►
From YouTube: 12-16-20 City of Boulder HAB Meeting
Description
12-16-20 City of Boulder HAB Meeting
C
B
Lynn,
that's
fine!
Let
me
just
call
the
meeting
to
order.
Oh
hang
on
here.
Sorry
we're
just
gonna.
Okay,
we're
just
gonna
call
this
meeting
to
order
right
away
so
that
lynn
can
speak.
Let's
do
roll
call
real,
quick,
okay,
perfect!
I'm
just
going
to
go
across
my
screen
here,
rock
julienned.
D
E
B
Yes,
okay,
okay
and
then
judy
nog.
Here,
thanks
perfect!
Is
that
it,
I
think,
that's
up
everyone's
here
we
have
a
quorum,
of
course,
okay,
great
and
let's
review
tonight's
agenda.
I
have
an
item
to
add,
but
I
want
to
see
if
anyone
else
has
any
any
amendments
they'd
like
to
make
to
tonight's
agenda.
B
Think
I
think
it's
just
I
think
so.
I
was
just
going
to
motion
to
add
an
item
before
5a
to
briefly
discuss
amendments
to
the
ordinance
discussed
last
night
on
mobile
homes
in
manufactured
housing.
I
think
here
about
8432,
so
just
a
brief
discussion
is
that
going
to
cover
what
you,
yes,
okay,
okay,
great
great,
so
motion
to
add
an
item
before
5a
to
discuss
the
amendments
to
ordinance
8432
regarding
mobile
homes
and
manufactured
housing.
B
One
two
three
four
five
and
then
yes,
okay,
perfect
thanks
thanks
judy
passes
unanimously
and
judy.
If
you
want
to
because
your
videos
off,
if
you
feel
like,
if
you
want
us,
maybe
you
can
always
just
speak
or
raise
your
hand
just
want
to
make
sure
that
you're
going
to
be
able
to
say
what
you
need
to
say
so,
okay,
perfect
great
with
that
said,
we'll
just
move
to
public
participation
and
lynn
will
let
you
go
first
but
jay.
If
you
want
to
put
on
the
timer.
That
would
be
great.
B
C
This
week
at
the
this
is
lynn
siegel
538
dewey
this
week
at
the
cu
south
meeting,
I
had
an
epiphany
of
the
problem
to
boulders
housing
problem
housing
issue,
and
that
is,
it
was
eu
that
gave
me
this
idea
because
I
said:
there's
66
000
students.
In
the
cu
system.
C
C
Well,
I
don't
think
so,
so
we
need
to
make
it
a
research
campus,
and
I
say
if
you
want
to
make
a
reason
to
you're
not
having
to
be
here,
because,
ultimately,
you
don't
want
to
have
to
have
a
housing
board,
because
housing
is
no
problem
in
boulder.
Right
then
make
some
directive
to
the
city
of
boulder
to
get
these
students
out
of
town.
These
undergrads
need
to
go.
Francis
draper
said
it
herself.
This
is
a
research
campus.
C
We
not
only
do
we
not
need
cu
south,
we
don't
need
them,
threatening
us
about
floodplain
and
all
of
this
issue.
We've
got
plenty
of
things
that
we
have
to
cover
with
infrastructure
in
boulder.
Without
the
burden
of
this
you
know
20
some
thousand
students
that
are
undergrads
that
are
not
part
of
the
research
campus.
They
need
to
go
to
denver
and
colorado
springs.
So
just
tell
tell
the
city
of
boulder
they
may
need
to
activate
on
that
issue,
because
it's
it's
it's
a
huge
huge
thing.
C
I
was
just
at
the
east
boulder
working
group
today,
housing.
How
are
you
going
to
everybody
housing
housing?
How
are
you
going
to
house
me
and
my
family?
We
want
to
own.
You
know
the
hispanic
community,
the
service
people,
it's
not
going
to
happen.
It's
never
going
to
happen
when
we've
got
20
000
high-end
students
here
taking
up
the
population
in
this
town
and
it's
a
hundred
and
seven
thousand
people.
We
should
not
have
that
burden.
C
C
Unfortunately,
all
of
these-
it's
it's-
it's
integrated
all
of
these
different
boards
and
these
departments
are
all
integrated.
There's,
not
one
thing
that
doesn't
touch
the
other,
so
I
have
to
be
in
two
places
at
once.
Twice
this
week
same
thing,
another
night,
good.
B
H
Here
you
are,
thank
you
have
if
you
guys
could
open
up
the
email.
I
sent
you
most
recently,
the
one
that
says
easier
easier,
so
that
has
a
few
pictures
in
there
that
I
think,
will
help
us
well.
Thank
you
so
much
for
having
me
and
for
your
beautiful
service.
H
H
But
you
are
the
hope-
and
I
really
believe
that
about
you,
guys,
you're,
a
great
group
and
as
martin
luther
king
said,
land
use
and
housing
are
really
the
keys
to
overcoming
the
segregation
and
separation
that
explains
so
much
of
our
current
politics
and
now
is
really
the
time
it's
a
great,
unprecedentedly
great
time
to
transform.
H
So
I
just
want
to
sort
of
re-um
propose
this
housing
model,
this
revision
of
the
housing
model
that
we
proposed
with
the
back
porch
group
back
a
few
years
ago,
and
I
want
you
to
understand
it
that
it
aims
to
change
the
model
from
the
barbell
society
of
rich
and
poor
to
a
bell
curve
model
of
mostly
middle-income
housing
that
we
produce
not
that
we
don't
produce
low-income
housing
or
but
we're
making
mixed
income
housing.
H
And
so
it
aims
to
change
the
model
and
it
aims
to
do
it
by
creating
a
few
examples
that
have
a
lot
of
neighborhood
input
at
the
beginning
that
people
can
see,
and
then
we
can
evaluate
the
best
ideas.
So,
just
in
the
pictures
there
you
see
the
history
goose
creek
brought
together
folks
from
all
sides
of
the
housing
debate,
starting
in
2016.
We
met
for
two
years
and
they
came
up
scott
holton
there.
The
developer
on
the
left
came
up
with
the
idea
of
doing
some
pilots.
H
So
now,
let's
just
look
at
this
graph
a
little
bit-
and
this
is
you
know
the
promise
of
this
idea.
So
the
green
is
all
housing
units
that
we
produce
historically
starting
in
1960
in
the
city
of
boulder,
and
the
blue
at
the
bottom
is
for
sale,
feed
restricted.
You
know
where
it
is
and
where
it
could
go
with
our
pilot
and
in
the
middle
is
the
crash
that
has
occurred
with
for
sale,
middle-income
housing
where
there's
virtually
none
of
that
available
any
longer.
H
So
that's
the
that's
the
picture
that
we're
trying
to
improve
with
the
blue
line,
arcing
up
as
we
as
we
try
some
pilots,
and
then
we
say:
oh
here's,
here's
some
things
that
we
can
do
to
that
would
really
work
for
everyone,
let's
so
the
third,
the
final
image
there
is
just
one
example
of
a
pilot:
we
bought
750
north
street
and
we've
been
trying
to
do
this
eight
unit
micro
condo
project.
H
There
we
proposed
it
in
the
middle
the
midterm,
update
apparently
so
anyway,
we'd
we're
now
we're
just
going
to
build
a
co-op
there,
but
we'd
like
to
you
know
create
some
area
where
we
could
do
these
pilots
next
year.
Council
said
they
would
consider
it
in
the
retreat
and
we'd.
H
Like
you,
our
ask
for
you
is,
if
you
like
this
idea,
please
remind
council
members
by
email
or,
however,
that
it
would
be
great
to
consider
that
in
the
retreat-
and
maybe
you
all
could
take
this
idea
up
next
year,
you've
been
doing
great
work,
the
tiny
homes,
the
homeless
issue
very
important,
and
this
is
part
of
that.
You
know.
H
B
Thanks
david,
I
just
have
a
quick
follow-up
question.
Is
that
graphic
the
last
one
or
the
the
rendering
is
that
is?
That
is
this
sorry,
if
I
missed
this,
is
this
a
land
trust
proposal
or
is
this
this
is
or
is
this
a
middle-income
housing?
I'm
sorry,
I
didn't
have
time
to
delve
into
everything.
Is
this.
H
So
the
land
trust
owns
the
land,
the
people
who
buy
the
units
own
their
units-
and
you
know
so-
these
units
cost
a
hundred
and
fifty
to
four
hundred
thousand
dollars
in
that
model.
Now
we're
going
to
do
a
co-op
instead,
where
the
shares
are
200
dollars
and
two
hundred
fifty
thousand
dollars,
but
it
costs
you.
You
know
thirteen
hundred
to
two
thousand
dollars
a
month.
I
J
Hey
david,
it's
jack,
a
question
or
maybe
a
couple
questions
for
you.
I
want
to
understand
so
the
the
challenge
with
this
project
that
you've
got
in
front
of
us
here,
and
the
reason
that
you're
now
doing
a
co-op
is
simply
because
the
city,
the
city
process
didn't
allow
for
the
density
that
you
were
looking
for
on
this
lot
is
that
right.
H
We
had
a
big
win,
you
know
in
we,
you
know
the
housing
boulder
2014
2015
identifies
this
as
the
key
priority
then
midterm
or
the
update.
We
got
this
idea
of
doing
infill
pilots
into
the
boulder
valley,
comprehensive
plan,
and
we
thought
oh
we're
home
free
now,
but
you
know
we
tried
all
different
ways:
they
just
couldn't
figure
out
how
to
do
it.
H
Bob
yates
says
we'll
put
it
in
the
midterm
update
and
let's
discuss
it
there,
so
we
do
that,
but
still
there's
just
this
block
and
council
actually
considers
it,
but
they
can't
you're
not
supposed
to
do
anything
important
in
the
midterm.
Update
turns
out
so
so
now
at
the
retreat.
You
know,
sam
weaver
was
for
it.
We
met
with
him,
he
was
for
it.
Many
council
people
were
for
it.
So
it's
just
one
of
those
ideas
that
people
need
to
consider
and
think
about.
H
Oh
here's
a
way
we
can
actually
have
beautiful
housing,
everyone
likes
it.
They
saw
it,
they
toured
it.
You
know
this
version
of
it
that
version
of
it.
I'd
like
to
have
this
next
to
me,
I'm
not
threatened
by
this.
It's
not
going
to
decrease
property
value.
Well,
they're
doing
this
shared
vehicles
not
going
to
not
going
to
increase
traffic,
it's
going
to
reduce
traffic,
not
going
to
block
anyone's
view
wow.
We
can
do.
J
G
K
H
You
know
not
just
this
one
idea,
you
know,
maybe
you
have
one
or
charlotte
has
one
or
terry
has
one
or
whoever
you
know.
That
was
what
you
know.
Jay
was
trying
to
help
us
create.
You
know,
have
a
have
a
something
that
meets
certain
criteria,
but
it
could
take
different
forms
and
we
were
just
showing
here's
how
you
could
do
it
without
a
subsidy
on
one
lot
all
permanently
affordable,
no
added
cars,
and
so
would
you
our
example.
J
H
J
G
H
Nod
of
five
we've
written
an
ordinance
staff,
you
know
someone
smart,
like
jay
et
cetera,
could
could
you
know,
take
what
we've
we've
written
up
and
and
make
it
something
council
consider
it
they
could
vote
on
it
and
we
could
all
get
off
to
the
races.
We
build
five.
The
first
year
we
build
ten
the
next
year,
all.
B
No,
no,
no,
you
guys
can
con
continue
the
conversation
another
time
and
I
I
will
also
follow
up
with
you.
Oh
sorry,
didn't
mean
to
ask
son
meet
you,
my
bad
okay,
jay.
You
can
unshare
your
screen.
I
think
unless
there
are
other
speakers-
oh
william,
sorry,
I
william,
would
you
like
to
speak
as,
oh
sorry,
sorry.
I
asked
to
unmute
him
sorry
guys,
I'm
like
not
doing
so
hot.
G
B
A
B
B
No
okay,
great
perfect.
Can
I
get
a
motion
to
approve
the
minutes
from
november
18th,
all
right,
danny
close
the
motion
seconded
all
in
favor
great
passes
unanimously
and
now
we'll
move
on
to
matters
from
the
board,
but
I'm
just
going
to
meet
myself
for
one
second,
because
my
parents
are
speaking
and
it's
really
distracting.
