this
very
seriously
and
I
want
to
appreciate
the
quick
action
by
our
police
department.
They
have
been
working
closely
with
CU
and
we
will
continue
to
think
about
how
to
address
some
of
the
issues
that
we're
seeing
in
our
community
and
the
other
issue.
Z
I
wanted
to
talk
about
in
terms
of
West,
Pearl
and
Street
program
in
downtown
I,
just
want
to
say
that
I'm
excited
that
we
have
the
process
subcommittee
kicking
off,
hopefully
with
a
vote
on
consent,
and
we
will
be
continuing
to
talk
about
what
that
looks
like
in
community.
Please
know
that
we
hear
folks
and
we
are
committed
to
continuing
to
have
an
engagement
process
about
Place
making
and
creating
additional
spaces
for
our
community
to
come
visit.
So
just
wanted
to
say
that
out
loud.
B
I
Thank
you.
I
have
two
questions,
but
I
want
to
go.
First
to
that
question
about
the
arrest.
Has
there
been
more
information
as
to
what
happened
or
were
the
did
these?
What
happened,
who
are
these
perpetrators,
or
how
did
this
happen?
I
think
community
members
would
want
to
know
more
I,
don't
want
to
speculate,
but
at
first
I
thought.
Okay,
are
these
students
who
are
they
community
members?
I
Are
they
people
from
other
parts
of
the
city,
the
state,
so
I
just
wanted
to
know
more,
and
do
you
have
that
information
eventually
to
share
with
community.
Z
New
microphones
I
appreciate
the
question.
I
I
want
to
make
sure
I'm,
not
speaking
out
a
turn
and
I'm
actually
going
to
ask
our
folks
in
BPD
to
share
what
they
can
as
we
continue
to
have
an
ongoing
investigation.
AA
AA
The
mic,
please
sure
what
I
can
disclose
is,
as
of
this
afternoon,
we
did
make
a
second
arrest.
We
made
the
first
arrest
the
next
day
after
the
person
that
we
were
involved
with,
that
night
was
released
from
the
hospital.
Both
suspects
have
been
charged
with
two
counts
of
attempt.
First
degree:
murder,
they're,
both
in
custody
on
a
five
hundred
thousand
dollar
Bond.
AA
For
this
specific
incident,
none
of
the
involved
people
that
we're
aware
of
are
students.
In
fact,
we
believe
the
majority
of
them
do
not
reside
in
the
city
of
Boulder.
One
of
the
big
questions
that
we've
been
asking
and
trying
to
determine
is
what
Drew
these
folks
to
Boulder
and
then
subsequently
to
engage
in
this
criminal
Behavior.
One
of
the
things
that
we
did
learn
is
there
were
some
words
exchanged
between
two
groups
of
people
and
then
some
shots
were
exchanged.
AA
Our
officers
were
on
foot
in
the
area
literally
around
the
corner,
dealing
with
an
issue
at
a
fraternity,
we're
notified
of
the
call
and
when
they
came
around
the
corner
they
actually
came
around
and
interrupted
this.
This
dispute,
where
shots
had
been
fired
and
officers,
took,
took
Swift
action
that
we
believe
probably
surely
prevented
additional
harm,
which
is
exactly
what
we
would
expect
of
them.
There's
much
more.
That
will
come
out
we're
reviewing
a
lot
of
video
surveillance,
we're
reviewing
and
we
still
have
witnesses
that
we
are
interviewing
and
again
we're
encouraging
anybody.
I
Thank
you
so
much
and
I
have
to
say
when
I
saw
the
pictures
I
was
really
sad,
actually
living
in
Wilder.
It's
such
a
beautiful
place
and
seeing
those
footages
were
really
really
saddening
to
me.
My
next
question
is
has
to
do
with
something
that
Evan
ravitz
mentioned
and
I
wonder.
If
maybe
we
went
from
three
three
minutes
to
two
minutes
for
our
open
comment.
B
Because
I
this,
this
was
a
change
that
that
I
think
either
right
before
I
got
on
cancel
made
my
first
year
on
Council
that
that
Council
changed
the
number
of
minutes
that
were
allowed
and
the
number
of
speakers
so
no
time
recently.
But
but
it
has
been
a
few
years
that
that
change
was
made.
Thank
you,
I
think.
That's
right!.
AB
Mitchell
I
just
wanted
to
thank
Ryan
Welch
for
his
humanity
and
empathy,
and
also,
most
importantly,
for
calling
out
really
inappropriate
online
trolling,
which
I,
don't
really
think
any
of
us
should
be
putting
up
with
in
this
world.
Also
welcome
back
everyone.
It
is
good
to
have
you
it's
hard
to
speak,
really
passionately
live
on
topics,
and
so
it's
it's
great
to
have
you
all
back
thanks.
C
Z
AC
AD
AD
So
good
evening,
council
members,
my
name
is
shabnam
bista
I'm,
a
senior
planner
with
planning
and
development
services.
I'll
provide
a
brief
presentation
on
the
process
to
date
for
the
annexation
of
6500
Arapahoe
Road.
AD
In
terms
of
the
process.
To
date,
the
annexation
negotiations
have
been
ongoing
with
the
school
districts
with
the
Boulder
Valley
School
District,
since
2018.
the
annexation
application
was
filed
and
routed
for
a
review
by
planning
and
development
services
in
July
of
2021,
since
there
were
continued
negotiations
regarding
the
annexation
agreement
terms,
the
planning
board
public
hearing
wasn't
scheduled
until
September
6th
of
this
year.
AD
So
just
last
month
at
the
public
hearing,
planning
board
added
two
conditions
or
proposed
two
conditions
regarding
the
height,
as
well
as
a
form
of
Good
Neighbor
agreement
to
the
annexation
agreement
on
September
29th.
So
last
Thursday
there
was
a
neighborhood
meeting
held
at
6500
Arapahoe
Road
regarding
the
affordable
housing.
AD
Modular
Factory
today
is
the
first
reading
for
the
ordinances
and
then
the
second
reading
and
public
hearing
for
this
item
is
scheduled
for
November
17th
staff
recommends
Council
consideration
of
the
proposed
annexation
at
this
time
in
terms
of
the
two
conditions
from
planning
board.
Those
have
not
been
agreed
to
by
the
school
board
at
this
time.
AD
Just
to
provide
a
brief
overview
of
the
annexation
terms,
additional
details,
it
can
be
found
in
attachment
e
of
the
packet,
which
is
the
annexation
agreement
itself.
AD
I'll
just
highlight
a
few
here,
and
so
the
annexation
agreement
states
that
bbsd
is
a
sovereign
entity
and
the
any
construction
remodeling
Renovations
will
be
permitted
through
the
state
and
not
through
the
city
of
Boulder.
Pvsd
will
pay
storm
water
plant
investment
fees.
They
will
comply
with
City
floodplain
regulations
and
Outdoor
Lighting
standards.
AD
AD
So,
during
the
Council
agenda
committee
meeting,
there
were
a
couple
of
questions
that
came
up
Council
and
we
have
provided
some
responses
here.
So,
in
terms
of
the
question
about
the
10-year
lease,
the
time
frame
is
a
state
limitation
on
how
long
School
District
can
lease
their
property
it's
something
that
can
be
renegotiated
at
the
end
of
that
lease
term
in
regards
to
the
site:
access
after
lengthy
negotiation
staff,
determined
current
access
is
suitable
and
future
improvements
to
Arapahoe
Road
will
be
it
just
at
that
time.
AD
And
lastly,
the
Boulder
Valley
School
District
responded
to
the
two
proposed
conditions
by
planning
board
and
that
was
forwarded
to
council
through
the
hotline.
Email
I
also
want
to
note
that
we
do
have
Kurt
fernhaber
Jay
sugnet
from
housing
department.
If
you
have
any
questions-
and
we
also
have
a
representative
from
the
school
district
present
tonight
for
any
additional
questions,
and
that
concludes
my
presentation.
Thank
you.
AD
Yes,
so
the
two
conditions
that
came
up
through
planning
board
discussions-
one
was
regarding
height
limitations
and
it's
a
board.
Members
felt
that
it
would
be
important
to
impose
the
height
condition
and
I
can
kind
of
share.
AD
So
if
the
property
will
be
continued
to
be
owned
by
Boulder,
Valley
School
District,
all
the
buildings
on
the
property
would
be
limited
to
the
city's
chartered
height
limit,
which
is
55
feet,
and
this
was
something
that
I
believe
was
part
of
the
Sea
of
South
annexation.
So
it
was
a
conversation
among
the
planning
board
members
to
possibly
include
that,
so
the
buildings
could
not
be
built.
You
know
higher
than
the
55
foot
limit
that
we
have
now
and
then.
AD
The
second
condition
was
that
the
school
district
was
will
work
with
residents
in
a
budding
residential
neighborhoods
to
establish
regular
communication
and
some
kind
of
an
agreement
with
reasonable
consideration.
Noise
impacts,
Etc
and
that
I
believe
came
from
the
the
num.
A
large
number
of
public
comments
that
we
had
during
the
public
hearing
from
neighboring
homeowners
who
were
concerned
about
the
the
noise
impacts
of
the
construction,
as
well
as
the
the
operations
of
the
actual
Factory
itself,
and
this
was
something
that
was
I.
AD
Think
additional
deep
details
were
provided
during
that
neighborhood
meeting
on
September,
29th
and
Jake
and
Jason
can
speak
more
to
that
as
he
was
presenting
at
that
meeting.
So.
AF
Thanks,
Jeff
and
I
think
you
indicated
your
initial
presentation
that
the
school
district
has
not
agreed
to
those
two
conditions
request
by
the
planning
board
is
that
does
that
mean
that
they
haven't
been
asked
where
they
were
asked
and
they
rejected
both
conditions.
AF
AD
Yeah
I'll
defer
that
question
to
Jay
segment
from
housing.
AH
I'm
here
good
evening,
everybody
jaystagnets
with
housing
and
Human
Services
yeah.
So
we
have
had
a
conversation
with
the
district
and
have
been
and
will
continue
so
it'll
really
depend
on
how
successful
the
factory
is
and
how
well
the
students
are
integrated
into
the
factory,
but
I
think
the
school
district
was
pretty
concerned
about
including
language
that
could
possibly
violate
state
to
state
requirements.
AH
So
we'll
continue
to
push
that,
but
they
I
don't
have
firm
answer
for
you,
sir
okay.
AI
Can
you
go
into
a
little
more
detail?
The
the
School
District
sent
us
a
letter
or
actually
yeah.
They
sent
a
letter
that
says
that
the
district
is
not
a
desire
to
unnecessarily
prolong
the
annexation
process
by
renegotiating
the
annexation
agreement.
Can
you
tell
me
what
that
process
would
be
that
that
is
so
drawn
out
and
difficult.
AH
AJ
Would
yes,
Glenn
sugru
I'm
the
district's
senior
planner,
so
the
process?
You
know
it
would
essentially
be
looking
at
it
as
a
renegotiation.
We've
been
in
the
negotiation
process
between
two
governments
for
well
over
for
over
a.
Y
AK
AJ
That
good,
okay
just
speak
right
into
it,
so
we
we've
had
it
been
in
a
negotiation
process
for
you
know
over
a
year
now
to
do
this,
and
and
these
conditions
from
The
District's
perspective
would
be
you
know
we
have
to
re-look
at
those
and
reprocess
those
conditions
before
we
could
accept
them
at
all,
and
that
process
would
involve
coming
back.
Of
course,
the
staff
level
going
through
Administration
and
ultimately,
any
land
use
land
decisions
have
to
be
approved
by
the
school
board
themselves.
AJ
I
I
think
in
this
situation,
getting
through
that
process
and
not
having
the
wording
or
those
conditions
changing,
would
be
I
think
a
long
shot.
Frankly,
I
think
that
the
sovereignty
issues
will
continually
come
up
with
the
school
district
and
those
that's
a
very
high
threshold
for
us
to
voluntarily
give
up
and
so
I
think
that
process
could
you
know
it
could
take
a
while
and
and
I
think
the
district's
preference
is
to
keep
the
process
this
process
the
annexation
process
moving.
AI
I
I'd
like
to
respond
to
that
and
I
want
to
preface
my
comment
by
saying
that
when,
when
I
start
drafting
legal
documents,
that
is
a
dangerous
thing.
However,
I
took
a
look
at
the
annexation
agreement
and
the
height
limitation
issue
could
be
resolved
by
adding
all
of
eight
words
to
paragraph
10.
and
I.
When
you
say
this
is
a
very
complic
complicated,
drawn
out
process,
I
am
hard-pressed
to
understand
how
that
is,
and
we
can
discuss
this
more
at
the
at
the
public.
AI
Hearing
on
November
17th,
but
I
I
am
I
am
not
seeing
the
the
issue
the
way
you
are
seeing
the
issue
and,
and
basically
your
letter
says
we
have
no
contemplation
of
going
above
35
feet.
We'd
never
do
such
a
thing,
but
we
can't
tell
you
that
we
would
never
do
such
a
thing
and
I
find
that
to
be
problematic.
I'll
stop
there
so
that
we
can
discuss
it
more
at
the
public
hearing.
V
B
Understood
that
correctly
and
if
I'm
well
I
have
the
floor
and
well
the
second
item
about
Good
Neighbor
agreements.
That
particular
requirement
wasn't
something
that
that
you
wanted
to
agree
to
specifically,
but
I
did
hear
a
commitment
from
the
district
to
continue
doing
public
Outreach
and
and
just
that
you
wanted
to
do
it
on
your
own
terms.
Did
I
understand
that
correctly.
AJ
Well,
we
are
a
public
entity
and
we
have
multiple
avenues
for
for
for
the
public
for
input
and
we've
reached
out
with
neighbors
about.
There
were
many
considerations
in
the
last
meeting
outside
the
realm
of
the
annexation
and
the
modular
factory
and
we're
working
to
resolve
as
many
of
those
as
we
can
now.
B
School
Board
District
representative
any
more
questions
for
no
okay,
so
I
guess
we'll
thank
you
for
for
addressing
the
the
question
and
so
I
think.
Yes,
if
people
don't
have
further
questions,
we
could
go
into
a
discussion
on
this
item.
So
if
you
get
comments
or
do
you
have
a
question?
Okay,
let's
go
for
a
question.
D
If
we
were
to
subsequently
modify
our
lighting
order,
ordinance
past
an
approved
annexation,
would
those
rules
carry
into
that
annexation
or
does
the
annexation
lock
into
the
current
version
of
our
lighting
ordinance,
not
a
future
change
that
that
may
come
down
the
pipeline
in
some
discussions,
we're
going
to
probably
have
about
outdoor
lighting
and
street
lights
and
that
sort
of
thing.
AC
Brad
Miller
with
planning
and
development
services
I
believe
it
would
be
subject
to
that.
The
then
current
code,
in
the
case
of
both
floodplain
and
lighting,
we
can
confirm
that
for
second
reading,
but
that's
my
understanding
and
I'm
getting
a
nod
from
very
reputable
people.
AB
Well,
maybe
I'll
try
and
reframe
it
as
a
question
for
staff
just
so
that
Brad
can
like
hop
right
back
up
or
it
might
be
for
Kurt
for,
however
I'm
not
even
sure,
but
you
know
to
Mark's
point
about
eight.
You
know
eight
words
being
needed
in
an
annexation
agreement
in
in
my
peripheral
experience
with
annexation
agreements.
AB
Sometimes
sometimes
things
are
given
and
taken,
and
so
it's
not
necessarily
a
matter
of
eight
words.
But
if
you,
if
we're
to
make
a
demand,
then
we
also
have
to
give
something
back
and
there's
back
and
forth
in
exchange
of
sort
of
value.
So
I'm
just
wondering
was
that
is
that
something
that
staff
wants
us
to
discuss
was
it
discussed?
Is
it
a
very
simple
thing
to
add
eight
words,
or
is
it
likely
to
be
a
a
thing.
AC
This
is
Brad
again
I
hate
to
play
the
new
guy
card,
but
I'm
going
to
go
ahead
and
do
that
right
now,
which
is
to
say
that
my
understanding
is
that
there's
been
actually
years
of
discussion
around
this
I
would
say
in.
In
my
experience
too,
on
any
kind
of
negotiation.
Sure
there's
always
your
once.
You
open
that
up
again,
there's
going
to
be
back
and
forth.
I
don't
disagree
that
it's
a
fairly
straightforward
change
to
adopt
those
things.
AC
I,
don't
have
a
good
frame
of
reference
for
how
difficult
that
is
to
go
through
the
school
processing
and
such
but
I
can
certainly
say
that,
given
the
history
and
length
of
history
as
I
understood
it,
we
concluded
as
staff
that
it
was
at
least
appropriate
to
put
this
out
in
front
of
council
at
this
time.
For
maybe
just
this
discussion
about
whether
it
is
ripe
or
not.
B
Well,
I'll,
just
a
last
word
here
so
I
think.
If,
if
we
approve
the
consent
agenda
as
written,
it
will
not
include
those
two
conditions
requested
conditions
from
planning
board,
I'll
just
say:
I.
We
will
have
a
public
hearing,
a
number
November
17th,
where
we'll
have
a
chance
to
hear
from
the
public
on
this
matter,
but
I'm
certainly
comfortable
moving
it
forward
without
those
two
conditions
at
this
time
and
we'll
take
it
from
there.
From
from
my
opinion.
AF
Yes,
yeah
I'm,
not
comfortable
I'll
vote
Yes
to
move
it
forward
to
it
to
a
second
reading,
because
we're
not
going
to
get
substantive
comments
but
I'll
just
say
to
the
school
District.
It
would
be
my
intention
to
vote
no
a
second
reading
unless
the
height
limitation
is
built
into
the
annexation
agreement.
You've
got
six
weeks
to
do
it
if
you're
in
Rush
it'd
be
good
to
get
started
tomorrow.
AI
B
AB
AB
Back
everyone
share
that
you
know
the
the
space
that
we're
talking
about
is
is
there
and
and
the
school
board
does
not
intend
to
to
go
over
35
feet.
But
you
know
it's
not
like
a
Prime
View,
shed
or
area
that
I'm
super
concerned
about
with
edging
over
the
height
limit
a
bit
so
I.
My
intent
would
be
to
vote
Yes
if
I
could
say
that
so.
AG
Yes,
mayor
and
Council
that
that
could
be
appropriate
at
this
point.
I
would
point
out
that
you
have
a
public
hearing
scheduled
and
certainly
your
preliminary
thoughts
on
how
you
might
vote
are
subject
to
the
record,
right
and
and
so
subject
to
the
materials
put
in
front
of
you
and
any
public
comment
received
and
so
I
think
in
the
spirit
of
knowing
that
these
are
preliminary
thoughts.
Certainly
you
could
move
forward
in
that
vein.
B
AG
It
seems
appropriate
to
me
that
you
would
want
to
know
that,
because
if
it
is
the
will
of
counsel
that
this
be
renegotiated,
then
you
may
well
want
to
do
that
before
a
public
hearing.
B
I
Part
of
I've
read
the
memo
in
I.
Certainly
don't
want
to
speak
about
it
publicly.
If
that's
not
was
the
purpose,
but
my
can
we
hold
them
accountable,
assuming
they
say
they
agree
to
the
35,
let's
say
different
Administration
for
VST
and
the
future
decide.
You
know
what
we
don't
want
to.
We
don't
want
to
uphold
this
agreement.
What
can
we
do
at
the
end
of
the
day.
AG
Yes,
so
a
distinct,
it's
important
to
make
a
legal
distinction
here
between
whether
the
school
board
is
required
to
follow
our
land
use
code,
and
the
answer
to
that
is:
it's
it's
certainly
possible
that
they're
not
required
to
do
so.
AC
Z
I
just
wanted
to
add
that
it
for
clarification
purposes
for
staff
and
perhaps
nod
that
you're
giving
to
the
school
board.
It
is
perhaps
right
now
helpful
to
know
without
perhaps
even
a
straw
poll,
but
these
are
your
concerns,
knowing
that
we
will
have
time
at
second
reading
to
discuss
more,
there
will
be
continued
conversation
and,
if
there
is
desire
to
say
could
be
supportive,
but
this
is
going
to
be
a
deal
breaker
for
to
me.
It
seems
like
that
is
in
the
vein
of
the
comments
that
you're
offering.
Z
B
D
I'm,
just
not
I'm,
not
comfortable,
going
that
far
down
until
we've
heard
from
more
of
the
community
I
I
just
I
think
that's
really
out
of
form
for
us
to
do
that.
Predetermining.
Some
outcome
based
on
something
I,
don't
know
I'm,
not
quite
comfortable
for
that
at
this
juncture.
So
I'd
love
to
just
stick
with
comments,
rather
than
what
your
intended
vote
would
be.
I
I
think.
B
We
should
avoid
that
yeah.
Well,
I
wasn't
proposing
what
your
intent
about
would
be,
but
point
taken.
So
let's
just
say
we
can
leave
it
at
the
comments
that
we've
given
we'll
hear
from
the
public
through
emails
through
the
public
hearing
and
then
we'll
have
conversation
from
there.
That's
all
right,
yep
Nicole.
AM
I
just
wanted
to
make
a
comment
as
somebody
who
works
in
a
large
state
bureaucracy.
Eight
words
in
an
agreement
is
not
five
minutes.
It
really
is
a
lot
of
time
and
so
I
just
want
to
empathize
with
everybody.
Who's
been
working
on
this
agreement
for
years,
recognizing
that
it's
not
necessarily
A
straightforward
thing
to
make
this
change
at
this
stage
of
the
process.
AB
Up,
okay,
I'm
wrapping
it
up
just
one
of
one
of
the
things
that
I
highlighted
in
the
agreement
was
that
bbsd
agrees
to
pay
the
city,
storm
water,
plant
investment
fee
of
approximately
2.1
million
dollars
and
to
council
member
Spears
point.
When
you
go
to
renegotiate
it's
it's
going
to
be
a
bureaucracy
and
and
there's
always
give
and
take,
and
so
I.
B
D
Would
love
that
all
right
I
make
a
motion
to
pass
the
consent
agenda.
H
B
AB
AN
AB
Sorry
3H
now
just
that
there
may
be
some
Community
confusion
around
a
sentence
in
their
discussion
of
policy
issues
and
specific
potential
Street
designs,
including
determinations,
if
possible.
Permanent
future
street
closures
shall
not
be
part
of
this
subcommittee's
purpose
and
those
are
reserved
for
the
full
Council.
So
I
just
didn't
know
if
maybe
Teresa
or
Nuria
wanted
to
explain
sort
of
whether
that's
usual
standard
for
subcommittees
or
any
cause
for
alarm.
Z
Foreign
Pro,
tem
and
I
will
say:
I,
don't
believe
it's
cause
for
alarm.
I
believe
that
that
is
language
that
we've
seen
used
before
and
former
process
committees.
