►
From YouTube: Boulder City Council Meeting 8-3-21
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
C
F
I
know
briefly,
but
yeah
good,
to
see
you
earlier
this
evening
national
night
out.
Thank
you
for
coming
out.
D
I
want
to
say
thanks
to
all
staff
who
coordinated,
that
that
was
a
delightful.
C
G
C
I
don't
want
to
start
without
nearby.
I
was
going
to
see
if
we
can
get
through
some
of
the
announcements
and
so
on.
C
But
we
will
be
voting
right
away
to
amend
the
agenda,
so
I
guess
we'll
just
wait
a
little
bit.
Is
it
possible
to
let
people
know?
I
guess
there
are
probably
some
people
on
zoom
watching
us
right
now.
Is
it
possible
to
let
channel
8
know
that
we
are
on
a
bit
of
a
delay
and
we'll
start
in
maybe
five
minutes.
A
E
E
E
I
E
I
E
C
I
C
Welcome
everyone
to
the
august
3rd
2021,
regular
meeting
of
the
boulder
city
council.
We
have
a
late
start
tonight,
because
many
council
members
went
out
to
the
national
night
out
celebrations
that
were
held
around
town.
So
thank
you
very
much
to
staff
and
all
the
communities
that
hosted
it,
and
thank
you
to
the
council
members
who
went
to
those
events
with
that
we
will
get
started
with
a
few
announcements.
C
The
first
announcement
is
copit
19
vaccinations.
You
can
find
out
more
local
information
on
getting
your
vaccine
and
sign
up
for
notifications
at
boco.org.
C
Covenvaccine
notify
sign
up.
Second
announcement
is
2021
mid-year
boards
and
commissions
recruitment,
we're
still
seeking
volunteers
to
serve
on
these
following
boards
and
commissions,
the
beverage
licensing
authority,
the
boulder
junction
access
district
boards.
There
are
two
of
those,
the
downtown
management
commission
and
the
housing
advisory
board.
C
Please
feel
free
to
sign
up
at
the
website,
which
is
up
boulder
colorado,
dot,
gov,
slash,
government,
slash
boards
and
commissions
is
a
great
way
to
serve
your
community,
and
we
would
really
love
to
have
your
help
in
making
boulder
an
even
better
place
and
with
that
alicia.
I
think
we
are
ready
to
call
the
roll.
G
C
Thank
you
very
much
alicia.
Our
first
order
of
business
today
is
to
amend
the
agenda
just
to
clarify.
There
is
no
open
comment
tonight
because
of
our
late
start
as
published
in
the
legal
agenda.
We
are
also
adjusting
our
agenda
to
remove
item
2a,
which
is
items
concerning
the
cu.
South
annexation,
we'll
add
a
new
item
to
a
which
is
a
motion
to
call
a
special
counsel,
meeting
august
10th,
which
is
next
week
and
we'll
add,
item
7b,
which
is
a
review
of
proposed
schedule
for
items
pertaining
to
cu
south.
K
L
Thanks
alicia
thanks
sam
I've
been
asked
to
read
a
declaration
prepared
by
city
staff
and
signed
by
the
mayor.
The
declaration
is
called
the
declaration
of
support
for
constructive
community
engagement
regarding
the
boulder
reservoir.
L
So
those
summary
of
facts
are
as
follows:
the
boulder
reservoir
has
operated
a
beach
and
concession
area
since
the
fifties.
Recently,
more
than
three
hundred
thousand
people
have
visited
the
res
each
year
in
two
thousand
twelve,
the
staff,
the
parks
and
recreation
department
and
the
parks
and
recreation
advisory
board
prepared
and
adopted
a
boulder
reservoir
master
plan.
L
That
plan
included,
among
other
things,
the
construction
of
a
new
visitor
center
that
would
expand,
uses
and
amenities
at
the
res,
including
a
restaurant
and
a
bar
in
an
event
space
serving
a
number
of
groups
based
on
a
2017
concept
plan.
The
new
visitor
center
was
built
between
2018
and
2020,
and
the
parks
board
and
council
approved
a
lease
with
a
restaurant
operator
there,
but
as
the
new
restaurant
was
preparing
to
open
a
number
of
reservoir
neighbors
expressed
various
concerns
about
the
hours
of
operation
and
the
service
of
alcohol.
L
L
Now,
that's
a
summary
of
the
three-page
fact
recitation
on
the
declaration.
The
full
declaration
was
posted
on
hotline
last
friday,
I'll
jump
ahead
to
the
last
page
of
the
declaration.
With
the
statement
of
principles,
the
boulder
city
council
declares
as
follows:
number
one:
the
reservoir
is
an
important
community
asset
and
is
one
of
the
most
important
park
facilities
in
boulder
and
the
surrounding
region.
L
Number
three:
the
city
council
supports
hosting
events
at
the
reservoir
that
benefit
the
community
in
a
manner
that
is
safe,
responsible
and
consistent
with
local
state
and
federal
laws,
and
we
are
proud
of
the
decades-long
legacy
of
beneficial,
safe
and
responsible
events
held
at
the
reservoir
number.
Four.
L
The
parks
and
recreation
advisory
board
and
city
council
have
also
heard
and
considered
the
community's
concerns
about
the
new
facility
in
a
public
forum,
the
parks
and
recreation
department,
the
parks
and
recreation
advisory
board
and
city
council
have
taken
and
continued
to
take
these
concerns
seriously
and
are
thankful
for
the
outrage
we
continue.
We
hope
to
continue
engaging
with
reservoir
neighbors
to
hear
address
and
accommodate
their
concerns
and,
finally,
number
five.
The
city
council
supports
civil
discourse
and
pragmatic
engagement.
L
We
strongly
we
strongly
approve
of
any
excuse
me.
We
strongly
disapprove
of
any
alleged
threats
to
disrupt
public
vetted
and
appropriate,
approved
events
at
the
reservoir,
and
we
believe
that
there
are
more
appropriate
and
productive
ways
to
express
concerns
or
provide
feedback
on
issues
of
public
concern.
C
Bob
council
members,
anyone
want
to
say
any
words
about
this
aaron
and
then
mark
erin.
G
Yeah
thanks
for
that
bob
and
and
really
appreciate
the
the
parks
board
working
on
this
and
putting
this
together.
It's
responsing
I
and
I
think,
pretty
much
all
of
us
were
really
disappointed
that
those
non-profit
events
were
canceled
and
that
there
were
threatening
emails
that
were
received.
That
precipitated
that,
so
it
was
really
unfortunate.
G
I
want
to
mention.
I
had
a
chance
to
meet
in
person
with
some
of
the
neighbors
a
few
days
ago,
and
while
I
did
hear
from
them
some
some
continued
concerns.
I
also
heard
from
them
some
real
unhappiness,
that
about
the
way
things
went
with
the
events
and
being
cancelled,
and
they
did
not
agree
with
their
neighbors
who
are
sending
the
threatening
emails.
G
M
Mark
yeah-
I
am
supportive
of
this
resolution
and
had
the
recitation
of
facts
been
exactly
as
bob
had
stated
it.
I
would
be
perfectly
fine
with
that
as
well.
M
The
recitation
as
in
full
is
a
little
bit
problematic
to
me
for
the
following
reasons:
the
the
overall
tone
of
it
seems
to
conflate
the
behavior
of
one
or
two
extreme
people
with
the
activities
of
the
larger
body
of
the
community,
to
advocate
for
a
different
policy
from
those
which
we
decided
upon.
There's
a
section
that
reads.
Despite
this
outreach
and
engagement,
some
neighbors
still
have
concerns
about
the
new
facility
and
events
as
if
this
was
somehow
improper.
M
You
know,
if
you
look
at
the
language
of
the
declaration
of
independence,
they
have
petitioned
us
for
redress
of
their
grievances.
We
have
taken
a
different
posture,
which
is
our
right
to
do
so,
but
there's
nothing
wrong
with
you
know
what
they
have
done.
I
am
not
privy
to
the
more
extreme
emails
that
we
don't
know
how
I
don't
know
how
many
there
were.
I
don't
know
what
their
content
was
and
there's
reference
in
the
recitation
of
facts
to
their
being
unverified.
M
I
assume
they
were
either
sent
or
not
sent,
and
if
they
were
santa,
we
have
read
them
or
some
portion
of
us
have
read
them,
then
it
should
be
verified
and-
and
I
hope,
there's
not
an
expectation
that
once
we've
decided
on
a
course
of
action,
those
who
disagree
should
you
know,
cease
their
efforts
and
go
home.
You
know,
if
that
were
to
be
our
attitude.
I
think
we're
going
to
be
in
store
for
a
great
deal
of
disappointment.
M
You
know,
cu
south
is
coming
and
I
think
we'll
find
that
to
be
this
kind
of
conversation
in
spades,
and
you
know
it's
just.
M
N
M
That
we
have
properly
characterized
what
most
of
those
neighbors
and
I
have
met
them
as
well
as
my
colleague
aaron-
are
thinking
or
trying
to
achieve,
but
I
do
it,
you
know,
support
the
text
itself
of
the
declaration.
M
I'm
just
concerned
that
the
background
creates
a
more
negative
impression
of
those
who
disagree
with
us
and
continue
to
advocate
for
a
different
approach
to
these
issues.
Thank
you.
O
Thanks
sam
sorry,
I
didn't
have
a
hand
raised
function
at
first,
so
mark
basically
just
said
what
I
was
wanting
to
say.
O
I
really
hope
that
moving
forward,
we
can
continue
to
address
the
concerns
of
the
neighborhood
and
keep
that
in
dialogue,
and
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
that
neighborhood
knows
that
yeah
there
was
an
action
of
one
person,
that's
not
verified
per
se,
but
that
you
know
I
I
do
support
the
neighborhood
and
hope
that
the
dialogue
between
them
and
the
city
will
continue
and
that
these
new
efforts
that
have
been
put
in
to
protect
against
sound
and
keeping
the
quality
of
life
that
they
currently
have
will
continue
and
just
have
a
well-rounded
open
discussion
where
the
parties
are
heard
and
felt
heard.
O
So
that's
that's
all
I
wanted
to
add
in.
C
Thank
you
all
and
I'll
just
wait
in
here
and
say
that
the
the
way
that
I
read
this
declaration
writ
large
is
a
request
for
everyone
to
keep
in
mind
that
there's
differing
opinions
in
a
community
and
that
we
should
all
treat
each
other
with
respect
and
everyone's
opinions
with
respect
and
when
a
decision
is
made,
it
would
be
great
if
we
can
continue
to
you
know
those
who
disagree
continue
to
do
so,
respectfully
and
without
any
kind
of
implied
or
or
overt
threats.
C
So
I
think
this
really
is
just
a
reminder
to
everyone
that
decisions
are
best
made
and
appeals
are
best
made
when
everyone
is
doing
it
in
a
way
that
respects
differing
opinions.
So
I
think
that's
that's
enough
on
that
subject.
K
C
Very
good,
thank
you,
alicia,
and
this
item
is
specifically
just
to
call
the
special
meeting
for
next
week
at
the
meeting
next
week,
there
will
be
first
reading
of
the
ordinance
related
to
the
cu
south
annexation,
as
well
as
a
state
required
resolution
that
will
announce
the
date
and
set
the
date
for
the
second
reading
public
hearing
of
the
annexation
ordinance.
So
the
action
that
we're
taking
tonight
it
merely
calls
the
special
meeting
next
week.
C
It
will
be
short
and
it's
anticipated
to
be
short
and
before
a
regularly
scheduled
study
session
and
then,
as
far
as
the
details
of
the
schedule
for
this
item,
there's
some
parts
we
need
to
to
talk
through
that's
under
the
matters
item.
At
the
end,
where
we
can
discuss
what
all
the
dates
and
so
on
will
be
nearby.
O
C
Great,
so,
can
I
get
a
motion
to
approve
the
consent
agenda.
D
C
P
J
K
B
C
And
you
can
take
us
to
the
next
item
as
well.
K
K
The
question
to
authorize
the
increase
of
debt
of
the
city
to
fund
capital
improvements
for
15
years
with
the
proceeds
there
of
to
be
used
for
capital
improvement
projects.
In
the
city
of
boulder,
as
set
forth
in
the
ballot
specifying
the
form
of
the
ballot
and
other
election
procedures
and
setting
forth
the
related
details,.
C
G
K
A
Great.
Thank
you
mayor.
The
next
item
really
has
been
a
big
lift
and
a
great
cross-departmental
work
group
has
been
formed,
but
cheryl
pitelli,
our
cfo
joe
wagner
and
finance
and
kathy
haddock
and
the
city
attorney's
office
are
all
here
to
answer
any
questions
and
I'll
throw
it
to
them.
As
we
kick
that
conversation
off.
Q
Thanks
nuria,
so
we
have
a
short
presentation
tonight,
thanks
emily
for
running
the
the
presentation
next
slide,.
Q
So
the
timeline
again,
we've
had
a
lot
of
touch
points
with
council
during
the
the
last
eight
months
or
so
in
this
tax.
We've
also
heard
a
lot
of
feedback
from
our
community
via
the
community
survey,
as
well
as
the
non-profit
focus
groups
that
we
held
back
in
june
and
july,
and
here
tonight
we're
really
focusing
on
the
ballot
language
and
the
ballot
questions
that
were
included
as
ordinances
in
your
packets
this
evening,
next
slide.
Q
Q
Q
So,
as
you
can
see
from
the
pie
chart,
the
majority
relate
to
public
safety,
but
there
are
a
lot
of
other
areas
where
we
do
have
unfunded
projects
for
the
city.
These
projects
of
the
312
unfunded
have
all
been
identified
as
essential
or
important
per
our
budgeting
for
resilience,
definitions
and
also
identified
by
our
current
or
pending
master
plans.
Next
slide.
Q
So
I
talked
about
the
survey.
We
brought
the
results
back
back
to
council
on
the
july
20th
meeting,
we
had
a
great
turnout
of
almost
2
000
respondents
for
the
survey
and
overwhelmingly
the
responses
were
showed,
support
for
a
15-year
extension
to
fund
both
infrastructure
and
non-profit
community
projects,
as
well
as
support
for
the
related
110
million
dollar
bond
measure.
Q
So
we
came
to
council
a
couple
weeks
ago
to
get
direction
for
you
that
will
enable
us
to
draft
our
ballot
questions,
and
I
want
to
thank
kathy
haddock
from
the
city
attorney's
office
for
doing
that
for
us
tonight.
Q
Your
direction
was
a
15-year
term
for
the
tax
90
or
an
estimated
180
million
of
that
is
for
funding
directed
towards
city
capital,
infrastructure
projects,
10
percent
or
an
estimated
20
million
funding
directed
toward
a
a
flexible
grant
program
for
non
or
I'm
sorry
for
community
nonprofits,
a
related
110
million
dollar
debt
authorization
measure,
and
then
you
ask
that
specific
projects
and
project
categories
be
included
in
the
ballot
language
next
slide.