B
B
B
You
know,
in
our
letter
rachel
friend
suggested
that
our
board
look
at
ordinance
8432
the
amendments
to
the
ordinance
in
january
to
our
next
meeting,
so
that
we
can
provide
council
with
some
suggestions
for
their
second
reading
and
numerous
council
members,
including
kurt
fernham,
agreed
that
you
know
we
discussed
this
item
in
greater
depth
and
I
know
that
jay
might
want
to
speak
to
this
a
little
bit.
Jay
there's
I
know
you
and
corey
were
talking
about
some
back
and
forth
with
some
other
staff
members.
L
Yeah,
so
I
can
provide
a
little
bit
of
background.
I
was
also
on
the
council
meeting
last
night,
so
what
the
project
manager
can
do
is
she
can
prepare
a
presentation
and
send
you
guys
a
memo
sort
of
in
there
it'll
be
in
our
in
your
standard
packet
in
january,
and
you
know
be
great
to
get
your
feedback
as
council
requested,
and
then
we
would
basically
delay
first
reading
and
second
reading
to
adopt
the
ordinance.
L
The
only
sort
of
slight
wrinkle
is
that
mary
young
was
concerned
that
this
was
this
was
kind
of
time
sensitive.
So
if
you
recall
the
the
manufactured
housing
strategy,
the
you
know
have
reviewed
that
provided
feedback
input
and
then
the
ordinance
was
sort
of
the
implementation
piece
and
that
the
main
bulk
of
that
95
of
it
went
to
council
back
in
september
and
was
adopted.
And
then
this
sort
of
little
piece
sort
of
was
a
an
add-on
sort
of
last-minute
request
from
park.
L
It
was
from
park
residents
requesting
some
additional
protections
and
so
the
desire
there
was
a
desire
to
get
that
done
fairly
quickly
and
by
the
end
of
the
year.
So
I
think
what
mary
young
had
asked
for
was
to
find
out
if
that
the
amendments
that
crystal
under
the
project
manager
had
proposed
were
addressed
all
their
concerns
sufficiently
and
if
there
was
an
urgency
to
get
this
done
quicker
and
that
csc
at
their
first
meeting
in
january,
would
sort
of
make
the
final
decision.
L
I
think
our
recommendation
is
still
going
to
be
to
have
it
come
back
to
hab,
but
I
just
wanted
to
warn
you
if
there
was
sort
of
a
an
outcry
from
sort
of
those
residents
saying
that
we
want
these
protections
in
place
sooner.
That
may
change.
So
does
that
help,
or
is
that
way
too
much
information.
G
L
B
Yeah
mason
and
then
shock.
F
And
I
think
jackie
were
first,
if
you
wanna,
if
you
wanna,
okay,
from
what
I
heard
last
night,
when
I
was
watching
it
was
that
kurt
was
for
us
hearing
it
and
at
the
very
end,
what
mary
and
rachel
agreed
to
get
their
needs
met
was
that
we
would
hear
about
it
on
j
in
our
meeting
on
january
20th
and
that
the
hope
is
that
we
could
come
up
with
something
by
then.
So
I
I
kind
of
have
two
parts
is
that
last
night
kurt
had
said
the
reason
we
hadn't
seen.
F
It
was
because
we
were
working
on
other
things,
and
so
I'm
curious
why
this
didn't
come
to
us
sooner
instead
of
and
then
we
wouldn't
have
had
to
delay
this
at
all
and
if
no
matter
what
it
could
be
prepared
and
presented
to
us
on
the
night
or
on
the
20th,
so
that
in
the
future,
we're
already
brought
up
to
speed
on
where
this
is
at,
so
that
I
I'm
hearing
from
a
couple
of
the
different
mobile
home
parks
that
there's
been
some
consistent
stuff
going
on
there
and
that
there
may
be
a
request
for
us
to
potentially
in
the
future.
F
With
city
council
participate
around
some
issues
with
mobile
home
parks.
So
I'd
like
to
be
informed
on
it,
no
matter
what
and
see
it
and
hear
the
presentation
so
that
we
have
the
information
and-
and
we
can
go
forward
with
the
recommendation-
whether
you
guys
recommend
staff
recommends
we
postpone
or
not.
L
So
yeah,
I
agree
the
second
point,
yes,
that
we
can
definitely
do
a
presentation,
regardless
of
what
the
outcome
is
at
the
cac
meeting
in
january.
L
Let's
do
your
first
point,
so
I
mean
the
reason
you
that
have
did
not
hear
the
ordinance
is
that
I
brought
I
did
bring
it
to
the
chairs.
I
think
it
was
in
either
july
or
august.
I
don't
know
jacques
or
judy
you're
gonna
have
to
help
me
remember,
but
the
focus
at
that
time
was
really
on
the
unhoused
issues
and
the
chairs
basically
declined
that.
L
I
think
the
the
sentiment
that
I
heard
and
that
I
remember
is
that
hab
really
focused
in
and
provided
input
on,
the
policy
which
was
strategy
and
that
the
ordinance
was
more
implementation
and
that
there
was
a
desire
to
focus
on
these
other
things.
So,
under
jacques
judy.
E
I
have
absolutely
no
recollection
of
that
at
all
and
would
be
surprised
because,
because
I
want
to
say
something
in
a
little
while
about
us
getting
more
information,
I
mean
my
my
to
me.
This
is
a
good
example
of
something
that
I
would
like,
if
possible,
for
you
to
talk
to
all
the
departments
within
housing
that
anything
that
comes
up
about
housing.
E
It
comes
to
our
comes
to
our
table,
whether
or
not
I
mean
just
comes
to
our
table
and
the
that
that
the
consensus
be
included
in
the
minutes.
So
it's
in
writing
that
anything,
that's
related
to
housing.
We
want
to
hear
about
we
and
we,
as
a
group
may
decide
to
not
discuss
it
for
whatever
reason,
but
I
think
we
should
know
about
it,
and
I
and
I
actually
don't
recall-
maybe
you
do
jacques,
but
I
don't
recall
that
at
all.
J
J
In
other
words,
I
guess
my
question
is
this
one
I'm
been
rolling
through
this
over
the
course
of
the
afternoon
since
I
saw
it
and
I
would
still.
J
My
perspective,
I
don't
I'm
not
I'm.
This
seems
to
be
a
reasonable
shift.
This
ordinance
this
change.
So
I
guess
one
of
the
questions
I
had
for
you
jay
is.
I
do
agree
that
I
think
we
were
in
the
homeless,
the
unhoused
world
pretty
heavily
at
that
point,
and
I
think
that
I
do
recall
sitting
and
just
saying.
Well,
we
think
that's
the
implementation
piece
of
things
as
you
described
it
and
we
weren't
sure
that
we
needed
to
be
involved
in
that
piece
of
it.
J
J
So
are
there
particular
aspects
of
this
jay
that
there
are
concerns
about
that?
We
think
that
have
made.
F
Well,
it
just
seems
like
we're
talking
about
processing
content.
You
know
which
we've
been
trying
to
shake
out
over
our
three
years
of
birth
anyway,
so
the
process
piece
when
jay
or
anybody
from
housing
brings
something
to
the
housing
advisory
board.
F
If
the
chair
and
vice
chair,
you
know
how
do
we,
let
us
decide
as
a
group
and
like
judy
said
so
that
we
can
hear
everything
and
somebody
may
bring
up
something
like
it
may
seem
reasonable
to
you,
jacques,
but
it
I
might
having
had
lived
experience
at
a
mobile
home
park,
see
something
that
somebody
else
might
not
see
so
being
included
and
being
able
to
have
that
conversation,
I
think,
is
important.
It
should
always
be
presented
so
that
we
could
be
brought
up
to
speed,
then
with
the
content
side
of
it.
F
Yes,
you
know
rachel
brought
up
a
really
good
point.
I
heard
this
on
on
a
different
side
of
it
is
that
she
was
like
sometimes
hab
or
any
of
the
boards
are
always
a
part
of
things
that
are
contentious,
so
we're
always
grappling
with
something
that's
contentious
and
she
goes.
Maybe
this
is
just
a
win.
Maybe
it's
easy
and
we
all
get
to
go
yeah
we're
on
board
with
it
and
stamp
it,
and
it
goes
off
and
it
gets
to
be
the
easy
win.
J
And
I
would
I
would
my
you
know,
I
would
respond
to
that
as
I
actually
agree
with
that
process
piece.
You
know.
I
think
this
was
within
the
process
if
we
have
it
set
up,
but
I
agree
with
you
that,
for
instance,
had
I
seen
this
at
that
point
in
time,
and
I
don't
even
know
if
this
was
a
completed
document
at
that
point
in
time,
jay
so.
J
I
So
I
and
I
I
agree
both
mason
and
jock,
and
I
guess
my
question
is:
how
are
we
trying
to
figure
out
how
to
do
this
as
a
process
where
you
know
we
have
a
heads
up?
So
if
we're
gonna
have
the
whole
board,
address
it
and
discuss
and
figure
it
out,
so
that
would
obviously
have
to
be
in
a
meeting.
So
we
make
that
decision
at
a
meeting.
How
much
time
would
we
have
typically
jay?
I
Do
you
think
until
this
thing's
moving
forward,
because
you
know
for
it's
like
let's
say
we
had
something
at
the
december
meeting
and
you
know
almost
like
we're
talking
about
right
now,
you
know,
would
we
have
that
opportunity
to
say
yep?
We
want
to
have
a
have
this
as
a
agenda
item
for
the
next
meeting
right,
because,
if
we're
figuring
these
things
out
on
the
fly,
we
might
not
have
the
background
or
the
time
frame
to
you
know
have
that
substance
discussion.
I
B
Yeah
danny,
I
was
gonna,
propose
yeah.
I
definitely
think
that
in
january
we
do
a
deeper
dive
into
this,
because
I
know
not.
Everyone
has
had
a
chance
to
look
at
the
at
the
ordinance
itself.
I
was
only
able
to
get
through
like
half
today,
so
I
I
like
that
process.
But
jacques,
did
you
have
your
hand
up
again?
B
J
I
did
sorry,
but
then
I
started
eating
a
christmas
cookie.
One
of
my
one
of
my
subs
brought
me
a
huge
tray
of
cookies.
Today,
like
perfect.
What
I
was
going
to
respond
to
was
the
process
piece
a
little
bit
and
is
it?
Is
it
possible
and
everybody
just
you
know,
just
looking
for
feedback?
Is
it
possible
to
say
that
if
something
like
this
comes
up,
that
is
a
housing-related
issue
that
we
can
just
be
provided
that
information
outside
of
a
meeting.
J
You
know
at
any
point
in
time
jay
and
we
can
review
it.
For
instance,
let's
say
this
came
up.
We
can
review
it
prior
to
meeting
and
if
members
wish
feel
that
there's
something
of
import
in
there
that
we
want
to
grapple
with
or
that
should
be
brought
up.
Like
mason
says
you
know,
there
are
things
that
I'm
not
aware
of,
and
others
may
be
or
perspectives.
J
I
I
So
the
agenda
is
the
mechanism
to
provide
notice
for
the
public
as
well,
and
you
know
if
we're
talking
about
like
if
we're
saying
like
hey,
if
there's
anything
housing
related
from
any
of
the
different
city
departments,
we
want
to
know
about
it
and
I'm
not
I'm
I'm
open
for
anything,
I'm
just
trying
to
figure
out
how
to
do
it
so
how
much
time
frame
we
have
and
how
we
can
have
a
mechanism
where
we
decide
what
we
want
to
hit
and
what
we
don't
want
to
hit,
because
I
think
we
need
to
make
that
decision
at
a
at
a
a
a
meeting,
a
public
meeting
and
then
we
need
to
schedule
it
for
it,
and
sometimes
we
can
pop
it
into
the
agenda,
but
it's
just
a
little
challenging.
F
Having
stopped
sat
through
a
lot
of
those
meetings
on
the
agenda
one
especially
now
year,
three,
it's
getting
less
and
less
and
less
that
the
city
even
brings
anything
to
us.
So
I
personally
would
be
for
it's
an
always
a
yes.