We
want
to
make
sure
that
the
full
Council
weighs
in
on
determinations
of
policy
decisions
moving
forward
and
that
the
process
subcommittee,
which
we're
excited
to
have
two
volunteers
who
raised
their
hands,
can
help
staff,
as
we
continue
to
think
about
what
the
next
steps
on
a
full-throated
engagement
of
this
work
is.
C
D
C
C
C
All
right,
sir,
so
this
is
our
public
hearing
item
five
on
tonight's
agenda
and
I
will
of
course
not
read
all
the
titles
and
summarize
that
it
is
a
consideration
of
the
following
items
relating
to
the
2023
budget.
First,
we
have
the
introduction
and
first
reading
of
the
ordinance
8535
adopting
the
budget
for
the
city
of
Boulder
for
the
year
2023
item
number
two
is
the
introduction
and
first
reading
of
the
ordinance
8536,
which
is
establishing
the
2022
city
of
Boulder
property
tax
meal
levies.
B
Thank
you
and
I'll
just
note
for
the
benefit
of
the
people
here
in
person
that
will
have
a
count,
we'll
have
a
staff
presentation,
we'll
have
Council
questions
and
then
we'll
go
to
the
public
hearing
and
then
conclude
with
council
discretion
in
the
vote.
So
Nuri
if
I
can
hand
this
off
to
you.
Thank.
Z
You
so
much
mayor
and
I
was
just
going
to
appreciate
Alicia,
because
that
was
a
mouthful.
It's
great
off
I'm,
going
to
send
it
to
our
CFO
Cara
Skinner
right
away,
but
I
just
wanted
to
make
it
to
thank
Council
for
their
thoughtfulness,
as
we
continue
to
get
questions
and
comments
and
how
engaged
you
have
been
in
this
budget
process.
So
we
would
just
really
appreciate
all
your
attention
to
what
is
really
an
important
milestone
for
any
city,
as
we
think
about
our
Budget
moving
forward.
So
with
that
Cara.
AO
Thank
you
Nuria
and
good
evening.
Council
Cara
Skinner
Chief
Financial
Officer.
So
we
are
here
and
we're
pleased
to
present
the
first
reading
and
public
hearing
for
the
2023
budget
and
we
will
start
with
a
presentation
on
Mark,
wolf,
senior
budget
manager
and
I
will
have
a
brief
process
overview
and
recap.
But
we
really
will
focus
on
follow-up
from
the
study
session,
as
well
as
some
staff
and
Council
proposed
budget
changes
and
then
find
finish
up
with
some
discussion
about
future
budget
considerations
and
potential
long-term
funding
strategies.
AO
AO
AO
We
also
are
programming
to
spend
down
ending
fund
balance
after
reserves
for
one-time
priority
projects
and
pilot
projects.
AO
We
wanted
to
share
again
that
what
we
first
did
was
build
a
2023
base
budget
that
included,
of
course,
some
adjustments
to
base
that
were
made
during
the
year
this
year,
as
we
tried
to
restore
programs
and
services
quickly
as
revenues
allowed,
and
we
made
another
of
many
other
budget
changes
to
be
more
strategic
and
our
departments
always
reevaluate
their
budgets
and
and
their
programs
and
services,
and
make
some
adjustments,
and
that
is
included
as
part
of
that
base
budget.
So
we
have
that
base
budget
before
we
then
considered
new
enhancements
or
new
Investments.
AO
So
as
we
develop
our
2023
budget,
we
start
with
Revenue.
So
for
2023
the
Rev
total
revenue
across
all
funds
is
491
million,
and
that
is
a
3.6
percent
increase
over
2022.
AO
And
then
the
expenditure
budget
for
2023
is
513.5
million.
So,
as
noted,
that
is
more
than
the
revenue
budget,
and
that
is
because,
as
we
discussed
in
September,
we
are
planning
some
draws
from
fund
balance
to
fund
one-time
expenses
and
pilot
programs.
So
the
difference
between
the
revenue
on
the
previous
slide
and
the
expenditure
budget
here
is
that
draw
from
fund
balance.
AO
This
slide
shows
total
uses
and
it's
we
know
it
has
a
lot
of
information,
but
on
the
left,
side
of
the
slide
is
total
uses
across
all
of
our
departments
and
programs,
and
the
largest
piece
of
the
pie.
You'll
see
is
utilities,
that's
water,
Wastewater
flood
and
storm
water,
and
so
you
can
look
and
see
that
that
is
the
largest
and
then
Transportation
police,
housing
and
Human
Services
and
fire
rescue.
AO
But
then
we
also
like
to
show
the
pie
on
the
right
without
utilities,
because
that
gives
you
a
little
more
granularity
of
those
other
programs,
since
utilities
is
so
large.
So
on
the
right
hand,
side
you'll
see
a
little
bit
more
depth,
then
this
slide
we
wanted
to
present
again.
This
shows:
how
does
our
2023
budget
compare
to
a
pre-pandemic
budget
if
it
was
adjusted
for
inflation,
so
the
purple
bars?
AO
There
are
the
approved
budgets
with
the
2023
being
the
proposed
or
the
recommended
budget,
and
then
the
light
blue
is
starting
with
our
2019
budget,
our
pre-pandemic
budget.
We
grew
that
by
inflation,
so
the
blue
bar
is
what
the
2019
budget
would
be
if
it
just
simply
grew
by
inflation.
So
you
will
see
in
2023.
Our
proposed
budget
has
not
kept
up
to
inflation
by
this
measure,
and
here
we
show
the
general
fund.
AO
So
the
general
fund
for
2023
is
188
million
and
you'll
see
there
that
some
of
the
large
pieces
of
the
by
pie
here
are
Public
Safety,
including
police
and
fire
housing
and
Human
Services
and
a
number
of
other,
and
then
you'll
see
there
that
General
government
slice.
We
have
added
a
little
detail
there
of
what
that
accounts
for
and
that
the
large
things
there
are
transfers
to
other
funds,
including
our
general
fund,
funded
Capital
program.
That's
a
big
piece
of
that
and
then
Insurance
costs
and
Debt
Service
and
some
other
city-wide
contracts
and
such.
AO
A
AP
Figure
out
the
mic
all
right
good
evening,
Council
Mark,
Wolfe
senior
budget
manager
excited
to
be
with
you
in
person.
Tonight
I
will
discuss
the
our
recap
of
our
23
budget
and
some
additional
information
to
help
guide
the
discussion
this
evening.
To
begin
the
section.
I'll
recap:
some
of
our
process
improvements
I'll,
highlight
our
commitment
to
Center
our
budget.
Around
Equity
I
will
highlight
our
investments
in
our
course
services
and
City
staff
and
review
some
of
the
key
proposed
investments
in
Council
and
Community
priorities.
AP
We
have
displayed
this
slide
before
we
are
in
the
process
of
implementing
what
is
called
budgeting
for
Community
resilience,
we'll
have
to
figure
out
a
good
naming
scheme.
We
have
a
number
of
different
terms
for
this.
Basically
we're
improving
the
budget
process,
and
so
we
have
taken
a
number
of
steps
since
last
cycle,
including
aligning
our
budget
around
programs.
AP
What
you
see
in
opengov
is
a
reflection
of
that.
We
have
also
adapted
our
strategy
strategies
internally
to
help
with
decision
making.
Part
of
that
is
beginning
to
articulate
our
intended
outcomes
for
all
of
our
investments
in
our
budget
and
including
those
key
performance
indicators
which
will
happen
over
time.
And
lastly,
as
you
and
Community
is
aware,
we
have
moved
to
opengov.
We
were
tapping
into
a
portion
of
that
capability,
so
really
excited
that
to
continue
to
roll
out
that
software
as
a
new
transparency
tool.
AP
As
I
mentioned,
it's
a
multi-year
process
so
with
a
focus
on
transparency
and
our
new
tools
this
year
improving
our
decision
making
process.
Overall,
it
goes
a
long
way
to
set
a
new
foundation
for
our
budget
process
improvements,
as
we
move
into
your
two
and
three.
Our
Focus
will
be
in
developing
those
key
performance
indicators,
the
metrics
around.
How
do
we
know
we're
hitting
our
intended
outcomes
so
you'll
see
more
and
more
of
that
going
into
the
24
and
25
process.
AP
Additionally,
we
have
made
Investments
not
only
in
core
operations
which
I
won't
go
through
the
list
on
the
right
side
of
the
screen,
which
is
significant
just
again,
keeping
some
of
our
core
operations
going,
including
Water,
Resources
risk
management,
Patrol,
Services
Etc,
but
also
investments
in
City
staff.
As
we
have
highlighted
in
the
past,
we
couldn't
do
the
work
without
City
staff
and
providing
services
to
community.
So
we've
made
a
number
of
investments
in
the
23
budget,
including
making
sure
that
we're
keeping
up
with
the
cost
of
living
and
other
pressures
on
employees.
AP
And
we've
shared
this
slide
before
I
will
not
share
all
of
the
slides
that
we
went
through
in
a
study
session
on
our
key
Investments,
but
just
to
highlight
for
Council
and
Community
this
evening.
2023
recommended
budget
includes
approximately
two
million
dollars
in
Wildfire
resilience
and
emergency
response
efforts.
It
establishes
a
new
pilot
program
for
a
non-law
enforcement
Behavioral
Health
response
team.
AP
We
are
advancing
a
key
infrastructure
projects,
including
several
projects
under
the
Community
cultural
culture,
resilience
and
safety
tax
such
as
Fire,
Station,
3,
and
continued
implementation
of
our
facility's
master
plan,
including
development
at
Alpine.
Balsam
I'll
also
note
that
we
have
many
other
2023
budget
highlights
captured
by
goal
area
on
the
on
the
online
open
gov
portal
under
the
2023
budget
by
goal
area
which
can
be
found
from
the
city's
main
web
page.
AP
All
right
and
I'm,
as
I
mentioned
this
evening,
so
we
had
a
very
nice
discussion
with
Council
back
in
September,
it's
been
about
a
month.
We've
been
able
to
take
some
of
your
feedback
and
provide
additional
information,
a
lot
of
which
is
included
in
the
memo.
This
evening,
we've
also
heard
from
community
over
the
last
several
weeks,
which
was
great,
we'll
learn
more
this
evening.
So
we
wanted
to
provide
some
additional
information
to
help
set
context
for
this
evening's
discussion.
AP
The
one
area
where
we
did
hear
clear,
Council
consensus
back
in
September,
is
in
the
area
of
additional
trash
management
strategies.
So,
as
mentioned,
the
2023
recommended
budget
provides
1.
million
dollars
to
extend
and
expand
the
safe
and
managed
spaces
program.
This
does
propose
to
include
an
additional
encampment
cleanup
team,
which
would
be
managed
out
of
utilities.
It's
a
general
fund
expense.
This
team
could
manage
some
additional
strategies
which
Council
Council
indicated
some
support
for
the
specifics
we
worked
on
over
the
past
several
weeks,
especially
our
safe
and
managed
spaces.
AP
Team
utilities
did
a
lot
of
leg
work.
We
got
some
feedback
from
Council
over
the
past
several
weeks,
which
framed
a
proposal
this
evening,
which
would
be
added
to
the
recommended
2023
budget,
so
starting
with
the
first,
is
looking
at
Sharps
and
needle
collection,
so
hot
off
the
press
as
a
couple
days
ago,
the
slide
says
a
grant
is
being
explored.
We
did
receive
a
grant
of
seven
thousand
dollars
through
a
Boulder
Community
Health
for
a
large
container
site
for
collections
at
9th
and
Canyon.
We
are
exploring
additional
locations
for
sharps
and
needle
collections.
AP
Another
proposal
is
for
enhanced
campus
related
trash
management.
There's
been
some
discussion
related
to
move
in
and
move
out
times,
especially
on
campus
and
managing
some
of
the
large
trash
items.
Currently,
there
is
a
program
where
the
onus
is
on
property
owners
to
expand
the
number
of
dumpsters
and
the
time
of
trash.
The
days
of
trash
removal
The
Proposal
is
here,
is
to
have
the
city
essentially
pick
up
costs
to
expand
the
number
of
dumpsters
in
the
number
of
trash
removal
days
during
those
periods
of
time
that
cost
is
up
to
55
000.
AP
and
then
another
proposal
is
to
install
on
a
trial
basis,
a
large
bear
proof,
dumpster
or
dumpsters
within
the
downtown
core.
The
cost
is
about
nine
thousand
dollars
per
dumpster,
so
our
total
recommended
budget
addition
this
evening
is
eight.
Eighty
thousand
dollars
for
these
strategies
out
of
the
general
fund,
gives
us
some
flexibility
within
those
different
areas,
as
proposed.
AP
In
the
area
of
Planning
and
Development
review,
this
was
something
that
came
up
as
a
topic
during
study
session.
We
did
want
to
reiterate
what
is
in
the
2023
recommended
budget.
It
does
propose
an
additional
eight
positions
in
planning
and
development
services
in
building
permitting
development
review
and
comprehensive
planning.
It
also
provides
additional
contracted
assistance.
Funding,
so
non-personnel
as
needed
staff
is
hopeful
that
the
additions
of
these
staff
and
process
improvements
this
year
will
be
able
to
meet
permit
performance
standards
later
this
year.
AP
AP
Another
area
that
came
up
both
at
study
session
and
I
know
Community
is
interested
in
is
the
arts
and
culture
budget.
The
funding
for
arts
and
culture
is
driven
by
the
community
cultural
plan
or
CCP,
which
was
accepted
by
Council
in
November
of
2015..
The
plan
sets
a
target
of
2
million
for
the
division
budget
by
2024..
AP
The
2023
recommended
budget
for
arts
and
culture
is
2.5
million
which
meets
that
CCP
Target
a
year
ahead
of
time
within
that
2.5
million
dollar
proposal
for
next
year
is
a
1.8
million
operating
budget
330
000
per
year
for
arpa
enhanced
General
operating
support
grants.
So
that's
a
million
over
about
a
million
over
the
22
through
24
and
then
400
000
capital
budget
for
annual
public
art
and
signage
installations,
and
that's
a
combination
of
general
fund
dollars
through
our
general
fund
capital
and
ccrs,
and
noted
here.
AP
AP
Another
area
of
discussion
is
in
basic
needs
in
human
services,
so
we
did
want
to
provide
a
full
picture.
There
is
a
two
hundred
thousand
dollar
enhancement
proposed
in
the
23
budget.
That's
in
the
context
of
larger
a
larger
constellation
of
basic
need
support
in
the
community.
The
total
funding
proposed
for
basic
needs
in
HHS
is
6.9
million
within
that
is
5.9
to
support
Community
investments
in
early
childhood
education,
legal
services
and
case
management.
AP
950
000
specifically
goes
to
support
rental,
Child,
Care,
financial
and
food
assistance.
These
are
programs,
including
epress,
or
the
eviction,
protection
and
rental
assistance
program,
which
is
approximately
540
000
proposed
in
2023..
The
200
000
would
be
adding.
So
it's
a
part
of
that
6.9.
That
would
bolster
the
Human
Services
fund
that
that
fund
goes
out
to
organizations
that
provide
that
basic
need
and
preventative
service
support,
and
in
addition
to
that
6.9
million,
we
do
have
nine
hundred
thousand
dollars
appropriated
as
we
need
towards
basic
needs
as
well.
AP
We
have
had
a
couple
questions
from
Council
related
to
the
timing
on
the
proposed
day,
Services
Center
and
the
operating
costs.
Again
we
have
proposed
750
000
in
the
23
budget
for
operational
expenses,
knowing
that
there's
some
uncertainty
on
the
location
and
the
type
of
facility
that
Community
process
is
underway.
We
know
that
Capital
costs
will
be
necessary.
AP
That
is
not
currently
programmed
in
the
23
budget,
but
we
assume
we'll
be
back
to
discuss
that
at
some
point
because
of
the
uncertainty
on
the
timing,
there's
likely
operational
savings
that
would
be
created
if
the
Center
opens
any
time
past
January
1st.
What
staff
has
done
is
have
a
discussion
about
potentially
tapping
into
those
operational
savings.
At
this
time
we
recommend
maintaining
the
flexibility
to
to
have
the
750
available
for
operational
needs
or
other
needs
as
they
arise,
but
we
can
talk
about
that.
A
bit
later,.
AP
I
had
to
get
used
to
a
whole
new
setup
over
here
all
right,
so
we
have
a
couple
staff
recommended
budget
changes,
one
of
which
we
discussed
so
additional
trash
management
strategies.
AP
Last
month,
we
received
the
guaranteed
maximum
price
on
fire
station
three,
as
we
you
all,
are
aware,
with
inflation
that
number
came
in
higher
than
what
we
had
anticipated
in
the
23
recommended
budget.
So
what
we
need
to
do
is
add
1.5
million
to
the
ccrs
fund.
In
order
to
complete
that
project.
AP
Since
we
released
the
recommended
budget,
we
received
updated
Accommodations,
Tax
projections
from
the
boulder
convention
and
visitors
bureau
that
does
match
what
we're
seeing
year
to
date.
So
that
is
good
news
by
contract
and
how
we
handle
the
CVB
annual
contract.
They
received
20
percent
of
the
annual
accommodations
tax
revenue,
100
of
the
food
tax
revenue
So,
based
on
the
updated
projections
that
contract
value
goes
up
in
2023,
so
that
is
the
the
increment
and
that
is
offset
by
the
revenue
coming
in.
AP
AP
And
so,
without
any
other
additional
changes,
what
you
would
need
to
do
to
have
a
final
number
this
evening
is:
have
a
general
fund
total
appropriation
of
that
188.4,
which
is
slightly
different
than
what
is
in
the
recommended
budget
for
the
ccrs
tax
fund.
That
would
go
up
by
the
1.5
mentioned
for
the
Fire
Station
3,
and
then
we
need
to
correct
the
Boulder
Junction
Improvement
fund.
AP
And
then
you
may
remember,
as
we
discussed
in
September
what
we
asked
Council
to
do
if
there
were
substantive
changes
to
the
budget
proposed
to
put
those
up
via
hotline,
so
that
we
could
essentially
work
on
those
and
bring
those
forward.
This
evening,
council
members,
Spear
and
Wallach
went
ahead
and
did
that
so
I
will
yield
to
them
to
advocate
for
their
various
changes,
but
just
to
summarize
for
council
member
spear,
what
she
suggested
was
one-time
dollars
to
support
additional
basic
needs,
either
through
arpa
or
the
operational
savings
that
we
discussed
from
the
day.
AP
Services
Center
reallocating
a
portion
of
Patrol
and
traffic
Services
budget
for
additional
preventative
measures,
especially
in
the
area
of
bike
and
cattle
converter,
thefts
additional
strategies
to
connect
people
to
services.
This
was
specifically
associated
with
the
current
Community
Court
model
and
then
a
proposal
to
reallocate
or
remove
the
additional
proposed
encampment
management
team
and
then
for
council
member
Wallach,
a
number
of
clarifications
related
to
ccrs
and
other
budget
items,
and
we
did
provide
those
in
in
memo
and
direct
hotline
response
and
happy
to
address
others
that
we
missed
this
evening.
AP
Some
concern
relates
to
the
time
it
related
to
the
timing
of
the
proposed
the
Services
Center
and
whether
or
not
that
funding
was
appropriate
in
the
23
budget.
Some
concern
and
requested
clarification
related
to
the
timing
of
the
airport
master
plan
and
Associated
Capital
Improvements
and
other
miscellaneous
funding,
suggested
suggestions
for
Wildfire
resilience,
arts
and
funding
strategies
to
address
long-term
funding
needs
and
speaking
of
long-term
funding
needs.
So
just
to
reiterate
a
few
points
that
we
made
in
September
and
highlight
a
couple
new
ones.
AP
AP
We
would
like
to
work
with
you
and
the
financial
strategy
Committee
in
aligning
our
master
plan
process
with
our
budget,
and
then
we
have
a
number
of
expiring
taxes,
a
couple
of
which
will
be
considered
in
November,
and
there
are
some
what
we're
saying:
funding
opportunities,
but
certainly
items
to
put
on
your
radar.
That
will
be
a
part
of
the
discussion
over
the
next
year.
AP
You've
seen
this
before,
but
just
to
put
a
pin
on
it,
we
have
a
number
of
items
that
will
require
ongoing
funding
that
we're
using
our
one-time
flexibility
just
to
make
sure
we
get
started
this
year
or
in
2023.
We
will
need
to
revisit
these
conversations
related
to
day
Services
Center,
Behavioral,
Health
response,
Recreation
services
and
safe
and
managed
spaces
as
we
move
into
2024
budget
planning,
and
we
are
taking
advantage
of
the
opportunity
with
arpa
to
invest
in
a
number
of
key
areas.
Again.
AP
These
are
likely
needs
that
extend
beyond
the
amount
of
funding
we
have
or
the
time
that
we
have
to
spend
these
funds
and
the
last
Slide
the
this
evening
is
just
to
point
out
some
of
these
funding
opportunities
or
future
conversations
that
this
council
is
likely
to
have.
We've
already
talked
about
Library
budget
reallocation
if
that
district
is
created
in
November
same
thing
with
new
climate
tax.
AP
There
are,
as
we've
heard
this
evening,
and
testimony
additional
state
and
federal
opportunities
through
our
the
federal
infrastructure
bill.
I
will
highlight
that
we
are
proposing
a
Citywide
Grant
position
in
this
budget
and
that
will
help
access
some
of
those
funds.
We
hope
and
then
reviewing
dedicated
taxes
and
the
authorized
uses
of
those
dedicated
taxes.
AP
It
has
been
some
time
since
we
have
done
that
research
on
what
is
required
through
voter
action
or
through
our
Charter
or
code,
and
looking
at
any
areas
that
we
might
have
some
flexibility,
given
the
number
of
dedicated
taxes
that
we
have
and
then
lastly,
looking
at
additional
Partnerships
to
leverage
the
city
dollars
that
we
do
have,
so
all
of
those
items
will
be
things
that
we'll
be
working
through
you
and
the
financial
strategy
Committee
in
the
coming
months
and
I.
Believe
that's
where
we'll
stop.
AP
We
do
have
a
very
busy
slide
for
the
motion
language
when
that
is
ready,
but
for
now
we'll
yield
to
questions.
B
AI
Yeah
I
do
have
a
few
questions,
but
before
I
start,
thank
you
so
much
for
your
response
to
my
hotline.
It
was
extremely
substantive
and
the
answers
were
very
strong
and
terrific
and
I
appreciate
that
and
if
I
might,
if
you
can
pass
on,
my
congratulations
to
judge
cook
I,
think
her
answer
in
terms
of
the
standards
by
which
we
would
judge
the
community
Court
funds
I
think
was
was
spot
on.
So
my
questions
are
as
follows.
AP
Yeah
I
will
have
to
yield
to
somebody
either
in
person
or
virtually
I
know
that
the
guaranteed
I'll
stall,
while
somebody
comes
up
but
the
guaranteed
maximum
price
comes
in
while
working
with
the
general
contractor
and
I
believe.
