►
From YouTube: Boulder Planning Board Meeting 8-1-19
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
August
first
city
of
Boulder
planning
board
meeting.
We
have
everybody
here
which
is
totally
great,
so
the
first
order
of
business
is
the
approval
of
minutes
and
we
don't
have
any
so
it'll
be
super
fast
after
that.
We've
got
the
opportunity
for
participation,
and
this
is
when
folks
who
are
interested
in
addressing
the
board
can
speak
to
us
about
things
that
are
not
on
our
agenda
tonight.
So
it's
on
their
agenda
is
agenda
item
5a,
which
is
a
review
of
the
open
space
master
plan.
A
B
C
My
name
is
Sheree
sapote
and
I
live
in
the
Ponderosa
mobile
home
park.
I'm
glad
to
see
you
all
here,
those
of
you
that
were
not
here
last
week,
I
encourage
you
to
go.
Look
at
the
I
spoke
last
week
too,
so
there
are
so
many
issues.
So
please
do
that.
I
would
ask
that
you
please
reject
the
Ponderosa
mobile
home
development
plan.
There
are
many
problems
with
it
and
it's
not
fair
to
boulders
poorest
residents,
they're
being
alfred
half
the
value
of
their
trailers.
C
I've
got
a
copy
of
the
daily
camera.
Today's
under
mobile
homes
for
sale,
we've
got
San,
Lazaro
number
182,
two-bedroom
two-bath
for
eighty
six
thousand
nine
hundred
dollars
got
one
at
Skylark
mobile
home
park,
2-bedroom
1-bath
for
$80,000
we've
got
a
1974
three-bedroom
two-bath,
asking
price.
Eighty
five
thousand
nine
hundred
dollars
a
1975
two-bedroom
two-bath
with
carport
450
$9,600
we're
getting
offered
way
below
market
value
for
homes
in
Boulder,
Colorado
I'd
like
to
read
for
a
quote
from
the
Bill
of
Rights
of
America.
A
Teresa,
thank
you.
If
anyone
else
wants
to
speak
to
us
before
we
kick
off
the
next
item.
That's
the
time
it
looks
like
everybody
else
is
here
for
other
stuff,
so
we've
got
two
discussions.
Two
cops
inform
us
tonight.
One
is
for
a
combination
of
attracting
a
parcel
on
crest
court
and
the
second
one
is
a
rerouting
of
the
Mesa
Trail,
which
is
really
in
front
of
us
for
a
wetland
permit.
So
you
have
any
questions
or
console
no.
F
I
was
trying
to
look
into
that
a
little
bit.
It
looks
like
back
in
the
1960s
when
most
the
Lots
in
this
area
were
planted.
There
was
several
subdivisions
being
planted
around
the
same
time.
The
subdivision
this
Lots
in
and
the
subdivision
kind
of
to
the
south
were
planted
a
few
years
apart,
and
there
was
kind
of
this
leftover
piece
that
was
never
planted,
and
this
tract
that
is
getting
combined
with
this
law
was
a
portion
of
that
sort
of
leftover
tract.
F
G
Wanted
to
point
out
to
the
board
that
I
sent
a
couple
of
questions
out
and
Kristin
Shepard
got
back
to
me
with
answers
to
those
questions,
and
they
just
concerned
the
public
access
to
the
trail
during
the
portion,
that's
being
rerouted
and
there
won't
be
any
disruption,
so
I
just
wanted.
Let
people
know
that
kissing
the
email
thank.
A
You
David
yeah
they're,
coming
to
it.
That's
great:
okay,
we'll
move
to
our
first
agenda
item
for
the
night
or
public
hearing
item
for
the
night,
which
is
recommendation
to
City
Council
for
acceptance
or
not
of
the
open
space
and
mountain
parks,
master
plan
and
a
second
motion
which
we'd
the
action
on
proposing
them
into
the
Boulder
Valley
comp
plan
open
space
and
men
parks,
master
plan
summary
way.
A
This
will
work
as
a
we'll
start
off
with
the
presentation
by
staff
planning
board
we'll
be
able
to
ask
staff
questions
after
that
they
don't
have
public
testimony.
If
anyone
wants
to
speak
to
this
item,
it's
good
time
to
sign
up
and
then
we'll
return
them
out
of
the
board
for
deliberations,
Chris
great.
H
I
need
use
myself
again:
Chris
Wranglers,
comprehensive
planning
and,
like
Chris,
had
mentioned.
I
coordinates
for
all
the
sales
department
master
plans
sitting
next
to
me
here
tonight
are
just
a
few
of
the
many
many
OS
MP
staff
members
I
had
a
vital
role
in
the
development
of
this
master
plan.
So
I
would
like
to
take
the
opportunity
for
them
to
introduce
themselves
in
mark
at
the
end.
Here
would
also
like
just
to
give
the
board
a
few
opening
remarks
for
the
master
plan.
Thank.
I
You
Chris
good
evening
board.
My
name
is
Mark
Davison
and
the
community
connections
and
partnerships
manager
for
open
space
and
also
the
sponsor
for
the
master
plan
sitting
next
to
me
is
Darren
Wagner.
She
is
the
senior
planner
for
open
space
and
has
been
the
project
manager
over
the
last
two
years.
Working
on
this
master
plan,
I'd
also
like
to
acknowledge
a
couple
of
folk.
In
the
audience
we
have
Dan
Burke,
our
interim
director
for
open
space
and
Tom's
Isaac's
and
the
board
chair
for
basically
the
master
plan.
I
Like
I
said
it's
been
about
two
years
in
the
making.
We
originally
had
a
project
management
plan,
the
winter
City
Council
for
approval.
As
part
of
that
effort,
we
adopted
the
strategic
engagement
framework
to
pilot
how
we
would
engage
with
the
community
over
the
last
two
years,
which
ended
up
being
about
five
engagement
windows,
something
from
sort
of
staff
perspective.
Is
this
master
plan
set
out
with
open
space
and
we've
got
many
divergent
opinions
out
there?
I
In
terms
of
setting
out
on
the
master
plan,
we
built
a
foundation
of
knowledge,
that's
part
of
the
so
the
strategic
engagement
framework
now
to
say:
let's
how
do
you
share
knowledge
with
the
community,
so
you
can
have
informed
decision-making.
So
Darren
here
has
a
system
overview
report.
Is
that
correct
this
little
report
here
it's
available
online,
but
that
really
describes
the
system
and
it's
set
up
as
sort
of
summary
of
all
the
plans
were
done
previously,
including
like
the
grassland
plan,
the
forest
plan
a
visit,
a
used
master
plan.
I
It
also,
obviously,
as
we
set
out
on
the
process,
were
guided
by
the
volar
Valley
comp
plan
and
that's
been
a
really
good
framework
to
keep
us
on
track,
provide
some
sideboards
as
we
go
through
this
process
and
then,
ultimately,
from
the
system
ovary
report,
we
developed
what
we
called
focus
areas,
five
focus
areas.