F
If
the
city
brings
something
to
us
and
wants
us
to
consider
or
see
or
view
something,
it
should
always
go
on
the
agenda
when
we
originally
had
the
meetings,
especially
in
the
first
year,
the
big
concern
was
when
we
were
trying
to
figure
out
our
direction
was
that
because
there
were
so
many
activists
and
people
interested
in
housing
that
we
would
get
so
many
projects
from
the
individual
board,
members
that
that's
what
we
would
manage
most
is
whose
issue
should
be
on
the
agenda
or
who's
whose
initiative
or
project
that
they
want
to
work
on
should
be
on
the
agenda.
F
But
we've
never
had
that
issue
and,
like
I
said
it's
gotten
less
and
less
and
less.
I
I'm
not
sure
that
I
could
imagine
another
year
like
our
first
year,
where
we
literally
had
maybe
nine
things
every
agenda.
It
was
a
crazy.
We
were
covering
a
lot
of
information
and
even
doing
the
un
house
stuff
we
should.
We
should
have
been
able
to
get
one
or
two
more
items
and
to
any
one
of
our
agendas.
So
I
don't
think
personally,
we
should
ever
deter
our
housing
departments
from
bringing
something
to
us.
D
One
the
the
idea
of
well,
first
of
all,
I
think
the
issue
at
hand
right
now
is
whether
we
review
this
ordinance
or
not
dealing
with
mobile
homes,
and
I
think,
we've
kind
of
gone
way
off
that
topic
and
talking
about
every
potential
housing
field.
D
One
thing
two
things:
one:
the
idea
of
having
every
potential
housing
issue
anywhere
in
the
city
coming
before
us
is
to
me
a
little
broad,
that's
one
and
two.
I
think
what
we're
trying
to
talk
about
now
is
this
ability
to
hear
this
positiveness
right
or
the
mobile
home
ordinance.
I'm
sorry
whether
we're
gonna
weigh
in
on
this
in
january
or
thereafter,
is
that
the
topic
at
hand.
It
seems
like
we've
taken
that
and
gone
way
left
of
center
talking
about
process
of
having
more
issues,
or
am
I
missing
something.
B
Absolutely
the
intent
is
for
us
to
have
a
deeper
discussion,
a
deeper
dive
in
january.
If
timing
was
an
issue,
I
was
judy.
Sorry,
I'm
delaying
you
you're
going
to
be
after
this,
but
you
know
if
timing
is
an
issue.
If
the
dates
are
a
problem,
how
can
can
we
move
our
meeting
a
week
earlier?
B
How
can
we,
how
can
we
make
ourselves
more
useful
to
counsel
if
you
know
if,
if
the
date's
an
issue
and
that's
going
to
prevent
us
from
you
know
discussing
it
at
all
I'd
say
we
just
move
our
meeting,
but
you
know
we'll
see
what
other
people
think
about
that.
I
just
wanted
to
throw
that
out.
There.
D
D
Line
up
so
I
think
your
idea
of
if
we
have
to
have
a
special
meeting,
I
don't
know
if
that's
possible
or
if
we
have
to
move
our
meeting
to
to
be
able
to
weigh
in
before
council,
makes
the
final
decision
I'm
all
for
that,
but
yeah.
I
think
the
issue
at
hand
right
now
is
you
know.
Are
we
going
to
hear
about
this
or
not
we're
not
sure,
and
I
think
we
all?
I
don't
know
if
we
all,
but
I
would
like
to
hear
about
it.
B
Yeah
so
jay,
if
we
decide
if
we
can
move
our
meeting
a
week
earlier-
and
I
don't
have
a
calendar
in
front
of
me-
would
that
put
us
in
the
window
that
council
wants
us
us
in
since
this
is
a
timely
issue,
and
I
know
there
was
concern,
let's
see
so.
E
I
was
looking
one
of
the
things
I
wanted
to
point
out
was
at
the
city
council
meeting
adam
accidentally,
inadvertently
gave
the
wrong
time.
He
said
our
meetings
are
on
the
third
wednesday
of
every
month
and
I'm
pretty
sure
they're
on
the
fourth
wednesday,
aren't
they
of
every
month.
So
the
date,
the
date
of
our
january
meeting.
B
E
B
B
B
Yeah
so
with
that
said,
jay
the
question
still
stands.
If
we
meet
the
13th
instead
of
the
20th,
when
is
the
cac
meeting
or
what
like
or
I
don't
know
wednesday.
L
Well,
for
now
it's
scheduled
so
they'll
decide
on
january
4th
at
cc
whether
or
not
to
postpone
it
and,
like
I
said
our
recommendation
is
going
to
be
to
postpone
it.
So
I
don't
think
it's
an
issue.
I
mean
if
you
would
like
to
move
it
up
and
try
to
be
more
timely.
We
could
try
to
arrange
that,
but
it
is
a
bit
of
a
challenge
trying
to
get
everybody's
schedule,
aligned.
B
Understood
yeah
danny.
I
I
I
think
I
think,
particularly
in
this
instance
moving
it
up.
I
mean
I
think
that
makes
a
lot
of
sense
and
we
don't
have
to
worry.
I
mean
it'd
be
really
important
if
we
just
have
that
you
know
scheduling
snafu,
so
if
we
can
move
it
up
to
the
13th,
it
works
for
me,
and
maybe
we
just
we
just
make
a
vote,
that
you
can
indicate
that
you
know
we're
all
willing
to
move
it
up
to
the
13th
or
something.
I
But
I'd
like
to
just
have
that
ahead
of
time,
because
then
we
have
that
opportunity
to
you
know,
have
some
lead
time
there
for
council
and
then
not
make
the
decision
to
postpone
without
knowing
what
we're
doing
so.
F
Okay,
so
if
we
move
our
meeting
to
the
13th,
would
there
be
a
reason
to
suggest
on
the
fourth
to
postpone
it
then.
L
I
guess
it
depends
on
you
know
the
outcome
and
the
type
of
feedback
we
get
and
how
long
it
takes,
but
yeah.
No
I
mean
we
can.
We
can
arrange
it.
I
mean
we
could
look
at
schedules
right
now
and
choose
that
date.
B
Yeah
I
mean,
since
that's
the
agenda
item
that
we're
on.
I
think
we
we
should
just
deal
with
it
right
now
upon
first
glance
of
everyone's
schedule.
How
is
it
would
everyone
be
able
to
attend
the
third
sorry
which
date
the
13th
january
13th
meeting
one
two?
Yes,
three?
Yes,
three,
yes,
four
five
and
then
maybe
from
juliet
okay,
okay,
okay,
I
mean
corey.
G
A
Yeah
I'll
be
there
that
week,
I
have
a
council
memo
actually
due
that
morning.
Okay,
let
me.
A
Actually,
second
reading
is
going
to
be
going
to
council
that
morning.
My
memo
submission
for
for
this
ordinance.
B
Wow,
okay,
then
I
will
propose
a
motion
to
move
our
january
20th
meeting
to
the
13th.
E
G
B
Perfect
passes
unanimously
great
and
then
sorry,
okay,
okay
great
now
that
we've
dealt
with
that,
I
know
that
there
are
some
outstanding
comments
that
want
to
be.
You
know,
folks
were
making
about
which
items
are
brought
to
have.
Are
all
the
items
regarding
housing
brought
to
hab.
E
E
We
should
hear
about
it
and
I'd
like
it
to
not
be
jay's
responsibility
to
have
to
chase
after
every
department
all
the
time
to
find
that
out.
I
I
would
just
like
it
if
we
could
have
a
consensus
that
we'd
like
to
know
as
soon
as
we
as
soon
as
staff
starts
working
on
a
project.
That's
going
to
counsel
in
housing
and
human
services
that
that
kurt
knows
to
tell
his
staff
people
to
notify
us
and
then
then
we
can
decide
at
a
meeting.
E
L
Well
so
I
just
want
to
be
clear,
I
mean
to
me
the
process.
Question
is
not
necessarily
about
staff
bringing
it
to
have,
because
I
did
raise
this
and
I
said
this
would
be
appropriate
for
have
to
review.
E
How
about
if,
instead
of
having
it
be
an
agenda
item
in
your
report,
you
know
how
you're
you've
got
that
section
in
the
agenda.
That's
the
staff
report.
You
just
tell
us
each
each
meeting
about
all
the
things
that
are
coming
up
and
that
way
it
goes
right
to
everybody
there.
You
know,
I
I'm
really
surprised.
I
mean
I'm
I'm
worried
about
me
having
memory
issues,
because
I
lived
in
a
mobile
home
park
myself
for
a
year
and
a
half
and
I
I'd
be
shocked.
E
If
I
let
that
go
because
it's
very
important
to
me,
so
I
I
actually
don't
recall
it
at
all,
and
if
I-
and
if
I
let
it
go,
I'm
really
sorry-
and
you
know-
and
I
don't
even
think
I
was
vice
chair
in
july
anymore,
but
anyway
yeah.
So
if
you
could
just
give
a
report
everything
that's
going
on,
then
the
whole
hab
could
hear
everything.
L
B
Yeah
I
mean
I
mean
what
happened
has
happened
like
we
can't
change
what
happened
in
the
past.
I
you
know
I'll
tell
you
that,
if
anything
has,
if
anything
comes
to
my
attention
from
counsel,
it
would
be
on
the
agenda
we
just
I
just
haven't.
Had
that
experience
where
council
asks
us
to
look
at
anything,
and
so
that's
where
that's
where
that's
the
mindset
I've
been
operating
in,
but
I
I
agree
with
judy.
If
council
it
is
going
to
look
at
anything
related
to
housing,
we
should
look
at
it.
B
It
shouldn't
even
be
it's
like.
It
shouldn't
even
be
a
choice.
It
should
just
come
to
our
board
because
that's
what
our
board
does.
It
doesn't
need
to
be
this
like
carried
out
thing
at
all.
It's
just
a
matter
of
like
how
that
information
is
transferred
to
us,
but
as
for
now
we
will
be
discussing
this
in
january,
which
is
great,
and
I
wanted
to
segue
to
danny.
You
had
your
hand
up.
I
Yeah-
and
I
I
think
you
know
somebody
brought
up
if
council
sends
something
to
us,
I
think
that's
obviously
I
agree.
That's
a
no-brainer,
that's
you
know,
obviously
we're
gonna
I'll,
listen
to
it
with
the
other
way.
I
wouldn't
want
it
to
be
too
much
of
an
imposition
just
on
jay
or
something
like
that.
So
that's
why
I
was
saying
if
it's
like
here's,
a
list
of
things
that
are
you
know
in
the
works,
go
on
the
city
council
and
I
think
judah.
This
is
what
you're
saying
I
would.
I
I
hope
it's
just
just
housing
related
right
and
not
just
housing
and
human
services,
not
as
broad
as
that,
but
here's
a
list
of
the
things
that
are
going
and
we
can
have
that
just
as
a
quick
line
item
and
hey,
do
you
want
to
listen?
Do
you
want
to
delve
into
any
of
these
any
further,
and
then
we
make
a
decision
each
meeting
for
maybe
the
next
meeting
or
something
like
that
that
outside
of
that
it
gets
a
little
squirrely.
I
think.
F
Jay,
it
seems
we've
fallen
away
from
this,
but
something
jeff
used
to
do
is
that
we
had
the
housing
department's
work
plan.
So
we
had
our
work
plan
and
the
schedule
of
that,
and
then
we
had
the
housing
department's
work
plan
and
what
we
did
was
in
the
agenda
meetings.
We
looked
at
what
was
coming
up
for
you
guys
and
because
there
were
so
many
things
going
through
at
that
time
on
how
to
place
them
in
we
did
it.
F
E
J
E
And,
as
I
recall,
it
also
came
out
in
in
the
agenda
with
the
agenda
the
work
plan,
the
account
the
council
work
plan
came
out
too
sure.
L
So
I
can
do
that.
I
I
will
do
that
for
the
next
meeting.
I
think
we
fell
away
from
that
just
because
the
number
of
agenda
items
was
getting
so
thin.
L
B
B
Thanks
jay
juliet.
M
Just
to
tack
on
to
that,
when
you're
looking
at
those
future
subjects,
jay.
M
G
M
Have
my
hang
on,
can
you
hear
me
now.
M
Me
out,
okay,
high
tech
issues,
so
my
comment
is
as
you're
as
you're
gathering
that
information.
M
M
So
when,
when
they
say,
weigh
in
on
this,
what
do
they
need
us
to
weigh
in
on
what
specifically-
and
I
know
in
the
past,
when
we've
had
issues
come
up,
staff
will
will
present
some
information,
and
then
they
pose
questions
to
the
group
saying
what
does
hab
think
about
this
or
that,
and
so
knowing
those
in
advance
also
helps
frame.