Q
Q
So
we
have
three
transportation
projects
in
the
draft
language:
maintaining
and
improving
roads
and
multimodal
paths
replacing
critically
deteriorated,
signal
poles
and
replacing
central
avenue
bridge
improvement
of
boulder
creek
path,
boulder
civic
area
phase,
two,
which
jeff
will
talk
about
in
a
couple:
slides,
completing
fire
station,
three
relocating
or
reconstruction,
or
reconstructing
fire
station
two
or
four
purchasing
emergency
vehicles
for
boulder
fire
to
provide
advanced
life,
support,
renovating
the
east,
boulder
rec
center,
acquiring
street
light
systems
and
converting
to
led
lights
and
then
refresh
of
the
the
pearl
street
mall
next
slide
also
included
in
the
ballot.
Q
Language
are
categories,
so
these
are
categories
that
we
could
spend
the
remaining
funds
on.
They
are
transportation
system,
resilience,
progress
toward
climate
goals
safe
and
prepared,
boulder,
active
and
healthy
boulder,
and
then
community
focused
technology
improvements.
I
I
do
want
to
know.
We
changed
that
name
once
again
and
I
really
think
that
this
new
description
really
is
a
lot
better
to
describe
what
we're
talking
about
as
it
relates
to
our
technology
needs
for
customer
facing
programs
next
slide.
Q
Q
It
is
a
tabor
requirement
that
we
show
the
repayment
amount
on
the
ballot
and
we
do
try
to
be
conservative
when
we
do
that.
We
worked
with
our
financial
advisors
because
we're
spanning
over
15
years-
and
we
don't
know
what
the
market
will
be
in-
let's
say
five
or
ten
years.
So
we
want
to
be
conservative,
so
we
so
we
have
adequate
ability
to
do
debt
financing.
Q
We
assumed
a
15-year
debt
instrument.
We
also
assumed
a
5.5
interest
rate
for
taxable
bonds
and
five
percent
for
tax
exempt.
I
will
say
we
assumed
about
15
percent
of
the
debt
issue
to
go
toward
the
nonprofit
projects.
We
wanted
to
make
sure
that
we
were
flexible
in
case
there
were
any
bigger
projects
that
came
to
us
early
on
in
the
process
and
both
our
debt
and
our
tax
extension
questions
were
reviewed
by
bond
council
and
disclosure
council.
They
recommended
many
changes
that
we
made
they
also.
Q
I
want
to
just
point
out,
for
transparency,
say
two
items:
one
is
the
terminology
of
use
of
up
to
ten
percent
of
tax
revenue
to
fund
non-profit
grant
pools
the
reason
why
we
had
to
say
up
to
it.
It
certainly
does
not
preclude
us
from
using
10
percent.
It
really
relates
to
our
debt
service
coverage
ratio
and
ensuring
that
we
can
meet
those
requirements
without
limiting
our
bond
capacity
to
the
full
110
million.
Q
We
also
want
to
point
out
the
nonprofit
projects
should
serve
the
citizens
of
boulder.
I
think
that
certainly
was
the
intent,
but
we
wanted
to
that
language
needed
to
be
added
in
order
for
us
to
be
able
to
bond
for
non-profit
projects,
and
that
is
the
end
of
my
presentation,
I'm
going
to
turn
it
over
to
jeff
haley
to
start
the
next
slide.
R
Yeah
good
evening,
council,
jeff
haley
with
parks
and
recreation,
you
can
go
ahead
and
advance
to
the
next
slide.
What
I
want
to
do
is
just
provide
a
little
more
background
information,
an
understanding
for
city
council
related
to
the
civic
area,
phase
two
project,
that's
being
discussed
and
specifically
that
area
within
central
park.
R
I
had
the
opportunity,
many
years
ago,
as
part
of
a
previous
ccs
tax
initiative,
to
manage
the
project
for
the
civic
parch
park,
which
was
west
of
broadway,
and
I
think,
we've
all
seen
some
of
the
success
that
we've
had
from
that
project
and
a
lot
of
the
activation
enhancement
we've
seen
in
the
downtown
core
as
a
result
of
that.
R
As
we
look
at
the
areas
where
we
have
our
farmers
market
and
other
activities
and
events
along
the
13th
street
corridor,
this
area
really
provides
nice
connectivity
to
pearl
street
mall
and
then,
as
well
as
you
move
south
and
kind
of
up
to
the
hill
and
around
the
cu
campus.
This
is
just
one
more
phase
or
opportunity
to
connect
our
visitors,
our
residents
through
all
this
area
with
transit
events,
activities
and
a
lot
of
the
cultural
activities
we
have
at
long,
bimoca,
the
tea
house
and
other
festivals
that
occur
in
that
area.
R
R
We
have
floodplain
considerations
and
many
other
different
disciplines
that
we
would
need
to
look
at
to
really
refine
the
the
final
design
and
the
detailed
cost.
I
did
want
to
specify
that
this
project
would
not
relocate
the
bandshell.
Some
of
you
may
remember
in
previous
discussions
and
dialogue
back
during
the
civic
area
master
plan
in
2015.
There
was
a
lot
of
lively
discussion
about
the
band
shell.
This
does
not
warrant
relocation
or
we're
not
proposing
relocation
that
and
in
fact,
just
to
dive
into
some
of
the
cost.
R
R
The
costs
are
outlined
here.
I
won't
go
through
them
in
detail,
but
it
is
improvements
that
would
support
the
the
festivals,
the
farmers,
market,
access
safety,
visibility
and
just
better
functionality
around
the
whole
east
book
end,
and
it
would
also
support
future
opportunities
and
those
that
are
familiar
with
the
civic
area
master
plan.
We
hope
to
enhance
that
whole
east
bookend,
with
a
variety
of
items
you
see
listed
here
with
access
enhancement,
perhaps
bimoca
enhancements,
transit
connectivity
as
well
as
that
future
canyon,
complete
street,
that's
been
designed
as
well.
R
So
if
you
want
to
move
to
the
next
slide
I'll
I'll
just
continue,
these
are
just
a
few
illustrations
that
also
help
give
city
council
just
a
sense
of
what
the
actual
infrastructure
would
result
in.
So,
if
you
consider
the
improvements
you've
seen
over
on
the
west
side
of
the
park
near
the
library
and
the
canyon
boulevard,
this
would
all
again
provide
better
functionality
for
large
community
gatherings.
R
You
can
see
some
of
these
images
that
demonstrate
you
know
large
community,
dining
opportunities
and
art
opportunities
and
other
cultural
amenities,
so
increasing
the
path,
the
options
just
a
better
functional
space
as
well
as
restrooms,
visitor
minis,
and
that
sort
of
thing,
so
that's
pretty
much
the
the
gist
of
the
phase
2
central
park
enhancements
again.
We
would
we
would
look
forward
to
engaging
the
community
and
really
refining
the
the
final
design
of
this
space
and
how
this
would
really
move
to
construction.
Q
Thank
you
jeff,
and
that
was
the
end
of
our
presentation
this
evening.
So
we'll
you
have
any
questions
we're
here
to
answer
them.
C
G
Thanks
for
the
presentation
appreciate
all
the
information,
just
one
one
thing
in
the
the
language
cheryl,
you
talked
about
adding
to
that
about
that
the
bond
measures
or
the
non-profit
projects
should
serve
the
citizens
of
boulder.
Can
we
not
change
that
to
residents
of
boulder
to
include
our
residents,
who
are
not
citizens
of
the
united
states.
H
That's
no
problem,
I
could
move
buttons
you're
absolutely
right
and
we
should
have
thought
of
that
before.
I
think
that
the
language
is
in
that
that
bondholders
bond
council
are
used
to
is
still
citizens,
but
we
will
let
them
know
we.
They
need
to
update
that
and
we
will
take
care
of
that.
Yes,
we'll
take
care
of
it.
I'm
not
sure
if
the
word
residence
is
what
they'll
want
to
use.
G
Yeah
and
whatever
the
language
needs
to
be
just
as
long
as
it's
inclusive
of
all
residents
of
older.
That
would
be
much
appreciated,
really.
C
My
question
really
has
to
do
with
the
civic
area
phase
two
and
the
central
park
improvements.
I
noticed
that
slide
11,
which
is
the
diagram
of
the
park
with
the
dotted
lines
around
it.
The
atrium
building
is
included
in
those
dotted
lines,
but
I
don't
see
any
plans
about
what
will
happen
with
that
building.
C
So
is
it
correct
to
understand
that
everything
that
will
happen
essentially
will
be
west
of
13th
street
so
that
mostly
this
is
about
the
park
area
or
is
the
atrium
building
included
and
you're
thinking
for
the
spend
on
this
money.
R
Yeah,
that's
a
great
question.
Thank
you
for
that
clarification.
Generally,
yes,
everything
is
west
of
13th
street.
I
would
add.
We
would
like
to
look
at
13th
street
itself
and
just
how
that
functions
with
obviously
the
market
and
other
festivals
that
happen
there,
but
to
be
clear,
the
atrium
building
is
really
not
involved
in
this.
This
diagram
is
from
some
earlier
versions
where
we
were
looking
at
options
to
include
basically
a
public
restroom
in
the
atrium
to
be
specific.
R
At
this
time
we
would
likely
not
focus
on
that
and
it's
more
in
the
park,
so
yeah,
that's
correct.
B
Yeah,
I
have
a
question
kind
of
sort
of
a
follow-up
to
aaron's
question
and
this
is
for
the
referring
specifically
to
the
non-profit
piece
of
it.
Is
that
correct
piece
of
the
measure
correct?
B
So,
if
say,
for
example,
the
homeless
shelter
were
to
apply
for
some
of
this
grant
money,
we
know
that
the
homeless
shelter
serves.
H
H
The
the
language
that
we're
trying
to
do
is
to
make
sure
that
we
are
not
violating
the
constitutional
prohibition
against
loans
to
private
corporations,
which
arguably
can
extend
to
other
areas
outside
of
boulder.
The
types
of
things
you
guys
are
raising
are
really
helpful
and
we
will
work
with
bond
council
get
better
language
that
it's
not
just
the
residents
directly
benefiting
that
it
is
about
the
community
as
a
whole
and
how
different
users
coming
into
the
community
affect
the
community
so
we'll
make
sure
that
we
can
cover
those
types
of
things.
B
M
Question
for
kathy,
can
you
review
one
more
time
why
bond
council
had
that
language
included
of
up
to
10.
H
Yes
and
and
cheryl
when,
when
I
messed
this
up,
be
ready
to
do
it
and
if
it
matters,
I
can't
turn
on
my
video.
I
don't
know
if
somebody
needs
to
do
something
with
when
we
issue
bonds,
bondholders
like
to
make
sure
they're
going
to
get
repaid.
H
So
when
we
issue
bonds,
we
usually
have
to
have
a
debt
coverage
ratio
that
make
sure
we
can
pay
off
our
bonds
one
and
a
quarter
times
or
one
and
a
half
times
or
whatever
the
debt
coverage
ratio
is
that
is
desired
so
that
the
bondholders
for
sure
get
paid.
So
we
may
only
plan
to
spend
up
to
100
of
what
we
issue
debt
for,
but
the
bondholders
want
to
be
paid
back,
want
us
to
have
money
available
to
pay
back
100
plus.
H
Q
You
know,
I
think
you
you,
you
explained
it
well.
I
think
the
sticking
point
is
the
fact
that
the
the
ratio
required
could
be.
You
know
one
one
and
a
quarter
one
and
a
half
times
the
expected
revenue
that
we
are
planning
to
get.
So.
Therefore,
in
order
to
bond
110
million,
the
expected
revenue
might
exceed
just
the
city's
90
percent
portion
that
we
would
need
to
make
bond
holders
feel
comfortable
with
the
transaction.
If,
if
that
makes
sense,.
B
Mark,
yes,
please,
so
I
guess
the
bottom
line
question
for
me
is:
would
that
impact
the
10
percent.
Q
It
would
not
impact
the
10.
It
just
relates
to
our
ability
to
bond
for
a
hundred
and
ten.
If
we
were
planning
to
do
the
entire
hundred
and
ten
it
would
impact
our
ability
may
impact
our
ability
to
do
that
it.
It
would
not
impact
our
ability
to
give
10
percent
for
the
non-profits
simply
again,
because
we
they
they
want
to
ensure
that
we
have
more
than
what
we're
estimating
at
the
200
million.
Q
So
they
may
want
to
make
sure
that
we
have
250
million
worth
of
coverage
in
order
to
do
our
bond
deal
so
sorry,
this
is,
I
know
this
is
complicated
and
I
might
not
be
explaining
it
the
best.
A.
M
Couple
of
other
questions,
however:
we
are
contemplating
the
possibility
of
bonding
off
the
10
percent.
How
is
that
possible
if
it
has
to
be
some
form
of
reserve
or
the
bond
for
the
90
percent.
Q
It
it
doesn't
have
to
be
a
form
of
reserve
mark,
it's
just
the
amount
that
we're
saying
is
available
to
pay
back
that
service,
since
it
has
to
be
in
excess
of
the
hundred
percent
and
cara.
I
don't
know
cara
skinner
if
you
want
to
save
me
on
this.
Q
If
there's,
if
you
want
to
try
to
explain
this,
but
it's
just
the
language
that
we
use
in
the
measure,
it
will
not
affect
our
ability
to
give
10,
because
we
know
we
were
very
conservative
when
we
came
up
with
110
million
that
the
debt
service
payment
needed
for
110
million
is
less
than
our
expected
revenue
every
year.
Within
a
pretty
nice
margin,
we
did
not
want
to
overextend
what
we
felt
we
could
pay
back,
including
the
the
10
going
to
community
projects.
M
Because
you
know
look,
I've
been
a
supporter
of
the
10
level
of
funding
for
the
community
projects,
but
I
want
to
make
sure
that
that
we
can
fulfill
that
commitment,
because
I
believe
it
is
a
commitment,
and
I
want
to
make
sure
that
that
we're
not
going
to
be
doing
a
bait
and
switch
and
saying
you
know
it
looks
like
it's
only
going
to
be
eight
percent.
Q
And
if,
if
you're
really
uncomfortable
with
using
the
up
to,
we
can
certainly
go
back
to
bond
council,
it
might
you
know
the
worst
thing
that
could
happen
with.
That
is
maybe,
at
the
end
of
the
day
given
where
our
revenues
are
at
and
where
the
market
is
at,
we
might
be
able
to
only
bond
out
a
hundred
million
like
it
wouldn't
be
the
worst
thing
to
to
do
that
in
my
opinion.