They
went
to
a
city
council
and
they
actually
approved
them
as
an
interim
step
in
the
master
plan
by
getting
them
approved
those
five
focus
areas
which
focused
on
how
ecosystem
recreation,
education
and
Inclusion
our
agricultural
lands
and
our
financial
sustainability.
I
It
allowed
us
to
then
focus
in
on
what
we
called
outcomes
and
strategies,
the
outcomes
being.
What
are
the
scenarios
of
what
we'd
like
open
space
to
look
like
in
the
next
ten
years
and
beyond,
and
then
the
strategies
being
how
we
implement
the
plan,
including
examples
of
actions
of
how
that
will
go
through?
So
ultimately,
what
you're,
seeing
tonight
and
Darren's
going
to
get
into
more
detail
on?
This
is
what
we
feel
is
a
unified
10-year
vision.
I
We
do
feel
like
it
really
will
guide
our
work
planning
as
well
as
our
CIP
and,
in
fact,
how
we
even
think
about
open
space
over
the
next
10
years,
and
there
is
some
serious
challenges
facing
us.
Like
the
climate
crisis
like
how
we
manage
our
large
habitat
blocks,
how
do
we
manage
increasing
visitation,
but
we've
also
had
a
lot
of
success
over
the
last
50
to
100
years
in
managing
the
system,
and
we've
been
able
to
pull
that
through
from
our
previous
planning
efforts.
H
Run
through
the
agenda
here,
we'll
kick
out.
The
staff
presentation
give
you
got
some
background
info
and
the
analysis
that
we
did
with
alignment
with
the
comprehensive
plan.
Any
clarifying
questions
that
you,
the
board,
may
have
we'll
be
happy
to
answer
all
the
public
hearing
and
then
we'll
move
into
deliberation.
H
So
just
some
background
information
on
the
city,
master
planning
process,
there's
really
three
key
issues,
and
this
is
the
way
to
you.
Remember-
was
organized
through
the
topic
of
discussion
tonight.
So
the
first
one
is:
is
the
masterplan
consistent
with
the
goals,
policies
and
growth
projections
of
the
Boulder
Valley
Comprehensive
Plan?
The
second
is:
does
the
master
plan
outline
the
BBC
pea
service
standards
and
a
plan
to
meet
those
in
the
future?
And,
lastly,
are
the
capital
needs
and
funded
sources
outlined
at
the
master
plan?
H
Now
I
want
to
point
out
the
image
to
the
right
that
you
guys
see
and
really
what
it
does
is.
It
demonstrates
the
relationship
between
the
community
sustainability
framework,
the
Boulder
Valley
Comprehensive,
Plan,
Department
master
plans,
the
capital
program
program
in
the
operating
budget.
That's
a
mouthful,
but
you
can
see
how
the
department
master
plan
is
sandwiched
in
this
process.
H
The
play
a
key
role
in
achieving
the
community
vision
set
forth
through
the
community
sustainability
framework
and
the
Boulder
Valley
comprehensive
plan,
and
they
also
help
to
inform
the
capital
improvement
program
and
the
operating
budget
as
well
so
planning
boards
role.
Specifically
most
of
you
probably
are
aware
of
the
city
plans
and
projects
handbook
and,
if
you're
not
essentially,
what
this
is.
It's
a
handbook
that
describes
a
city's
process
for
master
planning
and
capital
planning.
H
The
figure
to
the
right
shows
the
general
phases
that
are
outlined
in
this
handbook-
and
you
can
see
where
we
are
tonight-
is
master
planning,
which
is
the
first
step,
but
this
includes
the
highest
amount
of
community
dialogue
to
identify
policies
and
projects,
though
projects
that
are
identified
at
this
stage
are
really
quite
conceptual
in
nature.
Now,
plenty
role
playing
board
does
play
a
key
role
in
this
process
by
providing
the
recommendation
is
City
Council
for
acceptance
of
the
city
master
plan,
which
is
what
we're
here
tonight
to
do,
and
then.
H
Lastly,
as
mentioned
before,
the
board
looks
at
these
plans,
through
the
lens
of
the
Boulder
Valley
comprehensive
plan
policies.
So
with
that
I'm
gonna,
kick
it
back
over
to
Darren.
She
gave
you
guys
some
background
information
on
the
master
planning
process,
how
he
kicked
it
off
where
we
are
now
in
the
process
that
took
place
in
between
those
times.
J
J
Excited
to
be
here
because
we
have
actually
worked
so
so
deeply
with
our
community
to
talk
about
our
shared
values
and
why
we
get
so
excited
about
open
space.
So
we
have,
as
Mark
said,
generated
a
lot
of
optimism
and
creativity
in
the
process,
and
we
showed
images
like
this
in
the
beginning
of
our
process.
That
start
to
give
an
overview
of
what
we're
all
about
which
is,
as
you
well
know,
we
have
45,000
acres
of
open
space.
J
We
have
been
protecting
that
for
the
last
hundred
and
20
years,
we
have
about
15,000
acres
that
we
leased
to
farmers
and
ranchers.
We
protect
or
support
over
700
species
of
native
plants
over
300
species
of
native
birds,
as
well
as
a
host
of
other
native
and
fibia
--nz,
reptiles,
etc.
We
have
over
150
miles
of
trails,
and
we
really
offered
deep
connection
connections
with
nature,
and
it
really
is,
as
we've
kind
of
come
through.
The
process
have
heard.
J
Phrases
like
this
is
what
makes
Boulder
Boulder
and
it's
been
a
meaningful
place
to
start
with
some
images
like
this
and
some
conversations
around
our
shared
values,
and
so,
as
Mark
mentioned,
we
started
out
this
process
as
a
pilot
for
the
engagement
strategic
framework,
and
you
probably
well
know
the
shape
of
that
wheel,
where
these
nine
steps
are
identified
about
how
to
go
through
the
process.
And
we
were
really
guided
by
our
process
committee
in
this
case,
to
both
design
the
process
and
go
through
it.
J
And
in
our
case
we
were
lucky
to
have
two
council
members,
Erin
Brackett
and
Mary
young,
as
well
as
two
members
of
the
open
space
board
of
trustees,
Tom
Isaacson,
who
Mark
pointed
out
who's
in
the
audience
as
well
as
Curt
brown.
I,
also
wanted
to
point
out
that,
since
our
introduction,
another
one
of
our
board
members
has
come
and
Karen
Hall
wig
is
in
the
audience,
and
she
too
was
here
till
about
1:00
in
the
morning.
So
thank
you
for
coming
back
Karen.
J
We
affirmed
that
the
importance
of
this
foundation
of
information
and
that's
where
this
200
page
document
system
overview
came
from,
and
it
was
really
an
important
conversation
about
this
being
an
opportunity,
as
we
perhaps
haven't
had
in
the
past,
to
share
a
lot
of
wonderful
information
about
our
system,
because
we
don't
often
get
the
opportunity
to
talk
about
our
entire
portfolio
of
assets
and
services,
from
education
from
volunteers
and
from
trail
maintenance
to
trail
building
to
agriculture,
etc.