The
the
thinking
before
we
come
to
the
meetings.
B
Thanks
julia,
I
I
agree
so
we've
gone
just
like
create
our
own
agenda
item,
so
I
apologize,
but
I
I
felt
like
this
needed
to
be
discussed
terry.
I
know
you're
like
oh,
my
god,
but
this
needed
to
be
addressed
so
jay.
Thank
you
so
much
for
heeding
this.
These
comments
and
I
really
appreciate
the
the
work
that
you're
gonna
do
on
this
moving
forward
and
let
me
make.
D
It
charlotte,
I
think,
it's
a
good
idea
I
would
like.
I
would
like
to
have
more
more
topics
to
to
discuss
and
more
topics
to
weigh
in
on.
I.
I
think
that
would
be
really
good.
I
just
want
to
make
sure
we
we
don't
get
hit
with
five
things
a
month
to
just
spend
hours
talking
about.
Should
we
talk
about
this?
Should
we
not
talk
about
this?
When
really
nobody
even
asked
us
to
talk
about
it?
If
it
becomes
a
few
more
topics,
I
really
would.
D
I
would
like
to
see
more
issues
coming
through
our
table,
just
in
a
way
that
we're
somewhat
useful,
rather
than
just
us
talking
amongst
ourselves
as
to
whether
we
should
or
shouldn't
talk
about
it
and
does
anybody
even
you
know,
want
our
input,
that's
nice,
but
I
would
like
to
see
more
topics.
You
know.
B
If
it
becomes
a
problem
where
we
have
just
too
much
to
discuss,
you
know
we'll,
we
can
evaluate
it
then,
but
you
know,
as
she
said,
or
you
know,
we've
been
thinning
out
in
terms
of
topics
so
yeah,
okay,
so
I'm
gonna.
Are
there
other
comments?
Otherwise,
I
would
like
to
move
on
okay,
no
great,
okay!
Thank
you
all
that
was
really
that
was
really
great,
so
we're
just
gonna
move
to
the
committee
and
project
liaison
reports
judy.
B
E
So
the
joint
committee
is
temporarily
done
meeting
and
we
plan
on
meeting
one
more
time
towards
the
end
of
the
month.
I
think-
and
so
this
is
the
report
we
wrote
and
it's
pretty
self-explanatory.
We
talk
a
little
bit
of
the
background
of
how
it
came
to
be,
and
then
we
talk
about
the
things
we've
done.
We've
done
the
tiny
homes
village
pilot
report,
the
safe
parking
lot
report.
E
E
We
worked
a
lot
on
the
data
and
the
dashboard
and
have
concerns
about
that
as
we
stated
or
ideas
that
we
think
might
be
helpful
for
changes
and
we
definitely
support
an
oversight
committee.
We
felt
that
in
the
research
we
did
the
county,
we
thought
the
county
was
going
to
set
up
their
own
oversight
committee
and
that's
not
exactly
what
they
had
in
mind.
E
They
brought
a
few
people
in
to
discuss
a
few
certain
aspects,
but
there
really
is
a
county
oversight
committee,
and
so
we
highly
encourage
that
and
then
and
then
that's
all
this
is
being
presented
at
hrc
at
their
next
meeting
and
then
and
then
we
we
plan
on
turning
in
these
reports.
E
You
know
our
final
reports
to
council,
with
with
all
the
attachments,
as
well
as
the
initial
recommendations,
so
they
can
remember
what
hrc
and
hab
recommended
initially
way
back
in
june,
and
and
that
was
that
we
feel
that
there's
lots
of
work
that
can
be
done,
but
that
the
interests
of
hab
and
hrc
are
a
little
bit
different.
Just
because
of
what
we're
supposed
to
be
doing.
The
human
relations
committee
is
more
interested
in
things
like
terminology
such
as
being
service
resistant.
E
They
don't
like
that
language
and
feel
it's
really
important
to
get
that
changed,
because
that
implies
that
people
are
resisting
services
for
homelessness
when,
when
it
really
is,
is
they
don't
qualify
by
nature
of
they
don't
want
to
give
up
their
car
whatever
and
and
then
for
us,
we're
really
interested
and
we're
segueing
off
into
studying
tiny
homes,
and
all
that
we
should
be
more
interested
in
the
housing
aspects
of
it.
E
So
we
there
may
be
overlaps
where
the
two
groups
might
want
to
work
together
on
something,
but
we
think
each
group
can
carry
on
with
the
particular
areas
of
most
interest
to
each
one.
E
Yes
well,
where
it's
already
being
done:
the
costs
are
available
and
even
the
breakdowns
on
the
cost,
but
these
right
now
like
in
longmont,
for
example,
the
tiny
home
village,
is
of
no
cost
to
the
city,
the
monies
being
the
the
land
owner
donated
the
land
and
the
non-profit
is
raising
the
money
for
all
the
building
so
and
the
safe
parking
lot
is
is
the
same:
it's
no
cost
to
the
city,
so
both
of
those
are
no
cost
to
the
city,
and
there
have
been
there
are
yes,
okay,
thanks.
B
Okay,
thanks
judy.
I
I
also
have
one
more
question
with
regards
to
the
data
and
the
dashboard.
Do
you
know
when
there's
a
count
of
I
don't
know
if
it's
yearly
or
but
you
know,
every
two
years
you
mason.
I
think
you
know
this
the
answer
to
this.
How
many,
how
often
are
unhoused
individuals
counted?
Do
you
know
once
a
year
once
a
year.
B
Right,
so
that's
what
I
was
going
to
say
like
who
counts
as
unhoused
is
it
you
know,
and
then
there's
this
invisible
population?
That's
not
counted
people
who
are
surfing
couches
living
in
cars.
Like
all
these,
you
know
people
just
getting
by
not
living
on
the
street,
but
you
know
you
know
making
do,
and
so
I
know
that
in
california
this
is
a
problem.
There's
this
invisible
population,
that's
always
left
out
and.
E
F
They
have
to
have
a
certain
amount
of
volunteers
that
go
out
and
do
it
and
there
is
based
on
some
information
out
of
california
like
a
percentage
pad
on
what
we
think
are
people
living
on
sofas
and
in
vehicles,
and
those
were
all
I
mean
I
I
don't
have
it
readily
available,
but
I
I
got
really
close
to
adding
up
all
those
numbers
for
what
we
think
boulder
county's
at
when
I
was
backing
into
boulder
county's
numbers.
E
But
also
anecdotally,
it's
pretty
well
understood
from
people
who
have
lived
experience
or
people
who
are
advocates
that
the
number
of
the
point
in
time
survey
is
much
lower
than
the
actual
numbers.
We've
talked
to
people
who
said
they
could
name
at
least
50
people
themselves
who
wouldn't
participate
in
the
point
of
time
survey.
So.
F
H
E
F
Data
is
extremely
difficult
right
now,
even
oh,
I'm
spacing
on
her
name
with
the
equity
plan.
Her,
and
I
were
talking
about
it
and
she's,
trying
to
include
racial
data
for
the
equity
plan
as
well
and
yeah,
even
like
you
guys
all
saw
my
dialogue
with
kurt
was
that
he
kept
pointing
us
back
to
the
city.
But
if
you
go
there
and
you
look
at
it,
it's
all
based
on
percentages,
so
you
had
to
go.
F
It
was
this
very
convoluted
process
and
and
what's
hard
to
wrap
your
head
around
is
that
we
do
coordinated
intake
on
all
the
people
that
are
going
through
our
shelters
so
to
some
degree
we
have
all
of
this
data,
but
it's
not
getting
either
utilized
or
condensed
or
made
available
to
the
individuals
who'd
be
making
the
decisions
on
it.
It's
incredibly
frustrating
very
challenging.
K
F
B
Thanks
thanks
so
much
I'm
glad
you're
here.
No,
I
appreciate
it.
I
appreciate
the
the
information
mason
and
and
judy
are
there
any
any
other
comments
on
the
final
report.
B
No
okay,
seeing
none
judy
thanks
again
and
then
we
can
move
to
terry
and
jack.
I
don't
know
if
you
have
anything
to
say
any
updates
or
new
revelations
findings.
D
Jay
last
meeting
there
was
some
discussion
about
the
the
similarity
or
saying
the
similarity
between
tiny
backyard,
tiny
homes,
fixed
foundation,
tiny
homes
and
adus,
and
we
we
kind
of
just
assumed
at
the
last
meeting,
that
those
are
the
same
thing
and
I
wanted
to
ask
you
from
the
city's
perspective,
whether
it's
code
or
just
perception
or
whatever,
are
those
two
things:
the
adu
rules
that
have
been
adopted
and
backyard
tiny
homes.
D
Wonderful
right
answer
and-
and
I
think
I
heard
last
meeting
that
that
there
have
been
500
adus
built
since
the
the
the
regs
were
implemented.
Is
that
about
right.
L
No,
I
don't
have
the
exact
number,
but
it
was.
I
think,
it's
closer
to
200
a
little
bit
less
than
200
okay,
so
we
basically
doubled
the
number.
D
D
L
Got
it
I'd
have
to
go,
I
believe
it
was.
They
were
started
to.
They
were
allowed
again
in
1980
before
they
were
prohibited.
So,
yes-
and
you
know,
in
40
years
we
got
200
units.
D
It
takes
a
really
long
time
to
get
things,
concepts,
new
ideas,
new
types
of
housing
like
adus
through
the
process
through
the
everything
that
needs
to
happen
in
order
to
it
for
it
to
be
adopted
into
code,
and
then
people
can
go
out
and
actually
act
on
it
and
utilize
the
code
and
build
things.
It
takes
a
long
time,
years
and
years
and
years,
typically
between
all
the
subcommittee
meetings
and
the
the
all
of
it.
And
it's
just
a
long
time.
D
I
would
like
to
think
that
we
could
use
our
influence
as
a
board
to
help
build
on
that
to
help
make
it
easier
for
more
adus
to
be
built.
I
think
there's
some
restrictions
there
with
density
and
a
lot
of
waiting
lists
and
whatever
else,
and
not
so
many
in
a
certain
place
and
all
that
kind
of
stuff,
I
haven't
brushed
up
on
all
the
details
of
what's
of
what
it
is.
D
I
would
like
to
take
our
abilities
and
help
see
if
we
could
move
that
forward,
make
it
easier
for
adus
to
be
built,
and
we
won't
call
back
that
tiny
homes
or
call
me
to
use
it'd
be
easier
to
call
that.
I
think
that's
an
opportunity
that
we
have
as
a
board
to
say:
look.
We
have
200
of
them
now
I
thought
it
was
500.
I
swear
it
doesn't
matter.
D
We
have
200
of
them
now
we
can
have
another
100
next
year,
another
hundred
next
year
100
next
year,
and
by
doing
that
we
add
hundreds
and
hundreds
and
potentially
thousands
of
units
to
our
existing
housing
stock
without
having
to
build
any
more
roads
or
all
the
other
reasons.
Why
adus
make
a
lot
of
sense?
D
That
is
my
two
cents
on
on
tiny
homes,
adus
and
where
I
think
our
focus
should
be
with
respect
to
tiny
homes,
build
upon
what
we
already
have
build
upon
the
rules
and
regs
that
are
in
place.
It's
always
easier
to
add
and
tweak
when
something
already
exists
than
try
to
create
it
from
scratch
that
doesn't
preclude
us,
because
I
know
everybody's
really
excited
about
tiny
homes
on
wheels
that
doesn't
preclude
us
from
trying
to
get
tiny
homes
on
wheels.
Moving.
D
Well,
I'm
rolling
with
puns
all
right,
but
but
I
think
the
focus
should
be
on
building
on
what
we
have,
because
I
think
adus
are
good
and
I
think
they
work
and
I
think
people
who
have
lived
in
them
like
it.
I
think
people
who
have
built
them
like
it
like
them
and-
and
I
think
it's
a
good
thing-
that
we
can
add
to
and
build
on
and
keep
these
numbers
building,
because
it's
a
certain
type
of
housing
that
we
don't
have
a
lot
of.
Obviously,
but
it's
very
unique
and
it's
it's.
D
J
Charlotte
so
all
kind
of
piggyback.