So
kathy,
I
don't
know
if
you
have
thoughts
on
that.
H
M
You
know
the
rest
of
council
may
have
a
different
view
of
it.
I
I
I
just
think
that
we
should
be
pretty
clear
that
the
10
is
to
10
and.
M
As
I
said,
it's
not
a
bait
and
switch
that
we
come
back
and
say
well,
things
have
changed,
interest
rates
have
changed,
the
bonding
authorities
have
a
different
view
of
it
and
well
it's
only
going
to
be
six
percent.
You
know
so
sorry,
I
I
don't
think
that
would
be
an
appropriate
resolution.
C
Thank
you
mark
mary
and
then
once
we're
done
with
questions,
then
we
can
go
to
public
hearing.
B
Thanks
sam,
so
one
more
question,
we
received
a
lot
of
email
from
members
of
the
arts
community
and
I
noticed
that
a
lot
of
those
emails
were
coming
from
organizations
and
or
individuals
who
are
beneficiaries
of
the
arts.
Commission
grants
so
they're
getting
grants
for
events
or
particular
projects.
Things
like
that
are
those
types
of
grants,
strictly
the
purview
of
the
arts
commission
budget
or
would
those
also
could
those
also
be
encompassed
in
this
10
percent?
Q
Projects,
so
I
have
joel
here,
wagner
joel
if
you
wouldn't
mind
responding.
T
B
Okay,
great
thank
you
and,
and
those
those
sorts
of
non-capital
projects
items
would
be
covered
under
the
arts
commission.
Grant
making
budget.
T
And
I
believe
matt
schizansky
is
here.
If
he
wants
to
talk
on
that
piece,
thanks
matt.
U
Yeah,
thank
you,
matt
zanski,
with
the
office
of
arts
and
culture,
and
yes,
the
arts
grants
program
that
the
boulder
arts
commission
administers
works
with
general
operating
support,
project
grants,
scholarships
and
special
funds,
specifically
not
capital
grants
unless
that's
a
part
of
operating,
in
which
case
it
requires
a
special
vote
of
the
arts
commission
to
approve
it.
So
it
happens
very
rarely,
and
so
it
is
one
way
that
funds
are
distributed,
not
for
capital
projects
to
arts,
nonprofits.
G
So
that
prompted
additional
question
for
me
about
the
it
being
capital
funding,
would
you
be
able
to
fund
a
like
a
planning
project
for
a
capital
project?
Let's
say
an
arts
group
or
non-profit,
wanted
to
undertake
a
capital
project
but
needed
to
work
out
the
details
of
how
that
would
be
constituted.
Could
we
give
them
a
grant
to
do
that?
Planning
project.
T
Thank
you
for
that
question,
so,
in
my
experience,
a
a
planning
grant
that
would
lead
to
a
capital
project
could
be
considered
a
capital
related
to
a
capital
ineligible
for
funding
and,
again
I'll
ask
kathy
to
jump
in
if
she
has
any
other
thoughts,
especially
since
we're
talking
about
bonding
kathy's
experience
is
very
valuable.
With
these
questions.
H
C
No,
no
just
just
what
you
said,
I
think
is
is
perfect,
but
but
the
subject
was:
is
it
okay
to
use
these
funds
for
capital
planning
grants,
as
well
as
capital
grants.
H
Yes,
yes,
we
did
make
sure
that
that
was
covered
in
the
language
when
we
talked
to
bond
council
about
it.
C
C
C
V
Okay,
hi
council,
my
name
is
tiffany
director
of
community
cycles
and
we
were
a
past
recipient
of
one
of
these
grants
and
we
thank
you
very
much
for
that
and
thank
you
for
bringing
us
forward
again
and
just
wanted
to
point
out
the
great
work
that
was
done
in
the
past
by
joel
and
his
team
and
continues
to
be
done.
The
future
joel's
really
a
pleasure
to
work
with
just
a
few
things,
and
I
realized
also
when
joe
was
talking.
V
Maybe
I'm
talking
a
little
bit
more
about
implementation,
which
would
come
later
on,
but
I
would
want
council
or
or
whoever
says,
the
rules
on
this
to
make
sure
that
there's
enough
money
left
in
the
nonprofit
pool
to
go
for
a
while,
since
this
is
a
many
year
grant
and
we
could
use
it
up
pretty
quickly
and
in
that
respect,
I'm
also
on
implementation.
V
I
think
it's.
You
should
be
careful
with
the
planning
grants
and
keep
them
small.
I
would
I
would
say
that
organizations
should
raise
their
own
money
for
planning,
because
that's
a
good
start
to
get
to
your
capital
project
and
it's
a
good
practice,
because
raising
millions
of
dollars
is
not
very
easy.
V
So
it's
really
important
that
you
know
how
to
do
it
and
planning
grant
is
a
good
good
way
to
test
the
waters
there,
but,
but
if
you
do
do
allow
that
make
it
very
small
and
and
also
some
kind
of
questions,
are
things
like
ongoing
projects,
for
it
will
there
be
ongoing?
Also
for
city
projects
like
I
just
was
in
a
discussion
with
the
city
about
the
dirt
alleys
and
how
their
people
really
complain
about
them,
but
there's
no
money
for
them.
V
So
is
that
something
that
you
know
could
be
applied
for
down
the
road?
Or
is
it
just
this
list
that
we're
seeing
in
front
of
us
today
for
for
city
projects,
so
those
are
kind
of
the
details,
but
a
big
thumbs
up
on
this?
And
yes,
please
remember
to
keep
the
10
percent
for
the
non-profits.
Thank
you
very
much.
C
Thank
you
sue.
Next,
we
have
jan
burton
lynn,
siegel
and
daniel
sher.
It
looks
like
jan
burton
isn't
showing
up
here
so
jan,
if
you
can
reach
out
in
the
chat
or
the
q,
a
if
you're
here,
that'll
be
great
and
with
that
we'll
go
to
lynn
siegel.
When
you
have
three
minutes.
W
W
W
W
When
you're,
even
dreaming
of
seeing
yourself
now,
let's
go
elsewhere,
gun
barrel,
the
armory
diagonal
plaza
mckenzie
junction,
the
rev,
the
big
all
of
the
affordable,
unafford,
the
affordable
housing
that
makes
more
unaffordable,
housing,
east
boulder,
the
armory
26th
and
pine
condos.
Ever
as
far
as
I
can
see,
1900
folsom
across
from
the
chamber
of
commerce
the
huge
development
there.
This
is
all
costing
heavily.
W
Now
it's
the
developers
that
are
developing
these
places
that
need
to
pay
for
this
infrastructure
and
for
this
tax
revenue.
This
bond
that
you're
asking
me
to
pay
for
no
way
no
way,
not
with
the
way
you're
approving
one
after
the
other
of
third
stories
and
all
kinds
of
extra
subsidies.
For
all
these
developments
no
way.
W
W
C
X
Good
evening
council,
my
name
is
jan
burton
and
I
live
at
852
11th
street.
I
am
a
board
member
for
create
boulder,
an
organization
which
has
leveraged
other
foundations,
city
dollars
and
our
own
donor
contributions
to
get
more
than
four
hundred
thousand
dollars
in
the
hands
of
boulder-based
arts
organizations
and
artists,
since
the
great
quarantine
began.
X
I
have
three
points
tonight
number
one.
By
removing
the
word
culture
from
the
ballot
title,
you
have
sent
a
strong
message
that
arts
and
culture
are
not
important
reinserting.
The
word
culture
in
the
title
would
assure
council's
commitment
to
arts
and
culture
in
the
community
and
for
the
upcoming
update
or
of
your
own
cultural
plan
in
2023
and
2024.
X
X
X
On
the
other
hand,
the
city
of
boulder
has
a
cadre
of
planners,
incidentally,
paid
for
by
the
community.
So
it's
not
surprising
that
you
have
a
long
list
of
projects
with
the
new
15-year
tax.
Please
give
the
community
a
longer
runway
to
develop
small
and
large-scale
project
opportunities
without
a
bias
towards
city
projects.
X
Twenty
percent
would
be
aligned
with
the
original
tax
intent,
but
15
should
be
the
minimum
assigned
to
nonprofits
and
number
three
please
allow
for
planning
grants
so
that
nonprofits
wanting
to
explore
projects
have
the
same
capacity
as
a
city
of
boulder.
On
this
point,
I
tend
to
disagree
with
sue
print
as
an
alternative.
You
could
assign
20
of
your
planners
to
nonprofit
project
support.
X
Y
My
name
is
daniel
scherr.
I
live
at
2161
jonathan
place,
just
close
to
iris,
between
26th
and
broadway
for
20
years.
I
served
as
dean
of
the
college
of
music
at
cu
boulder
and
I
had
many
opportunities
to
work
with
our
partners
in
culture,
and
I
share
I'm
speaking
with
you,
because
I
share
many
of
the
concerns
that
jan
burton
just
enumerated
for
you.
Y
I
heard
the
conversation
before
I
had
this
opportunity
to
speak
and
there's
a
lot
of
talk
about
how
you
pay
for
this
and
how
you
pay
for
that.
But
I
asked
the
council
to
step
back
for
a
moment
and
take
the
larger
view
that
that
shapes
15
years,
which
is
no
small
amount
of
time,
wherein
not
only
is
culture
eliminated
from
the
title,
but
you
also
have
cut
the
budget
in
half
and
added
in
not
for
profits
that
are
not
necessarily
in
the
arts
space.
Y
So
boulder
has
not
had
a
reputation
of
being
supportive
of
the
arts.
I'm
thinking
of
a
group
that
tried
for
years
and
years
to
get
some
sort
of
approval
from
the
city
to
annex
some
property
where
a
performance
center
that
would
serve
many
of
the
local
organizations
that
so
desperately
need
it
with
arts
facilities
and
that
fell
flat.
Y
Z
Z
If
nothing
else,
the
pandemic
has
highlighted
the
important
arts
and
culture
to
us
all,
both
individually
and
collectively,
despite
the
devastating
impact
of
the
pandemic
on
the
sector.
Boulder's
many
artists
and
arts
organizations
continue
to
create
and
to
serve
the
needs
of
the
community
while
working
to
advance
social
justice,
equity
and
inclusion,
and
to
increase
access
to
the
arts.
Z
This
tax
extension,
unlike
its
predecessors,
will
not
specify
a
slate
of
proposed
nonprofit
projects
to
a
large
extent.
This
reflects
the
fact
that
most
organizations
have
been
hard-pressed
to
pursue
capital
planning
in
the
past
18
months,
while
they
were
struggling
for
their
very
survival.
It
also
explains
why
public
engagement
in
this
tax
extension
is
relatively
late.
Z
Z
Undoubtedly,
this
planning
process
will
identify.
Venue
and
facility
needs
fundamental
to
the
community's
interest,
a
15-year
tax
as
a
15-year
tax.
It
is
crucial
that
the
city
develop
processes
for
future
decision-making
that
are
open
and
transparent
and
include
substantial
community
input,
much
like
boulders
or
any
cities,
parks
and
recreation
assets.
The
arts
benefit
the
whole
community
and
are
foundational
to
boulder's
vibrancy
and
health
holders.
Arts
facilities
and
their
maintenance,
however,
are
supported
mainly
through
private
investment.
Z
Z
The
past
18
months
have
confirmed
for
all
of
us
the
fundamental
importance
of
arts
and
culture
to
our
social,
emotional
and
economic
well-being.
I
hope
the
arts
will
be
appropriately
supported
by
council
tonight.
You
can
do
this
by
increasing
the
percentage
of
funding
available
for
nonprofits
to
15
and
better
yet
20
percent
ensuring
a
robust
public
process
for
investment
decision
making
and
preserving
the
name
culture
to
ensure
that
the
arts
are
prioritized
in
future
funding
decisions.
P
P
That
commitment
was
20
not
up
to
10
percent,
and
it
was
a
critical
component
in
gaining
the
trust
and
support
of
all
of
us
who
worked
hard
to
pass
that
sales
tax
that
year.
So
I'm
voicing
my
concern
that
bond
council
has
an
outsized
role
in
driving
this
agenda
and
driving
and
creating
this
language.
I'm
concerned
that
this
renewal
is
for
15
years,
which
is
a
long
time
and
that,
most
importantly,
the
language
ignores
the
original
intent
of
this
tax,
that
the
percentage
of
revenue
for
arts
and
culture
is
too
small.
P
So,
specifically,
I'm
just
asking
you
to
support
three
changes
to
the
language.
First,
as
you've
heard
restore
20
of
revenue
for
arts
and
culture.
I
know
that's
a
stretch,
I
know
that's
a
challenge.
I
know
it
doesn't
work
for
your
numbers,
but
I
also
know
that
your
projections
are
conservative,
that
you
could
bond
a
smaller
amount
that
you
could
honor
the
commitment
to
arts
and
culture
that
was
in
the
original
intent.
P
Yes,
if
it's
15
that's
a
step
in
the
right
direction,
but
I
really
believe
that
20
is
the
right
number.
Considering
the
time
frame.
20
15
years
is
a
long
time
and
and
again
that
was
the
original
intent
of
it
as
it
was
a
passed
and
approved
by
voters
years
ago.
10
is
you
know
up
to
10
is
is
insulting
and
it
actually
constitutes
kind
of
a
whole
cloth
repurposing
of
the
tax.
It's
not
a
renewal.
It's
a
complete
transformation
of
the
original
intention.
P
P
P
I
know
it
feels
like
this
thing
is
already
done
that
the
survey
suggests
everyone
will
support
it,
but
the
arts
community
is
not
just
artists.
It's
businesses.
It's
civic
leaders
and
members
of
the
media.
This
is
not
done.
The
voters
have
not
voted
yet,
let's
work
together
to
support
arts
and
culture
in
this
tax.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
Nick.
AA
As
a
lesser
known
member
of
crepe
boulder,
I
am
perhaps
better
known
as
the
publisher
of
boulder
weekly,
and
it
is
in
that
capacity.
I
wish
to
address
my
concerns
about
the
ballot
measures
before
you.
I
find
it
is
better
to
air
our
concerns
and
work
towards
agreement
on
these
issues.
Now
than
to
later
hear
our
complaints
and
our
potential
reluctance
to
endorse
this
measure
when
it
comes
before
the
voters,
it
has
been
and
still
remains,
the
mission
of
boulder
weekly
to
promote,
support
and
sponsor
many
of
boulder's
cultural
and
social
non-profits.
AA
This
is
and
seems
to
be
incompatible
with
the
original
intent
and
spirit
of
the
tax.
It
appears
this
revision
of
the
tax
is
actually
masquerading
as
an
extension
I
have
learned
tonight.