That's
a
part
of
those
discussions,
but
Joanna
crane
is
here
and
I'll.
Let
her
answer
sure.
AQ
All
right
am
I
speaking
loud
enough.
Everyone
can
hear
I'm,
Joanna,
Korean
I'm,
director
of
facilities
and
Fleet,
and
so
absolutely
actually
we
did
a
lot
of
work
on
value
engineering
and
we
also
looked
at
our
contingency.
We
looked
at
lots
of
different
things.
Unfortunately,
what
we
saw
was
an
increase
just
across
the
board.
AQ
AI
Yeah,
okay,
thank
you.
Do
we
have
a
plan
for
replenishing
fund
reserves
across
the
Departments,
since
we're
kind
of
scooping
them
up
and
using
them
this
year,.
AP
Yeah
we
we
do
generally
and
Carl
might
want
to
add
to
this
I
I
think
we
do
expect
fund
balance
after
Reserve
after
2022,
just
with
operational
savings.
Some
salary
savings
that
that
will
help
I
think
what
we
were
taking
from
our
discussions
with
Council
and
FSC
over
the
last
several
months
is
to
try
to
program
those
dollars
the
fund
balance
after
Reserve,
where
we
could
and
knowing
that
we
have
the
flexibility
in
one
time.
B
AO
Right,
that's
correct,
okay
and
I,
and
I
would
just
add
that,
yes,
we
we
did
an
estimate
for
what
we
think.
2022
might
finish
when
we
said
what
would
those
ending
fund
balances
be
after
reserve
and
more
programming
to
spend
those
down,
but
we
could
very
likely
finish
2022,
but
you
know
with
more
savings
than
we
even
anticipated.
You
know
we've
had
challenges
as
have
many
employers
retaining
and
recruiting.
AI
More
is
there
a
particular
reason
why
the
flow
of
federal
infrastructure
dollars
seems
to
be
so
slow,
I
mean
we
were
sort
of
waiting
for
the
spigot
to
open,
and
can
you
tell
us
what's
happening.
AP
Yeah,
this
information
is
a
little
dated,
but
so
my
understanding
of
the
federal
infrastructure
bill
is
that
some
of
the
programs
were
in
existence,
and
so
those
dollars
will
flow
quicker,
although
those
are
likely
to
be
through
the
state
where
we
would
be
going
through
our
normal
kind
of
Grant
process
to
participate.
A
lot
of
regional
projects
would
be
a
part
of
those
programs.
The
infrastructure,
Bill
also
created
new
programs
and
so
I
believe,
there's
a
process
where
it's
Federal
program,
creation
and
so
on
and
so
forth,
and
that
that
does
take
some
time.
AP
I
I
do
think
it's
important
to
say
that
we
have
not
had,
at
least
from
a
from
also
speak
from
a
finance
perspective,
the
staff
time
to
really
look
deeply
into
what
funding
opportunities
are
coming
sooner
rather
than
later.
I
know
our
transportation
staff
has
certainly
for
those
types
of
projects,
but
that's
that
Citywide
Grant
Position
will
certainly
help
and
hopefully
be
able
to
start
right
away
in
2023
to
act
access
some
of
those
dollars,
but
but
it
has
been
slow
and
other
cities
have
been
experiencing
that
as
well.
AI
Z
AR
Z
AR
Good
evening
Vicki
Ebner
HHS
that
was
presented
as
part
of
our
annual
update
in
September.
However,
we
did
not
receive
a
full
recommendation.
I'm
sorry,
a
full
request
from
the
family
home
assist
team.
We
are
investigating
options
to
look
at
a
partnered
approach
with
County,
which
would
likely
be
an
allocation
of
Human
Service
funding.
B
I've
not
seen
anybody
else,
I'll
pop
in
with
one
and
when
we
talked
about
alternative
trash
Solutions
well,
first
of
all,
thank
you
for
looking
into
that
and
figuring
out
some
some
options.
I
was
glad
to
see
those
presented
in
the
recommended
budget
and
the
changes
to
thanks
for
that.
One
of
the
things
that
we've
talked
about
at
least
offline
was
like
the
possibility
of
a
program
like
where
you'd
have.
B
You
could
hire
folks
experiencing
homelessness
to
help
pick
up
trash
around
the
community,
and
so
programs
like
that
I
know,
have
been
successful
in
some
some
other
areas,
like
you
know,
Albuquerque
or
Portland.
Are
we
looking
into
that
at
all
for
for
this
coming
years,
that
possible
option.
AS
AT
So
it's
not
something
that
we
would
immediately
put
in
this
budget,
but
we
are
looking
for
looking
at
programs
to
consider
for
2023,
including
those
that
would
potentially
build
a
skill
or
be
more
Innovative
than
the
current
programs
that
we
have,
even
though
the
programs
that
we
have
are
great
but
just
to
see
how
we
can
build
on
that
and
and
evolve
the
programs,
so
it
whether
or
not
that
among
others,
is
one
that
we
would
look
at.
We
were
definitely
open
to
looking
at
options.
B
G
I
also
saw
in
the
memo
that
we
had,
it
mentioned
voluntary
voluntary
incentives
for
the
trash
pick
up
around
the
hill
I,
don't
know
if
that
was
thought
of
as
a
separate
or
similar
program
to
what
Aaron
just
mentioned.
It
is
that
it's
sort
of
in
the
same
place
where
you're
thinking
about
what
that
might
be
and
how
that
might
be
implemented.
AT
For
church
so
I
think,
generally
speaking
and
I'll,
let
others
time
in
as
needed,
but
I
think
there's
kind
of
themes
of
what
we'd
be
considering
one
is
we
just?
We
have
a
sense
or
a
spirit
of
openness
in
terms
of
what
we're
looking
at
I
know,
there's
we're
doing
pure
City
comparisons
to
see
what
other
folks
are
doing,
that's
working
and
also
what
what
we
could
make
our
own
I
think
we
need
to
do
further
integration
on
our
end,
to
figure
out
the
mechanics
of
what
specifically
would
be
successful
here
and
I
know.
AT
G
And
I
I
have
just
one
more
on
the
same
line,
so
there's
also
mention
of
either
20
to
40
new
dumpsters
on
in
the
Hill
area
and
three
large
bear
proof
ones
downtown.
Are
you
like
I'm
just
trying
to
imagine
where
those
would
go?
Are
you
thinking
that
that's
just
supplementing
what
commercial
properties
are
providing
or
is
that
something
that
would
be
separate
and
on
city
property
somewhere?
G
AT
To
the
so,
we
think
there's
two
separate
categories:
the
the
larger
number
the
20
to
40
on
the
hill
would
be
coincident
with
CU
move
in
move
out
periods,
and
we
would
need
to
identify
those
locations
and
the
idea
being
that,
because
there's
more
frequent
pickup
during
those
move-in
move
out
periods
that
they
would
be
there
for
a
temporary
stretch.
We
would
kind
of
do
a
blitz
and
then
and
then
move
them.
AT
The
three
downtown
the
bear
proof
would
be
more
permanent
and
we
would
need
to
work
with
within
our
own
department,
but
also
with
any
external
Partners.
But
the
idea
would
be
to
focus
on
those
corridors
that
were
most
frequently
in
along
Boulder
Creek,
so,
for
example
like
at
the
Justice
Center,
but
we
wouldn't
need
to
work
that
out.
AT
AL
I
Thank
you,
I
have
a
I,
have
a
a
question
and
comment
to
make
about
basic
needs.
I
find
that
word
that
term
a
little
bit
not
very
clear
to
me
and
part
of
the
question
I'm
looking
at
slide,
23
and
even
when
I
was
reading
the
packet
on
page
seven
I
was
thinking
okay.
What
does
basic
needs
really
include?
What
does
it
include,
and
it
mentioned
legal
services
and
I'm
wondering
legal
services
for
whom.
Z
AT
AU
Good
evening,
Elizabeth
Crow
with
HHS,
so
some
of
the
legal
services
that
we
invest
in
through
HHS
include
immigrant
legal
services
and
legal
services
for
community
members
experiencing
domestic
violence
and
who
need
other
services.
Organizations
like
the
Colorado
Legal
Services
bridge
to
Justice
immigrant
Legal
Services
Center
organizations
like
those
so
all
benefiting
community
members
who
are
low
income
or
experiencing
other
disparities
like
racism,
heterosexism
violence,
Etc.
I
AU
Because
she's
in
the
family
yeah-
and
we
primarily
provide
that
those
Legal
Services
through
the
Human
Services
fund
through
a
competitive
fund
around
process,
although
we
do
have
a
multi-year
channel
and
most
of
the
organizations
I
just
mentioned,
are
in
that
track.
We
also
provide
some
of
those
Services
invest
in
some
of
those
Services
through
the
Health
Equity
Fund.
AB
I
do
have
a
question
and-
and
it's
sort
of
an
overarching
question
that
I
think
will
invite
more
conversation
for
another
day
beyond
just
this
budget
discussion,
but
essentially
I'm
I'm
worried
that
housing
first
is
not
quite
working.
The
way
that
we
would
hope
it
would
be
working
I've
always
thought
that
there
were
sort
of
gaps
in
who
gets.
You
know
selected
for
housing
and
now
I
think
in
in
keeping
with
testimony
from
Tim
Timothy,
Thomas
I
believe
it
was
tonight.
AB
You
know
we're
sort
of
asking
affordable
housing
operators
to
succeed
without
enough
Staffing.
That
would
help
people
living
there
to
succeed.
So
I
think
we
need
a
much
deeper
bench
in
terms
of
an
array
of
housing
options,
including
lots,
more
living
situations
with
more
intensive
Staffing,
such
as
group
homes
and
even
staffed
safe
outdoor
spaces.
I'm
going
to
bring
this
back
to
the
budget.
AB
Trust
me
on
this
and
a
question
so
I
would
like
to
see
funding
for
more
dense
settings
like
group
homes,
aggressively
pursued
I've,
heard
from
a
state
representative,
and
tonight
we
all
heard
from
Jonathan
singer
that
there
are
just
tens
of
millions
of
dollars
sitting
there
waiting
for
people
to
apply.
So
my
question
is:
is
one
grant
funding
position
enough,
given
that
we
want
to
get
at
this
money
before
it
expires?.
AP
Good
question
I
think
we
can
start
on
the
grant
position.
So
what
we're
envisioning
is
the
is
the
city-wide
Grant
position.
There
will
also
be
a
dedicated
resource
pending
our
discussion
next
week
for
ccrs
as
well,
and
so
those
two
ideally
will
work
in
tandem
as
a
little
office
to
look
at
those
grant
opportunities.
I
do
think
it
would
be
helpful
to
have
a
conversation
at
some
point
about
prioritization
in
pursuing
grants.
AP
B
Z
I
was
just
going
to
say
that
that
there
are
folks
already
in
our
organization
that
do
a
great
job
at
looking
for
Grants,
a
lot
of
them
in
HHS
who
are
phenomenal
and
I
think
that
we
always.
This
is
never
the
only
bite
at
the
Apple
right
like
if
we
as
we
get
to
do
some
of
this
work,
and
if
we
see
that
we
need
more
support,
we
will
come
back
to
you
and
talk
about
it.
But
for
now
this
is
where
we're
starting
and
I
think
that
we're
in
conjunction
with
a
conversation
about
prioritization.
AB
AR
So,
regarding
the
joys
of
being
short
regarding
the
specific
homelessness
grants,
while
there
are
multiple
million
dollars,
quite
a
large
fraction
is,
is
earmarked
towards
some
of
the
large
campuses
that
are
being
put
in
regionally.
AR
AR
We
have
allocated
quite
a
bit
of
arpa
funding
toward
the
building
home
program,
which
gets
to
what
you're
talking
about
that
deeper
bench,
which
is
around
housing
retention.
We,
our
housing,
exits
team
at
HSBC,
has
Homeless
Solutions
for
Boulder
County
just
met
today.
One
of
the
conversations
was
about
group
homes,
transitional
housing,
some
of
those
other
pieces
of
that
puzzle
and
how
we
can
make
those
be
reality.
AB
AR
B
G
Have
a
Parks
and
Rec
related
question,
so
in
the
comments
from
boards
and
commissions,
there
was
a
concern
about
the
budget
not
being
enough
to
reduce
or
to
avoid
reductions
in
the
community
benefit.
Recreation
subsidies
and
I
was
wondering
how
much
what
kind
of
budget
allocation
it
would
take
in
order
to
not
see
those
reductions.
AV
Absolutely
this
is
better.
We
received
about
1.6
million
dollars
in
general
fund
subsidy
to
the
recreation
activity
fund.
This
was
about
a
2.1
million
dollar.
Ask
that
we
did
have
so.
The
2.1
million
dollars
would
allow
us
to
provide
a
full
community
benefit
programming.
AP
And
Lauren,
if
I
might
just
add
to
that,
so
the
way
that
the
budget
is
proposed
for
23
is
it
maintains,
as
Jackson
said,
the
current
level
of
service.
So
there
are
no
cuts
to
our
service.
It
does
raise
the
question
about
future
funding,
which
we've
pointed
out
that,
in
order
to
maintain
that
level
of
subsidy
for
those
programs
for
our
work
related
to
equity
programming,
we
do
need
to
have
a
larger
conversation
about
the
the
permanence
of
the
general
fund
subsidy,
so
I
I
think
in
Jackson.
You
can
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong.
G
B
So
just
a
couple
of
notes
about
changes
to
the
sign
up
list
we
had
Joshua
Pollock
was
signed
up
for
in
person,
but
it's
actually
virtual,
so
it'll
be
the
last
virtual
speaker
and
then
we
had
Dan
creel
and
Nate
urandi,
who
originally
on
the
open
comment
list
but
willing
to
speak
to
the
budget.
So
they
are
the
last
in-person
speakers.
B
We've
got
a
total
of
21
folks,
so
that'll
be
two
minutes
each.
If
you
are
pooling,
you
will
get
five,
although
you
will
have
to
have
the
people
you're
pooling
with
present
in
the
meeting.
Okay
so
and
please
do
queue
up
as
as
I
call
your
your
name.
The
first
three
speakers
are
Brooke
Harrison,
Holly,
Carlson
and
Emily
Reynolds.
B
AW
Okay,
Rick
Harrison
Boulder
resident
I'm
here
to
support
the
requested
funding
for
safe
and
managed
spaces
program
and
Boulder
Police
Department.
The
intent
of
the
safe
and
managed
spaces
program
is
not
to
solve
homelessness
and
in
encampments,
but
to
keep
our
public
spaces
clean
and
accessible
by
this
metric.
They
have
been
widely
successful,
collecting
106
tons
of
debris
and
addressing
389
camping
sites.
Council
person
spear
is
correct.
AW
We
and
we
clean
up
one
area,
people
move
to
another,
but
this
is
not
a
failure
of
the
program
or
of
BPD,
but
a
systemic
failure
in
our
approach
to
homelessness.
To
the
best
of
my
knowledge,
none
of
our
homeless
Services
have
solved
homelessness,
yet
it
is
not
being
proposed
that
they
be
defunded.
It's
also
not
unreasonable
to
try
a
pilot
program
like
the
Austin
Violet
bag
program
or
the
Tacoma
and
Elk
Grove
Pay
to
clean
Pilots,
but
these
are
not
a
substitute
for
an
organized
and
reliable
cleanup
crew.
AW
Consider
instead
investing
those
funds
and
expanding
drug
treatment
and
Mental
Health
Services.
Finally,
I
Echo
council
person
wallach's
dismay
at
the
at
the
below
inflation
increase
to
the
police
department's
budget.
We
have
a
growing
crime
problem
in
Boulder,
Chief
Herald
needs
money
to
recruit
and
retain
officers.
AW
AX
Council
members
I'm
commenting
tonight
on
the
2023
budget
of
11
million
dollars
for
affordable
housing
investment.
That's
what
you
guys
had
on
your
website.
I'm
a
single
mother
of
Two
and
a
resident
of
Depot
square,
a
dilapidated,
affordable
housing
building.
Depot
Square
maintains
a
multiple
City
voucher
units
and
has
made
the
news
several
weeks
ago
on
September
9th
because
tenants
and
who
have
lived
in
two
of
our
units
were
operating
a
meth
Fentanyl
and
bike
chop
shop
for
several
years
and
we're
in
possession
of
guns
and
other
stolen
property.
AX
AX
This
situation
continued
for
years,
despite
repeat,
tenant,
complaints,
two
Boulder
housing
partners
and
the
management
company
abnath
Capital
Management.
There
are
other
serious
ongoing
code
violations
and
criminal
activity
in
and
around
Depot
Square
I
worry
daily
for
the
safety
of
my
two
children
and
whether
we
have
been
living
in
a
building
contaminated
by
Meth.
AX
My
arrested
neighbors
had
a
long
history
of
criminal
activity.
Drug
addiction
homelessness
yet
were
housed
with
families
seniors
and
disabled
community
members
through
our
City's
housing
first
program.
How
is
this
considered
to
be
safe?
In
addition
to
the
crime?
Apartments
in
Depot,
Square
are
not
being
maintained
and
the
elevators
are
current
are
often
not
working.
I
am
the
one
who
has
to
call
boom
properties
to
get
them
fixed.
I
am
the
code
officer.
I
am
the
property
maintenance
manager
for
my
building
and
I
get
paid
zero.
AX
However,
I
am
bullied
constantly
by
avanath
Property
Management
to
the
point
now
that
they
are
trying
to
evict
me
so
I
do
hope
that
the
services
you
guys
offer
through
the
community
and
through
your
courts
through
the
local
courts
here,
actually
help
me,
because
I've
watched
two
residents
who
were
good
tenants
not
only
get
financial
assistance
through
Boulder
and
get
legal
help
through
Boulder.
They
went
through
the
court
system
and
still
got
evicted.
So
what
did
that
do
for
them,
but
Nolan
void
Council.
AN
Good
evening,
Council
nice
to
see
you
in
person
this
evening
regarding
Boulder's
budget
for
2023,
we
must
not
allow
our
public
spaces
to
further
degrade
by
limiting
the
budget
to
clean
up
the
tons
of
garbage
use,
needles
and
human
waste.
The
utilities
Department's
re
request
to
double
their
budget
for
cleanup
of
encampment
waste
and
Hazards
is
more
than
reasonable.
An
even
higher
amount
would
ensure
that
residents,
students
and
visitors
don't
have
to
step
in
it
so
to
speak
or
meet
the
guy
with
the
machete
on
the
creek
path.
AN
It's
absurd
to
pretend
that
if
we
give
them
money,
they
will
clean
up
after
themselves
giving
money
to
addicts
to
clean
up
their
own
mess
is
an
incentive
to
create
more
trash
to
get
more
money.
What
will
the
city's
liability
be
if
someone
gets
stuck
with
a
needle
or
harmed?
The
claim?
Is
the
program's
not
reducing
illegal
camping?
Please
note:
that's
not
the
purpose
of
this
team.
Their
goal
is
to
keep
our
public
spaces
safe,
clean
and
managed,
and
the
tons
of
trash
cleared
are
proof
that
they
are
doing
just
that
in
a
compassionate
manner.
AN
To
say
that
the
program
doesn't
work
having
not
spent
the
first
year.
Funding
is
ludicrous.
If
we
use
that
Progressive
logic,
we
might
well
close
down
the
scores
and
scores
of
houseless
programs,
because
none
of
them
are
reducing
illegal
camping,
though
some
counselors
want
the
police
out
of
cleanups,
the
cleanups
are
dangerous
and
the
crews
want
them
there
with
to
deal
and
to
help
with
hostile,
aggressive
campers.
Also,
these
cleanup
folks
include
people
of
color
and
formerly
homeless.
Why
take
their
jobs
away?
AN
B
Thank
you
Emily,
and
we
have
Garrett
Baum
and
I
understand
it's
not
pooling
time,
and
so
then,
after
that
will
be
Scott,
Crosby
and
forced
hunt.
AS
AS
AS
I
own,
a
building
in
Boulder
on
the
hill
that
has
been
vandalized
more
times
than
I
can
count.
I
have
to
pay
Crews
to
clean
up
human
waste
on
an
ongoing
basis.
I
have
tenants
that
have
been
forced
out
of
business
because
customers
are
afraid
to
shop.
There,
I
have
invested
millions
in
your
community.
I
pay
almost
80
000
a
year
in
property
tax
and
get
absolutely
nothing
in
return.
Falling
apart,
sideways,
sidewalks
graffiti
finds
no
snow,
removal,
broken
windows,
broken
doors
and
theft.
AS
Your
failed
policies
have
the
effect
of
encouraging
people
to
migrate,
to
Boulder,
to
commit
crimes
with
no
fear
of
being
caught
or
Consequences
gun,
violence,
public
intoxication
public,
illicit
drug
use,
illegal
camping,
harassment
of
community
members,
vandalism
and
theft.
No
big
deal
in
Boulder
take
seriously
the
health
safety
and
wellness
of
your
community
tell
your
judges.
You
want
them
to
follow
the
letter
of
the
law
incur,
and
incarcerate
criminals
speak
with
the
sheriff
and
work
with
him
to
assure
that
there
is
ample
space
space
to
adequately
incarcerate
criminals.
AS
AS
That
is
not
a
compliment.
Chief
Herald,
deputy
chief
Redfern
and
your
entire
police
department
want
to
protect
and
serve
the
community
in
forcing
the
laws
approve.
The
budget
for
the
police
approve
the
budget
for
the
cleanup
of
illegal
encampments
and
force
your
laws
take
care
and
protect
your
community.
N
All
right,
thank
you.
Please
increase
the
budget
to
fund
the
police
department,
so
they
can
restore
safety
on
the
hill,
speak.
B
N
The
mic:
please:
oh,
please,
increase
the
budget
to
fund
your
police
to
increase
safety
on
the
hill
and
throughout
the
Boulder
Community,
so
local
business
can
be
successful
and
parents
can
feel
free
to
let
their
kids
roam.
I'm
a
1990
CU
graduate.
My
son,
graduated
in
May
I
have
a
special
needs,
little
brother
that
would
be
homeless.
If
it
wasn't.
For
my
family
and
I
I
know
tough
love
works,
I
am
speaking
on
their
behalfs
I
have
been
managing
and
leasing
the
Boulder
Hill
property
for
over
10
years.
We
have
a
real
problem.
N
Now
the
hill
is
not
working
worth
investing
in
by
local
businesses
and
community
and
Community
visits
to
the
hill.
No
one
wants
to
visit
the
hill
anymore.
It's
too
dirty
it's
too
scummy
people,
businesses
are
closing
left
and
right.
Rosenberg's
is
about
to
consider
closing.
Their
lack
of
success
should
be
a
real
massive
wake
up
for
all
of
you.
N
N
Safety
at
a
minimum
is
a
requirement,
is
a
requirement.
The
city
must
provide
just
that.
Just
safety.
N
In
my
opinion,
the
city
has
reduced
police
budgets
to
where
they're
not
supporting
and
then
they're
not
supporting
the
good
police
officers.