On
top
of
that-
and
I
have
not
gotten
as
far
as
I'd
hoped
and
terry,
I
kind
of
agree-
I
mean
I
agree
with
the
the
general
track
that
we
started
talking
about
at
the
end
of
the
last
meeting,
which
is
there
are
two
things
that
we're
looking
at
and
I've
had
this
interest
in
the
mobile
home
or
the
mobile
adu,
so
to
speak,
or
the
tiny
home
on
wheels
and
the
other
one
is.
J
J
I
see
a
couple
of
problems
with
getting
more
tiny
homes
built
even
with
the
code
that
we
have
in
place
and
one
of
the
ones
that
I've
run
up
against,
and
this
is
anecdotal
but
with
my
clients,
is
that
it
ends
up
just
being
more
money
and
effort
that
they
can
engage
with.
And
what
I
found
is
there's
some
interesting
programs
which
are
essentially
and
whether
this
is
privately
funded
or
somehow
supported
by
the
city
is
something
that
I
think
we
should
look
at
and
discuss
and
then
we'll
bring
to
the
board.
J
But
these
programs
essentially
work
as
a
share
where
people
who
want
to
put
a
tiny
home
in
their
backyard
can
basically
there's
a
it's
a
work
share
essentially,
and
so
people
who
want
to
put
tiny
homes
in
their
yards.
You
create
neighborhood
groups
and
organizations
and
say
there's
five
people
and
they
support
each
other
in
the
construction
of
their
units,
with
whatever
skills
and
resources
they
have.
It
was
a
really
interesting
model
that
was
in
use
in
a
couple
of
places.
J
So
in
my
research
I
found
that
that
was
one
piece
that
was
interesting
because
it
helped
to
overcome
that
hurdle
that
people
have
of
expense,
the
other
one
that's
an
interesting
model
and
terry.
This
might
be
a
good
one,
that
you
know
you
might
have
good
insight
into
and
I'll
send
you
some
of
the
information
on
it.
So
you
can
look
at.
J
It
is
private
organizations
that
are
essentially
funding,
adus
yep
and
they
help
to
create
the
adu,
and
I
mean
I
don't
know
where
I
fall
on
this
exactly
yet,
but
they
essentially
create
the
funding
for
the
adu
provide
the
funding.
They
actually
will
deliver
an
adu,
and
this
will
require
some
work
with
the
city
on
approved,
pre-approved
plan
sets
for
adus.
J
You
can
build
an
adu
that
looks
like
this.
We
have
x
number
of
plans,
they
provide
it,
they
put
it
on
site
and
what
they
are
doing
is
they're
collecting,
essentially
a
piece
of
the
income
that
comes
with
that
off
the
top
and
they're
funding.
This
whole
process
through
what
they
collect
from
potentially
hundreds
or
thousands
of
adus
that
are
being
created
right
and
they're,
basically,
financing
them,
that's
right
on
the
front
end.
D
I've
dug
into
it
and
there's
all
different
shapes
and
sizes
and
forms
and
fashions,
and
they
put
a
crane
on
it,
there's
a
lot
of
options
as
far
as
what
adus
can
be
built
in
a
backyard
above
and
beyond
your
typical
foundation.
Stick
construction
et
cetera,
et
cetera
I'll.
Take
you
a
couple
ideas
more.
D
D
So
half
of
that
money
comes
from
the
affordable
housing
fund,
the
other
half
comes
from
the
property
owner,
but
for
that
money
you
have
to
limit
how
much
you
can
rent
your
adu
for
for
a
period
of
time.
I
don't
know
what
it
is
there
if
there's
one
thing
that
I
know:
money
flows
to
real
estate
in
boulder.
If
there's,
if
there's
ways
to
build
things
and
they're
profitable,
there's
money
out
there
that
will
come
to
help
make
it
happen.
D
So
there's
a
billion
different
ways,
there's
several
different
ways
to
finance
it,
and
we
can
dig
in
all
the
details
of
this
if
we
wanted
to
there's
so
many
different
angles
to
this,
but
I
think
before
I
keep
going
forever
because
I
get
into
tiny
homes
and
adus
and
all
of
it.
I
think
that
there's
a
lot
of
options
as
far
as
getting
them
built
for
less
money
than
people
think
getting
them
approved
the
approval
parts.
D
The
hard
part
and
then
financing
them,
I
think,
there's
a
slew
of
options
out
there
that
we
could
pursue
whether
it's
private
people
like
talking
about
that
build
a
lot
of
them
and
then
rent
them
out
and
split
the
money
with
the
property
owner,
whether
it's
the
property
owner
who,
who
can
finance
that
through
you
know
a
second
loan
on
their
property
and
the
they
rent
it
out?
It
works.
D
I
know
mason
that
doesn't
help
the
person
living
in
the
tiny
home,
but
it's
it's
as
far
as
building
equity
goes,
but
it
does
help
them
live
in
boulder
and
and
at
least
get
a
get
a
be
almo
be
on
the
be
on
the
island.
You
know
so
with
that
said,
that's
a
bunch
of
things.
I'd
love
to
dig
into
if
everybody
would
want
to
do
that.
B
Thank
you
yeah,
I
was
just
gonna
say
it
seems
like
there's
a
lot
of
energy
around
adus
and
how
boulder
can
get
more
adus,
and
I
know
from
working
with
clients
it
can
right
now
I
have
a
client,
that's
been
in
permitting
for
like
seven
months.
It's
just
like
it's
just
crazy,
and
do
you
know
how
long
I
know
san
jose
california
has
pre-approved
adu
plans.
B
J
You
know
I
I
think
I
think
that
I
I
don't
have
the
names
of
other
towns
off
the
top
of
my
head,
but
as
I
was
researching
that
I
definitely
ran
into
a
number
of
different
jurisdictions
where
the
pre-approved
plan
was
being
used.
Jay
did
they
do
that
in
portland.
L
K
J
I
do
think
that
you
know
this
is
landing
on
the
other
piece
of
this
whole
puzzle
of
getting
more
adus
built,
and
I
think
that
it's
a
it's
probably
close
to
a
50
50
and
it
plays
into
the
cost
aspect
of
it,
which
is
the
the
zoning
and.
B
Yeah,
so
it
really
seems
to
be
an
issue
like
I
don't.
No,
we
don't
have
a
representative
from
planning
board
here,
but
this
really
seems
like
a
project
that
needs
to
be
worked
on
collaboratively
between
planning
and
hab.
I
I
just
want
to
say
I
really
appreciate
this
conversation,
because
I
think
it's
very
substantive,
terry.
I
absolutely
agree
that
you
know
the
best
mechanism
is
to
take
an
existing
regulatory
structure
and
try
to
work
through
that
structure
to
accommodate
something
new,
and
I
think
that's
absolutely
a
focus
that
we
can
try
to
have
here
and
something
we
talked
about,
not
just
not
just
and
and
contemplating
or
allowing
them,
but
also
streamlining
them
by
pre-approved
plans
whatever
it
may
be,
but
that's
something
that
we've
talked
about
it's
in
our
letter.
I
It
was
in
our
letter
last
year.
This
is
exactly
the
kind
of
thing
that
we're
talking
about,
and
so
you
really
hit
home
on
that,
and
you
know
in
terms
of
the
the
financing
too,
I
mean
really,
if
you
look
at
it,
this
is
just
so
analogous
to
you
know
pifs
and
tips.
You
know
urban
renewal
and
that
whole
notion
of
amortizing
the
cost
over
time.
So
it's
there's
an
incentive
for
the
homeowner
there's
an
incentive
for
the
community
there's
incentive
for
the
occupant.
I
So
I
really
think
this
is
an
important
part
of
it.
And,
frankly
I
I
don't.
I
don't
not
looking
at
the
adu
regulations
right
now
at
this
moment.
I
don't
know
that
it
necessarily
even
excludes
the
notion
of
tiny
homes
that
are
on
wheels.
That
might
even
be
part
of
that
regulatory
structure,
but
I
I
think
this
really
taps
into
something
that
I'd
like
to
see
us
explore
further,
because
I
think
there's
a
ton
of
promise
on
this
and
it's
a
great
way.
I
You
know
the
bottom
line
is
housing
stock
is,
is
you
know
really
the
paramount
here
to
do
whatever
we
can
to
get
housing
stocks
so
that
we
can
have
opportunities,
especially
if
it's
steed
restricted,
even
if
that's
temporary,
it's
a
huge
step
in
the
right
direction,
so
I'm
very
supportive
of
it.
J
Jay,
so
I
this
has
been
on
my
list
since
our
last
meeting
I
haven't
gotten
to
it,
but
I
just
emailed
will
birchfield
so
just
to
kind
of
follow
up
on
that.
I
will
talk
to
will
just
to
get
sense
from
him
on
the
issues
with
pre-approved
plan
sets
from
the
building
department's
perspective
and
what
that
would
look
like,
and
then
I
guess
the
the.
J
What
what
can
we
do
to
look
at
maybe
creating
structures
that
are
or
do
you
guys
think
that
it's
worthwhile
looking
at
creating
structures
that
are
purely
citizen
driven
for
kind
of
this
concept
of
the
of
the
work
share
around
creating
you
know
and
putting
those
neighborhood
organizations
together
and
I'll
gather
more
information
and
send
it
out
to
you
on
that.
But
it
was
just
an
interesting
one
because
it
was
more
grassroots
in
its
energy.
It
was
neighborhoods.
Basically,
you
know
getting
together
and
creating
these
structures,
and
then
people
just
saying
I
want
one.
J
D
D
M
Yeah,
I
can
everyone
hear
me:
okay
yeah,
so
I
guess,
if
we
could,
I
would
be
supportive
of
looking
into
that
if
we
could
show
or
any
of
these
options.
If
we,
I
think
we'll
what
we'll
get
more
traction
is.
M
If
we
can
build
a
case
and
say
hey,
if
we
have
pre-approved
plans
for
adus
for
the
city,
we
can
reduce
the
building
time
from
x
number
of
months
to
y
number
of
months,
and
we
can
reduce
the
average
cost
per
square
foot
from
z
to
a
and
have
it
be
faster
and
less
expensive
and
build
a
case
for
how
we
could
increase
the
housing
stock
over
a
period
of
time
and
that
that
would
be
something
that
would,
in
my
mind,
have
legs
for
council
to
take
seri.
M
H
J
Juliet
I
totally
agree
with
you
and
that's
some
of
the.
I
think
I've
started
to
put
together
a
little
bit
of
information
from
these
organizations
that
have
been
doing
both
of
these
things.
J
The
one
that's
more
commonly
I
think
occurring
is
what
terry
also
has
seen,
which
are
these
these
kind
of
funding
mechanisms
that
are
put
in
place,
but
there's,
as
I
said,
there's
also
some
groups
out
there
that
are
doing
this
kind
of
work,
share,
piece
and
I'll
dig
into
them
and
see
kind
of
what
kind
of
success
they've
had
or
try
to
start.
You
know
putting
numbers
together
on
that,
because,
obviously,
the
original
presentations
that
I
saw
on
it
suggested
that
it
was
being
quite
successful.
K
But
what
that
really
means-
I
don't
know
numbers
wise
yet,
but
yeah.
Of
course
we
have
to
dig
into
that
a
little
bit.
J
B
B
B
D
D
As
we
all
know,
one
of
the
options
for
that
is
to
do
them
off-site
to
build
your
units
somewhere
else,
and
that
happens
a
lot,
especially
when
these
big
national
developers
come
into
town
and
want
to
build
200
units,
and
they
don't
want
anything
to
do
with
the
40
or
50
affordable
housing
units
that
they
they're
obligated
to
build.
So,
instead
of
paying
the
cash
in
lieu,
they
give
that
money
to
another
group,
and
that
group
goes
out
and
builds
the
50
units
and
actually
a
lot
of
the
times.
D
D
It's
not
just
another
apartment
complex
with
40
units
in
one
building
or
whatever
the
case
may
be
so
the
cash
and
lieu
off
site
avenue,
I
think,
could
be
utilized
with
private
property
owners
to
build
or
help
financially
to
use
again
with
the
understanding
that
they
are
rent
restricted
for
maybe
forever.
You
know,
maybe
it's
forever,
but
there's
a
lot
of
revenue
sources
out
there
that
I
think
can
be
tapped
into
to
help
people
pay
for
for
adus
in
boulder
hi.
B
J
J
L
Yeah,
it's
well,
that's
the
problem.