The
15-year
term
is
related
to
bonding
capability
issues,
but
even
cfd
in
2018
only
require
extension
from
the
voters
cutting
in
half
twenty
percent
to
ten
percent.
The
fundamental
non-profits
causes
great
unease.
AA
Having
recently
served
for
the
past
five
years
on
the
boulder
county
arts
council,
I've
become
initially
intimately
aware
of
these
organizations.
Facility
and
venue
needs.
No
one
knows
what
will
be
needed
in
the
next
10
years,
let
alone
the
next
15.
and
the
removal
of
culture
from
the
title
ignores
and
repudiates.
All
these
organizations
do
and
have
done
to
encourage
passage
of
the
first
tax
and
later
the
previous
extension.
AA
AB
Hi
all
cindy
cipooka
here
and
I
live
at
7173
old
post
road.
I'm
gonna
basically
echo
what
you've
already
heard
from
jan
deborah
daniel
nick
and
fran,
and
but
I
want
to
start
off
with
a
little
bit
of
history
way
back
in
2015
after
extensive
research,
hard
work
by
city
staff
and
many
hundreds
of
hours
of
input
from
the
community,
the
city
of
boulder
community
cultural
plan
was
passed
unanimously
by
city
council.
During
the
research
portion
of
the
creation
of
that
plan.
AB
AB
At
that
difference,
the
city
has
done
an
admirable
job,
increasing
that
pool
of
grant
funding
for
our
communities,
arts
organizations
and
while
funding
has
increased,
it
is
still
a
fraction
of
the
funding
in
peer
cities
that,
coupled
with
the
fact
that
boulder
has
one
of
the
highest
concentrations
of
creative
professionals
per
capita
in
the
nation,
makes
it
a
double
whammy.
The
community
culture
and
safety
tax
helps
make
up
some
of
that
difference.
AB
Endless
research
has
been
conducted
that
can
attest
to
the
benefits
of
arts
and
culture
brings
to
a
community,
it
improves,
well-being,
unifies
communities,
strengthens
the
economy,
drives
tourism
and
revenue
for
local
business,
sparks
innovation
and
on
and
on,
and
I
get
that
the
city
has
unmet
financial
needs
to
fund
infrastructure
projects.
AB
C
N
N
So
again,
I
think
these
these
are
very
worthy
projects,
and
I
I
also
would
remind
you
that
these
are
projects
that
do
have
a
return
on
investment
as
we
support
these
efforts
in
and
around
the
downtown
that
just
does
generate
more
tax
revenue
to
fund
all
of
these
worthy
projects.
So
again,
thank
you
for
your
consideration
and,
as
always,
thank
you
for
your
service.
AC
Good
evening
city,
council,
members,
staff
and
council,
I'm
kathleen
mccormick
and
I
live
at
30
55
11th
street.
In
boulder.
As
chair
of
the
commission,
I
can
tell
you
that
we
support
the
strongest
measures
to
provide
facilities
and
spaces
that
encourage
an
equitable,
diverse,
inclusive,
welcoming
and
vibrant
community
arts
and
culture,
our
foundational
community
infrastructure
for
healing
inspiration
and
resilience.
AC
As
as
we've
seen,
challenging
europe
coveted
strife
over
racial
inequities
and
the
tragedy
of
king
supers,
the
arts
commission
was
concerned
to
learn
that
the
word
culture
has
not
been
included
in
the
new
title
and
that
arts
and
culture
have
a
small
and
vague
piece
in
this
ballot
measure.
Even
though
it's
recognized
as
one
of
the
top
us
cities
for
our
size
for
arts
and
culture
and
our
arts
organizations
draw
a
national
and
even
international
audience
which
supports
our
economic
vitality
as
a
city.
AC
Boulder's,
arts
and
culture
community
includes
over
160
non-profit
organizations,
very
few
of
which
own
their
facilities
or
can
easily
access
appropriate
spaces
at
affordable
rents,
with
the
economic
impacts
of
cobid
we're
hearing
more
about
arts
organizations
that
no
longer
can
afford
to
rent
in
boulder,
which
is
a
huge
loss
for
our
community
facilities
such
as
bomoca
and
dairy.
The
dairy
need
room
to
expand
and
many
organizations
cannot
find
appropriate
venues
for
classes,
rehearsals,
exhibits
and
maker
and
office
spaces
as
they
are
displaced,
arts
and
culture.
AC
Spaces
of
all
sizes,
but
especially
larger
performance
and
gathering
spaces
are
critically
needed.
Please
consider
allowing
grants
for
smaller
facility
projects,
while
also
aggregating
funding
in
tranches
for
larger
projects
that
could
be
distributed
every
three
or
five
years.
Flexible
ballot.
Language
is
needed
to
allow
for
planning
grants
and
small
projects
with
immediate
needs,
as
well
as
larger
grants,
facilities
that
could
be
show
already
down
the
road.
AC
Please
also
consider
how
the
city
will
determine
which
nonprofit
should
get
tax
revenue
funds
who
will
define
the
process
and
administer
this
program?
Could
the
boulder
arts,
commission
and
office
of
arts
and
culture
help
determine
distribution
of
arts
organizations
and
or
partner
with
an
organization
like
the
community
foundation
for
distribution
to
non-profits?
AC
C
C
AD
Thank
you
city
council,
for
your
good
work
for
the
opportunity
to
speak
to
you
this
evening.
My
name
is
justin
veach,
I'm
the
president
of
the
boulder
county
arts
alliance's
board
of
directors,
the
boulder
county
arts
alliance,
of
course,
acts
as
a
catalyst
to
incubate,
stimulate
and
sustain
a
thriving
arts
community
here
in
boulder
county.
AD
AD
I
have
since
helped
get
the
jaipur
literature
festival
off
the
ground
as
a
key
volunteer.
I
worked
for
the
boulder
public
library,
organizing
author
events
for
a
while
spent
a
glorious
nine
months
working
with
nick
forster
and
the
great
people
at
e-town
and
the
last
three
and
a
half
years,
and
counting
managing
the
lone
mont
museum
steward
auditorium.
AD
We've
all
heard
much
of
the
research
and
metrics
demonstrating
the
extraordinary
impact
the
arts
can
have
upon
a
community's
economy.
It's
become
a
standard
ingredient
for
any
recipe
designed
for
community
revitalization,
but
the
arts
and
creativity
are
also
an
incredible
contributor
to
the
overall
quality
of
life
for
a
community.
The
arts
are
a
means
to
experience
the
world
through
another's
eyes.
They
offer
us
opportunities
for
connection
recognition
and
understanding.
AD
Support
for
the
arts,
in
other
words,
is
support
for
the
social
and
cultural
fabric
of
the
community,
which
is
why
it's
so
important
to
keep
funding
for
the
arts
and
culture
a
key
part
of
this
tax
in
line
with
create
boulders
and
everyone's
recommendations.
This
evening,
the
boulder
county
arts
alliance
supports
the
extension
of
the
0.3
tax
and
that
its
original
name,
community
culture
and
safety
tax
remain
in
place
so
as
to
demonstrate
the
city's
commitment
to
the
arms.
AD
C
Thank
you
justin,
and
with
that
one
last
call
do
we
see
michael
perish
in
the
meeting
all.
E
C
Thank
you,
ryan
with
that
we
will
bring
the
public
hearing
to
a
close,
and
we
will
turn
to
counsel
for
discussion
and
in
emotions.
AE
C
A
I'll,
let
I'll
defer
to
staff
if
they
want
to
weigh
in,
but
I
know
that
we
have
talked
internally
a
bit
and
we
certainly
defer
to
council
can
absolutely
place
that
back
in.
If
that
is
the
desire,
so
we
will
defer
to
your
discussions.
AE
Yes,
I
I
do
support
reinserting
culture
based
on
everything
that
I've
heard
earlier
from
the
speakers.
Also,
at
the
last
meeting
we
did
also
discuss
increasing
the
amount
away
from
10
to
something
closer
to
either
12
or
15.
C
Okay,
thank
you
aaron
and
then
hang
on
give
me
a
moment.
I
apologize.
I
covered
up
my
yeah
aaron
and
then
mary
aaron.
G
Yeah
thanks
for
that
jenny,
I
would
also
like
to
see
the
word
culture
added
back
into
the
text
name,
so
it
could
be
community
culture,
resilience
and
safety
tax,
and
it's
not
too
bad
of
a
mouthful,
and
I
think
is,
would
be
help
gain
support
and,
I
think,
show
the
commitment
of
the
the
tax
measure
to
supporting
cultural
and
other
non-profit
initiatives,
and
then
I
wanted
to
to
check
in
with
council
on
the
allocations
to
the
nonprofit
side
of
things.
G
I
know
the
last
direction
given
at
the
last
meeting
was
more
on
the
10
side,
but
we've
heard
some
really
compelling
testimony
both
in
email
and
at
the
public
hearing
tonight.
So
I'd
like
to
check
in
again
to
see
if
council
would
consider
you
know
changing
that
allocation
to
15
for
for
the
final
here
at
the
public,
the
public
hearing,
so
we
can
let
other
people
talk,
but
I'd
love
to
hear
other
people's
thoughts
and
see
if
there
might
potentially
be
support
for
that
15
level
time.
Thank
you.
C
Thank
you,
aaron
and
before
I
go
to
the
others,
I
will
say
I'm
I'm
planning
on
doing
a
straw
poll
on
both
the
culture
and
the
percentage
amount
to
nonprofits.
If
that's,
okay,
with
that,
we've
got
mary
rachel
and
mark
mary.
B
Thanks
sam,
so
we
heard
testimony
about
how
the
original
tax-
and
I
presume
that
they
were
referring
to
the
original
attacks
in
2014,
had
a
20,
because
that
that
was
the
original
one
and
then
that
original
one
was
then
renewed,
and
that's
so
it's
been
renewed
a
couple
times
and
I'm
just
wondering
a
if
the
very
first
time
that
it
was
put
to
the
voters.
B
It
had
a
percentage
in
there
for
the
arts
and
then
that's
part.
One
of
my
question
part
two
of
my
question
is:
is
it
a
on
a
temporary
tax
like
this?
That
is
renewed?
Is
there
a.
B
C
Great
and
I'll
turn
to
staff,
nuria,
cheryl
would
or
sandra
do.
One
of
you
have
information
about
the
2014
tax
and
the
renewal,
or
I
think
mary's
second
part
to
your
question
was:
is
it
required
to
keep
the
same
allocations
during
a
renewal.
Q
So,
and-
and
I
am
going
to
defer
to
joel
for
further
detail
on
this-
but
in
the
2014,
we
did
not
specify
a
pers
a
specific
percentage
in
the
ballot
language
language.
We
did,
however,
include
specific
projects
so
joel-
I
don't
know
if
you
want
to
add
anything
to
that.
T
Sure,
thanks,
cheryl
and
good
evening
again,
council
cheryl
is
correct.
The
original
ballot
item
listed
specific
projects
so
that
ballot
item.
I'm
sorry,
I
was
just
pulling
it
up
from
my
notes
here.
The
the
total
projected
revenues
was
27.6
million.
There
were
two
non-profit
projects
with
that
boulder
museum
or
sorry,
museum
of
boulder
and
dairy
center
for
the
arts.
They
totaled
approximately
28
of
that
ballot,
but
it
did
not
specify
a
percentage.
T
The
second
round
again
specified
specific
projects
and
the
community
projects.
There
were
7.9
million
on
about
42
million
dollars
worth
of
projects,
and
that
was
about
19.
C
C
H
Yeah,
sorry,
I'm
having
computer
problems
in
case
you
can't.
We
cannot
change
the
purpose
of
the
text
so
that
we
got
the
capital
improvements,
but
we
in
analyzing
it.
We
did
have
enough
private
projects
in
there
that
were
that
were
okay,
so
we
did
like
joel
said.
We
did
not
have
specific
allocations
before
we
don't
have
we're
not
tied
to
specific
allocations
or
not,
and
this
one
we
are
tied
to
related
purposes.
B
I
believe
it
did.
Thank
you.
D
Right
so
as
to
your
straw
poll
on
the
putting
culture
back
in
the
title,
I
would
be
in
the
yes
put
it
back
in
the
title
column,
and
then
you
know
on
the
10
versus
15
versus
20
percent
of
the
tax.
I
guess
I
feel,
like
my
understanding,
is
that
their
return
on
investment
for
dollars
that
we
invest
in
arts.
D
We
get
a
two
to
one
return,
so
I'm
I'm
a
pretty
strong
proponent
of
capitalizing
on
that
and
supporting
the
arts
where
we
can
and
then
I
I
also
am
hopeful
that
sort
of
the
infrastructure
cavalry
will
arrive
a
bit
from
the
federal
government
and
and
the
monies
that
we
are
expected,
both
federal
and
state
level.
So
I'm
I'm
inclined
to
push
for
the
full
20
percent
to
go
to
arts
and
hopefully.
M
Yeah,
you
know
there
was
no
intent
in
naming
the
statute
to
either
cut
out
the
artistic
community
or,
frankly,
to
offend
them.
So
I
have
no
difficulty
if
we
want
to
call
it
something
along
the
lines
of
community
resilience,
safety
and
culture
tax
that
really
wasn't
the
intent
of
of
where
we
were
going
and
if
it
is
important
to
them,
I'm
more
than
happy
to
comply
with
respect
to
the
allocations.
I
remain
convinced
that
it
is
time
for
us
to
be
serious
about
meeting
our
infrastructure
needs
and
we've
seen
the
numbers.
M
The
numbers
are
approximately
295
million
in
unmet
infrastructure
needs,
and-
and
when
I
look
at
that,
I
usually
lop
100
million
off,
because
you
know
there
are
some
projects
that
are
simply
aspirational,
but
that
still
leaves
us
with
million
dollars
worth
of
infrastructure
projects
that
we
don't
have
funding.
For.
So
this
renewal
will
still
only
get
us.
You
know
between
50
and
60
of
those,
and
that
list
is
likely
to
grow
over
time,
certainly
not
going
to
shrink,
and
so
we're
we're
simply
not
responding
to
the
deficit
in
capital
expenditure.
M
Funding
that
we
ought
to
make.
It
has
been
my
sad
experience
to
actually
live
in
a
city
where
capital
expenditures
were
ignored
year
after
year
after
year,
and
the
impacts
of
that
are
unimaginable
in
terms
of
what
it
does
to
a
city,
lack
the
loss
of
economic
vitality
and
other
impacts.
And
so
I
remain
convinced
that
the
90
10
is
the
way
to
go.
If
we
want
to
be
serious
about
handling
our
backlog
of
infrastructure
projects,
thanks.
C
Thank
you
mark,
and
I
see
no
other
comments,
so
I
was
going
to
start
with
two
straw
goals.