They
are
spread
too
thin
and
no
one
wants
to
be
a
police
officer
anymore.
Can
you
blame
them?
You
tie
their
hands
and
don't
let
them
enforce
the
law.
Worse,
you
empower
the
homeless
and
the
drug
addicts.
B
You
Scott
I've,
been
in
foreign
Force.
Time
is
actually
a
virtual
speaker,
so
we'll
get
back
to
force
later
on
in
the
public
hearing.
So
we've
got
Sherry
hack,
Susan,
Smith
and
Linda
quickly.
AY
I'm
a
long
time,
Boulder
resident
Public
Safety,
is
a
big
concern.
Every
day
we
see
more
and
more
crime.
Here.
Last
week
we
had
a
librarian
attacked
in
the
main
library
where
she
suffered
a
head
and
spine
injury.
Shortly
after
that,
we
had
three
separate
violent
incidents
on
the
hill.
In
two
nights
there
was
also
thirty
thousand
dollars
in
Damages
when
businesses
had
their
Windows
broken.
This
senseless
violence
is
devastating
our
city,
I
read
the
budget
document
and
I
want
to
talk
about
councilwoman,
Spears,
suggestion
to
reallocate
or
remove
the
budget
for
additional
encampment
cleanup.
AY
However,
there
is
opportunity
for
more
progress
to
be
made
better
enforcement
and
cleanup
would
cause
those
who
want
services
to
seek
them
out
and
those
who
don't
want
services
or
who
choose
to
commit
crimes
should
be
held
accountable
for
their
actions.
Our
laws
should
be
enforced,
not
ignored
the
money
allocated
to
enforce
those
laws
shouldn't
be
reallocated
or
cut.
The
trash
and
toxic
waste
at
these
dumps
requires
a
specialized
cleaning
team
with
a
police
escort
because
it's
dangerous
work.
AY
AY
The
budget
document
stresses
the
importance
of
businesses
in
Boulder
and
the
tax
revenue
they
generate,
how
long
before
business
owners
get
sick
and
tired
of
the
vandalism
and
crime
and
move
out
taking
taking
their
revenue
with
them.
Keeping
the
public,
safe
and
working
towards
the
best
interest
of
older
residents
should
be
your
number
one
priority.
With
this
proposed
budget.
AZ
Stipulate
the
city
council
recognizes
in
response
to
the
critical
distinction
between
homeless
and
transients,
the
latter
who
come
from
other
states
and
countries
who
do
not
want
to
better
their
situation,
are
criminal
addicts
of
illegal
drugs
and
substance
and
result
in
88
of
crimes.
We
are
suffering
in
Boulder
enabled
by
solely
by
your
destructive
policies.
You
are
stealing
appropriated
fronts
from
our
homeless,
while
they
are
frightening,
frightened
to
go
into
shelters
and
and
our
last
in
line
for
services
and
residents
are
terrified
to
walk
the
streets,
bike
paths
and
live
in
their
homes.
AZ
We
demand
this.
This
thing
should
be
recognized
and
acted
on
immediately.
Council
Boulder
used
to
be
known
as
the
best
for
everything.
Now
we
have
the
appalling
distinction
to
be
the
best
city
for
illegal
in
campus
and
services
for
hazardous
Nomad,
transients
unacceptable.
You
are
currently
spending
millions
of
dollars
which
does
not
not
include
a
massive
amount
of
resulting
expense
and
less
than
500
at
best
go
to
our
actual
homeless
residents,
unsustainable,
stop
stealing
from
the
homeless.
AZ
Do
you
rationalize
rules
for
ye,
but
not
for
me?
How
do
you
live
with
yourself
submissive
destruction?
We
demand
that
you,
first
home
home,
Foster
shelter,
fee
fondle
out
your
bikes
properties,
bodies
to
be
destroyed,
ravaged
and
solid
to
become
a
toxic
waste
thump
of
needles,
feces
garbage
and
render
your
residence
a
Haven
for
criminal
activity
and
demise,
stop
violating
victimizing
and
terrorizing
the
residents
of
our
community.
Stop
them
from
misappropriating
our
tax
and
grant
money.
You
are
investing
from
our
wholeness.
AZ
It
is
time
to
wake
up,
not
woke
up,
counsel
and
prioritize
Public
Safety
restore
restore
productive
residency
laws
that
eliminate
transients
recent
day
you
Center,
stop
misusing
and
abusing
our
police
as
pest
infestation
and
sanitation
controllers
stop
reaching
your
civilization.
Your
time
is
uphold.
AZ
B
B
Time
is
it
please,
stop
all
right
all
right,
and
hopefully
other
people
can
stick
to
the
two-minute
limit
here.
So
everyone
has
the
same
amount
of
time
to
speak,
so
we
got
Linda
Quigley,
Tim,
Thomas
and
Mary
Madeira.
Q
When
we
were
virtual
I
used
to
write
everything
down,
that
I
would
say
to
because
we
had
two
minutes
and
it
felt
much
worse
than
Indianapolis
500.
It's
the
town,
I
grew
up
in
I.
Think
there's
this
pent
up
desire
to
talk
to
you,
because
you
felt
like
our
stealth
Council
for
three
years
and
I'm,
not
saying
you
intended
that,
but
it
just
doesn't
feel
like
you've
been
there
we
write
emails,
they
go
into
a
black
hole.
We
don't
know
what
you
think,
but
we
see
policies
that
aren't
working.
Q
If
you
know
of
a
single
Progressive,
Run
town,
where
policies
like
we
have
are
working,
please
tell
me
I'd
love
to
go
visit
and
see
what
it
is.
We
missed
because
I
have
this
same
problem:
I'm,
disabled
I,
don't
want
to
bike
down
a
path
and
have
a
bottle
of
urine
thrown
to
my
head.
I!
Don't
I,
don't
want
children
to
run
through
a
gauntlet
to
get
to
school.
Q
It's
not
working.
God
bless
you
for
caring
about
people
who
have
lost
their
homes.
Nicole
God
bless
you,
but
you
cannot
lose
core
services
like
safety,
you
know
and
just
having
clean
spaces
for
the
public.
All
of
us
that
built
all
these
bike
paths
that
built
this
beautiful
town.
We
can't
lose
those
if
it
feels
like
that's
what
we're
doing
and
I
haven't
read
a
single
word
of
what
I
wrote,
but
thank
you
for
your
time.
R
R
You're
getting
a
first
look
at
over
a
half
billion
dollar
budget,
there's
only
two
major
problems
with
our
budget
process.
Putting
the
budget
together
and
spending
the
money
specifically,
the
city's
budget,
has
pretty
much
been
on
autopilot
as
long
as
I've
been
following
it.
It
mainly
consists
of
last
year's
budget
plus
some
percentage
putting
it
together,
maybe
view
some.
Some
of
you
think
it's
immoral
to
charge
sales
tax
on
food.
In
this
time
of
outrageous
inflation,
your
finance
department
would
probably
inform
you
that
you
can't
do
it
because
it
would
affect
our
bond
rating.
R
R
The
Denver,
independent
city
Auditor's
website
says
that
an
independent
audit
function
serves
as
a
tool
for
good
government,
transparency
and
accountability.
One
of
the
main
things
that
they
do
is
performance-based
auditing.
All
the
questions
that
you're
asking
right
now
an
independent
city
auditor,
would
have
given
you
the
answer.
Let
me
give
you
an
example:
Boulder
housing
Partners
is
part
of
something
called
the
moving
to
work
program.
R
R
BA
Hi
I'm
here
tonight,
because
my
daughter
told
me
the
other
day
that
she
does
not
feel
safe
like
yeah
I'm
here
today,
because
my
daughter
told
me
the
other
day
that
she
does
not
feels
my
14
year.
Old
daughter
goes
to
Boulder
high
and
my
12
year
old
daughter.
They
both
bike
together
and
they
go
to
school
down
the
bike
path,
They
Ride
one
and
a
half
miles
in
broad
daylight.
BA
BA
BA
BA
BA
BB
Hi
I'm
Zoe
Rhodes
wollen
I'm,
a
ninth
grader
at
Boulder,
high
school
and
I
bike,
with
my
younger
sister
on
the
bike
path
every
day
to
get
to
and
from
school
recently
I've
made
the
decision
to
bike
on
Arapahoe,
because
I
no
longer
feel
sick,
safe
biking
on
the
bike
path.
This
is
because
men
who
are
who
are
hanging
around
the
bike
path
have
yelled
at
me,
made
lewd
comments.
Ask
for
me
to
give
them
a
ride.
BB
BB
B
BC
Lisa
Spalding
I'm
speaking
on
behalf
of
the
University
Hill
Neighborhood
associations,
I'm
oops,
the
University
Hill
Neighborhood
association's
executive
committee
residents
of
the
Hill
are
terrified
by
the
growing
gun
crisis
in
our
neighborhood.
It
was
a
miracle.
The
two
police
officers
were
nearby
and
rushed
to
the
scene
of
the
shootout
at
1
27
a.m.
Last
Sunday
they
prevented
the
death
and
serious
injuries
that
would
surely
have
occurred
without
their
intervention.
BC
It
was
a
miracle
because
our
police
force
is
down
by
29
Patrol
officers.
Both
students
and
long-term
residents
are
frightened.
Guns
were
pulled
at
a
Fourth
of
July
party
this
year
and
later
that
night,
a
shootout
occurred
at
14th
and
Euclid.
Students
are
now
reporting
armed
home
invasions
and
armed
disruptions
at
Greek
parties.
BC
BC
BC
Denver
Mayor,
Michael
Hancock
earmarked
8.4
million
to
fill
188
open
officer
positions
in
his
proposed
2023
budget.
Hiring
police
officers
is
highly
competitive
and
Boulder
would
need
almost
1.3
million
to
match
the
money
Denver
wants
to
offer.
Please
revise
this
budget
and
allocate
sufficient
funds
for
our
Police
Department.
We
depend
on
you
to
keep
us
safe
and
to
support
economic
Vitality
in
our
business
district.
Thank
you.
Thanks.
BD
I
came
here
for
study
in
my
master's
degree
in
civil
engineer,
my
daughter
also
graduate
from
the
CU
and
15
years
ago,
I
owned,
Rosehill,
Wine
and
Spirits.
It's
a
small
liquor
store
only
800
square
feet,
and
then
we
have
a
great
team
over
here,
my
employee.
In
five
seconds.
They
can
identify
a
fake
ID,
even
though
they
even
they
know
the
signature
is
incorrect.
BD
So
you
know
this
team.
You
know
we
run
like
15
years
and
till
recently
we
really
really
suffering
a
lot
of
homeless
people
and
really
fighting
our
employee.
Our
employees
really
afraid
to
go
home
after
work,
so
I
need
to
buy
the
paper
spray
a
little
one
paper
spray
for
them
two
years
ago,
and
now
you
know
what
I
need
to
buy
the
bear
spray.
BD
BD
If
we
don't
have
a
decent
budget
for
them,
we
will
not
get
a
proper
Police,
Department
and
who's
going
to
protect
us,
so
I
need
to
what
I
need
to
look
into
the
eBay
or
Amazon
to
find
a
two
leader,
or
maybe
even
bigger
paper
spray
for
my
employee
or
for
my
store
that
just
doesn't
make
sense.
You
know
we.
If
we
don't
have
that
kind
of
a
law
enforcement
to
protect
us,
then
you
know
what
the
freedom
is.
Not
this
country,
the
freedom
is
for
the
homeless.
Thank
you.
F
BE
BE
Okay,
great
so
Nate
urandi,
my
wife
and
I
have
been
in
Boulder
since
1993
the
past
four
plus
years
next
to
the
2037
Walnut
Street
complex,
that
Dan
just
talked
about
and
2037
is
a
qualified
Section,
8
housing
I,
don't
know
the
exact
terminology
but
I'm
here
as
a
concerned
neighbor
for
a
lot
of
the
tenants
that
are
in
there
like
Dan,
you
know,
there's
a
number
of
tenants
who
have
been
assaulted
verbally
and
physically
and
do
not
feel
safe
in
the
complex
due
to
the
criminals
who
use
their
units
for
drug
dealing,
drug
use,
bicycle
shops
and
more.
BE
It
seems
like
a
common
theme
that
we're
hearing
today
over
the
weekend,
I
spoke
to
a
female
tenant
who
was
really
distraught.
She's
a
rape
victim
and
she's
been
threatened
to
the
point
where
she
actually
told
me.
She
wasn't
sure
if
life
was
worth
living
still
it's
a
very,
very
real
and
clearly
points
to
a
failure
of
the
current
system.
BE
As
an
example,
increased
budget
could
fund
Social
Services
to
the
tenants
who
are
trying
to
do
something
with
their
lives
so,
rather
than
giving
a
handout
to
those
who
abuse
the
system,
let's
change
the
focus
to
providing
a
hand
up
to
those
who
are
deserving
of
the
gesture
again
like
Dan
and
other
tenants.
Thank
you
thanks.
B
AL
Hello,
Council
and
staff
I
signed
up
to
speak
tonight
when
I
heard
that
the
alternative,
slash,
Behavioral
Health
response
program
was
on
the
2023
budget.
It
has
become
increasingly
apparent
to
any
attentive
member
of
our
society
that,
when
police
come
in
contact
with
distressed
individuals,
awful
awful
things
happen
and
jurisdictions
that
are
genuinely
interested
in
improving
outcomes
have
reached
the
same
conclusion.
Police
services
in
America
do
a
great
many
things
that
don't
actually
require
police
presence,
usually
to
the
detriment
of
all
involved.
AL
Finally,
I
wanted
to
express
appreciation
and
support
for
counselor
Spears
suggestion
that
we
reallocate
funding
for
encampment
sweeps
it's
misguided,
it's
ineffective,
and
it's
incredible
to
me
that
we
do
not
recognize
this
for
what
it
is:
a
toddlers
pushing
peas
around
their
plate
in
the
hopes
that
it
will
appear.
They've
made
some
measurable
impact,
except
in
this
case
we
are
playing
with
people's
lives.
I
urge
counsel
to
put
its
money
where
its
mouth
is.
What
tangible
quit
change?
AL
B
H
H
H
It's
an
8,
000
square
foot
estate
at
the
at
the
junction
or
Baseline
and
Flagstaff
8
000
square
feet.
6.1
million
bucks,
1.29
Acres,
someone
just
bought
it
as
an
empty
lot,
because
ldrc
passed
it
right
through
for
Demolition
and
ldrc,
isn't
recorded
and
doesn't
see
the
light
of
day
I'm,
the
only
one
that
goes
to
the
meetings.
H
So
as
long
as
you're
subsidizing
things
like
demolitions
of
Estates
in
Boulder,
you
got
a
real
problem
and
the
Public's
not
seeing
it
so
think
about
that
this
one
woman
in
little
Russia.
You
know
Floral
Park
wanted
to
put
some
windows
in
for
thirty
thousand
dollars
and
she
got
kicked
to
landmarks
board.
She
has
to
go
to
a
hearing
and
this
demolition
got
approved
it's
an
estate,
it's
rock
solid,
it
is
fireproof.
It's
a
beautiful
house
from
1941.
That's
been
completely
redone.
B
BF
BF
BF
Recently,
I
witnessed
homeless
people
down
on
pearls,
spitting
on
passers-by
urinating,
on
storefront
windows,
openly,
smoking
marijuana
just
outside
of
restaurant
entrances,
and
even
one
man
aggressively
not
letting
two
women
pass
while
demanding
money.
There
have
been
two
managers
recently
assaulted
inside
the
dushanbe
tea
house
by
a
homeless
person
once
while
a
wedding
was
going
on
and
their
employees
are
no
longer
allowed
to
walk
alone
to
their
cars
at
night.
BF
We,
as
we
know
the
lack
of
Tourism
during
the
pandemic,
has
had
a
big
economic
impact,
and
we
need
that
economic
visitation
to
help
keep
older,
thriving
and
we're
not
saying
that
all
homeless
people
are
criminal.
We
know
it's
a
very
complicated
situation,
but
we
do
ask
for
your
support
for
more
funding
for
the
safe
and
managed
Space
Program,
which
supports
enforcement
cleanup
and
the
downtown
Ambassador
team.
Thank
you
for
your
time.
AE
Thank
you
so
much
for
the
opportunity
to
speak
today.
So
safety
should
obviously
be
our
before
most
concern,
but
that
includes
protecting
our
residents,
which
does
include
the
homeless
from
unnecessary
police
harassment.
We
should
be
making
older
the
Envy
of
their
cities
so
effective
and
useful.
Our
police
are
our
policies.
Right
now
are
not
moving
toward
that
goal.
AE
We
need
to
allocate
more
towards
alternative
programs
that
don't
focus
on
jailing
and
punishing
people,
but
from
moving
forward,
and
also
I
want
to
point
out
that
increasing
police
funding
may
not
actually
help,
because
often
it
just
does
not
prevent
crimes
only
stops
it
after
it
occurs.
Multiple
Australians
have
shown
that
to
be
the
case.
I
would
love
to
send
those
for
further
consideration
and
also
to
help
make
decisions
on
that,
but
we
must
consider
science
not
just
feelings
in
preventing
crime
for
a
homeless
population.
AE
The
housing
first
method
has
proven
to
be
effective,
but
we
are
undergoing
a
housing
crisis,
so
I
understand
that
that
would
necessarily
be
difficult,
but
in
that
place
we
need
resources
to
be
allocated
to
programs
that
improve
long-term
outcomes
and
reduce
inefficient
and
effective,
ineffective
plans.
Like
the
ongoing
camp
cleanups
that
do
nothing
to
actually
solve
the
issue,
they
just
as
I
said
earlier,
push
these
around
like
peas
on
a
plate
with
doing
otherwise
is
just
wasting
taxpayer
money.
AE
AE
We
need
to
be
more
efficient
about
how
we
allocate
funding,
reduce
negative
police
interactions
and
improve
positive
outcomes
for
Everyone
by
using
methods
that
have
actually
been
proven
to
work.
Thank
you.
So
much.
BG
I'm,
sorry,
can
you
hear
me
now?
Yes,
thank
you
as
a
expert
in
the
commercial
and
and
working
with
businesses
for
years,
I
think
that
keeping
a
active
and
open
commercial
and
streetscape
and
commercial
landscape
in
the
community
is
important
to
keeping
businesses
thriving
and
also
it
helps
build
a
community
that
helps
you
know
uplift
and
build
a
positive
influence
against
homelessness
and
drug
abuse
and
crime
violence.
BG
So
we're
asking
that
you
fund
the
police
to
help
against
the
violence
that
we've
seen
the
homelessness,
the
problems
that
we've
all
seen
and
to
keep
businesses
thriving
in
the
community,
specifically
the
hill,
but
also
throughout
Boulder,
as
a
slippery
slope,
we've
seen
other
places,
obviously
Denver.
It's
prominent
16th
Street
Mall.
We've
watched
it
for
two
years
when
there's
vacancies,
people
congregate
and
there's
problems,
There's
issues,
and
it
leads
to
a
snowball
effect
that
influences
the
rest
of
the
community.
B
Thanks
Forrest
Joshua
Pollock's,
our
last
speaker.
BH
My
name
is
Joshua
Pollock
I
am
the
owner
of
bridge
and
tunnel
Restaurant
Group
that
operates
rosenberg's
Bagels,
Cherry,
Soda
Shop,
among
others
in
Denver
I'm,
a
CU
graduate,
and
so
my
love
for
Boulder
in
the
hill
attracted
me
to
open
my
businesses
in
2021.
BH
BH
BH
I've
lost
countless
amounts
of
dollars
and
employees
that
have
to
clean
up
feces
and
urine
daily
as
part
of
their
daily
routine,
coming
into
work
because
they
feel
unsafe
coming
in
early
in
the
morning
to
a
bagel
shop
and
my
heart's
broken
for
it
today,
I
had
to
make
the
hardest
choice
of
my
life
and
I've
closed
spoke.
Businesses
permanently
and
I
will
no
longer
be
occupying
a
business
on
the
hill
because
the
police
do
not
have
the
funding.
They
need
to
patrol
that
neighborhood.
BH
I
know
that
the
the
homeless
situation
is
complex
and
cannot
be
solved
with
one
budget
Act,
but
a
mere
police
presence
on
the
hill
will
really
curb
a
majority
of
these
issues
and
hopefully
Attract
it
to
another
business
and
make
it
the
retail
Corridor
it
was
when
I
first
went
to
Boulder
Colorado
it's
a
sad
day.
For
me,
it's
a
sad
day
for
the
people
who
have
been
patronizing
my
store,
even
though
they
have
to
walk
over
people
passed
out
on
the
sidewalk,
with
needles
sticking
out
of
their
arm
and
and
I
really
wish.
BH
B
I
Man
from
what
I'm
hearing
from
Community
member-
and
this
is
a
good
faith
question-
is
the
issue
funding
for
the
police.
Or
is
this
an
HR
issue
because
I'm
hearing
several
things,
I'm
hearing
we're
29
down
it's
hard
to
hire
then
I'm
hearing
we
need
to
fund
the
police
so
which
one
is
it.
AP
You
can
start
from
a
budget
perspective,
so
the
proposed
budget
for
police
in
2023
is
approximately
42
million.
That's
up
from
the
22
approved
budget,
which
is
40.5
million.
It's
about
one
and
a
half
million
dollar
increase
included
in
that
one,
and
a
half
million
dollar
increase
is
about
six
hundred
thousand
dollars
in
enhancements.
It's
primarily
in
technology
enhancements.
There's
a
couple
Staffing
additions,
but
largely
the
Staffing
conversation
is
related
to
the
police,
master
plan
process
and
that'll
come
forward
over
the
next
several
months.
AP
B
BI
Absolutely
good
evening,
Council
mayor's
Herald
police
chief,
excellent
question.
Right
now
we
are
down
29
police
officers
and
I.
Think
that
what
you're
hearing
tonight
from
the
community
is,
you
know
the
the
natural
breakdown
of
a
police
department
that
has
been
down
police
officers
for
the
last
two
and
a
half
years,
and
we
desperately
need
to
get
those
numbers.
B
BI
We
desperately
need
to
get
those
numbers
up,
because
it's
taken
a
toll,
as
you
can
see,
the
community
harm
that
we
are
seeing
is
real,
and
so
we
have
an
aggressive
recruiting
strategy.
Just
today
we
had
20
applicants
come
in
and
go
through
all
the
testing,
and
then
next
next
week
we'll
have
another
20
come
in.
It
is
our
desire
and
our
hope
that
we
can
fill
these
positions
as
quickly
as
possible,
but
keep
in
mind
even
if
we
fill
these
positions,
how
long
it
takes
to
train
these
officers.
BI
So
if
I
can
say
anything
with
the
community
tonight
is
that
I
didn't
hear
anything
that
is
not
true.