It's
not
really
not
really
possible
because
there's
a
state
prohibition
on
rent
control,
so
we
wouldn't
be
able
to
require
the
rents
to
be
restricted.
L
What
we've
done
is
and
all
this
is
in
the
adu
memo,
and
it
might
be
better
if
offline,
maybe
jack
and
terry-
and
I
chatted
about
you-
know
what
we
did
back
in
2018
the
memo
identified.
You
know
basically
the
eight.
L
I
think
we
were
up
to
12
biggest
barriers
for
adus
in
boulder
and
we
didn't
implement
all
of
them
because
it
was
supposed
to
be
this
sort
of
incremental
change,
so
that
might
be
a
good
place
to
understand
sort
of
what
this,
what
the
barriers
are
still,
but
also
the
other
piece
I
did
want
to
mention.
L
So
we
have
promised
to
counsel
that
we
would
do
an
evaluation.
Okay,
what
happened
after
the
adoption
of
the
2018
regulations?
What
were
the
changes
that
we
saw?
What
what
got
produced
and
what?
What
are
still
the
issues?
And
so
I
think
that's
gonna
really
help
us
to
better
understand,
and
I've
already
heard
you
know.
Process
is
extremely
long
and
it's
a
deterrent.
A
lot
of
people
aren't
getting
through
the
process
because
it's
still
fairly
cumbersome,
even
though
we
simplified
it
significantly,
and
it's
just
it's
really
expensive.
L
So
I
mean
cove
is
going
to
really
sort
of
throw
a
wrench
in
that
analysis,
a
bit
because
a
lot
of
it
is
a
lot
of
that
delay
is
due
to
cobit,
but
anyway
I
would
just
suggest.
Maybe
if
we
chatted
offline,
it
might
be
a
little
more
productive.
I
I'd
love
to
I
love
to
be
part
of
that
conversation
too.
I
mean
I've
actually
even
litigated,
rent
control
statute
and
stuff
in
the
past,
and
so
I've
dealt
with
that
a
lot
and
so
I'd
love
to
be
part
of
that
conversation
well,.
D
L
L
Yeah
yeah,
it's
just
it's
going
to
be
difficult
to
sell
to
use
city
funds
for
something
that's
not
deed,
restricted,
permanently,
affordable.
B
Is
great,
I'm
excited
to
I'm
excited
to
hear
about
this
conversation,
and
I
I
really
like
where
this
is
going.
I
do
want
to
look
at
the
time
and
see
if
we
can
move
on
shortly,
but
you
know
any
last
few
comments,
jacques
or
okay
awesome.
B
Well,
hopefully,
you
all
will
be
able
to
sync
up
outside
the
meeting
jay
if
you're,
if
you're
able
that
would
be
so
great,
so
very
cool.
Let's
move
on
to
discuss
the
listening
session
for
next
year,
crazy
we've
made
it.
I
have
given
some
thought
to
the
timing
of
this,
and
I'm
I'm
wondering
if
either
that,
if
february
or
march,
would
would
be
a
good
time
for
folks.
You
know
if
we're
looking
at
the
ordinance
in
january.
B
You
know
our
time
will
be
taken
up
and
just
to
give
ourselves
time
with
planning.
I
you
know
appreciate
us
doing
this
and
you
know
the
listening
session
in
february
or
march.
You
know
just
to
give
us
time.
I
started
to
dive
into
the
process
of
of
that.
You
know
a
few
months
ago
and
was
totally
overwhelmed,
and
so
I'm
happy
to
you
know,
take
the
lead.
You
know
take
the
lead
on
outreach.
B
Writing
the
letter
to
the
editor
working
with
the
city,
to
you
know,
make
sure
that
the
listening
session
is
broadcasted
on
social
media,
etc.
You
know,
gets
in
the
papers,
but
it
I
need
someone
else
to
commit
to
help
me.
I
We'll
do
that,
I
I
I
you
know,
we
talked
about
it
last
time,
so
I'm
I'm
with
you,
so
I
I
think
probably
march
would
seem
to
me
to
be
a
good
date,
for
it
springtime
might
be
a
little
warmer.
Who
knows
maybe
there's
some
means
of
having
something.
That's
outward.
I
don't
know,
but
I
think
probably
march
like
let's
get
through
this
the
winter
and-
and
you
know
so
to
be
late
march-
would
be
a
really
good
opportunity
to
you
know
to
put
that
together.
B
Great,
I'm
really
excited
about
it
and
you
know
really
looking
forward
to
the
feedback
that
we're
getting,
and
I
definitely
want
folks
from
effa.
I
I
can't
remember
their
names,
but
I
would
really
like
them
to
be
present.
Jay.
I'm
sorry
who
are
the
who
are
the
folks
who
are
at
the
meeting
last.
E
B
Well,
that's
great!
I
if
you
want
to
get
back
to
her
and
and
just
let
her
know
that
we
are
going
to
do
this
I'll.
I
can
be
in
touch
with
you
about
that,
but
that's
super
great
and
danny.
I
would
love
to
talk
to
you
about
planning
etc
how
we
can
just
like
divvy
up
things
and
you
know,
take
on
take
on
what
we
can
and
feel
feel
good
about.
So
so
I
will
put
forward
a
motion
to
have
our
housing
and
security
listening
session
in
march
at
our
march
meeting.
B
I
But
my
son's
in
middle
school
he's
been
on
spring
break
for
almost
a
year
now.
B
Yeah,
it's
like
I
don't
know.
Maybe,
but
I
mean
you
know
having
a
meeting
during
spring
break.
You
know,
I
don't
know,
I'm.
B
Try,
if
you
can't
come
julia,
it's
okay.
I
mean
like
just
let
us
know,
but
I
think
we'll
be
okay
for
march
either
way.
It
looks
like
we
have
a
majority.
I
counted
one
two,
three,
four,
five,
six
hands,
at
least
so.
E
I
think
we
can
look
up
can't
we,
the
boulder
valley,
school
district
calendar
anyway,
and
find
that
out
right
away.
B
Yeah
anyways,
the
motion
passes,
we're
gonna
have
this
in
march.
We
can
look
it
up,
I'm
I
don't.
I
don't
know
when
spring
break
is,
but
it's
hard
to
hard
to
think.
M
E
I
guess
I'd
also
like
to
add
that,
since
this
is
about
housing
and
security,
the
people
were
expecting
to
come
to
this
meeting,
I
believe,
are
the
people
who
are
really
worried
about
housing
issues,
and
is
it
silly
to
think
that
they
would
be
less
inclined
to
be
going
on
vacations
if
they're
worried
about
being
able
to
remain
in
their
houses.
E
M
Instruction,
so
I
just
wanted
to
throw
it
out
there.
I
don't
have
an
opinion
one
way
or
another,
but
I
I
wanted
to
make
sure
we
just
were
mindful
of
that.
F
With
our
meetings
in
the
evening,
wouldn't
they
with
the
classroom
juliet?
What
were
you
saying
that
with
classroom
instruction,
I
mean
they
would
be
getting
at
a
school
in
theory,
at
three
o'clock.
M
Not
being
in
school,
so
much
mason
is
just
having
a
parent
having
a
child
at
home
and
having
to
occupy
them
the
entire
day,
and
maybe
you
know
trying
maybe
being
at
their
wit's
end
and
not
having
any
any
mental
energy
to
attend
something
in
the
evening,
because
they've
been
trying
to
corral
their
their
family
all
day.
So
I'm
just
worried
about
mental
mental
energy
and
the
ability
to
participate.
M
B
F
Yeah
I
hear
you
on
that.
I'm
just
curious
how
one
day
differs
from
the
other.
They
would
have
to
occupy
kids
all
day
and
still
consider
what
to
do
in
the
evening.
Anyway.
J
F
J
J
B
B
I
B
Okay
great
passes,
so
we
will
have
our
listening
session
on
march.
31St,
beautiful
and
danny
I'll
be
in
touch
with
you
about
that,
and
if
anyone
has
particular
groups
of
people
that
they
they
think
should
come,
you
know
think
it
over
and
we
have
some
time
to
do
outreach.
But
you
know
this,
you
know
everyone
can
participate
and
and
help
with
the
process
of
planning.
This,
so
just
wanted
to
make
sure
everyone
knows
that
they're
they're
invited
to
help.
D
D
I
think
for
me
that
would
be
very
valuable
people
who
have
been
renting
in
boulder
for
a
long,
long
time,
less
transient
people
versus
students
who
come
in
for
a
few
years
and
then
leave
that's
just
my
two
cents.
I
don't
know
how
we
do
that,
but
I
would
like
to
hear
personally
from
a
lot
from
more
non-student
runners
and
student
writers.
If
that
makes
sense.
F
Nathan,
terry,
do
you
have
a
relationship
or
with
or
access
to
the
rental
association
board,
where
we
could
potentially
reach
out
to
them
and
ask
them
to
send
out
something.
B
F
It'd
be
cool
to
see
if
we
could
build
a
relationship
with
them
to
be
able
to
disseminate
you,
know,
flyers
or
to
their
email
list
or
something.
D
B
F
You
for
all
your
hard
work
on
developing
this
and
doing
it.
I
know
every
year
you
know
somebody
steps
to
the
plate
and
it
typically
they
get
lasted
and-
and
you
know
it's
a
challenging
positioning
job
to
be
in-
and
I
appreciate
you
again
spearheading
it
and
doing
such
an
excellent
job.
B
M
Julia,
oh
thank
you
and
yeah.
I
second
that
what
mason
just
said
charlotte,
thank
you
so
much
for
stepping
in
when
no
one
else
would
step
in
to
this
role
and
taking
that
on.
I
know
it's
a
it's
a
lot
of
work
and
it's
a
lot
of
opinions
to
to
juggle
and
and
consider-
and
I
I
just
want
to
make
a
comment
about
the
letter.
M
M
In
my
opinion,
just
came
across
as
a
little
confrontational
and
grievance
laid
in,
and
maybe
we
could
be
a
little
more
collaborative
in
our
tone
with
council,
because
we
do
at
the
end
of
the
day
serve
council.
We
want,
we
want
it
to
be
a
two-way
street
and
a
collaborative
and
not
confrontational
relationship.
That's
just
my
opinion
and-
and
I
want
to
try
to
make
sure
I
I
voiced
that
concern
earlier
in
the
processes.
M
Obviously
it's
too
late
now,
but
I
I
didn't
have
a
chance
to
share
that
the
last
time
and
in
rereading
everything
that
that
was
my
feeling,
but
thank
you
charlotte
and
I
do
appreciate
it
does
not
diminish
appreciation
for
for
all
the
hard
work
and
thought
that
went
into
it.
So
thanks.
E
I
also
wanted
to
say
charlotte
that
I
think
that
a
lot
of
people
on
council
already
actually
read
it
besides,
just
rachel
who
mentioned
it
at
the
council
meeting,
and
I
thought
this-
I
sort
of
had
a
good
feeling
that
they
heard
it.
You
know
they
made
a
big
effort
to
want
us
to
participate
in
the
discussion
about
manufactured
housing,
and
I
can't
help
but
think
the
part
of
that
is
because
they
took
the
letter
seriously.
D
Again,
I
agree
with
everybody
else
that
great
job
and
when
I've
read
it,
you
know
whatever
it
was
two
weeks
ago
or
whenever
the
first
time
it
came
out.
I
kind
of
got
that
pumped
up
feeling.
You
know
like
let's,
let's
go
get
them
kind
of
deal,
but
then
I
implemented
kind
of
the
24.
Well,
maybe
it's
14-day
rule,
I
don't
know,
but
whatever
it's
been
and
and
I
I
there
are
little
pieces
in
in
the
what
did
not
work.
D
Well,
that
I
thought
again,
I
agree
juliet
a
little
aggressive
one
in
particular
for
me,
is
in
paragraph
two
where
it
talks
about.
You
know
we
kind
of
cryptically
say
happenings
at
city
council
meetings
illustrate
how
politically
active
groups
received
more
attention
than
have
on
topics
related
to
housing.
It
feels
like
we're
trying
to
say
something
there
in
code
that
it's
kind
of
underhanded
a
little
bit,
and
I
don't
know
I
don't
know-
maybe
it
can
be
softened
up
just
a
little
bit,
I'm
not
looking
for
anybody
to
rewrite
any.
You
know
wholesale
changes.
D
Just
I
don't
know
I
felt.