The
first
one
will
be:
do
we
want
to
add
culture
to
the
title
of
the
tax?
I
will
propose
just
arbitrarily
that
it
be
the
straw
poll
be
on
community
culture,
resilience
and
safety
tax.
So
if
I
could
get
junie,
would
you
like
to
say
something
before
I
take
a
struggle.
C
C
Okay,
so
the
proposal
I
put
out
there
we'll
take
a
straw
poll
on
is
community
culture,
resilience
and
safety
tax.
So,
if
you'd
raise
your
hand,
if
that's
okay
with
you,
if
we
make
that
change
I'll
count,
hands
one
two,
three,
four:
five:
six:
okay,
so
we
have
plenty
there
so
staff.
I
think
you've
got
direction
if
we
could
change
that
tax
title,
the
community
culture
resilience
and
safety
tax.
That's
the
first
part
we'll
then
move
to
the
percentage
set
aside
for
non-profits
and
juni.
Who
would
you
like
to
share
with
us.
AE
Yeah,
I
I
want
to
be
I'm
very
optimistic
about
the
poll
that
you're
about
to
do,
but
I
also
based
on
the
conversation
that
we
had
last
week.
I
also
want
to
be
a
pragmatist,
so
today,
as
you
do
in
the
poll,
I
wonder
if
you
could
do
maybe
20
15
and
12
percent.
So
maybe
if
we
do
get
20
out
of
every
one
we
get
a
majority,
then
we
don't
have
to
go
to
the
lower
end,
but
I
just
don't
want
it
to
be
where
we
just
take
one
pole
and
then
it's
over.
C
Of
course,
I
I
was
thinking
of
starting
with.
Do
we
want
more
than
10,
but
if
you'd
like
we
can
start
it.
The
other
way
I'd
be
happy
to
do
that.
Let's
go
20,
15,
12
and
10..
If
we
get
a
majority
for
any
of
those,
then
we
can
move
ahead
with
it.
Okay,
so
council
members
raise
your
hand.
If
you
would
like
20
of
this
tax
to
be
allocated
to
nonprofits.
C
C
Okay,
with
that
I'll
turn
to
staff,
did
you
get
everything
that
you
needed
from
us
tonight.
C
L
I'm
gonna
do
both
of
them
at
the
same
time,
if
that's
okay
with
everyone,
I
move
that
we
adopt
in
first
reading
ordinance
eight
four,
seven,
six
and
eight
ordinance.
Eight
four,
eight
seven
is.
C
M
C
Yes,
there
is
all
right,
we
have
a
motion
and
a
second
alicia
could
get
you
in
a
second
aaron
alicia.
We'll
do
a
roll
call
as
soon
as
aaron
is
finished,
if
you're
ready,
erin.
G
Yeah
bob:
do
you
want
to
amend
that
to
include
the
revised
title
of
the
tax.
L
I'm
I'm
sorry,
yes,
with
with
the
revision
for
8476.
That
would
include
the
word
culture
in
the
name
of
the
text.
Thank
you.
Aaron.
C
K
L
P
J
K
All
righty
next
is
item
4b
the
introduction.
First
reading
public
hearing
and
consideration
of
a
motion
to
order
published
by
title
only
ordinance,
8486
submitting
to
the
registered
electors
of
the
city
of
boulder
at
the
general
municipal,
coordinated
election
to
be
held
on
tuesday
november
2nd
2021.
S
H
H
So
this
this
charter,
amendment
started
kind
of
towards
the
end
of
the
cycle,
wasn't
part
of
our
original
planning,
because
a
good
catch
by
a
citizen
that
we
have
not,
and
I'm
still
on
slide,
one
that
we
had
not
made
conforming
amendments
to
section
46
when
the
changes
were
made
to
the
charter
in
2018
and
those
were
to
reduce
the
number
of
signatures
that
were
required
for
initiative
referendum
and
recall.
So
that's
where
the
ordinance
started
with
that
working
recognizing
that
working
group
in
2018.
We
didn't
make
those
changes.
H
There
then,
was
a
flurry
of
emails
about
how
we
should
have
made
the
revisions
and
they
centered
around,
where
the
words
registered
electors
should
be
placed
and
how
it
modified
things.
We
realized
that
it
was
placed
in
a
different
place
in
each
section,
38a,
44
and
46..
H
So
the
proposal
before
you
tonight
is
amendments
to
all
three
of
those.
Our
intent
is
to
try
to
make
the
language
as
clear
as
possible,
not
add
additional
words,
so
I'm
gonna
start
and
we'll
go
to
slide
two.
Now,
thanks
emily
with
the
process
for
reviewing
signatures
on
petitions,
when
the
clerk
reviews
petitions
the
petitions
that
come
in
with
the
signatures,
she
first
eliminates
all
signatures
on
petitions
that
are
not
from
registered
electors
of
the
city.
H
H
The
clerk
reviews,
the
county
election
count
from
the
previous
two
municipal
candidate
elections,
to
determine
how
many
signatures
are
required
and
averages
those
the
reports
from
the
county
clerk
only
include
those
votes
that
were
counted.
They
don't
include
people
that
tried
to
vote
that
weren't
registered
or
they
weren't
qualified
to
register,
or
there
was
something
else
wrong
with
their
ballot.
H
So
when
we
are
at
this
stage
the
county,
neither
the
county,
clerk
or
the
city
clerk
is
trying
to
figure
out
how
many
voters
that
voted
in
two
years
before
or
four
years
before
registered
electors
they're.
Just
looking
at
the
number
of
voters
that
there
were
four
candidate
elections
in
boulder
and
that's
because
challenges
to
election
have
to
be
timely,
they
are
not
open
forever.
H
H
The
first
amendment
we
have
is
to
section
38
and,
as
you
can
see
in
this
one,
the
qualifying
language
of
registered
electors
is
removed
when
referred
to
the
counting
of
those
who
voted
in
the
previous
two
candidate
elections,
and
that
leaves
the
qualifying
language
of
registered
elector
remains
for
the
requirement
of
those
that
have
to
sign
the
referendum
petition.
The
initiative
petition
or
the
recall,
petition
slide.
Four.
H
This
removes
the
qualifier
of
registered
electors
when
referring
to
those
who
voted
in
the
previous
two
candidate
elections
and
then
slide.
Six
is
the
ballot
question
itself.
We
had
the
underlying
shows
what
we
changed
from.
What's
in
the
packet,
or
at
least
the
packet
that
was
presented
last
week,
you
should
have
received
today
the
corrected
packet
and
ordinance,
and
this
has
the
ballot
requestion,
referring
to
the
changes
in
38a,
44
and
46..
C
I
am
not
seeing
any
council
questions,
I
will
pull
up
our
public.
C
C
E
C
I
do
have
it
so
we
have
two
speakers
tonight,
lynn,
siegel
and
margaret
lecompte,
because
we
have
two:
each
will
get
three
minutes
to
speak
and
with
that
lynn,
you've
got
three
minutes
to
speak
on
amending
section
46
of
the
boulder
charter.
W
U
P
G
It
well,
I
want
to
appreciate
staff
for
coming
up
with
a
good
solution
for
this
problem,
so
we
did
get
an
email
pointing
out
some
some
issues
with
the
previous
version,
and
I
appreciate
your
attention
to
this,
and
so
I'm
happy
to
go
ahead
and
put
a
motion
on
the
table.
I'll
move
that
movie
we
adopt
ordnance,
84,
86
and
specifically
the
version
that
was
posted
on
hotline
earlier
today.
O
G
Well,
this
is
just
a
cleanup
provision,
so
you
know
we
were
doing
some
really
complicated
charter
changes
back
a
handful
of
years
ago,
and
so
there
was
a
flaw
in
what
was
done,
and
this
corrects
that
flaw
and
this
updated
version
takes
it
all
the
way
to
making
sure
that
all
these
different
charter
provisions
are
consistent.
So
it
seems
like
a
good
thing
to
put
in
front
of
the
voters,
get
cleaned
up
all
right.
Thank.
C
C
K
B
K
G
N
J
K
All
right
next,
we
have
item
4c,
which
is
a
second
reading
and
motion
to
adopt
ordinance
8477
submitting
to
the
electors
of
the
city
of
boulder,
at
the
general
municipal,
coordinated
election
to
be
held
on
tuesday
november.
The
second
twenty
twenty
one.
The
question
of
amending
section,
seven
of
the
boulder
city
charter
relating
to
council
compensation
by
requiring
the
council
compensation,
be
paid
in
equal
amounts
throughout
the
year
to
be
paid
on
the
same
schedule
as
other
city.
K
Employees
setting
forth
the
ballot
title,
specifying
the
form
of
the
ballot
and
other
election
procedures
and
setting
for
related
details
and
second
reading
and
motion
to
adopt
ordinance.
8478
submitting
to
the
electors
of
the
city
of
boulder,
at
the
general
municipal,
coordinated
election
to
be
held
on
tuesday
november
2nd
2021.
H
Thank
you
and
thank
you
emily
for
doing
the
slides
and
for
this
one
we
are
ready
for
slide.
Two
in
ordinance.
8477
section
seven
shows
the
changes
to
the
code
to
even
out
the
payments
for
capital
members
without
increasing
the
pay
and
emily
there
you
go.
The
reason
for
the
highlighting
in
this
is
that
when
we
were
researching
the
candidate
elections
before
we
realized
that
ordinance
8420
passed
by
the
voters
last
year
for
ranked
choice,
voting
was
not
codified.
H
So
in
this
slide
we
are
showing
the
changes
that
the
voters
approved
last
year
that
were
not
in
your
packet
form.
So
last
year,
council
amended,
I'm
sorry,
the
voters
amended
section
7
to
say
council
members
and
the
mayor
we're
not
making
any
change
to
that
part.
But
then,
when
we
get
down
to
the
highlighted
part
below,
we
have
to
address
the
fact
that
there
will
be
a
mayor
elected
in
november
of
2023.
H
That
also
has
the
opportunity
to
do
this
same
election,
so
that
language
is
added
so
that
the
mayor
can
make
the
election
for
the
person
elected
in
2023
and
thereafter,
and
otherwise.
This
the
amendment
to
section
7
in
84
77,
is
the
same
as
this
was
in
your
packet.
H
It's
okay
slide:
three
is
the
ballot
question
itself,
which
adds
also
the
language
for
the
so
we're
addressing
the
mayor
elected
in
november
of
2023
and
then
slide
four
is
ordinance
8478..
H
This
one
does
not
have
any
changes
from
what's
in
your
packet.
This
shows
the
language
I
didn't
print
out.
Everything
before
that
was
change
of
first
few
paragraphs
are
not
changed,
obsolete
language
is
deleted
and
then
the
change
is
underlined
on
this
slide.
To
make
it
clear,
the
council
has
the
authority
to
appoint
council
committees.
H
Other
council
members
can
attend
council
committees,
but
shall
not
participate,
and
then
it
changes
from
may
to
shell
the
requirement
to
appoint
a
council
committee
when
screening
applications
for
city
manager,
city
attorney
or
municipal
court-
and
this
was
also
recommended
by
the
council
charter
committee
and
slide
five-
is
the
ballot
question
for
ordinance.
Eight,
four,
seven,
eight
and
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
C
Very
good
kathy,
I
have
a
question
in
if
you
can
go
back
one
slide
to
the
previous
slide.
My
question
is:
we
often
have
a
standing
evaluation
subcommittee
that
gets
appointed
and
then
as
needed.
We
appoint
subcommittees
for
looking
for
city
manager,
city
attorney
or
municipal
court
judge.
Is
there
anything
in
the
language
that
you
propose?
That
requires
it
to
be
a
single
subcommittee
to
do
that
list
of
things,
or
is
it
okay
to
appoint
a
separate
subcommittee
for
each
one
of
those
different
things.
H
C
Okay,
because
it
just
okay,
if
you
think
that
that's
good
and
clear
that
we
can
do
separate
committees
for
each
of
those
city,
managers,
city
attorney,
municipal
court,
judge
and
evaluation-
then
I'm
good
with
that.
Okay,
any
other
questions.
Council,
members,
okay,
seeing
none!
We
can
go
to
the
public
hearing.
We
have
one
person
signed
up
for
the
public
hearing
on
this.
That's
lynn,
siegel
lynn!
You
have
three.
W
Minutes
yeah,
I
don't
know
exactly
how
you
can
do
this,
but
I
think
that
with
the
population
growing
the
way
it
is
in
boulder
with
all
this
development,
you
need
to
do
something
that's
more
representative
as
far
as
choosing
the
committees
and
as
far
as
choosing
the
city
manager
and
the
city
attorney
and
such
and
and
I
don't
see
you
improving
the
representation
by
increasing
the
population,
this
much
with
cu
south
and
with
all
those
developments
that
I
bark
to
you
about
every
single
week.
W
C
B
B
Right
there
a
suggestion
that
move.
B
The
other
council
members
may
attend
any
council
committee
meeting
to
observe
but
shall
not
participate
ahead
of
and
to
no
such
event
be
equal
or
greater
than
a
quorum
of
console.
So
the
the
intent.
I
don't
remember
what
the
exact
movement
of
the
sentence
was,
but
the
intent
was
that
the
subcommittee
itself
can
be
no
greater.
B
That
the
council
members
attending
cannot
total
be
equal
or
greater
than
a
quorum.
B
So
I
guess
I
have
to
look
up
that
email
to
tell
you
what
that
language
was,
but
does
somebody
have
that
email
handy?
I
do.
S
B
Right-
and
I
just
wanted
to
that-
that
suggestion
made
sense
to
me-
and
I
wanted
to
just
ask
my
colleagues
what
they
think
of
that
suggestion.
C
Thanks
mary,
I
see
bob
and
then
I
have
the
thought
as
well.
L
Yeah
I'll
respond
mary
thanks
for
raising
that
up
as
an
issue.
I'm
not
exactly
sure
how
we
would
work.
I'm
number
one
because
I
don't
know
if
it's
the
first
come
first
serve.
I
guess
a
quorum
is
five,
and
so
we
had
a
committee
of
two
and
two
people
showed
up
and
then
a
third
person
showed
up.
I
guess
it's
like
first
come
first
serve
and
then
it's
even
more
complicated
with
committee
meetings,
at
least
for
the
time
being
occurring
on
zoom.
L
I
don't
I
don't
know
how
somebody
simply
observing,
but
not
speaking,
has
has
an
undue
influence
on
the
two
two
council
members
who
are
actually
engaged
in
the
committee.
So
I
did
give
some
careful
thought
to
that
suggestion,
but
I'm
just
not
sure
how
it
work
or
whether
it's
even
necessary,
but
that's
my
thought.