This
community
is
seeing
things
that
they
have
not
seen
before,
and
the
complexities
of
the
calls
for
service
are
different
than
they
have
been
in
the
past,
and
our
allotment
right
now
is
190
for
our
police
department,
but
through
the
master
plan
like
Mark
indicated,
our
workload
analysis
indicates
that
we're
down
10
to
15.
On
top
of
that,
and
so
we'll
have
those
conversations
moving
forward.
I
hope
that's
helpful,
councilwoman
Joseph.
B
BI
Absolutely
we
try
to
prioritize
workload.
We
have
developed
a
completely
new
and
Innovative
policing
strategy
to
prioritize
these
issues
and
respond
to
these
issues
like
the
hill
I,
just
hope.
The
community
understands
that
all
of
our
specialized
assignments
have
been
dramatically
reduced
and
so
to
answer
your
question
mayor.
This
is
now
it
becomes
an
issue
of
prioritization
and
allocation
of
these
scarce
police
resources
right
now,
but
we
are
out,
we
do
mandate
over
time.
BI
We
do
have
strategies,
but
obviously
this
takes
a
toll
on
the
police
officers,
because
we
are
mandating
so
much
over
time,
so
we
are
out
there
in
Mass
actually
a
lot
of
times
when
we
don't
have
Manpower.
We
ask
our
SWAT
officers
to
go
into
soft
uniforms
and
Patrol
the
bike
trails
as
much
as
humanly
possible.
I
hope
that
answers
your
question
mayor.
AF
Chief,
that
was
helpful.
Two
questions
Chief
some
way
of
follow-up
one
is:
can
you
speak
to
the
challenges
that
maybe
some
of
your
your
colleagues,
other
Chiefs
of
police,
are
having
to
recruit
officers
up
and
down
the
Front
Range.
BI
BI
For
for
different
reasons,
but
this
isn't
just
Boulder:
it's
not
the
region,
it's
not
the
state.
It's
National!
We
are
in
a
policing
crisis.
For
several
reasons.
The
murder
of
George
Floyd
has
impacted
policing,
but
the
pandemic,
like
other
positions,
were
not
immune
from
what
everybody
else
is
feeling
with
a
workshop
Workforce
shortage.
BI
But
I
will
tell
you
on
a
positive
note.
If
you
don't
mind,
is
that
people
are
choosing
Boulder
Police
Department
because
of
the
work
that
we
are
doing
and
we
are
getting
older
applicants
that
are
choosing
Boulder
because
of
our
master
plan
process
because
of
the
Innovation
and
the
technology.
Advancements
we're
making.
So
that's
a
good
sign.
BI
I
am
just
pray.
I'm,
just
praying
every
day
that
we
can.
We
can
get
these
40
people
through
the
door
because
that's
what
I'm
trying
to
do-
and
it's
tough
but
yeah
everybody's,
going
through
the
same
thing.
Everybody
thanks.
AF
Was
how
competitive
are
we
here
in
Boulder
on
on
compensation?
You
mentioned
some
of
the
things
that
that
would
draw
people
here
for
econon
economic
reasons,
but
but
can
we
talk
also
about
the
economics?
How
are
we
doing
compared
to
cities
up
and
down
the
Front
Range
that
we're
competing
with
to
get
officers.
BI
I
think
we're
very
competitive,
salary
and
benefit
package.
I
think
that
we
lead
in
this
region
in
a
lot
of
those
categories
and
I'm
in
you
know
constant
communication
with
the
city
manager,
on
what
other
cities
are
doing
to
attract
police
officers,
and
so
you
know
we
Nuri
and
I
talk
all
the
time
about.
BI
What
else
can
we
do
to
attract
talent
to
Boulder,
because
I'll
be
honest
with
you,
I'm
competing
against
every
agency
in
the
state
of
Colorado,
and
so
you
bring
up
a
really
good
point
and
ongoing
with
budget
and
Nuria
on
what
else
we
can
do
to
attract
talent
and
I?
Don't
want
just
any
officer.
A
lot
of
people
are
downgrading
the
qualifications
right
now
Denver
is
is,
is
one
of
them.
I
refuse
to
do
that.
Policing
is
too
important.
BI
D
Right
I
appreciate
that
Chief,
so
it's
really
just
kind
of
a
follow-up
to
where
Juni
was
on
her
question
and
maybe
just
sort
of
add
some
granularity.
You
mentioned
that
we're
down
29
officers
up
of
the
budget.
That's
a
that
will
be
available
in
2023.
How
many
of
those
29
will
you
have
the
budget
to
support.
BI
D
Okay,
so
I
mean
that's
awesome,
because
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
it.
You
have
the
money
and
we're
just
now
trying
to
fill
those
seats,
but
you've
got
the
money
you
need
to
fill
29
and
when
we
hopefully
get
there,
we
can
talk
about
the
others,
but
I
just
want
to
help
with
the
community.
Thinking
that
throwing
money
is
is
at
policing
when
we're
still
trying
to
fill
the
Gap
with
the
money
that
we
already
have
allocated
is
maybe
not
the
solution.
At
this
moment,
we
got
to
get
our
officers
here
now.
BI
D
I
just
want
to
highlight
the
work
that
you're
doing
with
the
police
academy.
I
think
that's
when
we
can
lift
that
up.
I
think
that's
going
to
be
really
awesome.
So
I
just
want
to
highlight
the
work
you
and
sheriff,
and
and
Cupid
you're
doing
on
that,
because
I
think
that's
going
to
really
help
us
out
a
lot
yeah.
BI
And
I
just
talked
to
the
attorney
general
at
the
one
of
the
foundation.
Awards
I
was
at
he's
very
supportive
and,
of
course,
I
have
to
have
his
approval
for
it,
and
chief
Joker
tonight
at
CU
have
been
working
hard
on
this
because
I
think
it'll
be
a
game
changer
for
us.
G
BJ
First
I
want
to
thank
all
the
community
members
that
came
out
tonight,
especially
our
community
members
from
affordable
housing.
Specifically
thank
you,
Dan
and
Holly
for
speaking
tonight
so
and
Tim
sorry,
Tim
he's
my
good
friend
chief
I
was
wondering
if
you
could
talk
about
the
situation
in
the
affordable
housing
and
what
we
can
do
as
a
council,
a
city
to
stand
for
and
be
there
for
our
affordable
housing
community
so
that
they
feel
safer.
BJ
One
of
my
concerns
is,
and
I
know
this
might
be
out
of
your
purview,
but
please
explain
to
the
community
what
happens
when
people
are
arrested
for,
let's
say
drugs,
job
shops,
Etc,
and
then
they
go
back
into
their
units
to
torture,
to
make
everybody's
lives
miserable,
actually
that
are
trying
to
have
a
good
life
and
do
good
for
themselves
in
our
affordable
housing
community.
What
can
we
do
to
help
them.
BI
Thank
you
and
if
I
can
just
say,
council
member
weiner
that
the
the
tenants
that
spoke
from
these
units
that
we're
talking
about
these
were
undercover
investigations
that
we
made
a
lot
of
progress
with
and
we're
working
with.
Boulder
housing,
Partners
on
solidifying
solidifying,
a
strategy
to
do
more
of
this
work.
BI
And
but
it's
it's
so
resource
intensive,
because
you
really
have
to
spend
a
ton
of
resources
on
investigative
product
and
confidential
informants
which
we're
willing
to
do
so.
We're
going
to
be
developing
a
strategy
with
Boulder
housing,
Partners
and
I
feel
bad
because
on
this
particular
case
that
you
heard
about
tonight,
it
did
take
almost
21
days
to
have
an
eviction,
and
that
was
after
our
operation
so
that
tenant
continued
on
with
the
behavior
that
was
exhibited
in
the
first
place,
which
must
be
horribly
frustrating
for
the
community.
BI
And
so
we
continue
to
work
on
these
issues
and
I'm
I
am
hoping.
We
just
had
a
meeting
two
days
ago
with
Boulder
housing
partners
and
we've
agreed
to
work
together
on
these
issues,
because
it
must
be
horribly
frustrating
for
people
that
are
trying
to
recover
from
addiction
and
all
the
issues
and
then
to
have
this
constantly
occurring
and
so
for
my
seat
and
I'm,
not
Kurt
fernhammer,
but
I.
I
think
caseworkers
need
to
be
explored
here
in
Greater,
detail,
I,
hope.
BJ
I,
didn't
that's
also
at
2037
one
of
the
people
she
doesn't
have
enough
support.
She
has
a
mental
illness
and
she
doesn't
have
enough
support
from
Mental
Health,
Partners
or
whoever
there's
just
not
enough
backbone.
BJ
B
Yes,
fair
point
and
I
just
I
really
appreciate
Chief,
you
answering
these
questions
about
and
responsive
to
the
community
concerns.
We
are
on
a
budget
discussion
here.
So
I'll
just
encourage
us
to
focus
in
on
the
the
dollars
and
cents
here
that
we're
we're
approving
tonight.
But
do
we
have
any
other
follow-up
questions
before
we
go
to
discussion?
B
BJ
BI
Need
that's
a
great
question
and
actually
Nuria
just
approved
us
to
hire
for
civilian
investigators
to
supplement
the
work,
that's
being
done
at
the
detective
level
and
I
think
that
will
be
very
helpful
and
they
can
kind
of
pick
up
all
of
the
leg.
Work.
That's
needed
on
a
lot
of
these
cases
that
we
have,
but
I
will
tell
you
bike.
Theft
is
down
and
I
know,
that's
a
big
Community
concern,
but
we've
invested
heavily
in
bike
theft.
BI
In
fact,
our
crime
prevention
officer
is
right
there
and
he
is
working
day
and
night
on
crime,
education,
crime,
prevention
with
the
bikes
and
education.
So
we're
doing
a
lot
of
good
work
in
a
lot
of
areas
and
I
would
encourage
you
all.
We
have
a
new
strategy
that
we've
unveiled
and
it's
called
stratified
policing.
You
should
all
come
and
check
it
out
because
it's
really
powerful,
where
police
officers
Focus
their
time.
BI
Crime
is
reduced.
There's
no
doubt
about
that,
and
you
know
how
I
feel
about
this.
We
don't
even
have
to
rely
on
traditional
mechanisms,
arrest
mechanisms
to
make
crime
go
down;
I'm,
just
really
struggling
right
now
down
20
of
my
Workforce,
so
crime
is
stabilizing
in
a
lot
of
areas
because
of
the
work
of
the
dedicated
men
and
women
in
this
Police
Department.
BJ
BJ
So
I
have
a
question,
for
you,
do
I,
think
more
money
and
that's
why
I'm
excited
about
increasing
is
going
to
help
to
continue
to
help
manage
our
spaces.
Make
our
bike
path
safer
by
the
way
Goose
Creek
wasn't
looking
good
today,
but
that's
a
set
of
seven.
B
Thanks
Chief,
can
we
move
into
discussion
so
I
want
to
check
a
couple
of
things.
One
is
we
we
want
to
do.
We
asked
to
do
a
time
check
around
nine
o'clock.
We
are.
We
are
running
over
schedule
here,
so
I'll
encourage
folks
to
be
disciplined
with
their
comments
on
the
budget.
We
do
have
another
public
hearing
after
this
one,
so
hopefully
we'll
we
can
be
somewhat
expeditious,
but,
of
course,
is
a
very
important
topic
as
well.
That
deserves
a
full
hearing,
so
I'll
open
up
for
Council
discussion.
B
People
feel
free
to
make
General
comments.
If
you
do
have
specific
proposals
for
things
that
you
would
like
to
see
changed,
you
can
get
those
out
on
the
table.
We
can
discuss
those
and
if
anybody
wants
to
put
one
out,
we
can
certainly
strong
have
a
quick
discussion
about
in
straw
poll.
Whether
Council
would
like
to
move
forward
with
any
of
those
if
they're
proposed
so
open
it
up
for
General
comments
or
specific
proposals,
or
what
have
you
I.
D
I'll
I'll
start
with
some
softball
high
level
stuff
and
because
I'm
sure
we'll
dive
into
the
weeds,
which
is
what
we're
here
to
do
so.
One
thing
right
off:
the
bat
is
just
when
looking
at
so
as
I
thought
mentioned.
The
study
session
I,
like
the
open.gov
and
I,
know
that
we're
only
scratching
the
surface
in
terms
of
its
potential
to
deliver
the
information
at
everyone's
fingertips.
The
way
they
want
to
see
it,
but
two
specific
things
that
I
would
hope
to
sort
of
just
Elevate
is
one.
D
When
we're
looking
at
budget,
it's
helpful
for
us
to
always
be
able
to
see
the
actual
versus
proposed
going
back
years
so
that
we
actually
see
where,
in
certain
we're,
either
not
spending
money
or
overspending
money
on
a
departmental
level,
because
that
I
think
helps
some
of
us
understand
where
our
Trends
are
I
know
that's
hard
building
it
back
in
past
budgets
without
using
this
portal.
So
I
know
that's
just
a
back
data
problem,
but
I
think
just
going
forward.
D
The
actual
to
proposed
is
really
really
helpful
for
us
to
understand
those
those
nuances
and
then
the
other
is
just
better
search
functions.
D
You
know
we
all
maybe
have
different
words
in
which
we
would
describe
the
same
thing,
and
so
you
know
you
might
just
start
with
how
we
normally
do
it
in
the
budget
process.
But
add
you
know
a
dozen
keywords
to
it
and
Elevate
that
search
because
I
know
some
folks
have
asked
me
how
do
I
find
blank
and
then,
when
I
tell
them
the
the
acronym
or
the
word,
they
go
yeah,
but
that's
not
the
way
I
thought
about
it.
D
So
just
I
think
those
are
just
user
interface
functionality,
things
just
high
level
stuff
I
think
we
can
get
there,
but
if
we
can
Elevate,
those
I
think
we'll
make
it
easier
for
everyone
to
assimilate
the
great
information.
That's
at
our
fingertips.
So
but
thanks
for
the
great
work
that
you
guys
did
on
that.
B
AM
Thank
you
thank
you
and
thank
you
staff
and
everybody
in
all
the
Departments
for
all
of
your
work
to
put
together
this
budget.
It
really
I
think,
does
a
nice
job
of
reflecting
a
lot
of
our
values.
I
wanted
to
kind
of
put
a
specific
proposal
on
the
table.
I
know
that
housing
and
Human
Services
is
putting
a
lot
of
money
into
basic
needs.
AM
Support
already
and
I
just
want
to
say
that
for
right
now,
given
where
we
are
coming
out
of
covid
with
inflation,
Rising
with
costs
going
up
with
rental
going
up
now
to
me
is
a
key
point
for
us
to
invest
in
a
little
bit
more
even
more
than
we
already
have
there
and
I
had
sent
out
and
hotline
the
idea
of
taking
a
bit
of
money
from
the
public
health
emergency
fund
that
I,
if
I'm,
understanding
correctly
Finance
you
can
you
can.
Let
me
know
if
I'm,
not
it's
really
just
sitting
there.
AM
It's
not
allocated
it's
just
kind
of
hanging
out.
We
have
seemed
to
just
have
decided
we're
moving
past
covid,
and
what
can
we
do
with
that
money
to
try
to
help
alleviate
some
of
the
effects
of
covid
and
some
of
the
things
that
folks
are
experiencing
right
now?
Just
to
give
you
one
story
that
really
kind
of
hit
me
last
week
related
to
the
need
for
basic
needs.
AM
I
was
hearing
about
somebody
who
is
a
worker
employed
housed
they
actually
even
own
their
house
outright,
and
they
due
to
some
medical
issues
and
some
work
issues
related
to
the
medical
issues.
They
had
not
been
able
to
work
for
a
little
period
of
time.
They
had
a
job,
they
were
back,
they
didn't
have
any
more
leave.
AM
B
It
will
affecting
start
so
Nicole
I
believe
you're
speaking
about
if
I
understand
quickly,
there's
a
in
our
arpa
funding
allocation.
There's
five
hundred
thousand
dollars
currently
yeah.
Can
you
clarify.
AP
That
again,
Council
appropriated
a
million
dollars
for
a
public
health
Reserve.
We
did
begin
tapping
into
that
for
various
needs
related
to
covid.
The
most
significant
was
funding.
A
vaccine
incentive
for
employees,
I
believe
we're
in
the
ballpark
of
having
about
500
000
available
in
that
in
that
Reserve
that
is
already
appropriated.
So
you
don't
need
to
make
any
changes
so
the
budget
as
proposed
this
evening,
we
would
just
need
that
direction
and
then
I'll
point
out
that
we
are
back
in
front
of
you
again.
AP
AP
B
Car
up
here,
you
all
are
too
amazing:
did
you
okay,
great
okay?
So
what
I'll
do
is
I'll
ask
for
any
proposals
and
we'll
kind
of
have
a
list
so
that
we
can
consider
them
kind
of
holistically.
So
we
know
all
the
things
that
people
might
be
suggesting,
maybe
before
we
dive
into
this
specific
ones,
Mark.
AI
Well,
first
I
I
have
a
question
when,
when
we
talk
about
rental
assistance,
do
we
include
the
funds
that
are
being
generated
by
the
newer
ordinance,
because
that
was
supposed
to
be
about
a
million
and
a
half
dollars?
And
it
seems
to
me
all
of
that
is
not
being
factored
and
I
I
understand
some
portion
of
that
is
for
legal
representation,
but
I'm
curious
as
to
how
much
of
it
becomes
available
for
actual
rental
assistance.
AP
Yeah
that
that's
correct,
I,
believe
there's
multiple
sources
for
rental
assistance
and
arpa
has
helped
supplement
that
I
believe
the
number
we
quoted
earlier.
540
000
was
directly
related
epress
funding
for
that
type
of
assistance,
but
I'll
yield.
If
somebody
from
HHS
has
a
different
number
thanks,
Elizabeth.
AU
Hi
again
Elizabeth
Crowe
housing,
Human
Services,
that's
about
right,
so
we
do
have
staff
who
are
at
eviction
Court
every
Friday
intervening
and
steering
community
members
over
to
the
county
as
necessary,
and
tapping
that
Empress
funding
to
make
that
available
and
so
budget
does
include
that
moving
forward.
AU
We
also
have
a
little
bit
of
flexibility
with
other
funding
to
move
it
around
to
effa
to
help
folks
intervene
through
that
channel,
and
you
know,
provide
other
rental
assistance
that
actually
can
go
out
through
our
Older
Adult
Services
and
Family
Services
directly
for
people
who
qualify
in
that
way.
All.
B
AI
AI
Understands
I
had
two
comments
on
the
budget
of
this
like
appropriate
time
to
do
it.
Okay,
the
first
one
is
really
is
not
technical.
It's
just
I
really
think
that
that
a
little
bit
of
narrative
would
be
helpful
for
people
who
are
perusing
the
the
budget
and
are
not
strange
enough
as
I
was
to
try
to
delve
down
and
and
and
understand
as
much
as
I
tried
to
others.
AI
It
was,
and
there
were
times
when,
when
I
found
it
to
be
a
little
bit
fruitless,
I
think
I'd
made
some
mention
of
those.
You
know
the
the
capital
expenditure
program
for
open
space
goes
dramatically
down.
It's
not
a
good
thing
or
a
bad
thing.
It
would
be
nice
if
people
could
understand
what
is
happening.
AI
The
the
airport
is
going
up
five
times
in
in
terms
of
budget.
It
would
be
nice
to
understand.
What's
going
on,
I
don't
mean
to
treat
us
I,
you
know,
but
a
little
bit
of
narrative
on
a
department
by
Department
basis,
I
think
will
help
people
understand.
You
know
the
major
changes
and
variations
that
are
occurring
from
year
to
year.
Having
said
that,
I
I
think
the
budget
is
a
terrific
piece
of
work
and
I
really
congratulate
you
for
all
the
hard
work
that
you
put
in.
AI
If
I
were
to
make
a
specific
recommendation
for
increased
funding,
I
I
think
it
would
be
for
family
homelessness,
because
I
think
you
get
very
good
bang
for
the
buck.
When
you
provide
assistance
to
a
family
I
think
you
probably
have
a
good
Prospect
of
their
utilizing
that
assistance
and
recovering,
because
family
units
are
are
important
and
and
parents
are
going
to
try
to
do
the
best
they
can
for
their
children.
So
I
I
tend
to
think
that
we
underfund
family
homelessness
a
little
bit
and
we
could
do
better
there.
AM
Thanks
Mark,
and
just
just
to
follow
up
on
that
that
point
that
that
is
basically
what
I'm
talking
about
with
this
public
health
emergency
fund
is
to
use
it
for
exactly
that
sort
of
thing.
We
heard
a
couple
weeks
ago
that
family
homelessness
is
one
of
the
biggest
predictors
of
future
adult
homelessness
right.
AM
So
this
really
is
a
case
where
putting
some
money
in
now
when
we
know
that
the
the
folks
in
the
community
that
support
families
experiencing
homelessness
and
people
experiencing
need
in
our
community
they're
telling
us
that
people
are
in
a
worse
place
now
than
they
were
before
the
covid
pandemic.
I
think
we
really
need
to
listen
to
that,
and
there
there
are
groups.
There
are
ways
we
can
do
that,
as
you
mentioned
Mark,
to
really
put
some
more
money.
B
AM
D
There
all
right,
that's
my
dad's
name,
it
works
well,
so
I
want
to
Circle
a
little
bit
back
to
what
Nicole
was
sort
of
referencing
about
the
public
health
reserve
and
and
really
with
regards
to
thinking
about
the
two
most
disproportionately
impact
sort
of
Industries
or
workforces,
which
were
really
the
restaurant
workers
and
also
artists
in
our
community,
and
so,
if,
if
we
really
do
want
to
unlock
that
that
half
a
million
dollar
or
that
half
a
million
dollars
to
support,
certainly
I
think
some
of
these
efforts.
D
That
Nicole
was
talking
about
which
I
think
are
good
ideas.
I'd
also
like
to
see
a
large
chunk
of
that
really
go
to
some
of
that
immediate
need
for
our
Arts
Community
I
know
we're
increasing
that
budget,
but
they're
hanging
by
a
thread,
and
we
and
others
like
I
mean
we
had
the
you
know
the
restaurant
act
came
in
to
cert.
You
know
rescue
restaurants.
Well,
there
isn't
hasn't
been
much
of
that
to
rescue
our
Arts
community
and
I.
Think
an
immediate
injection
of
a
couple
hundred
thousand
dollars
would
really
lift
them
up.
D
While
we
start
to
think
about
those
longer
term.
Support
networks
as
they
kick
in
as
we
have
funded
and
others
think
come
into
play,
so
I
think
there's
an
opportunity
have
a
yes
and
where
we
can
support,
certainly
those
in
need,
but
the
other
groups
in
need
to
like
our
artists
as
well
and
sort
of
that
immediate
emergency
funding
aspect.