Maybe
a
little
softer
could
help
could
help.
If
they've
already
read
it,
then
I
don't
know
if
that's
gonna
help
at
all
but
yeah.
I
agree
with
juliet
that
maybe
a
little
softer
approach
is
is
usually
a
little
better,
especially
when
we're
trying
to
get
council's
respect.
I
don't
know
that
I
don't
know
I'm
torn
on
it.
D
I
think
a
little
softer
approach
might
not
hurt
anything
and
the
the
cryptic
part
at
least
cryptic
to
me
anyway
about
you,
know
politically
motivated
things
and
not
really
giving
any
detail
or
any
examples
just
kind
of
theoretically
what
we
think
may
be
happening
about
policy
disagreements.
I
don't
know
to
me.
I
I
didn't
really
even
understand
that.
So
that's
my
two
cents.
B
Yeah,
so
sorry
mason
I'll
just
jump
in
quick.
I
think
everyone
on
council
will
understand
what
that
means.
I
didn't
want
to
say:
hey.
You
actually
included
a
slide
in
your
presentation
from
safer
boulder,
but
not
from
your
housing
advisory
board.
Who
discussed
this
issue
right,
so
I
didn't
want
to
just
like
break
bring
it
out,
but
I
I
I
hate
your
comments,
so
I
hate
it
amazing
go
ahead.
Well,
I
just.
F
I
you
know,
I
understand
where
both
juliet
and
terry
are
coming
from,
but
I,
unless
I
mean
I
think
we
need
to
be
really
careful
here.
It
was
it's
already
done
and
it
already
went
out
and
and
there's
if
anybody,
especially
for
those
of
you
who
haven't
written
this
letter
or
really
stepped
to
the
plate
and
written
any
motions
or
written
any
of
the
recommendations
that
we're
sending
to
council
is
that.
F
You
know,
like
maybe
the
next
recommendation,
one
of
you
guys
can
step
to
the
plate
because
it's
it's
it's
a
very
challenging
thing
and
then
especially
to
hear
the
criticism
after
the
fact
when
you
just
worked
on
it
for
what
two
months
and
sent
it
out
to
us
repeatedly.
So
I
just
want
to
be
sensitive
and
aware
of
the
fact
that
that's
kind
of
hard
after
the
fact
to
say
that
you,
you
know
that
it's
a
challenging
piece
and
maybe
we
could
have
participated
in
that
process.
A
little
earlier
on.
D
Yeah,
I
understand
what
you're
saying,
but
I'm
not
talking
about
the
whole
letter,
I'm
just
talking
about
like
three
sentences.
It's
gone.
B
Yeah
next
time
I
mean
who
knows
who
will
you
know,
take
the
lead
on
writing
the
letter,
but
definitely
just
like
look
at
the
drafts
because
I
did
have
corey
send
it
out
like
a
lot.
Don't.
M
Mean
you
did
and
I
and
I
think
I
said,
shame
on
me
for
not
paying
paying
closer
attention
or
calling
that
out
sooner
and
I
think
I
was
focused
on
other
parts
of
the
letter
that
were
grabbing
my
attention
and
you
know
there's
and
not
on
on
the
whole
thing.
So
I
hear
what
you're
saying
mason
and
it's
true
everyone's
gotta
gotta
participate
and
speak
up.
I
I
missed
it
and
my
my
bad
on
the
timing.
J
You
know
I
I'm
happy
with
how
the
letter
sits.
Now
I
have
the
same
discomforts
a
little
bit.
I
think
that
juliet
and
terry
have
expressed,
but
I
want
to
say
that,
and
almost
you
know
a
little
bit
here
in
an
advisory
role.
J
I
I
think
that
in
a
way
it's
it
is
a
good
conversation
to
have
with
council,
in
that
it
brings
up
a
certain
kind
of
engagement
with
the
relationships
between
boards
and
council,
and
I
think
council's
been
hearing
a
lot
about,
and
I
think
that's
what
you
know
mason's
saying
is
that
I
think
council-
and
you
know,
and
members
of
council,
have
responded
to
that
positively.
J
So,
at
the
end
of
the
day
I
kind
of
said
you
know,
I
think
it's
it's,
you
know
we
could
argue
about
how
it's
worded
or
not,
but
I
think
it's
a
valuable
piece.
That's
a
concern
I
know
of
mine
from
being
on
the
board.
So
I
I
don't.
I
don't
see
that
there's
a
problem
with
us
expressing
it.
F
And
I
would
like
to
add
our
last
three
or
two
years
when
we
wrote
letters
were
very
soft
and
gentle
and
played
well
and
we
got
lamb
blasted
after
both
of
them
publicly
by
city
council.
So
I
think
it's
interesting
that
for
once,
we've
kind
of
stood
up
for
ourselves
and
made
it
clear
about
what
wasn't
working
and
being
real
about
it
and
they're
responding.
Whereas
the
last
two
years,
like
I
said,
we
got
land
blasted.
B
Well,
it
was
already
sent
and
I'm
ready
to
take
the
heat
from
council
and
go
ahead
and
present
this
unless
someone
else
wants
to
do
it.
I
We
did
have
that
conversation
regarding
the
phone
and
I
think
we
all
had
that
ambivalence
regarding
it.
But
you
know
we
had
that
conversation
in
the
november
meeting.
You
know
a
lot
of
other
things
came
in
there,
but
I
mean,
I
think
I
think
charlotte.
You
know
you
speak
for
all
of
us
and
you
know
we
can
talk
about
the
new
ones,
but
you
know
we
appreciate
the
the
effort
and
you
know
the
message
is
out
there
so
we'll
see
where
it
goes
right,
yeah
exactly.
B
B
B
L
G
M
I
want
to
put
put
something
out
there
and
I
don't
know
if
this
is
something
that
would
be
on
council's
agenda
in
the
next
year,
but
I
know
that
one
of
the
challenges
boulder
has
is
a
large
population
of
incommuters
for
work.
60,
000,
plus
people
coming
in,
and
I
believe
in
2015.
There
was
a
study,
a
housing
preference
study
that
was
done
to
study
the
reasons
for
why
people
chose
to
leave
boulder
and
commute
back
in
and
jay.
You
probably
you
have
way
more
institutional
knowledge
about
about
this
stuff
than
I
do.
M
But
if
I
recall
from
that
study,
one
of
the
reasons
why
people
choose
to
leave
is
because
they
want
a
single-family
home
or
they
want
more
space
and
they
want
it
at
a
less
price,
lower
price.
M
And
so
I
wonder
if
something
that
hab
could
look
at
in
the
future,
if
it
dovetails
with
council's
agenda,
is
a
way
to
make
changes
or
suggest
changes
to
whether
it's
zoning
or
or
code
such
that
we
could
integrate
more
single
family
style
homes
and
I'm
not
talking
about
building
more
single
family
homes,
but
rather
taking
existing
housing
stock.
M
That
may
be
a
single
family
home
and
converting
it
into
a
duplex
or
a
triplex
in
appropriate
locations,
so
that
we
avoid
the
issues
that
people
get
sensitive
on,
which
is
big,
blocky
buildings
and
sight
lines
and
and
building
height
restrictions.
We
make
it
look
compatible
with
neighborhoods,
but
we're
actually
creating
more
housing.
That
people
want,
because
the
people
that
move
out
a
certain
population
of
the
city
that
in
commute
want
a
different
style
of
home.
They
want
a
home
that
feels
like
a
house
that
maybe
has
a
backyard
and
maybe
has
a
garage.
M
E
I
think
a
lot
of
people
that
have
worked
at
home
that
used
to
commute
and
a
lot
of
businesses
are
now
thinking
about
the
possibility
of
downsizing
their
sizes
of
business
because
they
could
maybe
have
somebody
come
in
one
or
two
days
a
week,
instead,
five
days
a
week
and
it's
possible
that
there
might
be
some
adjustment
that
boulder
could
do
to
have
more
housing
space
available
from
converted,
formerly
business
space.
And
it's
just
something
for
us.
F
Yeah,
I
was
just
gonna
almost
say
what
judy
was
saying,
which
is,
I
think
housing
is
going
to
be
turned
on
an
ear
in
the
next
year
and
any
institutional
knowledge
that
we
may
have
or
jay
had,
I
think,
between
evictions
corporate
displacement.
F
I
think
we're
going
to
see
a
very
different
market
in
boulder,
as
well
as
the
the
knowledge
I
remember,
and
maybe
jacques
and
judy
you
could
you
could
refresh
my
memory
on
this
as
well.
Didn't
we
have
a
presentation
on
all
middle-income
housing
that
specifically
talked
about
the
timelines,
the
land
use
the,
how
it
all
broke
down
and
what
our
blocks
are
about,
bringing
it
back,
especially
around
duplexes
triplexes.
J
Yeah
I
do.
I
do
recall
that
I
think
one
of
the
to
go
kind
of
back
to
juliet's
and
then
also
just
segue
into
this
changing
housing
reality.
J
Those
patterns
might
change
slightly,
but
a
lot
of
those
are
service
related
pieces
where
the
the
community
most
affordable
housing.
I
don't
know
that
we'll
see
so
much
of
a
shift,
so
I
just
I
think
it's
something
to
be
cognizant
of
that.
Whatever
changes
may
be
coming
down,
the
pike
we
don't
become
overly
anticipatory
around.
Those
is
one
thought
and
then
the
other
one
juliet.
J
I
think
the
thing
about
the
single
family
homes
and
the
desire-
I
I'm
glad
to
hear
you
kind
of
present
that
position
that
the
desire
in
that
in
commuter
study
was
really
not
necessarily
around
the
single
family
house
per
se,
but
it
was
around
the
accessibility
to
some
yard
some
green
space.
It
was
a
little
bit
more
nuanced,
although
I
think
it
did
get
kind
of
politically
separated
out
into
into
a
more
black
and
white
issue,
and
you
know
I
do
think
we're
talking
about
that
right
with
increasing
density
potentially
along
transit.
J
You
know
transportation
corridors.
I
don't
know
where
anything
stands
anymore
with
the
large
lots,
large
homes
discussion
that
at
one
point
was
on
the
table
and
you
know
what
happens
with
you
know:
one
acre
lots
or
more
that
have
a
single
home
on
them
and
is
there
a
way
you
know
so
I
think
yeah
there's
a
lot
of
discussion
around
that.
I
agree
with
you.
We
need
to
keep
our
eye
on.
E
E
Sometimes
it's
just
good
to
have
a
presentation
like
I
think,
the
first
couple
years
we
got
to
have
fabulous
presentations
that
really
helped
us,
and
I
think
sometimes
it's
okay
to
just
have
somebody
talk
about
that
once
things
settle
a
little
bit
just
just
to
improve
our
overall
knowledge.
L
And
I
would
suggest
sort
of
in
the
vein
of
what
you've
been
talking
about
the
middle
income
housing
strategy.
You
know
it
was
adopted
back
in
2017
and
that's
where
we
talked
about
sort
of
that
missing
middle.
L
It's
all
the
stuff
in
between
that
we
don't
get,
and
it's
just
really
challenging
to
try
to
produce.
You
know
ownership
opportunities
that
have
that
space
for
a
yard
for
a
dog
and
kids
to
play,
because
even
townhomes
are
going
for.
You
know
1.2
1.5
million
dollars
in
boulder,
so
it's
not
affordable
for
sure
but
anyway,
so
my
point
is,
it
might
be,
and
what
judy
was
saying
we
could
go
back
and
revisit
the
strategy
and
say:
okay.
This
is
what
we
talked
about
back
in
2017.
L
You
know:
have
these
trains
changed?
Have
they
abated
slightly
or
you
know,
should
we
be
looking
at
new
opportunities
and
changes?
So
that's
a
potential
work
item.
B
J
Just
you
know
real
quick,
this
kind
of
does
wrap
back
around
to
david
adamson's
pilot
program
and
looking
at
ways
to
make
more
efficient
use
of
land,
which
is
essentially
what
his
pilot
program
is
trying
to
do.
I
think
from
my
understanding
of
it,
so.
J
Just
one
of
the
things
that
I
think
we've
been
talking
about
for
quite
a
long
time-
and
I
know
I've
been
talking
to
people
like
david
about
it,
but
you
know
that's
something
that
they
are
trying
to
get
counsel
to
put
on
their
plans.