C
I
guess
I'll
follow
up
marion
and
I
also
understand
the
intent
of
what
you're
suggesting,
but
I
I
don't
see
the
risk
here,
because
I
don't
believe
that
even
a
quorum
of
council
members
could
just
call
a
meeting
without
some
kind
of
public
notice.
So
I
I'm
I'm
thinking
that
there
wouldn't
be
a
way
for
this
to
turn
into
a
meeting.
If
a
subcommittee
meeting
is
called
and
the
two
appointed
members
are
there
and
then
observers
are
there.
I
don't
think
that
that
a
meeting
could
be
called.
C
S
I
think
that
it
would
depend
on
whether
there
was
council
business
being
discussed
at
the
meeting.
S
Generally
speaking,
we
take
a
conservative
approach
and
and
do
notice
on
public
meetings,
but
there
would
actually
have
to
be
action
and
work
being
done
related
to
you
know
the
business
of
government,
because
it
you
know,
if
you
can
imagine,
we
have
social
events
where
we
have
more
than
a
quorum.
You
know
or
we
have
a
quorum.
I
should
say
of
council
members
and
we
don't
notice
those
meetings.
C
Okay,
mary,
would
it
be
helpful
to
you
if
there
were
a
sentence
in
here?
That
said,
something
along
the
lines
of
no
other
council
business
may
be
taken
up
at
these
council
committee
meetings.
B
Any
any
council
business
shall
be
brought
forward
to
the
full
council
or
something
like
that.
What
I'm
thinking
is
similar
to
like
when
we
were
having
executive
sessions,
where
we
would
have
all
this
discussion
and
then
any
kind
of
official
vote.
B
S
Well,
I
was
just
going
to
allow
kathy
if
she,
if
there's
anything,
that
she
would
like
to
add,
she's,
really
she's
an
expert
on
quora
and
open
records
or
open
meetings.
I
should
say:
go
ahead
kathy
if
there's
anything
that
you
want
to
add.
H
And
I'm
trying
to
make
sure
I
understand
the
problem
that
potentially
we're
trying
to
fix,
so
council
committees
are
open
to
the
public,
so
those
meetings
are
open
to
the
public.
You
take
minutes
and,
and
you
take
records,
so
notice
is
required.
If
you
were
concerned
that
that
committee
would
talk
about
matters
beyond
the
scope
of
the
authority,
that's
been
given
to
the
committee
by
council.
We
could
address
the
problem
that
way.
H
If
the
concern
is
that
meetings
that
council
members
may
get
together
and
discuss
items
that
aren't
on
an
agenda
contrary
to
your
already
your
open
meetings
requirements,
there
might
be
a
different
way
to
address
it.
So
is
the
concern
that,
when
a
bunch
of
that,
when
several
council
members
get
together
that
they're
going
to
talk
about
something
beyond
what
the
meeting
is
called
for
and
is
that
what
we're
trying
to
fix.
B
G
Because
I
I
mean
I,
I
read
that
email
as
well
and
my
understanding
of
it
was
more
that
it
was
concerned
that
if
you
had
multiple
additional
council
members,
they
might
be
making
hand
signals
or-
or
you
know,
like
gestures
or
you
know,
kind
of
participating
in
subtle
ways.
So
so
as
to
you
know
in
in
influence-
and
you
know
from
with
the
majority
of
council.
G
Which
is
a
concern
that
I
don't
really
share,
I
you
know
occasionally
somebody
will
sit
in
on
cac
and
you
get
up
to
four
council
members
and
they're
always
quiet.
You
know
nobody,
nobody
says
anything
and
the
language
specifically
says
any
additional
members
shall
not
participate,
and
so,
if
they
were,
you
know
making
little,
you
know,
signals
or
something
that
would
be
a
form
of
participation
and
would
be
not
allowed.
So
you
know
if
two
council
members
showed
up
at
cec
and
listen.
B
I
so
I
I
I'll
I'll
drop
it.
I
I
don't
hear
my
colleagues
having
any
similar
concerns
and
others
have
given
it
a
lot
more
consideration.
So
I
will
go
with
the
proposed
language.
H
J
C
J
K
B
K
G
K
W
K
D
S
And
I'd
like
to
jump
in
and
just
say
and
kathy,
you
can
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
but
this
is
second
reading,
and
so
I
believe
we
had
changes
during
this
version
for
this
version,
so
it
will
need
to
go
to
third
reading
on
consent
on
august
17th,
correct,
okay,
okay,
thank
you.
C
So
so,
may
I
ask
sandra:
did
what
changes
did
we
make?
So
I
thought
we
went
ahead
with
it
as
proposed.
Did
we
make
changes.
H
We
did
not
make
changes
to
8478,
we
did
make
changes
to
8477,
and
this
is
where
you
guys
will
have
to
help
me
with
the
council
procedure.
I
believe
that
by
correcting
the
packet
before
the
meeting
with
what
you
receive
for
84
77
before
this
meeting,
that
means
we
do
not
have
to
go
to
third
reading
on
these
two
is
that
correct.
G
Well,
it
was
in
it
was
done
before
the
meeting,
but
the
text
that
we
just
adopted
was
different
from
the
first
reading
text
and
it
was.
It
was
substantive
right
to
include
the
the
mayor
in
the
text
so
that
that
strikes
me
as
something
that
would
require
a
third
reading.
G
S
S
K
I
K
A
Thanks,
alicia
and
sort
of
as
the
city
continues
to
lean
in
and
uplift,
racial
equity
and
social
justice
issues.
Staff
has
been
working
hard
on
the
land,
acknowledgement
update
and
we
have
dan
burke
and
phil
yates.
I
believe
to
talk
a
little
bit
more
about
that.
AF
Great
thank
you
nuria
good
evening
council
dan
burke,
director
of
the
city's
open
space
and
mountain
parks,
department,
and
I
will
be
joined
by
phil
and
clay
fong
in
just
a
bit
and
there's
some
other
staff
that
are
on
the
line.
AF
If
there's
questions,
this
is
an
update
to
inform
you
of
the
progress
that
we're
making
on
two
efforts
by
the
city
that
is
designed
to
strengthen
our
relationships
with
american
indian
tribal
nations,
who
we
regularly
consult
with,
as
well
as
indigenous
peoples
in
our
community,
just
to
remind
council
community.
This
is
actually
our
fourth
touch
together
with
staff
and
council
on
on
these
issues.
AF
On
april
6,
we
gathered
together
at
a
council
meeting
and
had
a
a
preparation
session
with
earnest
house
in
order
to
prepare
for
the
tribal
consultation
that
was
then
held
on
april
7th,
in
which
a
number
of
council
members
participated
in.
It
was
a
very
successful
tribal
consultation
a
full
day
on
april
7th.
AF
We
made
a
lot
of
progress
on
issues
that
we've
been
discussing
over
the
past
several
years,
in
which
the
name
change
of
settlers
park
to
the
people's
crossing
was
one
of
them,
and
that's
one
of
our
updates
to
you
tonight
and
then.
AF
On
june
1st,
I
was
joined
by
phil
yates,
who
help
us
sort
of
take
the
last
step
if
you
will
and
formally
change
in
the
name
of
settlers
part
to
the
people
crossing
to
the
people's
crossing,
and
we
had
a
good
discussion
with
council
on
june
1st.
AF
So
this
is
our
fourth
time
together
on
these
issues,
and
with
that
I
am
going
to
turn
things
over
to
our
communication
specialist
in
the
city
of
boulder
phil
yates,
to
update
you
on
on
the
people's
crossing
name
change,
as
well
as
the
land
acknowledgement.
So
phil.
AG
All
right,
thank
you
dan
good
evening,
council
members.
I
appreciate
the
opportunity
to
give
you
these
updates
tonight.
I
just
also
want
to
take
a
moment
to
thank
all
the
staff
from
several
departments.
Who've
been
cooperating
and
working
on
these
two
projects.
I
also
want
to
thank
emily
and
alicia
for
their
assistance
tonight.
AG
AG
So
yeah
first
we'll
start
with
just
the
update
on
the
people's
crossing
next
slide
before
we
start
again
with
the
presentation
and
get
deep
into
it.
Just
I
think
it's
important
to
look
back
about
the
meaning
behind
the
people's
crossing.
This
was
conversations.
The
name
came
from
two
consultations
we
had
with
tribal
representatives
and
the
meaning
behind
the
name
is
that
boulder
and
the
settlers
park
area.
AG
Well,
since
the
name
change
has
been,
it
was
adopted,
open
space
and
mountain
parks
have
we've
updated.
The
interactive
trail
map.
We've
created
a
new
trailhead
page
on
the
new
city
website,
with
an
alert
actually
describing
the
the
process
for
how
we've
came
to
this
important
community
development.
We've
installed
temporary
signs
in
the
area
just
to
inform
visitors
of
the
name
change
and
the
sign
actually
has
qr
codes
and
bitly
codes
that
will
link
to
the
project
web
page
that
provides
more
information
about
the
process
and
the
meaning
behind
the
name.
AG
AG
By
late
september,
we
anticipate
installing
a
trial,
a
trail
head
id
sign
will
be
that
will
be
installed
at
the
people's
crossing
parking
lot.
There's
gonna
be
a
trailhead
kiosk
just
north
of
farmer's
ditch,
that's
the
secondary
kiosk.
There
will
be
trail
map
signs
updated
with
the
new
name
at
the
people's
crossing.
AG
AG
Once
we've
installed
that
infrastructure,
we
anticipate
distributing
additional
community
communications
just
to
remind
community
members
of
the
name
change
and
to
announce
the
installation
of
new
sign
infrastructure,
so
that
will
be
communications
through
a
press
release
next
door,
social
media
in
the
emails
and
then,
as
a
part
of
this
work.
We
are
also
planning
the
october
community
event
to
celebrate
the
fifth
anniversary
of
the
indigenous
peoples
day
resolution
in
boulder
and
the
people's
crossing
renaming
effort.
AG
Along
with
that,
we
are
also
planning
an
event
with
tribal
representatives,
for
the
anticipate
or
for
the
march
consultation
next
year
and
clay
fong
is
here
to
answer
questions
about
indigenous
peoples
day.
Events
this
year
next
slide.
AG
So
right
now
we're
focusing
and
inviting
tribal
representatives
to
participate
in
the
city
tribal
working
group
that
we
agreed
to
at
the
2021
consultation
in
april.
What
the
first
goal
of
that
working
group
and
the
primary
focus
of
that
working
group
is
to
help
us
develop
long-term,
interpretive
panels
in
the
area
to
remind
to
talk
about
the
indigenous
presence
on
the
land
and
just
to
provide
additional
knowledge
for
how
we
can
develop,
probably
additional
signage
across
the
system,
but
primarily
focused
on
the
area.
AG
AG
It's
part
of
the
pathway
that
will
take
you
to
from
ebon
g
fine
nor
north
to
the
people's
crossing,
and
what
we're
doing
is
we're
talking
the
transportation
mobility.
Excuse
me,
transportation
and
mobility,
public
works
and
parks
and
recreation
again
about
the
long-term
future
of
that
inscription.
But
we're
also
planning
to
speak
with
the
city
tribal
working
group
to
gather
their
ideas
about
what
to
do
with
the
inscription
next
slide.
AG
Yeah
now
I'd
like
to
provide
an
update
about
the
city's
work
to
develop
a
landing
knowledge
event
next
slide.
So
since
early
2021
we've
been
focusing
and
working
on
developing
a
formal
land
acknowledgment
through
the
staffer,
it's
included.
We've
had
several
lessons
from
the
community
and
american
indian
tribal
nations
and,
as
a
part
of
this
work,
we've
really
kind
of
honed
in
on
four
key
purposes.
AG
AG
So
we've
taken
several
steps
as
a
part
of
this
process,
but
first
we
really
want
to
extend
our
gratitude
to
community
members
who
developed
the
indigenous
people's
day.
Resolution
and
staff
has
based
the
land
acknowledgement
work
on
their
hard
efforts
with
the
resolution
serving
as
a
foundation
for
a
city,
land
acknowledgement.
We've
taken
several
steps
through
this
process.
We've
spoken
to
the
human
relations
commission
on
february
20th,
we
conducted
some
community.
We
conducted
community
engagement
for
about
three
weeks.
AG
During
that
time,
we
received
community
input
on
themes
and
ideas,
not
in
the
indigenous
people's
day
resolution
that
could
be
included
in
the
land
acknowledgment.
We
then
provided
an
update
to
boulder
city
council
on
april
6th,
and
then
we
presented
with
all
that
input.
We
presented
a
preliminary
draft
to
tribal
representatives
and
we
stressed
that
it
was
just
the
starting
point
and
that
the
city
was
open
to
receiving
feedback
since
tribal
consultation.
AG
We're
continuing
to
receive
comments
on
a
land
acknowledgment
this
summer,
and
it's
important
to
note
that
tribal
representatives
are
quite
busy
this
summer
with
consultations
and
ceremonies
and
community
events.
So
we're
expecting
feedback
to
keep
coming
through
this
summer,
and
here
we're
here
tonight
to
give
you
an
update
about
all
this
ongoing
work
next
slide,
and
so
the
collective
weave
input
we've
received
through
these.
Several
steps
have
led
to
content
that
is
currently
in
the
draft
acknowledgement
that
we're
still
receiving
feedback
on,
and
so
the
first
theme
was.
We
really
wanted
to
base
the
acknowledgement.
AG
Like
I
said
before,
on
the
city's
indigenous
people's
day
resolution,
we
want
to
acknowledge
indigenous
peoples,
who've
lived
in
traversed
and
stewarded
lands
in
the
boulder
valley.
Since
time
memorial,
we
want
to
recognize
tribal
nations
that
have
agreements
with
the
city
of
boulder
and
have
historical
connections
to
colorado
and
consult
with
city
and
staff.
AG
AG
The
acknowledgement
can
initiate
meaningful
action
for
indigenous
community
members
and
american
indian
tribal
nations
and
create
an
acknowledgement
that
can
adapt
with
time
incorporate
new
knowledge
and
histories
and
meet
changing
community
needs
next
slide,
but
we
recognize
excuse
me
that
we
need
to
take
action
beyond
words,
currently
we're
developing
ways
to
use
the
acknowledgement
to
inspire
purposeful
reflection
in
action
for
indigenous
community
members
and
american
indian
tribal
nations.
When
we
begin
new
projects,
we
start
long-term
community
plans,
we
recruit
and
retain
staff.
AG
AG
And
so
here's
just
some
examples
first,
is
that
we
just
plan
to
develop
several
several
versions
of
the
land
acknowledgment
that
will
include
a
full
version
and
shorter
examples
in
order
just
to
accommodate
the
different
formats
that
it
might
be
needed
in
those
formats
could
include
the
web
or
which
would.
J
AG
We're
also
planning
to
refine
how
we
can
use
a
land
acknowledgement
to
initiate
meaningful
action.