A
AF
AF
I
think
that
that
using
some
of
that
money
both
for
family
homelessness
relief
and
also
for
support,
especially
of
our
Arts
organizations,
I
realized
that
arpa
has
strings
attached,
that
it
needs
to
be
for
Recovery,
that's
what
they
are
and
I
think
an
arpa
is,
but
so
we
don't
just
put
it
into
programs
or
ongoing
programs.
We
need
to
look
for
people
in
our
community
business
in
our
community
that
are
struggling
or
still
struggling
to
recover
and
as
bad
identified.
There's
restaurants
that
are
still
struggling
to
recover.
AF
AF
It
has
been
funded
by
the
500
000
that
you're
going
to
bring
back
to
us.
I
know
that's
not
tonight's
discussion,
because
we're
we've
kind
of
gotten
off
the
budget
a
little
bit,
but
as
long
as
we're
talking
about
it,
I
wanted
to
to
agree
with
my
colleagues.
I
I
did
have
a
question
actually
about
the
timing
on
the
day,
Services
Center
and
on
slide
24.
It
mentions
staff,
recommends
flexibility
to
tap
into
funds
as
necessary
to
facilitate
opening
the
facility
and
I'm
wondering.
Is
it
the
750
000
or
is
it
a
different
fund,
because
I
couldn't
tell
whether
it's
a
different
source
of
funding,
you're
thinking
about
tapping
into
as
needed?
It's.
I
You
I
just
wanted
to
comment.
I
agree
with
Nicole
and
I
think
that's
a
great
idea
to
use
that
money
to
help
community
members
who
are
in
need
Families.
My
only
thought
is
500
000
is
not
a
lot
of
money
and
I
would
want
to
know
exactly
how
you
intend
to
spend
it
because
you
know
you've
talked
you've
talked
about
basic
needs
today
right
and
it
means
different
things.
I
So
what
is
it
that
we're
spending
that
money
on
that
will
give
us
the
biggest
bang
for
buck
and
also
that
you
know
bring
into
the
conversation
that
Equity
aspect
because
I
hear
you
know,
different
people
have
different
ideas
who
it
should
go
to?
Who
should
be
the
beneficiaries,
so
who
will
be?
The
beneficiaries
would
be
really
helpful.
Thank
you.
G
Thank
you.
So
one
of
the
increases
that
we're
looking
at
is
an
increase
from
1.5
million
for
the
both
for
the
safe
and
managed
spaces
team,
Urban,
Park,
Rangers
and
downtown
ambassadors
to
2.8
million,
which
is
almost
doubling
that
program.
You
know
those
programs
budgets,
as
one-time
fees
and
sort
of
as
pilot
programs.
To
me,
I
I
would
prefer
to
see
us
running
more
of
a
variety
of
Pilots,
as
opposed
to
like
pre-picking
winners.
G
I
still
feel
really
strongly
that
the
downtown
area
needs
more
public
restrooms,
as
was
brought
up
in
public
comment,
mental
health
and
Addiction
Services.
We
could
really
use
some
expanded
help
in
that
area
and
while
I
really
appreciate
the
trash
proposals
that
you
brought
forward
to
me,
they
don't
feel
as
well
thought
out.
G
G
B
Additional
plus
to
80
000
additional
and
instead
go
to
the
purposes
you're
describing
yes,
okay,
thanks
for
clarifying
that,
if
I
can
ask
a
follow-up
clarifying
question,
I
know
that
when
we
were
talking
about
additional
trash
options,
one
of
the
things
that
we
did
mention
was
about
bathrooms.
An
additional
bathroom
options
like
in
the
downtown
or
in
other
parts
of
town
that
didn't
make
it
into
the
proposal
can.
Could
you
address
why
we
didn't
include
anything
for
that
yeah.
AP
Thanks
mayor,
so
we
looked
at
that
I
think
where
staff
was
at
and
certainly
I'm
happy
to
invite
Parks
and
Rec
staff
to
expand
on
this,
that
the
total
cost
of
of
owning
and
maintaining
those
bathrooms
is
is
pretty
substantial.
So
we
weren't
prepared
with
a
funding
source
in
the
23
budget.
For
that,
knowing
that
there
are
some
opportunities
for
future
discussion
as
we
consider
the
future
of
Civic
area
and
other
capital
projects
within
the
downtown
area.
AP
But
it
is,
it's
pricey
I
think
it's
a
million
dollars
million
and
a
half
dollars
over
10
years
to
maintain
just
one
public
bathroom
so
that
that
was
some
of
the
reasons
why
we're
focused
on
some
of
those
less
expensive
strategies
than
might
have
some
impact
in
23
and
leave
the
the
restrooms
for
a
broader
conversation.
Thanks.
I
Just
a
thought,
a
thought,
yeah
I
I
was
very
surprised
as
well
by
the
eighty
thousand
dollars
for
the
trash,
and
then
I
thought.
It
also
said
something
about
what
CU
students
moving
in
and
I
was
thinking.
Well,
is
you
helping
with
that
at
all
and
I'm
thinking?
Why
are
we
carrying
that
cost
ourselves
and
based
on
the
math
I
did
a
quick
math
on
you
said:
well,
it's
very
expensive
to
maintain
a
bathroom
right,
half
a
million
over.
Did
you
see
a
10-year
period,
That's
about
50
000
a
year?
It's.
AP
A
AP
The
initial
expense
of
installing
the
capital
costs.
BJ
Forgive
me
for
not
knowing
this,
but
we
did
have
a
very
big
packet,
so
I
have
a
quick
question:
I'm
I'm
thinking
about
that
those
two
girls,
the
two
teenagers
from
Boulder
high
that
and
how
they
were
affected.
What
the
problem
was
is
our
mental
health
services
are
not
where
they
should
be
and
I
know
we
need
to
depend
on
the
county.
But
can
you
just
remind
me
if
there
is
anything
in
the
budget
that
we're
doing
for
mental
health
or
is
that
all
the
county.
AP
AU
Yeah
correct
again
November
discussion
in
October,
so
we
are
going
to
be
providing
an
update
in
the
arpa
discussion
for
about
2.5
million
that
we
have
that
we
would
like
to
allocate
to
mental
Behavioral
Health
and
we
are
in
really
close
contact
with
the
county
who's,
also
making
their
ARP
allocations
and
is,
is
working
on
a
regional
county-wide
strategy
and
so
we're
constantly
in
contact
with
them
about
that
process.
AU
So
so
we
do
have
some
plans
to
utilize
the
zarpa
funds,
to
really
support
Workforce,
to
try
to
help
our
local
agencies,
large
and
small,
to
attract
and
retain
staff,
make
sure
they
have
what
they
need
and
to
try
to
expand
Services
as
well.
So
you
hear
more
about
that,
hopefully
very
soon,
on
an
ongoing
basis.
Again,
we
utilize
our
Health
Equity
Fund
and
our
Human
Services
fund
to
support
a
lot
of
mental
Behavioral.
AU
Health
programming
through
organizations
is
again
diverse
as
mental
health
partners,
our
primary
Mental
Health
Center
all
the
way
over
to
queer
asterisk
El
Centro
mestad
out
Boulder
County
that
that
are
really
integrating
a
lot
of
mental
Behavioral
Health
into
their
services.
So
hopefully,
that's
helpful.
Do.
BJ
AU
I
think
it's
safe
to
say
that
and
to
Echo
the
chief
similar
to
a
lot
of
other
Workforce
areas.
There
are
not
enough
people,
it's
a
national
Workforce
crisis
right
now
with
mental
Behavioral,
Health
and
that's
being
experienced
by
all
of
our
agencies
here
in
Boulder
as
well,
so
I
think
they're
they're
working
very
hard.
AU
We
know
they
are
to
meet
the
needs
of
all
of
our
community
members,
including
those
who
are
low
income
and
have
additional
challenges
in
receiving
services,
and
it's
not
enough
and
so
we're
mindful
of
that
and
again
in
close
contact
with
our
local
agencies
and
trying
to
use
what
dollars
we
do
have
to
help
support
that.
B
If
I
could
follow
up
and
we
and
the
area
of
substance
abuse
support,
we're
standing
up
a
meth
treatment
home
correct
and
is
something
that
we're
actively
in
progress
on
that's.
Y
D
So
this
is
kind
of
a
comment
and
and
perhaps
also
maybe
to
invite
Joanna
or
Josh
to
come
up
from
utilities
to
talk
about
it
as
well.
With
regards
to
the
80
000
for
the
enhanced
trash
This
was
not
really
half.
This
wasn't
not
thought
through.
D
That's
just
less
that
the
crews
have
to
work
on
to
deal
with
to
begin
with,
so
it
was
really
trying
to
work
Upstream
on
the
trash
aspect,
and
so,
when
you
think
about
the
investment
of
80
000
to
hopefully
eliminate
and
dramatically
reduce
in
just
a
small
fraction
of
a
couple
weeks,
it
makes
a
lot
of
sense
to
try
to
do
that.
Otherwise,
just
ends
up
in
the
creek
anyway,
which
is
where
it's
unsightly
and
people
are
struggling
with
with
all
the
trash
down
there
to
begin
with
so
there's
sort
of
there
was.
G
Yeah,
thank
you.
My
issue
is
not
with
trying
to
reduce
trash
during
those
periods.
The
part
of
that
proposal
that
I
found
most
intriguing
and
also
you
know
that
I'm
most
excited
about
was
the
voluntary
incentives.
I
think
that,
to
the
extent
that
we
can
not
have
things
go
into,
the
trash
stream
at
all
is
really
the
direction
I
would
like
to
see
us
move,
and
so
the.
G
You
know
the
budget
was
talking
or
the
the
dollar
amounts
we're
talking
about,
trash
can
locations,
dumpster
locations
and
I
would
like
to
see
more
than
that
and
I
for
me,
I
don't
feel
comfortable.
Approving
the
budget
for
the
trash
can
locations
when
I
feel
like
this
other
piece
to
me
is
more
important
and
I
would
like
to
make
sure
that,
if
there,
if
we
can
do
something
on
that
front,
that
we
have
budget
reserved
for
that.
AB
Yes,
so
it
I
mean
it
sort
of
feels
like
we
are
just
tossing
out
fantasies,
so
I'll
give
one
as
well
a
little
bit
of
a
broken
record
for
me,
but
when
I
was
on
the
encampment
clean
up
day,
tour
one
thing
I
noticed
was
like
you
know,
and,
and
the
team
is-
is
very
compassionate
and
and
lovely
with
the
people
that
that
they
are
moving
along
some
of
them.
They
knew
well
and
were
like.
Oh
hey,
Johnny
I
hear
you.
AB
You
got
a
voucher
coming
up
in
a
couple
weeks
and
you
know
it's
not
his
real
name,
but
just
that
that
level
of
knowing
and
I
I
saw
someone
else
that
I'd
seen
from
years
ago.
Who
said
that
they're?
AB
You
know
they
were
number
eight
on
the
list
or
something
and
so
I
think
there
are
some
people
who
really
are
have
been
here
a
long
time
and
are
are
sort
of
camping
in
ways
that
are
are
inoffensive
and
and
not
in
line
with
some
of
the
things
that
we're
hearing
in
public
testimony
tonight
and
I'm
I'm
super
sensitive
to
that
and
I
agree
with
the
person
who
said
you
know
our
our
brand
matters
like
we
are
a
to
some
degree,
a
tourist
town
and
we
pay
for
a
lot
of
the
services
that
we're
talking
about
from
our
sales
tax
and
those
dollars.
AB
So
we
do
need
to
I
think
have
a
a
safe
and
clean
Creek
and
bike
path
area.
It's
it
should
be
safe
to
be
in
those
areas.
That
should
be
a
no-brainer.
So
my
question
is:
could
we
take
some
of
that
money
and
and
pilot?
You
know
some
people
who
who
are
living
in
a
way
in
an
encampment
that
is
kind
of
the
the
kind
of
sanctioned
encampment
that
we
want
they're
they're
cleaning
up
after
themselves.
AB
AB
Could
we
pilot
some
people
who
have
been
here
and-
and
you
know
somehow
could
be
prioritized
for
a
place
that
that
would
have
some
of
the
the
trashes
and
and
restrooms
that
we're
talking
about
and,
and
that
wouldn't
be
you
know
all
over,
but
not
a
full-fledged,
sanctioned
encampment,
but
sort
of
a
pilot
of
people
are
not
at
the
creek
and
and
not
on
the
paths
and
and
waiting
for
for
vouchers
that
they've
been
in
line
for
for
quite
a
while
that
there's
my
fantasy
asked
for
five
hundred
thousand
dollars.
AK
AK
We
also
do
that
that
at
the
boulder
shelter
a
little
closer
wow,
so
the
the
boulder
shelter
as
well
does
that
so
we're
a
lot
of
the
residents
that
we're
putting
in
hotels
are
also
residents
that
are,
you
know,
close
to
that
housing
acceptance
or
close
in
that
process.
AK
AB
To
piloting
a
place
where
some
of
the
people
would,
then
you
know
be
be
not
living
on
the
creek,
it
would
be
a
lesser
impact
and-
and
maybe
we
could
make
Headway
with
some
of
the
people
who
are
still
there
and
causing
some
of
the
behavioral
issues
that
we're
seeing
and
and
some
people
could
be
living
sort
of
unharassed
and
unmoved
by
the
city
and
and
sort
of
stabilizing
and
then
hopefully
moving
into
housing.
AT
Yeah,
thank
you
again.
Joanna
Bloom,
so
climate
initiative
actually
is
kind
of
the
ambassador
of
that
program
and
then
we
enforce
it
through
code
enforcement,
but
my
understanding
and
Teresa
definitely
chime
in
if
I
get
it
wrong,
but
the
ordinance
is
in
effect
and
it
does
require
that
rental
property
owners
on
the
hill
and
pay
for
trash
during
the
designated
period
for
six
days
out
of
the
seven
day
period
during
the
this
designated
period.
AT
I
Narcan
is
available
through
the
pharmacies
and
also
the
the
university
and.
I
AU
I
would
not
want
to
speak
out
of
turn,
but
we'll
check
on
that.
I
can
say
that
correct
about
the
county
really
running
that
program.
We're
also
likely
to
be
allocating
some
resources
to
that
program
through
the
opioid
settlement
dollars.
Nuri
is
our
representative
on
the
opioid
Council
and
that's
one
of
the
many
plans
for
some
use
of
those
funds.
I
AM
Yeah,
it's
just
it's
a.
It
may
be
more
of
a
reflection
on
some
of
the
points
that
colleagues
have
already
raised
and
I'm
not
sure
if
it's
not
related
to
asking
for
different
pool
of
funding
somewhere,
do
I
raise
it
here
or
do
I
raise
that
later.
B
Y
AM
AM
This
time
around
before
approving,
more
funding,
I
know
that
our
Sam's
team
is
doing
work
to
build
relationships
and
to
try
new
things
that
are
more
than
just
picking
up
trash
and
I'm,
not
opposed
to
investing
in
more
of
these
Innovations,
as
some
of
my
colleagues
talked
about,
what
I'm
opposed
to
doing
is
giving
more
funding
without
some
clear
outcomes
that
tie
into
our
homelessness
strategy.
When
we
have
limited
budgets
and
a
crisis
like
homelessness,
that
we
heard
is
having
such
big
impacts
in
our
community
tonight.
AM
We
need
to
be
laser
focused
on
Solutions
with
every
dollar
that
we're
spending
we're
talking
about
investing
a
total
of
2.8
million
dollars
in
encampment
Management
in
2023
and
I
want
to
know
that
what
we're
going
to
get
in
terms
of
typical
metrics
we
use
to
measure
success
in
homelessness.
For
this
extra
1.3
million
dollar
investment
is,
is
leading
to
success
in
things.
AM
Beyond
just
trash
pickup,
because
every
interaction
that
we
have
with
someone
experiencing
homelessness,
even
just
picking
up
trash,
is
an
opportunity
for
connection
to
services
and
ultimately
to
a
pathway
to
housing
and
an
exit
from
homelessness
when
our
funds
and
resources
are
limited
and
when
our
whole
Community
housed
and
unhoused
is
struggling
as
much
as
it
is
everything
we
need
to
do
needs
to
connect
people
with
Services
I
know.
There's
a
lot
of
interest
in
this
approach.
AM
I
just
want
to
see
some
measurable
outcomes
with
a
plan
for
keeping
up
with
Rising
need
before
saying
yes
to
this
funding.
So
I
would
like
to
see
a
plan
before
approving
this
additional
1.3
million
dollars
in
funding
that
has
the
following
characteristics:
integrating
our
safe
and
managed
spaces
work
with
our
overall
homelessness
strategy
to
the
highest
possible
degree,
for
example,
by
making
sure
that
everyone
can
provide
the
most
efficient
path
to
accessing
services.
AM
I
would
like
to
know
what
are
the
measures
are
of
success
that
we're
looking
for
Beyond
tons
of
trash
picked
up?
How
many
people
are
getting
housed
because
I
know
it's
more
than
zero.
How
many
people
are
starting
to
pick
up
their
own
trash,
because
I
know
that
number
is
fairly
significant
as
well?
How
many
people
are
just
being
moved
from
place
to
place
how
many
people
are
connected
with
Services?
AM
That's
a
large
amount
of
money,
and
so
I
really
want
to
see
some
measures
of
success.
There
Beyond
just
trash
pickup.
We
know
that
homelessness
is
increasing.
We
know
it's
going
to
continue
to
increase
at
least
I
do
based
on
what
I'm
seeing
what
I'm
hearing
about
from
a
lot
of
our
providers.
We
need
to
find
a
way
to
coexist
with
homelessness
in
a
way
that
does
less
harm
to
everyone
involved
and
to
our
public
spaces
and
a
1.3
million
dollar
investment.
AM
B
AM
Z
Got
another
item
is
to
just
say
that
I
appreciate
it
councilmember
Speer.
Please
know
that
the
the
Sams
group
has
actually
really
been
working
hard
with
our
it
partners
and
I
try
to
lift
up
our
it.
Partners
too
they've
been
doing
phenomenal
work
to
really
get
to
some
of
those
metrics.
We
hope
to
share
some
of
that
soon.
We've
talked
a
little
bit
about
it
in
the
past,
but
we
too
want
to
make
sure
that
the
work
that
we're
piloting
actually
has
outcomes
attached
to
it.
B
BJ
Way
back
when
I
first
got
one
wheel.
First
for
newbies
on
Council,
remember:
one
of
my
proposals
was
more
lighting
Natalie
here,
more
Lighting
in
the
panels
so
and
I
know
that
this
is
not
as
vital
as
everything
else.
It's
obviously
but
I
just
wanted
to
make
a
plug
and
I
don't
even
know.
I
know
how
expensive
expensive
it
is
to
retrofit.
BK
Hi
I'm
Natalie
Stiffler
interim
director
for
transportation
thanks
Tara,
we
are
kind
of
evaluating
our
lighting
needs
across
the
system
and
we
don't
have
any
concrete
plans
to
make
retrofits.
Those
would
be
very
expensive
projects
that
would
need
to
go
into
the
CIP
but,
as
you
said,
we're
trying
to
make
improvements
that
we
can
with
the
existing
infrastructure.
That's
out
there.
B
Good
enough,
okay,
all
right
so
like
last
call
has
been
issued
and
all
right.
No,
there
was
no
more
takers.
So
here's
what
I've
got
so
I've
I've
got
from
Nicole
about
well,
let's,
first
of
all,
there's
things
in
the
arpa
category
right.
So
we've
heard
several
different
ideas
about
how
funds
in
the
500
000
Public,
Health
Reserve
could
be
used
for
different
things.
Nicole
mentioned
moving
some
of
that
money
to
basic
needs.
B
Mark
talked
about
helping
with
prevent
or
assist
with
family
homelessness,
which
Nicole
was
like
yeah.
That's
part
of
what
I
meant,
which
made
sense.
Matt
was
talking
about
Arts
funding,
additional
Arts
funding,
I
heard
some
agreement
on
that
from
Bob,
and
then
Rachel
mentioned
the
about
allocating
money
to
different
approaches
to
Camping
like
camping
options,
and
so
is
this
something
so
that,
with
this
arpa
funding,
what
I'm
hearing,
if
I
understood
correctly,
was
that
this
is
not
a
decision
that
we
make
tonight
as
part
of
the
budget.
B
But
perhaps
these
are
ideas
that
we
can
leave
you
with
to
help
shape
in
a
month
or
so
when
you
come
back
to
allocate
arpa
funding,
how
we
do
that
do
I
have
that.
That's.
AP
B
I
have
that
right?
Okay,
great
so
there's
there's
that,
and
then
we
have
this
specific
proposal
from
Lauren
to
not
approve
the
1.3
million
dollars
for
additional
cleanups,
but
to
instead
dedicate
that
to
some
additional
pilot
programs
in
this
kind
of
area,
as
well
as
to
not
approve
the
80
000
in
recommended
trash
new
trash
kind
of
approaches.
So
do
I
have
that
right.
Yeah.
AM
B
Z
I
appreciate
that
I'll
take
a
quick
stab
at
it
and
maybe
Cara
and
Mark
want
to
jump
in
but
similar
to
any
kind
of
conversation
we
have
about
dollars
right.
We
don't
have
an
unlimited
amount
of
funds
and
what
we
really
tried
to
do
when
we
tried
to
do
it
with
arpa
is
to
look
at
it
through
a
variety
of
lenses,
a
variety
of
prioritizations.
We
will
come
to
the
financial
strategies
committee
with
that
and
hopefully
then,
from
there
we'll
get
some
input
and
we'll
come
to
the
full
Council
as
we
move
forward.
B
Great
thanks
for
that
and
I
saw
General
support
for
that
and
I'll
just
say:
I
I
think
these
are
great
ideas
and
I
know
we
don't
have
it
infinite
funds,
but
I
look
forward
to
running
it
through
kind
of
equity,
lenses
and
staff
capacity,
lenses
and
those
kinds
of
things
and
seeing
what
we
come
up
with
in
those
areas
right
so
good,
good
on
that
and
then
I
guess
next
I'll
I'll
go
to
Nicole's,
it's
not
a
dollar
proposal
per
se,
but
the
Nicole's
mentioning
about
the
better
integration
of
the
cleanup
with
our
homelessness
strategy,
metrics
and
then
the
last
thing
you
said
as
well
and
and
I'll
just
say:
I
thought
those
sounded
like
positive
directions
to
move
in
but
wanted
to
open
the
floor
to
see
if
people
wanted
to
disagree
with
that
or
or
Echo
it
or
yep.
B
Okay,
Nicole
people
like
like
that
idea
so
well
said
well
put
metrics
yeah
I
think
be
really
valuable,
absolutely
okay,
so
that
that
brings
us
to
the
the
the
last
kind
of
specific
dollar
proposal:
you're
you're,
the
one
who's
really
requesting
different
dollars
to
Lauren.
So
you
get
you
get
to
stand
out
that
way
of
not
approving
the
additional
cleanup
funds
and
instead
look
into
other
pilot
programs
and
and
also
not
not
move
forward
with
the
eighty
thousand
dollars
in
additional
trash
pickup
funding
that
you'll
mention
not
that
you're
Pro
trash.