So
I
guess
I'm
putting
a
plug
in
for
that
again
that
as
individuals,
if
we
feel
like
that's
something
valuable,
we
could.
We
could
put
a
little
leverage
to
say
to
council
hey
how
about.
We
take
a
look
at
pilots.
J
We
may
not
know
exactly
what's
going
to
work,
but
we
got
to
start
somewhere
and
you
know
we
can't
wait
for
every
other
city
in
the
country
to
give
us
the
data
we
need.
G
A
K
F
I
made
a
meme
about
that
before
this
meeting
too.
This
brings
up
a
really
interesting
point
as
an
aside
to
what
juliet's
bringing
up-
and
I
noticed
it
with
our
tiny
home
discussion
as
well-
is
especially
when
we
have
new
members
on
and
some
of
this
historical
stuff
that
we've
gone
through
and
like
judy
just
mentioned
about.
F
Maybe
revisiting
is
like
right
now,
planning
board
is
going
through
their
land
use
codes
and
people
are
looking
at
their
master
plans,
but
housing
doesn't,
like
our
housing
board,
doesn't
have
a
master
plan
on
this
and
it'd
be
interesting,
like
jay
just
said
about
looking
at
the
middle
income
strategy
again,
because
we've
changed
so
much
since
2017.
F
Maybe
something
in
2021
that
we
might
want
to
do
is
go
back
and
look
at
the
things
that
we
looked
at
in
that
first
year
and
what
do
we
want
to
revisit
and
potentially
start
tweaking
some
of
that
stuff,
and
especially
again
so
so
much
has
changed.
Maybe
that's
a
new
business
item
where
we
start
to
look
at
and
it
will
also
bring
new
board
members
up
to
speed.
B
Terry
did
you
or
yeah.
D
I
mean
a
quick
I'll
try
to
make
a
quick
comment.
We
could
talk
for
hours
about
how
how
the
pandemic
has
impacted
housing,
but
I
think
the
the
unfortunate
reality
is
in
boulder.
D
It's
made
the
middle
income
world
even
less,
and
even
more
difficult
people
have
been
moving
to
colorado.
The
front
range
in
boulder
from
new
york,
new
jersey,
chicago
in
california
for
decades
and
decades,
and
this
pandemic
has
accelerated
that
so
much
it's
unbelievable.
The
remote
work
ability
for
people
from
big
cities
and
their
lack
of
desire
to
be
in
big
cities
right
now,
for
obvious
reasons,
has
driven
so
many
people
to
boulder
to
rent
and
buy
really
expensive
homes.
D
I
mean
record-setting
numbers
in
the
last
six
months,
people
are
paying
for
rent
for
single-family
homes
and
buying
single-family
homes
at
astronomical
prices,
even
when
we
thought
they
were
astronomical.
5
10
20
years
ago,
it's
even
more
now
and
that's
just
driven
the
middle
portion
even
farther
out
of
the
picture,
which
is
not
good.
It's
not
good,
but
that's
the
reality
of
our
world
and
to
piggyback
on
what
juliet
said.
D
People
now
who
are
working
from
home
because
of
the
pandemic-
and
maybe
they
won't
go
back
to
their
offices
full
time.
I
think
most
people
will,
but
there
will
definitely
be
less.
They
actually
want
more
space
right.
They
want
home
offices,
they
want
extra
space,
and
so
it's
driving
the
demand
for
for
bigger
houses
versus
smaller
houses
before
the
pandemic.
It's
just
it's
amazing
how
this
has
changed
things
in
six
months,
eight
months,
it's
unbelievable
to
me,
but
that's
a
whole
different
discussion
for
a
different
day.
B
Yeah,
I
it's
true,
it's
true.
Half
of
the
work
I
do
now
is
not
adus,
but
it's
like
studios
and
home
offices.
J
You
know
I
was
just
kind
of
nodding,
my
head
in
agreement
and-
and
you
know
I
I
always
kind
of
bristle
a
little
bit-
that's,
maybe
not
quite
the
right
term.
You
know
the
the
idealist
in
me
bristles
a
little
bit
about
the
realist,
sometimes
and
that's
how
the
world
is.
You
know,
and
I
just
want
to
put
out
there-
that
we
also
are
sitting
on
a
board
where
we
can
start
to
make
suggestions
to
how
we
can
create
the
world.
J
You
know
it,
it
does
become
a
little
bit
more
of
an
activist
position,
maybe
as
a
board,
but
we
can
put
things
out
on
the
plate.
At
least
there
are
things
that
we
can
do
to
impact
that
everything
from
pilot
projects
to
allowing
lots
to
be
divided
and
all
these
things.
So
I
think
we
have
ways
to
access
change.
J
G
D
The
whole
spectrum
has
moved
up
right
so
before
before
one
ever
picked
before
it
was
a
million
dollar
home
that
you
tore
down
and
built
two
seven
hundred
thousand
dollar
town
homes
right,
okay,
so
at
least
seven
hundred
thousand
dollars
is
still
crazy,
but
it's
less
than
a
million
dollars
right
and
there's
two
families
living
on
that
property
versus
one.
Now
that
million
dollar
home
is
a
2.5
million
dollar
tear
down
and
it's
being
replaced
with
one
and
a
half
million
dollar
town.
I
mean
it's
just
no.
D
K
M
Okay,
I
just
I
just
wanted
to
float
that
out
as
an
idea
and
ask
you
know-
and
jay
mentioned
the
the
middle
income
housing
strategy,
but
to
the
points
of
of
terry
and
jack.
The
pandemic
has
changed,
and
I
can't
tell
you
how
many
new
people
I
encounter
that
just
moved
here
from
major
coastal
markets,
with
enormous
equity
in
homes
in
those
markets
that
they
they're
able
to
come
here
and
and
and
for
them
buying
buying
things
that
exist
here
is
really
not
nearly
as
expensive,
as
maybe
where
they
came
from.
M
M
You
know
ownership,
land,
land
incentives
or
home
ownership
incentives,
so
just
it
is
what
it
is,
but
I
just
wanted
to
throw
it
out
there
as
an
idea
for
the
future
and
see
what
people
thought
about
it
about
looking
at
that
ways
to
bring
people
into
the
city
that
have
chosen
to
move
out,
because
they
want
more
of
that
little
bit
of
yard.
M
E
I
wanted
to
add
just
one
thing:
if
I
could
charlotte
and
that's
maybe
the
next
time
you
guys
have
an
agenda
meeting,
you
could
talk
about
maybe
just
putting
a
revisiting
of
middle-income
housing
presentation
and
then
we
just
have
a
little
discussion,
but
I
also
want
to
thank
juliette
for
for
using
this
new
business
time
on
the
agenda,
to
spark,
but
to
me
has
been
one
of
the
best
discussions
we've
ever
had
because
we
often
by
nature
of
what
we
have
to
do
focus
on
on
a
a
specific
issue-
and
this
was
more
of
a
big
picture-
look
and
I
think,
that's
very
helpful
for
us.
B
B
L
Here
I
got
a
couple
things
for
you.
So
last
night
city
council
approved
a
land
use
change
for
an
acre
in
gun
barrel
that
older
housing
partners
has
under
contract
to
purchase.
So
that's
exciting.
So
that's
a
future.
L
We're
gonna
land
bank,
it
for
probably
a
number
of
years,
but
potentially
25
to
35
units
in
a
great
location
and
not
displacing
any
existing
industrial
businesses,
which
was
a
big
part
of
the
conversation
and
the
oh,
the
city.
L
The
other
big
thing
that
I've
been
working
on
is
purchasing
a
leasehold,
so
the
city
owns
20
acres
in
the
planning
reserve
and
basically
we
we
bought
out
the
current
leaseholder
and
are
in
the
process
of
doing
that.
So,
where
atlas
flooring,
is
you
guys
familiar
with
that?
L
So
all
that
land
is
actually
behind?
It
is
owned
by
the
city
and
once
the
planning
reserve
actually
does
get
developed
in
the
distant
future,
that
would
be
dedicated
to
affordable
housing.
So
two
opportunities
there
for
land,
banking
and
then
the
last
piece
is
so
the
implementation
of
the
newer
ballot
measure.
L
So
there
will
be-
and
I
sent
an
email
to
everybody.
But
charlotte
asked
me
to
give
just
a
quick
update
for
everyone
and
we're
still
really
trying
to
figure
out
exactly
how
to
weave
that
into
our
existing
programs.
L
L
L
So
the
big
challenge
that
the
city's
sort
of
trying
to
figure
out
is
how
do
we
collect
this
fund
or
the
money?
It's
a
fairly
low
tax
and
it's
going
to
cost
a
lot
to
collect
it,
and
we
don't
what
we
would
seem
like
a
very
simple
thing
to
do.
L
We
may
have
to
create
a
whole
new
system
to
do
it
to
collect
that
75
dollars
a
year.
So
that's
it's
going
to
take
a
little
bit
of
extra
time
to
figure
that
out,
but
we
are
also
pursuing
sort
of
how
do
we
provide
that
legal
representation
right
away?
So
in
january,
when
the
ballot
measures
really
is
supposed
to
be
in
effect,
which
is
was
adopted
through
ordinance,
long
story,
but
anyway
we
are.
L
Our
city.
Attorney's
office
is
look
as
getting
responses
to
from
different
legal
organizations
to
provide
that
service
sort
of
an
on-call
so
that
there
would
be
someone
there
to
provide
that
legal
service
at
eviction
court
and
to
provide
those
services
up
front.
L
We
are
also
developing
are
in
the
process
of
hiring
someone
to
provide
coordination
because
part
of
the
ballot
measure
called
for
hiring
a
city
staff
person
to
implement
this,
and
also
there
will
be
a
a
committee.
So
the
ballot
measure
calls
out
that
there's
supposed
to
be
a
committee
that
would
help
advice
on
the
program,
but
also
on
how
to
direct
those,
the
rental
assistance
from
the
funds
that
are
collected,
so
that
part
probably
won't
happen
until
later
in
the
year.
L
B
F
Jay,
given
how,
with
the
land
baking
given
how
long
our
process
is
for
housing,
should
we
start
that
in
the
next
meeting?
If
we
want
something
in
10
15
years,
just
curious,
because
I'm
pretty
sure
we're
going
to
have
at
least
three
years
of
prairie
dog
discussion,
and
maybe
it
makes
sense
early.
E
L
That
is
a
great
question.
You
know
I'm
actually
in
oregon
right
now
and
oregon
has
had
an
eviction
moratorium
at
the
statewide
level
since
I
think
april,
and
they
still
haven't
renewed
theirs
theirs
gonna
will
expire
as
well.
Polis
has
taken
the
approach,
I
think
we
talked
about
this
last
time.
He
only
does
executive
orders
that
are
effective
30
days,
and
then
he
just
renews
them
every
month.
L
So
I
would
expect
there
would
be
a
renewal
fairly
soon
if
there's
going
to
be
a
renewal,
but
just
also
as
a
reminder,
so
the
city
has
absolutely
no
authority
to
stop
evictions,
but
we
do
like
we've
talked
about
before
the
city
does
invest
a
lot
of
time
and
resources
to
make
sure
that
people
get
the
resources
that
they
need
early
in
the
process
to
try
to
avoid
even
getting
to
the
eviction
process.
B
B
L
But
I
think
the
the
the
basic
idea
is
that
it's
it's
not
just
no
eviction
without
representation.
That
is
also
the
rental
assistance
piece.
So
how?
How
do
we
describe
the
program
with
its
with
the
current
scope?
That's
all
so!
I'm
sorry
so
did
I
mention
the
study
session
in
january.
L
No
no
yeah
see
I
was
supposed
to
leave
with
that.
So
council
is
going
to
get
an
update
at
their
study
session.
The
second
study
session
in
january-
sorry,
I
forget
the
date
but
I'll,
send
you
an
email
reminder
letting
you
know
when
that
is
close
to
the
date,
but
it's
a
30-minute
update,
sort
of
where
we
are
in
the
process
and
there
might
be
a
few
questions
for
them.
B
F
Jay,
can
you
make
sure
that
we
all
receive
a
link
to
the
city
council
retreat
in
january?
I
know
that
that's
going
to
be
a
zoom
process,
correct.
L
Yes,
yeah,
I
think
I
can
put
a
note
in
my
calendar.
B
E
B
I
B
13.
beautiful
well,
I
look
forward
to
seeing
you
all
then
and
motion
to
adjourn
this
meeting.