We
anticipate
consulting
staff
agenda
meeting
members
to
hear
additional
feedback
and
input
for
how
we
can
use
the
land
acknowledgement
and,
as
agreed
to
at
the
2021
consultation,
we're
inviting
tribal
representatives
to
participate
in
a
city
tribal
working
group.
That
working
group
is
expected
to
maybe
meet
sometime
later
this
summer
or
early
fall
and
as
agreed
to
at
the
consultation,
to
help
us
finalize
the
city's
plan.
Land
acknowledgement.
AG
AG
We're
also
trying
to
see
if
we
can
create
a
pronunciation
guide
that
can
help
community
members
pronounce
indigenous
names,
but
that's
certainly
pending
resources
and
other
barriers.
So,
as
we
look
ahead,
a
lot
of
steps
still
left
to
do
and
we're
anticipating
a
council
update
in
fall
winter
of
2021.
AG
C
B
Thank
you
for
all
of
this
fine
work.
It's
it's
really
wonderful
to
be
in
this
place
after
six
years
since
the
the
resolution
passed,
my
question
has
to
do
with
the
sign.
That
is
the
plaque
that
commemorates
rey
and
eunice
cornell.
That
includes
the
phrase
settlers
park.
B
AG
I
think
that's
definitely
the
case
I
mean
it
just
is
not
located
on
our
property
and
it
I
think
it's
the
personal
property
of
someone
else,
so
I
think
yeah.
I
would
take
additional
investigation
and
communication
with
their
family
to
speak
with
them
and
understand
how
they
want
to
approach
that
thing.
Moving
forward.
B
Okay,
great,
thank
you
yeah,
I
guess
actually.
Well,
I
have
the
floor.
I
have
another
question
about
this.
One
is
about
the
land
acknowledgement
you
had
the
slide
where
it
says
potential
places
in
which
it
could
be
used
and
in
it
it
included
like
planning
for
council
meetings
and
planning
for
boards
and
commissions
meetings.
B
AG
Yeah,
so
the
idea
was
more
of
just
to
reflect
on
it
when
important
items
that
affect
community
members,
indigenous
community
members
and
tribal
nations,
just
to
reflect
on
that
when
actually
putting
agendas
together.
That
was
kind
of
the
initial
idea.
Amy
are
you
here?
I
should
maybe
talk
a
little
bit
more
about
that
yeah.
AH
I'm
here
yeah,
so
actually
phil.
You
were
right
on
the
right
track
when
we're
like
looking
at
putting
together
what
an
agenda
might
look
like
and
ensuring
that
we've
got
this
acknowledgement
in
our
minds
with
any
decisions
that
will
be
made
moving
forward.
So
I
could
see
it
happening
at
a
cac
meeting,
depending
on
what's
kind
of
coming
down
the
pike
on
the
work
plan,
but
yeah,
I
think,
for
the
most
part
it
would
be
at
the
beginning
of
a
meeting
that
would
be
relevant.
B
Well
I'll
I'll
ask
so
the
intent
then
would
be
basically
to
it's
basically
a
way
of
embedding
our
actions
through
the
reflection
of
the
landing
knowledgement
prior
to
beginning
a
project
or
yeah
got.
AH
You
yeah,
the
intention
is
really
to
ensure
that
it's
not
just
some
rote
thing,
that's
being
stated
before
any
type
of
board,
commission
or
council
meeting
or
even
a
city
training
being
sure
that
we're
really
being
intentional,
because
that
can
happen
and
we've
seen
it
happen
in
other
jurisdictions.
And
we
want
to
ensure
that
we're
not
doing
that.
C
Okay,
good
counsel,
any
other
thoughts,
any
feedback
for
the
team,
anything
very
good.
I
will.
I
will
jump
in
and
say
it
is
great
to
see
this
progress
occurring
on
the
renaming
of
the
people's
crossing.
It
is
also
really
heartening
to
see
those
signs
going
up
and
so
on.
I
want
to
say
that
I
recall
from
some
of
the
consultations
there
was
discussion
about
you
know
a
naming
ceremony
and
how
the
different
tribes
would
look
at
doing
that,
maybe
a
little
bit
differently
from
each
other.
C
So
I
think
it's
well
worth
thinking
about
how
to
do
that
acknowledgement,
a
public
acknowledgement
that
the
park
name
is
now
the
people's
crossing
and
that
it
has
been
done
in
collaboration
with
the
tribes.
So
I
think
that's
an
important
piece
of
this,
and
I
guess
also.
I
just
want
to
appreciate
how
much
thought
is
going
into
the
land
acknowledgement,
because
I
do
see
a
lot
of
rote
kind
of
recitations
of
words
with.
C
I
think
a
lot
of
lack
of
connection-
and
I
think
doing
it
at
the
right
times
and
in
the
right
ways
and
for
the
right
purpose,
can
kind
of
prevent
that
from
happening.
So
I
guess
I'll
say
one
last
thing
you
know
my
experience
with
decision
making
in
these
consultations
has
been
that
it's
extremely
deliberate
and
careful
and
then
once
it's
arrived
at,
it
tends
to
carry
forward
for
a
long
time.
So
I
think
the
time
invested
in
this
it
may
seem
like
it's
moving
slowly,
but
that's
kind
of
purposeful.
C
I
think
and
and
we
should
resist
any
temptation
to
be
impatient
or
rush
things.
I
think
the
pace
that's
been
going
has
shown
that
we've
been
arriving
at
some
really
important
milestones
along
the
way.
So
I
want
to
thank
everyone
involved,
particularly
the
tribes
that
have
been
part
of
the
consultations
and
getting
us
here.
So
thank
you
all
very
much.
K
A
Sure
thank
you
mayor,
so
I
guess
a
couple
of
things
I'll
say
as
we
set
off
the
conversation
right
one
is
we
had
originally
planned
to
have
you
all
come
back
after
the
july
break
and
come
back
to
council
in
person.
We
had
some
technology
issues.
We
wanted
to
work
out
just
to
make
sure
that
we
could
do
that
in
a
way
that
was
still
taking
testimony
in
a
hybrid
approach,
as
we
are
not
anticipating
opening
the
muni
building
to
the
public
until
the
fall.
A
But
since
those
initial
discussions
cases
have
certainly
been
on
the
rise,
we
have
seen
a
change
and
trends
sort
of
veering
in
the
wrong
direction
with
covid,
particularly
with
the
variant
we've
had
multiple
conversations
with
staff,
as
this
has
been
going
on.
Certainly,
I've
had
conversations
with
some
of
council
members
as
well
in
the
past,
and
we've
been
keeping
and
tracking
what
the
cdc
is
telling
us
and
monitoring
to
what
our
regional
partners
are
doing
as
well.
A
I'll
say
that
my
position
on
coming
back
into
chambers
and
coming
back
even
in
the
fall
as
we
transition
back,
has
evolved,
as
we
have
seen
some
of
these
changes
in
the
covet
variant
rise.
I
know
that
we
are
going
to
have
a
meeting
on
this
topic
with
the
county
on
august
17th,
but
thanks
to
staff
and
james
brown
and
pam
davis
in
particular,
who
put
some
numbers
together.
A
What
I'll
say
is
that
we
have
seen
in
the
past
two
or
three
weeks,
and
this
is
one
of
the
things
that
has
really
made
me-
reconsider,
where
we
are
in
the
past
two
or
three
weeks,
we've
seen
about
25
employees
been
exposed
to
coven
19.
A
Some
of
those
have
been
breakthrough
cases.
I
want
to
emphasize
that
not
every
staff
member
has
tested
positive,
but
what,
as
we
were,
being
alerted
to
that?
What
we
realize
is
that
a
lot
of
staff
members
who
had
been
exposed
and
were
being
then
tested
were
in
fact
folks
that
have
been
unvaccinated
to
date.
Yet
we've
also
seen
our
seven
day.
A
Rolling
average
in
the
county
is
about
39.4
cases
per
day
this
in
comparison
just
last
week,
the
highest
average
was
25.1,
so
we
ourselves
here
in
the
county,
are
seeing
increases
in
cases
as
we
move
forward.
A
So
with
all
of
that,
I
will
say
that
I
have
shared
with
staff
last
friday,
an
email
saying
that
we
are
and
I'll
say
too,
to
honor
staff
as
well.
Not
only
have
we
heard
concerns
from
council
and
from
community,
but
staff
members
have
also
been
sharing,
as
we
have
been
having
town
halls
and
they're
talking
to
their
directors.
A
We've
been
having
increasing
anxiety
from
staff
about
coming
to
work,
so
we
have
been
again
thinking
about
what
do
we
need
to
do
to
make
sure
we're
augmenting
our
safety
precautions
as
clearly
as
we
can,
as
all
this
has
been
going
on
I'll
say
that
I
had
a
fellow
council
member
in
another
city,
said
something
that
resonated,
but
that
resonated
with
me,
and
that
really
was
that
we
owe
it
to
ourselves
to
community
and
by
community.
A
I
think
we
have
evolved
and
we
are
now
in
a
place
where
we
have
shared
with
staff,
that
we
are
soon
to
be
issuing
new
guidelines
concerning
masking
mandates,
and
certainly
we
are
waiting
and
continuing
to
par
partner
with
our
boulder
county
counterparts
in
conformance
to
what
cdc
is
bringing
forth,
but
we're
also
moving
to
figure
out.
How
do
we
have
staff
report,
their
vaccination
status
and
allow
and
a
compromise
for
those
that
cannot
get
vaccinated
either
by
choice
or
by
religious
objections
or
for
medical
reasons,
and
we
know
that
that's
there.
A
A
So
I
share
that
to
say
that
we
are
moving
in
a
direction
to
increase
our
safety
both
to
our
public
and
to
our
staff
and
to
you
and
that
we
are
hoping
to
hear
from
you
about
the
ways
in
which
you
want
to
come
back
and
ways.
You
are
thinking
about
coming
back
into
our
public
facilities
and
into
in-person
meetings
as
we
move
forward.
C
Thank
you,
nuria
council.
I
think
the
question
before
us
really
is:
what
do
we
want
to
do
as
far
as
coming
back
in
person
there's
a
much
broader
conversation
to
be
had
about
covet
and
city
policy?
I
believe
we're
teed
up
to
have
that
conversation
on
august,
17th
and
so
tonight
the
question
before
us
really
is:
do
we
want
to
even
try
and
establish
a
date
when
we
want
to
meet
in
person?
I
think
it's
kind
of
open
forum
to
weigh
in
on
what
we're
thinking
about
that.
C
There
will
be
a
more
fulsome
discussion
of
the
entire
set
of
numbers
and
kind
of
a
big
picture
city
organizational
directions,
but
I
don't
think
we
need
to
touch
on
all
of
that
tonight.
Tonight
really
is
a
more
focused
question
to
give
direction
to
staff
on.
Are
we
anticipating
wanting
to
come
back?
C
You
know
in
two
weeks
in
a
month.
How
do
other
council
members
want
to
look
at
this?
I
certainly
have
my
opinions,
but
I'd
love
to
hear
from
the
rest
of
you
before
I
go
into
that.
So
with
that,
I'm
going
to
open
the
floor
up
and
let's
hear
from
you
guys
what
your
thoughts
are,
I
see
mark
and
then
aaron
mark
okay.
M
All
right,
first
noria,
thank
you
for
for
that
description
of
where
we're
headed.
It
certainly
does
not
create
a
lot
of
confidence
on
my
part
for
a
very,
very
quick
resumption
of
in-person
meetings.
I'm
not
sure
we
need
to
to
put
a
time
on
it.
So
much
as
we
need
to
be
responsive
to
changing
conditions
because
we're
sort
of
headed
south-
I
I
don't
really
know
if
we
even
want
to
have
the
conversation
until
we
see
you
know
a
dramatic
improvement
in
in
infections
and
hospitalizations
etc.
M
I
would
simply
leave
it
open
at
the
moment
I
mean
if,
rather
than
keep
moving
the
goal
posts,
I'd
rather
wait
for
a
moment
when
we
can
establish
the
goal
post
and
hopefully
make
it.
So
that's
simply
my
view
on
this.
Besides,.
I
M
C
Thanks
mark
aaron
and
then
rachel
aaron
yeah.
G
I
agree:
I've
been
looking
forward
to
getting
back
to
in
person,
but
with
trends
moving
in
the
wrong
direction.
Now
does
not
seem
the
time,
and
I
agree
with
mark
that
we
can
take
a
wait
and
see
position.
I
think
that's
perfectly
fine
and
then
I
know
we're
going
to
have
a
bigger
conversation
two
weeks
but
mary.
I
just
appreciate
that
you're
reevaluating
the
city's
approach
to
masking
and
vaccinations
for
city
with
employees.
So
I
appreciate
that
sounds
like
it's
moving
in
a
good
direction.
D
Yeah
thanks
for
this
nuria
a
couple
things
you
know
you're
asking
for
our
feedback
on
when
we
return.
D
If
I
understand
it
like
what
what
would
we
like
to
see-
and
so
I
will
say
for
my
part,
you
know-
and
I
think
this
applies
to
everywhere
in
the
city-
not
just
chambers,
but
I
would
hope
that
it
is
kind
of
the
trend
that
you're
looking
at
people
who
are
vaccinated
and
have
submitted
proof
of
that
or
have
been
given
a
reasonable
accommodation
that
is
set
out
in
advance
for
wearing
a
mask
or
something
that
protects
them
as
well
as
everyone
else
who's
there.
D
And
you
know
in
terms
of
everyone
else
who's
there.
I
don't
know
at
what
point
we're
thinking
about
members
of
the
public
coming,
but
that's
you
know,
I
guess
like
phase
two
or
something
of
how
we'll
have
to
think
through
that.
I
think
there
are
conversations
happening
nationally
around
vaccine
passports
and
things
like
that,
and
I
would
think
that
that
you
know
if
it's,
if
it's
something
optional
and
where
you're
going
to
be
in
a
closed
room
with
people
for
a
while.
D
I
guess
I
personally
would
hope
that
we
and
members
of
the
public
are
keeping
each
other
safe
and
same
rules
would
apply
either
you're
vaccinated
or
you're
wearing
a
mask
and
if
you're
wearing
a
mask-
and
you
don't
know
that
people
are
vaccinated,
then
I
think
maybe
we
all
have
to
wear
masks.
So
that's
that's
a
possible
number,
another
level
of
it
and
obviously
with
delta.
I
don't
my
understanding
is
that
vaccinated
people
are
passing
it
back
and
forth
as
well.
D
So
I
think
that
until
we
know
more
about
that,
it
doesn't
make
sense
to
go
back
at
all,
because
this
seems
like
a
more
optional
thing
to
be
in
chambers
and
and
along
those
lines.