And
so
it
was
a
really
nice
place
to
start
the
conversation
and
then
throughout
the
process.
J
J
J
In
1986,
voters
amended
the
City
Charter
to
define
the
purposes
for
open
space,
and
those
are
those
are
our
guiding
foundational
policy
approach
for
managing
the
department.
We
pulled
those
through
into
this
process
and
reaffirm
them,
and
it
was
really
a
wonderful
sort
of
demonstration
of
how
enduring
those
values
are
and
what
that
means
to
us
going
forward,
and
then
that
conversation
led
to
the
development
of
these
focus
areas
and
as
Mark
was
indicating.
We
see.
J
We
see
this
as
a
an
interconnected,
complete
set
of
guidance
for
the
next
decade,
where
we
establish
these
five
somewhat
independent
themes,
as
well
as
throughout
the
process,
talked
about
the
ways
they
integrate
with
each
other
and
support
each
other,
and
so
just
to
spell
them
out
once
again.
Ecosystem
health
and
resilience
became
a
very
central
theme
in
a
lot
of
ways.
Again,
this
is
sort
of
what
makes
Boulder
Boulder
it's
the
foundation
that
we
always
start
with.
J
Agriculture
today
and
tomorrow
was
an
important
concept
that
our
board
and
council
brought
forward
in
the
process
of
affirming
the
focus
areas
themselves.
We
previously
in
engagement,
hadn't
heard
quite
as
much
emphasis
around
that,
but
board
and
council
felt
like
because
that
is
a
charter
purpose
that
we
ought
to
bring
that
into
the
fold
so
that
we
can
integrate
and
prioritize
across
our
full
portfolio
services
and
then
community
connection,
education
and
inclusion.
J
So
from
there
we
moved
into
these
conversations
around
okay
within
these
focus
areas.
What
are
the
outcomes?
What
are
our
aspirations
for
the
next
decade?
What
is
the
vision
that
we
want
to
create
for
ourselves,
and
that
was
prompted
throughout
the
throughout
the
process,
with
continuing
to
bring
the
system
overview
report
and
other
data
and
information
through
where
we
were
able
to
contextualize?
The
fact
that
you
know
the
climate
crisis,
for
example,
is
a
global
challenge
that
we
need
to
tackle
here.
Visitation
is
growing.
J
We
know
that
both
from
a
growth
projection
standpoint
in
the
comp
plan,
as
well
as
from
our
visitation
on
the
system
itself
and
started
to
identify
and
talk
about
those
pressure
points,
as
well
as
the
outcome
or
the
opportunities,
are
around
enhancing
our
equity
and
inclusion
efforts.
Building
off
of
the
youth
engagement
that
we've
done
over
the
years,
and
then
how
are
we
going
to
achieve
those
and
we've
built
a
series
of
strategies
to
try
and
set
ourselves
up
for
the
next
decade?
We
then
moved
into
okay.
How
do
we
prioritize
that?
J
We
know
the
master
plans
are
required
to
be
fiscally
constrained,
and
so
we
developed
a
set
of
financial
scenarios
that
we'll
talk
about
in
a
minute
and
that
allowed
us
to
anticipate
the
various
funding
levels
that
we
may
or
may
not
see
over
the
next
decade,
so
that
we
can
set
manageable
expectations.
And
then
we
started
to
talk
about
what
this
means
going
forward.
What
is,
as
Chris
mentioned,
it's
still
conceptual
at
the
master
plan
level.
But
what
can
we
start
to
anticipate
that
we
need
to
get
to
work
on,
especially
in
the
near
term?
J
Things
like
climate
resilience
and
soil
health
projects
around
carbon
sequestration
trail
maintenance
backlog
that
we
want
to
get
may
continue
to
make
progress
towards
what
are
the
real
actions
that
are
coming
out
of
this
guidance,
so
that
process
then
reflects
is
reflected
in
the
document
outline
and
hopefully,
you've
had
a
chance
to
move
through
this.
So
I
probably
don't
need
to
spend
too
much
time
here,
but
it's
it's
really.
J
As
part
of
that,
we
did
work
closely
with
Council
and
had
monthly
meetings
with
our
process
committee,
as
well
as
to
joint
study
sessions
with
Council
on
our
board
of
trustees,
we're
in
the
first
one
in
June
of
2018.
We
talked
about
those
focus
areas
and
then
soon
thereafter,
Council
approved
them.
The
second
joint
study
session
that
we
just
held
recently
in
June,
was
then
talking
about
the
outcome,
strategies
and
priorities
that
are
they're,
reflected
in
the
master
plan
itself
and
the
feedback
that
we've
heard
from
Council,
especially
in
the
most
recent
engagement.
J
Same
as
it
relates
to
our
open
space
Board
of
Trustees,
where
we
met
monthly
with
them
as
part
of
the
process
committee,
as
well
as
through
our
ongoing
board
meetings
and
really,
in
total
we've
as
of
last
night,
estimated
that
that's
a
total
of
about
300.
More
than
340
hours
of
deliberation
that
we've
been
grateful
to
have
the
benefit
of
from
our
trustees
and
that
doesn't
include
outside
review
time
and
phone
calls.
So
again,
thanks
to
everybody
and
feedback
last
night
that
we
heard
from
our
board,
we
did.
J
We
heard
the
the
need
to
clarify
what
the
global
climate
crisis
means,
specifically
for
OS
MP,
a
little
bit
more
in
terms
of
both
our
role
in
addressing
that
and
what
that
means
for
the
larger
city
region
and
beyond,
as
well
as
the
the
real
tangible
aspects
of
real,
tangible
projects
that
we
can
start
to
anticipate.
We
did
talk
through
refinements
to
the
strategy.
J
What
we're
calling
handles,
the
the
name
of
the
strategy,
the
the
policy
direction
that
that's
in
there
and
that
we
heard
some
adjustments
to
our
priorities
where
we
moved
one
from
tier
2
up
to
tier
1.
So
that
is
our
strategy
within
agriculture.
Today
and
tomorrow.
Around
reducing
conflicts
between
agriculture
and
prairie
dogs
and
another
was
moved
from
tier
2
up
to
tier
I'm,
sorry
from
tier
3
up
to
tier
2,
and
that
was
one
around
the
importance
of
science
and
and
how
we
apply
that
science
and
inspire
engagement
with
our
community
moving
forward.
J
Then
we
also
heard
you
know
the
acquisitions,
while
it's
a
part
of
that
financial
sustainability
focus
area
that
it's
still
somewhat
hard
to
find
in
the
document.
And
so
how
do
we
kind
of
call
that
out
in
a
section
and
make
that
clear?
So
that
is
five
bullets
summarizing
and
six
hours
of
deliberation,
so
I
need
to
recognize
its
high
level.
