►
From YouTube: 2-1-23 Landmarks Board Meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
B
E
B
Back
to
you,
abby
thank
thank
you.
marcy,,
so
we
will
move
on
to
our
public
hearing.
this
evening..
I
item
5
a
it's.
A
public
hearing
and
consideration
of
an
application
to
demolish
a
building
constructed
in
1,965
at
1,
0
5
bell
view
drive
a
non
landmarked
building
over
50
years
old,
pursuant
to
section
9
1123
of
the
boulder.
B
E
E
E
B
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
It
met
the
environmental,
significance,
criteria
or
geographic
importance..
It's
not
located
in
an
identifier
potential
historic,
though,
as
I'll
go
into,.
There
are
many
notable
mid-century
buildings
in
the
surrounding
area,
and
then
it
does
not
have
geographic
importance
because
it
was
designed
to
be
hidden
in
the
hillside
rather
than
a.
E
E
Finding
that
the
building
is
not
potentially
eligible
for
designation,,
I
also
would
like
to
say
that
this
was
an
application
that
we
staff
referred
to
the
board
for
finding.
It
was
potentially
eligible,,
and
I
do
feel
that
it
was
worthwhile
in
terms
of
doing
the
additional
research
and
learning
more
about.
E
E
E
E
E
F
F
E
F
B
B
G
G
G
G
G
So
one
of
the
biggest
problems
in
this
whole
house,
and
from
a
design
standpoint,,
was
this
retaining
wall
that
we
see
on
the
right
side,,
which
is
the
left
side
of
the
graduate
when
you're
driving
in,
was
not
sufficiently
designed
to
withstand
the
lateral
pressures
of
the
earth.
And
but
that
said,
the
entire
house
was.
G
What's
really
interesting
is
the
garage
door
is
a
vertical
garage,
door.
well,!
You
can
see
the
tapered
wood
piece
right
there
by
the
door
that
over
time,
this
hillside
has
caused
the
top
portion
of
it
to
tilt,,
probably
6,
to
8
inches
next
slide.
In
addition
to
that,
the
whole
hillside
is
pushing
in
there
and
again
cracking
the
wall.
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
B
A
A
B
C
C
C
C
Some
time
ago,,
because
we
would
not
necessarily
recommend
designating
this
house
over
the
objections
of
the
owner,,
but
I
reverse
that
question
to
this
board.
Is,.
What
if
this
owner
bought
this
building
before
this
landmark
board
and
asked
for
you
to
designate?
Would
you
and
quite
honestly,?
I
think
the
answer
to
that
would.
C
A
B
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
B
G
G
G
B
B
B
F
F
F
It's
a
very
problematic
feature
in
a
house..
It
may
be
dramatic
in
certain
instances,,
but
in
mountain
houses
that
are
more
than
2
stories
that
have
only
one
way
of
accessing
the
top
and
the
bottom
being
a
spiral
staircase,.
It's
a
very
unworkable
situation,
with
things
like
you
end
up,
wasting
pieces
of
furniture.
F
F
F
F
F
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
B
I
I
just
wanna
make
sure
I'm
understanding
the
process
correctly.,
I
think
it..
I
understood
in
some
past
discussions
that
the
significant
elevations
that
you
would
want
to
protect
or
landmark
are
the
ones
that
are
visible
from
a
public
right
of
way,
like
a
street
or
an
alley,,
and-
and
it
wasn't
clear
to
me
if
this
south
elevation
is
visible
from
a
street
or
an.