I'm
glad
that
we're
getting
an
update
on
the
17th,
but
that
seems
a
little.
You
know
two
weeks
in
covid
time
is,
you
know
it
can
be
exponential,
so
in
terms
of
things
like
city
and
county
mass
mandates
and
and
what
we're
doing
with
staff.
D
Hopefully
that's
not
waiting
on
us
for
for
two
weeks
to
have
those
conversations
or
make
those
decisions.
It
seems
like
I
wouldn't
want
to
delay
any
important,
important
progress.
All.
C
L
Yeah,
I
also
want
to
acknowledge
nuria
and
her
staff
for
the
hard
work
they've
done
over
the
last
week
or
so
to
evaluate
this
situation.
As
rachel
said,
it's
a
very
dynamic
situation.
It's
changing
from
day
to
day,
and
I
appreciate
the
open
mindedness
and
the
flexibility
that
nuria
and
her
staff
have
demonstrated
in
this.
I
know
you'll
make
the
right
decisions
with
respect
to
the
more
narrow
question
about
when
council
returns
to
chambers.
I
think
we
were
all
looking
forward
to
getting
back
together.
L
A
few
weeks
ago,
we
had
a
technical
glitch
that
postponed
things
on
the
glitch
is
now
gone.
We
have
another
problem,
and
it
just
occurs
to
me
that
if
we
have
a
situation
where
community
members
are
not
going
to
be
in
chambers
with
us,
and
if
we
have
some
staff
members
who
are
concerned
about
being
in
chambers
with
each
other
or
with
us,
it
probably
doesn't
make
a
whole
lot
of
sense
for
us
to
get
together
in
chambers.
L
We
should
make
the
august
17th
meeting
virtual
as
well
we're
going
to
learn
more
then
we're
going
to
learn
more
in
in
in
for
the
rest
of
the
month
and
then,
as
we
approach
the
fall,
we
can
make
a
kind
of
a
meeting
by
meaning
determination,
whether
we
feel
comfortable
getting
back
together
and,
more
importantly,
whether
our
staff
feels
comfortable
rejoining
us
and
when
we
want
to
invite
community
members
back
into
chamber.
So
I
agree
with
mark.
L
J
AE
Judy
yeah,
I
I
do
agree
with
the
staying
online
until
we
have
further
guidance
and
examining
further
with
the
new
environment
variant
variant
that
is
coming
because
again
it's
it's
evolving
and
I
think
we
definitely
need
more
information
to
know
what
is
the
next
step.
AE
So
I
think
staying
online
for
now
is
the
best
way
to
keep
us
safe
and
keep
other
people
in
the
community
safe
as
well-
and
I
think
I've
mentioned
this
before
going
into
chamber-
is
not
for
us
it's
for
the
community
and
if
the
community
is
not
there,
I,
I
wonder,
what's
the
value
of
sitting
in
in
that
chair
next
to
your
name,
when
really
you
participate
in
chamber
so
that
you
can
be
with
community
and
there
would
not
be
any
community
because
again
with
everything
that
is
constantly
shifting
and
changing,
we
have
to
think
okay.
AE
Do
we
also
want
to
put
community
members
in
chamber
and
put
perhaps
their
lives
at
risk,
so
I'm
staying
online,
I
think,
is
the
best
way
to
go.
As
far
as
the
vaccine
passport,
I
mean
I
watch
the
news
all
the
time,
I'm
not
sure
if
that's
the
right
way
to
go,
but
I
would
say
maybe
the
city
should
consider
just
following
cdc
guidelines
and
federal
policies,
because
recently
I
think
I've
heard
president
biden
mentioning
you
know
for
federal
employees.
AE
Maybe
they
will
have
those
guidelines,
whereas
people
have
to
carry
maybe
have
some
type
of
a
vaccine
passport.
I
I
don't
know,
but
I
from
what
I've
seen
watching
the
news.
There's
heated
debate
about
that
as
well
again,
it's
about
keeping
communities
safe
and
doing
the
right
things
for
community
members,
but
again
we
still
have
to
ensure
safety
as
well.
Also
balancing
you
know
what
people
would
call
their
freedom
of
choice.
AE
So,
as
someone
who's
been
vaccinated,
I
would
say
we
still
want
to
make
people
feel
welcome,
but
also
protect
other
community
members.
From
this.
You
know
this
deadly
virus
yeah.
I
think
following
it
following
cdc,
guidelines
should
be
what
we
do
in
this
community,
as
opposed
to
going
on
on
our
own
and
figure
things
out.
B
Yeah
I'm
so
I,
the
only
thing
I
would
have
to
add
to
everything
that's
been
said
is
that
if
and
when
we
come
back
hopefully
prior
to
the
end
of
this
term,
it
should
be
done
in
a
manner
that
we
aren't
wearing
masks
at
the
dice,
because
if
we
are
wearing
masks
at
the
dice,
I
would
think
that
that
is
way
less
transparent,
no
pun
intended
than
being
in
a
zoom
call.
B
So
so,
whatever
we
do,
we
should
be
there
maskless
and
and
if
we
can't
do
it
that
way,
then
there's
really
no
point
in
doing
it.
In
3d.
C
Great,
thank
you,
mary
and
I'll.
Just
close
up
here,
I
I
agree
with
pretty
much
everything.
That's
been
said.
I
will
say:
there's
two
purposes
for
this
discussion.
I
figured
it
would
probably
land
here.
It's
no
surprise
we're
all
watching
the
news
and
watching
going
in
the
wrong
direction.
I
think
the
reason
that
we
would
like
to
return
is,
as
juni
says,
for
the
community
and
for
ourselves.
C
I
think
we
get
a
lot
more
out
of
meetings
in
person.
We
can
see
body
language
we
can
understand.
You
know
how
people
are
trying
to
express
themselves
through.
You
know
means
other
than
just
the
2d
that
we
get
here.
However,
mary's
exactly
right.
If
we're
going
to
be
wearing
masks,
we
shouldn't
bother,
and
you
know
it
will
be
assigned
to
us
into
the
community
when
we
can
get
together
safely
without
mass
in
that
room,
and
that
would
be
the
beginning
point.
C
You
know
won't
be
the
end
point
we'll
have
to
get
our
study
sessions
in
person
we'll
have
to
bring
the
public
back
to
both
council
meetings
and
study
sessions.
So
this
is
really
setting
the
expectation
that
by
and
large,
our
community,
like
everyone
else
in
the
country,
has
seen
a
setback
in
the
progress
on
covet.
C
The
the
answer
to
this
is
vaccination,
and
the
answer
to
this
is
making
it
as
widely
available
as
possible.
I
think
there's
going
to
be
some
very
large
societal
forces
that
are
going
to
come
to
bear
on
this
and
and,
as
we
have
even
higher
levels
of
vaccine
penetration,
we
may
see
a
time
when
we
can
get
back
together
in
person,
but
I
guess
I'll
say
I
don't
think
that
that's
going
to
be
well
into
september.
C
You
know,
that's
just
me.
Looking
into
a
crystal
ball,
we
each
have
one
I'm
guessing
that
it's
going
to
be
end
of
september
before
we're
going
to
return
to
a
conversation
about
when
we
might
get
together
in
person,
but
as
rachel
says,
you
know
two
weeks
in
coba
time
who
knows
what's
going
to
happen?
We
will
touch
on
this
next
week
and
I
guess
I'll
finally
say
for
all
of
us
and
for
the
benefit
of
the
community.
C
I
know
that
they're
looking
at
this
closely
they'll
be
with
us
in
two
weeks
and
we
can
talk
to
them
about
you
know
what
our
thoughts
are
on
their
actions,
but
I
expect
between
now
and
two
weeks
from
now,
we
may
hear
from
boulder
county
public
health
with
some
new
guidance
one
way
or
the
other,
so
we'll
be
paying
attention
to
that.
Thank
you
all
for
weighing
in
on
this.
I'm
disappointed
that
we
can't
be
together
in
person,
but
it
is
clearly
in
the
best
interest
of
public
safety
that
we're
not
so
thanks.
K
C
Thank
you,
alicia
and
I'll.
Just
lay
out
what
cc
has
suggested.
One
thing
I'll
state
right
off
the
bat
is
that
all
decisions
about
the
schedule
on
cu
south
will
be
adopted
by
all
of
council.
So
cac
is
bringing
suggestions.
C
C
That
is
kind
of
the
extent
that's
been
planned
out
so
far.
If
we
do
end
up
needing
to
go
to
third
reading,
a
third
reading
would
be
able
to
be
scheduled
for
october
5th,
and
that
is
kind
of
the
schedule
as
it
is
so
far.
We
have
attempted
to
take
into
account
nearby's
schedule
so
that
she
will
not
be
here,
I
believe,
on
september
14th,
but
is
committed
to
watching
the
tape
of
that
public
hearing
and
presentations
and
counsel
questions
and
then
on
september
21st.
C
I
believe
we
will
have
a
full
counsel
to
be
able
to
hear
the
to
be
able
to
have
a
full
counsel
for
deliberations,
discussion
and
any
decision,
so
I
just
wanted
to
lay
that
out
for
everyone.
I
know
it's
a
little
complicated,
but
there
are
some
state
rules
as
well
as
our
own
council
procedures.
So
I
guess
I'd
turn
it
up
to
council.
Any
questions,
feedback,
thoughts,
concerns.
B
Yes,
sam,
thank
you
for
that.
I'm
wondering
how
the
agreement
works
into
the
resolution
and
the
ordinance.
C
And
there
will
be
a
copy
of
the
agreement
with
the
first
reading
and
I
would
then
turn
to
sandra
and
any
anyone
else
in
the
city
attorney's
office
to
go
further
than
that.
I
know
there
will
be
a
version
with
first
reading
and
that's
about
all
I'm
sure
of
right
now,
sandra.
S
Yeah
mary
thanks
for
the
question
and
if
there
are
any
folks
jacob
or
anybody
else
that
wants
to
chime
in,
please
feel
free
to
do
so.
My
understanding
is
that
the
agreement
will
be
submitted
with
the
resolution
and
ordinance
on
first
reading
on.
If,
if
council
decides
that
well,
we
have
set
a
special
meeting
for
august
10th,
so
that
would
be
the
date
that
the
agreement
would
be
attached.
B
Question
well,
no,
I
guess
what
I'm
I
guess.
What
I'm
wondering
is
the
the
resolution
is
is
setting
the
the
date
for
the
hearing
and
that's
per
state
law.
The
ordinance
has
to
go
through
first
reading.
Second
reading.
Third
reading,
the
agreement
is
another
kind
of
animal,
so
the
agreement
is
something
that
is
essentially
a
document
that
is
I'll
call
it
a
living
document
for
lack
of
a
better
word
until
some
point
in
time.
B
So
how
many
versions
of
that
agreement
do
we
anticipate,
will
happen
up
until
the
time
of
the
second
reading
hearing
and
possibly
third
reading?
So
will
the
agreement
be
evolving
at
that
point
in
time?
Are
there
certain
places
where
we
expect
to
release
different
versions?
At
what
point
does
it
stop
evolving.
S
AI
No
that
that's
correct
there
are,
there
will
be
some
changes
between
first
and
second
reading.
We
are
able
to,
hopefully,
as
council
members
may
likely
know,
the
planning
board
held
a
public
hearing
and
then
deliberation
last
thursday
and
provided
a
number
of
recommendations
that
were.
AI
We
are
working
on
through
the
process,
and
so
there
will
be
an
agreement
for
first
reading
and
then
at
this
point
we
don't
have
scheduled
an
interim
release
prior
to
the
second
reading
of,
and
so
when
council
gets
the
packet
with
the
ordinance
for
second
reading,
with
the
agreement
it'll
be
released,
then
towards
the
end
of
september
or
the
end
of
august.
B
Okay,
great,
so
what
that
says
to
me
is
that
if
folks
have
feedback
either
council
community-
or
you
know
the
the
negotiators
on
either
side,
see
you
or
the
city
or
the
community.
If
anybody
has
changes,
they
have
up
until
the
deadline
of
the
release
of
the
packet
for
second
reading.
AI
AI
Absolutely
we
have
two
listening
sessions
scheduled
for
august.
One
is
on
monday
august
9
from
2
30
to
4
30.
and
the
second
one
is
thursday
august
26th
from
4
30
to
6
30..
Those
are
two
hour
sessions.
It'll
start
with
a
half
hour
briefing
q,
a
by
staff,
followed
by
an
hour
and
a
half
at
a
minimum
of
just
listening
to
community
members,
providing
their
feedback.
I
C
M
Mark
just
a
quick
question:
is
it
your
intention
well
to
forward
to
us
the
recommendations
of
the
planning
board?
I
know
they
had
quite
a
number
of
recommendations.
AI
C
Mark
I'll
just
interpret
that
as
a
request
to
staff
that
those
that
spreadsheet,
with
those
recommendations,
be
sent
out
on
hotline,
if
that's
possible,
once
you've
got
them
collected,
because
all
council
members
will
get
it
and
then
it
will
go
out
to
the
public
as
well.
C
That's
excellent,
thank
you
and
mary.
I
think
kind
of
circling
back
around
to
your
question.
We've
got
those
two
listening
sessions
in
the
be
heard.
Boulder
portal
is
also
taking
feedback
on
this.
So
you
know
if
we
are
having
the
hearing
september
14th
sometime
the
first
week
in
september,
the
packet
will
get
locked
down.
So
I
think
you
know
there's
the
ability
to
take
feedback
and
incorporate
it
heard
that
the
team's
working
on
it
up
until
kind
of
the
first
week
in
september.
B
C
All
right
any
other
points
on
the
schedule
for
see
yourself
great.
As
I
said
and
I'll
remind
us
again,
council
will
be
voting
on
each
of
these
things.
On
august
10th
we'll
be
voting.
When
we
vote
on
the
resolution,
that's
going
to
establish
that
date
suggested
to
be
september
14th,
so
everything
about
this
process
will
be
ratified
by
the
full
council.
None
of
this
schedule
will
be
set
by
cac.
Only
suggestions
brought
forward
to
default
council.
C
G
Just
to
note
that
national
night
out
was,
it
was
a
great
event:
wonderful
to
see
community
members
in
person
and
see
the
members
of
our
phenomenal
police
and
fire
department
departments,
as
well
as
some
open
space
rangers
and
others.
So,
thanks
to
everyone
who
organized
that.
C
Thank
you
aaron
for
that
much
appreciated
everybody
who
worked
on
that
aaron
before
you
and
me
by
got
here.
We
did
have
some
chit
chat
about
that
as
well.
So
we
all
agree
with
you.
I
think,
and
with
that
we'll
gavel.
The
meeting
closed
at
1009.
see
you
all
soon.