J
H
It's
rather
that
some
have
stronger
alignment,
then
oh
there's
where
the
BBC
P
does
not
necessarily
provide
specific
guidance
on
that
topic
and
that's
something
that
we
should
probably
expect
so
for
the
focus
area,
ecosystem
health
and
resilience
staff
finds
that
there's
full
alignment
with
a
shared
sense
of
stewardship,
commitment
to
preserve
and
restore
ecological
health
and
the
change
in
climate
for
the
focus
area
of
agriculture.
Today
and
tomorrow.
Their
strong
alignment
with
shared
support
for
sustainable
local
agriculture,
soil
health,
food
system
resilience
and
access
to
healthy
foods
for
Responsible
recreation,
stewardship
and
enjoyment.
H
We
find
medium
alignment
with
shared
commitment
to
honoring
the
unique
community
identity,
including
providing
welcoming
and
inspiring
visitor
facilities
and
access
to
safe
and
enjoyable
experiences
on
all
OS
MP
lands
for
community
connection
and
education.
In
inclusion,
we
find
medium
alignment
with
charity
into
supporting
volunteerism,
engaging
in
connecting
youth
to
the
outdoors,
welcoming
diverse
backgrounds
and
abilities,
as
well
as
improving
health
in
well-being
and
cultivating
leaders
through
stewardship
and
last
but
not
least,
part
of
the
fun
interest.
H
Sustainability
focus
area
staff
has
found
that
there's
medium
alignment
with
shared
support
to
preserve
open
space
lands,
including
prioritizing
acquisitions
in
the
boulder
valley,
rural
preservation,
area
area
3.
For
those
purposes
with
that,
one
could
get
back
over
to
Darin
and
she's.
Gonna
run
you
through
the
next
two
key
issues
and
they're
not
coming
back
on
so.
J
The
next
question
being
the
extent
to
which
we
support
the
math,
the
comprehensive
plan
through
service
standards
and
ways
to
meet
those
in.
In
our
case,
we
are
lucky
to
have,
as
Mark
indicated
earlier,
a
set
of
more
specific
ecosystem
management
plans,
as
well
as,
if
there's
a
visitor
master
plan
and
other
documents
that,
in
in
the
case
of
say,
our
ecosystems
provide
us
about
80
indicators
that
help
us
track
the
health
of
our
forest
ecosystems
and
our
Grieco
system
in
our
grassland
ecosystem.
J
The
second
question
I'm
sorry,
the
third
question
that
is
before
you
tonight
is
the
extent
to
which
capital
needs
and
funded
sources
are
outlined
in
the
master
plan.
And
so
this
is
where
I
indicated.
We
would
describe
our
three
financial
scenarios
and
more
depth,
and
so
the
first
is
a
situation
which
we
are
in
now,
where
we
starting
next
year,
will
see
plans
ten
million
dollar
reduction
in
our
annual
revenue.
That's
something
that,
for
the
last
five
years
we've
been
working
towards
and
to
lessen
the
impact
of
that.
J
What
that
means
is
that,
through
the
engagement
process
with
the
master
plan,
we've
understood
clearly
from
the
community,
where
we
should
generally
prioritize
our
funding
at
all
levels,
but
specifically
in
this
continue
in
this
constrained
funding
environment
that
we
would
focus
on
maintenance
as
it
relates
to
new
acquisitions
or
new
services
and
initiatives.
And
we
heard
that,
for
example,
in
the
statistically
valid
survey
and
other
engagement
opportunities.
J
We're
taking
care
of
what
we
have
is
an
important
theme
that
community
members
shared,
and
we
recognize
that
in
the
scenario
that
we've
been
planning
for
it,
that
we
still
may
need
to
anticipate.
In
some
areas
of
the
system
that
conditions
may
decline
because
it
does
reduce
our
capacity
to
fully
meet
the
the
master
plan
vision.
J
The
next
financial
scenario
is
is
with
the
assumption
that
some
of
the
sales
tax
revenue
that
we
are
losing
may
be
restored,
and
it's
in
that
case
that
we
could
scale
up
the
work
that
we've
heard
is
important
for
us
to
focus
on
from
the
community.
So
in
other
words,
with
additional
money,
we
scale
our
efforts
to
those
funding
levels,
so
we
would
scale
up
conservation
and
restoration
work.
J
We
would
scale
up
trail
maintenance,
work
and
it
gives
us
a
little
bit
more
room
to
be
some
more
proactive
around
the
climate
crisis
and
around
soil,
health
and
soil
sequestration,
as
well
as
youth
engagement
and
a
number
of
other
strategies
that
are
important
to
the
community.
About
full
funding
scenario
is
very
typical.
J
H
So
the
second
part
that
we
wanted
to
bring
up
tonight
was
there's
there's
two
actions
that
we're
taking
tonight.
One
is
the
recommendation
to
the
acceptance
of
the
master
plan
and
to
City
Council,
and
the
second
is
to
approve
the
master
plan.
Summary
that's
in
the
Boulder
Valley
Comprehensive
Plan,
so
chapter
six
of
the
Boulder
Valley
comprehensive
plan
includes
master
plans
summaries
now,
as
far
as
how
we
go
through
this
acceptance
process
for
master
plans.
We
also
update
those
master
plan
summaries
in
the
comp
plan.
H
It's
largely
a
housecleaning
item,
but
it
is
an
amendment
to
the
comprehensive
plan,
so
that
was
included
as
attachment
a
to
your
guyses
memo,
and
so
we
will
ask
for
it
for
you
guys
to
take
action
on
that
in
particular.
So
where
we've
been
and
a
few
next
steps,
so
the
official
approval
process
for
a
master
plan
has
to
go
through
a
couple.
Different
set
steps.
First
is
the
master
planning
Coordination
Committee,
which
is
an
internal
committee.
H
They
have
to
approve
that
the
plan
is
ready
for
board
review
that
happened
on
April
18th,
July
31st
last
night,
I
guess
kind
of
into
this
morning.
So
maybe
it
should
say
August
first
Oh
SBT
considered
the
final
draft
and
recommended
that
to
City
Council
tonight,
August
1st,
you
guys,
will
also
be
making
a
recommendation
to
City
Council
on
the
draft
plan.
September
3rd
is
when
council
is
going
to
be
considering
the
final
plan
and
then
throughout
the
fall
and
winter
staff
will
be
working
on
providing
a
bit
of
a
moral
assertive
plan
document.
H
The
one
that
you
see
now
is
still
in
word
and
that's
largely
due
to
our
ability
to
track
changes
and
make
it
it's
in
a
more
succinct
and
efficient
way,
but
there
will
be
a
more
or
less
your
plan
document
that
I'll
come
out
later.
This
fall
in
winter,
we're
playing
integration
and
then,
lastly,
the
2020
annual
budget
approval
process.