B
I
I
welcome
your
ideas
very
much
but
I'm
wondering
too,
as
when
you
come
back
and
let's
say
we
decide
not
to
allocate
that
1.3
million.
What
does
that
really
mean
right,
because
we
had
a
lot
of
community
members
who
testified
today
or
at
least
who
came
before
us
and
explained
some
of
the
challenges?
Even
though
we've
already,
we
already
have
a
pilot
program
going
we've
been
trying
to
clean
up,
and
people
still
are
dealing
with
a
lot
of
issues
in
the
community.
So
what
does
that
would
look
like?
And
what
does
that
really
mean?
I
If
we
did
not
allocate
that
1.3
million?
Does
it
mean?
What
what
does
that
mean?
What
will
happen
right?
Well,
we
get
more
community
members
coming
in
and
say
things
all
worse,
so
I
think
that's
about
balancing
what
what
does
it
really
mean
that
we're
trying
to
do
as
well,
but
I
welcome
the
idea
of
trying
to
find
better
Solutions,
because
here
we
are
we've
allocated
money.
We've
been
trying
to
get
a
hang
of
this
issue
and
we're
still
seem
to
be
a
little
bit
further
away
and
community
members
are
still
very
concerned.
I
They
cannot
walk
the
bike
path.
I
mean
those
pictures
that
this
Community
member
brought
before
us.
She
didn't
make
it
up
right.
She
went
there
on
the
bike
path
and
saw
all
these.
You
know
those
what's
going
on
over
there
and
then
she
showed
it
to
us.
So
maybe,
as
Lauren
mentioned
other
Solutions,
what
are
those
Solutions
is
it?
Is
it
Rachel's
idea
of
having
this
pilot
program?
If
that's
the
solution,
let's
get
to
it,
so
that
we
don't
have
to
deal
with.
I
BJ
I'm
pretty
sure
the
community
members
that
all
spoke
wanted
more
money
for
safe,
managed
spaces
because
they
asked
me
and
I
know,
but
anyway,
I
think
what
they're
I
think
you're
right.
It's
not
solving
the
problem,
but
if
we
didn't
have
that,
first
of
all,
we
don't
have
an
I
mean
I
when
I
bike
I
see
loads
of
trash.
BJ
Now
on
on
Foothills
Parkway
by
the
railroad
tracks,
I
mean
you
all
bike,
so
you
see
that
mess
so
there's
plenty
of
trash
to
be
still
picked
up,
but
I
feel
like
those
community
members
are
saying.
Yes,
we
need
to
solve
some
of
our
problems
with
crime
and
mental
health,
and
also
we
need
to
increase
what
we're
spending
on
safe
and
managed
bases.
I'm,
pretty
sure.
That's
what
they
would
say
but
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong.
B
Great
so
can
I
call
myself
and
then
hand
it
over
to
you,
okay,
great.
So
no
thanks,
junior
I
thought
that
that
was
well
said
and
Lauren
I
appreciate
you
raising
the
issue,
but
I
I
think
fundamentally
we're
dealing
with
a
sanitation
issue
here.
I
think
we
have
really
significant
problem
and
it's
not
just
trash.
You
know
trash
can
make
me
think
about
litter.
You
know
we're
talking
about.
B
You
know,
use
needles,
sometimes
or
you
know
human
waste
we're
talking
about
some
things
that
really
do
constitute
Public
Health,
real
public
health
issues
in
terms
of
the
the
trash
and
the
kind
of
contamination
among.
A
B
Our
creeks
and
and
waterways,
and
some
of
our
other
public
spaces,
so
I
I
well
I,
feel
like
this.
Additional
funds
for
for
cleanup
makes
sense,
because
we
do
I
think
have
a
really
significant
problem
with
that
that
this
will
assist
with
now.
Is
it
ending
homelessness?
No,
it
is
not
ending
homelessness
right.
That's
an
enormous
issue
that
we're
trying
to
tackle
in
any
number
of
ways,
including
with
new
initiatives
in
this
budget
that
we're
devoting
significant
additional
resources
to
right.
So
we
have
to
keep
at
the
our
work
on
minimizing
and
ending
homelessness.
B
It's
super
important,
but
as
as
we
continue
to
work
on
that
problem,
I
think
it's
also
critical
that
that
we
keep
our
our
public
spaces
at
a
level.
That's
you
know
a
minimum
level
of
cleanliness
that
doesn't
present
a
public
health
risk.
So
I
think
that
this
program
has
has
made
progress
in
this
area
and
I.
Think
it's
worth
continuing
on
and
adding
some
additional
resources
in
I
really
appreciated.
Nicole's
points
about
integration
with
it,
so
that's
it
well.
The
trash
and
sanitation
issues
are
significant
and
we
need
to
address
them.
B
You
know
at
the
same
time
that
we're
working
on
these,
these
cleanup
programs,
so
I,
think
those
ideas
were
absolutely
fantastic
and
I
totally
support
them,
but
I
would
continue
to
I
would
take
staff's
recommendation
of
the
increased
cleanup
funds,
both
the
1.3
million
for
that
originally
proposed,
and
then
the
80
000
in
additional
trash
options
which
I
appreciate
you
bringing
forward
and
then,
but
at
support.
B
Lawrence
talk
about
other
Solutions
and,
like
I,
heard
the
interest
in
potentially
hiring
folks
experiencing
homelessness
to
help
with
trash
pickup,
which
I
think
could
be
a
potential
one.
There
could
be
others,
let's
keep
working
on
these
ideas,
but
I
support
the
budget
as
proposed.
That's
all
I.
AI
AI
We've
heard
a
lot
of
testimony
this
evening
and
while
this
will
not
solve
or
cure
our
problems
with
respect
to
homelessness,
it's
doing
something,
and
one
of
the
things
that
that
you
have
to
hear
from
this
testimony
tonight
and
from
some
of
these
emails
is
a
growing
sense
of
discontent,
anger
and
even
despair
at
our
inability
to
make
progress
on
what
is
the
the
largest
problem
affecting
our
community
today.
I
have
no
illusions
that
you
know
the
additional
funds
for
cleanup
are
going
to
get
at
any
of
the
root
causes
of
homelessness.
AI
AI
It
is
also
at
least
an
initial
down
payment,
or
a
first
step
to
dealing
with
the
frustration
that
so
many
members
of
the
community
are
experiencing
because
they
don't
feel
safe,
they're
seeing
things
they
ought
not
to
be
seeing
their
children
are
seeing
things
they
ought
not
to
be
seeing
and
so
I'm
going
to
be
supportive
of
this
I'm
always
receptive
to
new
programs.
If
we,
if
we
have
them
but
I,
don't
think
they
should
be
at
the
expense
of
something
that
is
concrete
and
available,
and
we
can
undertake
it
quickly.
D
Well,
I
appreciate
your
comments.
Aaron
and
I
agree
with
them.
I
think,
what's
important
for
perspective
is
on
when
I
did
my
walk
with
with
the
crew.
In
one
day,
six
thousand
pounds
of
trash
was
picked
up,
six
thousand,
and
that
was
just
the
north
side
of
Boulder
Creek.
From
this
building
to
the
Justice
Center
I
mean
it's
just
it's
a
whopping
amount
of
volume,
and
so
if
we
stopped
that
or
didn't
increase
that
effort,
I
mean
it's
just
it.
It
becomes
insurmountable.
So
I
think
it's
really
important.
D
We
do
with
what
we
know
works
for
the
problem
at
hand
which
is
trash
cleanup
and
the
way
to
do
that
is
to
have
more
trucks
and
to
have
a
crew
that
can
sort
of
work
both
sides
of
the
creek
or
go
to
other
areas.
So
so
it's
really
vital
that
we
think
about
it
in
those
areas.
I
love
the
some
of
those
Concepts
I'd
love
to
see
them
more
cooked,
but
these
are
known
solutions
to
take
care
of
the
trash
issue,
both
when
they're
at
the
creek
and
Upstream.
D
D
Incrementally
it's
not
going
to
solve
the
bigger
ales,
as
you
point
out,
Aaron
and
and
but
we're
going
to
put
in
the
work
and
I
know
we're
going
to
make
those
Investments
as
need
be
to
to
help
really
try
to
tackle
homelessness
in
a
meaningful
way
in
this
community.
We'll
continue
to
do
that,
but
I
don't
think
jettison
the
trash
cleanup
to
try.
The
other
things
in
this
instance
is
going
to
get
us
where
we
need
to
go.
AM
Yeah
I
just
wanted
to
clarify
my
point
earlier
that
I
really
do
want
to
see
some
of
these
outcomes
specified
before
approving
this
additional
funding.
So
for
me,
my
approval
for
this
extra
1.3
million
dollars
in
the
budget
is
really
contingent
on
the
the
things
that
I
mentioned
earlier
about
having
data
and
metrics
I
think
you
know
this
I,
we
are
collecting
trash,
yes,
absolutely,
and
we
also
don't
have
a
control
condition.
AM
So
this
is
sort
of
an
experiment
with
with
no
control,
and
that
makes
it
a
little
bit
hard
to
see
what
would
the
situation
be
like
without
I
know
we're
already
late,
so
I'm
not
going
to
get
into
kind
of
the
reasons?
Why
happy
to
talk
with
anybody
individually
about
that?
Otherwise,
but
you
know
I,
think
our
initial
down
payment
for
this
program
was
in
March
2021
and
what
I'm
really
curious
to
see
now
is
what
what
has
changed.
What
is
different
and
I
really
would
like
to
see
what
it
is.
AM
We're
going
to
be
looking
at
for
outcome
measures
before
moving
forward
with
additional
funding.
I
think
that
it
is
an
opportunity
to
build
relationships
and
connect
people
with
services
and
really
move
us
forward,
but
I
feel
like
what
I
was
seeing.
People
say
back
in
March
2021
is
very
similar
to
what
people
are
saying
here
tonight
and
so
I'm
curious.
Where
did
that?
You
know
three
million
dollar
investment
get
us?
Was
it
the
right
place
and
is?
Is
what
are
we
going
to
be
seeing
different
with
this
extra
1.3
million
dollars
so
I'm?
AM
B
All
right,
thanks
to
that
Nicole
and
so
obviously
we're
not
going
to
develop
that
on
the
Fly
tonight.
I,
don't
know!
Is
there
time
before
second
reading
the
budget
to
start
to
work
on
that
as
you're
or
are
we
going
to
have
to
say
you
know,
would
like
you
to
do
that,
but
you're
going
to
come
back
with
it
at
some
future
future
point.
So.
Z
I
appreciate
that
I'll
get
back
with
the
Sam
streams
as
we're
looking
at
it.
We
have
not
finalized
all
those
metrics.
So
if
the
conversation
I
appreciate
the
Candor
of
it
is
that
your
support
is
conditioned
on
that,
we
may
not
be
able
to
meet
that,
but
we
will
happy
happily
share
and
maybe
just
send
out
a
hotline
on
where
we
are
and
the
kind
of
things
that
we're
looking
at
that
I
can
commit
to.
AP
Appreciate
the
question:
so
the
1.3
million
is
tied
to
a
few
different
programs.
It's
the
expanded,
encampment
cleanup
team,
so
that
isn't
in
existence
yet
so
that
could
theoretically
be
delayed.
The
other
two
are
existing
extensions,
so
the
one
is
the
downtown
ambassador
program
and
the
other
is
the
urban
parks
ranger
program,
so
both
of
those
involve
staff
either
outside
of
the
city
or
in
inside
those
would
have
to
effectively
and
we
have
the
internal
employees
on
fixed
term
positions.
If
funding
wasn't
wasn't
approved
in
the
23
budget,.
AM
Okay,
yep,
then
I
think
just
sort
of
a
modified
proposal
holding
back
on
that
six
hundred
thousand.
Until
we
have
some
some
metrics
and
some
Integrations
and
some
clarity
around
what
it
is,
we're
going
to
be
trying
that's
a
little
different.
B
So
Lauren's
proposed
I
think
was
to
not
fund
the
1.3
million
11
600
000,
but
would.
G
AP
Okay,
just
a
point
of
clarification:
I've
received
the
number
715
000
is
the
number
for
that
team.
B
A
AP
B
That
all
right,
so
if
we
can
straw,
pull
this
right
and
then
we
can
I
think
we'll
be
about
done
so
people
in
favor.
What
Rachel
I'm
sorry.
AB
I,
don't
I
don't
want
this
to
continue
either
but
and
I'm.
Sorry,
if
this
is
already
answered
with
the
700
000
coming
in-house,
how
did
that
compare
with
what
was
being
spent
when
it
wasn't
in-house
like
it
wasn't?
We
were
still
cleaning
up
encampments
right,
so
there
was
still
it
wasn't.
I
assume
we
would
just
take
it
back
out
house
out
out
out
of
City
how
else
damn
1018
feels
late,
so
just
wondering
what
what
is
the
actual
dollar
difference
in
in
bringing
it
in-house
versus?
AB
AP
Outsourcing
we
currently
have
an
in-house
team.
That's
in
utilities.
This
would
add
a
second
team
to
that
and
part
of
the
715
is
Staffing.
A
part
of
that
is
other
expenses,
so
additional
trucks,
for
instance
those
would
be
one-time
expenses,
so
I
think
that
breaks
out
about
four
hundred
thousand
dollars
in
ongoing
301
time
so
that
you
know
potential
some
savings
if
we
had
to
hire
some
outside
help
for
certain
larger
cleanups,
but
it's
essentially
just
to
double
our
capacity.
B
Great
so
300K
in
one
time
and
400k
annually,
ongoing
about
yeah,
okay,
okay,
so
straw
poll
Lawrence
proposal
to
not
spend
the
710
000
additional
for
the
for
the
additional
crew.
So
I
guess
every
raise
your
hand
if
you
support
a
proposal
to
not
spend
the
money.
B
A
B
Okay,
well,
a
certain
point.
We
do
have
to
take
a
vote
on
something,
but
I
did
not
see
majority
support
for
the
proposal
and
then
separately
to
not
spend
the
80
000
on
the
newly
created
trash.
So
you
can
raise
your
hand
if
you're
in
favor
of
not
spending
that
money.
I
I
feel
like
that,
eighty
thousand
dollars
is
for
students,
and
that's
part
of
the
reasons
why
I
felt
that
how
is
cu
helping
and
I
don't
see
the
necessity
of
putting
that
money
toward
that
particular
program
without
knowing
what
is
cu
doing
as
well
as
a
partner.
So
that's
why
I
would
not
support
it.
Okay,
thank
you.
B
Thanks
for
clarifying,
but
perhaps
we
can
also
reach
out
to
see
you
because
more
partnership
in
this
area
would
be
I,
think
fantastic.
Okay,
so
we
didn't
see
majority
support
for
those.
Those
were
the
specific
proposals
on
the
table,
so
I
think
we
now
I
think
we've
got
the
majority
is
saying
to
adopt
the
budget
as
proposed
so
I
wonder
if
we
could
get
motion
language
up
on
the
screen.
AP
You
can
so
sharing
over
here.
There
we
go
so
the
first
two
are
the
easier
ones.
These
are
ordinances,
85,
36
and
85,
38
they're,
the
second
and
fourth
ordinances
that
you
have
on
your
agenda.
These
are
the
mill
Levy,
that's
setting
our
Mill
Levy
and
the
fees.
So
those
are
not
changing.
Based
off
of
the
discussion
this
evening
and
and
then
the
second
are
a
little
bit
more
complicated
and
then
I
took
a
shot
at
a
third
bullet
point
on
the
first
one.
AP
So
the
first
one
85
35,
is
your
budget,
so
that
sets
our
estimated
expenditures.
So
we
have
the
correct
numbers,
so
those
will
will
need
and
Theresa
will
kick
me
if
I'm
wrong
on
this.
We
need
the
exact
number
so
that
you
can
do.
You
can
approve
that
same
number
on
a
second
reading
in
two
weeks.
So
that's
why
those
new
numbers
are
in
there
on
both
the
first
one
again
is
for
the
estimated
expenditure,
because
that's
the
budget,
so
our
plan
in
spending
for
23.
AP
The
third
bullet
is
some
direction
related
to
the
performance
measure.
So
you
can
take
or
leave
that,
because
I
did
that,
literally
while
we
were
talking
and
then
the
second
one
is
85.37,
that
is
the
appropriation
ordinance
for
each
fund.
So
you
need
the
exact
dollar
number
for
the
appropriation
for
the
funds
that
were
changing
and
again.
The
three
funds
that
we're
suggesting
changing
based
on
the
discussion
tonight
is
the
general
fund
appropriation,
the
ccrs
appropriation
and
correcting
the
Boulder
Junction
Improvement
fund.
AF
AB
AB
The
total
Community
culture
and
safety
tax
fund
appropriation
at
30
million
561
or
a
thousand
is
that
a
debt
and
200
no
248
and
correcting
the
Boulder
Junction
Improvement
fund
to
Total
appropriation
at
250
000.
The
new
Total
estimated
expenditures
across
all
funds
of
582
million.
One
hundred
eight
thousand
nine
hundred
six
dollars
and
noted
direction
to
develop
additional
performance
measures
integrated
with
our
homelessness
strategies
related
to
safe
and
managed
public
spaces
and.
AB
For
two
motion
to
order
published
by
title
only
ordinance,
8537
appropriating
money
to
thank
you
to
free
expenses
and
liabilities
of
the
city
of
Boulder
Colorado.
For
the
2023
fiscal
year
of
the
city
of
Boulder,
commencing
on
the
first
day
of
January
2023
and
ending
on
the
last
day
of
December
2023
and
setting
forth
related
details
with
a.
A
AB
The
new
Total
appropriation
across
all
funds,
582
million
108
thousand
nine
hundred
six
dollars
come
on
keep
going,
there's
more
and
a
motion
to
order
published
by
title
only
ordinance,
8536
establishing
the
2022
city
of
Boulder
property
tax
malabies,
which
are
to
be
collected
by
the
county
of
Boulder
state
of
Colorado
within
the
city
of
Boulder,
in
2023,
for
payment
of
expenditures
by
the
city
of
Boulder,
County,
Boulder,
state
of
Colorado
and
setting
forth
related
details
and
a
motion
to
order
published
by
title.
AB
B
Yes,
have
a
drink
of
water.
Do
we
have
a
second
all
right?
We
got
a
motion
and
a
second
do
we
need
any
further
discussion,
or
can
we
move
to
vote
all
right,
move.
AM
AM
B
B
AI
I
am
not
I,
I
I,
think
starting
a
40
minute,
which
will
not
be
over
in
40
minutes.
Hearing
at
10
30
at
night
is
frankly
absurd,
not
a
question
of
whether
we
can
do
it.
Of
course
we
can
do
it.
We
ought
not
to
do
it
if
it
can
be
moved
to
another
evening.
We
ought
to
give
it
the
full
consideration.
It
is
due
and
not
have
a
bunch
of
people
nodding
out
and.
B
AF
Well,
maybe
they
would
have
been
here
anyway.
You
said
through
the
that
the
gripping
budget
discussion
I
agree
with
Mark
I,
don't
think
we
should
start
this
at
10.
30.
I
do
note
that
we
have
a
special
council
meeting
scheduled
for
next
week,
which
has
a
very,
very
light
schedule
on
it.
I
know
that
Aaron
you'll
will
be
gone.
AF
AF
I
may
go
into
the
kitchen
and
not
come
back
so
I
would
I
would
kick
this
to
the
next
meeting.
Okay,.
D
Maybe
I
could
offer
an
alternative,
because
what
we
didn't
mention
is
the
thing
at
the
end,
which
is
regarding
diapers
and
menstrual
products,
which
is
15
minutes
so
can,
if
we
are
we
good
taking
that
on,
but
maybe
pushing
the
because
I
don't
want
to
skip
both
and
if
that
allows
staff
to
get
chewing
on
that,
then
we
give
them
that
opportunity
is.
Are
you
guys,
okay,
doing
the
15
on
that
yeah
friendly.
B
Y
AM
I
just
want
to
say
we
keep
doing
this
to
staff
where,
where
we
have
you
stick
around
really
long
and
then
we
kind
of
cut
cut
off
the
presentation
and
things
so
I
sort
of
feel,
like
you
all
stuck
around
for
us
I'm
willing
to
stick
around
for
you.
I
also
think
that
they're
I
think
there's
only
a
couple.
People
who
are
on
for
the
public
hearing
on
the
next
item,
but
I
think
there
are
a
couple
members
of
the
public
too
and
I
think
it's.
I
AG
Mayor,
so
if
you
want
to
continue,
if
you
want
to
take
an
item
up
after
10
30,
that
would
require
a
vote.
That
is
a
majority
if
you.
If
the
council
wants
to
agree
to
extend
the
meeting
past
11
o'clock,
which,
with
a
40-minute
item,
you
may
consider
that
that
would
require
a
two-thirds.
AB
All
in
favor,
oh
did
we
make
a
motion.
I
was
just
going
to
make
a
motion
if
it
needed
to
be
done,
I'd
like
to
make
a
motion
to
extend
the
meeting
and
dig
into
the
next
two
items.
Second,.
AG
AG
C
Alrighty.
Thank
you.
Our
next
item
on
tonight's
agenda
is
the
flip.
My
pages
item
5B
the
consideration
of
a
motion
to
approve
the
following
items
related
to
the
east
Boulder
sub
community
plan.
We
have
four
items.
Item
number
one
is
the
second
reading
and
consideration
of
a
motion
to
adopt
ordinance
8544,
which
is
amending
sections
9-2-19
on
rezoning.
We
have
item
number
two
consideration
of
a
motion
to
adopt
the
bvcp
land
use
map,
changes
for
the
East
boat
or
some
community
plan.
C
BL
Thank
you
great
to
be
with
you.
I
will
be
quick
and
I'm
excited
to
talk
about
East
Boulder
again
tonight,
so
am
I
close
enough
to
that
mic
am
I
coming
through
okay
great,
so
my
name
is
Kathleen
King
I'm,
a
principal
planner
in
the
city's
comprehensive
Planning
Group.
BL
Tonight
we
have
a
staff
presentation
to
walk
through
the
four
items.
That
council
is
considering
I'm
happy
to
take
any
clarifying
questions.
After
the
presentation
we
will
move
to
a
public
hearing
related
to
the
bvcp
updates
and
a
proposed
ordinance,
and
then
Council
will
move
into
deliberation
and
decisions.
BL
The
four
items
for
council's
consideration
tonight
are
first
an
amendment
to
the
comprehensive
plan
which
will
add
a
summary
of
the
East
Boulder
sub-community
plan.
Next,
we'll
look
at
updating
the
bbcp
land
use
map
to
align
with
the
land
use
plan
included
in
the
East
Boulder
subcommunity
plan.
This
is
a
first
step
in
the
implementation
of
the
plan,
and
then
you
will
consider
an
ordinance
that
will
amend
our
rezoning
criteria
to
help
implement
the
sub-community
plan.