H
So
just
remind
you
the
two
recommendations
that
we
have
tonight
before
you
are
a
recommendation
to
City
Council
for
the
acceptance
of
the
open
space
in
the
on
parks,
master
plan
and
to
approval
of
the
Boulder
Valley
coverings
of
planned,
open
space
and
mountain
parks.
Master
plan
summary.
So
with
that,
we
would
like
to
open
up
to
any
clarifying
questions
that
the
Board
may
have.
A
K
J
So
we
are,
as
you
know,
in
an
environment
with
dramatic
cliff
sides,
rocky
outcroppings,
in
which
case
a
lot
of
times
that
makes
it
hard
for
any
forest
thinning
projects
to
be
fully
successful.
So
that's
typically
what
constrains
that
work.
We
do,
though,
have
guidance
from
a
forest
ecosystem
management
plan
in
the
late
90s,
where
it
set
out
a
series
of
ways
to
to
do
as
best
we
can
and
we've
achieved
almost
entire
the
entirety
of
those
objectives.
So
we'll
be
looking
to
update
that
plan.
J
H
I
also
coordinate
the
CIP,
so
that's
you
guys
will
see
that
in
two
weeks
on
August
15th,
it
has
informed
this
year's
capital
improvement
program
already
and
you'll
see
that
the
open
space
mountain
parks,
capital
submission,
is
going
to
be
a
little
bit
different
than
all
of
the
other
departments,
we're
figuring
out
how
to
best
incorporate
this
master
plan
into
the
capital
improvement
program.
So
there
is
a
bit
of
a
difference,
but
it
is
certainly
influencing
the
capital
program
for
this
year
and
it
will
continue
to
for
several
more
years.
Thank.
G
D
First
of
all,
congratulations
on
a
nice
piece
of
work.
I
think
it's
very
good.
Just
some
questions.
There
are
several
issues
that
have
some
of
which
get
a
lot
of
public
attention
and
some
not
which
it
seems
to
me
are
not
not
addressed
here
and
it
seemed.
It
would
seem
to
me
to
be
appropriate
at
least
to
mention
them,
if
not
to
make
final
decisions
on
them
included
on
those.
D
Secondly,
there's
a
question
of
with
respect
to
agricultural
lands,
and
we
all
have
heard
about
the
prairie
dog
problems
and
so
on,
but
not
to
focus
on
prairie
dogs,
but
to
talk
about
in
general
how
we
expect
to
deal
with
the
lands
that
are
leased
for
agricultural
purposes
in
the
future.
Whether,
for
example,
we
intend
to
do
some
of
the
things
that
the
county
is
has
been
proceeding
on
with
respect
to
use
of
GMOs
and
and
organic
processes
of
various
types
can.
A
D
A
A
J
Okay,
the
first
being
the
question
around
HCA's
or
habitat
conservation
areas
and
what
that
means
for
the
future
of
trail
development.
So
we
have
kind
of
a
couple
of
ways
of
answering
that,
so
we
actually
just
had
a
discussion
last
night
with
our
Board
of
Trustees.
Someone
in
relation
to
this,
so
I
would
start
out
by
saying
that
we
have
both
in
our
ecosystem,
health
and
resilience,
focus
areas,
focus
area.
We
have
strategies
around
reducing
undesignated
trails
as
well
as
other
impacts
from
human
use.
We
then,
in
our
recreation
of
responsible
recreation,
stewardship
and
enjoyment.
J
Focus
area
also
talked
about
the
importance
of
trail
maintenance,
as
well
as
building
new
trails
in
response
to
past
and
new
plans.
So
what's
happened
through
also.
The
prioritization
process
is
again
this
focus
on
taking
care
of
what
we
have
and
so
last
night
we
heard
additional
clarification
from
the
board
that,
as
we
think,
to
building
new
trails
that
we
would
focus
first
on
those
that
have
previously
been
committed
to
by
approved
plans
by
City
Council
and
that
those
that
may
come
online
later
through
the
results
of
future
design
and
planning
processes.
D
J
D
J
So
we
actually,
we
also
have
a
recently
approved
agricultural
resources
management
plan
that
really
led
to
the
development
and
articulation
of
this
focus
area
where
the
policy
is
in.
The
master
plan
is
in
direct
alignment
with
that
particular
plan,
so
that
agriculture
plan
goes
into
a
little
bit
more
detail
than
the
master
plan
does.
Arguably,
because
the
master
plan
is
sort
of
at
a
more
conceptual
level,
but
together
that
set
of
guidance
really
talk
about
trying
to
anticipate
the
future.
J
So
we
have
strategies
in
there
around
supporting
ranchers
and
farmers,
knowing
that
the
next
generation
is
going
to
be
important
to
nurture
and
support.
We
also
talked
about
integrating
our
native
ecosystem
approach
to
managing
those
those
areas
with
the
importance
of
preserving
agricultural
productivity,
and
we
start
to
anticipate
the
need
to
with
within
land,
where
it's
appropriate
to
diversify
our
agricultural
operations,
so
that
we
can
continue
to
support
the
local
agricultural
economy.
D
J
And
there
is
a
strategy
directly
on
that,
also
where
it
captures
the
current
commitment
that
staff
is
operating
under
now
to
address
that
in
an
expedited
way,
and
so
staff
has
been
working
on
that
with
guidance
from
our
board
of
trustees
to
do
that
in
a
condensed
way.
But
it
also
tries
to
capture
what
that
means
for
us
over
the
next
decade.
And
so
there
is
a
strategy
on
that
as
well.
In.
I
Just
in
addition,
we
also
include
sort
of
prioritization
of
soil
health
for
the
bigger
picture.
How
do
we
maintain
soil
health
in
the
system
or
restore
it?
How
do
we
look
at
supporting
our
ranches
and
farmers
because
we
realize
that
is
a
population
that's
been
around
for
many
generations
and
how
do
we
keep
that
continuity
going
where
they
not
only
manage
the
land,
but
they
manage
the
resource?
And
the
other
thing
we've
been
looking
at
is
water.
D
That
is
with
respect
to
the
development
of
infrastructure,
and
this
is
related
to
trails
every
once
in
a
while.
You
hear
something
about
desire
to
establish
picnic,
shelters
and
picnic
tables
and
their
development,
infrastructure
and
trailheads
and
so
on,
and
it's
never
been
clear
to
me
what
what
your
departments
attitude
has
been
towards
that,
because
there's
there's
differing
messages
from
time
to
time
and
so
I
wondered.
If
that's
the
sort
of
thing
that
you
might
be
able
to
clarify
in
a
in
a
master
plan
also,
certainly.
J
We
certainly
try
to,
and
we
start
from
a
place
of
recognizing,
that
our
history
involves
some
early
facility
development,
where
even
harkening
back
to
Frederick,
Law
Olmsted
and
his
vision
for
this
area
and
protecting
the
mountain
parks
did
involve
some
development
of
trails
and
vistas
and
facilities
to
support
that
use
and
enjoyment,
and
then
recognizing
that
in
some
cases,
those
those
facilities
are
also
aging.
So
again,
we
have
a
responsibility
to
maintain
our
existing
infrastructure,
as
it
relates
to
that
as
well
as
infrastructure
that
exists
throughout
the
system
and
the
eastern
plains
and
elsewhere.
J
We
had
a
follow
up
and
we
also
have
strategies
around
and
our
most
important
tier
in
terms
of
welcoming
diverse
backgrounds
and
abilities,
and
so
as
part
of
that,
some
of
that
does
involve
conversations
about
whether
or
not
think
our
facilities
are,
for
example,
accessible,
which
may
might
require
some
adjustments
to
our
facilities.
And
then
again
we
had
a
clarifying
conversation
with
our
board
last
night,
where
we
started
to
understand
more
clearly
that
we
do
want
to
again
emphasize
taking
care
of
what
we
have
and
also
recognize
that
in
the
next
10
years.
J
I
If
I
could
just
add,
we
mentioned
the
system
overview
report.
Page
119
summarizes
the
passive
recreation
activities
that
visit
a
masterplan
established
were
acceptable
on
an
open
space
and
that
really
summarized
the
types
of
activities.
Mostly
it's
the
hiking,
the
walking
photography,
running
equestrian
bike
use,
but
there's
also
things
like
photography,
traditional
climbing
cross-country
skiing.
These
are
sort
of
picnicking
the
smaller
activities.
I
So
we
do
look
for
facilities,
obviously
to
support
those
activities,
an
obvious
one
being
trail
as
a
facility
to
support
you
see,
biking
walking,
there
is
bathrooms,
trail
heads,
parking,
etc
or
other
typical
facilities.
But
what
do
we
want
to
emphasize
is
that
light
touch
on
the
land
we
take,
because
we
are
an
open
space
system
and,
for
example,
you
mentioned
picnic
shelters
Darren
mentioned
we
have
a
legacy
system
in
the
mountain
parks
that
includes
picnic,
shelters
from
the
1930s
developed
by
the
National
Park
Service,
mostly,
but
mostly
in
our
open
space
areas.
I
We
use
picnic
tables
as
a
way
to
allow
picnicking
to
occur.
It's
not
typically
a
picnic
shelter
unless
that's
a
legacy
facility
that
came
with
us
from
before.
So
that's
typically
approached
to
take
a
light
approach
on
the
land,
a
light
as
possible,
the
most
sustainable
approach
to
support
those
passive
recreation
activities.
Thank.
M
If
there's
you
know,
is
that
anything
that
is
being
thought
of
or
how
to
address
so
so,
just
to
give
an
example,
when
you're
asking,
for
example,
one
of
the
criteria
you
see
yeah
so
one
because
I
have
known
the
minister,
you
know
I
just
asked
them
if
they
have
a
some
sort
of
strategy
for
getting
better
in
alignment
so,
for
example,
on
the
responsible,
recreation,
stewardship
and
enjoyment
strategy
in
how
it
aligns
that
that
was
under
the
figure.
1.2
and
there's
one
example,
for
example.
M
But
there's
no
alignment
with
this
reduced
trail,
maintenance,
backlog
and
I
was
wondering
when
you
find
those
misalignment.
But
you
guys
thinking
about
what
can
we
do
to
do
something
to
get
this
alignment?
Because
the
outcome
was
that
there
was
no
guidance
in
the
in
the
master
plan
on
how
to
reach
that
point?
Where
you
guys
have
any
discussions
on
how
that
can
be
brought
out,
you
know
like
thinking
outside
the
box.
I
was
thinking
well,
you
know.
M
Maybe
this
is
a
good
opportunity
to
you
know,
bring
community
and
maybe
even
look
at
some
of
those
other
areas,
for
example,
to
get
more
community
involvement
in
participating
in
some
of
this.
You
know
maintenance,
you
know
maybe
some
of
the
lighter
assignments
or
lighter
maintenance
jobs
where
it
could
become
community
building
opportunities
and,
in
particular,
in
terms
of
how
do
you
engage
the
younger
generations
to
really
have
a
connection
with
the
open
space
which
we
have
such
beautiful.
M
You
know
beautiful
places
outside,
as
well
as
we
older
people,
but
certainly
with
the
younger
generation,
so
I
always
just
wanted
to
hear
from
youth.
If
you
even
have
been
thinking
about
those
sort
of
things
in
terms
of
the
things
that
you
don't
have
any
guidance,
do
you
have
any
opportunity
to
create
some
of
your
own
or
you
know,
maybe
get
feedback
on
how
to
create
new
things.
Thank.
J
You
for
the
question
so
I
take
a
first
step
and
then
Christmas
theater
to
fill
in
so
where
we
identify
places
as
you
bring
up
where
there
is
not
say
full
alignment.
What
we
see
that
is
is
an
opportunity
to
frame
conversations
in
the
update
process
for
the
Boulder
Valley
Comprehensive
Plan.
We've
never
had
a
departmental
master
plan
in
this
way
before
to
be
completely
Frank.
So
what
is
it's
come
through
as
we've
been
involved
in
previous
updates
of
the
BBC
P?
J
It's
it's
not
been
framed
or
supported
by
all
the
community
conversations
that
have
now
gone
into
the
master
plan,
so
we're
actually
pretty
excited
that
we're
sort
of
ahead
of
the
game
in
that
way
where
we
feel
like
the
master
plan,
has
filled
in
the
gaps
that
you
mentioned
for
our
purposes
now.
But
it
also
sets
us
up
again
to
talk
about
what
that
may
mean
and
making
sure
that
that
we
capture
that
in
the
next
complaint
update.
J
I
A
great
just
one
example
is
I,
think
you're
familiar
with
bridge
house,
the
nonprofit,
and
so
we
work
with
bridge
house
along
with
Parks
and
Rec
we
partner
and
that
created
they're
ready
to
work
program.
So
that
allows
folks
who
are
with
bridge
house
to
work
with
ourselves
on
really
good
projects
working
with
staff,
and
we
also
have
they're
ready
to
work
light,
which
is
like
an
intermediate
program
where
people
are
preparing
to
be
with
bridge
house.
I
So
that's
sort
of
a
lighter
work
week,
but
it's
set
you
up
to
go
into
the
full
program
and
we
at
one
point
we
were
able
to
locally
hire
one
of
the
members
of
the
bridge
as
crew
who's.
Now
one
of
our
staff
members
in
the
department,
so
there's
a
nice
transition
there
and
hopefully
sort
of
long-term
continuation
with
those
types
of
programs
and
as
Darin
and
Chris
pointed
out.
Ultimately,
this
is
our
first
master
plan,
so
we're
hoping
some
other
strategies
can
evolve
into
the
plan.