Finally
Council.
What
will
consider
whether
to
make
any
additional
amendments
to
the
sub-community
plan?
BL
BL
As
a
reminder,
Council
held
a
joint
public
hearing
with
planning
board
on
the
East
Boulder
subcommunity
plan
on
May
3rd
planning
board
moved
to
adopt
the
plan
with
amendments
on
May
5.
City
Council
also
moved
to
adopt
the
plan
on
May
17,
with
some
of
the
proposed
amendments
in
the
addition
of
new
amendments,
so
planning
board
considered
those
new
amendments.
This
past
July
and
also
approved
land
use
changes
and
moved
to
recommend
the
ordinance
you're.
Considering
the
plan
with
the
12
amendments
included
in
the
packet
is
considered
adopted
by
both
bodies.
BL
So
tonight,
if
Council
moves
to
make
any
additional
amendments
to
the
plan,
staff
will
revisit
planning
board,
as
both
the
board
and
city
council
must
adopt
the
same
amendments
to
finalize
the
adoption
process.
If
there
are
no
additional
amendments,
the
plan
is
considered
final
and
we
can
move
fully
into
the
implementation
phase.
BL
So
the
first
item
for
consideration
is
the
summary
of
the
sub-community
plan.
Chapter
5
of
the
comp
plan
includes
summaries
of
significant
area
and
sub-community
plans.
Council
members
received
a
copy
of
the
summary
as
an
attachment
to
the
memo
in
your
packet.
This
is
another
item
where
both
planning
board
and
city
council
need
to
approve.
The
summary
for
this
update
to
be
included
to
the
bbcp
planning
board
approved
the
summary
on
July
19th.
BL
BL
BL
This
criteria
describes
that
the
proposed
changes
must
be
consistent
with
the
policies
and
intent
of
the
comp
plan.
Not
have
significant
cross-jurisdictional
impacts
would
not
materially
affect
growth.
Projections
that
were
the
basis
of
the
comp
plan
don't
materially
affect
Urban
Services
would
not
affect
the
CIP
and
would
not
affect
area
two
or
three
boundaries
in
the
comprehensive
plan.
Staff
finds
that
the
proposed
changes
meet
the
criteria
and
planning
board
move
to
adopt
the
land
use
map
changes
on
July
19.,
along
with
the
land
use
map
changes.
BL
Staff
has
prepared
an
ordinance
for
council's
consideration
that
will
help
implement
the
sub-community
plan
into
the
future.
The
ordinance
amends
section
9219
of
the
boulder
Revised
Code,
which
describes
criteria
for
rezoning.
The
amendment
provides
staff
planning,
board
and
council
with
the
tool
to
make
sure
we
can
implement
the
plan
when
considering
individual
rezoning
applications.
BL
Without
this
in
place,
our
rezoning
could
move
forward
without
consideration
of
the
sub-community
plan.
Staff
anticipates
that
we
have
a
lot
of
work
ahead
of
us
related
to
code
updates
and
rezoning
considerations.
So
this
amendment
allows
us
to
make
sure
that
if
Redevelopment
occurs
concurrent
with
the
city's
development
of
new
regulations,
we
can
still
work
with
projects
to
implement
the
vision
of
the
plan.
BL
So
here's
where
we
are
with
plan
adoption,
the
plan
itself
has
been
substantially
adopted
in
May
Council,
put
forward
three
amendments
for
planning
board's
consideration.
Two
of
the
three
were
approved
and
all
of
the
Amendments
which
have
been
adopted
by
both
bodies
are
included
in
the
packet.
BL
The
amendment
that
did
not
pass
was
related
to
language.
Council
proposed
be
added
to
policy
H1
concerning
rezonings
of
properties
located
along
Western
Avenue
West
of
55th
Street
Council
proposed
this
amendment
to
ensure
Redevelopment
in
the
area
supports
compatible
uses.
The
northern
neighbor
to
these
Parcels
on
the
other
side
of
the
railroad
is
a
heavy
manufacturing
site
currently
home
to
cord
and
Pharma
concerns
described
for
potential
residents
of
this
area.
Included.
BL
Noise
and
Light
planning
board
really
had
a
very
robust
discussion
on
this
amendment
and
considered
a
variety
of
alternatives
to
the
land
use
map
to
the
place
types
map
thought
about
different
densities
and
tried
to
figure
out.
You
know
a
way
to
maintain
the
number
of
units
that
the
plan
was
proposing,
but
maybe
not
include
a
residential
mix
in
this
area.
BL
Developing
those
tools
and
making
recommendations
about
zoning
changes
in
the
area
is
really
our
first
charge
in
implementing
the
sub-community
plan.
Our
team
is
currently
considering
zoning
options
and
we
will
be
studying
choices
to
move
this
forward,
bringing
recommendations
to
planning
board
and
City
Council
in
the
next
year.
Additionally
to
support
the
TDM
focus
and
infrastructure
needs
of
the
55th
and
Arapahoe
station
area.
We
will
also
begin
working
on
the
establishment
of
a
general
improvement
district
or
another
similar
type
of
organization
to
help
implement
the
adopted
55th
and
Arapahoe
station
area
plan.
BL
So
I
have
some
suggested
motion
language.
Hopefully
that
was
pretty
quick
but
I
I.
We
can
move
to
clarifying
questions
or
the
public
hearing.
B
So
I'll
kick
off
if
I'm,
in
with
a
question,
I
get
a
couple
questions.
So
we've
we've
heard
from
some
property
owners
in
the
area
of
concerns
that
that
there
they
fear
they
might
not
be
able
to
develop
the
plans
they
already
had
under
their
existing
zoning.
But
just
want
to
see
if
I
have
this
right.
B
So
my
understanding
is
that
any
potential
future
rezonings
would
be
optional
for
these
Property
Owners
right
so
that
they
can
hang
on
to
their
existing
zoning
if
they
want
and
then
we're
still
developing
the
zoning
standards
that
will
apply.
There
will
be
public
input
into
that
process
and
so
we'll
be
able
to
hear
from
our
all
parties
as
we
develop.
Those
additional
zoning
standards
is
that
all
correct.
BL
So,
yes,
we
are
moving
forward
with
putting
together
zoning
recommendations
and
we'll
include
the
public
in
any
form-based
code
updates
we
make
or
zoning
recommendations
that
we
would
make.
We
don't
have
a
recommendation
yet
whether
we
would
pursue
a
general
rezoning
where
the
city
would
actually
initiate
a
series
of
rezonings
or
whether
we
might
have
you
know
like
a
preferred
zoning
map
and
if
a
property
owner
wanted
to
rezone,
he
could
he
or
she
could
come
in
and
work
with
staff
to
to
pursue
that
type
of
rezoning.
BL
Yes
and
any
rezoning,
anybody
within
the
general
area
gets
noticed.
There's
a
public
hearing
at
planning
board
a
public
hearing
at
city
council,
so
there'll
be
a
lot
of
opportunities.
AI
If
I
can
follow
up
on
on
what
Aaron
said,
one
of
the
concerns
of
property
owners
is
that
they
they
don't
want
to
be
in
a
position
where
any
expansion
of
their
current
operations
would
be
rendered
non-conforming
because
of
a
zoning
change.
Can
we
give
them
any
assurance
that
if
you
have
a
business
now,
you
will
have
the
opportunity
or
the
possibility
of
expansion?
If
that's
your
desire
and
still
be
consistent
with
with
the
the
zoning.
BL
AI
BL
D
And-
and
you
know,
kind
of
coincides
with
what
we
talked
about
with
site
review
when
we're
doing
that
criteria
about
creating
more
predictability
and
I.
Think
that's,
maybe
the
concern
here,
at
least,
or
at
least
mine
anyway,
with
regards
to
these
business
owners
is
just
creating
an
environment
where
there's
some
more
predictability,
especially
in
an
area
that
might
be
seen
as
going
under
acute
Evolution
still
providing
some
some
predictability.
I
think
is
really
essential.
So
I
think
that
the
language
that
was
certainly
brought
forth
by
Aaron
in
the
hotline
I
think.
I
D
AH
BH
B
But
thanks
for
calling
it
I'll
get
to
it
here
before
too
long
good,
any
other
questions
for
Steph,
okay,
seeing
none,
then
we
can
go
to
the
public
hearing
and
so
I
didn't
see.
B
One
there
we
go.
Thank
you
all
right.
We've
got
two
virtual
commenters.
We've
got
Lynn
Siegel
and
Mark
painter,
so
each
one
of
you
will
have
three
minutes
to
speak.
Since
there
are
fewer
than
15
speakers
and
we
will
start
with
Lynn
Siegel.
H
Thank
you,
I
do
not
support
this
plan.
I
do
not
support
CU
South.
This
is
growth
for
the
sake
of
growth.
It's
not
infill.
It's
not.
The
city
is
not
doing
anything
about
what
we
heard
tonight
from
all
the
people
about
the
homeless
issue
and
problem.
The
city
is
not
addressing
this
in
a
fundamental
way:
there's
greater
growth,
wealth
inequality,
as
exemplified
by
the
8
000
square
foot
estate,
that's
being
demolished
below
the
radar
of
the
public,
because
you
don't
even
record
Landmark
design,
review
committee
meetings.
H
H
H
H
BM
Good
evening
I'm
trying
to
figure
out
what
I
want
to
say
at
this
point,
because
you
all
stole
my
thunder
while
making
the
confirmations
out
I'm
Mark
painter
I've,
been
an
attorney
here
in
town
for
over
three
decades,
and
you
obviously
have
my
letter
in
the
letter
from
Jeff
Wenger
from
WWE
Reynolds.
The
commercial
property
owners
on
the
task
force
strongly
supported,
creating
all
these
incentives
and
and
the
right
to
have
housing
in
this
area
in
furthering
the
comp
plan.
As
you've
noted
Our.
BM
That
wasn't
a
possibility
that
the
the
commercial
property
owners
thought
was
there
coming
out
of
the
task
force,
though
they
definitely
believe
in
incentivizing
housing
as
an
option
and
that's
great
where
it
fits
with
adjacent
uses.
It's
financable
based
on
there
being
demand
for
it
and
it's
it's
appropriate.
BM
The
owner,
I,
just
I,
want
to
make
sure
that
the
reason
I'm
participating
this
is
just
to
make
sure
that
there's
good
direction
and
reassurance
going
forward
into
the
rest
of
the
process
that
those
owners
that
do
have
plans
over
the
coming
years
for
their
properties
are
able
to
pursue
those
plans
and
if
it
does
make
sense
and
if
the
incentives
are
there
or
even
if
it
makes
sense,
without
incentives
to
include
housing
that
that's
an
additional
option,
not
a
mandatory
requirement
for
the
development
of
properties
in
those
industrial
zones
and
since
I
think
you've
covered
those
issues.
BM
B
Thank
you
Mark
all
right,
so
that
brings
us
to
the
end
of
the
public
hearing
the
and
so
we'll
close
public
comment
and
bring
it
back
to
council
for
discussion.
If
you
all
don't
mind
if
I
just
kick
things
off
just
because
I
did
send
out
some
proposed
amended
code
language
this
afternoon
on
hotline,
and
do
we
have
that
available
Kathleen
for
display.
BL
B
And
the
intent
of
this
is
is
to
just
be
more
specific
about
when
we
would
consider
or
when
we
would
not
consider
a
rezoning
request
right,
because
the
the
staff
requested
the
original
code
Amendment,
so
that
people
wouldn't
rezone
before
we
had
the
standards
in
place
to
to
govern
the
future.
Rezonings
right.
So
I
just
asked
for
some
additional
specificity
about
when
we
would
consider
when
we
would
not
and
worked
with
a
planning
department
and
Helen
panel
with
the
attorney
in
that
area
to
come
up
with
proposed,
updated
language.
B
B
I
can
call
it
myself
so
I'm,
seeing
some
nodding,
heads
and
such
but
anyway,
I
think
it's
fantastic.
We're
we've
already
adopted
the
plan
right,
but
now
we're
doing
the
associated
land
uses
and,
and
these
standards
so
exciting,
to
see
this
moving
forward
just
to
to
Mr
painter's
point
in
some
of
the
emails
that
we
got.
You
know
the
the
intention.
B
AM
I
just
had
a
question
on
that
Aaron,
just
just
so
that
I,
make
sure
to
understand
is
what
you're
proposing
does
that
affect
in
any
way
kind
of
the
overall
amount
of
housing
that
we're
expecting
to
get
out
of
the
sub-community
plan.
How
does
that?
AM
B
I
think
if
a
property
owner
like
that
owns
property,
currently
zoned
industrial,
had
a
plan
to
redevelop
it
as
industrial
property
in
the
next
year
or
two.
Yes,
they
would
be
allowed
to
do
that.
So
you
can
bring
forward
a
proposal
that
does
not
include
housing.
It's
allowed
under
the
current
zoning,
but
that's
not
anything
different
from
what
the
plan
States
to
answer
your
question.
B
I
Z
AG
Yeah,
yes,
because
the
hotline
is
a
form
of
public
notice,
so
the
language
did
go
out
to
the
public
in
advance.
Therefore,
you
you
could
reference
it
in
your
motion.
B
I
will
go
ahead
and
make
a
motion
to
amend
the
Boulder
Valley
comprehensive
plan
to
add
a
summary
of
the
East
Boulder
subcommunity
plan
to
chapter
five
approve
the
bvcp
land
use
map,
changes
for
the
sub-community
plan
area,
including
the
new
mutod
land
use
designation
and
adopt
ordinance,
8544
amending
section,
9,
219,
rezone
and
BRC
1991
by
adding
rezoning
standards
to
implement
the
East
Boulder
subcommunity
plan
and
setting
forth
related
details
with
the
amendment
that
was
sent
out
on
the
hotline
this
afternoon.
AB
AI
BK
B
BL
B
Y
AB
I
I
will
I
think
we
can
do
this
in
two
minutes:
I'm,
basically
asking
for
a
straw
poll
to
see
if
we
would
like
for
staff
to
look
into
following
the
state's
lead
on
not
taxing
dignity,
so
there's
a
movement
to
end
taxes
on
period,
diaper
and
incontinence
products.
Some
of
our
peer
cities
have
already
gotten
on
board
with
this
and
I.
Believe
staff
has
a
brief,
two-slide
presentation,
maybe
for
this
and
they've
done
some
back
of
the
envelope
estimations
for
how
much
it
might
lose
Us
in
tax
revenue.
Z
AO
D
BJ
AN
AO
I'll
go
quick,
so
this
is
the
information
that
was
provided
in
hotline
and
we
have
done
a
preliminary
estimate
on
the
potential
annual
annual
revenue
impact.
If
we
did
exempt
these
products
from
sales
tax,
that's
236
thousand
dollars,
that's
across
all
of
our
sales
tax
funds,
so
the
general
fund
would
be
a
little
less
than
half
of
that.
We
just
put
up
there
our
methodology.
AO
We
followed
the
Colorado
Department
of
revenues
methodology
we
we
would
need
to
do
more
work
with
regard
to
our
demographics
and
such
and
more
analysis
to
get
a
a
more
specific
estimate.
But
that's
a
good
estimate
for
right
now
and
we
also
looked
at
what
other
municipalities
were,
that
we
surveyed
or
reviewed,
have
gone
down
this
path,
and
there
are
three
that
have
already
exempt
the
hygiene
products
and
two
that
have
been
exempt:
the
incontinence
products
and
the
diapers.
But
we
do
know
other
communities
are
considering
this
as
well.
B
AO
Just
if
we
did
it,
you
know
if
we
did
it
effective,
January,
1
or
something
like
that
or
I,
don't
know
if
we
could
do
it
that
quickly,
probably
it
probably
could
be
straight,
pretty
straightforward
and
yeah.
We
would
just
maybe
reduce
the
budget
by
that
amount,
but
I
think
that
the
budget
is
sufficient,
that
there
probably
wouldn't
need
to
be
any
expenditure
changes.
B
I
AO
I
I'm
in
full
support
and
I'm
wondering:
is
it
going
to
cost
us
as
much
money
to
do
this
research?
Are
you
going
to
hire
a
consultant
because
if
it's
only
five,
two
hundred
thousand
dollars,
why
are
we
doing
more
research
on
it?
When
we
know
it's
good,
it
serves
the
public
good,
so
I'm
just
trying
to
understand
that
a
little
better
and.
AO
AM
Yeah
I
think
that
that
takes
care
of
one
of
my
questions,
which
is
what
is
the
work
that
would
be
lost
if
we
did
this
or
postponed
right,
and
you
know
I,
think
kind
of
just
another
question
in
general.
Is
this
we
can
think
of
it
like
a
230,
000
ish
investment
right
is:
is
that
the
right
place
you
know
to
make
the
difference
that
they
were
wanting
to
have
I
mean
I
think
these
are
these
are
sort
of
the
bigger
questions.
AM
I'm,
supportive
and
I
think
that
these
are
just
questions
we
need
to
be
thinking
about
every
time,
we're
we're
spending
money
and
I.
Think
the
other
question
that
I
have
is:
how
does
this
fit
in
with
some
of
the
other
thinking
that
finance
and
the
city
are
doing
around
other
revenue
streams
right
other
ways
of
getting
money
because
I've
heard
well
I
know:
we've
had
conversations
I've
heard
it
brought
up
in
the
past
sales
tax
is
not
the
nicest
way
to
generate
revenue
for
our
city.
It
really
is
a
regressive
tax.
AM
AO
I
agree,
I,
think
it's
been
on
our
plan
and
agenda
to
work
with
the
financial
strategy
committee
to
to
examine
our
Revenue
mix
and
examine
it
from
various
perspectives,
and
so
looking
at
how
what
products
we
tax
the
exemptions.
What
are
other
Revenue
sources
that
we
could
possibly
contemplate
in
the
future?
But
that
is
work
that
is
on
the
agenda.
Yeah.
AM
Mark
and
then
Rachel
oh,
can
I
can
I
just
follow
up
on
that,
so
what
what
I
would
love
in
pursuing
this
is
also
taking
in
some
learning
and
knowledge
about
how
we
can
do
this
for
other
things
as
well.
I
have
an
issue
with
taxing
food,
for
example,
basic
human
need,
those
kinds
of
things
right,
so
I
would
love
if
we
could
use.
If
we
move
forward
with
this
think
about
how
this
process
can
be
applied
to
other,
what
I
would
consider
kind
of
basic
needs
in
the
future.
AM
AI
I
I'm,
supportive
and
I.
Don't
really
need
to
see
a
lot
more
research,
provided
you
can
give
me
some
assurance
that
the
the
200
plus
thousand
dollars
is
not
really
500
plus
thousand
dollars.
I
mean,
if
there's
a
degree
of
uncertainty
on
your
part.
Then
it's
probably
worthwhile
doing
a
little
more
analysis.
AI
If
you
think
that
that
the
numbers
you've
cited
are
at
the
upper
end
and
it's
highly
likely
that
that
it's
going
to
come
in
lower,
then
I
would
say
we
could
move
forward
without
looking
at
it
in
any
more
detail.
But
at
some
point
it
looks
like
real
money
and
I
would
just
want
to
at
least
know
what
that
is,
and
and
not
be
surprised
that
we
have
to
suddenly
do
an
offset
to
something
else.
AI
AI
AO
Something's
a
little
hard
to
you,
don't
know
what
you
don't
know,
but
we
definitely
think
just
with
our
retail
mix
in
Boulder,
there's
probably
a
good
chance
that,
for
example,
diapers
are
potentially
being
purchased
at
big
box
stores,
not
in
Boulder.
So
we
think
we
may
be
overestimating
with
respect
to
those
because
people
buy
them
in
bulk
and
and
so
for
the
other
two
products.
It's
really
a
demographic
look
because
we
use
the
Colorado
methodology,
but
that's
for
the
entire
State.
A
Z
AZ
Z
AI
AB
If
it's
a
vote,
I,
don't
know
just
wanted
to
say
that
the
information
I
have,
that
is
that
these
taxes
fall
disproportionately
on
people
who
can
least
afford
them,
including
communities
of
colors,
color
families
struggling
financially
and
older
adults
on
fixed
income.
So
hopefully,
the
one
thing
that
I
would
hope
we
would
get
back
is
that
it
gets
run
through
the
racial
Equity
instrument.
I
assume
it
would
but
just
flag
of
that
thanks
and
thank
you.
Everyone
for
considering.
D
A
D
Over
on
that,
can
I
just
go
ahead
and
just
say
like:
let's
can
we
just
move
straight
to
ordinance?
Can
that
be
my
suggestion
for
us
to
vote
on
not
study
and
just
let's
just
drop
hole
going
straight
to
making
an
ordinance
get
in
front
of
as
soon
as
possible
and
move
this
on
and
provide
some
folks
relief.
B
I
And
to
make
before
the
end
of
War
meeting
earlier
and
I
think
this
is
a
theme
that
I've
heard
in
a
lot
of
the
public
comments
Andrew
and
the
public
hearing
as
well,
which
is
that
people
feel
like
they're
not
being
heard
and
I'm
wondering
whoever's
on
the
community.
Engagement
I,
wonder,
are
you
looking
at
you
know?
We
just
recently
got
a
new
system
on
how
people
send
us
emails
and
I
can
say
to
you.
I
I've
just
heard
something,
but
I
have
a
hard
time,
knowing
when
someone
is
sending
an
email
to
me
or
whether
I
should
respond
before
it
was
much
easier
for
me
to
respond
to
emails
and
knowing
that
this
email
was
to
me
and
I
went
through
the
website
and
I
looked
around
people
can
pick
us
individually,
but
I
wonder:
does
this
new
way
this
new
website
the
layout?
Does
it
make
it
easier
for
community
members
to
reach
out
to
us
or
harder?
B
I
B
B
D
So
just
and
bummer
she's
not
here,
but
tonight
was
the
first
and
last
night
for
a
Daily
Camera
news
reporter
Deborah
swearington.
She
is
leaving
the
Daily
Camera.
So
ironically,
she
was
working.
This
beat
from
the
beginning
of
the
pandemic
and
had
effectively
never
stepped
foot
in
this
building.
D
To
cover
council
tonight
was
her
first
and
her
last
night,
she'll
be
leaving
the
paper
if
she's
out
there,
hopefully
she's
sleeping,
but
if
she's
listening,
we
wish
her
the
best
of
luck
in
her
new
Endeavors
and
appreciate
all
the
great
work
that
she
has
done,
covering
the
sometimes
great
work
and
sometimes
monotonous
work
that
we
might
pull
off.
But
anyway,
thank
you
for
your
for
your
tireless
work
and
we
look
forward
to
seeing
you
again
soon.
Maria.
B
To
okay!
So
yes,
so
best
luck
in
your
future
endeavors
Deborah
and
thanks
for
all
your
coverage
over
the
years,
all
right
so
folks,
we're
gonna,
go
ahead
and
gavel.
The
meeting
closed
at
11
10.