D
K
K
J
J
Yes,
as
you
say
that
that
visitation
has
grown,
and
we
know
that
in
the
last
decade
it's
grown
on
an
average
of
two
to
three
percent
every
year,
and
so
that
is
something
that
we've
tried
to
tackle
as
as
well
as
we
can,
because
this
is
a
master
plan
trying
to
capture,
as
I
mentioned
all
of
our
charter
purposes
and
bring
them
all
together
under
one
umbrella.
This
was
a
particularly
as
of
last
night
board.
J
Members
were
discussing
the
importance
of
making
sure
we
have
future
conversations
around
this
particular
issue,
because
it
brings
up
very
strong
feelings
and
and
important
decisions
that
need
to
be
made
at
a
level
of
detail
that
we
couldn't
at
this
at
this
stage.
So
the
way
we've
framed
it
with
guidance
from
board
and
council
is
to
say
that
we
need
to
do
sort
of
two
things.
J
One
is
continue
to
implement
the
past
planning
guidance
that
we
have
around
visitor
use
management,
and
so
we
have
a
series
of
ongoing
programs
that
you
know
even
involve
Leave
No,
Trace
education.
You
know
where
we
try
and
help
visitors
understand,
regardless
of
how
many
there
are
out
there.
But
how
do
you
behave
and
how
do
you
help
us
take
care
of
the
land
while
you're
there,
so
that
we
try
and
in
various
ways
mitigate
or
limit
the
impacts
of
increasing
use?
J
J
We've
had
conversations
with
our
board
in
in
probably
most
detail
in
terms
of
whether
or
not
that
really
is
feasible
depending
on
our
landscape.
That's
pretty
porous
where
it's
difficult
to
say.
You
know
limit
the
number
of
people
in
any
without
any
kind
of
physical
barriers.
So
so
there's
some
real
conversations
that
again,
even
as
of
last
night,
our
board
was
emphasizing
the
importance
of
using
science
to
really
understand
that
further
and
then
update
any
guidance
around
it
as
we
move
forward,
but
certainly
important
to
address.
K
J
And
I
will
admit
that
that
is
one
of
the
strategies
that
we
were
refining
as
of
last
night
with
the
board.
So
the
exact
wording
of
that
will
look
a
little
different
in
the
next
version,
but
but
the
concept
is
essentially
what
what
I
just
described.
Where
we
say.
Okay,
we
have
existing
guidance
already
to
continue
and
to
continue
addressing
the
impacts
of
increasing
visitation.
I
There's
also,
obviously,
without
the
regional
perspective
and
recently
there's
no
Northern
Colorado
no
Coe
is
emerged,
which
is
Forest,
Service,
National
Parks,
the
counties
and
it's
looking
at
the
visitation
increase
across
the
Front
Range
and
how
we
manage
it
as
partners
as
well
as
doing
it
individually
is
you
know,
a
city
because
obviously
we
affect
each
other
in
the
way
we
manage
with
looking
at
ourselves,
but
also
looking
at
that
big
picture.
As
Daren
pointed
out
it.
It
is
a
big
effort
and
it
is
a
big
question.
K
I
just
have
a
tools,
question
the
so.
The
two
sort
of
buckets
that
you
have
brought
up
are
protecting
what's
there
and
maybe
conversation
about
carrying
capacity
and
visitation
thresholds,
but
I'm
wondering
are
there
other
tools
that
might
be
sort
of?
Let's
say,
financial
tools?
That
would
be
you
know,
fees
or
permits,
or
and
I'm
totally
making
this
up
and
I'm
I'm
sure
this
is
not
our
remit
but
I'm
just
sort
of
curious.
If
you
all
have
been
thinking
in
those
terms
as
well.
Yeah.
J
As
a
partnership
with
the
city,
which
is
another
approach
we
are,
you
know,
we've
we've
asked
a
number
of
other
questions
in
terms
of
whether
separating
uses
by
either
day
or
by
uses
is
an
appropriate
tool,
and
we
saw
in
the
survey
around
that
particular
one
kind
of
mixed
results
on
that.
So
for
those
those
options
that
got
a
lot
of
support,
we
made
sure
we
followed
through
on
those.
So,
for
example,
we
have
a
strategy
in
and
of
itself
around
encouraging
multimodal
transportation
to
our
trailheads.
J
A
Thank
you
any
other
questions
from
you,
guys,
okay,
great
so
before
we
see.
If
there's
public
comment,
I
want
to
see
if
anybody
from
the
open
space,
Board
of
Trustees
elect
to
come
and
say
hello
to
us,
you
guys
are
all
here
so
because
you
weren't
up
late
enough
last
night-
and
this
is
not
you
don't
have
to,
but
just
want
to
give
you
an
opportunity
and
also
say
thanks
for
showing
up
thanks.
L
Tom
Isaacson
I'm,
the
open
space
board
chair
Darrin,
did
a
very
good
job
of
walking
through
all
of
the
at
a
process
level
that
we
were
involved
at
every
step
and
practically
almost
every
meeting.
For
the
last
two
years.
We
were
either
discussing
master
plan
issues
out
a
board
or
receiving
public
comment,
and
often
both
but
I
won't
go
through.
L
All
of
you
know
how
we've
been
involved,
but
I
think
it
is
fair
that
we've
been
you
know
at
every
step
of
the
way
in
designing
the
process
working
through
the
draft
numerous
drafts
and
providing
you
know
very
detailed
comments,
but
I
could
I
wanted
to
answer.
John
your
first
question
and
a
little
bit
more
detail
about
I
think
it's
an
incredibly
important
one
about
new
trails
and
trails
and
hcas
and
the
guidance
here
so
I
wanted
to
what
are
the
important
things
I
don't.
L
This
is
true
for
other
departments,
but
it's
certainly
true
for
us,
because
we
have
nine
other
plans
that
are
all
council
approved
and
many
which
are
very,
very
detailed
plans
and
all
kinds
of
aspects
on
five
of
them:
the
visitor
master
plan
and
then
for
trail
study
area
plans
all
relate
to
how
we
manage
trails
in
various
parts
of
the
system.
The
visitor
master
plan
has
quite
a
bit
of
detail
on
exactly
where
the
trail
criteria
for
an
HCA,
which
has
the
highest
level
of
habitat
protection
versus
the
other
three.
L
We
have
three
other
management,
designations,
natural
areas,
passive
recreation
areas
and
agricultural
areas.
So
a
lot
of
the
detail
on
how
do
we
allow
and
where
do
we
allow
trails
and
hcas
has
been
already
developed
and
the
master
plan?
True,
it
doesn't
repeat
all
of
those
criteria
and
although
those
guidance-
but
it
does
call
out
the
importance
of
looking
at
the
particular
Management
Area
designation
for
any
given
piece
of
property
and
saying
you
know
you
need
to
look
at
well.
L
The
trail
plans
for
and
identified
where
you
know,
trails
are
going
to
exist
and
where
trails
are
not
going
to
exist,
it
also
lays
out
the
importance
of
the
on
trail
requirement
that
we
have
in
HCA's
you're
not
allowed
to
go
off
trail
and
so
I
think.
There's
a
lot
of
other
material
specific
to
your
question
that
has
been
developed
and
it
sort
of
referenced
in
the
master
plan,
but
not
repeated.
A
Okay,
so
do
we
have
anybody
signed
up
for
public
comment
on
this?
No
okay.
Does
anybody
wanna
come
speak
to
us
about
it?
You
could
okay,
we're
turn
them
into
the
board,
and
we
can
focus
on
these
three
key
issues
and
see
what
our
responses
are
and
I
think.
Just
due
to
the
broad
nature
of
some
of
them,
we
could
just
use
negative
polling
to
see
if
we
agree
with
the
conclusions.
A
staff
and
OS
BT
have
come
to
so
key
issue.
One
is
really
does
the
master
plan.
A
B
D
D
That's
a
term
we've
altered
before
that
there
they're
constantly
under
threat
if,
if
great
care
isn't
taken,
and
so
it
seems
to
me
that
that's
an
example
of
the
sort
of
issue
that
might
be
called
out
in
a
master
plan
to
make
make
it
very
clear
of
their
special
status.
But
beyond
that,
I
think
this
is
consistent.
There's
it's
very
clear
to
me
great.
A
So
key
issue
number
two:
does
the
master
plan,
outlying
dbcp
service
standards
and
a
plan
to
meet
them
in
the
future
negative
pulling
again?
So
if
you
disagree,
this
is
the
time
to
speak
up
and
say
that
you
think
that
I
have
a
different
conclusion.
You'd
like
to
reach
good,
okay
and
then
key
to
number
three
again
sort
of
negative
pulling.
This
one
seems
like
the
most
factual
answer
is:
are
the
capital
needs
and
funding
sources
outlined
in
a
master
plan?
Does
anyone
think
that
they
aren't
okay,
I?
A
G
G
And
I
also
was
really
happy
to
see
that
Alec
made
the
motion
because
she's
rotating
off
the
board
and
if
it's
okay,
I'd
like
to
on
behalf
of
planning
board
kind
of
wish
her
well
she's
I
met
her
on.
He
bites
going
to
a
community
outreach
event
and
her
contributions
have
been
really
invaluable
to
the
to
the
board.
So
I
was
glad
to
be
have
see
that
was
happening
so
I
could
let
people
here
know
that
andrea
was
was
gonna,
be
rotating
off
to
pursue
some
other
things.
I'm.
G
Conformance
to
the
master
plan
on
the
recreation
stewardship
in
the
community
connection,
I
thought
that
was
a
bit
modest
just
because
you
know
I
was
just
last
week
and
there
was
a
Chamber
Orchestra
performing
a
concert,
impromptu
free
for
the
public
and
and
then
there
was
like
an
information
station
right
there
and
everybody
was
gathered
around
it
and
was
just
like
you
know
it's
that
was
a
pretty
strong
community
engagement
and
education
on
recreation.
So
I
also
wanted
to
alert
the
board
to
section
F:
oh
shoot
it
one
way
in
the
financial
section.
G
Fs7
has
verbiage
it's
the
only
real
discussion
of
land
use
in
the
master
plan,
and
it
has
some
useful
verbage
on
open
space
other,
which
is
something
that
we
sometimes
look
at.
So
if
you
haven't,
if
you
a
chance
to
read
the
page,
it's
it
kind
of
tells
us
how
it
ties
in
to
acquisition
open
space.
Other
designation,
the.
G
K
Mike
I'm
not
sure
this
comment
will
totally
make
sense
and
I
apologize
in
advance.
So
what
struck
me
was
that
chapter
3
of
the
boulder
valley
comp
plan
is
very
oh
three,
oh
four,
oh
seven,
oh
eight
are
very
focused
on
protecting
ecosystems
and
the
the
primary
are
almost.
The
very
first
message
that
you
all
provide
in
the
introduction
is
that
our
natural
ecosystems
need
our
help.
K
Now
more
than
ever
and
and
all
the
factors
that
drive
that
and
I
I,
just
guess,
I
want
to
put
out
a
thought
about
when
we
talk
about
the
financial
components
or
tools
that
might
be
available
to
help
address
the
challenges
that
we
think
as
creatively
as
possible.
I
realize
again:
that's
not
our
remit
that
City
Council's
remit,
but
it
seems
to
me
that
there
are
really
some
creative
things
we
could
come
up
with
and
maybe
maybe
then
a
regional
project
will
will
help
to
will
help
surface
some
of
those.
A
Great
any
other
comments.
We
want
to
make
up
great
we're
going
to
make
a
motion
I
move
that
we
recommend
appended
would
recommence
the
City
Council
acceptance
of
the
open
space
and
mountain
parks
master
plan.
Second
I,
don't
wanna
speak
of
the
motion.
Do
you
want
to
be
the
motion
speak
to
the
motion?
Sorry
I,
just
I
think
you
just
did
I
will,
since
it's
a
really
nice
short
went
off
for
Powell,
actually
say
the
men
who
the
motion
out
loud
again,
chairperson
bowen,
recommends.
A
The
council
have
made
a
motion
to
recommend
this
again
so
for
the
acceptance
of
open
space
in
mountain
parks,
master
plan
seconded
by
david
ensign.
What's
the
board's
motion
and
now
it's
the
board's
motion,
so
does
anyone
else
want
to
speak
to
it?
Great,
so
I
will
go
ahead
and
call
the
question
all
in
favor.
Aye
great.
Do
you
have
any
be
instant
I
didn't
see
your
hand
go
up
over
there,
so
I,
just
making
sure
okay,
cool
I
was
making
sure
we
had
unanimous
support.
So
congratulations.
A
You
get
two
in
a
row
and
there's
any
commotion
about
the
approval
of
the
Boulder
Valley
comp
plan,
open
space
and
mountain
parks.
I'm
sorry
Harman
does
so.
A
Mountain
parks,
master
plan,
summary
I'll,
second
down
I'll.
Do
it
again,
then?
Yes,
so
Barbara
Harmon
Zekrom
in
has
the
Boulder
Valley
I'm
just
getting
to
silly.
With
this
whole
thing:
Boulder
Valley,
Comprehensive,
Plan,
open
space
in
mountain
parks,
master
plan,
summary
seconded
by
oh,
and
now
it's
the
board's
motion.
Anyone
we
speak
to
it.
A
J
A
D
E
At
the
last
at
the
last
meeting,
John
asked
a
question
about
the
multi-use
paths
near
the
Google
development
and
the
construction
that's
occurring,
so
we
were
able
to
follow
up
on
that
and
they
do
have
permits
from
the
city
for
some
temporary
closures
for
construction
safety
in
that
area.
So
our
right
away
inspectors
are
monitoring
that
and
as
soon
as
those
are
no
longer
needed,
those
temporary
closures
will
be
removed.
Thank
you,
yep
great.